Slashdot Mirror


China Censors "The Big Bang Theory" and Other Streaming Shows

dryriver (1010635) writes in with news that the Chinese government has had enough of the antics of doctor Sheldon Lee Cooper. "Chinese authorities have ordered video streaming websites in the country to stop showing four popular American TV shows, including The Big Bang Theory and The Good Wife, senior staff from two sites said Sunday. The move suggests government attention is intensifying on the online streaming industry, which is freer than state television and China's cinemas to show foreign productions and other content and has stretched the boundaries of what can be seen in the country. A spokeswoman for a leading online video site, Youku, said it had received notification on Saturday not to show sitcom The Big Bang Theory, political and legal drama The Good Wife, crime drama NCIS and legal drama The Practice."

166 comments

  1. Well judged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All terrible shows that the world could do without.

    1. Re:Well judged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first three seasons of TBBT were pretty good.

    2. Re:Well judged by timelorde · · Score: 1

      As was that final season of The Practice - the James Spader year.

  2. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    China. Not Russia. Yes, I am a fucking moron.

    But I ninja'd all the haters who will now repeat this correction, at least. :)

  3. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less shit that the Chinese have to endure.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself only... Most people in China love it. Most geeks I know love it too... Don't know where all your hate comes from...

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's, ugh, obnoxious white people pretending to be nerds, written by the same guy (Chuck Lorre) who produced Rosanne. All he knows what to do is make jokes entirely out of pop-culture references and drive no plot or conflict other than pissing off some and pissing on others.

      That is not a story, that is just being cruel.

      A racist analogy would like having a film starring one white guy who wants to be a black guy, surrounded by three black guys and two black women who act like normal people, but talk like gangstas only to each other. "Yo nigga, I got brought yer hos here, wanna light up a joint to make em comfy?" ... Like to a white person this sounds like "how black people talk" but to a black person it sounds like someone has brain damage.

      The problem really is less about the subject matter, and more about the writing. The only character that makes the show unwatchable is "acts like an obnoxious jerk" Sheldon, and he's completely hateable because he embellishes how autistic nerds act. The rest of the characters have a more believable "uncomfortable nerd" stereotype that just has stupid inane interests.

      My mother loves the show, but I can only stand to watch it if the female nerd characters get half the screentime, and sheldon gets little. The male nerds by themselves just makes me wish they would experiment with each other and then never speak of it again.

  4. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Funny

    The road to first post is plagued with face plants.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  5. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This was the Chinese, Putin is in Russia. RTFA.

  6. Yeah, even Chinese censorship sucks. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    They're such a large market, though, so will we see television programmers tipping to the Chinese government's caveat?

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  7. How is that any different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From CBS blocking me from watching it in the UK?

    1. Re:How is that any different by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      Or CBS blocking me from watching it in Canada, eh?

    2. Re:How is that any different by mark-t · · Score: 1

      In Canada, you can watch last week's episode on CTV's website.

    3. Re:How is that any different by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Fortunately it's not an ABC show, because I would be blocked from watching back episodes in the US because my cable provider is not one of the handful of cats and dogs in the network's "verify to watch" list.

    4. Re: How is that any different by chromeronin799 · · Score: 1

      Or in New Zealand?

  8. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by guygo · · Score: 1

    BaZinga!

  9. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And poutine is in Québec.

  10. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Putin does not control China

    yet

  11. Good move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a good first step, but the ban should be wider and reach all the "I'm so nerdy XD" bullshit.
    Just goes to show that even censorship can have an upside.

    1. Re:Good move by pspahn · · Score: 0

      +1

      To be honest, the episodes that I have watched made me feel a little insulted. I've no idea what sort of creds the writers have, but I got the impression that it was a show that parodied "geeks" made by people who have no idea what the word actually means.

      Now, on the other hand, "did you try turning it off and on again?" is something that certainly rings common to me.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:Good move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once someone pointed out to me that it's not a show which is parodying geeks, but it's making fun of people with autism spectrum disorder.

    3. Re:Good move by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Basically it's a geek zoo to point and laugh at.

    4. Re:Good move by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Sitcoms Chuck Lorre also created include:

      Two and a Half Men
      Grace Under Fire
      Cybill
      Dharma & Greg
      Mom

      This may give some context to the tone of what you saw. I don't recall having seen any references to biting the heads off of live chickens.

    5. Re:Good move by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      It even gets the stereotypes down, like an obsession with trains.

    6. Re:Good move by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

      I've no idea what sort of creds the writers have

      Considering Mayim Bialik is an actual neuroscientist and several of the consultants for the show are physicists, the creds of the writers are very well established.

      Don't forget Danica McKellar who showed up for an episode, with her degree in mathematics (sum cum laude). Stephen Hawking, Brian Greene and Neil Degrasse Tyson have also appeared with Hawking lending his electronic voice to a handful of episodes as well.

      The fact of the matter is the show is written to both poke fun at the foibles of the nerd/geek crowd as well as provide a light-hearted commentary of some of the people, similar to yourself no doubt, and how they perceive things. Yes, much of it is formulaic but the zingers are worth ignoring the obvious plot holes (the most common of which is how Penny can survive on a waitress salary).

      It's a show. Stop being a nerd and trying to dissect everything as if it's supposed to have some grand, overarching meaning to anything.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    7. Re:Good move by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Well, we've got a truckload of butthurt nerds here apparently, who can't just relax and enjoy a funny show and laugh a little at themselves, or at least, their stereotypes, and recognize them for just that.
      Why so serious? I've seen these arguments here before. Leonard's asthma /inhaler are bit over the top and cliched, granted, but it's just a show. I don't go to comic book stores or buy Batman or Star Wars figurines, and never did, but I know some geeky types who do that.
      Another demographic joins the "I'm offended" crowd. *sigh*

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  12. well, that settles it by turkeydance · · Score: 0

    no China trip this year.

  13. Why is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China wants to prudently judge what foreign influences it allows into the country and doesn't want its young people to grow up to become daggitybos like some of the people who watch (and act in) The Big Bang Theory. Are we to be surprised that a state looks out for its citizens?

    1. Re:Why is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the children who watched that show know how to write "sesame".

    2. Re:Why is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daggitybo? Are you Australian, by some chance?

    3. Re:Why is this a surprise? by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      Sesame Street was never on the BBC. It was always on ITV. Therefore this is a lie.

    4. Re:Why is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8340141.stm

      The show crossed the Atlantic 18 months after its US launch, but the BBC rejected it because of its "authoritarian aims" in trying to change children's behaviour.

      "This sounds like indoctrination, and a dangerous extension of the use of television," said the head of children's programmes at the time, Monica Sims.

      You were saying?

    5. Re:Why is this a surprise? by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      It wasn't 'banned' as the AC hysterically claimed, it was rejected. Follow the link a sentence or two further, it was picked up by ITV, as stated.

      Banning means stopping it being broadcast. They couldn't and didn't do this. The next sentence in your link explains why they didn't pay money to the US for a children's programme, as they were quite happily making British pre-school television, without the letter Zee.

  14. Quality Control by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Funny

    You seem to assume that all Chinese censorship is purely politically motivated. The Big Bang Theory probably just fails basic quality control standards.

    1. Re:Quality Control by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Authoritarian governments often see the political in what we consider the mundane. They are often wary of allowing "Western" or "bourgeois" ideas to "corrupt" the masses under their control. Even literature or art from their own society can be banned. Consider the example of Doctor Zhivago:

      During Cold War, CIA used ‘Doctor Zhivago’ as a tool to undermine Soviet Union

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Quality Control by geirlk · · Score: 0

      You seem very informed about their terms and jargon...

      Are you, or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?

    3. Re:Quality Control by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      Actually I hear they're banning it simply because it's crap and want to spare their people the suffering. They're encouraging their citizens to watch the IT Crowd instead.

    4. Re:Quality Control by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      You seem to assume that all Chinese censorship is purely politically motivated. The Big Bang Theory probably just fails basic quality control standards.

      be careful, don't bash the BBT, all the kids who think they have asbergers are gonna come on here and yell at you.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    5. Re:Quality Control by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Sheldon doesn't have Aspergers, he's just a fucking douche. Theres a difference.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:Quality Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, yeah, I know that.

      But even pointing that out will get anyone associated with AS - in any way - on your case.

      Sheldon suffers from the same ailment as Greg House MD. Insufferable Tool Syndrome. Doesn't make either show any less enjoyable.

    7. Re:Quality Control by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Sheldon suffers from the same ailment as Greg House MD. Insufferable Tool Syndrome.

      True but the difference is that Greg House is portrayed as a highly intelligent bastard whereas, in the one episode of BBT I managed to watch, Sheldon was played as an unintelligent idiot who would not last 10 seconds as a grad student.

  15. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    China is much more concerned about "cultural contamination", not just political contamination. While the Chinese are Communists, they are not the hyper-political communists of the Soviet Union where culture such as religion and traditions were a plague to be eradicated, they are Communists with an eye towards preserving their very ancient culture.

  16. In unrelated news by arielCo · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Chinese Ministry of Culture reports a 3-point increase in the average urban IQ.

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    1. Re:In unrelated news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have never watched the alternative. Chinese / Korean shows in China. There are basically four popular ones. Singing/dancing contests. Korean love triangle soap operas. War soap operas depicting the Japanese as evil incarnate....

      Big bang was popular because it was about life in general, and people just trying to enjoy it.

    2. Re:In unrelated news by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Please explain to me what is or has been on TV, that is actually smart TV?
      Almost all public media that lasts more then one season (TV/Comic Books/Radio/Popular Blogs...) in general are made so someone with an 8th grade education will be able to get it. That is where the money is in. And if you get too much past that then viewers will drop.

      Why 8th grade? Well that marks an end of a students general education and they begin specializing. Some kids take more electives in the Math and Sciences, others towards Art and Music, and others go to Writing and Literature. Then when they get into college they will focus down on a particular Major, Grad School they will begin to focus down further in a particular topic in that Major. Then finally PHD where you focus on one thing in that topic.
      Because people get specialized it gets harder to market Smart broadcasts because you start weeding out people who haven't studied much in that particular topic and will not get it.

      If you want to get informed on a topic without schooling you will need to go to more geeky places on the internet. Read the academic Journals, Find mentors who are experts to help you out. But for general media, you will just get the overview that a 13 year old will be able to understand.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:In unrelated news by arielCo · · Score: 1

      I could mention a few things that I've enjoyed, but for every show there's a crowd that'll deem it too crass, too silly, or not smart enough; and then there are those who simply enjoy lamenting the state of things.

      Anyway, there's dumb, dumber and dumberer. There's something to be said against a show that can be recognized at a distance by the train of canned laughter pulses (yes I know, "filmed in front of a live audience", just like your gummy candy is "made with real fruit").

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  17. I just watched "The Other Guys" on Channel 5 UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Excellent movie, but it was missing almost all references to the banking system and TARP funds. For example, the entire scene at the end, where Derek Jeter hands them documents regarding banking fraud (their "next case"), was cut. The info graphics credits sequence omitted everything but the Ponzi scheme part (but it wasn't just cut off after that; the credits continued with the part after the info graphics). You can view the sequence on Youtube, but that's not complete either: It's missing the AIG and TARP bits.

    So China bans Big Bang Theory. What is being hidden from you?

  18. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by macpacheco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    tBBT shows enough pure unadulterated American freedom that is in conflict with sanitized state controlled media.
    China isn't the only country whose govts are pissed with pure uncensored internet freedom. Even my Brazil "democracy" has tried to police twitter, facebook, google plus to censure critics of politicians specially right before elections. Remember Turkey has banned twitter and facebook.
    Realize that without serious state controlled media, China will fracture into dozens of states. It's internal language, cultural and social disparities rival only the former USSR.
    China invented the technique of legalism back in (259 BC – 210 BC) when "China Qin Shi Huang" gave his name to his country, in the past having even censured attempts to use history against current rulers.

  19. So? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

    American companies stream movies to China.
    But they don't do the same thing to Europe (Game of Thrones as an example).
    How is that even billed? And now we have an uproar that China is censoring it.
    Wow ... I would like to have an uproar that we are forced to pirate movies because they get published here (in Europe) months if not years after they were made ...
    I'm fed up with movies/books being available in Europe months or years after they where made, for what ever reason ...
     

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the site Youku is actually just a youtube like site and its not legal streams as far as i know just pirated materials and Chinese home made stuff.

    2. Re:So? by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dont kid yourself: You arent "forced" to pirate it, you choose to because you want the content they produced but dont want to play by their terms.

      Maybe that doesnt bug you, but at least be honest about it.

    3. Re:So? by QQBoss · · Score: 2

      tv.sohu.com, though, is a legal streaming site and TBBT has been pulled from their, but 2BG (Two Broke Girls) is still available. I would think that this is a mind-boggingly bad decision, except I do meet people in China that feel they need to ask if women really do have Sex in the City, and if there really are so many murders every day in the USA to justify all the police dramas. Yet most of them can recognize that the Chinese war dramas may not be the best way of learning World War II history.

      That, and if you really want to terrify people about going to or admiring the USA, perhaps 2BG and Shameless are the best shows on American TV from a Chinese official's point of view. Oh, and Ellen, which is on a path to become just as bizarrely popular in China as in the USA.

    4. Re:So? by mjwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dont kid yourself: You arent "forced" to pirate it, you choose to because you want the content they produced but dont want to play by their terms.

      Dont kid yourself, when people find terms unreasonable, casual copying becomes justifiable.

      Ultimately piracy is a delivery problem, not a legal one. Here in Australia if I want to watch Game of Thrones I need to pay Murdoch A$70+ a month and have to do it on Murdoch's time table. Both of these are unacceptable to me. So downloading it is the only acceptable option remaining.

      The old system used by HBO and Murdoch's Foxtel is dying a slow death. People dont want to wait for shows to be on, they want to watch them at their own leisure nor do they want to have to pay for 30 channels of bullshit to get 1 show. Piracy isn't a scourge on humanity as Murdoch et al. would like to perpetuate, it's merely the market reacting to conditions they find unacceptable. If you want to see piracy of your show plummet, make it available through as many channels as possible for a reasonable price. The easiest way to do this is to allow anyone to resell it for a flat (per copy) license fee that people will accept.

      However they want to continue to prop up outdated ideas like exclusivity. So they will have to accept that piracy is an acceptable alternative.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DId you know that on CCTV they will even broadcast straight up pirated DVD's (complete with pirate marks) on tv? It's a different country out here.

    6. Re:So? by Windwraith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, there's no "need" to pirate per se. But in several cases getting that content legitimately, in Europe, is close to impossible. We are not talking just "delayed release" as the parent poster said, we are also talking about stuff that never, ever, is released commercially in Europe or regions of Europe for whatever reason. Not to mention some European countries like Spain do everything in their power to prevent you from legally purchasing products from other regions, or at least make it much more expensive than it should.

      This is different as don't wanting to play by their terms, this is literally having no terms to play with in several cases. And I understand his sentiment, it's a big deal when China can't have those, but when Europe doesn't have US-produced content, shows or articles, nobody gives a damn and we even get called out on pirating stuff we can't purchase without being rich. Please.

      Maybe that doesn't bug you, but it's a thing that happens, believe it or not.

    7. Re:So? by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      The content is "advertised" (usually officially) and not available for purchase, at any price. They are enticing you to watch it, then refusing to make it available. That's "forcing" someone to pirate it. Their terms are simple. "you can't have it" but they still suggest and advertise it.

    8. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      So you are in agreement with the above post stating " because you want the content they produced but don't want to play by their terms". Believe it or not but there are a bunch of folks who make a living by producing and releasing content. Murdoch might take his cut but your $70 a month does pay for a lot of other things. Your entitlement complex has you justifying theft because you don't want to pay.

    9. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I don't have cable TV but even if I did, I wouldn't be able to see a lot of the stuff I see.
      For example, I like to watch late night talkshows during my daily exercise.
      They are excellent when you need something to distract you a bit and not are able to concentrate very much so it doesn't matter if I miss something.
      (No I can not just go for a run or go outside to exercise anymore, wish I could, I miss it.)

    10. Re:So? by fazig · · Score: 1

      Certainly you aren't forced to pirate it per se, but you can feel compelled to.
      When I try to access HBO GO I can read this: To access HBO GO, you must reside within the fifty states of the United States of America. If you reside in this area and are still experiencing difficulties, please contact your television provider.
      So I use proxies to 'bend' the rules. HBO does get money from me but technically I committed tax fraud and violated local licences. This almost equals pirating it since the local license holder doesn't get his share and neither does the state. I caused them to suffer opportunity costs, which they calculate as financial damage, even though I would never have watched it on television there, but simply buy the BluRay to get the uncut version with the original audio tracks. But they don't care about that, they still perceive it as financial damage caused by a "pirate". You see, just because I paid HBO doesn't make it any more legitimate than piracy from the economical and legal point of view in my country.

      Other people simply say to themselves "fuck it, I'm simply going to download a ripped version off the internet" and do so.

      Now you might ask why do people do that? What's their motivation? Well the internet is a wonderful platform for communication around the world, national borders become almost irrelevant. I know people from all around the world, among them are US Americans, I consider them as peers and friends. I talk to them almost on a daily basis and on Mondays (from my timezone) I can't listen to them without getting hearing and reading spoilers of all your favorite TV shows. To fix that I basically watch the shows 'with them'. Doing so I play by the rules of HBO, but not by the rules of my country, and to be perfectly honest I couldn't care less. As I see it it's their fault to act like dinosaurs, unable to adapt to the circumstances, trying to change the rules, failing to realize that the internet will never bent to their will.

    11. Re:So? by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Yes, we are forced to pirate. A fair and reasoning sense of fairness applies with regard to all of the times we have been lied to about the quality of content and have been sucked into paying for shit. That sense of fairness demands that in response to being repeatedly defrauded as regards to the quality of the content being sold, we endeavour to recover non-refundable capital and also to ensure we are not again cheated in the future, we fully test out content prior to paying for it. If the content is sufficiently worth while as to justify a payment then it is made, less of course all of the times with have been cheated by falsely advertised qualities or prior purchased content. If you do not think that is fair, then I believe that you think it is reasonable to lie to people about the qualities of content in order to cheat them of their money, so screw you ;). Now that's being not only honest but fair and just.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:So? by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      But they don't do the same thing to Europe (Game of Thrones as an example).

      Huh. I guess that I get HBO Nordic (with full HBO backlog, excluding sadly Deadwood and Oz due to some ownership issues) and recent episodes the next day they're broadcast in the US with local subtitles on my smart-ish TV was just a dream. Oh wait, it wasn't, GoT day today.

    13. Re:So? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Ofc I'm forced to pirate it.
      GoT is not aired in germany when it is in USA. Nor is it available on DVD. And HBO is not streaming into germany either. So either I have to wait another year or ask a friend from the USA to give me a copy (which is strictly speaking not piracy and in fact legal, at least in germany).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re: So? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Whereas America has an average of 18 minutes of commercials per hour, whereas (the UK, at least) has an average of 12.

      Also in the case of the UK, it's been a long while since we only had 4 channels on the dial. We've had 5 since 1997, we've had subscription satellite TV since 1990, we now have digital TV (in terrestrial radio broadcast, satellite, and cable formats).

      Just the BBC, our "TV License" payee, has 9 television channels (most of them in HD), 10 national radio stations, a multitude of local stations, and the enormously popular BBC website, including the renowned BBC News.

      The license is £145.50 or just under $250, per year.

      Quite aside from the quality of the programming the BBC produces itself, the availability of a high quality, commercial-free national broadcaster forces all the commercial stations to raise their game - shorter commercials, better content (yes, including imports from other countries).

      While in recent years I have had some doubts about the impartiality of their news coverage, I wouldn't be without the BBC. I've seen American broadcast television. I don't want us to go the same way.

      Since the production of content is a fixed cost.. imagine the volume of quality content the USA could produce, given it has a population 5x the size of ours, if they had a similar license structure in place. Of course, the existing networks have imagined this, and quake in their boots....

    15. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont kid yourself: You arent "forced" to pirate it, you choose to because you want the content they produced but dont want to play by their terms.

      Dont kid yourself, when people find terms unreasonable, casual copying becomes justifiable.

      Ultimately piracy is a delivery problem, not a legal one. Here in Australia if I want to watch Game of Thrones I need to pay Murdoch A$70+ a month and have to do it on Murdoch's time table. Both of these are unacceptable to me. So downloading it is the only acceptable option remaining.

      I think you forgot the option of simply not watching the content. We are not talking about essential human needs here but entertainment. Just because you find the terms of a deal unreasonable it does not justify your illegal actions.

      Personally I don't give a rat's ass if you break copyright law or not but don't kid yourself into thinking you are doing anything but breaking the law to save A$70 month on a non-necessity.

    16. Re: So? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest: even the BBC has garbage shows that people want to like, because it makes them feel like better citizens.

      If there were more than WOW FIVE CHANNELS, the amount of trash would be more evident. I personally like Dr. Who and Top Gear, but the fact that BBC America finds the need to air ST:TNG reruns is telling.

      I don't see a big difference between the "TV licence" and simply confiscating the funds through taxes, as is done here through funding the amusingly named "Corporation for Public Broadcasting". You don't have any real control over what the BBC does and don't benefit from its success, and we don't have any real control over PBS or benefit from the taxes we pay to support it. It's simple.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re: So? by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Roughly 40 free to air channels, not including shopping, subscription or timeshifted, on UK TV. Nine BBC channels, variable quality (fair to excellent), but easily superior to any other main English-speaking nation in the world, and I've been to them all for periods > a month (plenty of time to absorb the shock).

      That and the ad-free radio (bliss) on seven excellent channels [pop, easy-listening, classical, news/drama/factual, talk/sport, music, repeats of drama from over 60 years of archives] plus local radio. Costs less than a pint of beer a week.

      Please don't listen to right-wingers in the UK that hate the BBC. In my personal experience, the BBC and NHS are the two things people here wouldn't want to see altered.

    18. Re:So? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Dont kid yourself, when people find terms unreasonable, casual copying becomes justifiable. Ultimately piracy is a delivery problem, not a legal one. Here in Australia if I want to watch Game of Thrones

      Note that your key word here is "want".. not "need".
      And what people find unreasonable is certainly a subjective decision which will vary with individual and circumstance, and therefore falls anywhere from meaningful to meaningless. It is deemed justifiable only if you feel you are somehow entitled to the content they created and distribute.
      I just wait for GoT to come out on BluRay, and buy it for $35 on amazon.com. Granted I'm a year behind this way, but I'm not paying for the extravagance that is HBO and other channels in a forced Comcast package for just one series. I still get to watch it though, without rationalizing not paying for it.
      Not that I'm doing an anti-piracy rant, I'm not, I've done it myself before, when I was younger. I just don't believe in trying to rationalize it.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    19. Re: So? by volmtech · · Score: 1

      You don't understand the kind of people attracted to government service in America. All the programing would have a left wing slant. While most programs would be somewhat entertaining that would only be to increase viewership of their propaganda. The Chinese and North Korean governments would gladly stream this content for it's praise of socialism and communism and hatred of the American way of life.

    20. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, when I go to the store to get bread, I only want two slices, not an entire bag full. I guess, by your logic, that it is acceptable for me to break into your house and steal the two I want instead of purchasing them. That sounds reasonable.

    21. Re:So? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      I think you forgot the option of simply not watching the content. We are not talking about essential human needs here but entertainment.

      Wrong.

      Speaking as someone who was raised without a television, I can tell you it's about far more than entertainment. It's about culture. If you are not exposed to the same entertainment as the people around you, you are not part of the culture. And that's incredibly harmful. Yeah, it gives you a different perspective from everyone else, but guess what: despite all PBS propaganda to the contrary, differing perspectives are not appreciated. They are barely tolerated, and in a lot of places, not even that. The ability to see the same entertainment establishes points of commonality with other people, which are necessary for comfortable human interaction.

      It's true this problem is much less pronounced today than it once was since the monolithic television culture has begun to show cracks, but it's far from gone. Internet memes are a manifestation of the same thing, but they're a poor substitute. Two people who have both seen Rage Guy can make references the other understands. But the total number of people who have seen Rage Guy is still far lower than the number who have seen NCIS. A glance at MemeBase is sufficient to show why. There are 10,000 Internet memes all trying to gain acceptance. The Internet mechanism that could replace the role of television in establishing culture is dead on arrival, already fractured into uselessness.

      Shared experiences establish culture and culture eases communication. People who believe they should have the right to put an exclusive lock and a toll booth on media actively harm that process.

      Just because you find the terms of a deal unreasonable it does not justify your illegal actions.

      Yes it does. Their unreasonable deal locks me out of sharing the experience other people have had. It makes me different. Eventually, the longer it lasts, very different. And there are many parts of the world today where being that different is literally deadly. It was not so very long ago that was true everywhere in the world.

      No, it's not "just entertainment."

  20. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is much more concerned about "cultural contamination", not just political contamination. While the Chinese are Communists, they are not the hyper-political communists of the Soviet Union where culture such as religion and traditions were a plague to be eradicated, they are Communists with an eye towards preserving their very ancient culture.

    OOOOOhhhh!!! (light goes on)

    NOW I understand why Sheldon Cooper is such a threat.

    No, actually not really. I'm even more fucking confused over BBT being part of this censorship...

  21. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Maybe because early episodes alluded to Leonard having a brief relationship with Joyce Kim, who turned out to be a North Korean spy...

  22. NCIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Received notification on Saturday not to show ... crime drama NCIS

    So, not all bad news then.

  23. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to see China setting a positive example in the human rights department for once.

  24. Cats' tongues all the way down. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    Three CBS and one ABC. Production companies don't align either.

    The shows themselves may not be objectionable, keep in mind. It may be payback or threat for other things, movies or something. In Iron Man 3, it's probable The Mandarin was converted from an evil actual Chinese guy to a lame cover story so as to not offend lest that and future movies be banned...or taxed extra hard.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Cats' tongues all the way down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Meh, I dunno, NCIS is pretty obvious US propaganda, although probably more aimed at aligning the views of americans to the will of the powers that be. Big bang theory, no idea why they decided to ban this. The two other shows, I dunno, never watched them but legal dramas tend to paint lawyers and cops as honest people with high standards for thruth and justice, some sort of idealised version of how america could be if it wasn't all corrupt, so I can see some propaganda value there.

  25. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    tBBT shows enough pure unadulterated American freedom that is in conflict with sanitized state controlled media.

    Yes, because a bunch of math nerds sitting around on a couch every Friday night arguing about Star Trek is EXACTLY what every frat house in America is also doing on Friday night...

    If THAT is "pure unadulterated American freedom", then WE should be looking to censor our own shit out of embarassment.

  26. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    IIRC they did an episode where Chinese researchers apparently faked scientific results synthesizing a super heavy element. In episode before that said Chinese researchers claimed that this discovery was the greatest thing besides of the communist party, and one of the main characters of the show said that the communist party made them say that.

    Perhaps this was enough to cross the line.

  27. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

    The Big Bang Theory is hugely popular among young people in China. It's one of the most famous American TV shows there, and it is (was) very widely circulated. There are many jokes they don't really "get," but they still really like it.

    --
    Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  28. Outsourcing by LMariachi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully we can get China to censor Big Bang Theory here in the U.S. too.

    1. Re:Outsourcing by mark-t · · Score: 3

      One is compelled to wonder what the aversion to the show is that I see so prevalently on slashdot. Rr is the antipathy based on a sentiment that seems generally opposed to anything that might be categorized as pop culture... a notion that in my observation seems most prevalent among nerds in the under-30 crowd.

      For myself, I like the show... my wife introduced me to it in what I would discover was season 3, and she now routinely mentions to me that my "Sheldon is showing" whenever I start acting like a dick without really meaning to.

    2. Re:Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly it's because it's not funny

    3. Re:Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's insulting.

    4. Re:Outsourcing by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      Nothing Is Any Good If Other People Like It.

    5. Re:Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A big source of my aversion is that they are actors pretending to be geeks. Replace 'geek' with anything else (Women? Chinese?), and it's pretty easy to see how that's unacceptable.

      If it was about real geeks making light of their own idiosyncrasies, it would be much more entertaining and informative. As it is, it's 'cool' people dressing up as geeks and humiliating geeks using the same tropes bullies have been using for years.

    6. Re:Outsourcing by mark-t · · Score: 1

      A big source of my aversion is that they are actors pretending to be geeks

      You know what? I think that's the first objection to the show that I've seen which makes sense. And it's true... Parsons, Galecki, Helberg... Nayyar... none of them are particular geeky or nerdy. Ironically, of the original cast, Cuocco is probably the nerdiest of the bunch, and I wouldn't rank her as being that nerdy except in relation to those other four. Of the current cast, however, Mayim Bialik probably gives the show the most geek cred... an actress who actually has a real-life doctorate in the same field as her character.

      And to be fair... the writers of the show certainly do their homework from a scientific point of view. Whenever they are talking about stuff that wouldn't make sense to most of the general populace, the stuff they are talking about isn't just technobabble. It's actual stuff relevant to real-world science. The scripts are written with the help of people with degrees in the appropriate fields, and in particular, the assorted formulae that you see on whiteboards or the like in the background of some shots are all completely genuine, and make sense to somebody who was literate in the appropriate fields.

    7. Re:Outsourcing by tsqr · · Score: 1

      A big source of my aversion is that they are actors pretending to be geeks.

      OMFG! A television show wherein actors pretend to be something they aren't in real life? How did we come to this deplorable state?

    8. Re:Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One is compelled to wonder what the aversion to the show is that I see so prevalently on slashdot. Rr is the antipathy based on a sentiment that seems generally opposed to anything that might be categorized as pop culture..."

      My problem with it is that its so wildly inaccurate. The "geeks" portrayed arent geeks, theyre fucking dweebs.

      Geeks are far more like in Revenge of the Nerds - crazy, fuck-it-attitude, pot smoking, iconoclast, nothing-is-sacred people who dont conform to social bullshit because theyre smart enough to know its meaningless.

      The characters on BBT are fucking dweebs - rule-followers, non-questioners, wnat-to-fit-inners - morons who still crave acceptance at some level by the clueless retards who have made fun of them all their lives.

    9. Re:Outsourcing by mark-t · · Score: 1

      So if I understand you correctly, a dweeb is just a geek who has actually matured since high school. Got it.

    10. Re:Outsourcing by werepants · · Score: 1

      For myself, the real turn-off has been that this show has become the defining cultural reference for nerd-dom. That is, when I talk about something nerdy, mention that my background is in physics, or do some socially inept thing that reveals my nerd-hood, there's a very good chance that someone will bring up tBBT, either comparing me to Sheldon, or comparing the thing I'm talking about to an episode of the show.

      Really, I don't think there's anything wrong with the show - it is just annoying how much it defines nerd culture in the minds of the public. I imagine doctors feel the same way about medical dramas, and most people who have identities that correspond superficially with television characters are probably familiar with it. It's like talking about Will and Grace whenever you talk to a gay person, or The Cosby Show whenever you talk to a black person. It is annoying when people base their opinion of you on a fictional comedic character. (Especially when the assumption is that you personally love the show because it contains people "just like you")

  29. the internet no longer routes around it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe in the past, but the more we centralize everything, the more censorship-tolerant (and surveillance-tolerant) the internet becomes.

    It needs to move to p2p, strongly encrypted communication. If it doesn't, it will die under the force of organizations that don't want freedom of communication.

    1. Re:the internet no longer routes around it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mesh networking for everyone!

  30. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dude, TBBT is a shit show. You need to protect your young ones from the lame lines that come out of these puppets. Just like Friends.

  31. laugh tracks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they censored it for the terrible laugh track.

  32. censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's censored in China. What makes it news here? What and whose propaganda machine is rolling this out?

  33. The BBT - Good start, not enough stamina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Big Bang Theory started off well, but has been progressively dumbed down for US audiences, a fate that befalls most science-related fiction. Thank goodness for the Canadians, who have a more complex sense of humour and can tolerate something other than sickly-sweet, mediocre-ness.

    1. Re:The BBT - Good start, not enough stamina by Tontoman · · Score: 1

      It's maybe becoming more like the TV show "Friends" with everybody in a relationship. It is remarkable the writers can come up with an interesting new script every week considering the show is in its Seventh season.

    2. Re:The BBT - Good start, not enough stamina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean like "Lost Girl" - a chunky succubus and everyone is flaming gay or otherwise ultra-PC?

    3. Re:The BBT - Good start, not enough stamina by tragedy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's maybe becoming more like the TV show "Friends" with everybody in a relationship

      That kind of tends to be the pattern in real life as well.

    4. Re:The BBT - Good start, not enough stamina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If real life were entertaining we wouldn't watch TV shows :-)

      Not to dig on Big Bang Theory. I actually like the show, just saying.
      I actually like that they're in relationships now. Most of the plot points in the first few seasons were around the fact that they were geeks and couldn't get girls.
      I'm happy they moved beyond that, as it was getting old, and exploring their fractured relationships is also fun.

  34. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    I think it was more likely to be the idea that a bunch of technical workers is depicted as affording to live outside of a company dorm.

  35. Re:Sounds more like protecting... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    So THAT's why nobody watches MSNBC. I was wondering about that.

  36. If only Australia would follow suit by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    I wish Australia would ban these shows too, then maybe the free-to-air stations might have to get off their lazy arses and make some decent home-grown shows instead. It's no wonder the commercial channels are dying out here - lazy content, too many adverts far too often, horrible cheap-and-nasty titling graphics, constant pop-ups. It's unwatchable. They don't get it, and the sooner they die the better. Or they could, you know, improve.

    1. Re:If only Australia would follow suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd just make more reality shows, which is what they currently fill their mandatory 'Australian made content' with.

    2. Re:If only Australia would follow suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd just make more reality shows, which is what they currently fill their mandatory 'Australian made content' with.

      I am so sick to death of having to watch amateur cooking, singing, dancing, "talent" show, renovation, real estate and pseudo-survival garbage just to spend some time with the wife. We have a medium that makes it possible to bring the best in the world to our doorstep and what do most people want? A show with a lot of people bitching at each other while they do something badly. Between that and children's programming my under 6 kids watch I had taken to reading a book or listening to science podcasts while this trash is on the TV but then you're not spending time with the other person.

    3. Re:If only Australia would follow suit by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 2

      We have a medium that makes it possible to bring the best in the world to our doorstep

      Yeah, it's called the Internet.

  37. Baaa.... by zawarski · · Score: 0

    ...zinga!!!!!

    1. Re:Baaa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheldon:
        They called it (Sheldon's discovery) the greatest thing since the Communist party.
      Although I'm pretty sure the Communist party made them say that.
      I like China.
      See they know how to keep people in line.

  38. Still available.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note that banned does not mean it's hard to find. It just means the government won't let companies make large profits off of it. You can easily walk down the street and find all kinds of banned items for sale in China from books to video games. They just won't be in Wal-mart anymore. People will just load up Baidu and search for it. The quality won't be as good as Qiyi, Sohu TV, or what not... but people will still easily watch it.

  39. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    A satire based on nerd and intellectual culture shows pure unadulterated American freedom?

    You are free to imagine this, but beyond that your freedom is largely imaginary.

  40. Re: One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hang on a moment, what streaming service with bbt is legally accessible in china?
    I still have to get these on the BitTorrent channel.

  41. Is it really censorship? by sshir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suspect it's more like a form of protectionism. They can't slap some serious tariffs due to WTO or whatever. So in order to protect fledgling local production they do a form of bang-bang control: now you can watch that and now you can't.

    1. Re:Is it really censorship? by guru42101 · · Score: 1

      I'd agree that it is protectionism, but more from brain drain. It shows eccentric scientists living happily and somewhat successfully in the US. One of the main characters is of Indian descent and there are often several other Asian scientists shown in the university lunchroom.

  42. In fairness to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...they were only trying to cut out the parts that weren't funny.

  43. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by larryjoe · · Score: 2

    "... when "China Qin Shi Huang" gave his name to his country ..."

    Someone should have suggested to the emperor that he could actually name the whole country after himself. I imagine he would have been very pleased. Of course, he would have had to come up with a name that wasn't based on Indo-European languages. Maybe a cursory look at Wikipedia on the etymology of China is in order.

  44. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    When it comes to language disparities, I think India at least equals China with its hundreds of languages and cultures. And manages to be relatively democratic, if highly flawed and still prone to some censorship.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  45. I think it is three things by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One is that they do a pretty good job portraying various kinds of geeks. Since it is a comedy it makes light of unflattering and silly characteristics that those geeks have. Well, many people can't laugh at themselves. Real life Sheldon Coopers can't laugh at themselves any more than the character can, and thus the character would be something they don't like.

    Another is jealousy. The characters on the show have generally had a good deal of success in love, despite being geeky, with very pretty women. This is something that many of the real life geeks on Slashdot do not share. Hence, there is jealousy of the characters.

    Finally there is the hipster-ish anti-pop culture thing. That somehow, if something is popular, it can't be good. For many geek, part of the identity is being an outcast, being different, and liking different things. So liking something mainstream won't do at all for them, not because they don't actually like it but because it would conflict with their self identity.

    Personally, I think it is hilarious. Not quite as good as the IT Crowd, but I enjoy it and it makes me laugh regularly. Being that it is a comedy, that is all I can ask :).

    1. Re:I think it is three things by mamer-retrogamer · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. I was about to post something very similar.

      --
      Schrödinger's cat is not amused—maybe.
    2. Re:I think it is three things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about those things, but for me it is the unholy laugh track.

    3. Re:I think it is three things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have watched a fair amount of The Big Bang Theory, but something I read put most clearly into words what bothered me about it: The Big Bang Theory's jokes are very often about humiliating its characters for being geeks/nerds. On the other hand, see Community, which, while it also makes fun of its characters, it lets them have geeky interests without making fun of them for it. The other not-funny-ness in The Big Theory is pretty much normal for sitcoms (e.g. the laugh track other comments are complaining about).

    4. Re:I think it is three things by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the reason I don't like BBT is that especially in the last few seasons, it's basically gotten mean. Penny calls the geeks losers, the geeks call Penny a loser, no one actually achieves anything, the geeky side of things is mostly there to get laughs on the basis of "look how anti-social and inept they are".

      So in short, it's not really geeky anymore, the humor is basically about insulting everyone right and left, and the people are basically flat stereotypes.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    5. Re:I think it is three things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The characters on the show have generally had a good deal of success in love, despite being geeky, with very pretty women.

      This one really annoys me (or it would if I liked the show), but not as much as medieval movies where everyone looks great and has perfect teeth. I think one of the movies I've seen that was more realistic in this respect was Les Visiteurs. There's something really wrong when a time-travelling knight is more believable than most knights.

    6. Re:I think it is three things by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely.
      The poke in the eye is that when you hear about the show your first thought might be that finally, here's a show on TV that's actually taking note of who you are. Finally something on TV not dumbed down? Could this be like discovering 2am Open University programmes?? Another Monty Python?!

        Then you watch it... and as the bad laugh track comes in your heart sinks as you realise it's just another bad sitcom.

        It's the most popular show at work other than Game of Thrones. Sheldon is alright, but seems like a one man show.

      I guess this is the fault of TV in general; lack of specialisation. Other groups , such as old people have the same problem; nothing on TV for them to watch.

    7. Re:I think it is three things by mark-t · · Score: 1

      One is that they do a pretty good job portraying various kinds of geeks. Since it is a comedy it makes light of unflattering and silly characteristics that those geeks have.

      I have more than enough in common in my real with the character of Sheldon to be regularly compared to him in real life.... not only by my wife, but by other people who know me and also watch the show. At my last job, I had been there for only four days before somebody asked me if I watched BBT, saying that I reminded him a lot of Sheldon Cooper (except not quite as dickheaded). In all honesty, I probably would not have liked the character or the show when I was a lot younger, but I think I've mellowed out as I've gotten older and have learned to be able to find the humor in the things that I do that other people might find a bit... strange.

      Another is jealousy. The characters on the show have generally had a good deal of success in love, despite being geeky, with very pretty women. This is something that many of the real life geeks on Slashdot do not share. Hence, there is jealousy of the characters.

      If so, I think that may be a self-esteem and maturity issue... a sense that may be prevalent only among people who have not yet learned to accept themselves for who they are, and spend much of their lives thinking that there might be something wrong with them, rather than just embracing the kind of person they really are and making the most of that. Speaking from personal experience, that's exactly when love comes running right at you.... when you aren't in the least worrying about it, and are actually happy with who you are.

      Finally there is the hipster-ish anti-pop culture thing.

      That's seriously a lot of what I suspected it may be, actually. I'm not sure if there's a proper term for the phenomenon, but I do know quite a few people who are like that.

    8. Re:I think it is three things by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      I watched a single episode of The Big Bang Theory. It was about a "Magic the Gathering"-esque contest between Will Wheaton (as himself) and Horrible Geek Guy (Sheldon?). It was obvious that none of the writers on the show had the faintest idea about how Collectible Card Games worked, just knew they were something competitive that gross nerds did. Seriously, the portrayal of a CCG was embarrassingly bad, kind of like that CSI Miami episode about Grand Theft Auto. (I'll admit, it didn't posit any theories that CCGs would cause you to go on a killing spree, but if you have to be a person like that Bazinga guy, why wouldn't you?)

      Anyway, Horrible Geek Guy gets his comeuppance for liking Star Trek and Collectible Card Games, so I guess justice was finally well-served to all those awful nerds out there.

      Who's up for a game of racket-ball or golf?

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    9. Re:I think it is three things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Big Bang Theory doesn't use a laugh track. They have a live audience.

  46. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by macpacheco · · Score: 0

    Perhaps China could become a democracy and stay a single country. I hope it could.
    But for as long as it's a dictatorship, I have less than zero respect for that country. Same for Cuba, North Korea, Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and many other de facto dictatorships like Russia,Venezuela,Equador. Oh the curse of having lots of Oil.

  47. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple.

    The show shows It's fun being an American. Maybe China doesn't like that?

  48. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    and poontang is everywhere

  49. Big Bang Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I keep thinking that Big Bang Theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the early development of the universe. The key idea is that the universe is expanding. The Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.82 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe.

    But in reality, the Big Bang Theory is an American sitcom created by Chuck Lorre and Bill Prady, both of whom serve as executive producers on the show along with Steven Molaro.

  50. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except Slashdot.

  51. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not Chinese. If you haven't studied it, it's hard to explain.

  52. tBBT= NeoMarxist/Social Justice/Hipster Propaganda by Suiggy · · Score: 1

    If you disagree, it's too late for you.

  53. Good by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 0

    Big Bang Theory is terrible, and the rest are awful at best. Good Guy Chinese Government is saving their people from shitty shows.

  54. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "paved", roads are paved.

  55. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by camg188 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the show feature an unmarried couple living together?
    Some censors don't like stuff like that.

  56. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

    Good luck with that, Vlad.

    Compare China's GDP to Russia's sometime. I don't think Vlad will be annexing any chunks of China any time soon. China's army is just a teensy bit bigger than Ukraine's.

  57. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Qin Shi Huang is an alias used in history texts. His name is Ying Zhen, where Ying is the family name. Qin was the name of a state before it became a dynasty, and that name was derived from the name of the land on which the state was founded, a long time before Qin Shi Huang.

  58. dear cbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bash india more and we will reconsider.

    -china

  59. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite right. After all, who's want to live in a country controlled by a small group of elites.

  60. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If such a thing happens, then the CIA would start funding separatist movements, political parties, Chinese "springs" and demonstrations, antinuclear NGOs (to make the country dependent on foreign oil and so a slave of American/Arab companies)...

  61. I could see NCIS, not sure about the others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NCIS actually suggests China is in bed with Terrorists at some points. Nothing too explicit, basically "Ooh didya know the Chinese are making all the oil money off the deaths of our American brothers fighting for Iraqi freedom?"

    I'm not sure what else, but I'm sure there's accusations of chinese espionage or sabotauge in episodes as well. I haven't seen too much of it, I only watch it for the silly looking goth lab scientist.

  62. Vulgarity rather than political by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

    tBBT is quite rude in places. A repeated episode I saw last week had Penny suggesting that she was picked up by a guy in a bar, who then picked up another girl and they went off to have a threesome. Or Sheldon worrying Leonard about Penny being hypnotised by a male friend to 'make her think she's a chicken pecking seed' (moving his head back and forward). If you listen carefully, there are a lot of pretty close-to-the-knuckle lines like this.

    I have no problems with this, but am surprised it's so regularly repeated in the daytime here in the UK. Maybe it's because they don't swear? Perhaps that says a lot about the real concerns of censors.

  63. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This road, however, is also plagued.

  64. Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Copyright is a legal right to monopoly on the distribution of certain media (intellectual property). If they choose to advertise but not release then they are within their legal rights, and those that infringe copyright are disrespecting these rights.

    Don't get me wrong, I believe that copyright law itself is unethical, but under no circumstances does your scenario "force" people to infringe copyright. If you don't like the effective censorship, then resist copyright in it's totality rather than being a hypocrite.

  65. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by quenda · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the show feature an unmarried couple living together?

    Who? Not since Howard left Raj to move in with his wife.

  66. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by scarboni888 · · Score: 0

    Only real roads are paved. Metaphorical roads, such as the road to first post, can't support pavement therefore they are instead 'plagued'.

    Thank you come again.

  67. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they are basically like the Taliban and the French and the..[insert radicals of many nations, with the Eddie Murphy voice].

    While the Chinese are Communists, they are not the hyper-political communists of the Soviet Union

    The relatively practical Soviets were annoyed by the political zeal of the East Germany. That tells you something about the state and the role of the Chinese communism.

  68. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're preventing a massive loss in Chinese productivity from people trying to figure out how an out-of-work actress (subbing as a waitress) seems to live in an apartment that's the same size as the one that two reasonably accomplished university scientists share, even though apparently "lesser" fellows live in apartments on their own.

    On the one hand, maybe waitresses earn a lot of money in America? She can afford a big apartment no problem. Or maybe scientists don't earn very much? After all the building can't be all that great because the lift never works. Or maybe she's being bank-rolled by some family member? Or perhaps the government pays some sort of welfare to potential actresses? Or maybe the scientists spend all their money on their geek toys and so don't have much left for rent, so aren't very good at mathematics and home-finances?

  69. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

    tBBT shows enough pure unadulterated American freedom that is in conflict with sanitized state controlled media.

    Yes, because a bunch of math nerds sitting around on a couch every Friday night arguing about Star Trek is EXACTLY what every frat house in America is also doing on Friday night...

    If THAT is "pure unadulterated American freedom", then WE should be looking to censor our own shit out of embarassment.

    depends on what fraternity you're in

    --
    Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  70. Full backup, reinitialize, reinstall by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    Just that episode explains why I love Big Bang Theory, it is so much fun to laugh at yourself! Maybe I'm just not geeky enough to get offended?

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  71. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by guru42101 · · Score: 1

    Or maybe she's failing at paying her bills and often has her boyfriends loan her the money to pay them? (The actual reason given in the show).

  72. Re: One of these things is not like the others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the Chinese ones.

  73. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by sadboyzz · · Score: 1

    Not really. In fact, The State Media (CCTV) itself is in the process of translating The Big Bang Theory and releasing it in mainland China , and that is probably the real reason for this ban. IOW this isn't about censorship at all, this is simply using the censorship tool to protect the (incompetant) state media from competition by the more competant private media streaming companies.

  74. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by ChaseTec · · Score: 1

    Considering China's on/off relationship with North Korea I wonder if this is a response to the episode about Leonard dating the North Korean spy - http://bigbangtheory.wikia.com...

    --
    My Hello World is 512 bytes. But it's also a valid Fat12 boot sector, Fat12 file reader, and Pmode routine.
  75. censor CSI by hagnat · · Score: 1

    dear lord, i would love that every CSI-like show to be censored in any country
    perhaps this way we would get rid of those clients from hell who think that any image can be zoomed and enhanced to HD level

    --
    "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
  76. Well, I for one will NOT stand for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bazinga. Of course I am.

    Also, Coitus.

  77. Re:One of these things is not like the others... by macpacheco · · Score: 1

    I live in Brazil. Brazil is a democracy, since we can vote, and we can criticize anybody without fear of being arrested or singled out by the govt.
    Perhaps you should understand the basic pillars of a true democracy:
      1 - Freedom of the press
      2 - Freedom of peaceful assembly
      3 - Freedom of expression
      4 - Right to private property
      5 - Right to a fair trial
    Many countries are controlled by a fairly small political elite, but are subject to the 5 above rules, even though the political elite doesn't quite do what the people want. It's still a democracy. Questionably even Brazil, USA, and some european countries are in that category.

    But in the countries I singled out, all of those liberties are only real as long as you don't offend the political powers. Criticize the Chinese or Russian govt to hashly and you will be arrested, subject to a rigged trial and thrown in filthy prisons to rot away.

    It's very useful to study the thinkings and sayings of the French and American revolutions. If you haven't studied both you can't call yourself a properly educated man. My Brazil teaches the French revolution but ignores the wealth of knowledge from the American one. Too capitalist for the taste of the ones in control of our education system.

  78. China should like NCIS by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    I dunno why China would want to censor NCIS. It depicts an armed federal agency violating the law and the Constitution with astonishing regularity and effectively with impunity (the Season 10 cliffhanger ending notwithstanding). From illegal wiretaps to illegal tracking to outright extrajudicial killings, it makes a mockery of law and order in the US. The Chinese government should be delighted.