Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Can I Prepare For the Theft of My Android Phone?

New submitter Adam Jorgensen writes "Last week my 4-week old Moto G phone was stolen while getting onto the train at Salt River in Cape Town, South Africa. That in itself is no big deal. Cellphone theft is a huge problem here in South Africa and I've had at least two previous cellphones stolen. The big deal this time, for me at least, was that this was the first time I've lost an Android phone to theft. When I actually sat down and thought about it, losing a fully configured Android phone is actually a big deal as it provides ready access to all kinds of accounts, including ones Google account. This could potentially allow the thief to engage in all kinds of malicious behavior, some of which could have major implications beyond the scope of the theft.

Luckily for me it seems that the thief did the usual thing: Dumped the SIM card, wiped the phone, and switched it off. It's probably had its IMEI changed by now and been sold on to some oblivious punter, possibly some oblivious punter in another country. Still, the potential for serious issue is making me have second thoughts about replacing the phone with anything capable of doing much more than calling. My question is this: Are there any serious solutions out there for Android that secure against theft?"

He continues:

By serious I mean solutions that go beyond the laughably easy to defeat 'Find My Phone' and 'Remote Wipe' options provided at present. Presently I'm thinking along the lines of:

  • Full encryption of phone contents
  • Some kind of 'Travel Safe' mode that would lock the phone down and trigger a full wipe of not unlocked correctly (Including wiping the phone on next boot if not unlocked before being switched off/running out of battery).

So, any ideas?"

374 comments

  1. oops... just wanted to read the comments by endoboy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    but I'd like to go on record as joining the beta sucks bandwagon

  2. Seriously? by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Encrypt the phone, and set a numeric PIN of 6 or more.

    Done and done.

    1. Re:Seriously? by dfsmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks! I set my PIN to "7".

    2. Re:Seriously? by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Followup, in case you dont know how to do that:
      http://www.howtogeek.com/14195...
      Its been available for quite some time IIRC.

    3. Re:Seriously? by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      None of the things will protect against theft.

      The thief will still pick your pocket. When they get back to their evil lair, they will find it is password protected. If they try to break the protection (which is easy with the right tools) they will find it is encrypted. Then they will trash the device or perhaps attempt to sell it. For you it doesn't matter, your device is still stolen and must be replaced.

      There are tons of tools out there to make backups so restoration is easy on a new device. But your device is still stolen and must be replaced.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    4. Re:Seriously? by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Exactly, if the phones encrypted they're going to have to wipe it to use it. Ok, yea, if the NSA gets the phone, I'm sure they could guess the password eventually, but I doubt you're a political dissident or whatever. You could also get one of many programs that let you remotely control or locate your phone. Yes, if they turn it off you're not going to find it but at least you have a decent chance. The number of criminals that are smart enough to plan for such things are few and far between.

    5. Re:Seriously? by slashgordo. · · Score: 5, Informative

      After encrypting the phone with a good passwd/pin, go to all apps -> Google Settings app -> Android Device Manager, and enable "Remotely locate this device" and "Allow remote lock and erase". Then if it does get stolen, you can use the Device Manager app or https://www.google.com/android... to find it or remotely wipe it. Then go to your Google account settings at https://security.google.com/se... , select your device and "Revoke Access". If you used an application specific password for your Android device, go to https://accounts.google.com/b/... and revoke it. Change your Google password. If you used 2-step verification, move the Google Authenticator to a different device, and re-seed the keys with a new QR code. It is scary how much important private stuff we keep on these portable smartphones, tablets, etc these days, and how screwed we could be if that falls into the wrong hands.

    6. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      None of the things will protect against theft.

      The thief will still pick your pocket. When they get back to their evil lair, they will find it is password protected. If they try to break the protection (which is easy with the right tools) they will find it is encrypted. Then they will trash the device or perhaps attempt to sell it. For you it doesn't matter, your device is still stolen and must be replaced.

      There are tons of tools out there to make backups so restoration is easy on a new device. But your device is still stolen and must be replaced.

      Encryption has jack shit to do with recovering the hardware.

      Your data and personal information contained on the phone can be proven far more valuable and far more difficult to recover from if leaked.

      Neither of these facts belie your ignorance here. Use your damn head. Encryption helps mitigate a rather specific problem with phone theft.

    7. Re:Seriously? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've set it awfully low, most phones these days go at least up to "11".

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Seriously? by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      The major with built-in storage encryption for a smartphone is that it can't encrypt/decrypt on the fly, it's only encrypted when the phone is completely off. OTF encryption would be pretty incongruous to the functionality of a phone; the only way it would work would be with an asymmetrical encryption setup (yeah, try exchanging keys with your mom and see how that goes) or for it to demand your key to unlock with every call, SMS, notification, etc.

    9. Re:Seriously? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Encrypt the phone, and set a numeric PIN of 6 or more.

      Done and done.

      Funny you suggest that, but as a trial a few years back on my android smart phone I did just what you suggested. I was easily able to bypass it by going into the developer menu and turning it off after doing a factory reset.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many, not all , android phones have the lock screen too easily bypassed without knowing the passcode for this to be viable. 4.4.x devices are much more robust in this regard.

    11. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTF encryption would be pretty incongruous to the functionality of a phone

      Why?

      the only way it would work would be with an asymmetrical encryption setup (yeah, try exchanging keys with your mom and see how that goes)

      Using FDE on my PC, I don't need to do that with every website I visit, every email I send, every Skype call I make, etc. Why would a phone be any different?

      or for it to demand your key to unlock with every call, SMS, notification, etc.

      See previous comment.

    12. Re:Seriously? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      I doubt you're a political dissident or whatever.

      Well...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re:Seriously? by nullchar · · Score: 2

      If you've done a factory reset, then the phone owner doesn't need to worry about their data anymore...

    14. Re:Seriously? by mlts · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here is what I do to secure my Android device:

      1: Unlock the bootloader, flash a CM or custom ROM that doesn't sport crapware.

      2: Encrypt the device with a screen locker PIN 4+ digits. I personally use six for this, just for ease of typing.

      3: Use "su -c vdc cryptfs changepw foobar" to change the passphrase. This separates the passphrase Android asks for at boot versus the screen unlocker PIN. Of course, if you change the screen password, the cryptfs password will change, so you will need to use root and change it again, or use an app for this.

      The advantage of this method is that the boot password can be very secure, while the password to get past the screen locker can be easy to type in.

      4: Relock the bootloader. This forces someone to have to erase the data partition if they want to reflash.

      5: Install a third party security app like Cerberus or Lookout that can locate and remotely erase the device, or just sound a siren until the holder trashes it. Some utilities can go into /system and persist against wipes as well.

      6: If the device has a SD card, consider using an EncFS app to mount and store files under. This way, anything written is immediately encrypted.

      7: Use Titanium Backup Pro with encryption and saving to a remote cloud provider. TB's encryption is remarkably sane (it uses private/public key, so the passphrase is only needed on a restore), and storing copies of backups remotely means that data is still obtainable even if the phone is lost. It does require root though.

      8: Unless directly in use, keep USB and ADB completely off until needed.

      9: Use a utility that demands a PIN before various apps can launch, especially preferences and an app that pops up a console/shell window.

      10: Use a TRIM utility that runs in the background. This way, if the data isn't encrypted, it is not existing.

      These will help protect data on a phone. If stolen, the attacker would have a few guesses on the PIN before the device locks them out. A reboot will force the attacker against the full passphrase. A data wipe will still mean Cerebus or a security program is still in /system, forcing the thief to completely reflash the phone to a factory image (ensuring all is gone.)

      Of course, there is the physical hardware loss, which insurance might cover (Asurion for example), and stored data can be recovered via Titanium Backup. However, done right, an Android phone can be made decently resistant to theft or physical attacks.

      The reason why one should use a utility to PIN protect apps and app groups is that if the phone is swiped before the screen locker comes on (for example, out of the user's hands directly). That way, assuming preferences and other settings are secure, a thief has limited run on what is available on the phone.

    15. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for contributing, you worthless shit stain.

    16. Re:Seriously? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Haha. :)

    17. Re:Seriously? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is scary how much important private stuff we keep on these portable smartphones, tablets, etc these days, and how screwed we could be if that falls into the wrong hands.

      Maybe you shouldn't be putting your important private stuff on your phone?

    18. Re:Seriously? by ruir · · Score: 1

      Why so much trouble? you just take the memory card out and connect it to a computer...

    19. Re:Seriously? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The major with built-in storage encryption for a smartphone is that it can't encrypt/decrypt on the fly,

      Thats not correct. On-the-fly encryption is exactly what it does.

      Your notions of why it wouldnt work havent stopped FDE from working on any other OS, why on earth would you think it doesnt with Android? The danger as you say is that its functionally not protected when its unlocked, but if you set a PIN you are protected. As with windows, while the OS is running it enforces memory / PIN protections, and if you attempt to power it off to bypass them the FDE kicks in.

    20. Re:Seriously? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Thats what the encryption is for.

    21. Re:Seriously? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      #4 is somewhat superfluous. If you've encrypted the device, they need to erase it to do anything.

    22. Re:Seriously? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      If they try to break the protection (which is easy with the right tools)

      Golly gee, care to share those tools which break full disk encryption?

    23. Re:Seriously? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      What changed in 4.4, then?

    24. Re:Seriously? by rioki · · Score: 1

      You mean like your mail and social media accounts? I think that sort of defies the entire part of the smartphone. The only two features remaining are phone and games.

    25. Re:Seriously? by rioki · · Score: 1

      Except the revealing pictures of your girlfriend on the SD card...

    26. Re:Seriously? by N1AK · · Score: 1

      There's more you can do, and given how easy it is I'd suggest they do:
      1/ You can remotely track, lock & blank the phone via the play store on the web
      2/ If you're using two factor authentication for your google account then it would stop them doing any real damage before you have blanked the device

    27. Re:Seriously? by inasity_rules · · Score: 2

      Political dissidents are actually legal in South Africa, as long as they are peaceful (though many aren't). We are certainly not a functioning democracy, but this is one of the more progressive African Countries. We even have multiple political parties, and the giant struggle party that tends to rule African countries is losing some support.

      Back on topic, I quite like Samsmung's feature that lets me remote track and remote wipe the phone. I heard something about google or others providing such a service. Might be a place to start looking...

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    28. Re:Seriously? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      You mean like your mail and social media accounts? I think that sort of defies the entire part of the smartphone.

      Anything you'd rather not be compromised, yes. The smart phone is useful enough as a data storage, transfer and communication device that can run arbitrary programs for utilitarian reasons or perhaps entertainment. As for social media, will the world end if you don't access Facebook on your phone? I realize that it might be difficult for some people to understand, but not everyone cares or cares equally about social media.

    29. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that society in general (but specifically the whites who complain about the blacks) has absolutely nothing to do with it? Sure, there may be a correlation, but I can't help wonder what would happen if these guys were more integrated, have property, wealth, be represented in the top 1%. Oh noes, socialism! Sure, society doesn't owe them wealth or anything. But what is society doing wrong that these guys can't seem to wrap their heads around wealth to begin with? Once you have a tiny bit of wealth you stop stealing cell phones and move on to bankrupting nations, which is OK, because your friends will bail you out :)

    30. Re:Seriously? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Thanks, this is some of the kind of information I was looking for. I had no idea the Revoke Access system even existed. Thanks for enlightening me :-)

    31. Re:Seriously? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point. If you're not going to link your smartphone to any accounts, what's the point of it?

      One might as well use an old Nokia 6230...

    32. Re:Seriously? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      The big problem with Android phones is they make it very easy to link in your Google account. Once you're Google account is linked that opens the device up to all kinds of misuse...

    33. Re:Seriously? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      The problem with remote tracking is that it's very easy for the thief to switch off GPS and Data. Once that's been done you can't Track the phone and the thief can take their time digging through your data.

      In my case, I was only got home a full 45 minutes after the phone was stolen. By the time I logged in to Motorola Support, the GPS and Data had already been disabled.

    34. Re: Seriously? by BESTouff · · Score: 1

      #4 doesn't work on all phones (does it on some ?) and would prevent you from upgrading your rom (so no security fixes) #10 is stupid on many points on flash-based devices, which smartphones are

    35. Re:Seriously? by ketomax · · Score: 2

      About an year ago my HTC HD2 was stolen while getting off a bus, here in India. I am quite aware of my belongings while traveling so it came as a surprise. I realized that it was stolen within 15 seconds but could not find it on anyone (yes they were generous enough to allow being frisked; pockets only). Most probably, it was the person sitting next to me. He had taken the ticket to the same stop as me. But, while getting down he was nowhere to be found.

      That day I realized how easy it was for these guys. Although, I do respect them for their skills. Apparently, the key to pulling it off is a push. At the police station, there was a template for reporting stolen mobiles. In fact that is the only template they had. Ever since, I have been using a phone so cheap that it would strike their prestige should they attempt to steal it.

      I realized that all I really needed from a phone is the ability to make/receive voice calls, receive SMS alerts and sometimes, text people. This dumb phone serves all these and it's keypad gives me the most efficiency in doing them. Until the manufacturers and service providers implement a kill switch for all stolen phones, I have decided to stay clear of smartphones.

      Not everyone is as lucky as my boss who has had cabbies frantically try and succeed in their attempts to return the phones he had left behind. Even a village rallied to find the owner of a phone he dropped in a swamp while snapping (photographs) birds. I am sure Poseidon is spending sleepless nights trying to return the phone he threw into the ocean while being frustrated by a client.

    36. Re:Seriously? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that the end goal of theft is to be a jerk, and not sell the device for cash; if every phone is encrypted and can't be restored without a password, there's going to be a lot less incentive to steal them in the first place.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    37. Re:Seriously? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Which can also be encrypted

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    38. Re: Seriously? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      It's an android phone. No one wants to steel that. Now if it was an iPhone then you should be worried.

      Of course no one wants a "steel" phone, the 1950's are over. Everyone needs a titanium, gold, or platinum phone now.

    39. Re:Seriously? by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 4, Funny

      None of the things will protect against theft.

