Slashdot Mirror


Russia Blocks Internet Sites of Putin Critics

An anonymous reader writes in with news about Russias censorship of internet sites critical of President Vladimir Putin. "Russia blocked access to the internet sites of prominent Kremlin foes Alexei Navalny and Garry Kasparov on Thursday under a new law critics say is designed to silence dissent in President Vladimir Putin's third term. The prosecutor general's office ordered Russian internet providers to block Navalny's blog, chess champion and Putin critic Kasparov's internet newspaper and two other sites, grani.ru and ej.ru, state regulator Roskomnadzor said. The move was the latest evidence of what government opponents see as a crackdown on independent media and particularly the internet, a platform for dissenting views in a nation where state channels dominate the airwaves. Ej.ru editor Alexander Ryklin called it 'monstrous' and a 'direct violation of all the principles of freedom of speech,' More at EFF, and in earlier stories at the The Huffington Post, and Deutsche Welle, which notes, 'This year's report by Reporters Without Borders on World Day against Cyber Censorship condemns Russia as one of the "Enemies of the Internet." "Russia has adopted dangerous legislation governing the flow of news and information and freedom of expression online," it concludes.'"

37 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Reassembling the Soviet Union by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sadly, Russia is turning more and more to Soviet ways. Putin was even rehabilitating Stalin.

    Putin Reportedly Claims the Dissolution of the Soviet Union May Have Been Illegal

    This may not end well.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by loonycyborg · · Score: 2

      Soviet Union dissolution was technically illegal like any other coup/revolution, so calling is so is a truism, but what does it have to do with rehabilitating Stalin?

    2. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As one of the great monsters of history, rehabilitating Stalin is an important bit of symbolism and tone. If Austria and Germany were to one day declare that they were reuniting in an act of self-determination by the German people, and then started making public pronouncements about the many great achievements of Der Führer, wouldn't that be cause for concern? Stalin killed far more than Der Führer.

      Putin’s long game? Meet the Eurasian Union

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by spark89 · · Score: 2

      For 400 years Ukraine fights with Russian occupation. Even in the USSR, we still resisted their regime.

    4. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by spark89 · · Score: 2

      Ok, say that to ''green mans'' in Crimea and personally to Putin. We, Ukrainians, don't want to fight with Russia, but if occupation will continue, we will counter-attack.

    5. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by Cenan · · Score: 2

      Nationalism must be eradicated for the good of the Humanity

      At gun point if need be right? We've all heard it before, you don't need to try and package it up into something that will be easily digestible, nobody believes your bullshit outside of Russia.

      --
      ... whatever ...
    6. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by h5inz · · Score: 2

      Assembling the Soviet Union was illegal, so any laws and treaties made by Soviet Union are void anyway.

    7. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by Cenan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I grew up in the shadow of fucking Soviet warheads. When the abomination that was the Soviet Union collapsed (because that is what it was, a collapse that forced a dissolution), everyone were better off. We've never had it better here in fact, than since that monstrosity of a union disappeared, and Russians could have had it just as good, were it not for Putin.

      There is no interest in "eradicating the old elements", Putin is one of those old elements himself. He's building himself a buffer zone that he can steal from without repercussions, because he wants a new empire and he can't afford it on Russian GDP alone. He needs vassals he can exploit without affecting the core of his new empire. He is in essence rebuilding the Soviet Union, one invasion at a time. He couldn't have done it without you though, and I'm sure he's grateful for your support (no, not really).

      The way he is doing this is actually quite smart, although the end goal doesn't serve the widest of interests. He's filling the Russian media with macho propaganda and grand standing to seed the yearning for the old days of power. Ask almost any Russian and they'll have zero clue what the fuck is going on, except what Putin has made them believe. If he says green is red, that is what the Russians will walk into the future believing. "Solving" the world's problems isn't on the agenda for you great leader, it is a talking point - and nobody outside of Russia is buying it, but that's not the point of it. All that sauce is for you, not us, so you can stop regurgitating it, Putin already knows it's a sham and you sound ridiculous when you do.

      When there are no protests at home, you can pretty much act as you wish. When you act like a dick and the negative responses start flooding in, you can always point to them and go: "everyone is afraid of us, they don't understand our grand design, we must continue on with our master plan". But what your great leader has forgotten to tell you is that his grand standing is hinging on a bluff, and an assumption that nobody is going to call it out of fear of "Old Russia".

      If the gas revenue stream dries up, you guys are going to be seriously fucked. For the takers of the gas, the price of heating a living room will rise, but that is not the end of the world over here - we still have the money we're not giving to Putin in our hands. But for the Russian end of the transaction is a catastrophe. There will only be more gun point diplomacy or capitulation left, again. An argument can be made that those two options really are the same, the only difference is the length of time it takes the first option to merge into the second option, or you could count the number of bodies that has to pile up before that happens - your choice really.

      What all this amounts to, is a massive failure in learning from your collective mistakes. All of this will not end well for anyone but Putin himself, he's already pocketed enough money to not care what happens to the rest of Russia, the worst that can happen (bar a gunshot wound to the head, launched from a mile out) is exile with pockets full of cash, so of course he's moving forward. Just don't keep kidding yourselves and thinking he's going to take you all with him.

      What's more likely to happen down this path you're following, is another era of an isolated, poverty stricken Russia, and the really, really sad part is that you're all buying into it as the only way to go. I feel for you guys, I really do. It saddens me, because I remember the 80s. Do you?

      --
      ... whatever ...
    8. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by psychonaut · · Score: 2

      You could say the same thing about the United States of America, whose formation in 1776 was a treasonous act against the Kingdom of Great Britain. In both cases it makes little practical sense to consider all their respective laws and treaties void, and as a matter of law they are not (at least insofar as Russia and the USA are concerned).

    9. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Putin’s long game? Meet the Eurasian Union [bostonglobe.com]

      It's always struck me that being just outside the european union must kinda suck. Customers in the EU will be reluctant to buy from your buisness because they know they risk being stuck with stupid fees for collecting trivial ammount of VAT*. Travel into neighbouring countries is subject to restrictions decided by the block as a whole** rather than by your neighboughing country.

      Putin aside I can see why the russians would not much like the idea of going from being the dominant force in a block to being the ones stuck just outside it

      * buy a £20 item, pay £4 VAT plus £10 fee for collecting the VAT is the sort of experiance i've had when buying from outside the EU.
      ** Strictly speaking it's the schengen area rather than the EU per-se but there are only a handful of countries that are in one but not the other.
       

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    10. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know what you understand under socialist and dictatorship, but these 2 terms are mutually exclusive. USSR was fascist.

      USSR was a secular theocracy. It treated Marxism - or "Dialectic Materialism" - as revealed truth, and as theocrats usually do, made more shit up as it went along. If and when reality disagreed with revelation, it got ignored or violently suppressed. And it never really changed: people got tired and disappointed with their prophet, just like they'd gotten tired and disappointed with the Czar earlier, and abandoned him. But the spirit of autocracy - the myth of divine leader - lived on, thus Putin is now enthroned as the new Czar, just like Stalin before him. Meet the new boss, the same as the old boss.

      And no, USSR was not fascist. Fascism and Stalinism are both manifestations of something far older and nastier, a sickness that to some extent pervades all human societies. All who try to build a utopia reach the point where it seems the goal is just within range if they only sacrifice a few people to reach it. If they don't, the paradise remains flawed, and if they do, it turns into a nightmare - just like Soviet Union and various fascist regimes did.

      Of course, the US also did exactly that to win the Cold War, and it seems the bill is now coming due. Time will tell how far the "land of the free" will fall before what it's unleashed is done with it.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    11. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Naturally I don't ask them to give up their culture. But I don't want them to force it on unwilling people on territory of Ukraine. This is absolutely inadmissible. "

      Yet you want to force it onto them and when you do it it's not inadmissible? You don't see the hypocrisy in that?

      "This is the reason Crimea rebelled."

      Accept it didn't. In polling in February before this all happened only 41% of Crimeans wanted to join Russia. What's going on in Crimea isn't rebellion, it's Russian occupation - it's forced annexation of Crimea against the will of the people there - you know, that thing that on one hand you're saying is inadmissible, and on the other you're arguing for?

      "If Ukrainian state respected Russian people as much Russian Federation respects its own people of different nationalities"

      Yeah because it's so nice being Jewish in Russia and suffering attacks from Neo Nazis? It's so nice being Chechnyan in Russia and getting bombed to fuck? Outside of nationalities it's so nice being gay in Russia and being legislated against and beaten to death with the blessing of the state? It's so nice having differing political views than Putin and being beaten, jailed, or killed?

      The only thing Russians look after in Russia are straight white Russians who conform to the will of Putin. Anything else and you're fucked.

    12. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by Xest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No side wants to be part of the Russian block, that's a key myth that Putin is desperately trying to peddle:

      http://www.cityam.com/blog/139...

      The whole reason Putin has troops locking down Crimea and spreading propaganda left and right is precisely because he knows he could not win the referendum there legitimately. It's a sham, a stitch up, theft of Ukranian territory against the genuine will of the people. Even with a majority of 58% of ethnic Russian origin in Crimea most of those ethnic Russians still identify their nationality as Ukrainian, even though their ethnicity is Russian.

      There is no division in the Ukraine, separatists across the whole nations are an absolute minority. It's no different to Scotland and the UK in this respect - the fact that 90% of the population there are Scottish doesn't mean 90% are in favour of independence, on the contrary, polling consistently puts only about 30% in favour of independence.

    13. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

      Actually the latest polling on Scotland gives more like 38-40% in the "yes" block.

      I would like to see evidence for your claim that Ukraine is not really a divided country and that's all Putin's propaganda. Everything else I've seen suggests that Ukraine really is a highly divided country with a large population of people who would prefer to be a part of Russia than the EU. I'm not convinced this is something Putin is just making up.

      The problem here is that the west has already decided it doesn't matter what the outcome of the Crimean referendum is - if Russia wins, that must be because of foul play, intimidation or excessive "propaganda" (as if western elections are not also filled with propaganda). In fact, I don't see any way the people living there could ever actually decide they prefer to be aligned with Russia without western powers decrying it as the work of the dastardly Putin.

      Here's an idea. Why don't you go compare American propaganda (Obama's comments) vs Russian propaganda (Putin's comments). In particular note that Obama doesn't even bother taking press questions any more, whereas Putin takes lots of very aggressive and straightforward ones.

    14. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Funny how all flavors of strong socialism end up fascistic. Almost like there was a basic defect in the philosophy.

      Hint: the defect is excessive concentration of power.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Reassembling the Soviet Union by polar+red · · Score: 2

      >excessive concentration of power.
      That's exactly what socialism is NOT any system with a large concentration of power in few hands goes against the definition of socialism

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  2. Go find another thread to whine in by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There a topic that isn't about America? Well can't have that! Spin it to be about America! Redirect all topics to be on America, particularly whining about America!

    Seriously, this American-centric bitching is really annoying. People need to knock it off. This is about Russia. That things are happening in America doesn't mean things aren't happening elsewhere. It also doesn't mean those things aren't of interest to the wider world. What is happening in Russia right now is of quite a bit of interest not just to Russians, but to Ukrainians, and to the whole of Europe. Also some people from the US might like to know too because hey, it is nice to be informed about the wider world.

    So quit. Quit trying to make every thread about the US. There are lots and lots of those on Slashdot. When something comes up on a foreign country, let it be on that topic. The topic at hand is Russian media/internet censorship not NSA spying. That one is a little further down the front page.

    1. Re:Go find another thread to whine in by Dave+Emami · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There a topic that isn't about America? Well can't have that! Spin it to be about America! Redirect all topics to be on America, particularly whining about America!

      What's ironic is that the folks who tend to do this, are just as likely to sneer that Americans don't care about anything happening outside the US.

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    2. Re:Go find another thread to whine in by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      There a topic that isn't about America? Well can't have that! Spin it to be about America! Redirect all topics to be on America, particularly whining about America!

      Yep, welcome to Slashdot. You could have an article about the most hellish police state on earth, where visiting a site like Reddit could have your grandmother tortured to death and the second comment post (after the GNAA and frosty piss comments) will be "YEAH, but the USA is WAY WORSE."

      Usually these posts are by basement-dwellers who have no concept what living in a police state or under a totalitarian regime actually means.

      Could the USA do better? Yes. Dramatically better, but there are many places on this blue marble that are MUCH, MUCH worse.

      ...oh yeah, and I'm not American and I don't live in the USA.

    3. Re:Go find another thread to whine in by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2

      There a topic that isn't about America? Well can't have that! Spin it to be about America! Redirect all topics to be on America, particularly whining about America!

      What's ironic is that the folks who tend to do this, are just as likely to sneer that Americans don't care about anything happening outside the US.

      Well, Americans don't really care about anything happening outside the US, unless it affects them. Even the US government is that way... why are they not in Ukraine right now while this democratic country is under attack by "unspecified" militants? The US was happy to roll into Afghanistan (for revenge) and Iraq (for oil) at a moments notice. No problems helping dispose of their old enemy Gaddafi either. (Libya has oil, right?)

      The Europeans can't complain much though as they are even softer on military intervention! They were excited about the Ukraine's merging with the EU, but all it took was a little posturing from Putin to reduce the European states to hand-wringing and empty threats. Why? Because they are whores for Russia's oil and have no backup plan in place were Gazprom to cut them off.

      Finally, Asia and South America only care about their own continents. So pretty much everyone only cares about themselves.

      I am surprised that no one is calling Putin's bluff however. He's refused to acknowledge that the "pro-Russian" troops are Russian. It seems like a good way to force his hand would be to start rolling heavy military equipment into the rest of the Ukraine to protect it from the "terrorists" in Crimea. Then, when Russia starts saber-rattling, NATO should start testing their ballistic missile and interceptor assets... You know, to protect the Russians from the Crimean terrorists. Bullies only respect other bullies.

    4. Re:Go find another thread to whine in by Megol · · Score: 2

      There a topic that isn't about America? Well can't have that! Spin it to be about America! Redirect all topics to be on America, particularly whining about America!

      What's ironic is that the folks who tend to do this, are just as likely to sneer that Americans don't care about anything happening outside the US.

      Well, Americans don't really care about anything happening outside the US, unless it affects them. Even the US government is that way... why are they not in Ukraine right now while this democratic country is under attack by "unspecified" militants? The US was happy to roll into Afghanistan (for revenge) and Iraq (for oil) at a moments notice. No problems helping dispose of their old enemy Gaddafi either. (Libya has oil, right?)

      The Europeans can't complain much though as they are even softer on military intervention! They were excited about the Ukraine's merging with the EU, but all it took was a little posturing from Putin to reduce the European states to hand-wringing and empty threats. Why? Because they are whores for Russia's oil and have no backup plan in place were Gazprom to cut them off.

      Europeans isn't a valid word to use here. Europeans isn't one nation. This is something mostly Americans doesn't get (I don't know however if you are one) which I personally find very strange. Europe isn't the same culture, not the same language, not the same legal system and not the same political system. Why should a group of mostly independent states have the same goal in a matter that isn't about their survival (all out war) or economic catastrophe?

      Not all European countries need Russian oil or gas so claiming that just makes it clear you don't know much about Europe.

      But even so European countries aren't much for using military force since the end of WW II. While it isn't impossible it would in most cases require an UN intervention which, due to the fact that Russia is the aggressor here, is impossible due to their veto rights.

      The alternative would be a NATO operation. Some European countries are members of NATO, some are not BTW.

      Finally, Asia and South America only care about their own continents. So pretty much everyone only cares about themselves.

      I am surprised that no one is calling Putin's bluff however. He's refused to acknowledge that the "pro-Russian" troops are Russian. It seems like a good way to force his hand would be to start rolling heavy military equipment into the rest of the Ukraine to protect it from the "terrorists" in Crimea. Then, when Russia starts saber-rattling, NATO should start testing their ballistic missile and interceptor assets... You know, to protect the Russians from the Crimean terrorists. Bullies only respect other bullies.

      Yes that seems like a good idea - irony.

  3. Hopefully Russians don't give up their freedoms by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rules against criticizing the government makes a political campaign all but impossible for anyone but the incumbent. In other words, they are now a dictatorship. Hopefully the Russian people won't give up their freedoms so easily, and push back.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
    1. Re:Hopefully Russians don't give up their freedoms by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, it's nice to hope, but Putin's rating is at its highest in the last 3 years, somewhat about 71%. There is no realistic hope for any "push back" anytime soon. Its not like some crazy dictator and small group of his henchmen took over the country - no, its like the majority of population is winding up some sort of mass psychosis. Which is a much more terrifying thought, really.

      --
      Absence of proof != proof of absence.
    2. Re:Hopefully Russians don't give up their freedoms by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Normally I like to not try and blame the people for the actions of their leadership, but frankly I've lost all faith in the ability for the majority of the Russian populace to engage in any kind of rational thinking at this point. They are part the problem.

      A couple of years back they were out in protest against Putin rigging the vote to put himself back in power and I thought hey, finally, the Russian people are taking responsibility for their state, and trying to deal with their dictator.

      Now two years on, an Olympic games, a bit of propaganda, creating a hate target in homosexuals to blame societies ills on (just as Hitler did with the Jews etc.), an attempted annexation of Crimea, and the resurrection of Stalin as a popular deity and suddenly Putin has 70% approval ratings again.

      So whilst there are clearly a good number of Russians that still want him out, at this point they're a minority by quite a stretch. It really is the Russian people that are the problem - you might as well just alias the nation as Dumbfuckland now, because it really is a nation mostly full of dumb fucks given the approval they're now giving Putin based on his fascist, dictatorial policies. I thought it was bad enough that my nation, the UK is full of people so easily swayed by populism, bigotry, and general ignorance peddled by the media, but the idiocy of many of my countrymen appears to pale compared to those in Russia. At least whilst our population recently argued against striking Syria by a decent margin. In contrast, the Russians positively support annexing the whole of the Ukraine, not just Crimea with about 59% support on latest polls.

      I wouldn't put your faith in the Russian people, they mostly seem to be an extremely fickle, easily swayed bunch and Putin controls the media, so swaying them his way appears trivial.

    3. Re:Hopefully Russians don't give up their freedoms by Xest · · Score: 2

      Except no coup has been staged. Yanukovych was kicked out by a similarly elected branch of government using the procedure of impeachment with a majority of 73% voting to oust him.

      This was an entirely democratic act against a single individual who granted himself more powers than the people wanted him to have and no longer was representing the people. That's how it promotes freedom - by giving the majority what they want.

      So I'll turn the question around on you, how does allowing Yanukovych to stay in power amongst the will of the majority and allowing Russia to lock down Crimea holding guns to people's heads, taking over the airways and spreading propaganda promote freedom in your mind?

      This has been brewing since 2004 when Russia poisoned Yanukovych's competitor in the race for president and the Ukrainian people voted for a Western facing government back then. Russia has been meddling and forcing Ukraine against it's will back towards it since then, and you're surprised that after 10 years of that the people finally take matters into their own hands and the parliament votes in favour of the will of the people and you call that a coup? What fucking planet do you live on, Planet Putin by any chance?

  4. Re:Until the NSA stops spying on America... by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are other stories about the NSA and related matters on the page now, and over the last several days. I find it odd that you apparently didn't post in them. You kind of went off topic there.

    Or just trying to deflect the heat off Russia? You even got there with a first post.

    Is the rule we can't discuss anything other than the NSA? Are you felling personally oppressed?

    Other parts of the world have problems besides the US. They can be discussed too. It isn't a "hollow" problem.
     

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  5. Re:Until the NSA stops spying on America... by Dave+Emami · · Score: 4, Informative

    Until we stop living in a mass surviellence state, this all rings hollow.

    The US (and the West in general) differs from Russia not in our inclination towards surveillance -- pretty much all governments do that -- but in the fact that it's controversial here.

    You do know that it's possible to criticize bad things done by the US government, and criticize bad things done by other governments, right? Because your statement seems to indicate that you're unaware of this option.

    Unlike Russia, we don't need to ban critics. We can just stalk and harrass them, until then ruin their lifes.

    Tell that to Alexander Litvinenko, Viktor Yuschenko, Anna Politkovskaya, Yuri Shchekochikhin, Yuri Shchekochikhin, and many others.

    --

    "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  6. Re:Funny by Mitchell314 · · Score: 2

    That's a whole lotta words just to say "Please mod me down, I wanna pretend to be ironically persecuted so I can feel vindicated".

    --
    I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  7. Re:Russia is evil again. by rasmusbr · · Score: 2

    It's nice that we've had 25 year break from facing global thermonuclear war, but Russia is an expansionist aggressive nation again. Mutually assured destruction may not work this time if Putin would rather die and take the rest of the world out with him rather then relinquish power.

    I suspect you're quite wrong. Men like Putin (megalomaniac psychopaths) adore and respect military strength in others and, as with all psychopaths, they love themselves far to much to risk dying. If Obama had responded by moving intermediate range nuclear missiles into Poland and the Baltic countries thus enabling a faster first strike capability, Putin might have been angry at first, but the US would have won his respect in the long run.

    If history is anything to go by Putin is going to keep doing land grabs until someone with a good arsenal of nukes agrees to play the brinksmanship game with him.

  8. Re:Funny by Mitchell314 · · Score: 2

    Yup, it's completely true. We all email each other and hold secret meetings with our own special handshakes. And you're not invited. All to make you rage those sweet, sweet tears.

    --
    I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  9. Re:Until the NSA stops spying on America... by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh don't be so stupid. I'm no fan of the NSA's surveillance either but pretending that has any bearing this is complete nonsense.

    About the only connection is that Putin's Russia is a warning about how bad it can get, so yes the NSA and CIA need to be reigned in somewhat, but the US isn't exactly as bad as Russia where the KGB, sorry, "FSB" as they prefer to be called nowadays, have their man in charge and basically run the entire show. At least there's still some semblance of separation between US intelligence agencies, the courts and the people who run the country still. In Russia it's all one big completely KGB orchestrated machine. The very fact the CIA had to try and meddle with the senate in itself shows they don't have that level of control over them yet, in Putin's Russia they'd have just had Feinstein and co. arrested on some trumped up charges and that would be the end of it.

    So yes, whilst the US has lost it's right to preach on some issues (i.e. bitching at China for hacking) this is at least one area where it's hardly reached Putin-esque levels of dictatorship.

    Stalking and being harassed even if that were happening on a widespread scale to all critics (it's not, people are still free to criticise - that's what you're doing for fucks sake and I doubt anyone is stalking or harassing you) is even then still a far cry from being beaten senseless and chucked in jail, or just outright assassinated with a bullet to the head by an assailant that never gets found (because they don't want to find him).

  10. Tell Putin that you disapprove by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Commenting here is great, but Putin does not read Slashdot. Write to your country's Russian ambassador, tell him what you think. OK: what you say will be ignored, but if 10,000 of you write - then Putin may hear of it ... maybe no more than 2 lines at the bottom of some report, but that is better than nothing.

    Just to make it easier for you: the UK Russian embassy contact page (I would suggest Russia-UK relations queries); the USA Russian embassy contact page, post & 'phone only, unless someone can dig better than I can. Also feel free to reply to this comment with contact info for the Russian embassy in your country.

    If you say nothing, then you will be ignored. Saying something cannot be worse than that !

    1. Re:Tell Putin that you disapprove by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is what I wrote. Do not copy this word for word, write it your way.

      Dear sir,

      I was aghast to learn that Russia has sought to stifle political dissent by blocking news sites and closing these sites. This is very much against the spirit of glasnost that the great Mikhail Gorbachev used some 25 years ago when he brought the Soviet Union into the modern world.

      To be healthy a society needs its citizens to be able to speak freely, otherwise it will stagnate: innovation will suffer if new ideas are frowned upon, we live in a changing world, if we do not change then we slowly decline.

      This is as much about science & technology as it is about politics. If you stifle political thought then you chill all thought and the country will suffer.

      Mr Putin is putting his short term comfort before the long term health of Russia. Please tell him this this is neither good for Russia nor the rest of the world.

      Please convey this email to the ambassador.

      If you are not aware of what I talk about, please read: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/03/russia-blocks-access-major-independent-news-sites

  11. Pity by korbulon · · Score: 2

    Petty power play by Puting to prevent protest and put plaintive political people in a perpetual position of powerlessness.

  12. Re:Hypocrisy is always on topic by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But the level to which Russian society is controlled by the government has always been markedly higher than the level to which the US society is controlled by the goverment. What about restricted cities, internal passports, vastly greater lack of freedom of speech and expression etc.? Even though I'm always ready to call on Americans for being absurd, I'm also perfectly willing to admit that the civic situation in the US, while not perfect, is somewhere in the 90th percentile, as far as the world's nations are concerned. You simply can't say the same thing about Russia. You never could.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  13. Re:Until the NSA stops spying on America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In Russia, you cannot become rich and/or powerful unless higher-ups have tons of "compromat" on you. And at the moment you step off line, you'll stop being "rich and powerful", and become prisoner. (Look at Magnitsky's case. His bosses were even Putin's vocational supporters! They were rich and powerful. And at the moment they stepped off the line, they were robbed, and Magnitsky was murdered in the jail). Sure, US and EU tendencies with mass surveillance, censure, attack at investigative journalists, etc are quite troubling, and may end up with catastrophe in few decades (power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely). But Russia already went far beyond that line.

  14. Re:Funny by iNaya · · Score: 2

    >> My university degree and the 22 books I've written are conclusive proof that I can express myself just fine Well they didn't teach you that starting off by insulting a group is NOT the best way to get them onside? I think you are incapable of expressing yourself in a non-arrogant manner.

    --
    The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?