Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft On US Immigration: It's Our Way Or the Canadian Highway

theodp writes Even as it cuts about 14% of its workforce, Microsoft is complaining that the company might be denied some of the "roughly" 1,000 H-1B visas for foreign workers it intends to seek, and made it clear that the company could shift some work to Canada or overseas if it can't get talent on its terms. "If I need to move 400 people to Canada or Northern Ireland or Hyderabad or Shanghai, we can do that," said William Kamela, a senior federal policy lead at Microsoft, who later explained that about 60% of Microsoft's workforce is in the U.S., yet it makes 68% of its profits overseas (where it also stashes its cash out of IRS reach). Kamela made the statements on a panel at a two-day conference on high-skilled immigration policy, where he sat next to Felicia Escobar, special assistant to President Barack Obama on immigration. The day before the conference, Mark Zuckerberg's FWD.us PAC — which counts Bill Gates as a Founder and Steve Ballmer and Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith as Major Contributors — posted its "MythBusters" video on H-1B visas.

67 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. Fine! by DaMattster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let them move jobs overseas. In retaliation, we the people should demand that the government ditch all Microsoft products and go open source!

    1. Re:Fine! by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      its a problem with ANY group or individual that want to decide what's "best for you."

      what's best for you never seems to be very good for them.

      --
      never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    2. Re:Fine! by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      The Salish Sea straddles Washington State and British Columbia if Microsoft want to move HQ from Redmond to Vancouver!

    3. Re:Fine! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait, why do you think that Gates thinks he's exempt from being a responsible citizen?

      I'm pretty sure he thinks he's doing a pretty good job. What with the fight to end malaria, the public library funding, and helping to put a pc in every home. Sure he's profited hansomly, and broke some rules along the way, but you can't say that he hasn't done some good.

      (This coming from someone who detests microsoft products these days, and is writing this from Fedora).

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    4. Re:Fine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's one of the richest men in teh world. A 1% of a 1%. There are no liberals like Gates, or conservatives for that matter. When you're standing in the rarefied atmosphere atop the layer cake, you're political ideology is bent to maintain your position.

    5. Re:Fine! by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let them move jobs overseas. In retaliation, we the people should demand that the government ditch all Microsoft products and go open source!

      You know, the reality is that US businesses have been moving labor to cheaper places for decades now.

      This whole globalization thing was your idea, and has been championed as economic policy for a very long time now -- so that corporations can maximize profits.

      I find it terribly amusing that suddenly Americans are going "Yarg! But what about our jobs?".

      And I'm sure a lot of your politicians will say that anything the companies are doing for profit is a good thing. Until that is you realize just how much you're gutting your own economy.

      But, hey, that's the version of Capitalism America has been pushing on the rest of the world for several decades now.

      And since American firms have been buying up companies around the world, and outsourcing those jobs to yet another country ... I'm not sure the rest of the world has much sympathy for you on this front. In fact, I'm betting very little.

      Because America has been doing it to us for years now.

      That it's starting to hit you close to home means you're finally realizing what we've known for years -- that Globalization guts local economies in order to allow multinationals to play a shell game and not give a rats ass about how it affects anybody else.

      So, really, cry us a river ... many other countries have been on the receiving end of this for a very long time now.

      This is Capitalism as envisioned and pitched by you guys. If you don't like the outcome, don't blame us for it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Fine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      hahahaha! Gates is anything but. His "charity" is a tax dodgy scam. He doesn't give a shit about malaria, only allow the drugs (he owns the pharmaceutical companies) into countries where he gets direct benefit. He energy concerns are all about promoting his new energy investments. It's not about doing "good", it's about increasing his personal wealth.

    7. Re:Fine! by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Robber barons usually do try to leave a legacy that doesn't make them look like horrific monsters, but that doesn't change the fact that they are robber barons.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    8. Re:Fine! by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      This whole globalization thing was [the American political and corporate elite's] idea, and has been championed as economic policy for a very long time now -- so that corporations can maximize profits.

      I find it terribly amusing that suddenly [the American general public] are going "Yarg! But what about our jobs?".

      Once you clarify what you're talking about, I don't see anything funny about it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Fine! by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm pretty sure he thinks he's doing a pretty good job. What with the fight to end malaria, the public library funding, and helping to put a pc in every home.

      Many robber barons have succumb to their conscience late in life and begin to try to make recompense. Others just do it for good PR to keep "the masses" from rioting at the Gate's. If Gates had truly been interested in serving humanity he would have been doing it (probably at a smaller scale) his entire life. John D. Rockefeller gave over half of his fortune away in his later years but was known to be quite ruthless and ethically challenged.

      I liken it to burning down a city, killing the mayor and making yourself the new ruler and then offering to rebuild the city at a reduced rate but you still get to be the ruler.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    10. Re:Fine! by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Better idea. For every piece of work they shift, their taxes go up to support communities they dump. As in, they are forced to shoulder the real costs of outsourcing, rather than "outsourcing" the cost to the tax payers.

      But in today's system, where corporations are people with human rights and capital has more rights than most people, that's not going to happen.

    11. Re:Fine! by CaptSlaq · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Implying that "doing good" and "making money" are mutually exclusive... I believe this to be a false assumption.

    12. Re:Fine! by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't let me not employ Americans in America, then I'm going to go not employ them outside of America!

      Then why bother capitulating to them?

    13. Re:Fine! by BonThomme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      oh bullshit.

      -bullshit, if your school doesn't have differentiated curriculum, it sucks, not common core
      -bullshit, exploring how math concepts evolved is not that same as "going back to"; "showing your work" has been a part of education forever
      -bullshit, the only people introducing politics are ones like you (who tend to introduce politics or religion into anything they don't like or understand)
      -epic bullshit, doesn't merit a response
      -bullshit, the Texas school board does this

      I lived through New Math decades ago enduring binary, octal, and hexadecimal in 3rd grade, so I have every right to be skeptical of CC. I find it a vast improvement over what was there, but I recognize the consternation of parents who suddenly realize their snowflakes aren't quite so precious.

    14. Re:Fine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gates has nothing to do with Microsoft cash handling and has not since a long time. Public companies are driven by director board who seek the maximum returns for share holders, using whatever legal means it take. And as there is legal loopholes allowing big companies to shuffle cash around, the accounting use it to maximize profits.

    15. Re:Fine! by cHiphead · · Score: 2, Informative

      From your "starting point" video summary:

      He has taught at major research institutions and small liberal arts colleges, and his been active in education reform, developing and implementing an elective Bible course that is currently available for public high school students in Texas.

      You are kidding right? I watched parts of that nonsense and it's entirely propaganda for anti-common core, conspiratard conservative should-be-home-schooling douchebags that need their religious views justified by applying them to the public educational system, trying to infect every facet of historical context with religiosity regardless of factual truths. Common core is probably just too hard for willfully ignorant people to adapt too. I think a lot of it is stupid, but I'm not an educator and don't devote my time to research on the topic.

      The example of 'Roman math' was a case of not-following-the-directions so an answer was marked wrong. Part of the purpose of the boxes is to teach the material in a functional manner that allows for better visualization of how to develop equations and functions, at the end of the day, these kids will grow up to become the next computer scientists, since everything is computer based now. They need this stuff, even if it's the 'long' way of problem solving and can be done quicker (that's another lesson that comes after you get the fundamentals down).

      There was already a monopoly for textbooks. Sometimes it seems that Texas is just mad that they are no longer a predominate driving force behind textbooks (and good riddance, with their succumbing to religious indoctrination as a part of curriculum in their educational mandates).

      You are the one spreading propaganda.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    16. Re:Fine! by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      its a problem with ANY group or individual that want to decide what's "best for you."

      what's best for you never seems to be very good for them.

      Shh .. your mum could be listening!

    17. Re:Fine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does it matter? Malaria researchers are getting more money from him than anyone else, regardless of his motives. If there are people who genuinely care more about malaria, they sure as hell aren't even close to keeping pace with this "false" philanthropist. Given that, maybe more people should be greedy pigs, motivated only to increase personal wealth. The world might be a better place for it. Perhaps you could put up a few $billion to prove him wrong?

    18. Re:Fine! by Anon-Admin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is not exactly right.

      He gives $X of his personal income to his non-profit charity. He can now write off the $X from his personal taxes and still keep the money in something he controls.

      Aside from that, being the head of the non-profit means that he can receive benefits from the non-profit for his time and service. For example the non-profit can own his house, car, boat, etc and provide for his use free of charge. This protects his assets while still giving him control of them, on top of this it is deducted from the non-profit as an operating expense. Remember, a non-profit can spend 90% of it's income on operating expenses and 10% or less on the charitable actions.

    19. Re:Fine! by jbolden · · Score: 2

      goes back to roman math (seriously, according to common core, the way to add 62 + 36 is to draw 9 squares and 8 lines and then add them. If you don't draw your squares you fail, BTW)

      That's been standard in the math curriculum for decades at least. You don't remember it because you were young when you learned to grasp why you can't just add things in the "tens place" and the "hundreds place" together and instead had to line numbers up. Until you do that exercise kids will gladly do things like 32.5 + 60 = 33.1, 38.5 or 632.5.

    20. Re:Fine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Semantics. "How math is taught is completely up to each school." - This is the talking point of common core defenders. "It's not a curriculum, it's a standard." But of course to meet this standard you need a supporting curriculum generated by Pearson or McGraw-Hill. So, while it's not technically a curriculum, it is a curriculum by any practical measure.

      I'm no tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist, and the basic idea of a "core" standard sounds good, but the implementation is classically bad big government screw up. The big text book/curriculum companies have this bought and paid for and the product they are selling is garbage. Most of the stuff my kid has brought home has just been very poor quality, and often politically biased. It is yet another attempt to reinvent the wheel. I sat and listened to school administrators talk about how things change and evolve and the cell phone we use today doesn't look like the dial phone we used as kids....BS. 4th grade math is (or should be) exactly the same in 2014 as it was in 1940 or 1960 or 1980. But that doesn't sell too many new text books does it?

    21. Re:Fine! by ultranova · · Score: 2

      when it comes to actually "running" the company then you are suppose to do what is in the best interest of the company and shareholders

      No, just shareholders. The company can be utterly destroyed as long as share price goes up in the short term. That's arguably one of the bigger problems nowadays: companies are treated as people yet are effectively not bound by law or even basic survival instinct.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    22. Re:Fine! by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Standing alone sure, but the comment was not standing on its own. The comment was about Bill Gates who is a known liar (See the US vs. Microsoft Antitrust cases for easy to validate examples) and made his fortune on thievery, manipulation, and lies. Ignoring known immoral behavior in determining someone's "character" would be asinine correct?

      To further believe that an obvious narcissist would do anything for purely altruistic purposes is also asinine correct?

      So the statement that was made does not equate to your gross oversimplification. The statement made was that roughly that "Bill Gates is not altruistic and/or of high moral character".

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    23. Re:Fine! by cptdondo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seriously? I got a 3 year work visa to Canada just by showing up at the border with a letter from my employer. The whole process took less than an hour. Canada has logical, common sense immigration controls, as opposed to the completely broken and non-sensical immigration laws that we have in the US.

      In the US, if I got an H1B visa, my wife would not be allowed to work. In Canada, with a work visa, my wife is allowed to work, doing anything she wants. I could go on, but don't tell me Canada has "stricter" controls; Canada has controls that work, while the US has no controls at all - a handful of H1B visas, and millions of illegal workers.

    24. Re:Fine! by mr_mischief · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No. There were no boxes and lines when I was taught to add. We lined places up vertically. It's called column addition.

        32.5
      +60.0
      --------
        92.5

      Number line addition, ten frame addition, etc. are different ways to teach addition.

    25. Re:Fine! by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      I think you need to drop the brainwashing you recieved and seriously think about this a bit more.

      Here we are in a regulatory and tax climate such that a traditionally American company is willing to relocate to another country if we do not let enough foreigners in to work for them and your focus is on scolding the people wanting to cure the regulation and tax problems because they are evil in your mind.

      Wow.. thats kind of like fucking a knothole in a fence and bitching that people on the other side saw your pecker. Wake up and look at the entire picture. Stop letting politics screw your vision.

    26. Re:Fine! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And somehow you seem to think this hasn't been happening to other countries for years, and that it's different when it happens to you.

      Numerous American firms have bought Canadian companies, signed contracts saying they'd keep the jobs, and then after a few years shut everything down and left .. leaving us with neither the jobs nor the ownership of the original business. And in several instances when the Canadian company was more profitable, but since they weren't American jobs they were expendable.

      Multinationals are like locusts, they take what they want, make huge demands to get concessions, fail to live up to their promises, and then move on to somewhere else.

      Companies like Nike have been steadily moving their labor to the next cheapest place whenever people start asking for fair wages and working conditions. And yet a lot of people just say "well, that's the free market, adapt or die".

      I've been looking at the entire picture for the last 20 years.

      Maybe some Americans are only just now realizing what that picture is?

      The problem is the branch of economics which says all of this is a desirable outcome, and the fact that politicians and business people have been feeding us this line saying it's going to improve our lives. Because it's all predicated on lies, bullshit, bad assumptions, and the implicit idea that greed is the highest ideal.

      The reality is, it doesn't, and never actually has.

      What it has done is allowed corporations to do what you describe for the last several decades, and the politicians who back them (or, are paid by them), hand over what they want.

      Capitalism as envisioned by a lot of people is basically a suicide pact, and as long as the people at the top get what they want, nothing will change.

      The rest of us just get screwed. And, like I said, it's been happening to everybody else for decades.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    27. Re:Fine! by TheSync · · Score: 2

      Companies like Nike have been steadily moving their labor to the next cheapest place whenever people start asking for fair wages and working conditions.

      Actually the evidence indicates that multinational firms routinely provide higher wages and better working conditions in poor countries than their local counterparts, and they are typically not attracted preferentially to countries with weak labor standards.

      On the other hand, if manufacturers are forced to stay in high labor cost countries, they will simply use more automation and employ fewer people. US real manufacturing output is near an all-time high, yet US manufacturing jobs are down 35% from the peak in 1979. This is not just a US trend, but typical of all advanced economies.

    28. Re:Fine! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2

      You don't get a choice when government is involved. 51% votes for stupid things 49% has no choice, that's the problem with big government.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    29. Re:Fine! by OhPlz · · Score: 2

      Your solution is to modify the law to allow corps to bring as much low cost labor as they want? Now you've suppressed wages to the point of significantly lowering the standard of living for everyone. That causes drops in tax revenue which hurts schools, fire, police, etc.. The whole point of quotas is to ensure that we don't bring in more people than our communities can handle.

    30. Re:Fine! by afidel · · Score: 2

      Considering Gates has pledged to give away 100% of his fortune any tax avoidance is only to increase the amount of money that ends up in the charity. Let's face it, as the wealthiest man in the world he's never going to go hungry, or even be uncomfortable, but unlike many his goal isn't to setup a line of descendants that never need to work. He's done making his money and now his focus is how to use that amassed wealth to help the world. Frankly to his mindset offshoring isn't necessarily a bad thing as it increases wealth in parts of the world that need a lot of infrastructure work that's beyond the scope of even what the Gates Foundation is capable of.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  2. "stashes its cash" by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Only the US charges income tax on profits from foreign subsidiaries which have already been taxed abroad. Besides being unfair, such a disincentive to bring the money into the US obviously discourages the spending and employing here that could be done with it.

    1. Re:"stashes its cash" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's because you claim Australian residency in addition to being an Australian citizen. If you claimed residency overseas they would stop doing this.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_taxation

    2. Re:"stashes its cash" by flyingfsck · · Score: 2

      Nope, they'll say "Sorry, eh!". TFIFY

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:"stashes its cash" by tlambert · · Score: 2

      Your comment would have more value if Microsoft was actually being taxed on its overseas income somewhere but it is my understanding that they move all the money through Ireland and the Caribbean thereby avoiding any taxation. They are not being good US or world citizens. They take money from everywhere and pay a share of taxes nowhere.

      This is actually incorrect. They pay a lower tax rate by doing this, they don't pay a zero tax rate. Depending on the corporate tax bracket, income tax is paid in Ireland at 25%, 12.5%, or 10%.

      Then, because both it and Ireland are E.U. countries, the money is transferred to Belgium, which due to E.U. law does not have a tax applied on that transfer.

      Then, due to treaty, it's transferred to the Bahamas, which like Bangladesh, Bahrain, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, the Central African Republic, Chile, Estonia, Malta, the Marshall Islands, Saudi Arabi (if you're a Saudi), Sri Lanka, the Turks and Caicos Islands, the United Arab Emirates, and the British Virgin Islands, all have a 0% corporate income tax rate.

      Note that the other 0% countries are less desirable than the Bahamas, due to political instability, less friendly banking laws, and citizenship requirements on corporate ownership (some), but they are all viable ways, through one treaty or another, of transferring money from Ireland, and then out of the E.U. at low/no cost to the corporation.

      The transfer is usually in the form of intellectual property licensing fees, which is a legitimate business expense in Ireland, and also in Belgium, but can also be in terms of contracted management services/consulting fees as well.

      Second choices from Ireland would be Bulgaria (10% corporate tax) and Gibralter (10% corporate tax), since they are both E.U. member countries, followed by Latvia and Lithuania (15% corporate tax), also E.U. member states.

      Not that all of this is perfectly legal, and you could do it too, if you wanted, but you'd need a pretty substantial cash flow to justify the set up costs for the corporate mechanisms you'd need to put in place to establish the pipeline.

      I keep waiting for some company to establish the pipeline for individual consultants, who incorporate in the Bahamas and incorporate in their home countries, and then the middleman company takes a 1-2% fee of transfers through the pipeline as a service fee for establishing the pipeline connection between John Doe, Inc., Bahamas and John Doe, Inc., France/UK/Germany/wherever.

      But just because you don't have the cash flow to make it worthwhile to do the same thing the companies are doing, doesn't make what the companies are doing illegal.

      If you don't like them paying less taxes by scrupulously following the rules, then change the rules, but don't bitch about them being better at following the rules to their benefit than you are at following the rules to your own personal benefit.

  3. Muck funny in politics and muck Ficrosoft. by Iamthecheese · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only reason politicians pretend to listen to arguments like Microsoft is making is the money passing under the table. The only reason Microsoft needs to argue this point at all is to present the pretense that politicians are uninformed, as opposed to corrupt.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Muck funny in politics and muck Ficrosoft. by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only reason Microsoft needs to argue this point at all is to present the pretense that politicians are uninformed, as opposed to corrupt.

      I disagree. There's no reason politicians can't be both.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  4. Cake and eat it too by sinij · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Corporations want infrastructure, rule of the law, and educated workforce that comes with doing business in US while paying third-world wages and hiding income in tax shelters. You can't have it both ways.

    I also highly doubt that Canada, for example, going to look any more favorable on work visas. If they move to Canada, they will have to hire Canadians (or people eligible for NAFTA visas). That won't be 25K/year PhDs from India.

    1. Re:Cake and eat it too by Kingkaid · · Score: 2

      Canada is much more business friendly than the US, believe it or not. The corporate tax rate is even lower :)

    2. Re:Cake and eat it too by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you incorrectly believe that _everyone_ pays the US 35% corporate tax sure, the US has the highest corporate tax rate. You would have to be extremely ignorant or gullible to believe that anyone pays the base rate. 70,000 pages of tax code are currently ensuring that anyone that can afford an a loophole has a loophole.

      If we had any legitimacy in the Government, I would expect the Government to be asking why Microsoft just terminated 18,000 employees (including no-competes preventing their hire at MS or anywhere else) and is now requesting 1,000 more foreign workers.

      For those that claim that H1Bs have nothing to do with wages, I'd ask the same exact question.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    3. Re:Cake and eat it too by Shados · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're both somewhat wrong. What he was talking about is TN visa status. A Canadian that matches certain criterias (more or less, has a meaningful bachelor degree should do), and an accepted job offer in hand can show up at the border, show the paperwork that they have a job waiting for them, and move in, start working.

      However, the moment they lose that job, they have to get out. Not tomorrow, not next week. NOW. They also have no path for permanent residency, cannot have a bigger attachment to the US than they do to Canada (ie: there's restriction in investments and real estate), and still file canadian tax reports.

      Its annoying as hell.

    4. Re:Cake and eat it too by Shados · · Score: 2

      Then it won't scale though. You can just get 30-40% cheaper in Montreal, still have a lot of people, and bonus point, get kick backs from the government begging you to keep your office there.

      Cake -> yum.

    5. Re:Cake and eat it too by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      Corporations want infrastructure, rule of the law, and educated workforce that comes with doing business in US

      What, you think Canada doesn't have an educated workforce?

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  5. We just laid off a ton of people by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Insightful

    so please let us hire more overseas. Please?

    Pretty Please?

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  6. there I said it by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    It has nothing to do with training or intelligence and everything to do with money spent on wages.

  7. Satellite Offices by Luthair · · Score: 2

    All these tech companies simply need to open a few satellite offices. Inherently some people don't want to be in San Fransisco, Redmond, etc. if you can't find the talent you need perhaps you aren't in the right area?

    1. Re:Satellite Offices by CycleFreak · · Score: 2

      This!

      Despite NE Ohio's obvious downside (namely, the weather), I would never leave the area for a job in SF making $150k / year. That's a fine salary - more than I'm making now - but would diminish my standard of living as compared to NEOH. Answer? Open an office in Solon or Beachwood or on the west side in Westlake or Rocky River (but please, not Cleveland proper - what a dreadful city that is). Paying $100-$150k / year would allow a family to live quite nicely in those areas.

  8. Geographic matching by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    who later explained that about 60% of Microsoft's workforce is in the U.S., yet it makes 68% of its profits overseas

    Which is pretty much irrelevant when it comes to software. There is no need at all in software to match development costs to geographic locations. It's one of the beautiful things about being in that industry. That's why you can have a development team in India for a product that isn't even sold there and it still makes sense. It's not a tangible good you export.

    Now if they cannot get the right talent for the right price domestically then sure they might have to look elsewhere but frankly I doubt that is really the core problem for Microsoft. If they are having trouble getting good talent I think it has a lot more to do with the fact that people are well aware they have a pretty toxic corporate culture where everyone has to have their knives out at all times and so much of the best talent decides to work elsewhere. Microsoft is just not an attractive place to work compared with Apple or Google or some of the other top IT firms.

    It's also a little disingenuous to claim you need cheaper talent when you have net profit margins well above 20%. Microsoft's problems are not rooted in their cost structure but in their revenue streams. Their problems are that their key revenue streams (Windows and Office) are tied to tightly to the PC market and they haven't been able to translate them very well to the mobile market. They spent so many years trying to maximize their monopoly on the PC they they found it difficult to acknowledge that mobile devices have different requirements and to relax their grip so that they could grow. Microsoft saw the opportunity in mobile 10-15 years ago but kept trying to cram a PC into a mobile device with predictably bad results.

    1. Re:Geographic matching by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's why you can have a development team in India for a product that isn't even sold there and it still makes sense. It's not a tangible good you export.

      This is the thing I don't like. Companies play both sides of the fence.

      If I start selling copies of Win8, I'll be put in jail because I'm stealing MS's property.

      If MS sells a copy of Win8 in the US, they have to pay a licensing fee to MS Caymans for the rights to sell Win8 in the US, so the US company doesn't make much profit but they'll happily report that profit in the Caymans at a 0% tax rate.

      On the other hand, when they want to install Win8 on 10M computers and the code was written in India, well, they just FTP that over with no tariffs because it is an intangible good that has no legal value for customs purposes.

      If MS had to pay duty on 10M copies of Windows (at full retail cost) to have a 3rd party install copies on 10M computers, then I bet they'd rethink their development model.

  9. The DO have it both ways by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Corporations want infrastructure, rule of the law, and educated workforce that comes with doing business in US while paying third-world wages and hiding income in tax shelters. You can't have it both ways.

    So far they very clearly have been able to have it both ways. Sad but true.

    Now let's be fair that Microsoft in general is not paying "third world wages". You only have to look at their financial statements to prove that. They generally pay their employees fairly well. That said, I think they are being more than a little disingenuous in claiming they need workers from overseas when they have net profit margins well in excess of 20%. Microsoft's problems aren't with their costs but with their revenue streams and no amount of cheap overseas talent is going to solve that problem.

  10. US vs. Rest of the world by Flavianoep · · Score: 2

    [William Kamela] later explained that about 60% of Microsoft's workforce is in the U.S., yet it makes 68% of its profits overseas

    Those figures don't compare well, at least not to justify moving Microsoft out of US. The US is one country versus about 200 others; the latters' population is more than 200 times that of the US.

    The only conclusion I can make from that figures is that it is very likely that the US is the single country Microsoft makes more profit from.

    --
    Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
  11. Re:Is it just me... by acoustix · · Score: 2

    What??? They clearly stated that hiring H-1B Visa workers creates more jobs. What more proof do you need???

    (sarcasm)

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  12. Double standards by sjbe · · Score: 2

    That's the problem with liberals like Gates. They are very good at telling others how to be responsible citizens but consider themselves exempt from that

    And you think "conservatives" don't do exactly the same thing? Bit of a double standard you have there. One standard will work just fine.

  13. Re:If MS does that... by Brewmeister_Z · · Score: 2

    This is another call to anyone still holding stock after the Windows 8, Surface tablets, and Windows phone fiascos that the rats have left the ship and the odd pitch and roll of the ship is not a momentary issue that should be shrugged off. Microsoft is the Titanic of corporations. To stupid to think that it could ever fail.

    --
    I Cater to the Needs of Stupid People. - from a coffee mug Christmas gift
  14. Re:H1Bs have two faces. by Major+Blud · · Score: 2

    "but the high end is being too greedy"

    So that confirms what everyone here has been saying all along.....that it's not because of a job shortage, it's because H1B's are being used to drive down wages.

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  15. Mythbust this! by PlanetX+00 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is all about keeping wages down: Microsoft cuts 2,100 jobs in its latest round of layoffs (http://www.engadget.com/2014/09/18/microsoft-layoffs-round-2/) Intel to cut over 5,000 jobs (http://money.cnn.com/2014/01/17/technology/intel-jobs/) Cisco plans 6,000 layoffs in restructuring plan (http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2014/08/13/cisco-plans-6-000-layoffs-in-restructuring-plan.html?page=all) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  16. Globalization by CrankyOldEngineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most large tech businesses are following this strategy.They are just responding to our illogical tax and immigration policies. The US can compete, or try to be a self-sufficient island. Like it or not: Workers compete for jobs. Businesses compete for customers. Governments compete for businesses. All three compete for capital.

    --
    COE
    1. Re:Globalization by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Self sufficient island sounds good. Especially since I suspect Europe, Japan and a nice chunk of the 3rd world would join a less corporate driven island.

  17. It's a scam. Cheaper Labor is the reason by Virtucon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Come on Microsoft, stop the horseshit and just hire workers from within the US. You fucksticks have had it your way too long.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  18. Re:Eh by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

    Yes, because if there's one thing you can say about the US, it's that it doesn't do enough for businesses....

    I am a fan of smaller government, but we have a far more dire need for that to happen on the side of greater personal liberties, with many of the laws we have being problematic because we are so beholden to corporations.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  19. Show Equal Investment in College Hires by Kagato · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm fine with H1B sponsorship, so long as a company can show they put an equal about of time, money and resources into college hire and training programs. When I first started programming it was very common for me to see programming interns and college hires. I consult with many mid and large companies, and I haven't seen a programming intern in 7 years. I've seen two college hires in that time as well. At some point in the 2000s some bone headed bean counter figured they could pay an H1B about the same as a college hire. If that's the case, hire the "experienced" resource. The problem is that created a devastating hole in Junior level programmers for almost a decade. Now companies are finally starting to hire college folks again they want to increase the H1B levels again, and repeat the cycle over again.

  20. Oh Canada by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    Canada would welcome the jobs. One could also argue that at least moving the jobs to Canada would have a larger net positive impact on the US economy anyway due to our trade relations. Not to mention if you are a unemployed US tech worker, a move to Canada for work isn't that big a deal either.

  21. Another globalist crime. by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This ought to be an outrage and insult to American citizens who are being kicked out on the street by having their jobs stolen from them so that Bill Gates can add to his billions dollar fortune. Studies have shown that there is a surplus of American workers, which means we have a lot of people in this country who cannot find work becuase the work is being stolen by foreign immigrants, illegal aliens, H1B visa holders, and so on. The H1B visa program is a scam designed to enrich the 1%. That Obama is involved with this shows what Obama really is, a traitor who hates the United States, and who does everything he can to undermine our citizens. It is time to completely abolish the H1B program, and stop all immigration. This will as well create the press and necessity we need to fix our own countries problems, such as improving our education system, and promoting family values, such as marriage, so that we do raise healthy (mentally and otherwise) workforce. You cannot have a country without borders. Ultimately I fear what drives companies such as Microsoft is that they are globalists that want to eventually dissolve the United States and as well destroy it as a unique entity.

  22. Re: FWD.US lies, just like its founder, Zuckerberg by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Undercover of helping immigrant agricultural workers who have long needed a break in America, the American technology sector - lead by Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg - has seen fit to heavily lobby Congress to increase H1-B and other worker visa permits, vastly increasing H1-B visas at a time when very good research shows that there is no shortage of tech workers in America. Zuckerberg has so far succeeded, in the Senate. What is motivating the claim for more H1-B visas?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

    previously

    One of the most respected technology pundits in Silicon Valley has this to say about the H1-B worker problem and Two H1-B's walk into a Bar: More on the H1-B visa problem

    One of many examples of what goes on behind closed doors: an immigration attorney and his consultants teaching corporations how to manipulate foreign-worker immigration law to replace qualified American workers.

    H1-B's are only the tip of the iceberg; there are more than 20 categories of foreign worker visas.

    Professor Norman Matloff's extremely well documented studies on the H1-B and foreign worker visa problem. Matloff claims that Hi-B abuse has cost Americans $10Trillion dollars, since 1975. Inc. Magazine weights in Professor Matloff's Webpage

    Mother Jones weighs in:How H1-B visa abuse is hurting American tech workers

    Marc Zuckerberg and other wealthy tech scions - including large immigration law firms and corporation who profit from importing H1-B's continue to perpetuate this trend

    How H1-B malpractice hurts the American economy

    Most of the new crop of H1-Bs is coming from one of the most corrupt university systems in the world.

    Indian government officials are not happy that the universities that they collude with might have some limitations placed on the abuses that have enabled them to "sell" their product to the American IT sector.

    How the new immigration bill could ignite a trade war with India

    How to underpay an H1-B worker

  23. Give Bill Gates some credit (as if it matters) by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'll leave aside the fact that most of these "charities" are tax-avoidance scams, and would probably do the world a favor by not existing.

    Bill Gates gives about 40 times as much money to charities as do the Koch brothers, who together have about the same amount of money as Gates. The Koch brothers, in turn, are about 25X as generous as all the Walmart heirs combined- 85% of whose donations come from Christy and 15% from Alice. Jim and Rob also each have their $35 billion and together they donate approx. $30,000 to charity each year- i.e. 4 ppm of their total income. If I make six figures and I toss a dollar at a homeless person, I've just donated 10 ppm.

    In comparison, the LDS church for example receives approx. ten billion dollars in "donations" (i.e. tithes) per year- ostensibly for charitable purposes- but spends only fifty million for charity, an overhead of approx. 99.5%. The Gates Foundation has an "overhead" of 90% (meaning 90% of his wealth is stuffed in his mattress). Charities would benefit 20X more if Mormons sent their tithe payments directly to scum-of-the-earth Bill Gates!!!!

  24. Re: FWD.US lies, just like its founder, Zuckerberg by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    I agree, that was a bad video hitting all the corporate dogmas. It makes an unwarranted assumption behind the scenes that only H1-B workers have computer or technological skills. And that's the lie being told, that no domestic worker with the skills can be found, despite these jobs often needing only basic IT drone skills.

    As for Microsoft, it should be made to prove under penalty of perjury that for any H1-B worker they want to get that they did not lay off a worker that had those skills.

  25. Re: FWD.US lies, just like its founder, Zuckerberg by BigDaveyL · · Score: 2

    I would even go one step further: They can only hire an H1-B if they did not offer these jobs (and any training) to the 18,000 people laid off.

    In other words, someone hacking on Office could be offered a job writing software for XBox with minimal re-training.