Slashdot Mirror


Under Armour/Lockheed Suit Blamed For US Skating Performance

Koreantoast writes "The United States' surprisingly poor performance in speedskating, despite strong performances in recent World Cup events, has been blamed in part on an untested speedskating suit. The Mach 39, designed through a joint venture between Under Armour and Lockheed Martin, was supposed to provide Team USA with a high tech advantage, using advanced fluid dynamic models and a dimpled surface to disrupt air flow and improve comfort. Instead, performances have been disastrous thus far, with athletes going as far as modifying their suits at the Olympics to try and reverse their fortunes. The suits have caused enough concerns that U.S. Speedskating is taking the unusual step of seeking special dispensation from International Skating Union to ditch the high tech suits and switch back to their old uniforms. Teams are normally required to keep the same equipment through the entire Games. Insert jokes and comparisons to Lockheed's more famous product, the JSF, here."

38 of 357 comments (clear)

  1. Untested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who the hell goes to the Olympics with untested gear, just hoping it will work?

    1. Re:Untested? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Americans

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Untested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who the hell pushes untested code to production, just hoping it will work? Who the hell pushes an untested insurance exchange on a country, just hoping it will work? Who the hell pushes an untested beta on 25% of a website, just hoping it will work?

      Testing is unAmerican.

      BTW, you can bet whoever is responsible for this already jumped ship with an extra golden parachute for "bringing it in ahead of time and under budget" by chopping the test schedule and test team.

    3. Re:Untested? by QilessQi · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know whether this should be modded +1 Funny or +1 SadlyObvious.

    4. Re:Untested? by icebike · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Who the hell goes to the Olympics with untested gear, just hoping it will work?

      Apparently no one. Regardless of what the summary says the linked articles say different:

      Under Armour developed the skintight aerodynamic suit for the Sochi Games and it was pretested for specific conditions, including the sea-level altitude, that athletes would face there. ...

      The suits were delivered to the team in January, when preliminary adjustments for fit and comfort were made for each athlete, Mr. Haley said. The company also sent a team of specialists to Sochi to make adjustments as needed. The U.S. team wore the suits in the past month for simulated race conditions, but the Games marked the first time in competition.

      Any professional skater can tell you after a month of testing that your suit sucks. But chances are the US Olympic committee didn't want to listen.
      That clue was dropped by the coach:

      U.S. national long-track team coach Ryan Shimabukuro declined to discuss the suits or Under Armour. "I'm not going to criticize them, even if I was allowed to," he said.

      I'm betting there was bitching all along.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    5. Re:Untested? by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or more likely they were bitching all of january about the new suites but too much money and sponsorships were on the line and the US Olympic committee just told them to shut up.

      In most other sports you have quite a bit of leeway as to your sport clothing. As long as the colors pretty much match the team colors, nobody checks the labels and sizes.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:Untested? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

      When they get the bugs worked out, yes. From their design brochure:

      "It's basically a micro-sandwich — a high-efficiency filter and heat-exchange system. The skin-contact layer's porous with vortex-damping dimples. Perspiration passes through it, having cooled the body ... near-normal evaporation process. The next two layers . . . include heat exchange filaments and salt precipitators. Salt's reclaimed. Motions of the body, especially breathing and some osmotic action provide the pumping force. Reclaimed water circulates to catchpockets from which you draw it through this tube in the clip at your neck... Urine and feces are processed in the thigh pads. In the open desert, you wear this filter across your face, this tube in the nostrils with these plugs to ensure a tight fit. Breathe in through the mouth filter, out through the nose tube."

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    7. Re:Untested? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Better question is, who the hell tries to gain an unfair advantage over other athletes by having millions of dollars worth of resources dumped into their clothes, then expects to be taken seriously when they ask for a variation of the rules because those clothes are slowing them down?

      I'm embarrassed for them.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    8. Re:Untested? by QilessQi · · Score: 4, Informative

      I read TFA, and yes the suits were tested by the manufacturer, but they were only delivered to the team in January where "preliminary adjustments for fit and comfort were made for each athlete... The U.S. team wore the suits in the past month for simulated race conditions, but the Games marked the first time in competition."

      These skaters have spent years practicing, and yet they spent just one month in the actual gear they would wear for the competition. And worse, some of them are making last-minute mods:

      "Several skaters, including Heather Richardson, ranked No. 1 in the 1,000 meters, sent their suits to an Under Armour seamstress Thursday to have the panel modified with an extra piece of rubber. After the alteration, Ms. Richardson finished seventh—more than a second slower than the winner."

      So there's a perfect example of an American racing in untested gear.

    9. Re:Untested? by QilessQi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fair enough, but then what's worse...?

      • 1. blowing your once-in-four-years shot at an Olympic medal by racing in untested gear (as Heather Richardson did anyway with her last-minute mods),
      • 2. blowing your once-in-four-years shot at an Olympic medal by racing in gear that you've tested to the point that you know it's bad, when you had the option of using your own gear,
      • 3. blowing your once-in-four-years shot at an Olympic medal by racing in gear that you've tested to the point that you know it's bad, but you were dumb enough to sign a contract saying that you'd race in whatever the heck you were given or else be sued out the wazoo, or
      • 4. blowing your once-in-four-years shot at an Olympic medal because you were just outclassed, and then blaming it on the gear?

      I mean, there aren't a lot of good options for the American team...

    10. Re:Untested? by psithurism · · Score: 4, Funny

      Olympic metal

      Sorry, I don't usually point out minor spelling mistakes, but this one made me the picture athletes competing to be the most hardcore metal nation. The costumes would be awesome.

    11. Re:Untested? by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't it quite bad if athletes try to get an advantage to other athletes by having a high-tech company develop suits for them? Isn't it just a fair punishment if these athletes end up in positions below their actual talent and capabilities, when they tried to get in a position above their talent and capabilities?

  2. Its too bad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its too bad these games end up being more about your tech than your personal ability. Participants should all be required to use the same gear so that the gold is won based on personal merit.

    1. Re:Its too bad.. by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Like the IOC did with swimming banning such suits, you'd think they would have made this a rule across all sports.

    2. Re:Its too bad.. by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While it drives massive sales of consumer goods, but it also drives interest in sports, even though most just watch them and forget about it. It's especially important for young impressionable children, who may pick up sportsmen and women as their idols instead of whatever singer or model or actor mass media sells them. And in effort to be like their idol, instead of doing massively stupid shit that these idols are known to do, they might actually pick up sports instead.

      I would argue that with the current health situation in the West, anything that drives obesity down is going to be a net positive. We are simply losing far too many good people to it.

  3. Another way to look at it... by grub · · Score: 3, Insightful


    ...perhaps other countries just have better made and tested suits.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  4. Then again, maybe it’s not the suits at all. by djupedal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Michel Mulder, who led a Dutch sweep of the medals in the men’s 500, offered another explanation.

    “It could also be,” he said of the Americans, “that they were just outclassed here.”

  5. The Dutch... by mars-nl · · Score: 3

    ... are just better skaters. With or without suit. Live with it.

  6. Hard to get excited about Olympics by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's all money, money, money. Corporate, corporate, corporate. The tickets are expensive, the travel murderous on the pocket and many seats are taken by corporate people who never show up. Then we get to the ugly bits about technology, so and so has a suit built by some high tech company of Unobtanium fibres and they are going up against Joe Somebody from Outer Slobovia, who is wearing whatever was on the rack at the local sport shop.

    It's like cheering on millionaires and then getting your blood in a boil when you think someone cheated them.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Hard to get excited about Olympics by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I thought at the end you were about to say this shows that sport is still about athletic performance and not just money after all. That's what I think. And I don't the US should be allowed to change equipment during the competition either. Even though I'm skeptical it would matter.

      The amount of whining I've heard about these Olympics in general is pathetic. So transparent. Even though the games themselves have been not bad at all IMHO.

      Similarly it was pretty lame to listen to the announcers bend over backwards to excuse the mistakes of the US snowboard halfpipe team on the bad snow or the design of the pipe itself - then Shaun White said, "yeah, well, everybody was on the same course." I've been seeing some articles lately about him being a dick but that bumped him up a couple notches in my book.

  7. Re:Dice Blamed for Beta by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the ancient world, Greek athletes competed naked, and rubbed with a layer of olive oil.

    I advocate this as the rule for all modern Olympians.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  8. Re:Dice Blamed for Beta by sexconker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the ancient world, Greek athletes competed naked, and rubbed with a layer of olive oil.

    I advocate this as the rule for all modern Olympians.

    Some of the gymnasts and figure skaters are 15 years old. But I bet you knew that.

  9. numbers? by clovis · · Score: 3, Funny

    I read the articles, and what's missing is the actual times.
    The articles say they're slower than the other competitors, but what I'm curious about is this: are the USA skaters posting slower times in the suits than they did wearing other suits? If not, then it isn't the suits.
    I know I could spend some time researching this on the Internet, but I'm feeling as lazy as the reporters that wrote the original article.

    1. Re:numbers? by ginoledesma · · Score: 4, Informative

      Emery Lehman, highest scorer for the US, on the Men's 5000 meter competitions:

      Salt Lake City USA (2013-11-17): 6 min 19.86 sec (personal best)
      Sochi Olympics 2014 (2014-02-08): 6 min 29.94 sec

      His performance at the Sochi Olympics is 19.18 seconds away from the top scorer.

      Jonathan Kuck, second after Lehman for the same competition:

      Salt Lake City USA (2013-11-17): 6 min 09.73 sec (personal best)
      Sochi Olympics 2014 (2014-02-08): 6 min 31.53 sec

      Patrick Meek, third in Sochi Olympics 2014, for the same competition:

      Salt Lake City USA (2012-01-21): 6 min 23.89 sec (personal best)
      Sochi Olympics 2014 (2014-02-08): 6 min 32.94 sec

      Only Jonathan Kuck's personal best beats out the top scorer in this competition. I'll defer to wiser minds in determining whether having a suit give you +5-10 second advantage is "fair" in this competition.

    2. Re:numbers? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here - let me kill this for you right now:

      Lehman 5000m 27 December 2013 6.25,72

      So he has times of 6 09.73, 6.25.72 and olympic 6.31.53

      Meek: 17 November 2013 6.19,86
      Meek: 25 October 2013 6.24,73

      and those vs the olympic 6.32.94

      And we are to blame the suits? In Lehman's case if he were a horse I would ask if he was taking Lasix to get the 6 09.73

      Consider that athletes, like horses, do not always perform at their best on race day. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. Beyond the myriad physiological reasons, ice is not the same rink to rink, skate blades can be sharpened differently with different interactions between the ice and the athlete's legs and so on.

      This kind of whining is really embarassing.

    3. Re:numbers? by bitingduck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And how much of that is due to the elevation difference between SLC (~1288 m) and Sochi (near sea level). I'm too lazy to do the math for all of them, but based on my experience in cycling at sea level vs. 1500 m, those look like substantially attributable to the elevation. Add in differences in ice quality, and you might have all the difference. A more appropriate comparison is to look at how they've been doing against all their international competition over the past year, looking at performances at the same venue on the same day, and extrapolating.

      This article: why higher elevation is better even points out that the final training for the US team was done at elevation. Training at sea level and using hypoxic tents at night might have been a better idea.

  10. Re:Dice Blamed for Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some of the gymnasts and figure skaters are 15 years old.

    And?

    Remember, nudity != porn.

  11. Typical American Attitude by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Heaven forbid that someone else in the world was just better and won legitimately. No, there has to be something to blame for the loss.

    For every winner of gold, there are dozens who go home with nothing. Maybe it's just your turn to be the ones who go home empty handed.

    It does happen.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  12. Hard to have sympathy by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like they were trying to get an advantage with better gear, and it turned into a disadvantage. What, do you only want the good parts of having non-equivalent gear, and not the bad?

    Seems like we should look into standardizing the gear across competitors-- if not, doesnt seem like theres much room for complaining.

  13. Re:Dice Blamed for Beta by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Athletes would succumb to exposure in a short time if they competed naked.

    Not in Sochi they wouldn't...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  14. Re:Dice Blamed for Beta by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm certainly ashamed of *my* human form and have no desire to cause economic damage to any nude resort by my attendance au naturel.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  15. Re:Then again, maybe it’s not the suits at a by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Michel Mulder, who led a Dutch sweep of the medals in the men’s 500, offered another explanation.
    “It could also be,” he said of the Americans, “that they were just outclassed here.”

    The issue is that these same Americans have been winning races against the same competitors over the last two years. Brittany Bowe is a world record holder, but came in 8th this week.

    To the American athlete's credit, they have been downplaying the suit's impact and giving credit to the winners. The controversy is coming from the media.

  16. Re:Dice Blamed for Beta by erice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The ancient Greek olympics happened in the summer, not the winter. The Winter olympics have only been around since 1924. Athletes would succumb to exposure in a short time if they competed naked.

    This clip suggests otherwise. (NSFW)

    And, at Sochi, there seems to be one unintentional attempt.

  17. Re:Then again, maybe it’s not the suits at a by blackfeltfedora · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'll listen to the guy who designed the Dutch suits: Bert van der Tuuk, the designer of the Dutch Olympic team's suits, said Thursday he had tried a similar ventilation panel on the back of a prototype three years ago, but it slowed his skaters by letting in air and creating drag. "The suit was blowing itself up," he said. http://goo.gl/YaDlg8

  18. Re:Not so simple by bitingduck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For instance, in cycling one major decision is which gears you put on your bike for a given race. Some people are better with bigger gears, and some smaller gears. Forcing everyone to use the same ones would put people at a disadvantage.

    This isn't a problem: just give them all a multi-speed bike that has ALL the gears. The only reason you'd only put some gears on a bike for a given race is because you're trying to eliminate extra weight and streamline the bike for the conditions it'll see in that race (you're trying to optimize it). If everyone has the exact same bike, this isn't necessary. No, this bike won't be as optimal for any one person as a custom-built (and -geared) bike, but it'll have all the gearings that any of the athletes might want, and eliminate the machinery as a competitive advantage

    And the machines still make it unfair- if you homogenize the machines to that extent then you end up homogenizing the people who can be competitive, as well. Staying with your example, small cyclists tend to have high power to weight, but low overall power, so it makes them more suited to climbing. Putting them on bikes with "all the possible gears" at the expense of weight means that the machine is a larger fraction of the rider+weight than for larger cyclists, thus using the machine to take away some of their real physical advantage. Even racing in a very controlled environment (i.e. a velodrome, where it's essentially dead flat), where riders are allowed to choose any gear they want (but only one gear), riders in a given race will choose different gears depending on their riding and racing style (spin vs mash, breakaway for laps vs. sit in and sprint). Sticking everyone in the same gear will likely put some of them at a disadvantage (which is intentionally done in junior racing, for both physical and fairness reasons).

  19. Re:Dice Blamed for Beta by quantaman · · Score: 3, Funny

    As a guy who understands the effects of cold temperatures I'm going to say that's a bad idea for the winter Olympics.

    As person of either gender who watches the games I'm going to say that's a bad idea for the winter Olympics.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  20. Re: Dice Blamed for Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to mention that in the era of the original Olympics, 15 year olds of both genders were *all* married and usually had more than one child.

    The notion that a sexualization at 15 is "immoral" is just the last nanosecond on the historic clock. Remember that 99% of your ancestors married at 15 or younger. By contemporary definitions, we are all descended from long lines of pedophiles. As childhood gets longer and longer, how long until 18 also becomes "immoral"?

  21. Dominating by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 3, Informative

    In my opinion the US skaters are just looking for a scapegoat. The truth is much simpler, us Dutchies are completely and utterly dominating the speed-skating competition at the Olympics.

    A good suit is vs a bad suit just gives you a very very marginal advantage, the rest is training and professionalism. It's not just the US that is being squashed right now, each and every country competing in speedskating is getting a good ass-kicking. ;-)

    --
    Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.