Slashdot Mirror


Introducing a Calendar System For the Information Age

First time accepted submitter chimeraha (3594169) writes "Synchronized with the northern winter solstice and the UNIX Epoch, the terran computational calendar contains 13 identical months of 28 days each in addition to a short Month Zero containing only new year's day and a single leap year day every four years (with the exception of every 128 years). The beginning of this zero-based numbering calendar, denoted as 0.0.0.0.0.0 TC, is on the solstice, exactly 10 days before the UNIX Epoch (effectively, December 22nd, 1969 00:00:00 UTC in the Gregorian Calendar). It's "terran" inception and unit durations reflect the human biological clock and align with astronomical cycles and epochs. Its "computational" notation, start date, and algorithm are tailored towards the mathematicians & scientists tasked with calendrical programming and precise time calculation.

There's a lot more information at terrancalendar.com including a date conversion form and a handfull of code-snipits & apps for implementing the terran computational calendar."

36 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Um no by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We can't even get people to agree on daylight savings time. This will never happen. Anyone using this probably is going to type an angry reply on their DVORAK keyboard from a location directly in the center of their own little fake reality.

    1. Re:Um no by Pope · · Score: 2

      Hey, why don't you go re-invent Railroad Time, since that's what these stupid DST discussions always devolve into.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:Um no by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Informative

      We can't even get people to agree on daylight savings time.

      I assume you mean Daylight Saving Time. Singular.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Um no by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We can't even get our damned weights and measures base 10.

    4. Re:Um no by Newander · · Score: 2

      Planck length is the only rational measure of distance.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    5. Re:Um no by omnichad · · Score: 2

      I don't know about that. Maybe it's my E-W position within my timeline, but I find daylight time to be preferable to standard time. I'd even prefer the whole year to fit that. In the depths of winter, it's sunset when I get done with work. I could have at least an hour of daylight to myself every day of the year.

    6. Re:Um no by fizzer06 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Urine volume should go metric so that last drop that comes out after you zip up would be centipeed.

    7. Re:Um no by omnichad · · Score: 2

      set their own schedules

      I'd love to set my own schedule - but I have a job. And they follow the state/federal mandated time schedule. We all saw what happen when Seinfeld's neighbor Kramer set his watch an hour ahead of everyone else and set his own schedule. Nothing but chaos.

    8. Re:Um no by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but luckily when it comes to calendars we can be saved by people that implement 13 equal months with 14 unequal months that are claimed to be 13, except when you have to talk about the 14th, which they think they can hide by numbering it 0.

    9. Re:Um no by invid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I want to do away with this base 10 nonsense and institute a base 12 numbering system. Try evenly dividing your primitive base 10 system into thirds!

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    10. Re:Um no by almitydave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Planck length is the only rational measure of distance.

      Indeed, unfortunately SI prefixes run out before we can really do anything useful with it (unless you're into particle physics). Therefore, I suggest we standardize on the yotta-planck-length (YPL, pronounced "yoople") as our base unit, utilizing SI prefixes on top of that:

      -Intel's new Haswell architecture utilizes a 1361-yoople process.
      -I am 117 gigayooples tall.
      -The Earth is approximately 2.4 exayooples around.
      -The Earth is 9.26 zettayooples from the sun.

      As you can see, we run out of SI prefixes again for astronomical scales, so we should use the yottayoople (YYP, pronounced "yippee") for that:

      -The Milky Way galaxy is about 59 megayippees across
      -The size of the observable universe is about 26.9 terayippees.

      I'm sure everyone can get behind these new units. Time to rewrite the textbooks!

      -almity "I can't drive 8.2e-7 yooples per yoopit" dave

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    11. Re:Um no by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      If we all just used Galois fields of order 2^p, we could divide anything into anything and get a result in the field.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    12. Re:Um no by careysub · · Score: 2, Informative

      I want to redefine the second and do away with the awkward 24/60/60 nonsense that is time. 10 hour days, 100 minute hours and 100 second minutes for a total of 100,000 seconds in a day.

      Also the US needs to kill AM/PM, its simply unnecessary and redundant.

      Good luck with that. The division of the day into 24 hours originates in Egypt 130 BC years ago, and was adopted in China by 900 AD so that this is a shared ancient system of time measurement in both West and East. The division of the day into twelve "double hours" is even more ancient in both places originating by the Ur III period of Sumerian civilization (2100 BC).

      The division of hours into minutes and seconds uses the sexigisimal number system was also invented by Sumerians and used by them for angular measurement (the passage of daily time corresponding to angular motion the the sky/Earth). It was adapted for small time unit measurement (minutes, seconds) by Claudios Ptolemaious in 130 AD, then spread throughout the Old World by Islam (and later by Europeans). We have had these units as a common nearly world-wide standard for a long, long time.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    13. Re:Um no by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Of course AM/PM is redundant. We already have 7-11.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    14. Re:Um no by lennier · · Score: 2

      I don't think they're very concerned with easily-divisible numbers—4*7-day months and 13-month years!

      13 months is a little annoying, yes; you have to split the months on week boundaries to make quarters. But we actually do have 13 lunar cycles in a year, so this naturally aligns the months with the real moon. And we keep 7 day weeks, which is a win both because we're used to our week, and because 7 days is a natural quarter-moon. And no more "30 days hath December..."

      Thing is, a workable Earth calendar never is going to be evenly divisible by powers of 10, because it has to stay aligned with astronomical cycles which are subtly varying; even the Sun and Moon don't strictly align. So everything's going to be a bit of a juggle. Frankly, I think this is the best alternate calendar design I've seen in a long while.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    15. Re:Um no by ultranova · · Score: 2

      Anyone using this probably is going to type an angry reply on their DVORAK keyboard from a location directly in the center of their own little fake reality.

      But unlike DVORAK, there's not even a theoretical basis here: the whole point of Information Age is that computers do data conversions of arbitrary complexity, so why would everyone need to be on the same calendar? You write the timestamp on whatever format you prefer and I read it on whatever I prefer.

      Besides, the whole need to keep everyone on the same schedule was an artifact of Industrial Age, where it took a lot of coordinated labour to run a factory. As Information Age finishes automating those and the shift towards desktop manufacture accelerates, why would my sleep-wake cycle need to be linked to yours? I wrote this message on my convenience, you read it on yours.

      With any luck, the whole concept of employment - in the form of current coercion-based power structures, at least - will die out, and future belongs to truly voluntary cooperation - and that means sleeping when you're tired, not when a clock says you should.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. Human Calendar? by RobinH · · Score: 2

    I thought this was called the Human Calendar.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Human Calendar? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Funny

      After the humans rejected it, they had to rebrand to reach a wider audience.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  3. Oh great... by smithmc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So now every software developer will have another calendar to have to convert back and forth between...

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    1. Re:Oh great... by Cenan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fail to convert back and forth between...

      --
      ... whatever ...
  4. Their website isn't in Esperanto? by Garridan · · Score: 5, Funny

    What the hell guys, if you're going to try and design something to replaced an entrenched convention, you might as well go whole hog. Oh wait, no, I know... their website isn't in Esperanto because such projects always fail.

  5. And time in .beats? by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    Are we going to have to use Swatch Time with this calendar?

    All kidding aside, they mention:

    MINUTES, SECONDS, & FRACTIONS OF A SECOND
    Both minutes and seconds have a range from 0 to 59. If including a fraction of a second, write it as a decimal at the end: 41.13.27.23.59.59.999 TC .

    ... so no handling of leap seconds. I know some people would be happy about this, but if you're not going to care about solar noon, why deal with leap days and such, too?

    (and for those who complain that UTC shouldn't have leap seconds ... I say go and use TAI or GPS, but don't change UTC because you don't want to deal with the complexity)

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  6. Sabbath by kurisuto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There have been various alternative calendars proposed, and some of them have the property that there's a special day in the yearly calendar which doesn't count as part of the regular seven-day-per-week cycle (such as the "month zero" proposed here).

