Slashdot Mirror


NASA Pondering Two Public Contests To Build Small Space Exploration Satellites

coondoggie writes "NASA today said it was looking into developing two new Centennial Challenge competitions that would let the public design, build and deliver small satellites known as Cubesats capable of operations and experiments near the moon and beyond. The first challenge will focus on finding innovative ways to allow deep space communications with small spacecraft, while the second focuses on primary propulsion for small spacecraft."

85 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you move me to the beta slashdot abortion i'll add this place to the block list and never visit again.

    Too many other news sites regurgitate the exact same storys i see here. And all of them don't look as shitty as the beta slashdot.

    Stop being stupid

    1. Re:NO! by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't come here for the stories, I come here for the comments. Whatever trolling is going on, there always was somebody with relevant knowledge around.

      I have been reading /. since 1998 almost every day (changed userID when I changed e-mail address), loading everything in full at level 0 and summaries at level -1 (not because I love trolls, but because some really interesting AC comments never get modded up.) In the Beta, it just doesn't work like that anymore - that is a big difference with all previous /. restylings.

      Filled in the survey, like many others did, it seems we are being ignored. I would rather go back to a monochrome 40 character width screen than to the /. beta.

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
    2. Re:NO! by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      Anybody have a greasemonkey script that will fix the beta site? I've tried to use it but just don't like it.

    3. Re:NO! by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2

      That's just a band aid, not a solution to the problem. The rot goes inward.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  2. Beta by RyanFenton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll join the crowd and help post in every thread that pops up, and upvote all the other comments I can find doing the same.

    Slashdot Beta is not fixable - it is trash code that should be abandoned as a "lessons learned" exercise. It's not even a close decision - it's pretty much unanimous amongst the users - the ones that provide 90+% of any meaningful content on this particular site in particular.

    If this advice that everyone is giving isn't honored by the local 'beta' admins, I believe it's time to start communicating with the people in charge, and pulling the levers of power a bit - and hopefully get these folks a stern talking to about what they were throwing away.

    Shorter version: THE BETA SUCKS. LOSE IT.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Beta by Bob9113 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I *LOVE* Slashdot. That's why I have spent so much time creating comments that I hope add value to the discourse, and put so much effort into my otherwise tenuous self-restraint regarding flaming. I come here to read comments, and to add value to the comment trees. I am happy for Dice to make a profit selling ads on the content our community creates by playing host.

      That is a really good trade for all of us, Dice. Don't screw it up.

      As for my personal #1 gripe: Don't require Javascript to read comments. OpenStreetMaps is content that begs to be browsed dynamically. Reading a comment tree is an almost entirely static endeavor. Keeping Javascript disabled on most sites is something I'm guessing a large portion of the audience here does. And remember: The audience creates the content. Lose one, you lose the other.

      The Spirit of Mohdri Dragon Lives!

    2. Re:Beta by mrsam · · Score: 1

      Agreed that beta blows chunks. It's nothing more than change for the sake of change. It doesn't add any more features, it nothing but eye candy. Well, it's intended to be eye candy, but the problem is that eye candy is in the eye of the beholder. I challenge anyone to find any actual change in beta that's not eye candy.

      Having said that, I'm going to demand my money back. Oh wait...

      Thinking about this situation, a bit: as much as it sucks, I see no reason to really get excited about it. It's not like I'm paying for this shit. I looked at that eyesore briefly. and I figure this: if, and when, its the only way to waste time, around here, if I find that I can live with it, I'll live. If not, I'll find some other place to waste some time on. I've got plenty of stuff bookmarked. Dropping one entry won't make much of a difference, in the grand scheme of things.

    3. Re:Beta by SenorPez · · Score: 1

      I, for many, do not welcome our vile beta overlords.

    4. Re:Beta by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I gave my formal feedback on Beta and flat out pointed it was just awful all around in my replies. I don't mind promoting off-topic threads on the issue too as clearly the folks running Slashdot don't have a clue as to what it is that the site has been or what they can do to maintain the community.

      If the beta becomes the standard interface, they will lose most of the traditional audience. I'm sure some folks will continue to stick around, but it won't be the same place. It sure is a hell of a gamble and it looks more like "not invented here" as a new generation takes over the site. It really is change simply for the sake of change and no other reason.

      Hell, I don't even like the cute photos on the beta site either.

    5. Re:Beta by SGT+CAPSLOCK · · Score: 1

      srsly the beta sux

      ^ This comment looks ugly when viewed from the beta.

      I assure you that it's BEAUTIFUL when viewed from the classic version though!

    6. Re:Beta by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      It's not even a close decision - it's pretty much unanimous amongst the users - the ones that provide 90+% of any meaningful content on this particular site in particular.

      Maybe we are not the customers any more. This is happening on cheezburger too. Every month they get rid of more sites with intelligent posting and replace it with something with fart jokes.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    7. Re:Beta by Thanosius · · Score: 1

      Having said that, I'm going to demand my money back. Oh wait...

      Interestingly enough, Linux fanboys use the same argument when complaints about the state of various problems in Linux distros are raised... and then they wonder why not enough people use Linux.

      Just because you're not paying for something doesn't mean it's beyond criticism and reproach. Not only that, but Slashdot's probably one of the longest-service sites that a lot of people here would have gone to over the years. A lot are concerned that this is finally the tipping point where Slashdot will never recover. You of all people with an ID that small should be at least understanding of that, if not necessarily in agreement.

      --
      Account abandoned. I can't fucking spell for shit and Slashdot doesn't even allow time-limited edits of posts. Plus you'
    8. Re:Beta by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 1

      The beta doesn't add any useful new features. All it doors is remove them and severely fucks up the best part of this site: the commenting and moderation system. If the commenting system goes out the window, why would I come here? The stories are always several days or a week old, the editors are terrible at their job, and all of the actual articles are on other sites I could browse instead.

      What the hell, Dice?

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    9. Re:Beta by glavenoid · · Score: 1
      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    10. Re:Beta by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention the new design just displays the same data more spaced out.

      No, it doesn't. It hides much of the data, making it difficult to get to, and impossible to get to without losing the context.

      It seems deliberately discussion-unfrendly, and like many others, I come here for the discussions.

      I left when the last beta was forced on us a couple of years ago, and it took a while before I came back - and that was only because someone posted how to trick the settings into displaying the working format.

      But the new beta is ten times worse - completely unusable, and in a format only an MBA and his designer girlfriend could love. It's not for nerds who like to discuss, and post more than 160 characters.

      Sorry, DICE, but Slashdot's user base is what makes it attractive. Alienate the user base, and you end up with nothing. Then the advertisers won't like you either.

      And no, you won't attract fresh blood. Fresh blood doesn't come to sites that don't provide anything special. What was special here was the userbase, and that userbase [b]will[/b] be gone, unless you fire the incompetent nincompoop who decided on deliberately alienating the one asset the site has.

    11. Re:Beta by couchslug · · Score: 1

      The redesign was ordered by a human.

      Who is he?

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    12. Re:Beta by arth1 · · Score: 2

      The redesign was ordered by a human.

      Let's not jump to conclusions here.

      Who is he?

      Nor that conclusion.

    13. Re:Beta by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      I am viewing from classic, and I assure you your comment has all the beauty of a cup of coffee in the morning, lit by a soothing green glow.

      That's how I will always remember Slashdot when this place is gone. It will be just a memory, but such memories they will be: people like OG and Taco and Ethanol and the GNAA, copypasta tolling about Obama and Al Gore, hot grits and the slashdot effect.

      Good memories.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    14. Re:Beta by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      I have seen more 3, 4, and 5 digit user IDs in the past 24 hours lambasting the beta. It's amazing. I even saw a 2 digit user ID throwing in his two cents. (I should have marked the spot but can't find it now.)

      -- Common Joe

      Slashdot Valentines Day Massacre: Boycott Slashdot because "Fuck Beta!": February 10 - 17

      And Support Okian Warrior's Alternate Slashdot Idea!

  3. Fuck Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Beta != Slashdot

    Once there's only beta, slashdot will cease to be slashdot. FUCK SOULLESS BETA

  4. Buck Feta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Feta cheese was on sale today for only a dollar a pound.

    That's a dollar and a pound of cheese more than the Slashdot beta is worth.

    1. Re:Buck Feta by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Roses are red,
      Violets are blue,
      Slashdot Beta deals,
      Like fetid monkey poo.

      Tulips are pink,
      Bumstains are brown,
      Bury Slashdot Beta,
      Deep underground.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Buck Feta by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

      Glad to finally see someone finding a creative way to express the prevailing sediment. Though others may strive to be beta masters, you truly are the Master Beta.

  5. Beta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Geez, when are they going to shit can this beta web site. It is total garbage.......

    1. Re:Beta... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      They're gonna shitcan the beta by making it production. It won't be the beta.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  6. Make Beta go away please by nixon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been a Slashdot quite a while, been so long I can't remember. This new beta site needs to go. The current layout works just fine. The new one looks like one of those SEO spam sites used to get clicks. Please make it go away.

    1. Re:Make Beta go away please by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      This new beta site needs to go. The current layout works just fine. The new one looks like one of those SEO spam sites used to get clicks.

      I thought it was an SEO spam site the first time I saw it. I checked my browser address bar while muttering, "Shiiiit, hijacked," under my breath. I assumed those giant columns of white space on either side were jammed full of advertising banners that AdBlock had gleefully expurgated for me. In fact, I still think that.

      Come to find out it was real. I actually spent half an hour trying to use it. Found it not just stupidly ugly (if you're using fixed width on the web, you're DOING IT WRONG, ASSHOLES!), but also nonfunctional. So I found the "make this shit go away" button and never went back.

      Now they think they're going to force it on me? Ha. No more clicks for you, Dice.

    2. Re:Make Beta go away please by dmomo · · Score: 1

      OK. I've been on here forever... but looking at your id.. damn. Forever and a few years. I really hope beta bites it. Send all the people who like it over to http://slashdot.org/topic/bi/

      And it would be nice if they didn't try to force me to use it on my ipad. I stay away from this site on mobile devices.

  7. Romney Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Beta is not appealing to your base. Don't make your base stay home like Romney did. They'll go to Reddit or something other good site and stay there forever.

    DON'T ROMNEY SLASHDOT

    There are only 47% of us left as it is.

  8. Beta. Suicide. Difference? by stastuffis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been coming to this place for a while, mostly for the discussion.

    I don't post much at all, but without an effective and easy way to consume/produce comments, this place is fucking worthless.

    DOWN WITH BETA.

  9. Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design.

    Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

    If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

    We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.

    Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
    Commentors - only discuss Beta
    http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

    Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

    Captcha: fuckbeta

    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4757125&cid=46169357
    http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4757125&cid=46169451
    http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4757045&cid=46168351
    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4756947&cid=46167453

  10. Save Slashdot Classic! by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Informative

    I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window. Open it, and stick your head out, and yell, "I'M AS MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!" I want you to get up right now, sit up, go to your windows, open them and stick your head out and yell - "I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!"

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Save Slashdot Classic! by geraldthewes · · Score: 1

      Yes, save the classic version. The beta has nothing going for it.

    2. Re:Save Slashdot Classic! by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window. Open it, and stick your head out, and yell, "I'M AS MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!" I want you to get up right now, sit up, go to your windows, open them and stick your head out and yell - "I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!"

      I would love to support your cause, but I need to ask you a question. What is the linux equivalent of this "go to your windows" step?

    3. Re:Save Slashdot Classic! by adolf · · Score: 1

      I would love to support your cause, but I need to ask you a question. What is the linux equivalent of this "go to your windows" step?

      fvwm95

      (To remain on topic: fvwm95 is about as about as ugly and uninspiring as /. beta. NASA itself hates fvwm95 almost as much as it hates /. beta.)

    4. Re:Save Slashdot Classic! by PingXao · · Score: 1

      "What is the linux equivalent of this "go to your windows" step?"

      The linux equivalent is, "... get out your shinebox, open it and stick your head in and yell - 'I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!'"

      Yes, the linux equivalent of "window" is now "shinebox".

  11. Hard to believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Someone told me that slashdot beta was developed by al-qaeda operatives. I don't want to support terrorists.
    Can anyone confirm this?

  12. In other news... NASA says FUCK BETA! by denzacar · · Score: 5, Funny

    "NASA today said it was looking into fucking beta that would let the public fuck, bugger and dickplow beta known as "fucking beta" capable of sucking and being fucked near the moon and beyond. The first challenge will focus on finding innovative ways to allow deep fucking beta with small spacecraft, while the second focuses on fucking beta for small spacecraft."

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  13. Logged In for Beta by haster · · Score: 2

    Look I visit this site nearly every day and more than once a lot of days and have for nearly 10 years. I rarely log in, a few times in past couple of years. I also admit that I use adblockers so it is unlikely you have or will ever make any money off of me. BUT THE BETA SUCKS. You will lose my eyeballs if you implement it. It just has too much white spaces and is not information dense enough for me.

  14. Beta Haiku by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2

    Slashdot fartbiter
    The Beta makes my clown weep
    Oh God, more whiskey

    1. Re:Beta Haiku by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2

      The poem troll is right

      This is the end of slashdot

      Haiku makes me sad

      Burma shave

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  15. Re:amusing trend in stories suddenly by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2

    Yes, the trend is quite clear. Let's stay on it and see where it takes us. Who knows, by this time tomorrow, the editors might have explained the nature of dark matter, invented a better electric car battery, and brought back "Farscape". Either that, or their heads will have exploded. I see it as a win-win situation.

  16. Time for a slashdotting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is Dice's "Contact Us" page. Everybody be sure to call them tomorrow using whatever numbers from that page you can get to ring. Tell every darn receptionist in every darn one of Dice's holdings, along with anyone you can get them to connect you to, that the Slashdot beta is terrible and you won't shut up until it goes away. Fax them a well-illustrated complaint or two or three. Send them a choice letter via snail mail, along with whatever memorabilia you wish.

    They keep soliciting our feedback, they can get our feedback, right where it counts.

    Spread the word by mentioning this in every article's comments.

    The most obvious contact points are:

    Dice Holdings Inc.
    1040 Avenue of the Americas, 8th Floor
    New York, NY 10018
    T: 212-725-6550
    F: 212-725-6559

    Slashdot
    594 Howard St Suite 300
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    Tel: +1-877-433-5638
    www.slashdot.com

    1. Re:Time for a slashdotting. by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Slashdot
      594 Howard St Suite 300
      San Francisco, CA 94105

      So they are no longer in Michigan? Is that just an empty office/mailing address? That is right by the BART Montgomery station. I think I will stop by tomorrow and see if any actual people are there.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  17. Beta blows by sharky611aol.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So I guess I still haven't been forced over to the dark side yet, but I went to try it out again to just see if it still sucks as bad as last time. And yup, it does. Completely unreadable, absurd amount of scrolling, ridiculous forced spacing, asinine column widths. Seriously, what's it going to take to make this die?

  18. Buying Slashdot by Gregory+Arenius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What do you guys think a fair price for slashdot would be? I'm curious because I'm thinking about starting a kickstarter or something to buy slashdot and turn it into a community run forum.

    This site is valuable because of the community it has. I don't come here for the articles, I come here for the discussions. I know that the majority of the people who come here do so for the same reasons. DICE doesn't get that, and once they kill the community there won't be any real way to rebuild it. I think that would be a shame since I love this place. For all its flaws I think the community here is awesome.

    So, what do you guys think? Is it at all within the realm of reason to buy slashdot and make it ours?

    --Cheers,
    Greg

    1. Re:Buying Slashdot by drussell · · Score: 1

      What do you guys think a fair price for slashdot would be? I'm curious because I'm thinking about starting a kickstarter or something to buy slashdot and turn it into a community run forum.

      This site is valuable because of the community it has. I don't come here for the articles, I come here for the discussions. I know that the majority of the people who come here do so for the same reasons.

      Couldn't agree more... Except they'd never let us buy it... We apparently need to create a NewDot....

      DICE doesn't get that, and once they kill the community there won't be any real way to rebuild it. I think that would be a shame since I love this place. For all its flaws I think the community here is awesome.

      Amen, Brother....

      So, what do you guys think? Is it at all within the realm of reason to buy slashdot and make it ours?

      Highly unlikely.... Unfortunately.... Soon there will be nothing left here to be worthy of even an occasional visit and I find that very sad. :(

    2. Re:Buying Slashdot by Thanosius · · Score: 1

      It's too late by then. When Digg changed their site they destroyed most of the appeal of people going there and lost most of their audience. Soon enough a site called reddit was born which had the same level of simplicity and community interactive as the old Digg had and it took off like wildfire. Eventually Digg reverted some of their changes and morphed into a semi-decent return to its own styling, but by then the damage had been done, reddit had made its mark and the rest, as they say, is history.

      Slashdot will never come back from this.

      --
      Account abandoned. I can't fucking spell for shit and Slashdot doesn't even allow time-limited edits of posts. Plus you'
    3. Re:Buying Slashdot by T.Hobbes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a discussion about a fork over here.

      somenickname (1270442) has registered some domain names that could be used (http://bangslashdot.org|.com|.net) (eg !/.)

    4. Re:Buying Slashdot by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Damn fine idea. Dice bought it to fuck it up and doesn't have a mission, so they should be willing to sell it.

      We could return it to its former glory.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Buying Slashdot by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      We apparently need to create a NewDot

      Unfortunately slashnot.org is already registered. Maybe Matthew Strebe would switch it over from being a satire site (that he hasn't updated since 2006) to being a place for refugees.

    6. Re:Buying Slashdot by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      I'll wager 400 quatloos on the newcomer.

  19. destroy beta. by CaptainStumpy · · Score: 1
    --
    It will be better to purchase from an owner who is a good farmer and a good builder.
    1. Re:destroy beta. by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Way to go, capt'n.
      Everybody complains about how beta has lots of empty spaces and you send a link for a page on mobile wikipedia with... you guessed right, lotsa empty spaces when opened on non-mobile computer.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:destroy beta. by CaptainStumpy · · Score: 1

      Way to go, capt'n. Everybody complains about how beta has lots of empty spaces and you send a link for a page on mobile wikipedia with... you guessed right, lotsa empty spaces when opened on non-mobile computer.

      similia similibus curantur

      --
      It will be better to purchase from an owner who is a good farmer and a good builder.
    3. Re:destroy beta. by c0lo · · Score: 1

      ...sed in errare perseverare diabolicum.
      Bis idem error numquam

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  20. Option to turn off advertising by elloGov · · Score: 1

    Where has the option to disable advertising gone?
    Here's the funny thing. Out of appreciation of being given a choice, I chose to not disable. However, now that it's gone, I feel as if it's forced down my throat.
    I haven't tried Beta, but I'm gonna go ahead and join the revolt simply because "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". I'm satisfied with Slashdot Classic.

    1. Re:Option to turn off advertising by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      I'm still seeing it at the top of classic slashdot.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  21. There will be no more real discussion here until.. by drussell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This Beta garbage dies in a burning ball of galactic-temperature-infused inferno...

    I should have seen this coming for months and set up a slashdot clone we could all move to... Hmm, shortsighted!

    Shut it off... Turn it off NOW! Bad, BAD experiment!

  22. Beta is to Slashdot as Windows 8 is to MS by Chewbacon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nuff said. You're just pouring gas on a fire with your base. Slashdotters are apparently happy with the site as is and appreciate its familiar usefulness. Beta fucks it up. FUCK BETA.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  23. Slashdot Beta is an MBA Nightmare by Kotoku · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slashdot Beta is the worst thing I have encountered in years. It's like someone took the metrics for time on page, click through rate, and advertising sales stats for pages viewed and total hits to create this abomination which is in no way useful to the users. I can get the content of Slashdot on Reddit/TechCrunch/AndroidCentral and more. I come here for the comments and the discussion. If you insist on killing the community I will throw in the towel on this site myself. Even "Slashdot Classic" used to be better before it was rolled out. Stop making things worse! It's like common sense doesn't work on you people.

  24. Beta by Jadeus · · Score: 1

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque a rhoncus dui. Quisque aliquam lorem commodo tincidunt dignissim. Morbi nunc est, dignissim quis ullamcorper eu, varius sed mi. Vivamus tempor vehicula feugiat. Fusce dictum est faucibus mauris adipiscing ullamcorper. Phasellus id erat pellentesque dui ultrices dapibus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam nibh ante, malesuada eget lacinia ut, commodo nec diam. Proin fringilla metus nibh, ac sollicitudin lorem congue ut. Nunc quis metus auctor, luctus turpis vitae, varius purus. Sed non augue est. Sed consectetur feugiat nunc vel sodales. Etiam semper arcu quis lorem scelerisque, eget aliquam tellus blandit. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Etiam et odio ut eros semper ultricies quis nec nunc. Maecenas enim quam, semper ac elementum et, euismod ut diam.

    We'll prolly just end up with disabled accounts, but at this point that's not much of a loss. ;-(

    --
    --- Bigger bits, softer blocks, tighter ASCII.
  25. Use NoScript to block Beta by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    Try it.

    1. Re:Use NoScript to block Beta by faedle · · Score: 1

      The argument can (and should) be made that I shouldn't have to use browser tools like NoScript to make a site "readable." And few people will:

      This "new look" for Slashdot pretty much guarantees Slashdot continues down the path of irrelevancy, as another wave of people decide the downsides of (say) Reddit now aren't nearly as bad as the Microsoft Windows 8-inspired Slashdot.

    2. Re:Use NoScript to block Beta by c0lo · · Score: 1

      as another wave of people decide the downsides of (say) Reddit

      At this point, https://news.ycombinator.com/ starts to look appealing to me.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  26. How long before we can no longer avoid the beta? by 2phar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess Ars is the place to go, even though the comments system is nearly as bad as the Slashdot Beta, at least the stories are fresher. The beginning of the end was when they launched SlashBI and we all thought it was an April Fools gag.

  27. Disable advertising by maliqua · · Score: 1

    I generally left the advertisements enabled because i wanted to support slashdot, heck some were even interesting occasionally. but until they shove beta up their ass i will keep ads disabled and definitely wont give them a click

  28. Leave the Betas in the aquarium. by rugfrog · · Score: 1

    If I wanted tons of wasted white space and larger fonts, I'd run windows 8 on a 50" TV. But I don't do that. Because I don't want that. Just like I DONT WANT THE BETA. Kill it, please.

  29. Jon Katz by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

    Come back Jon Katz! All is forgiven! Screw Beta!

  30. Re:Where are the comments? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    The people that wanted to post comments had 5 hours of nausea generated by beta. They'll be back, and with lots of complaints.

  31. Agreed by Anubis350 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I feel like the beta is being pushed simply because it's new, and they're ignoring that it's not *better*. I've seen this before: after enough money's been invested in something a company will move forward with it whether it is actually good or not simply to avoid admitting they were wrong and the New Thing needs work.

    I hope Dice doesn't keep pushing this without substantial changes. Outside of outraging their user base it will cost them in destroying /.'s brand and following - what they definitely paid more for than whatever they've thrown at the beta dev.

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    1. Re:Agreed by LordFlower · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I just spent a little time with Beta again to see if I'd acclimate.

      Well, if it were some other site I'd shrug my shoulders, but I like being able to see more information on a single view as is possible on Classic.

      It feel claustrophobic. I'm out when Beta is in.

    2. Re:Agreed by nateman1352 · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who has been visiting this site daily for over 10 years, honestly I don't know what the hell they are thinking. If they want different fonts than make the make the article title sans serif and the article body serif like the really old slashdot from the 90s, not this bullshit of two slightly different sans serif fonts that clash with each other.

      Oh I almost forgot: They even got the wrong fucking green color!

    3. Re:Agreed by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Outside of outraging their user base it will cost them in destroying /.'s brand and following - what they definitely paid more for than whatever they've thrown at the beta dev.

      It's possible that the Dice has some ingenious plan to chase away all the old-guard Slashdot users, allowing them to claim the name and refashion it as a kind of "tech-cred" brand to sell products to Hipsters, Brogramers, and PHBs using the old Slashdot's reputation.

      Though it's more likely that no-one at Dice knows or cares about what they are doing.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  32. Re:Where are the comments? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    That is if they didn't die of a cerebral hemorrhage after actually trying to read Stinkdot Beta.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  33. Name the person who ordered the redesign! by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Seek out the guilty!

    Who is he?

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  34. WHOA! We don't need to go that far! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just because the Slashdot Beta site is remarkably shitty it does not mean we need to resort to something that drastic. Jesus Christ, son, be careful what you wish for!

  35. In other news... by vomitology · · Score: 1

    hashtag buckfeta yes.

    --
    ~Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, but Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.
  36. Nobody wants to talk about tiny spacecraft. :( by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    Fucking SlashBeta. Nobody wants to talk about tiny spacecraft. :(

    Where will I go to talk about tiny spacecraft where I can read just the gems, without having to wade through all the dross in some bullshit forum format? For that matter, where can I go to read about tiny spacecraft where the people posting actually know anything? So much of WannabeSpace is jammed full of know-nothings who wouldn't recognize the rocket equation if it bit them on the ass. Sure, even on Slashdot, I'd only expect 100 or so posts, from the still credible mob of users (hundreds of thousands?), and a bunch of those would be bad jokes, but at least there'd be something.

    Fucking beta...

  37. Re:Nobody wants to talk about tiny spacecraft. :( by demosthenes · · Score: 1

    Beta is the current Charlie-Foxtrot the Slashdot community is dealing with, and we're nothing if not navel-gazing when it comes to change. Though usually that change isn't quite as damaging as Beta is in the current form. However, for /. to continue to be a useful source of information, the commentators should prove the necessity they are to the success of the site by actually posting useful content, along with the quite justified complaints about the new system being forced on the users.

    That having been said, this is a very interesting change in direction for the microsat community. Most microsats live for a few months (at best) in Low Earth orbit. The current NASA contests are for what are essentially the first deep-space microsats, which can potentially (with the right design) perform useful science for decades or more, far away from Earth. Just how much useful propulsion can you cram into a satellite that weighs 3 pounds? With cheap, consumer-level sensors and a few government waivers, I would think quite a lot. The potential of a swarm of mini-RTG-powered microsats zooming around the Solar System towards or around various planets could yield quite a lot of useful science. Not to mention that this could be a useful demonstration for future Von-Newmann probes, simple machines created from raw materials, in an asteroid or planetary moon and spread throughout the Solar System (and beyond?), exploring, replicating, and continuing to send valuable data to Earth to inform future exploration or colonization..

  38. Beta? by adolf · · Score: 1

    Every attempt to improve Slashdot's display -except- for the Threaded view introduced by Taco well over a decade ago has been a dismal and utter failure that nobody actually likes.

    Even those that thought they liked the previous round of UI "improvements" because they had never seen Slashdot in its glory breath a sigh of relief when shown how to enable "Classic" with the old D1 discussion system.

    Seriously, Dice: We're all leaving once "beta" becomes the only reality. We'll build something else. And we'll slashdot every article with comments telling folks about the new place, and moderate all such comments as "Informative" while moderating any topicful commentary as "Offtopic."

    Once we find a new place to hang out (and we will -- many hands make light work), we'll all be doing our best to destroy whatever value the ghost of Slashdot might have once had.

    Do you know how I know that this will happen? Because this is the first time that the folks on Slashdot have actually agreed on anything, ever, in the history of these pages. It is an unprecedented and historic event. And any time you get this number of disagreeable people disagreeing in unison, change is inevitable.

    Fuck your beta.

  39. IT'S A TRAP by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/submission/3320177/slashdot-beta-discussion To avoid having clicking on the beta-infested link.

    Mugnyte (and others), clean your links. Most are going to be beta-ised now.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:IT'S A TRAP by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      having clicking

      I'd fix that if there was a way to edit comments after submission. But that would mean creating a change users have asked for.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  40. Re:Nobody wants to talk about tiny spacecraft. :( by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    Just how much useful propulsion can you cram into a satellite that weighs 3 pounds? With cheap, consumer-level sensors and a few government waivers, I would think quite a lot. The potential of a swarm of mini-RTG-powered microsats zooming around the Solar System towards or around various planets could yield quite a lot of useful science.

    I wonder just how well a cubesat can survive out beyond Earth's Van Allen belts. And transiting them, for that matter. Especially given such choices as consumer-grade sensors and other electronics. Such chips really don't like hard radiation, and that form factor makes it rather difficult to wedge in any sort of effective radiation shielding, or sufficient redundancy to maintain sanity when you take a particle to the knee.

    And I suspect there's a minimum functional size for an RTG that is larger than a CubeSat. One would think covering 3 adjacent faces of the cube with 44% efficient solar cells would do the job. It's not like there's even room for a lot of electronics to use that power.

    It's a fascinating topic that still has a lot of room for development. Historically, satellite designers have thought in terms of tons and hundreds of millions of dollars. Thinking in terms of grams and individual dollars is alien to the endeavor. This year will see only the third CubeSat conference. There are a piddling 15 papers listed on cubesat.org, only 14 of which have links. That's a pretty miserable showing for 15 years of development.

    Here's hoping SpaceX continues to accommodate CubeSat secondary payloads.