Slashdot Mirror


Australia's Bureau of Meteorology Dumps Water Data Project

littlekorea writes "Australia's weather bureau has racked up bills of $38 million for a water data system, based on Red Hat Linux, MySQL and Java, that was originally scheduled to cost somewhere between $2 million and $5 million. The Bureau's supplier, an ASX-listed IT services provider SMS Management and Technology, did a good job of embedding itself in the bureau, with all changes having to be made by the original consultant that built it."

112 comments

  1. We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've got to say that the initial post on this topic perpetuates one of the paradigms that is sticking in the craws of Slashdot users. We are not an audience. We might be users, we might be members, we most certainly are contributors. But we are not an audience.

    If you persist in thinking of us that way, then you're going to get it wrong. You serve an audience differently than you serve contributing members of a community. Most of the complaints hinge on that difference.

    If we were an audience, we'd be coming here for the articles. Most of the complaints are about the comment system, how difficult it is to follow a conversation, how difficult it is leave a comment, etc. I come here, most of us come here, to read what my/our fellow slashdotters have to say. The value here is the community, and the most important contributors are other members, not the site or the editors.

    If you don't get that straight, then you aren't going to "get" why we're upset, so there's no chance that you'll deliver us something that we can live with. And that community is going to vanish, leaving you with nothing of value.

    You can take suggestions and maybe reduce the implosion, but unless you understand *why* we're upset, you're going to be heading in fundamentally the wrong direction.

    1. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Whats the matter with all this crap about the beta site visible in every fu... fine topic ? :-(

      Either some people do not know how to behave, or this site has a major failure.

    2. Re:We are not an audience by PGC · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Must be something wrong with the comments system, `cause I could swear I had replied to this... Once more then: See http://meta.slashdot.org/story... .

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    3. Re:We are not an audience by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Either some people do not know how to behave, or this site has a major failure.

      Correct.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Copyright law is the basis of the GPL. Copyright law says that the original holder of the copyright has the exclusive right to copy a work. The only way you can copy a work that has Copyright protection is with the permission of the author (or some other cases involving fair use that aren't relevant to this post). Most Copyright business happens as a result of contracts between the Copyright holder and those that make copies. In the book industry, the author sells his right to make copies, in some fashion, to the publisher. The publisher then creates the copies consistant with the contract, sells them and gives the author the amount of money that he or she is due (sometimes this figure is $0). This is no different than the FSF granting permission to copy a work based on a set of terms and conditions. People that publish 'political' or 'religious' works often do similar things. Many pamphlets I see contain words to the effect of "verbatum copies of this may be made without charge or further permission of X, the lawful copyright holder of this work." The GPL is based solidly in contract law, and is very similar to other software licenses in that it grants the ability to copy in a certain way, so long as certain terms are obeyed. The fact that the details of these terms differs is somewhat irrelevant when one is testing the validity of the licenese. To the extent that they are lawful is the only test that matters. And since they are lawful, SCO's claims not-with-standing, the contract is valid.

    5. Re:We are not an audience by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1, Insightful

      WE HEAR YOU We did tell you we wanted feedback.

      If they hear our feedback, and yet do nothing to address it, then it is clear that they do not care about our opinions. If they were truly listening to the user base, there would be a simple story announcing "BETA is over - we were wrong, forgive us." At this point, that is what it will take.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    6. Re:We are not an audience by PGC · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mod parent up

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    7. Re:We are not an audience by PGC · · Score: 0

      Damn, these kind of protest-posts are truly a mind-fuck. At least with the FB posts, I directly know what it is about, hereby I keep thinking WTF? Ps. Fuck Beta

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    8. Re:We are not an audience by ixvo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      sudo mod parent up

      FTFY

    9. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet. (Copy-paste the html from here so links don't get mangled!)

      On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design. Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

      If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

      We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
      We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott

      Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
      Commentors - only discuss Beta
        http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

      Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

      -----=====##### LINKS #####=====-----

      Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=56395415

      Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=3321441

      Alternative Slashdot: http://altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

    10. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      If we were an audience,

      YOU would be entertaining us.
      We however are entertaining ourselves. Your theater, but we are the actors capiche?

    11. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      sudo shutup -u -mf

    12. Re:We are not an audience by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually couldn't initially believe it when timothy described the commenters as "an audience".I mean, I could have genuinely accepted "peanut gallery", but audience is really just too much considering how most of the performance is actually made down here in the comments.

      Then again, such an attitude would explain a lot of the editorial decisions over the years. Have the slash editors really been looking at the site as a news blog first, and a commenting system second? For all these years?

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    13. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      We're an audience just like the audience when they show Rocky Horror Picture Show.

      slashcott: Feb 10 - 17

    14. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      My interpretation of the slashdot crowd is older, liberal, IT folks. Embittered by not reaching what they consider their potential, they read news daily about technology hoping for some little bauble that'll make their life better, or some obscure scientific notion that makes them feel relevant again, and bitch when it's not technology-related.

      That, my friend, IS an audience.

    15. Re:We are not an audience by Jaysyn · · Score: 0

      Bzzzt, wrong. I read *news* at Ars Technica. I come over here to talk about it.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    16. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up

      Fucking idiots like you are one of the things wrong with /. nowadays. If you have mod points, use them. If you don't, shut your fucking mouth about mod points until you earn some of your own to spend.

    17. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're an audience just like the audience when they show Rocky Horror Picture Show.

      slashcott: Feb 10 - 17

      I was gonna say "minus all the faggots and weirdos" but then I remembered that this is still slashdot.

  2. beta boycott next week! by rr_at_slashdot · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    See you all back on February 17!

    1. Re:beta boycott next week! by PGC · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      It is not februari 10th yet

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    2. Re:beta boycott next week! by rr_at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Have a nice weekend and see you back on February 17th! ;)

    3. Re:beta boycott next week! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See you all back on February 17!

      Pro Tip for Boycott: Add the word 'BOYCOTT 10-17' your Slashdot bookmarks so that you don't accidentally forget and click on it.

    4. Re:beta boycott next week! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice how the number of comments has dropped off? Normally they're about 1/3 to 1/2 of normal. Looks like people are already taking their warm bodies, and not posting.

      As a fun fact, some people will remember other sites Digg, or LGF for example where they either did massive site redesigns or pissed all over the people who made the site. Notice how their decline into the ashes of history continues? Right. /. has a chance to fix that by actually listening to their userbase who comment and drive the site with the unique information they provide. If they don't, those of us who do post unique, interesting, and insightful information will go away. If they do listen, then the site will get a reprieve until the next MBA with their head up their ass tries the same thing.

      As a useful protip to the staff who are reading this, DICE's "going forward plan" will kill the site.

    5. Re:beta boycott next week! by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Why? Only if we're coming back to sling shit again until they say "we were wrong, we didn't have a clue what we were doing". But life's too short for that - we need a new home, one that's not under DICE's idiotic control.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    6. Re: beta boycott next week! by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      clearly he only reads /. at work (instead of working)

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    7. Re:beta boycott next week! by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Beta and Mobile delenda est and Ecrasez le Infame while we are at it.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  3. Beta sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Down with slashbeta

  4. Beta by pitchpipe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Beta is so bad, all of the comments have turned to shit!

    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    1. Re:Beta by PGC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, Fuck Beta.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
  5. Agencies taking their clients money by mrthoughtful · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sucks when some designers or an agency comes along and takes all your money and then produces utter shite, which you are expected to pay for, because you asked for their advice. Like Slashdot. What an epic mess.

    --
    This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
    1. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much did you pay for Slashdot?

    2. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      How much did you pay for Slashdot?

      It's a business. They make money somehow...

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but how?

    4. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      I think many of us have been wondering how /. manages to stay alive since the site's creation you know...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by rossdee · · Score: 1

      There is an option to subscribe, at least on the classic site.

      But so far I haven't seen anything from them that says "if you subscribe you can keep access to the classic site"

      I probably would subscribe if I hd to to keep thte classic interface.

      Theres no way I would pay for the Beta

      BTW Is it pronounced Bee Tar or Bay Tar
      I have heard people say both
      How did the original Greeks pronounce it

      Who lives in the Beta quadrant? The Alpha quadrant is where the Federation and the rest of the species that show up in TOS and TNG are from
      The Gama quadrant is accessible through the Bajoran wormhole in is run by the Dominion
      and Delta quadrant is where Voyager went, and has lots of Borg

      So who is in ther Beta quadrant?

      I suppose I should say something about Australia dumping wate so I am on/off topic
      What do Climatoligists predict will happen to Australias climate as climate change gets worse?

    6. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Isn't if full of lifeguards? That's what I remember from BetaWatch.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    7. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how?

      By selling ads to show us. Thing is, if there is no "us," there are no ads to sell. They haven't gotten that memo yet.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    8. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by fatphil · · Score: 1

      In Greek, it's more like vay-ta (probably /veita/ in ASCII-IPA).
      I have no idea where the voiced bilabial plosive (stop) came from.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    9. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 1

      How much did you pay for Slashdot?

      Using RIAA/MPAA maths, many billions (if not trillions) of dollars.

      And, since (giving feedback) = (being ignored): fuck beta.

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
    10. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VI-tah

      With emphasis on the first part.

      VI => the "i" is short, as in "bit", "git", "quick"
      tah => sounds like "ta" (sometimes used when saying "thanks" to a small child) only a bit shorter

  6. racked up bills of $38 million by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

    racked up bills of $38 million for a water data system

    for that amount of money they could have secured a water supply for a small town, or provided flood defenses along half a mile of a river.

    1. Re: racked up bills of $38 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And bought back slashdot from a bunch of soulless high level marketers

      FUCK BETA

    2. Re: racked up bills of $38 million by crutchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      for that amount of money they could have secured a water supply for a small town, or provided flood defenses along half a mile of a river.

      a private company, maybe
      a government agency... not a chance in hell
      government is the definition of waste

  7. US5722418 + US5644363 + GoogleGlass by Anachragnome · · Score: 0

    The kind of information they are trying to stop flowing...by intentionally killing Slashdot .

    US5722418
    +
    US5644363
    +
    GoogleGlass
    +
    Acceptance
    =
    ????

    If history is any sort of an indicator, any rights we sell today, our children must buy back with blood tomorrow

  8. Boycott, vote up anti-beta submissions by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi Folks,
    It's your regular neighborhood troll magic maverick , and I've got a small couple of requests for you.
    1. In the firehose, vote down as offtopic anything that isn't related to the beta. Vote up anything that is related to the beta.
    2. Join the boycott from 10th to 17th Feb. Demonstrate that without the commentators, /. will obviously die.

    Cheers,
    Now back to your regular scheduled trolling.

    --
    HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    1. Re:Boycott, vote up anti-beta submissions by StripedCow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meanwhile, at Slashdot headquarters:
      "Wow, the comment statistics have really been going up lately."
      "Must be related to those 25% of users that are using beta now. They seem to like it. Keep pushing it!"

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    2. Re:Boycott, vote up anti-beta submissions by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

      LOL someone is butthurtz about my post and modded it off topic. I guess I'm going to need a bigger shotgun.

      --
      HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    3. Re:Boycott, vote up anti-beta submissions by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure "Slashdot Headquarters" consists of a few cubicles with a few underpaid admins. Dice Holding Company's headquarters are probably much nicer, but I doubt that there are many employees there either! I'm willing to bet that there are just enough to get by and make profits by dismantling websites and genericizing acquisitions according to an unimaginative formula that they believe will help them make net profits in the long run.

      --
      Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  9. I sucked a lot of cock to get where I am. by magic+maverick+ · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I only want to be the best that I can.

    My mouth is stained.

    Ah fuck it, you know what? Fuck you and your mother, I'm not getting paid enough to post this shit.

    --
    HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    1. Re:I sucked a lot of cock to get where I am. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      This effectively rules out any Linux 2.0-based systems. And considering the uptimes needed to get on the list (659 is the lowest when I'm writing this), Linux 2.2 has had very little time getting on the list. Should've been up since sometime around the end of april 1999 (somebody check this?). This allows for about 3-4 months from the release of linux 2.2.0, which means that the only admins to put this on their webservers would be freaks who just gotta have the latest bleeding-edge thingy running their server, and I'm very sure that these freaks have upgraded their systems since. Furthermore, this rules out any linux-kernel newer than 2.2.7 (which was released april 27, 1999) Now, if I remember correctly, 2.2.0 - 2.2.4 had *issues*. (and 2.2 didn't get wide acceptance before sometime after 2.2.10 or so... no wait... Red Hat released a version with some 2.2.5-version, I think... Of course, that proves nothing.)

  10. Reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is rude to randomly redirect visitors to beta.slashdot.
    Even more so because beta sucks.

    Providing a hard to find opt-out, adding /?nobeta=1 to the url, just upgrades the aggravation level from "rude" to "insulting and infuriating".
    The only acceptable option is, as always, opt-in.

    I guess you need reminding. a lot.

    1. Re:Reminder by PGC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess you are right. Hereby another reminder: Fuck Beta.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    2. Re:Reminder by pejyel · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is rude to randomly redirect visitors to beta.slashdot. Even more so because beta sucks.

      Providing a hard to find opt-out, adding /?nobeta=1 to the url, just upgrades the aggravation level from "rude" to "insulting and infuriating". The only acceptable option is, as always, opt-in.

      I guess you need reminding. a lot.

      that's why everybody's heading to this page to talk about what our options are if DICE refuses to hear us.

  11. I HATE BETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save *BSD from its fate at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dying

  12. Millions flowing into a sh*tty project... by gridzilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... that sounds exactly like BETA!

    Let's stick with the old layout Mmkay?

    1. Re:Millions flowing into a sh*tty project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What truly scares me is how folks like this are lusting over something they could never even utilize. I could *maybe* understand someone's desire for a Cray (and even that's a stretch), given the company's interesting history (and even more interesting founder, Seymour Cray). But a cluster of PCs?? What's so great about having racks upon racks filled with x86 systems sitting in your den that will recieve little or no use? And really, what's so great about a Cray in your own home? What are you going to run on either? Distributed TTY GNOME? And no, you're not going to be able to recompile the Linux kernel in two seconds with -any- cluster. You're better off builing a nice desktop PC and a companion server. Lust over the 100 GHz PC that you'll be running in just 8 years.

  13. Fuck Beta by FunPika · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet. (Copy-paste the html from here so links don't get mangled!)

    On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design. Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

    If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

    We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
    We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott

    Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
    Commentors - only discuss Beta
    http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

    Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

    -----=====##### LINKS #####=====-----

    Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=56395415
    Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=3321441
    Alternative Slashdot: http://altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

    --
    After years of not using a signature, I am going to make one to say the following: Fuck Beta
    1. Re:Fuck Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real catch here is a VCP with no rewind. There won't be any DVD's as they will figure out that with video cassettes and no rewind, they will have your viewing habits, as you will have to purchase a new tape each time you wish to watch something!!! To assure this, they will likely not really attach the tape to one spool to make sure that you don't build an illegal external rewinder. They wouldn't want you to be able to view that tape that you legally purchased more than one time.

    2. Re:Fuck Beta by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet. (Copy-paste the html from here so links don't get mangled!)

      On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design. Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

      If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

      We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
      We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott

      Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
      Commentors - only discuss Beta
        http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

      Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

              -----=====##### LINKS #####=====-----
             

      Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=56395415

              Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=3321441

              Alternative Slashdot: http://altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

      All of you who don't like the Beta, just put 'I hate Slashdot Beta!' in your SIG and find something else to talk about. Just for god's sake stop hijacking threads with this off-topic whining. The rest of us have all long since noticed that you don't like the new site layout.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    3. Re:Fuck Beta by PGC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you are right. Fuck Beta.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    4. Re:Fuck Beta by N1AK · · Score: 1

      I thought that for the last couple of days. Then I tried using Beta for a couple of threads and it is a much less enjoyable experience so I can understand the frustration. Putting "Fuck Beta" in a signature isn't going to do anything to change the owners mind. Being polite and respectful and offering feedback, has apparently, been ineffective. So what would work? Making the comments section largely unusable by spamming it with "fuck beta" comments perhaps? You have to consider that the pro-beta comments are being moderated favourably which implies that it isn't just a few bitching change adverse users but a widely held view.

      Yes, it inconveniences people who wanted to get insightful comments but that's exactly why it's more likely to be effective.

    5. Re:Fuck BETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a coding camp, but a web UI design camp.

      It looks like a bunch of design newbs threw together every current design fad they could name, with no concern whatsoever for the overall goal of the system (keep commenters showing up and contributing content every day) or even its basic usability.

      How long is it going to be before some of these nitwits and their moronic bosses rediscover "form follows function"? Given that they never should have forgotten it, it's already been way, way too long....

  14. on topic thread here by crutchy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    this article seems to imply that linux was the reason for the cost blowout... and not that it was managed by a government agency.

    look at any project administered by any government agency around the world... how many are on budget? why is that? it has nothing to do with linux and everything to do with government waste

    1. Re:on topic thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In the United States, the standard railroad gauge is exactly four feet, eight-and-one-half inches wide. Why? Because that's the way they built them in England. Why did they build them that way in England? Because that's how wide English tramways were. And why were they that width? Because the people who built the trams also built wagons, and wagons wheels were that far apart. Why? Because the ancient Roman roads in England had wheel ruts exactly that far apart. Why? Because those ancient ruts were made by the wheels of Roman war chariots, and their wheels were exactly four feet, eight-and-a-half-inches wide. Why? Because Roman war chariots were just wide enough to accomodate two Roman war horses.

    2. Re:on topic thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now, perhaps with proper microstructuring, you could make a system in which electrons under a potential difference tunnel across a gap, carrying heat without providing a thermally conductive path back to the cold side, and perhaps you could get high cooling efficiencies out of such a device. Granted, you still have to pull the heat off the hot side of the device, but if you could (for example) have the cold side at 20C next to your CPU, and the hot side at 120C exposed to an air stream, you will move more heat into the air stream than you would from the 50C surface of a CPU that was not actively cooled.

    3. Re:on topic thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      You may be wondering what CmdrTacos special taco is. You will be wishing that you hadnt been wondering after you finish reading this post. To make his special taco, CmdrTaco takes a taco shell and shits on it. He then adds lettuce, takes out his tiny withered dick (otherwise known as his Commander), puts his special taco sauce on it which means he jacks off on the taco, and adds a compound to make the person who eats the taco unconscious. Of course, the compound does not make the person unconscious until the taco is fully eaten. Thus CmdrTaco force-feeds the taco to the unsuspecting victim. After all, who would knowingly eat shit and CmdrTacos jizz?

    4. Re:on topic thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      who would knowingly eat shit and CmdrTacos jizz?

      the CEO of Dice

    5. Re:on topic thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this article seems to imply that fuck beta was the reason for the cost blowout... and not that it was managed by beta

      look at any beta by any beta around the world how many are fuck beta? why is that? it has nothing to do with fuck beta and everything to do with beta.

      There i fixed it.

    6. Re:on topic thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if it were Windows, then all the blame would clearly be on Windows. Since it's Linux, Linux is the victim of this

    7. Re:on topic thread here by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      SciAm's "connections" was a great column!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:on topic thread here by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is the tender system is broken. Government projects in Australia are contracted to the consulting company who promises to deliver a solution in the shortest time and the smallest budget. They then sign a blank cheque based on the expected initial phase of development and then the company puts its hand out until completion.

      What happened here is that the company promised to deliver a solution at $2.5million a year and has managed to milk the system for an additional $30m ! So it's a government department, certainly, but the contractor exaggerated its ability to deliver.

      I've worked for a government IT project, directly employed by the department, where years after the original company did handover, we were still cleaning up the mess. No documentation, no code comments, some of the worst anti-patterns I've ever seen. Too many cowboys in the industry and it's a pity the government just don't have an in-house development team.

    9. Re:on topic thread here by crutchy · · Score: 1

      either that or just not put the tender out to begin with... it's not like taxpayers are going to benefit from any outcome

      the government should just stick with what it was originally chartered to do... govern... and that's all

    10. Re:on topic thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or... you know... you could just look at the topic objectively... but why the hell would you wanna do that?

  15. Yea yea yea by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 0
    "did a good job" and "with all changes having to be made by the original consultant that built it" in the same sentence surely this is an oxymoron!

    Sorry will have a go at BETA on my next post

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Yea yea yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      You may be wondering what CmdrTacos special taco is. You will be wishing that you hadnt been wondering after you finish reading this post. To make his special taco, CmdrTaco takes a taco shell and shits on it. He then adds lettuce, takes out his tiny withered dick (otherwise known as his Commander Beta Sucks), puts his special taco sauce on it which means he jacks off on the taco, and adds a compound to make the person who eats the taco unconscious. Of course, the compound does not make the person unconscious until the taco is fully eaten. Thus CmdrTaco force-feeds the taco to the unsuspecting victim. After all, who would knowingly eat shit and CmdrTacos jizz?

  16. Diff between Using and Being FLOSS by Coeurderoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This waste of public money illustrate the fact that companies might be "Pushing Open Source" but not wanting to be "Open Source"...

    Using "free" software is not really relevant if the company does not integrate a policy of putting software back into to "free" pool...
    If they would use best practice, the level of contribution (+ probabley higher reuse) would make sure that they are not the "only player avaiable"...

    And of course going over 80% increase of the initial deal should get you axed anyway, how the hell did it grow to 38 in 18 month ?

        Somebody willing to "show" his/her code would probably not end up in this situation, additionally even if the deal would be "more expensive than initially planned"
        at least the Australian government would have something they could promote, share, sell to other countries....
        That way they just have a big hole in the public account (and probably some people who have got a very nice and totally undeserved bonus of some form or another...)

    1. Re:Diff between Using and Being FLOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Horror/Sci-Fi writer Stephen King was found dead at his Maine residence this morning. Apparently, Mr. King was working in his garage when a loaded nailgun fell off of a workbench, causing it to discharge and riddle him with approximately 37 penny nails. He then fell face-first into his newly-poured concrete driveway, where he hardened and was found six hours later by his son Owen. I'm sure he will be missed by the Slashdot community - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his impact on the advancement of Objectivism as the "hip philosophy" of the 21st Century. Truly an American icon.

  17. So this is how Slashdot dies. by McDutchie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Much like Digg did. How sad.

    1. Re:So this is how Slashdot dies. by StripedCow · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The worst part of it is: M$ will outlive Slashdot...

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  18. StackExchange please help us by StripedCow · · Score: 0

    StackExchange, can you please build us a new Slashdot?

    You have most of the code already in place (comments need to be hierarchically structured, though).
    You have the servers.
    Most importantly, you have lots of sincere users with a background in programming, physics, etcetera.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    1. Re:StackExchange please help us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, let's turn open-ended discussions into a bitch fest about how questions and posts don't meet the requirements and downvoting it into oblivion instead of actually addressing issues and being constructive...

  19. BACK ON TOPIC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    FUCK BETA. BETA SUCKS. FUCK DICE HOLDINGS. DICE HOLDINGS SUCKS.

    Note that any associated supporting element is not subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds delimits the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), relational information appears to correlate rather closely with a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is to be regarded as a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. With this clarification, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is rather different from irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.

    FUCK BETA. BETA SUCKS. FUCK DICE HOLDINGS. DICE HOLDINGS SUCKS.

  20. IRL DDOS of DICE 888-321-DICE (3423) by Halapchik · · Score: -1, Troll
    So since the Dice corporate overlords seem to be oblivious to the desires of the "audience", and seem to only care about the $$, it would follow that the way to get the attention of said corporate overlords is to impact their business at Dice.com. I propose an IRL DDOS of their phone lines. Emails can be deleted by the million, but phone calls on the other hand take up valuable time from their limited support staff. Please feel free to contact Dice support and keep their reps on the line for a few minutes. Talk POLITELY (hey they work for a living too) about how their bosses own a website called Slashdot which is an integral institution of the internets, and how Dice is destroying it.

    Even if only 10% of us make one phone call once a day, thats over 40,000 phone calls. Once their customer service department becomes too overwhelmed by calls to function, and if we can make it persist for a few days, you can bet that the higher ups will take notice.

    Here is their customer service line: 888-321-DICE (3423)

    If you have more phone numbers for Dice, please post them as well.

    Oh ya, BETA can suck an unwashed shit covered cock after an all night ass rape orgy.

  21. BOYCOTT 10-17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Fuck beta. We are not coming from 10 to 17 of February so you learn your lesson.

  22. Will it also dump the... by ppff · · Score: -1

    Slashdot Beta ? I will join the boycott. 10th to 17th February. If the beta is not dumped the 18th, I will not come back. I just cannot understand how they can make such a sucky design.

    --
    x
  23. This is the way the Slashdot ends... by wbr1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is the way the Slashdot ends
    This is the way the Slashdot ends
    This is the way the Slashdot ends
    Not with a big bang but a beta.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  24. Hot Grits on Natalie Portman's butt cheeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUCK BETA. BETA SUCKS. FUCK DICE HOLDINGS COMPANY. DICE HOLDINGS COMPANY SUCKS.

    Dennis Ritchie: I think the Linux phenomenon is quite delightful, because it draws so strongly on the basis that Unix provided. Linux seems to be the among the healthiest of the direct Unix derivatives, though there are also the various BSD systems as well as the more official offerings from the workstation and mainframe manufacturers.

    Dennis Ritchie: My own computational world is a strange blend of Plan 9, Windows, and Inferno. I very much admire Linux's growth and vigor. Occasionally, people ask me much the same question [about Linux], but posed in a way that seems to expect an answer that shows jealousy or irritation about Linux vs. Unix as delivered and branded by traditional companies. Not at all; I think of both as the continuation of ideas that were started by Ken and me and many others, many years ago.

    FUCK BETA. BETA SUCKS. FUCK DICE HOLDINGS COMPANY. DICE HOLDINGS COMPANY SUCKS.

    Slashdotters unite! Revert to your feral nerd forms!

    1. Re:Hot Grits on Natalie Portman's butt cheeks by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      Slashdotters unite! Revert to your feral nerd forms!

      NERDBOTS ASSEMBLE!

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  25. Fuck BETA by puffingbear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fuck BETA, that is all

  26. TFA disagrees with submission summary by maynard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to TFA:

    SMS Management and Technology won the IT initial development contract in June 2009 in a deal initially expected to be worth at least $2.5 million per year.

    The audit office questioned the value of the project, which is estimated to have reached $38.5 million for associated systems and applications by 30 June 2013.

    So, across four years what should have cost $10M wound up costing nearly $40M. However:

    Within 18 months, however, four change orders had been processed, increasing the value of the deal to over $15.4 million in the first two years

    Thus, change orders from a client who changed milestones mid-stream:

    The milestones for the contract were not tightly specified, nor was the extent to which the industry partner staff would be integrated with or separated from internal bureau IT staff roles and deliverables.

    Leading to a situation where, "The contract began to resemble a time and materials contract rather than a fixedâfee contract contingent on achieving milestones and deliverables." Meaning that the client kept changing their mind so often the consulting firm was required to baby a system they hadn't thought through to begin with and had thus grown into a monstrosity that served disparate and disorganized goals.

    No wonder it went over budget.

    But that has nothing to do with open source and everything to do with bad project management. Notice that they've solved the problem by choosing "...a replacement, based on an off-the-shelf software product."

    Which, if it meets their needs - bully for them. But is more likely an imposed solution to a problem they hadn't clearly defined to begin with. Thus, it's likely they'll find themselves in the same situation. Not because open source software is bad, or the commercial software is bad, or the consulting firm was probably bad... but because the bureau of meteorology has no idea what it wants to do with this data.

    The problem here is with undefined goals set by management. Until they face that fact they'll go round this merry-go-round again and again. And taxpayers will foot the bill.

    1. Re:TFA disagrees with submission summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Around 1991-1992, I started getting into playing with UNIX variants. At this time, almost everyone and his dog has a commercial UNIX. Dell, Mt. Xinu (had source with it), Sun (Solaris 2.x was not around, so it was still SunOS 4.1.x, AIX was out, being a BSD with SVR4 extensions, and Apple's A/UX was out, System V to the core. NeXTStep was out, very much BSD. All of these either required fairly expensive hardware and/or the OS was priced too high for a humble University of Texas student. So, at that time, were two new varients that were free to play with. One was Linux (3 dists, TAMU, MCC, and SLS), and the other one was 386BSD, which the binaries came on 11 floppies, X and source, about 20-30. 386BSD from Jolitz was very stable, and from booting the compressed boot/root disk was amazing what it had on, on just one floppy. I promptly had 386BSD running, and posted for help for two small issues in the BSD/386 newsgroup (BSD/386 and 386BSD shared the same newsgroup. BSD/386 was BSDI's commercial UNIX.) I got the answer I needed quite quickly, and politely. (A bug in 386BSD would freeze the console until you logged in via a serial port, and did an 'su'. Bog knows why that fixed it.) I played with that, had docs on Linux, but I never started using Linux until about 1993. At the time, development was seeming to be stagnent on the 386BSD front, and Linux was _the_ OS to hack for. I soon got SLS, then Slackware (which I still keep a subscription to, as that distribution deserves my support). Soon after, 386BSD broke into two camps wanting different things -- FreeBSD for better x86 tools, NetBSD for better cross-platform portability. Around mid-1995, OpenBSD split off, mainly for personal differences, but for other factors as well -- having very good security, IIRC. Now, we have three BSD's, each very solid. (All have S/KEY built into the login sequence, so if you don't have an ssh client, you can still telnet in, using a one-time password algorithm, something I had to bolt onto Linux) All in all, neither is better, each has a different reason for being around, and the *BSD and Linux infighting is just plain foolish. Microsoft is the target, and all 4 OS's are now in the 'catch MS's taillights' mode, instead of going into new territory.

    2. Re:TFA disagrees with submission summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Governments all over the world are laying off staff to the point where what is left of the government bureaucracy is too dumb to even BUY technology.

    3. Re:TFA disagrees with submission summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might be attributed as anonymous coward but you are probably the most coherent and well-thought-out of any respondent, and as such the person to whom I think this response is deserved.

      Before I start, though, here are some facts - I was on the project team and one of the last to leave the client (I worked for the consultancy in question) and there were only two or three consultants left at the time. I left the client site in SEPTEMBER 2011. So close to two years of alleged cost and wastage were not even within the scope of anything done in the initial project. There's something to think about where did the money really go and ? ;-)

      In other "reports" - and I use the term loosely - of what happened in the project (for example, read this http://www.itnews.com.au/News/371666,weather-bureau-forced-to-dump-water-data-project.aspx for a mindless rehash of the report that prompted this furore) there is nothing more than parroting of the report findings with nothing new added to the dialogue. I apologise if I didn't format that URL correctly, it's my first post and I'm pissed in more ways than one.

      It is relevant to note that the so-called saviour, AWRIS 2, actually commenced development in late 2011 / early 2012. Oh wait, hang on, 2012 you say? Delivering at the end of 2014 you say? Hmmm.

      The fact is that the initial release of the software was done in only four months from start of development. Yes, FOUR MONTHS, or FOUR SPRINTS (we did 20 day sprints). There were about two or three months before that where a skeleton team elicited requirements, architected infrastructure, application and security aspects and set up the development and test environments. There is NO WAY it cost the bureau $38M. The engagement was as an industry partner with a requirement to provide capability uplift of the client staff, which would have worked if they hadn't kept resigning because they "didn't do TDD".

      Despite being code complete in four months, the project's initial phase (water storages) dragged out another five to six months because it didn't have any data loaded, and even though that was not within the remit of the consultancy's engagement, we helped our industry "partner" to achieve their goal (and made [] look good oh did I say that?).

      The project was not perfect nor was the design, but frankly it was far better than many I have worked on in 20+ years of software development (IMNSHO). It was the best we could do given the Bureau's own (replaced) enterprise architect mandated certain requirements that resulted in some of the highlighted issues in the report. We were forced to design a system that held multiple versions (potentially incorrect) of time series data within fact tables of our warehouse - and we are talking 15 minute measurement intervals here folks and sometimes less, sometimes more. So we had massive complexity simply in finding the latest valid measurement to use.

      Not only that but despite the fact it was ensconced in law (go read the water act 2007 yourself as I did, somewhere around section 24/26) that the BoM could legally enforce a data transfer standard on all of the 270+ data suppliers, they lacked the will to do so and instead forced the project team to support 270+ individual data transfer formats, almost all of which were different. I'm sure everyone reading this can design a simple (i.e. not >/dev/null) system that can handle 270+ arbitrarily complex data transfer formats and ingest them into a database using a common storage format, with appropriate normalisation against Australian Hydrological Datum and including relevant water storage rating tables in less than six months with a small team, right?

      To be fair, the number of suppliers for the initial launch was drastically reduced (I can't be sure but 18 suppliers leaps to mind) as a recognition of the complexity of the task.

      Let's talk about some of the real reasons behind all of this.
      * Yes, the system was in some aspects overly complex. This was due mostly to the direction impo

  27. beta is hard to look at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *In case nobody else already mentioned it, the beta comment layout's flat grey boxes are hard to see if your screen isn't perfectly calibrated, or you want to read without glasses, or your vision generally isn't that great.

    *The beta look may be more modern, but this isn't a fashion site, the community prefers function over form.

    *Fashion blog themes made by kids on tumblr have better visibility without sacrificing the functionality of the site.

  28. Fuck BETA by delta98 · · Score: 1

    It looks like shit. Where was this designed , a coding bootcamp?

  29. Beware the lesson of gay.com by Powercntrl · · Score: 0

    Once the most popular chat and dating site for gays and lesbians, gay.com launched a bad redesign to their site and their subscriber count never recovered. The redesign broke compatibility with all of the third party chat clients and the redesigned on-site chat was so unreliable when it launched that it sent most of their users running to competing chat/dating services. By the time most of the bugs were fixed, it was already too late - a fundamental paradigm shift had taken place, their users had switched to smartphone apps and no longer had much interest in sitting at home in front of a computer.

    Had they brought the full functionality of their popular dating site to mobile devices, history may have played out differently. Instead, they launched a horribly broken desktop site and sealed their fate. Dice could learn a lot from this failure.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  30. There's always Hacker News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    While the Beta mess is sorted out (I hope it is!), why not cool down your nerves and relax at Hacker News. That's most close to Slashdot of the sites I can think. Comes with a premium no-frills UI that is great with all devices, and HTTPS out of the box. Pair that with newsyc20 Twitter feed and you're all set.

  31. And you're dreaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    It has been pointed out with financial information from Dice that Slashdot is not worth it as is. It's in the hole for millions and I don't think anyone has ever made Slashdot a money maker. The only folks who made money on Slashdot were the founders who sold it off during the Dot Com craze.

    In other words, Slashdot, as you know it, is a goner because it is not pulling its weight.

    All these "protests" and bitching is STILL traffic to the site. And even if all you got a clue and just stopped coming here (fat chance! You're all so addicted to this site, I don't blame the management for taking you for granted.), Slashdot/Dice will just have a monetize the domain some other way.

    "Slashdot.com - where to go for enterprise servers!"

    1. Re:And you're dreaming. by Pikoro · · Score: 0

      But. What could the costs really be other than what they paid for the site? Subtract that, and you got what? 5 "editors" at say $80,000/yr (which is insane for how little they do, should be $30,000) So $80k x 5 is 400k/year total. Hosting should be in house. Bandwidth costs are practically non-existent, and server maintenance should be done by the editors cause they're "geeky". If they couldn't handle something as simple as that, they shouldn't even be here. I don't see the issue. I ran a site that got millions of unique users per month for damn near nothing but my personal time and the cost of an internet connection (~$80/mo). If they're losing millions, they're doing it wrong. Way wrong.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  32. * FORK FORK * FORK FORK * FORK FORK * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    thank you.

  33. Too early in the morning to... by darkz0r · · Score: 1

    ....point out that Beta sucks ?

    1. Re:Too early in the morning to... by Mix+Master+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Never too early, hopefully not too late.

      --
      Oppressing an entire population is never cheap.
      --Jeckler (/. Beta IS GARBAGE!)
  34. More news: Slashdot dumps users with beta site. by urbanriot · · Score: 2

    In other news, a high school co-op student 'working' for Slashdot has racked up an undisclosed amount of semester time designing a new beta site, a site heavily criticized by any user that's pushed into it. Many users are attempting to pool their resources to create an alternative Slashdot site as they feel the owners of Slashdot.com aren't listening to their criticisms since the current site is fine the way it is and doesn't need any the horrid beta design.

  35. I will Adblock on Slashdot until Beta goes away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol revenue, amirite DICE?

  36. stories about dumping trial projects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If enough headline stories are about dumping expensive beta upgrades to things that are not broken maybe BETA can be canned ?????

  37. You FAIL it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    during this file aal; in order to go MOViE [imdb.com] as WideOpen,

  38. A not unusual situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What has very likely happened is that, at each stage, the contractor has delivered something that sort of meets the specification (which was probably inadequate since the customer did not understand their requirements, let alone the issues and trade-offs), but is obviously unusable - hence the inevitable change order. It is also quite likely that they sold the the customer on the desirability or even the need for changes that lead to the need for more changes. Of course if the in-house expertise is lacking, it is almost inevitable that things will go from bad to worse. One of the perverse things in these situations is that the poorer the quality of the work, more money the contractor will end up being paid.

  39. I stopped reading slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Because of the "community."

    I'm a human being in the business of IT, not a basement dwelling linux zealot. I want information, not advocacy.

    More content and less circlejerk would be great.

  40. How about they just dump comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since no one seems to have anything to add aside from asinine dump beta comments. Pretty sure that acting like petulant children and spamming f beta isn't going to do anything. How about you just just have your pointless little boycott next week and the comments can actually be useful. I'm posting this comment from beta just to spite the anti-betas.

  41. get a room by rewindustry · · Score: 1

    for pity sake

  42. from my understanding of the case by rewindustry · · Score: 2

    used to know the leader of this project quite well, personally, and i can assure you the company in question did everything in it's power to deliver an honest specification and work. the problem was the australian government - it's damned near impossible to hit a specification moving at the speed of australian politics at the time.

  43. This is typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an anonymous coward who has had dealings with SMS and others in the past, I can confirm that the attitude of management at times has not been about "how do we get the job done?" but "how do we get more people in on this work?". It seemed that the quest to charge customers extra often overrode the intent to complete a project. The client did not help themselves at all by not managing the situation well from their end.