Slashdot Mirror


The Odd Effects of Being Struck By Lightning

HughPickens.com writes: "Ferris Jabr reports in Outside Magazine that every year, more than 500 Americans are struck by lightning. Roughly 90 percent of them will survive, but those survivors will be instantly, fundamentally altered in ways that still leave scientists scratching their heads. For example, Michael Utley was a successful stockbroker who often went skiing and windsurfing before he was struck by lightning. Today, at 62, he lives on disability insurance. "I don't work. I can't work. My memory's fried, and I don't have energy like I used to. I aged 30 years in a second." Lightning also dramatically altered Utley's personality. "It made me a mean, ornery son of a b****." Utley created a website devoted to educating people about preventing lightning injury and started regularly speaking at schools and doing guest spots on televised weather reports.

Mary Ann Cooper, professor emerita at the University of Illinois at Chicago, is one of the few medical doctors who have attempted to investigate how lightning alters the brain's circuitry. According to Cooper, the evidence suggests lightning injuries are, for the most part, injuries to the brain, the nervous system, and the muscles. Lightning can ravage or kill cells, but it can also leave a trail of much subtler damage and Cooper and other researchers speculate that chronic issues are the result of lightning scrambling each individual survivor's unique internal circuitry (PDF). "Those who attempt to return to work often find they are unable to carry out their former functions and after a few weeks, when coworkers get weary of 'covering' for them, they either are put on disability (if they are lucky) or fired," she writes.

191 comments

  1. Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Having millions of volts of electricy pumped through a person's body causes nervous system damage and changes. Who would have guessed?

    1. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Across". Current goes through.

    2. Re:Who would have guessed by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is interesting, though, is how relatively subtle the changes are. Death and/or ghastly electrical burns? Unpleasant; but likely enough. It's the relatively modest changes to things like personality or perceived energy level that really take some unraveling.

    3. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the symptoms sound like brain/nerve damage, but understanding what is done and how are the hard parts.

    4. Re:Who would have guessed by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Ever seen a circuit board fried from an electrical surge?

      Happens all the time when relying on the multi-plug surge arrestor for one's delicate equipment. They sell a much better unit that takes the place of two breaker spaces in the main panel, for under a hundred bucks.

      Oh. And wouldn't you know it? There's no surge arrestor in your organic brain.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighting creates long glass channels in sandy areas when it hits to the ground. Similar network of burned tissue should be there, tracing the tasty, I mean the salty parts of brain and the rest of the body.

    6. Re:Who would have guessed by volmtech · · Score: 1

      So what do you do with the two rooms that no longer have power?

    7. Re:Who would have guessed by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      Power is usually described as going in or out.

      --
      Visit the
    8. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most of the circuit breaker panels that I've seen (in the US) have extra, unused breaker slots. Also, double breakers - two breakers in one slot - are available.

    9. Re:Who would have guessed by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Resistance is futile.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    10. Re:Who would have guessed by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      If your panel is already full it is no longer legal. Either you change it for a larger one, either you merge circuits. In a house an electrical panel is rarely more than half-full.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    11. Re:Who would have guessed by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The after effects sound like the longer term effects of a stroke. I'd guess that both kill some brain cells (or at least fry some pathways). Most of the time, a well treated stroke victim has subtle changes. It's the 80+ year old victims who already could only just barely dress themselves who have a stroke that end up massicely affected. "aged 30 years in a stroke (of lightning)" when you are already feeling like 120 years old leaves you 150 years old, and that's the traditional drooling incontinent stroke victim. That and the untreated stroke victim - the one where they had the stroke sometime in the night, and didn't get any treatment until noon the next day, so they went 16 hours with an untreated blockage or bleed.

      For me, I had a massive stroke at 35. Treated within a couple hours (at the hospital within 15 minutes of the first symptom), and the only effects are the very subtle ones. Nobody guesses that I had a stroke, let alone that was one of the biggest the stroke specialists had ever seen. But I know the difference. It does affect energy levels and patience.

      I had a 2-year MRI, and 25%+ of my brain was still "darker" than the rest. At least with a stroke, the MRI will show exactly where the damage is, years later. The lightning would affect random connections spread to where there's no identifiable damage area. We aren't smart enough to be able to see brain damage as minor and random as the effects reported here.

    12. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope never seen that happen, I am 40 now. In the Netherlands we don't have low voltage (couple of kV) power lines above ground, the only power lines above ground are the ones who are above 750kV. The high voltage lines are protected for lightning and after the transformers there won't be much of a surge left.

    13. Re: Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      750 kV? In the Netherlands you have 380 kV, 220 kV and 150 kV lines. That's all.

    14. Re:Who would have guessed by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      Why would I have guessed?

    15. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael Utley was a successful stockbroker who often went skiing and windsurfing before he was struck by lightning. Today, at 62, he lives on disability insurance. "I don't work. I can't work. My memory's fried, and I don't have energy like I used to. I aged 30 years in a second." Lightning also dramatically altered Utley's personality. "It made me a mean, ornery son of a b****."

      Seriously? He was a stockbroker, he was always a mean son of a bitch.

    16. Re: Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buying and selling shares in companies is now a capital crime and the epitome of evil? WTF is wrong with morons like you?

    17. Re: Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They see the system for what it has become. Maybe the moron is not them, but you?

    18. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha! That comment knocked my shoes off!

    19. Re:Who would have guessed by bitSmiter · · Score: 1

      LOL. Wish I had mod points left.

    20. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You a re telling this to me now, And I just missed the deal on organic metal oxide varistors on digikey last mint

  2. Bummer... by MindPrison · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...The Odd Effects of Being Struck By Lightning...

    And here I was hoping for special powers like instant genius or telepathic abilities, and it turns out that the best we can hope for is instant Alzheimer?

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Bummer... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Super powers. Check.

      But it still didn't get me out of having to do community service.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Bummer... by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Undoubtedly, rereading all those comic books made it likely you scored high on the SAT, but nevertheless left an impression that every lab accident could result in superpowers.

      Ah, to be naive again.

      People always speculate they would like to return to an earlier version of themselves, if they could know what they know now, but forgetting the the awesome sauce of youth is inexperience.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Bummer... by peter.kingsbury · · Score: 1

      My gf would argue that my ability to forget things is unmatched by people struck by lightning...

    4. Re:Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trick: Have it almost happen but not actually happen to you -- this is the indicator for a unique identity with the power to alter reality. It's happened 3 times to myself.

      Once, when I was 8 years old in the state of Maine, coming from out of nowhere, completely circling me twice, then disappearing into the ground; again at 12 years old on the northwest coast, when it came out of nowhere, stopped 20 feet away, turned into a crackling beach ball sized sphere, slowly moving from my front to my far right, then exploding after 15 seconds; and again at 18 while in Vietnam where it came straight done, went through a microwave receiver dish, turning 90 degrees, going parallel to the ground (looking like a sawtooth wave, with crackling fingers at the tip of each tooth) going through our group of 6 about 5 feet away, continuing on down the (initially 2000 foot high) hillsides, until it disappeared into the Vietnam/South China Sea several miles away.

      Although a healthy, youthful longevity seems to be my main characteristic, I know I'm not invincible; but having later life changing events, such as having a gun put to my head by a gang of thugs only to hear the trigger fail makes me wonder.

  3. striking distance by ThorGod · · Score: 4, Informative

    I worked for a lightning research lab in college. From what I remember, lightning can strike up to 60 miles (?) from the host cloud if the internal charges of the cloud are "right" for it. My take away was if you can see bolts of lightning then you're (possibly) within range.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re:striking distance by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1, Funny

      I worked for a lightning research lab in college. From what I remember

      Well, if you were hit by lightning during that time, you probably won't remember!

      That's the whole point of the article . . . or don't you remember what the article was all about . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:striking distance by ThorGod · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is /. We don't read the articles. We maybe read a sentence from the summary and the title of the post then say whatever comes to mind first.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    3. Re:striking distance by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      out of interest, what's the propagation speed of an AG lightning bolt? I've heard various figures bandied about from 35 to 90 miles a second. Care to weigh in as more of an expert than a lot of people who have ventured a guess?

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    4. Re: striking distance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      An African or European lightning bolt?

    5. Re:striking distance by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Funny

      Doctor, he's fine. He still skims through Slashdot articles; you'd be better off checking his responses to ACs or goat.se links. Don't cut him loose on e-bay, not yet.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    6. Re:striking distance by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Either that, or we all read the articles but then are struck by lightning and forg....

      *ZZZZAAAAPPP!!!!*

      What was I posting about again?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    7. Re:striking distance by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      how does a 4th grade hearsay make it as informative on slshdot, my god are all the nerds just stupid code monkeys now?

    8. Re:striking distance by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      Sorry, Karma is not listed anymore. I cannot make a diagnosis of this patient.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    9. Re:striking distance by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      But this is one of the few times when the article is actually more interesting than the comments here. Worth reading, even if that is breaking the unwritten rules around here.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    10. Re:striking distance by kbahey · · Score: 1

      In August 2009, a boy was hit by lightning and later died in hospital. Witnesses said the sky was blue above them, and there was no thunder or rain.

      Link

    11. Re:striking distance by Vastad · · Score: 1

      Dude, don't make fun of Thor. See? He has a smaller ID than you.

  4. I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by billstewart · · Score: 5, Informative

    The main change is that when I hear people say "You're more likely to get hit by lightning than to have X happen" I can say "I've already been hit by lightning."

    Back around 2000, I was with a group of people at an observatory up in the mountains, which we'd reached by ski-lift-gondola, after some discussion about whether the weather was turning thundery and we should cancel it because we might get stuck there for the day which would mess up our schedule. The thunderstorm decided to show up, and I was outside the observatory looking at the mountains. A few raindrops started to fall, and a bolt of lightning bounced off the building and hit me on the head. The impact wasn't very hard, maybe like dropping a pen onto a hard floor from 5 feet. My wife yelled at me to get in out of the rain. And we did in fact get stuck up there for a few hours - the gondola system shut down when the lightning struck, leaving a gondola full of kids hanging about 100 feet from the observatory for a while before they could restart it, and once they had them safely unloaded they left it stopped until the storm was over.

    The other effect was that I had to tell my wife about the previous time when the group I'd with had almost been hit by lightning, hiking at the top of Colorado mountains when the early-afternoon thunderstorm set in. We'd sat down in a low rock shelter, and some of the folks were having sparks from their fingers to the wet rocks, which were making a bit of a sizzling noise.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is a serious question: Did you notice any impact on your ability to obtain and maintain an erection after you were hit by lightning?

      Years back, I worked with one fellow who survived a lightning strike. He said it was actually the best thing that had ever happened to him. Before being hit, he suffered from extreme difficulties obtaining an erection, and even when he managed to get one he couldn't sustain it for more than a minute or two. But after being hit, he said those problems went away. As he described it, he was then able to get the "fattest throbbing fatties" (I think those were his words, or something along those lines) that he'd ever had, and he'd talk about how he could "screw his wife for hours" before ejaculating.

      Did you notice anything similar?

    2. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other words, did you gain any screw-per-powers?

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    3. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Years back, I worked with one fellow who survived a lightning strike. He said it was actually the best thing that had ever happened to him. Before being hit, he suffered from extreme difficulties obtaining an erection, and even when he managed to get one he couldn't sustain it for more than a minute or two. But after being hit, he said those problems went away. As he described it, he was then able to get the "fattest throbbing fatties" (I think those were his words, or something along those lines) that he'd ever had, and he'd talk about how he could "screw his wife for hours" before ejaculating.

      So basically, super powers.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Son, 4Chan is thataway ....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by rmdingler · · Score: 0

      the weather was turning thundery

      You mean you talked like that before?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    6. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    7. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Years ago when I was in junior high or early high school, my father was taking my younger brother and I to go shopping. I could hear a thunderstorm outside as we were shopping, but we lived in south Florida, so that was nothing out of the ordinary.

      As we were heading out to the car after our shopping was done, something occurred that never happened to me before or since: I heard a crack at the exact same time that I saw a flash of light. I didn't see a source for the flash, just the light, seemingly all around. I had been standing next to my dad, who was holding my brother's hand while we were in the parking lot, but when I turned to see what their reactions were to what I assumed was a REALLY close strike, my dad was on the asphalt on his knees with his hands gripping the top of his head. The umbrella he had been holding had fallen to the ground, my brother and I were getting soaked, and my father wasn't responding to us when we asked him if he was all right.

      After about a minute, my father was finally able to respond, and was actually rather embarrassed by the whole thing, since he could see and hear us, but was simply incapable of responding. We didn't know exactly what had happened, since none of us had actually seen the lightning strike, but we knew it had to have hit close, given that none of us had ever heard the crack of the strike happen at the exact same time that we saw the flash of light. My brother mentioned that his heart was racing oddly as well.

      When we got home, sure enough, we found a little scorch mark on the top of my father's head that was hot to the touch, and over the course of the next week or so, he discovered that his sense of smell had been damaged, with things smelling differently than they should. It ended up being about a year before he could smell things correctly again. We figure that my brother may have also gotten some of it through him, given that he was holding my dad's hand at the time that it happened.

      It was probably a good 5 years before the three of us stopped being skittish when outside in a lightning storm, and even to this day I treat them quite a bit differently than I used to, despite having grown up with them around all the time and generally having practiced good habits around them (even at the time of our strike, there were tall poles and trees (that we weren't under) all around us, so it always seemed odd to me that the strike landed where it did).

    8. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Scary stuff. You said he was holding an umbrella at the time. What is in use at made of metal? FYI, lightning starts from the ground and forms filaments reaching out, at which point the bolt comes down from the sky and meets up with it. The connection is made and the discharge is completed to it's final destination. You're father (like many others) was in its path along the way. I suspect that umbrella made for a nice pathway for the filament to form.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I've had a near miss. I was standing nearby when there was a ground strike. I didn't see it though - I was facing the wrong way. I did see the sky flash white as the light was reflected from raindrops, and it was so loud it set off a couple of car alarms.

    10. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! My penis fell off!

      Now I'm an Anonymous Cow!!

    11. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would have all been in his mind.

      I imagine that surviving a lightning strike would turn nearly anyone into a very confident individual: "fuck lightning, that shit didn't bring me down" and as such that confidence in the bedroom would be noticed as stronger erections and probably a more aggressive style of love making. Your friend may not t have commented on it, but I would bet he's been unfaithful to his wife, or at least come much closer to being so than he would have before.

      In other word, he stopped being a fucking pussy and manned the fuck up. Good shit, I'm off to play golf in a storm!

    12. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we got home, sure enough, we found a little scorch mark on the top of my father's head

      By any chance your father went to Hogwarts?

    13. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'd agree. It had a nice, blunted metal spike on top and a metal shaft. To say the least, that umbrella quickly got relegated to non-thunderstorm rain duty.

    14. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "my father was taking I to go shopping"

      Apparently lightning destroyed the part of your brain that understands pronouns.

    15. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Completely sincere: thanks for correcting me on that. It's something I still routinely get wrong and/or simply forget to consider.

    16. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by friesofdoom · · Score: 1

      My guess is that you weren't struck substantially enough, or at all.

      A bolt came about 500 meters above my head and it felt like something had hit me even though it was +-500 meters away. The sound was like a gunshot in my ears and it made me scream like a girl and jump across my courtyard.

      Your description of a bolt of lightning "bouncing off a building" makes me seriously doubt your claim. What I wold guess happened, is the bolt hit the building and you crapped your pants and went inside.

    17. Re:I wasn't fundamentally altered by it. by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

      somebody shed light on this one please:
      25 years ago, (when I was but a wee lad), in the middle of hot summer, I was running home because it was about to rain. The clouds were almost black and really low, the wind was getting crazy, a few large drop here and there. One could feel in the air a storm was about to start.

      I pulled an umbrella out of my bag and as I opened it above my head, my thumb and index finger were still on the plastic runner; suddenly i heard a crackle and saw sparks between the metal shaft and the 3 remaining fingers of that hand. There was no lightning or sound of thunder around me, but the tips of my fingers got properly burned and I could not feel them for a week. WTF? (I'm no electrical engineer.)

  5. The Last Sentence of the Summary by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    The last sentence of the summary explains a lot:
    "Those who attempt to return to work often find they are unable to carry out their former functions and after a few weeks, when coworkers get weary of 'covering' for them, they either are put on disability (if they are lucky) or fired or made Slashdot editors (if they are really unlucky)," she writes."

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:The Last Sentence of the Summary by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It sounds a lot like chronic fatigue. Something breaks and your body just doesn't deliver energy to the muscles properly any more, including the brain. As well as being tired you can think straight and become forgetful. There is no way to fix it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. Sometimes the change is good by pjbgravely · · Score: 4, Informative

    A local doctor was struck by lighting and became a concert pianist as a result. You never know what might change your life forever.

    --
    Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    1. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      All of them become conductors.

    2. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's because they couldn't resist.

    3. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Skarjak · · Score: 1

      This comment is sadly underrated.

    4. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In 1994, when Tony Cicoria was 42 years old, he was struck by lightning near Albany, New York, while standing next to a public telephone. He had just hung up the phone and was about a foot away when a rogue bolt of lightning struck. He recalled seeing his own body on the ground surrounded by a bluish-white light. Cicoria’s heart had apparently stopped, but he was resuscitated by a woman, (coincidentally an intensive-care-unit nurse) who was waiting to use the telephone.[2][3]"

      Holy crap!.... makes me almost want to believe in some sort of higher power.

    5. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should have stayed ohm that day.

    6. Re:Sometimes the change is good by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      "In 1994, when Tony Cicoria was 42 years old, he was struck by lightning near Albany, New York, while standing next to a public telephone. He had just hung up the phone and was about a foot away when a rogue bolt of lightning struck. He recalled seeing his own body on the ground surrounded by a bluish-white light. Cicoria’s heart had apparently stopped, but he was resuscitated by a woman, (coincidentally an intensive-care-unit nurse) who was waiting to use the telephone.[2][3]"

      Holy crap!.... makes me almost want to believe in some sort of higher power.

      110 or 220?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Telephone lines in the USA are 48VDC, 90VDC when ringing.

    8. Re:Sometimes the change is good by 14erCleaner · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would have been a chance to catch up with current events.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    9. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I hear they get really amped up about the experience.

    10. Re:Sometimes the change is good by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It is after all if not the alpha then at least the omega

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take this thread to Reddit.

    12. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know watt you're talking about -- clearly their lives weren't impeded by the event.

    13. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. 1994 and using a pay phone. Did they still have pay phones back then?

    14. Re: Sometimes the change is good by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      They were lucky. They could have diode.

    15. Re:Sometimes the change is good by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Take this thread to Reddit.

      These threads on Slashdot predate Reddit. If you want the old slashdot back, then this is what you want.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Sometimes the change is good by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      He got a stroke of inspiration?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    17. Re:Sometimes the change is good by DaTrueDave · · Score: 1

      I didn't get my first cell phone until 2000. 1994 was definitely the pagers and pay phones era.

    18. Re:Sometimes the change is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. 1994 and using a pay phone. Did they still have pay phones back then?

      Yes padawan, yes there were payphones then, before the great cellphone wars...

  7. Frontal lobe of the person in example by Champaklal · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Lightning partially passes through the body, because body gives a lot of resistance to the charge. Remaining charge flows through air to the ground.

    2. it looked to me as if the frontal lobe of the person in story was affected. Frontal lobe is associated with such changes in personality

  8. only lazy get disability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We have way too many people gaming the system and taking false disability in this country. We need to do away with disability altogether. I don't care what your problem is, everyone can do something productive. I don't care if it's just stamping bottle caps on to beer bottles. Being 'ornery' should not qualify you for disability. I'm guessing this lazy asshole never even was hit by lightning in the first place. We need to stop the handouts in this country. They didn't do it in 1776 and there's no need to now. We're being taken advantage of.

    1. Re:only lazy get disability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:only lazy get disability by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It does bring up an interesting question: how does a doctor verify somebody got struck and is not cheating?

    3. Re:only lazy get disability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to popular opinion few people gainfully employed have no pride to speak of.

    4. Re:only lazy get disability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to stop the handouts in this country. They didn't do it in 1776 and there's no need to now. We're being taken advantage of.

      Shut up and get to work Granny, you've got to knock off this old lady act and start blowing fascists and libertarians if you want you teeth back. Do go limp on us just because they did. We all lose body parts from time to time. Just be productive, just like Stephen Hawking. Learn some math...jeez....Lazy Fucks. No Dropping Dead allowed you old whiny fakers...you're not even 80.

    5. Re: only lazy get disability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may believe in the magical retirement fairy, but I'm afraid to have to tell you that it doesn't exist.

      Granny has three options: (1) she can save for her own retirement, (2) she can be forced to save for her retirement in some inefficient, crony-capitalist plan, (3) she can go on a spending spree until she retires and then force the next generation to pay for her retirement at gunpoint.

      Democrats claim we are doing (2), but actually, we are doing (3). Of these, (3) kind of worked as long as the population was growing; (2) never works.

      What we should be doing is (1).

  9. Dear Hot Chick from High School by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was recently struck by lightning. I am writing you to renew my request for a date per your stated conditions.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Dear Hot Chick from High School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're lucky! I have to wait for Climate Change to affect Hell...

    2. Re:Dear Hot Chick from High School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're lucky! I have to wait for Climate Change to affect Hell...

      Hell, Michigan... Pretty much every year. Good luck sir!

    3. Re:Dear Hot Chick from High School by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      I was recently struck by lightning. I am writing you to renew my request for a date per your stated conditions.

      So, she let you slide on the subterranean ski-lift tickets?

  10. indirect strike in 1983 by ihtoit · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was part of the ground circuit when lightning struck my house and blew the ring main on its way through - I had the misfortune of happening to be plugging in the TV at the time, got thrown across the room. Only permanent effect as far as I can tell is a marked reduction in tolerance for idiots.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:indirect strike in 1983 by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      You just need to drink more.

      It doesn't make you more social so much as it makes everyone else at the party more interesting.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:indirect strike in 1983 by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      that's where I was going wrong.

      Not enough alcohol.

      Thanks for that - now I know, I can rectify the deficiency.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:indirect strike in 1983 by Required+Snark · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Only permanent effect as far as I can tell is a marked reduction in tolerance for idiots."

      Why do you read/post on Slashdot?

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    4. Re:indirect strike in 1983 by KliX · · Score: 1

      Brain damage.

    5. Re:indirect strike in 1983 by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      selective amnesia also.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    6. Re:indirect strike in 1983 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The /. ratio of Idiots : NotIdiots is lower than the average for the Internet as a whole. Yes, the 'Net is quite the cesspool!

  11. thanks for that great information by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Funny

    the brain an nervous system is a complex and fragile low voltage electrical signaling system

    lets zap it with lightning

    best we can guess is that "Mary Ann Cooper, professor emerita at the University of Illinois at Chicago" who by the way retired in 2008 says that lighting fucks shit up

    good god damn job

    1. Re:thanks for that great information by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does your grumpiness originate from getting struck by lightning?

    2. Re:thanks for that great information by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      how fragile do I suggest

      assumption made

    3. Re:thanks for that great information by Osgeld · · Score: 0

      no it originates from dipshits who think the most simplistic thing represented in text form is a massive revolution in human evolution

      its not, its fairly common knowledge and the article does not include any new or useful information

      maybe you didn't know that whacking an electrical system with lightning will fuck it up, but that's because you are stupid.

    4. Re:thanks for that great information by Prune · · Score: 1

      The only assumption made is that of standard semantics of the use of a qualitative term to indicate a quantity in an imprecise or relative manner. In the case of your post, "fragile" stands for "fragile relative to the average expectation of a population relevant to the context of this subject or discussion". Of course, the assumption of standard language semantics presupposes a more basic one: that one's interlocutor is an entity to which assignment of semantic understanding is apropos; I must admit, though, the possibility that in this assumption I have erred, and you're but a chatbot.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    5. Re:thanks for that great information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a feeling somebody around here was a stupid dip shit, but nothing new or useful struck until you lit up the room with that light bulb in the bubble cloud over your head. Thanks Zippy! Everybody sing: "You light up my life"

    6. Re:thanks for that great information by BringsApples · · Score: 1
      Normally I'd say that you seem to be having a bad day, but looking at this article entitled "The Odd Effects of Being Struck By Lightning" to basically say:

      ...every year, more than 500 Americans are struck by lightning. Roughly 90 percent of them will survive, but those survivors will be instantly, fundamentally altered in ways that still leave scientists scratching their heads.

      Just to read on and conclude that basically "lightning can damage your brain in many different ways, sometimes". It leaves me wondering, not about this mysterious new understanding of lightning's effects on the brain, but rather, wondering why doctors are left scratching their heads. Obviously they're not electricians, but are they really scratching their heads in wonder?

      If you think that a lightning strike can change your life in mysterious ways, try some DMT.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  12. FIRST POSSSSSSSSSSTZZZZZZZZZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    reaction time suffers as well

  13. Is the looking for study volunteers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to volunteer.

  14. Pretty bad example of a radical change. by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Funny

    Michael Utley was a successful stockbroker who often went skiing and windsurfing before he was struck by lightning. Today, at 62, he lives on disability insurance. "I don't work. I can't work. My memory's fried, and I don't have energy like I used to. I aged 30 years in a second." Lightning also dramatically altered Utley's personality. "It made me a mean, ornery son of a b****."

    Had it been an example where he became a greenpeace or PETA speaker or something, it might be more shocking but this doesn't come across as entirely surprising.

    1. Re:Pretty bad example of a radical change. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Huh? I see we haven't met many environmentalists. They're mean sons of bitches who spend their entire day being angry.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Pretty bad example of a radical change. by pupsocket · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are absolutely correct.

      Successful investment bankers usually have smooth manners and a gift for softspoken vagueness that makes their duplicity harder to spot.

      The mean ornery dogchild is just a midlevel henchmen for the really dangerous types.

      And I've paid with for the right to say so.

    3. Re:Pretty bad example of a radical change. by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Like we're really supposed to believe that he was 32 just before it happened....I might look stupid but he looked 62 all along.

    4. Re:Pretty bad example of a radical change. by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      You mad, bro?

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    5. Re:Pretty bad example of a radical change. by Prune · · Score: 1

      How so? I'm an engineer, not a finance guy.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    6. Re:Pretty bad example of a radical change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently it made him sincere. That's not good for the job. It might be good for his life though. The woman in the second video said being struck made her see what really matters in life. A big part of that is to stop taking shit from people who think they're entitled to a part of you, like relatives.

    7. Re:Pretty bad example of a radical change. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I know a bunch, and they're not mean at all. In fact, the ones I know are very pleasant, kind, generous people. Environmentalists tend to be able to not distinguish themselves from the environment in which they live, hence them having an interest in it and caring for it. Are you sure the ones you know aren't angry because they have to put up with your nonsense? :)

  15. But... always? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 2

    I would assume that most lightning injuries wouldn''t have any observable effects on personality, because more often than not they're not going to hit the brain. But that could be a wrong impression. Maybe a high voltage jolt to the peripheral nervous system always carries back to the brain along nerve fibers and does damage there.

  16. Lightning Rod by kcelery · · Score: 2

    Once met with a guy who install lightning rod in 80+ storeys buildings.

    He said, grounding the current from above is not enough. When lightning strikes,
    the current is ground, but then the many computers in the building would malfunction.

    Special technique is required that only few companies can get it right.

    I would suspect the current has to be shield like coaxial cable or the circuits along
    the current path will got damaged. In this case the victim's brain.

    1. Re:Lightning Rod by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      EMP. Lightning struck a few houses down from me. Instantly I lost WiFi connectivity when the bolt stuck while everything else was fully functional except for the router which still had power. Both my computer and router are connected to a SmartUPS with a valid grounded connection. Basically, the WiFi antennas picked up the EMP and passed it down to the chipset; effectively "fried".

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  17. Re:ProfessorA emeritA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are wrong. professor emerita is perfectly fine.
    "In the United States, a full professor who retires in good standing may be referred to as a professor emeritus for men, or professor emerita for women"

  18. What the fuck are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is making up bullshit English words in some failed, self-defeating attempt to avoid sexism a new feminist/social-justice-warrior fad these days?

    "Professora" is not even an English word, goddamn it! The English word is "professor", and it applies equally well to both men and women and any one of the thousands of other "genders" that allegedly exist today.

    "Emerita" is an English word. It can be used with the English word "professor" to create the English term "professor emerita".

    Since "professora" is not an English word, the term "professora emerita" is not English. It is gibberish.

    And since you're probably the kind of self-righteous dickweed who probably screams "CITATION NEEDED!" all of the time, let me give you one: Proof that "Professor Emerita" is the correct English term.

    1. Re:What the fuck are you talking about? by martin-boundary · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That is utter drivel unrelated to my point, which merely shows your own ignorance of the issue. Please allow yourself to be educated.

      "Professor" is a Latin masculine noun, and as such is correctly paired with the adjective "emeritus". As I said in my post, if you want to refer to a woman as a "professor", which I have zero objection to, then use the correct adjective, namely "emeritus". If you want to refer to a woman by the latinized "professora", then by all means "emerita" is correct as well. However, "professor emerita" is anglicized pig-latin bullshit which merely serves to mark those who use it as wannabes, who never studied Latin but wish to use an exotic phrase to aggrandize themselves in front of their peers.

      Now that you know, please feel free to use whatever phrase you prefer, in full knowledge of the various probable consequences.

    2. Re:What the fuck are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not have noticed, but we speak a language into which thousands of words have been imported and bastardised.

      Latin however is a dead language, and was never perfect and immutable, so it's hard to understand what the fuck you are looking back to. However feel perfectly free to invent your own little hillbilly lingo and let the rest of the grown-ups use whatever consensus word enables communication - the point of language.

    3. Re:What the fuck are you talking about? by martin-boundary · · Score: 0

      You may not have noticed, but we speak a language into which thousands of words have been imported and bastardised.

      To say that you speak it (which implies mastery) seems rather debatable, as the thread so far demonstrates. While we all agree I think that "professor emeritus" is indeed imported into English and used correctly as a phrase such as it is, the modification to "emerita" is not. Rather, the latter is an example of non-mastery, and your defence of it is, so far, ineffectual. Its use arises out of ignorance and repetition, which is not uncommon for other phrases on this site, viz. "I could care less". In this case, a poor attempt at imposing feminine endings yields a botched result.

      What I find particulary fascinating though is the insecurity apparent in perhaps a large number of readers who prefer to defend and repeat a corrupt usage from someone who may not have known better, lest their own competency in English be considered. It is also puzzling, given the importance correct use of language has in the technical fields most of us here occupy ourselves with, how quickly any incorrect use can be justified as bastardization, as if that label puts it beyond questioning.

    4. Re:What the fuck are you talking about? by Your.Master · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Professor is an English word, albeit one with a Latin origin, and it has been an English word for about 700 years. Most English words do not get inflected by gender. It must be admitted that many occupation-words that can be used as pronouns are inflected (actor/actress, waiter/waitress, etc.), but professor is not among those words. Professora does not appear in any English dictionary I tried, such as dictionary.reference.com. Professor, emeritus, and emerita all appear in every dictionary I tried.

      Furthermore, "Professors Emeriti/ae" is often used as the plural. The 's' plural demonstrates that "professor" is being used in its English-language form.

      Surely if a student were to talk about their "professors", you would not lecture them on their ignorant use of plurals. Why, then, do you insist that the professor is "professor emeritus" is actually a different word in a different language and therefore subject to different inflections?

      And if that isn't convincing, there's the fact that "Professor Emerita" is an officially-conferred title, and therefore it is correct by definition:

      http://www.sfu.ca/policies/gaz... -- an example from Canada
      http://www.ucc.ie/en/academics... -- an example from Ireland
      http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/artic... -- an example from the United States

      What I find particulary fascinating though is the insecurity apparent in perhaps a large number of readers who prefer to defend and repeat a corrupt usage from someone who may not have known better, lest their own competency in English be considered.

      The pot calling the kettle black.

    5. Re:What the fuck are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct plural of "professor emeritus" is: professors emeritus

      Just as for "governor general" it is: governors general

    6. Re:What the fuck are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Latin rules don't fucking matter.

      We aren't using Latin. We are using English.

      The English rules are what matter.

      So don't bring up Latin. It doesn't fucking matter!

  19. Extremely Unlikely by Bob9113 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Ferris Jabr reports in Outside Magazine that every year, more than 500 Americans are struck by lightning. Roughly 90 percent of them will survive, but those survivors will be instantly, fundamentally altered in ways that still leave scientists scratching their heads.

    Yes, sure, it has some unpleasant effects, but keep it in perspective. How much resources should we as a society be dedicating to lightning strike victims? Nearly ten times as many people die drowning every year as get struck by lightning (including non-fatal strikes). In fact, you're only about twice as likely to get struck by lightning as to die from a terrorist attack, which a statistical non-risk. And we don't go running around panicking about terrorism... oh, wait...

    1. Re:Extremely Unlikely by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Wrong question: fundamentally it's neurological damage. How many resources should we dedicate to helping people who suffer it by some means?

    2. Re:Extremely Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS neurological damage, but a lot of the effects can also be explained by the near death experience. Other than medical help, did those people get psychological help as well?
      With that fucked up healthcare system, my guess is no.

    3. Re:Extremely Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong question: fundamentally it's neurological damage. How many resources should we dedicate to helping people who suffer it by some means?

      Yeah, why should they suffer for free? Make 'em pay to suffer, no free rides for submissive victims. Lick my boots you little worm...

    4. Re:Extremely Unlikely by BringsApples · · Score: 2

      Conclusion: Lightning is an act of terror, and yet we don't go off and build a dome over the entire country, closing ourselves inside our new "safe" structure, opening new agencies that get endless funding, secret courts... all in the name of, maybe, preventing it from ever happening again.

      Very good point, sir.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    5. Re:Extremely Unlikely by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Wrong question: fundamentally it's extremely rare. How many resources should we dedicate to helping people who suffer it by some means?

      That's more like it.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    6. Re:Extremely Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Study them because they're interesting subjects for study. Perhaps the information gathered can be used to learn more about human systems and applied to treat other neurological diseases.

    7. Re:Extremely Unlikely by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      A dome that large would probably be big enough for thunderstorms to develop within it.

      Therefore, the people who came up with this idea are trying to develop a terribly unsafe solution. Which makes that proposer a terrorist.

      The bus will be along to collect you soon. It's more economical than sending out a whole black helicopter for each convict.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  20. Lou Christie's Revenge by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I was struck by lightning in April of 2004. After that, all I wanted to do was smoke weed and play computer games.

    Of course, that's all I wanted to do before I was struck by lightning, so clearly the effects were very subtle. I no longer wanted to play JRPGs, text based adventures or 2D platformers. Plus, there is a strange blue glow emanating from my scrotal sack. It's kind of like superpowers, except not really useful, except at Halloween parties where I go dressed as a partially bioluminescent Michelangelo's David.

    http://youtu.be/LyRqdzF8swY

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  21. Not guaranteed memory problems by s.petry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was struck as a kid, probably 11 or so years old, when a thunderstorm rolled in during a little league baseball game. I happened to be opening a car door, so was grounded when I was hit. My forearm turned black and blue, like a massive bruising, but I didn't feel any pain in my arm. I was blinded for a short time, my eyes were not closed when the lighting struck. Outside of a headache from the flash, I had no short or long term damage. Yes, I was extremely lucky to have been mostly grounded.

    The Guinness record holder was struck 7 times, and lived to 71. Hard to say if the long term effects led to suicide, but an interview of him I heard long ago seemed to indicate a pretty normal guy.

    TFA also indicates that not all incidents lead to permanent damage, physical or psychological. As with most events dealing with electricity, there are a massive number of factors involved making each event unique. For example, when I was in the military I saw two people guy get popped by a 550KW generator. Both guys mishandled the same coupling, both were in Texas and on similar training grounds. The primary different was weather and luck. One guy's clothing caught fire and he suffered only minor burns as they put his clothing out, the other guy died almost instantly. It was winter so rainy and wet when the first guy was popped, making its likely that his wet clothing caused a grounding effect which saved him. The second happened in the summer, extremely dry and hot.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      grabbing a car door does not make you grounded, it makes you a bigger target yes, but there's seveal inches of isolation tween the car and ground, as if that mattered at all, lightning travels several miles though the air to get stopped by a 4 inch rubber sidewall lol yea sure

    2. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. The car is a Faraday cage if you are inside.

    3. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is strange to read that you were actually hit by lightning and don't know you are actually writing a lot of bullshit. A car is grounded, if you are outside the car and toughing it, YOU are the path of least resistance from car to ground.

    4. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by s.petry · · Score: 1

      So a metal handle is not conductive, and my hand being on the handle would transfer no energy from me to the car? Either you believe this happened in very modern times where cars are surely made with many low/non conductive materials or you don't know much about electricity.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    5. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by s.petry · · Score: 1

      The car is wet so has direct to ground connection since said car was parked in the dirt next to the baseball field. I didn't fill in every minor detail, but assume that people can read a bit into "a thunderstorm rolled in" which usually indicates lot of water is also coming down. I surely hope I don't have to point out that water is conductive.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    6. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. While occupying the interior of a vehicle would afford better protection than you'd get standing alone, you wouldn't have to be fully inside the car for it to afford some protection in the event of a lightning strike. Merely being in contact with the door handle would create a condition whereby the car provides a more conductive path to ground than your body. You appear to have a poor understanding of electricity. Incidentally, rubber becomes more conductive at power levels approaching those supplied by lightning strikes.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    7. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      This is grossly incorrect. The car is a a much better conductor to ground than a human body. Even leaving the metal portion of a car aside, rubber becomes an rather good conductor at the power levels provided by a lightning strike, certainly a better conductor than your body. Where are you getting your misinformation?

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    8. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Merely being in contact with the door handle would create a condition whereby the car provides a more conductive path to ground than your body.

      This is what I stated in slightly different terms. I used to try to run differential equations trying to estimate how many volts/amps my arm may have taken. There are far too many unknown variables to do so, but it was a fun project for a while.

      You appear to have a poor understanding of electricity.

      It's actually pretty good, which may not be apparent even if you had bothered to read both posts (It's Slashdot, not a dissertation). It's been a couple decades since circuit design, but I can still read schematics and calculate impedance, frequencies, etc... Perhaps this is confusing to you, since I don't attempt to belittle people. If information is missing I attempt to have people fill in the gaps, I don't jump right to conclusions based on opinion.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    9. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Indeed, people installing aftermarket battery sticks in Honda IMA hybrids learned the hard way: each stick of 6 D-cells slides through a pair of rubber matrices supporting the 20 sticks. Aftermarket installers were first just throwing the bare sticks into the matrices, and the batteries after a time would sometimes smoke and catch fire.

      Turns out the plastic shrink wrap on the outside of each cell became important to insulate the batteries from the carbon black in the rubber at the 180V the system could hit. It looked like window dressing, but wasn't. Fun times. I bet lightning (at WAY higher voltage than 180) would go through rubber like it was steel.

    10. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by samwichse · · Score: 1

      http://www.insightcentral.net/...

      A link to the source.

    11. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      My comment was in reply to the posts made by Osgeld and the AC that followed, not to you. Thus, I never said you appear to have a poor understanding of electricity. Quite to the contrary, I was providing a correction for the erroneous statements made by the aforementioned posters. However, I would be remiss if I failed to note that factual observations and contradictions of untrue statements are not intrinsically belittling, although accusations of such intent are frequently made in an appeal to emotional sensitivity by those who wish to deflect attention from flawed positions. I have no interest in taking extraordinary measures to avoid bruising fragile egos, and thus I tend to ignore appeals to emotion and focus further on points which are apparent sensitivity zones. If anything, such areas frequently deserve even closer critical examination.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    12. Re:Not guaranteed memory problems by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the clarification, and happen to agree that interrogation and clarification is severely lacking in dialogue. That said, statements such as "You appear to have a poor understanding of electricity." are purely speculation and opinion and don't seem to match your claim of tendency and interests. This serves as precisely as an appeal which you claim to ignore.

      No harm done to my ego, and hopefully not yours either. I enjoy good dialogue, and try to practice as often as I can (not easy on Slashdot either).

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  22. and tasers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if something similar happens to people who have been tasered, even in a milder version. It should be researched as it would be tragically ironic if law enforcement's latest panacea were endangering peoples' long term futures.

  23. i met a guy that had been hit by unity · · Score: 2

    I was having a safety meeting with a guy when he told me how he had been hit by lightning once on a construction site. I said, "what'd you do?" He said, "I got up and ran! The only thing I could think of was that I didn't want to get hit again!"
    He seemed like a normal enough guy, but he was adamant about not wanting to get struck again, that's for sure.

    1. Re:i met a guy that had been hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be the first time I've seen "safety meeting" refer to a meeting regarding jobsite safety rather than "let's go out back and smoke a bowl".

    2. Re:i met a guy that had been hit by unity · · Score: 1

      Heh, I actually did mean the latter. I used the term because he was the first guy I ever heard use it that way. It was raining and I suggested we bring in some chairs from under the rain to under our cover and that segued into his story...

  24. Re:ProfessorA emeritA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't Rome. This is America. We speak American English here. Some of that is Anglicized Latin. But it's not Latin, and doesn't have to follow the rules of Latin any more than anything else borrowed from other languages has to follow the rules of those languages.

  25. That just begs the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How many of these "disabilities" are due to the lightning strike and hire many are due to other factors but attributed to the lightning strike? Anyone done a study on verified cases? Is the prevalence of those effects higher than the average/mean?

  26. I had an close incident by future+assassin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This was 1991 I belive. I was sitting on this tire swing looking at the thunder storm coming into the valley over the city. Next to me 30 feet infront and 20 to the side was a tennis court all fenced off with a 20 foot fence.

    As I was sitting there for a bit watching lightning strikes all of a sudden everything went white for a second and when it dissapeared I heard a huge bang and while looking at the sand below my feet, I saw electricity flying around on the ground. Took me a few secs to get orientged again and all I herd was "Holly Fuck", "Holly fuck" "Did you feel that all over your body" from the two guys that were playing in the tennis court.

    Nex thing I know some panic attack hit me and I booted it home about 20 feet away. I started to get a clod sweat and when I felt my heart it must have been going 400 + beats per minute. Then it slowed down rapidly and all I could do is sit on the couch and go WTF?!!!

    So for about a few weeks after that everytime there was a thunder strom and the lightning strikes got close to home I always felt wird electric charge aroung me. Well I never stuck around and booted it home the second I got the feeling.

    Can't say it changed me but was a weird experience.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:I had an close incident by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      I was sitting on this tire swing looking at the thunder storm coming into the valley over the city. Next to me 30 feet infront and 20 to the side was a tennis court all fenced off with a 20 foot fence.

      ...

      Nex thing I know some panic attack hit me and I booted it home about 20 feet away.

      So, you were in your yard, where you have a tennis court? Maybe the lightning did have some effect...

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    2. Re:I had an close incident by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Since I didn't want to write novel about it here... This was in a townhouse complex with the playground (where teh swing was) and tennis court right by the building. My door was like 20 feet or so away from it. Thanks for playing...

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  27. Re:ProfessorA emeritA by infinitelink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is this rated to 0? It's a true statement--not something to downmod. Downmoding such a comment, I'm sure, actually bespeaks ignorance or violation of the terms of modding! And while that's not new for /., it's still something to have the actual admins take a look at. It's especially problematic, though, since it's a true statement.

    While it is preferable to follow certain rules of grammar for use of Latin phrases, that is within the confines of acceptable English practice. "Profesora" has not, in fact, ever been used--as far as I am aware--in the English language, as an English term. Not, at least, enough to be conventional rather than eccentric. These days, perhaps all the more due to it being Spanish (though being in the Western US where we have a lot of Spanish speakers, perhaps I'm just reinforced given that perception; the east coast, on the other hand, tends not to know jack about Spanish from our POV). I am okay with it to the extent someone would have a Latin or Romance background, but the significations associated with "professor" vs. "profes[s]ora" aren't quite the same, so from that POV I would avoid it myself since it would seem to be a mis-communication, therefore an error.

    And "-a" isn't even a solid indication, in English, that a term is actually a feminine for Latin. ("-a" isn't even just feminine in Latin, depending on case!). It *frequently* is in Spanish, but not enough for someone without the prior knowledge. For the last three or so centuries, however, even when Latin was widely taught, been acceptable to mix Latin forms as properly understood or most likely to be, rather than force correctness based on the classical Latin forms (and I have critiques on usage dating back over a 100 years in my personal library), so I don't get the hostility: oversensitivity to "correctness", to me, bespeaks being a poseur--as is often the case in English grammar.

    It all seems like the pedantry of correct for case with "I and me" without regard for the actual use-intentions of the personal speaking English, given that the complaints are often applied to usages which antedate the oldest grammars and indicate a different mode of thinking altogether--i.e. evince a feature of English-speakers' mind that doesn't even exist in other classical languages. (Even modern, simplified English, possesses pre-classical features, and actual mixtures of features that span several language families, that ante-date the periods of major influence by Romance and Latin upon the Teutonic, e.g. altering mid-vowels to change tense, not just endings). It's the...gilded age of English armchair philology and grammatical-wishful thinking by the sophomorically over-read and over-credentialed, regarded only for being critics and clever...just not "right."

    But in general, critiques of English usage typically proceed out of posing rather than expertise. It's a long-standing tradition in Anglophonic countries, and unfortunate for all the confusion has bred. e.g. I was recently standing in line at a post office and literally stood next to two old women, one who had been warned against the horrific error in saying "dug" rather than "digged", and the other warned contrarily about the error of "digged" over "dug." Both were also pissed I wouldn't take their side...or amused that I could explain the history of that "issue" though a young man, and that the other was so stupid to prefer a "non-word" they had never encountered. I actually found myself in disbelief that either could have suffered such limited exposure.

    --
    Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
  28. Blast of X Rays? by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    Lightning can easily give off Xrays and even Gamma rays. So would it also be possible that these people who have this blast right along their skin are also getting a solid dose of radiation.

    1. Re:Blast of X Rays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was sceptical of your claim (must be your handle, he he, very good) and did a quick web search.

      http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/x-rays-abound-when-lightn/

      It's not been thoroughly proven, but early signs indicate that lightning strikes do emit x-rays. Not sure on the gamma ray claim though. Still, this is pretty amazing stuff!

  29. Lightning stike victims and Multiple Sclerosis by Traf-O-Data-Hater · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I heard a news report - might have been BBC - years ago that a study had found that a high correlation between lightning strike victims and the probability of developing Multiple Sclerosis later in life.

  30. Re:ProfessorA emeritA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this rated to 0? It's a true statement--not something to downmod. Downmoding such a comment, I'm sure, actually bespeaks ignorance or violation of the terms of modding! And while that's not new for /., it's still something to have the actual admins take a look at. It's especially problematic, though, since it's a true statement.

    The GP is at 0 because it was posted as AC. Anonymous posts always start with a score of 0. Nothing to get excited about.

  31. Struck by /. beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet that would've pissed him off.

    beta.slashdot.org

    NO, I want www.slashdot.org

    beta.slashdot.org

    NO!!! I WANT WWW.SLASHDOT.ORG!

    beta.slashdot.org

    OH FUCK THIS SHIT

  32. Emerita by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Mary Ann Cooper, professor emerita

    Stop this shit, academia. Learn Latin if you want to use Latin words to make yourself sound special. The word is for soldiers. No fucking professor called themselves "emeritus" until the late 18th century. And now you've got dipshits getting it doubly wrong with gender. Emeritus is specifically a masculine noun.

    An emeritus is a retired soldier (noun). Emeriti are retired soldiers (plural noun).

    If you want to use it as an adjective it has to agree in with the noun it modifies.

    A soldier emeritus is a soldier that is retired (adjective). Soldiers emeritum are soldiers that are retired (plural adjective).

    "Professor" is a genderless word in English, so you need the genderless adjective.

    A professor emeritus is a professor who is abusing the word "emeritus" (neutral adjective). Professors emeritorum are professors who are abusing the word "emeritus" (neutral plural).

    If Mary Ann Cooper really wants to use an "a" form of the word, she must do so in a way such that it agrees with gender and count and case.
    Emerita Mary Ann Cooper. Mary Ann Cooper and Anne Marie Cooper Emeritae. In a more gendered language such as Spanish, we could do "Mary Ann Cooper and Anne Marie Cooper profesoras emeritarum".

    But [name], [title] emerita is just fucking wrong! Stop being wrong, people. I know you like to act high and might and pat yourselves on the back (and I know because I work in academia), but please just fucking stop being so fucking wrong.

    1. Re:Emerita by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      http://www.thefreedictionary.c...

      In current usage, it's now an English, not Latin word meaning "retired, but wishing to use the pre-retirement title". Like how all Presidents of the USA are "president". President Bill Clinton is still "president" by title, even if "retired".

      And make no mistake, it's an English word, like so many foreign words, used without great change for a meaning slightly different than the "original".

      It's not "wrong". It's language. That's how English works. Much like the original definition of broadband defines 56kbps dial-up as "broadband" and 100 Gbps fibre as "not broadband (baseband). Now, "broadband" means "fast" and baseband means nothing. Language evolves. Even in ways we don't like.

    2. Re:Emerita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My! what a bickus dickus you have professor vente emericana! I bet your Testes are as hard as your quizzies.

    3. Re: Emerita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's make the female version of "emeritus" "emeristupid" instead. It's how language works, you know.

    4. Re:Emerita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still makes you sound stupid if you use a mock-Latin feminine adjective with a masculine noun in a language that doesn't even have grammatical gender. If you want to be antisexist, drop gender from language wherever you can, don't try to reintroduce it.

    5. Re:Emerita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Professors emeritorum are professors who are abusing the word "emeritus" (neutral plural). [...] In a more gendered language such as Spanish, we could do "Mary Ann Cooper and Anne Marie Cooper profesoras emeritarum".

      No because emeritorum and emeritarum are genitive forms. "Professors emeritorum" might be those who teach the veterans.

    6. Re:Emerita by sexconker · · Score: 1

      No, it's fucking wrong. They even put the adjective in the wrong spot in order to mimic Latin. It's like saying "Joe Schmoe, professor retired". If you want to use it as an adjective in your title, then it has to be before the thing it modifies. This is how English works.
      Alternatively, if it's a minor designation you could do "professor (retired)".

      Which is it? Is it an English word following English rules? If so, then it has no gender and it should come before the word "professor".

      If it's a Latin word, then it's wrong for all the reasons in my other post.

    7. Re:Emerita by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you want to use it as an adjective in your title, then it has to be before the thing it modifies. This is how English works.

      Like Joe Schmoe, O.B.E.? That's British English, but the title after the name (like where they put the degrees and such in the US, as well as the UK) is the norm, and (retired) whether you say "retired" or "emeritus" is part of a title.

    8. Re:Emerita by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You're trying to claim "Professor retired" is a title. That's wrong. "Retired professor" would be a valid title.

    9. Re:Emerita by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      "Professor Bob" is common, but "Bob, Professor of Chemistry" is more common in formal settings. And I've *never* seen someone say "Professor of Chemistry Bob". Perhaps as a verbal introduction to a person (such as for a speaker), but I've never actually heard the "full title" prepended, only appended. Note, the proper way to form a title is with honors appended, not prepended. My Father, Dad Lastname, LLB. was never "LLB Dad Lastname" as you imply would be appropriate. He was Honorable Dad, but Honorable isn't a "title" as you claim. Sometimes the "title" (Professor (of Chemistry), always last in the full form) is the same as the honorific (professor) and you are confusing the honorific, which preceeds a name, with the title, that succeeds the name.

      Your certainty doesn't correlate with correctness.

      Some titles go last, others first. Honorifics almost always go first. Sometimes the honorific for the title is the same (or sufficiently similar) that it can be unclear whether the word alone is a title or an honorific. For example, President. "President" is the honorific, and the short form of the title. "Barak Obama, President of the United States of America" is the name with a title. "President Obama" does not have the title precede the name. "President" is the honorific for those with a title containing "president". I understand it's confusing. The only question is, are you willing to learn the truth when confronted with it, or are you going to just argue until the other person gives up, regardless of whether (or especially when) you are wrong?

  33. thanks for that great information by Prune · · Score: 2

    BS. The nervous system is an electrochemical system, not an electrical one; and, while it is physically fragile, it is not nearly as electrically fragile as you suggest, exactly because it is electrochemical rather than electrical in nature. This is a significant reason why 90% of lightning strike victims survive (the skin's lower resistance being another), and why execution through electrocution is nowhere close to being an instant process.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  34. Pretty bad example of a radical change. by Prune · · Score: 0

    I know this is Slashdot, but even here the level of stereotyping and hateful crowd mentality exhibited by your post is an eyesore. So let me take this occasion to mirror your posting style by reminding you that, if you perhaps on occasion ventured out from your parents' basement, you might find that there's little basis to your intimation of a statistically significant correlation between involvement in the financial industry and being a "mean, ornery son of a bitch".

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  35. Whole House Surge Protector is not enough by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Many thinks erroneously that after they installed a Whole House Surge Protector everything else would be fine

    That Whole House Surge Protector might be able to clamp a sudden surge from the outside, but the respond time often isn't fast enough to save the delicate electronic devices connected to the wall sockets

    What you really need is a layered approach --- getting a Whole House Surge Protector to clamp a _lengthy_ surge from the outside, while still attach your delicate electronic devices to surge protectors with fast response (something like in the nano-second range) that plug into the wall sockets

    Three links that might be able to assist you:

    http://techomebuilder.com/inde...

    http://www.electronichouse.com...

    http://www.us-tech.com/RelId/1...

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Whole House Surge Protector is not enough by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      Just install a power conditioner at your intake and call it a day if your power is that shitty. Or you live in Florida.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Whole House Surge Protector is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Florida and my house has been struck by lightning.

      Essentially, just deal with it. The surge protector warranty will protect against a bunch of damage, and the homeowners insurance will protect against damage to the structure. In general, the "plug stuff into surge protectors" plan is protection against the damages.

      It's a pain, but shit happens everywhere*.

      *trees fall, high winds blow stuff over, termites eat houses, streets flood, etc.

  36. Found two more links by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2
    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  37. Old news by Meneth · · Score: 1

    We already knew Lightning Can Do Anything. :)

  38. Re:ProfessorA emeritA by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    You've been here how many years and you don't know how AC posting works?

    Or perhaps you were struck by lightning during the course of this thread and forgot how it works...

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  39. Re: ProfessorA emeritA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, we don't have to follow the rules of Latin.

    But English does not change adjectives based on gender, so let's not introduce this crap needlessly.

    "Professor emeritus" is fine for both genders in English. Really.

  40. Self Awareness by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Nevertheless this would imply that there was significant change: he finally became aware that he was an "ornery son of a b****".

  41. So did Holly fuck him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kind of sounds like a Christmas tune too: Holly fuck! Holly fuck! Fucking all the way. Oh what fun it is to fuck on one horse fucking sleigh....

  42. ultimate golf joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When golfing, always have a 1 Iron in the golf bag.

    If you see lightning, hold the 1 Iron over your head, because even Jesus Christ can't hit a 1 Iron.

    ba da bump. I'll be here all night. Be sure to tip your waitress.

  43. Obligatory Dave Attell by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    " A lot of people think if you get struck by lightning you will get magic powers. Like the ability to read minds or shoot lightning from your hands. Not me. I got the ability to shake on the ground and shit my pants. Will I use these powers for good or for evil?"

  44. Re:ProfessorA emeritA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's poseuse for you.

  45. Shocking Life Experiences by eanbowman · · Score: 1

    I've been shocked by wall current many times, but that doesn't even come close.

    I've been shocked by a TV capacitor once, that merely hurt.

    Being within 15 feet of a lightning strike was weirder. It wasn't pain so much as a tingling everywhere. Most of the charge dissipated around me.
    (Lightning struck a tree and I was in a porch area nearby playing video games outside a farm house on a giant old TV. The game and the TV didn't suffer any damage, so I think the charge may have not come from them.)

  46. I know a lady... by kc7rad · · Score: 1
    I know a lady that suffered a side strike back in 1985. She was in Texas, about the age of 19, getting out of a car when lightening hit a tree about 30 feet away. The side strike hit her and the car. She was thrown about 10 feet where she landed on the asphalt and lay there mostly unconscious for about 15 minutes. Her wonderful family (sarcasm) just set her back home on a bus to San Francisco. There, her husband immediately took her to the hospital because, "she just wasn't right."

    Her immediate injuries: Burnt and split tongue; Tennis shoe sole had been melted into her right foot; numerous shattered teeth; fractured facial bones and tree-like markings on her upper back and lower right leg.

    Her long term injuries: Brain scaring and lesions; scaring on the surface of many bones; numerous nerve related ailments; stroke in 1994; poor long term memory; generally can't remember much about what happened before the strike but does have flashes of memory if she looks at old pictures, etc...

    She does have a super-power of sorts. With about 90% accuracy she can predict whether a thunderstorm is coming - without external references or information. She tells me that her skin tingles a certain way. Don't know exactly what that means, but after knowing her nearly a decade, I trust her tingly skin reports more than the meteorologists' predictions.

  47. tin foil hats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will save your brain. Wear them always! The government should make them mandatory for all pedesttians, just like seat belts for motor vehicle occupants.