    A significant objection is that some religions require that every seventh day be kept as a holy day. If the calendar contains a day which isn't part of the regular week, then there are sometimes more than seven days between one weekly holy day and the next.

    It's not a consideration for me personally. However, I'm sure that this feature would lead to significant resistance to the adoption of such a calendar.

  7. Not bad by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    As far as calendars go, this is not a bad effort. I don't think I would personally use it, but I've seen (and created) far, far worse. It is very regular; the rules have few exceptions, and the exceptions are well-defined. There aren't too many decisions in it that stand out as glaringly unjustified or confusing, other than of course by definition, when you create a new calendar, the very decision to do so stands out as glaringly unjustified. :)

  8. I'm in by Rich_Lather · · Score: 2

    As long as the months are named after Jesus and the twelve disciples.

  9. Re:Nostalgia by wiggles · · Score: 2

    Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.

  10. /sigh by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    13 identical months of 28 days each

    365 is semiprime and neither of those factors is either 13 or 28.

    in addition to a short Month Zero containing only new year's day

    Epagomenal days wreak havoc on "monthly" billing cycles (see: Coptic calendar, Mayan calendar, et al.). This is why the Julian and Gregorian bissextile day is explicitly a part of February.

    and a single leap year day every four years (with the exception of every 128 years).

    The Gregorian calendar design explicitly rejected more precise intercalation cycles in favor of numbers that were easier to remember (i.e. more user friendly). Hell, the quadrennial bissextile cycle introduced by the Julian calendar got screwed up in Augustus Caesar's own lifetime. Never underestimate the need for simplicity.

    The beginning of this zero-based numbering calendar, denoted as 0.0.0.0.0.0 TC

    We can't even get all programming languages to start their arrays at 0. What makes you think it'll be easier for non-programmers to accept this?

    is on the solstice, exactly 10 days before the UNIX Epoch (effectively, December 22nd, 1969 00:00:00 UTC in the Gregorian Calendar).

    The solstice is an instant; the date it occurs on depends entirely on your meridian/time zone (e.g. the Chinese calendar explicitly specifies Beijing time). So "exactly ten days" is a meaningless descriptor.

    Besides, since you're adopting a quadrennial intercalation cycle, that instant will drift back about six hours every year, further screwing up your "exactness."

    Last but not least: the solstice is a fundamentally difficult astronomical phenomena to measure. The instant it occurs is somewhere in the window where the sun's north-south motion is too small to measure. Equinoxes have historically been measured with far greater precision.

    It's "terran" inception and unit durations reflect the human biological clock

    Then where the heck are your 28-day months coming from? The billions of people who live under a lunar or luni-solar calendar already know that the average synodic month is about 29.5 days, and that's the "month" that affects tides and human fertility cycles.

    and align with astronomical cycles and epochs.

    Really?

    • There is no integer number or integer ratio of days (mean solar or otherwise) in a tropical year
    • There is no integer number or integer ratio of days (mean solar or otherwise) in a synodic month
    • There is no integer number or integer ratio of months (synodic or otherwise) in a tropical year

    Days, months and years have nothing to do with each other; there is nothing to "align" to.

    Its "computational" notation, start date, and algorithm are tailored towards the mathematicians & scientists tasked with calendrical programming and precise time calculation.

    Days, months and years aren't SI units, and the one true SI unit of time has jack shit to do with any of them.

  11. Interesting, but irrelevant by jc42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We already have a calendar system "For the Information Age": the second counter. Actually, of course, we have a whole series of them, but they differ only in the zero "epoch" second, so translation between them is trivial. The most widely-used such counter is the unix/POSIX time() value, perhaps augmented with a decimal point and a fractional second value.

    This "calendar system" has a property that all the others lack: simple arithmetic operations work with it. And once you have the second for some event, there are library routines that can translate it to a human-readable form in any other calendar that you like.

    So feel free to invent other interesting calendars; we software types won't be offended. We'll just ask you to be very precise in how you define your calendar, so we can write the routines to produce your calendar from ours. Of course, we'll expect you to pay us for this unnecessary labor, but it only has to be done once for each calendar. And maybe one of your calendars can be the human-readable calendar that supplants the silly Christian calendar, relegating it to use in scheduling your religious holidays.

    Just don't ask us to use your calendar (or any other that's not a single number that can be used to any precision) inside our OSs or libraries. The "Information Age" needs a calendar system that works using ordinary real numbers, and aside from the question of when the zero was, we have that already.

    (Actually, there's also the slowly-growing problem of different clock speeds caused by relativistic effects, but that's probably a discussion for a much more technical forum than this one. ;-)

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  12. Re:Start at perihelion by xfade551 · · Score: 2

    The actual perihelion point isn't a good choice because the earth wobbles a bit in it's orbit due both the gravitation of the other planets and especially our own moon, making for slightly inconsistent times between perihelions.

  13. Zero is fine for indexing an array by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, the months are 28 days long ...
    How many days is it from 0:00 at 28th of month one till 24:00 1st of month two?
    Wow it is not two days? Just because you idiot decided the first day is named ZERO?
    There is no 0st element in anything, there is a first, a last and an n'th and if you want your 'thing' may contain zero elements and be empty!
    There is no zero'th wheel on your car, nor is the first beer you drink in the evening your zero'th beer, it is the first ... try to get that.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  14. Form: Why your new calendar system won't work by in10se · · Score: 2

    You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform. Your idea will not work. Here is why:

    Standard Reply Form for Your New Calendar System Idea

    --
    Popisms.com - Connecting pop culture
  15. Re: Not really imperial units by xfade551 · · Score: 2

    It's a common misconception that the U.S. uses Imperial Units. Sure, we use the same unit names as Imperial, but really, ours are just a bit off, except for liquid measures, which are off by a fairly large amount.

    Modern U.S. standard units are also set to be fixed values of the metric system:

    1 pound-mass = 0.45359237 kg (exactly)
    1 inch (US Standard)= 2.54 cm (exactly)
    1 gallon (US liquid) = 231 cubic inches (exactly) = 3.785 L (approx.)

    But, compare:
    1 gallon (UK "Imperial") = 4.54609 L (exactly)

    There's also the quirk that, for land surveys, the older definition of 1 foot = (1200/3937) meter is still used. The difference between the standard foot and the survey foot is at the fifth decimal place, so most of the time, it's an insignificant difference.

  16. Re:WOW!!! Way to much time on their hands! by jonbryce · · Score: 2

    The birth of Jesus is "year one", not "year zero". We go from 1BC (or BCE if you prefer) to 1AD (or CE) with no year zero.

    We do know for a fact that we got year one wrong in our calculations. The Bible says Jesus was born during the reign of King Herod, and King Herod died in 4BC.

  17. Sounds like Ethiopian Calendar by mspohr · · Score: 2

    The Ethiopian calendar has 12 months of 30 days plus a thirteenth month of five or six days (leap year every four years).
    Their national travel motto is "Thirteen months of sunshine".
    They also start their clock at (our) 6am which can be a bit confusing when making appointments to meet people (our 10am is their 4am).
    They also missed the Gregorian calendar correction so it's now 2006!
    From Wikipedia:
    Like the Coptic calendar, the Ethiopic or Ge'ez calendar has twelve months of exactly 30 days each plus five or six pagome days, which comprise a thirteenth month. The Ethiopian months begin on the same days as those of the Coptic calendar, but their names are in Ge'ez. The sixth epagomenal day is added every four years without exception on August 29 of the Julian calendar, six months before the Julian leap day. Thus the first day of the Ethiopian year, 1 Mäskäräm, for years between 1901 and 2099 (inclusive), is usually September 11 (Gregorian). It, however, falls on September 12 in years before the Gregorian leap year.

    The current year according to the Ethiopian calendar is 2006, which began on September 11, 2013 AD of the Gregorian calendar.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  18. Re:Do it the perl way by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    Here in Phoenix its ALWAYS 10 minutes to Wal-Mart.

  19. That's the smell by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

    scentipeed

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear