Slashdot Mirror


QuakeNet: Government-Sponsored Attacks On IRC Networks

Barryke writes "Like FreeNode, it seems more and more legitimate businesses or non-profit organizations are being targeted by government subsidiaries in attempts to disrupt and spy on their users. IRC network QuakeNet has posted a press release condemning these efforts. Quoting: 'These attacks are performed without informing the networks and are targeted at users associated with politically motivated movements such as "Anonymous." While QuakeNet does not condone or endorse and actively forbids any illegal activity on its servers we encourage discussion on all topics including political and social commentary. It is apparent now that engaging in such topics with an opinion contrary to that of the intelligence agencies is sufficient to make people a target for monitoring, coercion and denial of access to communications platforms. The released documents depict GCHQ operatives engaging in social engineering of IRC users to entrap themselves by encouraging the target to leak details about their location as well as wholesale attacks on the IRC servers hosting the network. These attacks bring down the IRC network entirely affecting every user on the network as well as the company hosting the server.' One of those tactics applied by governments is the DDOS, which (perhaps not so) coincidentally, is what their suspects are accused of. Is this irony or hypocritical?"

197 comments

  1. Fuck Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet.

    On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design.

    Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

    If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this [slashdot.org] in a new tab. After seeing that, click here [slashdot.org] to return to classic Slashdot.

    We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
    We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott [slashdot.org]

    Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
    Commentors - only discuss Beta http://slashdot.org/recent [slashdot.org] - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

    Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

    Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.p... [slashdot.org]
    Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.p... [slashdot.org]
    Alternative Slashdot: altslashdot.org [altslashdot.org] (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

    1. Re: Fuck Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want "pathetic and obviously ineffective", take a look at beta.slashot.org, setting a new standard for toxic waste.

    2. Re: Fuck Beta! by dmbasso · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your apathy leads nowhere. Our action perhaps will bear fruits, who knows...

      But you're mirroring the regular population apathy in politics. Most people take no action because "it is obviously ineffective", as The Man brainwashed you to think.

      At least here it is pretty easy... if they don't listen to me (us), I'll not use the shit that's being imposed. But if I don't manifest my opinion, I can't even complain later.

      So fuck beta, and FUCK YOUR APATHY.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    3. Re: Fuck Beta! by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 5, Informative
      Pathetic and ineffective? It's just a bad link. Here, I'll fix it:

      Alternative Slashdot: altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

    4. Re:Fuck Beta! by Aighearach · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've been here since the 90s, what makes you think I'm going to let Mr. Coward tell me how to mod?

      Next you'll suggest I read articles! lol

      As to the summary, which I skimmed, I already know about the freenode blog that it links, because I'm a freenode user. And the blog doesn't talk about the big bad gubermint DDoSing freenode. Actually it talks about cooperating with law enforcement in handling DDoS attacks, but that there aren't enough resources to track down the command and control servers so nothing is likely to get done on that front.

      It is actually some insidious FUD, trying to imply that FOSS == Anonymous, which is totally absurd. Freenode is a white hat IRC network.

    5. Re:Fuck Beta! by dmomo · · Score: 2

      Don't forget to comment on reddit:
      http://www.reddit.com/r/social...

    6. Re:Fuck Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They will get the point when their readership drops off by the order of, oh -- I don't know, a metric fuck-ton. Until then, whatever.

    7. Re: Fuck Beta! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      Er, not that wiki appears to already be feeling the effects of slashdotting just from curious people looking at the front page.

    8. Re:Fuck Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translations: I am whiny prick probably with a case of autism. I don't like change, for any change I will find all the disadvantages about it and let it stew in me, so I can get more and more Angry about it.

      Because only smart people are able to find find faults.

    9. Re: Fuck Beta! by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      It's a temporary home. Okian Warrior just registered it a couple of hours ago, so what can you expect? BTW, notice that my comment was downmodded OT into oblivion, even though (despite the snark) it was actually relevant to GP's comment? There is a disturbing trend here.

    10. Re:Fuck Beta! by mickwd · · Score: 2

      When I went to uni, more years ago than I care to remember, I would return home from time to time at the weekend, and go out with the lads on a Saturday night. As it was a rural area, we'd drive to the nearest big town, visit a pub and then go on clubbing.

      We'd usually visit the same pub, but every few months the pub we went to would change.

      Why?

      We didn't go to the pub with the best beer, the best music, the best seats. No, we just went to the "place where everyone else went". From time to time, everyone in town would get bored with one place and move on somewhere else which then became the new "place where everyone went". That made it (for us, at that time) the place with the best atmosphere.

      What Dice needs to realise is that all that Slashdot is is one of the "places where everyone goes" for computer / techie discussion (OK, so it's not the only one, but you get my drift). This site has no value, other than being the "place where everyone goes".

      It won't be at all difficult for someone to set up Dashslot, or Slushdirt or whatever, with the same formula as traditional Slashdot, and once word gets around that new site will be the "place where everyone goes" instead of here. Slashdot will become the new Kuro5hin, a steep and tragic decline from former glories.

      And that new site might even have decent editing and Unicode support.

    11. Re:Fuck Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! FINALLY! PEOPLE WITH THE COURAGE TO STAND UP AND FIGHT THE MAN!

      You can try to misdirect us with stories about the government spying on us, but luckily the fine community has seen through this non-issue to what really matters: Slashdot Beta.

      Some people would describe those who put their freedom and sometimes lives on the line to stand up to the surveillance state as "heroes". I'm glad that Slashdot recognizes the true heroes: people who sit in their basement complaining that the formatting on their favourite website is slightly different. GOD BLESS AMERICA!

    12. Re: Fuck Beta! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I think that was just the knock-on thread effect... your moderators appear to be modding you up at the moment.

      Why is it this is one of the only days this month I don't have mod points?

    13. Re: Fuck Beta! by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      Indeed. About an hour ago everyone was complaining about OT downmods and making accusations. With the latest articles, it seems the Fuck Beta posts are being left alone.

    14. Re:Fuck Beta! by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I personally like the beta.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    15. Re: Fuck Beta! by eriqk · · Score: 1

      If only the /. readership was this dedicated to causes that actually mattered.

  2. About the beta. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is now official. Netcraft has confirmed: Slashdot is dying.

            One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Slashdot community when IDC confirmed that Slashdot page views has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all websites. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Slashdot has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Slashdot is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by the stupid fucking beta website and the wholesale discard of user feedback.

            You don't need to be the Amazing Kreskin to predict Slashdot's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Slashdot faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Slashdot because Slashdot is dying. Things are looking very bad for Slashdot. As many of us are already aware, Slashdot continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

            Slashdot Beta is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core users. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time Slashdot users Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: Slashdot is dying.

            All major surveys show that Slashdot has steadily declined in market share. Slashdot is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Slashdot is to survive at all it will be among S&M enthusiasts. Slashdot continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Slashdot is dead.

    That crippling bombshell sent Slashdot fans into a tailspin of mourning and denial. However, bad news poured in like a river of water.

    Fuck the beta.

    1. Re:About the beta. by JWW · · Score: 0

      Parent comment is so meta.

    2. Re:About the beta. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The sad part is that if any fork is created to attract the Slashdot crowd, they will be sued by Dice blaming them on Slashdot's failure.

    3. Re:About the beta. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? really?

  3. Beta feedback helps by Sowelu · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not going to quote them without permission, but from talking with one of the editors, some of our sentiment about the beta is shared by them, and they really do want user feedback to help things go in the right direction. Presumably they have no power directly, but if literate and thought-out comments get submitted to the beta feedback, they will do what they can to send them upwards. Don't just complain in the comments, help the editors help you, at least some of them are on your side.

    1. Re:Beta feedback helps by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We've tried that already. The feedback was ignored.

      It's obvious that whoever is working on the new site either lacks the skills or the desire to match the functionality of the current interface. No amount of feedback is going to change that, and so the Beta will always suck.

      Do they want to stop the complaining? That's easy. They don't have to get rid of the beta. They just have to formally commit to keeping the classic interface available, and make it straightforward to use it instead.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Beta feedback helps by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's true...at least know that (some of) the editors know how bad it is and know what the consequences of Beta will be. The ignoring is happening above the level of people who read the feedback mail. If they're going to keep fighting, I'm all for giving them all the ammo we can.

    3. Re:Beta feedback helps by demontechie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The beta feedback discussion for the last couple days has been literate and well thought out, but there has been no public response of any kind. Not even a half-hearted "we hear you and we'll see what we can do about making classic available in perpetuity, but no promises."

      And with the revelation of Dice's view of the slashdot finances projections, and the heavy handed mass downmodding it's hard to see what reason the users have to retain any faith in the editors or their superiors.

    4. Re:Beta feedback helps by carlos92 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you have access to the editors, let them know that nobody is discussing the stories today. In a day or two this will be a ghost town, they don't have much time to process the feedback.

    5. Re:Beta feedback helps by Soulskill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Believe me, we're well aware of what everybody is discussing.

    6. Re:Beta feedback helps by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As an example, you just linked to 4 different, individual posts within threads. The Beta site doesn't even have post IDs, even on the user's home page, so linking to an individual comment is impossible. SID and CID are GONE in the new Slashdot.

    7. Re:Beta feedback helps by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Believe me, we're well aware of what everybody is discussing.

      ... and really busy ignoring it?

    8. Re:Beta feedback helps by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Now if only anybody over there gave a fuck.

    9. Re:Beta feedback helps by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 2

      Believe me, we're well aware of what everybody is discussing.

      Is that why suddenly our comments get massively downmodded now?

      Folks with mod point get the complaints to +5 and suddenly they are back to "0 Offtopic".

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
    10. Re:Beta feedback helps by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      being aware is a good first step.

      please reply back (on a new toplevel topic) addressing our concerns.

      if you really want the beta, fine; but don't remove the older version!

      let both run for a year and see if the beta 'proves itself'. what's so wrong with that? scientific and you'll get a lot of data samples rather than just raw emotions.

      let logic decide. if the new site does not bring in the post-counts you are after, there's your answer.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    11. Re:Beta feedback helps by Soulskill · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's all any of us are talking about today (and most of what we've talked about for the past few months). Whatever changes get made, they need time to be decided on and implemented. I'm sorry it doesn't go faster, but that's why we still have the classic site available.

    12. Re:Beta feedback helps by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      We'll have more posts coming about how the beta will shape up. (Possibly one within a few hours.) The comments and feedback emails are still rolling in, and we're trying to get as much information as possible.

      I can't really speak to letting the old site hang around in perpetuity -- it's not my call. I know it'd be a stretch for our small engineering team to support both, though.

    13. Re:Beta feedback helps by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Informative

      Soulskill, your stakeholder management is poor. Up on the front page there is a big "We are shoving this down your throat soon" message thrown at your customers--executive stakeholders, low power, high interest, low influence. You've largely shuttered them out, rather than keeping them informed; you've solicited comment and not informed them at large that their comments are heard and being discussed actively. This is producing customer backlash.

      You should change the primary message in everyone's face to reflect what's been said here, and to notate that you are considering further changes and delays before moving to a full public release. Make prominent also that you have decided on the short-term availability of Slashdot Classic after launch as yet another metric. Provide a larger update page describing how this will handle--more discussion, more sampling, surveying, and then when and how you will launch. Maybe detail a launch process where everyone is set to New Slashdot by default, with a Slashdot Classic option that resets once per month at most, after major changes, so that the metric of who immediately runs back to Slashdot Classic can be re-sampled after major changes.

      I suggest Tres Roeder's book "Managing Project Stakeholders" particularly for your review. The other book (A Sixth Sense for Project Management) is more useful in closed quarters, but I can recommend both.

    14. Re:Beta feedback helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever happens, if these guys do lose their jobs, I hope the Slashdot community will be willing to help them find the connections they need to continue their careers.

      BETA SUCKS. FUCK BETA.

    15. Re:Beta feedback helps by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      Yeah. One common thread that's starting to come out of this is, these directives are from on-high. Just about every single one of us has been stuck on projects that we know are doomed but can't convince higher-ups about. The best you can accomplish is to try and change minds, keep the doom to a minimum, do the best you are allowed to for your users...but you can't always convince management.

      It's pretty rare to watch it happen from the outside.

    16. Re:Beta feedback helps by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the comment and that you are hearing our voices on this issue.

      even if the old site is not 'supported' in terms of bugfixes, etc; its been years since it was written and I would assume/hope that there is not much new work needed to support code that pretty much Just Plain Works(tm).

      here's an idea, though: there is a lot of desire within the community to keep this older site going. if you need support, why not just ask for donated time (from reasonably qualified people). there are a lot of out of work engineers (heh, I'm currently one of them, sigh) and I'm quite sure you could get some quality people to contribute support and fixes, as-needed. does not even have to be paid work.

      pass that up the food chain, please.

      thanks.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    17. Re:Beta feedback helps by unitron · · Score: 2

      "Whatever changes get made..."

      aren't really necessary in the first place, at least not the ones represented by beta.

      Trying to optimize beta is like switching around the order in which influenza symptoms occur. It's still a disease.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    18. Re:Beta feedback helps by unitron · · Score: 2

      In spite of probably half or more of all comments made today being anti-beta, not one of the anti-beta submissions has been moved from gray title bar to green title bar, so that it can be "the" we-hate-beta thread.

      If your corporate overlords are thinking "just ignore them and they'll go away", that may be one of the few things about which they've been right lately.

      Because right now it's looking like we will be going away, from the 10th to the 17th.

      Possibly never to return.

      I think there's definitely a Valentines Day Massacre coming, only question is will the victim be beta or your userbase.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    19. Re:Beta feedback helps by Sowelu · · Score: 2

      Okay, devil's advocate, even though by now I'm just coming across as a huge apologist.

      We're vocal. We're probably even a majority. But is it /entirely/ unbelievable that some people don't care that much about the beta thing, and really do just want relevant comments? Sure it's important to deal with the beta, but some people are content to fiddle while things burn. I can totally see some of those people downvoting this stuff (for a while, until they run out of points and give up).

      Of course--the day that Slashdot deletes comments, even beta-hostile ones, is the day that the exodus becomes unstoppable. It's only happened what, once before, and the backlash lasted months. I don't think we'll hit that point.

    20. Re:Beta feedback helps by trawg · · Score: 1

      Please make a news post about the issue. I'm glad you're finally responding to the comments but today has been a train wreck and failing to publicly acknowledge that will not help matters.

      Give people an official thread to comment about the beta. Ensure that it has the feedback mechanisms - the survey and the email address, both of which I've used - prominently listed.

    21. Re:Beta feedback helps by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I think there's definitely a Valentines Day Massacre coming

      Will there be pink ponies?

    22. Re:Beta feedback helps by labnet · · Score: 2

      Soul skill. I've managed a company for 20 years. I have two jobs. Manage problems and add value. If a customer or employee comes with a problem, the first thing I do is acknowledge the problem (whether I agree or not) by restating the problem in my own words. This 1. Helps me understand the problem 2. Defuses the initial emotion from complainant. /. Management has always been opaque, but in this case lack of communication has caused the biggest protest I have ever seen here. Yet this is the first grain of acknowlegment from a stakeholder and in a forum post rather than a banner announcement.
      DICE needs to man up and have the empowered decision maker communicate directly by acknowledging the problem; being the beta site significantly reduces the community experience by using too much whitespace, reducing information density, and breaking below threshold comment summarisation; then detail a course of action. Even if management is bloody minded enough to continue with beta, at least have enough fortitude and character to tell the community. If you are having tough internal debates, make us a part of the debate so it can bring clarity to your conversation.
      Silence is the the worst way to deal with crisis.

