Slashdot Mirror


Western US States Using Up Ground Water At an Alarming Rate

sciencehabit (1205606) writes A new study shows that ground water in the Colorado basin is being depleted six times faster than surface water. The groundwater losses, which take thousands of years to be recharged naturally, point to the unsustainability of exploding population centers and water-intensive agriculture in the basin, which includes most of Arizona and parts of Colorado, California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, and Wyoming. Because ground water feeds many of the streams and rivers in the area, more of them will run dry.

36 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. ALL RIGHT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Soon the Department of Water and Power will control all the water and have all the power.

    1. Re:ALL RIGHT! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One of the fun things about Seattle is we actually own the entire watershed here. All of it. So the suburbs basically have no water rights.

      They either buy it from us at a premium to what our citizens (who own it) pay or they buy it from someone else (at a higher premium since it has to be trucked in).

      Capiche?

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  2. Peak Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And you thought the wars and environmental harm over oil was bad, we ain't seen nothing yet.

    1. Re:Peak Water by alen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      US military does periodic defense reviews and the ones i saw back in the late 90's predicted wars over water shortages

    2. Re:Peak Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, predicted as in considered the possibility of, right?

      No. Predicted as in we already see the wars being fought over the economic conditions arising from a lack of it elsewhere.

      Believe it or not, you can live without Internet, oil, air conditioning or even meat. But if drinking the local well water is gone, or "just" poisons you, you can't survive. You'll kill not for gold or ideology, but for water to drink, or to prevent your kids/wife/etc from dying of thirst. The ironic bit is we will poison the local well water via fracking for gas, so we can have "cheap" oil to fight for farther distant oil fields.

  3. getting worse by jbmartin6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    And now all the pot farming is going to make it even worse.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  4. I'm alarmed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    That headline alarmed me!

  5. Just more alarmism from waterists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Waterist like to pretend water is crucial for life and plant development. These are all fabrications from hydrologists who wish to keep their grant money.

  6. Cancerous tumor. by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some time ago I remember reading about a proposal to building an aquaduct from the Snake River in Idaho to Southern California. It reminded me of the metaphor that when a cancerous tumor grows unchecked it will commadeer local blood vessels for its own use.

    1. Re:Cancerous tumor. by ShaunC · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your post contains words that are known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  7. Why I'm on a well in a sustainable aquifer. by digsbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the things I was looking for in a house was to be able to supply my own well water. I've got the acreage, and the area is fully developed. All 2 acre lots. Never had a problem with the water table, never should. And I won't need to deal with government restrictions over municipal supplies.

    1. Re:Why I'm on a well in a sustainable aquifer. by TheReaperD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You say that now but, when that well runs dry, you'll be screaming "why didn't the government do something about this!"

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    2. Re:Why I'm on a well in a sustainable aquifer. by nblender · · Score: 5, Informative

      Until your well collapses one day and you need to get approval to drill a new one and that approval is not forth-coming because there's now a water-coop that you need to join instead; paying them lots of money to run a pipe to your house and charging you per cubic meter...

      Seen it happen; it's coming.

      My well collapsed and fortunately a permit to drill a new one was a rubber stamp and I have a nice clean (albeit very hard) 10gpm well. Hopefully this well will last until I'm too old to care...

    3. Re:Why I'm on a well in a sustainable aquifer. by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I might be misunderstanding, but how does having a well protect you from people depleting the groundwater? If the groundwater is depleted, doesn't your well go dry?

    4. Re:Why I'm on a well in a sustainable aquifer. by JimSadler · · Score: 3, Informative

      What usually happens is that the well water starts getting nasty and the well must be drilled a bit deeper to get decent water. There are places out west where good water used to be had at 200 ft. and now the wells have been extended down to 450 ft.. The energy used to lift that water gets more and more expensive.

  8. Re:Streams will run dry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Santa Cruz river thru Tucson has been dry for so long, the local joke is the first day that the temp hits 100F, "breaking news, the ice has melted on the Santa Cruz"

    In the 1960's there were pictures of concrete pads on wells that were three to five feet off the ground. Drive I-10 near Pich-a-co Peak (Picacho Peak) and there is a ten foot drop in the highway from ground water subsidence.

    Not new news.....

  9. Re:Colorado has California over a barrel by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a proposal to built a freshwater pipeline from Lake Superior. I'd prefer to see growth limited to sustainable levels before they start pumping water out of the Great Lakes...but moneyed interests will probably get their way...they usually do.

    --
    The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
  10. we are experiencing something similar by Espectr0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    in northwestern Venezuela we are having the biggest drought in 60 years. We only have 57 days left of water, and that's including with limited use (1 and a half days of water per week!)

    Our water comes by the way of reservoirs, and we depend heavily on rain. Can't remember the last time it rained and we are getting extremely worried

    1. Re:we are experiencing something similar by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like it's time to sacrifice some virgins to the rain god. There are plenty on slashdot if you are recruiting.

  11. And you think it's sustainable why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    All of those 2 acre lots are a tiny spot on the water table map that they lie on. Everyone else is sucking up your water and you don't even know it.

  12. Re:Colorado has California over a barrel by xfizik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pumping out of the Great Lakes would not make Canada happy.

  13. An old Colorado Saying about water applies here: by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting.

    This applies to all of the southwest and a lot of the plains. Land is useless for anything but energy production without a supply of water, so you drink your whiskey and fight over the water. This has been true for centuries and will continue to be true for many more.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  14. PBS covered this by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the local farmers said "I expect when we run out this next decade, everyone will be very angry over the decisions we made to plant water-intensive crops in a very arid land for so many years".

    It's like Global Warming.

    It's coming for you whether you believe in it or not.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  15. Water? Like out of the toilet? by Maltheus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why don't they just use Brawndo? It's the thirst mutilator.

  16. Re:Oh really? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what alarmist hyper-environmentalist news stories are we to believe? Last time I checked, we had environmentalists screaming that fracking thousands of feet down leaks chemicals (sand, light hydrocarbons) through thousands of feet of permeable geological layers. If these layers are so permeable and the alarmists are telling the trough, how come it takes `thousands` of years to recharge the aquifers?

    The act of fracking, or fracturing, creates many tiny cracks.

    Here's a thought experiment: Stick your head under a bucket of tightly packed soil (mostly clay) in a bottomless bucket and fill it up.

    Now try the same thing after you use a spade on the soil in the bucket for a few minutes.

    Get the picture?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  17. Re:Colorado has California over a barrel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The water in the great lakes are already starting to drop. The great lakes consortium states would do just about everything to stop other states from coming in and taking their water. It would be the equivalent of Wisconsin trying to forcibly move all the wealth of silicon valley to green bay.

  18. Lumping everyone together.... by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really hate when they lump everyone together. The fastest draining aquifer is the Ogallala, which is in the middle of the country, not the west. What this article claims is absolutely not true in 99% of the areas included in that list of states. My state, Utah has one of the most highly regulated water systems in probably the world. We have strict regulations on wells and draw rates that are reviewed and approved by state regulators that will halt all pumping if they detect subsidence in the aquifer. The aquifers are almost uniformly carefully monitored to ensure water levels don't drop, and in some areas near the salt lake they monitor to ensure positive pressure into the lake is maintained so salt water isn't sucked back into the fresh water.

    Yes there are bad situations out there, Las Vegas and Phoenix are terribly managed water systems IMO, favoring growth over conservation. We shouldn't have 6 million people living in a desert that can barely naturally support 1/10 that many. And pumping several hundred thousand acre feet of water over a mountain range for Phoenix is a terrible waste of water, not to mention the water lost to evaporation in the process and the power used.

    But this blanket inclusion of all the western states in this indictment is stupid. Those of us with scarce water resources have carefully managed them for the most part. Utah's been managing water use far longer than most states because it's a scarce commodity and always has been. There is a river in Utah where every single drop is used 7 times before discharge into the Salt Lake and the river isn't very long.

    If you want to talk about water misuse, talk about the areas misusing water and stop lumping the rest of us in with them.

  19. Is California populated by idiots!!! by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    California is sitting next to the largest body of water on the planet, all they need to do is set up some desalination plants to make it potable

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:Is California populated by idiots!!! by DudemanX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. Now let's work on the hard part of your plan which is convincing people not to be against new wind farms and nuclear plants along the coast.

  20. Re:Colorado has California over a barrel by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is a treaty with respect to water in the Great Lakes. Not sure how that would affect things.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  21. Re:Colorado has California over a barrel by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

    You mean where they've been at the highest point in a decade because we now seeing a return to normal winter snowfalls? I remember 8 years ago that they were screaming that the end was nigh because the water levels had dropped. This was because we had unseasonably short winters with no heavy snow packs.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  22. Re:Better late than never, Slashdot by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People have been talking about this ever since (and likely before) T Boone Pickens stole the water in western TX.

    Texas has uniquely dumb laws that let you suck up whatever water is underneath your land.

    So if you own a couple acres on the edge of a giant underground reservoir that spans several counties, you are allowed to drain the entire reservoir from your property.

    Texas tried to mitigate this by allowing for local water boards, but they get bullied/sued if they don't allow the resource extraction.
    Read more here: http://www.mensjournal.com/magazine/print-view/who-stole-the-water-20140623

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  23. Re:Colorado has California over a barrel by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That said if you have a lawn and your shower/bath water doesn't provide the primary water to the landscaping, you are part of the problem too.

    If you still believe in the concept of lawns you are part of the problem.

    At what point did people start thinking that spending resources planting and maintaining a monoculture of sterile inedible grass was a good idea? Did golf players do this to us? The same area and resources could be used for everyone to have fresh vegetables growing around thier homes except:
    1) homeowners associations and baby boomers would throw a fit
    2) Americans don't eat vegetables anyway

  24. Re:Colorado has California over a barrel by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sad thing is Los Angeles is right there on the ocean......they have plenty of water if they would just purify it instead of stealing it from half of the rest of the country.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  25. Re:Should the United States accept more foreigners by ranton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Food is not cheap. Taking inflation into account, food prices are at an all-time high on a global basis. They're even higher than they were during World War II, when rationing was in place.

    The price of food increasing far faster than wages has in fact resulted in more poverty, which has in fact resulted in more obesity is many nations around the world.

    The parent post should have said developed countries instead of modern world, because in developed countries food certainly is cheap. In 1900 families spent 43% of their money on food, while in 2003 it was 13%. Food is incredibly cheap by historical standards, about a third of the cost of food 100 years ago. source

    Poverty only correlates to obesity in areas where food is abundant. Then the same incapability to delay gratification that causes poverty also causes obesity. One does not cause the other, they have the same root cause.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  26. Re:And what's even funnier by mirix · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh no! Kids in Seattle must not have rotten teeth. The horror!

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11