Slashdot Mirror


New Nail Polish Alerts Wearers To Date Rape Drugs

stephendavion writes Checking to see if your drink has been tampered with is about to get a whole lot more discreet. Thanks to the work of four North Carolina State University undergrads, you'll soon be able to find out without reaching for a testing tool. That's because you'll already have five of them on each hand. The team — Ankesh Madan, Stephen Gray, Tasso Von Windheim, and Tyler Confrey-Maloney — has come up with a creative and unobtrusive way to package chemicals that react when exposed to Rohypnol and GHB. They put it in nail polish that they're calling Undercover Colors.

81 of 595 comments (clear)

  1. The world we live in. by jcon1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That we need ways to test drinks for date rape drugs shows the state of the world we live in. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

    1. Re: The world we live in. by AvitarX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm willing to bet strait alcohol is the most common one.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:The world we live in. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm trying to come up with a way to point out that the world is fully of humans doing all sorts of awful things to each other, without it seem like condoning the date rapists as being "not so bad" or whatever.

      I couldn't. Because there's something uniquely shitty about disabling and taking advantage of someone who's already going on a date with you. They went out of their way to spend time with you, and you just go "not good enough" and betray the hell out of them.

    3. Re:The world we live in. by sribe · · Score: 3, Informative

      I couldn't. Because there's something uniquely shitty about disabling and taking advantage of someone who's already going on a date with you. They went out of their way to spend time with you, and you just go "not good enough" and betray the hell out of them.

      While that is uniquely shitty, it's not all that "date rape" drugs are used for. It's not at all uncommon for them to be used on strangers at a bar.

    4. Re:The world we live in. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      True enough, but a huge majority of rape is acquaintance rape. I tend to avoid emphasizing stranger rape, because that's the stereotype that people already tend to over-focus on.

    5. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ok, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you're a completely stupid fuck. For one thing I know someone who had roofies used on her. She knew a member of the frat since they were little kids and he still pulled a "bros before hoes" on her. (Yes I know he was probably the rapist.) I have also stumbled on someone in downtown Portland who had been given something. Had one drink and she couldn't walk properly. Roofies are not a "moral panic block", they are widely available, tasteless and odorless drug used by sociopaths to rape people. Do you read the news? Do know who many women are raped each year on campuses in the US? Take your useless, ignorant, thoughtless, opinion and have some frat boy tape it to his dick and shove it up your ass and see what you "think" about it then.

    6. Re:The world we live in. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a clever bit of science, but unfortunately, I fear the young ladies who are most likely in need of this product are probably not going to have the foresight to wear it. If they had such foresight in the first place, it seems like perhaps they wouldn't be in a position where someone they shouldn't trust could surreptitiously slip them drugs in their drinks.

      I'm not "blaming the victim", mind you. No should be subject to drugging and rape regardless of circumstances, and the perps and deserve all the wrath our legal system can throw at them. I'm just pointing out that some people are more prone to making poor life choices. I'm sure we've all met them before. We feel really bad when these people are eaten by wolves, but we can't help but thinking: "was it really the best idea to go out in a suit made of meat and barbeque sauce?"

      The big problem is that if you're drugged, you may not be in a suitable state of mind to fight off a would-be rapist even if you know you've been drugged. The best defense is, as always, for women to watch out for their friends when at bars and parties. Don't go wandering off alone after heavy drinking with a guy you don't know or trust. That's asking for trouble in about a million different ways. Drugged drinks are just another type of potential trouble among many.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    7. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being able to say no to liquor is extremely easy.

      Being able to say no to GHB that's been slipped into your drink isn't.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    8. Re:The world we live in. by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Yes, indeed. Completely unethical fear-mongers all around that blow irrelevant risks all out of proportion, and countless stupid sheep that fall for that. Truly a sad state of affairs.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    9. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know someone who had roofies used on her.

      It's far more likely that you know someone who claims that happened to her. She may even believe it. It's far more likely though, that she drank more than she wants to admit.

      Do know who many women are raped each year on campuses in the US?

      Yes, and according to the FBI, it's a hell of a lot fewer than you and your fellow SJWs pretend.

    10. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ok, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you're a completely stupid fuck. For one thing I know someone who had roofies used on her. She knew a member of the frat since they were little kids and he still pulled a "bros before hoes" on her. (Yes I know he was probably the rapist.) I have also stumbled on someone in downtown Portland who had been given something. Had one drink and she couldn't walk properly. Roofies are not a "moral panic block", they are widely available, tasteless and odorless drug used by sociopaths to rape people. Do you read the news? Do know who many women are raped each year on campuses in the US? Take your useless, ignorant, thoughtless, opinion and have some frat boy tape it to his dick and shove it up your ass and see what you "think" about it then.

      The point the parent was trying to make you asked right back in the form of a question. Yes, we know how many women (and men, sexist much?) are raped each year on campuses. Care to tell me what percentage of those involved anything other than straight alcohol? Yeah, I thought so.

      Yes, we all know it's a problem, it's simply not anywhere near as powerful or prevelant in rape culture as you or anyone else make it out to be. Alcohol is a drug. Why is it people seem to forget that, or excuse it because they don't want it to interfere with their chosen lifestyle? Isn't it ironic when everything is bad and evil except when it's a vice of yours. Easiest solution to avoid this? Don't consume drugs. Of any kind. That would include your beloved precious fucking alcohol and your lame-ass excuses to keep drinking it in order to have a "good time".

    11. Re:The world we live in. by sribe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Acquaintance rape seems like an unplanned thing that happens over alcohol.

      While this is the stereotype, the truth is that normal acquaintances are not rapists, and rapists often stalk their victims, becoming their acquaintances, testing boundaries, and then attacking.

    12. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'm not "blaming the victim""

      I hate to break it to you, but that is exactly what you are doing. You are also claiming that only woman without much brains or ability to think for themselves and plan ahead like to have a good time in public.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re:The world we live in. by Cabriel · · Score: 2

      One who is aware of this could check up to 10 drinks for their friends. Through effectiveness, that one might be able to convince others. Everything starts with a few who convince others.

      Look at Google, for example. It used to be a nerd-only thing (I remember a time before Google was). Now, I can't think of anyone who doesn't understand when someone says "just google it".

      But, really, if you want to educate people, teach them to drink only from a bottle and to keep their thumb over the neck when they aren't drinking it. Alternatively, convince them that if they ever take their eyes off of their drink, even for a second, and there are other people within arm's reach, just leave the drink and hit the dance floor for a while then get a new drink.

      The only "safe" way to drink open drinks (cocktails/hiballs) is to drink them all in one go over a period of five or ten or fifteen minutes without putting down the drink, then do something else for a while, like dance or get some fresh air or hit the washroom, or just have a conversation with someone. If you're concerned about getting too drunk, a good bartender will not judge anyone, especially women, for ordering water, and if the bartender does give the person a hard time about it, that person should never return to that bartender.

      Obviously, the safest way is to not go to the bar, but no one will listen to that advice, so if they're going to go out, they should be well-informed with good advice.

    14. Re: The world we live in. by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Why not get call the police to report the crime and ambulance to get her to a hospital? Seems odd that somebody would leave their friend to sleep in a car after suspecting that they had been drugged. Sure the perpetrators may have gotten the dosage right, and she could just sleep it off, but they could just as easily have given her too much, and put her in danger.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    15. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, they exist, they get used, I've seen it, too; in fact, I've been a victim. Doesn't change the fact that most club rapists simply buy a girl drinks until she can't walk straight anymore, though. Cheaper and you aren't carrying something that will land you in prison just for possession. Think about it.

      I know a guy, a former friend (basically because he does this kind of shit) that will meet a girl at a bar or club, take her to a table that has no visibility of the bar, and buy himself a beer and her a drink. Innocent enough, just buying a girl a drink, right? Well, his game, and the reason why the table must not be able to see the bar, is that he keeps buying her drinks, bringing his beer with him on every trip to the bar (he never lets the waitress bring drinks), but, instead of getting himself another beer, he gets a glass of water and refills his empty beer bottle before returning to the table. She thinks he's drinking as much as him, making him less of a threat.

      Scum. Absolute scum. After I learned what he was doing (he was proud of it when he told me) I did tell a few bartenders at places he was known to frequent but they didn't seem to care, which, I suppose, makes them scum, as well.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    16. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, the FBI's statistics only include what actually gets reported; if all rapes were reported, we may well see that men rape women no more often than women rape men. And yes, women do rape men. Mine went unreported, officially, but I do talk about it when the subject comes up.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    17. Re:The world we live in. by Frobnicator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed.

      Looking over the USDOJ stats, it seems Rohypnol is a regional problem with relatively low use count. In many places it is listed as "the least accessible date-rape drug", in other regions it is a suspected factor in hundreds of rape cases. The numbers show it going from about 1000 suspected cases nationally in 1997 to it's modern level of being suspected use in 1.5% of rape cases, a few thousand cases per year. Consider: how many hundreds of thousands of dates where a drink is consumed are there every year? Millions of drinks? Hundreds of millions of drinks? On a per-drink basis the number of uses is a very small percentage. Since it is small as a percentage that suggests going after bigger percentages for the bigger reductions.

      While any number bigger than 0 is a problem, as a statistic these two drugs are not used in a high percentage of rapes, and date rapes themselves are relatively rare. I'm not trying to trivialize it. As the parent post suggests, a very rare problem does not lend itself to a TSA-like drug test where millions of drinks are tested for something detectable only a few thousand times annually at a maximum. My rough estimate is around 100M drinks across the nation over the course of a year, roughly 3000 testable contaminated drinks, so 0.0003% of date drinks, or one in every 30,000. That's a lot of useless fingernail-dips.

      I suppose if you do go that route, of the new products this one that continuously monitors your drink by the cup and straw changing color seems much better than nail polish you need to dip frequently. It is both passive and continuous. Someone could slip the drug in after you dunk your fingernail, but the sensor on the container or the straw is 'always on'.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    18. Re: The world we live in. by danlip · · Score: 3, Insightful

      frat is just an abbreviation for fraternity. What is the distinction you are trying to make?

      And they have a terrible reputation, which they have earned.

    19. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let me preface my response with the following: I'm speaking as a victim, here. A victim who learned a valuable lesson about personaly responsibility.

      No, he wants to live in a world where people take responsibility for their own safety. Knowing that rapists are out there, and knowing that keeping your drink in hand at and in view at all times is a simple and effective preventative measure, it is irresponsible not to take that simple measure.

      Hell, a girl I was dating brought me a drugged drink when I was 17; it wasn't even alcohol and we weren't even at a club, it was kool-aid and we were at someone's house, babysitting their 3 kids. I learned, then, that you get your own drinks and keep them in hand and in view at all times, even around people you trust. It's not your fault if you get raped if you don't do that (of course, the rapist made the decision to rape) but it is your fault you didn't at least take steps to prevent it (you made the decision not to).

      I don't blame myself for the girl's actions; after all, I didn't drug my own drink, she did. And I didn't rape myself after I passed out, she did. I don't even blame myself for trusting her; I had known her for over a year at that point and she had always been good to me. Hell, she wouldn't even have had to rape me, I was willing, so the thought never even crossed my mind. I let my guard down, and I do blame myself for that; but, at the same time, life isn't worth living if you don't let people in at some point. So, instead of becoming a woman-hating shut-in, I considered what I could have done differently to prevent it from happening, and I learned from it. In case you haven't absorbed the information by now, that is to get my own drinks and keep them in hand and in view; that allows you to still trust people, until they give you a reason not to, while allowing you to quickly and easily see that you have reason not to trust that particular person *before* something bad happens.

      It's not perfect, bad shit can and will still happen, but by taking mitigating steps, at least you've prevented one form of bad shit. Really, the same reason you lock your doors, despite the fact that a criminal can just break a window.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    20. Re: The world we live in. by pr0fessor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know a few guys who are certain a woman slipped them a Viagra and one that knows since it went horribly wrong and he ended up going to the ER.

    21. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

      That would mean staring at your beverage the entire night rather than socializing.

      This is amazing. The message should always be, "never rape" instead of "don't get raped."

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    22. Re: The world we live in. by Kielistic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rape apologia on a tech site!? GASP

      There was no rape apology there.

      There's a huge difference between being slipped a mickey and being extremely intoxicated.

      Which is why people are not allowing you to conflate the two. Some times alcohol hits you harder than you expect. A lot of women think this means they were roofied (because people like you tell them there's roofies around every corner).

    23. Re: The world we live in. by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It already is.

      But non-idiots mitigate risks as best they can - trading off against convenience and so on of course, sometimes with convenience winning by miles.

      The message is "never burglarize" and no one thinks advising people to lock their doors somehow changes that message.

      The message is "don't abduct children" and no one thinks that "stranger danger" type idiocy in schools changes that message.

      Why does any mention of mitigating rape risks always get portrayed as undermining "don't rape".

    24. Re: The world we live in. by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank goodness I don't live in the US. I kind of forget how nice it is to have health care available to everyone paid for by taxes. If I'm lying unconscious, I don't want anybody making decisions about whether or not I should go to the hospital based on whether they think it will cost me too much money to save my life. If I saw somebody (especially a friend) unconscious on the street, I would call an ambulance, health insurance or not. Hell, you could probably be found negligent if you didn't get the person to a hospital and something bad did happen them.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    25. Re: The world we live in. by MitchDev · · Score: 2

      Because no one wants to take any responsibility for themselves ....

    26. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Even moreso, this nail polish isn't even really effective in that narrowly-defined scenario. It provides a false sense of security, as it detects only two of many date rape drugs, so a negative result means nothing; and, by its mere existence, opens up a potential plain-sight avenue of attack: woman claims to be wearing this polish (but really is not), woman crushes up a roofie and packs the powder under her nail, woman offers to test friend's drink, drink "tests" negative, but has, in reality, just been drugged. This stuff is just a bad idea, all around.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    27. Re: The world we live in. by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative

      if all rapes were reported, we may well see that men rape women no more often than women rape men

      I don't think that is in any way very likely.

      According to a 2010 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 1 in 5 women and 1 in 71 men in theed States have been raped. The actual number is likely higher, experts say, as incidents of sexual violence are severely underreported in the United States -- particularly among male victims.

      Against his will: Female-on-male rape

    28. Re: The world we live in. by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 2

      I had a friend who worked in a lab that police/paramedics would send various blood samples to for drug testing. He said that in a 4 year period, out of all the hundreds of date rape drug test requests, 100% percent of them showed nothing but alcohol. He said it was a real eye opener for him, how people (in this case women) underestimate the power and simplicity of alcohol. Drinks can be mixed that almost completely mask the taste of booze. Now I know that this was only in his particular state, and not all states will have the same results, but I still think it's telling over all. Be less worried about pills getting slipped and more wary of the fact that alcohol can completely drop your inhibitions,

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
    29. Re: The world we live in. by kheldan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Being able to say no to liquor is extremely easy

      Yes, it is. However: if a woman has had too much? That's still not an excuse to take advantage of her. I don't know about anyone else, but I've had women want to have sex with me while they were significantly drunk, and I just won't do it because I know they'll regret it later, and I don't want to be That Guy. Oh, and for the record: Women should not take advantage of guys who are too drunk, either. Of course there's a double standard, as always, which is also bullshit, but that's another subject entirely.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    30. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 2
      From your own quote, supporting my position:

      The actual number is likely higher, experts say, as incidents of sexual violence are severely underreported in the United States -- particularly among male victims.

      Exactly the point I was making. Thank you.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    31. Re: The world we live in. by Nephandus · · Score: 2

      The CDC's "forced to penetrate" showed 1.1% victimization (obviously of males) over 12 months as did their "rape" of females, so any "rape" of males would raise male victims over females. Also according to "Accuracy of Adult Recollections of Childhood Victimization: Part 2. Childhood Sexual Abuse.", males with documented sexual abuse were 5 times more likely to deny sexual abuse later than females. The numbers could be heavily skewed for both but are hiding way more male than female victims.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    32. Re:The world we live in. by quenda · · Score: 2, Informative

      Would it help to know that it is largely an urban legend?

      Drink spiking with Rohypnol and GHB on a large scale that people are imaging is not real.
      In my city, a study was done on a large number of young people arriving at the city hospital (free A&E) with suspected drink-spiking.
      Not one had any traces in their blood. Maybe some had been spiked with extra alcohol, but mostly is was young women not taking responsibility for their own excessive drinking (or pills).

      Similar data from the UK:
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

    33. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Why, thank you for telling me the thing that happened to me happens, I wasn't really sure. The sick part is really how I found out it happened in the first place, but those are private details I will not discuss on a public forum. You can be convinced of whatever you want (and clearly you will not be swayed) but then the CDC and FBI disagree, with the CDC reporting similar positive rates (roughly 1.1%) on rape kits performed on men and women who report rape (stats reported by another user, elsewhere in the thread, ask that user for the source if you really care), with the fact that society expects men to be "unrapeable", leading to fewer men than women reporting rape when it does happen... well... if the per-capita percentage of positive rape kits (in response to a report of rape) for men and women are roughly equal, and the per-capita incidence rapes reported by women is roughly 4x that of reports by men (in the US, at least)... well, if you could do the math, you would have already, so I'll do it for you. For every 4000 women reporting a rape, 11 will show a positive rape kit; every 1000 men reporting a rape, on the other hand, will show the same 11 positives. By those numbers, it sure looks to me like 4x as many men are actually raped, but it's more likely that men only report *actual* rape and the numbers are actually much closer to equal.

      Of course, not every rape gets reported and not every reported rape actually happened, so any statistic based on reporting rates is going to be skewed by both of those factors. Just food or thought.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  2. As someone who went to NC State by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You have to sign over all inventions you create as undergrads to the university.

    At least if you're an engineer.

    The university was bitter about an undergrad project turning into a billion dollar company(SAS) and them not seeing a cut.

    1. Re:As someone who went to NC State by Steve+Blake · · Score: 2

      That is not consistent with the current policy:
      http://policies.ncsu.edu/policy/pol-10-00-01/

    2. Re:As someone who went to NC State by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Informative

      From that page(bolding mine):

      All INVENTIONS arising from (1) research conducted with University-administered funds, (2) work within the INVENTOR’S SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT, or (3) the SUBSTANTIAL USE OF UNIVERSITY RESOURCES are owned by the University.

      I guess the relevant thing is whether they used university facilities to develop their chemical. My guess is that they did.

  3. The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We don't have to. The better solution would be to use cups that are covered and not set them down after being filled.

    As far as this technology goes, it might cut down on those particular drugs being used, but I doubt they're the only ones that people use.

  4. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it might be that you respond this way when no one accused you of it.

    Methinks the not-lady doth protest too much.

  5. I wish we didn't need something like this by kheldan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do enough members of my own gender have to be such creepy bastards that we need something like this to be developed? I enjoy sex as much as the next healthy, red-blooded adult man does, but I have never had to slip drugs into some woman's drink to get it. I sure as hell haven't always 'got the girl' at the end of the night, but seriously? How fucked up do you have to be to do something like this? Shit like this is one of the many reasons why, if there are alien civilizations out there watching us, that they don't contact us openly: We still act like goddamn animals (and no, I'm not trying to be funny).

    C'mon guys, knock this shit off already!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do enough members of my own gender have to be such creepy bastards that we need something like this to be developed?

      Well, it's not actually that complicated. There's a few common psychological threads that tend to unite serial rapists. Pyschopathy/sociopathy/anti-social personality disorder(whatever you feel like calling it) is one. People who just can't imagine another persons' perspective at all tend to be capable of some pretty shitty things for pretty stupid reasons.

      Another is a flexible definition of rape. They tend to look for an excuse for why something "doesn't count" as rape. So they blame "mixed signals" or "unreasonable rejection" or "playing games" or similar kinds of behavior. People tend to be excellent rationalizes, and after the first rape, serial rapists tend to start finding any excuse.

      (Oh, and don't mistake "serial rapists" for the common image of stranger violently raping women on the street, most serial rapists still engage in acquaintance rape. That's a pretty important distinction.)

    2. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Why do enough members of my own gender have to be such creepy bastards that we need something like this to be developed?

      Because those are the types of people we reward with powerful political positions and high paying jobs. Such is the power of charisma. The psychos are loaded with it.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not just people who have serious mental defects, it's people who might otherwise be normal human beings. It's what some people call "rape culture", the fact that a lot of guys don't really see anything particularly wrong with pressuring girls for sex or treating them as disposable sex objects so it isn't that much of a leap to go as far as drugging them. I mean, if plying them with alcohol so they are less inhibited is okay...

      Once you become away of it you start to notice how prevalent it is in western culture. A few years ago there was an advert for pain medication where a women told her husband she didn't want sex that night because she had a headache. The guy produces the pills, "problem" solved, and the woman looks... Well, in all honestly the actress looked like she was resigned to being raped that night, by the look on her face. Going back much further if you watch this scene from Goldfinger it's supposed to be... romantic? but Bond basically forces her to have sex with him.

      Women are often portrayed as either wanting this behaviour or as deserving it. Female characters tend to be manipulative, using their looks and the promise of sex to get what they want. It gives guys the impression that if they meet a girl, she is attractive and dresses in anything lower cut that a turtleneck, she is trying to manipulate them. If they go along with it and maybe buy her a drink or two they have "paid" and expect something in return. Changing her mind or wanting to go slowly is just a rip-off.

      It's really screwed up when you start to look at it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The police have to take her statement if she claims a crime took place, regardless of how ludicrous. If I went to the police and said I saw a UFO land, Bill Clinton exit, who then murdered Family Guy's Lois Griffin, and finally flew away, the police would take my statement.

      The fact they take a statement doesn't mean they'd follow up with an investigation or arrest, let alone do anything that would result in a prosecution.

    5. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No need to paint the male gender as a whole as being filled with sociopaths. It's just the law of large numbers at work. There's maybe 30 million American men in the age rage that are likely to pick up srange women; if just 1/10 % of them are sociopathic predators that's 30,000 predators; and since they *are* predators they'll be overrepresented in young women's encounters with men in pick-up scenarios. Small numbers can produce disproportionate problems. In this case it represents numbers the actions of such a small proportion of men that our ideas about how normal people act aren't a reliable guide.

      Drink spiking is a very rare crime. Most studies that look for evidence of it find very little. The highest I found was a government study which found date rape drugs in 4.5% of the cases from four sexual assault clinics. Note this is 4.5% of the cases where the assault occurred, so we're not talking about 4.5% of encounters, we're talking 4.5% of rapes. 4.5% is certainly high enough to be a concern in certain situations, like residential parties at a college. In such a situation a date rape drug detector might actually have some utility, even though it addresses relatively rare actions by a tiny proportion of men.

      A bigger concern than what we think of as a "date rape drug" is alcohol itself. The same study that found date rape drugs in 4.5% of sexual assault samples found alcohol in 55%. This result is consistently found across studies: alcohol is very frequently associated with sexual assault -- around half of the time. This is especially concerning because some people (men and women both) don't believe that surreptitiously incapacitating someone with alcohol in order to have sex is rape. They don't distinguish ethically between two people getting drunk and having sex and one of them slipping extra alcohol into a drink.

      But the fact remains most men wouldn't do something like that. But that doesn't preclude the possibility that a woman might often encounter the few remaining men who would. A typical man has sex with a small number of women many times; a man who has sex with a large number of women only once is bound to be encountered by women disproportionately often.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

      But the police don't prevent rape. They apprehend rapists after the offense. Rape can be pretty traumatic and in some cases is life changing. This needs to be addressed before the Rape happens.

      The proposal doesn't seem to be about arresting the perpetrators but in making sure guys don't act when situations arise (so to speak).

      And of course, arrests after the fact should already be happening.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
  6. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And obviously that's what they're suggesting here, that you and me and every other guy on the planet is despicable scum.

    Has it ever occurred to you that this is a valid and common concern? It's ridiculous that women have to go through such lengths to feel safe going out. But the current reality is that it IS necessary. Not because you yourself might spike their drink, but the chance that someone might is high enough, and the result is horrific enough, that products like this are the necessity.

    And instead of sympathizing with that, you decided to make this about how you personally feel slighted that anyone would suggest there's a need for this.

  7. In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In 14 years practising emergency medicine, I've seen large numbers of young women who get drunk and come to A&E firmly believing that they've been given a "date rape drug," but when laboratory testing is used to confirm that belief I've only ever seen one actual case of drug-facilitated sexual assault. We live in a world with a lot less drug-facilitated date rape than fearmongering about date rape drugs.

    1. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      well wouldn't you expect GHB to be hard to detect since it occurs naturally anyway in the body and the body is excellent at eliminating it? I have taken it myself, it onsets in 10 minutes if the dose is large enough, and is pretty much back to baseline within an hour, its doubtful anyone in real disress makes it there fast enough to be reliably tested.

      That said, I have little doubt you are mostly correct that its very few. Having personally gotten myself to debilitated states on both GHB and Alcohol, I would be hard pressed to really differentiate the effects (aside from GHBs lack of a hangover but, if you are doing both anyway....) from such a state.

      I suspect the majority of such cases are really people who got drunker than they realized, and may have trouble believing that they drank that much.

      Which brings up a very legitimate question: Do these nail polishes give a false sense of security when out drinking? Or, on the other hand, will simply having a "string on ones finger" itself help to remind the wearer to be more careful by inducing her to take conscious steps towards recognizing danger?

      I suspect the former but.... I can't really say that the second is implausible either. Regardless, I am doubtful that their main effect of detecting these substances will, in and of itself, be of much use.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Cardoor · · Score: 4, Informative

      i think your sample set and conclusions might be seriously biased. i'm no expert on rape-statistics, but it's my understanding that a very significant amount of non-drug-assisted rapes go unreported by the victims for a variety of reasons.

      it seems to me that under the circumstances where a woman 'comes to' and can't even remember what happened (not to mention probably still feeling mentally/emotionally impaired from the chemical hangover) there would be an even higher incidence of the rapes going unreported.

      it may still be possible that drug-facilitated rape occurs with less frequency than feared, but i see no ability to reach that conclusion logically from your estimation.

    3. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because fearmongering about dirty, nasty predatory men is a lot more politically palatable than talking to young women about making bad choices and the consequences thereof. That's "substantiating the patriarchy".

      The public narrative is about "victimization" not about "stupidity and carelessness".

      Don't get me wrong, a man who takes advantage of a girl who's drunk is just as much a scumbag shit as someone who takes advantage of a girl who's been drugged.

      But... I know that if I left my car running with the keys in it, even if the guy that (almost inevitably) would steal it should & would be prosecuted, simultaneously the insurance company isn't going to replace my car because of my own stupid choices.

      Just sayin'.

      --
      -Styopa
    4. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Says the Anonymous Coward. Without any kind of reference to reliable statistics your anecdote is utterly worthless I'm afraid. Could be completely made up.

      I'm not saying you are wrong, merely that an anonymous anecdote with no data to back it up shouldn't be modded "informative".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      In 40 years of living on this planet, I've never had a heart attack. And no one I've personally known has had one. Therefore, heart attacks never happen. Ever. To anyone.

      Alternatively, we could learn the difference between "anecdote" and "statistics".

    6. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by sinij · · Score: 2

      Because heart attacks happen, we should treat everyone as if they are having, or about to have a heat attack. Because you never know, and HeartAttack Culture!

    7. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Oh come off your fantasy planet. You're making it seem like all men are honest and all women are liars. Did you get accused once and now are on a crusade to prove that rape doesn't exist? And what were you doing rifling through someone's purse, that certainly doesn't give you any high ground. You've got a chip on your shoulder so big you can't walk straight.

  8. Re:Discreet? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It takes 2 seconds with your back turned to get a drink spiked. The level of responsibility you're demanding is beyond human. Unless you spend your entire night focusing on nothing but your beverage(which I gotta say, is worse than dunking your finger in your drink occasionally), that's not going to work.

  9. nice idea by Cardoor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    my first thought was that this was redundant, as but it seem to me that women who are apt to buy and wear this nail polish would probably already follow the most basic rule.. if a drink leaves your hand... (or passes within someone else's range of dosing), you don't drink from it again. EVER. to me, that's probably the most basic think to teach girls new to bars. I was astounded when i was in thailand a couple of years ago taking a course, and when we hit a bar one night, a girl from my class (probably 21 or 22 years old) put her drink down and left it to dance.. only to go back to it afterwards. i gave her quite an earful about the dangers etc etc.

    all that being said though, the rule wouldn't help you if the bartender is in cahoots with his buddy. you could also then only drink beer from a bottle (that you see opened in front of you), but for mixed drinks - why not have the extra level of security?

    also, to the extent that people understand this exists, it may prevent ne'er do wells from trying it in the first place, as a positive test should result in some serious accusations flying that creepers would probably like to avoid.

    1. Re:nice idea by Cardoor · · Score: 2

      i absolutely agree with you vis-a-vis the manipulative farce that is 'terrorist' risk - but in my mind, this is materially different for a few reasons:

      'terrorist' acts either go reported (due to their obvious ex-post nature) or are "thwarted" by those who have a vested interest in trumping up the whole scenario. in the date-rape scenario, there is no military-industrial-complex that stands to gain from people believing the stories... granted, others might be motivated to do so, but not nearly to the same extent.

      also, and perhaps most importantly, is that the data for reported cases (also, unlike car accidents) is so corrupted. given that non-drug assisted rapes often go unreported , it stands to reason that drug-induced rapes have a significantly higher incidence of going unreported for a variety of reasons. so the lack of demonstrable cases cannot be used as evidence that it doesn't exist (or exist in significant numbers).

      that's of course not to say that there is proof it IS a high risk - but here is where the final issue comes to play - cost to detect/prevent. if you're talking 'terrorism', you're talking billions or trillions of dollars and the trashing of civil liberties left and right. this? a few bucks to paint your nail polish a color?? incidentally, if women actually all used the nailpolish, they could report cases where the dosing/rape was attempted but AVOIDED (and the drug was detected) which could yield far better data.

  10. A few issues with this... by Zapotek · · Score: 2

    First of all, you've got to stick your fingers in your drink, which doesn't seem at all appealing. Why nail-polish? Why not just use the strips? If all you had was nail-polish and someone came out with strips, that'd be an improvement. This looks like a step backwards.
    Secondly, what's the false-positive/false-negative rate on this thing? Were there any compromises in accuracy in order to make it work as a nail-polish?

    Again, doesn't anyone see a problem with sticking your fingers in your drink? I know I'm the finicky type, but doesn't this look bothersome to anyone else?

    1. Re:A few issues with this... by Cardoor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i think the benefit of nail polish is that it's subtle. to whip out a testing strip in a bar is to say "hey everyone - i think the guy im talking to may be a rapist and trying to drug me. pardon me while i conduct an experiment. "

      to dip one fingertips into a well stirred (and presumably mostly full) drink could be very discreetly done. and i dont think hygienics should be an issue (esp with the alcohol content.) and if a girls fingertips are so grody she feels the hygiene is too rough, well.. then she may have bigger issues.

    2. Re:A few issues with this... by _anomaly_ · · Score: 2

      You keep asking for sources about whether or not compromises were made in testing accuracy to get it in the form of nail polish. I assumed you were just being lazy, because how could there not be a more in-depth article out there on something that's getting so much attention. Well, after a bit of searching, it appears you probably weren't being lazy... I couldn't find anything out there in the form of details. Maybe the detection rate isn't so great... or (god forbid) they're having difficulty with false positives or false negatives.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
  11. Re:This is Slashdot . . . by kheldan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I encourage you to stand with me here, instead of posting as an AC. I don't believe in this 'rape culture' nonsense I keep hearing about, but I do believe that us men have a responsibility to police our own against these flaming assholes that do shit like this. The line needs to be drawn here, and no farther.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  12. Re:Discreet? by Millennium · · Score: 2

    It's more discreet than using a special straw, which seems to have been the predecessor (at least in spirit) of this new method.

  13. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

    Seriously? Never heard of the Duke Lacrosse Team that was falsely accused of rape?

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  14. Allergies... Can they expand the detection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know a lot of folks with allergies and diet sensitivities. Wheat, Gluten, Dairy, Casein, Soy, Peanuts, Tree Nuts, Shellfish, etc... A detector like this could be really useful if the detected compounds were expanded.

  15. brilliant, but with a few flaws. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    unless you're Penn Jillette, most men do not wear nail polish.
    it would also be very important to educate the wearer that they could never, under any circumstances, topcoat as it would render the system useless. Salons would also need training on numerous procedures that, while safe for normal polish, would damage the system.

    Disclosure: ive worked in a salon. my suggestion would be to offer a topcoat or clearcoat that can be added to existing colours. This system would also work well in french tips, but again, most men do not wear them.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  16. Re:Here's an idea! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

    You've never blued someone's soda? Bromothymal blue does it. You can't see it in caramel color, and then you pee green or blue.

  17. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 2

    Rapists don't have Rapist stamped across their forehead.

  18. Re:Is this really necessary as a mass-market produ by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can't get GHB anymore because of dumb ass jocks, but, for some reason, Phenibut isn't scheduled.

    Phenibut is a GABA receptor agonizer with a powerful relaxing effect. It's OTC, but pretty useless: you become tolerant on the first use, and then require high doses to get an effect. It might be useful once a month, give or take a week. After using it for 2-3 days--by upping the dose a bit to overcome tolerance--side effects include severe depression and suicidal desires. Your life actually becomes a steaming pile of despair from which you wish to escape. It's far more addictive than Valium, and worse than Heroin.

    A dose of 250mg is a good, strong initial dose. Doses of 5000mg are common among body builders, who use the substance as a relaxant while training (bodybuilders used to dose GHB for the same purpose). A dose of 5000mg directly into some girl's drink would be fantastic... until it wore off. In the interim, nothing would bother her, and she'd probably be amenable to whatever you want. The next day, she'd cry a lot, then kill herself after deciding she'd be better off.

    Again: this stuff is OTC, has no viable medical use, is impossible to use without addiction, has severe withdraw effects, is not directly toxic at high doses, and can be used to make someone compliant.

    It should be banned because it's sold OTC as an anti-stress relaxant, yet is incredibly fucking dangerous to the user. It's not a thing you could dose yourself safely--like Modafinil or Dextroamphetamine--because it's not a thing a fucking physician could prescribe safely for any useful treatment. It's not a dangerous drug that can provide a recreational high or a medical benefit or can somehow be managed; it's a completely useless, indirectly toxic substance that creates immediate tolerance and brings on intense withdraw qualifying as a medical emergency.

    I bet their strips don't test for that.

  19. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

    Also many rapists meet their victims at a bar or club.

  20. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    The truth of the mater is, women have absolutely no problem playing the victim card when it suits them. They lie and manipulate to garner support to punish innocent people.

    It's that last line that betrays you. Some women have no problem lying and playing the victim when it suits them, but in your mind that has morphed into ALL women, and that is your problem, not theirs. Some men also have no problem doing bad things to women and lying when it suits them. The women are just trying to figure out how to be safe short of withdrawing from society.

  21. What about all those people who need a kidney? by TheRealSteveDallas · · Score: 2

    Do you people have any idea what this will do to my organ harvesting business?

    1. Re:What about all those people who need a kidney? by Cardoor · · Score: 2

      dont worry - if it isn't already, the economy will be sending people your way as willing participants.

  22. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by BronsCon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But that is a societal problem.

    So is the need for this product.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  23. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, jerk. Nothing here says "All men are savages". That's all in your mind. Some men are savages, and women need every level of protection against them possible. This story is about one new form of protection.

    I guess the real question is: why do you feel threatened by a new date rape prevention tool?
    Do you get equally offended when Toyota adds a new interior airbag?
    Do you assume that Toyota is telling you that *you are a terrilbe driver?

    How about when you're operating system alerts you to a new security update?
    Is Microsoft or Redhat telling you that you can't keep your computer safe?

    Why would this story be any different?

  24. How many women are raped each year on campus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  25. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by danlip · · Score: 2

    No, it is not suggesting that every man is a despicable scum, it is suggesting that there is a reasonable chance that at least one man at a party is a despicable scum. And that seems like a reasonable suggestion.

  26. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by danlip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the main point is to prevent the woman from drinking the spiked drink. I think it is rather unlike that a guy gets convicted (or even prosecuted) based solely on this test. Perhaps arrested, but more likely just questioned. Unless he's black, in which case he would probably be shot by the police, but that's a problem which has nothing to do with this product.

  27. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've recently stopped driving a taxi (after a 1 1/2 years, 2 summer seasons) in the Hamptons of E. Long Island NY. Through my fares telling me what happened to their friends (cute looking, vulnerable type young women), I applaud this fingernail polish roofie detecting product.

    Last summer, I had on one early Sunday morning fare (a woman), tell me how her friend walked out of the Southampton Social Club (near the Southampton Lirr train station) the Saturday night before after feeling 'strange', and fell onto the club's driveway, face first, slightly (thank God) cutting up her face. The young woman managed to call her friend (my passenger) who drove and picked her up. No police were summoned, and as I've learned since, it wouldn't have mattered much, since the Southampton Police in L.I. do not even have a 'rape kit' available to them.

    One other episode was this (2014) summer: Early one morning (5:30 am), I was dispatched to a local, S.Hampton call to a (very expensive, not unusual for the vicinity) home. After getting admittance through the gated driveway, two beautiful young women got in. One was sick and 'out of it', though her friend was much more in control of herself, and gave me the info needed to get them to where they needed to go (a temporary summer rental home). The other young woman was a really cute, vulnerable type young lady, who I could tell, was not feeling very well. During our trip she needed a plastic 'barf bag' that I supplied her with. And her friend told me how she suspected that her friend got 'roofied' by one of the residents of the home. Very plausible allegation, to my mind. I did my job and delivered both of them safely to their destination. A few days later I was called to their address to take both of them to the train station so they could leave Southampton. On the trip we spoke little, other than me asking the young lady if she was alright, she quietly said she was, though I had a very bad feeling that she was molested that day. As their cab driver, there wasn't a damn thing I could do to help them, excepting safely delivering them where they wanted to go. It's a shitty, powerless feeling for a man.

    Some 5 years ago I was roofied myself, by a supposed 'friend'. Within a 30 minute period after eating a drug laced slice of pizza, I felt quite 'odd', and left the home of my 'friend'. I walked over 2 miles to get back to my rented room, needing to stop on the way to throw up the pizza I'd ingested. The final, 3 story climb up the stairs to my room were the most difficult, I was forcibly pulling my body up the stairs by gripping the stairway's banister, and I'm a somewhat strong man. As soon as I got inside my room and locked my door behing me I collapsed onto my bed, and for the next six hours I slept the sleep of the dead. Woke up knowing this was not a normal thing to happen to me, and deduced that I must have been 'roofied'. I wanted at the time to go back and kill that guy who I know did that to me. I didn't do that. One day I went there, knocked on his door (acting normal), and made sure that I got my belongings out of storage from his garage. As I walked away, his last words to me were, "You need a psychiatrist!" (I had just began walking away from him down his driveway while carrying my packed up bags).

    At those words I almost froze, intent on wanting to drop my bags, and go walk up to him (my 'former' friend), and clock him a good one in his face. I didn't do that though, my intent was just to get away from the asshole without police involvement and my meager, but important to me, belongings intact. Instead of doing that, I remember my steps hesitating a small bit, but I instead kept on walking away from him, despite my wanting so much to stop, go back and smash his face in for what I knew he had done to me.

    Now, I am a somewhat strong guy who is non-violent by nature, though I am capable of violence, when pushed too far. I mentally 'chose' not to act upon my 'baser instincts'. I 'thought' through it as it was happening, kno

  28. Never as easy as it sounds. by westlake · · Score: 2

    Being able to say no to liquor is extremely easy.

    It can be extremely hard to say no to alcohol in certain social settings --- and you don't have to be an alcoholic to know this.

  29. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by 1arkhaine · · Score: 2

    Thanks for the story. Honestly.