      --
      46137
    23. Re:Beta feedback helps by carlos92 · · Score: 1

      Ok - let's hope that changes are made quickly, before all the producers of the real content get bored of complaining and take their wit elsewhere. You could at least send a signal that feedback is being received and changes are at least being considered, perhaps that will help get things back to normal.

    24. Re:Beta feedback helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free speech zone = containment.

      Fuck containment.

      Fuck beta.

    25. Re:Beta feedback helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we still have the classic site available.
      What the hell. How friendly of you to still have the normal Slashdot available. F u.

      It's simple.
      We *kill*
      the Beta.

    26. Re:Beta feedback helps by unitron · · Score: 1

      Not until April, and maybe not even then.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    27. Re:Beta feedback helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't really speak to letting the old site hang around in perpetuity -- it's not my call. I know it'd be a stretch for our small engineering team to support both, though.

      You have two different UIs, and you can't support both. OK, that's understandable.

      So which one do you keep? One of them is a little creaky, but it's been working for many years. The other one is universally hated by your users. Yeah, it's a tough choice.

    28. Re:Beta feedback helps by umghhh · · Score: 1
      funny that most of project management skills in organizations I worked for last few years are considered useless or (god forbid) 'old way of working'. Not sure why. After all most of the projects that are meaningful for large organizations are also large i.e. require considerable skill in managing. One can of course claim that such projects can be split into set of smaller ones but this again requires quite some knowledge not only in management but also in involved technology.

      Other than that I consider bett a 'success' in uniting /.ers - I have never seen such majority agreeing here on anything.

    29. Re:Beta feedback helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The ignoring is happening above the level of people who read the feedback mail.

      "Then there is no hope... our planet is doomed."

      > but if literate and thought-out comments get submitted to the beta feedback, they will do what they can to send them upwards.

      "Yeah, there's a message here, Walter, and it's FUCK YOU. Leave me the fuck alone!"

  4. Beta a Bust by LordFlower · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Beta sucks. I will not be back if Beta is made mandatory.

    1. Re:Beta a Bust by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      I'm just glad I've never seen it.

      I already know I'm not interested in a slashdot-replacement, and I don't really care if it has the name "slashdot" on it or not. I won't be there.

    2. Re:Beta a Bust by DustinB · · Score: 1

      They should permanently keep it at beta.slashdot.org. It's trash.

    3. Re:Beta a Bust by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      It's pretty awful. But it seems to be happening only part of the time... my browser clears cookies/etc. on close, and it only gives me the beta about half the time.

      I get what they're trying to do, but it's really quite terrible for a threaded comment system.

  5. Soulskilll and Timothy by Princeofcups · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Give it up guys. You know that no stories are going to be discussed. Today is the end of the old Slashdot. Start sending out resumes, since this is going down in a blaze of glory.

    Hey, the first story we should get on the replacement site when set up is an interview with Rob and Roblimo on why they really left Slashdot and left these incompetents in charge.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    1. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by carlos92 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They won't give it up because they still don't get it. They think of the site users as the audience, as if the value of Slashdot was the articles. Just in case Dice reads this: the value is in the comments from the community, some of which are less biased and more informative than the referenced articles. Some are written by experts in the matter, or contain perspectives that a journalist doesn't have. Sure, most of the comments are junk, but the mod system helps you with that. But nobody from Dice will read this, because if they read Slashdot they would have already seen it.

    2. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by ShaunC · · Score: 2

      Hey, the first story we should get on the replacement site when set up is an interview with Rob and Roblimo on why they really left Slashdot and left these incompetents in charge

      The lameness filter says I should probably not opine on how the true reason is:

      $$$$$$$$$$$

      I don't blame them for leaving; really, I don't. I'd have cashed out too! I do blame the new stewards of the Slashdot domain and brand for fucking it all to hell. A few years ago, "Dice" was, to me, "a tech job site." Now, "Dice" means, to me, "that moronic company who fucked up Slashdot."

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    3. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Soulskill · · Score: 5, Informative

      We know most of the discussion will be centered on the beta. Some people will want to read news anyway, so we'll keep posting.

      You folks are certainly welcome to keep commenting about the beta; we're reading all of it, and we're communicating it to the Product team who makes the decisions about the design.

    4. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by LordFlower · · Score: 2
      Good.

      And know that we do not hold anything personally against anyone.

    5. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by CoolHnd30 · · Score: 1
      too bad I don't have mod points today...

      ...and fuck the beta.

    6. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by dmomo · · Score: 1

      I think this needs more attention outside of the control of slashdot moderators. Please help by voicing your thoughts over at reddit:
      http://www.reddit.com/r/social...

    7. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by dmomo · · Score: 1

      Backlash at Slashdot Beta needs attention outside of the control of Slashdot moderators. Please comment over on reddit:
      http://www.reddit.com/r/social...

    8. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      You should update your sig. I propose:
      The only thing worse than a Democrat or a Republican is beta.slashdot.org

      --
      Time to offend someone
    9. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by arth1 · · Score: 1

      They won't give it up because they still don't get it. They think of the site users as the audience, as if the value of Slashdot was the articles. Just in case Dice reads this: the value is in the comments from the community, some of which are less biased and more informative than the referenced articles. Some are written by experts in the matter, or contain perspectives that a journalist doesn't have. Sure, most of the comments are junk, but the mod system helps you with that. But nobody from Dice will read this, because if they read Slashdot they would have already seen it.

      I think this should be submitted as an article. Then, perhaps, the overlords would see it.

      Yes, the value of slashdot that keeps people coming back is the discussions - the posts from users. Not the articles. The people who discuss are not just customers, they are the people who are the reason why people come here at all.
      Alienate them at your own peril.

    10. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by snemarch · · Score: 1

      The beta has a nice fresh & simple look to it, but it suffers in usability/readability. Way too much scrolling to read through comments. Knowing what vocal, picky bastards the slashdot crowd is, why didn't you get the community involved instead of suffering the current farce? :-)

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    11. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Fantastic. And is there any intention of leashing the crazed mass downmodder that downmods en masse?

    12. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      Or, better yet, put a "Beta" discussion topic on the main page - like they should have been done hours ago when all this first kicked off. At least the comments there will be on topic.

      Oh, and anyone care to bet that this will be the "obligatory XKCD" link when tomorrow's strip gets posted? ;)

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    13. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Soulskill · · Score: 5, Funny

      We've had the community involved since October, actually.

    14. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell them to get a look at their stock chart.

      http://bigchartsus.wsj.akadns....

    15. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by snemarch · · Score: 0

      Can't please everyone.

      And hey, it's easier to get all riled up in your parent's basement than it is to get involved and give proper feedback.

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    16. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Since the beginning, we've been saying: can't follow discussions because of sidebar, whitespace and unresponsive design. What did you do? Changed the fucking fonts.

    17. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, better yet, put a "Beta" discussion topic on the main page - like they should have been done hours ago when all this first kicked off. At least the comments there will be on topic. Oh, and anyone care to bet that this will be the "obligatory XKCD" link when tomorrow's strip gets posted? ;)

      Error 404?

    18. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be reddit, slashdot. Be slashdot.

      Keep the moderation and treading system please, throw out the rest if you need to. Also, in the beta, a collapsed post takes up way too many vertical pixels.

    19. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by unitron · · Score: 1

      "We know most of the discussion will be centered on the beta. Some people will want to read news anyway..."

      This is the news today.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    20. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure most people are wishing that Beta was a 404, but I think you misunderstood the "when tomorrow's strip gets posted" bit - I'm guessing that Randall might well be taking a swipe at DICE in the next XKCD strip, which won't be posted for a few hours yet.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    21. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can't please everyone.

      And hey, it's easier to get all riled up in your parent's basement than it is to get involved and give proper feedback.

      What I have seen repeated many times so far, is that the pubic feedback options for Beta actually *HAVE* been used, and that the issues mentioned in that feedback has been consistently ignored, A La what happened with Metro, Gnome3, and Unity.

      It looks more and more like the current crop of UI developers does not know how to accept that their architectural marvels can be so poorly recieved that people would be willing to salt the earth and nuke the site from orbit to rid themselves of it, and instead "Just cant understand why people dont love it."

      There does not need to be a reason to dislike something. For instance, think of the food you most despise. Why do you despise it? Can you quantify exactly what it is about that food that sets you off, and makes you go elsewhere? Could you give insightful feedback about what might be done to improve it, (that does not involve simply not serving that food-- because that option has been categorically decried as "Unhelpful".)

      Most of the time, the answers to those questions will be a resounding "no", because personal preferences dont NEED reasons, and often times, dont even really HAVE a quantifiable reason to cite. People simply dont like the thing.

      When you have resounding negative feedback like this over a product, the question you need to ask is "What DO you want?", not "Oh, so you dont like the taste of liver and onions? How would you make liver and onions more palatable?" The former establishes good will-- the second one shows that you dont really care about what your consumer wants, and intend to make him eat liver and onions regardless.

      In the case of /., the community HAS stated, emphatically and repeatedly, EXACTLY what they want-- They want a no-nonsense, low resource, and high data density version of classic with editing abilities for registered users, and unicode support, that does not break the commenting system and is very lean on data bandwidth and computational resources for rendering.

      So far, the response from the beta team has been the sound of crickets chirping, followed by announcements that liver and onions will be served on feb 10.

      If slashdot's beta team members would grow a pair like soulskill just did 2 posts up, and actually come in and discuss this matter with the community, it would really show some good will on their part.

      As is, they are only just digging the hole deeper with their bullshit.

    22. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that you have reading comprehension issues? Because I don't know anyone in the community that likes the new beta.

      Fuck the beta.

    23. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would you make liver and onions more palatable?

      Bacon!

    24. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any idea how long slashdot has been a 'product'? For fuck's sake, the term slashdotted infers wild popularity. Fuck yourself, your sophomore business and philosophy course has served you a disservice.

    25. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by arth1 · · Score: 2

      "We know most of the discussion will be centered on the beta. Some people will want to read news anyway..."

      This is the news today.

      Indeed. Stuff that matters.

    26. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      "Involved" doesn't mean "nod and go 'mm-hmm' then do whatever the fuck you were planning to do anyway;" it means "actually make changes to implement the community's desires."

      Anyway, since you're allegedly listening, here is a partial list of the problems I have with Beta:

      • THERE IS NO HYPERLINK TO THE INDIVIDUAL POST NUMBERS ANYMORE!!!!!!!!!! How am I supposed to reference another comment (other than the one I'm directly replying to) without the ability to link to it?
      • The default comment title when replying is missing.
      • The "from the ... dept" text is missing on the list of stories on the front page (and is in the wrong place on the individual story's page).
      • The story tags are missing everywhere.
      • Posts should always have precise timestamps, not this "__ minutes/hours/days/weeks/months/years ago" bullshit.
      • Why are you wasting my horizontal space?
      • This unordered list is missing its bullet points (of course, classic fucks that up too...).
      • The two things that people actually wanted fixed -- Unicode support and maybe more allowed HTML -- are hardly any better with beta than they were before.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    27. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      "Involved" doesn't mean "nod and go 'mm-hmm' then do whatever the fuck you were planning to do anyway;" it means "actually make changes to implement the community's desires."

      I agree. However, I'll add that it doesn't necessarily mean implementing everything everybody asks for. A number of the things in your list are due to be implemented and/or fixed.

      Horizontal space is a trickier question. Some readers demand words that go from one side of their 1920px-wide monitor to the other. Usability studies have shown that doing so actually decreases readability. Given that we can't set a different width for every user, we've got to try to figure something out. We also have to take into account comment indenting.

      I don't know what how the horizontal space situation will shake out. I know I'd personally like the right rail to disappear once the content ends. But I'm not one of the designers or engineers, and I don't know the difficulties and tradeoffs in doing so. It may or may not end up to your liking. If it doesn't, I'm truly sorry -- but that doesn't mean we're not listening to you and weighing your opinion along with the opinions of other users.

    28. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by MrPippers · · Score: 1

      Horizontal space really is not that hard -- just resize your browser window if you don't want text over all 1920 pixels of width.

    29. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I mean why would I give a shit about the stories, i get the same from a dozen more sites and often with a hell of a lot more depth. One doesn't come here for the stories, one comes here for the insiders and the arguments!

      I mean where else could we have had a 200 post argument over file systems? Where a guy like me could say "I'm having trouble wrapping my head around a part of string theory" and have a guy from CERN actually break it down for me? Before Dice bought it and started filling the thing with Slashvertisements we'd have epic arguments and even if you didn't agree with somebody you LEARNED from the experience.

      Beta is just another Digg/Fark/Gawker, where you read the article then get the hell off so that fugly Disqus comment system doesn't trash your eyeballs...well if I wanted that, why would I come here instead of Digg/Fark/Gawker? What benefit does it offer me over those? none that I can see because if anything beta is even worse than those as it takes the broken modding system and bolts it into a Disqus framework...eeew.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    30. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Horizontal space is a trickier question. Some readers demand words that go from one side of their 1920px-wide monitor to the other. Usability studies have shown that doing so actually decreases readability [baymard.com]. Given that we can't set a different width for every user, we've got to try to figure something out. We also have to take into account comment indenting.

      The source that link cites is a book from the Sixties. That is not especially relevant on a web forum, especially when we can now choose how many characters are per line ourselves by zooming in or not.

    31. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Horizontal space is a trickier question. Some readers demand words that go from one side of their 1920px-wide monitor to the other. Usability studies have shown that doing so actually decreases readability. Given that we can't set a different width for every user, we've got to try to figure something out.

      HTML/CSS are not designed for doing fixed layouts like you want. They are designed to give hints about layout so that the browser can then flow things as the user prefers or is necessary for their screen size. That's why Classic is so good. You can view it well at 1920px on a monitor (as I normally do with a 15" laptop, 22" monitor at work and 24" monitor at home) and on a mobile phone in portrait mode (800px wide).

      If I found it unreadable I'd just make the window smaller. Don't pick a width and force it on me, let me decide. That's why Classic is great, it's an actual proper web site and not some lame attempt to copy print media like a million other shitty blog style news sites.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Thanosius · · Score: 1

      It looks more and more like the current crop of UI developers does not know how to accept that their architectural marvels can be so poorly recieved that people would be willing to salt the earth and nuke the site from orbit to rid themselves of it, and instead "Just cant understand why people dont love it."

      It takes a brave soul to look at something they've spent much time, money and effort developing, realize it ain't gonna work and then willingly destroy/abandon it for the good of all concerned. It's a necessary part of good development of any project - some things just don't work out and really should be either rebuilt with lessons learnt from the experience, or scrapped completely until such time that it makes sense to try again.

      Modern designers have more of an approach that resistance to their efforts means that it's working, that the controversy validates the quality of their efforts and that they should push even harder for their view to be accepted. They simply cannot handle the idea that they're producing shit that no-one (or very few people) wants. Being humble is paramount to being a good designer. Be humble and trash this beta shit before it destroys what's left of Slashdot. Because like everyone else, I'll just move elsewhere if it's made permanent. It's not like we can't...

      --
      Account abandoned. I can't fucking spell for shit and Slashdot doesn't even allow time-limited edits of posts. Plus you'
    33. Re:Soulskilll and Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

      We want a news/commentary board that is about the comments and community.

  6. NO to Beta by mccotter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do not make beta mandatory. Keep classic.

    1. Re:NO to Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not make beta mandatory. Keep classic.

      Fuck the Beta and the classic site. /. is dead. We're just on borrowed time.
      Nerds of /. unite and create THE ultimate /. . A site of Nerds for Nerds, no ads, no bullshit corporate decision making etc...

    2. Re:NO to Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget the blackjack and hookers.


      Also, it might be productive to note specific problems instead of just howling " BETA SUCKS ".

    3. Re:NO to Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not make beta mandatory. Keep classic.

      Fuck the Beta and the classic site. /. is dead. We're just on borrowed time.
      Nerds of /. unite and create THE ultimate /. . A site of Nerds for Nerds, no ads, no bullshit corporate decision making etc...

      Information wants to be free.

      But server space and bandwidth and dev time want to be paid. Sorry about that.

    4. Re:NO to Beta by unitron · · Score: 1

      don't forget the blackjack and hookers.

      Also, it might be productive to note specific problems instead of just howling " BETA SUCKS ".

      You want the specific problem?

      Beta sucks and they're going to try to cram it down our throats anyway.

      That's the problem.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  7. donotwant Slashdot Beta by acid_andy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dice, Editors, your silence is deafening! Slashdot is News for Nerds but no true Nerd wants your Beta. Stop pretending this problem will go away. Maybe you actually hope it will go away, maybe you hope Slashdot itself will go away. Whatever - at least have the decency and respect for your long term readers to give some kind of response to all the negative feedback. Why not keep two versions of the site? If Beta was done properly it would all be a CSS skin with some scripts that could all be swapped out. You already have a mobile site, so it can't be to improve appearence on mobiles, tablets, phablets, touchscreens, etc. Oh sorry, I forgot, that wouldn't keep the advertisers happy. Slashdot was awesome while it lasted.

    --
    Your ad here.
    1. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 1

      Dice, Editors, your silence is deafening!

      Their actions speak loud enough: they are mass-downmodding all Beta comments.

      We post these things because we care. Our overlords are trying to stop making us care.

      For posteriority: many of these "-1 offtopic" and "0 offtopic" posts that you see in today's threads were at one point "+5 interesting", "+5 insightful" or "+5 funny". That was the opinion of the people with mod points, what you see now is what the editors were told to do by Dice management.

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
    2. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by acid_andy · · Score: 1

      Yeh but the downmodding with no other communication doesn't qualify for my "have the decency and respect for your long term readers" clause.

      --
      Your ad here.
    3. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Oh sorry, I forgot, that wouldn't keep the advertisers happy.

      You would think that what would keep the advertisers happy would be increased page views.

      I'm betting that even a week of useless threads due to complaints about the beta will cause a substantial, permanent loss of readership. If it keeps up for much longer, the site will be dead. And given the non-response of the editors so far, it looks like that's how this is going to go down.

      I hope that somebody is keeping track of a history of page views, unique visitors, ad impressions, and so on. It will be a good demonstration of what happens to a company that ignores its users.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    4. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      We're collecting and listening to all of your feedback.

      There have been many changes to the beta site since its inception last October, all in response to user feedback. It's an impossibility to act on it all, since some users want exactly the opposite of other users, but we're weighing everything we get. And there's work yet to be finished; it's still a beta, after all.

    5. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      It's an impossibility to act on it all, since some users want exactly the opposite of other users,

      What, you mean there are people who actually like the redesign?

      Don't get me wrong the "new version" is more visually engaging (in the way that a lot of default Wordpress themes are), but if you've been involved in Slashdot for more than the last 30 seconds, you know that the community here cares far less about visual stimuli than we do for the communication we share in the discussion threads.

      Make whatever excuses you want, but so long as commenting is treated as an afterthought in the redesign, you're making it plain to us that you don't care what we think.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      Well, to answer your first question -- yes, there are some users who like the redesign. It's a bit of an echo chamber in the comments, but we've received some complimentary emails. (Which is not to say we weight those more heavily than uncomplimentary ones -- we don't.)

      Commenting is certainly not an afterthought. It's at the top of our list for things that need more work. We know you come to the site for the comments (as we ourselves did back in the '90s).

    7. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Commenting is certainly not an afterthought. It's at the top of our list for things that need more work. We know you come to the site for the comments (as we ourselves did back in the '90s).

      So... You've known all along that the main reason we come here for the discussions; the beta's been going on for what, the better part of a year? And commenting is still horrifically broken.

      Not to bust your chops, but that's kinda the definition of an afterthought, bro.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    8. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by acid_andy · · Score: 1

      Thanks very much for responding, Soulskill. I'm pleasantly surprised.

      The one thing I can't get my head round is this obsession with increasing whitespace on new sites. I'm assuming it's connected with wanting to space out things people want to click on with their fat fingers on a small touch screen, but just increasing the size of buttons and links should do that.

      I noticed even the current (classic) Slashdot site got its whitespace cranked up a lot a little while back, (I think it was sometime last year) around when the icons got redesigned, and people bitched about that even then.

      Yes, I'm aware I'm not submitting this feedback through the proper channels. I guess you can put that down to a combination of cynicism, laziness and rebellious protest. I really feel it's something of a lost cause. This is the way the whole web is going.

      --
      Your ad here.
    9. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by crontabminusell · · Score: 1

      Well, to answer your first question -- yes, there are some users who like the redesign. It's a bit of an echo chamber in the comments, but we've received some complimentary emails. (Which is not to say we weight those more heavily than uncomplimentary ones -- we don't.)

      Commenting is certainly not an afterthought. It's at the top of our list for things that need more work. We know you come to the site for the comments (as we ourselves did back in the '90s).

      "as we ourselves did back in the '90s" - interesting choice of words. Are you implying (either on purpose or by accident) that you don't come to the site for the comments anymore, or that you just don't come to the site (except for work)? Why?

      The beta looks terribly cookie-cutter in its design, and the comment layout just feels off. It doesn't feel right. Sorry, but I'm not sure how else to explain myself in this case. But do keep in mind that Slashdot is Slashdot because of the users that participate in the comment sections (AC or not), not because of the stories posted. Experienced users know how to wade through the piles of shit posts (frosty piss, update your hosts file, you're a friend and a cosmonaut, etc) to get to the real discussions. Rather than overhauling the entire site, why not make it easier on newcomers to get to "good" comments and participate in a real discussion? Figure that out first and I think other needed improvements will become obvious.

    10. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Commenting is certainly not an afterthought.

      Then why is there no way to see replies to my comments, and no way to jump to my comments to post further replies? That makes it impossible to actually keep up a conversation. All you can do is shout into the void.

      Commenting is currently unusable on beta. It is an afterthought.

    11. Re:donotwant Slashdot Beta by Wookact · · Score: 1

      So, you know we come for the comments, then why wasn't the priority number one with the beta? Also the color scheme sucks.

  8. Save Slashdot Classic by Bob9113 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Shame, I'd actually like to discuss this topic. But, then I'd be jeopardizing every future discussion.

    Javascript dancing baloney and giant pretty pictures belong on USA Today, not Slashdot.

    The meat of Slashdot, the substance that draws viewers here instead of the alternatives, is the comments. Lose those comments and you will lose the eyeballs. Lose the eyeballs and you will lose the ad revenue.

    Alternatively, you can accept that you made a mistake, keep Slashdot classic, and keep the steady flow of cash. Make the right business decision, here, Dice. Don't kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.

    Alternative alternative: Dice; make us an offer. If you really have written this thing off, give us your stats so we can crunch the numbers and tell us your price. It should be pretty clear that the path you're on will not be lucrative, so show your lowest and best offer. There's some pretty affluent folks here, and this place is important to us. If the workers at Harley Davidson could do it, surely it is possible for us to do the same.

    No legitimate discussion until Slashdot classic is restored. Sacrifice a few days of discussion now to save all the days in the future. The Spirit of Mohdri Dragon Lives! (feel free to get drunk and naked while posting)

    1. Re:Save Slashdot Classic by sinij · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if they let Beta render without allowing half the internet run random sh1t on your browser.

      Also, if you ever seen pop-up announcment about Beta - you are not doing intrwebs right. Secure your browser!

      Now imagine Beowulf cluster of Beta covered in hot grits.

    2. Re:Save Slashdot Classic by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      (feel free to get drunk and naked while posting)

      Uh, excuse me, but I'm at work.

      Meaning the drunken nudity is a foregone conclusion :)

      Works pretty well for keeping the marketing drones away from my cube.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  9. My guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    They are trying to get IRC to split to garner some information from the servers about the users and connections to it, or take over ownership of the channel briefly and get information that way about the users in the channel.

    Look up General Smedley Butler and read some of his very short books on the subject. Its interesting he isn't' in U.S. history books in school. This all looks familiar somehow.

  10. The information I heard.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was told that the redesigned /. will look like balls. I logged in, the other day, with Opera (wanted to try the old Opera before WebKit) and oops?! WTF is this? A UI that tries to HINDER me from accessing information? Not good.

    I will be boy cot ting! 10-17 of february

    1. Re:The information I heard.... by carlos92 · · Score: 1

      Boycott will never happen. This will be dead even before the boycott, it's already almost dead now. I have only seen one comment on the article. The spirit of Slashdot has already departed.

  11. BetaNet: DICE-Sponsored Attacks on Slashdot by ShaunC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cut this shit out. Revert. Take the DICE Marketing department out for a nice big lunch, drinks and all. Then send them home for the weekend. Then undo the damage they've done.

    I'm sadly sure that this is an intentional ploy to drive away long-time users ("geeks" and "nerds") who have contributed so much that, like me, they're eligible to disable advertising. What they don't understand is that even if my karma was shit (we don't get numbers anymore, I guess mine would be 50++++++), I'd still be using Ghostery and AdBlock to block the ads without Slashdot's generous option.

    Wake up, guys. This is a tech site. The comments make the site. The users make the site. We aren't going to sit around and watch it go to shit. You will have nothing, ZERO left if the beta interface goes into production, except for a few new users who came over from MSNBC.

    Writing, wall, see it, hope you have negotiated a nice severance package.

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    1. Re:BetaNet: DICE-Sponsored Attacks on Slashdot by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2

      The Marketing Department at DICE Cybernetics Corporation are a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.

    2. Re:BetaNet: DICE-Sponsored Attacks on Slashdot by stoploss · · Score: 1

      Cut this shit out. Revert. Take the DICE Marketing department out for a nice big lunch, drinks and all. Then...

      Damn, I was hoping you were going to go in a more Game of Thrones-style direction at this juncture.

  12. Slashdot Clone? by Keick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, I tried the beta. Yeah its not pretty, the comment section is pretty small width wise, it looks HORRIBLE on my iPad... The client side filtering of comments completely ignores my long time preferences, etc etc.

    To the point; Many have asked about cloning Slashdot, and retaking the community site. But has anyone thought about how such a mission could be accomplished? Yes I know I can go grab slashcode and standup a 16 core xeon box to toss on my 100mbps connection. But what about the users, the stories, the comments. We can't just screen scrape those to stand up a new site.

    In what possible way could we honestly standup a new slashdot that is community owned?

    Brett

    1. Re:Slashdot Clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a good question that low UID users should be able to answer.

      How do you bring the vict^H^H^H^H users to a new and promised land?

    2. Re:Slashdot Clone? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Ok, I tried the beta. Yeah its not pretty, the comment section is pretty small width wise, it looks HORRIBLE on my iPad... The client side filtering of comments completely ignores my long time preferences, etc etc.

      To the point; Many have asked about cloning Slashdot, and retaking the community site. But has anyone thought about how such a mission could be accomplished? Yes I know I can go grab slashcode and standup a 16 core xeon box to toss on my 100mbps connection. But what about the users, the stories, the comments. We can't just screen scrape those to stand up a new site.

      In what possible way could we honestly standup a new slashdot that is community owned?

      Brett

      The stories and comments come with the users.

      The users seem to be ready to shift as soon as they're given an option.

      If you build it, they will come...

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    3. Re:Slashdot Clone? by deconfliction · · Score: 1

      We can't just screen scrape those to stand up a new site.

      Really? Computers are awesome at repetitive tasks.

      Comments owned by the poster.

      and public. Sounds like fair use to me.

    4. Re:Slashdot Clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what possible way could we honestly standup a new slashdot that is community owned?

      I honestly dont think its possible. I've seen it happen in several other communities, where massive amounts of users are forced away by extremely shitty management and try to reestablish the community somewhere else. What happens is that, instead of a new, single place where the community can continue existing, made up of all the people who left, there will be 5, 10, maybe more different splinter communities, which wither away and die.

    5. Re:Slashdot Clone? by Keick · · Score: 1

      I know this thread is old, but as far as 'build it and they will come' I've been tracking AltSlashdot for the last two days now and I think they will pull it off.

    6. Re:Slashdot Clone? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Thanks :-)

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  13. Government Does This Everywhere, But ... by dmomo · · Score: 1

    It's usually obvious to the users. For instance, look at Slashdot's beta design... No normal webmaster who knows this site and its users would ever let garbage see the light of day. Slashdot Beta is obviously Government-Sponsored malware.

  14. C'mon editors by gallondr00nk · · Score: 1

    Open up a story for all of this. There's been dozens of red marked stories in the firehose, and you're all going on like nothing is happening. It's your job, I can appreciate that, but as site staff you need to address this at some point.

    If Dice are wanting to turn /. into another me-too Cloud/Biz/TV news aggregation garbage, it's your jobs that are on the line too. The slashdot you know will get eaten alive.

    Ask yourselves, what will the site have left if nobody contributes?

    1. Re:C'mon editors by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      I suggest you have a "sticky" top story for beta remaining at the top of the page ( maybe with a different background ) until this is decided one way or another, this way hopefully it will be more likely beta discussions will stay in there vs in every story that's posted.

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    2. Re:C'mon editors by arth1 · · Score: 1

      As long as we don't see "Leave Classic Discussion System (D1) available for those that want it", there's not really any progress.

      If you insist on killing it, well, you also kill the discussions, which is the bread and butter.

    3. Re:C'mon editors by faedle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that's buried in the Slashdot Blog and not prominently featured in either the "you're gonna get beta whether you like it or not!" popup and/or a sticky on the Slashdot front page tells this long-time Slashdot user that your "Product Team" isn't really interested in our honest feedback.

      Beta sucks, period. It's a design change the users haven't asked for and don't want.

  15. Down with beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just another comment saying FUCK BETA

  16. "As we migrate our audience" by skillrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's one way to look at it what this Beta will do.

    1. Re:"As we migrate our audience" by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      THAT's the problem right there. They think we're the AUDIENCE and not the CONTRIBUTERS.

      NEWSFLASH: We don't come here for the stellar editing, we come here to make and read and reply to each other's comments. YOU'RE not supplying the content, WE are. Display some ads and stay out of the way, or expect most of us to "migrate" to another site.

    2. Re:"As we migrate our audience" by DustinB · · Score: 1

      Here here!

    3. Re:"As we migrate our audience" by deconfliction · · Score: 1

      THAT's the problem right there. They think we're the AUDIENCE and not the CONTRIBUTERS.

      This. Mod parent up. I hope someone (or several someones) other than the NSA have been mirroring the comment database. At the bottom of every slashdot page has (always?) been this-

      "Comments owned by the poster."

      And those comments have always been obviously public. Sounds like a slashdot clone with a scraped comment database for preservation purposes is entirely fair use to me.

      Also, reading all of this beta flamefest and considering recent TLD issues- maybe slashdot should be kicked out of .org. Let them go to .com which is clearly what they are primarily interested in.

  17. Ahhh Bitcoin mining was DDOSd the other day by Havokmon · · Score: 1

    I was wondering why anyone would DDOS a mining pool. It doesn't seem to me like that would be an effective method of stealing cyrpto-currency, but the Government surely doesn't like it, so there's the answer. https://www.multipool.us/index...

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  18. Fuck beta by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 2

    If Dice doesn't reconsider this redesign by the 17th, I guess there won't be anything left to do on here other than earn membership in GNAA.

    --
    Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    1. Re:FUCK BETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you! I LOVE the beta! ..... Said no one ever....

  19. Car analogy time by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Car analogy time:
    I have gotten rid of vehicles that sucked less than the Slashdot beta. Seriously even that '85 Bronco II where everything was rusty, none of the body panels matched, and that had bad compression on the #5 cylinder sucked less than beta.slashdot.org.

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:Car analogy time by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Car analogy time:

      I have gotten rid of vehicles that sucked less than the Slashdot beta. Seriously even that '85 Bronco II where everything was rusty, none of the body panels matched, and that had bad compression on the #5 cylinder sucked less than beta.slashdot.org.

      Yeah ..I've heard that about Bronco's .. seems like they haven't had a good run for years

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Car analogy time by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Car analogy time:

      I have gotten rid of vehicles that sucked less than the Slashdot beta. Seriously even that '85 Bronco II where everything was rusty, none of the body panels matched, and that had bad compression on the #5 cylinder sucked less than beta.slashdot.org.

      Yeah ..I've heard that about Bronco's .. seems like they haven't had a good run for years

      Suddenly I wish I hadn't commented on this thread...

      +5 Zing!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  20. Re:Sure the beta sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...says the guy whining about all the whining.

    Slashdot is dead. I'm willing to bet that half of the regular contributors will be gone by the end of the week. They see the future and the future is Beta. No thanks.

  21. Beta by riis138 · · Score: 2

    Please learn the lesson that M$ should have learned with Windows 8. Don't push a cantankerous and cranky user base towards a pseudo-modern U.I.

    --
    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
  22. The more star systems you squeeze the more by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    The more star systems you squeeze, the more will slip through your grasp, NSA Vader.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:The more star systems you squeeze the more by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      WillAffleckUW, and now your planet will be destroyed; good going.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:The more star systems you squeeze the more by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      You assume this is my planet.

      The rebellion will live on in our ice base at Tattoine.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  23. FUCK BETA by vivek7006 · · Score: 2

    FUCK BETA. I want my classic back. And one more thing, FUCK BETA!

  24. 2014: Will Slashdot Beta Be The End of Slashdot? by AmicoToni · · Score: 2

    Another Slashdot reader since 1998 here. Not for much longer, presumably: if Beta stays I will most certainly leave, as may others will, no doubt. Appalling.

  25. Wow, a story about IRC and no comments! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been over an hour, and there are no comments. The old guard here really has fled. A decade ago, I would have expected 200+ comments the first hour rather than zero.

        -- Proud AC since Oct '98

    1. Re:Wow, a story about IRC and no comments! by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      For whatever it's worth, there ONE comment relevant to the article posted above, titled "My guess" by an AC.

  26. BETA SUXX0RS!!! by tedgyz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry Dice, but I have to jump on the beta-hata wagon. I'll just point out two things:

    1. Right side bar squeezes out comments. We are here for the comments, not whatever crap you want to cram down our throats.
    2. Vertical spacing of text wastes tons of real estate. It looks like a High School book report padded to fill the required pages.

    Dice Holdings, Inc: Please consider your next steps carefully. The /. castle was not built in a day, but it can easily be destroyed in a day. You have one chance to avoid a mass exodus. As others have said, eyeballs == advertising $$.

    Stop trying to squeeze blood from a stone. The reason we come here is because most other news sites suck. If you want to throw your hat into the sucky news site ring, all I can say is good luck with that.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  27. Re:Stop Beta! by dkman · · Score: 2
    Trying to be more constructive I sent this message to the feedback email:


    There are a lot of users who do not like the beta design. I don’t especially hate it, but I do like the turquoise bars signifying the start of a new thread or comment. The beta uses a larger font which is not nearly as apparent.

    Comments are also very squished with the right bar eating so much space. 3 comments deep you can fit 70 characters opposed to 140 in classic. I also don’t like the font change in comments.

    In reality I do hate the squished comments. I wrote that part before I went into comments.

    --
    I refuse to sign
  28. Re:No one cares about ontopic discussion by crontabminusell · · Score: 1

    The topic is fuck slash beta until it goes away. If it doesn't go away, then fuck this rob malda left it in terrible hands. He has lots o money and he didn't even leave the site in good hands. He left it in the hands a fucking content farm company. He might as well as sold it to answers.com.

    He wanted /. to die in a fire so people would migrate to his new company, Trove.

  29. MOD THIS REPLY UP by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    States exactly what the problem with the current situation is (I love the Liver and Onions analogy, good show)

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  30. Slashdot beta is okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop whining.

  31. The Beta is a sad joke by melting_clock · · Score: 1

    Like many people, I hate the beta slashdot but it isn't the only problem facing this site. The quality of stories have been in decline for some time. There has been an explosion in trolling comments by ACs. Browse at -1 and you often see a first post that is particularly sickening. When I started reading slashot, many years ago, it was for the user comments that opened the subject on perspectives that I might not have considered. Now, I read fewer comments and find most are completely off topic. There are other sites that I visit while drinking my morning coffee and slashdot might be dropped very soon.

  32. Slashdot beta is perfectly okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simply stop whining and begging for attention. The idea of an "alternative slashdot" is ridiculous. If you prefer to use a weird wannabe alternative, do so and never come back to /. again. Nobody will miss your off-topic nonsense comments here anyway.

  33. Why Do You Think We Read Slashdot? (Fuck Beta) by boolithium · · Score: 2

    We are geeks. We can get tech stories from a billion places on the web. Actually, we don't really need web browsers, if all we want to do is read tech articles. There are better news readers than browsers. We read these stories here, because we know a bunch of smart people are going to provide context in the comments. Some are programmers. Some work in the industry. Some are hobbyists. Some are fanboys. But the comments let us refine our opinions on a piece further, and god forbid, teach us something. If that is not there, I can just fire up a newsreader and read the same product without ever coming here.

  34. Why isn't this automatically filled in? by BigT · · Score: 1

    If you know commenting is so broken, why are you forcing people to use the Beta?

    For the last 4 days, I've been stuck using the beta when I browse from work (IE8, not my choice) because the page is too broken to give me the option of using 'Classic mode'. I emailed the feedback link (once I found it, another thing I can't see in the beta), and got no response.

    The UI and back-end stuff may be beta, but the comment system is alpha, at best, and shouldn't be forced on anybody.

    --
    Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
  35. Freenode #slashdot-refugees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freenode #slashdot-refugees

  36. Little dutchboy with finger in leaking dike.... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    I thought it was my imagination, but several others have commented on this apparent downmodding.

    Regardless, I have been using my mod points lately to mod up constructive criticism type comments, and will continue to do so.(making heavy use of "+1 under rated" mod-I heard that can 'lock in' the mod point[as does "-1 over rated"], but I don't really know how true that is)
    Even if it just keeps them busy downmodding, maybe that's less time they can spend on that abomination they call beta.

    I usually get 15 mod points about every other day on average,(I doubt I'm unique in that), and I'm not afraid to use them in the "Down With Slashdot Beta" campaign. ;-)

    (now I wonder if I will ever get mod points again after this comment?)

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  37. Freenode, #slashdot-refugees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freenode, #slashdot-refugees

  38. Re:2014: Will Slashdot Beta Be The End of Slashdot by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    I personally like the beta, I think it needs some improvements; but leaving? What is there to leave over?

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  39. I have nothing against the BETA design by Barryke · · Score: 1

    I have nothing against BETA design, except perhaps that it has less room for text.
    I just hope my boss doesnt think i'm venturing on some "The 9 Things About Cats You Should Know" website or Youtube..

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  40. And? by kbahey · · Score: 2

    Soulskill,

    Aaaand?

    Dice can't see it, since they are new here (he he)... but you and the editors should know well what I am about to say:

    The most loyal long time most avid readers of Slashdot, are not trolling the site, in protest of the failed beta. Never thought I would see the day ...

    Where is GNAA, Natalie Portman grits, and frist prost when you need them!

    I sent feedback on the beta months ago on the survey, and sent it again today. I sent emails for feedback, and I posted this several times:

    Requiring Javascript to browse the site is suicide!

    Please, save the site from your managers ...

  41. I protest BETA by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 1

    I've emailed them... they ignore... the more they ignore the quicker their downfall.

    Ignore your userbase, and you shall have none. If I am ignored much longer, I will leave. Just like I left mashable after their AOL'ed it.

    PS. I've been a slashdotter for 7+ years.

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
  42. Maybe it's just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but would we discuss the article please?

  43. "illegal activity is not allowed" by HavenBastion · · Score: 1

    ...except if it's illegal government spying? i guess they don't read TOS either.

  44. Did someone say beta? by myspys · · Score: 1

    Yes, please fuck the beta.

  45. No Beta by SnappyTech · · Score: 1

    Beta will kill this community.

  46. Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's idiots like you that are ruining it.

    I, like many others often read but seldom comment. I don't participate in these retarded arguments you hardcore slashdotters do.

    I am having trouble using this site because I used to be able to trawl through the comments after reading the article to see the occasional constructive discussion and real insight into the article from people with experience.

    Now I have to trawl through a shitload of "Fuck Beta" threads to see any of this. To me, Slashdot just looks different. Cleaner layout, more modern and some nice pictures - I like it, but I can't be fucked with you fixed-focus assholes who cant handle change. Just fucking get over it.

    1. Re:Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A sure way to KILL a site is to pull the rug out from under its community and when they complain, tell them to just get over it.

  47. Re:2014: Will Slashdot Beta Be The End of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a form of protest and understanding that Slashdot isn't what it used to be. I don't really know when DICE bought Slashdot, it feels like eons ago but I've been around since around 2001 and seen it get better and then worse and worse. I left Engadget after Timewarner bought them out because they stopped caring about their audience. I liked it back when it was indie since most things indie tends to care about their fans. Slashdot is becoming like wired. Very bias, late with every article posted, and tries to be something that it is not and it's forcing its new slashdot down our throats. But if they make the decision to go with the beta then I'll also be leaving. I left a few sites before because of their greed. IGN, Engadget, Wired, Joystiq and a few others. I don't miss out on anything since these sites just retell the same news you can find on any other site, in fact slashdot is probably the worse because it has piss-poor editors that don't edit summaries or titles properly and misguide you to RTFA. I don't think DICE understands its audience.

  48. Re:No one cares about ontopic discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I don't really know how I came about slashdot but normally nothing you look up will bring up this site so it's like its invisible to the web. Maybe 10 years ago this site was all over the web and that's how I found it but these days there's nothing. Perhaps the new slashdot (not the one in beta) is also hidden from searches and only the elite can find it rotfl Cowboyneal, please guide us!

  49. Re:2014: Will Slashdot Beta Be The End of Slashdot by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    As a form of protest and understanding that Slashdot isn't what it used to be.

    We could go back to dupes, terrible HTML formatting with broken threading, page loading issues, very bad and biased summaries, various live updates being performed on the website because the developer felt like working on the actual site to develop in real time.... But personally, I don't really want to.

    feels like eons ago but I've been around since around 2001 and seen it get better and then worse and worse.

    Reflecting on my above comment, Slashdot feels better from a site administration point of view. Comment wise, I don't find myself debating with people as much anymore; but I don't know if that's just a personal issue of my own or just that other users on this site are no longer that interesting to discuss things with.

    Slashdot is becoming like wired. Very bias, late with every article poste

    You must be new here... I remember incredibly bad bias many years back, but nobody decent would trust their summaries to begin with.

    in fact slashdot is probably the worse because it has piss-poor editors that don't edit summaries or titles properly and misguide you to RTFA. I don't think DICE understands its audience.

    Seriously, I don't think you know Slashdot's past that well or you're viewing it through rose tinted glasses.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  50. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dastardly deeds on irc, NO Say it isnt so.

  51. A police state is never happy with data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooner or later there will be roundups.
    No one or thing can stop this, it is as sure as you breath to live.

  52. 2nd that by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

    I think that's about the size of it.
    Last redesign swapped me from visiting several times daily to visiting maybe once or twice a month.
    This time round I don't think I'll be back, the whole thing seams to be little more than playpen for some new employee, I see no evidence to strengthen the "community" aspect of /. an over emphasis on whitespace and no tools to make the bland text comments more interesting.
    first post on slashdot beta, possibly among the last on slashdot. Can I just say thanks to everyone it was fun while it lasted, you hung in there while all the others fell.

  53. Re:Let's say it again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did not want to get involved in this, but this here goes *way* too far.

    1) it is a no-go to post contact information of people without their consent.
    2) Asking to flood people with spam (and that is all this bitching is!) is another no-go.
    3) Calling any person names is not appropriate. Calling a woman bitch is another huge no-go in a public forum. Yes, it might be cool in your "gang", but totally unacceptable when talking to grown-up people.
    4) Claiming that somebody is evil and has no soul just because she is of a different opinion is another no-go.

    Either get some manners or shut up.

  54. you came here in the 90s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So ... you are a bunch of crazy whackjobs that has come to slay your childhood hero, for some crazy notion of love?

  55. please stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    know what makes the beta so awful?

    comments like this.

  56. for some reason, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    i thought irc networks were being discussed here

  57. Why not? by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

    I don't see what would prevent you from screen scraping the archive, and bring our history with us to the new site.

    url_pattern = "slashdot.org/archive.pl?op=bytime&keyword=&year=&page="
    for year in (1998 to 2014):
        thread_page = 1
        while true:
            url = url_pattern.replace(").with(year).replace("").with(thread_page)
            threads = extract_threads( fetch(url) )
            if no threads:
                  break
            for thread in threads:
                comment_page = 1
                while true:
                    comments = extract_comments(thread + "?page=" + comment_page)
                    if no comments:
                        break
                    append_to_database(comments)
                    comment_page += 1
            thread_page += 1

    How long would it take?

    The Slashdot archive spans 16 years.
    Let's say there is an average of 35 pages worth of threads each year.
    Each such page of thread links takes about 7 second to load.
    In an hour you should be able to get all thread URLs.

    Let's further assume it takes 4 seconds to load a comment thread and that there are 270 threads URLs per page.
    That gives us a total of 16 x 35 x 270 ~ 150000 thread pages.
    Getting all those threads so you can extract the comment related data and meta data would then take about a week (7 days).

    Finally, lets assume each discussion thread has two pages, so we double that time. Still it's only two weeks of linear scraping to get the entire slashdot archive.
    Now if you parallelize this, it'd naturally go much quicker. A few hours of scraping is all that's needed, or a bit longer if we don't want to put undue stress on the site (being good netizen).

    Go for it I say, before the PHB DICE folk realize that they bought a platform for technical people by technical people and start removing useful features from the site (like the archive).

    --
    In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    1. Re:Why not? by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      Ok, the slash-filter botched the meta-code, but you get the point I hope ..

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié