Slashdot Mirror
Obama Presses Leaders To Speed Ebola Response
mdsolar writes with the latest plan from the U.S. government to fight the Ebola epidemic in West Africa, and a call for more help from other nations by the President. President Obama on Tuesday challenged world powers to accelerate the global response to the Ebola outbreak that is ravaging West Africa, warning that unless health care workers, medical equipment and treatment centers were swiftly deployed, the disease could take hundreds of thousands of lives. "This epidemic is going to get worse before it gets better," Mr. Obama said here at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where he met with doctors who had just returned from West Africa. The world, he said, "has the responsibility to act, to step up and to do more. The United States intends to do more." Even as the president announced a major American deployment to Liberia and Senegal of medicine, equipment and 3,000 military personnel, global health officials said that time was running out and that they had weeks, not months, to act. They said that although the American contribution was on a scale large enough to make a difference, a coordinated assault in Africa from other Western powers was essential to bringing the virus under control.
U.S. lawmakers called for a government-funded "war" to contain West Africa's deadly Ebola epidemic...
"We need to declare a war on Ebola," Senator Jerry Moran, a Kansas Republican, said...
It's good to see that word in a context that we can all agree on.
Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
When the populace actively attack medical workers, violently disrupt quarantines, and engage in ebola spreading funerary customs? 3000 soldiers seems hardly enough to combat that level of ignorance of how disease transmission works.
While such a strong message of support from President Obama cannot help but shed a ray of hope, I have to wonder what strategy is entailed. So far the United States is mostly known in Africa for unleashing airstrikes, death, and devastation. Perhaps this may change, but I don't see how. In any case, "coordinated assault" is not a phrase designed to inspire confidence in a problem that can only be solved through love and brotherhood.
I heard that one of the local customs is to bathe the deceased and then the relatives drink the bath water.
Which seems like an exceptionally dumb idea if your relative died from, say, Ebola.
I don't think there's much Obama can do about that. But he's got a pen and a phone and seems to think he can do pretty much anything with them.
The number of cases more than double in the month of August. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebola_virus_epidemic_in_West_Africa
This pandemic is almost certainly worse than it seems. For every reported case there are now likely a dozen unreported.
I have a feeling that all this effort from the US and others is to make the folks back home feel safer in that we are 'doing something'. In all likelihood the only thing that'll stop the spread at this point is stricter quarantine around the infected countries(!). Refugees would need to go into quarantine to make sure they are not carrying the disease.
This disease, and the corresponding collapse of infrastructure, will likely kill hundreds of thousands of people before its over.
I hope I'm wrong.
Wonder what the underlying motivation is considering that nothing was done with the genocide in Rwanda. Why the sudden concern?
The Nations that have Ebola, have governments that want bribes and kicks back just so that non-profits can operate and help. Then even when they get there, more mafia style extortion occurs. Is there some way to change this behavior?
Not to sound like a jackass, but currently (wiki) there's been 5,232 cases, and 2,538 deaths (52%). The population of Africa is 1.111 billion. As such, it's infected about 0.0005% of the population, and killed 0.00025%. Is this really a pandemic? Give me a break.
It would never spread in a western country anyways, because people here aren't stupid, and won't start fondling the dead infected victims.
The Nations that have Ebola, have governments that want bribes and kicks back just so that non-profits can operate and help. Then even when they get there, more mafia style extortion occurs. Is there some way to change this behavior?
Give this man a big white pointy hat with eye-holes
-- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
What his white masters tell him to do.
Close all the borders and let it run it's course
It is grim because we don't want to "offend" anyone with the proper response (quarantine the zone) . Political Correctness run amok is going to kill people.
How many dead or sick people before we stop worrying about feelings and sensibilities?
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
researchers in 1973:Jesus christ we've just found a horrible disease in africa! ....seriously....
Nixon: lol africa.
researchers in 1995: jesus guys this outbreak just killed 250 people in the congo.
the clinton: but i dont play the congo.
researchers in 2007: guise this deathtoll is over 1000 so far and Western Uganda is looking pretty bad.
Dubya: What do you mean western union kicks ass their commercials are funny.
Ebola 2014: remember me? LOL KILLSTREAK=4000 and i took a few medics too u mad?
Obama: I'm dedicating 175 million dollars to fight this horrible disease
congress: nope.jpg
Obama
Congress: LOL y u mad bro?
Good people go to bed earlier.
Wut? How do you get to this decision?
Wow. This is the dumbest comment in a thread full of dumb comments. Congrats.
Pease take off your tinfoil hat - it's acting as an antenna and overconcentrating the paranoid thoughts the CIA is putting into your tiny brain.
It is grim because we don't want to "offend" anyone with the proper response (quarantine the zone) . Political Correctness run amok is going to kill people.
How many dead or sick people before we stop worrying about feelings and sensibilities?
Don't be daft.
It is impossible to quarantine an area encompassing Nigeria, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Senegal, Congo, etc. Furthermore, a quarantine condition would likely lead to a humanitarian disaster, which I'm guessing the US government foresees and wants to establish a presence on the ground to "assist."
As the days go by I can't help but think of the way in which the military was deployed in 28 Weeks Later (sequel to 28 Days). Let's hope treatment production can ramp up and get to the sufferers before a tactical military response is even contemplated.
Also, I suspect one reason why the US is out in front of this is that they've run epidemiological simulations on EBV and have found that the whole world, including the US, in a shitload of trouble in short time.
blog
I guess we need Bill Cosby to say it so that people won't herp and derp around about racism and actually consider that it might be true.
It is grim because we don't want to "offend" anyone with the proper response (quarantine the zone) .
Quarantine? How do you know that's the correct response? That's a drastic military response that would result in a huge number of deaths.
Political Correctness run amok is going to kill people.
WTF? You really think being polite is the problem here?
How many dead or sick people before we stop worrying about feelings and sensibilities?
*sigh*
if it happened in north america or the EU they'd quarantine the areas and the people inside would be super pissed but likely understanding mostly.
if its in some 3rd world shit hole where we all have to walk on eggshells about what we say or do concerning them its unreasonable to quarantine them
Can you picture Obama bent over a petri dish?
Thats idiotic. There is no issue quarantining the affected zones as long as adequate care is provided to the sick and reasonable conditions are kept for the probable infections.
Quarantining and waiting for them to naturally die is moronic, if thats what you want go a die a painful death yourself.
Clearly the racists in the USA created Ebola in an attempt to wipe out the Black Man. Now they are trying to destroy Africa by isolating it from the rest of the world!
Don't let the white man win. Fight back against your oppressors! Fight for black power! Escape quarantine and infect as many crackers as you can.
Except we already have a cure.
The play in Africa is about destabilization (with the initial "outbreak"), then control with the military presence "justified" by the need to provide aid, then takeover.
I just don't know WHY.
What a great humanitarian Obama is. Let's mobilize massive resources to stop this Ebola outbreak which has caused ~2,500 deaths since the initial infection in December; again 2,500 deaths in 9 months. Why? Because it's in the news.
I'm sure the TB patients of the world are feeling pretty good for the ebola patients, despite the fact that TB, an entirely treatable disease, causes more deaths per day (~4,100 per day in 2011) than Ebola has in this entire outbreak. I'm sure he'll get to that humanitarian crisis once he's done making headlines about ebola.
yeah as a Canadian i'm also worried about it coming in via our southern border
Granted, it won't be that fast unless it mutates in such a way that it can be spread through the air. If it does that, then growth quite a bit faster than exponential is possible.
Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
It is grim because we don't want to "offend" anyone with the proper response (quarantine the zone)quote> lulz. why would you think that quarantine zones would be effective? issue a: the quarantine cordon would need to actually stop people from entering and leaving. even if you post troops there will be people bribing and sneaking in and out. issue 2: you need a massive logistical response to take care of a large population under quarantine, and the currently afflicted nations don't have the logistics they need. issue d: what do you do when people riot.
come back to me with an example of when quarantining was effective. ever. in history.
WHY is the Chinese. We're being out-competed. The Chinese are providing technology to a number of African countries in exchange for resources (e.g. Coltan in Congo. Oil from Nigeria) and they're not insisting on human rights or democracy to provide it. Right now, the USA has the closest thing to an Ebola cure, which means that the Chinese are at a disadvantage.
This won't last, of course, and may result in a significant worldwide plague. Whether this is an unforeseen consequence of a planned feature is left as an exercise for the reader.
Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
if it happened in north america or the EU they'd quarantine the areas and the people inside would be super pissed but likely understanding mostly.
maybe in Europe because they're used to their governments telling them what to do. in America, people have RIGHTS and people have GUNS and they're going to do what they please thank you very much.
Like this? http://www.google.com/imgres?i... Sorry, no chest hair.
1495 Quarantining of Mercenaries in Switzerland.
While not 100% effective immediately, it did drastically reduced the infection rate. WHICH is really the goal.
Now, if your one of those "100% or don't bother trying" people, you're part of the problem.
But then again, allowing infected people to migrate all around the world seems so much better option. I mean, how else are we going to reduce population by 7 billion people to "sustainable" levels like the Georgia Guidestones suggest?
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
You might have a point there. If this happened in the US, people would perhaps really go nuts, many would likely panic and do all kind of crazy things, and some of them would shoot around like mad men, killing their fellow citizens, doctors, nurses and aid workers, and then infect 20 other people ... and then refuse to get vaccinated even tough a vaccine was available ...
Its AIDS all over again. Lets just sit back and watch it spread because its just Africans, then panic when it pops up in San Francisco.
It is impossible to quarantine an area encompassing Nigeria, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Senegal, Congo, etc.
Completely? You'd be right. On the other hand, blockading air and maritime travel, and deploying military forces on the borders of these countries would go a hell of a long way towards containing the disease.
The rest, while yes I agree would suck hard, is probably and sadly the only way to be certain that no one outside those areas get infected.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
Watch any other tv shows? I mean, we could use a few experts like you over there. Maybe you could give Jack Bauer a call.
Guns? Yeah, we got 'em in spades. Good luck using one to stop an M1 Abrams, a Hellfire missile, an AC-130, or suchlike.
Yes, we also have rights, but... an extreme and obvious case such as an Ebola outbreak in the US will obviously trump those rights (hell, past presidents have suspended habeas corpus before in the name of extremes...)
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
you're really excited to give your rights away, but I'm not going to let you take mine.
In fairness, I suspect that GP was assuming that aid and care would still be shipped in (volunteer basis of course), which does not preclude or invalidate a quarantine.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
Also, I suspect one reason why the US is out in front of this is that they've run epidemiological simulations on EBV and have found that the whole world, including the US, in a shitload of trouble in short time.
You need to read more. The major infection vector for Ebola is touching the deceased. Even if certain portions of the US are somewhat skeptical of science and medicine, touching the deceased isn't part of US funeral rites. Sure, it won't be pleasant, but the "Western" world shouldn't take anywhere near the damage Africa is taking.
I believe I see the world map turning red very very slowly.
Someone here gets the reference.
So the best example you can find is from 600 years age? Ummm ok then let's try something different
Not sure if your sarcasm detector is faulty or you actually think you're right. CDC and WHO have never shown a hint of being concerned when diseases break out in Africa. When it's China and then it eventually gets to the UK and United States, it's defcon 0 within the blink of an eye as if they have no long term memory or ability to think ahead. Despite how they frequently and jovially talk about "We have a plan for zombies." Okay, how about your plan for actual diseases that you still keep in your lab which still exist?
Guns? Yeah, we got 'em in spades. Good luck using one to stop an M1 Abrams, a Hellfire missile, an AC-130, or suchlike
I'm so weary of this Rambo Commando talk. the world doesn't work this way, k?
Ye Gods... really?
If you're quarantined and you see neighbors dying of Ebola, for fuck sakes - do your rights demand that you escape by any means, carry it with you, and spread it to other areas?
I get individual rights over statism, and would be among the first to take up arms against a tyranny, but damn... think of your fellow human beings for once.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
The first soldier I kill gets his dog tags pulled. Then me and mine pay a special little visit to his family. Get it, dumbass?
The death rate for the first 1000 infections was around 75%.
So 750 deaths.
By the time we reached 2000 infections the overall death rate was around 65%
So 1300 total deaths, or only 550 of the second 1000, which is 55%.
and by the time we reached 3000 infections it was around 55%
So 1650 total deaths, or only 350 of the third 1000, which is 35%.
The actual death rate right now is more like 35-45%
Which is certainly an improvement, but it's still terrible.
I assume this is because the care is improving and more people are pulling through
They try to keep them hydrated and well fed so that they don't simply die from the vomiting. They also try to detect them as early as possible to prevent the disease from spreading, and that likely makes the treatment more effective. However, there isn't much they can do as the treatment doesn't attack the virus directly, but is merely focused on keeping the body as healthy as possible so that they don't die before the immune system is able to deal with it.
but outbreaks like this often become less virulent over time as well.
That's the nature of things that change. At first they get worse, then at some point they're as bad as they are going to get, then they get better. However, without hindsight, it's difficult to say where we're at on that timeline.
Really? That's good to know.
Is that the same Furgeson that while having all that military gear still failed to stop a riot?
"His name was James Damore."
CDC and WHO have never shown a hint of being concerned when diseases break out in Africa.
You mean besides sending doctors and scientists to help?
wtf?
So they possibly exposed the president to Ebola?
Better to talk with those doctors over video phone me thinks.
Kind of like Homer Simpson telling his nuclear technicians to "work faster." Except, I think Homer has probably done more actual work in his life than Barry has.
I don't know about you, but, I'd have serious concerns about being sent INTO exposure to ebola. Military or not. Regarding military....our soldiers are not taken care of when injured in war, or police-actions, so who really thinks they will be taken care of if they get exposed to ebola? If they get exposed, will they get left behind as MIA ? which way is cheapest ? I'm just saying... yeah yeah, if we don't do something, it will only get worse....folks, you are kidding only yourselves if you think that we can still make a difference NOW. it is going to run its' course, all over the world
No it would not. I would give you a false sense of security. That is an enormous area that is virtually uncontrolled at present. All you need is dozen infected people to wander into some major city at the border of the quarantine region and it's all over.
Nobody has enough military forces to cover that much ground.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
I worked on a ship that brought US food aid to several African countries, including Liberia. We did have to bribe all kinds of people to be allowed to give them free food. I don't know why you're accusing someone of being racist for telling the truth about corruption in African countries.
Sure, it won't be pleasant, but the "Western" world shouldn't take anywhere near the damage Africa is taking.
You're doing that thing some of us call "skating to where the puck was" rather than "skating to where the puck will be".
EBV has already manifested several versions, some airborne (not yet contagious for humans), others with lower lethality (which is why this recent outbreak is so much more severe than previous ones).
If EBV is not contained now and stopped in its tracks, it will mutate/evolve and eventually be "successful" enough that you, I, and everyone else in the Western world will wonder what the hell happened.
blog
He's probably one of them that think that if we deploy a few hundred guardsmen to the 3145km of Mexico border, we could stop every single person crossing illegally. He's incapable of even comprehending what a border of 10744km (Republic of Congo alone) is much less how many people would have to be stationed how many feet apart in how many shifts just to stop the first few non-violent runners before the riots and armed mobs start rushing the borders.
Not at all. That's because we don't have teams dedicated to study tropical diseases or virology or epidemics or anything like that ....
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
He really needs to cut out the bath salts. That's nasty stuff - you can tell.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
I'm not convinced some level of quarantine wouldn't be wise. Just ban general air/maritime travel to/from any location within 100 miles of a reported Ebola case, and lock down borders/etc as best as you can. I agree that the disease will certainly continue to spread, but then you just expand the quarantine region as it does, staying a step ahead.
The goal isn't so much to prevent any spread at all as to keep the disease off of aircraft, where it could spread globally overnight.
Sooner or later the spread of the disease will end up running against geographical barriers, like the Sahara or the Atlantic/Indian Oceans. Gaza certainly would be a defensible border. There are limits on how far the disease could spread against a coordinated effort to contain it.
Plus, a decent quarantine will at least slow down the spread so that you have a fighting chance to do something about it. What is the alternative, throwing your hands up in the air and saying, "sure, feel free to get on a plane if you're sick?" Better to have a handful of people sneaking through the jungles between checkpoints spreading the disease than hundreds of people taking busses.
you're really excited to give your rights away, but I'm not going to let you take mine.
Uh, if you're in the one town in the US where there is an Ebola outbreak you're not going to be able to stop the rest of the country from taking your rights. There will be fences, tanks, armies, drones, aircraft, and the general works surrounding your town. Your stash of AR-15s in the basement aren't going to accomplish much except maybe to keep your neighbors from stealing your food assuming you have a stockpile so that you can stay inside and let the disease blow over. Besides, if you do have such a stockpile then just hunker down - you'll outlive the epidemic anyway, which is probably why you have that stockpile to begin with.
Well, that is if the rest of the country has the brains to set up a strong quarantine. There is a good chance that this won't look good in the polls so we'll just ask everybody to be nice and stay at home, and watch the disease overrun the country. Maybe I should work on my own stockpile... :)
But, if the government has any brains they'll put up a perimeter around the town, lock down all air travel into/out of the country, And burn down everything within 10 miles of the town to create a no-man's land. I mean, we are talking about a plague that could kill half the population here. Given a choice of raising taxes half a percent to rebuild the no-man's land after it is all over, or watching the entire country turn into a post-apocalyptic horror story, I'll take a bit of authoritarianism and call you in the morning.
There is some level of quarantine - the liberian government blockaded in the slum area where a clinic was raided, and sealed off about 50,000 people. That's probably about the limit of their efforts.
But frankly, you're also ignoring what's been actually happening: such an ambassador catching Ebola in one country, knowingly returning to another (via air travel), then staying in a hotel without telling anyone being treated in secret by a doctor, who also doesn't tell anyone, goes home, and spreads it to his wife.
Queue a couple 1000 potentially infected, by a vector which would be utterly missed due to plain old corruption and idiocy.
So what do you do now? Expand the quarantine? Do you even have enough troops to do that? And in the meantime, what about all the regular issues such as food and water, sanitation and normal completely curable diseases which will take hold.
Tea Party would have a field day with a title like that. :)
I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
Why would they want to stop the riot? Allow the riot to happen, and suddenly you've got justification to buy all this nifty military gear you couldn't previously.
Ok, maybe it's justified if it's your next-door neighbor. You know, maybe anyone on your block. Better be safe and make it anyone within the ZIP Code. Why not just expand it to be the entire city? Better safe than sorry.
1) fantasy quarantines don't work. they never have.
2) i'm not going to waste any more typing
The West Point slum quarantine was only for a few days. There were already more patients outside the quarantine than inside. It was more of a toll road than a medical quarantine anyway - people were regularly crossing for as little as $2. This is Liberia.
Help stamp out iliturcy.
Americans have other dirty habits West Africans don't have, such as snorting drugs of unknown origin.
Help stamp out iliturcy.
Compared to the number of people Obama has killed with his bombing campaigns and warmongering, Ebola is a small problem.
Mr Obama should shut his mouth, and look to sorting the problems with trying to democratise America, before lecturing anyone else on anything.
Dont they? I lived in Africa and heard from pothead friends how was so much easier to get drugs there, and far less the risk of being caught. And I saw routinely foreign people drugged.
Maybe not blocking air and sea travel has something to do with Monsanto buying shares of the firm producing the miraculous drug that kills Ebola...
"touching"? you have no idea. http://www.refworld.org/docid/... "Nigeria: Ritual whereby a widow drinks the water used to clean her husband's corpse; consequences for a widow's refusal to drink the water; whether a widow's refusal is interpreted by others as responsibility for her husband's death"
How many dead or sick people before we stop worrying about feelings and sensibilities?
Well, your plan seems to be for somewhere between 10 and 20 million.
Idiot.
Watch this Heartland Institute video
deploying military forces on the borders of these countries
You are an idiot. What on earth do you imagine the "borders" of Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea look like?
Watch this Heartland Institute video
But frankly, you're also ignoring what's been actually happening: such an ambassador catching Ebola in one country, knowingly returning to another (via air travel), then staying in a hotel without telling anyone being treated in secret by a doctor, who also doesn't tell anyone, goes home, and spreads it to his wife.
Queue a couple 1000 potentially infected, by a vector which would be utterly missed due to plain old corruption and idiocy.
But that's exactly what as already happended and lead to 21 cases and 7 deaths, not a world wide pandemic.
Watch this Heartland Institute video
if it happened in north america or the EU they'd quarantine the areas and the people inside would be super pissed but likely understanding mostly.
maybe in Europe because they're used to their governments telling them what to do.
Bullshit.
In Europe we have functional health systems and governments that understand that violent force is not the appropriate response to disease.
Watch this Heartland Institute video
Burundi, Lesotho, and Malawi, Togo
The Spanish Sahara is gone,
Niger, Nigeria, Chad, and Liberia
Egypt, Benin, and Gabon.
Tanzania, Somalia, Kenya, and Mali
Sierra Leone, and Algiers,
Dahomey, Namibia, Senegal, Libya
Cameroon, Congo, Zaire.
Ethiopia, Guinea-Bissau, Madagascar
Rwanda, Mahore, and Cayman,
Hong Kong, Abu Dhabi, Qatar, Yugoslavia...
Crete, Mauritania
Then Transylvania,
Monaco, Liechtenstein
Malta, and Palestine,
Fiji, Australia, Sudan
I never claimed the quarantine would work.
You claimed that "you're really excited to give your rights away, but I'm not going to let you take mine."
My point was simply that you have no ability to prevent the government from taking your rights away in a situation like this.
US cant keep the border with Mexico airtight, there are people getting out of North Korea, hundreds of thousands of immigrants make it to Europe through Mediterranean Sea, there were even people getting through Berlin wall. How the hell do you plan to secure 1000km of jungle with millions of people inside wanting to get as far away from Ebola as possible?
Quarantining the zone is pipe-dream that cannot work, but would create only panic and other complications.
That was the stupids thing I have seen posted on /. for ages.
First: european have rights, too. And some even guns.
Second: suppose a town gets quarantined in the USA, what do you believe your punny guns inside of the quarantine will help you against tanks and flame throwers? A SAVE BET IS THAT THE US GOVERNMENT WILL HAVE NAPALM BOMBERS circling over the town, exactly BECAUSE they know that idiots like you rather risk to get infected by breaking out with other infected people, or risk to get shot instead of simply staying in their 'safe' house.
So you certainly won't be doing what you 'please'. You either are uninfected and stay in a house and survive: or you die, either to the infection or by running around like a chicken or idiot and get infected or by those who have the bigger guns, idiot.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
You have no right to infect me, no idea how you come to that absurd idea.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
Unfortunately, even tough he is being non-PC he is telling the naked truth. Now, if you want to call racist to someone who is telling the uncomfortable truth, that is your problem. Yes, it is that bad, but some countries without the external aid money would have (almost) no money at all.
And then even you bribe them, often the food is given to the right kind of people to "buy" tribal and political favours. Or sold.
It may result in a plague because there is not a blockage. We had already had a few scares here in Portugal and Spain, but luckily until now they were false.
It is grim because we don't want to "offend" anyone with the proper response (quarantine the zone) . Political Correctness run amok is going to kill people.
How many dead or sick people before we stop worrying about feelings and sensibilities?
Don't be daft.
It is impossible to quarantine an area encompassing Nigeria, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Senegal, Congo, etc. Furthermore, a quarantine condition would likely lead to a humanitarian disaster, which I'm guessing the US government foresees and wants to establish a presence on the ground to "assist."
As the days go by I can't help but think of the way in which the military was deployed in 28 Weeks Later (sequel to 28 Days). Let's hope treatment production can ramp up and get to the sufferers before a tactical military response is even contemplated.
Also, I suspect one reason why the US is out in front of this is that they've run epidemiological simulations on EBV and have found that the whole world, including the US, in a shitload of trouble in short time.
Why not send the sick to ISIS. Their belief in Alah will save the sick.
Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
If the government can't stop undocumented immigrants, how can they stop a population full of people with 9mm diversions and nothing to lose?
That wasn't the question. It works, when it is kept. The problem is that people don't give a shit about others, and thus spread death in the name of freedom. Lame.
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
ok, so given that people are inherently selfish, what is the best way for a society to prevent the spread of disease? cordons are less effective than other options. instead of being absolutists and insisting on an ineffective cordon because we think it's "the way things should be", let's use cheaper, more effective solutions that will slow down the virus and save lives. it's like we're talking about teen abstinence. did you know the regions that are so focused on abstinence-only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy?
" let's use cheaper, more effective solutions that will slow down the virus and save lives."
Like what? Bringing infected people to the US. That sounds like a real good way to keep infections out. Or do you not understand the consequences of bringing African Bees to Brazil for "research"?
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.