Slashdot Mirror
Treasure Map: NSA, GCHQ Work On Real-Time "Google Earth" Internet Observation
wabrandsma) writes with the latest accusations about NSA spying activity in Germany.
According to top-secret documents from the NSA and the British agency GCHQ, the intelligence agencies are seeking to map the entire Internet.
Furthermore, every single end device that is connected to the Internet somewhere in the world — every smartphone, tablet and computer — is to be made visible. Such a map doesn't just reveal one treasure. There are millions of them. The breathtaking mission is described in a Treasure Map presentation from the documents of the former intelligence service employee Edward Snowden which SPIEGEL has seen. It instructs analysts to "map the entire Internet — Any device, anywhere, all the time." Treasure Map allows for the creation of an "interactive map of the global Internet" in "near real-time," the document notes. Employees of the so-called "FiveEyes" intelligence agencies from Great Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, which cooperate closely with the American agency NSA, can install and use the program on their own computers. One can imagine it as a kind of Google Earth for global data traffic, a bird's eye view of the planet's digital arteries.
Furthermore, every single end device that is connected to the Internet somewhere in the world — every smartphone, tablet and computer — is to be made visible. Such a map doesn't just reveal one treasure. There are millions of them. The breathtaking mission is described in a Treasure Map presentation from the documents of the former intelligence service employee Edward Snowden which SPIEGEL has seen. It instructs analysts to "map the entire Internet — Any device, anywhere, all the time." Treasure Map allows for the creation of an "interactive map of the global Internet" in "near real-time," the document notes. Employees of the so-called "FiveEyes" intelligence agencies from Great Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, which cooperate closely with the American agency NSA, can install and use the program on their own computers. One can imagine it as a kind of Google Earth for global data traffic, a bird's eye view of the planet's digital arteries.
The guise of national security.
I'm surprised they haven't used pedofiles as an excuse[reason] for this.
Both mac and ip can be spoofed so can't really be relied upon.
I would suggest its an extension of their or existing meta data DB. Going a step further of tying data to specific "devices"
The last 4 or 5 major disclosures from Snowden documents have gone unreported in the mainstream US press. Sure, you can find them on some more off the path sites, but the mainstream press has moved on. It's not as important as (from current CNN site): "Is this a spaceship or super mall?", or "5 ways to think yourself well!"
As far as the vast, vast majority of the public is concerned, it's over. Forgotten. Our cultural attention span was exhausted, and nothing happened. The chance of serious change now - like disbanding the organization and arresting those responsible for widespread constitutional violations - is now zero.
And they know it.
Looking at where all data enters and exits the internet (www or the World Wide Wiretap) :)
Wifi, VPN, implanted OS or hardware devices, pubic, private, down to MAC address as expected.
Sorting by Infected hosts or Tor router?
All part of collect it all
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Everyone will have all their internet usage examined and your fines will be deducted automaticaly. An email receipt will be sent daily.
Every user's location and identity is known. Violators will be jailed.
Have a nice day, Big Brother is watching you.
Probably using something like supercookies.
Have gnu, will travel.
"Majority" is clearly a more subjective word than I thought.
First, your MAC address is not transmitted past the first hop in the network so it never gets anywhere to be of any use to anyone.
Second, what is APK? Using abbreviations is great except when it is one you dreamed up yourself and no one else knows WTF you are talking about.
MAC address doesn't go onto the network, period. It's too bad a HOSTS file can't stop Flash, and Browser Helper Objects, and Persistent Cookies.
Sometimes we must take away a few freedoms to preserve the majority of freedoms.
I hope you are being sarcastic. Otherwise take a trip to Syria and join ISIS so someone can kill you.
I don't see any freedoms being preserved here.
Sure, there are lots of nasty people like pedos online. And I support law enforcement in their reasonable efforts to remove them. But aside from soothing my conscience, whether some people are downloading kiddie porn or not doesn't affect me.
Have gnu, will travel.
Too Much Information (TMI) can be as big a problem as too little information.
With all that information, you can get a false sense of security that you know enough and get bitten.
With all that information, you tend to focus on what you see and not what you don't - you develop tunnel vision.
With all that information, resources that could have been devoted elsewhere are taken up sorting out the trash and the false positives.
Blank spots stay blank. Example - Android phones have had NFC since Gingerbread, so if two operatives want to exchange data (photos of a target, NSA documents, etc), they can do it in person just by using Android Beam or Bump-to-Exchange, without saying a word to each other, just standing in line to pay for a newspaper.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Couldn't agree more. I fully support law enforcement in this area. However they respect boundaries in order to achieve this goal, they pretty much piss on said boundary whilst strolling past it.
APK is a renowned Internet kook, hostfile whackjob, fucktard and pedofile. His specialty is threadjacking and sockpuppeting to talk about his malware-infested crapware and various conspiracies. No-one EVER knows WTF he's talking about. The current question of how MAC adresses would get into TCP/IP frames is also a fine example that HE doesn't know what he's talking about, either.
He will respond to this and any following posts with "learn to read", "you're projecting", "I'm not APK, but he's my hero", re-post the same reply 7 times, etc., etc., etc. until the time_t's wrap around or he has the last post in every sub-thread.
Hey Kowalski, I thought I told you to fuck off and not come back!
Yeah, MAC can. ISPs use modem MACs to allow customers on their network. Change/spoof that and see how far you get.
Besides. All they need is a small enough circle and cell phone tower records will do the rest.
Sometimes we must take away a few freedoms to preserve the majority of freedoms.
Do you use any seasoning or you you prefer the boots you lick
to only have the taste of the boot itself ?
Holographic surveillance w/ satellites and radar being going on for some time. w/ full city, home, body, brain, object scans, so nothing is secret or hideable.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5859609.PN.&OS=PN/5859609&RS=PN/5859609
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5455590
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5557283
then they map out our brains and thoughts using these patents & technologies, from 1974 on ward, doing the it from the same multi-functional satellites and radar from ground, sea, and space based interferometers. http://www.oregonstatehospital.net/d/russelltice-nsarnmebl.html#patents..
http://www.obamasweapon.com/
Second, what is APK?
You must be new here. Also, it's considered bad form to post from a parent's account.
. . .stay for the Bond Villain who, knowing what he's up against, reads "Dorsai!" and comes with a completely off the grid attack.
Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
Ok say they get into every ISP's network...
how are they going to monitor every device? pings? imagine the traffic overhead for that?
will the NSA have to pay to be in the "fast-lane"?
what about Dynamic IP's ? how often will they monitor those changes?
It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
That's how it begins...
With the possibility that dozens of individuals have full access to your computing device, can anyone actually get in trouble for what is on their computing device anymore?
A real world example:
If a dozen people had been shown to have been in your house without your permission, could you be held responsible for anything that is left behind?
I would think prosecutors are getting very worried about this being brought up by defense attorneys.
> APK is a renowned Internet kook, hostfile whackjob, fucktard and pedofile.
That's not true, he's not a pedofile. He might download a pedo-file, if he's a pedophile. Phile =lover of, so audiophiles love audio.
I can't argue with the rest of your post.
I take back those lies I just said about you. I'm projecting my own freakishness again.
Second, what is APK? Using abbreviations is great except when it is one you dreamed up yourself and no one else knows WTF you are talking about.
Otherwise known as "The HOSTS file troll." (Google for "hosts file troll apk") Stuck in the '90s, attacks anyone who makes fun of his "solution" by using multiple anonymous accounts. Real name Alexander Kowalski. Demonstrates traits of narcissism, transphobia, etc. Post something negative about his obsolete "HOSTS file solution" and watch the resulting crap-flood.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Thanks for enlightening me. I thought from the post that APK was something meaningful.
I think we can really fuck with them. Chaff, deception traffic...
Let's get started on making more hay for their stacks, people! Hell. You'll run a client for SETI, why not run one to preserve your intelligent life, here on Earth!
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
Sorry, but the post you're responding to isn't mine. Paranoid much? But thanks for reminding me that you also have something against people who are handicapped. Real quality act you got going there, Kowalski.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Do you really keep all these 3 sockpuppets here on slashdot http://news.slashdot.org/comme... ? How many more do you have?
Why're you running from apk's fair challenge to you here then http://news.slashdot.org/comme...? We've already seen how many sockpuppet accounts you keep here too.
With NATs, MAC randomization, WiFi hotspots, user agent spoofing, VPNs, TOR, it seems difficult if not impossible to fingerprint the devices that belong to those who strive to remain hidden.
Twinstiq, game news
You could try. For a while. In the end you're going to be needing to evolve faster than they can. Consider your strengths and weaknesses in that regard.
They don't have to, if the adversary (NSA/GHCQ) has access to ISP records and routers. They can probably tap half the routers between you and the other end of your connection, too. They can get the ISP to match up a broadband customer's modem MAC and serial with credit card records and the IP assigned by DHCP. They (capitalized) will know who you are. You alone can't beat a supremely well-funded and trained government agency. Period. True anonymity requires a major lifestyle change akin to (and probably involving) homelessness. It's more productive to ask what you can do with your time instead of trying to be 1337er than the NSA.
It's a quote any 'terrorist' could make. It's a quote that would make out anyone who made it a 'terrorist'. Could you be?
Good to know at least one federal agency seems to know what it means to execute their mandate.
While I am sure this is a project that will earn millions of dollars for some companies and promotions for individuals, I am not sure how successful you can be at mapping everything. I would imagine more than half of the Internet is hidden behind various NAT boxes. Even with the help of folks like Comcast, CenturyLink, Verizon, AT&T, and the rest of our friends who might help the NSA and GCHQ; we still have businesses, colleges and universities, and most households with most of their computers hidden behind NAT. Maybe when IPv6 becomes ubiquitous it might be possible. I agree with a earlier post too much data, no enough content.
Now, nobody can claim that they will not get attacked. There is this global, ethically-challenged attacker that does sabotage and industrial espionage and leaves targets vulnerable to other attackers as well because they are not perfect (far from it, they just have tons of money). So in the long run, this might do wonders for IT security in general, even if that revolution may come from countries not too friendly towards the US. Of course, the British run with the big bully, but everybody else is getting more and more wary of that cancer growing in northern America.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
Do you see any freedom taken away because of surveillance?
We are used to hide and lie in order to escape punishment, and of course surveillance will make it a lot harder to successfully hide and lie, but surveillance by itself has nothing to do with freedom. Someone watching you masturbate with pictures of young boys naked will not prevent you from doing it.
What takes your freedom away is not surveillance, it's not even the police, it's the law. Surveillance and the police are just tools, they're not the source of the problem. If you want to fight for your freedom, fight the source of the problem.
This is far more enlightening about BarbaraHudson the sockpuppeteer stalker http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Not too well. It seems they have stopped zero terrorists so far. But if you think that their mandate is actually spying on ordinary people and economic espionage, then yes.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
It may be a better idea to simply use weak wifi networks (and a yagi) as your endpoint and drop off the grid altogether.
The guise of national security ...
If the "five eyes" limit their surveillance on the people of their respective five countries the 'national security" argument could still be applied
But what TFA is describing has gone way beyond their respective national border. Their aim is to extend their authoritarian control over THE ENTIRE WORLD and this is the one thing that the whole world must reject
Not since the dawn of time _any_ one entity has the control of the entire planet - As a comparison, even the largest empire ever was, the British Empire, in its peak, controlled less than 25% of the world
The worldwide hegemony must be defeated, dismantled and destroyed, or our future, the future of the Human Race, will forever be shrouded under a thick layer of very dark cloud
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
In the end, the "freedom to be free" will be all that remains, but if will not be a freedom you can actually use as that would make you a "terrorist". Have fun in the 4th Reich! As the US is a bit larger than Germany, this time it will take economic collapse to remove the fascism. Can take 100 years or more. Or they might succeed in building a 1000 Year Reich.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
They generate a hash of each device's HOST file and store it in a multi-tiered relational database (which is most likely clustered across at least 3 - 4 servers, each with it's data volume stored on a RAID 10 array for performance and reliability). Thus, if the device gets renamed or connects via another network location, they can just compare the hash of that node's HOST file to the one in their central database.
"What you mention is WHY they have you register any modems you buy that aren't theirs into THEIR network (for tracking purposes)."
I haven't had to register the last two devices of mine. In fact, that's why I've got two full-speed connections for the price of one.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
TIL APK the networking genius thinks that the MAC address of a cable modem allows ISPs to see the MAC addresses of devices behind it.
This is APK
http://www.thorschrock.com/200...
A clueless, witless idiot that uses threats to try to get his way.
Tactless, incorrect (the fact he mentions MAC addresses of modems proves he doesn't know jack shit, when that only identifies a gateway device, not an actual user, much like an IP address,) clueless, bull-headed, autistic child without a fucking clue. This is why he has to post AC on Slashdot and why he is banned from Wikipedia.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
Go ahead and spoof your IP and MAC. See how well you can send and receive data online.
Hint: If you're receiving data back via IP protocols, your IP is visible/traceable.
Hint: If you're receiving data back on Ethernet networks, your MAC is visible/traceable.
The ISP you connect to has a log of what IP was assigned to what connection at what time, along with where their control of that connection terminates.
What you want to be doing is using connections that aren't associated with you in any way, and are not near your place of residence, while using a different MAC every time.
It warms the cockles of my heart to see APK taking something else seriously. Or that could be the whiskey in my veins.
captcha: reform
Sure, let us begin by taking away the government's freedom to legislate such insanity. If the system is rigged and broken, break the system.
This quote from Thomas Jefferson seems apt :-
"God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. ...And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
I read you are here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and seeing you keep a TomHudson sockpuppet account http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... and this other of your many sockpuppets on slashdot too http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... also makes me believe you may be. Are you? I can see you saying you're handicapped if you cut off your OWN package like that (lol).
Uh, I "set" my mac all the time to get a new dhcp/ip. They don't usually do anything about it unless they have rules against that, which would be troublesome.
It seems like mesh network initiatives like this haven't been covered extensively on Slashdot, though I'm curious as to anyone's take on what protocols like CJDNS and the experimental hyperbora network will be able to do to stop this... of course, the caveat being that we would have to assume that the networks were bigger than they are now, more accessible. Any thoughts?
I read you are here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and seeing you keep a TomHudson sockpuppet account http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... and this other of your many sockpuppets on slashdot too http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... also makes me believe you may be. Are you? I can see you saying you're handicapped if you cut off your OWN package like that (lol).
Second, what is APK? Using abbreviations is great except when it is one you dreamed up yourself and no one else knows WTF you are talking about.
Otherwise known as "The HOSTS file troll." (Google for "hosts file troll apk") Stuck in the '90s, attacks anyone who makes fun of his "solution" by using multiple anonymous accounts. Real name Alexander Kowalski. Demonstrates traits of narcissism, transphobia, etc. Post something negative about his obsolete "HOSTS file solution" and watch the resulting crap-flood.
I find a hosts file works quite well for me, it's not really his solution - people have been doing it forever. Most people use a browser extension these days, but you can redirect anything by creating a host entry for it and it doesn't only work in the web browser. What is wrong with it? You don't have to trust some random dude(or dudette) who created a browser extension, you can see your host file changes yourself with your own eyeballs and know what's going on.
The surveillance puts a damper on free speech, it's hard to freely communicate knowing the government can be listening in. This is especially true for dissenting political speech, whether you're part of the opposition party or more extreme the possibility that the government can be listening in dampens. The government is quite capable of screwing you if you come to its attention as a threat of any kind. Whether digging into your tax situation, spreading mis-information or setting you up for a criminal investigation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
On hosts files badly here this past week Khyber http://mobile.slashdot.org/com...
MAC address doesn't go onto the network, period. It's too bad a HOSTS file can't stop Flash, and Browser Helper Objects, and Persistent Cookies.
Don't install flash? Don't keep your cookies?
On how you've been caught trolling + sockpuppeteering on /. by your own words http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
/. is dead when we can't get a decent technical comment on a story like this.
I read you are here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and seeing you keep a TomHudson sockpuppet account http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... and this other of your many sockpuppets on slashdot too http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... also makes me believe you may be. Are you? I can see you saying you're handicapped if you cut off your OWN package like that (lol).
There is nothing wrong with it. There are ways to circumvent it before that layer though.
apk's got a point as it's all they'd need as your name's on it as acct holder possibly making you liable and face the fact that cisco's been caught inserting backdoors into their stuff with the nsa too.
This IS about devices. What do you register w/ your ISP? Your cable/dsl modem. It's no "big stretch of the imagination" to wonder about when CISCO was recently caught inserting "backdoors" into their router/modem products with the NSA (or even bugs in router/modem firmware they KNOW about how to abuse) to do this.
So "spoof" your IP address all day long - doesn't matter: It's the MAC Address of your cable or dsl modem that tracks you... *try* to "spoof" that, & see how well you operate @ your ISP afterwards.
APK
P.S.=> Only thing I could come up with off the top of my head as to HOW it could be done, & with EVERY single device online... only way I can think of? See above... apk
My FREE hosts program adds speed, security, reliability, & more, by doing more, more efficiently vs. addons + fixes DNS' issues:
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ 32/64-bit:
http://start64.com/index.php?o...
---
A.) Hosts do more than:
1.) AdBlock ("souled-out" 2 Google/Crippled by default http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... )
2.) Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
3.) Request Policy -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
B.) Hosts add reliability vs. downed/redirected dns (& overcome site redirects e.g. /. beta).
C.) Hosts secure vs. malicious domains too -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... w/ less "moving parts" complexity
D.) Hosts files yield more:
1.) Speed (adblock & hardcodes fav sites - faster than remote dns)
2.) Security (vs. malicious domains serving malcontent + block spam/phish & trackers)
3.) Reliability (vs. downed or Kaminsky redirect vulnerable dns, 99% = unpatched vs. it & worst @ isp level + weak vs DGA, & Fastflux + dynDNS botnets)
4.) Anonymity (vs. dns request logs + dnsbl's).
---
* Hosts do more w/ less (1 file) @ faster levels (ring 0) vs redundant inefficient addons (slowing slower ring 3 browsers) via filtering 4 the IP stack (coded in C, loads w/ os, & 1st net resolver queried w\ 45++ yrs.of optimization).
* Addons = more complex + slow browsers in messagepassing (use a few concurrently & see) & are nullified by native browser methods - It's how Clarityray's destroying Adblock.
* Addons slowup slower usermode browsers layering on more - & bloat RAM consumption + excessive cpu use too (4++gb extra in FireFox https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth...)
Instead, work w/ a native kernelmode part - hosts (An integrated part of the ip stack)
APK
P.S.=> "The premise is quite simple: Take something designed by nature & reprogram it to make it work for the body rather than against it..." - Dr. Alice Krippen: "I am legend"
...apk
W. Palant wrote me by email 1st saying "hosts are a shitty solution" to which I replied:
"Show us adblock can do more for added speed, security, reliability, & anonymity than hosts can, + that adblock does it more efficiently than hosts"
Which on my latter 'point-in-challenge' on efficiency AdBlock's proven by research to be MASSIVELY inefficient -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... & adblock does FAR less than hosts (especially crippled by default).
I sent Wladimir Palant that challenge in response to his statement from 2 different email addresses I use!
Result = Still no answer from him in regard to my challenge put to him to this very day MONTHS later - that tell you anything? It did me!
He knows his addon is less efficient & features laden by FAR vs. hosts - Wladimir Palant RAN like a scared rabbit!
ClarityRay's also DESTROYING AdBlock - via native browser methods to DUMP what addons you use (it can't DO THAT to hosts files).
I only tell it how it is on hosts' superiority vs. AdBlock - Funny part is, Wladimir Palant running does too!
Especially considering "Almost ALL Ads Blocked" has 'souled-out' -> Google And Others Reportedly Pay Adblock Plus To Show You Ads Anyway: http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
APK
P.S.=> Bottom-Line: Hosts = a superior solution that also fixes DNS redirect security issues (vs. browser addons & their inefficiencies + messagepassing overheads as well as myriad lack of abilities hosts have from 1 file that's part of the IP stack itself - faster, more efficient, & less redundant as well, since TCP/IP has 45++ yrs. of refinement & optimization in it, & runs in a higher CPU serviced ring of privelege & operations in kernelmode vs. slower usermode layering over browsers slowing them more, & hosts = 1st resolver queried by the OS itself also)... apk
Who uses many /. accounts to upmod her own posts + for downmodding and trolling others http://news.slashdot.org/comme... is exactly how and it's all shown in that post in her own words, with only some of her many sockpuppets listed at the bottom of that post.
This.
Plus I don't need some crooks (Congress, competitors with deep pockets) looking over my shoulder and front-running any of my venture capital deals.
You think Snowden was a unique case? Not by a long shot. The only difference between him and many other people scraping up NSA data is that he released it to the public instead of handing it to some buddies in exchange for Hookers 'n Blow.
Have gnu, will travel.
Birds of a feather (criminal scumbags) that flock together http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...
Birds of a feather (scumbags) that flock together says it all http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...
I used to use them, and *IF* you buy a new cablemodem of your own vs. theirs? You *MUST* register it with them (or you won't work right).
APK
P.S.=> Yes, that "registration" is done by MAC Address ("Gee, I wonder why?" NOT - it's so they KNOW who you are, @ all times, & changing/resetting things on that modem to for instance, get a new IP address, means SQUAT to them (that's not easy to do on THEIR network either: It, however, *IS* on others & less troublesome than what YOU are claiming to have done) - it's ALL MAC ADDY based for their purposes, tracking YOUR account)... apk
What takes your freedom away is not surveillance, it's not even the police, it's the law. Surveillance and the police are just tools, they're not the source of the problem. If you want to fight for your freedom, fight the source of the problem.
The law and the tools enforcing the law are parts of the same whole. Neither can co-exist without the other. A law which is not enforced is just a meaningless scribble. A policeman without the authority granted by the law is just a hired gun. Conducting surveillance without legal authority is being a peeping tom.
Fighting the tools is just as important as fighting the source. The tools are what enables the unjust laws. The Prohibition was ultimately ineffective because the masses decided to ignore the law.
But you have cookies, and browser fingerprints, and logons, and device ID / Application ID info...
Riding on a free uplink doesn't do jack.
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
I'm not banned on wikipedia: I can edit there all I like & I always post ac here on /. (since 2005 iirc).
Personally?
I never saw the use, or value, of a /. "registered 'luser'" account like YOU use!
(& you ARE A SORE LOSER, see link below, no doubt about it)
Now, you *might* want to talk to BarbaraHudson = http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... AND http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... your fellow troll here:
Question: DO YOU *THINK* I'D EVEN WANT TO BE *ANYTHING* LIKE YOU 2 LOSERS ARE?
No way... sockpuppets galore, see above.
* You still a "wee bit sore" I tore you apart on hosts files here this week http://mobile.slashdot.org/com...
?
APK
P.S.=> Answer = "YES" to that LAST question, no doubt about it... lol, but seeing you REDUCED TO LIES too? LMAO - please...
... apk
So you're acknowledging that it is the coercion and threats thereof which are the chilling mechanism; not the surveillance per se.
What is it going to take for you to pick your guns up and put them to the use for which they exist?
Protip: If you are being marched to re-education camp, that would be too late.
Huh? They go hand in hand, without the surveillance wouldn't have to worry about the coercion and threats and why do the surveillance unless looking for dirt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
Is that why you trolls are here in full force? Because your handlers think no-one cares? Yet here you paid fucks are here shilling lies, just like always. Fuck you, you lose. Collect your paycheck and kill yourself. You'll be doing a favor to anyone who values the truth.
Have you heard the good news about Big Data? It's, like, the new thing.
If your name is never connected to a cookie you're good. Use a VM for browsing and torrents, use Tails for Tor. If they find you you're someone down the block who knows nothing, and intelligence agents are lazy so they'll drag him into Room 101 instead.
Off grid doesn't mean that you do nothing online, you want to establish an extremely boring "pattern of life" so no one chooses to look at you. It means that you do banking and family/friends email and nothing else on an ID linked account.
Uh, yea. Charter.
Magic trick? Get different services that require different boxes (cablecard/net, phone/net, super-speed net.) Then swap out boxes with your own (excepting phone/net modems.) Then cancel in a specific order, leaving only the internet up. All boxes have internet access. Dual 100mbit and a 60 mbit line, for the price of 60 mbit plus phone.
You're so useless it's funny. What're you gonna do, threaten to sue me for libel when your sorry ass has no leg to stand on being proven time and time again that your outdated shit is exactly that, outdated and useless?
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
When people think of surveillance, it's always with the Orwellian model in mind. The problem with Orwell is that he had no idea something like the Internet would ever exist. He had no idea everyone would constantly have a camera on them, with the ability to immediately share everything with everyone. Because of that, his vision is now more or less obsolete.
So instead of the obsolete Orwellian model, imagine a world where surveillance is so common that even the government or anyone with power, even your boss, is under constant observation by everyone. How can those person screw you?
If you want to fight for your freedom, fight the source of the problem.
How do you fight against the universe?
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
Thomas Jefferson was a dangerous fool, this country would do well to forget him
If you are from North Korea, you are right
But if you are an American, take my advice --- get a visa, fly to North Korea, and when you arrive at North Korea, tear that North Korean visa to shred and demand a political asylum !
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
This is one of those cases: we must take away the freedom of governments to spy on their citizens in order to save the freedom of their citizens.
How can those person screw you?
They can screw you quite easily because they're the ones in control of the surveillance and the power. Do you really expect those in power to let us know that they've done anything unlawful?
So you wouldn't mind if videos of your own kids * being raped were being passed around?
* Or, this being slashdot, your nieces/neighbour's kids or whatever.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
Absolutely! I would like my freedom to randomly murder people and not pay taxes returned, please. All this "society" malarkey is for the birds. Every man for himself!
Oh we already have enough random data in the pipe: facebook, twitter and youtube.
Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
think we can really fuck with them. Chaff, deception traffic...
In the end you're going to be needing to evolve faster than they can. Consider your strengths and weaknesses in that regard.
Not really. Consider what happens if you don't.
That is a defeatist attitude, and with all due respect, you deserve loss of liberty if that is how you see things. That is not an option.
You are your own weakness, and sap your own strength. If you want to give up without a fight, that is your loss.
You should read some Military and Navy security papers some time. "Evolve faster" has nothing to do with anything, even the world's largest, best-funded intelligence agencies know that it is a matter of who uses their resources most EFFECTIVELY. Not "who has the most resources" not "who can deceive the most people most of the time" even but who is most EFFECTIVE with what they have to work with.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Perhaps you should ponder that. "Evolve faster" just does not matter. To a point, but it is not the end-all be-all of everything. That is arrogance and how empires fall, story as old as time.
It is, quite frankly, naive, young, timid, loser talk -- whatever side you are on.
No offense, you might as well stay in the library if that is how you feel. Be the announcer maybe.
There is no need for you and your attitude.
Unless you are an NSA or GCHQ agent deliberately attempting to sabotage people, you are worthless and should hang your head in shame for that kind of talk. Supposing you are, it is pathetic and too easy to see through you -- please step up your game if you expect anyone to take you seriously.
surveillance by itself has nothing to do with freedom.
Not true. You will be the first to say you would not like a camera on you 24/7 broadcasting to the world.
Sorry, but put up or shut up. Where's your live feed? You are all empty talk, sitting from a spoiled privileged position.
No offense, you may not see the problem, but you are delusional on that point.
If you want to fight for your freedom, fight the source of the problem.
Don't disagree here. But surveillance and "the law" are one and the same. The "law" needs private companies to get government contracts.
So, the "public" and "private" factions merge into an orgy of corruption, and there is no separation anymore.
If you can't make an omelette without cracking a few eggs, then the eggs are indispensable at that point. Once the egg is in the omelette,
there really is not any "reverse course" option where you can dissect the egg itself back out, fully intact, and place it back inside its shell.
The companies who do business with "the law" are one and the same at some point. I will still agree there is a far cry between one lone camera maker who government agencies happen to prefer and an ISP that has secret back-room deals to monitor all traffic.
So not all surveillance is of the same level, sure.
"The law" is not obeyed. "The law" is ignored. Do you see NSA people in jail for lying to congress?
Me neither. Where is "the law" on that one? Being pissed on, and smiling and enjoying it.
If the goal was genuinely security you would be right. Call me a CT, but by now i think the goal is not prevention in itself but rather reaction/punishment : if anybody become "relevant" you then have all the info already ready and can ass rape their privacy and their life at a button press. Think of this : the old guard politician and spook will have now *ALL* information they wish about whom the new whipper snapper rising politician meets or any dirt they want on somebody or pile on crime if they want somebody gone.
That is the true benefit of the massive surveillance. Crime prevention is just some sugarcoating to fool average citizen, especially since the average citizen has no understanding that violent crime is dropping and terrorism is probably not as deadly to them as taking a bath.
I am now morbidly watching what is becoming of the US, I just hope I will have dead of old age before the powderkeg explode.
under constant observation by everyone. How can those person screw you?
That is already screwed. There is no "you" at that point. If the only "you" that exists is "under constant observation by everyone"
than there is no "you" left anymore at that point.
It may not be as bad as Snowden says, but I am inclined to agree. That is a radical change of what constitutes "you."
So no, perhaps they cannot screw you, but you are already screwed at that point.
If that's all you've ever known, you won't notice the difference, of course. Not unless you read "obsolete" tales of bygone eras and dream of such a thing might be possible, and then you get the crazy idea to try it (or, at that point, you would have to convince/fool others to get on board).
The thing is, if my mind is not allowed to go where it wants to go, even places I do not wish to take it, I will radically change course about things I think about if I know my thoughts are being transmitted. That is a step further, but not that much, I don't think.
Now, if you want to say we are all part of one great collective life force anyhow, that still won't make me feel any better about such things, but at least I would see a point, that it is more "efficient" perhaps to cooperate than not. That still just does not seem worth the trade, to me.
I don't think the Orwellian model is obsolete, I think you are newspeak-ing us, either knowing exactly what you are doing, testing us for sentience, or have been deluded yourself. May be a combination of all those things.
OF COURSE by the time things get widely deployed the "Orwellian model" is obsolete. Duh. That is what the government bootlickers would obviously say. No shit, Sherlock.
Is it that bad already? How old are you?
If all you know is constant surveillance, then yes, the "Orwellian model" is obsolete, because it has come the norm. No duh.
At that point, the battle is already over. Are you giving up early? Testing the waters? Just prefer independent thinking to
blindly accepting "normal" viewpoints?
While it is a brave step forward, and I commend you on testing things, it is 100% rubbish.
An interesting thought, but "constant observation by everyone" is not going to make angels out of everyone.
You need to accept human nature for what it is. Not that I wish to see you hurt or injured or heartbroken, but if you don't learn
now, it will just hurt more later. No, everyone is not bad. That doesn't change things.
Large groups of people are dangerous and stupid, yes. All the time, anytime. No, individuals are not magically smarter or
more moral. But your argument, in the end, is simply "trust the crowd" and that is empty, collectivist bollocks.
Aside from anything else, it is not compatible with how some countries (in theory, long gone now) are supposed to operate.
It still does not make you wrong, but there is no need to abandon an already 99% flawed reality for one with no discernible improvement. I will keep that last 1% of hope, thank you.
You sound already sold. Which is fine. But you have to sell us on what we gain. I don't see any benefit. There is no reason to accept
your "imagine a world" except as a sign you will do it anyway, whether people agree to your world view or not.
Yes, if you ignore everyone who disagrees with you, then at that point the Orwellian model is "obsolete" because anyone who disagreed
was ignored. It is just self-fulfilling tripe.
You might say the same thing, "surveillance is the $ux0r!" is just self-fulfilling garbage too, and just creates the problems it anticipates.
There is a choice. And "obsolete" is just slang for "we already decided without your input" I am afraid. Either you are deliberately deluded, sneakily selling us, or just testing the waters.
I'm not sure I have a valid reason, or one that I care to explain, but I suppose, I still do not want to go there. It is not something I want to imagine. I do not refuse to,
P.S.=> Mere speculation but... any thoughts? apk
No, I don't see any indication of thought in any of your texts.
Chromebook in developer mode can ghost it's mac address easily. You can also set up a Raspberry Pi as a pass-through device for the sole purpose of sanitizing connected traffic and automating connections to a VPN darknet. It is difficult to implement but if you're smart enough to avoid logging in to your personal gmail with your device MAC address tramp stamping every packet you're already making good progress with an "Incognito" browser window.
No, We don't.
I'm not banned on wikipedia: I can edit there all I like ...
Yes! I remember that. How'd it go again?
Thank you for coming to the talk page to discuss this. Your additions have been removed (twenty times now) because they are not suitable...
... Right? ... What's going on? ... Why am I being arrested? ... I am not part of ISIS or AQ ... I was only trying to rent "Lawrence of Arabia" from Redbox ... No, don't shoot! Please!!! ***blam***
Joe Biden is a square shooter. Joe Biden for 2016!
See subject. Learn to read.
Go for it (instead of minus modding them to try hide them) here http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
APK
P.S.=> Nothing I've ever written on hosts is unsuitable (or offtopic, unless a moron like the transtesticle multiple sockpuppet using FREAK BarbaraHudson = http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... AND http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... shows up noting them (& I just do what I did to you - challenge you to PROVE MY POINTS WRONG, & you never can - period (they're rock-solid fact is why))... apk
I wrote:
Otherwise known as "The HOSTS file troll." (Google for "hosts file troll apk") Stuck in the '90s, attacks anyone who makes fun of his "solution" by using multiple anonymous accounts. Real name Alexander Kowalski. Demonstrates traits of narcissism, transphobia, etc. Post something negative about his obsolete "HOSTS file solution" and watch the resulting crap-flood.
You wrote ... the same old outdated crap as always ...
Thanks for proving my point. BTW, I wasn't the anon poster you replied to elsewhere. I have neither the time nor the interest to post anon. Unlike you, who has no choice except to post anonymously. BTW, you might want to read the results of googling "hosts file troll apk". You have quite the reputation of being a net-kook.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
IF you modify my program by even 1 byte it signals it's changed & won't run, stupid.
* It's my method for "native/built-in" antivirus protection EVERY APP should have, & that I was upmodded for here on /. for no less, in "CODING FOR DEFCON" years ago -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
It works (so you've shown us ALL you're full of crap, lol!).
APK
P.S.=> You're a delusional fool - & Khyber (as far as hosts files go)? LMAO - I burnt his dumb ass 8 TIMES on hosts this week, all consolidated here -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/com...
... apk
FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.p... :
"HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off)." - by tomhudson (43916) barbara.hudson@ ... a - h u dson.com on Saturday April 16, 2011 @01:38PM (#35841122) Journal
Gosh - TomHudson, look @ that email address on that post (BarbaraHudson, anyone?), 1st of all - Secondly:
So - Isn't that *EXACTLY* what you're doing here with all the AC posts libeling me calling me a pedo, which I am NOT?
Sure is, see below:
---
BarbaraHudson by AC #1 calling me a pedo -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
BarbaraHudson by AC #2 disagreeing calling me a pedo -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
---
First stating I am, & then NOT, via ac posts??
I don't *think* you "GET IT", do you??? I've got YOU, completely 'clocked' cyclops... & YOUR OWN WORDS DO YOU IN, every time... lol!
APK
P.S.=> You're a pitiful little transparent stooge of a sockpuppeteer + ac troller, BarbaraHudson = http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... AND http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... (& from what I've read here, you're also somekind of TWISTED FREAK that did a sexchange to yourself, lol... wow!)
... apk
You're full of shit since harmonic filters are applied on the cable (small cylinder) on *ANY* connection, separating them from doing multiple services on 1 line *IF* said service isn't paid for to do so on that particular line (I used to install these "back in the day" long ago stupid).
Plus?
CHARTER MUST BE STUPID THEN IF THEY DON'T HAVE YOU REGISTER IN YOUR MAC ADDRESS ON NEW MODEMS ON THEIR NETWORK!
(Huge blunder that - however, THAT is assuming YOU tell the truth... & I do *NOT* think you are!)
NOW - *IF* you paid 3x the normal like it sounds like to do THAT? You're stupid - there's FAR EASIER WAYS to do that from a SINGLE box, dumbass...
(It's your money though, lol! Glad to see you spend it "so wisely", lol, which explains WHY you probably have nothing since you certainly are NOBODY & a "ne'er-do-well" troll, nothing more).
APK
P.S.=> I can't *believe* you're that stupid - then again, you showed how STUPID YOU ARE this week when I scorched you 8 times on hosts files, here http://mobile.slashdot.org/com...
... apk
That's all (go for it): You said you have before, do it now... & are you a transtesticle? I read from YOUR OWN MOUTH you are... WoW: THAT, explains a LOT on why you're such a whacko (seriously)...
My reputation's FINE (lol, especially compared to yours, freak - wtf is it with this sex-change you had I read about here, lol?)...
APK
P.S.=> Now - As far as your methods using multiple REGISTERED /. accounts AND how you troll by ac?
LMAO:
You noted that too (busted by your own words again stupid)? See here -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
You're a liar transtesticle: This proves it (your own words) - FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.p... :
"HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off)." - by tomhudson (43916) barbara.hudson@ ... a - h u dson.com on Saturday April 16, 2011 @01:38PM (#35841122) Journal
Gosh - TomHudson, look @ that email address on that post (BarbaraHudson, anyone?), 1st of all - Secondly:
So - Isn't that *EXACTLY* what you're doing here with all the AC posts libeling me calling me a pedo, which I am NOT?
Sure is, see below:
---
BarbaraHudson by AC #1 calling me a pedo -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
BarbaraHudson by AC #2 disagreeing calling me a pedo -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
---
First stating I am, & then NOT, via ac posts??
I don't *think* you "GET IT", do you??? I've got YOU, completely 'clocked' cyclops... & YOUR OWN WORDS DO YOU IN, every time... lol!
APK
P.S.=> You're a pitiful little transparent stooge of a sockpuppeteer + ac troller, BarbaraHudson = http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... AND http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2...
... apk
Can adblock do the following things (that custom hosts files can):
1.) Secure you vs. known malicious sites/servers
2.) Secure you vs. downed DNS servers aiding reliability
3.) Secure you vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns servers
4.) Protect you vs. fastflux using botnet attacks and stop their communications back to their C&C servers
5.) Protect you vs. dynamic dns using botnet attacks and stop their communications back to their C&C servers
6.) Protect you vs. domain generation algorithm using botnet attacks and stop their communications back to their C&C servers
7.) Speed you up for websurfing not only by adblocking but also hardcoding favorite sites
8.) Get you past a dnsbl you may not agree with
9.) Keep you off dns request logs
10.) Do all of those things and block ads (better than adblock) more efficiently in cpu cycles and memory usage
11.) Work on ANY webbound application (think stand-alone email programs, for example).
12.) Give you direct, easily notepad/texteditor controlled data for all of the above
13.) Block out trackers
14.) Block spam mails sources
15.) Block phishing mails sources
"?"
* Simple YES or NO answers will do for repliers to this - that's all.
APK
P.S.=> Of course, ANSWER ="NO" to each enumerated item above as far as "Almost ALL Ads Blocked" (crippled by default & 'souled-out' defeating it's very base purpose) is concerned -> http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/...
So, *IF* you feel like doing things LESS efficiently as well -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... ontop of doing less than hosts do (by far) with more complexity + from a slower mode of operations (usermode with more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode, also starting up w/ the IP stack itself, before REDUNDANT inefficient addons even BEGIN to operate, & as the 1st resolver queried by the OS as well)?
That's illogical, but up to you - I can lead a horse to water, but I can't make them drink!
... apk
My FREE hosts program adds speed, security, reliability, & more, by doing more, more efficiently vs. addons + fixes DNS' issues:
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ 32/64-bit:
http://start64.com/index.php?o...
---
A.) Hosts do more than:
1.) AdBlock ("souled-out" 2 Google/Crippled by default http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... )
2.) Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
3.) Request Policy -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
B.) Hosts add reliability vs. downed/redirected dns (& overcome site redirects e.g. /. beta).
C.) Hosts secure vs. malicious domains too -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... w/ less "moving parts" complexity
D.) Hosts files yield more:
1.) Speed (adblock & hardcodes fav sites - faster than remote dns)
2.) Security (vs. malicious domains serving malcontent + block spam/phish & trackers)
3.) Reliability (vs. downed or Kaminsky redirect vulnerable dns, 99% = unpatched vs. it & worst @ isp level + weak vs DGA, & Fastflux + dynDNS botnets)
4.) Anonymity (vs. dns request logs + dnsbl's).
---
* Hosts do more w/ less (1 file) @ faster levels (ring 0) vs redundant inefficient addons (slowing slower ring 3 browsers) via filtering 4 the IP stack (coded in C, loads w/ os, & 1st net resolver queried w\ 45++ yrs.of optimization).
* Addons = more complex + slow browsers in messagepassing (use a few concurrently & see) & are nullified by native browser methods - It's how Clarityray's destroying Adblock.
* Addons slowup slower usermode browsers layering on more - & bloat RAM consumption + excessive cpu use too (4++gb extra in FireFox https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth...)
Instead, work w/ a native kernelmode part - hosts (An integrated part of the ip stack)
APK
P.S.=> "The premise is quite simple: Take something designed by nature & reprogram it to make it work for the body rather than against it..." - Dr. Alice Krippen: "I am legend"
...apk
When the CIA launches a hellfire in this middle of nowhere, where do you think the information came from?
I read you are here http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and seeing you keep a TomHudson sockpuppet account http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... and this other of your many sockpuppets on slashdot too http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... also makes me believe you may be. Are you? I can see you saying you're handicapped if you cut off your OWN package like that (lol).
Caught red-handed again, by your own words, FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.p... :
"HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off)." - by tomhudson (43916) barbara.hudson@ ... a - h u dson.com on Saturday April 16, 2011 @01:38PM (#35841122) Journal
Gosh - TomHudson, look @ that email address on that post (BarbaraHudson, anyone?), 1st of all - Secondly:
So - Isn't that *EXACTLY* what you're doing here with all the AC posts libeling me calling me a pedo, which I am NOT?
Sure is, see below:
---
BarbaraHudson by AC #1 calling me a pedo -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
BarbaraHudson by AC #2 disagreeing calling me a pedo -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
---
First stating I am, & then NOT, via ac posts??
I don't *think* you "GET IT", do you??? I've got YOU, completely 'clocked' cyclops... & YOUR OWN WORDS DO YOU IN, every time... lol!
APK
P.S.=> You're a pitiful little transparent stooge of a sockpuppeteer + ac troller, BarbaraHudson = http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... AND http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2...
... apk
My FREE hosts program adds speed, security, reliability, & more, by doing more, more efficiently vs. addons + fixes DNS' issues:
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ 32/64-bit:
http://start64.com/index.php?o...
---
A.) Hosts do more than:
1.) AdBlock ("souled-out" 2 Google/Crippled by default http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... )
2.) Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
3.) Request Policy -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
B.) Hosts add reliability vs. downed/redirected dns (& overcome site redirects e.g. /. beta).
C.) Hosts secure vs. malicious domains too -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... w/ less "moving parts" complexity
D.) Hosts files yield more:
1.) Speed (adblock & hardcodes fav sites - faster than remote dns)
2.) Security (vs. malicious domains serving malcontent + block spam/phish & trackers)
3.) Reliability (vs. downed or Kaminsky redirect vulnerable dns, 99% = unpatched vs. it & worst @ isp level + weak vs DGA, & Fastflux + dynDNS botnets)
4.) Anonymity (vs. dns request logs + dnsbl's).
---
* Hosts do more w/ less (1 file) @ faster levels (ring 0) vs redundant inefficient addons (slowing slower ring 3 browsers) via filtering 4 the IP stack (coded in C, loads w/ os, & 1st net resolver queried w\ 45++ yrs.of optimization).
* Addons = more complex + slow browsers in messagepassing (use a few concurrently & see) & are nullified by native browser methods - It's how Clarityray's destroying Adblock.
* Addons slowup slower usermode browsers layering on more - & bloat RAM consumption + excessive cpu use too (4++gb extra in FireFox https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth...)
Instead, work w/ a native kernelmode part - hosts (An integrated part of the ip stack)
APK
P.S.=> Barb, we also know it's YOU again, trolling me by ac which your own words prove -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
...apk
For separating signal: You're STUPID (so's Charter apparently NOT REGISTERING NEW CABLEMODEMS ONTO THEIR LAN THAT ARE NOT THEIRS as you stated - but then again, you don't DO very well on tech OR TELL THE TRUTH, now do you -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... )
* LMAO...
(Especially considering how EASILY I utterly ANNIHILATED YOU on my points on hosts files earlier this week, vs. your "so-called 'points'" & you couldn't even *BEGIN* to validly disprove mine in favor of hosts... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> You're a joke: No WONDER you're nothing but an online "ne'er-do-well" troll complete unknown - @ most/best? Some "techie" stooge that puts up lines & hasn't grown in know-how since (see link above)... apk
Wrong. Raised cosine filters are not harmonic filters.
LC filters are harmonic filters.
Go home and come back when you can design radar guidance systems. Maybe then you'll have half a clue just how dead wrong you have always been.
Well, the fact you use Bing already shows just how wrong you are.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
"No you didn't, because we didn't use harmonic filters 'back then.' We used a cosine shaping filter 'back then' on analog cable modems. Ya, I used to work for Stream as a Time Warner technician, you nitwit. Still wrong, as always!" - by Khyber (864651) on Monday September 15, 2014 @10:47AM (#47908815) Homepage
Oh, really? Better read how DOCSIS works along with the fact cosine shaping filters ARE what I said they are (harmonic filters), stupid:
"Now about that root raised cosine shaping filter⦠The purpose of that filter is to minimize the RF harmonic energy produced by the cable modem so that it does not produce interference with adjacent devices. The way it does this is by acting as a low pass filter by removing all of the high frequency components of what would normally be a very âoesquare waveâ looking signal." from http://volpefirm.com/docsis101...
LMAO!
* WoW - you have TRULY PROVEN YOURSELF to be a mere "by rote" dumbass who doesn't even *UNDERSTAND* the principles behind tools he merely "uses" to work with... pitiful.
APK
P.S.=> LOL - Now, top that off with the FACT I utterly ANNIHILATED YOU on hosts this week too, 8 times -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... & you couldn't even BEGIN to validly technically disprove my points on them too? Man - lol, YOU FAIL - hugely... apk
So you wouldn't mind if videos of your own kids * being raped were being passed around?
What does tht have to do with mapping every device on the Internet?
First of all, kiddie porn isn't an NSA, GCHQ problem. That's for the FBI, local law enforcement and their foreign equivalents to pursue. NSA and GCHQ are primarily involved with monitoring their respective internal populations for the purpose of political control and suppressing dissent. Unfortunately they seem to be co-opting local law enforcement into supporting their mission rather than pursuing criminal activity, including kiddie porn.
Have gnu, will travel.
Khyber give up. APK tore you up hilariously as usual with documented facts http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Here on DOCSIS cablemodem cosine filters being harmonic filters http://news.slashdot.org/comme... and earlier this week on hosts too (bonus for apk here) http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... and it's obviously YOU being stupid here yet again Khyber. You can't alter apk's program and have it run due to his skills in coding accounting for idiots like you http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
You also stated you stalk me by ac posts too: FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.p... :
"HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off)." - by tomhudson (43916) barbara.hudson@ ... a - h u dson.com on Saturday April 16, 2011 @01:38PM (#35841122) Journal
Gosh - TomHudson, look @ that email address on that post (BarbaraHudson, anyone?), 1st of all - Secondly:
So - Isn't that *EXACTLY* what you're doing here with all the AC posts libeling me calling me a pedo, which I am NOT?
Sure is, see below:
---
BarbaraHudson by AC #1 calling me a pedo -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
BarbaraHudson by AC #2 disagreeing calling me a pedo -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
---
First stating I am, & then NOT, via ac posts??
I don't *think* you "GET IT", do you??? I've got YOU, completely 'clocked' cyclops... & YOUR OWN WORDS DO YOU IN, every time... lol!
QUESTION: I've read you are a transtesticle? Are you?? It would explain a LOT about you, lol... freak.
APK
P.S.=> You're a pitiful little transparent stooge of a sockpuppeteer + ac troller, BarbaraHudson = http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... AND http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2...
... apk
You punch it real hard in the balls
Secondly, you ARE, apparently by your own admission, a freak transtesticle who likes to incite an ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY OF LIBEL vs. myself (proven by YOUR OWN WORDS on "how to troll the host file guy" (me)) -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
That's criminal you know... then again, you're TOO "whacked in the head" to care, apparently.
Barb - additionally:
I don't USE a "registered 'luser'" account here (I did one time in 2005 to talk to Mr. John Carmack, a technical hero of mine, on hardware requirements for Quake III iirc, & never used it, EVER, again)... so what's your point there?
HOWEVER:
WE DO KNOW WHO USES MULTIPLE SOCKPUPPET ACCOUNTS HERE ON /. THOUGH, now don't we? See below... you FAIL again, lying twisted freak troll.
APK
P.S.=> Barb you He/She-Shim (lol, that's what I am understanding about you being a transtesticle @ this point too, what a nutjob/twisted FREAK): YOU, however, ARE KNOWN to have multiple registered accounts here too, or are THESE NOT YOUR ALTERNATE ACCOUNTS ON SLASHDOT (active @ same time - so you could mod yourself up, & opponenents you can't get the best of DOWN with as you've done to me all thru this exchange, only to FAIL AGAIN as usual on YOUR part, lol) -> BarbaraHudson = http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... AND http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2...
Actually, no one (outside the agency) knows what the NSA's mandate really is. Their charter was signed in secret by Truman and classified. The Senate Intelligence Committee had to beg and plead to eventually be allowed to see it.
We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
It's all here on both DOCSIS docs backing apk + hosts files facts you can't prove wrong of his http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Are you really a transtesticle? I read you are here (you said it) http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and seeing you keep a TomHudson sockpuppet account http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... and this other of your many sockpuppets on slashdot too http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... also makes me believe you may be. Are you? I can see you saying you're handicapped if you cut off your OWN package like that (lol). You even said it again but to verify it, answer the question (this is hilarious and unbelievable but it explains much about you).
Don't you have any balls? I read you literally cut them off http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and you can't prove the person wrong on hosts http://news.slashdot.org/comme... whom you stalked online by multiple registered accounts here as well as by ac posts which your own words caught you doing inciting AN ORGANIZED CONSIPIRACY OF LIBEL directed his way vs. him http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Calling apk a pedo and asking others join you in an organized conspiracy of LIBEL too http://news.slashdot.org/comme... ?
Do you seriously think they cannot "look through" your crappy DSL router and through those other 2100 million crapware DSL routers and Cable modems ?
If yes, I have an Eiffel Tower for sale - just for you.
By proof of his own massive stupidity 2x (on hosts + DOCSIS facts) http://news.slashdot.org/comme... LOL!
Hint: it works by subverting the R&D teams of the router makers. And probably leadership of the hw makers knowingly cooperate with this activity. If there is too much security in some product, just hire a mediocre guy and order him to "add some important feature".
The elite guys at NSA will then find their way into your 192.* subnet and ALL you have attached to it.
If you have a Checkpoint(TM) firewall, then you have the TIGER (unit 8200 of I.D.F.) guarding the henhouse. Look it up.
I can "ghost" MAC on every OS known to man - practically. Most of those with a Berkeley-derived TCP stack are /dev/device lladdr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
sudo ifconfig
What we want here is not to just selfishly hide - but to pollute their collection with billions of plausible "false positive" pseudo computers and mobiles.
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
Why can't you validly prove them so here http://news.slashdot.org/comme... ?
I think it has been shown that they lack the technical knowledge to do the kind of science fiction hacks the media all gets in a tizzy about. They have show time and time again, that they do not need any such hacks anyway, as they can simply force companies to comply with handing over information by law.
I mean why spend time developing the super widget to spy on everyone, when you can coerce any company they owns the applications, hardware, or infrastructure to do your bidding for you. Heck they will build it for you should you submit enough "information requests". Best part of the arrangement is in many cases there is a charge back to the company that can actually make money providing the information, using your own tax dollars to pay for it! Win-WIn.
I *tried* to point that out (along with others like sexconker seconding me) until that literally transsexual cyclopic monstrosity BarbaraHudson showed up downmodding me with her many sockpuppets we all know she has, from here downwards http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
You can't get a spoofed MAC addy to work on a network like TimeWarner on the same cablemodem (put it this way - TRY to get a NEW CABLEMODEM of your own to work, MINUS registering it with them... it's "no dice" & what MAC addy's are for mainly - tracking/accounting).
APK
P.S.=> JC, for the MOST part (don't know why), I don't *mind* you (even though you masqueraded as me before & got caught) but, lol... finding out BarbHudson (your pal) is a FOR REAL transexual, from her OWN mouth admitting it? WoW (yes, it's ALL in that exchange above - blows the mind, but - makes sense to explain her stalking me like the psycho he/she ("shim"), truly obviously is) - I mean, lol, COME ON MAN: What kind of MAN cuts his OWN PACKAGE OFF, for Pete's sake? I'll tell you - a sicko freak that is NOT normal is who... apk
Just a word of warning... this entire thread is nothing but a bunch of APK drama. Nothing too see here, move along to the next top level comment.
Why's your post history show you stalk, harass, and constantly shoot your mouth off about apk for then? This new account shows you started up with him almost as soon as you started it. Is it since he's made you look so stupid when you said you proved his hosts file 'crapola' as you called it, wrong, when you never once have? Too bad he made you look stupid and your own twisted transsexual hormonally imbalanced clearly insane obsessed limited brain isn't reacting well to it, freak.
R O T F L M A O (you really are a transsexual freak) http://i.cbc.ca/1.2529772.1391...
"Barbara" (or is it really Tom) Hudson = Frank N. Furter http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net...
Hey fuckwit:
I'm the one who posted exactly two (this is the third) posts to this thread: the one you're responding to here, where I called you a fuckwit and a pedofile, and the one about shooting fish in a Dixie cup. Believe what you will, I'm not Tom/Barbara.
You're fucking crazy. The other voices in your head are fucking crazy, too. You're paranoid and delusional. You need medication and possibly, confinement.
I know you'll see and respond to this, because you're fucking crazy.
See you next time, Kowalski.
Telling others to stalk apk by ac posts as he/she does:
HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off) - by tomhudson (43916) barbara.hudson@ ... a - h u dson.com on Saturday April 16, 2011 @01:38PM (#35841122) Journal
from http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so take your meds Frank N Furter: We know it's you again, stalking apk by ac posts.
Or did you not say this FrankNFurter?
HOWTO: trolling the hosts file guy in one easy step The next time you see a post by him, just reply anonymously. And to really mess with his head, reply anonymously to your anonymous post, disagreeing with your first anon post (extra points if you claim in the second post that you're him - that REALLY sets him off) - by tomhudson (43916) barbara.hudson@ ... a - h u dson.com on Saturday April 16, 2011 @01:38PM (#35841122) Journal
from http://slashdot.org/comments.p... You believe in free speech alright: As long as you can stalk by ac posts as you do it.
Dead giveaway here like when you used your BarbHudson account here http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
"No you didn't, because we didn't use harmonic filters 'back then.' We used a cosine shaping filter 'back then' on analog cable modems. Ya, I used to work for Stream as a Time Warner technician, you nitwit. Still wrong, as always!" - by Khyber (864651) on Monday September 15, 2014 @10:47AM (#47908815) Homepage
Oh, really? Better read how DOCSIS works along with the fact cosine shaping filters ARE what I said they are, below (harmonic filters), stupid:
"Now about that root raised cosine shaping filterÃfæ The purpose of that filter is to minimize the RF harmonic energy produced by the cable modem so that it does not produce interference with adjacent devices. The way it does this is by acting as a low pass filter by removing all of the high frequency components of what would normally be a very Ãfoesquare waveÃf looking signal."
From http://volpefirm.com/docsis101...
LMAO!
* WoW - you have TRULY PROVEN YOURSELF to be a mere "by rote" dumbass who doesn't even *UNDERSTAND* the principles behind tools he merely "uses" to work with, allegedly... pitiful.
Lastly - DOWNMODDING THIS days later, EVERY TIME I POSTED THIS PROOF, proving you utterly full of shit here http://news.slashdot.org/comme... and here http://news.slashdot.org/comme... ISN'T PROVING YOU RIGHT EITHER - it shows YOU are a TOTAL loser!
APK
P.S.=> LOL - Now, top that off with the FACT I utterly ANNIHILATED YOU on hosts this week too, 8 times -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... & you couldn't even BEGIN to validly technically disprove my points on them too? Man - lol, YOU FAIL - hugely... apk
"No you didn't, because we didn't use harmonic filters 'back then.' We used a cosine shaping filter 'back then' on analog cable modems. Ya, I used to work for Stream as a Time Warner technician, you nitwit. Still wrong, as always!" - by Khyber (864651) on Monday September 15, 2014 @10:47AM (#47908815) Homepage
Oh, really? Better read how DOCSIS works along with the fact cosine shaping filters ARE what I said they are, below (harmonic filters), stupid:
"Now about that root raised cosine shaping filterÃfæ The purpose of that filter is to minimize the RF harmonic energy produced by the cable modem so that it does not produce interference with adjacent devices. The way it does this is by acting as a low pass filter by removing all of the high frequency components of what would normally be a very Ãfoesquare waveÃf looking signal."
From http://volpefirm.com/docsis101...
LMAO!
* WoW - you have TRULY PROVEN YOURSELF to be a mere "by rote" dumbass who doesn't even *UNDERSTAND* the principles behind tools he merely "uses" to work with, allegedly... pitiful.
Lastly - DOWNMODDING THIS days later, EVERY TIME I POSTED THIS PROOF, proving you utterly full of shit here http://news.slashdot.org/comme... and here http://news.slashdot.org/comme... ISN'T PROVING YOU RIGHT EITHER - it shows YOU are a TOTAL loser!
APK
P.S.=> LOL - Now, top that off with the FACT I also utterly ANNIHILATED YOU on hosts this week too, 8 times -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... & you couldn't even BEGIN to validly technically disprove my points on them too? Man - lol, YOU FAIL - hugely... apk
"No you didn't, because we didn't use harmonic filters 'back then.' We used a cosine shaping filter 'back then' on analog cable modems. Ya, I used to work for Stream as a Time Warner technician, you nitwit. Still wrong, as always!" - by Khyber (864651) on Monday September 15, 2014 @10:47AM (#47908815) Homepage
Oh, really? Better read how DOCSIS works along with the fact cosine shaping filters ARE what I said they are, below (harmonic filters), stupid:
"Now about that root raised cosine shaping filterÃfæ The purpose of that filter is to minimize the RF harmonic energy produced by the cable modem so that it does not produce interference with adjacent devices. The way it does this is by acting as a low pass filter by removing all of the high frequency components of what would normally be a very Ãfoesquare waveÃf looking signal."
From http://volpefirm.com/docsis101...
LMAO!
* WoW - you have TRULY PROVEN YOURSELF to be a mere "by rote" dumbass who doesn't even *UNDERSTAND* the principles behind tools he merely "uses" to work with, allegedly... pitiful.
Lastly - DOWNMODDING THIS days later, EVERY TIME I POSTED THIS PROOF, proving you utterly full of shit here http://news.slashdot.org/comme... and here http://news.slashdot.org/comme... ISN'T PROVING YOU RIGHT EITHER - it shows YOU are a TOTAL loser!
APK
P.S.=> LOL - Now, top that off with the FACT I utterly ANNIHILATED YOU on hosts this week too, 8 times -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... & you couldn't even BEGIN to validly technically disprove my points on them too? Man - lol, YOU FAIL - hugely... apk
"No you didn't, because we didn't use harmonic filters 'back then.' We used a cosine shaping filter 'back then' on analog cable modems. Ya, I used to work for Stream as a Time Warner technician, you nitwit. Still wrong, as always!" - by Khyber (864651) on Monday September 15, 2014 @10:47AM (#47908815) Homepage
Oh, really? Better read how DOCSIS works along with the fact cosine shaping filters ARE what I said they are, below (harmonic filters), stupid:
"Now about that root raised cosine shaping filterÃfæ The purpose of that filter is to minimize the RF harmonic energy produced by the cable modem so that it does not produce interference with adjacent devices. The way it does this is by acting as a low pass filter by removing all of the high frequency components of what would normally be a very Ãfoesquare waveÃf looking signal."
From http://volpefirm.com/docsis101...
LMAO!
* WoW - you have TRULY PROVEN YOURSELF to be a mere "by rote" dumbass who doesn't even *UNDERSTAND* the principles behind tools he merely "uses" to work with, allegedly... pitiful.
Lastly - DOWNMODDING THIS days later, EVERY TIME I POSTED THIS PROOF, proving you utterly full of shit here http://news.slashdot.org/comme... and here http://news.slashdot.org/comme... ISN'T PROVING YOU RIGHT EITHER - it shows YOU are a TOTAL loser!
APK
P.S.=> LOL - Now, top that off with the FACT I utterly ANNIHILATED YOU on hosts this week too, 8 times -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... & you couldn't even BEGIN to validly technically disprove my points on them too? Man - lol, YOU FAIL - hugely... apk
APK made you look even more stupid here hahaha http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
However it's child's play for apk to tear you up with it vs. your puny threat here http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
You told them to harass apk by ac posts quoted right here from you http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
BarbHudson's best was minus modding you apk thru her many sockpuppets to try hide she can't prove you wrong man. She can talk her shit all day but when the chips are down on the table, she folded.
He knocked the piss outta both Khyber http://news.slashdot.org/comme... and BarbHudson http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
"His only "legend in his own mind" was that he claimed that "his" hosts file could completely secure a windows computer. " - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday February 12, @11:19AM (#35186644) Homepage Journal FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... in the YEAR 2011 years ago no less
I never claimed a HOSTS file can secure you completely... show me where I have? I want a quote, big talker... you'll never get it, because I never, EVER said that: HOSTS files are, however, a valuable layer of defense for the concept of "layered security".
* You couldn't produce proof THEN, & you certainly can't now (vainly *trying* to put words in my mouth I NEVER ONCE SAID!)
APK
P.S.=> Still @ your LIES, you transsexual weirdo? Ok, asking it again now nearly 5 yrs. later now in response to your bullshit lies again here quoted:
"APK - not only an expert on how the HOSTS file is the best way to secure your computer" - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @07:06PM (#47932519) Homepage
Under your NEW sockpuppet account too no less: SEE my challenge to you above - where've I ever said they completely secure you? I never have, liar...
Of course, YOU ARE welcome to disprove my points on them after you said this lately too:
"I tore apart your stupid hosts file crapola." - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @10:46AM (#47703255) Homepage
Oh, really?
Then why'd you run from disproving my points on them giving users added speed, security, reliability & more here too then -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... ?
... apk
One of the 1st times "Barb" libeled me stating "APK is a know-nothing that's never worked in the industry" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... in 1 of her numerous sockpuppet fake accounts kept active @ the same time here she uses to upmod herself & downmod opponents she can't get the better of (everyone's onto your games, freak).
Funny part is I've DONE FAR BETTER than ole' "cyclops Frank N. Furter" ever has shown in that exchange too http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , lol!
---
Later, he/she kept a journal on me & libeled me even more but worse -> http://slashdot.org/journal/25...
(Typical b.s. to *try* to 'put down' computer "geeks/nerds" saying "I live in a basement with my mommy" etc. when *ANYTHING BUT THAT* is true, considering I am a taxpaying homeowner!).
---
* From the dates you can SEE she's kept this up unceasingly since early to mid 2010 no less, & that's only scratching the surface (there's far more).
(Even TELLING OTHERS TO HARASS ME BY ANONYMOUS COWARD POSTS, calling me a "pedo" -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme... )
He/She left in May 2012 after being exposed for ALL OF THAT, but came back with this NEW account of hers, & what started up again (I did *NOT* bother "shim" even once before that)?
You guessed it (more harassment) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
Where I challenged her for her usual CRAP she always runs from (to validly disprove my points on hosts, which she clearly, cannot):
"I tore apart your stupid hosts file crapola." - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @10:46AM (#47703255) Homepage
Oh, really?
Then why'd you run from disproving my points on them giving users added speed, security, reliability & more here too then -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
APK
P.S.=> Barb/Tom (whatever, with multiple sockpuppets too http://slashdot.org/~BarbaraHu... = http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... + http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... ) you've destroyed yourself yet again...
...apk
"His only "legend in his own mind" was that he claimed that "his" hosts file could completely secure a windows computer. " - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday February 12, @11:19AM (#35186644) Homepage Journal FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... in the YEAR 2011 years ago no less
I never claimed a HOSTS file can secure you completely... show me where I have? I want a quote, big talker... you'll never get it, because I never, EVER said that: HOSTS files are, however, a valuable layer of defense for the concept of "layered security".
* You couldn't produce proof THEN, & you certainly can't now (vainly *trying* to put words in my mouth I NEVER ONCE SAID!)
APK
P.S.=> Still @ your LIES, you transsexual weirdo? Ok, asking it again now nearly 5 yrs. later now in response to your bullshit lies again here quoted:
"APK - not only an expert on how the HOSTS file is the best way to secure your computer" - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @07:06PM (#47932519) Homepage
Under your NEW sockpuppet account too no less: SEE my challenge to you above - where've I ever said they completely secure you? I never have, liar...
Of course, YOU ARE welcome to disprove my points on them after you said this lately too:
"I tore apart your stupid hosts file crapola." - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @10:46AM (#47703255) Homepage
Oh, really?
Then why'd you run from disproving my points on them giving users added speed, security, reliability & more here too then -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... ?
... apk
One of the 1st times "Barb" libeled me stating "APK is a know-nothing that's never worked in the industry" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... in 1 of her numerous sockpuppet fake accounts kept active @ the same time here she uses to upmod herself & downmod opponents she can't get the better of (everyone's onto your games, freak).
Funny part is I've DONE FAR BETTER than ole' "cyclops Frank N. Furter" ever has shown in that exchange too http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , lol!
---
Later, he/she kept a journal on me & libeled me even more but worse -> http://slashdot.org/journal/25...
(Typical b.s. to *try* to 'put down' computer "geeks/nerds" saying "I live in a basement with my mommy" etc. when *ANYTHING BUT THAT* is true, considering I am a taxpaying homeowner!).
---
* From the dates you can SEE she's kept this up unceasingly since early to mid 2010 no less, & that's only scratching the surface (there's far more).
(Even TELLING OTHERS TO HARASS ME BY ANONYMOUS COWARD POSTS, calling me a "pedo" -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme... )
He/She left in May 2012 after being exposed for ALL OF THAT, but came back with this NEW account of hers, & what started up again (I did *NOT* bother "shim" even once before that)?
You guessed it (more harassment) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
Where I challenged her for her usual CRAP she always runs from (to validly disprove my points on hosts, which she clearly, cannot):
"I tore apart your stupid hosts file crapola." - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @10:46AM (#47703255) Homepage
Oh, really?
Then why'd you run from disproving my points on them giving users added speed, security, reliability & more here too then -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
APK
P.S.=> Barb/Tom (whatever, with multiple sockpuppets too http://slashdot.org/~BarbaraHu... = http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... + http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... ) you've destroyed yourself yet again...
...apk
It's really not that big of a secret: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...