Slashdot Mirror


Will HP's $200 Stream 11 Make People Forget About Chromebooks?

theodp writes With an 11.6" screen, Windows 8.1, and free Office 365 for a year, the $199.99 solid-state HP Stream 11 laptop is positioned to make people think twice about Chromebooks (add $30 for the HP Stream 13). But will it? "The HP Stream 11 is clearly both inexpensive and a great value," writes Paul Thurrott. "At just $200, it's cheap, of course. But it also features a solid-feeling construction, a bright and fun form factor, a surprisingly high-quality typing experience and a wonderful screen. This isn't a bargain bin throwaway. The Stream 11 is something special." The HP Stream Family also includes the HP Stream 7, a $99.99 Windows 8.1 Tablet that includes the Office 365 deal. By the way, at the other end of the price spectrum, HP has introduced the Sprout, which Fast Company calls a bold and weird PC that's bursting at the seams with new ideas, from 3-D scanning to augmented reality. (We mentioned the Sprout a few days ago, too; HP seems to be making some interesting moves lately, looks like they're getting on the smartwatch bandwagon, too.) If you're looking at the Stream as a cheap platform for OSes other than Windows, be cautious: one of the reviews at the Amazon page linked describes trouble getting recent Linux distributions to install.

232 comments

  1. No by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chromebooks are not just cheap, they are very low maintenance and easy to use. If you buy your mum a Windows laptop she will need technical support. If you buy her a Chromebook after the initial set-up you can forget about it.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy her a Chromebook after the initial set-up you can forget about it.

      Yep, and if you look at the specs, it's right at the bottom end for Windows PCs, So it'd be slow and run out of storage really quickly, not to mention security concerns around Microsoft's cozy relationship with the US government TLAs...

      Intel Celeron N2840 Processor
      2.0 GB DDR3L SDRAM
      32 GB Solid-State Drive

      There's a lot better options for the same money.

    2. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Install Ubuntu on it and don't give her the root password. Teach her how to access the web browser, email program, and LibreOffice. Problem solved for 99% of mums.

    3. Re:No by SpockLogic · · Score: 1, Troll

      Noooooooooo ....

      Sprouts make me fart.

    4. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So microsoft's relationship with the govt is relavent here but google's is not?

    5. Re:No by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even Paul says its not too good (without saying "its too underpowered"):

      Whether the Stream's Celeron process, 2 GB of RAM and 32 GB of eMMC storage will stand the test of time will of course require some, well, time. But I can offer a few quick observations.

      First, this configure seems perfectly capable of running Windows 8.1 (and thus Windows 10 as well) and doing well for the types of casual computing tasks one should expect of such a machine. You can run Word and Office 2013. IE. Facebook. That kind of thing. My bloated Chrome configuration, with multiple add-ons, quickly overwhelmed available memory, and while it does run fine, you won't want to run Chrome alongside any other heavy hitters.

      so its not really enough to browse the web with the addons one expects nowadays (and I assume heavy javascript web pages) and do anything else, and he goes one to say you have 10gb storage free. You'll have to carefully manage that once you store a load of music or movies on it.

    6. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chromebooks are not just cheap, they are very low maintenance and easy to use. If you buy your mum a Windows laptop she will need technical support. If you buy her a Chromebook after the initial set-up you can forget about it.

      This is precisely the reason I recommended my mother buy an Acer Chromebook because after years of supporting her Microsoft Windows-running computer it was definitely a blessing to have a computer which I could set-up for her the features (email, web browsing) she cared about and be done with support. The only support request I get these days, which admittedly is as rare as hen's teeth, occurs when the track-pad mouse freezes - attributable to the suspend mode I dare say. For 99% of the things I use a computer for these days a Google Chromebook would suffice since any software development work can be done on a virtual machine or physical server accessible via SSH from the Google Chromebook.

    7. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So microsoft's relationship with the govt is relavent here but google's is not?

      Yeah, the NSA hacked Google to get at their data, Microsoft was a willing collaborator.

      The US National Security Agency (NSA) has been hacking data links connecting Yahoo and Google's data centres, according to leaks by Edward Snowden.

      Millions of records were gleaned daily from the internet giants' internal networks, according to documents published by the Washington Post.

      The agency's director said it had not had access to the companies' computers.

      As opposed to:

      Microsoft has collaborated closely with US intelligence services to allow users' communications to be intercepted, including helping the National Security Agency to circumvent the company's own encryption, according to top-secret documents obtained by the Guardian.

      The files provided by Edward Snowden illustrate the scale of co-operation between Silicon Valley and the intelligence agencies over the last three years. They also shed new light on the workings of the top-secret Prism program, which was disclosed by the Guardian and the Washington Post last month.

      The documents show that:

      * Microsoft helped the NSA to circumvent its encryption to address concerns that the agency would be unable to intercept web chats on the new Outlook.com portal;
      * The agency already had pre-encryption stage access to email on Outlook.com, including Hotmail;
      * The company worked with the FBI this year to allow the NSA easier access via Prism to its cloud storage service SkyDrive, which now has more than 250 million users worldwide;
      * Microsoft also worked with the FBI's Data Intercept Unit to "understand" potential issues with a feature in Outlook.com that allows users to create email aliases;
      * In July last year, nine months after Microsoft bought Skype, the NSA boasted that a new capability had tripled the amount of Skype video calls being collected through Prism;
      * Material collected through Prism is routinely shared with the FBI and CIA, with one NSA document describing the program as a "team sport".

    8. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine here on a $75 Thinkpad and kubuntu LTS. Made the parent an administrator (for updates) disabled most of the kdeplasma auto-drag crap (because otherwise he ends up with the menu as a plasmoid on the desktop and a taskbar that takes up half the screen), and life is good.

    9. Re: No by superswede · · Score: 1

      [Serious question] I'm currently helping my mother on Windows remotely via TightVNC and it actually works alright. As long as it boots up I can do most/all work from across the Atlantic. My mother does have to do anything - no "click to accept" or similar.

      Now, what's a similar option for a Chromebook/ChromeOS? Anything that just work without my mother's interaction? I need to be able to get full control just as if I was in front of the machine.

      Related, being able to remotely control the device is also why I've retained from getting here a, preferably an Android, tablet, because of the built-in security making remote access tricky. I understand that one get around it if one root it, but if imagine the user base doing that is so small that the quality of such software is just not there yet, or?

    10. Re: No by benjymouse · · Score: 1, Informative

      So microsoft's relationship with the govt is relavent here but google's is not?

      Yeah, the NSA hacked Google to get at their data, Microsoft was a willing collaborator.

      Since you so dishonestly quoted text from an article without linking back to it, here is the link: http://www.theguardian.com/wor...

      This concerns the "Prism" program - which since the initial bruhaha has been revealed to be little more than an automated way to comply with (presumably) lawful requests from law enforcement agencies. (Note: I strongly disagree with the constitutionality of having a secret court issuing secret orders; it totally undermines the democracy)

      The participation in the automated system (aka Prism) does not require a company to comply with more FISA requests, nor does non-participation allow a company to *not* comply with FISA requests. It simply has no bearing on it.

      Importantly, the automated system does NOT(!) allow the agencies more access to users' data. Each FISA request will STILL have to be considered on a
      case-by-case basis, and lawyers for the company will STILL have to review all material sent to the agency through PRISM before hitting the "send" button.

      And conspicuously absent from your quote is the fact that while Microsoft was mentioned in the title, Skype, Apple, Google, Facebook and Yahoo were also mentioned.

      Little information is available on the actual design of PRISM, and basically all of the speculation was based on this single slide from the Snowden leak: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      From that slide you can see that Microsoft was indeed the first company to comply with FISA orders through PRISM, but that Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Paltalk(?), YouTube, Skype, AOL and Apple all followed.

      So you are grossly misrepresenting facts, being dishonest and out lying about the information in a transparent attempt to taint Microsoft while letting Google of the hook. Now, why would you do that? Anonymous cowardly liar.

      --
      Reading slashdot one-liner: (irm http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot).rdf.item | fl title,desc*
    11. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're complaining about the offerings of two entirely different price points. This for $200 versus a macbook air? It's only 5 to 6 times more expensive. For the price point the value is clear here, even if you're blind to price point.

    12. Re: No by Pikoro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Chrome Remote Desktop. Full password protected access from anywhere in the world, even if she's NAT'd behind her router. Chrome Web Store

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    13. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what a 16 GB micro-SDHC card costs, right? 10 GB *is* bullshit these days, unless below $10.

    14. Re: No by superswede · · Score: 1

      Thanks. However, last time I played with Chrome Remote Desktop (on Windows) it required interaction on the receiving end (e.g. initiation or at least approval). I'm looking for something that requires zero interaction on the other end, i.e. "Just start the computer and I fix the problem for you". See, my mother sometimes get stuck when another windows gets in front of the web browser and she can do nothing, have an even harder time explaining the problem over the phone - it's at that level. So I need to be able to at a minimum log in remotely a view the screen - ideally take over a run it.

    15. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just use Firefox... Firefox uses a lot less memory then Chrome.

    16. Re:No by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Chromebooks are not just cheap, they are very low maintenance and easy to use.

      So:
        - buy this laptop
        - return Windows to Microsoft for a $100 refund
        - install Chrome
        - profit!!

      Seriously - if you can score this hardware for $100 and run some other OS, they'll sell like hotcakes.

    17. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moms don't have a load of music or movies. If they have movies, they're still on DVD. Many still haven't recovered from their fall out with technology, which started early (typically with very poor interfaces to set the clock on VCRs). Well, at least this describes my family, which is a shame, as it would be a bit more fun to live in with a tech-ed out Mom.

      What they do get is the Internet. Some will learn about digital photography, if they had a photographic bent in the first place. Pandora is about the level of user interface design they are seeking. Roku boxes are almost another big hit, provided you can set it up 100% and they trust you enough to do it.

      It is hard to blame them, remember that their mothers lived in a time before cars were widely available. My Grandma (now passed) got her driver's license as a promotional offer at a folding table outside a department store. She had never driven, and they only needed a name and address (no test).

      It is easy to knock the technophobes, but really, we have come a long way in a very short time. It's not appropriate to deride those who manage to successfully accomplish a lot without playing by our new rules.

    18. Re:No by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Will it run FreeBSD?

      If so, it might actually be useful.

      [boople woople twaddle twaddle, /. says I type too fast.]

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    19. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Teamviewer is available for Android....

    20. Re:No by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This $200 Stream has an SD Card slot. For $110 you can expand it to 256 GB if you want. OK, that's overkill for a $200 device, but you get the point. Get a 32GB card for $15 instead.

    21. Re:No by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2

      An extra $20 gets you a usable machine (sometimes it goes on sale for $200): http://www.microcenter.com/pro...

      Granted it isn't as small as the Stream, but it certainly isn't bulky or heavy. 4GB of RAM is plenty for current apps and storage isn't a concern. I landed up getting two for a friend of mine to replace some really old XP boxen. Performance was good for day to day tasks and the Celeron N2830 has GPU accelerated video for playing 1080p cat videos on YouTube. The only "con" I have with it is that it only has 2 USB ports.

    22. Re: No by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Well let's benchmark these things properly before saying that Chromebooks are fast and celerons are slow. On passmark the celerons have a score close to that of an old core2duo. Are we telling people to use "pay as you go" apps from Google Play instead of Microsoft's Live Essentials and those apps that come with W8 just because we can't compare Celerons with ARM SOC s?

    23. Re: No by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      SDHC cards are not in the same ballpark where speed is a concern

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    24. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Amazon listing does no state, what model is the GPU, just a "Intel HD graphics", so the device may have the crappy Power VR chipset in it. The Power VR Linux driver does not support hardware accelerated 3D, so the Unity is really, really slow.

    25. Re: No by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      Loading movies and music on a computer is something older geeks do but hardly anyone else. Everyone else is using online services like Netflix, Spotify, and Vudu and just renting/streaming. This is especially true for the college age crowd the Stream and Chromebooks are marketed towards. They're sitting on gigabit Internet connections in their dorms so cloud storage is a no brainer for them.

      For anyone wanting to use a Chromebooks or Stream PC as a backup laptop it's cheap to pick up a high speed SD card with a lot of storage. for most tasks they have plenty of power. Loading up a browser with too many extensions is problematic on any machine, not just low end ones.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    26. Re:No by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's a low cost device for casual use. People who need a lot of heavy Chrome add-ons are not the target audience. The target audience is people who listen to Spotify and other streaming services, or watch Netflix so have little need of local storage. It's basically for people who want something like a tablet but also with a reasonable keyboard so they can type a few emails or letters.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't used Chrome OS, but if it's anything like Android, then I wouldn't wish it upon my worst enemy. Android is a maintenance nightmare. I can't recall how many times I've had it crash, BSOD (black sleep of death), randomly wipe out configuration files and degrade in performance, all on its own on what you'd think are well maintained devices (no dodgy software installed and minimal background tasks running).

      I've been using Windows 8 Pro since the $15 upgrade offer and aside from having to install Classic Shell, it's been flawless. No instability, no slowdown, no problems of any kind. If I needed a laptop to tote around on the road without worrying about anything happening to it (mine is a desktop replacement which I use for travel), I probably would buy one of these $200 HP systems or one of the many other sub-$300 Windows laptops. I've had some really bad experiences with HP, but at $200, it's practically disposable.

    28. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA paid Google millions to install backdoors for them and Google accepted the offer. That's not even mentioning all of the tax breaks Google gets from cooperating.

    29. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he should have tried Firefox instead. I've recently re-adopted Fx after abandoning it long ago due to the well-known (and well ignored by developers) memory leak. Not only have they fixed the leak but Firefox absolutely roasts Chrome in startup times, responsiveness and less memory use. Rendering and JavaScript performance-wise, Firefox is as fast or faster than the latest Chromium builds. To top it off, Firefox doesn't secretly install spyware/bloatware "updater" garbage, the update mechanism is built into the browser, as it should be for any well made piece of software.

    30. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has a lower spec CPU/GPU than the HP. Asus is also a pretty crap brand now, though I'd rate them about on par with HP.

    31. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im seriously almost at the point of yelling WAKE UP SHEEPLE at google supporters. Theyre as bad as 9/11 or obama is a muslim/not an american truthers at this point. Their cognitive dissonance allows them to rationalize anything.

      Big deal if google "gave" you a free email address or a "free" os for your stupid phone. No company is acting in your best interests, they act towards their own interests.

      If you do not work for google, yahoo, microsoft, or apple there is absolutely zero reason to defend their actions.

    32. Re: No by rkcth · · Score: 1

      You don't get 100gb free with a MacBook, you get 5gb.

    33. Re:No by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Also: Chomebooks are know for very fast boot, and great battery life.

    34. Re:No by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      If you have a NAS, who cares, and if you don't have a NAS, why not?

    35. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teamviewer is available for Android....

      As a user of teamviewer it's slow and bloated and wants to run at startup on every device. If you're comfortable with the performance hit, go ahead.

      "Why is my tablet/computer runnng slow?! Fix it!"

      "oh, it's because I installed teamviewer and an antivirus so that I can login and fix it. these two really slow everything down"

      "take it off"

      "ooookaaaay"

      captcha: stupid

    36. Re:No by mordenkhai · · Score: 1

      Fixed the leak? I have to double check that I have the most updated version, but I am pretty sure I do and FF takes more RAM each hour it is open regardless of if I am actually browsing, or just leave it running while I game. I wish they would fix it. I have been tempted to swap to Chrome or even..... IE.....ewww.

    37. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. unfavorable review of Google product. favorable review of Microsoft product. Therefore you are an obvious shill .

      Your comment will be downmodded into oblivion. May God have mercy on your soul.

    38. Re:No by spire3661 · · Score: 0

      The problem is the system does not see SD cards as a local disk. ITs not a trivial matter you can handwave away. Some programs wont let you install on removable storage. I own a Dell venue 8 32 GB, i will NEVER buy something with that little main memory ever again. I would like to add i have been managing small OS drives for 10 years, starting with a 74 GB Raptor drive. I prepared for this future of small OS storage, what i didnt prepare for is how long OEMs would rape us on memory and no one is saying anything about it.

      --
      Good-bye
    39. Re:No by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that laptop from microcenter is a lot heavier. 2.8 lbs vs 4.7 lbs. That is a huge difference when you weigh the stuff in your backpack by the gram.

      --
      Good-bye
    40. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Google CEO Schmitt and Ex-NSC (oversight of NSA) man Cohen (now working at Google), they intend to "use Google to further U.S. interest worldwide".

      In other words, they will rat out each and every gmail user to USG in order to play politics. You know, life is boring when your favourite toy is the B757 private jet. The only get a kick from POWER these days.

    41. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open up an ssh port. ChromeOS really is only Linux. Then you can ssh into the machine and have all the power of the Unix command line.

      If you want graphical stuff (which you dont need in most cases), you can also export the X11 display to your local PC. Google how to do that - this works since the 1990s.

      Or if you want GCHQ (they have now been sold to an English hedge fund) in the game, use TeamViewer.

    42. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then GCHQ-Teamviewer.

    43. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are whining because Google now has an army of $hills like Microsoft had for ages ?

      Booohooo. This world is unfair. They copy all the nasty tactics from Microsoft and Standard Oil.

    44. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the nightlies (v36.0a1 currently), which are several versions ahead of stable, but the memory leak has been gone for a while, at least since v33 or v34.

    45. Re:No by BBF_BBF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is the system does not see SD cards as a local disk. ITs not a trivial matter you can handwave away. Some programs wont let you install on removable storage. I own a Dell venue 8 32 GB, i will NEVER buy something with that little main memory ever again. I would like to add i have been managing small OS drives for 10 years, starting with a 74 GB Raptor drive. I prepared for this future of small OS storage, what i didnt prepare for is how long OEMs would rape us on memory and no one is saying anything about it.

      Too bad that even with 10 years experience, you cannot figure out if a computer/tablet runs Microsoft Windows or if it runs Android. The Dell Venue 8 runs Android, the HP Stream and the Dell Venue 8 Pro both run Windows 8.

      I own an Asus T100TA that also runs windows 8 and when I add a microSD, it shows up a drive D in windows. It looks and works like any other drive in windows. I can install programs on it no problem.

      However, the Venue 8 is an android machine and with the newer versions of android, Google has really restricted what can be stored on an external microSD card and what each program can access on them. You're talking about restrictions on an Android platform and applying them to a thread about Windows 8 machines. Meh.

    46. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet truth is still truth. I really don't care who makes what, I call it like it is.

    47. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, but SDXC cards are pretty fast. UHS-I cards can be had for like $25 for 64GB and would be fast enough for most general purpose uses. The UHS-II cards are a lot more expensive, but they'll come down in price faster than SSDs will.

    48. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious troll is obvious.

      I'm beyond thinking of it as $hills, because they're actually not. And because typing it with a dollar sign is really juvenile.

      They are simply brand whores. Their self identity is wrapped up in a consumer product.

    49. Re:No by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Getting enough internal storage for your applications is solid advice.

      That said, this runs Windows, not Android like your Venue, and it has a USB3 port, so there should be no obstacles to installing programs on an external drive, and it should perform fine.

    50. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just use Opera.

      Firefox, chrome, safari and ie have been stealing ideas from Opera for a decade now. Why not cut out the middleman?

      Currently using chrome's rendering.

      No "Firefox memory leaks."

      It's not ie. nuff said.

      It's not a user tracking and marketing device like google chrome.

    51. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used Opera for years, until they took Chrome, rebranded it and called it "Opera". The new Opera is fast, but it does not cater to old Opera users for speed and functionality. If you use NuOpera, you might as well switch to Chromium or Chrome.

    52. Re: No by ranton · · Score: 2

      You're complaining about the offerings of two entirely different price points. This for $200 versus a macbook air? It's only 5 to 6 times more expensive. For the price point the value is clear here, even if you're blind to price point.

      While the AC is a bit silly for comparing any HP Stream spec with the Macbook Air, s/he does make a good point that 10 GB of free storage space is really really low. You need to produce a usable product for people to buy it, regardless of the price point. 10 GB is just too low, and it is pretty obvious IMHO that a 64 GB drive would have made this product far more useful, even if it would have made the product $225 instead of $200.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    53. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use remote desktop almost daily and it requires no interaction on the remote end (maybe a click on ok the first time, don't really remember)

    54. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is slow. Personal experience. The thing comes with 100mb empty drive space.

    55. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus this POS has a caps lock button. No thanks!

    56. Re:No by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I own the Venue 8 PRO, the Venue 11 PRO AND the Asus T100....... Just because it shows up as a D drive under windows doenst change the fact that its labeled and handled as removable storage and some programs will not install to it as it is not seen as a 'real' system drive.

      --
      Good-bye
    57. Re:No by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I meant Venue 8 PRO. windows 8 labels the SD as removable storage and some programs will not install on it.

      --
      Good-bye
    58. Re:No by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That one is easy: Put a notebook Linux like Mint on it and most maintenance issues go away. Question is, have they made that easy or hard?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    59. Re:No by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      My older Thinkpad T61p is around 6.0 lbs. We just got a T440s (which is Lenovo's thin version of the T440) and it's about 3.5 lbs. Macbook air units are 2.4-3.0 lbs.

      (I was curious as to weights of various devices. And most of those figures don't include the weight of the charger.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    60. Re:No by Christian+Smith · · Score: 1

      - return Windows to Microsoft for a $100 refund

      Seriously - if you can score this hardware for $100 and run some other OS, they'll sell like hotcakes.

      Except you'd more likely get around the ~$15 (guesstimate, no citation) OEM unit license cost as a refund. We're not talking the retail license here, and it puts into light what a rip-off the retail license cost actually is (assuming the extra cost of for the "support" that comes with the retail license.)

    61. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Intel HD Graphics" *IS* the model of the GPU. Sandy Bridge based Celeron with a 6 core GPU. Oh and Intel doesn't use PowerVR GPUs, they make their own.

    62. Re:No by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Except you'd more likely get around the ~$15 (guesstimate, no citation) OEM unit license cost as a refund. We're not talking the retail license here, and it puts into light what a rip-off the retail license cost actually is (assuming the extra cost of for the "support" that comes with the retail license.)

      Probably less, though.

      You forget the Windows license comes "for free" because of the hardware subsidy that comes with cheap computers. You know, all the crapware that is preinstalled? Even if OEM Windows cost HP $50, they probably get more than that to install Norton Antivirus, McAfee and others together , plus demos of plenty more software. Since you didn't accept Windows, technically those companies don't have to pay so you only get back a token sum.

      Something like this probably heavily subsidized by all that crapware, too.

    63. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which programs are those specifically? I've installed tons of stuff to USB flash drives and SD cards with my laptop.

      I'm willing to bet that there are far more applications that will install to an SD card than there are applications which won't. Most programs don't care or notice whether a drive is "removable" or not.

    64. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when did knowing what you're talking about ever need to be a qualification for having a strongly held opinion ?

      I agree. You certainly don't know what you're talking about when it comes to Windows 8, nor how to diagnose, nor about webDAV or USB flash drives and portable apps.

      When I want to get work done, I need a real PC, not the little browser appliance that could.

    65. Re:No by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that while you are right lots of software will install on the removable storage, not everything will, and that is a problem, for me. The first time i ran into it was Sony Play Memories, and it made me realize there is a fundamental difference between SD storage and onboard, even to the OS, thats all. For most things it will work, but its important to recognize onboard and SD card storage are not the same thing and are treated different by the OS. This will shape my buying decisions in the future. Stop trying to handwave it away and recognize that its a quirk to be dealt with, nothing more. The worst IT advice is always 'well, it works for me'

      --
      Good-bye
    66. Re:No by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Really, 32GB drive? If it is anything like win7 that will be filled by system updates alone within the year.

    67. Re:No by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      In-store purchase only? That's slightly less than convenient. Nice screen size for the price, though.

  2. Depends by fisted · · Score: 1

    on whether I can run a BSD or at least some Lunix on it.

    1. Re:Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like it with Ubuntu.

  3. The real question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I run 1080p porn on it?

    32 gigs ain't exactly a lot of porn to torrent, but I can set up a wireless seedbox for that.

    1. Re:The real question is by manicb · · Score: 1

      Can I run 1080p porn on it?

      32 gigs ain't exactly a lot of porn to torrent, but I can set up a wireless seedbox for that.

      "seedbox"

  4. Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well Windows uses 24GB after all the patches, so the solid state storage is only 8GB or so. So that requires you use the 1TB online storage.

    So you're actually looking at a $200 + $70 a year to continue the Office 365 + storage you filled up in the first year. $99 a year for the professional version. All your files would be online so you'll have to migrate if you ever want to stop paying.

    It's maybe better to buy a Netbook and put OpenOffice on it, it will have a 500GB drive, and you can store your docs and files locally.

    Chromebooks are for Google fans, its sort of a poor mans Windows, but with only 32GB of flash and Windows taking most of it, this isn't really a Windows laptop.

    1. Re:Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Windows uses 24GB after all the patches, so the solid state storage is only 8GB or so. So that requires you use the 1TB online storage.

      So you're actually looking at a $200 + $70 a year to continue the Office 365 + storage you filled up in the first year. $99 a year for the professional version. All your files would be online so you'll have to migrate if you ever want to stop paying.

      It's maybe better to buy a Netbook and put OpenOffice on it, it will have a 500GB drive, and you can store your docs and files locally.

      Chromebooks are for Google fans, its sort of a poor mans Windows, but with only 32GB of flash and Windows taking most of it, this isn't really a Windows laptop.

      You don't need to make guesses about available storage, it is tested right there in the linked article. Before you install Office you have 17.3 GB available, after you install Office (and "a few other apps", which is a stupid thing to do by the tester but still) -- you then have 10.3 GB free. If you keep your online storage below 15GB you can continue for free next year. But still, this obviously isn't the machine for anyone who'd rather have a local 500 GB non-solid-state disk.

    2. Re:Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Stream 11 has USB ports. So you can store your music and videos on USB drives or external USB disks.

    3. Re:Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's maybe better to buy a Netbook

      I thought netbooks were discontinued in favor of tablets.

    4. Re:Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Whatever. I never use a tablet for computing unless there is nothing else available. My dinky little Acer Aspire One is better at everything than my tablet with the exception of being a smart remote which is what the Samsung 7" tablet I have has become. It makes a fucking fabulous remote control though, I threw the logitech remote in the trash.

    5. Re:Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Heh, everytime I go by the laptops section in any large store that sells electronics, there's always a few Netbooks (usually not described as such, just as small laptops costing around $2-300.)

      The "Netbooks are dead' meme has never made much sense to me. The marketing has changed. Indeed, I believe someone out there, maybe HP, is introducing some kind of small $200 laptop that runs Windows 8.1...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people might have more if they already have a OneDrive account. When I opened mine, I got 25GB and now I have 35GB. I know MS has a referral program where you can get more space, but I never used it. I'm not sure why, but they gave 10GB more somewhere along the way.

      Box.com is another I use. They give 25GB for free, but I have 50GB because I signed up with an old LG phone (they had a deal with LG at some time). My Google Drive is only there because I have a Gmail account, however, I never use it because it's only 15GB.

    7. Re:Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chromebooks are for Google fans, its sort of a poor mans Windows, but with only 32GB of flash and Windows taking most of it, this isn't really a Windows laptop.

      Google fan here. I consider windows a suckers option for what a Chromebook is used for.

      A laptop with windows on it is a windows laptop. Just because the performance sucks compared to a Chromebook doesn't make it not a windows laptop.

      I would think just the opposite, cheap hardware, poor performance, this must be windows.

    8. Re:Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I liked my Aspire One for the first few months. Great for traveling fairly light, easy for browsing and word processing. Then it started locking up constantly, especially when doing any downloading or network activity. I can keep it running for half an hour or more if I'm not using the network for much, but any kind of moderate net usage causes crashes within 3-5 minutes. This includes Windows updates and other attempts to patch drivers, etc., none of which helped. After a while I just gave up and stopped using the thing.

    9. Re:Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year by vandamme · · Score: 1

      >> this isn't really a Windows laptop

      Who cares? We're just going to put Linux on it anyhow.

  5. Maybe some by drolli · · Score: 2

    I for my part consider buying a cheap windows tablet, which includes a office 2013 version.

  6. Answer: No. by Johnny+Loves+Linux · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a Celeron CPU. Office 365 is a rental. It's 2GB of memory. It's Windows. vs. http://www.google.com/intl/en/... and the OS is ChromeOS which is automatically updated. And it's not a rental. And you can install Ubuntu/Debian if you want in a chroot using crouton if you want a fully functional OS for programming.

    1. Re:Answer: No. by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

      And it comes in blue and pink.

    2. Re:Answer: No. by supremebob · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'd imagine that the Chromebook would drive me nuts every time Google decides to shut down a web service that you're depending on to get your job done. You know, like Google Reader, Google Wave, or the other dozen or so popular services have done so in the past few years.

      Microsoft has it's issues, but at least they usually aren't forcing you to uninstall products that you already have installed.

    3. Re:Answer: No. by NotInHere · · Score: 2

      I'm still missing codesearch. Luckily Github has improved its search since then.

    4. Re:Answer: No. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Informative

      no, true... but then Google doesn't expect you to pay regularly to continue to keep accessing your files (first year free).

      I would say that a lot of Google services have not been closed but morphed into a different product - Wave was the start for functionality now in Google Docs for example.

    5. Re:Answer: No. by leonbev · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that the person who did a "-1 Disagree" on this post has never lost data due to a web service suddenly being shut down or signifigantly changed.

      I'll bet that a bunch of the former Megaupload customers out there have learned this lesson the hard way. Google is likely to give you more advanced warning than that, but it's still something to be concerned about.

    6. Re:Answer: No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly:
      -a Celeron N2840 on par with a Core 2 Duo E6300 from 2006...
      -a measly 2GB of RAM which is very limiting
      -a tiny 32GB drive that will be ~90% filled by the OS and updates after a while
      -a small low quality screen with a low resolution
      -you get to suffer with Windows 8.1 and the metro shit no one wants of
      -they hope you'll keep renting MS Office and OneDrive too (an extra monthly bill, for services that have zero value to me)
      -only comes in colors that would be appealing to 8yo kids

      As for the $99 HP tablet, it's even more underpowered and the app store for it is empty (and everybody knows it will remain so). Plus, you still have to suffer from metro... I'll sooner buy a no-name android device from China!

    7. Re:Answer: No. by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Google expects you to start paying after 2 or 3 years

      https://productforums.google.c...

      --
      This space for rent.
    8. Re: Answer: No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google may not extract payment from you, but they do get their pound of flesh. You morons that keep acting like Google exists to provide you with technological charity are really, really annoying.

    9. Re: Answer: No. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      In Google's case, the "pound of flesh" is a little bit of privacy, for a whole heaping helping of convenience. A lot of people consider that tradeoff OK.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  7. Windows 10 please. by wjcofkc · · Score: 2

    This will be a formidable low-end x86 machine if Windows 10 actual hits before the end of 2015, otherwise it's getting late into the game for these things. Then give anyone who buys one now a free upgrade. I would not want the tile interface unless I could use it like a tablet, and switching between tablet and notebook mode all the time just doesn't sound practical. A simple micro hdmi connector or even MHL compatibility would make this greater.

    So is this one of those situations where I have to say, "mod me down all you want.." in ordered to get modded up? Just for the record I have been a huge Linux geek since about 95 with Slackware. Computers, operating systems, and software are tools and I explore all available tools. I've been running the Tech Preview pretty happily. It would make this machine an impulsive buy.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Windows 10 please. by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Read the specs it has a full HDMI port. If you don't like metro, there are several free to commercial options that return the start menu.

      The Windows 10 upgrade is the big question. But it's been rumored that it will be a free upgrade for 8/8.1 users. But that's just speculation at this point.

  8. European price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably at least €250, but more likely €300 once you've added import duties and value added tax (a whopping 21% in The Netherlands).

  9. Why? by Monoman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If people buy these simply based on price then most are likely to be disappointed. My guess is they will be marketing these towards students which is probably the best angle. Assuming they sell an acceptable number of them then only time will tell us if these keep customers happy for a reasonable amount of time. They'll need to make the upgrade to Windows 10 (and Office ?) free AND easy. They'll need to "just work" and stay that way. If these things things get easily infected with malware, spyware, or something more costly like Cryptowall then all money saved will be lost and then some. Windows has a reputation to fix and I'm just glad it isn't my job to try to fix it.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    1. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For schools buying in bulk with a committee buying on price perhaps, but most of my college students have MacBooks. Price is apparently not an issue.

    2. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For schools buying in bulk with a committee buying on price perhaps, but most of my college students have MacBooks. Price is apparently not an issue.

      When mommy and daddy pay for everything nothing is an issue for their son or daughter. I would like the new fully-loaded Apple Mac Pro computer system but it's not in my immediate future.

    3. Re: Why? by Monoman · · Score: 1

      Macbooks aren't as common at my local community college from what I have seen.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  10. Windows Shit in 2014 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It got me excited until I found out it got shitty OS

    No buyer here.

  11. Impartial by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..."The HP Stream 11 is clearly both inexpensive and a great value," writes Paul Thurrott....

    Now there's an impartial opinion.

    1. Re: Impartial by leonbev · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the guy gets paid to write about Microsoft products for a living. Not exactly a guy to go to for an unbiased opinion.

    2. Re:Impartial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He was praising Windows 8 as being the best OS ever too (same for Vista previously). Either this guy doesn't have a clue or he's simply paid to say whatever...

    3. Re: Impartial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the writes that don't solely write about Microsoft get paid to write things. It's not a matter of they payment, it's a matter of whether they try to balance their biases or just flaunt them.

    4. Re:Impartial by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Both.

    5. Re:Impartial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only used Vista after SP1, but I never had problems with it. It's basically the same OS as Windows 7 without the annoying taskbar iconification crap.

      Microsoft fucked up bad with the "Metro" integration in Windows 8. They really should have made it default to desktop mode and only have the new UI when it detected a touchscreen. Still, the underlying foundation for Windows 8 as an OS is better than its ancestors.

  12. And with colors that ugly... by gaiageek · · Score: 2

    No one would steal it, because they'd think it's a toy. But seriously, call me when it boots Linux Mint 17, and is available in black or silver.

    1. Re:And with colors that ugly... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Buy a can of spray paint. Rumor has it that Linux will run.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:And with colors that ugly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the problem with you Linux idiots. You keep thinking that the hardware should support the OS when it's the other way around. You want Linux Mint to run on it? Then go make it run on it. This is the very reason your Linux distro of the week is not and will never be a good desktop OS.

    3. Re:And with colors that ugly... by vandamme · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, sir, fuck you.

  13. Role reversal? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I just saw in Costco a HP Chromebook, 13 inch full HD screen, 1 year of 4G service (I think capped to some ridiculous 200 MB per month. But still good enough for very occssional use), 10 sessions in domestic flights, etc. Priced at 300$. Paired with T-mobile. T-mobile has some great pay-as-you-go data plans too.

    So HP is pushing a souped up Chromebook, and a bare bones PC, along with bare bones chromebook and the usual standard formfactor laptops. Looks like HP is throwing everything on the wall and is waiting to see what sticks. It might drop the bare bones chromebook price down too. Come Christmas I would not be surprised to see same spec chrome book at 99$ or 129$

    Basic selling point of Chromebook is not just the low price, it is a low maintenance streaming device, with a full keyboard and better screen. HDMI out, bluetooth keyboard, ... why would I even think of buying Roku or chromecast, or smart TV?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Role reversal? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      XBMC on a chromebook, that's a thought.

  14. They did it on purpose by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    It's ironic that it doesn't run Linux well, given that [a] Linux can be installed on everything from mechanical watches to dead badgers, and [b] Google insists on the non-release of Windows drivers for their Chromebooks.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    1. Re:They did it on purpose by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      No actually new hardware is often problematic for Linux. It's the driver issues see? New proprietary hardware has to have drivers reverse engineered and that takes time. Give it 6 months to a year then try, by then these will be all over ebay at a fraction of their new prices.

    2. Re:They did it on purpose by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      Next thing you'll tell me is that I can't run Linux on my clockwork zombie badger. That, sir, is the kind of nonsense up with which I will not put!

      TBH getting Linux to run on a Chromebook is a bit of a process, too, and some of the drivers just made it to the kernel in 3.17. While we're on the topic of irony, it's strange to think that it's normal for closed-source drivers to be reverse-engineered for Linux, but no one is likely to use the open-source Linux drivers to produce Windows drivers for the Chromebooks.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    3. Re:They did it on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like Wintel modems! Except it's nonfunctional everything else, plus a nonfunctional modem. I'm so nostalgic.

      Google is just as bad as Microsoft at this point.

    4. Re:They did it on purpose by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It's that pesky GPL. They can't just take it and run.

    5. Re:They did it on purpose by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      Well, that's true to some degree, but it's still possible to do a "clean room" implementation. These sort of things have been done before, perhaps most notably by ReactOS. It's a hell of a lot better than starting with nothing in any case. I suppose it's less common to have a device for which Linux drivers exist but not equivalent Windows drivers, but it's still a little odd for reverse engineering to be normal in Linux-land and completely unheard-of (by myself, at any rate) on the other side of the fence.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    6. Re:They did it on purpose by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      The biggest reverse engineering project I remember was the one where the original PC bios was reverse engineered thus creating the clone market.

  15. Interesting devices by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    I run some auto diagnostic software on a Mac using a VM running WindowsXP. If these devices are backwards compatible a Stream 7 would be an ideal device to replace my Mac. It's cheap, portable and has enough screen space even with the small screen to display diagnostic results. A micro USB -> USB adapter would to let me connect to the OBDC and a bluetooth keyboard would complete the setup. The 11 has full size USBand a keyboard but if the 7" works there is no need to shell out an additional $100.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Interesting devices by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If these devices are backwards compatible a Stream 7 would be an ideal device to replace my Mac.

      Well, they probably won't run XP properly. Anyway, you're better off keeping that stuff in a VM, and not letting it autoupdate. That way it never bones itself.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. "... solid-state HP Stream..." Solid-state?! by fygment · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell no! I want the vacuum tube version. Better yet, get me a steam powered version with 1.2 cycles per second pistons.

    Seriously, since when is 'solid-state" anything but all-pervasive in the world of laptops?

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  17. No, but schools will take a second look by vjlen · · Score: 2

    We test piloted Chromebooks vs Windows laptops last year, and the decision was made to go with Chromebooks by the district's tech committee over the summer. 700 Chromebooks were purchased and rolled out to a complete grade level plus classes in other grade levels.

    The decision to go with Chromebooks was purely political. There was a staff member on the committee (who is no longer with the district) that hyped Google Apps, but when September came, everyone found out you could not run Office on them, and many of the Google "Apps" listed in their directory for Chrome were either just shortcuts or weren't free, so there has been some resentment towards the Chromebooks and Chrome.

    Yes, Chromebooks are lower maintenance. However, it would have been only a slight edge with Windows 8's recovery features. Windows 8 can run in 2GB pretty well for what kids would need it for.

    1. Re:No, but schools will take a second look by wonkavader · · Score: 2

      They'll take a second look, and the smart ones will go with chromebooks. The chromebook world is full of boxes which perform acceptably at a low cost. They have no recurring costs. They're disposable. When one is smashed, you can use can replace it with without any setup at all. Work is never lost due to a disk crash.

      The kids can install Linux and mess with that on these things. It runs reasonably well.

      You can still have some Windows or Macs around to do the hard-core crap (that wouldn't work on underpowered windows boxes either) but the massive bulk of the computing needs for the students should be chromebooks. It solves lots of problems and has both a low entry price and a low continuing price.

      Hardly a political decision.

    2. Re:No, but schools will take a second look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but when September came, everyone found out you could not run Office on them

      ... This is why i hate Microsoft, ignorant lockins.

    3. Re:No, but schools will take a second look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The decision to go with Chromebooks was purely political. There was a staff member on the committee (who is no longer with the district) that hyped Google Apps, but when September came, everyone found out you could not run Office on them...

      Why do students need to learn an office suite? Besides there are plenty of applications which are accessible via the web browser if a GUI is important. Students can write their reports and essays using LaTex (WriteLaTeX.com), presentations using Beamer (WriteLaTeX.com), or even a markdown language. There are a variety of IDEs for software development for classes teaching some aspects of programming along with GitHub and BitBucket to host their projects. Microsoft Office 365 is accessible via the web browser on a Google Chromebook although I cannot think of a valid reason students should be learning a proprietary application.

    4. Re:No, but schools will take a second look by jma05 · · Score: 1

      > Students can write their reports and essays using LaTex

      Good luck getting anyone outside CS to do that. Even if the student learns LaTeX, he/she won't likely be able to collaborate with other students/advisers easily. Exporting and importing into/from PDFs is not really a solution when edits are involved.

      > I cannot think of a valid reason students should be learning a proprietary application.

      The most common and valid reason is when other people you work with want to use a proprietary application and you are not in a position to make them do otherwise.

    5. Re:No, but schools will take a second look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, two $hills from different camps slugging it out. Popcorn to the ready !

    6. Re:No, but schools will take a second look by rainer_d · · Score: 1

      > Students can write their reports and essays using LaTex

      Good luck getting anyone outside CS to do that. Even if the student learns LaTeX, he/she won't likely be able to collaborate with other students/advisers easily.

      Even for my CS thesis, the professor wanted word files (annotate feature).
      But I used lyx/klyx to write it and so he got PDFs, which he printed.

      Lyx was wonderful, allowing me to concentrate almost exclusively on the text itself and not worrying about formatting. p I wish they would teach actual typesetting skills in school (because producing a document is a bit more than just filling a page with letters and spaces and a few pictures)!

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    7. Re: No, but schools will take a second look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there.

    8. Re:No, but schools will take a second look by jma05 · · Score: 1

      I used Lyx initially for the same reasons and exported to PDFs. Soon it became apparent that it was much easier to just pass Word files since I could just click to accept or reject suggestions (I know Lyx can do that as well... if the people on the other side also use it) from my advisor who used Word. So I exported to Word and stayed there. Plus using Zotero with Word was much easier than with Lyx. I also liked the grammar checker in Word, flawed as it may be (it is popular to criticize it, but I liked it). There is LanguageTool integration for Lyx, which can be more comprehensive, but is also weakly integrated. I do hope to furrther use Lyx in the future though.

    9. Re:No, but schools will take a second look by rainer_d · · Score: 1
      We met about once every six weeks face-to-face and he told me what to fix.

      Turned out to be a good thing.

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  18. Re:"... solid-state HP Stream..." Solid-state?! by itzly · · Score: 1

    Solid state means that it doesn't have a spinning hard drive.

  19. Or for twice that I can do actual useful work by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    I frequently see new ThinkPads on sale for less than $400 brand new through Lenovo. I don't see what the advantage of this crippled $200 netbook would be; I would sooner spend a little more money to buy a vastly more useful system. Or spend a lot more and get a really nice thinkpad that won't need attention or upgrades for many years to come.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Or for twice that I can do actual useful work by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      It's market is in places where you need cheap hardware. I used to have National Grid as a client; many hours trying to troubleshoot their mobile collection laptops (mostly toughbooks) that where honestly far over-powered and complex for that situation. Schools too; low-powered systems might be more secure and have less "after class chicanery" than with a fully-functional laptop. Unfortunately, this product doesn't fall under that idea since it's Windows 8.1 lol. I doubt it would even work for companies like National Grid since I doubt it supports various other requirements but really the "tough" part isn't really needed as much anymore since most of the linemen today comprehend the frailty of electronics (they all have smartphones and know how to keep them alive) and probably don't need the whole toughbook idea, or at least not for all of them. And those things are HEAVY...my gf on the other hand is sometimes quite clumsy and her Toughbook is still functioning even with chunks of the case missing from being dropped, and stepped on. Her new one was recently a victim of a cat attack that poured a glass of water all over the bottom it while it was upside down and closed on the floor...any other laptop would have been toast! Thus why I pushed her to get another one...I just said "look at this old one, no other laptop can withstand you" lol.

    2. Re:Or for twice that I can do actual useful work by weilawei · · Score: 2

      Or you can buy a refurb'd Thinkpad for $125-150 with specs and durability that will blow away these toys. Works just fine.

    3. Re:Or for twice that I can do actual useful work by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

      Or you can buy a refurb'd Thinkpad for $125-150 with specs and durability that will blow away these toys. Works just fine.

      I do the majority of my work on a thinkpad that matches that description. It was ~2 years old when I bought it used and it's still humming along just fine 2+ years later. I've had previous ones meet those kind of reliability numbers as well, and I'm not exactly easy on my hardware.

      Frankly it baffles me how much people will pay for hardware that won't last this long.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    4. Re:Or for twice that I can do actual useful work by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I'm still using a T42 that I bought new ~11 years ago. Granted, I don't use for any heavy work, but with Arch Linux and XFCE, it handles basic everyday tasks just fine.

      The battery is down to ~10-15 minutes of runtime by now, it's heavy, the screen resolution is low, some of the plastic has broken off one of the corners and I'm on the third (IIRC) mini-PCI WLAN adapter. Firefox/Chrome really doesn't like more than about 10 tabs open at any one time, multitasking in general is not advised.

      But it plays 720p video (downloaded, not Youtube) just fine without dropping frames, surprisingly.

      I've been considering an upgrade and I would be willing to buy another decently-specced Thinkpad in the hope that it would also last at least 10 years for everyday usage. But on the other hand, looking at my normal usage, why should I spend ~$2000 on the Thinkpad I want (FHD IPS display, SSD etc.) when a ~$200-300 Chromebook could handle all of it just fine, without leaving me completely hard-broken if I were to accidentally drop it or spill soda in the keyboard?

      --
      Eat the rich.
  20. No one can catch the ginderbread man! by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else amused by the rapidity of this race to the bottom?

    Enjoy bankruptcy.

    1. Re:No one can catch the ginderbread man! by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      lol thus why Enterprise Services is going it's own way. My division at HP is far more concerned with up-time, reliability, meeting SLA's, and 24/7/365 monitoring and troubleshooting than profit...probably stemming from the massive fine we got a few years ago from the Feds lol. Now every time I see some new product I wonder which side it is on...

      But personally I think Meg's ideas are mostly working...the split puts both sides in better shape, faster reactions as a corp, and a finer tuned "vision". Of course I'm unhappy seeing some of my friends loose their jobs but that's just corporate life ESPECIALLY in IT and from what I've seen no one was "singled out" it is pretty random. Even while some divisions are laying off people others are hiring...we lost some help desk people but are adding mainframe operation techs and they get paid almost twice as much! Honestly I'd much rather see HP having more "mainframe" level activities going on than expanding contracted help desk operations but we have to leverage the capabilities we have in-office.

      I think though that my location might be a "special case" since we're the site of IBM's 360 SABRE location and this system can't be "moved" easily. It's all underground, multiple bubble doors, iris scanners, password-of-the-day stuff. I work a few hundred feet away for almost two years and haven't seen the inside of it but walk around the top of it during my smoke breaks every night...yet I have worked deep inside the Cherokee Data Center for months on end so I have whatever "clearance" to be inside of it technically. Our location is quasi-government entangled and is kinda it's own entity inside of HP lol.

    2. Re:No one can catch the ginderbread man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So HP can only run a proper operation on Govt Pork ? Yeah, seems about correct.

      All the fine engineers have been fired, all the IP has been either rotten or presented to Intel and Google (explicitly or by kicking out seasoned experts so that Google can catch them).

      HP, once the core of U.S. electronics (founded and run by electrical engineers, actually inventing word-leading stuff like portable atomic clocks and the PA RISC processor), now a zombie in the hands of the MBA brigade.

  21. Cost of data by tepples · · Score: 1

    any software development work can be done on a virtual machine or physical server accessible via SSH from the Google Chromebook

    If you're SSHing and VNCing to the server on which you're developing software, how much data would that use per month? At $10 per GB (common price for cellular data in USA) that could get expensive.

    1. Re:Cost of data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any software development work can be done on a virtual machine or physical server accessible via SSH from the Google Chromebook

      If you're SSHing and VNCing to the server on which you're developing software, how much data would that use per month? At $10 per GB (common price for cellular data in USA) that could get expensive.

      For the record I have Internet access via cable modem (~2.5Mbps / Unlimited Data) as well as wireless carrier modem (3G / 3GB Data). I have an in-house physical server configured with multiple VMs in addition to cloud-provider-based VMs which I can spin-up and spin-down at will. Taking your question in account let me say that a typical month of secure shell connection from my notebook computer to the cloud-provider costs CAD7.70 per month for 24-hour "running state" plus the wireless carrier Internet costs CAD45.00 per month, and I have yet to come close to using the full 3GB data allocation during those SSH sessions. Why would I run a GUI on a server? I don't. When I am streaming radio stations or YouTube videos or educational/professional development content I switch to the cable modem.

    2. Re:Cost of data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Cost of data by tepples · · Score: 1

      Surely a Chromebook won't prefer wifi when it can get it

      Which it can't, as public transit in my home town doesn't offer Wi-Fi. In order to get Wi-Fi on a bus, I'd have to pay a cellular carrier several hundred dollars per year for wireless hotspot service.

  22. HP Split-up by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    this is a direct result of the split; it's why HP did it (I think). This, along with the 3D printing, Moonshot, etc shows how much faster two smaller corps can move instead of one big corp going multiple directions.

  23. Xbox Live for original Xbox by tepples · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has it's issues, but at least they usually aren't forcing you to uninstall products that you already have installed.

    Halo 2 multiplayer perhaps?

    1. Re:Xbox Live for original Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halo 2 multiplayer is integrated into Halo 2 single player. You can still play one of them at least.

      The same fate awaits all MP games that don't allow people to host. That's the biggest draw to Star Citizen for me, personal servers while also having a persistent MMO world and a single player mode..

    2. Re:Xbox Live for original Xbox by tepples · · Score: 1

      Halo 2 multiplayer is integrated into Halo 2 single player. You can still play one of them at least.

      Purchased functionality is still permanently missing.

      MMO

      Which reminds me: There exists a better example in Asheron's Call 2: Fallen Kings, an MMORPG first published by Microsoft in November 2002 and shut down in December 2005.

    3. Re:Xbox Live for original Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purchased functionality is still permanently missing.

      And nothing of value was lost. Nobody played Halo 2 for PC online because are far better MP FPS games on PC. Halo 2 SP was _barely_ worth the playthrough for the thin story.

  24. Re:"... solid-state HP Stream..." Solid-state?! by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    You are of course right, but just as a sidenote for those who don't know, in electronics solid-state is a broader concept than just hard disks with flash memory.

  25. ExplorerBook by Luthair · · Score: 2

    I think unfortunately these devices are very misleading, with 32gb of (very slow) local storage they simply don't offer anything more than a Chromebook. There isn't space for installing programs (or games), nor is there enough space for local media.

  26. E'rethin' Old is New Again by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

    posted from my Celery 900MHz "netbook"

    1. Re:E'rethin' Old is New Again by bobjr94 · · Score: 1

      I still have and use an eee pc 1000hd. It has an extended battery and SSD, boots up very fast and runs a long time. For web, facebook, slashdot and youtube (not HD) its fine. I even have some games on it, warcraft 2 & 3, they run great on 8 year old hardware. This machine with non expandable 2gb ram and 32gb drive is just not going to do it for me. I can spend another 75$ and get a real mini laptop thats upgradeable for the future.

    2. Re:E'rethin' Old is New Again by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I had one of the original 7" display Eee 701s with the ~600MHz underclocked Celeron. Man, that thing was a turd. On the other hand, my dad is still using its replacement, a 1001HA with the 1.6GHz Atom and upgraded to 2GB RAM. It works brilliantly as an ultraportable diagnosis and firmware-flashing machine, and as a DMX controller for his amateur rock band.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  27. Another HP 2000 by Deathlizard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Awhile back, HP made the HP 2000 Laptops running low end AMD Processors and sold them at Walmarts at $279.

    Piece of Crap doesn't even describe this PC. These are easily the slowest PC's I have touched in years, and it's not because of Windows 8. (Hell, I think Chrome OS Would struggle on these things.) It's the Hardware components they chose to use with them. Using Low end AMD C and E processors coupled with hard drives with embarrassing slow speed and latency times, it's built to be as cheap as possible and it shows. HP seems to have a track record with this as well, Slipping Tablet, Phone and NetBook Components in full size laptop form factors to convince Granny that she's getting more Laptop than she actually is.

    I constantly get these in the shop and I tell the customers there's nothing I can do to them speed wise to make them any faster. Even if you reset them to factory (Which Amazingly removes all of the bloatware down to only essential Hardware necessary items) it's takes practically 30 minutes to boot before you can actually use it. Patching it takes about 1 full day between waiting an hour for it to actually register updates, to installing Windows 8.1, which takes 4-5 hours, and another 6-8 hours installing the Windows 8.1 patches. With just about any other laptop (short of the Toshiba's that follow this same Price model) I can go from windows 8.0 factory to fully 8.1 patched in under 3 hours.

    If $279 Gets you crap like the HP 2000, I can't imagine what these $199 systems would be like, Unless MS is seriously giving HP Money each time they sell one of these.

    1. Re:Another HP 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a touchsmart tx2z, a convertible tablet pc with a beefy AMD turion dual core for 1000 dollars a few years ago. Beautiful machine and way ahead of its time. A multitouch tablet with a swivel screen that could also crunch some serious numbers if it needed to.

      The model is well known for overheating and destroying its own graphics card after 14 months.You know, just past that one year warranty. wink wink. You can however, purchase a new mobo for 300 dollars that will destroy itself after 14 months as well. DIY solution is penny on the graphics chip and to reflow the solder by baking it in the oven which can also destroy the mobo. No product recall was ever made.

      The problem with HP isnt their budget laptops. You can spend 200 bucks or 1000 and you will have a problem.

    2. Re:Another HP 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put Xubuntu, OpenOffice, Gimp on these machines and you and your customers will be fine. Ahh, and kick Win8 into the toilet. This thing has been designed to please their chummy INTEL.

    3. Re:Another HP 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you'll have to worry much. These really aren't laptops. They're tablets with keyboards and no touch screen.

      The system is based on the baytrail atom, a completely integrated SoC from intel. I think you're safe because, frankly, there's not much for HP to fuck up. The entire system is a tiny PCB the size of a credid card. Just the chip, an EMMC module for storage, a LPDDR3 module for memory, a few supporting components, and wires that go to the ports, display, battery, KP/Touchpad. No moving parts (even fans)! The platform is so low power that it's passively cooled. It really is tablet hardware.

      And that's it. Completely bog standard generic tablet hardware that we know is reasonably reliable. There are a lot of other baytrail windows 8.1 devices you can buy and they're all the same. And they all work reliably.

      I have the Asus TransformerBook T100. Its similar, except it's more a tablet with a detachable keyboard. It runs surprisingly well. USB chargable, no fans. Doesn't even get very warm under load.

  28. Acer Aspire E-11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just for this type of comparison I bought a Acer Aspre E-11 from Best Buy for $179.00. It has a Celeron N2830, 2GB Ram, and a 320 GB HD. At first the user experience was so poor I could not figure out why anyone would buy one without taking it back. I than learned I could set the mem cache to static and it became usable. When it is closed it looks almost the same as my Samsung Chromebook. It is a full Windows box but it has not taken the place of the Chromebook. The reason is my Chromebook lives on the kitchen table, in the kitchen, family room, etc. Everyone uses it everywhere and it gets tossed here and there. It's wake up from sleep is instant and it always works. You never have I had to wait for a software update. It just works all the time when you need it to look something up fast or watch something while you eat. If a system update needs a reboot it lets you know but doesn't kick you out of what you are doing. Reboots are almost instant. The Acer may be better for content creation but it doesn't compete with the Chromebook for what we use the Chromebook for. I also own a Dell Venue 8 table and it's has 32gb of storage which makes it useless for running traditional Windows applications because they are so big. It came with office installed (not 365) and was only $250.00. Again not a very useful device. Yes I buy about one of everything just to play and compare but the Chromebook gets heavy use.

  29. Once your netbook dies by tepples · · Score: 1

    My dinky little Acer Aspire One is better at everything than my tablet

    I can see how this might be true. But what do you plan to buy once your "dinky little Acer Aspire One" dies?

    1. Re:Once your netbook dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A second-hand dinky little Acer Aspire One from ebay, you dimbulb.

    2. Re:Once your netbook dies by tepples · · Score: 1

      How long do you think sellers will continue to offer working Acer Aspire One computers at a reasonable price on eBay?

    3. Re:Once your netbook dies by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Long enough. There are plenty of Commodore 64's still for sale.

  30. Forgetting Chromebooks by Goody · · Score: 0

    The Chromebook being a 21st century dumb terminal made me forget about it, not a race-to-the-bottom Windows 8 laptop.

    --
    Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
  31. pedant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pedant

  32. Consider the Haswell Celeron 2995U chromebooks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here's a refurbished Acer C720-2644 with 4GB of ram and a 16GB SSD for $209: http://www.amazon.com/Acer-Lap...

    The same refurbished C720 with 2GB of ram usually goes for $150 on Amazon, but they just ran out of the refurbs.

    By the way, it is easy to add more memory to these things: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    1. Re:Consider the Haswell Celeron 2995U chromebooks. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      For a moment there I was excited. You mentioned the 4 GB and 2 GB (ram) models, followed by "add more memory". The video was about upgrading the SSD, though. Not surprisingly, as it's generally much easier to change the disk than ram, although there are exceptions (my trusty/mouldy Powerbook has a simple RAM bay, but you need to dismantle the whole thing with O(100) screws to access the HD).

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  33. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never understand this response. From the experience with my daughters chrome books that she gets at school they are buggy and so underpowered everything takes forever.

  34. Links? by sootman · · Score: 1

    What's up with the Amazon links? HP doesn't have product pages anymore?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  35. HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > one of the reviews at the Amazon page linked describes trouble getting recent
    > Linux distributions to install.

    HP might be dumb as a box of rocks these days, but they know systemd is shit.

  36. Actually, Yes by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    I'm going to get at least one of these. Should be perfect for my house; I'll mount my users area in my NAS and I can browse the WWW or RDP to my EXSi hosted VMs from a nice little inexpensive terminal I can leave in the living room or garage, or both. I'll probably also send 1-2 of these to some family overseas who like to Skype as well.

    It's an incredible (subsidized) value. Not a great main system but still useful in many scenarios.

  37. Re:It didn't work like that for me in reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now that you've described this theoretical and/or fantasy scenario you've made up, let me describes how this really works.

    Total time spent getting a Chromebook running, and maintaining it for less than a year? An hour getting an acceptable Google username, two hours setting it up initially, countless (I'd estimate over 12) looking desparately and often unsuccessfully for alternative software, and then occasional phone calls of several minutes when questions came up, or it stopped working well because the Internet connection dropped out.

    Can somebody please mod the parent down? It really is just a fantasy, and doesn't correspond at all to reality. It shouldn't be +5.

    The Google Chromebook is too difficult for you apparently. Pray what specialised applications does your mother require on her computer that takes you hours to install and configure on the Google Chromebook? Dropping the Internet connection sounds like a WiFi router/access point issue.

  38. Price -Microsoft Tax? by WheatGrass · · Score: 1

    Minus the Microsoft tax, what would be the cost of this device? (I'm just trying to figure out what Windows 8.1 is worth these days.)
    Should I buy Windows and get a free PC or can I buy Windows 8.1 OEM for a quarter without the free PC?
    Microsoft is now fully into its race to the bottom for diminishing returns.
    Does the company expect to make a killing on the app store?
    Will this thing blend?

    1. Re:Price -Microsoft Tax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "microsoft tax" on devices of this kind is zero. Yes, microsoft doesn't want payment from the manufacturer if certain things are met (screen size low, cheap, bing pre-selected as search page, ...)

      So 8.1 is worth nothing. In a way :-)

    2. Re:Price -Microsoft Tax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your objective is to create documents, spreadsheets and the like and you want your data 100% of time available. get yourself a Raspberry PI with a case and a USB power supply. Should be something like 50$ and will fit into your trouser pocket.

      Use a random USB keyboard, a random ethernet cable and a random monitor to run it. Be the king of your data.

      It is not well-suited for browsing the bloated JS sites like Slashdot, but you wanted to do work, correct ?

  39. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a shameless advertisement attempt and a flamebait on /.

    This is a Windows system which many people are already trolling about. I assume those Google fans, complaining the OS consumes most of the SSD, when Chromebooks come with 8GB of SDD (ridiculous).
    Perhaps being Windows is not great, but I second you Bill: PLEASE, don't come to say it will be better to get the Chromebook, because those are very low end.

  40. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    English a second language?

  41. I'm still waiting by plopez · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I have been waiting for years for the 'Lovecraft' model from HP.

    *runs* *ducks* *hides* :)

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  42. Re: It didn't work like that for me in reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lol, it took you 3 hours to turn a Chromebook on and create a Google account!? You must be a special kind of stupid.

  43. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, because it's a closed platform and you can't use any other servers or your own home fileserver like you now can with chrome OS..

  44. Re:It didn't work like that for me in reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a disaster! It took well over an hour to set up. Since she's a late-comer to getting a Google account, it took her many tries before she could get an acceptable username that wasn't already taken,

    An hour getting an acceptable Google username

    Hahahaha!

    Oh dear, the Redmond team is getting really desperate now...

    It's a fair point. Google made a mistake in trying to make sure everyone registered a google account for their android phone/ chromebook / user account to comment on a blog. The accounts never sunset and will exist forever. Many new android users are so clueless that they will register a chromebook account that is different than their android account.

    So new users are pretty limited as to what their username will be. Usernames are effectively the online persona that we project out into the world and it's very important and very personal.

    If you want to discuss this further, my google username/ gmail address is wetfarts0

  45. Yo Mama by MacDork · · Score: 1

    Is computer illiterate? Buy her or pops a Chromebook and they can't do their taxes on it.

    Anyway, computer illiterate parents are not the market where Chromebooks are selling. Most are landing in the hands of computer illiterate children via schools looking for a "cheap laptop." Schools love them. They are inexpensive and low maintenance. You don't need IT with Chromebooks and that's exactly what schools want to hear. Too bad the kids can't really use Chromebooks to learn anything about computers.

    20 years ago, Microsoft sold US education policy makers on the concept that "learning computers" meant learning the MS Office suite. That has produced a generation which is completely deficient in general computer knowledge. Tech giants are now flailing around trying to encourage kids to code now, because of the rarity of truly educated computer users.

    Chromebooks will be the final nail in the coffin for US tech labor. "Computer people" in the US will be even more rare. Doing anything beyond web browsing and email is difficult on a Chromebook. I've used one as a daily driver for more than a year now. My C720 is my only laptop. I've installed Chrubuntu and chroots using Crouton. I've done Android development on it. You might think that would serve as proof that kids *can* use them to learn, but it is not the case.

    My productivity has easily been a quarter of what it was on a 'real' laptop. I rarely do anything in linux on it, because every time I boot it up, I have a chrome window with my top 8 websites staring at me. Oh, hey, let me check the news on (HN | CNN | Slashdot | etc) really quick before I start work. 3 hours later, I'm bored with laughing at stupid pictures on imgur and wondering what it was I had planned to work on today. Even when you do want to work, the hardware is cheap, so everything takes just a little longer. Let me switch back to chrome and check email really quick while this thing compiles... Okay, that was funny cat picture... well, will you look at the time! I guess I will work some tomorrow instead.

    And then there's the problem with Chrome's habit of autoupdating itself. Every auto update has the potential to hose your chroot environment. Meaning, oops, that autoupdate just blew your afternoon. Time to spend several hours reinstalling ubuntu and all the developer tools that took ages to set up properly.

    In short, I wouldn't recommend a Chromebook as a real computer any more than I'd recommend an iPad. It is not a producer device. It's designed to allow passive consumption of whatever garbage lies on the web. I'll be getting myself a new 'real' laptop for xmas.

    1. Re:Yo Mama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can file taxes on-line these days in many countries either directly with the government or through a third-party tax filing application via your web browser. I still file taxes by paper just to be a pain in the government's posterior.

      As for setting up a development environment on your Chromebook maybe you could spend a few dollars each month on a hosted virtual machine and synchronise your code and your configuration files with GitHub or BitBucket. Access your VM via SSH using certificates with a password.

    2. Re:Yo Mama by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Is computer illiterate? Buy her or pops a Chromebook and they can't do their taxes on it.

      Actually, I think they can, thanks to cloud-based tax software. Mostly because of the rise of OS X which means a bunch of Windows only tax software just won't work for them.

      Sure, there are plenty of issues when trust Intuit and others with your tax information (it's web based, after all), but with a Chromebook, I'm sure security of the laptop isn't as big a problem.

      And given the way people generally backup, at least users won't be able to have the IRS pull a fast one over them since they can retrieve what they filed online rather than try to hunt for a backup or realize it was on the crashed hard drive.

      Not as secure, though if the IRS already has the data... but I'm sure for a lot of users, probably way more convenient, way more secure and way more recoverable.

    3. Re:Yo Mama by MacDork · · Score: 1

      Many states have locked PDF forms that can only be filled with Adobe Acrobat. The PDF can't even be saved once filled, so an electronic backup is out. The only backup available is a printed one. You're not going to be able to fill and print them on a Chromebook, even with Linux.

      Sorry. I don't trust other people with my tax returns.

    4. Re:Yo Mama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PDF can't even be saved once filled, so an electronic backup is out. The only backup available is a printed one.

      Screenshot.

    5. Re:Yo Mama by MacDork · · Score: 1

      Screenshot what? A blank form? You can't even fill the form on a Chromebook because it requires Acrobat Reader.

    6. Re:Yo Mama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stated the only way to have a backup copy is as a printed, physical copy. I indicated how stupid that is and how stupid you are for suggesting that.

      Try following the thread next time, moron.

    7. Re:Yo Mama by MacDork · · Score: 1

      lol. Says the moron who couldn't figure out Acrobat runs on neither ChromeOS or Linux.

      You go ahead and take several screenshots of partial pages and then go into an image editor to stitch them together though. Hey, maybe you can even break out your iPhone and take pictures of your screen. That'll be even better, because you'll add an extra step or two between you and a final product.

      I'll just print them, thanks.

    8. Re:Yo Mama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see where I ever mentioned Acrobat or Chrome OS. Your reading skills and comprehension are complete shit.

      Tapping "Prt Scr" works great for me, without wasting power, paper or toner.

  46. HP making better decisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Current product names: Envy, Elitebook

    New product names: Sprout, Stream

  47. CAD540 per year by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why would I run a GUI on a server?

    Because you're developing GUI applications and want to test the GUI. Using an actual computer for this would save you CAD540 per year. But then perhaps I'm an outlier because I program on my laptop on the bus ride to and from work.

  48. Re:It didn't work like that for me in reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is especially important to use correct, real names when it comes to the NSA panopticon. Subject, Obey Order !

  49. Re: It didn't work like that for me in reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, don't disturb his FUD efforts. You should think of the Redmont Rodents !

    These days, Utter Stupidity rules at Dollarsoft. They have made Nutella their CEO and all he can do is to emulate Google. He doesn't have any original thought of his own. IF he had, he would offer an NSA-resistand "private cloud server", which you can run on your Raspberry-PI-class device next to your DSL modem.

    With Snowden they essentially had the ability to smoke out Google by a campaign of "we let YOU own YOUR data". But nothing such-like happened. In other words, M$ has shrinked their skulls into that of a mouse.

    This seems to be the destiny of the American Corporation: Founded and expanded by a Reckless Genius, then handed over to the MBA idiots who will downsize the brain, cut the muscle and elect a mouse-brain for the CEO post. C.f. Hewlett-Packard Co.

  50. Microsoft revolts me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee... I wonder _why_ it's difficult to install Linux. Could it have something to do with Microsoft's UEFI collusion. When do these assholes go to jail? Ever? The American sheeple are _so_ fucking stupid! Actually it seems to be the human condition in most places.

  51. Who wants 11.6" screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do these tiny screens really sell? To anyone who can afford a real computer, not just people who buy them because it's all they can afford? The Surface is mainly stacked up in warehouses. Do any of these 15" screen machines actually sell? Is there demand for them,?

    1. Re: Who wants 11.6" screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think of any laptop with less than a 15" screen as being "I can't afford a real computer" and/or "I only use my computer for Facebook" machines.

  52. 10.1" vs. 11.6" by tepples · · Score: 1

    Perhaps what died at the end of 2012 was the 10" screen size on a device with attached keyboard. Most of the "small laptops" I see nowadays are 11.6", which may need something bigger than a typical man-satchel to hold one.

    1. Re:10.1" vs. 11.6" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A purse dude. You carry a purse.

  53. Another HP 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So because Hp put a one subpar product on the market, all of their products will be subpar? If that was the benchmark, then no hardware vendor would be worthy; not Apple, Dell, Alienware, Lenovo, Acer, Asusno one. I for one am prepared to be open minded.

    Anonymous Coward too lazy to log in.

  54. How can you forget something you never heard of? by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    OMG... maybe it worked!

  55. ACER's Chromebook13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of the crappy celeron in the stream11/13, the Chromebook13 from ACER 249 and has Tegra K1 192 core GPU with quad+1 CPU.

    Best bang for the buck in my opinion.

  56. Problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, this has 1 GB running Windows 8. That means that it is Windows STARTER edition. As I enter this comment using my 2 GB Netbook, limited to 2GB by Windows Starter I can tell you it will be, or will become slow as ...

    Next, the problem of Windows updates and virus protection remains a PITA!!! I hate it enough to avoid another Windows machine. But whether a Chromebook is any better I have to admit ignorance on that.

    In the end, I might buy one of these as my DLNA server for my media collection. But I doubt that I'd want to use it on a regular basis. But of course I wouldn't use a Chromebook either as I have no need for another under-performing toy.

    1. Re:Problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has 2GB and there is no such thing as Windows 8 "starter". It runs Windows 8, which is perfectly suitable for most people. Windows 8 Pro only adds additional admin tools and bumps the max supported RAM from 128GB (in Windows 8) to 512GB.

  57. Long-term reliance on used hardware by tepples · · Score: 1

    You claim that people will be able to rely on a long-term supply of a product that includes its own hard drive, display backlight, and lithium ion battery for at least as long as people rely on a long-term supply of a mains-powered, solid-state product such as the Commodore 64 computer. But good luck finding an affordable working Vectrex console, which is a more apropos example because like the Vectrex, an Aspire One computer has its own screen. And I've seen a lot of sellers selling used Nintendo Entertainment System consoles for more than the $50 that Nintendo was selling them for new at the tail end of the NES era. And good luck getting the seller to provide a reasonably long warranty, or get used to buying one every 31 days when the eBay guarantee runs out.

    1. Re:Long-term reliance on used hardware by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I see old laptops all the time at yard sales for next to nothing. Still I don't really expect to use a 20 year old computer. I used an Amiga 3000 from 94 until 99 and despite the fact it was 10 years old had no trouble finding anything I needed for it at reasonable prices. Still I ended up moving on to a newer much more powerful system because eventually technology moves so far that upgrading becomes irresistible. I didn't leave the Amiga because it wasn't viable anymore but because something far better finally came along at a price I couldn't turn down.

  58. No. Chromebook is actually the better package. by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No. Chromebook is actually the better package for most people.

    8 hrs. battery time. Boots in 8 seconds. Zero maintenance. Zero worries about backups. Zero worries about installing programms. Zero virii. Zero synching your photos, videos, audios, whatnot with your tablet and/or phone. Everything in the cloud. Drop your laptop, have it stolen, pour coffee into it - no problem. Order a new one, log on, all your stuff is there and you didn't even have to archive. While the the one is being shipped you can use your friends computer or your cellphone to do the most important stuff until it arrives. I gave my fiance a laptop (IBM Thinkpad, Ubuntu 14.04, all ready and set up) and an android tablet. She used the laptop once. The tablet she uses constantly. Just watching her is a real eye opener.

    Anther Point in case:
    I'm your type A slashdot computer geek and even *I* would prefer a chromebook over a windows laptop (typing this on Linux btw.)

    I'm quite convinced that my next portable computer will either be an android tablet with an extra bluetooth keyboard or a chromebook - routing a chromebook with crouton and installing linux on it is quite easy, and 8 hrs battery time for 299 has a nice ring to it.

    The truth is: Google is set to bring the second half of humanity online. They are basically the budget Apple. You pay significantly less with at least as much convenience, if not even more. Google takes care of you and all your computing stuff for free and in turn the may observe you 24/7. That's the basic deal and there is no upside MS can offer to that.

    With MS it's pay premium, and get observed, and functionality degraded over time and virii and we want to know all your details before you can use windows unencumbred. Oh, and MS Office is a subscription now. ... Who the eff wants that? ... MS only has a chance to do that for historical reasons, and those are wearing off quickly.

    No one I know would want this ugly laptop with windows on it.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:No. Chromebook is actually the better package. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I'm your type A slashdot computer geek and even *I* would prefer a chromebook over a windows laptop (typing this on Linux btw.)

      I'm quite convinced that my next portable computer will either be an android tablet with an extra bluetooth keyboard or a chromebook - routing a chromebook with crouton and installing linux on it is quite easy, and 8 hrs battery time for 299 has a nice ring to it.

      I feel the same way. I could upgrade my aging T42 (one of the best laptops ever, IMHO) to the modern equivalent (probably a T440 or X240), and I'd be willing to pay the premium price for another 10-12 year capable laptop. But a Chromebook would handle 99% of everything I ever use my laptop for and cost so much less. The Toshiba Chromebook 2 with the FHD IPS display looks like a nice candidate.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  59. ACER Chromebook13 with Tegra is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why settle for celeron? For 249 you can have the ACER Chromebook13 with a 192cuda core GPU and four+1 CPU, way more responsive and usable especially with the incredible 13 hour battery life using those specs.

  60. glossy or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to get one as lightweight machine for typing/writing and there's no info if those gems (stream 11) have matte screens or

    those goddamn glossy atrocities. Damn, I had bought Toshiba ac100 with Android/possible Linux just for typing and like a

    moron I found out when I got one that glossy screens really piss me off. Bet I'm not the only only one with that gripe.

    1. Re:glossy or not by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to settle for a glossy display, but only if it's a high-res IPS display and no matte IPS option is available. TN panels can go sulk in a corner, they're worthless to look at.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  61. It didn't work like that for me in reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So she has crap internet service but someone got her a Chromebook.
    And this is the Chromebook's fault ?

  62. The positive and negative, it has Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows on cheap hardware is not a Chromebook killer. The best that can be said about it is "performance is not terrible". They should make an ad campaign around that statement.

    Chromebook runs superb on cheap hardware. Starts in seconds, response is snappy, and the administration is next to zero. My wife and kids have not been able to mess theirs up. I never have to mess with them.

    Just for grins, I wiped my Chromebook and re-installed. It took about five minutes (I made some coffee and the install was done when I got back to it so I don't know how long it was exactly). That's not just the OS, that is everything, programs settings, everything.

    The Chromebook works like a good appliance. I bought it to surf the web, do emails, calendar, budget, etc. If I had an appliance that worked like a windows computer, I would throw it away.
     

  63. Re:No. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    Flamebait? Try brutally obvious. Where are the Google book advertising?

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  64. Give examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Different AC here, if you really do have applications that refuse to install to a removable disk, name them. Otherwise you've just handwaved that question.

    1. Re:Give examples by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I did name one, Sony Play Memories. REGARDLESS, it exposes the fact that ANY application could do that if the devs choose. The main overriding point is that SD storage is NOT the same thing as onboard, and comes with its own limitations. It is the only salient point to this discussion.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Give examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So because one application that nobody uses, probably has deep hooks into some Sony Vaio bloatware and even has problems viewing files on an external USB drive doesn't install on to a flash drive, that somehow negates all of the software that works fine.

      Sorry, but I'm not convinced.

  65. Goodbye Chromebooks for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always liked the Chromebook concept, because what they're capable of is just barely under what I'd actually do or need. This hits the spot though. A bit of space to install Steam for sales/chatting, and a place to install Firefox. Also good for firing up old dosbox games. No Google spyware. Nothing more needed.

    1. Re:Goodbye Chromebooks for me. by yenic · · Score: 1

      Yup. On the money. HP Stream is my next laptop as well. Any serious work needs a desktop in my experience. You could certainly get by on a Macbook Retina, but I wouldn't want to have to unless I traveled for work. Tablet that lets you install standard programs and has a keyboard is basically what I think the market wants. Chromebook almost hit the mark, but not quite there.. a little too Google-oriented with their services push for most people's taste.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/en/delete-slashdot-account Stop visiting Slashdot.
  66. Yes by vandamme · · Score: 1

    There's a 7 GB recovery partition on that HP, that would be the first to go.

    On my present HP laptop my biggest OS/apps partition has 13 GB in it. My current Mint 17 is under 7 GB. Of course Windows and some huge antivirus plus Office won't fit in that, but I'll never have to worry about that again. I'd be very comfortable with a 64 GB SSD. Another 64 in a SD would be just overkill.

  67. Re:And with colors that ugly.. by vandamme · · Score: 1

    Rumor is that Mint 17 has the kernel from Ubuntu 14.04, and some stuff doesn't work (touchpad, wifi?) but Ubuntu 14.10 runs fine, and the newest Mint should follow soon.

  68. Re:"... solid-state HP Stream..." Solid-state?! by vandamme · · Score: 1

    Yeah, lot of people waiting for the Steam powered version, actually.