Slashdot Mirror


South Carolina Student Arrested For "Killing Pet Dinosaur"

Rambo Tribble (1273454) writes In South Carolina a 16-year old boy, Alex Stone, was arrested and charged with creating a disturbance at his school, as well as suspended, for choosing to write: "I killed my neighbor's pet dinosaur. I bought the gun to take care of the business," in response to a class writing assignment. The story has attracted international attention.

421 comments

  1. Land of insanity by qbast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only in America ...

    1. Re:Land of insanity by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      I'm in America, and when I was in 7th grade I wrote a sci-fi story where all the characters were cooked inside a giant microwave oven disguised as a movie theater.

      I got a perfect grade on it.

      I'm sure in any large country there are numerous strange school decisions, just based on statistics. Heck, even just in 1 US State there should be enough school decisions being made to find outliers in numerous directions. Certainly at a minimum I would expect both excessive responses to minimally violent expression, and also excessively mild responses to actual violence.

      When I read your comment I think, "wow, your school system didn't teach math or social studies very well." But you could also just be a bigot.

    2. Re:Land of insanity by CQDX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I was a kid today I'd probably be institutionalized.

      When I was in 1st grade or so the Vietnam War was on the news all the time and I was just getting into plastic model building. My favorite thing to do was to build Army tanks and helicopters and play war with them. One day at school we had to write a little story and draw a picture with it. I wrote little scenario where a bunch of Army tanks and helicopters were blowing a bridge with a bunch of NVA crossing it (didn't know what a NVA was, they were just the bad guys). The picture had lots of explosions and bodies flying everywhere. It was very colorful and had a lot of detail. I got a good mark for my creativity.

      In the afternoon we'd play Army with plastic guns that looked liked the real thing. None of this pink gun shit. We didn't shoot imaginary dinosaurs. We were out hunting Germans and Japanese soldiers. Whoever got stuck being the enemy would at least have fun hamming up his death scene. I guess it wasn't such a big deal back then because I grew up in San Diego and there were more than a few WWII vets that would egg us on.

      I don't look forward to seeing what our world will be like when the current crop of kids grow up to be our nation's leaders.

    3. Re:Land of insanity by qbast · · Score: 1

      And how many years ago it was? Besides giant oven is ok - you did not use any of the magic words like 'gun', 'bomb', etc.

    4. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, there are 13.1 million of us who raised our hands and grew the f**k up.

      When I have children, I will shoot them with nerf guns for fun. Anyone complains, they get the airsoft ones... Complain louder... well...

    5. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I was about to post this exactly.

    6. Re:Land of insanity by easyTree · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Putting aside that these people are retards for thinking he's serious and that they massively overreacted... if you recall, your whole culture (certainly, appears to) celebrate guns, killing etc (certainly movies/tv, film, youth culture). Your armed forces have been at war overseas for hundreds of years. Relatively recently there was video of two good old boys laughing it up whilst shooting news cameramen from an attach helicopter with a 50mm gun. Your own police are now paramilitary organizations quite happy to use armed troop carriers, rubber bullets, tear gas, etc... on civilians.

      So, doesn't it seem pretty much like the horse has not only bolted but has evolved into an entirely new life-form and is on a beach somewhere drinking Piña coladas? Hint: yep, it does.

      For moderation purposes, troll != you-have-inconveniently-reminded-me-that-I-live-in-a-police-state.

    7. Re:Land of insanity by lgw · · Score: 2

      Relatively recently there was video of two good old boys laughing it up whilst shooting news cameramen from an attach helicopter with a 50mm gun.

      Just making shit up doesn't help your argument any. I can only guess you're talking about the incident where we heard the gunship crew radio that they saw a group of hostiles (true) and a guy with a tube-like device on his shoulder (true) and requested permission to engage. They were given permission to engage. There was no laughing. There was no evidence they knew there was a reporter embedded with the enemy troops. (There's also no such thing as a 50mm gun.)

      "good old boys"? If you think that anyone with a southern accent is a bad person, you are simply a bigot.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the question is was his neighbor riding it at the time?

    9. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus christ, if they read the story I wrote for my English exam, I'd have been arrested so hard everyone ELSE would be in prison.

      This is like a baby giggling compared to mines.

      America is doomed.
      Someone should compile a list of the most stupid charges people have gotten across the whole country so we can see which states are the shittiest.

    10. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Obama is a good indication of the what the current crop of kids will be like when they grow up.

      A journalist is beheaded on video and Obama makes a little 5 minute speech and then goes off to play golf. That beheading did not affect him emotionally in any way. In fact, it was more of a nuisance to him to have to even make a statement about it.

      I'm almost as old as your generation and I have to say we have a very different reaction. We identify the beheaders as simply evil and we want them dead, period. Obama sends out Attorney General Holder to say the beheading will be treated as a criminal offense as if the guy jaywalked. The thought that he simply deserves to die is beyond them -- after all, guns and violence are "bad".

      Most of the people in this current generation in grade school will likely not put up much of a fight if attacked and they will be attacked.

    11. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They dont make 'toy' guns look real any more because your likely to get shot by some cop who is annoyed he couldn't eat his donut in peace!

    12. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Jews...

    13. Re:Land of insanity by Seumas · · Score: 2

      Not really. School is used less as a tool for actual enlightenment and education and critical thinking skills and more for indoctrination and acclimation to submission to authority throughout most of the world.

    14. Re:Land of insanity by easyTree · · Score: 1, Informative

      You might want to watch the video for yourself.

      I'm particularly fond of the way they fabricate a justification to kill complete strangers who at worst would be guilty of defending their country from an invading force.

    15. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Death to the American literature, or at least to the apocalyptic hunting prose written by under 18-year-olds."
      -- A Random School Administration in South Carolina

    16. Re:Land of insanity by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      I suppose the 9/11 bombers were just "defending their country from an invading force" too?

    17. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were no bombs used in 9/11.

    18. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tell that to the people burned alive by fire or crushed by the collapse of the buildings.. Improvised bombs are still bombs.

    19. Re:Land of insanity by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      And in Australia ...
      A while ago, my daughter, aged approx 14, wrote a rather scary essay all about grooming of girls for sex. It was a creepy story - about creepy people.
      The school was shocked, called her in for counselling, and called me. After a while they settled down, came to the conclusion she was not writing about real life, and let the story stand.

      No police, no arrests, sensible consultation. I think they did a much better job.

      Scary essay though. Where did she get it all from?

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    20. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At school in the UK, I wrote a story which involved the grisly death of my English teacher - struck by lightning before falling through a glass skylight of a warehouse roof. Sensibly, I changed the character's name and profession - but the physical description matched.

      Surprisingly, I got a good mark for it - but said teacher queried my spelling. I WAS CORRECT.

    21. Re:Land of insanity by easyTree · · Score: 0

      I'm not clear that members of the CIA consider themselves patriots so I'm going with 'nope' on that.

    22. Re:Land of insanity by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no one in america is killing iraqis for defending their home from an invading force (the invading force being ISIS)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    23. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing you know they'll start arresting everyone that shows up to sign up for highschool ROTC. Here in the USA, we've now become the grand new, U-S-F-P (United States of Fucking Pussies)!

    24. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in America ...

      Our ghey government

    25. Re:Land of insanity by Optali · · Score: 1
      That's almost as good as the Catholic Archbishop who sued a group of Satanists to get back some sacred Wafers the Satanists wanted to use at a Black Mass:

      satanist turns communion wafer-

      Mind you: The wafers were not stolen, but bought via Internet from Turkey. XD

      l

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    26. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thousands of Americans were killed on 9/11 and when Bush learned about the attack on America, he waited to finish reading a children's book before he would react. Then during a trillion dollar war funded by deficit spending, knowingly predicated on faulty intelligence data, where thousands of American troops were killed and millions of innocent civilians were slayed, Bush spent 879 days being on vacation.

      You right wingers are nothing more than ambulance chasers, looking for bodies to pin on Obama under the most tenuous of circumstances when your incompetent boy Bush has more blood on his hands than any other president in recent history.

    27. Re:Land of insanity by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      (There's also no such thing as a 50mm gun.)

      Indeed, there's no 50mm autocannon anywhere in the skies. The GAU-8 Avenger, a 30 mm rotary cannon that is the A-10's primary armament, is the heaviest automatic cannon mounted on an aircraft.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    28. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if it turned it was a sign of mental illness and was found in the aftermath of him shooting up a school I wager you'd be the first one saying "no one was paying any attention to the signs of a problem".

      Most of you folks on /. aren't motivated by actual principles, but simple contrainess. specifically contrariness to authority. if they did nothing you'd blame them, and if they did something, you'll blame them for that too.

    29. Re:Land of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this hadn't happened in a state where a significant % of the population believe that man and dinosaurs coexisted, it wouldn't have been a big deal. Obviously the school staff and local law enforcement have a hard time telling where reality stops and fantasy begins.

    30. Re:Land of insanity by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Judging from your user id, a few decades before your great grandpappy was born.

      And I did use a bunch of "magic words," like kill, cook alive, etc.

      Also, I paralleled a hate crime and attempted to let the horror of it speak for itself; I made no attempt to explicitly declare the actions as deplorable.

      I stand by my claim, though. There will be outliers, and you can find excessive responses to art, and ignoring real violence.

      You didn't even address the main point, which was that you were spewing bigoted anti-Americanism based on an outlier that will exist in any populous nation, and accused us of being unique in having negative outliers.

  2. LOL by war4peace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only in 'Murica.
    Here' if a 16-year old writes something like that, everyone would have a good laugh.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re:LOL by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      The child understood that dinosaurs don't exist anymore. It's not clear that the police were operating from the same viewpoint.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:LOL by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The police were probably just hoping they'd get a chance to shoot a dinosaur themselves.

    3. Re:LOL by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      Only in 'Murica.
      Here' if a 16-year old writes something like that, everyone would have a good laugh.

      That's what happens in "'Murica," too. Unfortunately, we also have nationalist bigots like you. You'd feel right at home, I'm sure. You could just replace "'Murica" with France or China in your hate speech.

      Did it cross your mind that perhaps you were misled by a sensationalist tabloid? Don't they also have tabloids in your country? I'll bet they do.

    4. Re:LOL by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Well gee, Sparky. Why don't you tell us what pseudoenlighted country you live in. So that we may delve into some random idiotic episode that happens in your hinterland and make fun of it.

      Everywhere has some stupid crap going on.

    5. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, but 'murica beats everyone with how stupid their shit is

    6. Re:LOL by qbast · · Score: 1

      Come on, show me link to story that got French or Chinese kid arrested over writing school assignment about shooting something.

    7. Re:LOL by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Oh we have our fair share of retarded stuff happening, but punishing teenagers for writing stupid shit clearly ain't it.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re:LOL by war4peace · · Score: 1

      1. Not a hate speech. I don't hate USA, not at all.
      2. I don't read tabloids. If this story was posted on /. and came from a tabloid, I expected better and I'm sorry for /.
      3. Who says I'm a nationalist, let alone bigot? I hate my countrymen because they're retarded, but in other areas.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    9. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but only if it's unarmed.

    10. Re:LOL by hedleyroos · · Score: 2

      It is illegal to hunt extinct animals.

    11. Re:LOL by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Come on, show me link to story that got French or Chinese kid arrested over writing school assignment about shooting something.

      It wouldn't make the news. That's not the same thing as saying it doesn't happen. In China, the child would probably be sent off to a re-education camp, and everyone would think it normal. In France, he'd likely just get a bad grade.

    12. Re:LOL by dlt074 · · Score: 1

      Murika is conditioning its citizens to fear any and all mention of guns and weapons. none of these types of storys are because of "stupid" administrators and teachers, it's an unspoken, unwritten plan to make all future generations shun weapons and guns.

      it's the only way to do away with the pesky notion of personal responsibility and self defense.

      an entire generation of children so scared of even talking about guns, will never own a gun let alone vote against anything that bans them.

      conditioning at its best.

    13. Re:LOL by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That law may be on the books but no one has enforced it in years.

    14. Re:LOL by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that would work.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    15. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they do. He was talking about a parrot, which is a common pet dinosaur.

    16. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of perhaps shoot the child or one of the adults there.

    17. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some point you really need to read the story of what actually happened. The kid wrote a story and one of the teachers took it wrong. They then didn't call his parents but instead called the police. The police came and the kid did not respond well to the questioning and the police arrested him. He wasn't punished for what he wrote. He was arrested (read arrest, not punish btw...there is a difference) and I'd wager the charges end up getting dropped.

      Stories like this are just bait for insecure people who want to bash somebody else to feel better about themselves while completely ignoring their own problems (in this case your own countries) so you can feel superior. A stupid event happened that was probably caused by one persons over reaction and a kid didn't react well to it which is understandable given the circumstances and you're trying to say something like, "only in 'Murica herk herk".

      Read the story. Don't be the sheep that you clearly are.

    18. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, but 'murica beats everyone with how stupid their shit is

      People outside the US don't get the full picture. You see the cowboy mentality from Texas, the hillbillies from Appalachia, the Valley girls, and the gangs of the inner cities. You don't get that the average Usian doesn't fit any of these stereotypes.

    19. Re:LOL by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That it is a story when it happens in the US proves that it is unusual, that it is an outlier.

      You thought "news" was the stuff that is normal, and they ignore the unusual stuff?

  3. NSPCD, get on that! by slgrimes · · Score: 2

    I'll bet the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Dinosaurs will put him in his place.

    --
    What is popular is not always right; what is right is not always popular.
    1. Re:NSPCD, get on that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft, that's not even a real organization.

      The closest I could find was the Extinct Species Rights Organization.

    2. Re: NSPCD, get on that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to get on that. Time travelers picking them up only to have the poor Dino self combust is becoming a real problem now!!

  4. Just like Happy days.. by mrbcs · · Score: 3, Insightful
    America has jumped the shark..

    This is like watching a train wreck in slow motion. Will it ever stop?

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    1. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Aighearach · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Maybe it is your anti-American hate that jumped the shark. Will it ever stop? I doubt it. No reason to expect humans to behave differently wherever you come from.

      You might have missed the part where the story isn't from a newspaper that is claiming to have researched it and presented the facts. It is actually from a blog called the "mommy files," and they don't describe the actual charges, or interview anybody other than the student and his mother.

      Also note that the assignment was not "creative writing." The students were supposed to write something about themselves. So that is what he wrote "about himself," that he acquired had acquired a gun and killed his neighbor's pet. Clearly that is protected speech, but it is perfectly reasonable in that circumstance to investigate if there was an actual pet (or human) who had been shot. It is common for teenagers who do something violent to make up a "story" so they can deal emotionally with their actions. Using an imaginary creature as a proxy for a real person or animal is normal in that situation. They weren't investigating him because he said the word "gun." There is more context here, and anybody with knowledge of child psychology should see that it is worth looking into whatever problems this child had that led him to this expression; at least in a preliminary way to see if he was discussing real violence. Obviously that would be more effectively done by a mental health professional than by the police. But if the police are the ones called, and his behavior towards them is disruptive, it is perfectly normal that he would receive a minor charge based on being disruptive. Unfortunately most schools don't teach children about their rights, and how to deal with police officers in a way that protects your rights without exposing you to legal charges. Freaking out and yelling at them and refusing to cooperate is usually going to get a person a minor charge. That is true in most of the world.

    2. Re:Just like Happy days.. by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      Maybe it is your anti-American hate that jumped the shark.

      Why are you arguing this point? Do you believe the USA is the best country on the planet?

    3. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Government schools in America jumped the shark about 40 years ago. Local government police jumped the shark 15-20 years ago. As a whole, America jumped the shark November 6, 2012.

    4. Re:Just like Happy days.. by reikae · · Score: 1

      I think it's perfectly reasonable to assume the student hasn't actually killed anyone or anything. If the student later is involved in an investigation as a potential suspect, then you can bring something like this up.

      I agree on teaching students how to deal with the police, ie. not to say anything. The situation was probably quite scary to the kid, so I do understand his behavior although I don't condone it.

    5. Re:Just like Happy days.. by msauve · · Score: 3, Informative

      "You might have missed the part where the story isn't from a newspaper that is claiming to have researched it and presented the facts. It is actually from a blog called the "mommy files," and they don't describe the actual charges, or interview anybody other than the student and his mother."

      You definitely missed the part where they linked to their source article, which was on a Chicago TV station news site.

      The rest of your post just sounds like the sort of BS a psych major might spew.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    6. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Will it ever stop? Yo – I don't know
      Turn off the lights and I'll glow
      To the extreme I rock a mic like a vandal
      Light up a stage and wax a chump like a candle."

    7. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly certain the teacher could have handled this herself. If she was really concerned she should have spoken with the teen's parents first, to see if there could possibly be any truth to the story, before involving the police. She showed poor judgement, which has resulted in a teenager being harassed, arrested, and charged for essentially being a teenager.

    8. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You might have missed the part where the story isn't from a newspaper that is claiming to have researched it and presented the facts. It is actually from a blog called the "mommy files," and they don't describe the actual charges, or interview anybody other than the student and his mother.

      Said blog is associated with the San Francisco Chronicle, a well-known newspaper. It quotes articles from the New York Daily News and Fox on the subject. These articles further quote other coverage on WCSC TV and 5 News. The Fox article includes quotes from the police, which are included in the blog post you state doesn't have any such information.

    9. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America the joke country. Everyone in Europe and Asia laughs at them, no kidding. I do teaching in China and all over Europe and when you talk to the locals about all the crazy stuff happening over there they start laughing and call them either stupid, uneducated, or worse.

    10. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as long as we let liberal bed-wetters and the religious right continue their influence. We need centered, normal people in positions of power and a drastically smaller government.

    11. Re:Just like Happy days.. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      long story short, the kid should have been given a grade, and that should have been the end of it, no cops, no bullshit. Anything you just said should be irrelevant because it should never get to that point

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    12. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and anybody with knowledge of child psychology should see that it is worth looking into whatever problems this child had that led him to this expression

      Yes,he has a vivid imagination - just like millions of kids before him. Anyone who's actually *had* kids knows this, as opposed to child psychologists who THINK they know about kids - and promptly prescribe Ritalin and once-weekly consultations to justify their fucking existence.

    13. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of your excuses for the "authorities" matter. the teacher didn't like the student's smart ass response to her/his assignment and being a statist
      POS like yourself, called the freakin' local henchmen to scare the kid into submission. when he didn't immedietely cower to their godly status they used the little power they had to arrest him. now lilly-livered law lovers like you are here trying to make all that sound reasonable because you all are selfish whores and it's politically convenient.

    14. Re:Just like Happy days.. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      ever notice how few child psychologists actually have kids??

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    15. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      He isn't accused of killing anybody, so who cares if he killed anybody or not? Fail.

    16. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The rest of your post just sounds like the sort of BS a psych major might spew.

      So you're bigoted against psych majors, or even software engineers that are well educated enough to sound educated. Gotchya.

      Mine was hashbrowns and eggs.

    17. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'm quite sure letting the teacher "handle it" would not resolve any of the serious issues. When a student substitutes violent fantasy for a non-fiction assignment, it is highly likely that they need some professional intervention. Obviously, the most effective way to handle that would be gently, by a trained professional, who can provide low-pressure counseling to attempt to uncover what the problem is, or if the student was simply trying to alarm their classmates for fun.

      I find it interesting that what he's accused of is actually the least dangerous possibility. The most likely, in my opinion, is that this child is abused and had a pet murdered by a friend or family member, and would benefit from counseling. Obviously in this scenario calling the police is counter-productive and actually harmful.

      But it is known that killing animals can lead to killing humans. Most children are at some point cruel to animals, but taking it too far at the wrong developmental phase can lead to dysfunction around the valuing of life. That can, and sometimes does, lead to murder. Getting treatment early could save this kids life, if he wasn't just trying to alarm his classmates.

      So it all comes back to, unless it is something worse, then he was indeed trying to alarm people, just like pulling a fire alarm. If you think alarming people with fake violence should be legal, that is a good debate to have in a State legislature, but I don't want workers or school officials to make up their own version of what they think the laws should be, and impose that instead of the real laws.

    18. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The whole point of putting it off into a blog is to show that it is not part of the main site. Being owned by a newspaper, or having hosting provided by them, doesn't cause some sort of authority to leak over to it. That would be crazy. If that was the case we'd have to believe everything they say on cable news, too, because those same companies might own trusted newspapers.

      Does the blog follow the standards of journalism that the SF Chronicle is so well known for? No. Does it claim to? No, it claims to be a blog. And a quick glance at their methods, they give one side from a "mommy perspective." Which makes sense and is appropriate, because it is The Mommy Files.

    19. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Imagination has nothing to do with the problem. People are knee-jerk reacting to this because it matches the cliche, which most of us experienced first hand, of teachers over-reacting to nonsense.

      Using violent imagination in place of non-fiction shows either real emotional problems, or clearly trying to alarm people. If he had simply told the police, "It was just a joke, I wasn't trying to alarm anybody I was trying to make them laugh," then he wouldn't have been charged. Instead, he did a full "freak-out" yelling at the police, so they charged him. Keep in mind, in most States this won't lead to any real charges or a record; it will lead to a visit with a Juvenile Court Judge who will, as long as the kid can show he learned to say what he is supposed to say in front of Authorities, assign some community service and drop the charges.

      IMO the mother should be teaching the kid the Big Boy Realities here; freaking people out with fake violence crosses lines, and when you cross lines and Authorities are coming down on you, you need skills for that. I mean, unless you're just going to follow the rules. Instead he's learning to whine and cry about being charged with... what he was actually trying to do. Which he should either deny, or be proud of.

      The fact is there could be a dead pet that he killed. Or his dead pet that was murdered might be troubling him. Or a dead human he witnesses being killed. Even more likely than any of those, more likely than "innocently" trying to alarm people, is that the child is abused and asking him to "tell something true about himself" creates a real emotional dilemma for him. If they had used not a teacher, but an actual trained counselor, they would have had a chance to determine that. Maybe the police needed to be called, but with a totally different reported crime. We'll never know.

    20. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Right, so some Coward who calls people names on the internet, that must be your example of a Good Person? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

      LOLOLOL

      LOL

      I'll give you a hint, though, even though you're trolling. You didn't attempt to understand my words; and I'm not defending their idiot actions. I'm pointing out the flaws in the complaints against those actions, and also providing examples of better actions they could have taken. Just because they were small-minded idiots doesn't mean that any complaint against them is right. In fact, small-minded complaints about small-minded actions are recommending even worse actions. Like, don't even try to find out if this kid witnessed a murder. Obviously the police aren't the right people to find out why this kid is troubled, or if he even is troubled. But neither is the teacher, or the school nurse. What he needed was to have a trained counselor find out what was wrong. They only should have taken the "punish for being disruptive" attitude if he refused to "come clean" and provide a believable story as to what was going on in his mind. It was clearly not "nothing."

    21. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It is normal for people with advanced degrees to seek out degrees that they personally relate to. Since psychologists earn low pay compared to the number of years they have to study, most of them will have psychological problems, and that is why they identify with the field. That maps better to treating adults who are seeking treatment than to treating children, who are still developing. Few psychological conditions can be treated with psychiatry at a young age, because most conditions change as a person ages and develops. Instead, there is a lot of danger of harm by excess treatment.

      That is why in these cases it is almost universally advised to use a Counselor, instead of a Psychiatrist. A counselor is trained in listening, asking good questions, and showing compassion. People who are drawn to the field of Counseling often relate to the field because they felt like people didn't listen to them, or else because they felt people did listen to them, and they valued that, but saw that most others don't have somebody who listens.

      Counselors more typically have families, compared to psychiatrists. And they have lower divorce rates, lower suicide rates, etc.

      Night and day, actually; psychiatrists have above average suicide rates, counselors have below average suicide rates.

    22. Re:Just like Happy days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine was hashbrowns and eggs.

      Tapeworm ?

    23. Re:Just like Happy days.. by reikae · · Score: 1

      There's no reason to think he killed anybody. That's also why you or I aren't involved in a murder investigation right now. The police can't know for sure we didn't kill anyone. That doesn't mean they don't care. You think what he wrote is a reason to think he killed somebody; I don't.

  5. Please, don't tell them ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... but I strangled my neighbor's unicorn, last night.

    1. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by hduff · · Score: 1

      ... but I strangled my neighbor's unicorn, last night.

      Or you could have sodomized that unicorn. That would have been OK as well.

      But mention the word "gun" and everybody goes batshiat insane!

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    2. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      And there's a new euphemism for the list.

    3. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Eevee · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... but I strangled my neighbor's unicorn, last night.

      Now, I've heard the phrase choking the chicken before, but that one's a new euphemism to me.

    4. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's worthy of an extended visit to Gitmo. Unicorns are endangered you know.

    5. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

      I was afraid of that. So, how do you get pixie dust off your hands?

    6. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by ArcadeNut · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I support the banning of hands! Just think of all the crime it would stop! Strangling, Shootings, Stabbing, Stealing... Without hands, you cannot do any of that (easily)!

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    7. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 2

      Isn't that what they call "Sharia Law"?

    8. Re: Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish those PETA protestors outside my house would realize that no actual chickens were harmed while choking my chicken.

    9. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      The word "gun" had nothing to do with the problem. The assignment was non-fiction, to write about himself. He wrote that he killed a neighbor's pet. That the "pet" is an imaginary creature suggests he might have serious guilt problems associated with having killed a real pet, or even a human; or witnessed such a crime. Or he could just be a teenager who wanted to be disruptive in class. Most likely the latter, but it is reasonable to check. They probably should have called a district mental health professional, not the police.

      If it was a creative writing assignment this would not have raised the same red flags.

      Also keep in mind, and I know we don't read the stories, but it is a blog called the "mommy files" and they only interviewed mommy and her perfect little darling. And he didn't freak out during the interview, like he did in the police interview. And neither he nor his mommy attempts to explain factually what behavior he was actually charged with. I'll give you a hint, though, it is the same (minor) charge he'd get if he was caught pulling a fire alarm or shouting "fire."

    10. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      A unicorn is a bi-sexual person of either gender, generally in the context of a threesome with a couple and where the unicorn has sex with both members of the couple.

      So I think he means he gave a hand job to his neighbors bisexual male third wheel. What a bunch of sluts. LOL

      Legal in most States. ;)

    11. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, if it upsets you that much, post your address and I'll be glad to mail you a hankie. A nice pink one to go with your politics.

    12. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he was caught pulling a fire alarm or shouting "fire."

      But he wasn't. I know you Republicans always have trouble with the truth, but that's ridiculous. He did not pull the fire alarm. He did not pull the fire alarm. HE DID NOT PULL THE FIRE ALARM. If he had, that would be a crime. You might as well ask if he was caught anally raping the principal's seven cats while cutting the clitoris off of his teacher's vagina. That is what your nonsense is like. Please stop doing this typical Republican thing. It is disgusting.

      This boy was beaten and thrown in a hole because he is black. Stop ignoring the facts. Of course that's all you Republicans do. Try watching a news channel instead of your Faux Knews garbage. I guess you got this fire alarm nonsense from those morons.

    13. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by countach · · Score: 1

      Maybe the gun was a water pistol. Maybe the "killing" was part of a game. It's quite possible this status report was actually true in its own context, not creepy at all, not weird at all. Don't you think asking a few questions might have been the first step, rather than calling in police, mental health people or whoever?

    14. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Kohath · · Score: 2

      You are the problem. Stop trying to police everyone. Stop trying to be everyone's insane busybody mom. Mind your own business.

    15. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, man, I strangled my neighbor's unicorn so much last night... Kept going till there were rainbows all over the place. LOL!

    16. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      That the "pet" is an imaginary creature suggests he might have serious guilt problems associated with having killed a real pet, or even a human; or witnessed such a crime.

      Oh bullshit. Stop playing psychologist, this wasn't some six year old. Every time I was asked to write about myself I fabricated stuff and made it plain that I did. It's not a teacher's job to investigate a kid's psyche.

    17. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Look ass-hat AC, I'm a Rep and I find the teacher's, school's and police response intolerable. Most Rep's do, by the way. We're not the ones freaking out over any mention or play acting concerning a gun.

    18. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No, it is generally only women that are counted as Unicorns. As in, "Finding a hot young chick that want's to have sex with me at 45, and my wife at 43 is like finding a unicorn."

    19. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Nope. Maybe in your town/circle of friends. But nope.

      Interestingly, you not using it that way, does not, cannot, mean that others don't use it that way.

      You can look it up, I'm sure any of the websites that keep track of slang can inform you of multiple usages.

    20. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      But he wasn't. I know you Republicans always have trouble with the truth, but that's ridiculous. He did not pull the fire alarm. He did not pull the fire alarm. HE DID NOT PULL THE FIRE ALARM. If he had, that would be a crime. You might as well ask if he was caught anally raping the principal's seven cats while cutting the clitoris off of his teacher's vagina. That is what your nonsense is like. Please stop doing this typical Republican thing. It is disgusting.

      If you're entirely oblivious to American politics (fair enough if you're not from here) then some facts: The Republicans are the pro-gun side. The Democrats are the anti-gun side. Public schools in the US are profoundly dominated by the Left (or was passes here for the Left).

      Also, the left here is pro-"that religion that cuts girls clitorises off", the right is anti-that-religion. (But I thought that was true in most of Europe too?)

      Please inform your future hate-filled rants with these simple facts.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by fermion · · Score: 1

      An arrest is clearly overkill. Many urban districts are trying to go against the insanity of the past 20 years of zero tolerance and return the classroom management to the classroom teacher, along with more leeway. That said, like your post, such things are usually a call for help. I have see in kids that I personally have known for many years. I have seen it in kids that I hardly know. Such things almost always a request for a response by the child. It might be dropping everything and having a one on one conversation, or therapy. Some educators think that just ignoring the kid is the proper thing to do, and honestly sometimes it is, and if the behavior is repetitive then it simply a training thing, like the baby repeatedly dropping the spoon. But it is a new things, or an escalating things, while it may not be a plan to actually cause harm to someone or themselves, it could be a cry for abuse or some other such thing. Which, again, is not best handled by calling the cops. So we have had the conversation, and attention has been given, and I hope you feel better.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    22. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by danlip · · Score: 1

      I believe Dan Savage coined the term unicorn, and it applies specifically to females (as it is generally much easier to find men who are up for MMF threesomes). Urbandictionary agrees too (mostly).

    23. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't forget the most important one!

      With no hands comes no masturbation!
      And with no masturbation means no sinning against the almighty!

    24. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No cause ever time some one shuffles of this mortal coil they find 70 virgins waiting for them unfortunately they are probably American basement dwellers

    25. Re: Please, don't tell them ... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      ERM. As somebody who lives in Africa I should tell you there is NO religion that condones cutting girls clitorisses off. There are several CULTURES that do but they do so despite not because of their religious beliefs and quite a lot of them are Christian.
      And as an American a country where male genital mutilation is an extremely common cultural practice despite being discouraged by your major religion this should not be hard for you to comprehend.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    26. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First you fall into the fallacy of moderation, followed by a pseudo-psychological analysis of the situation using the knowledge from the article, another fallacy of moderation, and then you announce the article is a load of over-the-top crap and cite relatively extreme examples as a reason for an excessive response to a non-event.

      Learn to reason and stop being a dick.

    27. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by markass530 · · Score: 1

      Kid isn't black jackass

    28. Re: Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xians hate the idea of women enjoying sex so they've supported it for hundreds of years. That is the way of their kind.

    29. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch it now young man! You're walking a fine line, do you really want us to suspend you and get the cops?!

      Yea that's right, we do what ever we want don't you question our authority!

      Perhaps they should rename the teachers union to the TSA - Teachers Security Agency.

    30. Re: Please, don't tell them ... by torsmo · · Score: 1

      Nobody here believes your cock-and-ball story.

    31. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      im going to go on a limb and guess you are a psych student. because no, no one in their right mind would think that he has guilt problems for writing fantasy regardless of if it was supposed to be non fiction or not. The only people who would believe that are psych majors, and liberal pansies

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    32. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      hey idiot, its the liberals who get butthurt over things that are gun related

      its the liberals who have ran the schools for 2 generations now

      republicans would think the teacher/principal should be fired (as they should)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    33. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

      Then again, it may simply reflect an act of defiance toward an assignment that was unwelcome.

    34. Re:Please, don't tell them ... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You might need a citation for that. Where did I claim to be policing everyone, or to be your mommy?

      Are you absolutely sure that being against his arrest requires you to misconstrue the actual events?

      Is your reading comprehension truly so low that you couldn't read what I said and discover that I was advocating an in-school mental health response?

      Do you claim I have no business discussing how schools in my own community should respond to situations? Who is the "busybody mom," again?

  6. Mandatory panic! by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a. He's a he.
    b. He's a teenager.
    c. He goes to a school.
    d. He wrote the word "gun" in a "fantasy" story.

    Mandatory panic! Alert the police! Search EVERYTHING! Connect the dots!

    Personally, I blame the teacher for not sufficiently explaining the limits of the assignment.

    1. Re:Mandatory panic! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mandatory panic! Alert the police! Search EVERYTHING! Connect the dots! Personally, I blame the teacher for not sufficiently explaining the limits of the assignment.

      I doubt very much the reaction would have been the same if he'd written that he did it with bow & arrow.

      As far as I am concerned, it was the school's actions that were criminal. First, censorship is not the business of schools. Second, they called the police over a non-crime. They didn't even have a reasonable suspicion that any crime had been committed.

      It's one thing to say "no guns in school". It's quite another to ban any mention of them. This isn't China.

    2. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The police account was that he became "irate" and that's why they had to arrest him. So I'd add to your list e. (isn't rich and) doesn't act how the police like.
       
      The best case spin on this for the police is as another version of the "Don't tase me, bro!" guy.

    3. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes this stuff gets outrageous. We had a personal experience with it 3 years ago. In a high school English class our son - 15 at the time - was assigned to write a simple biographical essay. They got to chose the subject and needed to have it approved by the teacher. Our son chose Mikhail Kalashnikov and the teacher approved it. They were then allowed to use class computers to do some research. The teacher freaked out and had our kid taken the to the office and there was a big brouhaha because he was "looking at a web site with guns on it". Really? Really? You don't expect to have some pictures of guns in biographical information about the guy who designed the fracking AK-47 along with several other guns? Argh! If they didn't want guns to be seen on school computers perhaps they should not allow students to select the designers of said guns as their biographical assignment. Yep, out of control loonies running the schools.

    4. Re:Mandatory panic! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      He wasn't arrested for writing about shooting the neighbors' dinosaur. He was questioned about it, and then he escalated things from there. The story even says this. Even so, this type of anecdotal story is utterly worthless without knowing the backstory and what else was going on. Maybe it's just as ridiculous as it sounds, more likely not, but you really can't tell anything either way from these little tabloid "Can You Believe It!?" writeups.

    5. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I doubt very much the reaction would have been the same if he'd written that he did it with bow & arrow.

      Well, of course, the arrow would have bounced off the dino's skin and the dinosaur would have eaten him, end of story!

    6. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      His teacher heard the name and thought the paper would be a fluff piece extolling the brutes of communism. Surprise, Teach'!

    7. Re:Mandatory panic! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      At first I thought you were taking about this guy, and all I could think was: "OK. I'm not really a fan either, but expecting the teacher to assume the presence of guns might be taking even my disdain for it a bit too far"

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    8. Re:Mandatory panic! by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, based on the writeup it sounds like he could be guilty of nothing more than knowing his rights.

      He was questioned by police without his parents. That's not acceptable. He shouldn't be punished for anything that arose from an illegal interrogation. He may have simply refused to cooperate.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:Mandatory panic! by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I dunno, I robbed a bank once by walking in, unarmed, writing "gun" on a piece of paper, and then shooting everyone in the place with it. Once I'd shot all of them, there was nobody to trigger the alarm or stop me from walking out with all the money.

      Letting people write the word "gun" on a piece of paper is very dangerous.

      And yes, for those who can't detect satire, this really did happen. We should ban pens and paper so it doesn't happen again.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    10. Re: Mandatory panic! by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Why would that matter?
      Does your opinion on the events change depending on his skin color?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    11. Re:Mandatory panic! by meerling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Irate? Yeah, I'd have become "irate" if some blithering idiot was accusing me of violating the law for a piece of fiction written for class in which his character (modeled as himself) hunted a species that became extinct millions of years ago. (Of course, being a "pet dinosaur" you could probably classify it as fantasy.)

      As to fiction including guns. Oh no! Go arrest EVERY AUTHOR ON THE PLANET!!!

      The ones disturbing the school were the police and the idiots that panicked over the short story/assignment. At least one person deserves to be fired.

      When I think back to the stories I wrote for class back in high school, morons like the ones at his school would have called out the police, fire department, FBI, NSA, NASA, Marines, Air Force, and MIB!

    12. Re:Mandatory panic! by flayzernax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      yeah, losing your shit is a sure fire way to demonstrate calm and respectful behavior to a young kid writing about *his* fantasies.

      if it was a girl she probably would have been treated differently too

      our culture is a culture of fear and cowardice :( plain and simple, when we all realise this collectively (lets hope it doesn't take a collective ass kicking) we'll grow up

      Until then, our empire is tiny and shitty compared to the aztecs and mighty vikings that came before it, we will see

    13. Re:Mandatory panic! by flayzernax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      p.s. ps this isn't a testosterone fueled rant, about warrior races, this is coming from someone who is out and proud of who they are and unafraid of their speech still.

      we could stand to learn a lot from independent more decentralized cultures from all over the world if they were studied as such, but they are put down as primitive and backwards in history class, while the great white empire of the east india trading company and royal academy of sciences is touted as the greatest achievements of mankind

    14. Re:Mandatory panic! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Informative

      He was questioned by police without his parents. That's not acceptable. He shouldn't be punished for anything that arose from an illegal interrogation. He may have simply refused to cooperate.

      I don't know anything about what happened in this particular case, but in general, your assertion about the law is not true. Minors may be questioned by police without parents present. However, what the Supreme Court has said is that police may have to adjust their standard of when to issue a Miranda warning, depending on the subject's age. The normal standard is that Miranda is not required for questioning when a reasonable person in that situation would feel free to leave at any point. However, minors may sometimes assume they must be more obedient to authority figures and therefore may not feel they are free to leave -- thus, in some cases the Miranda standard should be altered to take that into account. Minors may therefore need to be advised of their rights earlier, or offered an opportunity to speak with parents or counsel to help them understand their rights in that situation.

      But there's no legal requirement in the U.S. that parents always need to be present for police to talk to a minor or ask him questions. You haven't presented any evidence of an "illegal interrogation."

    15. Re:Mandatory panic! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      By the way -- I'm NOT at all saying I agree with the actions by the police in this situation. The outcome certainly sounds ridiculous. But just because his parents weren't present doesn't make the police questioning "illegal."

    16. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a Homework assignment......

    17. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I look forward to the day I can look out of my window and see an "Enlightened(TM)" corpse swinging from every lamppost.

    18. Re:Mandatory panic! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      We should ban pens and paper so it doesn't happen again.

      "Oh no! He typed 'pens and paper!' When will they stop?!?"

    19. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sure is KKK in here.

    20. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, you do not find cops questioning and searching 16 years old boy after fictional Facebook post mentioning gunning down dinosaur overreaction?

      They questioned and searched him and he became difficult cause they acted like bunch of idiots. Then they arrested him, because you have to totally submit yourself to cops no matter how ridiculous their reason for detaining and searching you. Right?

    21. Re: Mandatory panic! by alex4u2nv · · Score: 1

      This story will yield a jurassic response

    22. Re:Mandatory panic! by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 0
      • a. He's a he.
      • b. He's a teenager.
      • c. He goes to a school.
      • d. He wrote the word "gun" in a "fantasy" story.

      He's white.
      Anyone think we're going to see Obama weighing in on this one?

      --
      Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
    23. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TWO TIME WORLD WAR CHAMPS!!!

      Suck it mother fuckers!!

      U-S-A!! U-S-A!!! U-S-A!!!!!!!

    24. Re:Mandatory panic! by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      "We should ban pens and paper so it doesn't happen again."

      Oh, it's YOU. I was there that day. I would have been dead if I hadn't had a pen in my coat pocket to write "emergency exit" on the wall behind me.

      So, no, I disagree. Pens don't kill people, aneurisms do.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    25. Re:Mandatory panic! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's one thing to say "no guns in school". It's quite another to ban any mention of them. This isn't China.

      Why the China bashing? It is not illegal to write a story about guns in China, and I have never heard of this sort of political knee jerk reaction there. An American is FOUR TIMES as likely to be arrested and imprisoned by their government as a Chinese citizen.

    26. Re:Mandatory panic! by Cryacin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly, the pen is mightier than the sword! Will someone think of the children having to witness these horrors!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    27. Re:Mandatory panic! by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

      No kidding, they would have locked up my writing partner and me in high school and thrown away the key! Our english teacher lovingly referred to us as the Jeffery Dahmer society. ...and our papers were no longer read aloud in the class. But, we still got high grades on them for creativity so I had to give the teacher a lot of respect. Plus, he didn't do anything stupid like this idiot teacher did.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    28. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samefag. You obviously posted "Was he black?" just so you can reply to yourself.

      1/10, I responded but you are not getting me to waste mod points. Troll harder next time. You can do it!

    29. Re: Mandatory panic! by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, but a lot of peoples reaction to the event will.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    30. Re:Mandatory panic! by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly, the pen is mightier than the sword! Will someone think of the children having to witness these horrors!

      Google does. Their new e-mail filter might reject statements like the above depending on the word frequencies in spam du jour, because it contains the phrase "pen is".

      I wish I were only joking.

    31. Re:Mandatory panic! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      "The pen is mightier than the sword" is really a typo; it should read "The pen is mightier than the words." It's hard to poke someone's eye out with a word.

    32. Re:Mandatory panic! by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      This isn't China.

      Yea, in China its perfectly ok to shoot your neighbors Dinosaur with a gun in a fantasy story.

      Criticize the Government... not so much.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    33. Re:Mandatory panic! by msauve · · Score: 1

      "...he escalated things from there. The story even says this."

      Are you reading the story linked here? Because, it says no such thing. The closest it comes is "Police told My Fox Chicago that Stone was difficult during questioning..."

      That may simply mean he refused to answer their questions, which is well within his rights, and actually the proper thing to do. Don't talk to the police.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    34. Re:Mandatory panic! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I remember having to write a story a week in grade 8; I wrote a number of fictional stories based on real life happenings, some of which did include guns. A lot of what I did at/brought to school looks like it would now result in a call to the police. Of course, I have my suspicions that in many cases (including this one), there's more to the story. I don't think that if the schoolboy me was suddenly dropped into today's schools, they'd call the police (at least not for that sort of thing). More likely, this is a kid that had been talking a lot about guns, was being unruly in class, and this was the last straw for the teacher -- so they abused a "gun" rule and tried to scare him into proper behaviour by having the local policeman talk to him. Doesn't make it right, but it sure frames the story differently, doesn't it?

    35. Re:Mandatory panic! by arth1 · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what many, especially Americans, think, you cannot win a war. The "winners" are simply the last ones standing, whether they have lost arms legs or heads.
      We still lost the war, like every other participating country.

      (And two? One can hardly say that USA "won" the great war. The American participation was minimal and not decisive in any way.)

    36. Re:Mandatory panic! by digsbo · · Score: 2

      we could stand to learn a lot from independent more decentralized cultures from all over the world if they were studied as such, but they are put down as primitive and backwards in history class, while the great white empire of the east india trading company and royal academy of sciences is touted as the greatest achievements of mankind

      Yes. I was having this argument with a self-described progressive, who, when faced with me saying, "maybe we don't need to be militarily great, and can learn to live humbly, and trade freely with people without having a huge *@#(ing military" responded with, "But every great nation has to be made that way by having a strong central military" or some such rubbish. It boggled me that someone who nominally claims interest in peace equated greatness with military might. It's downright disturbing.

    37. Re:Mandatory panic! by DexterIsADog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Contrary to what many, especially Americans, think, you cannot win a war. The "winners" are simply the last ones standing, whether they have lost arms legs or heads. We still lost the war, like every other participating country.

      It's not that I disagree, it's that you are demonstrably wrong.

      Which countries redrew borders in the Middle East after World War I? Germany? Guess again. Did Germany voluntarily pay reparations? No.

      Which country dominated the world in trade and influence after World War II? Again, not Germany, Italy, Japan, etc. It was the "winner", the U.S.

      If you are making the point that even the winners were worse off after the war, I'd have to disagree. The U.S. was booming within a few years. If you argue that the world as a whole was worse off after, for example World War II, tell me, do you think it would have been better to let Germany continue its policy of lebensraum, or two fight the war?

      I avoid violence whenever possible, it sickens me. But I cannot deny that it sure solves lots of problems.

    38. Re:Mandatory panic! by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Through all of history, every place with a remotely hospitable climate was eventually governed by a nation with a strong military. If on government didn't have that, it would be conquered by one that did. There's no evidence that it's even possible to not have a strong central military for a long time (unless you live someplace where the environment is so hostile it's not worth anyone's effort to conquer, but sometimes even then).
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    39. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got a penis mightier? You're sitting on a gold mine!

    40. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing "gun" on a piece of paper and handing it to the teller might actually be effective - it conveys the threat of force and probably would lead to armed robbery charges.

    41. Re:Mandatory panic! by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 1

      Letting people write the word "gun" on a piece of paper is very dangerous.

      It's only dangerous if people were literate. banin reedin an riitin wud b tha eydeel solushyun.



      ....________|_
      \-' _________|
      ) ___/
      | `./_/
      | |
      `---'

      If they can't see.....

      --
      BM3
    42. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a progressive does not imply one is a pacifist.

    43. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still lost the war, like every other participating country.

      Nope, we nuked the Japs and turned them into sissies whose biggest conquest these days are some whales. We made the Germans our little bitches as well. We won and won decisively.

    44. Re:Mandatory panic! by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Based on what? The official numbers published by China? China executes so many of it's people that they need custom-built execution vans for logistical convenience. America is a China-wannabe when it comes to human rights violations. We try (Delaware apparently bought 1 execution van in 1986), but we always fall short. Write a story about violence in Tiananmen Square and see what happens.

      But that doesn't change the fact that the US has gone absolutely fucking insane about both guns and drugs in schools. When you punish a student for eating a Pop-Tart in such a way that it briefly looks like a gun, it's time to back slowly away from the levers of power and let someone sober, sane, and rational take over. And at least that incident has prompted a couple of state legislatures to take action in defense of sanity, but clearly not in South Carolina.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    45. Re:Mandatory panic! by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 0

      we could stand to learn a lot from independent more decentralized cultures from all over the world if they were studied as such, but they are put down as primitive and backwards in history class, while the great white empire of the east india trading company and royal academy of sciences is touted as the greatest achievements of mankind

      Yes. I was having this argument with a self-described progressive, who, when faced with me saying, "maybe we don't need to be militarily great, and can learn to live humbly, and trade freely with people without having a huge *@#(ing military" responded with, "But every great nation has to be made that way by having a strong central military" or some such rubbish. It boggled me that someone who nominally claims interest in peace equated greatness with military might. It's downright disturbing.

      You're right. That IS disturbing--that he even bothered to rebut you. I'd have just laughed in your face at your display of abject naiveté. There's a phrase that summarizes what you're describing: "Conquered Nation."

    46. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in China you get sent to jail for political satire. Last time I checked, political cartoonists weren't being jailed in the US for mocking Obama.

    47. Re:Mandatory panic! by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's one thing to say "no guns in school". It's quite another to ban any mention of them. This isn't China.

      Why the China bashing? It is not illegal to write a story about guns in China, and I have never heard of this sort of political knee jerk reaction there. An American is FOUR TIMES as likely to be arrested and imprisoned by their government as a Chinese citizen.

      Hey, did you see the Dalai Lama in Tiananmen Square? He was talking about all of the corruption in upper reaches of the Chinese government with some Maoists while he was on his way to the Falun Gong Meeting.

    48. Re:Mandatory panic! by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2

      He wasn't arrested for writing about shooting the neighbors' dinosaur. He was questioned about it, and then he escalated things from there. The story even says this.

      Evidently, your reading comprehension is a bit off. From the article: The cops took Stone in for questioning and searched his locker and backpack for guns. None were found.
      Police told My Fox Chicago that Stone was difficult during questioning and they arrested him and charged him with disturbing the school.

      How, praytell, did he "disturb the school" while he was "difficult during questioning" AFTER they "took Stone in for questioning" which, by common American syntax, means at the police station?

    49. Re:Mandatory panic! by westlake · · Score: 1, Troll

      I dunno, I robbed a bank once by walking in, unarmed, writing "gun" on a piece of paper, and then shooting everyone in the place with it.

      Show the paper to a teller and she will take it as a threat, as she is trained to do.

      In real life most of us aren't being paid enough to sort out the real crazies from the geek playing a prank. We'll assume the worst and let the geek - who should know better - fend for himself.

    50. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The morality that has occurred due to our "winning" lead to Korea and Vietnam. Dozens of smaller conflicts and a culture of bullying and ignorance. Of resting on our military and the axiom "might makes right". We may have won on the battlefields, but as a culture, we lost. And continue to loose.

    51. Re:Mandatory panic! by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      However, if the kid HAD gone on to commit a gun massacre, everyone would be questioning why the signs that the kid was fantasising about guns weren't followed up.

      The problem with America here isn't too much censorship, it's that there's too many school gun massacres. Other first world countries don't have security guards and metal detectors in schools. In most other countries school principles don't need to make plans for what to do if a kid turns up with a gun.

      Your American problem is your gun culture. And many of you don't even realise it's an aberration.

    52. Re:Mandatory panic! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      And they'll even execute you for non-violent offenses like not paying your taxes.

    53. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, censorship is not the business of schools.

      Perhaps not, but bringing up responsible and reasonable citizens is. Teaching kids what's okay and what's not is. Steering kids' lives in a generally "good" direction is. How would you like it if all a kid was doing all day was writing about child rape, and writing to encourage his fellow classmates about child rape? Or about bombing the classroom? Should the school let that continue unabated?

      This isn't China.

      You got that right. In China, one can't turn a fantasy that involves guns into reality later in the afternoon. China can afford to be more lax about high-school kid fantasies involving guns. America cannot.

    54. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried writing "vagina" on a piece of paper once. Didn't work out quite as well. I ended up unfilled and with papercuts.

    55. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your pussies - you cant win a war when neither the Russians or the Brits aren't there to hold your hands!

    56. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the China bashing? It is not illegal to write a story about guns in China, and I have never heard of this sort of political knee jerk reaction there. An American is FOUR TIMES as likely to be arrested and imprisoned by their government as a Chinese citizen.

      Nice spin on that story there, bud. What you're really saying is that an American has FOUR TIMES AS MUCH FREEDOM to be arrested and imprisoned by their government than a Chinese citizen. USA! USA! Land of the free!

      Sigh.

    57. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt very much the reaction would have been the same if he'd written that he did it with bow & arrow.

      When are people going to get fed up with these "no tolerance policies"? I know that school administrators love them because they don't have to think and make a decision, but we need to stop this kind of idiocy. Maybe a bunch of parents should start demanding the school board permanently revoke the teachers license to teach in that state. After several people get their licenses revoked maybe the others will get the idea that there must be a real, valid reason, to panic.

      What if he had used the word "God" or "Bible" in his assignment? news.yahoo.com/bless-you-suspension-153852989.html

    58. Re:Mandatory panic! by Entropius · · Score: 1

      And yet Japan and Germany are two of the most prosperous countries in the world today.

    59. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think Chinese police shoot unarmed black men who have their hands raised?

    60. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's bullshit. If you hand a teller a note that involves violence or a gun, that's the likelihood. If you hand them a fantasy short story they'll likely promptly not read it and go about their business.

      A story about killing a pet dinosaur is only worth worrying about if there's signs of mental illness or it's showing up somewhere other than as part of a fantasy writing assignment.

      Yes most people aren't trained to tell the difference between the crazies and other folks, but for God's sake it was a paper about killing a dinosaur with a gun! It wasn't even a fantasy about killing classmates or other people.

    61. Re:Mandatory panic! by hawkinspeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless you were there fighting the war, it's a bit disingenous to take on other people's war victories as your own. I'm a Brit, but I had nothing to do with World War II or any other war since then. Just being born on the same piece of land as someone else is a strange way of measuring your worth.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    62. Re:Mandatory panic! by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      "maybe we don't need to be militarily great, and can learn to live humbly, and trade freely with people without having a huge *@#(ing military"

      It's a nice thing to aspire to, but without said military, what happens when one of your trading partners decides to just take what you have by force?

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    63. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having lived in both places, I have to call bullshit. Yes, China does execute a lot of people, but the US executes fewer and the trend is towards zero executions. Even in places like Texas the execution rates are going down as life without possibility of parole is increasingly used as punishment for capital crimes.

      China doesn't have issues with weapons in schools the way that the US does. I used to teach over there and there'd regularly be students with knives. The knives were for use in classes, but there's no way that they'd let you keep them for the rest of the day in the US.

      The US does have significantly more freedom and you are right about writing about Tiananmen Square, but the US and China have relatively little in common other than being some of the largest countries in the world.

    64. Re:Mandatory panic! by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is why there's so many killings in schools that teachers need to be worried about someone looking at a website with guns on it. Do you Americans really shoot yourselves that much that you get scared when a kid looks at pictures of guns?

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    65. Re: Mandatory panic! by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's also quite a difference between "strong central military" and "three times the size of any other military force in the world"

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    66. Re:Mandatory panic! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "The penis, mightier than the sword" - W J Clinton.

    67. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yes, in large part because the us rebuilt them from the ashes we consigned them to after their failed adventures in fascism. Then we outlasted the soviet bloc because that system was riddled with internal inconsistencies and improbabilities. The us is far from perfect, but is far better than the alternative of either national socialism, the greater east asian co-prosperity sphere, or the CCCP.

    68. Re:Mandatory panic! by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the US were to close the military tomorrow, all standing army, all reserves, all Coast Guard, every gun owned by the feds were destroyed tomorrow (not sold, but destroyed), we'd still have a military force in just the local police enough to repel any threat, including the rest of the world combined invading. China may have a larger military, but has no ability to project that force. Sadly, England would be able to do the most damage, but even then, not able to "invade" or hold anything that wasn't right on the coast under near-constant navy bombardment.

      A "realistic" disarmament, leaving national guards, Coast Guards and such in place would be able to repel the rest of the world combined in a world war.

      Comparatively, the world has had a large decrease in military force, where world wars were a 20-year occurrence. But those mostly ended after WWII. And yes, lots of wars in the 1800s that weren't world wars were still world wars because Spain, England, and France were battling behind the scenes in lots of "local" skirmishes.

    69. Re:Mandatory panic! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      New Zealand has a military that is outclassed by a number of US police departments. Yet nobody has made an issue of it. In practice, "weak" nations do not get invaded. Singapore has a larger military and has been invaded more, the largest British surrender, once. Didn't stop the invaders.

    70. Re:Mandatory panic! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      One can hardly say that USA "won" the great war. The American participation was minimal and not decisive in any way.

      So you are saying that if the US entered the war on the "other side" that the result would have been the same?

    71. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously the next deterrent is to ban typing.

    72. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odds are the school aced in loco parentis or "in place of the parents". Basically when the school opts to call the police, and the school is entrusted to care for the children with equivalent right of the parents, there's not a legal breach.

      Now that a school would, acting as a parent, decide to turn their own (acting as a) child in is just despicable; but, the real parents of the world are just happy (and often demand) that the school do just what it did, except that they are mostly happy when it happens to other children.

    73. Re:Mandatory panic! by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      He said arrested and imprisoned, not executed. The USA incarcerates more people, in absolute numbers, and per capita than any other country in the world. The USA has 5% of the worlds population and 25% of the worlds prisoners.

      China isn't even in the top ten.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    74. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason to invade NZ is if your country had an otherwise insurmountable deficit of sheep and/or sailboats. Try finding an example that actually has meaningful resources worth capturing. Otherwise, try finding any police department in the USA that has jets and/or helicopters that can fire armed heat or radar guided missiles.

    75. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the US government execute you for not paying your taxes? China does.

    76. Re:Mandatory panic! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      No, the teacher thought it would be about ballet. For a non-gun person, they'd likely correct the surname in their brain to a more popular (and commonly biographied person), and even presented with it in writing wouldn't read it correctly.

    77. Re:Mandatory panic! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And if the USA had 10 times the population and faced massive prison overcrowding? Also what does execution have to do with the fact that the USA incarceration rate per capita is 7x higher than that of China?

    78. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did that happen? To whom? Al Capone?

    79. Re:Mandatory panic! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There is oil and coal production in NZ, not sure how much as it isn't "my country" just an example of a country with trade partners and near-zero military. A single counter-example proves a generalization wrong.

    80. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There can be only one answer. Sue the school and sue the pigs.

    81. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America is a China-wannabe when it comes to human rights violations

      Based on what? The official numbers published by America?

    82. Re: Mandatory panic! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If he was black, the police would have just shot him.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    83. Re: Mandatory panic! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's when they back up their liberal fantasy utopian vision for the rest of us with force, do they become communists.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    84. Re:Mandatory panic! by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      No. This fear is irrational.

    85. Re:Mandatory panic! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      I was talking about China as was the person I responded to. And just to correct myself, apparently 3 years ago they stopped executing people for it.

      http://www.newser.com/story/11...

    86. Re:Mandatory panic! by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Aren't you all missing the point! It's not about the gun.

      He KILLED his neighbors dinosaur!! Horrible.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    87. Re: Mandatory panic! by schlachter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think China has a military of this size partly to keep people employed. It's not like they really use it.

      But it is only twice as large as any other force in the world...twice the size of the USA, twice the size of India, and North Korea.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    88. Re: Mandatory panic! by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      skin color and sex, both, yes.

    89. Re:Mandatory panic! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Mandatory panic! Alert the police! Search EVERYTHING! Connect the dots!

      How can you make such sarcastic references indicating that you clearly understand the issue and disapprove of what happened, then proceed to "blame the teacher for not sufficiently explaining the limits of the assignment"?

      Personally, I blame witless school officials, over-reaching law enforcement, and a military-industrial complex that has propagandized and brainwashed the populace into believing that even just a fictional description of violence is tantamount to a crime. This is 'thoughtcrime' straight out of Orwell's '1984'.

      BTW, your post reminds me of another Orwellian concept, namely "doublethink".

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    90. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was fantasizing because that was the assignment you dim wit. Inner city minorities have problems with guns in their schools. Majority white schools have shootings infrequently enough that it's major news when it does occur (and I will gladly accept the 1 in 1000 chance during my lifetime of me or my kid dying by firearm if it means I retain my fundamental human right to effective self defense.)

    91. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fantasy about shooting a dinosaur? Are you mentally ill or just stupid?

    92. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, eg stalin, pol pot, hitler.

    93. Re: Mandatory panic! by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Nah, socialists use taxes on your income and property, the communists use guns as they already own all of your property.

    94. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US were to close the military tomorrow, all standing army, all reserves, all Coast Guard, every gun owned by the feds were destroyed tomorrow (not sold, but destroyed), we'd still have a military force in just the local police enough to repel any threat, including the rest of the world combined invading.

      Well, no shit. Thanks to "surplus" programs handing out billions in military equipment, our police force has become our military.

      Between Boston and now Ferguson (pre-National Guard), I don't know how the fuck you don't see that.

      Ironically, we have to listen to police chiefs talk about how they've reduced crime in the last 30 years, which of course is the logical reason his police force just took delivery of a fucking tank and 100 more assault weapons.

    95. Re:Mandatory panic! by russotto · · Score: 2

      The cops just didn't know that dinosaurs were extinct. Now, if he'd written that he killed an honest cop, they'd have known it was fiction.

    96. Re:Mandatory panic! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and we've gotten to the point that with the Guard holding "real" tanks and things like fighter jets, and the police with APCs and such, we have a domestic military capable of repelling the entire world, should the entire world declare war tomorrow. The military is surplus, and should be eliminated, saving trillions we can use to pay down the debt. If we paid off the debt and eliminated the military, we could cut Federal income tax in half, and increase services.

      But no, being able to kill foreign dictators because they sell oil in Euros, not Dollars, is worth bankrupting the country and destabilizing the world.

    97. Re:Mandatory panic! by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between military might, military dictatorships, and a strong cultural propensity for the martial arts.

      I'm not sure what we stand to gain from making ourselves the largest and possibly most unwieldy (yes we can project force all over, but at what cost and how easy is it to disrupt us?) force on the planet.

      I've read through most of this thread. I believe it does take more than a strong central military to hold a society together. Needless to say. I am speaking in terms of endurance and stability over large stretches of time. Modern society is still relatively young and going through lots of growing pains. We probably kill each other more on a regular basis violently than we did in the past overall. Just in a much more dynamic, indirect and less nationalistic way. But I haven't really sat down and looked at the numbers or have done any research to specifically back up that idea.

    98. Re:Mandatory panic! by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      Err, as in force, I meant to say the largest target as well.

    99. Re:Mandatory panic! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I wish that wasn't a good point. I know that there are many things that are considered human rights violations in many countries that are common in the US. But do remember that EVERY country lies to it's citizens so that they will think that its better than it is. And there is no real agreement as to what is a human rights violation.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    100. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      What, pray tell, (ignoring all other effects for a second) do you think would happen to the economy if a)all defense contractors suddenly had their orders shrink by 80% (bearing in mind this cascades down the supply chain to everyone from small subcontractors like speciality machine shops to the delis that make their bones on selling lunch and coffee to everyone working on projects) and b)if we suddenly dumped all the people currently employed by the DoD directly in the labor market? Not that the military is really about to be drastically eliminated but if it were the economic effects alone would probably tank the US economy, and the world's right afterwards.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    101. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      NZ has the advantage of knowing that if another nation invaded them there are countries with big sticks, like the US and UK, that would defend them. It's easy to go light on national defense when you have other people willing to step in. When you're already the big fish there isn't someone else to rely on

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    102. Re:Mandatory panic! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      No, not really.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    103. Re: Mandatory panic! by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the US military, which has a budget more than three times the size of China's. China might have more troops, but the US' combat ability is still far greater.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    104. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they check him out, I'd give them that.

      But he is STILL SUSPENDED FOR A WEEK on his school record and CHARGED with a crime. THAT is childish, petty, and criminal. That's beyond wrong.

    105. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if he was a cop, he can video himself talking about killing citizens that cross him legally... And get less punishment.

    106. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why New Zealand hasn't been invaded? I was wondering about that :)

    107. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where is the sad but true moderation!

    108. Re:Mandatory panic! by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      GDP would triple in 5 years. Easy. Next time ask a hard one.

    109. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean that in China you know what to not do, to avoid getting arrested?

    110. Re:Mandatory panic! by drkim · · Score: 3, Funny

      Writing "gun" on a piece of paper and handing it to the teller might actually be effective - it conveys the threat of force and probably would lead to armed robbery charges.

      Does this look like "gub" or "gun"?

    111. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. 1000 times. Schools have the moral duty to condition kids - by psychological pressure if necessary - into conforming to socially acceptable behavior. We have the means now to enforce social engineering on the new generations and it's high time to do it. Anyone who express any form of violence-prone thought should be punished and publicly ridiculed.

    112. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "samefag"? gb24chan, kid.

    113. Re:Mandatory panic! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      How, praytell, did he "disturb the school" while he was "difficult during questioning" AFTER they "took Stone in for questioning" which, by common American syntax, means at the police station?

      Despite the wording here, Stone was questioned at the school. See this article, for example, for clarification:

      The police report suggests that the entire incident was handled as if Stone was an active shooter, rather than a kid who had written an obviously fantastical story: "While administrators, Officer Floyd and I looked for the suspect all students were held in their homeroom classes, until the suspect was located, bookbag located, and locker was cleared with negative results for a weapon."

      Stone was then brought to the principal's office, where police questioned him about the gun comment in the story. He "became very irate stating that it was just a joke," and then "continued to be disruptive and was placed in handcuffs, which were double locked and check for fit, and was advised he was being detained for Disturbing Schools."

      According to Aylor, Stone was taken to the police station and booked like a common criminal. He was released after his mother arrived and signed a Custodial Promise form. The charge is "disorderly conduct based on the alleged interviews related to when they were discussing the writing," said Aylor.

      I agree that the response to all of this sounds rather crazy, and there seems to be little reason that this should have escalated to an arrest. However, let's keep to the facts here. Whatever Stone is accused of doing in terms of "disorderly conduct" happened at the school.

    114. Re:Mandatory panic! by quenda · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I robbed a bank once by walking in, unarmed, writing "gun" on a piece of paper,

      Worst analogy ever. Handing the teller a piece of paper with "gun" on it will get you done for armed robbery. It will reasonably be construed as a threat. Same as hands in pockets with finger extended.
      Threatening to have a gun or knife is enough to have you locked up for years.

      But the kid did not make any threats, so what on earth is your point?

    115. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schools are like prisons; inmates do not have normal rights. It's pretty clear by precedent that students have no right to free speech or freedom to be secure against search and seizures without a warrant. Why do you think they can't be compelled to incriminate themselves?

    116. Re:Mandatory panic! by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      when I was in 8th grade i had a smaller than kid hand sized, see thru blue water pistol in the last few weeks of school. the principal brought me in, and the cops were there. I wasnt arrested but i was yelled at by both the cops and principal, because "someone might mistake it for a real gun"

      my mom and dad are just laughing at them like are you kidding me?? I ended up getting suspended for a day, my dad took me to the shooting range to show me what a real gun was (and made sure the principal and cops knew, and knew i wasnt in any trouble)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    117. Re:Mandatory panic! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      wouldnt you escalate things if you were being accused of something ridiculous?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    118. Re:Mandatory panic! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no, only the ones where they feel its a gotcha! moment (then it usually turns out that the teenager was in the wrong)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    119. Re:Mandatory panic! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      translation: average chinese citizen is four times as fearful of their government as the average american citizen

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    120. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, it's /. Eternal September.

    121. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't the school be dragged to the court for swatting ?

    122. Re:Mandatory panic! by lgw · · Score: 1

      And I said according to whose figures? The official Chinese figures? Including the millions in work camps? Or do those die off fast enough to keep the count low.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    123. Re:Mandatory panic! by denzacar · · Score: 1

      What if you write "sword" instead?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    124. Re:Mandatory panic! by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      ...Sadly, England would be able to do the most damage,..

      The problem with that statement is that England does not have any armed forces. The Royal Air Force is British, The Royal Navy is British and even specifically regionally English army units are in the British army. It is uninformed statements like yours that has caused so many of my fellow Scots to want separation from the UK.
      (Hopefully this will fail like their last attempt, despite the fiddling that has been done.)

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    125. Re:Mandatory panic! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Mandatory panic! Alert the police! Search EVERYTHING! Connect the dots! Personally, I blame the teacher for not sufficiently explaining the limits of the assignment.

      I doubt very much the reaction would have been the same if he'd written that he did it with bow & arrow.

      As far as I am concerned, it was the school's actions that were criminal. First, censorship is not the business of schools. Second, they called the police over a non-crime. They didn't even have a reasonable suspicion that any crime had been committed.

      It's one thing to say "no guns in school". It's quite another to ban any mention of them. This isn't China.

      When you live in a gun society, and you glorify the criminally insane, what do you expect. You live in fear, in fear of another mass killing.
      And the sad part is that the wild west ended in the 1800s around the world, but in the USA. So, the right to bear arms is a right that results in the country with not the largest population, but the largest per capita gun killings, accidental of intentional.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    126. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Censorship is totally the business of schools, according to tradition and the SCOTUS. You know teenagers (or maybe you don't!) - any instance of a teacher correcting bad writing would be decried as "censorship!"
      But I agree this is idiotic. I might take the kid aside for a little talk - this whole "taking care of business" thing is a little bit cold-blooded. And who knows what he meant by "dinosaur". He might not like the neighbor's dog, or even their child, but know that if he wrote "dog" (or child) he'd get in trouble.

    127. Re: Mandatory panic! by denzacar · · Score: 1

      They have 3 years of service in the army, 4 in the navy.
      Even with all those deferred "if he is the only worker in his family providing its means of subsistence or if he is a student in a full-time school" - that's still a LOT of recruits coming in every year.
      Which necessitates a large military structure just to handle all those enlisted men.

      In a country with such a large rural population (about 656.56 million, a lot of them poor) obligatory service like that boils down to essentially population control and education.
      Through drilling-in obedience to authority and military discipline into 18-year-old teenage boys and through essentially removing them from the pool of potential fathers for 3-4 years.
      Also, you're not neet while serving in the army.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    128. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All well and good until the first school that doesn't is sued in civil court for not having done so.

      A litigious society is a *dumb* society.

      Personally, I'd have offered the kid a spot in the Daily Show writer's room.

    129. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and then he escalated things from there. The story even says this."

      you're a boot licking treasonous pos. the student escalated it? those stupid socialist teachers and the traitors at the PD are the ones who escalated it.

    130. Re:Mandatory panic! by BronsCon · · Score: 1
      The punctuation mark at the end of that quote is a comma. Do you know what that means? It means

      and then shooting everyone in the place with it.

      is part of the same sentence. Your whole post kind of falls apart when you realize that, doesn't it?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    131. Re:Mandatory panic! by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Hell, I wrote a short story, impromptu, not even part of an assignment, about a kid who was bullied and just plain didn't fit in, who ended up bringing a gun to school, threatening his classmates, then shooting himself. All of my teachers loved it, except for one who thought it was a red flag; she took it to the principal, who also loved it. He congratulated me for having written something so thought provoking and compelling, told me he wished more of his students wrote the way I did, and that was the end of it. Shit's gotten too out of hand today.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    132. Re:Mandatory panic! by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      Sure, and by the same measure, the average European citizen is about 20 times less fearful of their government as the average American citizen. And that's the land of the free?

    133. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Except it isn't the largest by spending or certainly by per capita. Which would be the USA

    134. Re: Mandatory panic! by Optali · · Score: 1

      China might have more troops, but the US' combat ability is still far greater.

      You sure?

      Check out this link:Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding

      You have seen Kungfu Panda, right? Nuff said.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    135. Re:Mandatory panic! by Optali · · Score: 1

      As far as I know England has no army. Maybe if you wait a few years and Wales and Northern Ireland follow suite to Scotland it will. Unless you count the supporters of West Ham United... pretty scary of you ask me.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    136. Re:Mandatory panic! by Optali · · Score: 1

      Ha! You treacherous Englishman wanting to make these poor Yanks believe that you don't have a powerful army. But you can't trick me, I have read a lot and I am well informed about these Knights of the Round Table you have hidden somewhere in a secret place known as Camelot.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    137. Re:Mandatory panic! by Optali · · Score: 1
      That's because of their gross habits New Zealand Pub Serving Horse Semen Shots.

      Nobody wants to get even close to this country... not to speak about being infested y hobbits!!

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    138. Re:Mandatory panic! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Comparatively, the world has had a large decrease in military force, where world wars were a 20-year occurrence. But those mostly ended after WWII. And yes, lots of wars in the 1800s that weren't world wars were still world wars because Spain, England, and France were battling behind the scenes in lots of "local" skirmishes.

      Two things:

      1) one of the reasons world wars went out of style was the US's overwhelming military dominance. World Wars were fashionable when the "great powers" (note the plural) had comparable military strengths.

      2) Before the 20th century, "world wars" were mostly impractical because it took so damn long to get anywhere. Months to cross the Atlantic, more months to cross the Pacific, much less to do the fighting when you got across, that sort of thing....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    139. Re: Mandatory panic! by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      He also wrote "kill" using the "gun". Tell the whole story. America's gun terror is a consequence of its idiotic gun laws.... Or lack of them.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    140. Re: Mandatory panic! by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      China can descend into violence on a large scale and quickly. History makes that clear. That huge army is probably required for disaster relief and suppressing local insurrections.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    141. Re:Mandatory panic! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The problem with that statement is that England does not have any armed forces. The Royal Air Force is British, The Royal Navy is British and even specifically regionally English army units are in the British army.

      Should I presume the British forces to belong to Britain (England and Wales) or Great Britain? Or are UK forces called British, even if not from or based in Britain?

      I was under the assumption that the UK armed forces, whatever they are called, are roughly proportionally staffed by member kingdoms, making English, what, 80% of the population of the force?

      An army that's 90%+ English wouldn't be unreasonably called "English".

    142. Re:Mandatory panic! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Before the 20th century, "world wars" were mostly impractical because it took so damn long to get anywhere. Months to cross the Atlantic, more months to cross the Pacific, much less to do the fighting when you got across, that sort of thing....

      Yes, but before 1492, "World Wars" were common, but only involved Eurasia/Africa. The one continent where someone could theoretically walk from South Africa to France to China without ever getting your feet wet, though in practice, boats across the Aegean and Mediterranean were much easier than walking. And, for a while, every England vs world (France and Spain) was a world war. The Crusades were World Wars, even if East Asia didn't really care.

    143. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the fault of the military industrial complex! Ha! Its the fault of zero tolerance policies instituted by left wing social workers and teachers unions who think that there is no difference between the genders and boys should act like girls, and any outlet for normal male behavior is banned for being too aggressive. Boys should just learn to play with dolls, sit around the campfire, sing kumbaya and be obedient little politically correct drones of the state. If not, pump them up full of psychotropic until they do. If the parents don't let them pump them up full of drugs, throw the parents in jail!

    144. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he's called into the principals office during school hours to be questioned by the police and you state that he should somehow have the impression that he is free to walk out at any time and so shouldn't feel pressured to answer questions without discussing it with his parents.

      What kind of idiot are you?

    145. Re:Mandatory panic! by digsbo · · Score: 1

      There is a huge gaping chasm between a huge military that can only be justified by imperial interventionism abroad, and just enough military to safely defend the continent. One could argue the latter wouldn't need to be highly centralized, even, except maybe the navy and a small air corps. He, also, seemed to miss that point, as you did.

    146. Re:Mandatory panic! by digsbo · · Score: 1

      See my reply above: http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      It's a false dichotomy to say we need enough bombs to blow the world up a million times or be totally undefended.

    147. Re:Mandatory panic! by digsbo · · Score: 1

      And if other nations scaled back on excess defense spending, the ones who rely on them would have the option of stepping it up. It's not an either/or thing, and it's dynamic.

    148. Re:Mandatory panic! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Just curious, was the name of pet called, "Barney?"

    149. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably within a short time all the taxes saved would get spent on productive endeavours, instead of blowing things up. Bridges and other infrastructure could be built, productive jobs would appear. Not all spending is equal, and defense spending is not particularly productive.

    150. Re:Mandatory panic! by romons · · Score: 1

      High school age kids are just coming into their psychosis at that age. Full blown schizophrenia happens in about 1 in 100 individuals, so, if you have kids in high school, and your high school has 1000 kids, 10 of them are probably fighting incipient insanity. Many more will end up in jail.

      I'd go with being more, rather than less, paranoid in this situation if I was a teacher or administrator.

      --
      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
    151. Re:Mandatory panic! by quenda · · Score: 1

      The point is, you were being sarcastic, but unwittingly stating a truth among the pointless absurdity. Wring "gun" on a piece of paper can be very dangerous - especially in the scenario of a bank.
      But not in a school essay - so there is no connection. Context is vital.

    152. Re: Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whwhwhwoooooosh!

    153. Re: Mandatory panic! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      China only has conscription in theory. In practice, because the volunteer pool is so large (and it obviously is, not just because of the sheer size of the country, but also because military is a fairly prestigious and stable career, and hence desirable), they don't actually draft everyone, it's all volunteers.

    154. Re:Mandatory panic! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Those shootings happen so rarely in practice that all the outrage about them is just farce, and the security measures are just theater. Much like terrorism, the chances of your kid dying in a shooting are so low as to be negligible, especially compared to the real dangers such as cars and swimming pools.

      But because it is very easy to hype, and hype gets eyeballs - and therefore sells ads - the media keeps blowing it all out of proportion, and hence you have a moral panic about guns.

    155. Re:Mandatory panic! by aybiss · · Score: 1

      "our culture is a culture of fear and cowardice :( plain and simple, when we all realise this collectively (lets hope it doesn't take a collective ass kicking) we'll grow up"

      Your culture is a culture of guns. You don't even need to grow up about it if you just stop letting people shoot at each other all day long.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    156. Re:Mandatory panic! by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile the guy with the pet dinosaur gets off scot free. Don't these people realize how dangerous those things are?

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    157. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one thing to say "no guns in school". It's quite another to ban any mention of them. This isn't China.

      although they would have been equally upset had he written that he fucked the dinosaur.

    158. Re:Mandatory panic! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I've more wit than you give me credit for?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    159. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True "Governments" may win a war but "People" always lose. If you have ever been in battle you know this. Maybe one side or the other "wins" but all directly involved (boots on the ground) lose something. Sometimes their life, sometimes their soul.

      Like yourself I avoid violance whenever possible but sometimes it is the only answer as sickening as it is.

    160. Re: Mandatory panic! by denzacar · · Score: 1

      First a correction.
      The law I quoted above was changed in 1999, and the obligatory service is now 2 years, not 3-4.

      Second... You are quoting a Wikipedia article(s) which fails to source its claim of "in practice - it's all volunteers".
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

      Which is a claim, arising from some BS "is blue REALLY blue" philosophizing in a footnote in National Air and Space Intelligence Center's handbook on China's Airforce.
      http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/aw...

      Which goes on and on, describing the whole compulsory registration process, the numbers and stats of 400.000 conscripts EACH YEAR, how many come from urban and rural (mostly rural) areas, how the law states that there is a 2 year sentence for NOT REGISTERING - and then they decide to bullshit about it all MAYBE-SORTA-KINDA being voluntary recruitment cause almost no one goes to jail for not registering.
      Riiiiiight.

      That's like saying that you don't need a driver's license cause almost no one goes to jail on account of driving without a license.
      The same report, few pages earlier, mentions the prior practice of "volunteering" for 16 years (quotation marks included) after serving the obligatory 3 or 4 years, prior to 1999 reforms.
      And the same section asking "Hey? Is this REALLY conscription? Or perhaps happy-fun-volunteer recruiting for fun and profit?" goes on and on about the issues and actions taken to ACTUALLY recruit college graduates.

      Because there are almost no college graduates in the army. Because that is one of the exceptions for NOT serving - being in school.
      Urban kids represent only about 33% of conscripts. Cause they have more means to avoid service until "aging out". To bend the law.
      Starving oneself into exemption if needed - like that Taiwanese kid.

      China IS reforming its military and its recruiting policies, but they will probably never completely eliminate the conscription.
      Too many young single males and too much rural population with too much free time on their hands and nothing to do.
      And while for most people being conscripted into military service is the closest they'll get to serving a prison sentence for something they didn't do - some actually benefit from military discipline and routine.
      And that population sample tends to intersect with the sample of young, poor and (in China) rural boys with little access to higher education.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    161. Re:Mandatory panic! by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Why the ascii art pic of someone getting tea-bagged?

    162. Re: Mandatory panic! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between registering for service, and actually getting drafted for service. US doesn't even have an active draft, but still requires all males of applicable age to register, and a couple decades ago the penalties for not doing so were quite hefty (if not enforced in practice). I have no doubt that China has even harsher laws on the books, and may well enforce them. The question, rather, is how many of those registered are actually drafted.

      The paper that you cite does not necessarily support the notion of compulsory conscription. Yes, it does say that 400k conscripts enter the force every year. It does not say whether those were involuntarily conscripted, or it's those that actually expressed the desire to serve. The two notions are not contradictory - I'm quite familiar with how conscription works in my home country, Russia, and there also you see some people who are actually eagerly waiting for it, because it gives them a steady occupation and a roof over their head for a year (used to be two), opens up some career opportunities such as police or further contract service, and is generally vastly preferable to being jobless and drinking oneself to death in their home village of 100 people. China, with its much larger, and poorer rural population, should have the same thing on a vastly bigger scale, and their army deal is better to boot, so they shouldn't have any shortage of willing recruits. Now, if in practice, every year they only draft those that expressed the desire to be drafted, is it a de facto voluntary system? I would say yes.

      I'm not sure what your link to the Taiwanese kid story is supposed to prove, since this is a different country, and the one where conscription definitely does exist, and people are drafted against their will.

    163. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you compare the US to our closest cultural mirror the UK, We are 10.30 firearms related deaths per capita vs. 0.25 per capita. Over 40 times higher. Firearms are the #7 cause of preventable death in the US. You only have a 1.3% (32,000 persons per year) chance of being killed by a firearm in the US. Ranking above sexually transmitted infections and and drugs abuse.

      This is a pesky line, where the rationality of fear should fall. Should we treat sex and drugs harshly in the school, but not firearms? Then again there are far more serious items on the list that we don't really harp on strongly in school. Obesity, for example. It is safer to live around all the guns then it is to live around all the McDonald's, it would seem.

    164. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He KILLED his neighbors dinosaur!! Horrible.

      Yeah, where's PETA??

    165. Re:Mandatory panic! by almitydave · · Score: 1

      wouldnt you escalate things if you were being accused of something ridiculous?

      I'm imagining a scene where a typical 16-year old boy, having written an obviously nonsensical, nonthreatening comment, is corralled in the principal's office. There are a couple of stern, serious police officers staring him straight in the face, asking in all seriousness about shooting his neighbor's dinosaur. How could he possibly react EXCEPT for an irate "are you f-ing kidding me?!?" I'm not sure that I, with 20 years of life experience on this kid, could react very differently.

      Do it - imaging yourself, sitting in a chair surrounded by a bunch of stern authority figures, some in uniform, asking you: "why did you want to shoot your neighbor's dinosaur?"

      Sure, maybe he was unruly towards the officers, which is never a good strategy, but some people are provoked to anger by (accurately) perceived lunacy on the part of people who should know better, which would include teachers, principals, and officers of the law.

      Of course, I wasn't there - perhaps he actually did something criminal, but I haven't seen it mentioned yet.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    166. Re:Mandatory panic! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      WWI was fought almost exclusively in Europe and the Middle East, with some initial actions elsewhere in the world, wiping out German colonies and warships. The submarine warfare did extend through the Mediterranean and much of the North Atlantic, IIRC. The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries were quite capable of similar scales.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    167. Re:Mandatory panic! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The biggest powers on the winning side were the US, the Soviet Union, and the British Commonwealth and Empire. The Brits were badly hurt economically by the war, and never did regain their former standing. The Soviet Union was ravaged, but did benefit from the elimination of a lot of the competition.

      It's worse in WWI. Russia was technically on the winning side, and its government didn't survive. The British Empire was badly hurt, France was really screwed over, and Italy suffered some serious blows. Only the US, among the victors, wound up better off. (Well, technically, Romania got a whole lot of territorial expansion out of a truly miserable military effort.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    168. Re:Mandatory panic! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There really aren't all that many killings in schools. The problem is that they dominate the news when they do happen, and so it's perceived that there's a lot of killings in schools. I believe a psychologist would call it the availability heuristic, the idea that if you can come up with examples of something easily you'll perceive it as common.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    169. Re:Mandatory panic! by Gnostic+Teflon · · Score: 1

      You mentioned the Aztecs. I think you should read the memoirs of Bernal Diaz del Castillo, one of Cortez's foot soldiers, to know truly what the Aztecs, and all the occupants of Mesoamerica were really about. It was not a romantic reality. Even with our cowardice state ruler mentality, we have it magnitudes better than any of those, except the royalty, that came before us.

    170. Re: Mandatory panic! by denzacar · · Score: 1

      The question, rather, is how many of those registered are actually drafted.

      No.

      Replace "conscription law" with "death sentence" and see if "how many of those are actually carried out" and see if that makes sense.
      A law is a law is a law.

      Government MAY not enforce every single law fully as it lacks the capacity or willingness to enforce 100% of laws on the books, but the fact of an existence of such a law shows CLEAR INTENT TO ENFORCE IT.
      They reformed the laws several times, yet they kept all elements needed for unforced conscription.

      The paper that you cite does not necessarily support the notion of compulsory conscription.

      You are missing the point of that citation. Reread my comment above again.

      The paper lists MANY examples of circumstantial evidence of an existing and ongoing conscription.
      What it DOES NOT DO is prove a "de facto" non-existence of conscription and an existence volunteer service in its stead.
      BUT, it tries to argue such a position, despite the COMPLETE LACK of any evidence for its thesis.

      I.e. It's bullshit.
      And I'm not citing it as a proof of existence of conscription or volunteer service or non-existence of either, but as a source of that unsourced and unsubstantiated bullshit claim.

      I'm not sure what your link to the Taiwanese kid story is supposed to prove

      Again, reread my comment.
      It is there as an example of tactics and means for deferment available to the urban population, and NOT available to the rural kids.

      Taiwanese kid could afford such a stunt at 24 - i.e. 6 years after he became eligible.
      For 6 years he dodged the service in the country you define as "one where conscription definitely does exist, and people are drafted against their will."

      A rural kid of 18, trying the same dieting technique, would just be written off as underfed because he's from a poor village.
      Older than average, emaciated kid among the group of well fed city kids 6 years younger... clearly he's sickly and incapable of service.
      He probably even looked at least 30% older than all the other recruits.

      And a city kid gets that 6 year buffer cause he has a high school right across the street and a college two blocks away.
      Unlike the rural kid who probably walked couple of hours to and from school IF there was one that near, and who could never afford to go to a college unless he was exceptionally intelligent and studious so that he would get a scholarship to a college somewhere in the city.

      While the rest of his class went off to serve.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    171. Re:Mandatory panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never thought of this until I made the same typo elsewhere a few minutes ago: B, or b doesn't look line N, or n in handwriting. On the other hand, B is next to N on a keyboard. Therefore, Woody Allen wrote that script on a typewriter.

    172. Re:Mandatory panic! by drkim · · Score: 1

      Never thought of this until I made the same typo elsewhere a few minutes ago: B, or b doesn't look line N, or n in handwriting. On the other hand, B is next to N on a keyboard. Therefore, Woody Allen wrote that script on a typewriter.

      You are very wise...

      Mr. Allen writes everything on a typewriter. An Olympia portable model SM-3, to be precise.

      He bought it in 1951, and has used it for every script he's written since.

      Bonus factoid:
      Instead of [CTL] X and [CTL] V, Mr. Allen uses scissors and stapler.

    173. Re: Mandatory panic! by sudon't · · Score: 1

      I think the anonymous coward was wondering if the child's color influenced the reaction of the school.

      My opinion is that this teenager learned a valuable lesson - don't trust authority. It's important for people to understand that the adults in charge can just as likely be hysterical idiots as not, and the rules they invent can be nonsensical. The sooner you learn this life lesson, the better, and the schools are doing an excellent job of teaching this nowadays.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

  7. I thought this only happened in Florida by Issarlk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And as for the kid and his pet dinosaur killing, here's an even more disturbing news: so kids as young as maybe 8 are shooting at each other in pretend cowboy-indian or thief-policeman "games". Time to build more prisons for youngsters.

    1. Re:I thought this only happened in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Youngsters?

      Do not minimize the dangers that these pint-size suspects pose to law enforcement safety. 8 year olds should serve mandatory 20 year sentences in prison for pretending to make a gun shaped hand motion at another 8 year old who is designated as the sherrif. Law enforcement safety comes first.

    2. Re:I thought this only happened in Florida by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Time to build more prisons for youngsters.

      What, have Truancy Officers really been slacking that much?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:I thought this only happened in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When every Christmas come
      You buy the youth a pretty toy gun
      When every Christmas comes around
      You buy the youth a fancy toy gun

      So, you can't blame the youths when they get bad
      You can't fool the youths
      You can't blame the youths of today
      You can't fool the youths

      South Carolina better play nice with their intelligent youth or they will leave. I know I ran away as fast as I could when I was old enough.

    4. Re:I thought this only happened in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already have those, they are called Kindergarten.

  8. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How'd it taste?

    1. Re:So... by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      South Carolina BBQ sauce is good. https://www.google.com/search?...

    2. Re:So... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Are we back to talking about that guy strangling his neighbor's Unicorn again?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  9. My pet dinosaur ate my neighbor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He had bought a gun to take care of business, but really who brings a gun to a dinosaur fight?

    1. Re:My pet dinosaur ate my neighbor by NotSanguine · · Score: 2

      He had bought a gun to take care of business, but really who brings a gun to a dinosaur fight?

      Get real. Everyone knows you need A Gun For Dinosaur. I wonder if de Camp was arrested for this story. Sigh.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    2. Re:My pet dinosaur ate my neighbor by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Bonus points for quoting one of my favorite stories.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:My pet dinosaur ate my neighbor by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      Bonus points for quoting one of my favorite stories.

      It is a good one. Although, I'd more highly recommend The Gnarly Man if you haven't read it.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    4. Re:My pet dinosaur ate my neighbor by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Personally I prefer the Hurdy Gurdy Man.

    5. Re:My pet dinosaur ate my neighbor by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      Personally I prefer the Hurdy Gurdy Man.

      Cool. However, we were talking about fiction written by L. Sprague deCamp, rather than music. Not sure if that's really comparable.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  10. South Carolina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    What will those wacky liberals in South Carolina come up with next?

  11. Debbil in de details by paiute · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you read the details of the story, it becomes quite a bit less sensational.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Debbil in de details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the details you mean he was "difficult during questioning." Which obviously means he should be charged with disturbing the school and suspended for a week.

    2. Re: Debbil in de details by bistromath007 · · Score: 2

      ...How so? I just read it, and the only thing that makes it in any way "less sensational" is the fact that this mother and child are both so thoroughly whipped by this idiotic culture that they're playing along with the idea of it being the kid's fault for daring to have some cheek.

    3. Re:Debbil in de details by WaffleMonster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you read the details of the story, it becomes quite a bit less sensational.

      The details make it worse because not kissing police officers asses resulted in bullshit disturbance charges. (e.g. retaliation)

      Not only did the grownups at the school abuse their authority so did the police.

    4. Re:Debbil in de details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much do you want to bet that being "difficult during questioning" was him stating they're acting like a bunch of insane idiots?

    5. Re:Debbil in de details by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      When a blog called "the mommy files" interviews mommy and her little darling and describe his behavior as having been "difficult," without giving any account of the police or school version of events, you should probably read that as, "luckily he didn't get charged with assaulting a police officer, because that is what an adult would have gotten."

    6. Re:Debbil in de details by jedidiah · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No. If you read the details of the story, it becomes MORE sensational.

      A minor was questioned by the police without his parents present.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:Debbil in de details by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In what way? 16 year old writes two clearly flippant sentences that cannot possibly be true. School officials, apparently too mentally ill to distinguish reality from fantasy, call the cops. Cops, apparently also mentally ill, question the boy as if what he wrote could possibly be a confession. They then arrest him for the perfectly natural outrage he expressed at being subjected to their madness. Then principal Nutty McCuckoo suspends him for a week over the incident that the school instigated.

      In what way is that not sensational?

      In a just world, the students and their parents will mock and ridicule the principal until he is forced to resign. He brought it upon himself by refusing to be more mature than the kids in his charge.

    8. Re:Debbil in de details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he rolled his eyes once, and didn't respect their authoriti.

    9. Re:Debbil in de details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get slammed for the fallacy of moderation, you cite the article to support your claims and then you slam it as a source, and now you're slamming it as a source and just plain making shit up that suits your own argument.

      You are a fool, but unlike most fools who are content with simply appearing as such, you confirm it by repeating your failure to reason as often as you can.

    10. Re:Debbil in de details by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      When he's in police custody, being questioned, how can he be disturbing anyone? Or do the police hold private questioning in the auditorium of the school with all the students invited? Seems much more likely, it was a fabricated charge to hold him for something, and then his family started making a fuss, so the police stuck with it.

    11. Re:Debbil in de details by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      When the police and the school are contacted for comment and refuse, what would you do? Bury the story to not soil the good reputation of the police?

    12. Re:Debbil in de details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My adult self would have told someone to fuck off and that this was asinine. I don't think I would expect any less from my son.

    13. Re:Debbil in de details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police have a good reputation?

    14. Re:Debbil in de details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clearly? how do read intent in text?
      you lot hammer school officials daily for not taking threats seriously enough, for ignoring warning signs.
      and then when they actually DO do something, you lot hammer them for being oversensitive.
      Make up your minds.

    15. Re:Debbil in de details by sjames · · Score: 1

      Based on the assignment and the response, flippancy is clear. Or did you suspect his neighbors somehow opened a rift in time to acquire a pet dinosaur? Perhaps they are witches?

      Me lot? How many of me do you think there are? How about they blow the dust from their brains and act on credible threats rather than obvious non-threats? How about they do their job? How about they actually handle the situation like real adults instead of calling the cops every time someone sneezes?

  12. guns guns guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their whole society is based on worship of guns, possibly because of the success with which them Injuns were driven off their land with them. 70% of Hollywood films show how good will triumph if it has more guns, better guns, bigger guns. Yet, if a child should mention the word or make gun-shaped toast or point a gun-shaped finger, he (always he?) is treated with absurd ferocity as if he is a dangerous deviant. Go 'Merkins.

    1. Re:guns guns guns by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      I have a sneaking suspicion that you're British.

    2. Re:guns guns guns by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      We don't "worship the gun". Go watch the movie Zardoz, THAT is worshiping the gun!

    3. Re:guns guns guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should have let the Nazi's keep all of Europe. Ungrateful whiners.

  13. Nation of Retards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in the country that brought us "You can't take my gun unless you pry it from my cold dead hand", you can't actually mention "gun"?

    1. Re:Nation of Retards by just_a_monkey · · Score: 0

      You laugh, but if Obama bin Laden had gone to this school, you can be sure that he would not have been flying that plane into that building ten years ago. This is how it starts.

      --
      How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
  14. Lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zero Tolerance Money Making Opportunity

  15. Now I'm worried about Holocaust assignments by FutureRobertOverlord · · Score: 2

    Clearly what this means is that any kid who writes any assignment about any subject is going to carry out the contents of what they wrote. There are thousands of schoolchildren writing about the Holocaust who should probably be locked up before they commit genocide.

  16. What else? by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

    He'll probably get jail time if he admits he chokes his chicken too...

    1. Re:What else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to rumors he also spanked a monkey once.

      In his defense, the monkey was throwing feces first, so it had it coming. Silly monkey...

  17. Don't Ask if you Don't Want by The+Raven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is ludicrous. He should get an A on the assignment... it was completely convincing apparently, despite the inclusion of a pet dinosaur. The school administration and cops were all convinced. The kid should put it on his fucking college resume: "Turned in a story that was so well written I got arrested for the fictitious deed."

    Alternately, his college application could be, "I got this excellent ACT score despite being taught in a school that doesn't realize Dinosaurs are extinct."

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    1. Re:Don't Ask if you Don't Want by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      No wonder's they are extinct. School kids keep shooting 'em!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:Don't Ask if you Don't Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFA (w/emphasis mine): When a South Carolina student was given an assignment by his teacher to create a Facebook-type status report telling something interesting about himself

      Frankly the teacher, school administration and related law enforcement should all be charged with child abuse. Anyone making a Facebook related assignment should also be charged with corruption of a minor.

      side comment: The term "gun control" obviously was not thought up by anyone that ever went to basic. Ex-soldiers and marines, did anyone in your platoon make the mistake of saying "gun"?

    3. Re:Don't Ask if you Don't Want by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      FTFA (w/emphasis mine): When a South Carolina student was given an assignment by his teacher to create a Facebook-type status report telling something interesting about himself

      Huh. Then he was following the rules of the assignment. Facebook statuses are mostly fiction, and some are fantasy.

    4. Re:Don't Ask if you Don't Want by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Huh. Then he was following the rules of the assignment. Facebook statuses are mostly fiction, and some are fantasy.

      Ah; I begin to see the problem. For him to be so insightful, he'd have to be using Facebook. As he's not 18 yet, he's underage to be using facebook, and so needed to be visited by the police for participating illegally in adult activities such as reading Facebook.

  18. Probably all too plausible by sacrilicious · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The school officials probably felt that since it was only 6000 years ago that dinosaurs weren't only confined to zoos, the plausibility of the essay was too eerily real.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    1. Re:Probably all too plausible by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they're up to date enough to realize that the Blue Jay I'm looking at out in my backyard is a dinosaur.

      As is the neighbor's parakeet....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  19. Coming soon... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Jurassic Park banned from video stores for being terrorist propaganda!

    1. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jurassic Park banned from video stores for casting Jeff Goldblum!

      FTFY

  20. Disturbance in the course by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Have to love broad laws willfully designed to make everyone guilty.

    When the kings dislike you they need to have a "legitimate" excuse to beat you down and lock you away in their dungeons.

  21. Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't China.

    We have gone to idiotic mode here in the States - beyond plaid.

    We have been taken over by the lying bullying pundits - Hannity,Maddow, O'Reilly, Oberman, etc ....

    Our media isn't really state controlled as it is corporate controlled - the corporations use the government to solidify their idiocy.

    Even my beloved NPR doesn't escape my cynicism when the Koch brothers sponsor it along with many corporate sponsors - regardless of their political leanings.

    We are being bombarded by shit.

    Shit media.

    All of it.

    And it has become impossible for us to differentiate the shit from the Truth.

    Mix in 110 proof pundits like Hannity and Limbaugh, and we're fucked.

    I am trying to cut myself off from media - even the Internet.

    It is getting ridiculous.

    To paraphrase Thich Nhat Hanh, 'Don't watch the news. If it is really important, you will hear about it.'

    I don't mean to stick my head in the sand, but when I cannot get the facts - or I have to sift through countless media outlets to get it - I just have to say, "Fuck it! Let me take care of my neighbor!"

    1. Re:Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "my beloved NPR.." - there's your problem. No news organization should be "beloved". It just makes you their bitch. Just because you don't like the facts that you are getting doesn't mean that you "cannot get the facts".

    2. Re:Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've watched /. going the same way in the comments section. It used to be great and informative, but now it's getting like reddit. If I want reddit, I go to reddit (and love it... over there).

      /. has traditionally been a very different audience, but comments here are being overrun by asshats. I don't blame you for leaving.

    3. Re:Yes it is. by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's no better decision you can make, IMO, than to walk away from broadcast media, and newspapers, and all those centrally-controlled outlets for news. If you have a deep distrust of blogs, that can work for you. Find a blog or two of interest; look for ones that routinely correct stories when commenters point out flaws, avoid those that instead ban the commenters. As long as you keep your distrust of blogs, that's a good way to keep your head out of the sand.

      The only way to learn anything about current events is the combination of a hard-to-censor channel, a willingness to correct mistakes, and your own distrust of everything on that channel.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:Yes it is. by jopsen · · Score: 2

      Unless you want to do a journalist job... You need a reporter you can trust to present the story without too much bias... That's very hard today...

    5. Re:Yes it is. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, does the phrase "50 cent army" mean anything to you?

    6. Re:Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol If we only had the schwarz..... But Lonestar made off with our dignity.

    7. Re:Yes it is. by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where do you think those blogs are getting their info from? Their large collection of reporters circling the globe and getting the real scoop? Or do they just check out the big news sites for 99% of their stories? (Hint: the answer is B). So you have yet another layer of obfuscation and bias in there. Congratulations, your news is even worse.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    8. Re:Yes it is. by pyg · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the spirit of your post but slashdot is no longer an independent blog/news site. Just because you're paranoid... doesn't mean XXXXXXX won't be modifying/moderating your post.

    9. Re:Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd trust 50 Cent to run the army, more than I would politicians.

    10. Re:Yes it is. by lgw · · Score: 1

      What's needed is a layer of editorial fact checking. Today, the broadcast media instead checks for compatibility with their political party, instead. Many blogs many do the same, of course, but there are already a few that at least view favorable stories with suspicion, at least do a cursory google search first, ask around for technical experts on technical topics, and often update stories with retractions. None of which ever happens in the mainstream press.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could argue with any one single point you've made. I can't. I'm stuck watching my Star Trek Original Series DVD Collection. At least there... I know... what crap... I'm... in... for! (in true Shanerhythm)

      We know a lot of folks in the larger Mennonite communities. They don't bother with the news, TV, Radio... How do they get along? Fine! Just fine!

    12. Re:Yes it is. by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1

      You seem to be filled with paranoia, an easy sense of outrage, and distrust of all media. Are you by any chance a news pundit?

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    13. Re:Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a wanker......beloved NPR. It shows better than anything else where your head is.

      You are of the same stripe as the left that wants to make the world a better place by banning words, creating euphemisms, getting rid of guns, yada, yada, yada.

      Whether you think Limbaugh et. al. are crackpots THEY certainly would not be advocating banning a kid for the bogus BS of writing he shot his peter dinosaur. That has the footprint of the 'left loons' all over it.

      Or can't you differentiate?

      You parrot every unthinking lefty line like you can't think for yourself: Koch brothers, corporate sponsors....what an empty mind you must have. Not an original thought in it.

    14. Re:Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To paraphrase Thich Nhat Hanh, 'Don't watch the news. If it is really important, you will hear about it.'
      Way cool dude! Happy to hear others know of Thich Nhat Hanh.

       

    15. Re:Yes it is. by nobodie · · Score: 1

      "Wumao brigade"
      The Chinese army of "fact checkers" who make sure that nothing "bad for the public" gets on the internet (or SMS when I was there, including Skype of course). The sad part is that most of them are unemployed Masters and PhD holders from mid to lower level Chinese universities who have formed the "Ant Tribe" and live in little concrete boxes with a bed, a desk and a computer on the desk. It is worse than you can imagine: they have tapped out their family's resources and have nothing to show for it, not even a factory job (they are over-educated for something like that).

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  22. I give up by Guru80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Society is collectively out of their damn minds. Pretty soon sneezing in public will almost certainly be considered a biological weapon attack, because Ebola!!!...arrest and solitary him immediately!

    1. Re:I give up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.designntrend.com/articles/18357/20140823/santa-barbara-warrant-contagious-tuberculosis.htm

      This case I agree with arresting people. Seek treetment or GTFO of the herd!

    2. Re:I give up by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      They always were. Officially, it's not psychotic, if it's normal, and you're "socially disordered" if you have a problem playing along with them. Seriously. Check either shrink bible.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    3. Re:I give up by slew · · Score: 1

      Society is collectively out of their damn minds. Pretty soon sneezing in public will almost certainly be considered a biological weapon attack, because Ebola!!!...arrest and solitary him immediately!

      Not sneezing itself, but saying "bless you" when someone else sneezes will get you suspended, but shutter to think what would happen if someone said "god is great" when someone sneezed...

  23. Mod parent up! by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    Police told My Fox Chicago that Stone was difficult during questioning and they arrested him and charged him with disturbing the school.

    How did "the school" know about this? At most his teacher and the school principal and the regional/district/whatever superintendent should have been aware of the issue.

    If anyone was "disturbing" "the school" it would have been one of those three (or the cops) and they should be arrested.

    For a student, being "difficult during questioning" should (at most) result in expulsion AND NOT ARREST.

    1. Re:Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "For a student, being "difficult during questioning" should (at most) result in expulsion AND NOT ARREST."

      being "difficult during questioning" by police should result in nothing at all since that is a constitutionally protected right.

    2. Re:Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a student, being "difficult during questioning" should (at most) result in expulsion AND NOT ARREST.

      "being difficult" is cop code for exercising your rights and should never result in punishment, but should be praised.

    3. Re:Mod parent up! by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      why should "difficult during questioning" result in expulsion? You've got to be fucking kidding me.

    4. Re:Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a student, being "difficult during questioning" should (at most) result in expulsion AND NOT ARREST.

      He's 16. He's being accused of crap. Of course he's going to be difficult. This shouldn't even come close to expulsion.

  24. He should have... by countach · · Score: 1

    If he'd said he'd shot Osama bin Laden, they probably would have made him Valedictorian, and nominated him for a medal.

  25. I had to switch my stepson's junior high school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He mentioned the word "gun" to a classmate, (he was in army cadets at the time) A teacher overheard him, and apparently this was a banned word at the school. The principal threatened to suspend him if he even mentioned the word "gun" again on school property. We promptly moved him to another school. This was in Canada by the way. Political correctness gone amok. Ironically, my dad used to fire rifles at his school as a part of ROTC training in Nova Scotia. How times have changed.

    1. Re:I had to switch my stepson's junior high school by scotts13 · · Score: 1

      Pffft! I had a riflery class at my christian summer camp. When I was nine. I was a pretty good shot. Good thing I didn't write a story about it.

    2. Re:I had to switch my stepson's junior high school by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      I think he should have proposed starting a rifle club.

    3. Re:I had to switch my stepson's junior high school by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Fortunate that you had another school to switch to. Many places, you have a choice of one.

      And I'm with the other two replies... this was the time to start a rifle club!

      I don't think it's coincidence that we also have the insanity of "trigger warnings" lest someone be traumatized anew by the mere mention of whatever evil befell them... in Another Forum[TM] I griped that soon mere breathing will require a 'trigger warning' lest it traumatize someone who once had a sip of water go down the wrong way.

      Cuz, ya know, the mere mentioning of something (eg. a gun) is the same as doing horrible things with it.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  26. Agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is clear that the real reason he was arrested was for believing in dinosaurs.

    Everyone knows that the world is 1000 years old and that God created dinosaur skeletons to trick heathens.

  27. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Disturbing the school" cannot be a crime when done via the first amendment. Creating fear is not illegal if that fear is not based on credible threats.

    Shouting "fire" in a theater is not illegal. Creating a panic in one that injures (or has substantial potential to injure) others because what if there is actually a fire? Or what if someone stood up and said "in 5 seconds, I will scream fire, but do not worry, there is no fire. (5.4.3.2.1) FIRE!" In neither of these cases would that person's actions rise to criminality because in the first case, there was a fire he was responding to, and in the second, a reasonable person would not fear the fire that they were warned did not exist.

    In this case, a reasonable person would assume that the teen did not actually shoot a dinosaur in his neighbor's back yard because reasonable people know that dinosaurs no longer exist. Also, even if that teen admitted ready access to firearms, he was not threatening to use them in illegal, immoral, or unsafe manners. (an argument could be made that shooting a dinosaur would be against endagered species laws, but after Jurassic Park, we all know what happens if you don't shoot dinosaurs...

    My question. What happens when this school teaches about wars? Do they arrest every student who writes a paper about Pickett's Charge or the Battle of the Bulge for mentioning firearms? What about the teachers? If the student can be arrested for "disturbing the school," wouldn't the teacher who asked students to write papers about wars be guilty of enciting panic himself? And asking multiple students to do so would place the school in jeopardy of RICO charges for asking multiple students to work independently to break laws.

  28. Share the blame by Livius · · Score: 1

    Could we at least put some of the blame on the teacher for giving such a lazy, vague, open-ended assignment?

    (I *hated* those in school - I work best with structure.)

    1. Re:Share the blame by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      This kind of assignment is usually done at the behest of social services to see what "signs" of home problems or mental issues students may have. It's pretty much a standard for students aged 13-15.

      And yeah; I hated those too; but what I hated most was when no structure was given, and then I was penalized for thinking outside the box (yes, that unspoken box that the teacher said didn't exist until s/he saw my work).

  29. Where is the dinasour? by vargad · · Score: 2

    Okay the police did not find the gun, but have they found the poor pet dinasour?

  30. This is entirely justified by bunhed · · Score: 1

    In the scale of geologic time, trivializing the demise of dinosaurs is entirely too soon. Give us time to grieve ffs. This kid is clearly not very sensitive to the plight of other species. What next for him and his thoughtless fantasies? Making a mockery of the middle ages? Pointing a rapier at the Renaissance? RIP dinosaurs! #nvr4get

  31. you're making California look good by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    If there's anyone in South Carloina with enough brains to form a synapse, please put them in charge. Stupid, brutal behavior like that make even the craziness of California look good.

  32. Disturbing by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    I'd be disturbing too if it was me being harassed by the police for thought crime. If my kid did this I'd tell me he did good to question censorship and police harassment.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  33. Not sure I shuld funny by future+assassin · · Score: 0

    at this or cringe with fear that you actually wrote that.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  34. I'm old. by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    Jesus christ, thinking back upon the mounds of morbid, violence filled short stories, poetry, and many many many drawings I produced growing up, reading stuff like this makes me glad I grew up then and not now.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  35. He should have wrote about a jesus pet by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    that the neighbor had which he shot then crucified.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  36. I had to switch my stepson's junior high school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gun is not allowed, only assault rifle.

  37. The school did the right thing by real+gumby · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pet dinosaurs are quite rare. In fact I’ve never seen one. So to kill it is a crime against humanity.

    At least this kid had enough remorse to need to admit his crime.

    I know his message was a cry for help but the school must pursue criminal action as a warning to others who might kill dinosaurs. Thank God we live in a country that takes “If you see something, say something” seriously.

  38. It's all ass covering by scotts13 · · Score: 2

    God forbid the kid ever does anything violent for the rest of his life. Then, everything he's ever written, said, or done comes under scrutiny. And anyone who ever saw it, and didn't report it to "proper authorities" goes under the bus with him. Gotta over your ass, just in case.

    Not-news for these "authorities" - there isn't a teenage boy (or a lot of girls) born that hasn't fantasized violence, against more than an entirely fictional dinosaur, at least once. A lot of them even write it down. But as long as they don't know about it, no one cares.

    1. Re:It's all ass covering by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Bingo on the ass covering. Everything about this reeks of CYA.

      The teacher reads the word "gun", and while they are probably okay with laughing it off and asking the student to take the assignment more seriously, they know that if anything ever comes of it, they'll be fired, so they report it to the department head. The department head knows that "boys will be boys" and that this is just silly, but they have no choice but to pass it up the line if they want to make sure that they aren't the one holding the hot potato if the student ever does go off the deep end. So on and so forth until it gets to the principal, who takes it to the police.

      The police should have had the common sense to tell the school they were overreacting and that they wouldn't do anything at all about it, or at the VERY most just pull the kid aside for a few minutes between classes and get a read on him while letting him know that it probably wasn't a smart thing to write, but instead they demonstrated extraordinarily poor judgment, leading to the situation we saw here.

  39. Steven Spielberg soon to be arrested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  40. please ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent up!

  41. Give him an A+ by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Because this is the sort of shit i see on Facebook all the time, I think he did the assignment great.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  42. Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, so Hannity and Rush are to blame for the complete zero tolerance, LIBERAL policy in schools? Do you ever sit back and think why so few EVIL people(hannity, rush, Fox News) have such high ratings/followings? It's because the rest of the media is so left wing, DNC water carrying stooges, that there really are no other alternatives.

    Blame Hannity all you like for "This" situation. But ask yourself why you are so mad at Rush/Hanity, yet so no problem with being exposed to an opposing viewpoint to your own in the rest of the media.

  43. Hanity runs the government? or points out stupid by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hannity,Maddow, O'Reilly and Oberman run the government? I thought their job was to point out when the government is screwing up. Matter of fact, if you go to their web sites and look for this story, that's exactly what they're doing.

  44. Re:Even more disturbing by captjc · · Score: 1

    The most disturbing news in all of this is that his neighbor is breeding raptors. The kid was justified in his heroic actions, the deranged neighbor needs to be indicted for crimes against humanity.

    God creates the world. God creates dinosaurs. God destroys the world to get rid of the raptors. God creates man; Man kills god. Man brings back raptors. My god, what have we done!?

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  45. Thanks a lot kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just made dinosaurs extinct, again... :( We could have started a Jurassic Park if that little bastard killed the neighbors invisible friend instead.. Nah I'm sorry, I didn't mean that I don't want to see the little guy be charged with fourth degree murder.

  46. South Carolina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will those wacky liberals in South Carolina come up with next?

    Zero tolerance policies are a whacky liberal idea.

  47. The only way to win is not to play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other side is that there have been a lot of ridiculous school shootings where people wrote loopy things and came under fire (unjustly, IMHO) for not realizing that the kid had a screw loose and was dangerous to everyone.

    If they were wrong and this was one of the crazy kids that shoots up a school, they'd be screwed.

    The real problem is that we escalate everything to 11. There seems to be no way to calmly look into something without punishing people or going overboard because everyone is so willing to threaten everyone with police, guns or whatever.

  48. Re:fear and cowardice by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Fear yes, but cowardice, no. That is not the point.
    Folks in the US seem to have a hard time believing and/or seeing what is going on. It is social engineering 101. You are being taught several things. First and foremost, do not question authority.
    They are also trying to teach fear the punishment for any thought of violence. They are even being to teach people to fear the consequences of speaking out against their leaders.
    Swat raids for twitter posts anyone? In 20 years America will not even be recognizable. For F's sake, most teens don't care at all over the amount of control the government has over their lives. They are taught, from the beginning that this is good and right and just!
    We saw the writing on the wall years ago though and left America to a free country.

  49. Strong military overmilitarized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes strong military help avoid being conquered. But AMerica does not have a strong military , America has an over militarized force. Even if it was half as funded it would still be fine enough. And remember that the military compelx lied a lot about the strength of its enemy to get more funding, Like when they pretended soviet russia had tons of nuke to justify making tons themselves. They started the nuke race. If you look at the statistic it would be years before russia had a small stock and a decade or two before they started overcoming US nuke stocks.

    The bottom line is that the US military has long stopped a force of defense and looks dangerously like a force geared toward conquest of other territory. Eager to use their toys.

  50. Holy Bat-shite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What in all crazy hell has gone wrong with your country?

  51. Get your kids OUT of the public schools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US public school system is in full-meltdown mode. In most places (the only exception I can recall is Texas) they are unionized now with the teachers being members of one of two national unions that are tightly-aligned with the Democrat party (so your kids are bing indoctrinated by leftwing-political activists like the ones who youtubed their classes singing "mmmm mmmm mmmm, Barack Hussein Obama..." and the whackos who trashed the capitol building in Madison while using thier students as political props. Letting kooks like that "educate" your kids is as political (on the left) as letting the Koch brothers or Ann Coulter do it (on the right)

    All the public schools, including in Texas, are further corrupted by lawyers. Left-leaning lawyers sue the schools over any policy they politically object to (like ANYTHING religion-related), and trial lawyers are always "ambulance-chasing" for clients if anybody is harmed in big institutions with "deep pockets" like public schools, so the lawyers for the school districts advise the districts to "fold" on ANY challenge immediately rather than risk a legal fight. As a result, most public schools have brainless "zero-tolerance" policies on all sorts of insane stuff. "Common Sense" can no longer operate in a public school. If you want your kids to be able to THINK, get them OUT of those places! Get them into private schools if you can afford them, religious schools if that fits your fancy (I'm not Catholic, but Catholic schools used to do a very good job on all the basics) or home-school them (the best option for many geeks), or try a mix (Catholic for "reading, writing, and arithmetic" and home-school on science or whatever). Brick-and-mortar schools are as obsolete as brick-and-mortar bookstores at this point.

  52. Same tactics as war on drugs, now its war on guns. by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    Part of the population of the US wants to ban guns, so some states are taking baby steps to pass laws that will make it easier. Total registration is the first step in the future plan. These states keep saying they need a federal/state registry to check for criminals, when all we really need is an 800 number for people to call in before private sales, a simple yes/no if the person is allowed guns. Only a ban list is kept, and never a total registration list. Thus no private sales to criminals, and we keep our historical idea of a ban on government confiscation.

    (Except NY, they are chipping away rights faster than California, how would you like to be a store owner with riots like Ferguson and have only allowed a few bullets in a magazine due to bad laws...)

    For the kids, the brainwashing has started. Its Doctors asking kids if their parents have guns at home or Teachers trying brainwash kids that guns are bad, and if you mention guns, its a suspension.

    This is about forcing political change with the children. Also why people want to stop all religious actions, mandatory LGBT studies at k to 6, rules on cakes at school functions, ban student stores, ban the pledge of allegiance, mandatory feminism classes, etc.

    It's about control.

  53. Where's this going to end up? by amalek · · Score: 1
    So was his offence the mention of a firearm, or the mention of its employment in ending a fantasy creature's life? If he said he shot a raccoon, would he have also been expelled?

    The US has been glorifying scenes of extreme violence for years on TV or in the movies. And yet, if a child were to mention they watched anything like that, and, god forbid, write a synopsis on it, they'd be looking at expulsion/sternly-worded letters too? Really, what kind of children are being raised there these days? Where everything is an offence of some kind, where to feel mildly insulted is a level of indignance akin to to smacking your mother in the face elsewhere in the world.

    In a couple of decades, these mis-educated, skin-as-thick-as-paper children are going to be the ones running a country possessing the most powerful military on earth.

  54. ... Err by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This, in a land where guns are legal in many states... Ok. To be honest I would have understood more if it was about the word dinosaur, seeing as how so many people there claim they never existed.

  55. Release the kid imediately! by jraff2 · · Score: 1

    If one writes a murder mystery where someone kills someone else with a gun, are they arrested and put in jail? What CRIME did the kid committ? Release the kid imediately!

  56. schizo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cops took Stone in for questioning and searched his locker and backpack for guns [...and dinosaurs]. None were found.

  57. system will kill itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    interestingly the article mentions they now want to homeschool.

    This is the way all centralized systems ends. At first a few people are ostracized / arrested for writing about guns, gay people, nazi's or whatever.
    Over time these few become more.
    People reject the system (remove their children from public schools).
    Central authorities (state and federal) keep taxing. So parents are paying for both private schools and public schools (through taxes).
    Eventually enough parents revolt and the public system crashes. Even though politicians cry out that the widows, orphans and minorities need public schools.

    Dictators who've stayed in power the longest know that you can't kill too many people, you need to kill enough to maintain fear, but not so many that you remove hope. The way we're going is we've gone past the maintaining fear stage, as seen in Ferguson, Nevada, Occupy Wall Street, people using Uber even when banned etc.
    Remove hope and you have anarchy, provide a new hope and you have a revolution.

  58. statute of limitations by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    The statute of limitations is apparently over 65 million years. That doesn't explain how a 16 year old could have done it. Maybe there's a typo, and he's really 160 million years old?

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  59. Techically Kidnapping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the facts are as described, the police officers are guilty of kidnapping. The moment they violated their oaths to uphold the Bill of Rights, which under the 9th Amendment protects reasonable conduct, they ceased to be police officers, such oaths being preconditions for holding that office. It was thus as private citizens that they took this person against his will, hence kidnapping. Not to mention misuse of government equipment and facilities, and impersonating a police officer.

    It is not within the legal authority of government to provide immunity (or pardon) to members of government, or former members of government, who violate their oaths to uphold the Bill of Rights. This is precluded by the existence of the 9th Amendment. There can be no rights retained by the people if government officials can freely violate any rights that might reasonably be asserted (a contradiction), hence there can be no immunity for such violations.

    The school officials are likely accessories to kidnapping (not to mention they certainly are guilty of violating a number of fundamental rights arising under the 9th Amendment). As such, they are - at a minimum - disqualified from holding any position of public trust or responsibility, EVER AGAIN.

    Any attempt to retain these people in government by ANY government official makes that official an accessory to the original illegal actions.

    Learn the lesson taught at Nuremberg: positions of authority do not come with permission to abuse others, and any laws to the contrary are invalid.

  60. Is there context? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    Mandatory panic! Alert the police! Search EVERYTHING! Connect the dots! Personally, I blame the teacher for not sufficiently explaining the limits of the assignment.

    doubt very much the reaction would have been the same if he'd written that he did it with bow & arrow.

    Maybe he had previously been complaining that his neighbor's pet dinosaur was barking too loudly? (Just made that up, to show what a difference context can make)

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  61. That's nothing... by JasonGoatcher · · Score: 1

    I went to the end of rainbow and bitch-slapped a leprechaun until he handed over his pot of gold. Then I stabbed a unicorn in the flank and watched it bleed to death, cut off it's horn and made an awesome knife. Then I stepped through a StarGate portal and came back to reality, where stupid crap like this story happens.

  62. creative writing vs public schools by streamfortyseven · · Score: 1

    That'll teach that kid - never, ever write anything remotely creative for a public school, it's a waste of time and it'll get you in trouble. If you want to write, you can put it in a weblog or on wordpress, or you can submit it to publications that publish the kinds of things you write about. Writing is a craft involving creativity and thinking and observation and discipline. It requires a significantly longer attention span than any public school could possibly tolerate. Public schools inculcate obedience to arbitrary authority and discourage creativity and independent critical analysis, which is why they have nothing of value to people who wish to educate themselves in the writer's craft.

  63. Seems a clear first amendment challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The kid said/wrote something which was unlikely to cause a problem.
    Not at all like yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater.

    The school made a silly, unnecessary big deal out of it.
    Makes perfect since if you mission is to raise a crop of wimps unable to fend for themselves.
    Idiotic if your mission is to prepare kids for life.

    The kid and his mom should appeal this all the way to the supreme court.
    It would be good for the country for them to win.

    God help us if they don't.

  64. Mandatory SNL by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

    No, it's actually "S" words, words beginning with the letter "S". On a side note, I've got to ask you about the Penis Mightier. Will it really mighty my penis, man?

    --
    Error: No error occurred
  65. I'm confused by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 2

    Are you against arresting kids for writing the word "gun"? I have to wonder because Hannity, O'Reilly and Limbaugh regularly rail against schools' substituting zero-tolerance policies for the use of common sense. The arrest of young Mr. Stone is anything but a reason to rail against Hannity, O'Reilly and Limbaugh.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  66. Re:Hanity runs the government? or points out stupi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    False, it is their job is to showcase the Republican Party's point of view. You will notice how NSA spying on everyone was the best thing since sliced bread when Bush wanted the Patriot Act Passed (or extended), and only a terrorist-murica-hating-commie-liberal-jew would disagree. Until, Obama signed an extension of the Patriot Act, and the details of the NSA finger-banging your privacy became public. Then it was the kinda big-brother-government-intrustion into your daily life that the Founding Fathers and Jesus warned about, and only some sort of pinko-feminist-homosexual-atheist-secular-liberal-scumbag could possibly support it.

  67. Re:Hanity runs the government? or points out stupi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are the mouth organs of the "powers that be"... My belief is that those powers are the monied but you are free to insert your controlling obsession e.g. Trilateral commission, Koch, Coke, Illegal Aliens, Extra-terrestrial Aliens, Multi-Nationals, Washington-Nationals, Left wing, Right wing, Little Wing, Wing Nut, Hike! etc.

    I don't think these organs of the state are they themselves particularly intelligent but they are pretty good at talking/herding up the lemmings into distinct groups rallying around minutia (things that won't actually lead to physical upheaval ) and in exchange, given a pretty comfortable life by their patrons.

    And for the non-political we have HSN, ./, and things of that ilk to further distract us. Ummm, must go, just received my Netflix DVD in the mail.

  68. happens in CA schools all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but there's only internet outrage on /. when it happens in one of them "redneck" states.

    anything to disparage the "flyover" states while refusing to acknowledge where this sort of crap ORIGINATED.

    Overreactions due to political correctness stifled a hell of a lot more thought and creativity in schools (and society at large) in the last three decades than any wannabe creationist in Podunk, Ohio.