Slashdot Mirror


Computer Scientist Parachutes From 135,908 Feet, Breaking Record

An anonymous reader writes: The NY Times reports that Alan Eustace, a computer scientist and senior VP at Google, has successfully broken the record for highest freefall jump, set by Felix Baumgartner in 2012. "For a little over two hours, the balloon ascended at speeds up to 1,600 feet per minute to an altitude of 135,908 feet, more than 25 miles. Mr. Eustace dangled underneath in a specially designed spacesuit with an elaborate life-support system. He returned to earth just 15 minutes after starting his fall. ... Mr. Eustace cut himself loose from the balloon with the aid of a small explosive device and plummeted toward the earth at a speeds that peaked at more than 800 miles per hour, setting off a small sonic boom heard by observers on the ground. ... His technical team had designed a carbon-fiber attachment that kept him from becoming entangled in the main parachute before it opened. About four-and-a-half minutes into his flight, he opened the main parachute and glided to a landing 70 miles from the launch site."

175 comments

  1. Where's Bennett? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has Bennett Haselton certified this record-breaking feat? I will not believe these claims until he has written a lengthy blog post on how this feat relates to Burning Man ice queues and distributed social networks.

    1. Re:Where's Bennett? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 4, Funny

      After graduation, Haselton worked on Visual Basic at Microsoft for seven months.

      Yet another reason to hate him. Fuck.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    2. Re:Where's Bennett? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      the dessert druggies.

      mmm dessert drugs, you know, for after dinner. that would be epic.

    3. Re:Where's Bennett? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear Gods, don't you realize what you are doing? You are turning Bennett Haselton into a meme! Now the man will never die!!!

    4. Re:Where's Bennett? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I will not believe these claims until he has written a lengthy blog post on how this feat relates to Burning Man ice queues and distributed social networks.

      Haselton earned a master's degree in mathematics from Vanderbilt University, and created and operates a significant First Amendment website. I'm sure you have similar credentials? Why don't you tell us about it?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:Where's Bennett? by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      He is a frequent contributor after all.

  2. Re:Ruuuuuz by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

    It takes a dedicated conspiracist to declare how the elite are pulling the wool over our eyes at news of an incremental improvement in a record achievement.

  3. And if the attempt failed... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 5, Funny

    He planned to go up and try it again.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  4. That was quiet by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    Hadn't heard anything of this before today, I'll have to look for videos. I guess he didn't want to draw any attention.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:That was quiet by lq_x_pl · · Score: 2

      Sounds like that was his intent:
      Instead, Mr. Eustace planned his jump in the utmost secrecy, working for almost three years...

      --
      An internal system operation returned the error "The operation completed successfully.".
    2. Re:That was quiet by aitikin · · Score: 1

      Red Bull didn't sponsor him because they gave everybody who ever drank their product $10.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    3. Re:That was quiet by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Hadn't heard anything of this before today, I'll have to look for videos. I guess he didn't want to draw any attention.

      well the other guys needed to be publicity whores to raise the needed cash, but this guy just paid for it out of his own pocket.

    4. Re:That was quiet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any denied support from Google because he didn't want it to be a marketing event (ie like Red Bull's)

    5. Re:That was quiet by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      Hadn't heard anything of this before today, I'll have to look for videos. I guess he didn't want to draw any attention.

      There was a video on the NYTimes site, but it was really short. And I just realized that the New York Times has one of the most irritating video players I have ever used.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  5. Very Cool! by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, it wasn't covered by the Discovery Channel. Sigh! I'm glad to see a Computer Scientist break the record :-)

    1. Re:Very Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he did not break the record. He used a drouge parachute for stability during the jump which means that he broke the world drougefall record previously set by Kittenger, not the world freefall record. I bet Guiness will honor it as the freefall record, but I am curious to see if the FAI will accept it and thus make it a true world record.

  6. dropped =/= jumped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy got plopped off the end of a trash pick tool

  7. Being a computer scientist by alaskana98 · · Score: 2

    it would have been cool if he would have jumped from 128,000 feet. ;)

    1. Re:Being a computer scientist by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Funny

      131,072 feet, surely?

    2. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      131072

    3. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean 131,072?

    4. Re:Being a computer scientist by Bodhammer · · Score: 1

      00110001001100110011000100101100001100000011011100110010

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    5. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would have been cool if he would have jumped from 128,000 feet. ;)

      I believe you mean 131,072

    6. Re:Being a computer scientist by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0

      Why 128,000? It isn't a power of 2 and it doesn't translate into any special hex or binary value so why else would that number have any special meaning for a computer scientist?

    7. Re:Being a computer scientist by sunderland56 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Except that he isn't a computer scientist....

      >> a computer scientist and senior VP

      You can't be both. You hand in your geek card when you become upper management.

    8. Re:Being a computer scientist by Macdude · · Score: 1

      131,072 feet would of been cooler...

      --
      "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
    9. Re:Being a computer scientist by kqs · · Score: 2

      Wow, you have clearly never talked to a Google senior VP before.

    10. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      HAVE

      131,072 feet would HAVE been cooler...

      The word "of" has no meaning in the context you typed it.

    11. Re:Being a computer scientist by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      it would have been cool if he would have jumped from 128,000 feet. ;)

      That would only work if he was employed by Western Digital or Maxtor.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    12. Re:Being a computer scientist by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

      The word "of" has no meaning in the context you typed it.

      If he wanted your opinion, he'd axe for it.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    13. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But he did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night.

    14. Re:Being a computer scientist by Zynder · · Score: 2

      I suspect the OP deals in storage, and you and I still don't believe in those kibibits, so it didn't compute with us.

    15. Re:Being a computer scientist by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Reading the entirely of the responses to your post I think it's pretty clear why he left the alligators in that particular swamp the hell alone.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    16. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a Mac dude. They do everything in some ass backwards way that makes no sense to anyone but morons, but dammit it they look good doing it!

    17. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would have been cool if he would have jumped from 128,000 feet. ;)

      The previous record was 128,100 -- so no, not cool. As others said 2^17 would've been cooler (131,072).

    18. Re:Being a computer scientist by St.Creed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah. I see you wanted to share the very definition of "prejudice" with us by providing a clear example. Thank you.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    19. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I could care less what you think. For all intensive purpose the two phrases are one in the same. Which begs the question, are you the type of person that would cut off your nose despite your face?

      Irregardless, if you think you can extract revenge threw grammar nazi posts, you've got another think coming. I'll get off scott free!

      (I know I know, each phrase is worse than the next).

    20. Re:Being a computer scientist by tqk · · Score: 0

      131,072 feet would of been cooler...

      131,072 feet would've been cooler ...

      See contraction, of "would" plus "have". I realize we'll (we plus will) lose this battle, and I can live with it. Newspeak rulez!

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    21. Re:Being a computer scientist by tqk · · Score: 1

      He's a Mac dude.

      Ah. The light dawns (or something/sumfin).

      Don't you twits have *anything* better to do? This is what you do for entertainment?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    22. Re:Being a computer scientist by tqk · · Score: 0

      For all intensive purpose ...

      "For all intents and purposes ...". WTF does "intensive purpose" mean?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    23. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww, are your panties in a bunch cause I don't want to deepthroat Google employees as if they were gods?

    24. Re:Being a computer scientist by mooingyak · · Score: 2

      That's the only one that bothered you?

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    25. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      65535 feet ought to be enough for anybody.

    26. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I could care less what you think. For all intensive purpose the two phrases are one in the same. Which begs the question, are you the type of person that would cut off your nose despite your face?

      Irregardless, if you think you can extract revenge threw grammar nazi posts, you've got another think coming. I'll get off scott free!

      (I know I know, each phrase is worse than the next).

      They are sentences, not phrases :-)

    27. Re:Being a computer scientist by ray-auch · · Score: 2

      *woosh*

    28. Re:Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at Google.

    29. Re: Being a computer scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      65535? I can't tell any more whether these comments are wrong or explicitly stated for there comic value :-) but surely that should be 65536, no?

      And don't call me Shirley.

    30. Re:Being a computer scientist by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      No, that's "whoosh".

  8. Skydiving lesson by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    So this skydiving student goes on his first solo jump. When the plane gets up to altitude and over the target, he jumps. Falling to the proper altitude, he pulls the release on the main chute. Nothing.

    Fighting back panic, he remembers what they taught in class and pulls the release on the backup chute. Nothing happens again. Things are starting to look pretty grim as he watches the ground rapidly approach.

    Then, he notices a man, rising toward him from the ground. Odd, he thinks to himself. But what the hell ..... When this person gets within earshot, the skydiver yells, "Hey buddy! Do you know how to work a parachute?"

    "No", the other person replies. "Do you know how to light a Coleman stove?"

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it.

    2. Re:Skydiving lesson by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      i think it's that the guy blew up his stove and the explosion sent him hurtling upward(?) if so, it's tough for a nerd site. the physics of that would be sufficiently dubious as to prevent the joke from being 'got'.

    3. Re:Skydiving lesson by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      WHOOOOOOOOSH!

      Coleman stoves use white gas (or unleaded works fine), and gas is quite explosive under certain conditions.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:Skydiving lesson by kooky45 · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are all skydiving jokes over your head?

    6. Re:Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally for you:

      Whoooooooooosh!

    7. Re:Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha

    8. Re:Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coleman stoves use white gas...

      Even funnier. In the original joke, the guy going up was a black guy trying to light an electric stove.

    9. Re:Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      GP AC here. As an avid backpacker, I have some experience with portable stoves (protip: they're serious when they say "do not tilt while lit"; the fuel will pour out in liquid form, on fire, creating a rather unsafe situation). I was pondering the joke with this in mind, but figured I must've still been missing something.

      The whole situation fails to make sense to me. Not because a Coleman stove can't possibly create an explosion sufficient to launch a person to any appreciable altitude. Not because a person launched in this manner would be unlikely to be conscious, let alone capable of articulating speech. Mostly because if the person had been blown into the air by an exploding Coleman stove, the logical implication is that he was already successful in lighting the stove!

    10. Re:Skydiving lesson by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      oh this joke is as old as the T-10 parachute.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    11. Re:Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jackie the Jokeman Martling will be suing you shortly.

    12. Re:Skydiving lesson by sconeu · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between a bad golfer and a bad skydiver?

      One goes WHAP! Damn!

      The other goes DAMN! WHAP!!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    13. Re:Skydiving lesson by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Being a geek you used logic to try to understand the joke thus fucking it up.

    14. Re:Skydiving lesson by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      +1,000,005: caught me right out there

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    15. Re: Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's the joke?

    16. Re:Skydiving lesson by tqk · · Score: 1

      Being a geek you used logic to try to understand the joke thus fucking it up.

      That, and they've never heard of artistic licence, nor willing suspension of disbelief. Probably shouldn't bother trying to write fiction. It'd read like a manpage, or worse.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    17. Re:Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    18. Re:Skydiving lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " he was already successful in lighting the stove"
      But it was obvious to him that he had not used the proper technique, since the result seemed to be sub-optimal.
      He was requesting instruction since the written man page had been unclear.

    19. Re:Skydiving lesson by PPH · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. I think this joke dates back to WWII.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  9. That's how we CS people roll by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can tell it was a REAL computer scientist because there was no "test first", just pure perfect action.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That's how we CS people roll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who the fuck tests shit, go or or die

    2. Re:That's how we CS people roll by Kingkaid · · Score: 1, Funny

      You can tell it was a REAL computer scientist because there was no "test first", just pure perfect action.

      I don't know about that. I heard he was caught in a catch loop for the first two hours until he managed to use a throw command.

    3. Re:That's how we CS people roll by bob_super · · Score: 3, Funny

      CS people are raised on "Do or do not. There is not Try"

    4. Re:That's how we CS people roll by Dins · · Score: 1

      Or go and die, depending...

    5. Re:That's how we CS people roll by halivar · · Score: 1

      Yikes! No, please. (go or die) or (go and die) = die.

    6. Re:That's how we CS people roll by halivar · · Score: 1

      Annnnnd, joke fails due to logic error.

    7. Re:That's how we CS people roll by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      He said depending, so there are more terms (and more brackets) that he's not telling you about.

    8. Re:That's how we CS people roll by Zynder · · Score: 1

      (go or die) or (go and die) = die

      Annnnnd, joke fails due to logic error.

      Was that an AND joke? It appeared to be an OR joke to me, which historically are funny....or not!

    9. Re:That's how we CS people roll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CS people are raised on "Do or do not. There is not Try"

      So if/else, not try/catch -- gotcha.

    10. Re:That's how we CS people roll by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

      No, he was in a "I'm Feeling Lucky" mood.

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    11. Re:That's how we CS people roll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      & by the landing. He fell over onto the ground like a flipped omelette.

    12. Re:That's how we CS people roll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the act WAS the first test.

  10. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another trend people with no life will begin to follow, and post all over the internet

    1. Re:Great by gustgr · · Score: 1

      As they have no life to begin with, at least they won't lose much if things go wrong.

  11. Not to be outdone by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Informative

    Vladimir Putin announced on Russian Times that he will jump from the Mir space station at an altitude of 300,000 kilometers to celebrate the upcoming 70th anniversary of the Battle of Stalingrad.

    1. Re:Not to be outdone by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Vladimir Putin announced on Russian Times that he will jump from the Mir space station at an altitude of 300,000 kilometers to celebrate the upcoming 70th anniversary of the Battle of Stalingrad.

      Made even more of an awesome feat due to the fact that Mir had been de-orbited in 2001.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    2. Re:Not to be outdone by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      I hear he's challenged Chuck Norris to a biplane duel for the last leg.

    3. Re:Not to be outdone by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I don't think the mir is up that high. it's probably more like 400km, no? geosync must be about 50k km. The moon 1m km?

    4. Re:Not to be outdone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfff. Kim Jong-un already free-fell from the Moon last year.

    5. Re:Not to be outdone by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      MIR isn't that high currently since it was deorbited in March of 2001. Prior to that, it was at an altitude 364 km +/- 10km depending on where it was at in orbit.

      Geostationary orbit is ~36,000 km from earth (radius ~42,164km). The moon is 384,000 km (+/- 21000 miles)

    6. Re:Not to be outdone by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Made even more of an awesome feat due to the fact that Mir had been de-orbited in 2001.

      OP failed to mention that, to make the jump possible, Mr. Putin first plans to throw Mir back into orbit.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:Not to be outdone by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Right, and their weapons are 12-guage shotguns(handheld) and flamethrowers(wing mounted)

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    8. Re:Not to be outdone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      psssst. The Mir crashed in 2001.

    9. Re:Not to be outdone by G-Man · · Score: 3, Funny

      And then he's going to do the jump bare-chested. Riding a bear.

    10. Re:Not to be outdone by Noah+Haders · · Score: 0

      close... earth radius is ~6,000km, not 40,000km!) Saturn is 50,000 km, Neptune is 25,00km.

    11. Re: Not to be outdone by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Right. The orbit is 36,000 km from the surface, or a radius of 42,000 km, a difference of...6,000km

    12. Re:Not to be outdone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But PETA wants to know if the bear will have a spacesuit?

    13. Re:Not to be outdone by wbr1 · · Score: 2

      www.youtube.com/watch?v=13sxFHM6Mjg

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    14. Re:Not to be outdone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vladimir Putin announced on Russian Times that he will jump from the Mir space station at an altitude of 300,000 kilometers to celebrate the upcoming 70th anniversary of the Battle of Stalingrad.

      You mean 358 km?... lol. 300,000 km would be just short of the moon.

    15. Re:Not to be outdone by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      Throw? Don't you mean push? Throwing a space station into orbit is nothing, but pushing it...!

    16. Re:Not to be outdone by iMactheKnife · · Score: 1

      Putin will then be the first President to join the orbit of the space station with a ten second lag. Will Medvedev then ascend?

  12. He went up with just one single instruction... by orledrat · · Score: 2

    ...JA - Jump If Above.

    1. Re:He went up with just one single instruction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...JR - Jump Retard

    2. Re:He went up with just one single instruction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RS -- Return Safely

  13. Record by bigdavex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Computer Scientist Parachutes From 135,908 Feet, Breaking Record

    What's the record for EEs? I might have a shot at that.

    --
    -Dave
    1. Re:Record by Zynder · · Score: 3, Funny

      128,908 + 14,337j feet....

    2. Re:Record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slow clap. Too bad you didn't remember that electrical engineers in the US use SI units; maybe you were thinking of mechanical engineers?

    3. Re:Record by neurovish · · Score: 1

      128,908 + 14,337j feet....

      ...just when I thought I was over the PTSD from my electrical networks class, the fetal position your joke induced demonstrates otherwise.

    4. Re:Record by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Original was in feet so I carried that over into the joke. Somebody always has to complain, don't they?

  14. I don't get the joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has Bennett Haselton certified this record-breaking feat? I will not believe these claims until he has written a lengthy blog post on how this feat relates to Burning Man ice queues and distributed social networks.

    I don't it and searching gives me no insight.

    Please explain.

    1. Re:I don't get the joke. by tqk · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm with the parent. I've read the Wikipedia page, and your link to his /. submissions, and I'm not seeing why such vitriol is being flung (in multiple stories) about him. What, is he a faggot/fairy/LGBTt (???) or something and that offends you, or you're a spammer, a paedo, or you think Burning Man is Emo; or what?

      FWIW, I'm with him on what I've read about his views on obscenity and nudity. How nakedness can be percieved as disorderly conduct escapes me. Sure, lots of people are fat slobs so I don't want to see them naked, but how's it obscene? Not understanding the hate here.

      I'm an anti-Microsoft bigot (bite me), and I wouldn't hold even that against him. He took their money!

      W.T.F?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  15. Baumgartner took too much credit by kooky45 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I watched Baumgartner's jump live and a follow up documentary on it and it seemed to me far too much credit for his jump was given to him. He got claustrophibic in the suit so dropped out of the project for an entire year and only came back when he got worried that a test pilot making test jumps in his place might do the actual record jump and deny him his press. I like this new one, seems to have been done for the right reasons.

    1. Re:Baumgartner took too much credit by Ancil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I like this new one, seems to have been done for the right reasons.

      What exactly are "the right reasons"?

      I'm being serious. Is there some sort of "right" or "noble" reason to spend all this money jumping from slightly higher than the last guy who spent a lot of money?

      Am I missing something here? Off the top of my head, the only reasons which come to mind are "extreme wealth" and "boredom".

    2. Re:Baumgartner took too much credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right reasons means Google looking for more ways to help the NSA spy on you... from Spaaaaaace!

    3. Re:Baumgartner took too much credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same reason there is for doing literally anything.

      There! I said it; life is a giant waste of time.

    4. Re:Baumgartner took too much credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing it for it's own sake. Same reason why most CS people code when they aren't being paid for it. This one just extended that attitude into high atmosphere jumps.

    5. Re:Baumgartner took too much credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, both of them are dubious simply because of the "extreme wealth" and "boredom" factors involved.

      However, there is an obvious strong distinction that was made:

      1) Pushing the extreme limits of an activity to see if it's possible and in the process develop new tech to make it possible.
      2) Publicity

      Can you really not tell the difference between the right one and the wrong one?

      If not, there's this guy named Hannibal you'd probably get along with great.

    6. Re:Baumgartner took too much credit by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The same reason there is for doing literally anything.

      To woo women?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:Baumgartner took too much credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, what, you're suggesting he brought his army across the Alps on elephants for the publicity?

    8. Re:Baumgartner took too much credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't have a guitar with him... So, probably not.

    9. Re:Baumgartner took too much credit by strikethree · · Score: 1

      The right reason is: It was done for fun or curiosity.

      Everything else is failure.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  16. Was he wearing his Glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If he did this without wearing google glasses I'm going to be upset.

    1. Re: Was he wearing his Glasses by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      He used a gopro. Very sensible choice.

  17. Meh by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Call me when someone does a jump from the ISS :-P

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the cow jumped over the moon. Beat that.

    2. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The ISS has significant relative lateral velocity. So far all these high dives have roughly 0 relative lateral velocity. The speed of orbit requires a heat-shield for re-entry. If you took a sounding rocket up to the height of the ISS, a good enough suit would certainly work, and probably wouldn't need any special materials, but you wouldn't want to get anywhere near the station. It would zip by in the blink of an eye. If it came close enough the visual could be terrifying, but it's doubtful you'd see it as anything other than a bright flash. You'd probably think there'd been an explosion nearby.

    3. Re:Meh by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      I doubt that you are correct here. At an the apogee of 205 miles I figure that from just the gravitational acceleration he is going to hit close to 5000 mph before friction starts slowing him at all. Rough figures.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  18. Next record by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    The next record-breaking attempt will end badly with the man floating away into the emptiness of space.

    1. Re:Next record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what altitude would a person like this act like orbital reentry and bounce off the atmoshere into space? 50, 100, 150 miles up?

    2. Re:Next record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gravity works over an infinite distance.
      The Sun has more gravity than Earth.
      We should be pulled away toward the Sun.

    3. Re:Next record by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      the only idiot here is the one who brings politics into a topic that has NOTHING to do with politics

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    4. Re:Next record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think he is a bible thumper

    5. Re:Next record by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      No altitude would cause bouncing into space, only velocity can cause that. In theory, you could go well past the moon's orbit (as long as the moon was on the other side) and fall to Earth. You'd gain so much speed in the vacuum that you'd burn up on re-entry like the rest of the meteors.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    6. Re:Next record by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      To an ever increasing portion of the population, everything is about politics.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:Next record by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      now go read up on the inverse square law.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    8. Re:Next record by angelbar · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that the little jumps on the moon where about not to berak the space suits. Now I know what was the fear to jump too hard on the moon!.

      --
      -no sig today-
    9. Re:Next record by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Won't happen. Because he is falling straight toward the planet he will not bounce. Pick up enough speed and the g-force of the deceleration will kill him if the fireball of friction does not.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  19. Nailed the Halting Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can hardly wait for the paper.
    (ba-dum-ching!)

  20. That's not how you do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would have been much cheaper if he dove from 5 miles up 5 times.

  21. Re:Ruuuuuz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But... Google.

  22. Correction on Altitude by REALMAN · · Score: 1

    From the News story - "Mr. Eustace’s maximum altitude was initially reported as 135,908 feet. The final number, based on information from two data loggers, being submitted to the World Air Sports Federation is 135,890 feet."

    --
    - A Frog in a pond utters an azure cry. -
  23. Guinness, not Geek by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 3

    For the bizarre books that the former keep.
    Nothing to do with geeks even if (and increasingly 'precisely because') it involves Google.

  24. One word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

  25. Sheldon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheldon, is that you?

  26. NOTHING in mainstream by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    ...FB's jump was fucking everywhere.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:NOTHING in mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it was sponsored by Red Bull (tm).

    2. Re:NOTHING in mainstream by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      oh wait, this jump got a footnote on Channel 4 News tonight...

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  27. A Challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should call out Mark Zuckerberg to jump.

  28. Frankly, I don't give a damn... by squash_me_quickly · · Score: 1

    ...unless this leads to the development of technology which has a "useful" use.

    This could be for the hypothetical, and highly unlikely scenarios, where one knows a plane will fall apart in the next few minutes and the only hope for the passengers is to put on their high altitude parachute gear, jump, and hope for the best.

    Spending ridiculous amounts of money breaking this record just to seek notoriety, is about as interesting as breaking the record for eating boiled eggs. (That just happened to be on the TV earlier.)

    1. Re:Frankly, I don't give a damn... by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      Or part of the development and testing process for a new generation space suit?

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
  29. Why should we care what he is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hell do I care if he is a "Computer Scientist"....

  30. Imperial units by short · · Score: 1

    "135,908 feet, more than 25 miles" - I had to laugh, a mile is not anyhow more imaginable unit than a foot.

    1. Re:Imperial units by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      How long would it take you to drive 135,908 feet?

      How long would it take you to drive 25 miles?

      I'd say the latter is easier to guess at than the former.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  31. And the record broken was ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... most archaic unit in an otherwise metric world. I hear the top speed reached was 42 furlongs per fortnight :-)

  32. Seven word posts do not need a subject by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 1

    No one like a show off, honey.

  33. JMP Considered Harmful by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    (...)

  34. What arrogant bastard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone else in the world is working hard to make the world a better place, but these bastards are having fun skydiving from long distance. Don't they have anything better to do?

  35. What I want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Eustace cut himself loose from the balloon with the aid of a small explosive device and plummeted toward the earth at a speeds that peaked at more than 800 miles per hour,

    What I want to know, is how he smuggled an explosive device past the ever vigilant TSA before he boarded his flight!