Slashdot Mirror


Australia's Bureau of Meteorology Dumps Water Data Project

littlekorea writes "Australia's weather bureau has racked up bills of $38 million for a water data system, based on Red Hat Linux, MySQL and Java, that was originally scheduled to cost somewhere between $2 million and $5 million. The Bureau's supplier, an ASX-listed IT services provider SMS Management and Technology, did a good job of embedding itself in the bureau, with all changes having to be made by the original consultant that built it."

52 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've got to say that the initial post on this topic perpetuates one of the paradigms that is sticking in the craws of Slashdot users. We are not an audience. We might be users, we might be members, we most certainly are contributors. But we are not an audience.

    If you persist in thinking of us that way, then you're going to get it wrong. You serve an audience differently than you serve contributing members of a community. Most of the complaints hinge on that difference.

    If we were an audience, we'd be coming here for the articles. Most of the complaints are about the comment system, how difficult it is to follow a conversation, how difficult it is leave a comment, etc. I come here, most of us come here, to read what my/our fellow slashdotters have to say. The value here is the community, and the most important contributors are other members, not the site or the editors.

    If you don't get that straight, then you aren't going to "get" why we're upset, so there's no chance that you'll deliver us something that we can live with. And that community is going to vanish, leaving you with nothing of value.

    You can take suggestions and maybe reduce the implosion, but unless you understand *why* we're upset, you're going to be heading in fundamentally the wrong direction.

    1. Re:We are not an audience by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Either some people do not know how to behave, or this site has a major failure.

      Correct.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:We are not an audience by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1, Insightful

      WE HEAR YOU We did tell you we wanted feedback.

      If they hear our feedback, and yet do nothing to address it, then it is clear that they do not care about our opinions. If they were truly listening to the user base, there would be a simple story announcing "BETA is over - we were wrong, forgive us." At this point, that is what it will take.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    3. Re:We are not an audience by ixvo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      sudo mod parent up

      FTFY

    4. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      sudo shutup -u -mf

    5. Re:We are not an audience by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually couldn't initially believe it when timothy described the commenters as "an audience".I mean, I could have genuinely accepted "peanut gallery", but audience is really just too much considering how most of the performance is actually made down here in the comments.

      Then again, such an attitude would explain a lot of the editorial decisions over the years. Have the slash editors really been looking at the site as a news blog first, and a commenting system second? For all these years?

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    6. Re:We are not an audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up

      Fucking idiots like you are one of the things wrong with /. nowadays. If you have mod points, use them. If you don't, shut your fucking mouth about mod points until you earn some of your own to spend.

  2. beta boycott next week! by rr_at_slashdot · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    See you all back on February 17!

    1. Re:beta boycott next week! by rr_at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Have a nice weekend and see you back on February 17th! ;)

    2. Re:beta boycott next week! by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Why? Only if we're coming back to sling shit again until they say "we were wrong, we didn't have a clue what we were doing". But life's too short for that - we need a new home, one that's not under DICE's idiotic control.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    3. Re: beta boycott next week! by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      clearly he only reads /. at work (instead of working)

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    4. Re:beta boycott next week! by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Beta and Mobile delenda est and Ecrasez le Infame while we are at it.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  3. Beta by pitchpipe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Beta is so bad, all of the comments have turned to shit!

    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    1. Re:Beta by PGC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, Fuck Beta.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
  4. Agencies taking their clients money by mrthoughtful · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sucks when some designers or an agency comes along and takes all your money and then produces utter shite, which you are expected to pay for, because you asked for their advice. Like Slashdot. What an epic mess.

    --
    This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
    1. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      How much did you pay for Slashdot?

      It's a business. They make money somehow...

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      I think many of us have been wondering how /. manages to stay alive since the site's creation you know...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by rossdee · · Score: 1

      There is an option to subscribe, at least on the classic site.

      But so far I haven't seen anything from them that says "if you subscribe you can keep access to the classic site"

      I probably would subscribe if I hd to to keep thte classic interface.

      Theres no way I would pay for the Beta

      BTW Is it pronounced Bee Tar or Bay Tar
      I have heard people say both
      How did the original Greeks pronounce it

      Who lives in the Beta quadrant? The Alpha quadrant is where the Federation and the rest of the species that show up in TOS and TNG are from
      The Gama quadrant is accessible through the Bajoran wormhole in is run by the Dominion
      and Delta quadrant is where Voyager went, and has lots of Borg

      So who is in ther Beta quadrant?

      I suppose I should say something about Australia dumping wate so I am on/off topic
      What do Climatoligists predict will happen to Australias climate as climate change gets worse?

    4. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Isn't if full of lifeguards? That's what I remember from BetaWatch.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how?

      By selling ads to show us. Thing is, if there is no "us," there are no ads to sell. They haven't gotten that memo yet.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    6. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by fatphil · · Score: 1

      In Greek, it's more like vay-ta (probably /veita/ in ASCII-IPA).
      I have no idea where the voiced bilabial plosive (stop) came from.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    7. Re:Agencies taking their clients money by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 1

      How much did you pay for Slashdot?

      Using RIAA/MPAA maths, many billions (if not trillions) of dollars.

      And, since (giving feedback) = (being ignored): fuck beta.

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
  5. racked up bills of $38 million by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

    racked up bills of $38 million for a water data system

    for that amount of money they could have secured a water supply for a small town, or provided flood defenses along half a mile of a river.

    1. Re: racked up bills of $38 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And bought back slashdot from a bunch of soulless high level marketers

      FUCK BETA

    2. Re: racked up bills of $38 million by crutchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      for that amount of money they could have secured a water supply for a small town, or provided flood defenses along half a mile of a river.

      a private company, maybe
      a government agency... not a chance in hell
      government is the definition of waste

  6. Boycott, vote up anti-beta submissions by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi Folks,
    It's your regular neighborhood troll magic maverick , and I've got a small couple of requests for you.
    1. In the firehose, vote down as offtopic anything that isn't related to the beta. Vote up anything that is related to the beta.
    2. Join the boycott from 10th to 17th Feb. Demonstrate that without the commentators, /. will obviously die.

    Cheers,
    Now back to your regular scheduled trolling.

    --
    HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    1. Re:Boycott, vote up anti-beta submissions by StripedCow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meanwhile, at Slashdot headquarters:
      "Wow, the comment statistics have really been going up lately."
      "Must be related to those 25% of users that are using beta now. They seem to like it. Keep pushing it!"

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    2. Re:Boycott, vote up anti-beta submissions by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

      LOL someone is butthurtz about my post and modded it off topic. I guess I'm going to need a bigger shotgun.

      --
      HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    3. Re:Boycott, vote up anti-beta submissions by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure "Slashdot Headquarters" consists of a few cubicles with a few underpaid admins. Dice Holding Company's headquarters are probably much nicer, but I doubt that there are many employees there either! I'm willing to bet that there are just enough to get by and make profits by dismantling websites and genericizing acquisitions according to an unimaginative formula that they believe will help them make net profits in the long run.

      --
      Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  7. Re:Reminder by PGC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess you are right. Hereby another reminder: Fuck Beta.

    --
    The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
  8. Re:Reminder by pejyel · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is rude to randomly redirect visitors to beta.slashdot. Even more so because beta sucks.

    Providing a hard to find opt-out, adding /?nobeta=1 to the url, just upgrades the aggravation level from "rude" to "insulting and infuriating". The only acceptable option is, as always, opt-in.

    I guess you need reminding. a lot.

    that's why everybody's heading to this page to talk about what our options are if DICE refuses to hear us.

  9. Millions flowing into a sh*tty project... by gridzilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... that sounds exactly like BETA!

    Let's stick with the old layout Mmkay?

  10. Fuck Beta by FunPika · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet. (Copy-paste the html from here so links don't get mangled!)

    On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design. Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

    If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

    We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
    We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott

    Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
    Commentors - only discuss Beta
    http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

    Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

    -----=====##### LINKS #####=====-----

    Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=56395415
    Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=3321441
    Alternative Slashdot: http://altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

    --
    After years of not using a signature, I am going to make one to say the following: Fuck Beta
    1. Re:Fuck Beta by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet. (Copy-paste the html from here so links don't get mangled!)

      On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design. Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

      If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

      We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
      We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott

      Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
      Commentors - only discuss Beta
        http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

      Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

              -----=====##### LINKS #####=====-----
             

      Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=56395415

              Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=3321441

              Alternative Slashdot: http://altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

      All of you who don't like the Beta, just put 'I hate Slashdot Beta!' in your SIG and find something else to talk about. Just for god's sake stop hijacking threads with this off-topic whining. The rest of us have all long since noticed that you don't like the new site layout.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    2. Re:Fuck Beta by PGC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you are right. Fuck Beta.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    3. Re:Fuck Beta by N1AK · · Score: 1

      I thought that for the last couple of days. Then I tried using Beta for a couple of threads and it is a much less enjoyable experience so I can understand the frustration. Putting "Fuck Beta" in a signature isn't going to do anything to change the owners mind. Being polite and respectful and offering feedback, has apparently, been ineffective. So what would work? Making the comments section largely unusable by spamming it with "fuck beta" comments perhaps? You have to consider that the pro-beta comments are being moderated favourably which implies that it isn't just a few bitching change adverse users but a widely held view.

      Yes, it inconveniences people who wanted to get insightful comments but that's exactly why it's more likely to be effective.

  11. on topic thread here by crutchy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    this article seems to imply that linux was the reason for the cost blowout... and not that it was managed by a government agency.

    look at any project administered by any government agency around the world... how many are on budget? why is that? it has nothing to do with linux and everything to do with government waste

    1. Re:on topic thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In the United States, the standard railroad gauge is exactly four feet, eight-and-one-half inches wide. Why? Because that's the way they built them in England. Why did they build them that way in England? Because that's how wide English tramways were. And why were they that width? Because the people who built the trams also built wagons, and wagons wheels were that far apart. Why? Because the ancient Roman roads in England had wheel ruts exactly that far apart. Why? Because those ancient ruts were made by the wheels of Roman war chariots, and their wheels were exactly four feet, eight-and-a-half-inches wide. Why? Because Roman war chariots were just wide enough to accomodate two Roman war horses.

    2. Re:on topic thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now, perhaps with proper microstructuring, you could make a system in which electrons under a potential difference tunnel across a gap, carrying heat without providing a thermally conductive path back to the cold side, and perhaps you could get high cooling efficiencies out of such a device. Granted, you still have to pull the heat off the hot side of the device, but if you could (for example) have the cold side at 20C next to your CPU, and the hot side at 120C exposed to an air stream, you will move more heat into the air stream than you would from the 50C surface of a CPU that was not actively cooled.

    3. Re:on topic thread here by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      SciAm's "connections" was a great column!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:on topic thread here by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is the tender system is broken. Government projects in Australia are contracted to the consulting company who promises to deliver a solution in the shortest time and the smallest budget. They then sign a blank cheque based on the expected initial phase of development and then the company puts its hand out until completion.

      What happened here is that the company promised to deliver a solution at $2.5million a year and has managed to milk the system for an additional $30m ! So it's a government department, certainly, but the contractor exaggerated its ability to deliver.

      I've worked for a government IT project, directly employed by the department, where years after the original company did handover, we were still cleaning up the mess. No documentation, no code comments, some of the worst anti-patterns I've ever seen. Too many cowboys in the industry and it's a pity the government just don't have an in-house development team.

    5. Re:on topic thread here by crutchy · · Score: 1

      either that or just not put the tender out to begin with... it's not like taxpayers are going to benefit from any outcome

      the government should just stick with what it was originally chartered to do... govern... and that's all

  12. Diff between Using and Being FLOSS by Coeurderoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This waste of public money illustrate the fact that companies might be "Pushing Open Source" but not wanting to be "Open Source"...

