Slashdot Mirror


Soccer Superstar Plays With Very Low Brain Activity

jones_supa (887896) writes "Brazilian superstar Neymar's (Neymar da Silva Santos Júnior) brain activity while dancing past opponents is less than 10 per cent the level of amateur players, suggesting he plays as if on "auto-pilot", according to Japanese neurologists Eiichi Naito and Satoshi Hirose. The findings were published in the Swiss journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience following a series of motor skills tests carried out on the 22-year-old Neymar and several other athletes in Barcelona in February this year. Three Spanish second-division footballers and two top-level swimmers were also subjected to the same tests. Researcher Naito told Japan's Mainichi Shimbun newspaper: "Reduced brain activity means less burden which allows [the player] to perform many complex movements at once. We believe this gives him the ability to execute his various shimmies." In the research paper Naito concluded that the test results "provide valuable evidence that the football brain of Neymar recruits very limited neural resources in the motor-cortical foot regions during foot movements"."

160 comments

  1. Put it another way... by denzacar · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You don't need much brain for running around kicking a ball.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Put it another way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or making a /. comment.

    2. Re:Put it another way... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      You don't need much brain for running around kicking a ball.

      No, you don't need much intellect.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    3. Re:Put it another way... by alphatel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't need much brain for running around kicking a ball.

      You're absolutely correct in a very zen kind of way. In order to be in the zone, or flow, you still need to make decisions such as "lean left, kick right", or "stop short, pass forward", but they key is to not let those minor mental decisions get in the way of your physical ability to execute. Some people are born with the ability to simply "do it", other may take years of practice to learn to let go of the process, but in the end it's all about realizing your potential without anxiety about the outcome.

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    4. Re:Put it another way... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      No, but running at full speed while controlling the ball and getting past highly skilled opponents who are trying to stop you does.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    5. Re:Put it another way... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      The interesting part is are some people really born with the ability to "do it". There is a lot of research that disputes that. Even studies of child prodigies like Mozart show that they have actually put in their 10,000 hours, it's just that they started at a very young age and had an opportunity for a very high quality practice (Mozart father was a famous music teacher and he started from the day Mozart was born).

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    6. Re:Put it another way... by GenaTrius · · Score: 2

      I think the idea is that all this guy's practice has streamlined his mental footballing process. If you tried to go kick a ball around in a stadium full of screaming fans while trying to avoid all the other people trying to kick the ball, you'd use tons of brain power. I suspect I'd use so much I'd pass out. But this guy's trained himself to filter out all the superfluous information and do the work as naturally as I type these words.

    7. Re:Put it another way... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      I wonder if some people are just born with strong interests, so they just have more time consumed with something that caused them to be better.

    8. Re:Put it another way... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      A chicken can do half of that task with its head chopped off.

      Had it been taught to kick a ball while running around, it could probably do that as well.
      Insert joke about it still being better than the players of team XY.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    9. Re:Put it another way... by denzacar · · Score: 2

      I think the idea is that all this guy's practice has streamlined his mental footballing process.

      Exactly. He's been pushing one single button for most of his life.
      He got really good at pushing that button. He can push it in his sleep.

      I suspect I'd use so much I'd pass out.

      LOL! No.
      Unless you regularly faint whenever you encounter a problem as mentally challenging as deciding if the traffic light is red or green.
      Ever played chess and fainted? If not... you're probably safe from "stadium induced fainting".

      The article is just click-whoring for the last bits of interest in that recent ball kicking event.
      Which was once again won by Germans as I hear.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    10. Re:Put it another way... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Study proves just the opposite.

      I.e. That anyone can do it. He just does it better and with less effort. After training his whole life.
      Ergo... not much brain power needed if average Joe can do it too. But to do it at expert level - you must train your whole life.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    11. Re:Put it another way... by denzacar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's called being obsessive compulsive and it is a mental disorder.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    12. Re:Put it another way... by eulernet · · Score: 1

      In fact, thinking slows down the entire "flow".
      The more you think, the slower you get.
      This is because our brain is a very slow tool, with a very limited bandwidth.

      It's easy to verify: some people try hard to think while they speak and this is audible ;-)

      Beginners want to achieve perfect results, so they try hard to master every single step of the process, and they spend a lot of their brain's bandwidth on their actions.
      Experts don't need to master everything, so their brain bandwidth is pretty unused, making them more efficient to handle more unexpected tasks.

      And yes, from a zen's point of view, you can totally act without any thinking (even if you are not an expert !).
      Every action becomes natural and spontaneous, but almost impossible to explain since there is no thinking process.
      Obsession for the outcome disappears and the action is always in the present.
      Creativity becomes natural, because ideas appear without any obstacle slowing them down.

      In reality, this is the "normal way", but since we are so much busy with a lot of parameters (which monopolize the brain), realizing this is pretty difficult.

    13. Re:Put it another way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The skills of the individuals isn't nearly as important as their ability to work as a team. "Decapitated chickens" is how Brazil played against Germany. Even if Neymar was in the match, it would have been a severe loss for Brazil.

    14. Re:Put it another way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well your American version certainly proves it.
      "coach what do we do?"
      "hit em"
      "derrr?"
      "ffs hit him harder!"

    15. Re:Put it another way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is more or less old news. If you train for a long time just about anything can become automatic. In his case it's a lot of training combined with tough opponents. In order to see this level of adaptation you really need both components.

      Now, with an individual activity like composing music or writing poetry, that's much more about just the person.

    16. Re:Put it another way... by schnell · · Score: 3, Interesting

      News flash: basement-bound nerds think being a world champion-caliber athlete is easy. Film at 11.

      Let go of your hatred of the dumb-ass jocks who got laid in high school but could never compete on a professional level, and consider that it might not be so brainless to be a world-class athlete. All this study says is that the very best athletes have learned to do it on autopilot, but for everyone else a lot of thinking is involved.

      Geeks can actually simulate the experience to a certain degree, given that some modern video games have evolved to a high degree of realism. Play "Madden NFL" on an expert difficulty level, and you'll see just how hard it can be for a NFL quarterback to try to read the movements of 11 defensive players simultaneously and pick the best route to throw the ball... even when you don't actually have to have the arm strength to throw it. Play "MLB the Show" on an expert level and you'll see how hard it can be to react in a tiny fraction of a second whether you're swinging at a 100 mph straight-ahead fastball, an 85 mph changeup that looks just like a fastball, a 90 mph slider that stars out straight but breaks away from the pitcher's arm, or a 70 mph knuckleball that just floats all over the fucking place.

      TL;DR - (some) video games these days are good enough to replicate just how hard professional level athletics are, even without the actual physical exertion. Please don't dismiss athletics as brainless if you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    17. Re:Put it another way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I played a competitive sport for 15-20 years. I found that the best games I played, I remember little of. Basically, you don't think about what you're going to do, you look for "openings" and then "exploit them", auto-reflexively. E.g. Oh look, Buzzy's open! Gee, I just threw to him without thinking about it. And damn, it was right on the $. In other words, I see Buzzy and I throw to him without thinking about how I'm gonna throw, where I'm gonna put it and what I have to do to get it done. It happens "auto-magically". That said, it took me several (as in multiple) years of concerted practice to get to that point.

      Of course, if you haven't played sports much, this is probably gobbledygook. No offense or disrespect intended.

    18. Re:Put it another way... by GenaTrius · · Score: 1

      I do have a minor amount of social anxiety, and I've never played chess while half the world stared over my shoulder and everyone within shouting distance of me shouted at me! If I didn't faint, I'd feel very, very uncomfortable. I certainly wouldn't be playing chess on autopilot.

  2. No shit, it's soccer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Soccer is literally one of the dumbest sports around.

    The field is huge, so there aren't really any space constraints.

    The objective is as simple as could be: kick a ball around.

    The ball is large.

    The nets are large, especially compared to the size of the human trying to guard them.

    The pace is rather slow, even during bursts of "activity".

    Any sort of physical contact above a slight nudge will get a player penalized.

    It's like every single aspect of the game has been crafted to be slow, dumb and easy. I have no fucking idea how a single match can attract 100,000 third-worlders to attend in person, who will sit there for 90+ minutes to watch a boring, uninspiring "sport".

    1. Re:No shit, it's soccer. by redback · · Score: 0

      I bet you prefer handegg.

    2. Re:No shit, it's soccer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying that it is easy as shit?

    3. Re:No shit, it's soccer. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You forgot the most important aspect of soccer:

      It can be played by anyone, anywhere, without any equipment save something round-ish to kick.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re: No shit, it's soccer. by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Everything sounds dumb when you oversimplify it.

      I mean, shit, American Football is a game about running forward and sometimes catching a large ball. And you want to talk about slow pacing, they cover a field 2/3rds the size of a soccer field about 1/10th as many times, and most of the game is standing around waiting to play. Even the "exciting" bits only move a few yards.

      Your post and mine have roughly the same amount of truth to them.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    5. Re: No shit, it's soccer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do soccer fanatics always bring up American football whenever somebody points out that soccer is a rather shitty sport?

      And why the fuck would soccer fanatics do this when nobody else has said anything about American football prior?

      So Rugby fans saying that "American football and rest-of-the-world football both suck" for the last hundred years or so don't count?

    6. Re: No shit, it's soccer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why exactly are sports with a slow pace shitty?
      I mean, I hate running and I think watching any sport on tv is boring as fuck, but apparently football is entertaining enough for people to play it.
      So what makes it shitty exactly? And what makes you an expert on determining the merits of sports?

    7. Re:No shit, it's soccer. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Oooh boy...

      And your take on golf is....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re: No shit, it's soccer. by GNious · · Score: 1

      Football is called "The Beautiful Sport" for a reason - there is more to it than running the fastest and scoring the most point, in the smallest-possible area.
      Some of the above posters only care about action and numbers, and dislike concepts like elegance and skill.

    9. Re:No shit, it's soccer. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The same can be said about martial arts :D
      And you need much less space, or other way around: you can place much more people on the same place, e.g. a soccer field.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re: No shit, it's soccer. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      i think women's beach volleyball is "the beautiful sport"

    11. Re: No shit, it's soccer. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I've never heard football called "elegant," but in soccer they have flop plays where you elegantly throw yourself to the ground and squeal like a stuck pig.

    12. Re:No shit, it's soccer. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, I don't think there are any shortage of good fighters from areas of little material wealth either. :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. expert skill-based integration by anegg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm only an armchair cognitive scientist, but my interpretation of this result is that it shows how an expert player has integrated the knowledge of how to play as a skill. The player no longer has to think through each situation and plan a response, the brain recognizes patterns and produces a response automatically. This allows for a higher-level of play because the player's conscious mind is free to act at a higher level, producing better tactics and strategy.

    1. Re:expert skill-based integration by drkstr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's just muscle memory. They drill this into us all the time in martial arts. When fighting, you don't have time to sit and think about your next move, it just has to come naturally, like some kind of instinct. I'm not surprised by these findings at all. Sparring is one of the very few activities that allow me to quite my mind.

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    2. Re:expert skill-based integration by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what it is. Like a master level chess player plays 20% by calculation and 80% by pattern recognition while with a recreational player it is the opposite.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    3. Re:expert skill-based integration by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      It is not muscle memory.
      Muscle memory is something completely different and works on a very different level.
      Muscle memory e.g. lets you perform a perfect strike, or a punch or a kick.
      But it does not let judge you how to pass a ball perfectly into the way of the guy who will make a goal, avoiding offside and the guy tackling you and the other one and that third defender running straight into the obvious path.
      Nor does muscle memory help you to actually execute that pass.
      Muscle memory only helps to execute perfectly simple basic moves in perfection. (I'm a martial artists, doing Aikido roughly 30 years and some others for decades, for Karate e.g. muscle memory is very important, for Aikido not so much)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:expert skill-based integration by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your experience and insight, but for me at least, this is not the case. I'm a TKD/BJJ guy myself, so I need to be ready for the fight to go anywhere and be ready defend against anything. The ability to "turn your mind off" and just go with the flow is exactly what keeps me from getting my head knocked off. I would have described myself as someone who is bad at sports prior to getting into MMA. In hindsight, maybe I was just bad at sports because I thinking to hard...

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    5. Re:expert skill-based integration by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Then try to wake up in that flow, and watch yourself. Much more fun.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true.
      People who drive in heavy traffic all the time don't use much of their brain to do it, they're managing at a higher level, and the "vehicle management" is almost autonomous.

      Same for riding a horse. The first 6 months, you have to work at just staying on; but eventually, that comes automatically, and you start managing the process at successively higher and higher levels.

      Someone who is a competitive football player and plays full time is going to do things like running, dribbling, kicking, trapping without having to consciously think about it.

    7. Re: expert skill-based integration by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      the brain is likely choosing which pitch to throw, e.g. high and outside fastball, but the arm does the throwing, i.e, snap the wrist at the exact moment to give it the spin it needs.

    8. Re:expert skill-based integration by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      That's exactly what it is. Like a master level chess player plays 20% by calculation and 80% by pattern recognition while with a recreational player it is the opposite.

      As a rated chess player I have to say, "What a load!"

      Calculation vs "pattern recognition" isn't even the dichotomy used in chess. And pattern recognition is mostly considered to be part of the calculating process. The strategic process ("positional" play) is based on a wide variety of things, very little of which is pattern recognition. For the master, anyways. For the club player it is pattern recognition because they have little understanding and just have to match the learned rules of thumb (patterns) to the position.

      But at the higher levels of chess it is well established that the top players (for decades!) use a balanced style that doesn't favor any part of the game or any particular style, and the players with a strong style or preference do not score consistently and are lower rated.

      Strategic play is not pattern matching, it is based on extensive understanding, on having studied a large number of games, broken them down into concepts, and then deciding which concepts overlap in which places. You can't just match patterns, you have to have an understanding, and apply it. Pattern matching is without that semantic element. The same pattern will have a different meaning depending on edge subtleties, and those subtleties are what positional play is about.

      Pattern matching is mostly part of "tactical" (non-strategic) play, where you find a type of weakness that can be exploited by force. Pattern matching tells the chess player which lines to calculate. So calculation cannot be the opposite to pattern recognition.

    9. Re:expert skill-based integration by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

      An intriguing idea if I can pull it off. I will have to give it a try! Thank you for the tip sir.

