Slashdot Mirror


L.A. Science Teacher Suspended Over Student Science Fair Projects

An anonymous reader writes "A high school science teacher at Grand Arts High School in Los Angeles was suspended from the classroom in February, after two of his science fair students turned in projects deemed dangerous by the administrators. "One project was a marshmallow shooter — which uses air pressure to launch projectiles. The other was an AA battery-powered coil gun — which uses electromagnetism to launch small objects. Similar projects have been honored in past LA County Science Fairs and even demonstrated at the White House."

54 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Sudden outbreak of common sense by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine if these things fell into the hands of tairsts, or pediofiddlers? Someone could lose an eye.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by gman003 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      tairsts

      For a minute I read that as "tsarists", which was arguably more interesting.

    2. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Paper mache vulcanos are the only science high school students will ever need to know. That and intelligent design.

      Also; nukular.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  2. Sick Society by JimSadler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Suspending a teacher over such nonsense borders on drooling idiocy or insanity. Any decent science class unavoidably teaches students to build devices that might be used to do harm. If you teach a kid in chemistry class how not to make an explosion you are also telling him exactly how to create an explosion. That does not imply that teachers should not teach chemistry.

    1. Re:Sick Society by litehacksaur111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is exactly what is wrong with the schools here. Stupid administrators making decisions on what should and should not be taught in the classroom and disciplining teachers for actually inspiring their students to think and build things. All administrators want nowadays are kids who are only capable of mindlessly following a given set of instructions.

    2. Re:Sick Society by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      I looked at this as the administrator was fine combing and looking for a reason to fire him/her.

      It is hard to fire tenured teachers and many have resorted to doing things like complaining on their credential to professional boards as an example to find something to fire them etc.

      Get rid of tenure and the problem goes away and they do not have to make up excuses. My exwife was a teacher and you wouldn't believe the crap they tried to pull to make her quit. Of course she is very opinion oriented which didn't help and caused the situation.

    3. Re:Sick Society by meerling · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Go to the article source and read the comments.
      There are a number of them by the locals involved with that school.
      It looks like this is a not uncommon tactic variation certain higher ups use to punish those they don't like, as well as those peoples supporters.
      All very questionable and completely unethical. Hopefully this time it backfires in a big way.

    4. Re:Sick Society by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you think that schools would be better if it was easy to fire teachers who had opinions that differed from the administrations, leaving only the mindlessly obedient ones to teach the nations children how to also be mindlessly obedient?

    5. Re:Sick Society by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is not about science, it is about tje progressive anti-gun stance.

      Seriously - stop spreading their propaganda. They explicitly want those in power to have all the guns they need. They just want the People to be disarmed and figure their friends will be in power.

      This is not at all an anti-gun stance, it's a central-control stance. This gives them a sense of security, like those living under Mao or Pol Pot.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:Sick Society by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Grand Arts High School was formerly known as Ramon C. Cortines School for Visual and Performing Arts . . . apparently, lowly science is not a "Grand Art". It doesn't sound like the place you would send your kid to prepare to study Physics at Princeton or Electrical Engineering at MIT. I pity the poor teacher of science or math in a school full of kids from "pushy" parents, determined that their offspring is destined for stardom.

      Kinda weird . . . normally we expect the anti-science crowd to come from the religious corner off the ring . . . and low and behold . . . they get upstaged by a "Grand Arts" school staffed by administrators confounded by the entire concept of what "science" is.

      "Grand Farts High School", indeed . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re:Sick Society by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you and I have the right to piss off management and our bosses? What makes them so special?

      You don't seem to understand what tenure is. Tenure doesn't protect teachers from being fired if they act irresponsibly or do not do their job. Tenure only protects the teacher from being fired without just cause.

      The case here is really the question of whether allowing a student to build a marshmallow gun powered by compressed air represents just cause. The administration says it is, but they have an axe to grind with the teacher in question because he's also a union representative, etc. (as detailed in other comments)

      The suggest that the solution is to just give the administrators the right to fire all teachers without any justification for the firing is idiotic.

    8. Re:Sick Society by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, that explains why the cities with the strictest gun control laws have the lowest murder rates and those with the laws making it easier for law-abiding citizens to own and carry guns have the highest murder rates...No, wait, it's the other way around. If you actually look at the facts it turns out that it is people like Bloomberg who are blood-drenched and the NRA who are the heroes.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    9. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you "fend for yourself" with a gun, you're more likely to be murdered by it than to save the life of you or someone you love.

      completely untrue, but keep spreading brady lies like they're truths and eventually some retards will believe you.

    10. Re:Sick Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nonsense. If that's the case, they should be going after actual guns

      there are over 100,000,000 gun owners in the united states, owning more than 300,000,000 guns.

      you cannot "go after guns" and expect to accompish anything in one year or even ten years. you have to play the long game, and that includes any number of tactics, including conditioning kids into being so scared of even talking about anything remotely related to firearms, so that 50-100 years from now, gun owners are a tiny minority, at which point there's no real opposition to your idiotic control schemes, because really, gun control is people control.

      british history lesson: http://www.guncite.com/journals/okslip.html

    11. Re:Sick Society by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As long as the NRA and RWNJ refuse to acknowledge that we have a gun problem, not a people problem, the deaths will continue and there will be nothing to stop it.

      ~300,000,000 guns, ~100,000,000 gun owners, with about ~14,000 annual homicides committed with firearms. Rhetorical question: What's 14,000 divided by 100,000,000 or 300,000,000?

      It is a people problem. Studies have shown that the vast majority of first time murders already had extensive violent criminal records. Clearly the justice system is not doing these people or society justice, since there were ample opportunities to intervene before they took a human life.

      It's also a socioeconomic problem, because crime is driven in large part by poverty. You want to cut gun violence? End the war on drugs, increase education and job placement funding, and start to look at seriously reforming our mental healthcare system.

      Of course, all of those things are hard to do. It's a lot easier if you can just blame the guns, as though inanimate objects are possessed of powers of their own.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    12. Re:Sick Society by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine what they'd have thought of a chemistry set from the 50's! Oh man, they'd shit bricks.

    13. Re:Sick Society by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Take a four year old to the range with his/her first bb gun during a protest and watch how they react.

      Bonus points if the kid tells them 'they'll get his gun from his cold dead fingers'. I can still see the reaction from the fuckers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:Sick Society by Euler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The US is tops of the list of gun violence for any country with a stable government."
      Yes, we all have heard this statistic. Basically, it is cherry-picking by various ambiguous qualifiers: "stable", "developed", etc. Usually these are just keywords for "..as compared primarily to the UK, Western Europe, and Canada.."

      Russia and Mexico both have stable governments. They also have strict gun control (at least according to the written laws.) Guess what, both have a much higher gun homicide rate compared to the USA.

      Don't get me wrong, the homicide rate in the USA is embarrassingly high. There are many honest discussions to be had. But for now, both sides continue to dig in and not look for any real solutions that would fit with the culture and political setting of the USA.

    15. Re:Sick Society by tepples · · Score: 2

      Yes, a boss has a right to complain if you do not perform your job a. what b, when and c. how it is done to his or her specifications.

      The problem comes when the school administrators micromanage said specifications in a political way that interferes with education.

    16. Re:Sick Society by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The administrator wasn't doing the teacher's job by disciplining the kids because the kids did nothing wrong. It was completely correct what they did. But the administrator disagreed. And that kind of disagreement is *exactly* why we have tenure: to protect teachers who actually teach something controversial.

    17. Re:Sick Society by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Do you and I have the right to piss off management and our bosses?

      Yep.

      Do we need to be mindlessly obedient at work?

      You seriously need to pull your head out of your ass ASAP. Even soldiers who can be sent to prison for NOT following orders are not required to mindlessly following orders. In fact they're required not to follow illegal orders.

      The rest of life is no different. Apart from in your rather odd fantasy world, bosses are not absolute rulers. There are whole piles of law in fact about what they cannot do.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    18. Re:Sick Society by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      SO? Who cares whether the homicides are done with gun or without? Dead is dead.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    19. Re:Sick Society by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 2

      Russia has strict gun laws? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...

      As far as Mexico is concerned the gun homicide is not independent of US. In fact lax gun laws and huge drug demand in the US coupled with extreme economic disparity is creates this gun-toting criminal network in Mexico responsible for all the killings.

      Other stable and developed countries like England and Australia have unfortunately had mass shootings like the US, and result was stricted gun laws and less gun deaths. As far as sound public policy is concerned, it makes sense to keep guns out of the hands of stupid an irresponsible people.

      As far as keeping the King in check, gun owners do very little for that (who did more to influence the NSA all the gun owners in Texas or Edward Snowden). Voting and involvement in the political process is a lot more valuable than irresponsible posession of dangerous firearms.

    20. Re:Sick Society by nbauman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Give up. This is not about science, it is about tje progressive anti-gun stance.

      In your haste to construct an anti-liberal, pro-gun narrative, you missed the real reason for his suspension, which somebody mentioned above.

      http://articles.latimes.com/20...

      Schiller, 43, also was the teachers union representative on the campus and had been dealing with disagreements with administrators over updating the employment agreement under which the faculty works. His suspension, with pay, removed him from those discussions.

    21. Re:Sick Society by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      How much controversial stuff is taught in High school? Tenure makes sense in a college setting where professors are given the freedom to teach. Tenure in grade school and high school is just a method to protect incompetent teachers. Many states and teachers unions got rid of tenure for that very reason, even then it is still difficult to get rid of bad teachers. Private schools don't have that issue they can hire, fire, and compensate based on performance, couple that with them not being forced to babysit kids that don't want to learn and you can see why private schools routinely outperform public ones.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    22. Re:Sick Society by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is a people problem. Studies have shown that the vast majority of first time murders already had extensive violent criminal records. Clearly the justice system is not doing these people or society justice, since there were ample opportunities to intervene before they took a human life.

      15% of murders are committed by a domestic partner. 56% of murders are committed by friends or acquaintances. The notion that murders are committed against random people by some set of hardened, life-long criminals is not supported by data. Perhaps all the more so, given that convicted felons are generally prohibited from owning firearms.

      Likewise, given that 65% of gun deaths (as distinguished from murders) are suicides, I have to say I consider it highly unlikely that the vast majority of gun violence is committed by people with extensive criminal records

      There is data collected by the FBI and local state agencies if you'd like to check. For starters not all homicides are gun-related. Secondly, the question is not whether it is strangers murdering strangers, but whether 1) poverty and drug-related crimes/drug-related environments are fueling the bulk of homicides (and gun-related homicides in particular) and 2) the typical perpetrator has already a crime record.

      The data I alluded, collected by various law enforcement agencies and 3rd party organizations/analysts points into that direction. African Americans and Hispanics (my community) are dis-proportionally represented in gun-related homicides. When you break down gun-related homicide by race, we find that among non-Hispanic Whites, the murder rates are comparable (slightly higher but still comparable) to those in Western Europe.

      Furthermore, 80% of gun-related homicides are committed by hand guns, not the ZOMG assault weapons politicians like to ban. I cannot find the link to the FBI study where it showed the type of handguns used the most in homicides, but it clearly mentioned the majority of them were on the cheap end, 2nd-hand saturday night special type of hand guns, not the $500+ firearms the typical law-abiding gun-owner possess.

      So, clearly, race and income are a factor. Since race and income are (still) tightly correlated in the US, we can generalize this by simply saying it is a class-related phenomenon. Add to the fact that drug-related crimes significantly affect African Americans (where there has been a marked breakdown in families and an increase in single-parent families), Hispanics and to a lesser extend Caucasians in the South due to the "meth" belt, we see a strong correlation with the war on drugs.

      Now, I'm not saying we should not have tighter controls with firearms. I own firearms, and I conceal carry wherever it is legal. But I also acknowledge we should have much better ways to track who buys or sells what. Illegally acquired firearms and straw sales are a major factor in gun-related crime. So we have to deal with it.

      But the primordial factors here are race/economics, poverty, even health ([a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/01/03/how-lead-caused-americas-violent-crime-epidemic/" target="new"]refer to lead poisoning as a possible cause in the spike of crime from the late 60's to the 80s[/a]). Most importantly, it is culture.

      Fins and Swiss have significant %s of gun-ownership, and the Swiss can open carry, and yet you do not see the significant murder rates as in the US (though there are rates of spousal murder where alcohol is involved, but that is a universal.)

      Honduras is the capital murder of the world, and although gun laws are flexible, most people simply do not own a piece legally (prices are out of reach to most - ownership is for the well-to-do). Poverty is rampant, the police is ill-equipped to deal with gang/drug related violence, and the country lacks institutions to deal with recidivism.

      Nicaragua, adjacent to Honduras is the poorer of the two, with gun laws and legal private own

  3. First they get rid of shop by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Then Chemistry labs.

    Now this. Sigh.

    Lets burn the lawyers offices down. Everyone is so freaking terrified of a lawsuit that nothing happens. We have to give everyone a medal for participating, not discipline kids who tell teachers to go f**ck themselves, can't teach controversial subjects requiring critical thinking skills, can't flunk them, etc.

    We are not doing them any favors when they get out in the real world afraid to take risks or wonder why their boss fired them instead of giving a raise for participation?

    1. Re:First they get rid of shop by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets burn the lawyers offices down.

      The lawyers are powerless without the courts. It's the Court orders, backed by ... wait for it ... men with guns that make this environment possible.

      Do you know why everybody is so jumpy and the cops are doing summary executions now? Because everybody is a criminal, everybody is a suspect, and the cops and the courts enforce these absurd laws rather than than defend the Constitution as a co-equal branch.

      Hell, the Constitution didn't even make it past 1803 intact in design, and FDR accepted the Supreme Court's final surrender in 1937 from Chief Justice Hughes as a settlement to his plan to expand the Court with its cronies. Overnight, SCOTUS began finding all of Roosevelt's programs suddenly Constitutional even concluding that growing wheat for your family farm is part of "Interstate Commerce" and suddenly of Federal providence.

      The problem now is that it's impossible for the People to know what the Constitution says because (supposedly) it doesn't mean anything until SCOTUS tells us what it means, which might well be the opposite of what we "think" it means (that is, the plain English meaning). The catch is that the Constitution is what authorizes the government in the first place. If the People aren't competent to understand their agreement with that government, then they weren't competent to create it in the first place and the grant of power is void.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:First they get rid of shop by rainmaestro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My 8th grade elective (in 1998) was rocketry. We spent the semester building and launching model rockets. Something tells me that elective is no longer being offered.

      You can still find sanity in a few holdouts. My high school (a magnet program, not a regular public school) had a well-stocked research lab and all students performed research. Mine involved cellulolysis and a strain of bacteria that I forget the name of now. The lab (and the research) is still ongoing, though I suspect the program's status gives it more freedom than a regular school would have. They even still had shop courses, or at least they did when I was there. No dodgeball, though, that was forbidden.

  4. Yeah, sure. by drolli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am lucky I grew up in the 80s I guess.

    1. Re:Yeah, sure. by cultiv8 · · Score: 5, Informative
      I suspect there is a secondary motive here, the science teacher was also the teachers' union representative and had been dealing with disagreements with administrators over updating the employment agreement. His suspension removed him from those discussion. Source and quote:

      Schiller, 43, also was the teachers union representative on the campus and had been dealing with disagreements with administrators over updating the employment agreement under which the faculty works. His suspension, with pay, removed him from those discussions.

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    2. Re:Yeah, sure. by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 2

      Wait. Did you just admit that he's being targeted improperly because he is the union rep . . . and then say that if we got rid of tenure and let them fire whoever they want for whatever reason it wouldn't be a problem anymore?

  5. Marshmallow shooters can be quite dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    if you cross the streams.

  6. Losing good men to the war on pretend violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is part of the war on pretend violence which is really a war on boys who enjoy war and fighting fiction. It shouldn't surprise any man that if we give an assignment of write anything you want. That young men might write about what it would be like to be a sniper or hunt down a fish. But yet if they do that their must be something wrong with them.

  7. Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read article by drnb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lets burn the lawyers offices down. Everyone is so freaking terrified of a lawsuit that nothing happens.

    Its not fear of lawyers, its an anti-gun agenda. I'm not kidding, from the article:
    “supervising the building, research and development of imitation weapons.”

    Things that look or function remotely similarly to a gun are not to be tolerated. If you let kids shoot marshmallows at stacked plastic cups they might have fun, take pride in their mastery of ballistic trajectories, and you never know where that might lead ... nerf ... airsoft ... a .22.

  8. Re:Maybe anti-gun measures are good? by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps teaching kids that use of guns and violence in schools will not be tolerated is a good thing? Do we want to teach out kids how to use fake guns now, then careless use of real guns once in the real world? Schools need to keep zero tolerance on anything gun related if we want to see our crime rate go down (hint: Only a few countries have worse gun violence than the US... and they either have unstable governments, or no governments.)

    The better thing is to actually educate children about the dangers of firearms, and how to tell the difference between real guns and toys/replicas/marshmellow shooters. I grew up playing with toy guns, but my grandfather had several real firearms that he kept in a wood and glass gun cabinet. I was taught that they were dangerous and to only touch them with my grandfather or father. Keeping children from getting exposure to guns other than in video games or on TV means that if they are over at their friend Timmy's house and find his dad's gun they start playing with it and blow little Timmy's head off. If the child knows what to do when they find a gun (don't touch it, leave the area, and find and tell the nearest adult) little Timmy gets to go to school the next day. Abolition won't stop gun violence or even get rid of guns (out of the 6 guns that I own only 3 have any documentation of me purchasing them, and one of those is a hunting rifle). But education will reduce gun deaths significantly.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  9. Administrative politics by wickerprints · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is about office politics. The administration at his school has decided to make an example out of him, and they're using these science experiments as an excuse to make his life miserable. That's what this is really about. He doesn't toe the line, so someone with power has decided to exert their authority.

    To make this about gun politics is as equally absurd as to say that we should stop kids from eating any food because there's an obesity epidemic. These science projects are no more related to actual firearms than the gas stove in your kitchen is related to a nuclear bomb. The only plausible explanation for this situation is that Schiller dared to butt heads with some administrator, and this is payback.

  10. Electricity by edibobb · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should ban electricity in science fair projects. Electricity is highly dangerous. People die from electrocution every year, some of whom are not even enjoying capital punishment.

    1. Re:Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Electricity is nothing compared to the dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide! http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

  11. Re:Maybe anti-gun measures are good? by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps teaching kids that use of guns and violence in schools will not be tolerated is a good thing?

    Perhaps you're a blithering idiot. Oh, wait: there's no question about that.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  12. Re:Maybe anti-gun measures are good? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gun safety is something every parent owes their children. Along with power tools, basic electrical wiring, plumbing, plant a grape vine, how to build a computer, tune an engine, build a computer and compile a Linux kernel.

  13. I was lucky to grow up in a saner environment by spiritplumber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://spiritplumber.deviantar... This is a SLIGHT fictionalization of what happened to me when faced with a derpy administrator -- the dates and names have been changes but you can probably guess my age by the stuff referenced in. Ultimately, teachers and administrators operate in loco parentis; the parents have to get mad.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  14. Another school shooting averted. by Elyjah · · Score: 4, Funny

    I approve of this decision. Someone finally thought of the children; just think how many lives were saved! Science is dangerous, and definitely has no place in our schools. Clearly, the children that built these have some severe mental problems, and all right-thinking people know their parents must be fat, conservative tea-baggers. The kind of violence exhibited by these devices cannot be tolerated. This is exactly why children should not be allowed to think for themselves in school; they are too unpredictable.

    I'm glad we were able to stop these domestic terrorists before they killed anyone.

  15. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    Sigh do not bring politics in this.

    As someone who has worked in the school district I can tell you administrators need to make up good reasons to get rid of bad teachers and this is one of them and yes lawsuits prevent both administrators and staff from doing their jobs.

    If the teacher said you can use this as a weapon. Then yes that would be very bad and inappropriate. If it is used to teach expansion of gas in a chemical reaction then that is a different matter.

    I guess we will find out. Administrators have a reputation of being clueless. More likely they are puppets of the lawyers of school districts and need to do things like this to get rid of a few tenured bad apples.

  16. Progressives are *not* anti-gun ... by drnb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... it is about tje progressive anti-gun stance ...

    Progressives are *not* anti-gun, neither are environmentalists, etc. Ex. Teddy Roosevelt was known to be a fan of target shooting and hunting.

    Call it what it is, the radical left. Don't let the radical left redefine and despoil the term "progressive" and they did "liberal".

  17. Re:Its the anti-gun agenda, seriously, read articl by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... it's a stupid policy created by people that don't own guns ...

    There is nothing wrong with not owning guns. Its a personal choice, OK for some, not for others.

    However creating policy and regulations when you are completely ignorant and misinformed about firearms, that is something else. Some non-owners are quite well informed and not hysterical. Some owners are quite ignorant and in dire need of instructions and education.

  18. Its not about saftey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Schiller, 43, also was the teachers union representative on the campus and had been dealing with disagreements with administrators over updating the employment agreement under which the faculty works. His suspension, with pay, removed him from those discussions.

    cite
    Its not about safety, its about removing the union rep from negotiations at the expensive of his students who are preparing for their AP exams.

    1. Re:Its not about saftey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Y'know, I was wondering why they suspended the teacher instead of the students. Now it all makes sense.

    2. Re:Its not about saftey by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you agree this is a dirty underhanded tactic, please sign the petition to get him reinstated.

      https://www.change.org/petitio...

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  19. Re:tsarists by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

    Yes but arshmallows would add an element of surprise.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  20. Mexico and russia ? by aepervius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason western europe and canada is compared to USA, rather than say mexico and russia, is because they are the one which ressemble much the cultural, economical environment but also far more important political environment of the USA. Mexico and russia may fullfil one or two of those, but not all 3.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  21. Re:tsarists by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 2

    Not to mention, yummy.

  22. Bras by sycodon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, the correct analogy is that there are over a trillion bras.

    Clearly, there is a link between bras and breast cancer.

    We should outlaw Bras! Mod up to outlaw Bras!

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.