Slashdot Mirror


The Great Robocoin Rip-off

FhnuZoag writes: Last year, Andrew Wilkinson, founder of MetaLab, bought a Robocoin Bitcoin ATM, figuring it would be a fun little side project and a good way to help move Bitcoin forward. It did not quite turn out that way. He has now written a timeline of the 10-month, $25,000(CAD) struggle. In short: there was a massive shipping delay, a $2,000 charge to clear customs, no knowledge base, unhelpful support, and the ATM itself flat out didn't work.

117 comments

  1. was it made... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    by butterfly labs??? that would explain it

  2. A bitcoin product was a scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good heavens never saw that one coming!

    1. Re:A bitcoin product was a scam? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      I wonder how much mass the delay actually had.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    2. Re:A bitcoin product was a scam? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      You lost your faith too fast. I'm sure the bitcoin product is blessed in it divine honesty and all the corruption comes from that Wilkinson guy. If that's even his real name.

      (In the name of Mr.Nakamoto, the bitcoin and the block chain. Amine)

  3. Serveds him right for being a hipster twat by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Trendy overhyped thing turns out to be utter fucking shite. Film at 11.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Serveds him right for being a hipster twat by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think a general rule of thumb is that once you hit 5 digits of price, a test drive is never too much to ask.

    2. Re:Serveds him right for being a hipster twat by c · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think a general rule of thumb is that once you hit 5 digits of price, a test drive is never too much to ask.

      That's really just a subset of an even more general rule of thumb, "a fool and his money are soon parted".

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    3. Re:Serveds him right for being a hipster twat by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      I think a general rule of thumb is that once you hit 5 digits of price, a test drive is never too much to ask.

      Exactly. That's what I told my diamond guy. "Give me one that's over $9999."

      Sadly, my future father in law disagreed.

    4. Re:Serveds him right for being a hipster twat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trendy overhyped thing turns out to be utter fucking shite. Film at 11.

      +5 insightful

      Oh man this site has gone to shit! ha ha ha!

    5. Re:Serveds him right for being a hipster twat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put an Apple sticker on it that shit fixes anything

      Gallomimia~

  4. All software is garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything involving software costing more than $0.99 is bound to disappoint.

    1. Re:All software is garbage by CauseBy · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't that include, say, cars boats trains airplanes and spaceships?

      I'd happily pay $2 for a spaceship, even if it ran Windows.

      I'd pay more than $2 for a Tesla.

  5. What did you expect by style7711 · · Score: 1

    That's life on the bleeding edge.

  6. should of just put pinball games in the bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should of just put pinball games in the bar.

    With a good game you can make both make money and games in bars is very big right now.

    1. Re:should of just put pinball games in the bar by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      should of
      would of
      could of

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    2. Re:should of just put pinball games in the bar by Overzeetop · · Score: 0

      your not helping

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:should of just put pinball games in the bar by mark_reh · · Score: 1
    4. Re:should of just put pinball games in the bar by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I try and help better next time.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    5. Re:should of just put pinball games in the bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in a large part of the US, it's not actually "could of", it's a slurring of "could hae" which stems from the Scottish. But, it's more fun to mock people from flyover states than to understand their culture.

    6. Re:should of just put pinball games in the bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      y'all mean "could have"?

    7. Re: should of just put pinball games in the bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. You don't slur written words.

        In Australia, with our mongrel mixed breed heritage, it's very common to hear 'coulda', 'shoulda' and 'woulda', but the words are still written correctly.

    8. Re:should of just put pinball games in the bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Could've" turned into "could of." In Australia, New Zealand, and a number of other places they say "could of" as a way of elongated the shortened "could've."

    9. Re:should of just put pinball games in the bar by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      (that was the idea; too subtle, I guess)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  7. Easy to see coming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anything called "Robo" as in ROBerCoin should be telling just from the label.

  8. Startup/new company fails? by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 1

    That's unpossible!

  9. Visible douchebag by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

    Look at that Jordan guy. Just look at him. Are you fucking kidding me? With a haircut like that, you know he's a vacuous retard.

    1. Re:Visible douchebag by Dahamma · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but looking at Wilkinson's photo, his douchiness quotient may not be far behind. Their combined daily hair product emissions alone could probably power a small town.

      One overprivileged hipster screws another. Oh, the humanity! And it's so sad to see, since in another world they could have been bros, sharing some PBRs on a Sunday morning at the beer garden while talking over each other about their new iPhone apps.

    2. Re:Visible douchebag by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 0

      I try not to judge people by their appearance, but going out in public with a hair-cut that bad shows very poor judgement.

    3. Re:Visible douchebag by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's the look of a person who believes appearance and flamboyance wins friends, because he read it in some self-help book or he's just that stuck on himself. It's the way people who think they're so great that they can set trends or simply stand apart and make themselves a unique image, and people will praise them over it.

      You can see it right there: he claims he's worked with many people, his service is great, and that he's doing his client a great favor by being such a great guy giving them a refund when his company doesn't actually do that, yet simply ignores all other complains about other costs incurred by his company's mismanagement and failure to keep promises and meet contractual obligations. "I'm so fucking great though! Don't you see how great I am?!"

      The $2300/mo number was probably one guy somewhere whose BitCoin ATM provided a big spike of output when it first showed up due to novelty and a temporary crowd come to ooh and ahh over the spectacle. I'd bet money that's not typical.

      This is the kind of guy who would rape a college girl and then tell her she should quit bitching about it because he's got such awesome muscles and a big dick and is rich and totally awesome and she should feel awed by his awesome schlange.

    4. Re:Visible douchebag by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Based on the emails, I get the feeling that this company couldn't afford to issue a refund. They had to find another dupe to scam, so they could pass that victim's cash to the first victim and keep the grift going.

    5. Re:Visible douchebag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, who in their right mind would visit a barber who needs a step ladder?

  10. God damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Reading the chat logs just pisses me off. WiFi losing connection, power getting turned off.. Is it so fucking hard to get a CAT cable hidden and tucked away and to pay someone not to turn the damn power off if you spent 20K already?

    Hyper agro tech support guy? You made yourself look like an amature.

    1. Re:God damn by michrech · · Score: 2

      Better would be to have the system use a cellular data network (with a VPN connection to whatever network it needed to communicate with for transaction data). That way it's isolated from the bar network *and* you don't need anything more than a power plug.

      --
      bork bork bork!
  11. Robocoin has 44 operational ATMs worldwide by De+Lemming · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can't vouch for the quality of their products or service, but I know Robocoin is one of the leading Bitcoin ATM manufacturers. According to Coin ATM Radar, there currently are 44 Robocoin ATMs operational worldwide, in the United States, the UK, Canada, Spain, Japan,... Robocoin provided the very first Bitcoin ATM machine in the world, in October 2013 in Vancouver, Canada.

    They are currently ranked 2nd, after Lamassu with 90 ATMs. But the Lamassu ATMs are mostly smaller and cheaper one-way machines (cash to Bitcoin), although they do sell a two-way solution now.

    On Coin ATM Radar, a total of 267 operational Bitcoin ATMs are registered at the moment.

    1. Re:Robocoin has 44 operational ATMs worldwide by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      You should recognize them easily too from the prominent OCP logo. And if somebody enters the PIN wrong three times, a belt comes out, imprisons the guy and zaps him dead.

      Captcha: coolly

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:Robocoin has 44 operational ATMs worldwide by rudy_wayne · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't vouch for the quality of their products or service, but I know Robocoin is one of the leading Bitcoin ATM manufacturers.

      According to the email exchange shown in the article, Robocoin is NOT a manufacturer, they are simply a reseller who installs their own custom software. Which may or may not be crap and which may or may not actually work.

    3. Re:Robocoin has 44 operational ATMs worldwide by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      And it won't even run down your battery.

    4. Re:Robocoin has 44 operational ATMs worldwide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATM also has meaning that is NSFW - A******onous Tr****er M***

    5. Re:Robocoin has 44 operational ATMs worldwide by Robert+Goatse · · Score: 1

      Protip: ass to mouth = a2m. Er, or so I hear....

    6. Re:Robocoin has 44 operational ATMs worldwide by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      I can't vouch for the quality of their products or service, but I know Robocoin is one of the leading Bitcoin ATM manufacturers. According to Coin ATM Radar, there currently are 44 Robocoin ATMs operational worldwide, in the United States, the UK, Canada, Spain, Japan,... Robocoin provided the very first Bitcoin ATM machine in the world, in October 2013 in Vancouver, Canada.

      They are currently ranked 2nd, after Lamassu with 90 ATMs. But the Lamassu ATMs are mostly smaller and cheaper one-way machines (cash to Bitcoin), although they do sell a two-way solution now.

      On Coin ATM Radar, a total of 267 operational Bitcoin ATMs are registered at the moment.

      Wow, that's /almost/ 1 per state.

    7. Re:Robocoin has 44 operational ATMs worldwide by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      I wish I had some seed money, I'd buy some Bitcoin ATMs and resell them with my own custom software written by the Office Space crew.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  12. The inevitable by gsslay · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is there a deluge of unsympathetic ridicule heading this guy's way?

    1. Re:The inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There will be two groups who will ridicule this guy the worst:
      1) People who think everyone who buys a magazine with the word "bitcoin" deserves to be scammed because free market durp
      2) Bitcoin uber-nerds who are shocked these n00bs didn't use a P2SH decentralized escrow service by manually copying and pasting the signatures

      Normal people in the middle will just shrug and say "sue 'em!"

    2. Re:The inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not you.. The comments here have degraded to a level equal to that of Yahoo or Facebook.

  13. Huge spreads on withdrawals! by jratcliffe · · Score: 2

    Wow, looking at those bitcoin ATM maps (http://coinatmradar.com/), it looks like these kiosks are charging a 5.5% fee for conversion into "fiat" currency. That's a huge forex spread, and amounts to an enormous ATM fee.

    1. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by jythie · · Score: 1

      I can not help but notice how many of the communities rail against banks implement the same behavior in BTC related services. It is almost like they simply want to be the ones doing it an are bitter someone else is already.

    2. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can see this in the micro lending industry too. People paying 7%+ for car loans to "fight the man" when they could just go to the bank and get 3%.

    3. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 0

      Or you could just 3D-print your car and pay 0%.

    4. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Right but, is it really that hard to understand? I mean yes, if you only value strict dollar value it seems like a contradiction but, if you realize that smaller operators take a larger proportionate risk with each transaction, you understand why they have to charge more for it to be worth it.

      It makes as much sense to me to pay this extra fee as it would to pay the extra dollar to get similar coffee at the local coffee shop because I like that there is a local coffee shop at the corner and I get value from it being there and not being just another starbucks.

      Its called values, different people have different ones and....shocker.... make decisions based on them.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by Animats · · Score: 2

      It's worse than that. Much worse. Robocoin, right now: "Sell rate: USD 347.43 | Buy rate: USD 465.87". That's a 17% spread in each direction. On top of that, the one at Hacker Dojo in Mountain View adds a 5% fee. So you lose about 22% on each transaction.

    6. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya but, to be fair, anyone willingly going into a place called "hacker dojo" kind of has it coming

    7. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Well, except, you know, running an bitcoin ATM in a shop is about a million times easier than getting a full blown banking license. Right now they often charge very high spreads because there's a lot of risk involved and the machines costs have to be paid down. But in theory there could be quite a bit of competition, given friendly governments and a long enough time horizon.

    8. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by denzacar · · Score: 1

      It makes as much sense to me to pay this extra fee as it would to pay the extra dollar to get similar coffee at the local coffee shop because I like that there is a local coffee shop at the corner and I get value from it being there and not being just another starbucks.

      Except this is not about coffee or service but about money.
      And someone giving even more money to A cause they don't like that B is overcharging them - that's cutting off the nose to spite the face.

      Its called values, different people have different ones and....shocker.... make decisions based on them.

      Which is just fine - as long as those people realize that such a decision is purely emotional and not rational in any way, shape or form.
      Trouble starts when people start pretending and/or believing that their choices are correct because they are rational and logical.
      That's being delusional.

      Which coincidentally explains the whole bitcoin craze.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    9. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look what those money exchange places in airports charge. I think it's more than 5.5% yet they are always busy.

    10. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      The airports have a captive market for people that didn't plan ahead. also remember it isn't just 5.5%, it is 5.5% plus the massive margin they make on the buy sell rate. So think it is closer to 20%.

    11. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > And someone giving even more money to A cause they don't like that B is overcharging them - that's cutting
      > off the nose to spite the face.

      Or that is you over-simplifying their values. I guess if you accept that the only reason they have for disliking A is a feeling of being "overcharged" then, and only then it makes sense. Most people I know who would pay more elsewhere have more reasons than that to dislike the big banks and not want to do business with them.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    12. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Most people I know who would pay more elsewhere have more reasons than that to dislike the big banks and not want to do business with them.

      None of those reasons having anything to do with the purpose of the transaction - to acquire or use money in a way that guarantees getting most monetary value out of the said money.

      All other reasons are akin to picking a car based solely on its color.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    13. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Do you even have a point other than that you refuse to recognize that people might have more nuanced world views than you?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    14. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Do you even understand that MONEY IS A TOOL and that "more nuanced world views" about money are about as relevant as more nuanced world views about hammers?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    15. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Yes I understand that you hold this opinion.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    16. Re:Huge spreads on withdrawals! by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Do you even understand that MONEY IS A TOOL and that "more nuanced world views" about money are about as relevant as more nuanced world views about hammers?

      If you want to consider money as just a tool to transact and the simplified world view that getting the best value for money is the end game, then yes, you're correct.

      However, money is also an instrument of change. If I want a buy a book, I could go to Amazon and get it, or my local bookstore across the street. Monetarily, I'd come out ahead using Amazon as Amazon has way less overhead than the bookstore, and thus be generally cheaper (at the expense of waiting a couple of days). And on a strictly money for goods transaction, yes, that makes most rational sense.

      However, there are reasons I decide to buy said book at the bookstore. For one, I may actually like shopping there and want to keep them in business so they don't turn into a coffeeshop I don't use, or a high end clothing retailer or whatever. Or maybe the environment is such that I feel welcome and more like a valued contributor to the arts than just a customer.

      Basically, I choose to spend more of my money because of the non-monetary benefits of the transaction.

      It should not be a surprise that the big corporate stores are suffering from things like showrooming because they don't offer much added value to justify their costs.

  14. Cost of Production by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    What's the energy cost to physically produce a bitcoin? Anybody know?

    1. Re:Cost of Production by pla · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's the energy cost to physically produce a bitcoin? Anybody know?

      With a Butterfly Labs' Monarch (700GH/s)), at a difficulty of 19,729,645,941 and a block reward of 25...

      655 kWh per BTC, on average, or roughly one third of the current USD:BTC exchange rate in power costs.

    2. Re:Cost of Production by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      List I heard, $113 but that sounds a bit low to me.

  15. Lowest cost laundering by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One persons large spread on a conversion, is another persons bargain on laundering.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Lowest cost laundering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      person's*

              persons = more than one group of people.

      Learn this.

    2. Re:Lowest cost laundering by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Laundering? Whoa, whoa, careful! These days the preferred term is "Double Irish with Dutch Sandwich."

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  16. CSR by nazrhyn · · Score: 1

    To be fair, the only thing I can see "wrong" with what the support guy did was that he wasn't apologetic. Outside of that, he seemed attentive, persistent and adaptable. If I were trying to remote troubleshoot some hardware and the internet kept cutting off and the people I was trying to work with kept leaving early or showing up late, I would probably have been hard pressed to act as calmly as Frank did.

  17. 3646'41.7"N 11925'04.6"W by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Funny

    I tried to find the nearest robocoin kiosk to see if it was possible to witness one of these things in person. The nearest one is in "Los Angeles" California. More specifically it is at this Latitude and Longitude 3646'41.7"N 11925'04.6"W which is along a desolate road with no name that runs along side the King River 20 miles outside of Fresno.

    I was hoping for a bar or some other urban public space.

    I really don't want to run into Jordan Kelley or anyone from his company in the middle of the desert with no witnesses.

  18. Always a chuckle by Enry · · Score: 1, Insightful

    when libertarians get treated the way they'd treat others in a libertarian utopia.

    Caveat emptor.

    1. Re:Always a chuckle by ADRA · · Score: 1, Funny

      No no no sir, clearly when we all live in a libertarian paradise, everyone will behave themselves and lift the world out of the socialist cesspool that we live in!

      --
      Bye!
    2. Re:Always a chuckle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you like it when libertarians chuckle at your "socialist paradise" when the government screws up? It's a straw man argument.

    3. Re:Always a chuckle by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Because being told what to do by an overbearing government is "Civilization". No thanks.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Always a chuckle by cusco · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because of the thundering herds of lawyers that follow them around, since their answer to every obvious fault in their religion is "That would never happen because they would be sued!"

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:Always a chuckle by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      I'm not especially libertarian, but I do not believe libertarianism has anything to say against dispute mediation. Bitcoin itself has the ability to do dispute mediated transactions but it's not fully fleshed out. If it was, and had been used here, a third party could have signed off on the transaction and the money could have been released, only once the machine was delivered and working.

      Of course, Robocoin may have chosen not to use such a mechanism because with pre-sales, they are often spending the purchase money to actually build the machine, but that will always be extremely risky.

    6. Re:Always a chuckle by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Libertarians never said disputes or fraud don't happen in business. That's what courts are for.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    7. Re:Always a chuckle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we don't like it. Because the truth hurts. In both directions!

      Therefore it isn't a strawman.

    8. Re:Always a chuckle by Enry · · Score: 1

      Libertarians claim that bad business practices will force bad companies out of business allowing good companies to prosper, but any time a person buys a product from a 'bad' vendor is their own fault for not doing enough research.

    9. Re:Always a chuckle by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2

      That's pretty much what's happening here. Robocoin will hardly prosper by providing a "service" like this and getting sued for breach of contract. In fact that's how the world works in general except where companies are granted special privileges by the government.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  19. The cost of the energy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The way bitcoin was originally designed (and should still react, barring the surging/bucking from mining vendors shoving their 'new stock' online for a couple days to 'test', before shipping them out to customers when they're no longer profitable) is to scale evenly with energy cost. So however much it would cost you to run a current gen cpu/gpu/asic is about how much energy you need to spend to generate a coin.

    When I did it with an OpenCL capable GPU a couple years back the amount coincided exactly with the calculated energy cost over the winter. The only reason it wasn't a 'waste of electricity' is because it was done during a period where it provided heat that otherwise would've been produced by a heater and thus was either 'free money' or 'free heating' depending on how you look at it.

    That said: It was back when BTC were 10 dollars apiece, the difficulty was like 3 million, and Mt Gox was still a respected industry player (haha).

    While I don't have specific numbers, I assume current-gen hardware at the current difficulty numbers probably coincides to a similiar valuation up until the point where newer energy efficient models are produced, then there's a rapid jump in profitability for a few months until saturation takes place and then back to unprofitability.

  20. right.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blame the victim? Really?

    1. Re:right.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these guys are pussies. should have taken it to court Months ago. They are only victims to their ineptitude.

    2. Re:right.... by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      At some point YES the victim really does have to shoulder some responsibility. If I told you I was selling you a ticket to the newest hotel we just established on the moon for $2000 and you bought it then while I am scum, you have to be pretty mentally impaired to fall for that scam.

    3. Re:right.... by c · · Score: 1

      If your scheme to make money from Bitcoin involves giving real money to someone else who's scheme to make money from Bitcoin involves getting real money from you, then looking at past history of Bitcoin money-making schemes it's highly likely that out of all the people around the table, you are the sucker.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    4. Re:right.... by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Yup. Plenty of instances where it needs to be pointed out that a victim did something really stupid to enable their victimization.
      News flash: people are responsible for their actions in most cases. There are certainly cases where victims bear no reasonable responsibility for their predicament, but there are absolutely cases where they bear significant responsibility.

  21. Wilkinson is a bad guy???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One gets that idea from some of the nasty posts here.
    Look, the man tried to buy a widget. Widget supplier is a con man. Supplier takes the money, then takes as long as possible to provide anything useful. When buyer tries to return non-working pile of garbage, weasel supplier gives 16 lines of BS about why he can't return buyer's money.

    Wilkinson was a LOT more patient than I would have been.

  22. Robocoin has 44 operational ATMs worldwide by slashdice · · Score: 1

    "leading bitcoin ATM manufacturers"? LOL. Is that like the leading slashdot beta ux guru?

    ATM means Ass To Mouth, by the way.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  23. Whaaaaa by sootman · · Score: 2

    I blew $25k on a hobby and it didn't work out. LIFE IS SO HORRIBLE!!!!!11

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  24. terms and conditions by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    Who pays full price for something like this up front?! Across an international border?! I would never sign T&C's without some recourse for a non-functioning product. Things like paying customs and shipping, installation and support costs, that's all divvied up ahead of time.

    Wanting 100% cash up front is just not how business is done. You might pay some portion of it, but you never shell out the whole price unless you have some other leverage. Especially on something that is months out. In this case Robocoin had all the leverage. Even if they did ship a functioning ATM, they could flip a kill switch any time they wanted. I would have paid at most 30% up front, written proof of functionality prior to shipment, some payment at time of shipment, some payment at time of installation, and withhold a symbolic 5-10% for at least 30 days to make sure all the bugs are worked out.

    OT - I'm no deletionist, but I was a wee bit surprised to see Mr. Wilkinson's company had a Wikipedia article. Seems like this guy might just be after some limelight.

    1. Re:terms and conditions by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Who pays full price for something like this up front?! Across an international border?! I would never sign T&C's without some recourse for a non-functioning product. Things like paying customs and shipping, installation and support costs, that's all divvied up ahead of time.

      Wanting 100% cash up front is just not how business is done. You might pay some portion of it, but you never shell out the whole price unless you have some other leverage. Especially on something that is months out. In this case Robocoin had all the leverage. Even if they did ship a functioning ATM, they could flip a kill switch any time they wanted. I would have paid at most 30% up front, written proof of functionality prior to shipment, some payment at time of shipment, some payment at time of installation, and withhold a symbolic 5-10% for at least 30 days to make sure all the bugs are worked out.

      Depends on the product and the seller. If the seller is one of a few, you're going to be hamstrung by their terms because there's no competitor to turn to.

      And it looks like if they were first, they get to decide the terms of sale. If that means they get to demand 100% payment up front, so be it.

      And there was a contract of sale which stated it would arrive fit for service blah blah blah.

      The end result is, if you wanted to play, you had to pay. Most sensible people would do as you said and do partial payments on milestone completion, but bitcoin tends to make people a little bit crazy and all that, especially wanting to do first-mover advantage. Extremely risky, but if you are first, it's extremely rewarding.

      Especially when a promised 2.5K return a month which means the investment gets recoupled in about a year or so.

  25. Apology from CEO Jordan Kelley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2jakg4/the_great_robocoin_ripoff_how_we_lost_25000/cla6b7d

    1. Re:Apology from CEO Jordan Kelley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 100% accountable for this failure. I am responsible for not coming to an agreement with Andrew and his team with a swift and decisive buy back. I was stubborn about providing a refund as I hate to ever lose an Operator.

      Ultimately, I am responsible for taking the Robocoin name down a path that my team most certainly does not deserve.

      Why didn't you pay them back sooner? If they hadn't gone public, you would've partied away their money.

    2. Re:Apology from CEO Jordan Kelley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was his edited comment: This was his initial comment: http://i.imgur.com/QUJFyk8.png

      Source: The rest of that Reddit thread.

    3. Re:Apology from CEO Jordan Kelley by Megane · · Score: 1

      So he didn't just want to be on the bleeding edge, he also wanted to be the first guinea pig to do it with Canadian plastic money? Sounds like we have a diligent idiot here.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Apology from CEO Jordan Kelley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian money is plastic, and has been deploying for a while now. 20s were plastic in march of 2012, 50s and 100s before that. If you want to do some kind of automated kiosk handling money in Canada, handling plastic money is not a "let's beta test!", its what it takes to do business. All the real bank machines have been dispensing plastic money from, as far as I can recall, the launch of the new money.

  26. First by NotInHere · · Score: 1

    People who want to do something first should expect a bumpy ride. Having to pay $10k more is part of the word "pioneer". Pioneers clear the path for the masses.

  27. Charitable interpretation by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

    Jordan is operating on a shoestring, paying in advance (with his customers' money) for units he intends to modify with his own code, then ship to customers. The results are not surprising.

  28. Re:Once more... by tibit · · Score: 1

    There's no reason whatsoever to mine more of them for the system to be successful. A finite supply would be perfectly acceptable.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  29. Wait a sec by ddd0004 · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the transaction to purchase a Bitcoin ATM be conducted in Bitcoin.

  30. Bitcoin ATM is pointless by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    I have never understood the point of using a Bitcoin ATM versus buying through an exchange like Coinbase. It just seems like a gimmick. Why would someone on the street need to convert between fiat and cryptocurrency? If you have cash wouldn't you just pay with your cash?

    Bitcoin's great for storing and transferring value. No one can take your coins without your private key and you can do international transfers yourself. Purchasing with Bitcoin, on the other hand, is not terribly practical. Not many vendors accept it compared to fiat and the confirmation times are way too long for in-person purchases.

    Those guys would have been much better off spending their time and money creating Bitcoin wagering games playable over the Internet.

    1. Re:Bitcoin ATM is pointless by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      They make gold ATMs, too, and the same arguments apply. There's absolutely nothing practical about it, and you're going to be ripped off by the fees no matter what. I guess it's a fun novelty for some folks, "Press Button, Receive Bitcoin." No one who's serious about using Bitcoin for any quasinonymous purpose will get them this way, especially considering that these ATMs tend to be in locations that have cameras everywhere.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    2. Re:Bitcoin ATM is pointless by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      They make gold ATMs, too, and the same arguments apply. There's absolutely nothing practical about it, and you're going to be ripped off by the fees no matter what. I guess it's a fun novelty for some folks, "Press Button, Receive Bitcoin." No one who's serious about using Bitcoin for any quasinonymous purpose will get them this way, especially considering that these ATMs tend to be in locations that have cameras everywhere.

      Two reasons.

      1) The power of physicality. Sure you can do all your Bitcoin transactions electronically. But people DO enjoy some physical interaction with their money now and again. The Bitcoin ATM does just that.

      2) Emergency cash. Shit, you ran out of cash. You know you have bitcoins in your wallet though - so you can cash out right there.

      A bitcoin ATM is a last bridge between the virtual currency and the real world - you can definitely get better rates at an exchange, but those are all online and can be a little iffy (they can ask a lot of personal information and have questionable security).

      Or you want to show some people how easy Bitcoin is and show how they can get bitcoins out of it as an introduction, to how they can get regular cash from their bitcoins.

  31. libertarianism by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    It's my right to run around Texas if I have Ebola because the government engineered the virus to kill us and is trying to cover it up! Now pardon me while I go out and drown the government in a bathtub and then form my own corporate banking monopoly to earn an extra bit of bitcoin on the side so I can buy guns and cigarette paper and an eighth without the government taking the green hit off my doob.

    1. Re:libertarianism by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention Somalia. FAIL!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  32. Re:Once more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no reason whatsoever to mine more of them for the system to be successful. A finite supply would be perfectly acceptable.

    There is a finite supply of them. No more than 21 million will be mined. However the mining still needs to continue after that point. Mining is how the blockchain is secured.

  33. Lay off the sophistry... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    However, money is also an instrument of change.

    Your "argument" could just as well be applied to almost anything. From excrement to cars.
    Same as it could be turned around and broken by "proving" that money is an instrument of status quo.
    Cause if it were not so, how do the wealthy remain wealthy, become wealthier and pass on that wealth to their offspring.

    Both would be nonsense.
    It is a tool.

    Only we pass around tokens we confuse for money so we give it more material value and imagine it more real than say... mathematics.
    Which is itself a tool one needs to be able to use the tool of money properly.
    Hammer to money's nail.

    It should not be a surprise that the big corporate stores are suffering from things like showrooming because they don't offer much added value to justify their costs.

    Then you've never met a skillful salesman I presume.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  34. The old refuge of those without facts or logic... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Yes I understand that you hold this opinion.

    ...calling statements and facts "just opinions".
    Self-immolating their own intellect in exchange for the false coin of the last desperate attempt to clutch at pride.

    "Better all that is said be mere opinions, and thus an equation and a squiggle and a hard-earned fact be of same value, including such works of mine - than for ME to wrong.
    Let NOTHING be wrong then, for all is mere thought and nothing is of real value."

    Childish.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  35. Saw one locally by forrie · · Score: 1

    I saw a bitcoin-type ATM near Harvard Square, in Cambridge, MA, at a building called "The Garage" (bunch of shops and eateries). I've never seen anyone actually use it, though. It's the only one in the city I've seen. I was suspicious of it :-)

  36. Re:The old refuge of those without facts or logic. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    You can call me all the names you want, it wont change the fact that you are the one who is pretending that a rational person can't have different values or come to different rational conclusions than you.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  37. Rational ain't the same as factual. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    And ignoring factual isn't even rational. That's called delusional.

    Also, you're the one engaging in intellectual sophistry, still hiding behind "It is all just opinions. I know nothing and neither do you, for what can be truly known..."

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Rational ain't the same as factual. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Because in this case we are essentially talking about values. Values are, actually, just opinions.

      You are starting from a premise that the only thing that matters in a financial transaction is doing it the most cheaply. I reject the premise, which is, entirely based on values. Which....again....are opionions.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"