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    10. Re:expert skill-based integration by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      I used to wrestle in school, took it pretty seriously and won gold in several provincial tournaments. I found that my body would be operating automatically when I did my moves, just like the article describes, and that the conscious part of my mind would be "watching" as though I was removed from the fight and was being an outside observer. Except that it wasn't that simple, because the tactile is huge in wrestling, when you can't see the guy and you're rolling and flipping and flying through the air, your contact with your opponent gives you an "eyes in the back of your head" sense, and that gets merged into what you're "watching" without removing the outside observer feeling. In street fights, which is more like a team sport than wrestling, it lets me use my conscious mind to keep a "map" of where people are, which is full of estimates based on where they were and the direction they were moving when I saw them out of the corner of my eye while absorbed in an exchange with the guy in front of me. But it's still not like you're thinking. You're being conscious without making an effort to be creative, and you do what the situation tells you is obvious. All the mental effort is in holding the model together effectively.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    11. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TKD? The sports combat form of river dancing - never thought Id see that paired with MMA

    12. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember about ten years back I was hooked up to an EEG while gaming. I was told that my brain activity while playing was so low that it resembled sleep, which was not uncommon for diehard gamers. I think this article is more evidence of what any competitive player already knows.

    13. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first search result for TKD yields the Wikipedia page for Taekwondo, you twat.

    14. Re:expert skill-based integration by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, you can still be creative :)
      The founder of Aikido once said figuratively: "in the moment of contact with your attacker, you create a new technique." A unique - once for your lifetime - technique.

      From the fact that for an outsider such techniques look similar in the sense that you can group them into categories of similar techniques come the principles, the names for those categories, the names for those techniques.

      Sounds that you are really good in martial arts, I wonder where the urge for street fights come from? :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowhere. He's just a run-of-the-mill Internet Tough Guy.

    16. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you ever watched the way it is mostly taught these days ? its a sport were its all flick kicking with their fucking hands down.

      Its very rare to find the hardcore art these days.

    17. Re:expert skill-based integration by cavebison · · Score: 1

      > They drill this into us all the time in martial arts. When fighting, you don't have time to sit and think about your next move, it just has to come naturally, like some kind of instinct.

      You're talking about "reflex", not "muscle memory". I've done martial arts too, and found the problem with this approach is that, if someone has very reflexive, "automatic" defensive moves, it's very easy for an attacker to take advantage of that by baulking. Making the defender expect an attack in one place, then attacking somewhere else instead. Reflexes don't deal with that very well.

    18. Re:expert skill-based integration by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the article is talking about something entirely different than reflexes or muscle memory. I've actually been experimenting with this "turn off your mind" thing the past few days, and I've been finding I can do some things I normally can't. For example, I can't walk a tight rope to save my life, but I tried clearing my mind of all thought, not even thinking about the task at hand, and just started walking... Made it half way down before I became aware again and fell on my ass. I can actually feel it happen when I do it right... It's like my body is doing the thinking.

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    19. Re:expert skill-based integration by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of having an "urge". I lived in an area with a lot of gang violence, and I had a lot of friends who weren't particularly good at standing up for themselves... hippies, ravers, skaters, theater folk, etc. When your friends can't stand up for themselves and there's an imminent threat, you step forward.

      I was just a cowardly little nerd who skipped a grade and was younger and smaller than everyone else when I was young, and spent a lot of time running away. Then I hit puberty and my balls dropped, and I had an altercation where a teacher didn't show up for class and the students were running wild, a football player punched me in the back of the head and called my mother a whore, and I beat him half unconcious with tables, chairs and desks. I was standing over his prostrate body with a chair in my hand, and a third guy suplexed me on my head while I was paying attention to the guy who had infringed my honour. One second I was standing, the next I was on my head semiconscious. It all happened so fast, I wanted to understand how he did it, so I joined the team and for the first time in my life I was fighting guys my own size instead of guys who outweighed me by a hundred pounds, and I was undefeated in tournament.

      Now, we're all adults, I'm not wandering around being dwarfed by everyone I meet, and I'm a tough guy who still surprises himself because part of me still thinks of myself as David and everyone else as Goliath. I enter every fight expecting my opponent to break me, hoping only to break him more than he breaks me, and I'm always startled at how slow and incompetent he is. I still get my bones broken sometimes, I've broken ribs, my nose, my face, my teeth... but I fight through the pain until, in the end, I'm standing over my helpless opponent and holding his life in my hands.

      Truth is, I like it. When the violence comes, the adrenaline response I get is much higher than the average guy, to the point where I get chills and shiver and am completely dismissive of pain. It scares people, when it's in the aftermath and my teeth are chattering and I'm grinning like a madman and shaking like a leaf in a storm, wishing there was someone else to fight because I feel SOO fucking awesome. Based on conversations with doctors and martial arts instructors, only about 5% of the population has a physiological response like I do.

      Training aside, I seem to be built for this type of thing... although it's possible it's a learned response from the violence I saw in my youth.

      At any rate, I think about it and talk about it because I like it, I'm good at it, and when the shit hits the fan, the people close to me appreciate it, even if they find it unpleasant to hear about when we're all sitting and making small talk. It's nice to participate in a serious conversation about it.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    20. Re:expert skill-based integration by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Honestly, perhaps you should write a book about it.

      Can't judge how much you write here actually happened, but you write it in a nice style ... you have the hand for it.

      And regarding hitting guys with chairs etc. I suggest you stop that habit ... only in movies the chair breaks on the head of the victim. Usually the head breaks :D

      However as long as you have fun, why not, luckily in my country street fights like this don't happen since WWII

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    21. Re:expert skill-based integration by drkstr1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the article is talking about something entirely different than reflexes or muscle memory. I've been experimenting with this "turn off your mind" thing the past few days, and I've been finding I can do some things I normally can't. For example, I can't walk a tight rope to save my life, but I tried clearing my mind of all thought, not even thinking about the task at hand, and just started walking... Made it half way down before I became aware again and fell on my ass. I can actually feel it happen when I do it right... It's like my body is doing the thinking.

      Sorry to double post this, you just seem like you might have some experience so I wanted to get your take on it. When should I use my conscious mind vs "going with the flow" (for lack of a better term)?

      PS: Aikido seems like an interesting style, I will have to check it out. One of my biggest weaknesses is an aversion to punching someone in the face lol.

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    22. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you ever watched the way it is mostly taught these days ? its a sport were its all flick kicking with their fucking hands down.

      Its very rare to find the hardcore art these days.

      Gawd tell me about it. I can't stand americanized TKD. It feels more like dancing than a martial art. I was lucky enough to find a traditional martial artist to train under (who is only in my state because his son lives here). Took me a friggin' year just to get my white belt!

    23. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, you are the same AC! now I understand your river dancing comment. Haha ok, good one, I actually laughed. I'm a bit dense at times.

    24. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also for the record, keeping your hands down or mid level makes total fucking sense when your expecting to get flick kicked, you twat :p

    25. Re:expert skill-based integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And regarding hitting guys with chairs etc. I suggest you stop that habit ... only in movies the chair breaks on the head of the victim. Usually the head breaks :D

      That's how you know he's lying.

    26. Re:expert skill-based integration by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the article is talking about something entirely different than reflexes or muscle memory. Exactly, that is what I tried to point out when people came up with muscle memory.
      I've been experimenting with this "turn off your mind" thing the past few days, and I've been finding I can do some things I normally can't. For example, I can't walk a tight rope to save my life, but I tried clearing my mind of all thought, not even thinking about the task at hand, and just started walking... Made it half way down before I became aware again and fell on my ass. I can actually feel it happen when I do it right... It's like my body is doing the thinking.
      That is something entirely different again. It is a little nit of zen, or at least what asians teach in martial arts, empty your mind and just 'do it', or as Joda said in one of the Star Wars Movies: 'there is no try'.