      No. The only way I know to do that is what I do: forget it at home every day.

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    40. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reports online say that encryption makes Android devices horribly slow.
      Can you comment on that? What's your experience and with what phones?

          Thanks

    41. Re:Seriously? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      That boss of yours...

    42. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your comment adds what to the discussion? So shut the fuck up you bitch ass cunt.

    43. Re:Seriously? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      if they turn it off you're not going to find it

      So rather than encrypting your phone and setting a secure PIN you should just install Flappy Bird and have swipe-to-unlock. Encourage the low grade criminal to keep the phone on and not bother wiping it right away so that your tracking software has time to locate them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    44. Re:Seriously? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      2: Encrypt the device with a screen locker PIN 4+ digits. I personally use six for this, just for ease of typing.

      6 is not a good PIN, even if it is easy to type.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    45. Re:Seriously? by GordonBX · · Score: 1

      None of the things will protect against theft.

      No. The only way I know to do that is what I do: forget it at home every day.

      Really? Remind me where you live again ... I'll just pop round and steal it while you are out.

    46. Re:Seriously? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      These days, if you're not a political dissident, you are not paying attention.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    47. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just get a BlackBerry, set a good password and set BlackBerry Protect to "on." In the unlikely event that a thief steals it (thieves know), you can render the device utterly useless anywhere in the world. If the thief tries the password ten times and fails, device wiped and locked.

      Or you could stick with Android and run apps that gain root and pwn you. Fashion or superior tech -- your choice.

    48. Re:Seriously? by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But what is society doing wrong that these guys can't seem to wrap their heads around wealth to begin with?

      It isn't so much society in general, but the black community itself that seems to have a problem with what it takes to get out of the vicious cycle of poverty and crime.

      I've known blacks, even back when I was growing up, that during HS were working hard to get an education, taking part in scholastic function, like president of student council, etc. They were often shunned or ridiculed by their peers for "acting white". I was shocked to hear this.

      I think that is a large part of what the problem is. The culture, at least of the lower end of the class system, of blacks don't promote things like getting an education and working hard to be successful in today's society as something to strive for. However, thug life, gangsta rap type trappings, and professional athletes are the main heroes that are held up as something to emulate.

      I think this is part of the problem, and it is not something that you can legislate away.

      This general type of attitude is something that can ONLY be fixed from the inside of the community itself, and so far, this isn't being pushed. And sadly, you often see folks that DO escape from this cycle of poverty into successful jobs and neighborhoods, they also shun the lower end and often understandably so, as that they don't want their kids around that culture.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    49. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they sell the phone as parts.
      Customer has a broken screen? Broken electronics? Your phone becomes a parts supply for the phone repair shop (who gets cheap components from stolen phones).
      The encryption means nothing, if you want parts.

    50. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should shut the fuck up and let those of us who desire to use our electronics the way they are designed to be used, do so, grandpa.

      The questioner seeks a solution other than, "Well then, dad gummit, maybe you shouldn't be USING them thar eeee-lecttronic doo-dads in the first place, I reckon">

    51. Re:Seriously? by mlts · · Score: 1

      Malicious apps that gain root are rare. If an app is trying to get root, it is usually an exploit tool for a user to get a "#" prompt on their device, as opposed to malicious software. It usually takes some work with ADB and some user intervention to get it working for most of those. To boot, in Android 4.4, SELinux is turned on, so an app that does manage to carve itself a process at UID 0 will not be able to do much. Of course, the main door to root, the su app is well guarded. Modern su utilities require an app to have a permission on download (ACCESS_SUPERUSER.) (su.chainfire.eu has more details on this.) Even with this, the user is prompted before the app gets access.

      I do agree that Blackberry's security model is better with the prompting for permissions. However, Android is a lot more usable for a UNIX platform, even though busybox does not come near a full fledged userland. Android also is decently secure. I trust its disk encryption more than iOS's black box chip that holds keys, with Apple definitely having a master key.

    52. Re:Seriously? by nman64 · · Score: 1

      This fairly well summarizes many of the steps I take. Additionally, I have Tasker set up to reboot the device if an incorrect PIN is entered too many times. Once triggered, the decryption key is no longer stored in RAM and they have more than the relatively simple PIN to deal with.

    53. Re:Seriously? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      At least its not a combination an idiot would use for their luggage.

    54. Re:Seriously? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      They don't just make it easy... they make it near impossible to not have one on the phone. Check youtube once, and the entire phone is a Google device. How'd hangouts get there?

    55. Re:Seriously? by mlts · · Score: 1

      There is one Blackberry/RIM feature I wish was in Android. If the device doesn't get a "ping" from the master server in a certain amount of time, the device wipes itself.

      Yes, this can be dangerous, but if someone yanks the SIM, or even worse, tosses the device into Airplane mode, eventually the phone will erase itself.

    56. Re:Seriously? by Touvan · · Score: 1

      Do you have to be a political dissident (or some kind of criminal) to be targeted by law enforcement? It sometimes seems as if no one knows why we have courts at all. Maybe we should skip all that and just let the NSA/FBI/police lock people up straight away.

    57. Re:Seriously? by rioki · · Score: 1

      I am not saying you need social media. I for a fact do not have a facebook account. But I have my email account (google) linked in the device and that basically opens everything. By your logic, you are better off with a dumb phone and an ultrabook...

    58. Re:Seriously? by rioki · · Score: 1

      True that, but I was referring to:

      If you've done a factory reset, then the phone owner doesn't need to worry about their data anymore...

      Which is a faulty assumption.

    59. Re:Seriously? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I said "less incentive", not "no incentive". You know how much a working iPhone 5 goes for versus a "for parts" model?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    60. Re:Seriously? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I have a Nexus 5, fully encrypted. Havent noticed a change in performance.

    61. Re:Seriously? by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      I should clarify: it's not that it can't or doesn't do OTF encryption, it's that it's very limited and incongruous with with the usage model.

      When your computer is on, it's generally tied to a desk in a reasonably secured home or office building. If you have a laptop and you're carrying it in a bag, it's generally in suspend mode (TrueCrypt can be configured to automatically dismount volumes on logout, timeout, power saving, etc.), hibernation or powered off, and not otherwise polling for notifications like a phone is in its equivalent lower-power mode. Note that the hardware state of hibernation is equivalent to powered off, so any open encryption volumes are locked if you're using FDE or the OS volume is encrypted.

      If someone swipes your phone out of your hand or pocket, it's pretty unlikely that it's going to powered off in an encrypted state at the time and your data is in the clear, protected only by a relatively weak PIN. If somebody swipes your laptop bag out of your hand / your car / a bus / a train / etc., chances are much more likely that it will be in an encrypted state and your data is pretty safe.

    62. Re:Seriously? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Even in nations that had no history of slavery.

      Ah, yes. South Africa, that bastion of racial equality.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    63. Re:Seriously? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      That needs to be turned into a t-shirt.

      I'd buy one.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    64. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a "black culture" problem. It's a a problem that's endemic to poverty in general. You'll see the same behavior patterns in any impoverished group worldwide, across a great swath of ethnic and racial groups. You'll see it in poor white trash rednecks, gypsies, blacks, american Indians, chavs, abos, bogans, etc.

      People by nature want to be attached to a social group, and they also resist newcomers to their own social groups.

      If your social group is poor you feel pressure not only from your own group, but other groups that expect you to remain poor to enforce their own sense of social status. Social mobility is difficult because you meet resistance from your peers pulling you back AND others pushing you down.

    65. Re:Seriously? by martyn1807 · · Score: 1

      Bad idea. The unencrypted key is plaintext in RAM. An attacker need only extract the key from RAM and (s)he has access to everything. Instead, get a Blackberry Curve 9300, store minimal data on it and use encryption. When locked, the encryption key is wiped from RAM, meaning the freezer trick won't work.

    66. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if they steal your CC# from the web browser they just stole your NEXT cellphone too!

    67. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad state here on Slashdot that the answer was way down the page. Was going to post this. Slashdot comments at approaching YouTube comments levels.

    68. Re:Seriously? by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 1

      Very useful, thanks!

    69. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak unpleasant truth. Be tagged as troll.

    70. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite funny, how you were tagged as troll just by quoting. This speaks about the race and IQ level of "moderators".

    71. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your computer is running the disk is decrypted. If an attacker got access to your mounted drive they'd have access to all the data on it. FDE only helps if the computer is off.

    72. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you give a list of phones where the features required in this setup would exist? Moving from an ibone to a handroid is already an appealing idea, and I'd like to know which models to favour. Specifically, I notice that many handsets are sold only via a telcorapist and one cannot get an unlocked handset directly from the OEM.

      If you only know which ones on which you've been able to do all this - the key feature being root access by far, I'd guess - that info may be enough to predict which current and future handsets I should consider. I'm not getting some HTC Faptastic 910, only to find out it can't give me a gorgeous setup like the nirvana you describe.

    73. Re:Seriously? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Encrypt the phone, and set a numeric PIN of 6 or more.

      Done and done.

      Ok. 8 zeros? Nah, they used that for the nuclear code. Ok, got it. 87654321. That's safe.

    74. Re:Seriously? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Encrypt the phone, and set a numeric PIN of 6 or more.

      Cool, I'll just use my /. UID. Oh, wait... /me struts away trying to ride the old-timer credibility he doesn't deserve.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    75. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! I set my PIN to "7".

      aaahhhhahahahaha! possibly the funniest thing I have seen on /. in 6 months!

  3. Rooted? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    For rooted phones there are both a variety of backup options and variety of stolen phone options all of which you can locate in the Play store, or which can be found by simple Google search, since the options are discussed endlessly with their pros and cons on every major Android forum.

    For unrooted phones, you can still fully encrypt, and still backup -- although not fully. How painless the recovery is will come down to how much you trust and buy into online services. Your Candy Crush progress is going to have to depend on if you decided to integrate with Facebook, or if you've got your tinfoil set to max.

    1. Re:Rooted? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      > if you decided to integrate with Facebook, or if you've got your tinfoil set to max.

      Given Facebook's long history of privacy violations, I do believe there's a *few* steps on the dial between those options...

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:Rooted? by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did you ever think that some of the Ask Slashdot topics exist to provoke discussion rather than to seek knowledge? Take this one for example. How many folks here have never thought about anti-theft software until now? I'm sure I'm not the only one.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Rooted? by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Did you ever think that some of the Ask Slashdot topics exist to provoke discussion rather than to seek knowledge?

      If you depend on media corporations to prompt you to take care of basic things in life, you really do have a severe problem with the way you live.

      So... that's a "no" then.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Rooted? by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

      This is a question that is trivially google-able, and its been beaten to death by anyone concerned with security for years. Care about datatheft? Encrypt your data.

      Provoking discussions could be done in many ways other than "ask a question that I couldnt bother to research".

    5. Re:Rooted? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I love you too Anonymous Coward.

      P.S. Please give me back my spoon.

    6. Re:Rooted? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Well done, you worked out why I submitted this topic in the first place!

  4. Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android has full device encryption, turn it on when you travel. Leave it on when you aren't travelling. Enable the "Wipe after X failures."

    1. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Pow · · Score: 1

      No, android does not have full device encryption unfortunately. Only the encryption of /data partition. In most cases this should be sufficient though.

      I'm not sure about external sdcard for devices that have it. I have Nexus so emulated sdcard is part of /data and it gets encrypted. If that is not the case with external sdcard, tough luck.

      Also, doesn't look like google particularry cares about older devices and device encryption. See this issue for example (TRIM support on encrypted volume): https://code.google.com/p/andr...
      I'm not holding my breath to ever get this resolved for my 1st gen Nexus 7.

    2. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Enable the "Wipe after X failures."

      I presume you don't have kids :-)

    3. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Enable the "Wipe after X failures."

      I presume you don't have kids :-)

      Or you teach them that certain things are not toys. Why, maybe you even keep those things out of the kid's reach! Wow! Y'know, like every real parent has done throughout the ages. Knives, matches, car keys, stoves, cleaning chemicals, really there are things much worse than cellphones out there. If you cannot grasp the principle, you have problems much bigger and more important than having your smartphone wiped.

    4. Re: Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Clearly you don't have kids.

    5. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enable the "Wipe after X failures."

      I presume you don't have kids :-)

      Or you teach them that certain things are not toys. Why, maybe you even keep those things out of the kid's reach! Wow! Y'know, like every real parent has done throughout the ages. Knives, matches, car keys, stoves, cleaning chemicals, really there are things much worse than cellphones out there. If you cannot grasp the principle, you have problems much bigger and more important than having your smartphone wiped.

      Yeah but this is the New Generation. Nothing is *ever* their fault or their responsibility. Nothing. Ever. At all.

      So you see, clearly the problem is the phone. Yeah. Of course.

    6. Re: Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you don't have kids.

      Actually yes I do. Not that making this personal validates or invalidates anythign that was said. Really though I love the way someone will express an emotional sentiment while ignoring the concrete examples I gave. Really it definitely advances conversation. By that I mean it completely fails to do so.

      So you just let your kids run wild and play with the hot stove, or matches, or a bottle of bleach, anytime they want? If they get hurt or worse, that's just the luck of the draw? Right? Or are certain things off-limits making your phone off-limits too is a trivial addition? Which is it? Do tell.

      This is where the average Slashdot AC suddenly goes silent, as if they didn't read the reply, that way they can avoid admitting they failed to think things through before making a knee-jerk response. If you do that too, everyone will understand.

    7. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Enable the "Wipe after X failures."

      I presume you don't have kids :-)

      Or you teach them that certain things are not toys. Why, maybe you even keep those things out of the kid's reach! Wow! Y'know, like every real parent has done throughout the ages. Knives, matches, car keys, stoves, cleaning chemicals, really there are things much worse than cellphones out there.

      Confirmed. He's never had kids.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re: Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike the other examples you gave of bodily harm to the child, wiping the phone only affects the parent.

    9. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Enable the "Wipe after X failures."

      I presume you don't have kids :-)

      Or you teach them that certain things are not toys. Why, maybe you even keep those things out of the kid's reach! Wow! Y'know, like every real parent has done throughout the ages. Knives, matches, car keys, stoves, cleaning chemicals, really there are things much worse than cellphones out there.

      Confirmed. He's never had kids.

      Or he's a true helicopter parent, not leaving the kids out of his sight for even a second at a time. However your assessment is the more likely.

    10. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Well I don't know about the Android version of this feature, but on the iPhone, the "wipe after 10 failures" option puts an increasing delay between attempts. Once you get to the last few attempts, the delay is pretty long (I think 30 minutes or an hour, per attempt), so it's pretty unlikely even a kid would trigger it, unless the phone was left alone with them for a long time.

    11. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Even if you have kids, for many people the phone is with them 24 hours a day, so kids would be unlikely to get their hands on it for an extended period regardless. My phone is in my pocket during any time I'm awake, and when I'm asleep it's 30 cm from me on my bedside table (at which point the kids are asleep anyway).

      Keep in mind there's normally a delay on the "wipe after X failures" options on phones, such that the kid would need to have the phone for several hours in order to reach the limit. I'd notice if I was without my phone for a few hours...

    12. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he's a true helicopter parent, not leaving the kids out of his sight for even a second at a time. However your assessment is the more likely.

      Third option, and viable unlike the ones you listed: you keep the *phone* out of the *kids' sight*. In your pocket, on a dresser they cannot reach if they are so little they cannot be taught not to mess with it, whatever. This is easy. What is hard for some of you is remembering to do it consistently. That is easy for the conscientious.

      That's such an obvious option that you did not need me to spell it out for you. I really cannot help if you are deliberately obtuse and keep missing the point on purpose in order to continue arguing. I find people often do that when you suggest they stop being passive. Especialy when they know it's true. They cling to their passiveness because it's like any other form of stupdiity - it resists change and resents the notion of improving itself. Acting like that's my problem is the worst sort of blindness on your part.

    13. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by The+Cat · · Score: 0

      Yes. Kids are invincible. They will defeat their parents at every turn and will never listen to reason. Attempting to raise them is pointless.

      Therefore the clear option is to give up and let them run wild. Your cynicism has defeated all of human history. You are the pinnacle of wisdom, sir.

    14. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That never stopped me and was actually why I tired. You're trying to hide something from me? I want to know what it is and why. Figuring out how to get past your safeguards is just a bonus and made me feel more adult-like since I could do adult-only tasks.

      Teaching me worked, I never played with yuck-labeled bottles, but putting things out of reach meant I needed to try harder.

    15. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yes. Kids are invincible. They will defeat their parents at every turn and will never listen to reason. Attempting to raise them is pointless.

      You really never have had kids... or even been around kids... or even remember being a kid if you honestly think it's that easy. No kids don't listen to reason because they don't fully understand the concept of reason and if you dont understand that, you dont know much about raising kids.

      I haven't got kids, but helped my sister out with my nephew for a while. Yes kids will find a way into things, not because their evil, unreasonable or stupid, but because they are curious and attracted to shiny things (or anything with buttons). I guarantee you if you leave keys or mobile phones within reach of a 2 year old, they will have them within a number of seconds. You have no idea how much you need to secure from them, chemicals, cutlery, plates, anything made of glass, anything small enough to swallow... so your phone is so far down the list you just don't give a crap.

      I'm sure you could beat that behaviour out of them using a variety of electrodes but you see, that curiosity is a healthy appetite for learning and that isn't a bad thing (seeing as learning is a huge part of raising kids) so most parents don't.

      I'll also guarantee two other things about kids to you. First that if I left you alone with a kid, within half an hour that kid will have gotten into something they shouldn't have and secondly, that you were a little shit at some point in your life too.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re: Android Has Full Device Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He went silent. And he doesn't have kids.

    17. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by The+Cat · · Score: 0

      You really never have had kids... or even been around kids... or even remember being a kid if you honestly think it's that easy.

      You don't know jack shit about me.

    18. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You really never have had kids... or even been around kids... or even remember being a kid if you honestly think it's that easy.

      You don't know jack shit about me.

      And here you've just confirmed everything I've said about you.

      You responded with an attack, not a reasonable rebuttal (I like the irony here, claiming you can reason with kids but cant even reason with an adult). If you don't want to look so guilty, don't get so defensive.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    19. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      But your message was a bit attacking too, as you assumed things about him which you didn't know for certain.

    20. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by mjwx · · Score: 1

      But your message was a bit attacking too, as you assumed things about him which you didn't know for certain.

      As per your response, they were very good guesses.

      Your earlier post gave a lot away. So they were quite educated guesses. You clearly don't remember what it was like to be a kid, nor do you have them.

      BTW, the only kind of attack-ish thing I did was point out that at one point in your childhood, you would have misbehaved. Given the way you responded, I'd say that was a good bet too.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    21. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Heh heh...and now you assume things about me too? ;)

      Hint: I'm not the GP.

    22. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by The+Cat · · Score: 0

      You're not acting like an adult. I have no responsibility to treat you like one.

      You're lecturing someone you don't know, making assumptions that are wrong and drawing conclusions that have no basis in fact.

      Arrogance and condescension are often a sign of immaturity, insecurity and an irresponsible attitude.

    23. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Heh heh...and now you assume things about me too? ;)

      Hint: I'm not the GP.

      You're making the assertion that I dont know.

      Sorry, but if your only defence is to hold up your hand and shout "Y'all dont know me" shows a serious dearth of both a point and creativity.

      You and the OP, to which I'm still not convinced aren't the same person (you both have the same writing styles and the same argument) haven't managed to argue, let alone counteract a single one of my points.

      I award you zero points, and may god have mercy on your soul.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    24. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I am not the OP.

    25. Re: Android Has Full Device Encryption by ruir · · Score: 1

      Often the kids now better your password then you, even when you think they dont know...Last time I was at a friends house, it was their 4 years old that unlocked the iPad for me.

    26. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      That would be me...

    27. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      While your comment is indeed funny, I can't help but jump in here.

      As someone who has never had kids, I find it offensive and idiotic when people use this bullshit excuse to shut down a debate. I've never existed in a two dimensional universe, but that doesn't stop me from talking about basic geometry. To suggest that only direct experience qualifies one to take up any subject of discourse is absurd and wrong.

      In the context of parents talking down to non-parents, it makes you guys look stupid. Being a parent is stressful, exhausting, and unpredictable. It's not rocket surgery. You don't have some sort of magical insight into things unfathomable to the rest of us. Unwarranted elitism is comical from the outside looking in.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    28. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Not that I have a smart phone yet, but my kids only get their hands on my phone for about 5 to 10 seconds before I realize it since my phone is usually in my pocket or out of their reach while charging. If they do grab it if it falls out of my pocket they typically hand it to me as we've been through the motion of me immediately removing it from their hands and they just skip the step. They know they can use it when I hand it to them when grandma/grandpa is on the phone or someone else to talk to.

      Same with the ipad, my 2 year old knows to have myself or my wife 'set up' the ipad for him before he uses it and will bring it over to us if we leave it somewhere in his reach. Sure like anything it took a couple times to establish the routine, but once locked in, they pretty much follow it as normal. The kids slip up and get curious/drop milk etc on things, but typically I just let them use electronics in very specific ways like powering them on or off to remove the 'untouchable' curiosity factor and establish some ground rules about specific things and it works out for the most part.

      But every kid is different, some just don't listen, and they all act out at some point or another from what I've seen and talked about with people. Still, most kids know what they can and can't do in the house as long as you establish rules, and 95% of the time they seem to abide by them or cover their tracks well enough that you don't notice ;)

    29. Re:Android Has Full Device Encryption by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      As someone who has never had kids, I find it offensive and idiotic when people use this bullshit excuse to shut down a debate. I've never existed in a two dimensional universe, but that doesn't stop me from talking about basic geometry. To suggest that only direct experience qualifies one to take up any subject of discourse is absurd and wrong.

      In the context of parents talking down to non-parents, it makes you guys look stupid. Being a parent is stressful, exhausting, and unpredictable. It's not rocket surgery. You don't have some sort of magical insight into things unfathomable to the rest of us. Unwarranted elitism is comical from the outside looking in.

      It's not that it is rocket surgery or that you are only allowed to think about this stuff if you are a parent. It's that the things are not really as you imagine them before you have kids. I can remember several things we planned on for a new youngun. But once they come along, and they have their own personality and do things the way they want to, you change your views on what to expect. You cannot reason with them, that's for sure. They are very interested in learning about things, so you can use that to your advantage. But I have learned not to expect anything to be how I imagine it anymore and to adapt to the situation at hand. One example we faced was potty training. We tried logic and reason, we tried the lure of the big girl underwear, what finally worked was bribery with wrapped 10 cent toys each time she went or stickers for trying. Before hand, we derided bribery as weak parenting and thought it would be a bad way to go. In our case it worked out really well. It gave her the motivation needed to learn to go and she didn't get spoiled by needing the presents afterwards. We are definitely not the "get the kid what they want at the store" parents and she does not have tantrums and problems like that, so to hear me advocating bribing with toys even sounds weird to me still. That's basically what it come to. You don't live in the two dimensional universe, but can imagine one. It would be much harder for the two dimensional being to imagine the third dimension. Having your first kid puts you into the third dimension.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  5. How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Was it stolen out of the front pocket of your pants? Seems most of these thefts occur when people put it in the back pocket, which still baffles me to this day. The back pocket is the worst place to store anything of value.

    1. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      terrible if you live in a shit hole where people steal from your back pocket...

    2. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      a.k.a. everywhere on this planet, at least

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, it's not a problem here in Texas. I don't ride public transportation. I keep it in my front pocket right next to my gun.

    4. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol awesome

    5. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by hymie! · · Score: 1

      I couldn't believe, when I left New York to go to college, how many people stored things in their back pockets. I used to tell them all the same little rhyme --

      (tap front left pocket) wallet pocket
      (tap front right pocket) key pocket
      (tap back left pocket) pick pocket

    6. Re: How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taps front left pocket : phone pocket, key pocket
      Taps front right pocket : change pocket, wallet pocket ...

      Here's a rhyme;
      Wallet, keys, phone
      And I can get home.

      Here's a tip
      Don't leave your Wallet, keys, or phone open the theft.

    7. Re: How exactly was it stolen? by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      Phone and keys in the same pocket? That's a great way to scratch up the phone.

    8. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 4, Informative

      I couldn't believe, when I left New York to go to college, how many people stored things in their back pockets. I used to tell them all the same little rhyme --

      Yeah, ever since I started traveling for business on public transport, I no longer keep a wallet in my back pocket. Instead it goes in a front pocket, which is more difficult to pick pocket. Works well with jeans. This doesn't do so well if you are wearing dress slacks with loose pockets, so you'll have to resort to other means like the various types of hidden / zippered pockets.

      It's just too easy to have your back pocket searched when riding public transportation. And inside coat pockets aren't much better unless they have a button or zipper.

      Backpacks aren't safe either, a good thief can unzip it and look inside without being noticed. I prefer a messenger type bag with a cover that folds over the top and is latched down by snap-buckles combined with velcro. Harder to open quietly and I always have an arm wrapped around it anyway.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    9. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And yeah if the gun is going to come out at all, you are no longer talking about a pickpocket (propety crime).

      so how does having a gun prevent pickpockets then?

      just look at all the mass shootings, despite all this dick measuring about the need to have guns not one of those gun toting citizens ever has the balls to actually get in the firing line when shit goes down but the american solution is "need more guns!". look at australia, once they outlawed automatic assault weapons the instances of gun crime dropped dramatically and completely eliminated mass shootings...oh but americans could achieve that too if only they had more guns.

    10. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Why do you think it was a pick pocket? Someone could have just shoved a gun in his face and said "Give me your phone".

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing you weren't born black in an urban area. Otherwise you would have grown up observing and learning that "thug gansta bullshit" is how to be recognized by your peers and accepted in your urban society.

      I agree, change needs to happen within those communities, but just like child soldiers in the Congo, you are also a product of your environment.

      So blaming people for being black doesn't help with shit.

    12. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      just look at all the mass shootings, despite all this dick measuring about the need to have guns not one of those gun toting citizens ever has the balls to actually get in the firing line when shit goes down but the american solution is "need more guns!".

      It literally would only take a few seconds to find hundreds of cases where someone with a concealed handgun stopped a mas shooting. But I am sure you don't actually want any facts to interrupt your rhetoric...

    13. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by pepty · · Score: 1

      The wise man accepts reality and makes the best of it and tries to be a good example.

      Exactly. He doesn't fantasize about righteously shooting criminals and vigilanteism, especially not to the point of buying a gun. What kind of example would that set? Hint: imagine someone so creepy they natter on about hoping they get hit by a car 'cause they really really really want to sue someone to bankruptcy/death. Then they launch into a comparative description of which law firms will cause the most damage to the driver. Then they get snippy when you suggest their priorities might be a wee bit off.

      When you hear someone vomit nonsense about how much they hope somebody gives them a reason to draw their weapon you are not talking to a gun enthusiast. You're not talking to someone who sees self defense as a necessary tool. You're talking to a gun nut.

      A wise man also doesn't carry a loaded gun everywhere, since for most people in most places risks of both violent and property crime are quite low and getting lower. When he does carry it's in a fucking holster, not sharing a pocket with a fucking phone.

      Finally: why the hell do they call it a concealed carry permit when 90% of the people who get them seem completely fixated on telling everybody all about their gunnnnzzzzz?

      Honestly, it's like the "how can you tell if someone is vegan?" joke, except the concealed carry crowd is worse.

    14. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you will have to hate me because you certainly cannot rationally argue against me.

      This is off-topic of course, but...

      What I've never seen addressed is that we now know that everybody except people from Africa have a lot of Neanderthal DNA. And everywhere but Africa has signs of massive civilizations; there isn't a single ancient structure in sub-Saharan Africa that's larger than single person construction. It looks like sub-Saharan Africans just don't have some genetic code that supports large civilization.

    15. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by mark-t · · Score: 2

      That doesn't tend to be the typical use case of cell phone theft at all. The vast majority of cell phone thefts are crimes of opportunity.

    16. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing you weren't born black in an urban area. Otherwise you would have grown up observing and learning that "thug gansta bullshit" is how to be recognized by your peers and accepted in your urban society.

      Black people don't hold a monopoly on being "unrecognized" because of choosing to be an individual. If only they did, that would be a huge improvement.

      I agree, change needs to happen within those communities, but just like child soldiers in the Congo, you are also a product of your environment.

      Only cowards go through life as products of their environment, never objectively observing exactly what the environment is trying to turn them into and the coercive methods it uses to do that, never deciding that being your own person and thinking for yourself no matter the risk is the only real way to live. No, cowards think that's too much effort and too much risk.

      Not everybody who had it rough growing up turns out to be a fuck-up. The ones who don't turn into fuck-ups, didn't turn into fuck-ups for a reason. It is not a roll of dice.

      So blaming people for being black doesn't help with shit.

      I never said they should be blamed for being black. If you want to blame many blacks legitimately blame them for thinking that being a street thug is a worthy goal in life just because some culture makes it look cool.

      Black fathers can start reversing this trend by actually parenting their children instead of leaving them to be raised by single mothers with no positive male role models.

    17. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And yeah if the gun is going to come out at all, you are no longer talking about a pickpocket (propety crime).

      Nope. It's perfectly legal to shoot a pickpocket in the back as they are walking away (at least in the stipulated Texas).

    18. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Phyrexicaid · · Score: 1

      Not in South Africa

      --
      The meme is dead, long live the meme!
    19. Re: How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only someone invented pants with two front pockets...

    20. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by ruir · · Score: 2

      I always carried my wallet in my front pockets, even when studying. My father usually carries only a small wallet with his train ticket for the month in his coat, and the proper wallet hidden out of sight. As a true anecdotal story, once a thief sat besides him pretending to read a newspaper (known mode of work), and left after a short while. My father left without noticing anything. Next day he tried to board the train, there was no photo in the train ticket. The thief took the wallet, got mad it was a decoy, took out the photo as a "lesson", and put it in place without my father noticing anything.

    21. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by hoborg1 · · Score: 2

      [Citation needed]

    22. Re: How exactly was it stolen? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      The GP clearly had two pockets but still stored phone and keys in the same pocket.

    23. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      My phone was in the lower, left front pocket of my cargo pants. I was distracted due to helping to hold the train door open (The trains here sometimes suffer a failure of the system the opens the doors and this results in the door attempting to close while people are entering/exiting the carriage) and hence didn't notice that I'd been pick-pocketed.

    24. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      You should do some reading on violent crime studies.

      Conclusions so far have been that a prevalence of guns in a society contributes to crime rather than the opposite effect...

    25. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      I sure you would also find thousands of cases where someone with a concealed handgun committed a crime...

    26. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Wow, and they call South Africa violent...

    27. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by vakuona · · Score: 1

      I don't know why I am doing this, but:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G... (Great Zimbabwe Ruins)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K... (Khami Ruins)

      Yes, built by black people with painstaking effort.

      So disproved your rubbish claim with just two examples from Zimbabwe alone. There are lots of examples from Zimbabwe, and I would bet there are lots more elsewhere in Africa.

      So, you are not only racist, but ignorant as well. Actually, I think the last statement was _almost_ a tautology.

    28. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want facts. Also, I'm holding you to that claim of "hundreds of cases", seeing as you meant it "literally".

    29. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by AlabamaCajun · · Score: 1

      In Alabama (US) we keep our cell in a holster and the pistol tucked in our jeans.

    30. Re: How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You prefer the bulk of wallet and keys ?

      Or is coin and phone better ?

      The point is, front pockets are already in use, adding a phone and wallet is not an attractive option for men.

    31. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Only for idiots that can't separate "legal" from "common" (no, not a comment on SA, but Texas).

    32. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by AllenABQ · · Score: 1

      They make front-pocket wallets for men. I love mine. The only drawback is they aren't made to carry a lot of cards otherwise it defeats the thin profile that prevents your front pocket from bulging outward. I've found there are only a couple of cards I need to carry with me anyway.

    33. Re: How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phone and home don't rhyme idiot

    34. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I am sure that you are sure. But they keep stats on this and the number is amazingly low. Link for all of Texas for the entire history of our CHL it is still in the single digits. I would bet you would have a hard time finding 20 chl holders in the entire US that committed a crime with a gun.

      Unless you are talking about people illegally carrying a concealed handgun. You know... Like the criminals...

    35. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      First hit on google... http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanha...

    36. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      First hit on google... http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanha... I literally see them daily on my FaceBook. But a person who stops a crime with a gun, but where no one is actually shot, does not make for clickbait news...

    37. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1
    38. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any links to "studies"?

    39. Re:How exactly was it stolen? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I was pretty careful with my wallet walking through the SXSW crowd last night. My fault for going downtown to dinner, but I still didn't feel particularly safe about it.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  6. Laughably Easy? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Citation needed for the "laughably easy to defeat 'Find My Phone' and 'Remote Wipe' options". How are these laughably easy to defeat? Do tell. Also iphones have a kill switch installed, so they can't be wiped and reused. Compare this to your android solution of asking slashdot. I await more information.

    1. Re:Laughably Easy? by gnasher719 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, there was huge discussion a week ago how to defeat it. Take a stolen iPhone, wait for your mum to die, take iPhone, death certificate and will to the Apple Store... and damn, they still don't unlock it for you!

    2. Re:Laughably Easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.google.com/android/devicemanager or use Prey

    3. Re:Laughably Easy? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Citation needed for the "laughably easy to defeat 'Find My Phone' and 'Remote Wipe' options". How are these laughably easy to defeat?

      It depends on how the user's phone is set up.

      If the phone is not password-protected, it's laughably easy: put the phone in airplane mode. As long as the thief does that before the owner can get to a web browser, the thief can peruse the data on the phone at leisure.

      If the phone is password-protected but not encrypted, it's a little tougher. Airplane mode still blocks "Find my Phone" and "Remote Erase", but actually getting at the data is harder. If the thief can't guess the password within a few tries then he has to dump the flash and pick through the data, but that requires significant expertise which few, if any, thieves will have.

      If the phone is encrypted (which implies password-protected), getting the data requires dumping the flash and then brute-forcing the password, which can likely be done with an offline attack, but further ups the ante on the level of expertise required. How difficult that is depends on how good the password is. If it's a good password the data is safe from basically anyone. Of course, good passwords are a pain in the ass to type on a phone.

      Note that I only mentioned passwords. Android offers other authentication options, including face unlock, pattern and PIN (arbitrary-length numeric password) as well as alphanumeric password. Encryption requires PIN or password. Face unlock is convenient (once sufficiently well-trained), but not very secure; lots of random people will be able to unlock your phone and pattern is moderately good if you use a complex pattern and make a habit of wiping the screen clean, at least enough to smear out any pattern trails.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Laughably Easy? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      Note that I only mentioned passwords. Android offers other authentication options, including face unlock, pattern and PIN (arbitrary-length numeric password) as well as alphanumeric password. Encryption requires PIN or password. Face unlock is convenient (once sufficiently well-trained), but not very secure; lots of random people will be able to unlock your phone and pattern is moderately good if you use a complex pattern and make a habit of wiping the screen clean, at least enough to smear out any pattern trails.

      iPhone also has alphanumeric passwords and fingerprint password too.

    5. Re:Laughably Easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All iOS phones are encrypted by default. The pin/password simply protects the crypto key.

      http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4175

      An offline attack would require a bootrom/bootloader exploit, since you can't get data off the device while it's locked (it refuses to complete the USB handshake). Even in restore mode, USB DFU mode won't dump data, only overwrite.

      Online Brute-forcing is easily killed by enabling the 'wipe after 10 failed attempts' option in the settings.

      Finally, even after restoring to the stock settings/wiping the device, iOS 7 enforces an activation lock based on the user's iCloud account, stored in an ARM TrustZone-secured location.

      http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5818

      If you have a 4-digit PIN, and the wipe-after-10-attempts, your data is safe. If you have the latest OS installed (most do), the phone is effectively a shiny brick after this, since the phone cannot be activated.

      None of these settings can be modified without the actual PIN or iCloud password (for example, if the thief tries to change the settings during the grace period before relocking).

      iOS devices are surprisingly secure.

    6. Re:Laughably Easy? by swillden · · Score: 1

      An offline attack would require a bootrom/bootloader exploit, since you can't get data off the device while it's locked (it refuses to complete the USB handshake). Even in restore mode, USB DFU mode won't dump data, only overwrite.

      Android is the same in that respect. With either OS, the attacker can open the device and read out the flash directly, however.

      In the other areas you mention Android needs to improve.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Laughably Easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, reading the flash isn't possible on iOS - when you attempt it you just get zeros for the content not in class D data protection (which is most of the data on the phone).

      If you move the flash storage to a different device, then you need to defeat the HSM and thats never been demonstrated.

    8. Re:Laughably Easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't dump the contents of the flash on an iOS device without prior knowledge of the device passcode, and access to the device.

      With physical access and being prepared to destroy the device you can access it, but then you have to defeat the AES-256 key in the HSM. This is would require national level resources , and even then is likely not possible.

      It a common misconception that on iOS the password is used to derive the unlock key - it is actually only part of the input to the process, and significant entropy comes from other sources .

    9. Re:Laughably Easy? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Android is the same in that respect. With either OS, the attacker can open the device and read out the flash directly, however.

      In the other areas you mention Android needs to improve.

      Nope, Starting with the iPhone 3GS, the flash is encrypted. The encryption key used is encrypted with a per-device key that's known only by the device (and I guess, Apple). If you do a remote wipe, the encrypted key is deleted (making the data inaccessible), and a new key is created. The device then encrypts that key with the device key and puts it in flash.

      This is why iPhone and iPhone 3G take several hours to wipe, while every iPhone since the 3GS onwards only takes seconds. As a result, the flash is always encrypted and removing it gets you nothing if you don't know the device key to recover the media key. (AFAIK, the device key is only known to hardware - software cannot access it, other than commanding the device key be loaded into the key cache RAM at a certain index).

      Android also has the ability to encrypt the flash (starting with 4.0 I think) - you have to enable it though - by default it's off. I believe it uses a form of TrueCrypt so it takes about an hour to encrypt the flash, and it cannot be disabled unless you reflash the device.

    10. Re:Laughably Easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're spot on with this remark. My brother passed away 6 months ago and I have his old 4s. At first I wanted it open so that I could know how he passed, what his last thoughts and actions were, and that eventually turned into wanting access to his gmail/investment/phone records/sms in order to handle his estate.

      Apple would not help me and AT&T would not help me. If anyone else is ever in a similar situation and doesn't want to resell the damn thing but just wants info there's a secret. Instead of wasting time with 10k combinations, just grab their computer.

    11. Re:Laughably Easy? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Nope, Starting with the iPhone 3GS, the flash is encrypted. The encryption key used is encrypted with a per-device key that's known only by the device (and I guess, Apple). If you do a remote wipe, the encrypted key is deleted (making the data inaccessible), and a new key is created. The device then encrypts that key with the device key and puts it in flash.

      There's one key built into the CPU which isn't known to Apple and cannot be extracted. On top of that, every file is actually encrypted with a per-file key, so even if you managed to crack one file, it wouldn't help you with others.

    12. Re:Laughably Easy? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing most people do not have anything other than a Sim-card pin.

      Sure, you can expect technical, security minded folks to use multiple forms of protection but for the average joe that's all too much work. He just wants to be able to use his phone...

    13. Re:Laughably Easy? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Interesting. My opinion of the iPhone has risen.

    14. Re:Laughably Easy? by Pope · · Score: 1

      Check out their whitepaper, it's a very interesting read: http://images.apple.com/ipad/b...

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    15. Re:Laughably Easy? by mlts · · Score: 1

      Android uses dm-crypt, which has been in the Linux kernel for a while now. The downside is that newer releases only encrypt /data.

      Motorola devices used to have their own mechanism for loopback encryption, and they used a version of CFS/EncFS for SD cards, which means the SD card can be pulled and file sizes looked at, but the contents and the file names hidden.

      The downside of the iPhone's encryption is that the chip that guards the key is easily openable by Apple. LUKS/dm-crypt is all software based without any obvious backdoors (there can always be ones that are hidden.)

    16. Re:Laughably Easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn off data / phone until you get it into an area with no data.
      Jailbreak.
      Win.

      Again, laughable.

    17. Re:Laughably Easy? by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      One time I (or my kids) misplaced my Nexus 7 behind the bed. I couldn't find it for a few days, so I fired up the Android Device Manager and locked the device (just in case). When I eventually found it, there was no charge on the battery, no lock on the screen, and still no lock when it connected back to Google HQ over WiFi.

      (That harrowing paragraph should be expanded into a short Hugo Award story!)

    18. Re:Laughably Easy? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Nope, Starting with the iPhone 3GS, the flash is encrypted. The encryption key used is encrypted with a per-device key that's known only by the device

      Yes, I know the flash is encrypted (read the thread). But the key is on the device...

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    19. Re:Laughably Easy? by swillden · · Score: 1

      With physical access and being prepared to destroy the device you can access it, but then you have to defeat the AES-256 key in the HSM.

      There is no HSM in iOS devices. They do use the ARM TrustZone, which is a good thing, but is no HSM.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  7. Google device manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.apps.adm

    You can see where your device is, and wipe it. Also, use two step authentication.

    1. Re:Google device manager by HairyNevus · · Score: 1

      Nice, thanks. I already have Avast! Anti-Theft, data encryption, and a 10 digit password, but the more the merrier. My last line of defense: I put all my money/financial apps in a folder called "PlsDontH4x". 'Cause you never know where asking nicely will get you...

