Slashdot Mirror


Skinny Puppy Wants Compensation For Music Used in US Interrogations

First time accepted submitter time_lords_almanac writes "A Canadian band has sent an invoice to the U.S. Department of Defense after learning that its music was used without permission in 'interrogations' of detainees at Guantanamo Bay. The members of Skinny Puppy, who specialize in electronic music, were originally going to make the invoice the cover of their next album until they discovered they could bring legal action against the department. They were also none to happy to learn the purpose their music was being employed for, let alone illegally. The amount of compensation requested? $666,000, of course."

271 comments

  1. Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by east+coast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'll drive people out of their minds and since Slashdot won't have any users it will be easy to access.

    On a more serious note, I see Skinny Puppy's billing of the government to be a sign that they condone the use of their music in such a way. I know that's not true but a C&D letter would have been a much better political statement.

    Still, boycott the Beta. Fight Dice.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm "none to happy" about Beta.

    2. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by hawkinspeter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm still using "classic" slashdot and haven't tried the beta version. Has anyone got an opinion about the beta version?

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    3. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Beta hides details of dates and times, user ids, post ids etc.

      Seems like it is designed for the sort of people who are afraid of "ugly numbers" and can't handle technical information unlike real slashdotters.

      So if you see Beta, go do something else for a few hours, repeat till you get "Classic". Or just give up on Slashdot.

    4. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Can we get over it already? The beta look is not that bad. If you don't like it, there are browser plugins you can use to change the look. Or, less talk, more action, GTFO. I'm tired of scrolling through pages of Beta nagging and filtering actual comments from all the bitching.

    5. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hopefully their complaint does include a C&D clause, but they are also entitled to fair compensation for the past unauthorised use of their work.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live, I want to set up a crack den next door. Don't like it? GTFO.

    7. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is its community. We're not going anywhere else yet, because there's still a chance to preserve the community.
      If the suits avert the disaster, we'll see where the community is on the 17th.
      Otherwise, goodbye forever.

    8. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by dmbasso · · Score: 0

      The moderators (who modded you troll) and the AC above couldn't see the obvious humor in your post... I wonder if the beta is affecting their minds.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    9. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Can we get over it already? The beta look is not that bad. If you don't like it, there are browser plugins you can use to change the look. Or, less talk, more action, GTFO. I'm tired of scrolling through pages of Beta nagging and filtering actual comments from all the bitching.

      No we can't get over it. And no a plugin will not fix what is fundamentally wrong with the Beta. And the reason that you are scrolling through all those comments is because the corporate overloads will not listen to valid criticisms about the short comings of the Beta site

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    10. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see Skinny Puppy's billing of the government to be a sign that they condone the use of their music in such a way

      In this age of the starving musician, any additional audience is a good audience. Besides, perhaps some of those interrogations resulted new fans and an artist proud of his or hers art wants to represent it to as many people as possible. Who knows, perhaps as a payback the organizations associated with those captured people who are actually terrorists play Uzbek love songs to captured service members, in accordance with the pattern. =:)

    11. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by camperdave · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm still using "classic" slashdot and haven't tried the beta version. Has anyone got an opinion about the beta version?

      You can't see how your own comments are moderated without drilling down to them.
      You can't see if your message has been replied to without drilling down to it.
      You can't quote the message you're replying to.
      The comment subject is not autofilled.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    12. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Informative

      On my planet, all we do is scroll down to the bottom of the main page and click "Use Classic."

    13. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are rumors that now Guantanamo Bay prisoners are forced to use Slashdot Beta. This madness must stop, they are human beings after all.

    14. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by east+coast · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't like my whining? Then go whine somewhere else!

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    15. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by hawkinspeter · · Score: 0

      Yeah - I should have been modded off-topic rather than a troll, but I've got plenty of karma to burn (and some of my troll posts don't get marked as troll so it's all swings and roundabouts).

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    16. Re: Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      On my planet, we have a small script do that for us.

    17. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Also, you can't see any comments in the polls.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    18. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by egcagrac0 · · Score: 2

      The "Use Classic" button should be at the top on beta, and the "Try Beta" button should be at the top on Classic.

      Nobody should need to go below the fold for a highly desirable feature, or a feature you want to be highly desirable.

    19. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by David_Hart · · Score: 0

      You can't see how your own comments are moderated without drilling down to them.
      You can't see if your message has been replied to without drilling down to it.
      You can't quote the message you're replying to.
      The comment subject is not autofilled.

      .
      I like Slashdot Beta, but I agree that these things need to be fixed.

    20. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      To use some of your own words:

      'if you don't like it. there are other sites you can use'

      Some of us have been here a long time and find value here, and are wanting to try and hold onto that.
      If the beta drives away a lot of users, I will be sad, and go away also.

      So your whining about the whining is just background noise, as the large majority seems to have you outnumbered...deal with it.

      And get off my lawn!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    21. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about that... yeah I ended up opening the faq, searching for beta and finding a description of the link at the bottom of the page

      I also noticed that classic is scheduled to go away completely with only the new and improved version being available

      It was a kick in the balls and makes me feel like I am being trapped into using something that I do not want to use

      Will probably take my AC ass somewhere else, 'Goodbye and thanks for all the trolls'

    22. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says a guy with User id 1102727. I be you use Macs, you sick son of a bitch!

    23. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 2

      Nobody should need to go below the fold for a highly desirable feature.

      I ALWAYS go "below the fold!" With my tongue. That's where the most desirable, uh, "feature" is.

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    24. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have actually put out a statement describing their disgust with the fact their music was used in such a way.

      I think you have to see it more as their way of directing attention to the torture program.

    25. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't condone torture, I reckon letting the use of their music in this way slide without saying or doing a thing would give off that message, but alas, this is /. nobody reads TFA.

      That being said, blasting Skinny Puppy and being tied down, not able to dance, as a '90s goth-type, that's just fucking cruel.

    26. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      looks like mobile.slashdot and "reply to this" is borked, at least on kubuntu mozilla; so I'd say it's more alpha quality than beta quality still.
      Back on topic, I'm listening to Skinny Puppy now on pandora, I can see how Military Brass would think it would be good torture music; it would get pretty agravating playing 24/7. As far as getting paid, I don't think they should hold their breath, I'm sure that the DoD will just say it's covered under their American Forces Radio and Television Service lisences.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    27. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by anagama · · Score: 1

      On a more serious note, I see Skinny Puppy's billing of the government to be a sign that they condone the use of their music in such a way. I know that's not true but a C&D letter would have been a much better political statement.

      Interesting idea, but are they really able to tell certain customers they won't serve them, and others that they will? I would think the best they could get from a C&D letter, would be something along the lines of "stop using our music without paying for it." I think their demand for compensation, past and future, is probably their only option, so I don't see this as being supportive of the Govt.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    28. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 0

      I see Skinny Puppy's billing of the government to be a sign that they condone the use of their music in such a way. I know that's not true but a C&D letter would have been a much better political statement.

      Sounds like you don't know how music licensing works. Remember when Heart got all pissy with the Republicans for using their song "Barracuda" at the GOP convention? Yeah, they didn't have a legal leg to stand on. Anybody can play your song in their venue, anywhere, as long as they've paid the license fee.

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    29. Re: Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical IT geek: a disturbing political situation turns into discussions about.... an app... sigh...

    30. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geneva convention!

    31. Re: Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your only gain will be to lose all the good Slashdot users who are irritated. The moderators get paid either way, we the users get screwed by this, not dice.

    32. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to torture them, send them to slashdot beta, tell them its the *.gov's new health care exchange and task them with buying health coverage.

    33. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      I remember we had the same whining the last time Slashdot changed to the current look.

      And yet, the world is still revolving, life goes on. Go figure.

    34. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's fair compensation for use in torture? What do American Idol contestants get?

    35. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody should need to go below the fold for a highly desirable feature, or a feature you want to be highly desirable.

      You forget one thing. They're randomly whisking people off from Classic to Beta, but not the other way. So, if links are hidden and you can't find them, you'll eventually end up on Beta with no way back. It's like an IQ test for Slashdotters. If you can't find the way back to Classic, Beta may just be the right one for you, or something.

      Fuck Beta.

    36. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Yakasha · · Score: 2

      Nobody should need to go below the fold for a highly desirable feature.

      I ALWAYS go "below the fold!" With my tongue. That's where the most desirable, uh, "feature" is.

      You dig fat chicks eh? To each their own...

    37. Re: Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Yakasha · · Score: 2

      Your only gain will be to lose all the good Slashdot users who are irritated. The moderators get paid either way, we the users get screwed by this, not dice.

      Moderators get paid?!

      Somebody owes me a check...

    38. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Yes I'd much rather see goat.cx smiling at gay niggers licking hot grits off a nake petrifided Natalie Portman anyday too.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    39. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 2

      No, son. The OTHER fold. A little further --

      Oh, never mind.

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    40. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by egcagrac0 · · Score: 2

      I'm not forgetting that at all. The way that they're doing this beta vs classic thing is alienating the userbase.

      If they were doing it following my simple suggestion, they'd piss off fewer people.

    41. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by egcagrac0 · · Score: 2

      I flip 'em over, and stay above the fold. ;)

    42. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      The change was nowhere near as drastic and the comments were left alone if you choose "Classic Discussions" in your account settings. I did not like the interactive discussion and /. gives us the CHOICE to stick with the old view which I have looked at since 1999 and posted to beginning in 2001.

      We arent old fogies bitching because of some newfangled thing. We like slashdot for a few reasons, the main one being the comments and the second reason being the spartan design. The new design breaks all of that. We don't need pictures or videos on the main page as /. is a news aggregation site with a sprinkling of a community help site via "Ask Slashdot".

      Dice wants /. to move into becoming a news site with its own content but do we really need that? There are plenty of news sites already, some shittier than others. I come here as most of the shit has already been sifted through by the community and the interesting stuff gets posted via user voting on the fire hose.

    43. Re: Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus invented comment threading just specifically for this purpose.

      There's no Post Anon checkbox in Beta. Fuck Beta.

    44. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      If they were doing it following my simple suggestion, they'd piss off fewer people.

      Right, because nobody hates the new format, they're just mad there isn't a Classic Mode button at the top. It isn't as though the new version is almost entirely garbage or anything.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    45. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by egcagrac0 · · Score: 2

      The bulk of the frustration seems to be that it's hard to get away from the new format.

      Put a button on the top that says "this sucks, get me back to the old design", count the number of people who click it vs the initial page loads, and say "whoa... more than 80% of our users think this is foul - maybe we change back to the old format as a default".

      They're taking away our soothing green light even more. :/

    46. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by DocHoncho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The other, more serious problem is that it is inevitable, barring Dice coming to their senses, that the Beta will eventually be released, and thus no more Classic mode at all, save for the shitty little "Classic Mode" they added which removes the pictures, leaving the rest of the god awful, butt-ugly, clusterfuck that is Slashdot Beta.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    47. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was nowhere near this unanimous or voluminous on any of the redesigns in the last 12 years or so. In point of fact, I can't remember a single site redesign that was this universally abhorred.

    48. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Sique · · Score: 2

      Actually no. Past uses have to be paid for, and new uses have to be contracted for.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    49. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The bulk of the frustration seems to be that it's hard to get away from the new format.

      The bulk of the frustration that started this week, spilling over into every Slashdot story, came because Beta isn't just a stupid curiosity anymore. Now we get reminders that Slashdot Classic will be going away soon and we will have only the horrid Beta interface.

    50. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Hey AC, care to put a name behind that opinion? I haven't heard anyone excited about or interested in the beta besides Dice and Slashdot employees, as well as one or two ACs who probably belong to the former group.

    51. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      If it gets too bad, I'll just stop coming. A pity, really, as there doesn't seem to be any reasonable replacement, but they are within their legal rights to change to the design to be unusable.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    52. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I still consider the prior design to be much more usable than the current design. Getting used to something isn't the same as likeing it, it just means that I still find the payoff to be positive...even if not nearly as positive as it was before. If it goes negative, I'll stop coming, though I'll give it a week or so to see how much I can get used to it.

      FWIW, the reason given for the change, "It's been a long time since we changed things" is absolutely moronic. Or perhaps even stupider than that.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    53. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I briefly tried it, and it seems that they removed the two-pronged comment filter (where you have one threshold for showing the comment at all, and then another one for expanding it)? I don't want to hide 0/-1 comments, but I don't want to have them expanded, either - I just want to know that they're there in response to a higher-rated comment so that I can read them selectively in some threads.

    54. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been fair to middlin' before; never been none to happy. Seems like an excessively broad range, and therefore a useless descriptor of mood.

    55. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I ALWAYS go "below the fold!" With my tongue. That's where the most desirable, uh, "feature" is.

      As you get older you'll find you have to be a bit more careful about just which fold you're going below.

    56. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun fact: SERE training has sometimes used 24 hours of nonstop Britney Spears as harassment for the trainees.

    57. Re:Forget the music. Use the Slashdot Beta! by Yakasha · · Score: 1

      No, son. The OTHER fold. A little further --

      Oh, never mind.

      Fat dudes?

  2. Save money, use Slashdot Beta instead! by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 5, Funny

    The government should start using Slashdot Beta instead of music to torture detainees. Just sit them down in a room with a computer that can't go to any website except Slashdot Beta. They wouldn't last 5 minutes. I know I couldn't.

    --
    The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
  3. Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Should have been $666,666 two numbers of the beast.

    Oh and Fuck Beta.

    1. Re:Surely by HappyPsycho · · Score: 5, Funny

      $666,999?

      Ying-yang number of the beast.

    2. Re:Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What if that number is really supposed to be six to the sixth power to the sixth power?
      Much fatter check...

    3. Re:Surely by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      The beast sucking its own genitals?

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    4. Re:Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      6^6^6 is 10,314,424,798,490,535,546,171,949,056.

      Actually, if we use RIAA math to determine losses, that looks about right.

    5. Re:Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's just Cerberus cleaning himself.

    6. Re:Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Beast sucking Betas genitals.

    7. Re:Surely by chromas · · Score: 1

      Beta doesn't have genitals—it's been neutered. Beta can only suck.

    8. Re:Surely by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Beta doesn't have genitals—it's been neutered. Beta can only suck.

      I think Beta screws over the commenting crowd pretty effectively.

  4. Now thats a performance... by Nightbrood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So are they considering interrogations a "performance" that needs to be licensed? I'm sure the guys in black vans will show up shortly to assist them.

    fuckbeta

    1. Re:Now thats a performance... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So are they considering interrogations a "performance" that needs to be licensed?

      And this would be different from playing it in a bar how?

      Unless there is an explicit exemption in copyright law which says "except during interrogations", the copyright laws as bought by the media lobby still apply.

      If we can be sued by the copyright holders for crap like this, I fail to see why it should be any different for the feds.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are they considering interrogations a "performance" that needs to be licensed? I'm sure the guys in black vans will show up shortly to assist them.

      fuckbeta

      Well if playing the radio in an office is as some in the content mafia claim that is their office setting.

      And Scull Fuck Beta.

    3. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're so bad the government uses their music to torture people I'm not sure there are many bars that would let them play...

    4. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada you are supposed to pay artists for using their music in bars and other venues. If you are listening to it via radio, then the radio station is paying for it. But, if you put on someone's CD, you are required to pay them for using their music.

    5. Re:Now thats a performance... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There was a story on Slashdot Japan yesterday about the Japanese rights agency chasing people for using music at weddings. These guys have no shame or morals, you play you pay.

      Also, my isn't the beta site shit. Don't forget to boycott it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Now thats a performance... by Nightbrood · · Score: 1

      lol. I would completely agree with you but the Feds always think the rules apply to us and not them. I doubt we will see a precedent shift here since the band's request for remuneration obviously has political tones to the damage "calculation." Plus, I don't know if I would *want* people to know the Feds considered my music so horrendous that it would induce severe mental stress.

    7. Re:Now thats a performance... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      So are they considering interrogations a "performance" that needs to be licensed?

      And this would be different from playing it in a bar how?

      Unless there is an explicit exemption in copyright law which says "except during interrogations", the copyright laws as bought by the media lobby still apply.

      If we can be sued by the copyright holders for crap like this, I fail to see why it should be any different for the feds.

      I guess they could claim an exemption under this part of the US copyright code:

      (A) the performance or display is made by, at the direction of, or under the actual supervision of an instructor as an integral part of a class session offered as a regular part of the systematic mediated instructional activities of a governmental body or an accredited nonprofit educational institution;

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    8. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is...

      If you get sued by the copyright holders, you have to fork over a lot of money for the infractions.

      Whereas, if the Feds get sued by the copyright holders, you have to fork over a lot of money for the infractions.

    9. Re:Now thats a performance... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Informative

      Plus, I don't know if I would *want* people to know the Feds considered my music so horrendous that it would induce severe mental stress.

      You know, if you play anything loud enough and long enough, you will induce severe mental distress.

      And, before you get all smug, here's the playlist they used outside of Manuel Noriega's compound to drive him crazy:

      (You've Got) Another Thing Coming - Judas Priest
      Blue Collar Man - Styx
      Danger Zone - Kenny Loggins
      Dead Man's Party - Oingo Boingo
      Don't Look Back - Boston
      Electric Spanking of War Babies - Funkadelic
      Heaven's On Fire - Kiss
      If I Had A Rocket Launcher - Bruce Cockburn
      In My Time of Dying - Led Zeppelin
      Iron Man - Black Sabbath
      Judgment Day - Whitesnake
      Jungle Love - Steve Miller
      No More Mister Nice Guy - Alice Cooper
      Paradise City - Guns & Roses
      Panama - Van Halen
      Paranoid - Black Sabbath
      Refugee - Tom Petty
      Renegade - Styx
      Run Like Hell - Pink Floyd
      The Party's Over - Journey
      This Means War - Joan Jett
      Wanted Dead or Alive - Bon Jovi
      Wanted Man - Ratt
      War Pigs - Black Sabbath
      We're Not Gonna Take It - Twisted Sister
      You Shook Me All Night Long - AC/DC
      Your Time is Gonna Come - Led Zeppelin

      If you like any of those bands, get over yourself.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Now thats a performance... by slapout · · Score: 1

      Except a bar is usually open to the (legal drinking age) public. To me this would seem to be more a private performance (like playing the music at a party you only invited your friends to). As long as the government paid for the music I don't think the band has a case. Of course, the band could be just using this to make a public statement.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    11. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not that they think the music is bad, but that it is culturally different from what the detainees are used to. Same reason they show them nekked pictures etc.

    12. Re:Now thats a performance... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      Run Like Hell - Pink Floyd

      I cry for the missed opportunities. They should have used Echoes or One of These Days I'm Going to Cut You Into Little Pieces.

    13. Re:Now thats a performance... by bws111 · · Score: 2

      Not really that hard to figure out. Here is what the US copyright law gives copyright holders:

      Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following:

      (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;

      (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;

      (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;

      (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly;

      (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and

      (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.

      And here is the definition of 'publicly' from the US copyright law:

      To perform or display a work “publicly” means—

      (1) to perform or display it at a place open to the public or at any place where a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered

      So, the right that is being infringed is 'perfom the work publicly'. A bar clearly falls under the definition of 'publicly', while it would be very difficult to claim that an interrogation room falls under that definition.

    14. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not. That's why bars have to pay the recording industry a fee to be allowed to legally use a Jukebox.

    15. Re:Now thats a performance... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Depends how many people can hear it at a time.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    16. Re:Now thats a performance... by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Having listened to a few Skinny Puppy tracks, it would have to be an extremely soundproofed interrogation facility for it to not qualify as "publicly".

    17. Re:Now thats a performance... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with liking some of those bands? :-(

      And imagine the humor opportunities every time Danger Zone plays. XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    18. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conspicuously absent, Never Gunna Give You Up.

    19. Re: Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should they bill the detainees then ?

    20. Re:Now thats a performance... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's wrong with liking some of those bands? :-(

      Why, there's nothing at all wrong with liking those bands ... and I'm not saying there is.

      I was responding to a post which more or less said "wow, your music must really suck if they use it to induce mental stress".

      I can drive my mom away with punk rock, and malls routinely use classical music to drive away teenagers.

      I'm guessing Skinny Puppy was deemed to be about as far removed from anything the detainees would have ever heard. But just because you use it to stress out someone, doesn't mean it sucks or there's anything wrong with it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    21. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. I would completely agree with you but the Feds always think the rules apply to us and not them.

      Understatement of the year. I sure as fuck am not allowed to kidnap and "interrogate" people for years under some vague notion that I think they're a threat.

      I doubt we will see a precedent shift here since the band's request for remuneration obviously has political tones to the damage "calculation."

      No doubt. Next up it'll turn out that they've been feeding their kidnap victims PCP. Because it seems clear the whole objective in the war on terror is to induce terror on random 3rd world people by violating everything the US claims to hold dear. I mean, how better to show that it's "no holds barred" and magically hope that'll somehow stop further attacks? I mean, it's just like how since we instated the death penalty we've yet to have another murder.

      Plus, I don't know if I would *want* people to know the Feds considered my music so horrendous that it would induce severe mental stress.

      Kidnap and hold anyone long enough and virtually anything becomes part of their torture. It is, after all, a pretty fundamental torture to hold anyone like an animal to be used and abused however one pleases for whatever end one wants, whether they honestly admit to it at the start or simply grill you with "interrogation" for years. This is, btw, the whole reason why the right to a lawyer (as both an aid to legal guidance and as a witness) and a right to remain silent (to in part avoid the compelling of answers that under prolonged mental stress where almost always result in "lying" to law enforcement, which oddly is a crime) are such a cornerstone of western society. Without them, interrogation jumps very quickly to a form of torture. Is it any wonder the whole cadre (who predate Bush by decades and are obviously are a cornerstone of the current administration) want to avoid the legal system?

    22. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gitmo is not in Canada. Canadian laws mean jack squat their.

    23. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US laws also require such a payment and since it is the US gvt doing the "playing" they should do the "paying".

      Just look at all the US lawsuits suing "jane and john doe" for copyright infringement....

    24. Re:Now thats a performance... by s1d3track3D · · Score: 1

      Metallica was originally on the list too but it was discovered that the feds had illegally downloaded their music and well you know the rest,...

    25. Re:Now thats a performance... by fgouget · · Score: 1

      So, the right that is being infringed is 'perfom the work publicly'. A bar clearly falls under the definition of 'publicly', while it would be very difficult to claim that an interrogation room falls under that definition.

      My understanding is that the music is played in the prisoners cells, not in the 'interrogation room'. Also from the few images that leaked from Gitmo these cells did not seem to be soundproofed and it did not look like there was one speaker per cell. Finally it's not just in bars that one has to pay to play music, but at the barber shop too, so that sets a bar of about 5 people for 'public performance'. So all that considered I don't doubt this could be considered a public performance.

      However my understanding is that the main draw of Gitmo is that it's not on US soil so that US laws, on the prohibition of torture for instance, supposedly don't apply. That would also make it hard to apply US laws to collect royalties on public performance. Fortunately for Skinny Puppy the US Supreme court seems to have found otherwise so maybe they stand a chance.

    26. Re:Now thats a performance... by tepples · · Score: 1

      For using music in general, or specifically for using music controlled by a publisher that is a member of this rights agency?

    27. Re:Now thats a performance... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Were all Guantanamo inmates of legal drinking age when detained?

    28. Re:Now thats a performance... by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, Gitmo would qualify as public. I don't think the detainees could be considered to be social acquaintances or family.

    29. Re:Now thats a performance... by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      Ah, the GitRoll...

    30. Re:Now thats a performance... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think the band is being outrageous. After all, consider the promotion that the band has gotten. I'll bet their sales go up after this.

      They should be thanking their customers, the US Government, not trying to sue them.

    31. Re:Now thats a performance... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2

      Several species of small furry animals gathered together in a cave and grooving with a pict.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    32. Re:Now thats a performance... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      That's the state of the law. If the government don't like the law they can change it. Of course, talking about the government following it's own laws while in another sovereign country torturing legally innocent people is a little silly. For those who are like me and would kinda like listening to Skinny Puppy all day, they do sometimes switch it up and play Barney the Dinosaur.

      FUCKBETA!

    33. Re:Now thats a performance... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Ownership of IP is an artificial government construct. There's a procedure where the government can classify a patent as vital to national defense and use it without paying royalties (they can even prohibit you from licensing your patent to anyone else). I'm sure if they're really pressed, they'd be more than happy to do the same with a copyright.

    34. Re:Now thats a performance... by magarity · · Score: 1

      Gitmo is not in Canada. Canadian laws mean jack squat their.

      Isn't the whole point of the Gitmo prison that it isn't in the US either? It's in Cuba - the US just leases it.

    35. Re:Now thats a performance... by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is awesome! All the best music in one place!

      I've made this my Grooveshark playlist! See it here: http://grooveshark.com/#!/play...

      You. Are. Welcome.

    36. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lars tortured them with his incessant whining until they gave in.

    37. Re:Now thats a performance... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      "Manuel, we have the peace agreement here for you to sign!"

      It reads: "We're no strangers to love.." etc.

    38. Re:Now thats a performance... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I think more than 5 minutes of Miley Cyrus and I would give up any information and admit to any crime wanted just to make them stop.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    39. Re:Now thats a performance... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "it would be very difficult to claim that an interrogation room falls under that definition."

      As long as you only interrogate your friends and family, i.e. "a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered".

      This is also why you cannot play music at your workplace without a performance license, even if there are no outside customers.

    40. Re:Now thats a performance... by LanMan04 · · Score: 2

      Panama - Van Halen

      Relevant Drew Carey episode:

      "Celia returns from an out-of-town trip and learns about Drew's fight with Winfred-Louder. She offers her support. The store recruits Mimi to try to drive Drew out of the house. She points blinding lights at the house and constantly blasts "Panama" by Van Halen."

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

      http://www.tv.com/shows/the-dr...

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    41. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For using music in general, or specifically for using music controlled by a publisher that is a member of this rights agency?

      I don't think you've ever heard anything by Skinny Puppy, they are about as far as you can get from mainstream, much like Venetian Snares.

    42. Re:Now thats a performance... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Here in the United States, a performance rights agency (such as ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC) is a private company that represents those songwriters whose publisher is a member of the agency. For example, "Assimilate" is published through Universal Music Publishing, and one of the agencies administers its performance rights. The Billboard article name-drops BMI and ASCAP, the two big U.S. agencies.

    43. Re:Now thats a performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is awesome! All the best music in one place!

      I've made this my Grooveshark playlist! See it here: http://grooveshark.com/#!/play...

      You. Are. Welcome.

      And for the non-sucky, non-flash version:
      http://html5.grooveshark.com/#...

      You. Are. Welcome.

      I fucking hate flash.

  5. BETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    FUCK IT
    fuck beta

    fuckedy fuck beta

    But seriously. Fuck Beta,

  6. Buck Feta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    F
    U
    C
    K

    B
    E
    T
    A

    Captcha: fuckbeta

    1. Re:Buck Feta by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, I love feta you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Buck Feta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And fuck Captcha too.

    3. Re:Buck Feta by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Today's beta wisdom from the bottom of the page:

      Whenever a system becomes completely defined, some damn fool discovers something which either abolishes the system or expands it beyond recognition.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  7. Buck Feta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Slashdot Beta is horrible. They should kill it before readers go away.

  8. Everyone reads the comments, idiots by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Dear slashdot editors, everyone reads the comments, we know you're not letting beta articles through the firehose. Letting non-stories like this through instead don't help your case, it just makes you look like manipulators.

    1. Re:Everyone reads the comments, idiots by Antipater · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even Hugh Pickens' submission today was about Beta. The widespread and general crowd-hate may have been passed off by Dice as just groupthink and circlejerking, like the rage when Facebook changes up profile settings. But now that the site's most prolific/published submitter has threatened to leave, I hope that at least gives them pause.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    2. Re:Everyone reads the comments, idiots by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Ha. They don't see a userbase made of people, they see ad revenue levels.

    3. Re:Everyone reads the comments, idiots by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Not for long, they won't....

    4. Re:Everyone reads the comments, idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. They don't see a userbase made of people, they see ad revenue levels.

      And the users that will leave once Beta becomes The (Only) One, are mostly those who use Ad-Block, No-Script, and other malware-preventing, don't-fuck-me-in-the-ass addons. Of course, once those people are gone, the rest will follow, but not many a corporation has been accused of thinking that far ahead.

      Fuck Beta.

    5. Re:Everyone reads the comments, idiots by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      For the lazy: http://slashdot.org/firehose.p...

      Filter for the highest ranked stories: every one of them is about beta. Not that it matters to Dice: they've written down the value of /. to 0 so we're just fucked. http://www.twst.com/update/388...

    6. Re:Everyone reads the comments, idiots by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets"

      Methinks they're gonna have to increase that line item.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  9. Stop Slashdot Beta by aliquis · · Score: 2

    you insensitive clod!

  10. Buck Feta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody seems to be moderating down these comments a lot. Dice better wise up and not ignore its readers.

  11. money amount by schneidafunk · · Score: 0

    How can they justify $666,000? I thought there were legal limits to what you can charge and based on evidence you could say they owe x amount for the number of infringements.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:money amount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, just maybe, they're trying to *make a point*.

    2. Re:money amount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't know much about the music business do you? Did you know that there was once a lawsuit claiming in damages more money than actually exists on the planet? 666000 Would be a very small sum for a music lawsuit.

    3. Re:money amount by stoploss · · Score: 1

      You don't know much about the music business do you? Did you know that there was once a lawsuit claiming in damages more money than actually exists on the planet? 666000 Would be a very small sum for a music lawsuit.

      Yeah. All I could think was "Only $666,000? Maybe they thought they could only prove a single instance of infringement." I mean, last I heard, *two* infringements is eleventy billion GDPs worth of damage, according to the MAFIAA.

      Oh, and Beta? I hope you get fucked by Satan's goat cock, in hell.

  12. Beta woes by bartyboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a long-time reader but rarely log in these days. I made an exception to voice my displeasure at the beta version of Slashdot. The new layout wastes space and moves the comments to the background.

    I, along with many others, come here for the comments. If the beta is the default design, I will stop coming here. I imagine many others will do the same.

    Your move, Slashdot.

    1. Re:Beta woes by schneidafunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Am I the only one that still gets classic by default?

      --
      Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    2. Re:Beta woes by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      I don't know how, but I'm still getting it by default as well. I imagine that someone, somewhere, is desperately working to change that.

    3. Re:Beta woes by advid.net · · Score: 1

      No me too.

      But today came a big nag box telling me MOVIN’ ON UP., etc

      And when I deliberatly go to beta version, it's completly broken, the page doesn't seem to render, it half-way displayed (html and some pictures, no css).

    4. Re:Beta woes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I get classic by default as well, but the apocalypse is coming...

      Fuck beta.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Beta woes by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Some of us still get classic... for now .

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    6. Re:Beta woes by koreanbabykilla · · Score: 1

      I am still getting classic by default as well.

    7. Re:Beta woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet that Slashdot Classic is unmaintainable with all of the original crew gone. Not that it excuses the unforced errors in the beta design.

    8. Re:Beta woes by ninlilizi · · Score: 2

      I only got the Beta once.

      At which point I prompty removed my eyeballs with an icecream scoop and summoned a couple of priests to banish it away again.
      Not seen it since.

    9. Re:Beta woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The day I don't, I'll be gone.

    10. Re:Beta woes by richlv · · Score: 1

      i still get classic. i opened 'beta' and it was crap.
      then i saw a screenshot of 'beta' comments.

      it's not just "fuck beta", it's FUCKING HOLY CRAP THAT THING SUCKS. and then - FUCK BETA

      --
      Rich
    11. Re:Beta woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But today came a big nag box telling me MOVIN’ ON UP., etc

      Actually, it was supposed to be MOVIN' ON UP YOUR ASS, but the last two words got cut off.

      To make sure you don't randomly end up on Beta, change your bookmarks to http://slashdot.org/?nobeta=1 or http://classic.slashdot.org/. At least while they exist, that is.

      Fuck Beta.

      (Captcha: intended
      Yes it was, you poor Slashdot, yes it was.)

    12. Re:Beta woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't even care about beta, I'm more annoyed by the off-topic complaints about it.

    13. Re:Beta woes by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I don't know how or why, but I'm getting classic by default too. As long as it stays that way I'll be happy.

    14. Re:Beta woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 to the parent.

      I am appalled at the vociferous condemnation of this slashdot beta. Put in other words - please stop betaing with us /. Please reinstate the classic /.

    15. Re:Beta woes by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      It won't. They're boiling the ACs first, then they plan in gradually increasing the number of users redirected to beta before finally cutting off their nose to spite their face.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    16. Re:Beta woes by grrrl · · Score: 1

      Ditto.

  13. BETA made me do it! by Rastafario · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I am a long slashdot member, I don't usually post comments as I prefer reading them, but one look at the new BETA site caused me to break my habit.

    The new BETA sucks shit!
    - I've been a frequent visitor to Reddit, I don't go there anymore after their version 4 redesign which was as bad as the new Slashdot BETA!
    - I've been forced to read Slashdot through this abomination of a mobile version of the site on my tablet. Thankfully I've been able to revert to Slashdot classic.
    - If I am forced to read slashdot through this unholy thing that is the BETA, I will do Reddit and stop reading Slashdot altogether.

    So, seriously FUCK BETA

    I am fully prepared to join the boycott that is planned for February 10-17, please KILL BETA.

  14. Slashdot Users Want Compensation For Using Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This beta is worse than gitmo

  15. illegally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Illegally? Prove it. Immorally? That I can see.

  16. I am Slashdot by OzPeter · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I submit stories. I read stories. I add comments. I moderate comments. I am the reason that there is ad revenue.

    I am Slashdot.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:I am Slashdot by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      I see you're enjoying the opportunity to tell us that you're butt-ugly and handicapped.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    2. Re:I am Slashdot by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      I see you're enjoying the opportunity to tell us that you're butt-ugly and handicapped.

      But apparently not everyone wants to see that the emperor has no clothes .. I'm down to "0: off topic" right now!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  17. Practical Advice[Fuck Beta] by mrpacmanjel · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    For the time being you can do this: www.slashdot.org?nobeta=1

    Make you voice heard here:
    http://beta.slashdot.org/fireh...

    To quote Steve Jobs (rip) - "..and one more thing.."

    FUCK BETA

  18. Write to their shareholders by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    The Dice site has a link where you can do that. ...god, on my mobile device, the compose box is only eight letters wide.

  19. Cut off NSA and CIA net access by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Any organization involved in this blatant piracy should have, at the least, a one year ban on internet access. The only issue is who can enforce the punishment.

  20. Why must this be{ta}? by LaminatorX · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been here since 2001. It used to be a great site, and even in its latter days it remains a good one.

    The changes in this new interface are destructive to the culture of this community, particularly the removal of sigs and uid#s. It is the commenting community that makes this site special. Ignoring that is a gigantic mistake.

    The changes in this new interface are technically ill-concieved, requiting javascript, loading a bzillion comments but not displaying them, not supporting link markup.

    The changes in the new interface are sketchy from a design standpoint. They are what, optimizing for tablets? Isn't there already a (also crappy, but at least optional) mobile site for that?

    Please slashdot, don't do this.

    I will be joining in the Slashcott from Feb 10-Feb 17. It will be the longest I've been off the site since I was hospitalized after an accident in 2007. Hopefully I'll be back, but maybe not. We'll see.

    1. Re:Why must this be{ta}? by N1AK · · Score: 1

      particularly the removal of sigs and uid#s

      What does a UID tell you aside from how long ago that account was created? There's plenty of stupid posts on here by people with low IDs and plenty of insightful posts by people with new IDs, if publishing ID numbers does anything at all then it is that is makes age of account into a measure of the validity of your opinion which is something we'd be better off without in my opinion.

      I wasn't overly impressed by Beta but given the amount of immature bitching, not referring to your post here which makes valid points maturely, I wish they'd just get on with the change and either /. will die or, hopefully, the whiners will fuck off.

    2. Re:Why must this be{ta}? by LaminatorX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Speaking for myself, the uid tells me about the shared context that users have. I'll have some idea what events we were both around for, what in-jokes we'll both get, and so on. It's a cultural signifier in the same way that graduating classes and the like can be.

      For those who are way low, it tells me that they're they're the sort of people who were here before discussion boards were mainstream. That doesn't make old-timers inherently wise or whatever, but I'll pay a little more attention to what they have to say on that basis.

    3. Re:Why must this be{ta}? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      particularly the removal of sigs and uid#s

      What does a UID tell you aside from how long ago that account was created?

      How else will the SlashElders measure their e-penis?

    4. Re:Why must this be{ta}? by LaminatorX · · Score: 1

      Slashroulette?

    5. Re:Why must this be{ta}? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mobile site has been forced to beta for a while now. Ever since then, the site has been completely unreadable from mobile. I'm sure its just as unreadable from tablets.

    6. Re:Why must this be{ta}? by mckwant · · Score: 1

      My UID is too high to qualify, but speaking for my lowish-UID brethren, we take checks. Good bourbon and/or scotch will do nicely as well.

      And should beta come to fruition, I will likely leave, ending a 15-ish year relationship with this site and its community. Really, just leave it as an option for anybody already signed up. (top gear) How hard can it be? (/top gear)

      --
      ceci n'est pas un sig.
    7. Re:Why must this be{ta}? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Also, lower-uids can distinguish because a long-time poster and a troll account with similar name created to mock him.

    8. Re:Why must this be{ta}? by jdriselvato · · Score: 1

      I don't know when i started at using /. but I've always come back to this site for information because of the layout and the comments it's readers post. It's one of the few sites that actually allow for an awesome amount of discussion without being a tradition forum. I know people joke about this but I'm one of the many that read the comments before I read the article a story is paraphrasing from, for a better understanding of the content. Thanks for informing us of Slashcot Feb 10 - Feb 17, that's going to be one hell of a week.

    9. Re:Why must this be{ta}? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      For those who are way low, it tells me that they're they're the sort of people who were here before discussion boards were mainstream.

      Depressingly for you, discussion boards were commonplace for decades before Slashdot came along -though I'll only admit it having used them for around 5 years before Slashdot was produced, because I didn't have a telephone before then.

      That doesn't make old-timers inherently wise or whatever, but I'll pay a little more attention to what they have to say on that basis.

      I'm sure Jeremiah Cornelius will be along some time to correct your impression.

      What is this Slashdot Beta, and when is Slashdot going to start running adverts again? I can hardly remember when I last saw an advert on Slashdot.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  21. Ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I alone in seeing the irony that the US government is the worlds biggest advocate for tougher "copy-write" and "IP laws" with larger fines yet gets sued for infractions?

    1. Re:Ironic? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Am I alone in seeing the irony that the US government is the worlds biggest advocate for tougher "copy-write" and "IP laws" with larger fines yet gets sued for infractions?

      Rules are for the little people.

  22. If you're going to use Canadian music for torture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would think that Celine Dion or Justin Bieber would be much more effective at breaking the will of even the most stanchly determined Jihadists.

  23. Torture by SenorPez · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure using Slashdot Beta violates some part of the Geneva Conventions.

    1. Re:Torture by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Beta is not as bad as chlorine, but worse than mustard gas. Or IOW, not as bad as getting both eyes gouged out but on level with maybe one eye, a nose, and both legs.

  24. blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These days websites are getting worse and worse just to please the eye with all the eye candy and this is true with the slashdot beta which feels cumbersome, confusing. Original slashdot is simple, straightforward, and just plain easy to navigate.

    So if somebody entertains their guests(friends, family) at home with music or movies, should they also pay royalties to these record companies,bands, or movie producers? Or should the detainees have the right to sue this band for listening to their tortures music?

  25. Beta schmeta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any suggestions for where to migrate/fork this site when the inevitable happens? Only reason why I read Slashdot is the comments (and by definition, the community behind them)

  26. Beta read, then dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Nuff said.

  27. Beta problem by aepervius · · Score: 0

    In the old version the title of post were in green background, easy to read. New version it is in white background => they should change that because it makes it hard. There are a few kink here and there (can't click on the comment moderationand see the history easily so far as i can see), but I find the new version not "too bad". Just a question of getting user to it.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Beta problem by vux984 · · Score: 2

      No its shit. The first 3 stores are in that idiotic banner. With no summary... so if you want to read the first 3 summaries you have to click on each story.

      Then there is the decision to jam usually irrelevant stock photography in with each story. So every story about a network has a picture of a network cable or switch or something... and it takes up 30% of the summary space, making the section longer, driving the comments further down... which is the only reason anyone comes here... the comments. Nobody is lamenting the lack of shitty editorial stock photos.

      And that's just the very tip of the iceberg.

    2. Re:Beta problem by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      As I haven't been experiencing the pain of beta, I thought I'd manually go over there and see what the problem was.

      Here's what I got:

      Oops! You do not appear to have javascript enabled.
      Please switch to Slashdot Classic.

  28. excessively long music by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

    “I wouldn’t want to be subjected to any overly loud music for six to 12 hours at a time without a break”

    I hope noone plays his music at any raves

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
  29. Uh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Make some noisy music.
    2. Use for torture
    3. Profit!!!

    Not sure Skinny Puppy thought that one through...

  30. At first they used Neil Diamond... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    ...But the SCOTUS nixed that on Eighth Amendment grounds.

  31. Not a public performance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can play whatever you please in a private setting.

    1. Re:Not a public performance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The definition of 'public performance' in copyright law is where people other than a group of social acquaintances or family of the person performing (or playing a performance of) the work.

      Since the staff and prisoners in Gitmo are most certainly *not* all family or social acquaintances of the US government, it is, by definition, a public performance. Therefore playing it without compensating the owners of the work's copyright is an infringement of copyright.

  32. Unhappy with the new site design? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Unhappy with the new site design? Kick them where it hurts. Block advertising.

    Up until now I always allowed slashdot to show me ads. I've been reading the site pretty much daily for over a decade (this is my second UID).

    I just disabled advertisements. Why let them profit off of me?

    If this becomes permanent, I just will have to find something else to read. I've grown up and looking more towards investment forums now, anyway. (giving a shout out to bogleheads - http://www.bogleheads.org/foru... )

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  33. Profiting from a criminal act / bad move by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Seems like a liability black hole. If not a morality black hole.

  34. Strangest thing... by CokoBWare · · Score: 1

    I was just remarking to a friend today how Agent Side Grinder's new album "Hardware" sounded like as if Skinny Puppy, Kraftwerk, and Depeche Mode were to have an ugly baby.

  35. Beta Is Good by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's causing me to do more work and less trolling.

  36. I've been here awhile by Rival · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been here awhile, and have watched Slashdot go through a lot. Every time there's been a major change, a significant section of the user base has left and eventually been replaced. (The significance has not always been in terms of sheer numbers, but more often in longevity, character, personality and other less tangible demographics.)

    I'm sure it will "survive" beta in the same way, which makes me sad. More pillars of the Slashdot community will leave, to be replaced with shills, trolls and youths who simply don't have the history to carry on anymore.

    There are (at least) two things Dice fails to understand:

    1.) 1,000,000 users != 1,000,000 users. Every UID is different, and when someone leaves, you can't simply "undo" that by getting another person to sign up.

    2.) We don't want change. We're happy not being reddit, or 4chan, or (ugh) web 2.0, or whatever social media site or crap technology is the current buzzword this week. We're Slashdot. We come here because it's an old and familiar community. If you change too much, it's no longer familiar and we leave. Or if too many people leave, it's no longer a community and people stop coming back.

    Please, I seriously recommend you keep the old UI codebase around for those of us who use classic mode. It's not going to kill your servers and we've been here long enough to deserve this little concession. Remember, each of us are a vital part of the conversations that happen here, and it is the comments that make Slashdot. Don't force us old-timers away with unnecessary change. Thank you.

    1. Re:I've been here awhile by koreanbabykilla · · Score: 1

      One would think they would have informed us of their intent to keep classic around for us if that was the case. I can only infer by the silence that there are no plans to keep classic as a permanent option. The day beta is forced on me is the day I post my password and let whoever wants my accounts have em.

    2. Re:I've been here awhile by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Concur 100% ! Well said Rival !

      It is NOT about us "grumpy old men" saying "get off my LAN" because we hate change. We hate change for the sake OF change. The first rule: "Don't Fuck With It!" Translation for the layman: Don't fix what isn't broken! The wheel has been around _thousands_ of years because it _works_. Sure there are minor improvements here and there but the basic design & implementation doesn't leave people guessing.

      I've been on /. since ~1999. IMHO, the only FEW things that /. needs to change in order to go from good to great are: (Sorted by priority)

      * Editors to do their actual freaking JOB of fixing typos, spelling, grammar, dupes, bad/inaccurate headlines
      * Add UTF-8 support. Only of these I'll be able to post diacritics and über -- that is "Uber" with two umlauts. WTF is this 1997?
      * Allow us to edit our posts -- BUT show the original post so we can do a _visual_ DIFF of what has changed ! /. innovated moderation .. PLEASE innovate again.
      * If they actually fixed their broken 'ecode' tag -- I'm a programmer yet still can't post properly aligned code!?
      * Fix their lame-ass lameness filter -- against I've been here years, I want to post CODE but I can't. WTF.
      * Allow us to private message (PM) other members like every other forum does.
      * Lastly, stop with the shitty Betteridge's Law of Headlines -- that is, stop trolling us just to get more "ad revenue"

      That's IT ! (Please feel free to chime in what you would like to see in /.) Obviously the ad hominem arguments will go away but for the most part this is (or was) a mostly civilized and intelligent part of the internet before it got popular. If I want those stupid lolcat memes/articles I know where to go for emo-news.

      All this extra whitespace crap and bad UI with /. beta? Do. Not. Want.

      I've written about the "life cycle" of online social sites in the heck just 2 months ago in Dec 2013 ...
      http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

      Sorry for bad netiquette of quoting myself ...

      I've been online for 20+ years. The cycle of online human communication is *always* the same.

      * Forum (BBS / newsgroup / website) provides a common ground for people to share info. / tips / opinions
      * Site is small as only the "geeks" use it
      * Site gains Momentum and goes mainstream
      * The crazies come out of the woodwork -- Name Calling / Ad Hominem / Trolls attack -- people keep forgetting authority needs accountability
      * Moderators are either
          a) 45% of the time non-existent
          b) 45% of the time grammar/spelling/free-thought nazis where posters need to tow the party line,
          c) 4% of the time does it rarely exist there are balanced moderators who allow a difference of opinion as long as it it kept civil and intelligent
          d) 1% site allows members to self-moderate
      * All the old members complain about "the good ole days" when the noobs / newbs / hipsters, etc. didn't drive the S/N from Signal into Noise
      * New site starts that promises to be "Bigger, Better, Cheaper", etc.
      * Old site membership is split as some members leave to check out "Awesome new site" (temporarily, others for good),
      * Old site lingers but never really recovers from the mass influx of growth and decay.
      * Rinse and Repeat ad nauseum.

      What /. did innovate at the time was to allow the crapfest of usenet to be FILTERED. Reddit has mob rule when you get carpet modded into oblivion because people don't want their thinking challenged.

      Thoughts?

      --
      Only Cowards Censor

    3. Re:I've been here awhile by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Olbg. s/ arguments will go away / arguments won't go away / g

    4. Re:I've been here awhile by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that "private messages" is a good idea. The others are excellent.

      OTOH, judging by what I've heard of the beta I won't be here to see if they ever get implemented. It's truely unfortunate, as I don't know of a decent replacement for Slashdot, but they seem determined to kill it.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:I've been here awhile by schneidafunk · · Score: 1

      My thoughts is this is a spot on analysis. Concur 100%. Would vote you overlord.

      --
      Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    6. Re:I've been here awhile by grrrl · · Score: 1

      It is NOT about us "grumpy old men" saying "get off my LAN" because we hate change.

      Some of us are grumpy old women, you insensitive clod.

    7. Re:I've been here awhile by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Exactly, Slashdot is all about the discussions. Ars has the articles, but the discussion system is worse. Slashdot has an excellent discussion system (ignoring things like the whitelisted unicode and such.) I don't come here for the news, I come to see what people with experience in the fields relevant to the news think. That can be people like NYCL or Bruce Perens or Daniel Dvorkin or Spun or whoever. I've been here for quite a while, since back when I was working on the (pre-beta) Dark Magic Unreal Tournament mod in ~ 2002. I've moved on since then, and don't use this username anywhere else, so leaving leaving will be the end of a rather long era for me.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    8. Re:I've been here awhile by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Touché, or well, would be if /. allowed diacritics, namely the acute e. :)

  37. Awesome by MouseR · · Score: 2

    Been following that band since the mid-80s and actually will see them on their tour date on feb 16th in Montreal.

    Its not surprising that they would sure, if only to clear their name. Despite the harshness of the genre, Gitmo is precisely what they advocate against.

  38. Beta? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

    First of all, fuck the beta site. Who the fuck thought a site for nerds would benefit from a cosmetic redesign? If it ain't broke, don't fix it, assholes!

    However, the classic site now seems broken for me. I log in, and it brings me to my profile page. That's fine, but I didn't really want to edit my profile. So then I click over to the main page and, voila! I'm no longer logged in! It seems that if I want to complain about the beta site while logged in, I'll have to do it while actually using the beta site.

    Fuck my life.

    --
    Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    1. Re:Beta? by geekoid · · Score: 0

      "If it ain't broke, don't fix it, assholes! "
      The scream of Luddites everywhere.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Beta? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      "If it ain't broke, don't fix it, assholes! "
      The scream of Luddites everywhere.

      Luddites actually did break things, and then argued against fixing these broken things.

      I'm not suggesting that slashdot break its user interface. In fact, I'm arguing the opposite. I believe that in trying to fix that which isn't broken, by creating the beta site, they've actually broken slashdot. I'm not saying they should stick with the broken site, or that it shouldn't be repaired. I'm all for them fixing slashdot by returning to the fully functional classic site and shelving any ideas for redesigns until they can come up with one that is an actual improvement.

      Are you suggesting that the beta site is an actual improvement, analogous to the power looms of the early 19th century? What features does the beta site implement that were lacking in the classic site? What shortfalls of the classic site does the beta site fix? In what quantifiable way is the beta site better than the classic site?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  39. Taking vs. Police Power by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    If the use was a "taking," then the noisers will get paid. If the use was for "police power" then the noisers are going to get stiffed.

    Seems to me that it's a taking. When the military gets its boards for waterboarding, it pays for them. Seems it also should pay for the noise it uses for noise torture.

    1. Re:Taking vs. Police Power by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      . . .and they won't get paid that much. They'll get paid the fair market value of their work, plus their attorney fees.

  40. IRC - #slashdot-refugees (on FreeNode) by Pav · · Score: 1

    For those who know how to use an IRC client go to #slashdot-refugees on FreeNode. If you don't, use this handy web client and join anyway. :) Commiserate and/or make plans in case this situation goes horribly wrong. :-/

  41. Re:If you're going to use Canadian music for tortu by der_joachim · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Phil Collins!

    --
    Geek runner, motorcyclist and professional know-it-all
  42. Gitmo is illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The detention center at Gitmo is illegal and should be closed. The only legal way to end this travesty is to appeal to the highest law of the land.

    No, not the constitution. Copyright.

    Why have we been wasting so much time? And why did it take a Canadian band to point it out?

  43. Maybe Guantanamo Bay isn't that bad after all... by 0x537461746943 · · Score: 1

    You get to listen to Skinny Puppy. Sweet! Sign me up... oh wait... they put a water hose up where? while you listen?

  44. Slashdot users create compelling content / adverti by j-stroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The content created by us plebes is what actually sells your ads. I come to the site to read informed discussion. That is not created by: your editors, submitters, advertisers or user interface..

    NO WAIT!! IT IS CREATED BY THE USER INTERFACE!! THE SLASHDOT INTERFACE AND META-MODERATION SYSTEM IS WHY I COME HERE.

    Now fuck off with your godawful site redesign. I am definitely boycotting Feb 10 to 17 and likely longer. I have enjoyed being a multi view user, practically every day since I signed up.

    Why the hell would I buy a computer screen to look at the blank colour white? Let alone giant images of the incorrect aspect and the rest of the lame features.

  45. Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashcode? by seandiggity · · Score: 1
    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  46. Fuck Beta. by Jahoda · · Score: 1

    Fuck Beta.

  47. All I can say is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Dice can eat a giant dick!

  48. Gitmo is not a bar by langelgjm · · Score: 2

    It's different because Gitmo is not a bar.

    Unless there is an explicit exemption in copyright law

    Nope. Easiest way out of this is to claim that torturing detainees is not a public performance, so the use does not need to be licensed. And frankly, that argument is probably correct. Especially if they are blasting it with headphones, which is one of the things I've read. Maybe if they're piping it to a bunch of headphones simultaneously Skinny Puppy could have an argument...

    But how do you think this lawsuit will go down? The government will simply say it can't describe interrogation techniques in detail because NATIONAL SECURITY. Also, suing the Feds for copyright infringement is harder than suing anyone else, and even if you win you can only collect minimum statutory damages.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:Gitmo is not a bar by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Also, suing the Feds for copyright infringement is harder than suing anyone else, and even if you win you can only collect minimum statutory damages.

      And, thanks to the copyright lobby, the minimum statutory damages are rather sizable.

      You know, the "we want eleventy trillion dollars".

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  49. odd mods by schneidafunk · · Score: 0

    Huh, I get modded down for asking this legit question and then modded up for an off-topic comment on the beta version of slashdot further down.. Mods, can you try and be objective before slashdot completely falls apart?

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  50. Drop the money, where are the ethics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are we asking for money when it is more important to ask, are these interrogations legal in the first place?

  51. Re:If you're going to use Canadian music for tortu by khr · · Score: 1

    I would think that Celine Dion or Justin Bieber would be much more effective at breaking the will of even the most stanchly determined Jihadists.

    Ug, those are pretty bad. Skinny Puppy is great stuff, I don't see how it could be used for torture. It couldn't be that effective...

  52. Yeah... It sucks ass. by denzacar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fuck beta.

    It's everything you don't want in a discussion OR news delivery system and more.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  53. Christ on a pogo stick by nobuddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    That reads like my play list.

  54. That's our money. by twotacocombo · · Score: 2

    Every time someone sues 'the government', who pays the bill? We do. That's not the governments money, that's America's money. If you want to make a statement against the government, don't do it by putting all of us into even greater debt. Also, fuck beta in it's fucking beta face.

    1. Re:That's our money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are Canadian. So it is not their money. They will actually benefit from this. If USA didn't want another debt, they should have used the music legaly.

      And no, it is not "america's money" because America is a continent, not a country.

    2. Re:That's our money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skinny Puppy is Canadian.

    3. Re:That's our money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time someone sues 'the government', who pays the bill? We do. That's not the governments money, that's America's money. If you want to make a statement against the government, don't do it by putting all of us into even greater debt.

      The ONLY way to punish governmental misconduct is with financial penalties. If a 1,000 cops harass your group and is even just one made to apologize (a rarity - see the cop who arrested a firefighter yesterday, while the firefighter was responding to an accident), there's no disincentive to do it again. If the cop kills someone, and serves paid leave during an investigation, there's still no extrinsic disincentive for him or the department to change procedures. But if you hit that department for a million dollars, someone will notice. When taxes go up to pay for millions in police misconduct settlements, people pay attention and vote for people who at least CLAIM they'll reign those blue shirt criminals in.

      A million to the feds is nothing, nor to most states. But if you can hit a specific department and make that mid level guy go to his boss with a million dollar "oops" that guy gets canned. You can get a small town incumbent mayor booted out over that sort of thing. That's the point.

      Incidentally, this is also why a class action suit that gets the lawyers millions and the victims coupons is still a net good. It punishes the corporate wrong doer, because while the coupons may mean nothing, the lawyers only take cash. Justice that brings restitution to the wronged is great, but justice that punishes the wrong doer still serves as a disincentive to criminal behavior.

    4. Re:That's our money. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Being "the government" doesn't give them a free pass to do what they want (no matter what the NSA tries to tell you.) They have incurred debts and must pay them. If you don't like the way they're using "your" money, elect someone who won't incur this kind of debt.

    5. Re:That's our money. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Who? How?

      The party that most frequently promises that it will cut taxes, only cuts taxes on those earning 3 standard deviation above the median. (I *think* I'm exaggerating...but I'm not sure.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:That's our money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the government. Feel free to vote out your representatives if you don't want to keep paying the bills they're racking up on your behalf.

    7. Re:That's our money. by JThundley · · Score: 1

      America's money is not Canada's money. America doesn't pay for the Canadian government's legal defense.

      Fuck Beta.

    8. Re:That's our money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The band is Canadian. Your government, therefore your country (in your own argument) is stealing from Skinny Puppy by using their music for commercial purposes/public performance without paying them royalties. The band is damn well within their rights to demand compensation for the illegal use of their music from your country's government (and by proxy, from you).

      If you are not happy about your government violating international IP treaties they have signed (and in most cases authored) and the consequences of their violation, you should do something about it. Don't blame the victim when it is your country, not Canada and not Skinny Puppy at fault here.

      Governments are like children, they act irresponsibly when you don't supervise them, and you're financially liable for their fuckups as their parents/citizens.

    9. Re:That's our money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For starters, Skinny Puppy is Canadian, so why would they give a fuck about American taxpayers having to pay for their own legal defence? Secondly, American taxpayers have the government they voted for and deserve. Why shouldn't they have to pay their own mistakes??

    10. Re:That's our money. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      When did I mention any political party? When did I mention taxes. Taxes are the most common way for a government to raise money, but it's not the only one. No matter what a country's tax system, they still must pay their legal debts.

  55. I get Classic too by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I am logged in, and Classic is in my preferences.

    If I log out, and log in again, I get forced to go to beta, unless I visit the beta disable link first.

    After that, I get Classic all the time, unless I login, or have the cookies wiped.

    Looking at the cookies, there is one called betagroup and it is set to -1. Perhaps that is what forces classic.

    But, Dice seems to be set on ruining the site we know and love for 15 years, so we all have to voice our displeasure at beta.

    1. Re:I get Classic too by kbahey · · Score: 1

      When I wiped all cookies in the browser, and then logged in, I get betagroup 90. But I am still on Classic. So perhaps they just postponed me forced to beta by some days or weeks.

  56. Re:IRC - #slashdot-refugees (on FreeNode) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a sub 25 yo, shouldn't everyone know how to use an IRC client? They managed to type in slashdot instead of /., unless they inherited the computer from an older sibling.

  57. Re:IRC - #slashdot-refugees (on FreeNode) by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    Didn't they make the source code open source a while back? It'd be a shame to lose our old user IDs and post history, but someone could easily write a replacement including a script that allowed people to pull stuff from their old account using OpenID.

  58. Industrial - not "Electronic"; Beta Sucks by CrashNBrn · · Score: 2

    Skinny Puppy is known for their Industrial Alternative, not "Electronic" --- they aren't a hipster Dance band.

    Slashdot Beta is Trash. So was Skinny Puppy pretty much since 1992 (after Too Dark Park). But they have realized the Error of Their Ways and have returned to 1984. So now the 100,000 dollar question: Can Slashdot's caretakers realize the Error of Their Ways before it is too late?

    Anyone recall Arstechnica's major design change about 4 years ago? Nope me neither. Know why? When they did it, they left the OLD design available to use. Two settings exist to this day for Colour: Dark on Light, or Light on Dark; as well as a setting for layout. I wonder if maybe, just maybe its not such a boneheaded thing to do --- to give users a choice and stop being such a bunch of pricks.

    1. Re:Industrial - not "Electronic"; Beta Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      |Skinny Puppy is known for their Industrial Alternative, not "Electronic" --- they aren't a hipster Dance band.|

      Thank You, I have been listening to Skinny Puppy since I was a teenager and find it all these comments interesting but your comments pretty much got it right about the dates and comparison to this site. This sort of action against the DoD is protest in a very clever sense, ordinary to Nivek and Cevin. 'Weapon', they're newest album, is quite good, harkening back to Back and Forth, mid eighties style.

      Also, yes completely FUCKBETA for scathingly obvious reasons.

    2. Re:Industrial - not "Electronic"; Beta Sucks by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Most of the Reddit discussion was about how to properly categorize them. I usually go with "Electro-Industrial". What does Industrial Alternative mean? Is there a mainstream industrial scene?

    3. Re:Industrial - not "Electronic"; Beta Sucks by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Their videos tended to be on Much Music on Friday nights - late 80's/early 90's. Anything non-mainstream was fair game - it might of even been called "Alternative"-something-or-other. Music from Ministry, Skinny Puppy - were all classified at that point as "Industrial".

      IIRC most indie/used CD stores in Nova Scotia - that carried that "kind" of music would also likewise have an "Industrial" section.

      The odd time you might find Skinny Puppy in the "Metalz" section - if that was the case - the store in general probably did a poor job categorizing any of their music by genre at all.

      I'm sure one could argue over Synth-this-Electro-that, or even put NiN in the same general group...but I wouldn't. Industrial (alternative, being unnecessary) to me (and maybe others) was akin to Metal+ModulatedVoice(sometimes)+CreativeSamples+...

      I think one would be hard-pressed to be more specific with a genre for Skinny Puppy, beyond "Industrial" that would accurately fit all the songs on a given album without just shoehorning.

    4. Re:Industrial - not "Electronic"; Beta Sucks by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      The odd time you might find Skinny Puppy in the "Metalz" section - if that was the case - the store in general probably did a poor job categorizing any of their music by genre at all.
      [...]
      I think one would be hard-pressed to be more specific with a genre for Skinny Puppy, beyond "Industrial" that would accurately fit all the songs on a given album without just shoehorning.

      Some people seem to be intent on categorizing things to the point where each genre only has 3 songs in it.

      I used to frequent 2 record stores; around the same time one of them split the metal section into Death Metal. Black Metal and Darkwave/Industrial, while the other one created a new Metal/Punk Category. I stopped going to the second one.