      Sorry to double post this, you just seem like you might have some experience so I wanted to get your take on it. When should I use my conscious mind vs "going with the flow" (for lack of a better term)?
      Actually I guess there is no rule. I heard 2 interviews about emergency plane landings, one was the pilot who watered his plane in the hudson recently the other one is decades old and I forgot to what it was related, it might be that guy who landed an airliner glider style on an abandoned air base in canada - which he accidentaly happened to know about.
      I don't remember which of both said what. One did all the checks on the plane to get it down safely in 'automatic robot mode' talking to air traffic control about what is going on and shouting orders to his copilot ... so while one task was done 'in the flow' (not sure the term applies here) ofc his brain was not shut off but focusing on all the other stuff.
      The other pilot was the complete opposite. He always announced to his copilot what he was about to do, asked him to watch for certain boundaries, double checked if he had not made a mistake and announced the next maneuver. He was more on 'flow mode' in the talk to his copilot but 100% focused on handling the plane.

      I guess it depends on situation as well as on your capabilities? Or your 'special awareness' at that situation and depending on training/experience which applies to that situation? Most important is to avoid panic, calm down, like in your rope example. Visualize in your mind success. Then the steps to achieve success. Afterwards it is easyer to do the steps, regardless if you are full focused or do it in your subconscious.

      PS: Aikido seems like an interesting style, I will have to check it out. One of my biggest weaknesses is an aversion to punching someone in the face lol.
      That won't be a problem (except you are in a club of assholes). In Aikido there are no competitions (like in most old school martial arts). You practice in predetermined roles, one is the 'attacker' one is the 'defender', the defender is practicing the Aikido techniques, the attacker is practicing his attack. It is supposed that the attacker adjusts his power to the level of the defender, so the defender can successful practice the technique. That means if you are a beginner an I 'punch' you, I will stop before I hit you. The same is expected from you, especially if we practice with weapons :)
      So actual hits and blue eyes or blue bruises on the body or even real injuries are extremely rare.

      If you live close to a big city or in a big city and like to start indeed, send me a note (I really wonder why so many remember that I do Aikido :) )

      I know most respectable Aikido masters, if not in person then at least in name and can certainly suggest a Dojo.

      Regarding Aikido training, as a connection to your question above, I'm often very mentally involved into my practicing. The simple movements ofc. run subconscious, also the connecting of them. But as every master has his uniqueness during practicing of his uniqueness you watch him, your

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  4. Science or anecdote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a sample size of 1, what can this possibly prove?

    1. Re:Science or anecdote? by petes_PoV · · Score: 2
      Well it proves there is one footballer with a brain.

      If you've ever seen them being interviewed on TV - either before or after a match, even that singular result will be a surprise.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    2. Re:Science or anecdote? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, ost of them have more brains than the interviewers :D that is enough for me.
      E.g. during the game of germany against algeria the commentator kept repeating how bad both teams play. He kept repeating that it is a shame that germany can not handle that "third class team" (he omitted 'politely': from africa).
      Then every time the game was a bit less hectic he was telling us about the algerian team: "16 of the 22 players are born in France", "Mr. X plays for Manchester United", "Mr. Y playes for Barcelona" ... bla bla. Point is: half of the Algerian team consists of players who play in world class teams. The rest plays also in teams that are not that bad.
      The Commentators and Reporters simply are stuck in the late 70s where half of the world championships' teams where from third world countries that hardly could afford flying to the games. This game had only two teams that had no chance, USA and Iran, well Japan perhaps as the third one. People forget: it is a tournament. The one who is winning in the end is: The Winner. Not "The best Team(tm)".
      There is to much luck, red cards, injury, bad referees, going into the penalty shooting etc. involved.

      Now: how do you explain the first question of a reporter to the first player of the winning team after the mentioned game above: "why did you play so bad?" Retarded, isn't it?

      In my eyes it is not playing bad if you play against a very good team and you struggle to win against it.

      Well, I guess the answer of the german player, I believe it was Lahm, probably felt into the category you mean ;D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  5. Dumb jock? by j33px0r · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Captain Obvious has struck again by "proving" a common "truth" that everyone already knew.

    1. Re:Dumb jock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you idiot, it means that superior athletes don't have to expend as much brain power performing complex physical maneuvers than the rest of us slobs. Some athletes are gifted genetically that way, while everyone else has to practice repetitive movements in order to achieve the same level of performance.

    2. Re:Dumb jock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you failed at reading, the only idiot in this story is you.

    3. Re:Dumb jock? by j33px0r · · Score: 1

      Or in other news, superior athletes do not have the brain power to expend! Its a bad joke you anonymous coward! Do we need to plant electrodes to your head to test your genetic gift to interpret social interaction?

  6. Lucy ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what would happen if he used 100% of his brain !!!!

    1. Re:Lucy ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'd be playing hockey instead.

    2. Re:Lucy ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We call that a seizure, it's not much fun to watch.

    3. Re:Lucy ???? by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      He'd have a lotta splainin' to do?

  7. Duh by c · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess that's a sexier headline than "Expert Soccer Player Has Good Muscle Memory", and it does tie into that recent bit of excitement down in Brazil, but otherwise I'm not seeing anything in the summary that comes as a surprise... Is it that part where they quantify the differences in neural activity between "expert" and "amateur"?

    --
    Log in or piss off.
    1. Re:Duh by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      This is not muscle memory, but high specialized brain areas. Special neurons that clump together and specialize in certain 'low level' task.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where does this "muscle memory" sit, in the muscles? I doubt it. So how is low brain activity explained by "muscle memory"?

    3. Re:Duh by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Where does this "muscle memory" sit, in the muscles? I doubt it. So how is low brain activity explained by "muscle memory"?

      In the nerves that attach to the muscle, yes. It is distributed.

      When other parts of the nervous system are taking on a load, there is less load in the brain. The same thing is true in any similar system like an electrical circuit, hydraulic system, or heat distributor.

      It is well established that the limbs can respond, in certain situations like this, faster than the most simplistic analysis would presume. If you measure the amount of time it would take the signals to go from the eye through the brain to the conscious parts and then send a signal to another part of the brain to send a signal to the limb, well, an advanced athlete already moved before that signal would arrive.

      The details of that are not well known yet. Certain things like flinching from a poke to the finger are well understood; the nerve in your arm tells your muscle to move at the same time it is forwarding the signal up to your brain. UNLESS before the poke your brain was sending a "don't react" signal of some sort. How that part works is unknown, except that people can do it.

      Martial artists sometimes have similar response abilities to a soccer prodigy. It is usually called "mind of no mind," the ability to move and think with your whole body, without invoking the conscious part of the brain. It is generally believed to require extensive meditation practice in order to program the nerves with the catalog of responses.

      Muscle memory is a totally different thing, though.

    4. Re:Duh by c · · Score: 1

      TFA makes the discussion that it's all about a highly efficient foot-motor control area that can operate with minimal external input (i.e little conscious thought), which pretty much describes muscle memory. There's no mention of "special neurons", just regular motor control areas that are wired for efficiency and operate with less noise.

      Where someone might conclude that it's different from "muscle memory" is that muscle memory is usually focused on specific motor tasks, while this research is basically saying that entire areas of the brain related to motor skills which have a highly developed muscle memory work more efficiently. Which, I'd think, would be pretty obvious. Developing expert-level muscle memory is in practice about learning entire repertoires of movements, not just a single specific movement, and a consequence of having muscle memory for a large set of similar movements means the brain is wired such that anything resembling those movements will be handled at about the same skill level with about the same amount of conscious thought. If you've spent your entire life practicing all the 50 different ways to kick a ball under all possible conditions (different balls, ground conditions, shoes, lighting, angles, etc) then its unlikely you'll ever need to put any conscious thought into making your feet connect with anything ball-like.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    5. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has been a little research done on how much of what we think of as our "brain" is actually in the extent of our nervous system. I would like to see more neuroscience try and map activity beyond just the brain that is located in our head.

    6. Re:Duh by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is no mentioning of special neurones. Hence the article is misleading at best, because there ARE special brain areas with special interconnected neurons responsible for the 'unconciesnous control' of the interaction with the ball. Hence I suggested THOSE brain activity researchers should have cross checked with other researchers. The special developed brain regions for extraordinary motoric control are known since at least 20 years!

      Regarding muscle memory, that is 'memory' behind or starting at the spine. It is ingrained into the nerves connecting the limbs with the spine. It is half an effect based on increased intra musculaer coordination of the muscle fibres themselves and half a kind of compression algorithm on the signal traveling along the nerves.

      Both is trained especially good if you practice in slow motion. Ofc. as mentioned in other posts you need a high count of repetition (and regular practicing, both effects degrade if not practiced, the first one much faster than the second one)

      While your second paragraph makes some sense it simplifies to much. Most important: muscle memory as I pointed out above is 'stored' - more precicely: hardwired - in the neurons/nerves directly attached to the muscles. Not in the brain.
      Patterns for complex movements and sending the 'correct triggers' those are stored/hardwired in a special brain region.
      If you don't practice, the brain is the fastest to lose that hardwiring.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Duh by c · · Score: 1

      Most important: muscle memory as I pointed out above is 'stored' - more precicely: hardwired - in the neurons/nerves directly attached to the muscles. Not in the brain.

      It's in the brain. They don't really know exactly where muscle memory is stored, but it's in the brain. Most likely in optimized synaptic networks in or around the motor control area, but the specific location and mechanism hasn't been nailed down.

      That being said, there's a certain amount of muscle "memory" in the muscles themselves, in the sense that elasticity and power will become optimized for the patterns of motion they perform frequently (i.e. if you perform circular movements calling for short muscle fibers, you'll probably have a harder time with linear movements calling for long muscle fibers), and obviously nerve pathways for those repeated actions will be strengthened. This would reduce the amount of higher level neural effort needed to perform those kinds of movements and the actions would "fire faster". But really, there's not enough neural meat down there to handle the processing necessary for anything substantial enough to call it a "motor skill".

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    8. Re:Duh by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we are 'crosstalking' each other or the article, which I only skimmed uses a different terminology.

      Muscle memory as we athletes call it, is a a very special memory close to the muscles involved, it is not in the brain.

      Signal speed from the brain to a muscle is close to 1/10th of a second ... that would never work.

      but it's in the brain. Most likely in optimized synaptic networks in or around the motor control area, but the specific location and mechanism hasn't been nailed down.
      Perhaps you mean something different with the term 'muscle memory' then?
      Muscle memory is close to the muscles, it is hard wired into the nervous system attached to those muscles. Easy to test with an amputated limb and a simple 'correct' modulated electric impulse.
      The brain area we both are talking about is known since decades. Your 'has not been nailed' down point is wrong.
      It is an area in the brain that resembles a walnut sized are in the brain that looks on a positron emitting tomography like an embryo. It physically resembles the human body (embryo posture) in shape.
      If you practice certain activities like playing guitar or piano the corresponding area in that region grows. BUT: that is not muscle memory ... that is the brain part of a skill.

      Sorry: I studied this or I'm studying this since 30 years ... unfortunately I lack the proper english terms, I guess you can google for your self for references. After all, hence my complained about said article: all this is well known since ages ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re:Duh by c · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you mean something different with the term 'muscle memory' then?

      Hmm. Yes.

      I'm talking about it from a cognition perspective, which I think is also termed "motor learning". You're using a definition which describes my second point, which is that (in a nutshell) the body undergoes a physical change which adapts it to better performing those rehearsed movements.

      Quite frankly, I'm not sure it's meaningful to talk about those separately, though. If you repeat a physical task often enough to change the body at a physical level, you're almost certainly going to rewire the brain to repeat that task efficiently as well.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
  8. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by digitalchinky · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Malcolm Gladwell has an interesting take with his 10,000 hour theory. If you are passionate about something and you live and breath it for long enough, you obviously get good at it. Most people are not quite so fanatical - but this is a choice, meaning they could be if they wanted to. And what is intelligence anyway? How do you quantify it such that one person is born with more of it than someone else?

  9. Turned Off Brain by JimSadler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some people turn of thought when in a fight. It can be a learned talent and it makes ones response much faster and blows delivered much more accurate. The catch is that when in that state extra violence can be delivered as the person is on auto pilot. Courts have not dealt with this as so few people who do this can verbalize what was going on. I'm not so certain that the true capacity to form intent exists in a person in that state of mind. Even advanced chess players can get into a similar state in which they can calculate chess moves like a machine but are sort of not human for a bit after the game is over. A portion of their minds has been diverted elsewhere and it makes them sort of silly emotionally.

    1. Re:Turned Off Brain by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That is a different state of mind.
      When you play trance like soccer or are in a flow state in a fight, you are actually pretty aware about 'everything' going around you.
      A 'normal guy' who is capable of going into such a meditative state would never execute excess violence. People who do that are more in a 'berserk state' or similar 'rage states'.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Turned Off Brain by digitect · · Score: 1

      Which explains Suarez.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
  10. this why the NBA and NFL need minor league by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    They should not be in college and at some schools people on the Football team get a free pass in just about all classes.

  11. No one RTFA (as usual) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure we'll get plenty of prejudice and 'lol sports are dumb' here, but TFA compares the brain activity of a top professional player with that of an amateur, and it only shows that the pro needs to think less to perform.

    1. Re:No one RTFA (as usual) by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      What they didn't say is that Neymar shows only 10% brain activity compared to another "common" person for whatever he's doing...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:No one RTFA (as usual) by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      What they didn't say is that Neymar shows only 10% brain activity compared to another "common" person for whatever he's doing...

      So you're saying he's more intelligent than the "common" person? It's been understood/believed for some time that that the more intelligent a person is the less their brain has to work at similar tasks.

    3. Re:No one RTFA (as usual) by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you're going to call physical sports ability intelligence, then you'd have already known he was more intelligent than the "common soccer player" before this study.

      Everything uses the brain. A person more practiced at willful ignorance might, for example, use less brain power overcoming cognitive dissonance than a "common partisan mouth-breather" without the same level of experience. Does that make them more intelligent, less intelligent, or just better at a certain arbitrary skill?

      Humans are generalists, most things we do will involve the brain. But that doesn't make everything we do intelligent.

  12. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by sribe · · Score: 1

    It's something you are born with. You can hone it, as this guy's done, but the bulk of the work was done before you could even talk.

    Actually, that's not right at all. Research shows more & more the link between intelligence and environment & experience.

  13. Soccer superstars are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to write such a boring and lengthy piece of crap to tell people that.

  14. Naymar by present_arms · · Score: 0

    is Scottish for "No mom"

    --
    http://chimpbox.us
  15. Otherwise known as getting in the zone by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    You let your medulla most of the work. There's very little reason to spend any time on what's commonly thought of as higher functioning when you're focused on sight/reaction. Any "thought" is devoted only to grasping the topographical and tactical situation and mildly guiding yourself through it. This is what allows you to coordinate the multiple movements. Anyone promoting that this is dumb is merely rationalizing their inability to do it.

  16. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intelligence is the ability to solve problems that one has never before encountered.

  17. In other news, water is wet by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2

    So he plays using "automatic" skill. Every target shooter knows that place. Every cook flipping an egg knows that place. Hell, everybody knows that place. When you're first learning to drive, making a left-hand turn or backing out of a parking place requires lots of thought about HOW to do it. After long practice, you don't think about it, you simply do it. The trick, in soccer, or shooting, or writing code, anything that requires sustained performance, is to stay in that place.

  18. Focus by malvcr · · Score: 1

    Don't mistake it ... this doesn't mean that it is not necessary to think to have the job done.

    This means that some people has the capability of turning off some parts of their brain that they don't need in some specific moment to focus better in what they are doing. This is not negative, this is a very special capacity.

    I could call this the "soldier effect". A good soldier is the one that when given the order to kill perform the task without any complain. But a bad soldier could not to decide to kill because is thinking very much. The same happens with terror, then somebody is terrified he/she doesn't perform what is important, because the brain (that it is confused in that moment) will take the place of the automatic internal system that really knows what to do.

    Corollary: to use very much the brain doesn't mean that we do a better job. It depends on what the job is.

  19. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, that's not right at all. Research shows more & more that intelligence is highly heritable.

    What is not true is the classist notion that intelligence is 100% inherited.

  20. So by rossdee · · Score: 1

    How about some comparisons with other professional sports?

    1. Re:So by oobayly · · Score: 1

      Or even a comparison with his brain activity when inactive.

    2. Re:So by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      I remember a study making the news in the 90's comparing men and women's brain activity while doing tasks that require 3d reasoning. It was kind of a similar result: men and women would score about the same on the task, but the women's brains lit up like a Christmas tree while the men's brains had fairly localized activity.

  21. What about when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't care about his brain activity kicking a ball, what about when he's biting someone, is it 0% activity zombie mode activated?

  22. Flow by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

    Should be no surprise to anyone who's every played a videogame: he's in "flow" mode.

    Which raises the question: how is this news for nerds?

    1. Re:Flow by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Should be no surprise to anyone who's every played a videogame: he's in "flow" mode.

      How do you know that it is the same thing?

      Which raises the question: how is this news for nerds?

      I thought that how the brain works is quite nerdy topic. That is why I submitted this. Would you like to see less news like this in the future?

  23. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by michaelmalak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a common misperception of what Gladwell write. His actual formulation was 10,000 hours + talent + opportunity.

  24. Zen in the Art of Futbol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The foot kicks the ball itself, like the bamboo leaf slowly bends under the weight of the snow, then releases the clump of snow without thought.

    .

  25. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Indeed. 10,000 hours is the only ingredient that nearly everyone can put in.

  26. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1
    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  27. Is There A Lot More Activity by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Is there a lot more activity somewhere else in his nervous system? Perhaps we distribute the processing load as we learn the moves. IIRC I've read a couple of papers that suggest that more processing than we realize takes place in our retinas when we do object recognition. I'd guess if you measured the brain activity of someone who's been driving for a couple of decades while they're driving, you'll find a lot less brain activity than someone who's just started. Maybe that's why the newbie has so much trouble with it -- it's an activity that requires a lot of reflexive movement and the newbie hasn't learned those yet. I've noticed that when I get in a car where the controls are a bit different, my eyes don't know where to go to gather the information that I need right now and I actually have to think about it. Could be a symptom of that...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  28. Fore brain and Hind brain by RichMan · · Score: 1

    Well trained physical activity is done by your medulla oblongata which means it is done closer to the input and outputs and does not get your thinking brain involved. Thinking is indecision and slows down reaction time.

    1. Re:Fore brain and Hind brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well trained physical activity is done by your medulla oblongata which means it is done closer to the input and outputs and does not get your thinking brain involved. Thinking is indecision and slows down reaction time.

      You have been watching far too much Happy Gillmore.

      medulla oblongata indeed.

  29. Soccer makes you stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I KNEW it! Soccer really does make you stupid.

    Now they need to scan the branes of NASCAR fans to prove that particular stereotype.

    1. Re:Soccer makes you stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really quite funny to see all these people happy to proclaim that this is proof that sportmen are dumb, which is of course not, but their post is certainly proof that they can't understand a few lines.

  30. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by ranton · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's not right at all. Research shows more & more that intelligence is highly heritable.

    What is not true is the classist notion that intelligence is 100% inherited.

    He said there is a link between intelligence and environment & experience. He didn't even say it is a strong link. How could you possibly say he is not right at all when you completely agreed with him?

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  31. No shit, it's soccer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soccer is a great sport. Watching people run around for an hour accomplishing nothing is great if I need something to help me go to sleep.

  32. Soccer superstars are sick by justthinkit · · Score: 1
    --
    I come here for the love
  33. Actually not really news by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Interesting perhaps, 'in the german article' they said his brain activity was lower in comparison with other professional soccer players. That *is* interesting.

    But it is old news that high skilled professionals, especially if they do body work, like martial artists or artists or musicians easy get into a state called 'flow'.

    "Reduced brain activity means less burden which allows [the player] to perform many complex movements at once. We believe this gives him the ability to execute his various shimmies."
    That is ofc. nonsense. Instead of inventing brain dead 'explanations' they either should do some sports themselves, or cross link with other scientists.
    Specializations like this happen because kinda large areas of the brain specialize on a certain activity, like the left hand of a guitarist.
    While one part of the brain lowers its activity (that is what they figured) other parts have specialized into it (that is what many other brain researchers have figured long ago).

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Actually not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Maybe we'll discover that what we call "focusing intensely on a task" will turn out to involve the turning off of brain activity that is not related to the task. Neymar might be able to shut off neural background chatter, and just be completely concentrated on the action he's taking.

  34. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Research shows more & more..." is what is "not right at all".

  35. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by ranton · · Score: 1

    The "more and more" refers to an increasing quantity of research, not the magnitude of the link.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  36. Mushin no shin / The Mind without Mind by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    Japanese martial art traditions describe a similar concept of mushin ("no mind") where actions are achieved intuitively without active thought.

    At some level, most* achieve this for basic tasks. You don't need to actively think about each muscle contraction and joint movement when you walk, or type on a keyboard, etc.. A lifetime of repeating these activities has trained the brain to minimize expenditure during these tasks.

    The same goes for sports, martial arts, anything requiring extensive training to master.

    * but some people do, those with sensory or physical impairments.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  37. Feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it was Bill Shankley, watching a new player try out:
    " The trouble with you, lad, is all your brains are in your head."

  38. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Practicing 2x a week for 2h equals 208h per year.
    In roughly 48years you have the 10,000h done.

    Well, I don't know why it is called a "10,000h theory" ... after all it is a no brainer. Everyone who does some sports knows that a particular technique has to be repeated about 1000 times to work more or less and about 10,000 times to be close to perfect. But ofc. there is always room to improve even more.

    The hours are less important, the repetition counts. Unfortunately if you learn something complex, you basically have to learn a few dozen basic and many more complex movements in that art.

    However suppose one trains 5h each day (the art, not the additional body building, mental training, massages or gymnastics) for 6 days a week and practices 50 of the 52 weeks, he does 1500h in a single year. So from age 12 to 18 he has 9000hours .
    That translated into martial arts is roughly the equivalent of a 4th DAN, but for that you need longer due to 'regulations regarding examinations', waiting periods between 2 examinations.

    However I would not be scared if starting a new art. If you simply never stop you easy do it for 30 years, or longer till the rest of your life. Finally you will be an 'old master'.

    We germans have a proverb or a saying, well it is more a phrase: "Das Glueck des Tuechtigen". Means roughly translated: the luck of the strenuous one. The final goal in the soccer champion ships, was such a thing. The guy giving the pass did that from an impossible position for the shooter. But the shooter somehow twisted his body, looking over his shoulder to accept the ball with his chest, from an 'impossible' angle, letting the ball drop on his left foot and placing it into the goal. 'Just like that'
    Without his plenty of 10,000h's he would not have been able to do that, nor had the pass giver given such a pass. And it is very unlikely that someone with only 1000h training could have done that ... but that makes the "10,000" not a theory (in the laymen meaning of theory) but rather a physical fact.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  39. New Study by Pete+Venkman · · Score: 1

    Timothy edits with very low brain activity.

  40. Yeah, like a soccer player would never bite ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, like a soccer player would never bite ...

    Oh, wait.

    Sorry buddy, you and all your trancelike enlightened 'normal' guys are just as human and fallible as the rest of us apes.

    And just as likely to get violent and go berserk in certain circumstances.

    1. Re:Yeah, like a soccer player would never bite ... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You're almost there, buddy. Now the next step to understand is that being a meditative performance state, or being in a rage state, is temporal. A person might be a meditative state at one moment, and then get frustrated that they didn't score a goal, lose their meditative state, become enraged, and bite your ear off. None of that contradicts anything, or claims that it is somehow the nature of the human. You can be normal, too, and you can be momentarily enlightened, just like most other people. Don't sell yourself short.

    2. Re:Yeah, like a soccer player would never bite ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so true. As a yoga teacher for several years, and many years of practition before that as well (10 years), I'm always amazed how many misinterpret and make fantastical claims about yoga (which means "unity" or "harmony").

      Simply stated: Meditation and yoga is just two of very very many different tools to achieve harmony between body, mind and spirit (or consciousness if you will). Two tools is not enough for every human being, because everyone is different and in different places at any given point of time.

      Harmony in the mind is characterized by low brain activity, and therefore MORE efficient usage of the brain / consciousness. This has been known for ages. This is only news for those with their cups of knowledge already filled to the brim.

      When you have practiced something you love dearly (devotion), this allows you to do extraordinary things, because the neural synapses have actually formed exactly those patterns you need to succeed (especially if you LOVE winning and HATE losing / doing wrong). Indeed, it is less that new connections are made, although that can happen too, but we tend to specialize by LOSING synapse connections. This is the reason EVERY being is important, because they bring a unique perspective and therefore a unique talent / wealth, if only they are given opportunity.

      So any feeling and any states of mind, are usually (hopefully) just temporary, even "enlightenment". (Someone define "enlightenment" please before using it? My teacher usually say enlightenment is like a joke!)
      Indeed, when they are not, it's usually indicative of some form of mental illness. DO NOT try to "reach" or force mental states. Such practices are seriously disruptive and usually have serious drawbacks in the longer run!

      The nature of the world is Change. If we can stabilize our own psychology and physiology, we are able to persist and adapt better, than when we are blown with the winds or act inflexible like a little brat kicking and screaming being dragged into the future.
      We can fight, or we can dance. We can go to war, or we can see it as a game. We can blame, or we can stretch out a hand.
      It's our choice.
      It always was.

      Kudos for mentioning that mental states are temporary. That's a good reminder, even for many people "on the spiritual path" for 30+ years, and still they don't really "get it" ;-)

      YOU are the Holy Grail. (Warning: Misinterpretation is highly likely so use with care!)

  41. so what happens at +60% brain activity? by JohnnyDoesLinux · · Score: 1

    He can teleport the ball into the goal?

    1. Re:so what happens at +60% brain activity? by JohnnyDoesLinux · · Score: 1

      Damn, I just saw the earlier Lucy reference. Too slow. Must not be using my brain power.

  42. Yogi Berra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old news.

    "You can't think and hit at the same time." --- Y. Berra.

    Musicians also know the truth of this.

    -dpa

  43. Brains for soccer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only brains you need to play soccer is the ability to throw yourself on the ground while faking that you are in mortal pain as soon as an opponent comes within 10 feet....

  44. Not too surprising... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doesn't take a lot of brain power to fake an ankle injury

    1. Re:Not too surprising... by GiganticLyingMouth · · Score: 1

      Of course, when you get kneed in the back and get a fractured vertebrae, not much acting is required.

    2. Re:Not too surprising... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      On realy injury, 500 fake ones. Still not a lot of brain power involved.

    3. Re:Not too surprising... by GiganticLyingMouth · · Score: 1

      I was referring to Neymar specifically -- he got a fractured vertebrate in the game against Columbia and had to sit out the rest of the World Cup.

  45. I admit, my head is empty by hene · · Score: 1

    What is thinking anyway, you go your options through pretty quickly. I think, most of the time it is just making yourself accept the situation or solution.

  46. More on MA by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    That translated into martial arts is roughly the equivalent of a 4th DAN, but for that you need longer due to 'regulations regarding examinations', waiting periods between 2 examinations.

    Depends on the martial art. The most modern practice recognizes natural talent while incorporating considerable traditional technique; I assure you, everyone does not walk into their first day of training on an equal basis -- I've been teaching for decades and I think I've seen about every level of beginner skill there is. Some people are simply gifted. Certainly from there on in we see the difference between the shows-up-once-a-week and the person who seems to be there every hour they can possibly manage.

    Also, more on topic, I can definitely assure anyone who is curious that you're not doing high level thinking when executing advanced martial arts techniques.

    All you really need to do to understand this is think about bike riding. When you learn, you learn, you think like crazy. Which does you very little good. But eventually, you internalize the process (that's what I call it, anyway) and you can do it while carrying on a conversation with someone else, paying almost no attention at all to the activity of riding the bike. Those near-instant balance corrections, the precise amount of handlebar control and lean for cornering, all of that comes from "underneath." Same thing for advanced MA.

    That whole business about finding your calm center and holding it -- that's a real thing. If you start thinking under threat or pressure, your performance will drop like a stone. The best technique comes from a relaxed, centered condition, accepting of whatever comes.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:More on MA by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Depends on the martial art. The most modern practice recognizes natural talent while incorporating considerable traditional technique; I assure you, everyone does not walk into their first day of training on an equal basis

      Yeah, below Sho Dan. After Sho Dan you are limited by the restrictions of your federation, or you have to 'hand out' your 'own graduations' which are not respected by others or other federations.

      Also, more on topic, I can definitely assure anyone who is curious that you're not doing high level thinking when executing advanced martial arts techniques.

      Depends what you mean with that.
      All you really need to do to understand this is think about bike riding. When you learn, you learn, you think like crazy. Which does you very little good. But eventually, you internalize the process (that's what I call it, anyway) and you can do it while carrying on a conversation with someone else, paying almost no attention at all to the activity of riding the bike.
      So you mean: you are not thinking about the art. Ofc. not. But you perhaps think like a bike rider: what is about the next corner.
      For me it is easy to think while doing martial arts ... as I do the actual doing without thinking ... if that is what you mean. Or on the other hand I use to do 'self reflecting' while practicing ... that is a lot of thinking, too :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:More on MA by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's exactly what I mean.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    3. Re:More on MA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because martial arts are purely for show, like a drill squad. In a real fight, it's completely worthless and you'll really need to use your brain if you don't want to end up dead or badly injured.

  47. I made him by trumpetto · · Score: 1

    I Taught Him Everything He Knows

  48. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then the statement is vacuous. Time will always bring more evidence for a true proposition, but that doesn't necessarily increase its importance in the wider picture.

  49. Berserkers by kbahey · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the Berserkers in Viking stories, who went into battle and fought in a trance like frenzied state.

  50. Kind of explains "by reflex" by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    I think this study kind of explains when you learn something so well (say, by doing it so many times), you can do it "by reflex." Perhaps what that really means is you no longer need cognitive ability to do those tasks, such as riding a bike, driving in clear conditions, or typing.

    I think what they've found is that the brain becomes more reliant on on older parts of the brain that operates in the sub-conscious, perhaps like the brain stem. So doing something over and over might move the ability from the cortex down into lower parts, not unlike programming something in Java, vs assembly. Both languages can accomplish the same thing, but they way they do it is very different, as they are at different layers of abstraction.

  51. Sorry... but that's bullshit. by denzacar · · Score: 0

    That "Some people are born with the ability to simply "do it"" part.

    If there was any truth in that, there'd be a certain statistical probability for occurrence of such "Ubermensch" who are "born with the ability to simply "do it"".
    So... let's say that it's something as rare as an IQ of 150. That's 1 person in 2330.
    Or, about 3024000 people on the planet today.

    Who could "simply do it". Whatever the "it" may be. Cause they have instant access to "the zone, or flow".
    There'd be 3 million of 'Jack of all trades" experts IN EVERYTHING roaming around, looking like a Hitler's wet dream, cause they'd have perfect physique as they would be getting maximum levels of exercise from simply sitting on their ass and watching porn all day.
    3 million people who could outplay a concert pianist who trained his/her whole life, after an afternoon with an instrument they never played before.
    3 million people who could pass any test in record time cause all tests are designed with ordinary humans in mind. They'd be wiping their asses with diplomas.
    Unless they'd prefer to wipe their asses with Fortune 500 stock cause they'd be cracking that whole economy thing wide open.

    Cause they were "born with the ability to simply "do it"".

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Sorry... but that's bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you are equating football/soccer with "everything".

      I feel I have this with technical interviews. I just zone out and do them. While talking, I decide which topics to talk about. I don't choose words for sentences though -- I watch myself do this.

      I can't do this for poker though. Everyone always sees my bluffs.

      I suspect Neymar can make decisions on how to move the ball with minimal thought. But if you ask him to move the ball in a specific manner it might be difficult -- he can't just do what comes natural. That said, I don't expect Neymar could win the Nobel prize in Physics on instinct alone. Perhaps some skills are different than others after all.

  52. Very Low Activity by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    Sadly for Brazil, Neymar went through the recent World Cup with very low soccer playing activity as well. Brazil's defense seemed to exhibit very low brain activity as well.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  53. He-he-he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brazilian superstar

    Super what? 7-1

  54. Have they tested musicians too? by tomhath · · Score: 1

    They know music, they know their instrument, but a lot of thought goes into presentation. Would be interesting to see if they're running on autopilot or if their brain is totally engaged.

  55. Videogame analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this likely related to how I tend to miss often and make frequent blunders in first-person multiplayer shooters like TF2... but if I'm a little bit drunk and play said game, I do -significantly- better?

  56. I must be a coding superstar by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    My brain activity is abysmally low when I am coding. I must be engaging hardly 5% of my brain during coding. Often times when I am debugging my own code, "what the hell was I *thinking*?" But now I realize I must not have been thinking at all. I must have been a coding superstar unbeknownst to myself.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  57. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's something you are born with. You can hone it, as this guy's done, but the bulk of the work was done before you could even talk.

    Actually, that's not right at all. Research shows more & more the link between intelligence and environment & experience.

    Actually, that's not right at all. Research shows more & more that intelligence is highly heritable.

    He said there is a link between intelligence and environment & experience. He didn't even say it is a strong link. How could you possibly say he is not right at all when you completely agreed with him?

    I think you need to look over the discussion again. Something doesn't add up with your logic and/or comprehension skills.

  58. Possibly by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Well either that or we need to rethink how we measure brain activity.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  59. Mastery has to be (at least partly?) subconcious by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 1

    When grading expertise on any given task/process, the top level ("Master") is usually defined to be when the person can not even explain how she is doing it, everything is automated to such a degree that "the solution was obvious".

    Magnus Carlsen used to play even faster than he is doing these days, but he explains that this is not because to takes him longer to figure out the best possible moves, but because he has to take the time afterwards to do all the required calculations to confirm his instinctual choices.

    He has also explained after some really complicated end games where he has kept on playing for small advantages, eventually turning "obvious draws" into wins, that "it was very easy, I just had to play the only possible move".

    I believe the foot/leg motor skills of a Neymar is comparable to those of a world champion orienteer: The best orienteers can run cross-country, through rocks, stones, windfall & vegetation, while studying an incredibly detailed map in order to navigate, making it impossible to focus on the ground while looking at the map. This means that the actual broken field running must use a small amount of brain capacity, all the movements are fully automated.

    I know that Petter Thoresen (former multiple world champion) once was told to do a training race in Germany while a champion Kenyan cross country runner would tail him to check his technique: Even while orienteering Petter could run fast enough that the x-c runner was dropped after less than a mile.

    Terje

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
  60. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

    Talent is from what I understood really the drive and the natural attraction that would let the person endure the 10,000 hours of practice (and even enjoy it, for part of it anyway). The opportunity goes without saying (if you practice for 10,000 hours you have the opportunity). So I think it's not that much of a misperception that practicing something for 10,000 hours makes you very very good at it.

  61. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by nobodie · · Score: 1

    I was, years ago, a very skilled carpenter. What i have learned since I put my tools down is that now, almost 20 years later, I still know how to do those things, but I physically can't. My hands and body have lost the skill, the micromotor skills, the knowledge if you will, that they used to hold. I am not so much sad about it, but aware that many of the things that were trained into me are lost now that I am older and no longer practiced.
    The other thing I know is that those skills can come back quickly if I want to practice them again. But really, I don't. I do little projects here and there, but as I am seeing the "knowledge" come back, the project is finished and I go back to my desk and my classroom while the "knowledge" drains away again.
    Bittersweet.

    --
    Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  62. Re:"Intelligence" is not earned. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    That is normal, after all roughly every 15 years your whole body is completely replaced by new cells. Don't remember if it is 10 or 15 or 20, likely easy to google :) Without practicing the nervous system 'regrows' to optimize what you are doing right now, which seems not to include your 'old art'.
    So obviously the nervous system loses its 'specialization' for your old art, so are the muscles and the brain.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  63. Another great discovery from the team of Dr O'Bvio by Optali · · Score: 1

    Who said you need intelligence to,play football? Mate, just look at David Beckham. There's not much lower in terms of human intelligence, he even got to the USA to play! fucking hell man, a place were they don't even know what football is!

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast