Slashdot Mirror


Network Solutions Opts Customer Into $1,850 Security Service

An anonymous reader writes "Brent Simmons has posted about a troubling email he received from Network Solutions. He registered two domains with them in the 1990s, and the domains remain registered today. Simmons just received an email informing him that he'd been opted into some kind of security service called Weblock, and that he would be billed $1,850 for the first year. Further, he would be billed $1,350 for every year after the first. Believing it to be a scam, he contacted the official Network Solutions account on Twitter. They said it was real. The email even said he couldn't opt out except by making a phone call."

42 of 405 comments (clear)

  1. speechless by Redmancometh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow I am just utterly speechless...that a site could stay up for that long!

    1. Re:speechless by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Molesting captive giant squid?

      Just goes to show you that any thread can get hit with Rule 34.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:speechless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Molesting captive giant squid?

      Just goes to show you that any thread can get hit with Rule 34.

      Wait. That isn't normal?

      I see how this might be confusing. In anime the squid molests the people. The tables are turned in this episode of Netwaste Solutions. Can't wait for teh 3D version so I can finally see that squid get his.

  2. Illegal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, I don't know about you, but this is straight up criminal behavior where I live.

    Not shady, questionable, or dirty. Criminal.

    In addition to ceasing business with this company I'd inform your credit card company. If you don't end up needing to dispute the charge, I bet lots of other people will be.

    1. Re:Illegal. by jibjibjib · · Score: 4, Informative

      The number listed was posted on Network Solutions' official Twitter account, the same account which explicitly said that the email is real. It really is their official Twitter account; their website links to it, and checking archive.org reveals that their website has linked to it for quite some time.

      Web.com (Network Solutions' parent company) has also responded in other ways, confirming this story. For example, see http://domainnamewire.com/2014... .

  3. Free market means exactly that ! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Free market, bitches! Suck it you socialist faggots!

    Free market means exactly that - if the vendors do something despicable the customers stop doing business with them and choose other vendors who won't do similarly despicable things to them.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So the free market is being able to defraud people of money and the only consequence is to "lose their business"? Jesus you libertarians are dumber than I thought.

    2. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Free market, bitches! Suck it you socialist faggots!

      Free market means exactly that - if the vendors do something despicable the customers stop doing business with them and choose other vendors who won't do similarly despicable things to them.

      Exactly. Like, if I don't like Comcast I can just switch to... uh...

    3. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by manu0601 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In a truly free market, the domain problem does not arise, because internet have not been created. What you have is a myriad of proprietary networks instead.

    4. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by bob_super · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are free to start your own provider, and dig your own trench to the nearest CO.
      You are free to be off the web, too, or use dial-up into another state.

      Free market doesn't prevent abusive monopolies, as long as they only abuse their customers and not their symbolic competitors.

    5. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly what does enrolling a customer into an unwanted and ridiculously overpriced service has to do with shedding customers?! If the contract is over. Shed the customer. If the contract is not over. Keep up your end of the contract.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    6. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Informative

      Adam Smith himself wrote about the need to put legal limits on unethical business practices.

    7. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Network Solutions has to operate within their role as a bleeding legacy domain name provider.

      To anyone reading this who doesn't know, they used to be the sole provider of domain names in the world.

      Most of their remaining clients are very large businesses who don't care if their domain renewal is $6 bucks or $35 bucks or $500 bucks.

      They have to fight to survive in a way compatible with their mainstream client base --- big inept companies that didn't switch to a cheaper provider a decade ago like Godaddy or [insert your favorite low cost provider here].

      Network Solutions has a client base similar to a company running COBOL or with mostly government agencies as clients. Sure their business practices suck, but they are little different than other legacy service providers --- you might ask why the blogger of the article has been overpaying for domain names for 15 years? He probably has flushed $700+ dollars down the toilet compared to what he could have saved with another domain registrar ages ago. But he didn't, he's been volunteering overpaying for quite a while now and that is your average "still with Network Solutions" customer. Network Solutions has been doing this for a decade now through inertia and now for survival. This doesn't make Network Solutions innocent -- they aren't --- but their customer base does consist of people largely willing to overpay, which is largely big faceless corporations --- I bet Blackberry prices gouges captive legacy clients and I bet so does IBM, EDS and Accenture and even Microsoft. It is just what happens to legacy service provider's customers.

      This fellow should have switch a dozen years back if he was price shopping the market.

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    8. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by Desler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But knowing that would require actually having read all of what Adam Smith wrote not just the parts one likes.

    9. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by sgt+scrub · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am _not_ free to go around digging trenches everywhere That is totally true. I got halfway across my neighbor's yard before being shot at.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    10. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by zieroh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm shocked that someone with such a very low slashdot ID would be even the least bit confused about this.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    11. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you at least return fire from your dug-in position?

    12. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am _not_ free to go around digging trenches everywhere That is totally true. I got halfway across my neighbor's yard before being shot at.

      That's the reason we got much better internet in Europe. With our gun laws around we don't get shot while getting us better net.

    13. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative
      In the U.S., it actually was in the 19th century. Quoted from Wikipedia:

      A journey from Philadelphia to Charleston involved eight different gauges, which meant that passengers and freight had to change trains seven times.

      It was the government (sic!) stepping in after the Civil War with the construction of the transcontinental railways which caused the different gauges to be harmonized to the U.S. gauge of 1448 mm, later to 1435 mm ("normal gauge").

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    14. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by egcagrac0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fraud would be charging without notice, and without offering an opt-out.

      This isn't fraud, it's just a bad marketing strategy. It's also unlikely to work, since a lot of people will likely call their credit card companies and say "I didn't agree to that - reverse the charges."

    15. Re:Free market means exactly that ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Over here in Europe, it's definitely fraud. A contract is not opt out, it's opt in.

  4. This'll teach 'em a lesson by TheloniousToady · · Score: 5, Funny

    Call collect.

  5. Ewww. by Marrow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Their letter says they want to charge him that much for adding security to -their- website. To prevent changes to their data. It doesn't add any value to his service at all. Just theirs. How do people live with themselves.

  6. Re: Call a Lawyer by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Then they'll send you to a collections agent and have that appear on your credit report."

    They'd better not. Unauthorized charges to cards are pretty damned illegal. In fact, I think that amount would qualify as felony fraud. Grand Larceny. (Hell, it should anyway. Sounds like larceny to me.)

  7. Re:I can't find this feature by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I googled network solutions "weblock" and got their service agreement which refers to a service by that name.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  8. Re: Call a Lawyer by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unauthorized charges to cards are pretty damned illegal.

    Are you sure that the charges are unauthorized? What's in Network Solutions customer agreements? There might be some very small print that allows NetSol to add security services and charge for them.

    I just scanned the agreement and could not find anything that would allow NetSol to add products without authorization, but then I am not a lawyer.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  9. Re:Not exactly new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you think this falls within the EULA/TOS precedents, you obviously weren't paying attention in (or are still taking) your first year contracts course.

    This is clearly an attempt to foist terms completely outside and beyond the scope of the original contract of sale onto the user, and the alleged new terms stray far into the territory of unconscionability without the formation of a new and independent contract.

    There are also major problems with the extent and quality of notice given (a single email to an email account that may or may not be monitored?) and questions as to whether the "Head of Security" of Network Solutions has the authority (legal or corporate) to effectuate this contract on behalf of the company.

  10. Re:This is what libertarians think by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a free market there is no fraud.

  11. Re:I can't find this feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I googled network solutions "weblock" and got their service agreement which refers to a service by that name.

    From the ToS:

    Although WebLock shall provide for additional domain protection, you acknowledge and agree that the Service is not a guarantee or policy of insurance of any kind, and in no way will the use of or enrollment in the WebLock Service diminish or otherwise alter the other sections of this Agreement, including but not limited to, Section 7 (Exclusive Remedy) and Section 8 (Disclaimers of Warranties) above, which shall continue in full force and effect.

    Can't be the only one here wondering...For $1850, just exactly what in the fuck are you getting then...

  12. Re:This is what libertarians think by professionalfurryele · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Credit reporting agencies aren't about reporting credit, they are gangs who job it is to record which of the peons isn't being compliant.

  13. NWS -- more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A couple years back, Network Solutions "opted me in" for automatic payment of all my domains via credit (debit) card. I didn't want this, as I don't habitually keep enough money in the account to cover random charges; I put in what's needed, when needed, and that's how I like to roll. There's an opt-out checkmark; but it doesn't work. You have to call and it tells you so. Then when you call, they say "oh, hey, for some reason this isn't working..." So since I couldn't turn it off, I just changed to an expired card. Then I get panicked form emails about how it won't charge, and I pay by paypal. That worked last year. THIS year, though, what happens is that the Paypal charge is now automatic -- by paying once, you're opting in (without recourse of course) to paying them via paypal automatically forever. I found that once you paid, Paypal (not Network Solutions, but Paypal) has a way to disable the "agreement" and get you back to payment only when you authorize it. Takes some menu mining, but it's there. Or at least it was a few months ago.

    The only reason I continue to use Network Solutions is because over the years (and yes, some of my domains have been up since the 90's as well) I've watched other name registering outfits come and go, seen various name server problems, etc., and for all their horrifying business practices and high prices, my sites seem to always work, which is what I place the most emphasis on.

    Interesting note: When the above happened, I submitted the story to slashdot. Initially, it got high ratings, and I thought for sure it would post. Then it disappeared. I mean literally -- I could no longer find it in the submissions cue. It disappeared from my profile, too. Older and newer submissions remain. I have no idea what that means, but I thought it was weird. No other story I have submitted has disappeared like that.

    1. Re:NWS -- more info by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 5, Informative

      Get a prepaid debit card, such as a GreenDot or similar.
      Only put money on the card when you need to pay a bill, never link it to a bank account/credit card.
      Since the card isn't linked to a bank account, there is no automatic charge mechanism that will work.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  14. These guys... by Ozeroc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, I recently had two domains I was planning on letting expire get auto renewed for 5 years for a total of ~$380. I went to check and they were set for auto renewal (I don't remember requesting that.) When I went to turn auto renewal off it stated that I had to call. It was a big PITA but after 20-30 minutes talking to the nice guy in India (naturally) I had my money back and auto renewal turned off. They're hoping people are unattentive. Not too cool.

    --
    ...
  15. Re:Did he misread the email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The email implies it's an opt out but, it's not clear to me that he'll actually be billed until he sets up the enhanced security.

    When I first read the article I thought so too. But, actually, it tells him that he will be enrolled:

    Starting 9:00 AM EST on 2/4/2014 all of your domains will be protected via our WebLock Program.

    ...

    If you wish to opt out of this program you may do so by calling us at 1-888-642-0265.

  16. Re:Not exactly new by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since when do lawyers make the law?

    Pretty much since the 20th century. The law schools shit out lawyers and they end up in Congress. 60 Senators and 170 House members (last stats I could find) making up 43% of Congress. Largest representation of any profession, and that's not even looking at state governments.

  17. Re:Comcast, government enforced monopoly == (!mark by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The real solution for the "natural monopoly" is to have the infrastructure owned by the government, and providers buy service from there. It works great for mobile service in Europe (or did, until privatization took hold, and the assets were sold off below market, and the profits were lost and service got worse.

  18. Re:Opt them in to a service by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chances are, if you send them a properly formatted invoice for toner, they'll pay it (most companies do). See how much you can get before someone notices. It's no less fair than what they do. Just make sure you have a payment EULA that authorizes the charges.

  19. Illegal in Canada by celest · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's worth noting that this action (auto-enroll and bill) is illegal in Canada. Each province/territory has its own consumer protection act that requires explicit opt-in for any new services that are provided to existing customers, in writing. You cannot auto-enroll people and require them to opt-out to not be charged.

    Source (for Ontario, at least): http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/ht...

    Non-legalese summary provided by the Ministry of Consumer Services of Ontario: http://www.sse.gov.on.ca/mcs/e...

  20. Re:I can't find this feature by celest · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you enable replies on the Network Solutions' Twitter feed, you can see them responding to the flurry of crap they got from this. They mention that the email is the "first step".

    Seems real: https://twitter.com/netsolcare...

  21. Re:Not exactly new by Nemyst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd rather have lawmakers understand the field they're making laws in. You can always get lawyers to help you write legal documents, that's their job, but good luck getting a lawyer turned politician to understand medicine, physics, environment, psychology or economics.

  22. Re:Comcast, government enforced monopoly == (!mark by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The real solution for the "natural monopoly" is to have the infrastructure owned by the government, and providers buy service from there. It works great for mobile service in Europe (or did, until privatization took hold, and the assets were sold off below market, and the profits were lost and service got worse.

    It doesn't even have to be the government, rather it's an entity that has no commercial interests in the infrastructure they're providing. This can be done by making the wholesale provider a completely separate corporate entity from retail providers (and preventing the wholesale provider from being a retail provider).

    A government service like a infrastructure provider can be corporatised and run on it's own $0 profit mandate without govt interference. They only have to make enough to meet costs (incl. expansion costs).

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  23. Run away! by 605dave · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am currently in the process of moving over 100 domains away from NetSol to Hover. I'd used NetSol since I started getting domains in the 90s, but it has changed from a trusted institution on the web into a scam. Everything is an up sell, and everything is designed to confuse you into buying things you don't need. One personal example. Last year I set up a client on a basic WordPress account, but later wanted to move the domain. They would not let us access the .db file until we upgraded the account. They wouldn't give us our own data!

    So now I am going to through the multi-stage process of moving all these domains, waiting days for each authorization code. These guys are crooks, so stay the fuck away from ever doing business with them. And if you have domains there, run away!!!

    --
    Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato