Slashdot Mirror


After NSA Spying Flap, Germany Asks CIA Station Chief to Depart

The Washington Post reports that Gemany's government has asked the CIA station chief in that country to leave. From the article, which points out the move comes after several high-profile instances of U.S. spying on German citiens, including Chancellor Angela Merkl:. "A day earlier, federal prosecutors in Germany said police had searched the office and apartment of an individual with ties to the German military who is suspected of working for U.S. intelligence. Those raids followed the arrest of an employee of Germany’s foreign intelligence service who was accused of selling secrets to the CIA. ... For years, Germany has sought to be included in a group of countries with which the United States has a non-espionage pact. Those nations include Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. The Obama administration and that of George W. Bush both resisted such entreaties, in part because many U.S. intelligence officials believe that there are too many areas where German and U.S. security interests diverge."

219 comments

  1. Why by rock56501 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why didn't we steal something useful, like their plans/strategy for world cup?

    1. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think stealing their strategy would have given USA any chances, I have an almost not used bridge to sell you... toll booth goes on the house.

    2. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Head coach of USMNT is Jürgen Klinsmann, a German national. If anyone had access to the secrets of the World Cup, he had it. And why was the NSA not spying on him to help confirm his loyalty to the US on this important matter?

    3. Re:Why by torsmo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I get a feeling that overt nationalism is quite frowned upon in Germany. I have had a few German colleagues in the past who refused to even sing their national anthem. So while it is reasonably correct to assume that Germans are loyal to they own country, I don't think national pride would come in the way of Klinsmann's professionalism.

    4. Re:Why by erikkemperman · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is true for most of Western Europe, I would say. I'm not sure if it is actually reasonable, but very explicit nationalism still triggers memories of certain regrettable events in our not-that-distant past. I don't think I am exaggerating when I say many Europeans find the amount of flag-waving and anthem-singing that's on display in the US frankly shocking.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    5. Re:Why by rioki · · Score: 1

      In addition Jürgen Klinsmann was the head coach of the German national team. He brought a good part of the current top players together. The current coach (Joachim Löw) worked under Kliensmann. Löw basically learned his chops under Klinsmann and as such there was little the NSA could have found out that Kleinsmann did not yet know. A testament to the knowledge and talent of Kliensmann is the fact that the US team got so far. (2:1 against Germany is not bad either.)

    6. Re:Why by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      Some of us think that nationalism is a sign of immaturity. To think that because you happened to be born on the same land-mass as a bunch of other people, makes you somehow special, is just ridiculous.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    7. Re:Why by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      Not only Klinsmann, but the US players wokred incredibly hard.

      As a disappointed England supporter, I wish that our team had put in even half the effort of the US team. It especially annoyed me when they put in a lack-lustre performance in their third match because they were already out - if you're a professional footballer (soccerer) and you're playing for your country at the world cup, I don't understand how you can not be excited and thrilled to show your mettle.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    8. Re:Why by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      This is especially true for Germany, to a lesser extent Spain and France. Not true at all for Italy.
      Italians love waving their flag around and displaying it on clothing, almost as much as Americans.

    9. Re: Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.

  2. Not really a surprise.... by StirlingArcher · · Score: 1

    ...is it?

    1. Re:Not really a surprise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Germany doesn't have any problems with spying (as they do it on their own citizens), they're just butthurt to not be let into the clubhouse.

    2. Re:Not really a surprise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not really, but the outrage would be less phony if they weren't such hypocrites.

    3. Re:Not really a surprise.... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      No, a surprise would be throwing US agents in jail. This is definitely regular international diplomacy stuff.

      The occasional persona non grata happens.

    4. Re:Not really a surprise.... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's never about the moral high-ground. It's always about diplomatic leverage.

      This excludes actions by populist elected bodies or particularly fickle monarchs. But in general if one nation is doing something to another nation, it's maneuvering by state and intelligence departments.

    5. Re:Not really a surprise.... by Sique · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Germany has a problem with spying on their own citizens, as this was declared illegal by the European Court of Justice.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    6. Re:Not really a surprise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That was my point. This is fake outrage. The government was fine when the NSA was feeding them intelligence about their own citizens. They only became "outraged" when they were a target too.

    7. Re:Not really a surprise.... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but see, you can have your cake and eat it too. Eject someone if you don't get what you want, once you have the pretense to defy the US.

    8. Re:Not really a surprise.... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They're only arresting their own agents.

      If they tried to arrest a US employee, they'd likely have to confront the fact that most of this is probably authorized under the broad information-sharing agreements that they're party to.

    9. Re:Not really a surprise.... by s.petry · · Score: 2

      Not only is this hypocrisy, but they are using a single person as a scapegoat for what is obviously an institutional problem. Sending one guy away when the BND and Bundespost work directly with the NSA will not fix a damn thing.

      I truly hope that German citizens keep up the pressure to force a real change and don't accept this token arrangement as a "fix" to the institutional problems. Fortunately Germans are more aware of politics and games than Americans.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    10. Re:Not really a surprise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't. If they did they wouldn't be using the NSA as an intelligence source on their citizens. Other than a semantics game there is no real difference.

    11. Re:Not really a surprise.... by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Yes, but also this is a meaningless move by Germany in the real sense of the world, because it is still not demanding that all of its gold is returned by the USA immediately.

      Of-course the German central bank authorities decided a couple of weeks back that it is better to pretend that the USA still has German gold and not raise any noise than to make it clear that its gold is gone. Germany requested the USA Fed to return its gold about 2 years ago, USA came out saying that it will return half of the gold within 7 year period but in 2 years only returned 1/100th of what it was supposed to, actually the numbers can be found here. In any case if Germany truly wanted to make a statement it would insist on the return of its gold, with the correct serial numbers on the bars and everything.

      If Germany simply wanted to get the gold back it also has a choice of selling the gold in the market and getting dollars back, which the Fed could easily provide by creating them out of thin air as it always does, so that then Germany could buy the gold back in the market (of-course fewer tons could be bought since the prices would go up, but at least it wouldn't be a total loss as it is now). Any of this would be better than a useless symbolic gesture.

    12. Re:Not really a surprise.... by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      I don't think it is that complicated (as simple as it sounds).

      This is pure show. They kicked the station head out, not the entire CIA. The station will continue doing what it is doing because it gets orders from higher up the chain. They know this but it makes good political theater and appears like something was done for the populace to be appeased.

      The US does it too. The IRS commissioner (Steven Miller) who supposedly resigned because of the so called scandals was quitting anyways. It was just show.

      http://abcnews.go.com/Politics...

    13. Re:Not really a surprise.... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, a surprise would be throwing US agents in jail.

      They can't do that to "legal" agents. "Legal" agents are US Embassy employees recognized by the host government as diplomats with immunity. "Legal" agents usually have some silly, trivial sounding titles, like, "The Under-Secretary for Cultural Exchange". But their real job is gathering intelligence, and the host country knows that and tolerates it. These folks are quite easy to spot: Just look for someone who is obviously way to intelligent and clever for his job. Like someone with a Ph.D. in international affairs from Harvard and Yale who is doing clerical work at the embassy.

      Lots of intelligence work is actually quite boring, and not the James Bond stuff that you expect. The agents collect and assess political sentiment and economic developments and trends in that country. The CIA gives the President of the US a short briefing every morning for breakfast, and informs him if something is amiss somewhere in the world that needs his immediate attention. During this meeting the President also instructs them which areas he thinks need their "special attention".

      This is definitely regular international diplomacy stuff.

      When countries who aren't quite on the most friendliest of terms get in a huff, like Russia and the US . . . they will take turns tossing out some of each others' small fry "legals" described above.

      The occasional persona non grata happens.

      The CIA Station Chief is not an occasional persona. That's usually taboo among allies. Russia knows who the CIA Station Chief is in Moscow. But they do not toss him out. The US knows who the SVR Resident is in Washington, as well . . . and leave him alone.

      Tossing out the CIA Station Chief is a serious diplomatic escalation, which is why it is getting so much press coverage.

      Oh, here's an interesting Pro-Tip: If a foreign diplomat wants to hand you a piece of paper with an explanation of why their country just did something very nasty . . . you don't touch it. You instruct him to read it out loud. If you put your hands on it, his country will report that you "accepted" the explanation. If you don't, you will only hear in the news that the diplomat "read out load" or "recited" the explanation. This is the next thing that you will hear about this, as the professional diplomats from Germany and the US try to paper over the cracks left by the spooks.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    14. Re:Not really a surprise.... by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      You know how to tell if someone is a spy, if you're a slashdotter, and she's trying to talk to you?

      She's fucking hot, very smart, and loves adventure.

    15. Re:Not really a surprise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately Germans are more aware of politics and games than Americans.

      I've seen little evidence of this. Care to elaborate? The German intelligence services and the NSA have been friendly for years, and it hasn't changed. This is simply damage control to keep the status quo.

      Before you open your mouth, realize I've worked in the field.. with certain nationalities.

    16. Re: Not really a surprise.... by jopsen · · Score: 2

      It's not in Germanys interest to weaken the American economy... That would hurt them just as bad...

      I'm pretty sure no European country even wants to indicate that they want to mess with the US economy... Not because they are scared of a US response. But because they don't want to weaken the world economy, upon which many European countries depend.

      If Germany made thebUS dollar fall even more. That would hurt the European economy and weak EURO economies would need further bail outs...

      This is an appropriate and proportional response... It's not enough, I agree, but it's pretty good start! A European country deporting US officials is a big thing.

    17. Re:Not really a surprise.... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Actually, Germany has a problem with spying on their own citizens, as this was declared illegal by the European Court of Justice.

      Did anyone tell the Germans?

      The German Prism: Berlin Wants to Spy Too

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    18. Re: Not really a surprise.... by udachny · · Score: 0

      You are totally mistaken, nobody depends on USA economy except for the welfare recipients and there is no more such thing as a 'USA economy' anyway. USA doesn't produce enough to have an economy.

      It's the exact opposite that is the case, China, Germany and many others FEED USA, USA is the welfare recipient of the world and nobody depends on them for their economy. Economy is not consumption without repayment, economy is trade of goods that all sides participating in the trade produce and USA has been running 500Billion USD / year trade deficits for over 20 years now to claim that it has an economy that anybody relies upon, that ship has sailed together with the gold dollar.

      What would actually HELP all of the countries suffering from the USA initiated inflation is to stop throwing money into the bottomless pit that is the USA welfare state. Germany needs to get whatever gold it can back from the USA Fed in a short order otherwise it will never see any of it again.

    19. Re:Not really a surprise.... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I thought the gold was stolen by east Germans and moved to Canada or should I have watched die hard 3 till the end?

    20. Re:Not really a surprise.... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      it is actually about moral high ground as this is normally achieved by public show of how evil somebody else is. It helps if everybody already expected it anyway and it adds additional moments of joy if the side whose moral stand is being maimed is a pack of useless but nuclear armed fuckwitts.

    21. Re:Not really a surprise.... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      and 'working directly with NSA' involves what - bombing them with modern day equivalent of V2? How exactly should one work with an agency that is apparently out of control - or do you still think that US authorities (being government and/or congress) have any control over NSA?

    22. Re: Not really a surprise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Germany made thebUS dollar fall even more. That would hurt the European economy and weak EURO economies would need further bail outs.

      That is the short term result a major economic crisis in the US would have.
      A gradual weakening of the US dollar just shifts importance away from the US until it no longer matters if it tanks or not. Instead the Yuan and the Euro would become stronger.
      Not that the USD is particularly strong at the moment. Investing in it could make a nice payoff if you think it will become as strong as it used to be again. (Although that would probably require a government that is more interested in fixing things back home than dicking around in other nations.)

    23. Re: Not really a surprise.... by jopsen · · Score: 1

      That is the short term result a major economic crisis in the US would have. Yes, nobody wants that...
      I dislike the US for many of the crimes your government is actively committing in the US and around the world. And I want the US to fix these issues, not go down some dark bottomless hole of political chaos.
      Negotiations in a modern world is always about power... Too many nations are too powerful for this to be a viable option.

    24. Re:Not really a surprise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot arrest people who are beyond the law, now, get your shit together, we're going to a fucking wedding.

    25. Re:Not really a surprise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a big drop which will contribute to hollowing out the stone. Just have some patience.

    26. Re: Not really a surprise.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is already a more important market than the U.S. Which is great, because the US can handle neither finance nor their military properly. China saved us from Great Depression 2.0

    27. Re:Not really a surprise.... by jittles · · Score: 1

      These folks are quite easy to spot: Just look for someone who is obviously way to intelligent and clever for his job. Like someone with a Ph.D. in international affairs from Harvard and Yale who is doing clerical work at the embassy.

      A doctorate level degree does not make you intelligent or clever. And what is the point in not explicitly naming the station chief if they are so easy to spot?

      Oh, here's an interesting Pro-Tip: If a foreign diplomat wants to hand you a piece of paper with an explanation of why their country just did something very nasty . . . you don't touch it. You instruct him to read it out loud. If you put your hands on it, his country will report that you "accepted" the explanation. If you don't, you will only hear in the news that the diplomat "read out load" or "recited" the explanation. This is the next thing that you will hear about this, as the professional diplomats from Germany and the US try to paper over the cracks left by the spooks.

      Say what? They can't hand each other pieces of paper or they are "accepting" explanations? Do you have some sort of reference for this? This is the most asinine thing I have ever heard, and I have never seen a news story or report where it mentioned a diplomat "recited" or "read out load [sic]" anything. By your explanation everything would have to be done verbally and nothing could ever be done via letter. Were you a member of the diplomatic corps or otherwise employed by the state department?

      I don't mean to sound like I am attacking you. I have just never heard anything like this before and I would like to know more about it.

    28. Re:Not really a surprise.... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      and yet, Germany knew that we were in fact, spying on their citizens and giving German gov. information. For starters, we have stopped several AQ attacks on them because of that.
      What they DID NOT know, was the spying on their gov, which I have to say was surprising.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    29. Re:Not really a surprise.... by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I'm lost at your quote and your respective comment, what does your fallacy have to do with any of my statements?

      or do you still think that US authorities (being government and/or congress) have any control over NSA?

      That is plain old idiocy. If they want control they can impeach appointed officers, put criminal acts on trial, and remove funding from the departments.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  3. Spying On People Investigating Spying! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:
    "The 31-year-old suspect was, apparently, gathering information on a German committee that was investigating American surveillance on Germans. German officials say he sold 218 secret documents for 25,000 euro ($34,000)."

    Spying on people investigating spying! That's how our tax dollars should be spent.

  4. "Security interests" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine that's shorthand for "Germany doesn't like that the US has been treating all of Europe as a client state for the past 70 years." (Because Germany wants to do that instead.)

  5. after hymenology flap we return to creativity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no big surprise & none too soon with history racing up to correct itself & our future at the speed of right with new clear options provided by momkind et pals... see you there

  6. I don't blame them for being mad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think they're surprised, its more a case of now that the NSA has so much bad press its the perfect time to start cleaning out the foreign spies.

    1. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by Desler · · Score: 5, Informative

      And yet their own intelligence agencies have no issue with sharing and working with the NSA.

      http://www.spiegel.de/internat...
      http://www.spiegel.de/internat...
      http://rt.com/news/germany-nsa...

      Germany's government was perfectly fine with the NSA's surveillance until they found out they were being spied on too. It's faux outrage meant to deflect people's attention from them being in bed with the NSA for years.

    2. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it's the German population which has a problem with being spied on. And they were pressuring the government again and again no longer to tolerate it. Being spied on is an issue that has grown in importance within one year that now the German government has to fear to lose the next elections if they don't do anything about it. And that's exactly how it is supposed to work.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may not be fine with what the extent of said spying is after these revelations, its possible they were fine with what they believed to be a reasonable arrangement between the two and now are unhappy about some aspects they were unaware of previously.

    4. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by Desler · · Score: 1

      Which was exactly my point. They were perfectly fine when the plebes were being spied on by the NSA just not themselves.

    5. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by Desler · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the German population is pissed by it. But the outrage I'm talking about is the phony scapegoating coming from the government who is conveniently only upset when it wasn't just the plebes being spied on. They were perfectly fine with that.

    6. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 1

      But, Germany wants to be part of the "special club" that has been US, GB, Canada, Australia, New Zealand for sharing SIGINT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U... But, most of those are just part of the UK, and they speak English [more or less :-)], so Germany can never really be "one of the good ole boys" ...

      --
      Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
    7. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "And yet their own intelligence agencies have no issue with sharing and working with the NSA."
      The West German "intelligence agencies" grew out of ww2 - some where never vetted, some had their files lost or re written, some where invited in due to needed Soviet skills- no questions asked.
      Over time they selected new staff, where exposed due to their ww2 crimes or retired. The next generation was guided into a world of expensive technology to help the NSA, CIA and GCHQ understand and shape the West German teclo system.
      Great work, nice pay, dreamy budgets and on the winning team. This went on for decades and the West German staff got very comfortable ensuring the copper and later optical systems worked as installed by the USA. The GCHQ and NSA enjoyed full access to all aspects of West and later German telecommunications with the full help of tame, local German staff per site.
      At some point other groups within the German gov would have had enough of all their communications, trade negotiations, science, politics just flowing to the UK, USA and a few other competing countries for free every day thanks to tame German gov and private sector staff.
      At some point a white list of tame US and UK helping German staff with telco site/file access would have been created to ensure site access and pass/paper work.
      Perhaps other groups in the wider German gov now have a short list of German telco experts/gov staff who are more loyal to the USA/UK than German.
      Once the questioning starts beyond now 1 or 2 and grows to 10's, 100's will the US and UK offer their German helpers passports, pensions and residency outside Germany?
      Like the nice interpreters get after other occupations are over.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I do not know that many Germans that are seriously pissed off about that spying. Most of them do not even understand what the hell is going on - you can try to explain what metadata is or what it can be used for and see how far you get with that. Even for tin foil brigade the Snowden revelations were a bit of a shock, I am sure. Media are having field day after day of course and opposition parties have their fun too. Still, the way our, that is US and German, citizens' rights are twisted and reinterpreted is even more damaging. What the government is doing is what it is supposed to do: they found some spies they show them/us their anger and how strong they are and expel some 'diplomats'. The actual meaning of this is most likely hidden. I wonder how did they got these guys and if there were barely pawns sacrificed to achieve some other goal.

    9. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by zmooc · · Score: 1

      Germans have always had more of an issue with "being spied on" than others do. For example, Germany is one of the only countries in which taking a picture with others on it is illegal unless you've got permission from all subjects!

      Also, Germans have major issues with Google Streeview and they were the ones that sued Google for receiving their wifi-broadcasts.

      I think they've taken this privacy-thing a bit too far, though...

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    10. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Yes, and? What's your point? The US and Germany are allies, it makes sense to share intelligence with allies. What doesn't make as much sense and undermines trust is spying on the administration and institutions of your allies.

    11. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by steg0 · · Score: 1

      I do not know that many Germans that are seriously pissed off about that spying. Most of them do not even understand what the hell is going on - you can try to explain what metadata is or what it can be used for and see how far you get with that.

      The whole NSA/Snowden affair was regarded as an important topic in the 2013 election by a mere 17% of the population (pre-election ARD poll).

      The Pirate Party and FDP have since not stopped making a huge fuss about it, but the truth is that most Germans don't care. They probably think it'll only hit the terrorists. Same thing with CCTV in public areas, actually. If it only ever saves one pensioner from being robbed, the majority of voters are fine with it (and demand more!).

    12. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are NOT allies, we are VASALLS/Imperial Masters. Big difference here. And if you would poll+do-they-want the German people, we would be Switzerland #2 by next week. They have NO U.S. troops on their soil.

    13. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The French won't let the Americans leave Germany. Duh. They don't like the idea of becoming 'Western Greater Germany'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:I don't blame them for being mad. by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I do not know whether that is the reason but pirates have notoriously bad campaigns. One may say - typical for a socially impaired that the big part of them are. That is a pity as the general elections are a good point of time to pass message to the masses.

  7. To what end? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    So, what's the end game here, for Germany?

    And why chastise the US publicly when you could manipulate them through false information instead?

    What are the implications here?

    1. Re:To what end? by Desler · · Score: 1

      They want to join the 5 Eyes so that they can continue to receive NSA intelligence that they use against their citizens but the government officials won't be spied on.

    2. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Political leverage. They have solidly embarrassing information on US spying techniques, and while Germany is guilty of the same, they haven't been sloppy enough to let that information go so virulently public that it's politically convenient to shout from the rooftops without really souring relations. The US can't realistically chide Germany for publicizing these incidents, as they are already well planted in the public discourse; neither can the US raise classified incidents of German overreach, because doing so would constitute an actual breach of trust. Germany would be foolish not to use this leverage to get whatever it wants... within reason.

    3. Re:To what end? by Baki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No they don't. The supreme court actually has something to say in Germany, and its constitution is pretty strong (also in practice) w.r.t. privacy and citizens rights. I'm not german myself (but living near germany). My impression, also from German newspapers etc., is that most germans including politicians are truely mad and are seriously considering to cool down relations with the USA. The USA is risking to loose one of the few remaining friends it has in the world.

    4. Re:To what end? by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      The endgame is for individual politicials and political parties to distance themselves from their cooperation with US intelligence sharing programs in the eyes of their voters.

    5. Re:To what end? by houghi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What they can do is to force the closing of one or two US Army intalations in Germany. Although no real impact if they pick carefully, it would send an extremely serious message on a political level.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:To what end? by Arker · · Score: 1

      "My impression, also from German newspapers etc., is that most germans including politicians are truely mad and are seriously considering to cool down relations with the USA."

      As they should be, frankly the reaction seems inexplicably mild.

      Can you imagine the reaction if the shoe was on the other foot? If this was a BD spy caught infiltrating the CIA?

      A 'cool down' in relations would be a serious understatement.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    7. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US catches spies all the times, including those from "allies" like Israel. It's just part of the game.

    8. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Germany has had, in living memory, the bad experience of the East German Stasi. This was a secret police service of almost unbelievable power and penetration into ordinary people's lives.

      IIRC, it took about 10 years but finally (this is after German reunification) they opened up the records of the Stasi to everyone. Every former GDR citizen can look up their Stasi records and find out exactly what the state knew about them, at least what was written down. And who the informant was. This was hugely controversial and the main source of the slowness in opening the records.

      Again, from memory, but the issue was and continues to be, informants were everywhere. Most citizens either were informing or knew someone who was. Informants could prove to be your boss, your co-worker, a family member, friend, anyone. Social relationships have been damaged on a massive scale as citizens found out the truth about their social circles. This is only somewhat mitigated by the knowledge that informers were often bullied or blackmailed into their informing activities.

      I understand that some citizens have declined to even look in the records. The thinking being something like: The Stasi is finished, so let the past die quietly. Or nothing good can come of this. Or if intimidation of informers was widespread, then the informers do not have primary responsibility, so why damage their reputations.

      For this reason the notion of state spying in Germany today is tarred by the memory of the Stasi. I don't doubt that Germany spies. However I'd suggest that there are political limits on what are considered acceptable targets and levels of spying.

    9. Re:To what end? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Germany wants its own gov staff back. Germany wants its own trade deals in private. Germany wants its science and banking back. Germany wants its telco sector back. Germany wants its staff to be good Germans, not more loyal to "Five Eyes" plus other nations every working day. Germany wants its own domestic and foreign policy back from the US and UK.
      Setting up 'manipulate them through false information instead?" is tricky as West Germany found out. If the staff around your top political leaders work for East Germany - just setting up 'false information' might be noted.
      If the tame cleared German staff around your top political leaders work for other nations - just setting up 'false information' might be noted.
      So German is been cleared up in public. That reduces any security advantage hidden/cleared German staff have to re invent their pasts helping Western powers.
      That reduces any press advantage hidden/cleared German staff pasted to helping Western powers to slow the investigations down.
      The Western press spin of protecting German from "commienazis" may not work so well this time.
      Re 'What are the implications here?" Germany trades with the world as Germany again, not Germany with 5+ other nations having some real time advantage for their own brands and firms.
      German industry can emerge again to trade fully with the world.
      No more wondering why Germans where been frozen out of a trade deal or under cut by 5+ other nations again and again.. over decades.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA is risking to loose one of the few remaining friends it has in the world.

      I'm pretty sure you're overestimating Germany's importance by a couple of orders of magnitude, you stupid fuck.

      Aside from the, the Czechs or the Poles would be more than happy to take their place.

    11. Re:To what end? by Desler · · Score: 1

      The USA is risking to loose one of the few remaining friends it has in the world.

      Sure, if you're naive enough to think the government outrage is real and not just a show for the plebes. In the real world, the German government will continue to share information and use the NSA as an information source. They'll just try to continue to work towards making sure they are not being spied from now on.

    12. Re:To what end? by umghhh · · Score: 1

      As a friend of mine who is a physician likes to emphasize: if you push hard enough shit comes out - different people have different levels at which this happens. What I wanted to say is this: some of these stasi agents were coerced into doing this, some of them believed what they did was good for the society. What good is coming out of knowing that stasi had enough muscle to force your ex-lover to file mostly meaningless reports on you? We in Europe are not as vindictive as US people seem to be. I like to attribute that to culture but the bottom line is - in countries that pushed their secret service people too hard after change of system, these secret service people started building quite effective mafias.

    13. Re:To what end? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Germany wants its own trade deals in private.

      While you can negotiate a trade deal privately, it's pretty much impossible to operate one privately. After all, at least one other country has to know the details, and most (if not all) of the economic effects are easily detectable....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    14. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American, I thoroughly agree. This would be hyped up to epic proportions in the media. I can guarantee they would lambast and outright damn the entire security infrastructure of the US, and throw out a terrorism claim more than once. And all this, despite their call for need and requirement of the CIA and NSA activities to 'keep us safe'. It's hypocritical marketing at its worst, and every media outlet in the US is guilty of it. Damn it on one day, support it in the name of security and patriotism the next.

    15. Re:To what end? by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      To get (re-)elected.
      Unlike America, other countries have a meaningful choice when it comes to who they give their vote to. Politicians know this.

    16. Re:To what end? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      So they're leaving the EU?

      Seems unlikely.

    17. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RE: ".. force the closing of one or two US Army intalations in Germany.."

      - assuming they can actually find one or two still open, that ain't already scheduled for closure, that is.

      "The rationale behind the large number of closures is that the strategic functions of the bases, originally designed to serve as forward posts in any war against the Soviet Union, are no longer relevant since the end of the Cold War.."

      there actually are not many US bases left in Germany - and those still remaining are disappearing fast.

    18. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Merkel and some other Collaborateurs (e.g. "HM Submarine von der Leyen") want to be part of the UK-USA Imperium.

      The majority of Germans do not want to be part of the permanent war this causes.

      Just fuck over the Arabs on your own. And vice versa. Also, have lots of fun with Russia, as long as we are not bothered to take part !

      Dankeschön !

    19. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's part 9 of the thing. Currently we are at step 2.

    20. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EU is a U.S. construct forced upon Germany. It's purpose is to feed the Extreme Slackers like Greece, Portugal and the Blood Suckers like Ireland (sucking off taxes and defaulting while using German industry as collateral). Because they are somehow part of the UK-USA Imperium.

      Meanwhile many working Germans struggle to buy proper food. No hyperbole here.

      So, we would happily do trade and tourism and cultural exchange with ANYBODY on the globe. But please do it using Deutsche Mark and FUCK THE EURO-INFLATION-CURRENCY.

    21. Re:To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be pretty stupid to force closing one of those installations for the german gvt. They bring american tax dollars to the region. Even if the soilders have their own stores and such, they visit the civilian parts, too. Closing the sites would harm the region and germans more than americans. UK had rented (perhaps for 0$) some atlantic islands to the americans, and then could use their airport in the falkland war. They didn't have to pay for maintenance of the airport in peace times, but still could use it for getting the falklands back. The ships needed a time to arrive.

      Germany could force the american embassy to move away from the bundeskanzleramt in Berlin, forcing them to cooperate with another country's embassy when they want to spy on merkelphone.

    22. Re:To what end? by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      The last "Israeli spy" I remember hearing about was actually someone who volunteered to spy for the Israeli's. The Israeli's made agreeable sounds and then called the US State department or whoever to notify them that they had been approached by so-and-so who was offering to spy for them.

      Some Russians were caught who were acting as couriers for real spies here in the USA. And there was some acknowledgement from the NSA awhile back that they knew or assumed they had at least one Russian spy on the inside that they couldn't identify. And there was a Chinese industrial spy caught some time ago.

      I wouldn't say that we're catching ally spies all the time. Periodically catching spies, of any alignment, might be more accurate.

  8. There's something Germany can do right away... by bogaboga · · Score: 2

    The Obama administration and that of George W. Bush both resisted such entreaties, in part because many U.S. intelligence officials believe that there are too many areas where German and U.S. security interests diverge."

    How about getting rid of that United States base in Germany? A move like this would be in the right direction.

    Did I mention that Slashdot should at least try getting world leaders' name spellings correct? Anyone also sees this unfortunate Merkl spelling in the introductory piece>?

    1. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen. The US bases bring in a lot of money to Germany. Also, the Germans are in on it too. This is just a dog and pony show to pretend they're doing something about spying.

    2. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about getting rid of that United States base in Germany? A move like this would be in the right direction.

      First they'd have to get rid of the occupation statutes. As long as they are officially occupied allied territory, they don't have the right to unilaterally dissolve a U.S. base, or throw out a CIA officer.

      They can only ask nicely. Which is just what they did regarding that official.

    3. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because tons of Germans are employed there, and lots of businesses like all the extra people who need their services around the base, and if shiat ever comes to Germany the US can help the Germans fark them into schnitzel...

    4. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by Sique · · Score: 3, Informative

      Germany is not an occupied state, since the end of the 4+2 talks which was 25 years ago. Continuing to claim so doesn't make it true.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    5. Re: There's something Germany can do right away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany has ceased to be occupied just before reunification. This is common knowledge. You are misinformed and ignorant.

    6. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen. The US bases bring in a lot of money to Germany. Also, the Germans are in on it too. This is just a dog and pony show to pretend they're doing something about spying.

      It's a tad more than that. These agreements are NOT equal. Germany knows there's nothing they can do about the US spying so they try to co-operate to avoid being targeted themselves. But really it's kind of an Uncle Tom situation, they thought they'd found a way into the house, but really they're getting whipped in the end just as bad as everyone else.

    7. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Germans would riot (literally) if the US planned to close the base. It is a huge source of jobs, jobs that would otherwise go to US contractors but instead go to local German contractors.

      In the past when there were plans of reducing the size of the base, they protested strongly and got us to change the plans.

    8. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought you were going to say:

      Not going to happen. /. can't afford editors....

    9. Re: There's something Germany can do right away... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You are misinformed and ignorant.

      Sounds like a typical American.

    10. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re Germans would riot (literally) if the US planned to close the base. It is a huge source of jobs, jobs that would otherwise go to US contractors but instead go to local German contractors.
      UK and US sites have closed. The locals are unhappy but decades later an understanding of what been occupied is really all about is emerging.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    11. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Lets see the pedants say that when everyone from Japan to France has military bases on the U.S. mainland, whether or not the USG is a puppet or just bought off.

    12. Re: There's something Germany can do right away... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you are misinformed and ignorant. And, FWIW, I'm and American, of German heritage.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    13. Re:There's something Germany can do right away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really, does it ?

      U.S. - U.K. occupation of Germany (THAT is the proper term) comes with a nasty package of "hundreds of millions of Imperial Slackers (Greeks, Turks, Israelis, Irish, Portugese) who must be carried by Germany one way or the other". And of course it comes with "supportung New York Banksters, whatever insane stuff they come up with". It comes with "let's steal any trade secret we come across and give it to UK-USA competitors". Don't forget "Collaborators who work against German interest while being Germans" (thee Greenies and their quest to de-industrialize this country and transfer jobs to China).

      So, the Anglosaxon soldiers leaving Germany would be a great net benefit.

  9. Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When the Germans discovered that the NSA had bugged Angela Merkel's phone, Obama kinda sorta said, "sorry", and it looked like the whole matter would have been forgotten. I would have thought that Obama would have told his spooks to lay off for a while. But instead, it seems that he has racketed up the spying on Germany.

    Can someone tell me what Obama is trying to achieve by this? I mean, there must be some purpose behind all this. I just can't figure it out.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Maltheus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When Germany rolled over the first time, it was an invitation for more. Same is true here with the American people.

    2. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can anyone still believe civilians are in control of the government? Our MSM and gov maintain that facade, but it is less and less true.

      NSA, a military organization, rewrote the Constitution in secret. Justice Dept developed the justification, is not taking credit for the initiative.

      CIA, nominally a non-military organization, closely cooperates with the military, and is incestulous with the banking and military-intelligence-police complex of interests.

      NSA/CIA don't bother to tell the President or anyone else about a lot of things. Thus Snowdon is a hero, a patriot.

    3. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 0

      I mean, so far, in the polls, he's already being rated as the worst president since WW2.

      There's a growing number of Americans who strongly believe he is the worst president EVER.. BAR NONE.. And *I* strongly believe
      that number is growing daily....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    4. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      you sound like you're genuinely distressed, and i can empathize. all i'll say is that after a point, you realize that the extent to which you've been lied to is extraordinary. once you can acknowledge that fact, you begin to see things a bit differently. part of growth. it hurts sometimes, but it's required.

    5. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the Germans discovered that the NSA had bugged Angela Merkel's phone, Obama kinda sorta said, "sorry", and it looked like the whole matter would have been forgotten. I would have thought that Obama would have told his spooks to lay off for a while. But instead, it seems that he has racketed up the spying on Germany.

      Can someone tell me what Obama is trying to achieve by this? I mean, there must be some purpose behind all this. I just can't figure it out.

      Simple. We had spy on them in order to figure out how pissed the Germans really were that we were spying on them...

    6. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by misexistentialist · · Score: 0

      Obama is looking for his real birth certificate which is in a German vault along with the ark of the covenant, 1000s of art masterpieces thought to have been destroyed, $10 trillion dollars worth of gold bricks, and a cryogenic chamber in which the Fuhrer patiently rests.

    7. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may not know this, but the President of the United States doesn't have an office in the NSA, and doesn't have direct access to their leadership or decision-making.

      So no, Obama isn't trying to achieve anything, as it is somebody else doing it.

      Being able to fire the person at the top gives limited control in certain types of circumstances. In a regular business it means you have a lot of control over a department. But even a large corporation, you might not be able to succeed at getting things done the way you want just by firing department heads; and there is a cost to morale in attempting it.

      In the case of Government, the workers are the same under one President and the next, and they can drag their feet and wait-out a President who tries to micro-manage them. But also, appointing department heads for a President is a political act, it has real cost, and if you try to do it with a weak hand then Congress will win that battle. Also, the departments have entrenched support from Congress-critters that have been in place longer than the President and will be in place after his terms expire.

      You just can't use a small-business-owner model of Control to understand the powers of the President here. He's the one that has to explain the policies to the people, but in Intelligence and Law Enforcement, Congress has erected barriers to direct Presidential control. People often imagine that the President can just walk into any department and look at anything and order anybody around, but actually he's not a dictator, and can only move the levers of power that are provided.

    8. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      And there are just as many who think Saint Reagan was the worst President EV-AH. BAR NONE. And that number was growing while he was still in office! Z O M G!

    9. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's also a growing number of Americans that don't believe in evolution. Just because you choose to live in another reality doesn't make it true. Based on facts you're going to have a hard time justifying why you feel he is the worst president ever, there have been some real bad ones. Of course the powers of the presidency have been greatly exaggerated as congress hasn't accomplished a whole lot with record use of stall tactics.

      You'd be hard pressed to say he's the best President ever either, but he's hardly the worst, exaggerating only takes away from any valid criticisms of policy you have. The American people were much worse off as a result of Silent Cal's Presidency, there are many other examples as well.

    10. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I mean, so far, in the polls, he's already being rated as the worst president since WW2.

      Said someone about every president since WW2. You guys elected him twice, collectively you fucking love the guy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you stopped to think that it might just be that he's a fucking idiot?

      He's not an idiot, he's a puppet. I thought GWB was the worst president ever, but Obama seems hell-bent on wresting that crown. The fact that he's not an idiot makes it worse, not better. GWB at least could just blink cluelessly as he was told what to do.

    12. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I mean, so far, in the polls, he's already being rated as the worst president since WW2.

      I'm not fan of Obama, but I'm suspicious about the results of that (single) survey. 35% of respondents rated Reagan as the best president since WW2, followed by Clinton (18%), Kennedy (15%), and Obama (8%). On the other side, 33% said Obama was the worst, followed by GWB (28%), Nixon (13%), and Carter (8%). As far as "worst president" goes, it looks like recent memory plays more of a role than anything the guys actually did. Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy, the 3 directly after WW2, got 0-1% of the votes. Carter is probably happy just to be included.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    13. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Said someone about every president since WW2. You guys elected him twice, collectively you fucking love the guy.

      Hey, don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!!

      :)

      But seriously, I used to think Carter was the worst, and I wasn't terribly happy with Bush Jr., but Obama, ugh.

      I used to think it was just his agenda, but I'm starting to think it is more fully explained by incompetence. I used to joke and ask my friends that voted for him "How's that Hope and Change" working out for you.

      Not anymore, I'm frankly a bit scared about the US and the world. He has no answer and seems to really not even care about:

      Problems in Libya, Syria (draws imaginary line in sand when not going to back it up), ISIS coming in from Syria, Our southern US border currently being overrun by illegals, when he actually COULD with a swipe of his pen, fix the problem there, or at least send national guard and militarize the damned thing, economy still in the toilet, etc.

      He's a great speaker with a teleprompter and good politician (for getting elected), but I think as far as presidency, he's in way over his head and I'm frankly worried about the state of the world under his last 2x years.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      Like all large organizations, bureaucracies are hard to change and are resistant to political direction, which makes them difficult to control from the executive, but a determined and capable president can ultimately impose his will on them.

    15. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lynchpin of Obama's foreign policy is the "pivot to Asia". It's all about convincing China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, Indonesia - basically, places with sweatshops - that the USA is no longer inextricably married to Europe, and cares as much about them as it does about its longstanding allies in the First World.

      To that end, he's gone out of his way to piss off the Brits, the French, the Poles, and now the Germans. It's a tricky balancing act - he doesn't want to annoy them so much that they actually start cancelling contracts or pulling out of agreements, but he does want to convince others that the USA is no longer afraid to do that.

    16. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      You've either not seen the polls, or don't believe them, and are quite simply incorrect.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    17. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      What people fail to look at during the campaigns is what circles does this guy run in?...who is he going to put in his Cabinet? It's not about electing the figurehead, it's all about who's going to be pushing the agendas.

      FWIW, I agree with you on Carter, Bush, and Obama, all incompetent...I'll give Carter the title of nicest guy though.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    18. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Is that not a perception game? People think - this president he can do all why is he not helping me and my uncle Fred? At the end the guys can end marines here and there but that is expensive. He can try to propose some laws but that is ineffective - just look at your lawmakers. He cannot even appoint judges properly, it seems. So you confront expectations of (often perceived as evil) power which in fact is not as big as people think. As for evil - it often helps to look in the mirror first when one looks for people guilty of things. He may have acted differently but if that would bring anything is doubtful. He is just a sign on the wall that US political system has some problems.

    19. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re Carter http://www.salon.com/2013/07/1...
      It was an interesting decade with Halloween Massacre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    20. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may not know this, but the President of the United States doesn't have an office in the NSA, and doesn't have direct access to their leadership or decision-making.

      Actually, he DOES have direct access to their leadership and decision-making. He's the PRESIDENT!

      All he needs to do is pick up his phone and call the NSA Director, tell him to get his ass over to the White House RIGHT NOW, and, lo, the NSA Director will be heading toward the White House.

      Then he tells the NSA Director words to the effect of "Stop this shit, right the F**k now!", and lo, it will be stopped.

      And if that doesn't work, there's the "Fire him, right now" option. Like when Truman fired MacArthur back in the day.

      Remember, he's the President. Head of the Executive Branch. Which includes both CIA and NSA. They all work for HIM, not the other way around.

      The fact that this is still going on does not show a lack of power on the part of Obama, it shows agreement with this on the part of Obama.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    21. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Then there is a growing number of Americans who are prejudiced about blacks/democrats/liberals, take your pick, or have -no idea- about history, politics and governing. In these difficult times of wars and crisis, Obama is one of the best presidents Americans could have hoped for. Better than most of your clueless American public deserves.

    22. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      LBJ was, without a doubt, the worst president sense Grant.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    23. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That was my point. They don't work for him, they work for the Federal Government. Much about their employment is regulated directly by Congress, including their budget. A President can fire a department head, but then what? That might actually not matter at all to the section heads within the NSA. The political leadership comes and goes, but the rest of the organization is self-managing. The Director of the NSA might in fact not be able to run around snapping his fingers and cause the desired effect. They manage their own budget on a blank check from Congress.

      Obviously the departments that are overseen more directly by members of the Cabinet then the President has extensive access and generally better control. Except of course Law Enforcement which is all delegated as per post-Watergate rules.

      Something else you might not have considered, when you fire the Director, then the Deputy Director takes over. The Director is a military position; the Deputy Director is required to be a civilian. This guarantees that it will be a "career professional" from inside the organization, but who can't be appointed as Director. This means if you fire the Director, the short term effect is turn full control over to the organization. And then the replacement has to be formally Nominated and then Confirmed by the Senate. Whoever you just fired had connections in the Senate to have gotten confirmed in the first place. So firing him upsets those people. So the replacement will likely be further from the President than whoever he fired, because he'll have a weakened hand in confirmation.

      Also, the NSA is military, which means most of the President's staff don't have any say at all. Most of what the President wants to get done has to be done directly, and through the Secretary of Defense. And then most of the workers are actually civilians, so he can't give them orders as Commander in Chief. And the Secretary of Defense mostly has to go through the command structure.

      Civics is actually interesting to learn about. There are real reasons it is structured the way it is.

    24. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Or I know he's a lot more popular than Congress! And that is who he has to be at odds with.

      He's more popular than W was at this point, too, by 4 points. Maybe I did read the numbers after all.

      Nixon was at 24% approval

    25. Re:Why is Obama doing this . . . ? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      In these difficult times of wars and crisis, Obama is one of the best presidents Americans could have hoped for.

      Are you serious?

      Obama is completely disengaged from the turmoil happening in the world. I don't think it is him being "stand offish", I don't think he actually knows WHAT to do and is paralyzed by that.

      No one in the world has respect for the US admin...he doesn't know when to make a stand, nor will he stand on it. And the world knows this and is testing this right now.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  10. I found this article to be more informative by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Retaliation for Spying: Germany Asks CIA Official to Leave Country

    Initially, there had been talk of a formal expulsion of the CIA employee, who is officially accredited as the so-called chief of station and is responsible for the US intelligence service's activities in Germany. A short time later, the government backpedalled and said it had only recommended that he leave. Although it cannot be compared with a formal explusion, it remains an unfriendly gesture.

    On a diplomatic level, it is no less than an earthquake and represents a measure that until Thursday would have only been implemented against pariah states like North Korea or Iran. It also underscores just how deep tensions have grown between Berlin and Washington over the spying affair.

    The USA's response has been something along the lines of "you expected us not to conducting traditional spying activities?"

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if the guy did leave, voluntarily or otherwise, he'd just be replaced with someone else.

    2. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA's response has been something along the lines of "you expected us not to conducting traditional spying activities?"

      More like "you expected us to honor bilateral contracts?"

    3. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Aighearach · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd prefer a more proactive response, maybe carry around a bunch of WWII concentration camp photos and wave those around whenever the Germans complain about "spying."

      No they shouldn't be punished forever, but we probably should keep an eye on them forever.

    4. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be difficult, with a beam the size of Texas in your eye.

    5. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Dorianny · · Score: 2

      The USA's response has been something along the lines of "you expected us not to conducting traditional spying activities?"

      The USA rejected the proposed no spy agreement so the response is more along the lines of: We do not fully trust you and we will keep on spying on you not matter how much it annoys you.

    6. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd prefer a more proactive response, maybe carry around a bunch of WWII concentration camp photos and wave those around whenever the Germans complain about "spying."

      No they shouldn't be punished forever, but we probably should keep an eye on them forever.

      Their history with the Nazi state and the Gestapo secret police is exactly why Germans are so bothered by spying. They know for a fact that gathered information can easily be put to nefarious use.

    7. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      The USA's response has been something along the lines of "you expected us not to conducting traditional spying activities?"

      There's nothing "traditional" about the depth, pervasiveness, or reach of the USG's spying. If it's anything like military spending, the U.S. spends more than the rest of the planet combined.

    8. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      No they shouldn't be punished forever, but we probably should keep an eye on them forever.

      So who do you suggest should keep an eye on the United States, for it's history of genocide, slavery, imperialism, and overthrowing democratically elected governments? You'd need quite a team for that job.

    9. Re:I found this article to be more informative by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The Gestapo actually wasn't that good at spying. The German people were, however, quite good at turning their neighbors in to the Gestapo. There's a lot of myth concerning the Nazi police force. It's unfortunate that even today people repeat it without thinking.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know WWII was not won by Americans alone. By many measures the Soviets did the bulk of the job, and for a long while the Soviets were keeping an eye on Germans. Stasi and all that stuff. Not a good thing IMHO. That is why Germans are so bothered by spying.

      Gestapo (Nazis) did lots of bad stuff, but the wholesale surveillance was carried out by Stasi (Communists).

    11. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Gestapo actually wasn't that good at spying. The German people were, however, quite good at turning their neighbors in to the Gestapo. There's a lot of myth concerning the Nazi police force. It's unfortunate that even today people repeat it without thinking.

      I lived under a communist regime with a gestapo like secret police. It is quite true that everyone spied on everyone else but that was because of fear and intimidation tactics used by the regime. They didn't simply punish whoever they though was a threat to them, family, friends even neighbors if not sent to interment camps outright, would be punished with difficult jobs in far away regions, denied schooling and all kinds of other punitive measures. The only way to escape this fate was for them to be convinced that you already told them everything you knew. As someone with what they called a "unclean biography" because of a great uncle that had immigrated to the United States, I know full well how much suffering a totalitarian state can impose without the use of imprisonment.

    12. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 1

      The Gestapo actually wasn't that good at spying. The German people were, however, quite good at turning their neighbors in to the Gestapo.

      How is this different than public cameras, ISPs, your phones and internet-of-things supplying your information, exactly? The NSA generously collects data from external sources.

    13. Re:I found this article to be more informative by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      How's it different? Cameras aren't different than your friends and neighbors voluntarily going to the government to inform on you? Can you honestly see no difference there? Or are you just SO KEEN to say NSA=Gestapo that you will make any mental gyrations necessary to maintain your previously-established mental conclusions?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re:I found this article to be more informative by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Not really. Sticking to historical events rather than hysterical invention really simplifies the matter.

      The US hasn't committed genocide during its existence. The US government ended slavery in its territory (inherited from the European based colonies) although it required force of arms to do so. It's imperialism was limited in scope and time, and is long over. The democratically elected government of the Confederate States of America deserved its fate. Iran was no longer a democracy when the US assisted the return of the Shah to power since an election was faked, the legislature was dissolved, the "Prime Minister" ruled by decree and ignored the traditional check and balance of a constitutional monarch being able to dismiss the Prime Minister.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    15. Re:I found this article to be more informative by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      US military spending is high because it pays its volunteer soldiers a competitive wage while sustaining a substantial military that is actually capable of fighting despite the fact that it often has to cross oceans to do so. If you are observant you might have noticed a capabilities gap between the US military and the militaries of much of Europe. Since WW2 the US has borne much of the defense burden for Europe, Japan, and various other places.

      Many other countries have relied upon conscription, with some dropping it only recently. Germany, Russian, and China have all relied on conscription until relatively recently if they don't still use it.

      The US also pays Western rates for its technology and weapons, not Chinese or Russian rates.

      As to spying, Russia and China are quite prolific in their spying, including against Germany. Perhaps you don't follow the news about that?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    16. Re:I found this article to be more informative by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      There's nothing "traditional" about the depth, pervasiveness, or reach of the USG's spying. If it's anything like military spending, the U.S. spends more than the rest of the planet combined.

      Maybe you can use this to start bridging your information gap.

      Russia, China engaging in industrial espionage

      Germany is full of Russian and Chinese spies working to get information about top business and technology developments, according to the country’s domestic intelligence service.

      Studies show that the German economy loses around €50 billion a year as a consequence, Burkhard Even, head of the counterintelligence section of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, told the audience at a recent security forum in Bonn.

      The spying is a mix of official, intelligence service agents, and unofficial business spooks, he said.

      Even estimated that of the 500 registered staff of the Russian embassy in Berlin, at least 150 were working as intelligence agents, disguised as diplomats or journalists.

      He said that more than four million Russians live in the country as a whole, leaving him unable to guess at how many agents might be hidden amongst them.
       

      China's Growing Spy Threat

      But according to analysts and officials, the communist-controlled People’s Republic of China operates the single largest intelligence-gathering apparatus in the world—and its growing appetite for secrets has apparently become insatiable.

      From economic and military espionage to keeping tabs on exiled dissidents, China’s global spying operations are rapidly expanding. And, therefore, so is the threat. Some analysts even argue the regime—which is also gobbling up such key natural resources as farmland, energy, and minerals—has an eye on dominating the world.

      Estimates on the number of spies and agents employed by the communist state vary widely. According to public statements by French author and investigative journalist Roger Faligot, who has written several books about the regime’s security services, there are around two million Chinese working directly or indirectly for China’s intelligence apparatus.

      Putin's Secret Weapon

      Britain under attack from 20 foreign spy agencies including France and Germany

      "It is estimated that at least 20 Foreign intelligence services are operating to some degree against UK interests. Of greatest concern are the Russians and Chinese. The number of Russian intelligence officers in London has not fallen since the Soviet times."

      A Whitehall source told The Sunday Telegraph that Russia uses its massive spy network as an "extension of state power" in an attempt to "further its own military and economic base".

      The source said: "If a country, such as Russia or Iran, can steal a piece of software which will save it seven years in research and development then it will do so without any hesitation. Russian agents will target anybody that they believe could be useful to them. Spying is hard-wired into the country's DNA. They have been at it for centuries and they are simply not going to stop because the Cold War has ended."

      Officials say Chinese spies have targeted every sector of the U.S. economy

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    17. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Sique · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Germany had three regimes following each other which thought that wholesale spying on the population somehow keeps things in check. And the result was two World Wars and the breakdown of all three regimes.

      The U.S. believes that spying on the whole world somehow gives them early warnings, and they managed to completely miss the Korean War, the German Wall, the Cuba Crisis, the reconquest of South Vietnam by the Vietcong, the end of the Somoza Regime in Nicaragua, the polish Solidarnosc, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the subsequent dissolution first of nearly all communist regimes and then the Soviet Union, the conquest of Kuwait by Iraq, 9/11, Somalia, the Arabian Spring, the turning of the Arabian Spring into a strengthening of the extreme wahhabitian Islam, the ISIL conquest of North West Iraq, the annection of Crimea, and the pro-russian uprising in the eastern Ukraine.

      But they were pretty sure they find Weapons of Mass Destruction in post Gulf War Iraq.

      Somehow the whole spying does not yield the expected results. I wonder if still more spying and mass surveillance will solve this. And more IT infrastructure to dig through the data. And still more money to pay more analysts. And do everything to weaken any attempt to make communication secure.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    18. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Sique · · Score: 1

      The U.S. never enacted the Indian Removal Act, stole the land from the Native Americans and never forced them into reservations, which would be considered ethnic cleansing by today's standards (and thus the Bureau of Indian Affairs never formally apologized). The U.S. never forced the Cherokee to leave Georgia in the Trail of Tears. The U.S. never fought the Seminole Wars whose only reason was to subjugate the different seminole tribes and force them out of Florida. The U.S. never comitted Sand Creek Massacre nor the Washita Massacre or any of the other massacres. The U.S. abolished slavery already shortly after Zarist Russia ended it in 1861 (and all the other European countries ended it until 1815 on their territory and the South American states until 1822) The U.S. never followed the policy to take the children of Native Americans and have them adopted by white Americans until the late 1960ies.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    19. Re:I found this article to be more informative by umghhh · · Score: 1

      It is always good to have one scape goat guilty of the biggest evil etc. That is why results of neither Milgram experiment nor Stanford Prison experiment are valid for US citizens who are holly angels.

    20. Re:I found this article to be more informative by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The Gestapo actually wasn't that good at spying. The German people were, however, quite good at turning their neighbors in to the Gestapo.

      Which means Gestapo was good at spying. The indicator is whether you get results, after all, not whether you get them because you're smart or scary.

      There's a lot of myth concerning the Nazi police force. It's unfortunate that even today people repeat it without thinking.

      "He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling in your cities; he has indeed nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you."

      Tyrants stay in power, not because they're stronger than their very source of power, but because they're good at building myths. A nation, company or any other organization is nothing more than a myth shared by its members. And the myth of the Third Reich is so strong it still persists, long after its embodiment is gone, as a kind of ghost nation. Time will tell whether Hitler will take up permanent residence in our collective pantheon along the Caesar's and Napoleon.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    21. Re:I found this article to be more informative by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It is quite true that everyone spied on everyone else but that was because of fear and intimidation tactics used by the regime.

      Sounds a lot like what they are doing in the UK at the moment with paedophilia. They are actually talking about making it a law not to report suspicions now.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:I found this article to be more informative by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If we genocided the natives we did a terrible job of it. There are more alive today then in 1492.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    23. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Uberbah · · Score: 0

      So the Nazis weren't guilty of genocide because they merely killed millions of Romani, Jews, homosexuals and communists rather than completely exterminating them?

      Idiots.

    24. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      The US hasn't committed genocide during its existence.

      Did this little act of holocaust denial bring any twinges from the rabidly Zionist part of your brain, or do you just eat more racist popcorn while watching bombs fall on Gaza? I'd know I'd be feeling a slight sense of discomfort if I was a hypocritical psychopathic sophist on a scale that's positively Biblical.

    25. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can use this to start bridging your information gap.

      Maybe you could work on your reading comprehension. Pointing to the fact that other countries have militarizes and intelligence programs is a complete non sequitur when the subject is the depth, pervasiveness, and reach of the USG. The Vatican has armed guards, so it's pretty much the same thing as the U.S. Marine Corp!

      US military spending is high because it pays its volunteer soldiers a competitive wage while sustaining a substantial military that is actually capable of fighting despite the fact that it often has to cross oceans to do so.

      Do you have some smarter jingoistic friends that could troll on your behalf, because your constant practice you're still bad at it. The U.S. has over 600 overseas bases around the world - how many does Russia have? The United States has 20 air craft carriers in service, under construction, or in reserve - how many does China have?

      Go home, troll, you're drunk.

    26. Re:I found this article to be more informative by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Did this little act of holocaust denial ...

      And which "holocaust" was that? You'll have to be more explicit about which façade you are referring to.

      I'd know I'd be feeling a slight sense of discomfort if I was a hypocritical psychopathic sophist on a scale that's positively Biblical.

      If you were (are) psychopathic you probably wouldn't feel a sense of discomfort, hence the label. I can't say I've detected any signs of discomfort on your part for writing the nonsense you do, like this below:

      .. twinges from the rabidly Zionist part of your brain, or do you just eat more racist popcorn while watching bombs fall on Gaza?

      Racist popcorn? Are you perchance "rabidly anti-Zionist"? You certainly seem to have a sort of European slant to your thinking on these matters.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    27. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer a more proactive response, maybe carry around a bunch of WWII concentration camp photos and wave those around whenever the Germans complain about "spying."

      No they shouldn't be punished forever, but we probably should keep an eye on them forever.

      Their history with the Nazi state and the Gestapo secret police is exactly why Germans are so bothered by spying. They know for a fact that gathered information can easily be put to nefarious use.

      If they understand the history and are against having people make sure they're not subjected to that sort of governance again... that tells me which side they're on!

      Luckily pretty much everybody in American politics supports spying on the Germans, so I can be sure I'll remain protected from them no matter what they think of it.

    28. Re:I found this article to be more informative by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      If we take the heat for natural diseases surely we deserve credit for bringing them science based medicine?

      Remember the blanket story is virologically impossible. It's a myth.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    29. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Too much hyperbole and lies to even address. It is all off-topic, and most of it isn't true. You'd have to stretch almost every word just to make it slightly truthy.

    30. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Smallpox sent in soldiers to burn crops and kill women and children in villages? Wiped out entire tribes or forced them to travel hundreds of miles on death marches?

      Denialist idiots.

    31. Re:I found this article to be more informative by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      I trust you'll be relieved to read this paper:

      Did the U.S. Army Distribute Smallpox Blankets to Indians? Fabrication and Falsification in Ward Churchill's Genocide Rhetoric

      Abstract

      In this analysis of the genocide rhetoric employed over the years by Ward Churchill, an ethnic studies professor at the University of Colorado, a "distressing" conclusion is reached: Churchill has habitually committed multiple counts of research misconduct—specifically, fabrication and falsification. While acknowledging the "politicization" of the topic and evidence of other outrages committed against Native American tribes in times past, this study examines the different versions of the "smallpox blankets" episode published by Churchill between 1994 and 2003. The "preponderance of evidence" standard of proof strongly indicates that Churchill fabricated events that never occurred—namely the U.S. Army's alleged distribution of smallpox infested blankets to the Mandan Indians in 1837. The analysis additionally reveals that Churchill falsified sources to support his fabricated version of events, and also concealed evidence in his cited sources that actually disconfirms, rather than substantiates, his allegations of genocide.

      WARD CHURCHILL

      Ward Churchill was a professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder from 1990 until 2007, when he was fired for research misconduct.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    32. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You THINK they missed things like the invasion of Kuwait -- because that's the excuse you were told.

      James Baker said his secretary told Saddam "we have no policy in that regard" when he asked if it would be OK to invade Kuwait. If you believe that, then that's a choice you can make.

      I figured that there was an INTENT to invade Iraq on behalf of oil companies from the beginning, and history makes more sense.

    33. Re:I found this article to be more informative by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Smallpox sent in soldiers to burn crops and kill women and children in villages? Wiped out entire tribes or forced them to travel hundreds of miles on death marches?

      I trust you'll be relieved to read this paper: Did the U.S. Army Distribute Smallpox Blankets to Indians? Fabrication and Falsification in Ward Churchill's Genocide Rhetoric

      Reading? How'd you manage to take all those propaganda electives at Imperialist Psychopath High School without nailing down basic reading comprehension? Nobody's talking about infecting tribes with smallpox but you and your fellow genocide excuser, HornWumpus. Smallpox wasn't paying bounties on the scalps taken from natives with a "discount" for children under the age of 12. Smallpox didn't send the cavalry off to massacre tribes that had been allies, much less ones that fought back in response to having their land and lives taken by force.

      And which "holocaust" was that? You'll have to be more explicit about which faÃade you are referring to.

      Doubling down on insulting your own intelligence as well as mine? The formation and expansion of the United States was impossible without the organized mass slaughter of any native tribe that dared to try and hold onto their lands in the face of colonialist aggression.

      Are you perchance "rabidly anti-Zionist"? You certainly seem to have a sort of European slant to your thinking on these matters.

      You mean you'd like to deflect from your racist colonialism and imperalism. Too bad, as I am always for the oppressed: the Seminoles that were first slaughtered by the Spanish and then English settlers; the Africans taken as slaves, the Jews that were forced into ghettos by the Popes; the Palestinians murdered by Zionists wanting their lands. I am always against the oppressor: the rich taking all the land and charging rent from the poor; the slavemaster; the Inquisition; the IDF occupation that has even used starvation as a collective punishment alongside it's many many other crimes against humanity.

      Which is why I have a problem with you, cold fjord: you are one evil fuck who makes it his personal business to defend the worst actions of humanity.

  11. Re:What if he refuses? by Sique · · Score: 2

    First of all: Germany is no longer an occupied state, independently of what you think. Second: Of course Germany can do it. What will the U.S. do to retaitiate? Occupy Germany again? To what result? And is it worth it? Losing all the business in Germany? Losing all the taxes the U.S. earns from doing business with german companies?

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  12. Re:ahh typical dumb american by rock56501 · · Score: 0

    Didn't know that I had to include a /sarcasm tag for you to understand sarcasm.

  13. It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by boorack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most of European countries used to be vassals to US and if US spies were found, Europeans used to sweep such fiascos under the rug. This is changing now. My suspicion is that this is related to strong arm tactics of US government (if not outright bullying, eg. ACTA, now TISA, BNP Paribas etc.) and other fiascos (NSA, and now all this Ukraine/Russia fiasco, caused almost entirely by US neocons). My feeling is that European countries are now in the process of breaking out from strong US influence as they recognized USofA is actually not their friend. Russia might also be involved, assisting core EU countries in delicate path of reducing their political subordination to Washington. Note that France is also increasingly defying Washington orders (Mistral contract) despite of heavy bullying (BNP Paribas case), with top french politicians and central bankers talking openly about getting rid of dollar in international trade. Great Britain and Poland are the only countries trying to wreak as much havoc as possible in this process. Should this process go on for a while, it would force USofA to abandon its imperial project, reform itself and start behaving like ordinary country which would be good thing for everyone, especially Arabs/Ukrainians and ordinary Americans themselves.

    This is much more than just simple spy flap story.

    1. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AC because Mod.

      Very good point. Also, recent history shows that if the Germans really want to kick off, it takes the rest of the world, and a lot of lives and money, to dissuade them. You want to upset the Germans? You'd better be sure you can afford it.

    2. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My feeling is that European countries are now in the process of breaking out from strong US influence as they recognized USofA is actually not their friend.

      My feeling is that European countries want to be friends with the US, because otherwise they get bullied by Russia.

    3. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by 32771 · · Score: 1

      Given that we may be nearing some energy crisis you could think about what it might cause. Looking for it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...
      you can find talk about decentralization which means a break up of a system into smaller units. I think this is what might be happening, Europe is basically used up having an aging populace and diminishing resources, whereas Asia has lots of young people and some ambition to get their hands on resources. Since there have been signs in the past that energy demand has been outstripping energy availability, I would guess that for the US to keep its position in the world it has to find new resources and keep competition and resource use low. With the current system the finding of new stuff has long been passed, so its hampering other peoples development and reducing energy expenditure now.

      Europe is a competitor but not as much as Asia, I would expect Europe to become some kind of backwater and less useful to the US in the future, which would mean the fracturing of NATO. This spy scandal and Ukraine appears to be the start of this process.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    4. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Excepted UK, I don't know any European country wanting to be friend with US. US does not want to be friend. US is a bully.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures
      1 United States United States 682,478,000,000 4.4% 2012
      2 China People's Republic of China 166,107,000,000 2.1% 2012
      3 Russia Russia 90,749,000,000 4.4% 2012

      Now Europe
      4 United Kingdom United Kingdom 61,007,000,000 2.5% 2012
      6 France France 58,943,000,000 2.3% 2012
      9 Germany Germany 45,785,000,000 1.4% 2012
      10 Italy Italy 34,004,000,000 1.7% 2012
      19 Spain Spain 11,535,000,000 0.85% 2012
      21 Netherlands Netherlands 9,839,000,000 1.3% 2012
      23 Poland Poland 9,355,000,000 1.9% 2012
      [...]

      From http://www.eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/eda-publications/defence-data-booklet-2012-web a total of € 189.6 billion
      Europe is the second only to US. I don't think Russia will be stupid enough to bully an union investing twice as much than themselves.

    5. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re 'My feeling is that European countries want to be friends with the US, because otherwise they get bullied by Russia."
      The EU had 2 options - find its own oil and gas globally in the 1950's-70's and undercut protected US/UK oil brands with all the distant start up costs.
      Enrico Mattei views on big oil and finding Italy much needed cheap energy
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Option two was buy gas from the Soviet Union at set rates with new pipelines.
      The Soviet Union and Russia was paid on time and kept to the letter of the contracts with the EU.
      The EU and Russia seem to have a new vision of energy exports
      Russia Rushes To Seal Ukraine-Bypassing Gas Pipeline: Lavrov Pays Bulgaria A Visit (07/07/2014)
      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Ukraine caused by US neocons? You mean Obama and Kerry? Yeah, those famous Jewish conservatives...

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by boorack · · Score: 1

      I mean Nuland, McCain etc.. Obama/Kerry are just too weak and too dumb to keep neocons in check.

    8. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by boorack · · Score: 2

      No, this is british/american propaganda. WW1 was procured by Great Britain - british politicians at the time quote openly stated that WW1 is about extending British Empire for another 100 years. So they needed to destroy Germany that started outcompeting Britain in economic and industrial terms. They also managed to destroy Russsia in this process. WW2 was just part 2 of WW1 - peace conditions imposed on Germany guaranteed that and US bankers / corporations even helped bringing Hitler to power. Keiser was trying to avoid confrontation just as Putin today (contrary to nasty propaganda in western so called "free media"). My fear is that today's situation is very similiar to that from 1914 - dying empire choosing to wreak as much havoc as possible instead of reforming itself. Warfare changed a bit (instead of 3-gen industrialized wars we now have 4-gen proxy wars as those in Iraq or Ukraine).

    9. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Ah, OK, so it's not their fault, then. Whew! I thought they might actually have to take responsibility for their actions, but now I see nothing negative can ever be their fault. It's like some sort of mental state that defends itself in the face of contradictory information because the alternative is too horrifying to contemplate...what's that called again? Oh, right, cognitive dissonance.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:It's geopolitics, not just simple spy flap by umghhh · · Score: 1
      Every country has its moments - some go up only to go down, some stay down for long time. We will see what the future will bring. EU (which is not whole Europe) is being charged by waves of immigrants from Africa now which it tries to stop by building modern versions of roman walls. We know how it ended back then - destruction of empire and dark ages. These were followed by Enlightenment and wars and massive destruction in 20th century followed by growth etc. So yes we lost part of our energy in Europe. Look at US and you will see that the country lost part of its energy too. Big advantage US always had was to be a magnet of immigrants. This is changing for many reasons. There are other factors. You are right of course about the raise of new powers. Yet the history is never linear.

      The winds of change are blowing - this much is true.

  14. too many areas where German and U.S. security inte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "too many areas where German and U.S. security interests diverge"

    Spying on the Germans being the major one.

  15. Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You just outed our spies in your network and you expect us to sign a no-spy list? Come again when we have undermined your security enough that you're as safe as the other countries we pretty much already own.

    In other words, we'll only not spy on you if you hand over what we want willingly.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Translation by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't the existance of spies be the reason for a "no-spy list?" I mean if you're not spying on each other anyways, then why waste time and money negotiating that? Seems to be a required precondition.

      This proves the status quo is spying, therefore the premise of a no-spy list is valid.

    2. Re:Translation by Livius · · Score: 1

      The "countries with which the United States has a non-espionage pact" don't spy on the US. It's a one-side agreement, like most treaties with the US are in practice.

    3. Re:Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, that's what the US thinks...

      A non-spy pact with a country as paranoid as the US is like a no-kill pact with a homicidal maniac.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. Re:Considering Bush did this... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As to why the 'cheap shot', it's because Obama has been expanding upon many of Bush's most-hated policies. In his campaign speeches, he promised to scale back the War on Terror, close Gitmo and rein in the surveillance apparatus. He has done none of these things, and has indeed intensified those efforts.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  17. A diplomatic euphemism by mbkennel · · Score: 3, Insightful


    | The Obama administration and that of George W. Bush both resisted such entreaties, in part because many U.S. intelligence officials believe that there are too many areas where German and U.S. security interests diverge."

    This is a euphemism for saying "we believe that the German intelligence department is significantly penetrated by the Russian FSB".

    Of course the German intelligence apparatus also spies on US, and France and UK, as they all do to one another.

    1. Re:A diplomatic euphemism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is akin to saying "everybody are rapists, because I am a rapist". IF there is any German spying against the U.S on-going, I challenge you to come up with ANY reference.

      Germany was completely broken in many ways after WW1 and WW2. Nobody was interested in "playing great game" or something of the like. People were simply fighting to survive, because they had quite often been Ethnically Cleansed from their house and patch of land by all those Good Poles, Good Czech, Good Belgians, Good French and Good Russians. Because, you know, "two wrongs make one right" and so on. If they had not been killed in that process, that is. Population density was and is extremely high, therefore food supply a chronic problem.

      We don't suffer direct hunger these days, but I have never heard of ANY spying of Germany against the U.S. There was some spying on-going against the Eastern Bloc and against some more targets designated by the U.S. Many Nazi intel people happily became CIA/NSA assets in the form of FHO/Gehlen Org/BND. They certainly worked against German patriots like they worked for the Austrian Corporal. Just this time for America.

      Angela Merkel, a former Communist Youth Org Member (FDJ), decided she should back GWB in his quest to hit an unrelated party (Iraq) for 9/11. Angela will always please whoever is powerful. If Martians invade, expect her to be the Finest Collaborator.

      As Churchill put it "you either have the Hun at your throat or under your boot". Unfortunately, that is still true for quite a few people here.

    2. Re: A diplomatic euphemism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH, so now you're the sufferer and your neighbours are those bad guys? Tell me more about this... The nation of people who were only "executing given orders"...

  18. Re:ahh typical dumb american by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Online sarcasm was deprecated in 1986. Please read the manual, and get off the lawn!

  19. Re:Considering Bush did this... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Because Obama is the current President, and is responsible for the current policy?

    The nutcakes are the ones living in a fantasy land where we don't hold our currently elected representatives accountable. Hope and change, still waiting for the change. (I've given up hope)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  20. Re:too many areas where German and U.S. security i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spying on Germans is just common sense.

  21. Huh? by RAVEN2 · · Score: 1

    We were only following orders.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spelling *azi here. You should write it like this: Befehl ist Befehl.

  22. Re:Considering Bush did this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. When I read the summary, my immediate thought was "Here we go again...Obama's doing it but it's OK because BUSH DID IT FIRST!!!111" I.e. the exact opposite of the GP's take. It is utterly amazing how the Obama fan club continues to give him a free pass on everything under the sun...

  23. They are sending home the wrong man by Trachman · · Score: 1

    I think that Germany is sending the wrong man home. If US has any specialists worth their salt, then their station chief will be the driver, security guard. A cook perhaps, or public relations officer. If you remember from recent Snowden's revelations, officers are given made up identities. That being said, what is wrong with these Germans? The last time we have checked, Germany is an occupied nation since WW2 , it has occupiers' army and some must have forgotten who is the boss.

    1. Re:They are sending home the wrong man by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      I believe from reading the official histories for allies its custom and practice to let your station chief be known to his/her opposite number.

  24. I Spy.... by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1, Informative

    Without generating some type of comparison chart, I Googled multiple variations of who spies on who. Spies caught, spy agencies....etc.
    And the winner of my informal who spies upon whom poll......Somalia! With no official Government they have no official spy agency.
    Don't want to be spied on by your government you live under, this appears to be the place.
    it seems that every modern country has been caught in some capacity.
    (This was not a thorough nor proper search, just an hour of casual searching, so I know someone will come up criticizing this, finding counter examples, etc. So I say this is opinion based upon limited data and subject to change with refinement of data.)
    As always, the easy target is the one who got outed. But Germany whining about spying? Now that's giggle worthy.
    I don't like what the alphabet soup agencies (ANY of them, regardless of country of origin) do either. But this just seems like mock outrage to me. Just like Diane Fienstien who supports NSA spying getting bent when she found out she was targeted as well.
    When you sleep with cobras, you're likely to get bitten.

    --
    Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    1. Re:I Spy.... by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Somalia has a 'recognized' government, but it is almost completely ineffectual.

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    2. Re:I Spy.... by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Most countries do have spy agencies. And they often do have some reasons for that. But do they spy on their allies? Do they spy on general public? Care to to link some info about countries that do the spying and that are not in G8 and are not China or Korea?

      Sure, you were joking. But you are just trying to show that "everybody does it". The point is not only that that is not an excuse. The point is that it is not even remotely true.

    3. Re:I Spy.... by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Actually, the intent was to show my disgust with the G20 countries. Not to 'excuse them.'

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  25. Sanctions/Embargo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prevent German/Chinese/Russian goods being imported into the US.

  26. remember Gary Mckinnon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alternatively he can be put on trial in every country violated in the good name of the United States (in the technology sense)

    To give an idea of the damage: Does anyone think US tech products are still worth buying? The mere suggestion makes me laugh.

    If extradited to the US and charged, McKinnon would have faced up to 70 years in jail.

  27. Re:ahh typical dumb american by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    Or in the imperative the CIA has been made to understand: RAUS!

  28. The US State Dept by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    ...seems to be doing everything in their power to push Germany to be a regional power that DOESN'T NEED OR WANT the US.

    Is that the greatest idea?

    --
    -Styopa
  29. Now if only... by macraig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... we in the USA could also tell the CIA to GTFO.

    1. Re:Now if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... we could try and sentence them to prison, rather than giving them an early retirement bonus that is worth more than they would have made if they had continued to work until their retirement.

  30. Re:Considering Bush did this... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    You sound like a typical Democrat voter: anyone who disagrees with the Democrat party line is automatically a "nutcake gun-owning, violent conservative", Obama somehow isn't at fault for anything his administration does but Bush can be blamed for all current Democrat policies, and calling Obama on his pro-Bush policies is somehow "hatred of technology and science" and makes one a Holocaust denier.

    Honestly, I used to think the Republicans were the nutty ones, but these days I'm starting to believe it's really the Democrats who are insane.

  31. You have replied to an AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is in your sig:

    Notice: If you post anonymously do not expect a reply

    And I am replying to a comment which you replied to another AC

    I purposely am posting as an AC just to remind you of your own violation of your own principle

    1. Re:You have replied to an AC by s.petry · · Score: 1

      It is not violating my principle, you are choosing to ignore the definition of "expect". Hint: "Do not expect" is not a refusal.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  32. Germany Excluded from "League of Nations" because by realperseus · · Score: 1

    . ..because Germany has not allowed the Google mapping cars to traverse their entire countryside? Yea, I know there is more to this than that, but seriously, check it out...

    --
    "Trusting every aspect of our lives to a giant computer was the smartest thing we ever did.." Homer Simpson
  33. OT - Redgum by TapeCutter · · Score: 0

    Great band, I had the privlage of living across the road from the Olinda pub in 1979/80. A front row table for one of the best musicians ever to come out of Oz was not hard to come by. :)

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:OT - Redgum by AHuxley · · Score: 0

      Re OT, I saw the ASIO lyrics a few days ago linked from a slashdot comment and added the sig.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  34. Re:Considering Bush did this... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    A journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  35. Re:ahh typical dumb american by davester666 · · Score: 0

    please, no using hitler-speak in front of the children...

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  36. Anonymous for a reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... as you will see in this following posting:

    Try to find the differences between the NSA and the "Ministerium fuer Staatssicherheit" (Stasi) which had eastern Germany in a stranglehold, so to speak.

    You'll find very of them, especially since both seem to have the same pervasiveness of people's privacy by now.

    So please tell me, what makes one of them 'evil', and the other 'good', or at least tolerable?

  37. Here's their secret by billstewart · · Score: 0

    How do you get to the World Cup? Same way you get to Carnegie Hall - Practice!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  38. Who's the Spook? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    You may or may not have noticed that the US press hasn't mentioned the name of the departing CIA Station Chief, but they haven't. Why not? Because it's A Secret! The Germans know who they're kicking out, but the US press goes along with the pretense that it's secret, and other people he might spy on in the future won't know he's a spy, and people who he's hung out with in the past might be exposed as having been spies too. In some cases it's illegal for US government officials to reveal the names of spies, but if they leak them for administration political purposes, like Scooter Libby outing Valerie Plame, they get pardoned, and if they get leaked by accident, like a White House Press Release "notice what name is missing" oops a few months back, the press politely pretends they didn't see anything.

    If the Germans are really mad? Merkel can tell the German press the guy's name, and ask them to print it and put it online.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Who's the Spook? by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      like Scooter Libby outing Valerie Plame
      You misspelled Richard Armitage. Btw, no one was convicted of outing Valerie Plame, Scooter was convicted of lying to investigators, and his prison sentence was commuted, not pardoned.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  39. Re:What if he refuses? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Funny, I heard this bullshit when I was stationed there ('79-'81 Air Force), and from my landlord's son, to which I responded..."If we're occupying, why am I paying rent to your father?". It's not an occupation anymore when you can be asked/forced to leave, and that was the case even back then.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  40. Did Germany pay for his vacation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eheh, did Germany pay for his vacation? Maybe with a giftcard on top of that "Please come back and visit Germany again" :|

  41. True, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... i still see a difference between spying on people _because they can_ and doing so on court order. Which court ordered to tap the phones of government representatives, i wonder?

  42. She is doing the US a favour by sdack · · Score: 1

    Angel Merkel grew up in East Germany under a socialist regim where spying was a major tool in controlling the people. Back then when it had no computers and no computer networks did the government keep files on all their citizens, which tells a bit about the amount of espionage going on back then. The so called "Deutsche Democratische Republik" was not democratic at all with its single politcal party. Either you were a member of the party or you were not, and not being a member made you suspicious and a possible risk to the governement. It also did not have a free economy, but a centralised economy. It meant that if you wanted a car, of which there was only one brand available, you had to wait years to get one. The people of East Germany back then had to make the best of it and spying on one another was sadly a part of it. You could not say a bad word about the governemtn or the only political party (which basically meant the same people) without it having consequences for you. It could mean that the car you had ordered would get delayed by a few more years, or that you did not get one at all. If you were trying to build a house could this have meant that some basic building materials suddenly had become unavailable to you. And so on. So spying on oneanother and tipping off high ranking officials gave people power over each other. It is save to say that Angel Merkel knows quite well about the consequences of espionage from her childhood and her youth growing up under a socialist regim. I am not saying she is afraid of espionage, but rather is she an intelligent woman who can tell wrong from right and good from bad. She knows espionage can be good and as well as bad. A good spy is then one who uses his knowledge for good and who does not get caught, whereas a bad spy fails and is also the one who is more likely to get caught. With all that said, Angel Merkel will have done the US a favour by throwing out a bad spy. It will also help her in securing her own political position, because many Germans will still remember the ways of old East Germany. And personally will it give her a great relief to know that she is able to fight bad espionage between friendly nations.

  43. Let's be frank by AstroSurf · · Score: 1

    "countries with which the United States has a non-espionage pact. Those nations include Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand."

    What a joke! The U.S. doesn't have to spy on those countries. They are already *willfully* a completely open book to ANY U.S. data-gobbler. Started decades ago. Has everyone (including Angela) forgotten Echelon? Old news!

    --
    Astro
  44. One way by whipnet · · Score: 1

    Whew! Good thing that Germany is 100% not spying on anything or anyone in the United States ever. *

  45. I think by NewYork · · Score: 1

    US is fearing China & Germany are conspiring to dilute http://www.cnbc.com/id/1018146...