Slashdot Mirror


IBM's PC Junior Turns 30, Too

McGruber writes "Like the Mac, the IBM PC Junior first went on sale in late January 1984. That is where the similarities end — the PC Junior became the biggest PC dud of all time. Back on May 17, 1984, the NY Times reported that the PC Junior 'is too expensive for casual home users, but, at the same time, is not nearly powerful enough for serious computer users who can afford a more capable machine.' The article also quoted Peter Norton, then still a human programmer who had not yet morphed into a Brand, who said that the PC Junior 'may well be targeted at a gray area in the market that just does not exist.'' IBM cancelled the machine in March 1985, after only selling 270,000 of them. While it was a commercial flop, the machine is still liked by some. Michael Brutman's PCJr page attempts to preserve the history and technical information of the IBM PCjr and YouTube has a video of a PC Junior running a demo."

178 comments

  1. ...end? by QilessQi · · Score: 3, Funny

    That is where the similarities —

    Also the sentence. :-)

    1. Re:...end? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, Dice apparently accidentally the whole editorial staff.

    2. Re:...end? by Dan+East · · Score: 2

      "editor" and "button clicker who approves a story" are not the same thing, nor have they ever been at Slashdot.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    3. Re:...end? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh come on, the editors obviously add a lot of value by carefully all the submissions.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    4. Re:...end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, the editors obviously a lot of value by carefully all the submissions.

      FTFY

    5. Re:...end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, I thought, was way funnier. "While it was a commercial plop"

      I've made typos in my time, but on what keyboard is the F anywhere near the P?

    6. Re:...end? by dysmal · · Score: 1

      "by carefully all the submissions" Someone has been practicing the Slashdot/Dice ways I see! :)

    7. Re:...end? by michrech · · Score: 1

      They are close on the Dvorak layout...

      --
      bork bork bork!
    8. Re:...end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thatsthejoke.jpg

    9. Re:...end? by McGruber · · Score: 2

      That is where the similarities —

      Also the sentence. :-)

      That was my fault; the word was missing in my Submission

    10. Re:...end? by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      While they are only two keys apart, they are on different hands. Not much chance of accidental key presses.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    11. Re:...end? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      just building up a resume of work for when there is a slashdot editor opening...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    12. Re:...end? by Norwell+Bob · · Score: 1

      Yop're obviouslu a vetter typer than me.

  2. Collecovision by oldhack · · Score: 1

    PC jr reminds me of the Collecovision pc thingy with tape recorder built in.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Collecovision by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      The Colleco Adam? That was a design nightmare.

    2. Re:Collecovision by oracleofbargth · · Score: 2

      The Colleco Adam? That was a design nightmare.

      Isn't that the one that would degauss any tapes that you left inserted, because it generated a small EMP when the power switch was flipped?

    3. Re:Collecovision by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Inserted or anywhere need the drive. And you could open the drive door while the tape was moving, destroying it in the process.

    4. Re:Collecovision by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that the Adam's smarts were in the printer. If that needed work (and printers of that sort were quite unreliable back then) the whole system was unusable.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:Collecovision by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      And you could open the drive door while the tape was moving, destroying it in the process.

      A friend once pulled a cartridge out of a Sinclair microdrive when it was operating. We never realized there was that much tape inside them until we saw it spewed out all over the floor.

    6. Re:Collecovision by ArbitraryName · · Score: 1

      Not quite. It's true that if the printer failed the whole system was out of commission but this was because the power supply was located in the printer, not "the smarts".

    7. Re:Collecovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was an isolated problem that most people never had. I still have an ADAM and I've never lost data.

      On the other hand, I can tell you I've had 4 Commodore 64 power supplies blow up on me over the years, so why do people love them so much?

      Yes, the ADAM had some "interesting" design decisions, but also some excellent ones. As a matter of fact, the basic design was tweaked slightly and became the MSX standard that was so popular in Japan.

    8. Re: Collecovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I don't know. Ease of programming, the SID chip, and the fun to program 6502? Fuck the Z80. That being said, the 6809 dominates both of them.

    9. Re:Collecovision by Megane · · Score: 1

      My TRS-80 floppy drives would do that, too. If you turned something off (I think it was the drive itself) with the door closed, the drive light would flash for a moment, and a small EMP would zap whatever was under the disk head.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    10. Re:Collecovision by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it was well known at the time that if you wanted to collect on your houses fire insurance all you had to do was set up your Adam to perform a long print cycle. It just got hotter and hotter and hotter until it burst into flames, and then it continued to get hotter.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    11. Re:Collecovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't "become" the MSX standard, where did you get that ... interesting ... history from?

    12. Re:Collecovision by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, the basic design [of the Coleco Adam] was tweaked slightly and became the MSX standard that was so popular in Japan.

      It didn't "become" the MSX standard, where did you get that ... interesting ... history from?

      Maybe he's getting it confused with the Spectravideo SV-328 (and SV-318) which *were* supposedly the design upon which MSX was based, although not 100% MSX-compatible themselves.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:Collecovision by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

      You are right about the C-64 power supplies. I went through a few of them, myself. I remember ultimately getting a 3rd party model that was advertised in Compute or Compute's Gazette back in the day. They touted that it was far more reliable. I think it was pricey... I have a weird memory of it costing $35 back in the 80s. (My grandmother was kind enough to spring for it.) I still have it to this day and it still works like a charm, so I guess it was worth the money. :-) Solid and sturdy... unlike the stock ones that came with the system.

      On the other hand, you won't get me to easily praise much about the ADAM. heh I remember the commercials for it made it look great, though. Dragon's Lair looked quite good on it for the time! And it did play Colecovision game cartridges, so that was always a good thing. :-)

      --
      "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
    14. Re:Collecovision by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      That was the Adam, and it was a major piece of suck thanks to the fricking power cord for the ENTIRE UNIT being built into the PRINTER. lose the printer? you were fucked.

      I had pretty much all of the 70s and 80s PCs at one time (thanks to a trucker uncle that would pick up things that "fell of a truck" for me) and out of all of 'em I'd say the Trash 80 and the Commodore Vic and C64s were the most reliable. They took insane abuse with the only real issue being the cassette drives. While I didn't have a PCjr I had a cousin that did and it didn't last long,IIRC the keyboards on those were made of suck.

      And let this old guy shake his cane and you young whippersnappers and remind you that you don't know how good you got it! In the 80s the systems cost a mint, were all incompatible as hell, and many of them went from useful to doorstops in no time as there wasn't any easy way to get software if your local B&M. In some ways the 90s were worse, as PCs were compatible but were literally out of date before you got done unpacking, CPUs and sockets were here today and gone by lunch, and programs were taking advantage of every clock jump so a PC that was fast in 97 was slow by 98 and a dino by 99. It cost a crazy amount of money and by the time you paid it off it wouldn't run squat, just a rough time all around.

      Compare it to today where a 2006 C2D or Athlon X2 will run pretty much anything you want except games, and a 2008 C2Q or Phenom X4 will game just fine, PCs are cheap and plentiful, easy to upgrade, and can hold plenty of RAM and storage? Life is good guys, never been better I'd argue. Hell my youngest is playing all the latest games on a $60 triple (the Athlon X3 455 are looking at damned near 100% unlocks and can be had for as low as $45, just a crazy cheap deal) and a $100 HD7790, to play the latest games a decade ago I'd be out over a grand for the unit easy and in a year it'd already be dragging. Say what you will but computing has never been cheaper, PCs last longer than ever before, you whippersnappers need to take a minute and just marvel at how far we've come since the days of the PCjr...now get off my lawn!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    15. Re:Collecovision by Warphammer · · Score: 1

      The 64's power supply is an acknowledged weak point of a great system, so you put up with it. Use a 128 supply with an adapter instead.

    16. Re:Collecovision by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction. It's been a while.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by billcarson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The keyboard was horrible, yes, but that was fixed within months (I think people could swap the keyboards for free?).
    But for the money you got a lot more than the other home computers: a floppy drive, a computer that had a real
    operating system, 128K of RAM!, compatibility with most PC applications, etc. Plus this was the computer that made
    the Sierra Adventure games shine! (the enhanced graphics and sound made Leisure suit larry a lot better looking than its PC counterpart).
    The BIOS interrupt changes may have caused some problems (the keyboard was mapped to the NMI, so you couldn't
    touch it while transfering files f.i.) or compatibility issues, but that was only of minor concern at the time.
    I still don't consider the PCjr a poorly engineered machine. There were better contenders in that category (some of the Franklin PCs, for instance)

    1. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think people were most offended by the artificial limitations. Most computer companies were pushing their hardware to its limits in order to stay competitive, and here comes a PC with nice hardware that is artificially gimped to protect the more expensive products. It's one thing to be limited by engineering - quite another to be limited my marketing. With a typical product, you can subjectively debate the relative value - but in this case, marketing handed you a concrete, objective list of items that you were not getting for your money.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Sique · · Score: 2

      Hm... I wouldn't call DOS a "real operating system", because all it operated was the disk drive. Everything else had to be done in the program itself.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by billcarson · · Score: 2, Informative

      DOS was more than just some FAT routines. There was a program loader, driver model (albeit a very naive one), system services (I/O, etc.), basic system tools (format, debug, command.com, etc.).
      For what PCs were at that time, it was probably the best you could whish for.

    4. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I was eleven at the time, and even then we knew this. Only one of my friends got a Jr. ("Peanut" was the term we used at the time). His dad worked for IBM.

    5. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by hattig · · Score: 1

      But the model with disk drive and 128KB RAM was $1269 on its own, $1459 with DOS and a keyboard and a keyboard cord ($20!)...

      To use the decent graphics modes, which used 32KB system RAM, you needed the 128KB version. The graphics interfered with the CPU when it needed memory, slowing it down.

      But it had potential, but IBM probably wasn't the company to achieve it.

    6. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by billcarson · · Score: 1

      True, but a C64 with a floppy drive and monitor would exceed the 1000$ barrier as well.
      The lack of dedicated graphics memory was an issue yes, but there were expansion packs for that.

    7. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      , 128K of RAM!,

      I was too young to use computers then. Was that enough for everyone?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    8. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Informative

      The PCjr has the distinction of the first IBM PC to be able to use more than 640k, due to the weirdness of the Video BIOS location. The anomaly is also the reason why people had to buy programs that said "PCjr Compatible". If I recall, my Dad's PCjr could address nearly 768k, without a Memory Manager doing funky stuff to jam TSR's into the space between 640k and 1mb.

      AHhhhh good times!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    9. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Apple ProDOS had most of that, albeit it was 8-bit.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    10. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I didn't know anyone with a Jr, but I did have a friend with a Tandy 1000 of some flavor. It was pretty cool, but he always had software compatibility problems.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      , 128K of RAM!,

      I was too young to use computers then. Was that enough for everyone?

      It ought to be. :)

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    12. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I thought that the keyboard was pretty good if you didn't know how to touch-type, it helped you not mash keys. Once you knew where the keys were, then it would just slow you down.

      All I ever did with the PCjr was LOGO, for which it was a better platform than the Apple II. It was the first PC I used, though. Later, I was given an IBM PC with a 30MB HDD and an ISA card that brought it up to 448k RAM and added a RTC. Fancy!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll never understand these antagonistic replies on Slashdot. I suppose it's across the internet, but gosh darn it, why are people so *angry* all the time? Guy says, in his opinion, and with the passage of time, that maybe the device wasn't as bad as everybody makes it out to be.

      You almost treat his post as a personal attack against your mother and everything else you hold dear.

      Why?

      It's a just a guy posting some stuff on a forum that 0.1% of the general public reads. Who cares?

      Elucidate me. Why do people like you get so upset, resorting to silly replies like "Go get a job at Dell?"

    14. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I wonder what the D stood for..almost like it was a system for operating a disk...
      Oh well, I guess that's been lost to time~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people were most offended by the artificial limitations. Most computer companies were pushing their hardware to its limits in order to stay competitive, and here comes a PC with nice hardware that is artificially gimped to protect the more expensive products.

      Apple did a lot of this in the '90s, with their entry line, mid-line and high-end lines split into 100 or so different models, with a veritable stew of names and numbers on the front. Rumor has it even Apple's sales force couldn't keep track of which machines were actually in production and which had been discontinued.

      My friend in college had a Mac TV she inherited from her father. An interesting idea, but horribly crippled. The thing was limited to 5MB of RAM even if you could find higher-capacity DIMMs to fit.

    16. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by adric22 · · Score: 1

      I too do not understand why the PC Jr did not sell better. It had graphics and sound that were way better than everything else in the PC-compatible industry at the time and the Tandy 1000 carried on the video and sound systems for several years and were still better. I've recently been playing with DOSBox and set the system type to "tandy" and have played some of my old favorite games and I've been pleasantly surprised how good they look and sound compared to a similar system of the time with CGA or even EGA.

    17. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Plus this was the computer that made the Sierra Adventure games shine! (the enhanced graphics and sound made Leisure suit larry a lot better looking than its PC counterpart).

      My old Tandy 1000EX was much better for playing them :)

    18. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Snowgen · · Score: 1

      True, but a C64 with a floppy drive and monitor would exceed the 1000$ barrier as well.

      Citation, please

      It just so happens that 1984 was the year that I bought my C=64, and it cost $150. And also (a little later) in 1984, after getting bored of loading Telengard from cassette, and really wanting to play Zork that I bought my 1541 from Toys R' US, for $150. That's $300. I don't recall the monitor prices (I used a used TV i picked up at a flea market), but I believe they were $300-$400.

    19. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ...why are people so *angry* all the time?

      There comes a time when the jewels cease to sparkle, when the gold loses its luster, when the throne room becomes a prison, and all that is left is a nerd's love for his antiquated computing platform.

    20. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      The C64 was $595 when launched. The 1541 was $300. No idea on monitor. By the time you bought it the Jack Tramiel price war was in full swing.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    21. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 2

      We got our PCjr in 1985 some time. It did not have the infamous chiclet keyboard that was so reviled. It was still a condensed keyboard with no function keys, however.

      The lack of function keys definitely made office and productivity software written for the PC more difficult to use since it became a two key press. The keyboard didn't work well with combination presses with the Fn key, either, so you often had to press Fn, wait a moment, then press the key that corresponded to the key you wanted. It was cumbersome.

      Other than that the computer worked great. I did a lot of BASIC programming on the cartridge, and the games were really quite good. We eventually got the RAM extension side cart that took the memory up to 768 KB. It helped quite a bit since you could often work in programs without having to swap your data disk out for the program disk, and there were several programs that required 256 KB to work. We kept this computer until 1990-91 when we got a screaming fast 486DX 33 MHz with 4 MB of RAM and a 130 MB hard drive (all direct from Intel thanks to a family member that works there!). When was the last time you bought a computer that was literally an order of magnitude faster than the one you bought 5 years ago?

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    22. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Crikey, I remember running OS/2 level 1 on a CoCo 2 and having device driver, memory management and i/o subsystems far more advanced than pretty much any other home computer; all on an 8 bit processor with 64k of RAM.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    23. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

      The keyboard was horrible, yes, but that was fixed within months (I think people could swap the keyboards for free?).

      As proof that computer companies have always blindly followed in the footsteps of other computer companies and repeated their UI mistakes, the following computers preceded PCjr's bad keyboard design:

      When the PC/jr came out, the Commodore 64, Commodore Vic 20, Apple II series, Texas Instruments and Mac computers all had decent keyboards but IBM decided to reinvent keyboards again.

    24. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2

      OS9, not OS/2, surely? (And note, Mac heads, this is the original OS9 from 79/80, not Apple OS9 from much later)

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    25. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by billcarson · · Score: 1

      Maybe there were price differences between the US and European markets? Back then we didn't have the Euro,
      but it would have been around 450â for a C64 I guess. Nobody I knew that had a C64 used floppies, as the floppy drive
      was too expensive. Everyone used tape around here.
      According to Wikipedia the price for a C64+Disk drive was around 900$ at that time: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
      And that only gave you a computer with basic, limited expansion and no monitor.
      I'm not denying that the PCjr was expensive, IBM was always a premium brand,
      but you did get something more than the average home computer.

    26. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by michrech · · Score: 1

      I never ran into software compatibility problems with my 1000 (for non-game software), but it sucked that Tandy essentially put an EGA adapter in it, but then modified it enough that EGA software wouldn't work with it.. :(

      --
      bork bork bork!
    27. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Some people are just giant douchebags with poor ego development. It makes them feel good about themselves to "catch" people being "shills". They imagine themselves the savvy Internet aficionados, instantly seeing through everyone else's poor attempt to pull one over on them.

    28. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no, it did NOT run the normal IBM PC apps that were popular and desired, the people who could afford the thing tried to run their business apps on it. and most games looked aweful on it

    29. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed OS/2 (2.1 or 2.2, can't recall exactly) on an IBM PS/1 (486 at 25MHz if memory serves) but, afterwards, I don't know how, I accidentally the installation disk 2 and then lost it forever.

    30. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by floobedy · · Score: 1

      Go get a job at Dell or something?

      Grow up before posting or something?

    31. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we were like 10 at the time so I can pretty much only comment on game software :) IIRC, you had to have "TGA" support.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    32. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Reading the spec of it, it doesn't seem that bad for the time, but it just didn't do anything people wanted from a computer and became obsolete as 16-bit home computers appeared. I think more likely that it managed to alienate the two groups of prospective buyers at the price point. People who wanted an actual PC were disappointed by a crappy PC-a-like which couldn't run much software and came with a sucky keyboard. And consumers who wanted a home computer baulked because the Commodore 64, Atari 800, ZX Spectrum all cost less (and had more games).

      Also it didn't help that IBM are incapable of marketing products aimed at the home consumer market. I swear if they made a car it would come with a 2600 page instruction manual in 5 volumes, be operated by 50 dials, levers and switches positioned randomly around the cabin and would be immobile thanks to its 10 ton weight and triangular "wheels"

    33. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, usually not an effective long-term strategy. That's what you get for making a soda salesman CEO... a flavor for every demographic. Apple seems to have learned from their past - rather than create a gimped version of your product for the low end, just stay out of the low end altogether. I can't decide if the 5C is an example of them returning to past mistakes or if it was simply an ugly product without enough of a dollar savings to justify the downgrade.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    34. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Sponge Bath wins the internet for today.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    35. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Nelson · · Score: 1

      IBM and Intel rocked that model for another decade, if you look at the PS/2 line up, half of them were very nearly obsolete when they were released. Intel had it's SX chips..

      What kind of reality distortion field do you think that team had? I don't mean this in an offensive way but the Mac was demonstrated and announced at nearly the same time, (with it's own "SX" style 16bit bus 32bit chip...) People talk about the Apple reality distortion field but I can't imagine what being on the PC Jr. team must have been like when the Mac dropped... "Oh, people don't really care about graphics and stuff..." or "well, this is a business machine, not a toy..." or what on earth did you tell yourself?

    36. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      about 2000.
      but a 486 in 1990 must have been horribly expensive.

      I still remember the finnish computer catalog from around 1990. it only had 386dx's as the higher end though. but the point is, it still had 8086's as well and 286's - so the price range was from around 10 000(lowish end monthly salary) fim to 100 000 fim(some sort of a car).

      now imagine buying a computer for 300 bucks vs 30000 - sure you can do it but you're really going to be just piling up a bunch of expensive extras to hit the mark and not going to get that same kind of crazy speed boost either.

      so the scale of possibles is far smaller now.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    37. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 1

      ahhh yeah...the RAM!!

      i remember...i taught my high school best friend (who currently now works in IT) how to create a DOS Ramdrive with "all that memory" in order to really speed up this billing program he used for his lawn service.

      to his credit, from groking how the scripts worked and gaining an interest in computers, he ended up leaving the wonderful wacky world of lawn care and became (i believe) an IT security professional.

      incidentally, he got the machine as a hand-me-down from his dad, who actually worked at IBM / Ft. Lauderdale on the team that created the PC jr.

      --
      never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    38. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Megane · · Score: 1

      This. Tandy copied the PCjr CGA modes, and put them into a computer that didn't suck. (Or at least didn't suck compared to what you could get when they were new.)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    39. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      but then modified it enough that EGA software wouldn't work with it..

      The Tandy 1000 did not support the 640x350x16 mode that EGA boasted, nor did it support EGA's 64-color base palette (The Tandy 1000 just had a single static 16-color palette in 320x200 mode)

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    40. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by swb · · Score: 1

      But with all that documentation you could fix anything that broke and people would still be driving 1980s era IBMs because they just worked.

    41. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by TheloniousToady · · Score: 2

      I wonder how many people who once hated one of those keyboards that had poor tactile feedback now type away merrily on their phone and pad touchscreens?

    42. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by oldmacdonald · · Score: 1

      I bought one soon after the new keyboard was issued. You didn't have to send back the old keyboard as a trade, you could just keep it or throw it away.

    43. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Zordak · · Score: 1

      You almost treat his post as a personal attack against your mother

      His mother was a TRS80, you insensitive clod!

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    44. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > I'll never understand these antagonistic replies on Slashdot.

      You sound like tool, you get called a tool.

      This has nothing to do with Slashdot. HELL. It doesn't even have anything to do with the Internet. That's something you should be aware of if you were computing when the PCjr wasn't just a historical footnote.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    45. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      RAM disks were great on the Mac Plus too. Saving directly to floppy disk was gruesome and time consuming. Same goes for the other platforms of the day.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    46. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would not have in 1984. By mid to late 1984, you could pick up a C64 for ~$200, ditto for a 1541 drive. And monitor? Most folks used a TV as a monitor.

    47. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Maybe there were price differences between the US and European markets?

      Indeed.

      Nobody I knew that had a C64 used floppies, as the floppy drive

      In the US, many of the good games were on floppy so C64 owners needed 1541's

    48. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The keyboard was horrible, yes,

      And yet many (most?) modern laptops have keyboards that are marginally better and in many cases, worse. So much for the "advance" in technology.

    49. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yes. My first computer was a Tandy 1000HX (but in the mid-90's after it was obsolete). I loved that thing - and there was no shortage of software that had a special mode for Tandy/Jr. graphics and the great 3-voice sound. Space Quest II looked and sounded outstanding for its time.

      I never had any problems, though, and most of my games had special support for Tandy graphics/sound (few of them called it PC Jr. support - just Tandy).

    50. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Games made with it in mind looked much better than regular PC versions and regular PC games looked the same. It ran most normal programs (we had wordperfect among others) and the few that it didn't (like lotus 1-2-3) had a special version for it. There wasn't much that it couldn't do in the end and it had sidecars for everything.

    51. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Pope · · Score: 1

      Yeah! As I noted below, I'd use my PCjr's RAM disk to run Infocom adventures at lightning speed :) Beats waiting for the non-DMA floppy to access for every fargin' command you typed...

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    52. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, that was probably 10 years after the period I was referring to! :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    53. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And surprisingly there were still games in the store for it then. A great system. But mostly, I stuck with software from the era it was released. And most of the incompatibility I ran into could be solved by booting to a non-OEM copy of DOS (as legal or not as it was).

      Would love to hear the story on which compatibility problems he had- if you remember anything.

    54. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The PCjr has the distinction of the first IBM PC to be able to use more than 640k, due to the weirdness of the Video BIOS location.

      Great, but who's ever gonna need that?

    55. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      LOL, no I'm afraid that is long gone from my memory. I believe it was mostly getting the color to work in games, and some games ran at a funny speed. Possibly there was other associated weirdness, but I can't remember... I had an Apple IIe and spent my hours going through my college-aged uncle's many cracked games :) I didn't really learn any DOS until high school except for when I'd stare perplexed at his Tandy. I was able to figure out how to get my grandfather's Compaq to spit out stuff on the printer I guess. Maybe I was dorkier than I thought.... I don't recall having any alternative to MS DOS at the time. It did have a cool (for the time) graphical interface that wowed us.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    56. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It didn't have a real operating system them, it had PC DOS version 2. While this may have been slightly above average for the home computer market it was astoundingly backwards for the professional market. Yes it was a tiny machine so you couldn't expect too much for that price, but just one year later you got AmigaOS, three years later for OS/2, and so forth.

      The problem with PCjr was that it was in the wrong place at the wrong time. It was marketed to home market and thus was competing with cheaper home computers like Commodore 64 and Apple II, but without adding much overall power. But the built-in market for an IBM branded computer was used to the more power PC and even more powerful professional computers, so a hobbyist style computer didn't interest them much, and the software compatibility with the PC was lacking (ie, they often could not even take their speadsheets home to work on).

      This was a time when people started wanting more from a home computer than just a hobby system, but IBM gave them something else.

    57. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      And the limitations were obvious. They *could* have just had a price reduced version of the PC, more plastic and less metal, less memory in a base system but still expandable, slower clock speed, etc. Then it would have been fully compatible but not in competition with the business PC. Instead the clones did this just a year or two later, and it was the clones who turned the PC into a dominant standard and not IBM.

    58. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Not really a full operating system though. More like a big set of system libraries and some utilities. Given the underpowered CPU it had and the severe memory limitations you could argue they couldn't do better. But you can quibble with that too. The PC DOS utilities were very underpowered from what they could have been, limited because it was assumed they were all loaded off of floppy disks. DOS was essentially derived from ideas of CP/M and it shows, it was never intended to be more than a dumb program loader. Compare to Unix which was initially developed on a 16-bit machine with 64K of RAM. Absolutely you can do multitasking on an 8088 but the home hobbyist computer market took forever to do this (just one year later the AmigaOS was out). They could have dumped the ridiculously underpowered 8088 and do like Macintosh and go for a 68000 (even a 68008 would have been an improvement). But they didn't see this because IBM still saw the home computer market as just a glorified 8-bit hobbyist world, and were already locked into a mindset that they must be backwards compatible with inferior systems no matter what.

    59. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Whoops, fact check myself. Amiga was a year and a half later, though prototypes were shown at CES in 1984 (which prompted commodore to buy them). It also had 256KB RAM minimum (512 really to be more useful), while being relatively inexpensive compared to PCs.

      (not sure if RAM prices had fallen greatly or not, but it is interesting that both PCjr and Macintosh both came with severely reduced RAM that seriously hurt performance, so I'm wondering if the RAM cost was a limiting factor)

    60. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It is if you mostly want to do DOS or CP/M style of computing. It's gobs of memory if you're doing Forth programming. But it is cramped if you seriously want to do multitasking, or do graphics, or have a graphical UI, or do multitasking with a GUI, etc. 8086 and 68000 instruction sets could be quite compact so the size of programs was not the limiting factor so much as the size of data.

    61. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

      The PCjr was my favorite computer ever as a kid. 16 colors in days where the IBM PC had 4 colors, 3 channels of sound in a day when the IBM PC had 1 channel for sound, and support for cartridges.

      It wouldn't be until about 1991 before the IBM PC and compatibles series had 16 colors and 3 or more sound channels --- except for the Tandy.

      I was never aware it was a market failure at the time --- I was just a kid playing games like Ultima III, Dambusters, Ghostbusters, Castle Wolfenstein, Marble Madness, Pinball Construction Set, Crossfire, King's Quest and such. But the PCjr was utter obsolete and unsupported in about 3-4 years time --- which seemed like an eternity back in the day so I guess time goes slow when you are a kid.

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    62. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The segments A000 - AFFF could be mapped to memory instead. The 640K of memory stopped at segment 9FFF normally, with the A000 - AFFF segment reserved (later used for VGA memory cards). You could also buy (or make) a card that inserted an additional 64K of RAM in the segments. A small patch to DOS (move the end of memory pointer and ask DOS to reinitialize the linkage between used and free memory segments) and there was extra memory for DOS programs, under the 1MB limit.

    63. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by hawk · · Score: 2

      The mac's 68000 chip, though, was the same generation as the 8086.

      Intel went from 8 to 16 bits, while motorola put 32 bits inside the 16 bit package at a time neither *had* a 32 bit bus available. They also indicated the expansion path (extra register length, etc.) that a fully flushed out 68k would have.

      The 68k pushed what could be done, while the SX were deliberate limitations

    64. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      The keyboard was horrible, yes, but that was fixed within months (I think people could swap the keyboards for free?). But for the money you got a lot more than the other home computers: a floppy drive, a computer that had a real operating system, 128K of RAM!, compatibility with most PC applications, etc. Plus this was the computer that made the Sierra Adventure games shine! (the enhanced graphics and sound made Leisure suit larry a lot better looking than its PC counterpart). The BIOS interrupt changes may have caused some problems (the keyboard was mapped to the NMI, so you couldn't touch it while transfering files f.i.) or compatibility issues, but that was only of minor concern at the time. I still don't consider the PCjr a poorly engineered machine. There were better contenders in that category (some of the Franklin PCs, for instance)

      Are you seriously saying that most home computers didn't have a floppy drive? Really? My Apple II+ came with one and it predated the PCjr by many years. Oh, and the IIe had 128K RAM (also predates PCjr).

    65. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      but a 486 in 1990 must have been horribly expensive.

      Actually, it must've been 1992; it had MS-DOS 5.0, Windows 3.1, and Word for Windows 2.0. I forgot about that.

      It was expensive, but like I said, we took advantage of an offer Intel made to it's staff at the time. My understanding -- I would've been 15-16 at the time -- was that Intel was upgrading their entire company, and offered to let staff members purchase computers through the same order. I'm not even sure if Intel was building the PCs themselves or ordering them. They shipped in generic beige cases with no marks or labels. Well, beyond energy star labels.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    66. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      That sounds familiar. I can't believe you remembered it all. I didn't provide details, because they were lost in time.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    67. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no, the crappy 640 x 200 graphics with only 4 colors looked like ass.

    68. Re:Not as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      , 128K of RAM!,

      I was too young to use computers then. Was that enough for everyone?

      It ought to be. :)

      It is twice the 64K Steve Jobs said was enough.

  4. Fond memories by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dot matrix printer, Wizardry, Ultima IV (I think?), MicroLeague Baseball, Flight Simulator. A 12 year old that didn't know better sure enjoyed his PCJr

    --
    Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    1. Re:Fond memories by hoffmanjon · · Score: 1

      I was 16 when I got mine and I also have fond memories with Wizardry and Ultima IV. While I started programming on my Commodore VIC-20 (in BASIC) I learned C and Pascal on my PCjr which led me to the career that I have today. Wish I would of kept it.

    2. Re:Fond memories by geogob · · Score: 1

      Ah yes the memories! I also remember my original floppy of MS Flight Simulator (no sure if it was 1 or 2) infected with ping pong. That was the good ol' times with funny viruses.

    3. Re:Fond memories by McGruber · · Score: 2

      A 12 year old that didn't know better sure enjoyed his PCJr

      My parents bought a PC/AT when I was 14 or 15. It had a 1.2 meg floppy and a 20 meg harddrive. I learned a lot on that machine and was very happy with it because I just didn't know better. I lost my innocence in 1988 or 1989, when I saw the (discontinued by then) Amiga 1000 in person for the first time.

      It is still hard for me to believe that the first Amiga came out only 18 months after the PC Jr.

    4. Re:Fond memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okidata 92 dot matrix printer. Wizardry 1: Proving Grounds of the Mad Overlord. Countless other DOS games. Humming along with the disk drive access sounds while booting DOS 2.12. Upgrading it to 640k with the sidecars!

      If I could find one on eBay that wasn't absurdly expensive I'd do it in a heartbeat.

    5. Re:Fond memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you me?

  5. Color Computer FTW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radio Shack, The 800 lbs gorilla of computer retail and manufacturing. No one did it bigger.

    Then is all ended, badly.

    1. Re:Color Computer FTW! by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      I have a Tandy in my basement that will turn 30 this November. Still runs too, but they don't seem to make new software for it anymore...

    2. Re:Color Computer FTW! by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      the first family computer we had was a Tandy 1000 with deskmate. Nice interface, included some very useful tools and it predated WFW 3.11 while working far better. Now if I could only find my Tandy Dos (might even run on newer hardware). I've got a couple of old systems that may allow me to recover some of the files - had a music notation app included that we'd used to create a tune with. Want to recover that so I can at least print it out.

      Next system was a Pentim 75 and it ran WFW3 until a power surge blew a chunk from the Southbridge. Ended up with an Acer running Win95 that was one hell of an improvement over WFW3.11 and it eventually saw Win98 upgrade. Many folks bitch about WinME but if you didn't upgrade the OEM hardware, it actually worked quite well (still have several systems that run it).

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    3. Re:Color Computer FTW! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I was 13 when I got my hands on a 10 year old Tandy 1000. My first computer, and I didn't care that it was outdated because Windows 95 hadn't quite come out yet. Deskmate really was great for the time.

      Deskmate doesn't need real Tandy DOS to run. What you need is DOSBox. It has support for emulating the Tandy 1000 hardware:
      http://www.vogons.org/viewtopi...

      I've had good success even with some of the full color games with 16-color Tandy graphics support and 3-voice sound (e.g. Sierra adventure games)

  6. i bought one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bought one my junior year of college, I think it was about $2500 for the whole "package" (monitor, expansions, printer, etc.). It sucked, but it really helped me get through college, being able to use it to dial in to the campus system, do some Turbo Pascal, and even write a few papers (and a resume').

    Funny that for all the bitching about the "chiclet" style keyboard back then, now I see way too many laptops (and even Macs) that are using what looks like the same style. I hated it then, and I hate it now.

    1. Re:i bought one by Speare · · Score: 1

      Funny that for all the bitching about the "chiclet" style keyboard back then, now I see way too many laptops (and even Macs) that are using what looks like the same style. I hated it then, and I hate it now.

      I definitely should have said this in my other post. I laugh and laugh at the Mac's chiclet crap. They're horrible to use for touch typing, just one step above a membrane keyboard. Yet everyone "loves" them because Steve Jobs told them to.

      I swapped my chiclet infrared keyboard for the heavy-ass IBM keyboard right away. As soon as Macs went to chiclet, I bought two of the last heavy-ass Apple bluetooth keyboards; one for today and one as a spare, to use them through the years.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:i bought one by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      I definitely should have said this in my other post. I laugh and laugh at the Mac's chiclet crap. They're horrible to use for touch typing, just one step above a membrane keyboard. Yet everyone "loves" them because Steve Jobs told them to.

      The keyboards on the MacBooks are just fine. Actually very nice, because the amount of finger action needed to type is minimal. Returning your compliment, it's clear that you have been brainwashed by Google and Samsung to make such a statement.

    3. Re:i bought one by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Clearly you just like it becasue IBM told you to.
      I was very happy the day I could stop using those POS IBM keyboards, unlike you and your brainwashed ilk.

      OR maybe, just maybe we just happen to like different keyboards?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:i bought one by Blapvedder · · Score: 1

      I got mine around 1986, played games on it in high school but in college did all my work on it including Anthropology papers with detailed, lovingly hand-printer-coded tables and diagrams. Did my senior thesis on it using Volkswriter, brought the floppy to the campus laser printer to print two bindable copies. The floppy holding the only copy of the thesis died shortly after. Once I had my first job I invested in an sx/25 with an actual hard drive. I can't say I miss the PCjr, but I got my money's worth out of it.

    5. Re:i bought one by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      funny since what kind of kb's do google and samsung sell... ?

      and "fine" if you mean "not totally unusable for touch typing". what sucks 100% 200proof monkeyballs on them is quite simply this: half of the fucking characters one needs to type eventually AREN'T FUCKING PRINTED ON THE FUCKING KEYS for aesthetic reasons! so good luck hunting where £ is the one time you need it!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Not too bad...for a PC. by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    I bought one second-hand, circa 1986. It had the later, non-chiclet keyboard, and a Tecmar 256K expansion. I modded the Tecmar board to 640K and then it was functionally the equivalent of an XT with CGA graphics. Enjoyed it for a couple years before trading up to an Amiga 1000. Prior to Windows 95, I think most any PC was at a disadvantage in the home market.

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    1. Re:Not too bad...for a PC. by Green+Light · · Score: 1

      Thanks for mentioning this. I worked at Tecmar in that era, we had a lot of great add-on products and made a lot of money on expansion boards, graphics cards, tape drives, etc.

      --
      "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
    2. Re: Not too bad...for a PC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not really. The Junior was missing an essential component: the DMA controller. Since it couldn't use DMA for things like disk drive access, every byte of I/O had to travel through the CPU's accumulator. This is a major system bottleneck. The DMA controller was a seperate 40 pin Intel chip and omitting it probably reduced the cost by tens of dollars. It also severely crippled the I/O throughput.

    3. Re: Not too bad...for a PC. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The DMA controller was a seperate 40 pin Intel chip and omitting it probably reduced the cost by tens of dollars. It also severely crippled the I/O throughput.

      "Tens of dollars" (cost price) would still have been a significant amount back then. Also, if, as others have commented, the PC Jr was already intentionally hobbled to avoid competing with IBM's more expensive machines, this reduced performance would likely have suited marketing anyway(!)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  8. who has actually used one? by imatter · · Score: 2

    I had one growing up. I learned a little basic using it. I was all of 10 or 11... played King's Quest on it. Wireless keyboard!!!

    Not having access to other computers at the time I never realize how big of a joke/flop it was considered until I was older. I don't think i was harmed by the use of the Jr. Funny thing is that most people I have talked to that make fun of it never touched one.

  9. Remember the Nimbus? (Also 30) by zacherynuk · · Score: 0

    We should remember the RM Nimbus PC-186 - it is also 30 years old this year!

    Whilst it was not quite able to run MS Flight Sim 4.0 'properly' it managed to get very good penetration within the UK education sector.

  10. Mac, PC, Time for a post on Commodore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back then Commodore by and far provided the best system for the money, which is why it was enormously popular. GEOS provided a graphical interface that rivaled MAC, with commodore ram expanders and all sports of fun addons. (I particularly liked the sprite editors that let you 'erase enemies in games' etc .
    imo

    1. Re:Mac, PC, Time for a post on Commodore by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The Commie already had it's retrospective articles.

      It was certainly a much more populist machine, oddly enough given it's nickname.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  11. Had one. Liked it. by Speare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had one, and I really liked it. It lacked DMA on the floppy drive so things were a bit slower during a file load or save. It only had one bay. Otherwise, it was basically the same as the PC (my dad had a low-serial-number model 5150). It had a couple more graphics modes than the standard VGA, enabling a lot of games to use 16 colors rather than 4. Nobody I knew ever used the "sidecar" bus for anything worthwhile.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Had one. Liked it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard CGA, you mean? As I recall it had a mode not quite like EGA.

    2. Re:Had one. Liked it. by Speare · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's been a while... VGA was a dream compared. I also didn't mention the music chip, rather than just the usual bit-bang speaker.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  12. ADAM! by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

    But it all comes in one box!

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
  13. Shouldn't have called it the PC jr. by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    The name PC jr made you think it was a cheaper version of the IBM PC. It was built for a completely different purpose, and a different architecture. People saw it as a crippled PC, instead of a home computer better than most.

  14. trained from birth to 'make money' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now we're told we cannot make our own even, just work to get almost none (usually just debt for most of us) of what someone else decides? fiction has never been less believeable

  15. PCjr and the Crash by Pentomino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I attended a panel of veteran video game programmers from the Phoenix area a few years ago. They asserted that the PCjr had a greater role in the video game crash of 1984 than people realize. Many software companies bought into IBM's hype that the PCjr would dominate the market, and put a lot of resources into PCjr development, and ended up going bankrupt when the PCjr failed.

    1. Re:PCjr and the Crash by DigitalDreg · · Score: 2

      Doubt it. There were a handful of decent games provided on cartridge from Imagic and some games that took advantage of PCjr specific video or sound, like Kings Quest and MS Flight Simulator. That level of interest does not indicate an entire industry was hoodwinked.

      Spinaker's educational games for pre-schoolers were terrible and they deserved to go out of business on their own merits. ;-0

      Mike

    2. Re:PCjr and the Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Meh. Maybe locally somewhere, but it was actually caused by shovel ware games and the increased capabilities of 8-bit home computers (which just about all came with Atari-compatible joystick ports).

    3. Re:PCjr and the Crash by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The video game crash was in 1983, look it up on Wikipedia.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:PCjr and the Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incredibly unlikely. The video game crash of 1983 (not 1984) is very well understood and the events causing it were well underway in late '82. Very few software companies invested a significant amount in the PCjr (part of the problem with it) and no one went bankrupt due to its failure, certainly no major video game publisher. Whoever said that was speaking fully out of their ass.

  16. Commercial plop? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2

    I know it wasn't a seller but that's a bit harsh.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  17. no currency has any value without spirit behind it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    honor integrity etc... heartfelt is the new material for the new clear options open honest age of communications & commerce. creation still undefeated language of the heart foolproof

  18. Commercial Flop? by Marrow · · Score: 2

    Didn't IBM basically consider the entire PC product a commercial flop? Was it ever considered a success (ie profitable)? I thought they considered it a commercial loser, but a foot in the door for their larger boxes.

    1. Re:Commercial Flop? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. As a product, it sold way, way more than they expected. It was a sort of pet internal project no-one really thought would fly. However, when it did...

      Later on, when it came to the PS2 range, I remember going to an IBM presentation. They were trying to get the same software running on everything from the PS2 PCs to mainframe with unified architecture for programming, GUI etc. Trouble was, the actual machines were too far removed from what was by then a booming and standardised architecture so outside of corporates who bought into the dream, not many people went for it and it died out.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    2. Re:Commercial Flop? by hrvatska · · Score: 1

      Early on IBM made a lot of money off PCs. It made buckets of money from the original PC, the PC XT and the PC/AT. It was only after PCs became commodity items that IBM was unable to maintain their traditionally high profit margins.

  19. I remeber those! by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I didn't have one, just like everyone I knew

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. typo? or unconcious attempt to sneak in a hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    word? Google Unveils Prescription Eyewear for Glassholes http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2014/01/google-glass-prescription-lenses/

  21. Coleco Adam & Dec Rainbow were worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Adam and Rainbow PCs were much worse than PCjr. Its just that the PCjr was more famous.

  22. Not that bad. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    They really were not that bad, but those "chicklet" keyboards were awful. Yes, they were way overpriced, but those people who had the cash, and were interested in buying one, were turned off by those terrible keyboards. IBM eventually started selling them with keyboards comparable to those on their PC, but it was too little, too late.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Not that bad. by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By the way, the video above shows the second generation keyboard. The infamous "chiclet" keboard had no labels on the keycaps. The letter labels were on the surface of the keyboard between rows of keys, in order to permit overlays. That was a clever idea, but it wasn't going to fly in an era where mechanical switch keyboards were the norm.

      Of course today crummy keyboards are the norm; I bet the second generation PCJr keyboard beats what most people are using these days.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  23. I learned to spell playing KQ by chispito · · Score: 1

    My dad bought it off my uncle, who apparently had buyer's remorse. They keyboard must have been the revision, because I don't remember any issues with it. Then again, I was about five, so what did I know?

    I learned to spell playing King's Quest I, which is still fond in my memories. My mom wrote down a list of the words I would need to interact with the (frankly, pathetic) parser in the game, and left it to me to remember and figure out which word was which and how to use them. We bought several other games, but the only other star among them was Jumpman.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  24. Whats so special about 30th by rossdee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whats so special about 30th anniversary? Is 30 some kind of magic number?

    I believe in western culture that 25th anniversary is a special celebration for married couples, (silver) and also 50th (gold)
    And some cultures have special significance of 15th bithday, and/or 21st birthday

    1. Re:Whats so special about 30th by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      that's the magical median age when slashdotters leave their mother's basement

    2. Re:Whats so special about 30th by ziggyzaggy · · Score: 1

      it's an auspicious number dear to those in open source, the number of years the GNU project has been flounding about still unable to produce a useble operating system. HURD is not the WURD; it's a TURD

    3. Re:Whats so special about 30th by dj245 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whats so special about 30th anniversary? Is 30 some kind of magic number?

      I believe in western culture that 25th anniversary is a special celebration for married couples, (silver) and also 50th (gold) And some cultures have special significance of 15th bithday, and/or 21st birthday

      It is roughly a generation. I've gone back in my family tree about 20 generations and 30 years is just about the average difference between parents and child. Yes, even back in medeival times.

      I suppose you could consider it special because it means that people who grew up with computers of that era are now buying pocket supercomputers for their children.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  25. Looking forward to the Slashdotting! by DigitalDreg · · Score: 1

    Regards, Mike (yes, the one that owns the page referenced in the summary) ...

  26. It was a license to coin money. by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative

    Didn't IBM basically consider the entire PC product a commercial flop? Was it ever considered a success (ie profitable)?

    By the end of 1982 IBM was selling a PC every minute of the business day. Although the PC only provided 2-3% of sales. IBM found that it had underestimated demand by as much as 800%, and because its prices were based on forecasts of much lower volume, the PC became very profitable. By 1983 the IBU had 4,000 employees and became the Entry Systems Division based in Boca Raton, and the PC surpassed the Apple II as the best-selling personal computer.

    By 1984 IBM had $4 billion in annual PC revenue, more than twice that of Apple and as much as the sales of Apple, Commodore, HP, and Sperry combined. A Fortune survey found that 56% of American companies with personal computers used IBM PCs, compared to Apple's 16%.

    IBM Personal Computer

  27. What I remember most: by DarthVain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wizardry being dark, and scary encounters.

    What I remember most from Ultima was agonizing over the start questions :)
    http://www.gamefaqs.com/pc/562...
    http://www.tk421.net/ultima/
    http://www.beastwithin.org/use...

  28. then the "clones" moved in by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Dell, Compaq, with relentless manufacturing efficiency> Even IBM sold their operation to an Asian clone.

  29. Re:no currency has any value without spirit behind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pure bullshit, currency has value if you can buy things with it. spirit will only get you coffee at starbucks with a $5 bill

  30. $100 Tablet continues the dream and folly by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Raskins, Steve's , IBMs dream was a under $1000 reasonably powerful home PC. This was not really achieved until the 2000s thanks to Moores Law. And no one really celebrated this threshhold when it arrived.

    The $100 tablet with as much power as iPad is the equivalent dream. Its getting close, but not quite there here. Some are selling underpowered tablets under $200 and shooting themselves in the foot just like the PC Junior. But we'll get there soon enough.

  31. Three classic strikes by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

    The PCjr had three strikes against it right out of the box...

    • Not cheap enough compared to the IBM PC.
    • Late to market and fighting an entrenched Apple II family in the comparable price range.
    • Too expensive compared to the VIC-20 and the C-64.

    Even without it's various technical and performance problems and unclear target market, it still would have had a tough time gaining traction.

    1. Re:Three classic strikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all three are directly related to price. I agree with all your points.

      For what it's worth, I acquired my first PCjr recently, and I think that for the time and for the market, it was the right computer... had it been priced right. Clearly if you're selling one for what an Apple IIe costs, you're not going to buy it. And, the basic system (no floppy drive, and 64kB RAM) was still more expensive than an expanded C-64.

      Still, the package isn't really bad. The only qualms technically I've found with it are that the floppy drive and keyboard can't be used at the same time, and the odd choice of berg connectors which should be standard D-style connectors like every other computer of the age. Those two issues are very unfortunate and obnoxious.

  32. Was as bad as the reviews made it seem by hottoh · · Score: 1

    It would not run the IBM office suite of programs and was artificially limited on RAM. 'Running most PC applications' is not good enough.

    The original "chiclet" style had tall, hard plastic keys which made touch-typing virtually impossible and a better keyboard was offered, but not for free.

    The design limited the expansion, memory and speed of the system. For instance, with no DMA capability, the keyboard is disabled when accessing the floppy drive. Even worse, the serial port will drop data when the floppy drive is in use.

    The ads with Charlie Chaplin and the M*A*S*H characters where wholly laughable. IBM was clearly out of touch.

    1. Re:Was as bad as the reviews made it seem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When my dad purchased a PCjr for me, it came with both the chicklet and the better keyboard. It did run the IBM office programs (at least some of them) - my dad often brought work home from the office and was able to use the PCjr. I also often typed up school work on the PCjr and had dad take it to work to print out.

      I have fond memories of the PCjr - I even took it to college with me in '89 before it finally gave up the ghost and I ended up having to use either my roommate's computer or go down to the campus lab (which wasn't bad when I lived on campus and there were tunnels between the dorms and the rest of the buildings, but which became a real pain when we first moved to the non-attached dorm/apartments and then finally off-campus completely).

  33. My First Computer by robartin · · Score: 1

    Santa brought me a PCjr when I was a kid, the best Christmas present I ever got.

    Things I liked about the PCjr:
    * 16 Color Graphics - this was back at the time of CGA graphics on the PC, where you got your choice of 4 colors in one of two palettes. Graphics on the PC were AWFUL at the time. The PCjr's EGA-like graphics were beautiful by comparison.
    * 3 Voice Sound - on the PC, you got a beeper. On the PCjr, you got 3 voice sound that could produce some really nice music.
    * Games - King's Quest. King's Quest II. In 16 color graphics with 3 voice sound. Need I say more?
    * Wireless keyboard - I got the "true keyboard" version, not the chiclet keyboard. It used IR to communicate with the computer and worked flawlessly.
    * Learning How to Program - a great kid friendly system for learning how to program BASIC
    * Upgrade Modules - for a kid, the ability to upgrade your PC by bolting on a card to the side was great. I added a printer adapter and 256K of memory. For adults, there were some frustrating limitations with this setup.

    Things I disliked about the PCjr:
    * Compatibility - games had to be specifically programmed for the PCjr to work correctly. Otherwise it was a crapshoot whether a game would work. I remember making multiple trips to the software store going through one game after another until I found one that worked. Over time this got to be a deal-killer.

    Overall, I have really fond memories of the system and enjoyed being "ahead of my time" for a while with the graphics and sound capabilities of the PCjr.

  34. PC Jr in HS CS labs in 1989... by gatzke · · Score: 1

    We were using the PC Jr for Pascal in late 80s HS CS classes. They were completely adequate and had that distinctive higher end IBM look and feel. There were a bunch of terrible beige box PCs at the time and the IBMs actually looked ok and seemed to work fine for what we did.

    My favorite though was the Compaq luggable beast. About 40lbs in a suitcase form factor, the thing was a beast! Dad splurged for dual 5.25" drives and we eventually got a 30 MB 1.5 slot HDD.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compaq_Portable

    1. Re:PC Jr in HS CS labs in 1989... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite though was the Compaq luggable beast. About 40lbs in a suitcase form factor, the thing was a beast! Dad splurged for dual 5.25" drives and we eventually got a 30 MB 1.5 slot HDD. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compaq_Portable

      I did a business trip in the 80's, and carried that Compaq on board the plane. I remember walking through Chicago O'hare and having to stop every few minutes to switch arms. (Posting AC 'cause I'm moding today...)

  35. We had a PCjr by Pope · · Score: 1

    Got one back in 84 for Christmas IIRC. I ended up using it through to the end of my 2nd year of university, so a bit over 7 years. Of course by that time we'd maxed out the RAM & added a second external floppy. Best hack I had at the time: making a 360K RAM disk and copying the contents of any Infocom game floppies to it so they'd run lightning quick! Otherwise each command had to access the floppy, slowing everything down.

    Of course what I really wanted was an Amiga, but we couldn't afford it. :)

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  36. Tandy 1000 was a PCJr clone (Plantronics, not EGA) by erice · · Score: 1

    I never ran into software compatibility problems with my 1000 (for non-game software), but it sucked that Tandy essentially put an EGA adapter in it, but then modified it enough that EGA software wouldn't work with it.. :(

    It was not modified EGA at all. It had exactly the same video as the PCJr and output one bit per RGB + one bit luminance just like and compatible with CGA.

    EGA was very different in memory layout and EGA monitors used two bits per component.

  37. My first computer, and introduction to programming by Gnaget · · Score: 2

    This computer has a lot of fond memories for me. Having grown up very poor, we couldn't afford something like this. My uncle gave us his old one so my mother could do word processing from home. I used it to play games all the time until the floppy drive died. After that, the only thing I could do on it was load up the BASIC cartridge. If I wanted to do anything on the computer, I'd have to program it first, and the moment the computer turned off lose it forever. I would get the computer magazines that had BASIC code all ready to enter in, just so I could play a game. Of course, the code always contained errors, so I learned how to code by fixing them. I was 10 at the time.

    Now, I'm in my mid thirties, and shockingly a programmer. I didn't go to college, and barely graduated high school. To this day, I thank that computer for all the success I achieved in life. I'm wholly unemployable otherwise. People say that computer was a dud, but I'll always remember it fondly.

    Besides, how cool is it that a computer in the 80s had a wireless (albeit IR) keyboard?

  38. It was a great machine. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    The PCjr was my first computer growing up. If it had a shortcoming it was only the existence of the PC. But before EGA came along it was the only way in the PC world, to enjoy 16 color graphics. Also, with a 3-channel speak it offered a better audio experience than you got out of the IBM PC's speaker. Ours came with two keyboards, the chiclet keyboard everyone complained about and a replacement with conventional keys. As a kid, I preferred the look of the chiclet keyboard, but the keys had too much travel for the way they were shaped. The fact that they were infrared was great, as long as you didn't have a book in the way of the sensor. Or someone didn't come in with a second keyboard and screw with you.

    For all the fondness people display towards Apple, by comparison their machines at the time were crap. My school had Apple 2's which weren't good for a whole lot, especially the ones saddled with 2-color displays. We did have a single weird Apple clone that rendered more color. The Macintosh wasn't a consideration given it was so expensive. We got our PCjr for about $1000. The PC was maybe another $500 on top of that. But the Macintosh was easily $2500 and about all it had going for it was the GUI.

    Early on my father got an attachment offered by a company called Legacy that doubled the size of the machine but gave us an extra 520k and a second floppy drive. I don't remember now but I think we even got a 20MB harddrive for the machine. We definitely got quite a few good years of use out of that machine.

    Although, I'd be lying if I didn't look longingly at Amigas with their fantastic 4096 color displays.

  39. Despise that low-profile keyboard and mouse by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Funny that for all the bitching about the "chiclet" style keyboard back then, now I see way too many laptops (and even Macs) that are using what looks like the same style.

    I laugh and laugh at the Mac's chiclet crap. They're horrible to use for touch typing, just one step above a membrane keyboard.

    To be fair, AFAICT (*) "chiclet keyboard" is a word that seems to have changed its meaning over the years. In the PC Jr's day (again, AFAICT) it referred to *rubber-keyed* keyboards with the "chiclet" appearance. Rubber keyboards- like the PC Jr's- are not fun to type on.

    The present-day Mac desktop keyboards often called "chiclet"- like this one- are, to be fair, not rubber keyed.

    That said, I'd now like to agree with the parent and grandparent... they're still absolutely f*****g awful, style-over-substance garbage. I was typing on one (like the image above) today, and it's utterly horrid. I would blame it on the keys' lack of travel, but I've used laptop keyboards that are actually quite nice despite that. It may well be the "chiclet" layout, can't say. I've used it before as well, so it's not a case of being unfamiliar with it.

    On the same machine I'd already swapped out the equally overrated "Magic" mouse mainly because its low profile might have looked good, but it was odious from an ergonomic point-of-view (i.e. nothing to hold in the hand, and I don't even have big hands).

    Urgh.

    (*) Based on what I've read from US sources. I live in the UK, and the expression "chiclet keyboard" wasn't used over here in the early-to-mid-80s (because "chiclets" gum wasn't sold here either). We simply called them "rubber keyboards".

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Despise that low-profile keyboard and mouse by Speare · · Score: 1

      The PCjr was not one of those flexible rubber keyboard things. The Mac keys are actually dense rubber/nylon, while the PCjr keys were plain hard ABS plastic of the same shape. The PCjr keyboard had a raised ridge around the whole board. Otherwise they were quite the same as the current Mac standalone keyboards. One reason for the chiclet design on the PCjr was so they could make little paper cards that fit in the raised ridge and surrounded every key, to label various key functions for specific applications.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  40. ugh... PC Jr. - what a piece of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    charlie romeo alpha papa

    on the other hand, my IBM Aptiva w/40MB RAM, 10GB HD, and slow Pentium was a wonder... could survive a 2-second brownout from the electrical grid...

    i never lost a page of text while writing my numerous books...

    of course, it was running 1.2.13 - *the* classic kernel!

  41. PCJr - IBM's play of the education market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While IBM did sell and advertise the Jr. through retail as a consumer product, it's target market was the education channel. Remember, IBM at the time had a huge B2B sales force, a footprint in every high school though both the administrative S/36 and the Selectrics in the typing classes (that brought in pretty good maintenance contract money) and was looking to tap into classroom level/multi unit sales. They also saw - but were about 10 years too early for - the role that client server networking could play in class room management - as well as a link back to their "big box in a cold room" infrastructure.

    The Apple II had a huge head start in the classroom and won the enthusiast teacher with computer skills heart's and mind: part of the problem was that while IBM had the hardware, chicklet keyboard notwithstanding, and was close to price competitive on an academic discount basis, they didn't have the broad software support, especially from the lower end (Broderbund and down) type of edutainment software that was the basis of "computer skills" 6-12 training. Secondly, IBM's approach to selling a few dozen PC's (that often took a long time to find funding etc) was the same as selling a much bigger, more expensive system: fly in tons of specialists, offer lots of inservice, etc. vs the local Compuserve cutting a retail deal. Essentially the market wasn't big or mature enough to handle IBM's high cost/high touch approach. The final kiss of death was the untimely death of Don Estridge in a DFW windshear plane accident, who protected the Boca IBU from all sorts of political infighting and sniping: after that the Junior got back-burnered and faded quickly

  42. Interlaced EGA mode by Guppy · · Score: 1

    Standard CGA, you mean? As I recall it had a mode not quite like EGA.

    I managed to get a PCjr monitor for cheap back when I was a poor student stuck with monochome.

    If you chopped off the proprietary PCjr connector and put a standard DE-9 one on, you could use it as an ordinary CGA monitor. If your video card supported it, the monitor could also operate in a special interlaced EGA mode. Terrible refresh rate and flickering, but it worked.

  43. More redent PCjr Demo by cjellibebi · · Score: 1

    INTROjr by Hornet

    (and here's the YouTube video.

  44. Ascension Day by Guppy · · Score: 1

    that's the magical median age when slashdotters leave their mother's basement

    Ah yes, that is the age when our wizardly powers surge forth, granting eldrich understanding beyond the ken of ordinary mortals. I remember it well.

  45. My first computer by TagrenHawk · · Score: 2

    October 31, 1985

    Three things of note that happened that day:
    1 - We got in a crash with a parked car while delivering newspapers.
    2 - My mom felt so guilty about crashing that she offered my brother and I the option to stay home from school "If we felt bad." (Yes, we both stayed home.)
    3 - My parents bought our first computer: an IBM PCjr.

    While I remember all three events with clarity, I don't think I would remember #1 & #2 quite so viscerally if the computer hadn't shown up that day. Having that computer in my house profoundly affected my life in ways that I probably don't understand.

    The first day we had the computer in the house, and didn't have the basic cartridge to run any programs, I would boot it over and over to "play" with the little man that would come out and place the key on the screen you had just pressed on the keyboard. I tried all sorts of combinations: multiple, concurrent key presses; speedy consecutive key presses; top left to bottom right; ... you get the idea. It seems silly now that I spent so much time on such a trivial task, but it was amazing to me to be able to press a key and see something change on the screen.

    When my cousin who worked at Bell Labs came over and programmed the first line of Beethoven's 5th symphony to play on the PC speaker using Basic, I was hooked. I tweaked his program over and over to change pitch and duration of each note, then revert it back.

    And Jumpman. Oh, Jumpman! My parents hated that we played that game so much because we would fight about it, but we would also sit and watch each other play for hours. Of course, it really, really ticked me off when I would play for 3 hours, set the high score, then my oldest brother would come along and blow away my score in one game. Resetting the top score matrix was a big no-no, but my fingers may have slipped once or twice...

    All in all, even if it was a failure as a system, it affected me and my career. I write code for a living because of that computer. I am not saying that I wouldn't have had the same experience with a Commodore 64 (which I owned for one blissful weekend until my Mom made me sell it back to the kid I bought it from because I only played Space Invaders even though I swore I would use it to write programs), but it all started with a PC Junior.

  46. Silly question- are there any around anymore? by wishlish · · Score: 2

    Is there a working PCjr anywhere in the world today? I know there are working Commodore 64s, for example, but is there a working PCjr anywhere in America right now?

    (I know, silly question, but think of it. I have a 20-year TV that shows no sign of stopping. Is there a working PCjr anywhere? It's not like it was ever beloved like the C64 or an Apple II...so did anyone take care of one?)

  47. Must have been marketed by the OS/2 team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC Junior and OS/2 probably shared the marketing team, and they both flopped.