Slashdot Mirror


EU Votes For Universal Phone Charger

SmartAboutThings writes "The European Union has voted in favor of a draft legislation which lists among the 'essential requirements' of electrical devices approved by the EU a compatibility with 'universal' chargers. According to a German MEP, this move will eliminate 51,000 tonnes of electronic waste. The draft law was approved by an overwhelming majority: 550 votes to 12. At the moment, according to estimates, there are around 30 different types of charger on the market, but manufacturers have two years at their disposal to get ready for the new restriction."

51 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. Dumb by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What phones don't simply use the micro or mini USB cable and 500ma? iPhone 5?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Dumb by TWX · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep. Apple has been the most significant holdout.

      At this point every other phone I've worked with that's newly produced has either had mini-USB or micro-USB connections.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Dumb by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 4, Informative

      The EU mandated microUSB charging ports on phones, thus reducing the "cable clutter" that existed 5-odd years ago.

      Now, the EU is mandading the other end of the charging cable, the actual, physical charger is plugs into. Meaning, you'll only need a single charger, with a USB port in it, to charge your flip phone, your 4" mini-smartphone, your 6" phablet, and your 10" tablet.

      Right now, each device has it's own charger, with it's own specs (how many volts at how many amps). And you generally can't charge a tablet using an older phone charger.

      So you end up with a handful of different chargers in your drawer that you have to pick through to charge each device, or you end up with a drawer full of chargers you never use as you just plug everything into the most power charger you have (generally the one for the tablet).

      Standardising on a single charger would eliminate all the extra chargers gathering dust in people's junk drawers.

    3. Re:Dumb by ThePhilips · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because microusb has an absolutely atrocious, finnicky connector. I hope they use practically anything but microusb.

      MicroUSB was designed to put the wear on the plug (the cable), not the device. Or so they say. One year with Samsung Galaxy charging everyday - no problems so far.

      Apples Lightning connector would be great, actually, or something very similar. Near unbreakably solid, easy to plug in our out, can be plugged in either way...

      I thought the same until I read on forums about lightning connector corrosion.

      Note, I'm not arguing that MicroUSB is a good standard for charging. But IMO it is better than no standard at all.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    4. Re:Dumb by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Most phones nowadays use it because it became obvious that EU would mandate it if everyone didn't play ball a few years ago. Before it, manufacturers were making a mint off chargers.

    5. Re:Dumb by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 3, Informative

      my galaxy note 3 is microusb, but i think it needs more ma

      at work we were looking at the chargers for different android phones and they were all different specs

      Galaxy Note 3 uses MicroUSB 3.0 as standard charger (2.0A), but should still charge at a slower rate using a standard MicroUSB cord.

      Most devices will draw the max the charger will allow if they see the data channels shorted. I assume the charger will go into current limit (voltage will start to drop) once the maximum output of the charger is reached. Different charges from different phones may be rated different, but most still should provide a charge (even if slower). If plugged into a USB host (computer) it may be limited to 500mA or less.

      I thought this article was a dupe from 2009/2011 http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

    6. Re:Dumb by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem with MicroUSB is that it has three sides.

      You put it in, and it doesn't fit, so you turn it over.
      You put it in again, it doesn't fit, so you turn it back over.
      Now it fits.

      :/

    7. Re:Dumb by unixisc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because microusb has an absolutely atrocious, finnicky connector. I hope they use practically anything but microusb.

      Apples Lightning connector would be great, actually, or something very similar. Near unbreakably solid, easy to plug in our out, can be plugged in either way...

      I agree - microUSB has those 2 clip-ons which are very delicate & once the spring action is gone, it becomes useless, as I found out w/ a car cord. I'd prefer the miniusb - nobody had issues w/ that - have no idea why they had to change it. Apple's lightning conductor is an improvement on their 32-pin

    8. Re:Dumb by gutnor · · Score: 2

      Wasn't that the other way around ? They standardised first the wall part to USB 5V which more or less all constructor (including Apple) followed. Now they want to standardize the other end of the cable, the actual plug in the phone.

      BTW, isn't micro-USB limited to some ridiculously small Amp compared to the 2A / 5A / 15A that new devices draw from the cable now ?

    9. Re:Dumb by schnell · · Score: 2

      What I want is for someone to separate data from charging!

      I don't. I already have too many cables hanging off my computer as it is and desperately do not want another. Why would you want more cables rather than less?

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    10. Re:Dumb by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I'm glad they are doing this but I hope they also mandate Qi for wireless charging. It seems to be the de-facto standard but it wouldn't surprise me if we see a few more proprietary systems in the next few years.

      Cables are so old fashioned. I charge and sync wirelessly now, never plug my phone in.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Dumb by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wait, isn't this the SECOND time this standard was imposed, and didn't apple get a pass last time?

      Why will it be different this time?

      I'm betting Apple will issue another "E-waste" adapter to their ridiculous 30pin, and thumb their nose at this rule just like the last time.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    12. Re:Dumb by tlambert · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wait, isn't this the SECOND time this standard was imposed, and didn't apple get a pass last time?

      Why will it be different this time?

      I'm betting Apple will issue another "E-waste" adapter to their ridiculous 30pin, and thumb their nose at this rule just like the last time.

      You are aware that by using the native adapter, Apple is able to operate outside the power ranges which the power-over-USB folks were willing to support because it would have been more expensive to make the power adapters smart enough to negotiate amperage with the device up to the levels Apple runs at, right?

      In other words, the power-over-USB standard is pretty stupidly low powered, if you want to support faster charge cycles, so using this universal adapter and the "E-waste" adapter dongle is just going to mean Apple devices charge a lot slower in Europe than they do in the rest of the world. Just like all non-Apple devices don't tend to support fast charging, for lack of the ability to negotiate a much higher amperage between the charger and the device.

      So it's not "thumbing their nose", so much as it is "can't you power-over-USB people ever agree on a useful standard?".

    13. Re:Dumb by tlambert · · Score: 2

      BTW, isn't micro-USB limited to some ridiculously small Amp compared to the 2A / 5A / 15A that new devices draw from the cable now ?

      Yeah.

      The way you negotiate over 500ma in power is you have special docking cable with resistors on it that say to the device "I am a special docking cable with resistors of the right values on these pins; you should feel free to do a data negotiation over my ordinarily not connected data lines to talk the charger into giving you more amps". To do that, your special docking connector, like the one on the Zune and the one on Apple devices has to have more than the 4 pins in a standard USB connector. It kind of also needs the extra pins if you are going to do something like "audio out" or "video out" or "volume control by the speakerbox/charger combo that looks like a boombox" over a single power/data connector.

      Then the devices talks down the data pin and says "Hi, I am a special device who knows how to talk to an embedded chip in Mr. Charger Brick; are you Mr. Charger Brick?".

      If it's Mr. Charger Brick on the other end of the cable, it says "Yes, I am Mr. Charger Brick".

      Then the device says "Oh thank God! I thought I was going to have to talk to a standard power-over-USB charger, and those things are stupid as a box of rocks, and can only handle a 500ma current draw; since I now have someone intelligent to talk to instead, can you tell me how much power I can pull?".

      Then Mr. Charger Brick says "I can give you up to 5A".

      Then the device says "Yay! Please give me 4A (because that's all I can handle), so I can charge 16X faster than I would if I were talking to one of those stupid as a box of rocks charging bricks!".

    14. Re:Dumb by marcansoft · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is incorrect. There is no bidirectional negotiation between chargers and devices, nor are there any magic extra pins (at least for pretty much all Android and Apple products - dunno about Zune).

      What there is is one USB charging standard, that basically says one thing and one thing only (that matters): if the data pins are shorted together (but otherwise not connected to anything), then the port is a Dedicated Charging Port. A DCP must meet certain voltage/current curve ranges and may be engineered to supply anywhere from 500mA to 1.5A (or more), with the voltage dropping as the device exceeds the charger's maximum. Devices are simply supposed to regulate current draw upwards until the voltage drops below a threshold, indicating the charger's capability. No digital negotiation takes place. Devices are limited to 1.5A charging current, which is quite typical for modern devices (and significantly better than the 500mA of a non-charging port).

      There is a newer USB Power Delivery specification that is much more recent, supports higher powers, probably uses more complex negotiation (I haven't read it), and nothing implements it yet.

      Then there's what Apple does - they have an incompatible implementation that uses resistors on the data pins in the charger to signal its current capability. Different resulting voltages mean different current levels. This is completely incompatible with the USB charging standard. Recent Apple devices (since the iPhone 3G or so) do support DCP chargers (to some extent - some charge more slowly, and I don't know about larger iPads?), but non-Apple devices will only charge at 500mA or worse from Apple chargers.

    15. Re:Dumb by wiredlogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the source can support it, the cable will handle it just fine.

      Not necessarily. Some cheap cables don't have enough conductors to safely carry 2A. Also USB-PD is a power delivery extension that allows cables to identify their current limit using the ID pin originally added for OTG. These cables have the standard USB2 or 3 icon enclosed in a "battery" outline.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    16. Re:Dumb by icebike · · Score: 2

      All usb cables have 4 wires, of which only two are used for charging.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    17. Re:Dumb by skids · · Score: 4, Funny

      My coworker assures me that this a known case of quantum superposition at macro scales. The USB plug is simultaneously in two different orientations at the same time. It was formerly only thought to happen to SVGA connectors when viewed from the side while uncomfortably squatting under a desk.

    18. Re:Dumb by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Maybe he just meant "conductor". Or maybe he meant strands. But it's a fact that some cables with which devices will charge just fine at 5V1A will not supply 5V2A to a device successfully. I like to think the device is detecting low voltage on a brief test charge and then giving up, but probably it's just trying over and over again to charge and failing forever. Even the 7W for the Nexus 7 2nd has been a problem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Dumb by tlambert · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the source can support it, the cable will handle it just fine.

      Not necessarily. Some cheap cables don't have enough conductors to safely carry 2A. Also USB-PD is a power delivery extension that allows cables to identify their current limit using the ID pin originally added for OTG. These cables have the standard USB2 or 3 icon enclosed in a "battery" outline.

      There is a bug in the downstream power standard Intel chipset when used for USB-PD. You can't actually run it at 2A, or you have to only run it that way in ports that won't let you charge and communicate with the device at the same time, as a hard-wired option. We found this out designing the initial ChromeBox, which is why two of the back USB ports are not really that useful for charging.

      If you're using something other than an Intel chipset in your PC, yeah; the TI USB-PD/OTG implementation works, although I don't think there's any laptop hardware or desktop hardware that uses it. I think it's mostly used in drives and drive enclosures.

      Apple tends to get away with it because they use discrete electronics separate from the USB controller to handle downstream charging; of course, this makes their hardware more expensive, but it works, which some people value.

      I'm not sure how many power bricks are intelligent enough to do the USB-PD negotiations.

      There's some rather nifty drawing board plans for 100W power deliver for things like monitors, but so far, they've only been been demonstrates as FPGAs, rather than someone spinning them into silicon. The article on it is here: http://www.theinquirer.net/inq...

  2. Someone is against this? by rujasu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "This is a backwards step because imposing a single charger stifles innovation, curbs research, and may impose extra costs on the consumer. The alternative and better action is to encourage diversity, competition and greater development..."

    Seriously? How much "diversity" and "innovation" do you need in terms of a charger?

    1. Re:Someone is against this? by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ignore that bit. It's the UK Independence Party (UKIP). They oppose all EU regulations on principle. The reasoning is irrelevant. They're about as rational as Fox News pundits.

    2. Re:Someone is against this? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      The current micro usb is shit and fails after a few hundred cycles and the occasional bump.

      The last thing I want is some politician locking me in to some similar BS desgn.

      I would rather see mandated warranty repairs of same than this, and I wouldn't wanna see that, either.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Someone is against this? by Wookact · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The micro use on my phone has been used well more then hundreds of times, and shows no signs of failing.

    4. Re:Someone is against this? by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, consider electric cars for a moment.

      What happens when you mandate a single charger suitable for vehicles like the Leaf, then you have Tesla attempting to produce a long-range vehicle? The 'superchargers' that Tesla is building overpowers most 'fast chargers' out there by a substantial amount.

      Do you mandate that all chargers reach the Tesla's level, or do you cripple Tesla?

      Honestly, with the larger tablets I wonder if 12V might not be a better voltage for them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    5. Re:Someone is against this? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

      In USB land there is the new power spec that can deliver 100w over a standard usb 2.0 cable. It ups the voltage and amperage to get there and is negotiated.

      As to Tesla, forcing them to have the standard port does increase there costs but also means it can charge anywhere. It does not stop them from having a second faster port or letting there port negotiate for faster charging up to the voltage/amperage limits of the design.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    6. Re:Someone is against this? by radarskiy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How much "diversity" and "innovation" do you need in terms of a charger?"

      If you design a battery system that can accept a higher charging current, you may need a charger that have power levels and signaling to request those power levels that are not in the present spec for the one true charger. (This actually happened.)

      If you design a phone that can drive a wider variety of outputs, you may need more pins that the one true connector has. (This actually happened.)

      If you design a wireless charging system, you may want a case with no ports at all so that it is waterproof. (This is currently in development.)

    7. Re:Someone is against this? by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any cable that has any sort of orientation required to plug in is a crap standard and needs to die. All connectors need to be barrel or minjack style connectors, that are easy to plug in blind.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  3. Re:On the subject by NapalmV · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is not about the mechanical connector (you can always use an adapter cable). This is about those device manufacturers that verify via USB protocol that the charger is made by them too. So the device won't work with anything else regardless of the fact that the cable fits. The idea is that the check should be on the maximum current supported by the charger, not on its make and model.

  4. OK, guys, I got this one. by Medievalist · · Score: 2

    Why do they think this is a matter for governments to decide?

    Ooh, talking points! Let me try! Wait. OK, I've got it!

    Every one of the world's mysteries can be explained by proper understanding of the Elvis Factor.

    Man, there's a lot of unexplained phenomenon
    out there in the world.
    Lot of things people say
    What the heck's going on?

    Let me tell ya!

    Who built the pyramids?
    ELVIS!
    Who built Stonehenge?
    ELVIS!

    Yeah, man you see guys
    walking down the street
    pushing shopping carts
    and you think they're talking to Allah,
    they're talking to themself.
    Man, no they're talking to ELVIS!
    ELVIS! ELVIS!

    You know whats going on in that Bermuda Triangle?
    Down in the Bermuda Traingle
    Elvis needs boats.
    Elvis needs boats.
    Elvis Elvis Elvis
    Elvis Elvis Elvis
    Elvis needs boats!

  5. Re:Gubbamints... by Vermonter · · Score: 2

    Funny, my Android phone uses a common charger. Apple does not, so I don't buy from them (among other reasons). That's how a free market works. The problem is that too many people aren't willing to give up their precious iPhones in protest to Apple's greedy business practices of using expensive proprietary software. I guarantee you if the majority of Apple's customers stopped buying their products, Apple would start changing. But they don't, so Apple has no reason to stop doing what they are doing. Corporations won't usually self regulate. They will, however, take the most profitable route. If consumers don't demand regulation from corporations in exchange for their money, then obviously it won't happen.

  6. Re:Hold on... by compro01 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The "other jack" is a USB 3.0 microUSB port. It's backwards compatible with the USB 2.0 microUSB port.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  7. Re:apparently by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No. He is. They are just his kind of clowns, so they don't look funny to him. That is the only difference.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  8. Re:Gubbamints... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

    Because exactly that is what a government is for.

    You only see the plug, we see the environment and energy savings.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  9. Re:Too bad it won't apply to everyone by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From what it sounds like, this legislation is simply the next stage of a law that has been around for years already, and with which Apple has complied since 2011.

    Various European standards bodies made legally-binding agreements with Nokia, RIM, Apple, et al. back in 2009 to standardize on micro-USB within two years. Apple complied in 2011 by including a Lightning->micro-USB adapter in the box with all of its European models, and has done so for the last three years. Since that time, the rule has bubbled up the legislative hierarchy and is about to take effect across the EU for all manufacturers, regardless of if they were a party to the original agreements or not.

    I.e. This law changes nothing at all for Apple. Moreover, even if it did, the timeline in the summary is incorrect. Member states of the EU have two years to adopt the legislation internally. Manufacturers have an additional year on top of that to abide by it. So even if Apple were forced to replace Lightning with micro-USB, it wouldn't need to do so until 2017.

  10. Re:Gubbamints... by sjames · · Score: 2

    Because the corporations couldn't stop squabbling like children overdue for naptime long enough to come to an agreement. So papa government had to stand them in opposite corners and make the decision for them.

  11. Re:Use an existing standard please by sjames · · Score: 2

    The only actual features of the lightning connector are that it can be used by people who have suffered too much brain damage to understand spatial orientation and Apple can use dirty tricks to make sure only the unique Apple special snowflake cable can work.

  12. Re:This is what the EU is for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is what the European Union really does - they set standards so stuff works all over Europe, across borders and across vendors. Like GSM phones. In the past, over 20 years they moved the 220V and 240V countries to 230V. That was completed in 2003. Trying to get the whole EU to use the same AC power plug, though, was not successful.

    So when will the Europoean Union mandate a single spoken language and that all cars must drive on the same side of the road?

  13. Re:Gubbamints... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BS. Android phones would use USB charging anyway, it's the cheapest path.

  14. Re:Too bad it won't apply to everyone by Neil_Brown · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple complied in 2011 by including a Lightning->micro-USB adapter in the box with all of its European models, and has done so for the last three years.

    They certainly sell an adapter, but it is not supplied in the box, at least in my experience of devices bought from Apple stores in the UK.

  15. Why standards? by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do they think this is a matter for governments to decide?

    Same reason each country has a standard railroad track, a standard power outlet, etc. Letting industries decide on mutually incompatible standards largely serves to lock in consumers and also creates great inefficiencies in the economy due to incompatbility. Standardization would allow business like cafes & airports to offer charging solutions that fit all their customers, and it would produce less physical waste.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  16. Re:Too bad it won't apply to everyone by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

    Right you are, it seems. Mea culpa.

  17. Re:AKA the I HATE AMERICA ACT by Valdrax · · Score: 2

    Most phones except for the American Company Apple uses a Micro USB.

    Oh, please -- put down the flag.

    As an American Apple user, I hate the fact that Apple doesn't use the same charger / data cable as everyone else and that, worse, my iPhone 5 isn't even compatible with my iPhone 3 charger. It's an overpriced, short POS that has a pointless chip in it to prevent third party cables from working properly. It's also not water-resistant (which is great in case you accidentally drop the end of it into a glass of water on your desk). All in all, Apple's new charger has significantly worsened my enjoyment of the phone.

    So, I'm all for standardization on something nearly everyone else has agreed is sane. Apple gets no free pass for being American with me.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  18. I must be tired... by ayjay29 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I read it as:

    EU Votes For Universal Phone Charger
    The draft law was approved by an overwhelming majority: 550 volts to 12.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    1. Re:I must be tired... by labnet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, they already have dangerous 230V when 120V works just fine... Stupid Euros...

      Except 120v requires twice as much copper, and higher currents, causing more fires. You also have the worst mains power connector in the developed world and measure your cable in feet. Stupid yanks.

      --
      46137
  19. Cordless drills, too. by John.Banister · · Score: 2

    I wish DIN would make a standard specification for cordless power tool battery attachment. It'd be nice to be able to interchange brands with batteries and tools.

  20. Re:Use an existing standard please by sjames · · Score: 2

    It's not worth fixing with a proprietary socket that actively detects generic versions and rejects them while more than doubling the cost. It would be worth fixing with a fully open design. Or it could be fixed with color coding the shell around the connectors. It could even be fixed by putting a bump on the top of the connector to make orientation clear.

    At the same time, I don't see a bunch or people ripping their hair out because their house key needs a particular orientation.

  21. Re:Hold on... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    how is me talking about charger compatibility considered off topic?? lol

    You must be new here.

    Obviously you've upset a Samsung fanboi. An Apple fanboi will mod you as insightful shortly. I'm screwed as they will both mod me a troll for pointing this out.

  22. Re:Too bad it won't apply to everyone by snikulin · · Score: 2

    Is UK in EU?

  23. Ummm... How much do you need? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    Regular USB will do 10 watts, 5 volts 2 amps. My Samsung phone uses just such a charger. Need more? The USB Power Delivery standard, which needs different cables, will handle up to 100 watts, that being 20v 5a.

    USB PD was standardized in July 2012 so it has been around for awhile.

  24. Re:Gubbamints... by agm · · Score: 2

    There's nothing unreasonable about different companies having different standards. This is none of the governments' business. It's regulation where there should be none. The state should stick to their core business of protecting people from the initiation of force.