Slashdot Mirror


Uber CEO: We'll Run Your Errands

mpicpp writes with Uber's latest plans for expansion. The future of Uber is about pharmacies and rickshaws. So says CEO Travis Kalanick. One of several avenues for expansion is in a category of delivery that's about running errands. "In Los Angeles, we're doing something called Uber Fresh, which is you push a button and you get a lunch in five minutes," Kalanick told CNN's Fareed Zakaria. "In DC, we're doing Uber Corner Store. So imagine all the things you get at a corner store...FedEx isn't going to your nearest pharmacy and delivering something to you in five minutes," he continued. Another is in emerging markets, where the company may focus on rickshaws, rather than high-end black cars, Kalanick said.

23 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. Uber Fresh? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, they'll go to Subway, wait in line to be served, tell them what I want in my sub, pick up a bag of chips, fill the oversized cup with my choice of drink and then deliver it to me, all of that inside five minutes?

    I'd rather wait for the McCopter to deliver my Big Mac and fries.

    1. Re:Uber Fresh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Here random stranger, please take this prescription for a controlled substance down to the pharmacy. I look forward to your return in 5 minutes, when you definitely will not be around the corner snorting my painkillers."

    2. Re:Uber Fresh? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't see why not. The local cab company used to do beer/liquor deliveries where I lived. $5 flat rate for all deliveries. As students without a car it was the best/only way to get a case of beer to the house. As long as you bill appropriately for the time it takes to complete the errand, I don't see why they couldn't make good money doing this.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Uber Fresh? by alphazulu0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uber Fresh is very limited. It's only available in certain parts of West Los Angeles and only one food choice per day. So no going to Subway and no telling them what you want in your sub.

      However, if you want a sub, just be in West LA on Weds and they'll bring you a Godmother from Bay Cities Italian Deli. It's widely considered the best sandwich in LA.

      http://blog.uber.com/uberfresh...

    4. Re:Uber Fresh? by Livius · · Score: 2

      In some places the government builds the liquor stores.

    5. Re:Uber Fresh? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 2

      In Europe and Asia there are already services like this. The service has a link with the restaurant. So if you send in the order, they send their order into the restaurant (or call it in). Then when your food is ready a guy on a motorcycle comes in, picks it up, and the store settles up later.

      At no point in time is your delivery guy waiting 30 minutes on line.

      Plus there is generally a delivery charge (or the restaurant gives up a cut). If each delivery is $5, zipping around from house to house would be a very good job if it's organized correctly.

    6. Re:Uber Fresh? by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      Restaurants in america also do this already. In cities, many of them contract with a delivery service (a guy with a car who makes loops of several restaurants, picking up deliveries and dropping them off).

      Fees are already $5 or less...and often you can order online through a service like Seamless or GrubHub.

      It seems like this cover's other types of errands. Home Depot doesn't deliver that part you discover you need in the middle of a project. If you are already a carfree city dweller, you might have to take an Uber to the store to buy the part...so it is a logical extension that you could pay a little extra for the driver to make the trip without you. Saves you from having to clean yourself up (or at least get enough of the grease and grime off to feel comfortable riding in a stranger's car), and you can keep working on your project while they fetch the part.

      --
      Bottles.
    7. Re:Uber Fresh? by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Customer trusting the cashier?

      It's about pharmacy owner. They have massive amounts of security to prevent this very scenario.

    8. Re:Uber Fresh? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Informative

      And you trust the cashier making $3 an hour after taxes not to be stealing your controlled substances?

      So long as the bags are sealed in the pharmacy and the contents are not noted on the outside, it should be fine.

      Where the hell are you shopping, where your scripts are divvied out by the teenager running the check-out lane???

      I get my scripts from, you know, a pharmacist, who makes a hell of a lot more than $3/hr.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:Uber Fresh? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      even a pharmacy tech makes at least 15-20 an hour.

    10. Re:Uber Fresh? by neurovish · · Score: 2

      And you trust the cashier making $3 an hour after taxes not to be stealing your controlled substances?

      So long as the bags are sealed in the pharmacy and the contents are not noted on the outside, it should be fine.

      You obviously have no idea how much a pharmacist makes.

    11. Re:Uber Fresh? by neurovish · · Score: 2

      Honest question - in the 21st century, why do we still have trained and licensed pharmacists? Why can't a monkey with basic training operate a computer that has access to up-to-date pharmacy database containing information on interactions and etc. dispense pills?

      An obsolete profession if I ever saw one.

      If it's an honest question, I'll give you an honest answer. The pharmacist is not just dispensing pills. They know more about drugs and medication than the doctors prescribing them in the first place, and are kind of the last check in the healthcare industry to make sure that you don't end up with a drug combination that will kill you. A lot of pharmacists have doctoral degrees, so they've spent 8 years studying chemistry and drugs compared to the semester or two required for an MD. You can also talk to a pharmacist and they'll recommend a course of treatment for you or steer you in the right direction. Pharmacists can give immunizations (you've noticed all of the flu shot, etc signs outside of Walgreens this time of year, haven't you?). It's also within a pharmacist's right to not give you drugs if, say, you're all whacked out and show up with a prescription for 100 vicodin, or you give them another reason to suspect that you are abusing or about to sell whatever you just showed up to purchase. There's a lot more judgement and critical thinking involved in the job than filling bottles with pills, and also a shit-ton of paperwork that monkeys are not very good at. That critical thinking part is where a database of drug interactions comes short.

  2. imagine all that waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's wrong with bringing a lunch to work or walking there, rather than "push button lunch/car emissions come out"

  3. Re:Urban Fetch by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I immediately though of Kozmo.com.

  4. Re:Urban Fetch by geekoid · · Score: 2

    but WHY did it collapse? was it distribution? poor messaging? slow communication?

    A lot of those reason have been solved.
    Sometimes people see where a technology is going, and jump to the point, forgetting the need for infrastructure to support it. Once the technology infrastructure is in place, those things become marketable.

    In short, you need to eat your meat before you can have you pudding.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. Re:Urban Fetch by captainClassLoader · · Score: 4, Informative

    The documentary about Kosmo.com, e-Dreams, is both fascinating and painful to watch. These guys went through a breathtakingly huge pile of money in a very short time, trying to do exactly this sort of personalized delivery. It gives you a real feel for how truly insane VC funding was in the late '90s. Maybe Kalanick should check this film out before putting too much effort into this idea.

    --
    "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
  6. Uber is the new weed guy? by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't this ultimately what this kind of service (d)evolves into?

  7. Re:Urban Fetch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but WHY did it collapse?

    Because home delivery is expensive.

  8. Uncle Enzo sends his regards by preaction · · Score: 2

    Hiro Protagonist will be an Uber driver.

  9. Consumer feedback removes need for certification by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Historically, governments justified the "certification" requirements imposed on people wishing to pursue various professions by the consumers' inability to share the information required to make an informed choice of a service provider.

    For example, arriving to a new city, you don't know, what taxi company is decent and which hires serial rapists — the city hall should issue "medallions" to the good drivers and fight attempts by the non-vetted to provide the same services without paying the authorities their due.

    Uber is showing, how the consumer feedback, that's easy to provide and is immediately available to anyone with a smart phone, obviates the need for such certifications — along with the associated costs and the abuse-potential. Taxi-services is not the only market, where things can (and should!) be changed by the pervasive smart-phones. Plumbers and electricians would be next on my list of professions, which should not require certifications (though some may seek approvals from non-governmental authorities like "Angie's List", if they choose to). Then restaurateurs — patrons could report roach-sightings just as well (or better) than a city's health-inspector. Then lawyers and eventually, even veterinarians and human doctors...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  10. Re:Urban Fetch by digsbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You joke, but one of the effects of increasing income inequality can be that the high income group starts to rely on the low income group more and more for these kinds of services.

  11. Re:Consumer feedback removes need for certificatio by BorisSkratchunkov · · Score: 2

    Uber is showing, how the consumer feedback, that's easy to provide and is immediately available to anyone with a smart phone,

    Right- anyone. That's exactly the problem. All you need to do to game the system as an Uber driver is put together a network of colluders to give you good reviews after you give them "rides". In the past, you only needed to find a few bad actors within the government- now literally anyone can help you with your racket.

  12. Re:Consumer feedback removes need for certificatio by fermion · · Score: 2

    This is quite a piece of idolotry. Let us start at the end first. For many jobs no one requires a certified plumber or electrician or anything. There is no requirement to get such a certification. For certain jobs it is a requirement to get a permit, but that is to protect lives. OTOH I am sure you would no problem if your family died because the water heater exploded or the house caught on fire because of the work of a plumber or electrician was faulty, because, after all, she had good recommendations from people who had no expertise in critiquing the actual work. In any case, such requirements as the exists, are demanded not by government but by bankers, insurance companies, and general sane people who do not want to die because the invisible hand, or magic ratings, or whatever, was a substitute for competence. It is intersting that th.s hair brained scheme was introduced after the previous hair brained scheme, to force some Uber drivers to work at or below cost, failed. You see some of the driver took the capitalistic idea of better service leading to more profits seriously,So they only wanted to serve the high end clientele, and invested resources to do so. But Uber told them they could not limit themselves to high end customers, and said if the drivers did not pick up any customer that Uber sent, they would be out of the network. This was absolutely Uber's right to do, after all the contractors could just leave, but I think it speaks to an issue with capitalistic fantasy. At some point the people who are taking a cut of everything the workers do, will want an increasingly large cut to support their increasingly inefficient operations, and to do that they will begin to compete on price instead of service. The contractors, as individuals, can make that choice on a case by case basis. Corporate, however, seeing only a lack of funding for their cocaine habit, are only able to make drastic decisions to increase funding for said habit. In any case, the Uber drivers still had the ability to strike, so they did, and Uber relented.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black