Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft On US Immigration: It's Our Way Or the Canadian Highway

theodp writes Even as it cuts about 14% of its workforce, Microsoft is complaining that the company might be denied some of the "roughly" 1,000 H-1B visas for foreign workers it intends to seek, and made it clear that the company could shift some work to Canada or overseas if it can't get talent on its terms. "If I need to move 400 people to Canada or Northern Ireland or Hyderabad or Shanghai, we can do that," said William Kamela, a senior federal policy lead at Microsoft, who later explained that about 60% of Microsoft's workforce is in the U.S., yet it makes 68% of its profits overseas (where it also stashes its cash out of IRS reach). Kamela made the statements on a panel at a two-day conference on high-skilled immigration policy, where he sat next to Felicia Escobar, special assistant to President Barack Obama on immigration. The day before the conference, Mark Zuckerberg's FWD.us PAC — which counts Bill Gates as a Founder and Steve Ballmer and Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith as Major Contributors — posted its "MythBusters" video on H-1B visas.

20 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. Fine! by DaMattster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let them move jobs overseas. In retaliation, we the people should demand that the government ditch all Microsoft products and go open source!

    1. Re:Fine! by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      its a problem with ANY group or individual that want to decide what's "best for you."

      what's best for you never seems to be very good for them.

      --
      never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    2. Re:Fine! by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Robber barons usually do try to leave a legacy that doesn't make them look like horrific monsters, but that doesn't change the fact that they are robber barons.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Fine! by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm pretty sure he thinks he's doing a pretty good job. What with the fight to end malaria, the public library funding, and helping to put a pc in every home.

      Many robber barons have succumb to their conscience late in life and begin to try to make recompense. Others just do it for good PR to keep "the masses" from rioting at the Gate's. If Gates had truly been interested in serving humanity he would have been doing it (probably at a smaller scale) his entire life. John D. Rockefeller gave over half of his fortune away in his later years but was known to be quite ruthless and ethically challenged.

      I liken it to burning down a city, killing the mayor and making yourself the new ruler and then offering to rebuild the city at a reduced rate but you still get to be the ruler.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    4. Re:Fine! by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Better idea. For every piece of work they shift, their taxes go up to support communities they dump. As in, they are forced to shoulder the real costs of outsourcing, rather than "outsourcing" the cost to the tax payers.

      But in today's system, where corporations are people with human rights and capital has more rights than most people, that's not going to happen.

    5. Re:Fine! by CaptSlaq · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Implying that "doing good" and "making money" are mutually exclusive... I believe this to be a false assumption.

    6. Re:Fine! by BonThomme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      oh bullshit.

      -bullshit, if your school doesn't have differentiated curriculum, it sucks, not common core
      -bullshit, exploring how math concepts evolved is not that same as "going back to"; "showing your work" has been a part of education forever
      -bullshit, the only people introducing politics are ones like you (who tend to introduce politics or religion into anything they don't like or understand)
      -epic bullshit, doesn't merit a response
      -bullshit, the Texas school board does this

      I lived through New Math decades ago enduring binary, octal, and hexadecimal in 3rd grade, so I have every right to be skeptical of CC. I find it a vast improvement over what was there, but I recognize the consternation of parents who suddenly realize their snowflakes aren't quite so precious.

    7. Re:Fine! by Anon-Admin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is not exactly right.

      He gives $X of his personal income to his non-profit charity. He can now write off the $X from his personal taxes and still keep the money in something he controls.

      Aside from that, being the head of the non-profit means that he can receive benefits from the non-profit for his time and service. For example the non-profit can own his house, car, boat, etc and provide for his use free of charge. This protects his assets while still giving him control of them, on top of this it is deducted from the non-profit as an operating expense. Remember, a non-profit can spend 90% of it's income on operating expenses and 10% or less on the charitable actions.

    8. Re:Fine! by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Standing alone sure, but the comment was not standing on its own. The comment was about Bill Gates who is a known liar (See the US vs. Microsoft Antitrust cases for easy to validate examples) and made his fortune on thievery, manipulation, and lies. Ignoring known immoral behavior in determining someone's "character" would be asinine correct?

      To further believe that an obvious narcissist would do anything for purely altruistic purposes is also asinine correct?

      So the statement that was made does not equate to your gross oversimplification. The statement made was that roughly that "Bill Gates is not altruistic and/or of high moral character".

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    9. Re:Fine! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And somehow you seem to think this hasn't been happening to other countries for years, and that it's different when it happens to you.

      Numerous American firms have bought Canadian companies, signed contracts saying they'd keep the jobs, and then after a few years shut everything down and left .. leaving us with neither the jobs nor the ownership of the original business. And in several instances when the Canadian company was more profitable, but since they weren't American jobs they were expendable.

      Multinationals are like locusts, they take what they want, make huge demands to get concessions, fail to live up to their promises, and then move on to somewhere else.

      Companies like Nike have been steadily moving their labor to the next cheapest place whenever people start asking for fair wages and working conditions. And yet a lot of people just say "well, that's the free market, adapt or die".

      I've been looking at the entire picture for the last 20 years.

      Maybe some Americans are only just now realizing what that picture is?

      The problem is the branch of economics which says all of this is a desirable outcome, and the fact that politicians and business people have been feeding us this line saying it's going to improve our lives. Because it's all predicated on lies, bullshit, bad assumptions, and the implicit idea that greed is the highest ideal.

      The reality is, it doesn't, and never actually has.

      What it has done is allowed corporations to do what you describe for the last several decades, and the politicians who back them (or, are paid by them), hand over what they want.

      Capitalism as envisioned by a lot of people is basically a suicide pact, and as long as the people at the top get what they want, nothing will change.

      The rest of us just get screwed. And, like I said, it's been happening to everybody else for decades.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. "stashes its cash" by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Only the US charges income tax on profits from foreign subsidiaries which have already been taxed abroad. Besides being unfair, such a disincentive to bring the money into the US obviously discourages the spending and employing here that could be done with it.

  3. Muck funny in politics and muck Ficrosoft. by Iamthecheese · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only reason politicians pretend to listen to arguments like Microsoft is making is the money passing under the table. The only reason Microsoft needs to argue this point at all is to present the pretense that politicians are uninformed, as opposed to corrupt.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Muck funny in politics and muck Ficrosoft. by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only reason Microsoft needs to argue this point at all is to present the pretense that politicians are uninformed, as opposed to corrupt.

      I disagree. There's no reason politicians can't be both.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  4. Cake and eat it too by sinij · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Corporations want infrastructure, rule of the law, and educated workforce that comes with doing business in US while paying third-world wages and hiding income in tax shelters. You can't have it both ways.

    I also highly doubt that Canada, for example, going to look any more favorable on work visas. If they move to Canada, they will have to hire Canadians (or people eligible for NAFTA visas). That won't be 25K/year PhDs from India.

    1. Re:Cake and eat it too by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you incorrectly believe that _everyone_ pays the US 35% corporate tax sure, the US has the highest corporate tax rate. You would have to be extremely ignorant or gullible to believe that anyone pays the base rate. 70,000 pages of tax code are currently ensuring that anyone that can afford an a loophole has a loophole.

      If we had any legitimacy in the Government, I would expect the Government to be asking why Microsoft just terminated 18,000 employees (including no-competes preventing their hire at MS or anywhere else) and is now requesting 1,000 more foreign workers.

      For those that claim that H1Bs have nothing to do with wages, I'd ask the same exact question.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  5. We just laid off a ton of people by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Insightful

    so please let us hire more overseas. Please?

    Pretty Please?

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  6. Geographic matching by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    who later explained that about 60% of Microsoft's workforce is in the U.S., yet it makes 68% of its profits overseas

    Which is pretty much irrelevant when it comes to software. There is no need at all in software to match development costs to geographic locations. It's one of the beautiful things about being in that industry. That's why you can have a development team in India for a product that isn't even sold there and it still makes sense. It's not a tangible good you export.

    Now if they cannot get the right talent for the right price domestically then sure they might have to look elsewhere but frankly I doubt that is really the core problem for Microsoft. If they are having trouble getting good talent I think it has a lot more to do with the fact that people are well aware they have a pretty toxic corporate culture where everyone has to have their knives out at all times and so much of the best talent decides to work elsewhere. Microsoft is just not an attractive place to work compared with Apple or Google or some of the other top IT firms.

    It's also a little disingenuous to claim you need cheaper talent when you have net profit margins well above 20%. Microsoft's problems are not rooted in their cost structure but in their revenue streams. Their problems are that their key revenue streams (Windows and Office) are tied to tightly to the PC market and they haven't been able to translate them very well to the mobile market. They spent so many years trying to maximize their monopoly on the PC they they found it difficult to acknowledge that mobile devices have different requirements and to relax their grip so that they could grow. Microsoft saw the opportunity in mobile 10-15 years ago but kept trying to cram a PC into a mobile device with predictably bad results.

  7. Mythbust this! by PlanetX+00 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is all about keeping wages down: Microsoft cuts 2,100 jobs in its latest round of layoffs (http://www.engadget.com/2014/09/18/microsoft-layoffs-round-2/) Intel to cut over 5,000 jobs (http://money.cnn.com/2014/01/17/technology/intel-jobs/) Cisco plans 6,000 layoffs in restructuring plan (http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2014/08/13/cisco-plans-6-000-layoffs-in-restructuring-plan.html?page=all) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  8. It's a scam. Cheaper Labor is the reason by Virtucon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Come on Microsoft, stop the horseshit and just hire workers from within the US. You fucksticks have had it your way too long.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  9. Re: FWD.US lies, just like its founder, Zuckerberg by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Undercover of helping immigrant agricultural workers who have long needed a break in America, the American technology sector - lead by Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg - has seen fit to heavily lobby Congress to increase H1-B and other worker visa permits, vastly increasing H1-B visas at a time when very good research shows that there is no shortage of tech workers in America. Zuckerberg has so far succeeded, in the Senate. What is motivating the claim for more H1-B visas?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

    previously

    One of the most respected technology pundits in Silicon Valley has this to say about the H1-B worker problem and Two H1-B's walk into a Bar: More on the H1-B visa problem

    One of many examples of what goes on behind closed doors: an immigration attorney and his consultants teaching corporations how to manipulate foreign-worker immigration law to replace qualified American workers.

    H1-B's are only the tip of the iceberg; there are more than 20 categories of foreign worker visas.

    Professor Norman Matloff's extremely well documented studies on the H1-B and foreign worker visa problem. Matloff claims that Hi-B abuse has cost Americans $10Trillion dollars, since 1975. Inc. Magazine weights in Professor Matloff's Webpage

    Mother Jones weighs in:How H1-B visa abuse is hurting American tech workers

    Marc Zuckerberg and other wealthy tech scions - including large immigration law firms and corporation who profit from importing H1-B's continue to perpetuate this trend

    How H1-B malpractice hurts the American economy

    Most of the new crop of H1-Bs is coming from one of the most corrupt university systems in the world.

    Indian government officials are not happy that the universities that they collude with might have some limitations placed on the abuses that have enabled them to "sell" their product to the American IT sector.

    How the new immigration bill could ignite a trade war with India

    How to underpay an H1-B worker