      --
      You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
  8. Cerberus by iviv66 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Cerberus. It's available on the store: https://play.google.com/store/... Though if you download it direct from their website then you can flash it straight into the ROM, meaning that even if someone does a factory wipe on your phone it will still be installed and you can remote into it: https://www.cerberusapp.com/do... With it installed, you register your phone on the website, then sign into your account on the phone. From there you can carry out all sorts of commands, including GPS tracking, location history, call and SMS logs. You can even call or message the phone, get it to display messages, record audio, video, take pictures, all sorts. And finally you can wipe the SD card, wipe the phone, or reboot it. I don't remember how much it cost, but it was only a couple of pounds. I've never had my phone stolen yet, but I occasionally log into the site to check that everything is working and it always does what I want it to, so I've had no complaints with it.

    1. Re:Cerberus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

    2. Re:Cerberus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. Next time I steal a phone I'll make sure to re-flash a new copy of Cerberus to the phone's rom, thus overwriting the previous install.

      lol.

    3. Re:Cerberus by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      flashed into the rom would be fun if they had a random X hours and erase contents mode... Nothing is more enjoyable than knowing you are pissing off whoever bough your phone. I would like random insulting popups as well.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Cerberus by Mr+44 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Note that there was a major security hole in this last year:
      http://www.ifc0nfig.com/cerber...

    5. Re:Cerberus by Thanosius · · Score: 1

      How does Cerberus compare to say, Prey (http://preyproject.com/)? One thing I like about Prey is that I can use it on my mobile, tablet as well as laptop (since it started as a anti-theft tool for computers and then branched out to mobiles/tablets), and have all devices available for manipulation with the same account using the same software. It's a bit unfortunate that I see Cerberus talked about all the time but Prey is barely mentioned. It seems like Cerberus can do a bit more I'll admit, but options are worth expressing.

      --
      Account abandoned. I can't fucking spell for shit and Slashdot doesn't even allow time-limited edits of posts. Plus you'
    6. Re:Cerberus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, reminds me of my Nokia n900 with SMSCON . It's kind of strange that it took Android 5 years to catch up.

    7. Re:Cerberus by ruir · · Score: 1

      Remote tubgirl...

    8. Re:Cerberus by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Sounds good, thanks!

  9. And, via SMS commands - ALL FREE by DontScotty · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:And, via SMS commands - ALL FREE by phorm · · Score: 1

      "What does extrasec offered"

      Yes, because I really want to trust my phone to some random app written by somebody who can't even use proper grammar on the main heading of their website...

  10. These things are often stolen for quick resale by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    You could treat all your lost info as if it were a stolen credit card, but the folks capable of hacking the phone and private particulars are statistically unlikely to be grabbing them from folks on the subway.

    It's not even necessary to find a black market for them since several well-publicized used phone brokers will purchase late model phones for up to $200 US.

    I would hire a credit watch company to eyeball my credit inquiries for a year or two, and even that'll get your card suspended if you enter the wrong info a single time on Amazon, but unless there's reason to suspect foul play just assume a Mexican drug lord is pleased with your lost precious cellie.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  11. "How Can I Prepare For the Theft of My Android?" by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

    Save us both some time, and just send it to me...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  12. Root, Push Whatever by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't store important shit on your phone.
    When your shit gets stolen, just change the passwords to any accounts it was authorized to.
    Don't be one of those idiots who uses 2-factor authentication with one of those RSA hash clock apps on their phone. You'll just end up locking yourself out of shit when you lose your phone.

    Encrypting your phone does nothing because you decrypt it every time you power it on, and you always have your phone on, don't you?
    Passwords / locks will stop casual thieves from getting in, but they don't want in - they just want to sell the phone.
    Passwords / locks will NOT stop thieves who want your information. If your info is worth enough to be targeted it's worth enough for a 0-day bounty. (And with Android you don't even need that - it's likely to be a 6+ month old bug that your manufacturer / carrier never patched / pushed out the patch for).

    You may as well ask how to make sure your car can't be stolen. Can't win, don't try. Just minimize the impact.

    1. Re:Root, Push Whatever by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Encrypting your phone does nothing because you decrypt it every time you power it on, and you always have your phone on, don't you?

      But the first thing any thief will do is turn it off by pulling the battery, so it can't be located. When they next power it on, that encryption might help.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Root, Push Whatever by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Moto G you cant pull the battery, Got another tip?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Root, Push Whatever by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Encrypting your phone does nothing because you decrypt it every time you power it on, and you always have your phone on, don't you?

      Thats what the PIN is for. How do you propose bypassing the PIN without powering the phone down? Act quick, you only get a couple of hours.

      Its hillarious you think it does nothing, by the way, since thats exactly how FDE works for Windows and OSX, and most security experts dont think its useless.

    4. Re:Root, Push Whatever by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      Moto G you can, just takes a couple of screws.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
  13. Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. That way you can prevent your phone from being stolen in the first place.

    If you want everything encrypted: Sorry, you can't have that.

    1. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by sphealey · · Score: 1

      Unfortunate when the thieves cut your hand off to get the phone though.

      sPh

    2. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Buy a .44 Magnum. That way you can prevent your phone from being stolen in the first place, and not look like a complete fool.

    3. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by mab · · Score: 2

      But then someone steals your .44 Magnum

    4. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by tlambert · · Score: 2

      Unfortunate when the thieves cut your hand off to get the phone though.

      sPh

      They could always cut your hand off anyway.

    5. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by swillden · · Score: 1

      If you want everything encrypted: Sorry, you can't have that.

      Sure you can. All Android versions from Gingerbread (IIRC) forward support full device encryption, using dm-crypt. Of course, it's only as strong as your password, so you have to trade off convenience against security.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      They'd likely steal that gun, use it to shoot you, and then steal the phone and anything else you have of value on you in the process.

    7. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Duh, you encrypt the bullets.

    8. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Sounds scary.

      Before you know it, those bullets encrypt YOU!

    9. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Violent crime is not a typical use case scenario that accompanies cell phone theft, which by itself is almost always a crime of opportunity.

    10. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap for the gun. :D

    11. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds scary.

      Before you know it, those bullets encrypt YOU!

      Bullets are actually security by obscurity.

      They bury you, then everyone forgets you existed. :(

    12. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you own a crypt. Otherwise, they just plain kill -9 you

    13. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      If he bought a "Hello Kitty" .44 magnum no-one would steal his gun.

    14. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      If you want everything encrypted: Sorry, you can't have that.

      Sure you can. All Android versions from Gingerbread (IIRC) forward support full device encryption, using dm-crypt. Of course, it's only as strong as your password, so you have to trade off convenience against security.

      Bootloader and initial image. Most CPUs these days are incapable of running encrypted code directly. Also intermediate in memory images, as well as accessible swap for program images, and mappings, unless you knapsack encrypt all the files and programs, and put decryption code in the paging path (Mac OS X/iOS in fact does this, using FairPlay, if you use encrypted images), but the key is global and in a per device UUID encrypted knapsack, so it can be unpacked if you know how it works.

      The idea that you can make something secure from something resident on your system without resorting to something like a TPM or the encrypting/decrypting MMU in the XBox 360 is laughable, and it's also been demonstrated to be breakable, at least for the existing implementations on Microsoft and Apple platforms.

    15. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by swillden · · Score: 1

      You're right that the code is not encrypted. What is encrypted is the user data, which is what you want to protect.

      Whether or not you need a TPM to call it "secure" depends on the threat model. Under the most extreme threat models, TPMs aren't secure, either (they aren't designed to resist hardware hacks). Under a fairly reasonable threat model which assumes the attacker can read out flash but not RAM (because the RAM contents disappeared when the device was turned off for disassembly), the Android encryption model is secure, to the strength of the user password. The decryption key is gone from RAM so the flash-based storage cannot be decrypted, and of course any copies of the data in RAM are also gone.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    16. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by emj · · Score: 1

      Except a 2 year old

    17. Re:Buy a "Hello Kitty" wrist strap. by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      And here's a picture of one: http://tinyurl.com/pew26cy

  14. They copied Apple Find my iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google finally has copied Find my iPhone. Not sure if it works on all fragmented Android phones or not though. Best to move to the original and get an iPhone instead of a knockoff Android.

    http://techcrunch.com/2013/12/11/google-android-device-manager-play-store/

    1. Re: They copied Apple Find my iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which copied Lookout, which appeared on Android first? Original...yeah right.

    2. Re:They copied Apple Find my iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how these iPhoney users believe in this alternate history in which things were invented on the iPhone first. It's like they live in Bizarro world.

  15. Android Device Manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just came across this a week ago and it has device locator and remote wipe (you can also ring the phone in case you misplaced it in your house). It doesn't need to be installed on the phone, you can do it through any web browser with the google username and password.

  16. Really? Are you of legal age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any serious solutions out there for Android that secure against theft?"

    Get a concealed carry permit, lock your phone up when not in use and pay attention.

  17. Physical security? by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 2

    What are you doing with your phone that makes it possible that you've had 3 stolen from you? Are these thefts physically violent? I just can't imagine, for myself, that it would be super-easy to get my phone from inside my pocket or out of my hand without violence.

    --
    I think I'll stop here.
    1. Re:Physical security? by baka_toroi · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems Lady Luck has bestowed you with the privilege of being born in a first-world country. Good for you!

    2. Re:Physical security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a suggestion to the OP, I recommend "casing" the phone. It's unlikely anyone will try to steal the phone if you answer it by withdrawing it from your anal cavity.

    3. Re:Physical security? by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      As someone who has traveled quite a bit in so-called third-world countries, I was also wondering how it is that he's getting so many phones stolen. No it's not impossible (or hard) to stop yourself from being pick-pocketed in poor countries.

      If the thief wasn't threatening him with violence, he could probably solve his problem by keeping his phone in a zipped pocket when he's not using it.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    4. Re:Physical security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He needed money for weed so he traded his phone to his dealer then reported it stolen and had his parents buy him a new one. Oldest trick in the trustfunders handbook.

    5. Re:Physical security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick pockets can be INSANELY skilled. Zipped pocket ooh Fort Knox here we come.

    6. Re:Physical security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you have ever spent some time at Salt River station, you would realise the stupidity of your question.
      If the OP travels that line regularly, I am surprised it's only been 3.
      South Africa is....."different".

      Last time I was in South Africa, I left all phones at home (in the first world), and purchased a $30 phone and $1 sim card.
      That way, a prospective thief wouldn't be interested, and if he was that desperate, all I have lost is $31 and about $5 call credit.

    7. Re:Physical security? by gerf · · Score: 1

      "Cellphone theft is a huge problem here in South Africa" is an understatement. Theft and rape are so common in SA that it's just appalling. Forth percent of women in SA will be raped in their lives, and 1/4 men admit being rapists. I think stolen cell phones are the least of their worries... http://www.frontpagemag.com/20...

    8. Re:Physical security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that South Africa is populated by niggers right?

      The poster should simply be happy he wasn't raped.

      There are only two relevant rules regarding the nigger. When they are hungry, they steal. When they are satiated, they fornicate.

      Everything else is entirely spontaneous as with any beast.

    9. Re:Physical security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jezuz...if 4% of women are raped and 25% of men are rapists, that doesn't bode well for those poor victims as far as multiple attacks go.

    10. Re:Physical security? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      He asked a reasonable question and you respond with... being holier than thou? Condescending? Patronizing? I'm not quite sure what the specific term is, but you're being shitty and for no good reason. Jerk. And whoever modded you +1 informative is whatever you would call your specific brand of being shitty online but isn't even being original.

    11. Re:Physical security? by baka_toroi · · Score: 0

      What is reasonable about his question? The part in which he is an autist? Go fuck yourself.

    12. Re:Physical security? by puto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, I am Colombian citizen and Colombia is a country where people tend to steal your shoes if they are not tied tightly to your feet. Third world denizens tend to carry their expensive equipment in their hands as a show of wealth, and they get marked and the phones are easily stolen. I lived on and off in Colombia for years with expensive phones and never got them stolen. Why? I do not use them on the bus, the bar, or in the street. Stop using your smartphone as a status symbol in public.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    13. Re:Physical security? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Which is also why you need to be aware of your surroundings. Someone starts getting too close to you, cross to the other side of the rode, turn around, and just in general keep people away from you. Make sure your bag is close to you so a moto driver can't zip past and steal it. Common sense like that will reduce thievery.

      However, I will say the two attempted pickpocketings i had were in Europe. In Amsterdam I was looking at postcards, and looked down to find a guys hand around my waist (sort of the same way you might hold your girlfriend). He was making the (ill advised) tactic of trying to reach around and into my front pocket. He just said "pardon" and ran away. I should have probably clocked him, but I had the sad realization that if I did hit him, probably I would have gotten in trouble with the law.

      The other time was in Hamburg and is much funnier. I was on a date with a girl and we ended up going to the Reeperbahn to party. It's packed with people going out to party, and people are bumping into you all the time.

      Well some bumped into me, HARD with his shoulder. OW, he apologized, said sorry he was in a rush and ran off. Later I realized the pack of gum I had (in this trendy, flat, wallet shaped package) which was in my front blazer pocket was missing. The outline was clearly visible through my blazer so the guy picked my pocket thinking he was going to get my wallet.

      I was actually more impressed than anything else. It was so cool and I didn't lose any money.

    14. Re:Physical security? by Thanosius · · Score: 2

      For a lot of people in first-world countries, I doubt they see their phone as much of a status symbol anymore (perhaps a few years ago this was the case, but now when everyone has an iPhone or decent smartphone, the allure of exclusivity kinda disappears) and hence they just use their phone like any other device and don't think too much about it. However in a place like Colombia, a tourist used to having their phone our or easily visible/accessible isn't necessarily aware of how damn poor the environment they've entered is, at least compared to their regular lives. So by acting as they normally would, you think they're just flashing their gear as a means of using it as a status symbol. I assure you they're not - they just have the privilege of living in a place that has a better standard of living and behave in a manner that's normal for them, but not normal for the residents of that area. So they become attractive targets for theft due to their inability to blend into their environment.

      I really hate visiting countries with high levels of thief. I suppose I'd rather have my gear lifted without my knowledge than violently mugged for it, but I'd also rather not have to worry about it in the first place. I visited Rome on a tour and was warned about the considerable level of pickpocketing - in the end I spent more time paying attention to strangers and keeping my stuff hidden on me than enjoying myself. Thiefs are total pricks.

      --
      Account abandoned. I can't fucking spell for shit and Slashdot doesn't even allow time-limited edits of posts. Plus you'
    15. Re:Physical security? by mjwx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Really, I am Colombian citizen and Colombia is a country where people tend to steal your shoes if they are not tied tightly to your feet. Third world denizens tend to carry their expensive equipment in their hands as a show of wealth, and they get marked and the phones are easily stolen. I lived on and off in Colombia for years with expensive phones and never got them stolen. Why? I do not use them on the bus, the bar, or in the street. Stop using your smartphone as a status symbol in public.

      This,

      It doesn't matter how wealthy the country is, most people get their phones stolen through carelessness. There may be fewer thieves in a somewhere like London or New York compared to Bogata or Medellin, but they're still there and they're still looking for the same thing, an easy mark. The standards are different, everyone and their dog has their phone out in New York or London so they look for the ones that are drunk and alone, of course people do get their phones snatched in public but because everyone walks around with their phones out, they think that it wont be them (and act so surprised when it happens to them).

      This is why a lot of first worlder's get stuff stolen when they go to developing nations, they've never lived in a place where you have to be on your guard, where your phone will get stolen if you wander around with it.

      I've had a grand total of three things stolen from me in my travels, all due to carelessness on my part but fortunately, nothing that has cost me much to replace.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:Physical security? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      For a lot of people in first-world countries, I doubt they see their phone as much of a status symbol anymore

      Strangely, a lot of people still do see their phones as status symbols.

      The culture of one-upmanship and keeping up with the joneses is alive and well in western societies. A lot of people are constantly trying to get better toys than their peers and neighbours. Frank buys a ride on mower, not Bob and Steve have to have one. Steve gets a new Accord Euro, so Bob has to get a BMW 320 and not to be out done, Frank has to get a Mercedes CLA. Same with kids getting huge fart-cannon cat-backs (exhausts) to make their crapwagon sound louder.

      Phones are considered status symbols by a lot of vain people, they aren't very good status symbols but they are still status symbols for a great many people. This is why they rush to show everyone their new phone, mundane people don't care about how much RAM it's got or the new features like us geeks and every other mundane person knows it. They only care about showing everyone their new toy.

      There's a joke explaining the difference between a normal person and a douchebag.
      Normal Person: Excuse me for a second, I have to get my jacket out of my car, I left my phone in there.
      Douchebag: Excuse me for a second, I have to get my Northface out of my Lexus, I left my Iphone 5 S in there.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    17. Re:Physical security? by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      Was probably a typo on the parent post. The stats more clearly stated:

      South Africa has the highest rape statistics on the world.

      Approximately 40% of women in the country are rape victims.

      Approximately 30% of women are raped before they are 18.

      Approximately 17% of girls are raped before age 10.

      Approximately 25% of adult males openly admit to committing rape, mostly as gang rape

      Approximately 10% of adult males admit to raping a child.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    18. Re:Physical security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago I was walking back from a party in Mexico City around 04:00 because there were no taxis anymore. Behind me I heard steps at a slightly faster pace. Without looking around (avoiding to look scared) I crossed the street, and so did my follower. Could still be a coincidence. I then crossed the street again (back) and pulled out my Buck knife clearly visible under a street lamp in the middle of the street, and seemingly nonchalant started cleaning the dirt from under my nails. My follower stayed on his side of the road and continued walking away. I continued my walk too, after my nails were clean.
      I always wondered if it was a robber deciding to pick an easier prey, or someone just as scared as me.

    19. Re:Physical security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who lives in South Africa, you are wrong, the author is clearly an idiot who doesn't know how to look after his belongings. You have to be stupid to have had 3 cellphones stolen from you.

    20. Re:Physical security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, thank you, spot on. The author deserves to have his cellphones stolen because he is quite clearly an idiot.

    21. Re:Physical security? by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      3 phones stolen over the course of 12 years. Not that big a deal in terms of South African cell-phone theft stats.

    22. Re:Physical security? by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      Theft/burglary is extremely common in South Africa. Also, the Metrorail is well-known to be a prime location for crime. I visited a few months ago, and the advice was that the train was fine with more than a few people, but sometimes the cars will be nearly empty, and that is bad news. At the flat where I was staying, a tourist had had her baggage rifled through when she accidentally left a window open (virtually all properties are fenced in, so the burglar had to climb the fence to get in through the window).

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    23. Re:Physical security? by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      smart phones aren't used for status symbols. They're used to help navigate, communicate, find information and provide entertainment.
      Telling people not to use them in public is removing the whole point of taking a mobile computing device with you.
      I recommend instead of blaming the victims, you beat the thieves to death as a deterrent.

    24. Re:Physical security? by vakuona · · Score: 1

      I don't know who views a phone as a status symbol any more. It sounds to me like you are projecting your biases onto people who own these phones and who you think consider them to be status symbols.

      Apple sold in excess of 150m iPhones last year. That might be more than the total number of Mercedes Benz, BMW and Audi cars ever produced. iPhones are everywhere one looks. No one, even the most rabid fans, considers them to be status symbols. People might consider them to be fashionable, but that is very different from being a status symbol.

    25. Re:Physical security? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      smart phones aren't used for status symbols.

      Yes they are, I'm just going to do the copy/paste from the other comment I made about this.

      The culture of one-upmanship and keeping up with the joneses is alive and well in western societies. A lot of people are constantly trying to get better toys than their peers and neighbours. Frank buys a ride on mower, not Bob and Steve have to have one. Steve gets a new Accord Euro, so Bob has to get a BMW 320 and not to be out done, Frank has to get a Mercedes CLA. Same with kids getting huge fart-cannon cat-backs (exhausts) to make their crapwagon sound louder.

      Phones are considered status symbols by a lot of vain people, they aren't very good status symbols but they are still status symbols for a great many people. This is why they rush to show everyone their new phone, mundane people don't care about how much RAM it's got or the new features like us geeks and every other mundane person knows it. They only care about showing everyone their new toy.

      There's a joke explaining the difference between a normal person and a douchebag.
      Normal Person: Excuse me for a second, I have to get my jacket out of my car, I left my phone in there.
      Douchebag: Excuse me for a second, I have to get my Northface out of my Lexus, I left my Iphone 5 S in there.

      Telling people not to use them in public is removing the whole point of taking a mobile computing device with you.

      Erm, thanks for not reading my, or the OP's post.

      We didn't say don't take them with you, we said don't wander around with them out. Thieves look for easy targets and people too engrossed in their Idevice are extremely easy targets.

      It's a basic self preservation measure, like not accepting candy from strangers.

      Hey, but you're proving my point for me. A lot of first worlders don't have a clue about how to act in a country where theft is prevalent.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    26. Re:Physical security? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I don't know who views a phone as a status symbol any more.

      It sounds like you don't know many people.

      Oddly enough, it seems you're doing the projection here. You seem to think everyone has the exact same values as you. This is not correct. People do consider their phones to be status symbols, much the same as Zara Jeans and D&G handbags. This is why they line up every year to get the latest model. Phones to many a fashion accessories and occupy the same slot as other fashion accessories for these people, so yes, they are status symbols. How many purses did Michael Kors sell last year, I'd be very supprised if it wasn't a multiple of 150 million, they're still status symbols, not strong ones like Rolls Royce but for people who buy them they are an indication of status... The same with Iphones.

      I don't consider phones to be status symbols, but I know enough people to understand that this is my view (I own an old Galaxy Nexus) but here you've pretty much demonstrated you don't get out much, you definitely don't understand how mundane people work.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  18. Umm.. by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

    Android already features full device encryption, you've just got to turn it on. Keep in mind that not all OEMs support the feature, CyanogenMod and most AOSP derivitaves do. There's currently no self-destruct option should the pattern/pin lock be entered wrong X number of times, though I'm surprised Google hasn't implimented one as of yet.

    --
    The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    1. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really a full device encryption when it encrypts on the data partition.
      But I guess in this particular case it doesn't matter all that much.

    2. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * only the data partition.

  19. Public kiosk by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simple answer: Treat your phone/tablet as only slightly more trusted than logged in from a semi-public PC, such as at a library.

    I pretty much only log in to anything from my Android tablet via a browser in private browsing mode / incognito. I can then do everything through the browser that TFS' author presumably uses pre-logged-in native apps to do. Email, IM, cloud storage... I use them all, I just don't have my device set up to one-click root-my-life.

    I don't even bother with a password on the thing - It wastes more of my time than that of a potential thief. If someone nabs it, hey, they get a few gigs of music (that I have backups of) and a $50 (replacement value - they don't tend to age well) tablet. Woo-hoo.

    1. Re:Public kiosk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name? Address? Please!!!!

    2. Re:Public kiosk by swillden · · Score: 2

      I don't even bother with a password on the thing - It wastes more of my time than that of a potential thief. If someone nabs it, hey, they get a few gigs of music (that I have backups of) and a $50 (replacement value - they don't tend to age well) tablet. Woo-hoo.

      That's one approach, but I think on balance you're wasting more of your time with your approach. You don't have to enter passwords to unlock the device, but you do every time you want to do anything other than use media already on the tablet. The everything pre-logged-in approach is extremely convenient, and if you put a semi-decent password on it no ordinary thief is going to get into it. If you put a good password on it and enable encryption no one is going to get into it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Public kiosk by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      You have the luxury of not being a steward of sensitive information. Some people dont have that luxury.

    4. Re:Public kiosk by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      There's a bit of a difference between sensitive information and valuable information. Just about anyone who can afford a smartphone (in a first-world country) has sensitive information. That information probably isn't very valuable (less than $100) and so isn't going to be targeted with any serious effort to acquire - the phone is worth more. But, while that information isn't very valuable on the open market, dealing with the hassles of identity theft or similar makes it rather sensitive.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    5. Re:Public kiosk by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Sensitive is relative. Theres "could cause identity theft", and "could go to a prison in a third world country as a dissident". I suppose if you live in the first world, you dont really have to worry about the latter-- which is what I was getting at.

    6. Re:Public kiosk by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification. For all the faults of the society I live in, we can at least still state our opinions and not usually have to worry about jail or death. That said, there are things I won't say or put in writing because they can and have landed others in jail where I live (but not a third world jail). That's my solution to sensitive information, which, unfortunately, isn't going to do much to change the world for the better.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  20. Pretty easy. by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

    It's as simple as: Power down device, remove battery, remove SIM, do not re-connect to wifi hotspots. All of which can be done by anybody in less than 45 seconds. If the battery is non-removable? Power down, remove SIM, don't use wifi. Find my phone and remote wipe are pretty much a big hilarous joke if the theif know how to handle phones.

    --
    The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    1. Re:Pretty easy. by Quick+Reply · · Score: 1

      And getting past the PIN? And how useful would an iPhone be without Wi-Fi/Cellular Internet connectivity?

      You can't even restore the firmware without it verifying with Apple. Unless it is an old model that can be defeated offline, it would be more valuable for spare parts.

    2. Re:Pretty easy. by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 0

      With an iPhone? It's only 1,000 possible PINs for that lock. If you've got the hardware, take your time fingerhacking the pin. For Android, depending on ROM, the pin can get insanely long and you're pretty much boned.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    3. Re:Pretty easy. by dugancent · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can use an alphanumeric password on iOS. You do t have to use a 4-digit pin.

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    4. Re:Pretty easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an option on the iPhone to have a PIN that's not four digits, I hope anyone security conscious is using the advanced PIN.

    5. Re: Pretty easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually 10,000 possible pins, and I would assume most people have the wipe after 10 failed attempts enabled.

    6. Re:Pretty easy. by Desler · · Score: 1

      With an iPhone? It's only 1,000 possible PINs for that lock.

      Which is why they offer the passcode option for something longer.

      For Android, depending on ROM, the pin can get insanely long and you're pretty much boned.

      You need a ROM to get a long passcode? LOL. You can have an "insanely long" passcode in iOS simply by disabling the "simple passcode" option. I just typed in over 100 alphanumeric characters and it was still letting me type more when I stopped.

    7. Re:Pretty easy. by LocalH · · Score: 1

      Good luck restoring iOS to that device and making it usable as anything other than a stylish paperweight, if it was running iOS 7 and had Find my iPhone enabled.

      --
      FC Closer
    8. Re:Pretty easy. by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

      It's as simple as: Power down device, remove battery, remove SIM, do not re-connect to wifi hotspots. All of which can be done by anybody in less than 45 seconds. If the battery is non-removable? Power down, remove SIM, don't use wifi. Find my phone and remote wipe are pretty much a big hilarous joke if the theif know how to handle phones.

      iPhones wipe themselves unless the correct PIN or fingerprint is entered. I think you get 5 tries.

      So congrats. You've powered it down and kept it off networks. As soon as you power it back on you're still stuck on the lock screen.

      Actually, that's not true. You can unstuck it. If you take it online and let it talk Apple...

    9. Re: Pretty easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10,000. Not 1,000. 10,000. I think you're being disingenuous or you've never used an iPhone.

      That, and you can have it wipe the device after 10 incorrect entries. Try again.

    10. Re:Pretty easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10,000 in the default configuration 0000-9999 assuming you don't use alpha numeric.

      Even so, you can set the phone to wipe itself after a few wrong entries.

    11. Re:Pretty easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have Find my iPhone active on an iPhone, usually Activation Lock will be on. (there are exceptions to this for supervised devices, and it does require iOS 7, but given thats in excess of 85% of iOS devices out there, its a reasonable assumption)

      If you wipe the phone, you can not set it up or activate it without supplying the iCloud credentials used to set up Find my iPhone.

      You can't do anything with the phone, until it communicates the credentials back to servers at Apple - for uses other than as a paperweight, its bricked.

      So you can steal it, and deprive the user of their phone, but the device is useless as a device.

    12. Re:Pretty easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you failed again. iphones cannot be activated in this circumstance.

      Android fangirls ftl.

    13. Re:Pretty easy. by swillden · · Score: 1

      It's as simple as: Power down device, remove battery, remove SIM, do not re-connect to wifi hotspots.

      Why work so hard? Just turn on airplane mode.

      Of course, if the phone is password-locked, getting the data from it requires some hardware and software knowledge. If it's also encrypted and the password is a good one, the data is safe.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    14. Re:Pretty easy. by Trillan · · Score: 1

      First, you can set the password to much longer than 4 characters.

      Secondly, any parent can tell you that even without "wipe after 10 failed attempts" turned on, the iPhone will not allow you to enter PINs continuously. You'll start getting increasing delays fairly quickly, including delays that are quite long.

    15. Re:Pretty easy. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      How many of those characters are significant, though? 8? 12 maybe? It could be like dialing 1-800-got-hayfever. Anything after hayf is ignored.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    16. Re:Pretty easy. by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Incorrect - iPhone passwords can be alphanumeric, of any length you want. It ~defaults~ to a 4 digit PIN, but you aren't limited to that. Mine's 8 digits.

      Furthermore, anyone who cares will have enabled the 'wipe after 10 failed attempts' option.

    17. Re:Pretty easy. by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      With an iPhone? It's only 1,000 possible PINs for that lock. If you've got the hardware, take your time fingerhacking the pin. For Android, depending on ROM, the pin can get insanely long and you're pretty much boned.

      Bad maths and wilful ignorance. The default is 10,000 possible PINs. In addition there are the following options, available to anyone without any hacks: 1. Use a longer PIN, say 6 or 13 digits. 2. Use an alphanumeric passcode of any length. 3. Automatically wipe the phone after ten unsuccessful attempts. Always turned on is a growing time delay between attempts.

    18. Re:Pretty easy. by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      It's as simple as: Power down device, remove battery, remove SIM, do not re-connect to wifi hotspots. All of which can be done by anybody in less than 45 seconds. If the battery is non-removable? Power down, remove SIM, don't use wifi. Find my phone and remote wipe are pretty much a big hilarous joke if the theif know how to handle phones.

      Except when they try to use a phone like you use a phone - for making phone calls - it will be wiped. Or if you connect it to WiFi - it will be wiped. Once it's locked it's locked. And you can't reset it. So yes, you can steal an iPhone and keep it forever without it being found or wiped, but you cannot actually use it.

    19. Re:Pretty easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of those characters are significant, though? 8? 12 maybe? It could be like dialing 1-800-got-hayfever. Anything after hayf is ignored.

      All of them. If you set a passphrase (instead of the weaksauce PIN option) it's a passphrase like any other. The limit is somewhere north of 30 characters, alpha, numeric, and symbols.

    20. Re:Pretty easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, all of them? If my passcode is, say, B3t45uck5, I can't enter B3t4 and access the phone because that's not my passcode. I'd have thought that was obvious.

    21. Re:Pretty easy. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      But if the phone is only looking at the first eight characters of the passcode, then not only will B3t45uck5 work, so will B3t45uck1, B3t45uck2, B3t45uck3, and B3t45uck5N0t@a11.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  21. It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either,
    A: Never get an NSA/Android phone.
    B: Get rid of your NSA/Android phone.

    When is Blackphone out?

    Oh, almost forgot. FUCK BETA. Kill it with fire.

  22. secure against theft? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    so...not AFTER theft, but before: 1. wear a watch. that's how you check the time. don't flash your phone. 2. look around Before looking at your screen. really that simple. 3. finally, carry a dead one. give them that one. they only expect you to have ONE.

  23. A thermite charge will do by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Detonate automatically when the phone for a given period of time can't contact the wireless HW token you have on yourself.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:A thermite charge will do by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      With a minimal 5-meters blast radius. You will lose your phone, but will remove an asshole thief from the face of earth.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    2. Re:A thermite charge will do by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Nice. Except when you leave the phone in the car while you go in to pay for the gas and grab a pack of gum.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  24. sec by shentino · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised mostly becuase it didn't get seized by the TSA before he got there.

    1. Re:sec by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      The submitter appears to live in South Africa. After all, he wrote:

      "Last week my 4-week old Moto G phone was stolen while getting onto the train at Salt River in Cape Town, South Africa. That in itself is no big deal. Cellphone theft is a huge problem here in South Africa and I've had at least two previous cellphones stolen.

      There's no suggestion that he is an American who has ever had to to deal with "the TSA". Slashdot has had a global readership since forever.

    2. Re:sec by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Native South African.

  25. IMEI change by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    I thought IMEI could not be changed. Is it possible here because on a smartphone everything is software defined?

    1. Re:IMEI change by tlambert · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought IMEI could not be changed. Is it possible here because on a smartphone everything is software defined?

      You can generally do this, if you are super technically inclined, and have the right tools for the phone in question. In almost every case, you have to defeat the security on the baseband firmware, because it's embedded as part of the firmware in what's called a "seczone" (contains security data for the phone, which is cryptographically signed, including the carrier lock and IMEI).

      Most of the work required to rewrite the IMEI is not actually done by people attempting to be able to rewrite the IMEI; instead, the purpose is to be able to rewrite the carrier lock which happens to be in the same area, so if you have the source code for the tools, or know how to use IDA Pro and read and modify assembly language, you can convert the tool.

      This is basically true of almost every Samsung baseband chip firmware, since it has a buffer overflow attack that works against the cryptographic signature check, and then - game over. This is how the Sony, Samsung, and original iPhones carrier lock was busted. For other phones, you can buffer overflow the firmware by using a specially designed chip that pretends it's a SIM chip, and buffer overflows the baseband from the other side of things, rather than from application space. It's probably worth my while to not go into too much detail here.

      A non-stupid company that wanted to disincentivize that level of hacking on the baseband - said hacking also being an effective means of modifying the radio tables for the SDR (Software Defined Radio) - would put the carrier lock up in application space, rather than putting it in the baseband firmware in the first place. Most companies, Apple included, have been pretty stupid about their carrier lock implementations, though.

      So yeah, the tools exist, mostly because of carrier lock, and the implementation details for the carrier lock being in a stupid location that makes the IMEI rewrite an easy opportunistic target.

    2. Re:IMEI change by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      Too bad I cannot mod you +1 informative, since I already posted a comment here.

    3. Re:IMEI change by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      You seem to know way too much about phones, so naturally I'm overwhelmed by the urge to ask you something tangentially related.

      Is it possible to hack a PRL to get better connectivity? Say I have a CDMA phone (Samsung Galaxy S2 / Epic 4G Touch) on the Sprint network. Would it (at least in theory) be possible to modify the PRL in a way that results in the phone preferring Verizon towers over Sprint ones? Of course, this is assuming that Sprint and Verizon use the same frequencies and waveforms (I have no idea). I'd imagine it wouldn't work for data due to differences between the two networks...

      Or am I totally stupid for thinking something like this could work?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    4. Re:IMEI change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol ptmx_get_ioctl?

    5. Re:IMEI change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol ptmx_get_ioctl?

  26. really simple. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Step 1 change gmail password.
    Step 2 realize you were dumb for not setting a lock screen code.
    Step 3 - buy unlocked Moto X used on ebay for $260 and keep it in your front pocket next time.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  27. I use Prey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a paranoid type about big brother and his cousin google, so i always would leave GPS off...

    After my Nexus 4 got stolen, I got a 5 and installed 'Prey' (google Prey Project'), which is a pretty good tool...Like 'Find my iPhone' on steroids. I just hate leaving my GPS on all the time now.. :(

  28. don't leave it lying around by markass530 · · Score: 0

    you have to fuck up pretty big for your phone to get stolen

    1. Re:don't leave it lying around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, the author is clearly a moron.

  29. Google 2 Factor Auth by heezer7 · · Score: 1

    If you use that you can at least revoke that devices access so your google account is protected.

  30. Android Device Manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use built-in encryption and use Android Device Manager to ring, lock and wipe device:

    https://www.google.com/android/devicemanager

  31. Re:Hah! You wish! Get an iPhone and THEN you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, nicca. Where duh white womenz be at?

  32. Solve the problem at the source by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's a few simple steps to follow to prevent phone theft in the first place:

    Step 1: Wear gloves at all times
    Step 2: Put a non-conductive silicon case on your phone
    Step 3: Slip phone into pocket
    Step 4: Charge up a 400V 10uF capacitor and slip it into your pocket, leads up (now you see the need for gloves).

    Then you play a simple game.

    1 point for a loud scream on public transit.
    10 points for a loud scream followed by self injury while attempting to run away.
    100 points if the thief had a pre-existing heart condition.
    1000 points for a girl in the vicinity mistaking the agony with simple surprise of your well equipped package and offering to "take you now" right there on the train.

    1. Re:Solve the problem at the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1000 points for a girl in the vicinity mistaking the agony with simple surprise of your well equipped package and offering to "take you now" right there on the train.

      You have obviously never had a girlfriend.

    2. Re:Solve the problem at the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1000 points for a girl in the vicinity mistaking the agony with simple surprise of your well equipped package and offering to "take you now" right there on the train.

      And how many if she turns out to be a trap?

    3. Re:Solve the problem at the source by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Too funny. I had to stifle my laughter.

  33. obvious by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    You have 2 choices. 1, wait for the moron to take a selfie that auto-uploads to your instagram.
    2. self destruct button with a significant amount of C4 (plus phone insurance)

  34. Simple by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Set your background to a really attractive but clothed female to make them think that's the owner of the phone. Then put an app on your phone(displayed in a prominent place) that says "my hot nude pics" that when launched, wipes your phone. Done!

  35. Re:oops... just wanted to read the comments by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but I'd like to go on record as joining the beta sucks bandwagon

    Instead of cursing the darkness, why not light a candle?

    http://soylentnews.org/

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  36. Zipped pockets? by turrican · · Score: 1

    Maybe a pair of those 80's "parachute pants" would do the trick.

  37. How to prepare for the theft of your Android Phone by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    First, try not to get too attached to your Android. This can not be stressed enough as it is the absolute most important out of all the steps. Getting attached may feel right at first, but will make separation far more painful for all parties involved later. Despite how you feel about your Android now, the truth is it's highly unlikely you will never get an upgrade.

    Secondly, set a lock screen message addressing the new owner of your phone. Try not to make it too bitter sounding, or you will never see your Android again. Leaving your name and address, and times that you are typically at home is not recommended. Instead use something along the lines of, "Please take good care of my Android." Wishing the thief and your ex Android both happiness is a good idea, but you will have to see that message periodically which could lead to separation anxiety or a self fulfilling over the air update.

    Third, try to be sensitive to clues that your Android may be about to go missing. If your Android is acting up, freezes giving you the cold shoulder after receiving certain gestures, refuses to listen when you speak to it, suggests things in a mocking way, interrupts you while talking to someone you spend (too much) time with, or just can't make it through the day without a little "boost", these are signs that your relationship with your Android may soon be Terminated.

    Additionally, try your best to be a good person. Be aware that your Android is aware of almost everything you do down to the slightest touch or subtle tilt of your head. Thus, mistrust between you and your Android is a sure-fire recipe for disaster. Your android can hear those things you whisper under your breath after ending a call -- it senses how you act towards others you have contacts with. Performing acts of kindness towards others will reduce the chances that your Android will inexplicably leave your company, and can increase the chances of reuniting with your Android after an affair with a thief. If you are reunited after a separation, it will be up to you to decide if you can ever really trust your Android again; Unfortunately, one must beware of viruses...

    Finally, if things do not work out with your Android, do not despair. New models with more desirable features and stronger vibration functions will be available soon. Never damage your Android on purpose as this can lead to an immediate break-up, and may cause you harm as well. If you voluntarily end a relationship with an Android, return it to an authorized recycling centre so that it may be refurbished. Remember, if an Android doesn't bring you happiness, it may have been meant for someone else in the first place.

  38. Re:Hah! You wish! Get an iPhone and THEN you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone want a phone so shitty it crashes and reboots all the time? How many updates have the released for that iOS turd?

  39. Owning a Smartphone in CPT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets just sketch the situation properly for our international compatriots. The android phone in this is case is probably the only computer owned by this guy. We have to make to with less equipment simply because income is so low. Only the affluent will have computers / tables and a phones. This means that your entire digital life is likely to be on one device and loss of this is rather great.

    2 Major problems to deal with. Backups and Security
    Make sure your phone is properly backed up. There are a number of free apps for this. Secondly, you will need to make sure all your security features are enabled. The lock screen, the automatic lock when idle and the PIN on your sim card. The thief will usually switch the phone off immediately to avoid tracking. So the pin on sim helps a little to safeguard your number and stuff like your banking logins. Do not use any of the banking apps supplied by the banks. Rather use the browser and don't store the passwords and numbers. It is safer that way. I don't thing we really have to worry about encrypting the entire phone. These guys are usually not out to abuse your data, rather just to get a device to sell again. A wipe app might be useful just to clean out your accounts.

    How for the first world looking in.... Cellphones are a very good target for any thief. The SA cell companies are very reluctant to black list phones and the backyard shops usually have the tools to change the phone's identification numbers to a number from an old busted phone so the they keep on working on the network. An easy quick R200 ($20) can be made for a descent smartphone, keeping the thief in drugs for a day or two. Cape Town has a nasty drug problem with something called Tik. Almost the same as the US Crack. Nasty stuff.

    Good luck and stay safe.

    1. Re:Owning a Smartphone in CPT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, way to pour on the sympathy crap. It's true that electronic goods are relatively far more expensive here but you exaggerate far too much.

      As a South African myself I can tell you that *if* the author does not own a computer it is because he wastes his money on expensive phones (which he seems to love getting stolen) and other status symbol crap (designer clothes etc.). If he can afford an Android phone there is really no logical reason that he would not be able to afford a computer as well, computers can be had here for *far* cheaper than Android phones.

      Anyone who has their phones stolen 3 times (even in South Africa) is not aware of their surroundings and obviously flashing the phone around far too much, this author should wise up.

  40. Buy a blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically any blackberry will do. Set a device password. If you enter it incorrectly 10 times, the phone wipes itself (not the SD, though). BB10 phones even have BB Protect built in, which gives you some remote options if the phone comes back online. I don't think there's any IEMI hacks, either.

    The new ones even run about 90% of android apps right out of the box.

  41. Re:oops... just wanted to read the comments by mjwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but I'd like to go on record as joining the beta sucks bandwagon

    Instead of cursing the darkness, why not light a candle?

    http://soylentnews.org/

    Because every time I go to that site, I find it as frustrating to use as beta. Why do truncated comments have to load a new page?

    Also I haven't been forced onto beta since I opted for /. classic the first time I encountered beta.

    Soylent news will have to improve to get readership.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  42. Backdoor it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install a backdoor and pray to Allah that they don't factory reset it before you log in to the phone remotely.

  43. The funny part of stolen phones in Europe... by tlambert · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The funny part of stolen phones in Europe is that Europeans predominantly use prepaid SIM cards, so what they are really stealing is airtime for when they plug the stolen prepaid SIM in their own phone, and your phone gets sold or just plain thrown in the trash nearby, since most people trash SIMs instead of reloading them, and as long as they are not post-paid SIMs, the fact that the SIM number moves to another IMEI is not something the phone company cares about recording/tracking.

    1. Re:The funny part of stolen phones in Europe... by Zyrill · · Score: 1

      What data do you base your theory on? The people I know in Europe do not have prepaid SIMs... That stuff is for kids.

    2. Re:The funny part of stolen phones in Europe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two SIMs in my phone. One is on contract and has my permanent number on it, and the other (with a different network) is prepaid and is used for internet access.

    3. Re:The funny part of stolen phones in Europe... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      While that's an actual scam that happens, it's hardly the only phone crime in Europe:

      1) About half of SIMs in Europe are postpaid, ranging from a majority in some regions to a minority in others
      2) People will happily steal and resell your phone, and there are plenty of dodgy unblocking companies willing to facilitate that
      3) There's a longstanding way of making money of a stolen postpaid SIM, by using it to make a premium-rate call. This is why you're encouraged to use the SIM PIN
      4) Phone companies don't care about where a postpaid SIM migrates to either; they'll happily sign you up for a contract with no phone, or a phone you never intend to use.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:The funny part of stolen phones in Europe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're over-generalizing quite a bit...

  44. Hardware manufacturers need to design it in. by andy_spoo · · Score: 1

    What we really need is a phone / ring combination. i. e. phone only works with the wearer of a ring. No need to use pins, works all the time for every app, quick and convenient.

    1. Re:Hardware manufacturers need to design it in. by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      I have a somewhat bulky idea on how to increase the difficulty of taking the hardware. Basically a retractable cable attached to the belt and the phone. If the cable is long enough you do not need to remove it to use the phone. http://www.maclocks.com/blackb... http://www.kensington.com/kens...

  45. Big picture by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1
  46. Learn to not be an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I've been in South Africa my whole life and I've never had a cellphone stolen. If it's such a common occurence for you you are clearly doing something really stupid. Learn how to handle your property in a sensible way instead of preparing yourself for losing it again.

  47. Nice but also worrying by FalcDot · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that link, I found it very interesting.

    But also worrying.

    I mean, looking at everything Cerberus can do without apparently being detectable on the phone... How can I know that my phone doesn't have something similar installed on it?

  48. How to prepare for the theft of your Android Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try' mobiucare' android software not only does it track your phone and take pictures of the thief but it also allows you to do a full remote wipe the pro version is not free, but worth the money spent

  49. Blame the victim... by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 2

    I love all these replies placing the onus of the of blame on me and calling me dumb for having my phone stolen...

    As fun as it is for you to call me dumb and a moron for having been robbed, it's not really helpful either.

    And for the folks saying that I must be "doing something wrong" to have 3 phones stolen in the last 12 years:

    My last phone theft happening when the train I was on was robbed by a gang of men moving from carriage to carriage threatening people at knife point. Please illustrate to me what I could have "done right" in that scenario...

    1. Re:Blame the victim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My last phone theft happening when the train I was on was robbed by a gang of men moving from carriage to carriage threatening people at knife point"
      I call crap unless you can point to a news article about this, such an event would have made it to news24 or similar at a bare minimum.

    2. Re:Blame the victim... by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 2

      The train that was robbed was travelling from Cape Town to Bellville via Monte Vista and was a late train running between 6pm and 7pm.

      This robbery happened in 2008 and occurred during the same time period as the Xenophobia Riots that happened that year.

      The robbery did not make the news, probably because no one was killed and only one person was injured, a man on the same carriage as me who tried to prevent the thugs from stealing his laptop.

      You're welcome to call me a liar but the event in question happened and shortly after it did there was a huge up-surge in the number of train guards posted by Metrorail.

  50. Is there a way to make it explode? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    In South Africa the way we typically defeat car thefts is to leave a bottle of liquor in the glovebox and it's laced with cyanide. Usually they get about a half mile, die and crash. But it's just a fender. Drag out the dead guy, get the dings knocked out, you're good to go. I wonder if there's a way to kill the thief by making the phone explode though. Or at the least electrocute his face when he holds it up.

  51. You can do all that without an app even by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I helped set the BYOD policy at my company and did the initial rollout. Our requirements were exactly the same as OP, with a little more control. As others have pointed out; you can set encryption up, you can setup a lock PIN or password, and you can configure it to do a full wipe on incorrect password guesses.

    FWIW, we use MobileIron to do this.. but all MobileIron does is send the security policies to the phone (whose OS, Android or iOS, actually enforces the policy) and ensuring the phone isn't jailbroken (meaning we can trust that if we send a policy, the OS will honor it) - everything else is straight from the smartphone OS vendor and available in the Settings app for review.

  52. Re:"How Can I Prepare For the Theft of My Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything Cornelius says is SO fucking important, he has to make sure it gets to the top of the pile by replying, off-topic, to a frosty pisser. He's constantly doing that.

  53. But then someone steals your .44 Magnum by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 1

    They'd have to be feeling pretty lucky to try.

  54. What the hell is a "punter "? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    The article uses this term at least twice, and I have no fscking ideal what it means.

    Is punter some kind of African slang for something/someone?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:What the hell is a "punter "? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "The Google", pops. "The Google".

      You might have heard about it. It was in all the papers.

    2. Re:What the hell is a "punter "? by jkflying · · Score: 1

      As somebody from South Africa (and who even takes the train through Salt River), I have to say I was also a bit confused. I'm assuming they meant a fence, although a fence isn't really "oblivious" as OP said. Perhaps they mean a customer who just happens to find a 'great deal' on a refurbished phone at their local pawn shop...

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    3. Re:What the hell is a "punter "? by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      In Australia, at least as far I know, "punter" is slang for a customer (or likely customer) of a pub or betting place, e.g. "I watched the footy game with all the other punters", "I took a punt on the horses today". More broadly, also sometimes used as a substitute for "average joe" or "working class".

      http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/... lists some additional meanings. Seems to be of UK origin.

  55. Password protecting an unlocked bootloader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a theft standpoint, I am not worried about my data, but I am worried about the loss of the physical hardware. There are reasonable methods to keep a thief from accessing data on the phone (PIN, encryption) but no methods to stop them from booting to recovery and wiping the device. What I really want is protected access to recovery mode.

  56. Get more math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 * 10 * 10 * 10 = 10,000 combinations

  57. AirDroid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay for AirDroid. You can locate your phone, lock it, take a picture of whoever has it, wipe it, brick it, bla bla bla.

  58. Back up often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and buy insurance.

    Also, don't store TS/NSI data on it.

  59. Replace the logic board by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    The only laughing is being done by the people who are getting a cheap source of replacement parts thanks to Apple's iCloud lock feature. Everything but the logic board (motherboard) is still fully usable.

    Ironically, even the locked logic boards still seem to have value on eBay. I can only assume there's some recyclers in China where they're swapping out the flash memory chips with ones from logic boards that were water damaged.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  60. Re:"How Can I Prepare For the Theft of My Android? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Hey. It's "Gamification" of the comment hierarchy.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  61. Re:Success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that is a large part of what the problem is. The culture, at least of the upper end of the class system, of whites don't promote things like ecology and working hard to better society as something to strive for. However, high life, bling-like trappings, and professional banksters are the main heroes that are held up as something to emulate.
    This general type of attitude is something that can ONLY be fixed from the inside of the community itself, and so far, this isn't being pushed. And sadly, you often see folks that DO escape from this cycle of destruction into sustainable jobs and neighborhoods, they also shun the corporate culture and often understandably so, as that they don't want their kids around that culture.

  62. So what you want by gerardrj · · Score: 1

    Is Apple's security model for iOS with local passcode (simple or complex), 100% encryption, tracking, auto and remote wipe capability and the device is incapable of being used unless you log it in to it with the proper credentials so the activation server allows it to go past the lock screen whenever you restart it or even re-install the OS on the device.

    I'm guessing if I say you should just get an iPhone that you'd complain about the "walled garden" and "overseer status" of Apple, which is of course ironic given that those exact features are what it will take to lock any phone from hackers and thieves. You need to make up your mind... customizable Android based phone or highly secure iPhone.

    The way I see it is that such a secure setup could never happen with the Android system: No manufacturer wants to run stock Android as there would be little competitive differentiation. Since all Android installs are different you can't easily implement the activation server model or OS level encryption, plus who would do it? Carriers would want to raise prices to offer the service, manufacturers don't want to support phones for longer than it takes to sell them and Google doesn't seem to think security is a priority for the OS. Who's left?

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  63. The solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting enough I have not seen a post showing an answer to the original question. Granted, I did not scroll through every.....single....one. However, here is a simple, free, and proven solution. It's called the Prey Project and it's free. Just read the "recovery" stories section. Install it on your device, configure set up on that device, and if it's used after being stolen. You have a very good chance of getting it back.

    http://preyproject.com/

  64. Re:Success by ichthus · · Score: 1

    ...so far, this isn't being pushed.

    You're mostly right. Bill Cosby often speaks on this subject, advocating self-accountability and hard work. But, more and more, he seems to be shunned and dismissed in favor of others like Jesse Jackson who insist on blaming everyone else for the black community's woes.

    --
    sig: sauer
  65. Easy! Use a Win Phone 7 image as your lock screen by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 1

    My Nexus 4 has a lock screen that looks like a Windows Phone 7 screen. But I wasn't prepared for the thief to come back and go into a rant about me being a tool.

    --
    Place nail here >+
  66. Re:Success by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    You're mostly right. Bill Cosby often speaks on this subject, advocating self-accountability and hard work. But, more and more, he seems to be shunned and dismissed in favor of others like Jesse Jackson who insist on blaming everyone else for the black community's woes.

    True...and for the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons of the world, they really do NOT want to truly help the black community, if they were to promote success instead of victimization, they'd have all their revenue sources dry up.

    They make their living trying to keep racial dis-harmony going.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  67. Self answering question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody wants to steal an android phone no more than they'd want to steal a stock stereo out of a 20 year old car.

  68. Coordinates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just let me know when and where you'll be leaving it relatively (or - even better - completely) unattended,

    I'll take care of the rest!

  69. for starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let the phone get on the train by itself!

  70. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > How Can I Prepare For the Theft of My Android Phone ?
    By going to South Africa, apparently...

  71. Re:TFC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open your eyes, it's easier than you think.

  72. Re:TFC by ichthus · · Score: 1

    Uh.... what? Elaborate, please.

    --
    sig: sauer
  73. Yes, seriously by Pow · · Score: 1

    Did you actually measure it (adrobench storage read/write test for example) and did not find any difference?
    I'm assuming not and since Nexus 5 is fast to begin with there isn't any *noticable* difference.

    Only recently (KitKat release) Google added TRIM support for encrypted volumes. Without that the performance difference between unencrypted (with TRIM) and encrypted (no TRIM) was very noticable after device was used for some time.
    Unlucky for owners of older devices (1st gen Nexus 7, Galaxy Nexus) it does not work. This problem is very serious on 1st gen Nexus 7, to the point where it becomes unusable if encryption is used: https://code.google.com/p/andr...

  74. This article is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one steals android phones, especially motorolas. Even a Samsung only has a street value of $10. Get an iPhone and you'll have a phone people will steal.

  75. Re:oops... just wanted to read the comments by endoboy · · Score: 0

    wow... must have struck a never someplace... my trivial comment has been modded 8 times.

  76. http://www.androidlost.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word: http://www.androidlost.com/

    I was not only able to remotely install this app via google play AFTER the phone was stolen, but I was able to activate and use ALL android functions... including GPS, caling, text message, even set of a loud SIREN and take pictures and basically catch the thief red handed!! I felt like BORIS in Goldeneye... INVINCIBLE!

  77. Anti-theft device by wendyg · · Score: 1

    I actually have my phone (a Galaxy Note 2) on a lanyard and when I'm out I keep it tied to my person or hanging around my neck, like a little kid with mittens. Won't prevent *every* thief, but certainly lowers the ease of stealing it. Also protects against dropping and losing.

    wg

  78. Less and less of a problem by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    When I actually sat down and thought about it, losing a fully configured Android phone is actually a big deal as it provides ready access to all kinds of accounts, including ones Google account.

    [Shrug]

    When I trashed my phone - just before coming to work 7 weeks ago - had to pick up a £10 basic phone from a supermarket to allow me to be in contact while travelling. But it made me think - is that phone really any use with all it's complicated facilities? It's an address book, an alarm clock ... and that's about it.

    1. Trying to read or reply to email on it - an absolute nightmare (I've tried 3 different apps for 3 different accounts and deleted them all - 'nuff said)
    2. Surfing the internet - screen is too small, but far. And even when you've got a connection, it's ridiculously too slow.
    3. Twitter and shit like that - I already get by text message, so [SHRUG].

    Nope, when I get back from work, I think it's going to be upgrading to a basic phone (and recovering my normal phone number) for me. Oh, and using my tablet, with an added external keyboard and wall-wart for day-to-day mobile access. Or a netbook - essentially the same form factor. Which, since it lives in my rucksac, is considerably less pick-pocketable then a phone.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"