  59. Beta blowss, user base goes..... by rts008 · · Score: 2

    No, but I did get the warning that classic ends in 4 months yesterday when I logged in.

    I had been seeing all of the comments about the beta site, and finally got curious enough to open the beta site link in a separate tab.

    OMG!!!WTF!!!!!

    I stayed long enough to 'take the tour' with the little numbered boxes that show up, checked out how the comments work, then I went to the feedback survey (extreme upper right corner in my browser) to make my displeasure known.

    IMHO, the beta site is HORRID, and I for one, will not be back after the changeover unless 'classic'(as it is now) is a working option.

    I started hanging out on /. as an AC back when they first started handing out 5 digit UID's, and have learned a metric buttload of cool, useful, and interesting stuff here.
    I have met a whole lot of interesting people from around the world, from many professions and walks of life here on /., and really hate to lose that.

    Slashdot was and still is a unique place that I have come to enjoy, and have found no other place similar enough to go to.

    Guess I'll have more time for other interests and hobbies, but this will be quite a hole to fill....

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  60. Re:If you're going to use Canadian music for tortu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the two "Canadians" who live in the US and sell the bulk of their stuff there?

  61. Seems a little on the low side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that this music was used as part of Crimes Against Humanity, I would think that a larger fee would be due.
    If it had been my music that had been employed, as part of this brutal regime of torture, I'd be somewhat upset. I'd like to see this feed given in compensation to the victims of these terrible crimes, and to help finance some action by the International Criminal Court, to bring the responsible members of the political leadership or the American Junta, to justice.

  62. Fuck you very much, Dice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Force the beta on us and we'll trash the comments with such gibberish the site will lose its content.

    Some will even relish in fucking shit up because you're too bone-headed to leave things well alone.

  63. Sovereign Immunity is why. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    If we can be sued by the copyright holders for crap like this, I fail to see why it should be any different for the feds.

    I guess I wasn't the only one who slept through elementary school civics classes, eh? Turns out you can't sue the government unless it decides to let you.

    "The government is not liable to suit unless it consents thereto, and its liability in suit cannot be extended beyond the plain language of the statute authorizing it." --US Supreme Court, Price vs. United States, 1899

  64. Yes but that is $666,000 in Canadian Dollars by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    More like $500,000 USD.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Yes but that is $666,000 in Canadian Dollars by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      $601898.17 (source)

      You've fucked your economy too hard for your dollar to be worth that much any more. In much the same way as beta will fuck /. too hard for it to be worth coming back to.

  65. Crazy Rulers Of The World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same torture-music and compensation angle was discussed ten years ago by the creator of the "I Love You" song from Barney on Crazy Rulers Of The World:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUf8KBjKBpM

  66. Re:Beta is Slashdot Metro, er. Modern, nee Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    title says it all

  67. I only fsck that which I love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh and Fuck Beta.

    Why would I get intimate with that which I despise?

  68. Why isn't the gov being sued for DCMA violations? by tatman · · Score: 1

    Its a rhetorical question....although I wish it wasn't

    --
    I've always said English was my second language. Had Romeo and Juliet been written in C, I might have understood it.
  69. Is playing music for guests by geekoid · · Score: 2

    a copyright infringement?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  70. Re:Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashco by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Reported for spamming.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  71. Re:Slashdot users create compelling content / adve by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    The content created by us plebes is what actually sells your ads. I come to the site to read informed discussion. That is not created by: your editors, submitters, advertisers or user interface..

    This story is a perfect example. I read it a few days ago on Reddit (and no I didn't submit it to /.) Days later I see it here, but I still click on it to see what the /. crowd have to say about it. The Reddit crowd talked about it, but the moron/intelligent response ratio is far too high, the way /. arranges the comments allows me to filter out the useless comments, and only look at the highly moderated comments without fucking around too much. Also the quality of the users drawn here tends to be better informed and less partisan (two things that people always complain about here, but it's so much worse elsewhere.) If the beta gets pushed through, it'll basically be what I can get on Reddit 2 days earlier.

  72. Freenode #slashdot-refugees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freenode #slashdot-refugees

  73. Re:IRC - #slashdot-refugees (on FreeNode) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it's called Slash but nobody uses Perl anymore because it's not web scale.

  74. Re:No. by Your.Master · · Score: 1

    no one is being forced to use the beta site, and likely won't be required for months to come.

    People want to get a jump on ensuring they will not be forced to use it ever, because it explicitly says we will be forced to use it in "several months" and more people are being placed in the painful default.

    I actually think it looks kind of nice, but there's too few comments before "load more" and the comment threshold is insufficiently flexible. In my opinion, on a threaded conversation forum, it's just a terrible idea to completely hide posts. It keeps leading to misunderstandings where there's a string of asshole -1 posts between snide +5 posts, and then casual readers think the snide +5 posts are being assholes to each other, which generates real flame wars -- I think this is an actual problem in Classic Slashdot actually. But Classic Slashdot lets me put all the low-modded comments in a summary view, and everything else auto-expanded.

    Also the serif fonts on the reply/share/etc. commands are jarring and ugly.

    And the scaling is poor on thinner windows. If I use a maximized window, it's fine. I don't require text to go the full width of the screen; I know that optimal reading conditions actually favour a narrower column-width. But I don't run all my windows maximized all the time.

    What I personally want is to never have to click "Load More" (even classic Slashdot fails here, but to be fair I only have to click one time, maybe two on a hyper-popular post, with my settings to see it all), to be able to have most posts be in an auto-summary view with good posts pre-expanded, and either no sidebar or at least one that stops taking layout space when it's empty so that I can control column-width. I'd get over the seriffed fonts easily, and I'd get over the column-width grudgingly. I will not get over "Load More" or the summary views, since if I see an incomplete list of posts, then Slashdot will have lost the attributes that make it a better discussion board for me than the random forums that infest the web. And if I see a complete list of posts, but they are all auto-expanded, then Slashdot would only be readable once its userbase decreases substantially.

  75. [fuckbeta] Re:Now thats a performance... by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

    Amazing playlist. All my favorites in one place!

    Please listen at: http://grooveshark.com/#!/play...

    Best. Playlist. Ever.

  76. Why admit your music is torture? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    They are admitting listening to their music is torture!

    I do take issue with the US Government though, if they wanted to use music to torture they should've used Justin Bieber, and he's Canadian too.

    Would've been far more effective.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  77. you're a towel by j-stroy · · Score: 0

    No really. This present system works, as evidenced in this thread.

    Yes, this is the community using the community forum to discuss a meta issue "Things that matter". If you're looking for someone to blame, blame the thrust of this site dismembering. There won't be anything left for you in the future. By your complaint you're actually with us brother. Be grateful your community is still here to listen to your opinion. We're not as bad as the rest of the great unwashed, so take a stand for what you actually want. We are your allies despite your churlish trollishness.

  78. Re:If you're going to use Canadian music for tortu by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    Phil Collins is not Canadian.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  79. Re:If you're going to use Canadian music for tortu by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    I would think that Celine Dion or Justin Bieber would be much more effective at breaking the will of even the most stanchly determined Jihadists.

    Ug, those are pretty bad. Skinny Puppy is great stuff, I don't see how it could be used for torture. It couldn't be that effective...

    Actually several tracks on "Bites", "Mind: The Perpetual Intercourse" and "Cleanse Fold and Manipulate" were created specifically with subsonics to enhance the feeling of darkness, depression and dread. The ever popular "Assimilate" (from "Bites") is one of them.

    "...manifestations of a sort, so insidious off the point, simple solution never confusion, sport a gun kill a cop. Crazy world of weary thought, so receive me had enough, lock me up, lock me up... [...] ...Mutterings of death to bring, suffocate a newborn thing, degradation of an age, venereal it's all sensation, protect design the moral plan, infallible as propaganda, completely black, with no steps back..." (from "Assimilate")

    Yup, I'm a long-time fan (of Skinny Puppy, not beta!)

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  80. Feds also desecrate religious music.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago I heard the Feds also were using religious music, which may be considered an act of desecration. One I remember reading about was using recordings of Tibetan Monks chanting, aimed at The Branch Davidians during the siege in Waco, TX. Or maybe this is a violation of the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."?

    I'm also of the opinion, reading lists of other music they've used 'against' people, that whoever is choosing the music must be dweebs who probably think anything other than America the Beautiful, country music, and maybe some Protestant Church music will drive people insane because it drives them insane. I wish they listen to more and get being insane to the final conclusion.

  81. Not my idea of torture - more like romance! by cybrarian_ca · · Score: 1

    Hey, it's not torture - these guys are one of my favorite bands! They could play this at top volume all day long, and I'd be fine with it. My DH & I are going to see them on Valentine's Day - how's that for romance?

  82. Not torture by cybrarian_ca · · Score: 1

    Not only are they not bad, they're damn good. Also rich by now, with many, many fans. It's just that they're loud and abrasive, kind of as thrash is to metal. My husband & I are seeing them in NYC on Valentine's Day, and they're sold out. I've been going to their shows since 1988. Since they've been able to make a very nice living for all those years, guess it's the government that needs to check its taste.