Slashdot Mirror


Discovery Claims It Will Show a Man Being "Eaten Alive" By an Anaconda

An anonymous reader writes Have you ever wished that you could watch a man be eaten alive by an anaconda from the comfort of your own home? The Discovery Channel is betting that the answer is yes with their upcoming special, Eaten Alive. The channel says wildlife filmmaker Paul Rosolie will don a custom-built snake-proof suit, and go inside a live anaconda. They've even released a teaser. It's unclear what scientific conundrum will be solved in the process of feeding Paul to the snake, or how he plans to get out.

164 comments

  1. Oh good by paiute · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now I can literally watch another formerly decent channel turn to shit.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Oh good by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If by "formerly" you mean "long gone".

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think it started almost 10 years ago now.

      When I gave up on cable TV 2 years ago, good shows on Discovery where seldom. People said I should check out Discovery Science, and I paid for having that channel unlocked. But as it turned out on my local provider, YouSee, it was a 16:9 SD channel broadcast in 4:3 inside another 16:9 which ment what I saw was a small strip with big black space all around. Imagine how that looked when you zoomed in. (at the same time it was in HD in the US).
      I saw a few good shows on Nat Geo HD, but it seems like I had seen all their programming.

      I haven't had any TV channels for 2 years, I pay for Netflix and HBO Nordic and download the rest(that I get from a streaming service).
      Yesterday I visited a friend and had the pleause of watching cable tv for an hour or so and I can say that it is not something I would even consider paying for again.

    3. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have been sh*t for a while. :(
      [A while = more than 5 years!]

    4. Re:Oh good by postglock · · Score: 1

      Now I can literally watch another formerly decent channel turn to shit.

      "Literally." I don't think that word means what you think it does.

    5. Re: Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think he did, and was making a joke. We're talking about watching an animal ingest a human. The next step is digestion, which leads to feces. The actor doing the transformation is a representative of the channel in a way. Thus, we would be watching the first step of the channel (its representative) turning to shit.

      Doesn't explaining a joke make it hilarious?

    6. Re:Oh good by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      You must not have received the memo. Literally now means both in a literal sense, as well in a not so literal sense.

    7. Re:Oh good by ericloewe · · Score: 3, Informative

      He can literally watch it turn into figurative shit.

    8. Re: Oh good by postglock · · Score: 1

      Oh. Well, that was a little too sophisticated for me.

    9. Re:Oh good by postglock · · Score: 2

      I gotta start reading those Monday morning emails. I had a look in the trusty OED, and the earliest listed usage of literally in that sense was actually 1769. Who would've thunk?

    10. Re:Oh good by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Now I can literally watch another formerly decent channel turn to shit.

      "Literally." I don't think that word means what you think it does.

      I guess you didn't hear about their new reality show. "Little people swamp loggers taking a big shit in a pawn shop.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:Oh good by Andrio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I have childhood memories of watching the Discovery/Learning channel, and seeing so many documentaries and things about technology, science, and just plain learning.

      That went away a long, long time ago.

        Discovery = Reality shows targeting men
        TLC = Reality shows targeting women

      --
      The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    12. Re: Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone on earth who actually paid attention to its real world usage.

    13. Re:Oh good by chinton · · Score: 1

      I remember when The Science Channel, National Geographic, and Discovery showed actual science programming. Now they are filled with programming about loudmouth d-bags and their "dangerous" jobs, or redneck-backwoods survivors, or people doing stuff naked... I also remember when MTV played videos... Get off my lawn!

    14. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must not get out much. I literally only ever hear misuses of literally when people who complain about misuses of literally provide an example.

      Unless what I just said counts. But that would mean that I should have said "figuratively", which I have no idea how someone would "figuratively hear" something.

    15. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now I can literally watch another formerly decent channel turn to shit.

      I propose they rush straight to rock bottom...

      "Kim Kardashian being eaten alive by an Anaconda."

      I'd watch. No scientific justification required.

    16. Re:Oh good by kheldan · · Score: 2

      I think it turned to shit some time ago. Of course they must be new at it, because they're doing it wrong: If they want to appeal to the Vore fettishists, they need to have the anaconda eat a girl.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    17. Re:Oh good by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Kim Kardashian being eaten alive by an Anaconda."

      Gives a different perspective to the line: "My anaconda don't want none unless you got buns, hon"

    18. Re:Oh good by armanox · · Score: 1

      That might be the greatest thing I will read today.

      Also, AC's proposal would likely solve any ratings issues that they might have....

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    19. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've just officially qualified as a curmudgeon-at-large. Welcome to the club.

    20. Re:Oh good by msmonroe · · Score: 1

      I think this is one of those fake shows that Discovery plays occasionally like, "I had sex with a Mermaid" or "I bought drugs from a Martian".

    21. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about having the anaconda eat two Furries as they were going at it?

    22. Re:Oh good by Agares · · Score: 1

      I miss those days, I quit watching both channels for the simple fact that they are no longer educational.

    23. Re:Oh good by Agares · · Score: 1

      Good one, wish I had a mod point for you.

    24. Re:Oh good by Agares · · Score: 1

      Stop it you're making me feel old!

    25. Re:Oh good by Krojack · · Score: 1

      Oh but you still can! You just have to pay even more hard earned cash to get the Discovery2 channel! And if/when that becomes popular they will turn it into another 24/7 reality station and make the Discovery3 channel which will require even more money.

      Keep in mind you won't be able to get the Discovery3 channel unless you also pay for the Discovery2 channel which you also can't get unless you pay for the Discovery channel.

    26. Re:Oh good by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh but you still can! You just have to pay even more hard earned cash to get the Discovery2 channel! And if/when that becomes popular they will turn it into another 24/7 reality station and make the Discovery3 channel which will require even more money.

      Keep in mind you won't be able to get the Discovery3 channel unless you also pay for the Discovery2 channel which you also can't get unless you pay for the Discovery channel.

      Everyone who wants A La Carte, well, this is what happens when channels have to compete for your attention rather than being able to specialize because they were included as part of a bundle.

      First, the stations are moving their popular shows around - if you want the full complement of good shows requires buying all the channels in the network.

      Second, channels having to compete means even the best channels will only cater to lowest common denominator. Because who wants to run a specialized show that'll be interesting to a few when you can run a crap show that'll get millions of viewers?

      Pretty much about the only "good" TV left is PBS, and that's because they don't need to compete for viewers (they're forced by law to be carried by everyone) and through funding arrangements and donations, means they don't have to rely on commercial sales. Which is why their programming is practically commercial free and is ridiculously long (an hour show with 55 minutes of content? Compare to traditional TV with 42). And why they can show programs that are higher quality that appeal to fewer people - they don't need to compete for eyeballs and ads and thus don't have to dumb down TV for ratings purposes.

      Discovery, History, etc. - they're all suffering because they know their specialized channels will no longer be viable because the programming appeals to too few, so they'll have to dumb it all down just to appease the masses. So see more stupid reality drama shows and less intelligent programming.

    27. Re:Oh good by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Now I can literally watch another formerly decent channel turn to shit.

      "Literally." I don't think that word means what you think it does.

      I guess you didn't hear about their new reality show. "Little people swamp loggers taking a big shit in a pawn shop.

      Not enough Alaska or gold.

    28. Re: Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take direct tax transfers to PBS over the indirect bundling tax. For one thing, it means I don't even have to pay for cable. More importantly, it means the tax isn't hidden. Even more important, the tax is miniscule compared to the cable tax.

    29. Re:Oh good by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It does now.

    30. Re: Oh good by worf_mo · · Score: 1

      Been spending a bit too much time on aforementioned channel, eh?

    31. Re:Oh good by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      "Connections" was great. It was old even when they aired it but still, you weren't going to get to see that again on PBS and I watched the follow up series too. Definitely long gone. I miss that stuff badly. Television today is abysmal

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    32. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then producers get involved and think they have to change everything.

    33. Re:Oh good by antdude · · Score: 1

      Does any channels show stuff? Even PBS doesn't do much either. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    34. Re:Oh good by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I was shocked the last time I was in 'Murica. The fucking Weather Channel wasn't even showing weather anymore. It was all reality shows.

    35. Re:Oh good by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Everyone who wants A La Carte, well, this is what happens when channels have to compete for your attention rather than being able to specialize because they were included as part of a bundle.

      I don't understand how you can hold up Discovery/TLC as an example of the problem with A La Carte programming, instead of being part of a bundle, because... that's exactly how the system is now. TLC and Discovery are both "basic cable" channels, and are bundled, along with MTV, Comedy Central, Food Network, etc. Yet, despite being in this bundling where they should be able to continue their educational lineup, subsidized by other more popular stations, they too are being changed in content and degrading in quality.

      How does this show that the bundling method is better than a la carte?

      All it shows is the continuation of the same scam they pulled with ESPN.
      1. Take a root channel (ESPN)
      2. Dumb down/degrade the content to the point customers are not satisified with it anymore (showing lots of reruns is a good way to do this).
      3. Offer a new channel of the same genre (or multiples: ESPN Classic, ESPN2, etc) with the type of content the customer does want (and likely used to get on the original station) as a new higher-tier service.
      4. Make the original station a prerequisite to get the new channel(s).
      5. Profit. You now have the customer paying more for what they used to get with the old channel.

    36. Re:Oh good by drkim · · Score: 1

      "Little people swamp loggers taking a big shit in a pawn shop.

      This is the working title for the new Kardashian show.

  2. Darwin Award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And this year's Darwin Award goes to...

  3. Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no way for the Anaconda to survive this. There is no good research that can come from actions like these and the Discovery channel has really reached a new low. Used to love hard-facts documentary channels but now it's just hype and reality tv rubbish.

    1. Re:Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way for the Anaconda to survive this.

      Actually there is. Pets swallow things they can't digest all the time. To save them you have to cut them up and remove the object from their stomach and sew them back together.
      I can't see why that can't be done with the Anaconda in this case.

      What I do see is that the Discovery Channel doesn't want to foot the bill for the operation or take the cost for caring for the Anaconda during its post-op recovery. So while I also find it likely that the Anaconda will be killed I don't see any technical reason to why it can't be saved.

    2. Re:Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shoot the thing with a dart, open up its jaw, pull him back out. If you watch the teaser they have a strong cord on him. Anacondas can eat bigger things; it will survive if they're careful.

    3. Re:Disgusting by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Constrictors are able to regurgitate their meal in a danger situation. If they succeed in getting the snake to swallow an uncrushable prey item in the first place, it's pretty easy to corner it, provide a visual threat and have it regurgitate him.

      Youtube clip of one getting rid of a dog. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1Ge4Xsuijs

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    4. Re:Disgusting by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Regardless, it should be pretty obvious that survival of the Anaconda is a secondary concern.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:Disgusting by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      There are already people carrying the snake around, and a man (not the snake's favorite meal) is dressed in a thick rubber suit with electrical gear on. What are they going to do to scare the snake after that?

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    6. Re:Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is no way for the Anaconda to survive this"

      PETA, is that you? You're coming along a bit; finally making half-reasonable arguments.

    7. Re:Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discovery will reach a new low in terms of quality, but probably reaches a new high in terms of number of viewers.

    8. Re:Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Discovery also obtained the rights to Miley Cyrus' new video.

    9. Re:Disgusting by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but doing so puts the snake's health at risk. A snake regurgitating a meal could injure itself and so only does it in an emergency situation. This person is putting the snake's life at risk. This isn't for scientific advances or to somehow help other snakes around the world. This is just a publicity stunt. What's next? Holding a shark still while a guy climbs inside its mouth and videos the way down? I'm sure Discovery could play this next Shark Week alongside their latest "documentary" featuring CGI footage being passed off as real proof that a long-extinct species of shark is swimming around our oceans.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    10. Re:Disgusting by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If PETA were involved they would shoot the same video, but with a naked woman being fed to the anaconda.

    11. Re:Disgusting by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      I have some small constrictors as pets, and can confirm that they can and will regurgitate if they can't get a too-large prey item all the way down. I'm still really against this insane show.

    12. Re:Disgusting by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, you are correct, and everyone involved in this is an asshole.

    13. Re: Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Jesus, someone should make that happen, already.

      It's time to prove the fruits of activism bear watchable TV insanity:

      Here comes snakey poo-poo

    14. Re:Disgusting by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      One of those times I wish we had the "true, but still disgusting" moderation options.

    15. Re:Disgusting by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yes, but doing so puts the snake's health at risk. A snake regurgitating a meal could injure itself and so only does it in an emergency situation. This person is putting the snake's life at risk. This isn't for scientific advances or to somehow help other snakes around the world. This is just a publicity stunt. What's next? Holding a shark still while a guy climbs inside its mouth and videos the way down? I'm sure Discovery could play this next Shark Week alongside their latest "documentary" featuring CGI footage being passed off as real proof that a long-extinct species of shark is swimming around our oceans.

      If you watch the youtube video for this special, you'll see that a few years ago Discovery already did the "eaten alive" bit with a shark. Allegedly it was a real incident, but I'm not going to watch it to find out.

      Discovery has been pure shit for over a decade. The only nugget of gold in that pile was Dirty Jobs. (Hint: Mythbusters is trash, and no, it didn't encourage interest in science.)

    16. Re: Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Snakes can regurgitate their prey. It's a defense mechanism. Perhaps they believe they can easily trigger this reaction.

    17. Re:Disgusting by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Funny

      Four men in a giant mongoose costume.

    18. Re:Disgusting by Talderas · · Score: 1

      You misogynist! Women are not objects to satisfy the lust of turgid members.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    19. Re:Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way for the an animal to survive eating something that humans don't want the animal to digest.

      Or they could just anesthetize the [$animal] and cut open his tummy, take out the [$injestedObject], sew the [$animal] back up, and let the [$animal] rest for a night... like they have to do for almost every [$animal] ever brought to a vet, ever.

  4. Discovery? by frikken+lazerz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The channel isn't about learning anymore. Just TV's version of clickbait (advertising, probably misleading, to draw in gullible folks).

    1. Re: Discovery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because sadly this garbage gets better ratings then their previous science stuff. People would rather watch whale wars and ice truckers than learn something. Pathetic.

      Are there any channels left that actually are entirely devoted to educational programming? Maybe if you buy 500 channels there might be one or two...

    2. Re: Discovery? by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe if you buy 500 channels there might be one or two...

      When cable rolled out those hypothetical 500 channels, it seemed that there might be all kind of niche programming available. Unfortunately, every one of those 500 channels ended up chasing the same demographic after learning the financial meaning of 'niche'.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    3. Re: Discovery? by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What generally happens is that as a channel becomes successful in its niche it gets just big enough to attract the type of executives who think they can make a name for themselves by turning a 'niche' channel into a 'success'. Often this is a product of individuals trying to advance their careers at the cost of the company rather then a company wanting to be more profitable.

    4. Re: Discovery? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Because sadly this garbage gets better ratings then their previous science stuff. People would rather watch whale wars and ice truckers than learn something. Pathetic

      I don't think it's the number of watchers - it's the cheap. Pay some hillbilly a few grand to follow him around while he hunts for ginseng in the woods, a cameraman and editors, and boom - ultra cheap fecal matter to fill the dead space between catheter and maintenance medicine commercials.

      Are there any channels left that actually are entirely devoted to educational programming? Maybe if you buy 500 channels there might be one or two...

      I'm almost entirely on Youtube now. Obviously they have the low order trash, but lately I've been watching the Nurdrage stuff. It's about chemistry, and reasonably enjoyable. That will keep me entertained for a while.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re: Discovery? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      When cable rolled out those hypothetical 500 channels, it seemed that there might be all kind of niche programming available. Unfortunately, every one of those 500 channels ended up chasing the same demographic after learning the financial meaning of 'niche'.

      And now they are learning the meaning of opening the 500th pizza shop in a small town with 499 other pizza shops.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Discovery? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2

      You're better off reading a book than watching this stuff.

      Outside of a snake, a book is man's best friend.

    7. Re:Discovery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside of a snake, a book is man's best friend.

      So I don't waste my time watching this show can you tell me what man's best friend is inside of a snake?

    8. Re:Discovery? by rjstanford · · Score: 2

      Outside of a snake, a book is man's best friend.

      So I don't waste my time watching this show can you tell me what man's best friend is inside of a snake?

      Bzzt, no secret spy handshake for you. The correct response being sought was, "Inside of a snake, its too dark to read."

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    9. Re: Discovery? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Other things to check out:
      MinutePhysics
      MinuteEarth
      Veritasium
      VSauce
      Devin Supertramp (for a dose of anti-nerd)
      Sorted (for the food fix)

      All of those tend to have links to yet more YT channels with decent programming, but they've got huge archives of interesting and entertaining material themselves.

    10. Re: Discovery? by balbus000 · · Score: 1

      See: Dice buying Slashdot.

  5. I'm sure it will be more pleasant.... by SeaFox · · Score: 0

    than watching Slashdot get devoured by BETA.

  6. Discovery channel is racing to bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is likely just a publicity stunt. And the they can continue the UFO, ghost-hunting, alternative history and auction shows as before. I stopped my Discovery subscription years ago when they stopped being a science channel.

    1. Re:Discovery channel is racing to bottom by jythie · · Score: 1

      You know, if the anaconda ends up being CGI or paper mache, THAT might actually be worth watching!

  7. I don't watch discovery any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Discovery, tlc and animal planet have been taken over by reality shows and ancient aliens. It's not like its news that there programming has gone down hill.

    1. Re:I don't watch discovery any more by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 1, Informative

      And let's not forget the History channel.

      - Pawn shop guys
      - Restoration guys
      - Alien shows
      - Ancient civilization shows
      - Anti-Nazi propaganda

    2. Re:I don't watch discovery any more by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      The pawn and Restoration shows are *almost* appropriate for the History channel, simply because they discuss antique and sometimes historical items, and bring in the 'experts' to talk about some of the stuff they see. The others you mention are just dumb. On the other hand, when it comes right down to it, there is only so much of History that
      A: The public will be interested in.
      and
      B: Can be made into something that can be shown on TV.
      Combine that with documentary format shows falling out of favor in general, and you can see the History Channel's problem. You gotta keep making money, or close down, so they throw every 'historical' thing they can find at the wall, (even the loony conspiracy shit) and see what sticks.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    3. Re:I don't watch discovery any more by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      "Drunk History" disproves both A and B.
      Comedy Central again indirectly provides better information than the channels dedicated to providing information.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:I don't watch discovery any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad but true. Better news shows than the news channels. Better history shows than the history channels. Better music than MTV. At least the movie channels still show better movies.

    5. Re:I don't watch discovery any more by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      I think they've done a good job with some of the recent miniseries they produced. On History, they made the Mankind: The History of all of us, The Men who Built America, one about the Bible that I didn't watch, and a few others.

      For the most part though, its reality tv and profession following TV. They only ones of those that I've found to be really enjoyable and well done in the past were Dirty Jobs and River Monsters.

      The channel that dissapoints me the most is definitely National Geographic. They used to have so many good shows, lots of stuff on engineering and architecture, Taboo, the mind shows (which are still there) and for course the nature shows. Now Nat Geo is just the State Tropper channel.

    6. Re:I don't watch discovery any more by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Exactly right! Clearly, the Nazis are just misunderstood dreamers. Sure, they got a little out of hand, but how dare we show them in a negative light. Where's the balanced view?

       

  8. They have another show coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They have a comedy show coming called: "Ow! My Balls!"

    It'll be broadcast opposite ABC's version - "America's Funniest Home Videos"

  9. My anaconda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My anaconda don't want none unless you got buns, hon!

  10. Poor animal. by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How are they gonna get him out again? Cut the snake open?

    How about giving the beast some real food and/or just leave it alone?

    Or film it from a distance and watch it eat some of its natural prey.
    Isn't that what discovery channel usually does?

    And, btw, AFAIK boa constrictors - which include anacondas - prefer their prey not breathing anymore. And they don't really care if it's bottled air you're breathing or not. They constrict you 'till you stop breathing. Hence the name. Duh.

    To be honest, I kinda hope this snake teaches the guy a lesson and get's away with it. Now *that* would be some news. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Poor animal. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Same thing I'm thinking. There's no way to do this that isn't a serious violation of ethics standards. If you want to give people an inside look feed the poor critter a small camera it can just shit out later.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Poor animal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSF5Epnpkns

    3. Re:Poor animal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A good idea but it wouldn't be real world-altering scientific research if they couldn't interview the dude later. I mean, there's no way to know what it's like otherwise - I'm probably totally wrong if I guess it's claustrophobic, uncomfortable, dark, about reptile body temperature and that there is some partially digested prey inside. That's of course wild speculation but luckily we'll soon get an accurate description.

    4. Re:Poor animal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, just tickle its throat with a feather and it will throw up.

    5. Re:Poor animal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >Or film it from a distance and watch it eat some of its natural prey.
      >Isn't that what discovery channel usually does?

      This bullshit is offcourse a new low, but a friend of mine who worked a biologist in africa witnessed Discovery filming a 'documentary' about snakes about 10 years ago which involved catching (endangered) snakes and throwning them out of a tree (sometimes killing the snake) to film a 'hunting snake jumping on it's prey from a tree'. Or killing pisonous snakes and then wiggling them around for filming because a live snake would heve been too dangerous.

      She completely lost any respect she had had for Discovery Channel up to that point. And I have never been able to watch a Dicovery ' Documentary' and believe what they tell.

    6. Re:Poor animal. by jythie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, somehow 'death of defenseless creature' as entertainment feels really crummy. Even if one is an omnivore and allows for use of animal products in their ethical framework, the idea of doing something that gruesome 'for the fun of it' can still cross lines.

    7. Re:Poor animal. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      You have been playing a bit too much Kings Quest IV

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Poor animal. by carnivore302 · · Score: 1

      > [My english is better than most other people's german, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]

      Nothing wrong with your english, and definitely better than this guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Please login to access my lawn
    9. Re:Poor animal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read another story that said there's a rope or string attached to the top of his "snake-proof" suit so they can pull him back out. They're also gonna cover him in pig blood to make him more appetizing. I guess he'll be like a giant tampon and get pulled out.

    10. Re:Poor animal. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, somehow 'death of defenseless creature' as entertainment feels really crummy.

      Sure, it's an unethical way to treat a TV presenter, and yet, if the Anaconda does crush him before swallowing, I'll feel somehow satisfied.

    11. Re:Poor animal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, most people do not hold to the standard that snakes are worthy of any ethical concern whatsoever. They have the moral status of rocks. Of course, those same people will gladly kill anything that is "coming right for us".

    12. Re:Poor animal. by drkim · · Score: 1

      How about giving the beast some real food and/or just leave it alone?

      How about grinding up the people who came up with the show's concept, and the show's producers, and feed them to the snake?

    13. Re:Poor animal. by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      "get's" ?? I think you meant "gets"

      Ich danke Ihnen

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
  11. Oh good by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 1

    Discovery is crap for years. I remember it was OK long long ago.

  12. SHOCKING FOOTAGE by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've already had all of this sort of thing I could take with this horrifying video of a man being eaten alive excruciatingly slowly by an arctic fox. (NSFW)

    http://youtu.be/43dAN0C4J_0

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:SHOCKING FOOTAGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I'm at work so I can't watch that. I'm pretty sure my cat is larger than an arctic fox though. WTF?

    2. Re:SHOCKING FOOTAGE by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's not NSFW - it's a video of a baby arctic fox (I'm not sure if it actually is one or not) nibbling and pawing at some guys toes.

    3. Re:SHOCKING FOOTAGE by Megane · · Score: 1

      HOLY CRAP why didn't you warn me that the link contained vertical video?!?!?!?!!!! Have some consideration for other people, bub!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  13. pointless by tverbeek · · Score: 2

    And some people wonder why I don't have cable-TV service.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:pointless by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      It's precisely because thinking folks don't watch much cable television that this tripe is what's left to scavenge ratings from.

      I'm sure this is a prerecorded event, but if it were live, I'd be rooting for the snake to win in the style of Grizzly Man.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  14. What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember watching Discovery as a kid and it was actually interesting and somewhat educational.

    Now you get Duck Dynasty and the likes. Disgraceful.

  15. Getting out? Easy. by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

    How's he gonna get out?

    "That's not a knife. This is a knife."

    --
    Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    1. Re:Getting out? Easy. by necro81 · · Score: 1

      "That's not a knife. This is a knife."

      Well played, but wrong continent entirely.

  16. PETA by DaMattster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's spectacles like this which have the potential to harm or kill an animal for the sake of entertainment that makes me side with PETA on occasion. Otherwise PETA is too radical for me. There is no science in this.

    1. Re:PETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I don't know. Can't you see them lining up a bunch of naked supermodels with the tagline "I'd rather be in my own skin than inside another animals"?

      ie. stunts to get donations without any real work (or animal protection) involved?

    2. Re:PETA by KiloByte · · Score: 0

      So you're going to go mass-murdering cats and dogs too? (Intentionally using the wrong word between "murder" and kill", to follow your idols.)

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:PETA by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      PETA is mostly composed of people who just like animals and want to see them treated well - but all flocked around a band of hardcore crazy that actually runs the organisation.

  17. This is more educational than Discovery by ad454 · · Score: 1

    Skip Discovery and learn more from about anacondas from a music video parody:

    http://www.collegehumor.com/vi...

    Sure not all the facts are correct, but still more accurate than Discovery.

  18. Reason #14 not to intern at Discovery Channel by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

    Interns are snake food.

    Has anyone mentioned yet that this sounds like a stunningly poor idea?

  19. I'm less disgusted by the people responsible... by Simulant · · Score: 2

    I'm less disgusted by the people responsible for this than I am by the people who are going to tune in to watch it, but not by much.

  20. It turned out when they actually filmed it by queazocotal · · Score: 3, Funny

    that it turned out that the anaconda had a fondness for bread products, and would not eat anything without at least some in.
    The handler turned to the director, and said 'My anaconda don't want none unless she's got buns hun'.

    1. Re:It turned out when they actually filmed it by bmxeroh · · Score: 1

      There have been a few other people to invoke Sir Mix-a-Lot so far in these comments, but your set up was by far the best.

      --
      Central Ohio Home Theater Installation - The Theater People
  21. Gentlemen, we are out of ideas. by nimbius · · Score: 2

    Discovery Exec:In its early years, the channel's focus centered on educational programming in the form of cultural and wildlife documentaries, and science and historical specials. It also broadcast some Soviet programming during this time, including the news program Vremya. In 1988, the channel premiered the nightly program World Monitor. In 1988, we debuted an annual programming stunt called Shark Week, the week-long event eventually gained in popularity starting in the 1990s and continues to be shown each summer on the channel to this day. Fast forward to 2014 and, im sorry to say this but we appear to be flat out of original ideas. We sound probably just start shuttering the doors and handing out pink slips becau....
    breathless intern rushes through the door: A SNAKE!!!!
    Exec:....excuse...me?
    Intern: WE feed a camera man to a snake...or talent...or have talent outside but we feed someone to a snake and record it, for television.
    Exec: Jesus Christ on a crutch....thats just dumb enough to work...but how does he survive the snake?
    Casting director: Snake..proof...suit? Exec:: kid you just saved the season. at least, until we get the rights to honey boo boo.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:Gentlemen, we are out of ideas. by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      They have the rights to Honey Boo Boo. TLC is part of the Discovery Networks Garbage Corporation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:Gentlemen, we are out of ideas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they canceled honey boo boo.

    3. Re:Gentlemen, we are out of ideas. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Honey Boo Boo is canceled. Or more accurately, not being renewed after the current production season.

      HBB's Mother has started dating her old boyfirend, who just got out of a ten-year jail sentence for rapeing HBB's older sister and is not going to be living alongside HBB herself. There are some levels of shame - and more importantly liability, if they should end up filming child abuse for the sake of entertainment - that even TV executives won't brave. Yet.

    4. Re:Gentlemen, we are out of ideas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they will have a new show called "Honey Boo Boo's big boyfriend".

  22. Weirdest by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    That's the weirdest Slashdot story I've ever seen. (Also, pretending to be food is not nice to the Anaconda.)

  23. What next? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    And no I don't mean "what next" as far as what the discovery channel will do, I mean what next after TV? Seriously, we're out of ideas for movies and shows, obviously. People love TV so much, why not just combine it with something important, like school? So rather than sit around watching a bunch of desperate idiots attempt to "entertain" us with some new show as ridiculous as this one, broadcast stuff that teaches people things. Remember that show "E.R."? So many people watched it. They could have thrown in just 1 medical lesson per show and the general population of the US would know a good bit more about how to how to help themselves in a medical situation.

    It's called "The Discovery Channel", but if they show us a man being eaten by a large snake, what is the discovery there? This reminds me of that advertizement for that unicorn at the circus from the early 80's. But in the advertizement here that I saw, they never show the man going into the snake's mouth or anything. He's in a thick black rubber suit. My guess is that all the audience will be shown is that the snake won't eat the man in those conditions.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:What next? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      It's called "The Discovery Channel", but if they show us a man being eaten by a large snake, what is the discovery there?

      The Learning Channel used to feature shows that had some educational value. They've long since dropped that and changed their name to TLC. Perhaps Discovery Channel will do the same and change their name. They might not be able to use "DC" though, because the garbage they show is completely different from the garbage that takes place in Washington, DC.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:What next? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Christians fed to lions of course! With much fanfare I might add.

      Let it burn! Let it buuurrrn!! Let our nation take it's turn.... (to the tune of Frozen)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:What next? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Becareful what you wish for, the BBC has basically gone down the path of doing shows you can learn something from and apart from a few good Attenbroughs and a few good Brian Cox's every few years you basically have 3 choices:

      1) Generic medical drama #125423523
      2) Generic cooking show #35263463
      3) Generic 1800 - 1930 show #43634633

      I swear the BBC lost their costume cupboard in their move to Salford and all they could find afterwards were the 1800s clothes because if you turn the BBC on nowadays you'll either get some incredibly repetitive and dull artsy shit that caters to old people or one of the above, which mostly caters to old people. Long gone are the days where we got things like Spooks.

      But then that's probably also why over half of the BBC's audience in the UK is now over 60.

      So sure with the BBC everything they produce is something you can learn something from, but for christs sakes I'd only want to make so many puddings, watch so many heart attack surgeries or watch so many people doddering about boringly and aimlessly in the 1800s. Unfortunately it seems, if you wish for it, TV can end up just a little bit too much like the school you hated as a kid because most of the shit you were taught was boring crap that didn't interest you.

      Okay sure there's Doctor Who and Top Gear which are popular but how often are they actually on? What if you don't like those only two shows that don't seem wholly focussed on the over 60s as their primary audience target?

      I've never had a problem paying the license fee in principal because I think it's a good idea, and I think historically it's actually been great but nowadays I don't feel like I get my moneys worth given that the only thing I really get out of it is the news website and the rare documentary. I shouldn't be paying £120 a year for news and the excitement of one good hour long documentary every once in a while. There's something wrong when you can literally go weeks without there being anything in the TV schedule of interest. It's not like there hasn't been a wealth of subject matter they could've made good shows on but failed miserably in the last couple of years - 25th anniversary of the Falklands war, 100th anniversary of World War I yet on those topics it's either been repeats of documentaries we've all seen before or simply just crap. Even the World War I dramas have been more focussed on people in their 1910s clothes wardrobe pratting around in coal mines, fields, or mills back home than the actual fucking war itself.

      I love education too, god only knows I've studied enough post-graduate, but I would like the TV I pay for to be at least a little bit entertaining.

    4. Re:What next? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      It's called "The Discovery Channel", but if they show us a man being eaten by a large snake, what is the discovery there?

      The discovery is that if you try to do commercial educational programming on cable, this is what happens. I'm waiting to see if it ends up as 24hr pro wrestling. So the whole thing's gone meta. Don't watch the Discovery channel. Observe it.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    5. Re:What next? by MakerDusk · · Score: 1

      For this, I recommend Perception: it has a short lecture on different mental conditions, and the brain, per episode.

  24. um... by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So they fired Kari Byron.
    And now they are showing the poop shoot of a snake?

    Man... they're on a roll.

  25. Redhat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What version of anaconda are they using?

  26. Watch The Man Eating Chicken!!!! by jandersen · · Score: 1

    It sounds to astonishingly outrageous that one has to expect that it is simply a variant of the old joke about the 'Man eating chicken': Sounds like 'Man-eating chicken', but is actually 'Man, eating chicken'.

  27. The only discovery by Required+Snark · · Score: 1

    is that the Discovery Channel is directly competing with Maury Povich for sleaze.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:The only discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know who this Maury Povich is, but my wild guess is that by comparing him to the "discovery" channel, you are giving him a very good reason to sue you for libel!

  28. plain and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is wrong on too many levels to even think of, so i won't watch it, reccommend watching it or the dicovery channel in future.

  29. Perfect reason for canceling cable by Ogive17 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The downfall of Discovery Channel was a main reason I "cut the cord" about 2 years ago. They use to be one of my go-to channels when I had some free time. After the success of the crab fishing show (which names annoyingly escapes me right now), they basically switched direction and turned themselves into a reality tv channel.

    On the bright side, I am saving $1020+/year for not having cable.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    1. Re:Perfect reason for canceling cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, Discovery Channel! This literally (as in, literally) gave me my reason for cutting the cable. Discovery Channel, oddly enough, was the last reason I kept my cable package. This may prompt a person to ask "... why?!", to which I say, "That is an excellent question."

      (Captcha "witness". Hm.)

    2. Re:Perfect reason for canceling cable by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      After the success of the crab fishing show (which names annoyingly escapes me right now)

      Deadliest Catch.

      Which, while being part of the whole reality-TV craze, I did enjoy when I caught it now and then. It was at least a bit educational, in how they do their job and handle problems, but mainly because it was narrated by Mike Rowe and I really enjoy his voice. (Speaking of Mike Rowe, Deadliest Catch started after his Dirty Jobs show, which was psuedo-reality-TV.)

      Honestly, whatever channel turns into 24 hours of Mike Row and Morgan Freeman reading to each other is the one that I will sign up for.

  30. How else do you jump the shark? by PseudoCoder · · Score: 1

    When you've already got a whole week dedicated to them?

    --
    "Now, I doubt any of you would prefer a rolled up newspaper as a weapon against a dictator or a criminal intruder."
  31. Execs in this case know what they're doing... by Rick+in+China · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many people will complain about this. I initially thought along the same lines as many of the above posters when reading the blurb about what's about to happen - and also think it's terrible. What will happen, though, is the extremity and sleaziness also strikes enough interest that people _will watch it_, even if they hate Discovery channel while doing so. They'll get the viewers. They'll get attention. It'll be passed around. They surely know already that they have a reputation dive akin to GT Advanced's stock dive, so when you're deemed a channel with momentum diving downward so quickly I suppose they thought along the lines of: Embrace It...there are enough people who eat this shit up that it'll likely be their best ratings in recent memory.

  32. I guess it can be too much of a good thing. by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 2

    Freedom of the press, I mean.

    This is not what it's for.

    Here's the way I figure it. If the man survives, it's homicide. If the man suffers serious injuries (you, know, from being crushed by a giant snake), it's felony maiming (or whatever it's called in whatever non-jurisdiction they're planning to do this). If he survives without harm, it's reckless endangerment. If the snake is injured or dies, it's animal cruelty.

    1. Re:I guess it can be too much of a good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If the man survives, it's homicide.

      Sorry, what? Have I been whooshed?

    2. Re:I guess it can be too much of a good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what he meant was if the guy in the suit happens to be an adult, it's infanticide.

    3. Re:I guess it can be too much of a good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If the man survives, it's homicide.

      I hope you're never on a jury.

    4. Re:I guess it can be too much of a good thing. by drkim · · Score: 1

      If the snake... dies, it's animal cruelty.

      If it's a King Snake, it's regicide.

  33. Jumped the shark... by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    I'd say Discovery has now truly jumped the shark, except snakes can't exactly jump, and aren't sharks.

    1. Re: Jumped the shark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not the shark that jumps anyway, it's the guy on water skis.

    2. Re:Jumped the shark... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      No, they did that when their Shark Week got so ridiculous that shark experts have now reached an informal agreement never to appear in a Discovery show. The channel has had to resort to lying about their affiliation to get interviews, or settle for less-respectable experts without any actual qualifications who'll say anything to get on TV.

  34. I think it's fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as they don't prevent the snake from constricting him to death and letting the snake digest him everything should be fine.

  35. Animal Cruelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they get arrested.

  36. Another fake documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember a year or two ago, Discovery kicked off Shark Week with some fake documentary about how Megalodon might still be alive and swimming.

    I'm guessing that's exactly what this will be. It'll be presented as a doc but obviously fake. There's no way they can get away with willingly killing a snake for entertainment.

  37. feed honey boo boo to the snake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everyone happy.

  38. Hate propaganda TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your supposed to help people understand animals, not make them fear them you a$$ hats. I think I would rather watch WWE, it's more believable than discovery!

  39. Vore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all. GIS if you don't understand.

  40. Nickname by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I'm just trying to guess what his nickname will be when he comes out the other end of the snake.

    (Although I'm guessing that they will be cutting the poor snake open instead)

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  41. Shark Bite Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's only one way to test that.
    "Alright Jimmy, you got that shark suit on, it looks good... They want you to jump into this pool of sharks, and you tell us if it hurts when they bite you."

    "Well alright....hold my sign, I don't wanna lose it"

    HERE'S YOUR SIGN.

  42. chainsaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If he goes in with a chainsaw he should be able to get out like in Sharknado.

  43. Anaconda - The Educational Version (Nicki Minaj Pa by NealBScott · · Score: 1

    Anaconda - The Educational Version (Nicki Minaj Parody) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  44. PETA! HELP! by shadowrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If there was ever a need to let the dogs of peta run wild, it's this. This is disgustingly shameful. It serves no purpose other than to abuse a snake for entertainment.

    Nothing can be gained from this. We already know the snakes can eat a person. We can already send far less obstrusive sensors safely through a snake if we really need to see what's going on in there.

    c'mon a show in which ted nugent would kill and eat an anaconda before our eyes would be more on the up and up than this crap.

    1. Re:PETA! HELP! by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      i'm not really condoning the nug' kills a snake. obviously that snake is guaranteed to die where this one might just be uncomfortable,

    2. Re:PETA! HELP! by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      We do not know that they can eat a person. We know they can kill a person however our shoulders cause issues for any snake trying to swallow us whole. Beyond that they tend eat things smaller than us. Consuming a 200 pound animal makes it very difficult for the snake to react defensively or flee from any threats.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
      Relevant passage:
      Many local stories and legends report the anaconda as a man-eater, but little evidence supports any such activity.

      Regardless, this is stupid and it seems incredibly unlikely to be successful unless they found a horse jockey whose "snake proof suit" somehow can withstand the constriction while still being small enough to swallow.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    3. Re:PETA! HELP! by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, i didn't mean that we know they have consumed people. Just that there is a high probability that the largest of the big snakes are physically capable of swallowing a person. It likely wouldn't go well for the snake either. There are a number of verified stories of snakes of all sizes suffering after swallowing too large of a meal. That's what i find seriously concerning about this effort.

      I also find it hard to believe that you could coax a snake into swallowing a guy in a big suit too. I've been bitten plenty of times by large snakes because i smelled like rat or rabbit. while they certainly would have been capable of then proceeding to swallow my hand, they instead realize it is not what they thought it was and release. They aren't that stupid.

    4. Re:PETA! HELP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Nugent would show it an ounce of respect and kill it humanely, and its harm would serve a useful purpose.

  45. Hold my beer by jtwiegand · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gonna get eaten by this snake.

  46. Here We Go Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next week we'll be seeing this in the latest Cracked.com list of "BS Viral Stories You Fell For".

  47. Treadmill to Bucks by superstition222 · · Score: 1

    GO-GO-GARRATY NUMBER47 We Love You Ray "Maine's Own."