Slashdot Mirror


Declassified Papers Hint US Uranium May Have Ended Up In Israeli Arms

Lasrick (2629253) writes "Victor Gilinsky and Roger J. Mattson update their story on the NUMEC affair to take into account the recent release of hundreds of classified documents that shed additional light on the story. In the 1960s, the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) was found to be missing about a 100 pounds of bomb-grade uranium. Based on available evidence, Gilinsky and Mattson are convinced that the material ended up in Israel nuclear bombs. The newly release documents add more to the story, and Gilinsky and Mattson are calling on President Obama to declassify the remainder of the file."

9 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Isn't this story ancient? by lseltzer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this has been known for many decades

  2. Common Knowledge by megalomaniacs4u · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought this was well known, just unofficial.

    Hell, it even made a Tom Clancy novel!

  3. Were they insured? by Marrow · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, how do you report that to your insurance agent anyway?

  4. Re:Someone call Ben Affleck by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Theres a lot of evidence linking the Israelis to the South African nuclear weapons program

    Yes there's been official disclosure from the South African end.

    made its way on to apartheid South Africa

    No need to make a big deal about apartheid. We still put up with Israel doing it.

  5. This article is Antisemitic, please delete by Suiggy · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is quite disgusting of Slashdot to be spreading bigotry and hate in this day and age. This article should be removed immediately for spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories.

    1. Re:This article is Antisemitic, please delete by NicBenjamin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The worst part of debating Israeli issues on the internet?

      I have no idea whether this guy is kidding.

  6. Re:Good for them. by Xenkar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it might be because at the start of every peace negotiation, Israel announces a new illegal settlement project in the West Bank.

    Gaza and the West Bank are basically open air prisons. Do the prisons in the US make prisoners a better fit for society, or merely drive them further into anti-social lifestyles?

    Every new building in the West Bank needs almost impossible to get Israeli approval. Those who dare to build houses without approval get there structured knocked down by armored bulldozers.

    Gaza has a hard time getting raw materials shipped in to build buildings. Any farming they do will probably be destroyed by Israeli armed forces.

    Now let me ask you, if someone urinated on your face and you weren't into that, would you be grateful for them to do it, or will it piss you off? Asking him to stop just makes him aim it closer to your eyes. His buddies come up and beat the shit out of you if you dare strike back. They then join in the urination party. This is the Israeli-Palestinian relationship.

  7. Re:Good for them. by Xenkar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I tried to look up some cases of Palestinians destroying factories but I couldn't find any in the Google search results. It consisted mostly of Israelis destroying Palestinian factories and farms, or a Palestinian concrete factory that recycled rubble from bombed out structures from Israeli raids. Please enlighten me with some links.

    I took a look at the statistics a while back and Israelis are more likely to die from an automotive accident on their Israeli-only highways that web throughout the West Bank than from any Palestinian attack.

    I've looked at the structures that Palestinians like to construct. Thick walls, preferably earthbound if possible. Now while one might think that this is a horrible crime, it is the only way to build a structure that doesn't require air conditioning in the region. Air conditioners typically require electricity and it isn't like the Palestinians can count on Israelis to not bomb out their infrastructure.

    "Hmm, they bulldozed my house for the fifth time. Perhaps I should build something that's a bit more costly for them to destroy this time." Unfortunately they don't realize that the Israeli military is subsidized by the American and German tax payers and thus won't stop the Israelis from just using a bunker buster missile without second thought. They just need to say it was a weapons factory or a terrorist's bunker and all is forgiven.

    If I had driven one of my neighbors to do all of that, I'd deeply reflect on my own actions and wonder if building my house right in his front yard and then bulldozing his down was the best course of action.

  8. Re:Good for them. by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's nice and all, but maybe you can get the palestinian's government to explain why they're so pro-genocide in their teachings. With the various terrorist organizations, which were elected actively supporting said teachings, and taking money from the countries in the region to wage a proxy war.

    Absolutely.

    Israel is actively occupying Palestine and stealing the Palestinian's land.

    Look at the racism that occurs against Hispanics in the US due to them taking some crappy jobs. Is it a surprise that a nation that's been constantly losing it's land to self-identified Zionists for over 100 years is going to end up really antisemitic? Having Palestinians spontaneously turn into a nation of Ghandis isn't a realistic prerequisite for peace in the middle east.

    --
    I stole this Sig