Slashdot Mirror


Researchers See a Post-Snowden Chilling Effect In Our Search Data

Daniel_Stuckey (2647775) writes "How risky is it to use the words "bomb," "plague," or "gun" online? That was a question we posed, tongue in cheek, with a web toy we built last year called Hello NSA. It offers users suggested tweets that use words that drawn from a list of watchwords that analysts at the Dept. of Homeland Security are instructed to search for on social media. "Stop holding my love hostage," one of the tweets read. "My emotions are like a tornado of fundamentalist wildfire." It was silly, but it was also imagined as an absurdist response to the absurdist ways that dragnet surveillance of the public and non-public Internet jars with our ideas of freedom of speech and privacy. And yet, after reading the mounting pile of NSA PowerPoints, are all of us as comfortable as we used to be Googling for a word like "anthrax," even if we were simply looking up our favorite thrash metal band? Maybe not. According to a new study of Google search trends, searches for terms deemed to be sensitive to government or privacy concerns have dropped "significantly" in the months since Edward Snowden's revelations in July."

81 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. And if you think this isn't intentional... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...then raise your dominant hand and slap yourself silly with it. Internalized chains are the hardest to break, and what the ruling class can't do any longer with religion they now do with plain old fear.

  2. Call a spade a space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's almost as if the government's conduct can be discerned as a violation of our most basic human rights as guaranteed by the contract that allows said government to exist.

    1. Re:Call a spade a space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Show the incumbent protection machine (98% incumbent reelection rate) how much you despise them. Vote independent, and if that isn't a choice, vote for the challenger, regardless of party.

    2. Re:Call a spade a space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is hilarious.

      What makes you think the opposition to the incumbent shares any different views? Say it's democrat and republican. They share identical views! There is almost no nuances or differences whatsoever. Both sides vote against citizens when money is involved.

    3. Re:Call a spade a space by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      The point in the first go-round is less to get someone in with the proper views and more about sending a message to the current crop of politicians that they are not secure in their seats. With the re-election rate of Congressional seats, it is more important in the beginning to do this than to worry about getting the perfect person in. No matter who you vote in, it will end up badly for you if they never have to fear being voted back out.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  3. Re:for all of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    select *
    from collected_data
    where HasWarrant = true

  4. Is Slashdot useful for discussing this? by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

    What happens in the forums during discussions like this? Basic moderation as I understand it doesn't explain it.

    --
    Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    1. Re:Is Slashdot useful for discussing this? by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, there seems to be an inordinate amount of off-topic or intentionally offensive comments. This problem seems to be getting worse.

      Only on new threads. Give it a little time and they are down to -1 and benieth your threshold.

    2. Re:Is Slashdot useful for discussing this? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the page wideners. For some reason, those always cracked me up. Don't know why.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    3. Re:Is Slashdot useful for discussing this? by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      So, that's a "No, and it never has been useful," then? I must be new at something.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
  5. NSA incoming by Andrio · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's not blow this out of proportion. Sure, it would be the bomb if the NSA stopped spying on everyone, as all this spying is a plague on our freedoms. But let's not burn any bridges here.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:NSA incoming by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Would it kill the President to take a stand here?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    2. Re:NSA incoming by ultranova · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would it kill the President to take a stand here?

      Given what we now know about corruption and lawlessness in the US three-letter agencies, I'd have to say that it just might.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:NSA incoming by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Back in the 90s it wasn't uncommon that my IRC client said something like nuke USA kill the president terrorist bomb .. so on so on.

      I still wonder whatever that have affected my possibility of getting into the US =P

      Back then of course there was talk about Echelon. Did it really exist? If so it was fun to type stuff like that.

      I guess now we know it existed =P

      Since I have nothing to hide I may just as well say it even though they are listening?! Or how do the saying go? =P

  6. Emacs by laejoh · · Score: 1

    Why use http://nsa.motherboard.tv/ if you have m-x spook?

  7. Or... OR by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if Google is just conveniently forgetting to log more of those terms so that they don't have to do as much work snooping on people? I mean, if you don't have as many terrorist suspects showing up on your search engine you surely wont have as many illegal search warrants to process.

  8. Self censoring by Evtim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Brilliant! The desired effect is achieved!

    Remind me again, wasn't the Internet hailed as a game-changer that would bring people together, make us better human beings, or at least different.

    Where is this profound change? It did not happen. Perhaps the optimists have underestimated people's distrust for the different? So, even though James and Ivan could chat while being 10000 miles away, and learn how for instance the media that feeds them is biased diametrically opposite, most of the time they didn't.

    But just to make sure, you know just in case the impossible happened, all governments in the world made sure we won't talk with each other. Let me not recount the endless torrent of censorship all over the place across the whole world - this is /. after all. But in line with the topic, let me just remark - if I want to speak with someone from, say, an Arab country, to discuss the situation and gain the others side view - how many words we would use in the discussion that would be in those lists? Tens at least, I am sure. Now I have to be afraid of being flagged, and it is not paranoia - do you want to bet your ass in Gitmo that Buttle/Tuttle thing won't happen? @#$% that!

    1. Re:Self censoring by flyingfsck · · Score: 2

      Well, be careful what you think. You may be guilty of a thought crime.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:Self censoring by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      At least it is easy to find out if you are flagged. Just try and take a flight. (Assuming they do not misspell your name.)

    3. Re:Self censoring by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Where is this profound change? It did not happen.

      It did not happen because the software and distributed infrastruture needed to support it was never written or developed. The blame for this can be placed solidly at the feet of the global hacking community, which hasn't created a truely disruptive technology since Bittorrent back in 2001 (IMHO, the jury is still out on Bitcoin (2009) ).

      The reasons for this are largely socio-economic. The rise of Google and Co. has meant that "disruptive" software is now principally developed in corporate campuses, with most "hacking" talent now draw to the stable and lucrative paycheck offered by compaanies interested in neat toys, but not unfortunately in the kind of software the world needs to keep the NSA out of people's lives. Another big trend has been the mass migration of programmers towards writing "Apps" for walled garden devices. It would also be unwise to omit the drain of programmers to HFT firms and computer aided finance in general over the last decade or so.

      There is no modern Bram Cohen (or Satoshi Nakamoto) working on a mass privacy program. They're all writing iPhone games or working for Google, Facebook, the NSA, and the Banks. And without that individual, or small team, actively dedicated to creating a distributed, anonymous, and secure communication system, users will increasingly turn away from the panopticon that the internet has now become.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    4. Re:Self censoring by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Where is this profound change? It did not happen.

      Clearly you haven't been on Tinder.

    5. Re:Self censoring by s.petry · · Score: 1

      This is not a problem due to the Internet, it's due to people being ignorant. I'll argue that the dumbing down of people is by design, but that's not even relevant. People don't have a clue about human nature, politics, or how a Republic is supposed to work. How many high school kids have read Plato's "The Republic"? That is the blueprint for our type of Government, including all of the moral lessons required to get there. How many have read and understand the Constitution and Federalist papers? The Republic is 2,500 years old and a marvel, yet most college graduates never read a page.

      Instead of people "teaching" today, we have people cramming kids with test answers. Hell, a good number of people here tend to believe that education comes from a Google search, not knowledge. It's staggering!

      If the Internet was used for knowledge and eduction the world would surely be a better place. Facebook and Twitter are neither, but that's what gets hyped all over the place.

      Knowledge is power, and the people holding the most power know this. Too bad the average person continues to get duped time and time again.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  9. Do Not Search "Anthrax" by CycleFreak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because if someone thought you liked the band, that would be horrible.

    Oh the embarrassment! On your permanent record, no less.

    1. Re:Do Not Search "Anthrax" by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      "You confessed that you tried to make biological weapons despite just being a fan of some trash metal band?"
      "Y... yeah...."
      "WHY?"
      "I ... I was afraid my friends could find out ... the shame, ya know...."

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Do Not Search "Anthrax" by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Proud to let it be known I still think they're great! Saw them last year and... they still sound fantastic. Many bands sound ages, but there's something about this band that's raised them above many of their contemporaries.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    3. Re:Do Not Search "Anthrax" by Pherdnut · · Score: 1

      Ashamed of "I'm the man?" Why do you hate freedom?

  10. Constitutional by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 1

    I've stopped searching on the word Constitutional.

    1. Re:Constitutional by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, so has Congress.

    2. Re:Constitutional by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's because they can't spell it.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  11. Re:for all of this... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Just make sure that just before that statement you issue the update that sets HasWarrant true on all records.

    Due process is really important, but it may never stand in the way of absolute surveil... security!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Re:Or... OR by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    google (et all) are the government's bitch.

    they will do as they're told.

    or else.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  13. Thoughtcrime On A Stick by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    searches for terms deemed to be sensitive to government or privacy concerns have dropped "significantly" in the months since Edward Snowden's revelations in July.

    It is hard for me to find this shift to be acceptable. The government's oppressive surveillance must not lead to people changing the information they consume. That is the very epitome of cultural programming, the cost of which is far to great for our society to suffer.

    I think we have a solution; decentralized distribution of the very kinds of information that is being chilled. Copies of Wikipedia, Eroid.org, The Anarchists Cookbook (OK, I'm dating myself, and showing my ignorance of modern anarchist material online, but whatever the modern equivalent of that book is), and similar materials, written to 16 Gig USB sticks, and available for purchase at your local hackerspace for $20. Pop it into your computer, and read whatever you want without the goverment spying on you. Maybe even make it a bootable distro, with networking disabled, so you can be truly locked down (except for airgap-jumping attacks, of course, but those are still pretty esoteric). Maybe call it "Thoughtcrime On A Stick". Hmm, actually, I like that name so much I'm grabbing the domain names.

    Don't get me wrong, I don't relish the idea of making that sort of information more readily available; what peaceful minded person would? But if the alternative is chilling human knowledge, and the empirical evidence shows that it is already happening, what choice do I have?

    1. Re:Thoughtcrime On A Stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe even make it a bootable distro

      The problem here would be trust - way too easy to make a complete spy-ware distro and tell people that it is your "truly locked down" one instead.
      The solution isn't going backward in technology (sneaker instead of fiber), the solution is restoring privacy and anonymity with better technology.

    2. Re:Thoughtcrime On A Stick by PaddyM · · Score: 1

      What we need are nickel pages in a book. For some reason Thomas Edison thought he could store 1000s of books in the same space as a paper book, although his invention never came to be, and so I don't really know what he was talking about.

    3. Re:Thoughtcrime On A Stick by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      First of all, the cost of distributing information is fixed at the cost of distributing information. Those $20 DVDs? Bullshit, those cost $1 at most.

      Secondly, have you examined your racism? You are opposing the President of the United States, who is just as peaceful minded as you. If you're opposed to him, you are quite likely a racist. You need to stop doing that. You're wrong.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Thoughtcrime On A Stick by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

      The problem is that every one of those SUB sticks comes pre-loaded(for your convenience...) with all manner of NSA spyware.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    5. Re:Thoughtcrime On A Stick by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      Those $20 DVDs? Bullshit, those cost $1 at most.

      Oh, yeah, for sure (though I'm thinking memory sticks, not DVDs, since optical drives are going the way of the dinosaur). But I'm also helping launch a hackerspace, and I figure if you let the hackerspaces generate a little funding, at a price that people would be happy to pay, everyone wins.

      I also assume most would also let you bring your own stick and write a copy on demand. Just the idea of having a wicker basket full of sticks ready to subvert the masses appeals to me. :)

    6. Re:Thoughtcrime On A Stick by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that every one of those SUB sticks comes pre-loaded(for your convenience...) with all manner of NSA spyware.

      I don't know about your local hackerspaces, but the ones I go to all have at least a few people who are pretty hardcore about infosec. If one of those guys says he did is best to make it clean, I would trust both his integrity and ability.

      But, the truth is your point still has a great deal of merit. Potentially you could also sell a Raspberry Pi box for the true tinfoil hat afficionado. Even if it can record what you're looking at, that wouldn't help if it never gets connected to a network.

  14. Re:Other Banned Words? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    That dirty girl is the bomb!

    Oh, crap! That was supposed to be AC!

  15. Re:Back in the pre-internet days by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Pre-Gore days yes, NSA was discussed much

    I remember talk of the 8 key words that would have a message treated differently, it's certainly grown, just consider any message set over seas to be "treated differently" these days.

    Cain and abel ? it's a advanced password recovery tool
    http://www.snapfiles.com/get/c...

    4.3 Key Words & Search Terms
    Cain and abel Scammers

    Can't post the list (Filter error: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.)

  16. Re:for all of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't believe the tapping is. Police can't just tap everyone's phone, then play back the recordings once they get a warrant. Well, at least they *couldn't* before The Patriot Act. What a fucking euphemism for that one.

  17. Post Snowden? by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    Post Snowden? Can we stop blaming the one guy that did the right thing for uncovering the mountain of shit our government had piled up for itself? He didn't even release it all, a lot of the revelations have come from FOIA requests!

    It'd would be like calling "Post Woodward, Nixon was impeached" That Woodward jerk! How could he do such a thing!

    I'm fairly certain this "Post Snowden" line was written wholesale by the NSA. Way to perpetuate propaganda Slashdot.

    1. Re: Post Snowden? by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      Settle down, Beavis- the impression I get from this is post-snowden, aka after Snowden has revealed what pieces of shit are government actually are (confirmed might be more accurate for some) people are willing up to the fact that yes, they really are watching us and adjusting their search habits accordingly. I wouldn't say 'blame' as much as 'give proper credit to'.

    2. Re:Post Snowden? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A lot of people have been very heroic whistelblowers over many years and have faced a lot of court time.
      http://cryptome.org/2013-info/...
      Re 'He didn't even release it all" - all the material is now in the hands of the press.
      Some of the local press will remove all text ourside their local telcos ie for their own countries consumption. Other members of the press relase more per slide/documnet.
      re 'wholesale by the NSA" - that limited hangout is always a risk with material like this.
      Countries may be expected to make drastic hardware and software, staff changes brining in new junk equipment to replace older somewhat secure bespoke systems.
      As for the "mountain" of data - the NSA faces the same issues 1980's Eastern Europe did with a flood of data from diverse informants and connections within their own databases.
      You then need hundereds of thousands of new cleared staff to sort millions of new data points per hop of a nations population.
      The good news is people/the wider press now know about the brands, the brands tame legal teams, the brands tech 'experts' and the generations of junk encryption they sold/gave away.
      The good news is people/the wider press now know about the local telco hardware offering generations of support for 5++ other nations intelligence needs.
      The good news is people/the wider press now know about bulk junk encryption been offerend as tested internation 'standards' over deacdes.
      The good news is people/the wider press now know closed source encryption can be weak/junk.
      The good news is people/the wider press now know open source encryption can be weak/junk.
      A lot of the press, mathematics, programmers, cryptographers, telcos, lawyers and users to ponder.
      How could so much crypto that is used by so many be so useless with so many smart teams working so hard? A lot of trap doors per generation of brand and product passed a lot of gov/telco//brand/open source testing.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. Re:Why use google? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Yeah just send it to some other company over the Internet using a certificate from an approved CA.

    Please, citizen, go ahead. Why do you hesitate?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  19. I took a different approach by Capslock118 · · Score: 2

    I for one have only increased my search phrases to include "fundamentalist terror victim shoves anthrax-laden biochemical warheads into buttocks to appeal to president obama porn"

  20. Little known secret by Sperbels · · Score: 3, Funny

    Guys, if you don't want the NSA scanning your websites, just set up a robots.txt. Duh.

  21. Fuck the government by AndyKron · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Fuck the government

  22. Re:Other Banned Words? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

    For lunch I had a nuked Chicago-style pizza.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  23. Forgot one by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Ovaltine

  24. Funk & Wagnalls Encyclopedia by lemur3 · · Score: 2

    This is why I keep my full 1992 set of Funk & Wagnalls encyclopedia handy. Just incase I need to look up Anthrax, or Bomb or Detonator.

    I can do it safely, without anyone knowing.

    Or, one could go to the public library and look at the stuff in the Reference section, one cannot even check those books out! ..Or, just go to the regular stacks and read the books on-site, bring tracing paper for the diagrams.. oh man, there is a whole world of information outside of the internet! and the NSA subpenas

  25. I wonder if I'm on the list by gman003 · · Score: 2

    I recently considered getting back into model rocketry, but using more high-end rockets rather than little Estes kits. Since I've read plenty about rocket chemistry (read "Ignition!" if you like chemistry at all - it's worth it), I quickly figured out that a relatively easy* one to build would be a hydrogen peroxide monoprop - H2O2 decomposes into H2O + O2 in an exothermic manner, which can be used for thrust. It an also be used as an oxidizer with most fuels. For both you'll need high-strength peroxide - the CVS stuff is just a solution of like 1% H2O2 in H2O, but you'll want 80% or higher for rocketry. I decided to see how readily available it was, and how expensive it would be. It wasn't too expensive, and could be found fairly easily, but I wonder if I'm now on a watch list just for looking at a chemical that honestly wouldn't make a good terrorist weapon at all.

    * This would be easy in comparison to, say, one using nitric acid or liquid oxygen. It would still be a very difficult thing to build, which is why I'm probably not going to actually build one.

    1. Re:I wonder if I'm on the list by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      We're ALL on the "list." The only difference is what degree of escalation your monitoring is at. And, we're mostly accepting that. I listened to some comments last week by Samuel Jackson rephrasing the old "hey if you're not a terrorist you have nothing to worry about" refrain.

      Very disheartening and depressing. People are just whistling past the liberty graveyard.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:I wonder if I'm on the list by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      You probably did end up on a list, as with most hobbies if you go beyond the most simplistic things you probably end up on a list. I'm sure I ended up on with with my automotive hobby since when you get into restoring vehicles you end up using lots of things that fall outside of what a normal person would use. For example look at the chemicals as well as equipment I have ordered over the years, because really what individual needs an oxy-acetylene cutting torch, numerous types of gasses for torches and welding, gallons of various industrial solvents, and various acids.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:I wonder if I'm on the list by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Before you try using H2O2 80% as propellant, read about how dangerous it was as the monopopellant "T-Stoff" in the ME163. Lots of explosions and dissolved pilots...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    4. Re:I wonder if I'm on the list by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm aware of the danger (as well as the German use of it - I actually got the idea from the V-2 missile, which used an H2O2 monoprop rocket in the fuel pump).

      It's still less dangerous than many alternatives (like nitric acid), particularly since I'd only be using a quarter-liter or so at most. And the marginally-safer oxidizers like LOX would be harder to handle.

      But I can't really say that the safety issues didn't play a part in deciding not to go through with it.

    5. Re:I wonder if I'm on the list by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      You probably went onto a list when you downloaded "Ignition!"

      OTOH, the list you're on is probably the one of "people who know something about chemistry and are pretty unlikely to do anything worse than blow up their garage with it".

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  26. Important Legally by Etherwalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, the results here are important legally. One important persuasive argument in free speech cases is the chilling effect on speech. Empirical data showing that people do *not* engage in certain speech because of a government practice is useful for lawyers arguing against the illegality of those practices.

    1. Re:Important Legally by Trachman · · Score: 1

      In the closed session, reduction of certain phrases will be presented as a "win" against the terrorsm because only real terrirsts would be searching for banned concepts, rights? Since there are less searches, there is less work for a three letter agencies. So .... it will be presented that the current status quo... works. Just like TSA theater .... works too.

      That is not the problem. Problems will start when people with one half of the brain will know that they are being monitored, but, at the same time, with other part of the brain will genuinely think that they are free.

  27. Re:for all of this... by ubergeek2009 · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I remember an article on slashdot before outlining the process of parallel construction and how it was used against U.S. residents/civilians. They may be mining the data for an investigation and then not using it in court which is illegal, and if it isn't it should be.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

  28. I'm uncomfortable discussing Windows 8 by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I don't want to be flagged just because the latest OS from MS is a total bomb!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  29. The true chilling effect. by geekmux · · Score: 2

    So, let me get this straight.

    The same search engine we are actively not using, out of fear that someone is watching what we're searching, is used to run a search to generate a report to reveal what we are not searching for.

    Uh, you know that chilling effect we're all talking about here? Yeah, that would be Mr. Don't-be-Evil over there...

  30. Antrhax is The Bomb! by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    and "Worship Music" is the best thing they've done since "Among The Living".

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  31. spook by junkgoof · · Score: 1

    Oddly spook e-mail configs (to add random terms to generate false positives to big brother) were popular 20 years ago when there was almost no traffic and no reason for surveillance. They don't appear to exist now that there is a huge volume of e-mail and known government surveillance.

    Rebellion is so much easier in the absence of repression.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  32. Re: This isn't new... by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I recall seeing many Usenet posts ending with "NSA Line Eater Food" followed by lists of naughty keywords back in 1986 when I started college. The only differences are that now we have confirmation of what we took for granted back then (and probably before), and the scope is beyond what even the tinfoil hat guys believed.

  33. Technology suite by mugurel · · Score: 1
    Just in case you're wondering why the work DHS analists seems so ineffective, from TFA (page 50):

    The current suite of equipment on the Traditional Media desk includes one Dell Optiplex GX620 workstation (232 GB HD/2MB RAM),...

    1. Re:Technology suite by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      Just in case you're wondering why the work DHS analists seems so ineffective, from TFA (page 50):

      I didn't realize that Homeland Security had employees just to do anal. Your tax dollars at work.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    2. Re:Technology suite by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      What did you think the enhanced airport screenings were for?

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:Technology suite by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      What did you think the enhanced airport screenings were for?

      A good point! (pun intended)

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  34. There's also a chilling effect on criticizing him. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    For what wrong he has caused, more than you think, a certain lese majeste effect has surrounded him. People will try to disappear criticism, something that they think would happen to their idol.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  35. Re:for all of this... by s.petry · · Score: 1

    They still can't do so legally, which is why they now use parallel construction to fabricate information.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  36. Same shit, different Troll by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Taking some action is better than your suggestion of doing nothing. The best action would be to petition for people you know and trust, and get them into offices. Barring that, vote for people other than established politicians and change will begin to happen.

    If you stop telling everyone they are wrong, and teach them to do _SOMETHING_ then things overall can improve. It's shitbags like you claiming that no action is the answer. How well has that worked out for people over the last 3 decades of shit ass politicians? Yeah, I thought so.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  37. Re:Stop, please, this is "someone's" job very diff by NotSanguine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...who are ruining our everything.

    Those who would take our freedoms are the ones who are "ruining our everything." Those engaged in asymmetric warfare (including terror techniques) are definitely a concern. However, we've compromised our ideals (liberty, freedom of expression, freedom from government intrusion into the practice of our belief systems, etc., etc., etc.) with the focus on that small group, by allowing the government to intrude on our lives, our persons and our ideas.

    You're still more likely to be killed by lightning than in violent attack against the general populace. You're many, many times more likely to die in or by an automobile than in such an attack. Strange that we're not allocating our resources to fit the probability of such occurrences.

    That leads me to believe that the agenda of those engaged in curtailing our liberty is not one of preventing such attacks, but something else. What is that something else? A good question. It's possible that there is a nefarious plot to destroy our way of life (which, if true, is succeeding). However, I think Hanlon's Razor should be applied here.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  38. Oldspeak is doublepluss ungood, unlike Newspeak. by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by eactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. . . . The process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for commiting thought-crime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won't be any need even for that. . . . Has it ever occcured to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?"

    - George Orwell, 1984

  39. Re: Dangerous Searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/01/new-york-police-terrorism-pressure-cooker

  40. How can anyone not laugh at this 'study'? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Oh, right, the tinfoil demographic that characterizes Slashdot won't laugh because it plays right to their biases. When that happens, Slashdot's usual capacity for at least a little more critical thinking than the average Joe goes right out the window and the Two Minute Hate commences.

    Seriously, the 'study' verges on being joke. The words used were determined to be "sensitive" based on whether or not a bunch of random people would be "embarrassed" or thought "it would get them in trouble" - about as unscientific as you can get. Further, the drop is miniscule, 2.2% below what would be "expected" (and thus presuming their expectations were correct rather than pulled from their ass). Lastly, since we have no idea who was performing the searches in the first place, there's no way to determine if the minor effect has been "chilling" - or "deterrent".

  41. Ever seen a fire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pretty much anything can melt steel if there is enough of the stuff burning and nowhere the heat can escape. In building fires the burn gases will catch fire at some point. They burn easily as hot as 1000 degrees celcius in a normal small house fire. Several offices worth of crap plus an airliner wreck burning will collapse a steel structured building with ease. Steel will weaken at 500 degrees celcius. Melt at around 1300. The molten crap firefighters saw could have been anything. It's not like they went to examine it in detail. Or even could tell the difference between steel, iron, or any other metal. It's all a HUGE mess after a fire. For example, my bicycles steel frame was barely recognizable.

    Any light during a fire that big would not have been paid any attention to. Visibility is generally really, really low. Smoke blocks everything. You are lucky to see a couple of feet into it, no matter how bright the things inside burn.

  42. Re:for all of this... by jafiwam · · Score: 2

    Agreed. I remember an article on slashdot before outlining the process of parallel construction and how it was used against U.S. residents/civilians. They may be mining the data for an investigation and then not using it in court which is illegal, and if it isn't it should be.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

    Where do you think "anonymous tips" come from?

    On another site, there was a thread about a guy ranting on his Facebook wall about militias and general right wing stuff. He included something along the lines "you should watch out, people are getting angry" (paraphrased). The FBI called and wanted to talk to him.. Stupidly, he went to them. They had a folder FULL of his online activity, some of it going way back previous to the rant. They had no warrant, and he went willingly (stupid, but whatever).

    The point being, they record everything you do with an electronic communication device, and back fill until they find something or think they "know" you.

    There is likely to be an entire hidden justice system going on. The problem is, because it's hidden, we don't know what makes it work and how it is motivated. (Hint: IRS investigations used as a political weapon.) This "justice system" acts by tipping off the facade justice system out front.

    There has been a HUGE increase in the number of "we got these guys" without a reason HOW they got those guys. I think the hidden system is trying to appear useful. They used to just ignore smaller stuff like drug lords, gang activity, etc. Now they don't. They need people to think it's useful now, where it was just used for political purposes before.

    This stuff is way bigger than just "parallel construction." Whatever it is, it is not us anymore. The grand children of the Millennials (those idiots) will not have a "United States" as we knew it to live in.

    Not posting anonymously, because they'll figure it out anyway.

  43. A month from now by grimJester · · Score: 1

    I just googled for homemade plague gun with bombs. We'll see what happens next.

    A month from now you'll be looking proudly at the one in your yard going "Well I'll be damned"

  44. Re:Other Banned Words? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    That dump I took yesterday was a dirty bomb going off in the toilet. I ate a bit too much spicy Mexican food and it felt like someone detonated a small tactical nuke in my colon. My kids were pretty sure that I had engaged in some form of chemical or biological warefare possibly using saran gas, mustard gas, small pox, or possibly anthrax but I told them it wasn't that bad. I just flipped on the vent fan to blow the fumes out side.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  45. Re:You know by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

    It's basically a book you are trying to spread. How much were the cheapest readers nowdays? Not to put down any hackerist dreams of distributing Raspis all around.. but.. you could include a screen while you are dreaming it up.

    Not bad, not bad. I think I've seen touch devices out of China for about $100.