Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Data Miner Will Shock You

MojoKid (1002251) writes "A new website sponsored by Ubisoft as part of its advertising campaign for the upcoming hacking-themed game Watch Dogs isn't just a plug for the title — it's a chilling example of exactly how easy it is for companies to mine your data. While most folks are normally averse to giving any application or service access to their Facebook account, the app can come back with some interesting results if you dare. Facebook's claims that it can identify you with 98.3% accuracy based on images.The Datashadow app also offers the ability to compare various character traits and gives a great deal of information about total number of posts, post times and inferred values about income, location, and lifestyle. Is Ubisoft actually performing some kind of data analysis? Almost certainly not. This is far from an exhaustive, comprehensive examination of someone's personality or FB posting habits. The companies that actually perform that kind of data analysis are anything but cheap. The point Ubisoft is making, however, is that your FB profile contains enormous amounts of information in a single place that can be mined in any number of ways. All of this information absolutely is combined and collated to create detailed digital profiles of all of us, and the more we engage with various online services (from Facebook to Google Plus), the larger the data pool becomes."

164 comments

  1. And this is why.... by AltGrendel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I don't use Facebook. I'd keep away from it all if I could, but it's hard to be in the tech industry these days and have no/minimal online presence.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:And this is why.... by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...I don't use Facebook.

      Me neither, but don't forget that FB does keep profiles on non-members too. And your friends who are on FB might mention you by name, upload photo's with you in it, and so on.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    2. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really think this article is about Facebook then you have bigger problems than whether or not you have a Facebook account.
       
      Too many Slashdotters caught up in the branding game... can't see the forest for the trees.

    3. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why I don't have any friends, in addition to not using Facebook. (Seriously.)

    4. Re:And this is why.... by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 5, Informative

      And thanks to "like" embedding in every other page on the net, they can use a cookie to follow you (nearly) everywhere you go without you needing an account.

    5. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Firefox plugin "Disconnect" is excellent for blocking this.

    6. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet your enemies photoshop your face on to Margaret thatcher's body and tag you for lots of FB images. FB's shadow profile for you is very interesting.

    7. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's what Ghostery is for...

    8. Re:And this is why.... by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...I don't use Facebook. I'd keep away from it all if I could, but it's hard to be in the tech industry these days and have no/minimal online presence.

      It doesn't matter. Everything you do online is tracked and logged by a handful of large marketing software firms. Googles probably the biggest. They log key data points about you as you do this. Lots of things you probably don't even think about like which fonts you have installed, your preferred OS, monitor resolution. All of this data on it's own seems harmless but combined it creates a very unique fingerprint for you.

      The marketing software has plugins that websites can install, then the data about you is collected and stored in a centralized database. It's shared between all of the marketing companies clients. The end result is almost all of your data ends up in the same place regardless of what you do. You may have separate logins for Slashdot and that porns site, but that doesn't matter. They know your 2 separate accounts are for the same person. They might not know exactly who you are, but they don't need to. They just need to know you're shopping for tube socks, and display lots of adds for that. Oh, and by the way, once you finally buy the tube socks? Now all your accounts really are linked to your name.

    9. Re:And this is why.... by RJFerret · · Score: 3, Informative

      No button embedded on any pages I see with their .com and .net blocked by my Hosts file, slightly faster page loads without needing to wait for their servers too.

    10. Re:And this is why.... by Robert+Goatse · · Score: 2

      I don't think it's hard to be in "the business" without a stupid Facebook page. Aside from a few dummy test accounts, I've been gainfully employed for years without a FB presence. If you really want an online presence, create a blog and post some interesting research, etc. That, IMHO, would be way better than playing Farmville or whatever the FB game of choice is thesedays.

    11. Re:And this is why.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmm... so? Being profiled as a former prime minister of Britain, could be worse.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:And this is why.... by dsmithhfx · · Score: 2

      I think it's important to let Facebook and everyone else know why some find it useless and harmful. Potentially very, very harmful. But hey, knock yourself out. Just don't come crying when you're a victim, 'cause you had no idea 'they' were doing that.

    13. Re:And this is why.... by erikkemperman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ghostery was acquired by a marketing firm. That does not make it evil, per se, but probably deserves a bit more scrutiny.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    14. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No button embedded on any pages I see with their .com and .net blocked by my Hosts file...

      When the only sites you visit are xHamster, xTube, and 101BoyVideos.com, that's not a bad solution. But most people surf a few more sites

    15. Re:And this is why.... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Everyone does this -- when CNN post a link to a non-ad article about things to help with arthritis or the latest on diabetes research, they are building profiles of you and your IP address to bind you into higher-profit advertising groups for custom ad serving.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    16. Re:And this is why.... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      And thanks to "like" embedding in every other page on the net, they can use a cookie to follow you (nearly) everywhere you go without you needing an account.

      It's pretty easy to enable Tracking Protection to block everything coming from Facebook.

    17. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it couldn't.

    18. Re:And this is why.... by imatter · · Score: 1

      You have an account here and you posted as AltGrendel... you know there are a lot of AltGrendels -> on other web sites just google them.

    19. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IDP:

      # dig @127.0.0.1 facebook.com

      ; <<>> DiG <<>> @127.0.0.1 facebook.com
      ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 27691 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

    20. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use slashdot. Top that hipster.

    21. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is a place for discussing this issue. What's even more funny is that you decide to tell the person whose opinion you supposedly don't want to hear about how much you don't want to hear it.

    22. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's why it's an obvious result when one uses an online service as a personal journal/diary.

    23. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They log key data points about you as you do this. Lots of things you probably don't even think about like which fonts you have installed, your preferred OS, monitor resolution. All of this data on it's own seems harmless but combined it creates a very unique fingerprint for you.

      Most of that stuff used for browser fingerprinting is only discoverable with javascript. If you use noscript set to block everything by default you are pretty much immune.

      What matters more is your IP address. If you aren't able to change IP addresses and mix your traffic in with other web users then none of that tracker-blocking stuff will protect you. Get a VPN, the MAFIAA with their 5-strikes rule and all their bittorrent persecutions has seen to it that the market for VPN providers is very robust. You can get access to hundreds, in some cases even thousands, of different IP addresses for ~$3/month if you shop around.

    24. Re:And this is why.... by idji · · Score: 1

      Facebook knows who your family is, where you work, who your kids are and all of their friends and teachers and everybody else you have known for the last 20 years, because they all gave Facebook and Whats App access to their entire address book. It simply doesn't matter what you did - each of your email addresses is a GUID point to you.

    25. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to a thing called "Life" and "Society"...

    26. Re:And this is why.... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      How so? According to most reports about her when she was in office, she seemed to regularly go to hospitals in foreign countries and kill all the babies in them personally.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    27. Re:And this is why.... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      So Margaret Thatcher was worse than, say, Hitler or Kim Jung-Un?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    28. Re:And this is why.... by sstamps · · Score: 1

      I don't think an early comment on some website would qualify as "important".

      Maybe writing an article about it and getting it submitted to /. might qualify. But, then, I guess it would be important to someone other than just him, huh?

      No, I think you need help, at least in figuring out how to discern relevance and context.

      --
      -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
    29. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have heard this mentioned a lot that because of browser fingerprinting, the war for privacy has been lost. The current lack of good countermeasures seems to support that view. What I don't get is why is this such a hard problem? After all it relies on matching data provided by the target. It's easy enough to fake the user agent, or randomise it every session, so why hasn't someone cobbled together a solution which does the same with http headers, font lists or whatever else might be a liability?

    30. Re:And this is why.... by sstamps · · Score: 1

      I don't and never will use Farcebork or any kind of social media service which is specifically designed to profit off of me, using my personal information, without my permission or consent, let alone knowledge.

      --
      -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
    31. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just pissed that you were stupid enough to plaster your personal information all over the net and now it's too late for you to do anything about it.

    32. Re:And this is why.... by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      Adblock plus has a stopper for those things. The list to subscribe to is called "Antisocial".

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    33. Re: And this is why.... by kbx9118475 · · Score: 1

      Without my knowledge, let alone consent. Ftfy.

    34. Re:And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I don't use Facebook. I'd keep away from it all if I could, but it's hard to be in the tech industry these days and have no/minimal online presence.

      You work for a tech company that requires you to be on Facebook?

  2. link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    would it be too much to ask for a link to the website you're talking about

    1. Re:link by bemenaker · · Score: 4, Informative

      digitalshadow.com It's interesting to see what it says. I was suprised more by how much it got wrong, than by what it got right.

    2. Re:link by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Apparently I use facebook so little that it knows nothing about me except for I have 20 friends who I never talk to.

    3. Re:link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Not using my real name helps a lot. Although it knows that my wife is important to me, it doesn't know why. The first block in the "Important people" showed a broken image icon and said "Undetermined". The "Tactical" section was blank. The "time to strike" was empty.

      My plans are proceeded apace. Today, defeating a toy webpage connected to a video game. Tomorrow--evading security at the Big Lots! Mwahahahahaha!!

    4. Re:link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "proceeding"

      dammit.

    5. Re:link by zaren · · Score: 1

      The "password hacking attempt" at the bottom of the page had me concerned for a moment, but after seeing that it was just iterating common words found on my FB page with random l33tsp34k, I stopped worrying. I liked how they labeled one of my best friends (best man at my wedding) and my god daughter as stalking targets. I wasn't that impressed with the site.

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    6. Re:link by Robadob · · Score: 1

      Doesn't seem to want to let me auth, US only?

    7. Re:link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda difficult to use because I refuse to use my FB login anywhere but FB.

    8. Re:link by Chrisq · · Score: 1
      Same here:

      We could not log you in: You can't log in to this app because you do not meet this app's requirements for country, age or other criteria.

    9. Re:link by wirefarm · · Score: 2

      It's also not available to facebook accounts that are under "administrative hold", the term they use for accounts and those under subpoenas and national security letters.

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    10. Re:link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me, this looks like a bunch of "hacker-in-a-movie graphics" and a thing that reads a facebook profile to you.

      An interesting "shadow" would join the facebook profile to non-facebook activity that happens to re-use facebook cookies (e.g. like buttons) and then go another step away from there. It would have told me about my identity on non-facebook sites.

      Your real name (from facebook) is joe schmoe, and you like midget porn (from porn site where I happen to click midget videos more often than I click horse videos) and you are a member of the bull-moose party most recently purchased a book about how to cope with your panty-sniffing addition after googling various self-medication phrases related to that compulsion.

    11. Re:link by badzilla · · Score: 1

      I am not in the USA so also got the "we can't log you in" message in a new window. If you now click the blue "OK" button instead of just closing the window then it provides you with a URL in the form

      htttp://static.ak.facebook.com/connect/xd_arbiter/fjk6sKjilfjiowj.js?#

      and a scary message in 12-point bold red

      "SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone."

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    12. Re:link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't Slashdot have some sort of policy against phishing links?

    13. Re:link by grahammm · · Score: 1

      What is the purpose of restricting it to US only? Do they think that people outside the US would not be interested in seeing what could be mined about them from Facebook?

    14. Re:link by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      I am not in the USA so also got the "we can't log you in" message in a new window. If you now click the blue "OK" button instead of just closing the window then it provides you with a URL in the form htttp://static.ak.facebook.com/connect/xd_arbiter/fjk6sKjilfjiowj.js?# and a scary message in 12-point bold red "SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone."

      They don't lock session-specific URLs to a single IP address? And maybe these URLs don't expire often?

      Wow, FB is more hackable then I thought.

      All for performance, I'm sure.

  3. Abstergo Data Miner by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

    You know it's true.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  4. Anonymity by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tor should be the default network stack for the internet.
    Providing credentials/identity anywhere must be an active decision.

    1. Re:Anonymity by default by barlevg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let's ignore for a minute how it is to navigate the internet through Tor. Let's also ignore for a minute that the FBI has compromised roughly half of Tor sites and that they control a fair number of Tor nodes. Why do you think masking your IP will help you at all when you log onto Facebook and *give them* all your personal data?

    2. Re:Anonymity by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tor cannot protect you against javascript enabled unique browser analysis of the sort EFF's panopticon project explains. BTW my and likely your browser won't go there because it claims the cert is untrusted. Does EFF know about this? (hello?) .

      Moreover ,owning the vast majority of Tor nodes would be just a rounding error in the NSA budget. So you do the math,

      Bottom line, don't break the law (duh) and hope they're not killing / jailing people for their political beliefs (that will happen in a later adminstration under more stressful times...)

    3. Re:Anonymity by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he didn't say it would be truthful information he was *giving* FB.

  5. Wolfram Alpha by astro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd place a small wager that Ubi partnered with Wolfram Alpha on this - I did the Watch Dogs thing about a week ago, and thought it was actually a quite coolly stylized representation of basically very close to what WA spits out as analysis of my Facebook profile. I wasn't shocked. Rather, I thought it was pretty trick marketing, and was impressed.

    1. Re:Wolfram Alpha by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think TFA was incorrect when they said "it will shock you". They should have said "it will startle non-technical people." But that's not as pithy, and not as attention grabbing, and doesn't get your article re-blogged on Slashdot.

      --
      John
  6. You think? by adam525 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You send ALL of your pictures and your phone number and your email address to this site..

    Every morning you post everything that little mitzi and junior did at the ball game yesterday, as if anyone cares. You're favorite movies, books, TV shows, who you are in a relationship with. People will put EVERYTHING about them in their Facebook profile, and then they're surprised that it's easy for this company to track your habits, or for potential employers to screen you?

    1. Re:You think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered what happens if you just use a nickname, they way we did on the Internet at the age of myspace and before that. I just don't understand how and why people thought it's ok to put their real names on the internet. I still register to forums/online services with fake names and nicknames...

      In this case what will potential employers look for? Sure your nicknamed profile will be still data mined but it will not be associated with your real name. Basically I am asking if this is still a possibility. On my little experience on fb it is very seldom for one to refer to you with your full real name. At best he refers to you by your first name....

    2. Re: You think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...i've a pseudonymous facebook account i access two or three times a year when friends or family want to share pictures therein...digitalshadow pulls up nothing of note: most field remain blank and those filled-in either parrot my scant pseudonymous profile fields or present flat-out inaccurate speculation...

    3. Re:You think? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      You're favorite movies

      No, I am NOT favorite movies.

      That aside, I don't use FB. So there wasn't any data for that site to mine.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:You think? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      You're favorite movies

      No, I am NOT favorite movies.

      That aside, I don't use FB. So there wasn't any data for that site to mine.

      Are you sure? You didn't give them data about you -- at least not directly and on purpose -- but who's to say your friends and family haven't? (And since you and I aren't using facebook, we know even less about what's being said about us there . . . ) And by "friends", I mean the facebook definition of "friend," i.e. someone who knows you by name. Does facebook collect and analyze this anecdotal evidence about us non-facebook users? If there's money to be made at it, I'd guess "yes".

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:You think? by mrbester · · Score: 2

      No one who knows me by name and is on Facebook posts anything about me. I've asked.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    6. Re:You think? by adam525 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I put an apostrophe in there. It was early :)

    7. Re:You think? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Do you mean that you've asked people in that group, and they've told you that they don't post things about you on FB ; or do you mean that you've asked all people who know you to NOT post stuff about you on FB?

      For the last year I've been logging into my FB account less than once every 3 months, and most of the time I'm there I've been deleting old photos, posts, etc. It must be a couple of years since I added a friend to my circle (or whatever they're called). Deeply, deeply distrustful of FB. And Google.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    8. Re:You think? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      and most of the time I'm there I've been deleting old photos, posts, etc

      Plus, of course, spending 20 minutes flagging absolutely every advert they show me as being one of "offensive", "repetitive" or "sexually explicit". Shitting in their data mine like that may not be very effective, but it's a small strike for the common man against the corporations.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    9. Re:You think? by mrbester · · Score: 1

      The former.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  7. Ubisoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda like Mussolini pointing that Hitler is a Dictator.

  8. FB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FBI

  9. Pointlessly shocking the sheep. by nimbius · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Anyone who has a legitimate concern for their privacy and personal security has absolutely rid themselves of google plus and facebook. It didnt take a clever app to convince us, foiled fedoras or not, that we were as much a product as a herd of free-range cattle. our cud would be our status, the apple our friend request. We were to spend lazy afternoons basking on the hillside in the glow of farmville and grow strong and fat on content from friends and our mobile devices. This app is the same as working a stun bolt in front of a heiffer. Sure its loud and gets a response every time, but one must wonder if the audience ever truly understands its ultimate implication.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  10. The actual website by SigmundFreud · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pity the article did not mention it: the site can be found at http://digitalshadow.com/ It seems to be US only, though.

    --
    Sic transit gloria mundi.
    1. Re:The actual website by weave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Watch Dogs Digital Shadow will receive the following info: your public profile, friend list, News Feed, relationships, birthday, work history, status updates, education history, groups, hometown, interests, current city, photos, religious and political views, follows and followers, personal description and likes and your friends' status updates and photos.

      So basically you give them access to all of your data, and then they tell you all about you.

      What a shock.

    2. Re:The actual website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. There was just a login with FaceBook button and a fancy background animation

    3. Re:The actual website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a couple of friends try this and it didn't work for crap. It said one lived in a different state. I'm not sure how it missed that one. I'm going to call this BETA because it failed massively on the 2 I watched.

    4. Re:The actual website by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Basically it parrots back to you the information you just gave it access to from your Facebook profile, does some simple statistical calculations from your posts, adds some horoscope-style comments about your personality (I think mine was based on the fact that "craft beer" is one of my Likes), then generates a list of the kinds of dumb passwords that people come up with, based on their birth year, interests, whatever (3dward1970).
       
      I wish I made as much money as it thinks I do.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    5. Re:The actual website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is really interesting is that the site took my profile pics, and found other pics of me using facial recognition, but the pics it turned up were *not marked public*... In other words, this app (or whatever facial recognition API it used) has access to all pictures on Facebook, not just those market public. Most half-aware users at least expected Facebook to keep pics marked as private from being seen by random passers by on the internet... but they are not. That's the shock, IMO.

    6. Re:The actual website by weave · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Not really shocking. In the permissions you give it:

      and your friends' status updates and photos.

      So if one of your friends gave them permission, then they can grab the photos that way.

      So yeah, what you share put to your friends can be given away by them.

      Opinion: Facebook shouldn't allow an app to gain access to friend's data like this unless that data is marked public.

    7. Re: The actual website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call it what it is... "geotarded"

      The sooner we can make that a dirty word the better, imho. Fucking pointless and awful not to mention annoying.

    8. Re:The actual website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It then re-displays it with buzzwords related to the game. I liked wolframalpha's facebook report better.

    9. Re:The actual website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really shocking. In the permissions you give it:

      and your friends' status updates and photos.

      So if one of your friends gave them permission, then they can grab the photos that way.

      So yeah, what you share put to your friends can be given away by them.

      Opinion: Facebook shouldn't allow an app to gain access to friend's data like this unless that data is marked public.

      That's just it, the photo was _not_ in a collection of one of my friends or a friend-of-friend, in fact it was someone who I lost complete track of over 10 years ago when they moved out of state and even changed their name, and I can assure you that at this point we have 0 friends in common. Checking their public/relationship profile did not turn up the picture, it was set to private friends-only.

  11. Ha by synapse7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't have facebook, so the shock, is on you! hahahaha

    1. Re:Ha by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      I don't have facebook, so the shock, is on you! hahahaha

      Well given that only the Zuck has Facebook, that's hardly surprising.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Ha by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Don't worry. Even if you don't have FB, FB has you.

      The difference between having a FB account and not having one is only how much control you retain over your information. Not having one does not mean you're not present there. Your friends, coworkers, other people who deal with you have FB pages and whatever they write about you will be on there. And that's what is going to be on FB about you. For good or ill, correct or not.

      Personally, I prefer to add a bit of misinformation, just in case my "friends" post stuff about me on FB that actually has something to do with reality.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. http://digitalshadow.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://digitalshadow.com/

    That's the URL for checking it. Otherwise you have to click and click and click...

  13. "people with similar beliefs tend to cluster" by Gaygirlie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's this line in the article that says "people with similar beliefs tend to cluster together" -- it may be my best defense against datamining me. The people I have on my Facebook - account pretty much have nothing in common with me except for family members, and even they only share blood with me. If you were to base your opinion on me on the people that have added me to their circles you'd pretty much be totally off the course.

    1. Re:"people with similar beliefs tend to cluster" by mlw4428 · · Score: 2

      Problem is that it's easier to hide in a crowd than alone. It might be much easier to ID you if your thoughts/preferences stand out. Blending into a crowd obscures your personal data.

    2. Re:"people with similar beliefs tend to cluster" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      That's real world thinking that doesn't translate to the internet.

      How does blending into a crowd obscure anything on facebook?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:"people with similar beliefs tend to cluster" by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well I tag myself as random people in others' photos in an effort to poison the well. Some of my friends have started doing this as well once they questioned why I do that.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:"people with similar beliefs tend to cluster" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that does is red-flag you when the facial recognition determines that you are fucking with it.

  14. You can avoid facebook data miners... by kcmastrpc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Using this one weird trick!!!

    1. Re:You can avoid facebook data miners... by tippe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is exactly what I was thinking when I read that title. I expect the next slashdot story to be about a Columbus mom who is hated by computer anti-virus experts because she discovered one simple trick to rid your computer of viruses (with shocking results!!!).

    2. Re:You can avoid facebook data miners... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that mom lives in Grand Rapids. I've seen it in ads.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:You can avoid facebook data miners... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I thought she lived in Minneapolis.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  15. Something to do by kqc7011 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I feed most / some my profiles with false information. The email address that I use for sign-ups gets most of my spam. The land line that I use for sign-ups goes to a two ring answering machine with a short message and minimum time to record the spiel. The intentional misspelling of my name shows up on my junk snail mail. The multitude of birthdays that I have show up regularly. I sign up for emailing lists that I have no interest in, then after awhile remove myself from said lists. Those are just some of the things done.

    --
    Passionately Indifferent
    1. Re: Something to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, isn't it even worse? The problem is not so much knowing who and what you are, the problem is what will someone do with that, decisions they may make and actions they take that will affect you. What we all fear about it is someone changing (manipulating) our free will, or discriminating against us. Perhaps information availability on its own is not what is a problem. They might as well have it if they couldn't harm me with it. For that to happen, we the targets should have our defenses in knowledge of both our true selfs and psychology (against manipulation) and our mutual solidarity and tolerance (against character assassinations)... and in some cases massive amounts of restraining orders!

    2. Re:Something to do by GrumpySteen · · Score: 0

      I sign up for emailing lists that I have no interest in, then after awhile remove myself from said lists. Those are just some of the things done.

      Congratulations! You have the most boring life I've ever heard of. The sad part is that you seem to be proud of it.

    3. Re:Something to do by BiIl_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      It's definitely a step above from the typical Facebook retard (a grand majority of the people on Facebook), anyway.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    4. Re:Something to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolling again I see.

  16. Does anyone here by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2

    believe that slashdotters' posting habits and contents of their comments are of no mining interest to anyone?

    1. Re:Does anyone here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly, all of this goes into developing profiles of your political beliefs and a wide variety of other things. See my anonymous comment titled "it's worse than that". There's a reason you can't post to /. without enabling javascript even though web forms and http posts were designed to work without javascript. Javascript is the means through which spying takes place, irrespective of Tor or anonymous proxy use. See EFF's panopticon project for why javascript enables them to nail you uniquely no matter what else you do.

    2. Re:Does anyone here by reikae · · Score: 1

      If you can read this, posting works without Javascript.

  17. Correction by simplypeachy · · Score: 1

    It really won't shock me at all. Stupid Privoxy and its list of URL requests :-(

  18. NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Online companies need to totally violate the populations need for privacy about things like life style orientation, health status, psychological profile, bad or deviant habits, etc., in contraindication to existing laws and intents contained within the legal system so they can continue to provide it to the NSA wholesale under likely secret laws. This is why, with the unholy collusion of our corporacratic oligarchocracy that the actual electorate has no say in the matter and is not being represented by it's elected officials or even being accurately and fully reported in the corporate media. This won;t change along with all out other current raft of social ills till there is a grassroots counter culture.

  19. Where is the privacy policy of that site? by aviators99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's like a sick joke! They have a site that shows how much data they can mine (with your permission) and then they can do whatever they want with it?

  20. It's worse than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some of the same entities who maintain databases on you also develop and maintain personal profiles on you. This includes things like ability to defer gratification, sexual promiscuity / addiction, likelihood of having an STD (and which one(s)), sexual fetishes level of argumentativeness or agreeableness, your rank on a scale of respect for or defiance of authority,,(authoritarian scale), detailed political beliefs, number of past boyfriend or girlfriends and whether you were dumped or dumpee, likely personal frailties (vanity, you think you're too fat, you think you're smart, you conduct yourself with an exaggerated sense of entitlement). All o this is derived from FB ad other places and is used to profile you in various contexts from advertising to getting a job to loan applications to security checks and personal "risk profiles".

    Trust me. .

    1. Re:It's worse than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more....
      Facebook isn't just a seller of information, they also purchase info from other data brokers and add it to the info they already have on you. So if you used a secondary email address for your Facebook profile and did not give a telephone number, they have probable already purchase that data elsewhere and correlated it with your profile. They then turn around and sell their "expanded" data on you.
      Even though I do not have a Facebook account (the wife does) I am sure that they have a hidden profile on me (which they also are willing to sell).

      Posting anonymously to increase the difficulty of them tracking me.

  21. Completely useless information by z_gringo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use Facebook quite a bit. I also leave nearly all of my information as viewable publicly. This digital shadow app couldn't even accurately present information that is publicly posted or information to which it was given implicit access by logging in through Facebook. Location, Active times, close friends, income.. All completely wrong. I think that page is just a ruse to gain access to your Facebook information, which will then be used for other purposes.

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  22. Shock me? No by fascismforthepeople · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would be shocked if it drove people to stop giving up private information for free to facebook.

  23. Sidenote: 6 trackers on /. yro.slashdot.org by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sidenote: While you are reading this, 6 trackers on slashdot.org are tracking you.

    Just saying.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Sidenote: 6 trackers on /. yro.slashdot.org by dltaylor · · Score: 1

      Not on my browser install.

      BTW, in English, the proper names of languages, such as German, are capitalized.

    2. Re:Sidenote: 6 trackers on /. yro.slashdot.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sidenote: While you are reading this, 6 trackers on slashdot.org are tracking you.

      DoNotTrackMe says it blocked 3 things. Scriptsafe says it blocked 5. Ghostery says it blocked 4. My hosts file may have blocked more.

      Suck it bitches. If you're using the interwebs without stuff blocking crap like this, you're a fool.

      This prevents crap like Facebook and the other tracking sites from seeing all of the other sites you visit.

      You're not paying me, you have no contract with me ... therefore you have no expectation that I won't block your shit.

      Oh, and fuck beta.

  24. Unimpressed. Lame game tie-in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shocked? Nope.

    Facebook has a fictitious high school and no college for me, and no job titles it recognized, though I use real job titles, so it estimated my salary based on being a high school grad aged 49. It got it wrong.

    All the boxes, and I'm not sure what was supposed to be in them, say "insufficient data".

    It used words like "need" and "poop", in articles about my cats, to conclude I was self-absorbed, neurotic and insecure. On Facebook. Where even the most well-adjusted people post inane, narcissistic crap about themselves.

    I'm sure Facebook does a better job of analyzing the data, and it'd be newsworthy to know what they are able to figure out about my humorous posts and incomplete, semi-fictitious profile. But this lame game tie-in is not newsworthy.

  25. Not really by kajong0007 · · Score: 1

    Nope. This is exactly what I expected. Thanks for playing.

    Also, why do you have a link-bait title? Have we stooped so low?

  26. FB contains..information in a single place by Threni · · Score: 1

    > The point Ubisoft is making, however, is that your FB profile contains enormous
    > amounts of information in a single place that can be mined in any number of ways.

    Yeah, that's why we like it. That's why we use it. It's the point of Facebook. Without that info, what exactly would it be?

    Seriously, if people didn't like it they'd have stopped using it by now. Please take the paranoia elsewhere; some of us have a life.

  27. Interesting premise but pretty limited by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    Unless you really _really_ open yourself up to Facebook, the info isnt a whole lot of good. They were totally off on where I was located, but were kind of close to where I worked but were also totally off the mark on income. The tags to/from classifications are interesting but really one dimensional.

    I did like the list of easy to remember passwords they generated at the end, though.

    1. Re:Interesting premise but pretty limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The data FB gives out and the data they maintain internally are completely different

      Completely.

      Different.

  28. I am SHOCKED!...Shocked by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 1

    that data mining is going on in this establishment...

    --
    The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
  29. A warning by purnima · · Score: 1

    It may be a coincidence. After giving permission to this Ubisoft site, my poker account of facebook was banned. What gives? Is the page a ruse to gain access to your facebook account?

    1. Re:A warning by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Is the page a ruse to gain access to your facebook account?

      I don't follow. Did they ask for your Facebook password? There's you answer.

  30. Don't tell me what I'll be shocked by by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    Facebook Data Miner Will Shock You

    No, no it won't. But only six words in I already feel like this story is treating me like an idiot. Nice.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  31. And Naturally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you allow such cookie or like button to appear. FB* facebook* etc... all forwarded to 127.0.0.1 and strict cookies rules does wonder for the like button.

  32. ghostery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ghostery, it works

  33. Platform Apps by Salo2112 · · Score: 1

    The first thing all the security people tell you to do is turn off platform apps, and this site does not work without them. Nice.

  34. blocking FB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's what Ghostery is for...

    Also:

    echo "127.0.0.1 facebook.com" >> /etc/hosts
    echo "127.0.0.1 www.facebook.com" >> /etc/hosts
    echo "127.0.0.1 facebook.net" >> /etc/hosts
    echo "127.0.0.1 www.facebook.net" >> /etc/hosts
    echo "127.0.0.1 s-static.ak.facebook.com" >> /etc/hosts

    1. Re:blocking FB by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Totally OT, but your list of stuff to add to hosts produces an interesting optical illusion, as if these lines are waving like a flag. (At least in my Arial at 150%.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:blocking FB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you would benefit from visiting a doctor?

  35. Only if you allow it by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Since it has been known there has been addon and programs to randomize that for you adding/removing unused fonts/drivers/codecs/etc.... Naturally this is an escalation race until then next one they use to identify. But in the mean time good luck linking all my persona together.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Only if you allow it by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      programs to randomize that for you adding/removing unused fonts [...] good luck linking all my persona together.

      Hmm we have a set of visits who have a nonstandard font collection, and only comic sans and wingings are consistently in the list... must be aepervius!

    2. Re:Only if you allow it by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      And its been shown repeatedly that using most of those 'anonymouizers' actually makes you easier to sport rather than harder.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  36. Unimpressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't frightening at all. It's kind of sad. It found pictures I posted on my facebook because I gave them access to it. Other than that, it notes that I have high levels of interaction with my wife and my mom, but thinks my mom and the best man at my wedding may be potentially hostile towards me. It thinks I live in the remains of an abandoned town that I went urban exploring in 2 years ago. Oh, and it thinks that I'm submissive and conformist because I use the word "awesome". Sorry, smart guy, I just grew up in the 80s. It's like letting some random douchebag psych undergrad look at your profile and analyze you from it.

  37. Got nothin on me by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

    We could not log you in: You can't log in to this app because you do not meet this app's requirements for country, age or other criteria.

    I am the shadow, and the smoke in your eyes, I am the ghost, that hides in the night.

    Bow before your elusive target!

  38. Introducing: The Facebook Game by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    No, not another stupid Farmville crap browser game where you're supposed to toss money at it. No, Facebook, the game.

    The goal is to show up in a marketing research as someone who is anything but you.

    If you play well, you can win your privacy.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. 'most folks'? by Wootery · · Score: 1

    While most folks are normally averse to giving any application or service access to their Facebook account

    Really? Most folks? I personally am averse to doing this (I also go to the 'extreme' of only ever using Facebook inside a Private Browsing window, you know, as a /. tin-foil-hat-wearer and all), but there are a lot of people who happily integrate, say, Spotify and Facebook.

  40. ohh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook knows I like fantasy, sf, art, cats, John Stewart, science and 1st Edition AD&D!

  41. Dumber than advertised. by Kiyyik · · Score: 1

    So I just tried it (it's digitalshadow.com if you are having trouble digging it up), and it's not great shakes. Mostly I got "Insufficient Data", but what few things it worked out it got mostly--even comically--wrong.

  42. Ministry of Misinformation by retech · · Score: 1

    So why not use it but with wrong info? I caved because I was losing contact with some people that only network via social media. They got tired of emails and were impossible to get on a phone. My profile has nothing of importance. No location info. And all the data I did put in is wrong, grossly wrong. I never message directly with detailed info, I will just reply telling them to swap to email. This works for both of us. And harvesters have a very good set of data on me. It's just all wrong.

  43. Shocking!! Indeed Very Shocking!! by kgskgs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What shocked me indeed was the headline of the posting.
    We have seen enough of these "This will shock you" in tabloids and lately even on CNN.
    I am shocked to see this at Slashdot on consecutive two days.
    Yesterday there was some other headline about how some rubber band shapes shocked scientists.

    Let me read the headline and let me decide whether I want to be shocked or not. Why are you telling me that I will be shocked?
    Pathetic!! Real pathetic!! Nothing turns me off more than the following three types of headlines.

    "What this person said will shock you"
    "XXX did what to stop XXX ?"
    "The five things every should ..."

    Slashdot is turning into tabloid. Instead of printing about trashy reality shows and gossip about royal families, they somehow find things related to technology. That's the only difference.
    Slashdot, this had been a major turnoff.

    Sigh!!

  44. Again... by koan · · Score: 1

    Why are you using Facebook?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  45. FB consolidating online communication by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

    FB logins are now required more and more to do things online.
    A favorite radio station I listen to this morning mentioned all requests now must come via FB login.
    Can't they see how utterly wrong this is?
    It amazes me that anyone has to have this explained.

    Then there are government entities, cities, counties, etc, that are requiring FB logins to communicate or connect with them.
    This is so utterly wrong on so many levels.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    1. Re:FB consolidating online communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard a passing mention of a geek store in the next city yesterday. I looked them up, and they've scrubbed their online presence (archive shows they bought a domain and the cache shows skeletal "put your content here" template page, I guess website building is teh hard.) in lieu of having nothing but a facebook account

      Which, of course, couldn't render due to the bouncers at my front door, NoScript and RequestPolicy.

      So I have no intention of rendering their "store", digitally or physically. Or rendering unto them any of my money. -AC.Falos

    2. Re:FB consolidating online communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What realy sucks is when your Facebook account is deleted because you have no "friends".
      No more logins.
      All online accounts are gone.

  46. URL; child's play by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    Here's the URL that is missing from the summary.
    BTW, this is child's play compared to what Google can do. Not to even mention the NSA...

  47. I am shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At how poorly it handled me. It guessed my salary at less than 1/4 of what it is. It thinks people who are more important to me are the ones that I will "throw under a bus to save myself". It had an 8% accuracy guess as to my location, and barely managed to get me into the same state. Im not the most social on FB, but I have used it to keep in contact with people. Im still against the level of mining facebook does, but Im not particularly impressed with this.

  48. Insufficient Data by sudon't · · Score: 1

    I ran it, (after pausing all my various blocking wares), and in most fields it came up with: "insufficient data." Elsewhere, it was plain wrong. The few things it was able to figure out, like my age, are explicit on the FB page. And of course, it could determine my city, also explicit.
    Of course, I'm old school, and never use my real name on the internet. I'm blocking trackers and ads, and tossing cookies each session, so I don't know if FB's getting much that is useful on me.

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  49. Stupid by sudden.zero · · Score: 1

    I would be impressed if they didn't ask you to log into Facebook to mine your data. Anyone can mine data with full profile access. Let's see them mine that kind of data with a locked down profile. Whatever!

  50. Anonymous Coward still Anonymous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm this is what it reported for me:

    We could not log you in: You can't log in to this app because you do not meet this app's requirements for country, age or other criteria.

    I don't remember what country I told facebook I live in. I know my age is set to something reasonable. I wonder what criteria failed...

  51. F#cknuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have always imagined that someone was slobbering all over themselves with all the personal information that people seemed so trusting to post on this site. Its sickening.

  52. Yeah, but what are these profiles worth? Anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen these kinds of profiles in the past, and they're usually laughably inaccurate. They conflate data about people with the same name. They use old addresses and other stale data. They try to build demographics and come up with bizarre profiles that are so wrong that they're worthless.

  53. I block... by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    I block:
    127.0.0.1 facebook.com
    127.0.0.1 www.facebook.com
    127.0.0.1 www.facebook.net
    127.0.0.1 www.facebook.org
    127.0.0.1 connect.facebook.net
    127.0.0.1 static.ak.facebook.com
    127.0.0.1 s-static.ak.facebook.com


    Suggestions?

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:I block... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > I block:
      > 127.0.0.1 facebook.com
      > 127.0.0.1 www.facebook.com
      > 127.0.0.1 www.facebook.net
      > 127.0.0.1 www.facebook.org
      > 127.0.0.1 connect.facebook.net
      > 127.0.0.1 static.ak.facebook.com
      > 127.0.0.1 s-static.ak.facebook.com
      >
      > Suggestions?

      I block by IP address ranges

      31.13.24.0/21 aka 31.13.24.0 - 31.13.31.255
      31.13.64.0/18 aka 31.13.64.0 - 31.13.127.255
      66.220.144.0/ aka 66.220.144.0 - 66.220.159.255
      69.63.176.0/20 aka 69.63.176.0 - 69.63.191.255
      69.171.224.0/19 aka 69.171.224.0 - 69.171.255.255
      74.119.76.0/22 aka 74.119.76.0 - 74.119.79.255
      103.4.96.0/22 aka 103.4.96.0 - 103.4.99.255
      173.252.64.0/18 aka 173.252.64.0 - 173.252.127.255
      204.15.20.0/22 aka 204.15.20.0 - 204.15.23.255

      You can get the raw info from the command...

      whois -h whois.radb.net -- '-i origin AS32934' | grep ^route ...and you still have to clean up that output a lot.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  54. Suckers... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Some marketing company wants access to your FB info and you give it to them? That's undoubtedly the whole point of the digitalshadow.com website, to get their database updated with what FB has. And you fell for it!

  55. Close, but no cigar by DewDude · · Score: 1

    It got a few things...ok..the only thing it got right was my average income...it was a reasonably close guess for the average it ran the last 10 years.

    Other than that..it doesn't know me at all. It called me volitile, "You display unstable temperament and threaten to react with violence when provoked."

    Yup, that's about all it got right.

    I think the issue is most of the information I put on facebook is true, but it's only maybe 11% of the truth. Most of what's online about myself is only around 10% of the full truth anyway. It's a lot easier to keep most of your information secure when you just don't reveal it...or obfuscate it to the nth degree.

  56. Neat marketing trick. Don't fall for it. by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

    I'm curious to see what it says about me, but not so curious I'll give them access to the entirety of my Facebook account. Do they say what they'll do with your data afterwards? They must be sucking everything they can out of your account, and I doubt they destroy it afterwards even if you revoke permissions for their app.

    This scam is a marketer's wet dream.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    1. Re:Neat marketing trick. Don't fall for it. by johnsie · · Score: 1

      I hear you. Sounds like they just want to collect as much data as possible. For what purposes? Nobody knows. Fuck that!

  57. digital shadow.... by ak_hepcat · · Score: 1

    This automated system is a mess.

    I gave it access to my account temporarily, and afterwards revoked access.

    Turns out, it can't identify my face, nor can it identify my political leanings or my income with any certainty.

    It also couldn't figure out who my friends and enemies really were.

    All in all? It's a game, and it's not really doing any "data mining" that we should be worried about. ...

    Either that, or I'm a mischievous son-of-a-bitch that pads my timeline with fake information, and uses
    my kids face for my profile picture a lot, and only pushes location information if it's funny, irrelevant, or
    inconsequential.

    --
    Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
  58. This is cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the game sucks.
    I guess they are trying to regain all the hype they had before they released the very bad looking in game footage.
    Ubisoft, sony, EA, etc all like to render screenshots and footage on extremely high end PCs with upgraded renderes and then call them in game screenshots.

  59. Its just a marketing ploy. Breathe, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Um, I went to this site. Its a trailer / promotional site for Watch Dogs. Yes, it scrapes your Facebook and presents the data in a cool hacker-esque animated "file". First off, you have to give it explicit access for it to work, so what is the problem? Oh, and it was hilariously wrong on pretty much every count except that my girlfriend is "important to me". Wow, watch out. SkyNet is here. *Rolls eyes*

    What disturbs me is that whoever wrote this article was either a.) not very technically savvy to be so in awe over a game website or b.) deliberately trying to fan the cyberscare flames. Either way, fail.

  60. What shocked me was how stupid it was by MrEdofCourse · · Score: 1

    Wow, it got just about everything wrong in analyzing my profile. Right off the bat it shows a picture of my girlfriend that it thinks is me. It shows pictures of people I have a high level of interacting with, one of whom is George Tekei who it says it doesn't recognize and I've only briefly met once at a political fundraiser. It also doesn't recognize Wendy Davis (running for governor of Texas) even though the picture they used isn't one I took, but an official campaign photo.

    The commonly used words are out of context and were only used once each... Fire, Breast, Parties:

    Photo from an Arcade Fire concert.
    Photo from Breast Cancer fundraiser.
    "I rarely go to parties unless they're for a political or charity event".

    The "we can find you" shows a concert venue that is the 4th most common concert venue that I go to (only twice in the past year). This despite the fact that I have my home town listed and do check-ins at places there all the time.

    My income is about 1/3 of what it actually is and wouldn't come close to paying for any of the vacations I posted about, or the property tax where I listed that I live, or for my boats and cars. This one surprised me the most, since I list where I got my graduate degree and the titles of my jobs and companies I work(ed) for.

    The password attempts didn't even come close. My close friends and family could guess my "dummy" password really quickly (the password I use for sites I don't care about). My other passwords I wouldn't expect to be guessed at all since they're all different and randomly generated.

    Now all of that said...

    Ya, I see the point. There is data to be mined, and as foolishly as it is mined, it can be used even though the chances are high that it will be misused due to incorrect analysis.

    I'm not sure what the answer is. Initially, I thought having a profile allows you to at least project what you want your profile to be as opposed to being off-grid, which I can't be in my profession. Now I'm realizing that increasingly, the issue may not be humans individually making assessments based on manually viewing your profile but by using very, very stupid tools.

    Imagine this... an HR person looks for your profile and sees you're off-grid, ok toss that resume. They do a manual inspection and see you're high risk or acceptable. That's what we were dealing with, but now the HR person may get access to stupid tools and you could be labeled as risk for using keywords that were analyzed out of context.

    Ugggh!!!
    (oops, according to this tool, saying this once makes you depressed)

  61. Filthy Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently the site doesn't work if you are a filthy Canadian.

  62. they got my number;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    deviant
    Consider Blackmail or Character Assassination

    You display questionable moral judgment and proclivity for engaging in addictive behaviors.

  63. What about linking to the actual site? by allo · · Score: 1

    not some blog, which links itself all interesting links to itself?

  64. Filling out your own dossier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook is tantamount to a public Stasi dossier that YOU keep updated for free for Homeland Security. It's equivalent to tattooing you concentration camp serial on your own arm. When you finally get rounded up and put in a real concentration camp, frankly, you'll deserve what comes to because if your own complacency and willful ignorance of history.