    Using "free" software is not really relevant if the company does not integrate a policy of putting software back into to "free" pool...
    If they would use best practice, the level of contribution (+ probabley higher reuse) would make sure that they are not the "only player avaiable"...

    And of course going over 80% increase of the initial deal should get you axed anyway, how the hell did it grow to 38 in 18 month ?

        Somebody willing to "show" his/her code would probably not end up in this situation, additionally even if the deal would be "more expensive than initially planned"
        at least the Australian government would have something they could promote, share, sell to other countries....
        That way they just have a big hole in the public account (and probably some people who have got a very nice and totally undeserved bonus of some form or another...)

  13. Re:So this is how Slashdot dies. by StripedCow · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The worst part of it is: M$ will outlive Slashdot...

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  14. TFA disagrees with submission summary by maynard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to TFA:

    SMS Management and Technology won the IT initial development contract in June 2009 in a deal initially expected to be worth at least $2.5 million per year.

    The audit office questioned the value of the project, which is estimated to have reached $38.5 million for associated systems and applications by 30 June 2013.

    So, across four years what should have cost $10M wound up costing nearly $40M. However:

    Within 18 months, however, four change orders had been processed, increasing the value of the deal to over $15.4 million in the first two years

    Thus, change orders from a client who changed milestones mid-stream:

    The milestones for the contract were not tightly specified, nor was the extent to which the industry partner staff would be integrated with or separated from internal bureau IT staff roles and deliverables.

    Leading to a situation where, "The contract began to resemble a time and materials contract rather than a fixedâfee contract contingent on achieving milestones and deliverables." Meaning that the client kept changing their mind so often the consulting firm was required to baby a system they hadn't thought through to begin with and had thus grown into a monstrosity that served disparate and disorganized goals.

    No wonder it went over budget.

    But that has nothing to do with open source and everything to do with bad project management. Notice that they've solved the problem by choosing "...a replacement, based on an off-the-shelf software product."

    Which, if it meets their needs - bully for them. But is more likely an imposed solution to a problem they hadn't clearly defined to begin with. Thus, it's likely they'll find themselves in the same situation. Not because open source software is bad, or the commercial software is bad, or the consulting firm was probably bad... but because the bureau of meteorology has no idea what it wants to do with this data.

    The problem here is with undefined goals set by management. Until they face that fact they'll go round this merry-go-round again and again. And taxpayers will foot the bill.

  15. Re:Hot Grits on Natalie Portman's butt cheeks by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

    Slashdotters unite! Revert to your feral nerd forms!

    NERDBOTS ASSEMBLE!

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  16. Fuck BETA by delta98 · · Score: 1

    It looks like shit. Where was this designed , a coding bootcamp?

  17. Too early in the morning to... by darkz0r · · Score: 1

    ....point out that Beta sucks ?

    1. Re:Too early in the morning to... by Mix+Master+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Never too early, hopefully not too late.

      --
      Oppressing an entire population is never cheap.
      --Jeckler (/. Beta IS GARBAGE!)
  18. More news: Slashdot dumps users with beta site. by urbanriot · · Score: 2

    In other news, a high school co-op student 'working' for Slashdot has racked up an undisclosed amount of semester time designing a new beta site, a site heavily criticized by any user that's pushed into it. Many users are attempting to pool their resources to create an alternative Slashdot site as they feel the owners of Slashdot.com aren't listening to their criticisms since the current site is fine the way it is and doesn't need any the horrid beta design.

  19. get a room by rewindustry · · Score: 1

    for pity sake

  20. from my understanding of the case by rewindustry · · Score: 2

    used to know the leader of this project quite well, personally, and i can assure you the company in question did everything in it's power to deliver an honest specification and work. the problem was the australian government - it's damned near impossible to hit a specification moving at the speed of australian politics at the time.