Slashdot Mirror


How Did the 'Berlin Patient' Rid Himself of HIV?

sciencehabit writes: Researchers are closer to unraveling the mystery of how Timothy Ray Brown, the only human cured of HIV, defeated the virus, according to a new study. Although the work doesn't provide a definitive answer, it rules out one possible explanation. [R]esearchers point to three different factors that could independently or in combination have rid Brown’s body of HIV. The first is the process of conditioning, in which doctors destroyed Brown’s own immune system with chemotherapy and whole body irradiation to prepare him for his bone marrow transplant. His oncologist, Gero Hütter, who was then with the Free University of Berlin, also took an extra step that he thought might not only cure the leukemia but also help rid Brown’s body of HIV. He found a bone marrow donor who had a rare mutation in a gene that cripples a key receptor on white blood cells the virus uses to establish an infection. (For years, researchers referred to Brown as "the Berlin patient.") The third possibility is his new immune system attacked remnants of his old one that held HIV-infected cells, a process known as graft versus host disease.

107 comments

  1. Host versus graft disease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe the disease rejected him?

    1. Re:Host versus graft disease by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think the patient in Berlin now has a Wall to isolate himself from incorporated viral entrepreneurs.

  2. Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although the work doesn't provide a definitive answer, it rules out one possible explanation

    ...that conditioning by itself likely cannot rid the body of the AIDS virus.

    1. Re:Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The patient had HIV, not AIDS. They are not one in the same.

    2. Re:Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Although the work doesn't provide a definitive answer, it rules out one possible explanation

      ...that conditioning by itself likely cannot rid the body of the AIDS virus.

      No but a significant percentage of Europeans are resistant to HIV. Not sure what the news are here, Germans in general should have 25% chance of fighting off an HIV infection.

    3. Re:Missing in the Summary by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IMO he probably still has traces of the virus within his body somewhere, but in such small quantities that it's undetectable. Other viruses are known to do this, such as chickenpox, which can resurface later in the form of shingles if the immune system ever weakens. Except HIV feeds off of the immune system itself, so it's likely he'll never see symptoms of it again.

      However it would be unwise for him to do whatever he did to contract it in the first place as he could either spread his to somebody else or contract another variation of the disease that doesn't rely on the same receptor that he is now immune to (and yes, he does fit the "risk category" demographic if you haven't read his history.)

    4. Re:Missing in the Summary by jae471 · · Score: 3, Informative

      OP said "AIDS virus", not AIDS. HIV is the virus that causes AIDS. Calling HIV the AIDS virus is no different than calling rhinovirus the "common cold virus".

      (Unless you're one of those people...)

    5. Re:Missing in the Summary by rasmusbr · · Score: 2

      Little known fact: a person with HIV who has access to the right retroviral drugs and takes them on time is practically unable to transmit HIV during sex. There are now anecdotes about HIV positive men who have had sex without using a condom with hundreds of non-HIV positive men without a single instance of transmitting the virus.

      Of course, these people still transmit other STD:s.

    6. Re:Missing in the Summary by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good for them, I guess? Still nothing I would ever want to validate experimentally...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    7. Re:Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Call me old fashioned, but if you know you're HIV+, and have unprotected sex with hundreds of people ... you're an asshole.

      I find it hard to believe all of those people have had the benefit of informed consent.

      And, for what it's worth, yes, I do know people who are HIV+, and yes, they're gay men.

      Stuff like this is what people have been trying to combat.

    8. Re:Missing in the Summary by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      Call me old fashioned, but if you know you're HIV+, and have unprotected sex with hundreds of people ... you're an asshole.

      I find it hard to believe all of those people have had the benefit of informed consent.

      And, for what it's worth, yes, I do know people who are HIV+, and yes, they're gay men.

      Stuff like this is what people have been trying to combat.

      Yeah, the reason why these anecdotes are believable is that they are based on criminal investigations and court proceedings. As you might guess, some of those hundreds of men were not too happy.

    9. Re:Missing in the Summary by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      time is practically unable to transmit HIV during sex.

      No they are able to, just not likely. When it does happen, the results tend to be pretty bad as the virus that DOES spread tends to be resistant to multiple anti-HIV drugs, which means the recipient will be SOL when it comes to treatment and no amount of therapy will prevent the development of full blown aids.

    10. Re:Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO he probably still has traces of the virus within his body somewhere, but in such small quantities that it's undetectable.

      Thanks for that analysis, doctor. It's amazing that you're able to come up with better information about this patient than even doctors who have actually seen the man! Maybe you could turn your talents to remote diagnostics of other people who are unable to afford traveling to find the highest quality of medical care. I've been having some trouble with my knee...

    11. Re:Missing in the Summary by Gavrielkay · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, if what I remember is correct, people with that mutation mentioned are unable to get AIDS. Their T-cells lack the receptor that the virus attaches to. This was discovered a while back when certain people never got AIDS despite engaging in all the same risky behavior that caused people around them to get sick in droves. Apparently the mutation was enriched in Europeans because it also provided protection against the plague.

    12. Re:Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      s /asshole/attempted murderer/

      FTFY.

    13. Re:Missing in the Summary by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      i think you should be a 'felon' at that point.

    14. Re:Missing in the Summary by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      I assume everyone I sleep with has HIV.

      That's why I don't have to tell them about mine.

    15. Re:Missing in the Summary by thebjorn · · Score: 2

      you don't remember correctly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

    16. Re:Missing in the Summary by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 0

      How about dead. Dead sounds like a much better option than felon. Felons cost a lot of money, dead people are a sunk cost.

    17. Re:Missing in the Summary by niado · · Score: 4, Informative

      Although the work doesn't provide a definitive answer, it rules out one possible explanation

      ...that conditioning by itself likely cannot rid the body of the AIDS virus.

      No but a significant percentage of Europeans are resistant to HIV. Not sure what the news are here, Germans in general should have 25% chance of fighting off an HIV infection.

      You're a bit confused. Some Europeans (between 4% and 16%) carry a mutatation that reduces their likelihood of contracting specific HIV strains. The bone marrow donor mentioned in the summary had two copies of this mutated gene, which is a possible contributor to the "cure".

    18. Re:Missing in the Summary by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What about the non-HIV positive women they had sex with?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    19. Re: Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This archaic view is sadly a big contributor to the stigma around the virus.

      Recent clinical trials in AU, EU, and the U.S. have all failed to clinically transmit the HIV virus between serodiscordant homosexual male couples over an aggregate of almost 3000 years of unprotected sex. This is where the positive partner is on specific types of ART including integrate inhibitors.

      It is indeed seemingly so unlikely one such person could transfer HIV with today's medication that it's medically not even considered a risk, and legally things are moving in that direction as well.

      Someone would have more legal ground now days to sue you for giving them the flu because you were too much of an "asshole" to stay home and get better, than they would if you had unprotected aws with them if they had HIV and were on such ART.

      The unfortunate part of all this is people like you who have stigma based on outdated information from 30-10 years ago when this was not the case.

      Medical science and research moves much faster than human stigma and general knowledge, I suggest you educate yourself before spewing such uneducated vitriol around as fact.

    20. Re:Missing in the Summary by rasmusbr · · Score: 2

      What about the non-HIV positive women they had sex with?

      Penis in anus sex has a much higher risk of transmitting HIV compared to penis in vagina sex. We're talking something like a factor of ten difference.

      It has always been a little bit mysterious that HIV manages to spread epidemically among heterosexual people who don't use iv drugs in Africa. I don't know if this mystery has been resolved yet.

    21. Re: Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has already begun to be validated in clinical settings. Across the world, thousands of couples are taking part in studies as we speak to back up existing studies already done that all failed to transmit HIV between serodiscordant gay men having unprotected sex (thousands of samples over 2 years).

    22. Re: Missing in the Summary by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Somebody could take over the world with whatever they're using to convince people to participate in those experiments as far as I'm concerned.

      Outcome A) They were right and presumably they pay you.
      Outcome B) You now have HIV.

      "No, no! We're reeeeally sure it's gonna be B. Almost positive. We just need more data."

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    23. Re:Missing in the Summary by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      and takes them on time

      What's the rate on women forgetting to take The Pill and getting pregnant, anyway? Perhaps putting too fine a point on it, but I expect it's still a damn sight easier to get an abortion than to get un-HIV'd.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    24. Re: Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The couples involved are already serodiscordant, and already choosing to have unprotected sex.

    25. Re:Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame the unchecked spread of Christianity. Specifically, its obsession with vaginal virginity and shaming condom use that ultimately leads to women getting infected the exact same way most HIV+ gay men did: unprotected anal sex. The large intestine is an efficient superhighway for absorbing particles into the bloodstream. The vagina, cervix, and uterus aren't. A man having heterosexual intercourse with a HIV+ woman has roughly equal odds of getting it from unprotected vaginal and anal sex, but I think it's intellectually dishonest for researchers to keep pretending that vaginal sex is a major, let alone the MAIN, vector of infection for heterosexual women.

    26. Re:Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't "unable" to become infected, but they're kind of like normal HIV+ people who take a CCR5 entry inhibitor like maraviroc (Selzentry), except it's their body's natural state.

      I don't know whether the hypothesis has ever been formally tested, but in theory, a HIV+ individual with the CCR5 mutation could probably derive almost exactly the same benefit from Truvada alone that a "normal" person would get by combining Truvada & Selzentry. That said, I'm pretty sure the consensus in the US is that a CCR5 inhibitor like Selzentry is a great fourth drug to add to a failing 3-drug regimen, but doesn't quite go far enough to rely on exclusively AS the third drug in a 3-drug regimen. Eventually, the subset of virions that weren't affected by the CCR5 inhibitor would develop resistance to tenofovir and/or emtricitabine & become the predominant strain.

      On the other hand, this mutation is probably the reason why a few guys who got infected in the 80s and early 90s were able to survive on first-generation antivirals long enough for newer and better drugs to become available, instead of dying along with most of their friends & neighbors taking the same early drugs. I'd venture a guess that the overwhelming majority of long-term survivors in the US probably have the gene.

    27. Re:Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to add... Selzentry (maraviroc) is one of the drugs being currently tested (Google: nextPrEP) as an alternative to (or improvement over) Truvada for PrEP.

      My educated guess: unless tenofovir and/or emtricitabine (in combination with maraviroc) is OVERWHELMINGLY demonstrated to be superior to maraviroc alone, or maraviroc + lamivudine, they'll be seeking FDA approval of maraviroc alone or maraviroc+lamivudine for PrEP in preference to anything that involves tenofovir or emtricitabine.

      Why? Patents & licensing. If maraviroc alone, or maraviroc + lamivudine is viable, Pfizer can get it approved and use Truvada's patent (and high cost) to its advantage since their new product would be an alternative to Truvada, but wouldn't necessarily have to be any cheaper.

      On the other hand, if Pfizer has to wait for Truvada's patents to expire starting in 2017 (it's almost inconceivable that Gilead would allow them to license tenofovir and/or emtricitabine at any price that would make the new drug viable), they'll run the risk that someone like Cipla will get FDA approval for a cheap tenofovir+lamivudine combo drug the moment tenofovir's patent expires, and undercut BOTH Truvada AND the new drug in the PrEP market with a cheap alternative. Just to give a magnitude comparison, Cipla sells generic Tenvir-EM (same component drugs as Truvada) in India for about $33/month... and sells it for even less in Africa. In contrast, Truvada retails for more than $1,400/month if you're paying cash. With that kind of a difference, Cipla could charge $250/month and STILL almost completely corner the US market for PrEP meds.

    28. Re:Missing in the Summary by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Today I learned: There are people who think HIV is fake.

      Today I already knew: People will deny anything, even the obvious.

      Informative +10! Thanks.

    29. Re:Missing in the Summary by Zynder · · Score: 1

      dead people are a sunk cost

      How droll! (in my best Fred Flintstone voice)

    30. Re:Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have anal sex with a woman too.

    31. Re: Missing in the Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol AIDS is a syndrome caused by many diseases in combination/progression.

    32. Re: Missing in the Summary by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      So they're choosing to be stupid already, might as well be stupid for science?

      Can't argue there, I suppose.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  3. Simple. He's Immortal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He can't die, you fool, unless his head comes away from his neck.

    now that he's outed, expect a seven-foot lunatic with a sword to come after him.

    1. Re:Simple. He's Immortal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure he meets his end in New York, that way there can be twenty witnesses but nobody saw a thing.

    2. Re:Simple. He's Immortal by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1, Funny

      There can be only Juan!!!!

    3. Re:Simple. He's Immortal by jae471 · · Score: 1

      But Ramírez died...

    4. Re:Simple. He's Immortal by pushing-robot · · Score: 1, Funny

      He was not the Juan.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    5. Re:Simple. He's Immortal by blivit42 · · Score: 1

      "There are some who call me... Tim"

  4. sciencetabloid sez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't work for me!

  5. Not a thorough analysis by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does the subject possess any mysterious rings, amulets, or lamps?
    Does he make sacrifices to chthonic gods, and if so, which?
    Did he recently undertake a quest to bring together a collection of ancient magic gems?
    Is the hospital frequented by a wizard or a druid cult?

    I appreciate the work they did, but when they don't even consider the patient being swapped with his twin from an alternate dimension it's hard to call it rigorous.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Not a thorough analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does he have gaps in his memory where he was transported back to the future for medical treatment?

      This is how my ex swears she was cured of lupus.

    2. Re:Not a thorough analysis by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      it's never lupus.

    3. Re:Not a thorough analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because the anti lupus league(ALL) has a time machine which transports the patient to have lupus removed without their knowledge.

    4. Re:Not a thorough analysis by BrennanPratt · · Score: 2

      They did check him for a triangular beard and oddly inverted morality, though.

    5. Re:Not a thorough analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is how my ex swears she was cured of lupus.

      Did you run like hell before or after she was cured?

    6. Re:Not a thorough analysis by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      He collected exactly 100 gold coins

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
  6. Immune Lagann by AnotherAnonymousUser · · Score: 1

    His is the drill that will pierce the HIV-ens!

    1. Re:Immune Lagann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Take that, Viral!

  7. graft versus host disease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why does every slashdot article have to be about politicians...oh wait

    1. Re:graft versus host disease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because your stupid ass makes it about them. Fuck off AC!

  8. I am no dr. but come on! by funkymonkjay · · Score: 1, Funny

    there are only 2 things here:
    1. radiation treatment
    2. bone marrow from an x-man

    my money is on #2.

    1. Re:I am no dr. but come on! by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      there are only 2 things here: 1. radiation treatment 2. bone marrow from an x-man my money is on #2.

      Only problem is that the best match for super-healing happens to have an adamantium skeleton. Good luck getting bone marrow out of Wolverine!

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    2. Re:I am no dr. but come on! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's what the giant samurai robot was for.

    3. Re:I am no dr. but come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are only 2 things here:

      1. radiation treatment

      2. bone marrow from an x-man

      my money is on #2.

      I remember an article about Magic Johnson curing his HIV infection by an expensive (~$60k I think) bone marrow transplant. This summary made me think that Magic relapsed, but it could just be about the first body that cured the condition itself. He could be Red Skull in hiding or something.

    4. Re:I am no dr. but come on! by lissnup · · Score: 1

      I remember an article about Magic Johnson curing his HIV infection by an expensive (~$60k I think) bone marrow transplant..

      Magic Johnson denies those claims about expensive treatments etc . btw

  9. Wow by riis138 · · Score: 1

    Very interesting stuff. The far reaching implications of using this method to fight viral infections is fascinating.

    --
    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
  10. Summary missing punchline by quantaman · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to the summary

    Although the work doesn't provide a definitive answer, it rules out one possible explanation. [R]esearchers point to three different factors that could independently or in combination have rid Brown’s body of HIV.

    Unfortunately the summary forgets to mention the explanation that was ruled out or even clearly delineate the three different factors (though the latter was more the fault of the original article).

    From my reading of TFA:

    Explanation 1: Conditioning: The radiation that destroyed his immune system also killed off the HIV (because HIV lives in the cells of the immune system).

    Explanation 2: Shiny new immune system: The new bone marrow had a mutation that was immune to HIV and that cured him (maybe by detecting and killing HIV infected cells?).

    Explanation 3: Graft vs host: The new immune system killed off his old one, not just the HIV infected cells but all the old immune systems cells including those infected with HIV.

    So the researchers took chimps, extracted some stem cells (bone marrow?), infected them with SHIV (Simian HIV), destroyed their immune systems with radiation, then reinjected the uninfected stem cells.

    The SHIV quickly came back which rules out explanation 1.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Summary missing punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont bother...

    2. Re:Summary missing punchline by Pro923 · · Score: 1

      About explanation 2... I thought I remember reading sometime in the past that something like 10% of human beings are immune to HIV. Is that real - or not? If it's real, than that gives another boost to explanation 2...

    3. Re:Summary missing punchline by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Resistant would probably be a more accurate description than immune, with significant exposure even people with the mutation would still get infected eventually. Originally it was speculated that the mutation could have been selected for during the black death, but I believe that turned out to be largely bogus.

    4. Re:Summary missing punchline by Gavrielkay · · Score: 3, Informative

      The black death appears to still be considered a possibility for how the mutation got enriched in the population. Another possibility is smallpox. And according to what I've read, it's more like 15% European heritage have one copy of the CCR5-delta 32 mutation which provides limited resistance and 1% got two copies and have strong resistance but not complete immunity since some forms of the virus use other attachment points.

      citation: http://www.nature.com/scitable...

    5. Re:Summary missing punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Number 3 is very unlikely. GvH would not be specific to HIV resiviors and there are other resiciors that are not part of the immune system.

    6. Re:Summary missing punchline by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Minor note: It's SIV, not SHIV. SHIV would stand for Simian Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

    7. Re:Summary missing punchline by teranine · · Score: 2

      The CD4 receptors on the surface of our T cells are used by HIV to gain entry into the cell. The concept is similar to a lock and key mechanism. A very small minority of people in the world (I thought it was less than 1% actually, not 10%), have a mutated CD4 receptor. So the key used by HIV to gain entry doesn't work, access to the cell's nucleus is blocked and replication of the virus does not occur.

    8. Re:Summary missing punchline by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's because they used SHIV, a hybrid virus, not SIV. They chose SHIV because it's response to anti-retrovirals resembles that of HIV.

    9. Re:Summary missing punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homosexuality does not fulfill Koch's postulates as a cause of AIDS. There are plenty of counterexamples.

    10. Re:Summary missing punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hush! Do you want the white supremacists to be right? We can't have THAT, now, can we?

    11. Re:Summary missing punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it involves a MORAL question, it has no place in the secularized, pluralized, privatized, educated and enlightened PUBLIC SQUARE.

    12. Re:Summary missing punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So just as with windows computers: if you get a really nasty virus, don't bother trying to clean it out - wipe the whole thing and start over.

    13. Re:Summary missing punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Approximately 10% of caucasians have one copy. Approximately 1% of caucasians have two. If your ancestors came from what's now Slovakia, western Ukraine, and/or Belarus, your odds of having one or two copies are significantly higher.

      If you have one copy, it means that statistically half of your CD4 cells are uninfectable by R5-tropic HIV. If you're infected exclusively by R5-tropic HIV and take no medication, you're unlikely to ever progress to full-blown AIDS, because half of your potential CD4 cells would remain uninfected even if the other half were all destroyed.That doesn't mean taking no meds would be a good idea... you'd still suffer the effects of constant viremia, and would eventually succumb to HIV dementia after years of getting your nervous system ravaged by an uncontrolled HIV infection.

      If you have two copies, it means that NONE of your CD4 cells can be infected by R5-tropic HIV. On the plus side, this gives you approximately the same protection a normal person would get from using condoms (in the specific context of HIV). On the minus side, if you DO manage to get infected, it's going to be with a strain that's X4-tropic or dual-tropic and will progress at exactly the same rate as it would in anybody else.

      This has implications for both PrEP and treatment. While having the CCR5-delta32 mutation confers some degree of immunity in its own right, it's not individually enough to rule out eventual HIV infection if you have bareback sex enough times.

      If you have two copies of the mutation AND take Truvada, your risk of HIV infection is basically zero, even if you have daily receptive bareback anal sex with anonymous strangers treating you as a cum dump. Full stop, end of story. Your natural immunity will render 50-96% of HIV incapable of infecting you, and the Truvada will knock out 94-99% of the rest. If you step it up a notch and have sex ONLY with guys who are reliably confirmed to have no detectable HIV in their bodily fluids (either negative-and-PrEP'ed, or positive-and-undetectable), I'd say the risk is so close to zero, and your life's biggest problem isn't HIV... it's anxiety + OCD.

      If you have ONE copy & get infected by a HIV strain that's 100% R5-tropic, you'll want to begin antiviral treatment IMMEDIATELY, to avoid superinfection by a strain you DON'T have natural resistance to & slow down the rate of mutations to minimize the odds of a spontaneous mutation resulting in X4-tropic HIV. And if you're negative & take Truvada for PrEP, your HIV risk isn't much worse than someone who has two copies.

  11. To any fundamentalists who may have stumbled in... by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like those curses from god just ain't what they used to be. :-)

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  12. His name is Ray? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy. When the virus asked him if he was a god, he finally said "yes."

  13. With the help of AIDS of course by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Everyone can use some aids to help them with their daily lives.

  14. Summary missing punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like #2 combined with either #1 or #3 is the most obvious answer.

    A new immune system that is resistant to the virus combined with getting rid of the old system (either by intentionally destroying it prior to the transplant or by the new cells turning on the old ones) would intuitively seem like the way to deal with an infected immune system.

    Without the new system being resistant you'd expect the virus to simply infect the new cells as there should be some virii in the blood streamfor some time even if all the infected cells are destroyed by conditioning, and new vulnerable cells attacking the old vulnerable cells is an obviously flawed way to fight the infection.

  15. The real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He still produces HIV but his T cells aren't susceptible to infection (and death) because of the unusual receptor obtained from the bone marrow donor.

  16. Nautral HIV Immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't the first time HIV immunity has been recorded.

    1. Re:Nautral HIV Immunity by See+Attached · · Score: 1

      Is there a way to see if his immune system has developed something that could be useful to innoculate others? Thought go back to the first innoculations. http://amhistory.si.edu/polio/... - maybe this is the guy that hosts the solution? Adaptive immunity is very useful.

      --
      Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
    2. Re:Nautral HIV Immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a way to see if his immune system has developed something that could be useful to innoculate others?

      Innoculation in the vaccine sense is now mostly viewed as impractical, if only because any vaccine that produced antibodies to HIV would render most cheap & easy HIV tests unusable (They don't detect HIV. They detect... antibodies, which are exactly what a vaccine would be expected to produce.) And because there are SO MANY variants of HIV-1, any vaccine for it would be kind of like influenza vaccine... they'd have to guess a few strains you were likely to be exposed to, and hope you didn't get exposed to a different one.

      In contrast, PrEP with Truvada is "99.9% effective" at preventing HIV when taken without fail every day. It's kind of like if you were able to take Tamiflu every day during flu season. As long as you had therapeutically-active amounts in your blood stream, your likelihood of getting a flu would be almost nonexistent.

      As far as CCR5-inhibition goes, there's a relatively new class of drugs that do PRECISELY what this guy's new immune system does. Google "maraviroc". Somebody with 100% R5-tropic HIV taking maraviroc daily would achieve exactly the same kind of functional cure as this guy did. The only difference is that he doesn't have to take a pill every day to benefit from it. Not everyone with HIV can benefit from it, but for those who CAN (because 100% of their HIV can bind only to CCR5 receptors), they can become undetectable (and functionally cured themselves) within a matter of weeks, as long as they keep taking it.

      The thing a lot of guys don't seem to understand is that a poz guy who achieves complete viral suppression and becomes undetectable is really no different from a negative guy who takes Truvada for PrEP and gets exposed daily to HIV-infected semen. CD4 cells occasionally get infected, but the Truvada prevents them from replicating, and the infected CD4 cell eventually just dies & takes the HIV inside with it. That's how he REMAINS undetectable.

      One interesting scenario that's rarely discussed, and would be almost impossible to occur unless someone actively TRIED to get infected while taking Truvada for PrEP, would be if someone collected semen from detectable poz guys, then gave himself nonstop enemas with it day after day. At some point, he'd probably manage to have enough CD4 cells infected at one time (even if they couldn't replicate) to trigger an immune response strong enough to create HIV antibodies without actual HIV infection. And I'm sure someone, somewhere, will probably manage to pull it off within the next 5 years or so and earn his Darwin Award.

  17. Re:To any fundamentalists who may have stumbled in by sinij · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please, try being a Pastafarian. I get cursed with a terminal disease at least once before my morning coffee. Considering our vengeful god, it is amazing any of us still alive.

    Partially due to above circumstances, on a long enough scale, Pastafarian mortality approaches 100%.

  18. Re:Are we really that confused? by jonnythan · · Score: 1

    So eating a lot of protein cures HIV? Who knew. I guess those idiot physicians and biochemists and infectious disease specialists and epidemiologists just don't understand anything a pharmaceutical rep doesn't tell them.

  19. So, it's a little like fixing a Windows machine by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Format the drive and reinstall all your software. Probably takes the same amount of time, too.

  20. May still be infected. by Chas · · Score: 1

    I know they are pronouncing him "cured".

    That's the funny thing about diseases like HIV.

    The simple fact is, it may STILL be in his system. Just, currently, in quantities far too low to be detected.

    But, give it a couple years. And out of his blood/bone marrow/organs, it'll come. And it'll multiply into life threatening numbers again.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:May still be infected. by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's already been a few years.

    2. Re:May still be infected. by Chas · · Score: 1

      It's already been a few years.

      Yes. AND?

      Do people exposed to HIV immediately begin developing non-hodgkins lymphomas and a completely compromised immune system?

      No.

      Has this person POSSIBLY extended their life? Maybe.

      But going "It's been X years, he's clear!" with something like HIV is a dangerous precedent.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  21. Commercials 20 years from now ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We're going to take out your immune system ... And replace it with a new and improved one. Let's see if anyone notices!"

    1. Re:Commercials 20 years from now ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern HIV meds have so few real side effects anymore, I can't even FATHOM someone who's not in virological failure going through what this guy did JUST to be cured of HIV. ESPECIALLY if he had to keep taking Truvada as PrEP anyway to make sure he stayed HIV-free.

      Public service announcement: I'm negative (with Truvada-backed extended warranty to make sure I stay that way), and the only side effects I've had are 1) the anxiety I used to have every time I had sex is gone, and 2) sex is ten thousand times more fun. Treating everyone you have sex with like a class 2 biohazard might be a prudent strategy for avoiding HIV, but it's not a mentally healthy way to live.

  22. The answer to this is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He fucked a frog.

  23. Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stopped taking it up the ass by dozens of total stangers....

  24. Graft versus host disease? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now the story of a wealthy family who lost everything, and the one son who had no choice but to keep them all together.

  25. Re:To any fundamentalists who may have stumbled in by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Is it true your god condemns the unfaithful to die moaning in ecstasy, one bite before the end of a plate of pasta in a wine/blue cheese/garlic sauce?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  26. "the only human cured of HIV"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a crock of bullshit, humans are cured of all diseases all the time. The only time its widely publicized is when the 'medical industry' claims to have done it with their big pharma and other unnecessary medical treatments. There are documented cases of hiv positive people, becoming hiv negative without the 'help' of the medical industry as well as many other diseases and conditions. We just don't hear about it, because if everyone knew, the ultimate death sentence would occur to the medical industry - "lack of monetary gain".

    1. Re:"the only human cured of HIV"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Name ONE Google'able person who was credibly confirmed HIV+ by at least 3 validated tests (ELISA, Western Blot, and RNA or PCR assay), then later confirmed HIV- by the same 3 validated tests despite receiving no formal medical treatment for it. You can't, because it HAS NEVER HAPPENED. The frauds and nutcases who claim phony cures inevitably refuse to participate in any kind of credible testing.

      Right now, there's a new drug that literally cures hepatitis... for $90,000. As profitable as HIV meds are, pharma companies are businesses with a good understanding of both "present value" and "speculative risk". There's no secret conspiracy to suppress a "cure", because any company that discovered one & got the patents could literally charge a quarter of a million dollars per patient in the US, and instantly soak up the lifetime aggregate profit value of that patient within a matter of months. Any health insurer that tried to deny it post-FDA-approval would be INSTANTLY beaten into submission by legislators.

      If a company like Gilead found an outright cure for HIV, they'd instantly become the most intensely profitable company on planet earth. And after they cured everyone in America and Europe, they'd cut the cost as necessary and keep milking the near-endless supply of patients with HIV elsewhere in the world.

  27. Re:Are we really that confused? by rs79 · · Score: 1

    No.

    Again, when the virus stips your cells to make more of its own offspring - this is normal viral activity - it does something other viruses don't do, it also strips out selenium.

    So they tried supplementing with just selenium and that helped but did not reverse the disease.

    So they looked at what other essential (the body can't make them) molecules it took from the body and ignored non-essential (the body can make more of those molecules and doesn't have to ingest them) molecules the virus stripped from the host cells.

    Low and behold, Tryptophan, Cysteine and Glutamine.

    If you look up what has glutamine an in what amounts, nothing come close to beef[1] and it also has a fair amount of Tryptophan.

    Cysteine is in cheese, the more aged the better. Parrnasian probabky has more than more other common ones I'd guess.

    Because acidic rains for millions of years leached minerals form the Amazonian clay soils those minerals all ended up someplace an that's where brazil nut trees grow. They have so much selenium, that if you eat a handful a day you'll have selenosis in a week - a, um, disruption in the alimentary canal shall we say.

    From both ends. But they're utterly essential for heart, brain and immune system.

    In fact if you look you'll notice Senegal, like Brazil, has natural deposits of selenium in the soil everywhere and it was this that accounted for the reduced rate of incidence of HIV in Senegal - the HIV rate there is as low as it is in the US despite the fact the Senegalese have the same sub saharan cultural practices (and by that I mean fucking a lot) as the rest of the Sub Saharan Africa that has a 5-10X higher rate of HIV infection . This stands out, as does Finland where they put a lot of selenium in the soil to try to slow down heart diseases - the aids rate is lower than normal there too.

    So "eating a lot of protein" per se won't do it. You'd have to use beef, cheese and a brazil nut or two.

    Note also this works on all selenoviruses - which includes all the Coxsackie viruses which includes Hep C and others.

    Most commercial medical training is strictly for acute care and they're the best in the world. But for chronic conditions they're less than useless an haven't fond anything useful since penicillin.

    I hate t say it but there is literally no money in finding cures, there's only money for developing pills that are patentable that come close to what some other pill does. Some do better, some do worse. But if they're patented, they're funded.

    They has the same problem with vitamin C, too. Jacques Cartier got stuck in Canada in Montreal in the Winter of 1580 (and you KNOW what a bitch that can be) and when his crew was near death the were saved from scurvy with some pine bark tea. When they told the medical profession back home they's fond a cure for scurvy they were told "we have nothing to learn from savages" and took another 300 years to discover vitamin C, an essential nutrient to every living plant and animal and until then scurvy was known to be caused by Foul humors and more people died needlessly.

    So here's what happens when you try to tell people you have a treatment: the guy that discovered this raises money tests this where it's most needed, Uganda, at the Mengo clinic. It goes well and the guy then goes to the next village over and talks to the clinic there and says hey we have this treatment and we can cure your patients now.

    The doctor there is horrified. "We can't cure these people! We get paid by pharmaceutical companies to test antiretrovirals on AIDS patients and if they get better they can't test and the whole clinic shuts down and it's alll the village has and I'm out of a job as there's no money for a doctor here." This is what actually happened.

    So whaddya do? You write a book and move on. Not the first time this happened, there's at least a half dozen similar stories suppressed medicine in the form of biochemical understanding, but without commercial backing that makes treatments actuall

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?