Slashdot Mirror


Australian Post Office Opens Mail Forwarding Warehouse In the USA

Zanadou writes Australians are well used to paying what's called an "Australian Tax": high(er) prices for international products and services simply because they are are being accessed from an Australian IP address and/or being delivered to an Australian mail address. But Australia Post, Australia's national mail service, might have a solution: last week they opened a new warehouse/delivery depot in Oregon, U.S., allowing Australians to use a U.S.-based delivery address for mail items, which can then forwarded onwards to Australia.

However, this service, called "Shopmate", comes at a cost.

142 comments

  1. One has to expect this will be caught up with.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and terminated.

  2. Other prisons are the same by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Funny

    You have to deliver the package to the prison office for inspection before prisoners can receive the delivery.

    1. Re:Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia's obviously not a prison anymore; it's not being run by a corporation.

    2. Re:Other prisons are the same by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You have to deliver the package to the prison office for inspection before prisoners can receive the delivery.

      I'll have you know that in Oz, having criminals in your family history who were deported to Australia is actually a bit of a status symbol. Especially if you can trace them back to the First Fleet. I'm a bit pissed, as I can't do that as all my ancestors were free settlers.

      And the reason that the Brits started dumping convicts in Australia was partly because of some war or something that they had with a former colony that stopped them from sending the prisoners there.

      And in the words of some comic (who I can't remember)

      I'd rather live in a country founded by convicts, than one founded by Puritans

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, New England was founded by Puritans, but Virginia came first. Those guys got up to all kinds of mischief.
      My first US ancestor came over about 1630 as an indentured servant. He was convicted of having illicit relations with another servant in their master's bed!

    4. Re:Other prisons are the same by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...it's not being run by a corporation...

      You're kidding, right?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Other prisons are the same by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      but Virginia came first. Those guys got up to all kinds of mischief.

      Have you seen Virginia lately??????

      Anyway, the level of conservatism in the US is much higher than a lot of places in the world. Just take the reaction to Janet Jackson's nipple and nudity in general (think of the children!)

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    6. Re:Other prisons are the same by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Anyway, the level of conservatism in the US is much higher than a lot of places in the world. Just take the reaction to Janet Jackson's nipple and nudity in general (think of the children!)

      Well, to be fair, at that point in time it has become a bit of a worn out looking, saggy nipple that no one really wanted to see.

      Perhaps if the nipple in question had been about a decade or so younger there might not have been quite the uproar.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... overcompensating much?

    8. Re:Other prisons are the same by quenda · · Score: 2

      I'll have you know that in Oz,... I'm a bit pissed, ... the Brits ... some war or something that they had with a former colony

      I'm going to call you out as a fake Aussie. "Pissed" means drunk here (we say "pissed off"), and we never call the British "Brits".

    9. Re:Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the U.S. doesn't have to deal with the kind of internet censorship laws the EU has. Janet Jackson isn't going to sue my nip-slip site because she has the "right to be forgotten."

    10. Re:Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have you know that in Oz, having criminals in your family history who were deported to Australia is actually a bit of a status symbol. Especially if you can trace them back to the First Fleet. I'm a bit pissed, as I can't do that as all my ancestors were free settlers.

      And the reason that the Brits started dumping convicts in Australia was partly because of some war or something that they had with a former colony that stopped them from sending the prisoners there.

      Yes, my mother's side of the family traces its lineage in America to transported convicts. But not just any transported convicts - they were cousins of the King, issues of the second son of the previous monarch. Further up the line, they fought for the colonies in the American revolution. Quite amusing, really.

    11. Re:Other prisons are the same by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm going to call you out as a fake Aussie. "Pissed" means drunk here (we say "pissed off"), and we never call the British "Brits".

      Struth mate[1]. Don't come the raw prawn with me. Pissed can have multiple meanings, and you sound more like a whining pom than any brit.

      And yeah .. I did bring the aerogard last weekend

      [1] And if you don't know how to parse that, then I hope your chooks turn into emus and kick your dunny down.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    12. Re:Other prisons are the same by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      At least no one was beheaded over that incident.

    13. Re: Other prisons are the same by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Hahaha .... I'd never considered that. I had never bothered even looking for an uncensored image which probably supports this way of thinking further.

      It now seems to me that the uproar was indeed justified. Carry on friends.

      --
      .
    14. Re:Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey be fair we gave you all the honest convicts they got the traitors and oath breakers.

    15. Re:Other prisons are the same by anonymous_echidna · · Score: 1

      In the part of the arse end of the world where I live, the usage of "pissed" as "angry" instead of "pissed off" is fine, if the context is clear. Maybe it's a regional thing.

      --
      In most times, most places, by most people, liars are considered contemptible. - Ursula Le Guin
    16. Re:Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first US ancestor came over about 1630 as an indentured servant. He was convicted of having illicit relations with another servant in their master's bed!

      The rest of the story: your ancestor was in the master's bed with another man, and the master was jealous. That's right, your great great great great great great grandpappy was in fact a dandy. A giant flaming fop of a man.

    17. Re:Other prisons are the same by skegg · · Score: 1

      I can vouch for his comment that having ancestors who arrived as convicts DOES give one bragging rights in Australia.

    18. Re:Other prisons are the same by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He wouldn't have been allowed in, that would violate Australian rule number one.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Other prisons are the same by Talderas · · Score: 1

      As someone who doesn't live in Australia and is unaware of Australia jargon, could I get a translation into latin?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    20. Re:Other prisons are the same by RedOctober · · Score: 1

      Though around 150,000 convicts were sent to Australia, we can't forget that around 50,000 were sent to the American colonies as well.

      http://www.amazon.com/Bound-Iron-Chain-Transported-Convicts/dp/098367440X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1309874514&sr=8-1

      America has some claim to convict glory as well :-)

    21. Re:Other prisons are the same by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I'll just remind you that South Australia and Adelaide where directly founded as an independent colony ( "The goal was to establish the province as a centre of civilisation for free immigrants, promising civil liberties and religious tolerance" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...) no convicts at all, just happened to share a continent with them. South Australia just became a part of the same country at Federation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F.... So we tend to agree with the rest of the world when it comes to the New South Welshmen and the Victorians ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    22. Re:Other prisons are the same by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1
      Americani Ite Domum

      i.e. Go home, Yanks! :)

    23. Re:Other prisons are the same by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that .. I just ordered a copy

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    24. Re:Other prisons are the same by mjwx · · Score: 1

      ...it's not being run by a corporation...

      You're kidding, right?

      I hope he is.

      First off, the service is actually being run by Singapore Post, Australia Post are simply re-branding it.

      Secondly, Australia post is a corportised entity, meaning they aren't controlled by the government despite receiving government funding.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    25. Re:Other prisons are the same by mjwx · · Score: 2

      You have to deliver the package to the prison office for inspection before prisoners can receive the delivery.

      I'll have you know that in Oz, having criminals in your family history who were deported to Australia is actually a bit of a status symbol. Especially if you can trace them back to the First Fleet. I'm a bit pissed, as I can't do that as all my ancestors were free settlers.

      And the reason that the Brits started dumping convicts in Australia was partly because of some war or something that they had with a former colony that stopped them from sending the prisoners there.

      And in the words of some comic (who I can't remember)

      I'd rather live in a country founded by convicts, than one founded by Puritans

      The interesting thing about penal transportation from England is that they never transported dangerous criminals, only petty criminals. So the majority of crimes were petty theft, unable to repay debt (there were debtors prisons back then) and being Irish (because displaying an Irish flag was considered sedition). The hardened criminals like rapists, murderers, politicians were imprisoned in England. So we call them POHMS (Prisoners of His/Her Majesty).

      One of the reasons Australia has such a high occurrences of Irish surnames is because a lot of the people transported here were sent here, just for being Irish.

      Also the Swan River Colony (what later became Perth, Western Australia) were the last to receive convicts in 1857. Technically we didn't even become Australia until federation in 1901.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    26. Re:Other prisons are the same by fj3k · · Score: 1

      Vah, amicus! Et dedisti mihi, squilla, rudis! 'Pissed' plures significationes. Tu magis sonant plus sicut a doletium 'pom', Britannus.
      Ego obtuli, 'aerogard' ultimum volutpat vestibulum.
      Si non intelligitur, spero gallina ad 'emus' pullis vestra delenda ad latrina.

      Disclaimer: my Latin is terrible.

      --
      Two men claimed to have walked into a bar. Only one had the bruises to prove it.
    27. Re:Other prisons are the same by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Australia's obviously not a prison anymore; it's not being run by a corporation.

      Then why are we being constantly monitored, and why are our laws being written by US and multinational companies?

      http://www.smh.com.au/digital-...
      http://www.choice.com.au/revie...

      I don't remember what I did to deserve this treatment, but it must have been fucking diabolical.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    28. Re:Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No..AP recieve no government funding, and are required to return a profit to the major shareholder - the government.
      And although 'technically' it's corporatised, it still has to comply with a lot of community obligations, which are legislation, and so are controlled by the government - just not directly.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia_Post
      Disclaimer - I work there, in that very area.

    29. Re:Other prisons are the same by sr180 · · Score: 1

      Translation:
      Please stop being unreasonable. I do not believe the lies that you are telling. Pissed can mean angry, drunk, annoyed etc. You sound more like an Englishman.

      I am Australian, because last weekend I had an outdoor grill, where I remembered to bring the insect repellent. Mosquitos are an issue for most parts of Australia in summer.

      If you do not understand what I am saying, then I place a nasty curse on you. (Your chickens turn into large Australians birds (like ostriches) and kick down your outside toilet.)

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    30. Re:Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what it was a crime to fuck around on the job? Your politicians are doomed then.

    31. Re: Other prisons are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take puritanism over sharia any day. Just how often do you get to Virginia anyway or are your views based on TV and Internet?

  3. Good by mattventura · · Score: 1

    Now if only we could end the even more idiotic practice of regional price gouging for digital goods/services too.

    1. Re:Good by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At the company I used to work for we ran into this but in reverse.
      A company in South Africa wanted to buy our software but they didn't want to pay the same as in the US they said it was too expensive for the market.
      The issue was that it was a lot more expensive for us to support customers outside the US and Canada than in the US and Canada. In the end they paid the same as everyone else.
      And yes we charged everyone he same rate but some nations really wanted us to take a lot less.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks to me like the Aus Govt is taxing these transactions and it is not the private sector's fault.

    3. Re:Good by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      When I lived in the UK, I'd have US companies tell me we had to pay more because it was more expensive to support companies in the EU because they had to translate the software from English....

    4. Re:Good by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      It sounds like the software your company was selling either included a lot of skilled labor hours in the price, or required substantial localization and wasn't exactly a household product.

      Charging poorer customers less is really only doable when the per-unit costs are small enough that you still make money at the discounted rate. Often the case for software and media if support is essentially nonexistent and localization is sufficiently cheap or spread out across enough units; but that's more likely with mass-market software and somewhat less likely with more specialized products.

      I'm assuming from the tone of your post that the company you were with sold something comparatively expensive and specialized?

    5. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. Because many EU countries do not speak English.

    6. Re:Good by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Isn't there some ring of truth to that? I can't remember the specific laws, but I was pretty sure that if your business discriminated against any particular national who was also part of the EU, it was some kind of hate crime (not that extreme of a punishment, but you were discriminating against them somehow.)

      Basically like how in Canada you can't provide services only in English, you have to provide them in French too.

    7. Re:Good by sdoca · · Score: 2

      The federal government in Canada is officially bilingual and provides services in both official languages. The only province that is bilingual is New Brunswick and it also provides services in both languages. Quebec is unilingual French, and is required to only provide services in that language. All other provinces are unilingual English.

    8. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only GOVERNMENT services, and even then, every government office you go to has every form available in like 30+ languages. The people who work there generally speak English+something else. Unless you live in Quebec, then you are treated like a dirty foreigner if you don't speak Quebecois.

      It's kinda funny and sad at the same time how Western Canada, Washington State down to Texas generally have no "issue" with foreign speaking individuals because slavery wasn't around these parts very long (or at all) so the intense racism is only brought by the immigrants themselves. Sure in BC we may have french on packaging, but that's only because of Quebec. You can go to any Asian market here and the only English signage you will see will be on the barcode affixed to the package. However everyone working there will speak to you in English. In Western states, there may be Spanish on packaging, but that's for Puerto Rico. It just so happens that it benefits those with Mexican heritage, and makes it cheaper to ship things to Mexico than to Canada.

      With the exception of things like "Special K" which is a completely different thing in Canada than it is the US, most "Canadian" versions of American food products are formulated the same, except where something else is cheaper. Coco Pebbles, Fruity Pebbles and Trix, use the same packaging but the contents are different. In the US, these cereals have a pitch of around 1/4", where as in Canada they're sometimes 1/2" in size and hilariously mismatched to the packaging. But they taste the same. Froot Loops is another example where they don't color the product the same (Froot Loops in Canada is extremely pale.) The recent FrankenBerry and Count Chocula cereals... only those two were even shipped in Canada. The BooBerry one was not. Was it too expensive to put French packaging on the box? Another example: Cream Soda. Cream Soda in Canada is Pink (grenadine). In the US it's a Vanilla flavor, and in Asia it's a yellow color and made with something else (closer to mountain dew.) They taste completely different, more so than different brands of the same flavored thing would.

    9. Re:Good by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The added support cost was in staffing and phones. The phone issue was solved by the customer getting VOIP lines with US numbers. The staffing never was. You see people in the UK start work a lot earlier than the US so we had to increase staffing at that hour.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:Good by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      We also had to change the spell checker to UK spellings.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:Good by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes. It was targeted to specific industry and ran 4k a seat.
      But at least we charged the same to everyone.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  4. Bigger cost than you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost is that you have to live in Australia. *shudders*

    1. Re:Bigger cost than you might think by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Australia is like that island in Lost. It's fine as long as you don't venture too far from the beach.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Bigger cost than you might think by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of emigrating, any suggestions? :)

    3. Re: Bigger cost than you might think by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Stay close to the beach? Good idea! There are only crocodiles, jellyfish, cone shells, blue ringed octopus, sharks, spiders, snakes, bees, various dangerous species of fish, dingos, and the risk of severe dehydration and sunburn there. You should be fairly safe from the cane toads there.

    4. Re: Bigger cost than you might think by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Compared to the outback, that's paradise mate!

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    5. Re: Bigger cost than you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed stingrays, Irwin's bane.

  5. is this an ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reads like a not so cleverly hidden advertisement for this shopmate website, which apparently comes at a cost.
    Click here to find out what that cost is. On our website.

    1. Re:is this an ad? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The cost is about AUD 30 minimum, which is about USD 26 per package. Yes, it may be less than directly shipping individual packages, but it's still gouging.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:is this an ad? by Falos · · Score: 1

      Colloquially known as a Slashvertisment. If you're generous, assume the incompetence of Dice/editors.

      OT: When [proxy] tools can directly circumvent something, it's blatantly broken. Either yield on it or waste endless resources trying to whackamole the workarounds forever.

      When proxy tools merely circumvent in a ethical or conceptual sense, you're still writing bullshit laws or rules. If things like a remote camera/viewer or deadmanswitch get around your policy or ruling or copyrightlulz, you had something retarded to begin with.

    3. Re:is this an ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly as free market economics would predict.

      Just be thankful government isn't running it, or it'd cost twice as much and you'd be OBLIGED to buy from them.

      --
      roman_mir

    4. Re:is this an ad? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha, nice. Somebody actually bothers to impersonate me at the time when my 'karma' is not too shitty to leave normal comments under my account name?

      Too funny.

      By the way, you idiot, this website IS a government operation, it is owned by the Australian Post Office.

  6. And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to it? by SirGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does ANYONE think that this would be happening if the gov agencies didn't think they could get something from it ?

    It would allow the Australian NSA access without violating those pesky laws they're supposed to follow...

  7. I'm not clear by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2

    After reading the links it's still not clear to me why this is occurring. Is it that sellers charge Australians more just because they can, and if so, are they not able to get away with it elsewhere? Do even huge online retailers like Amazon charge different prices depending on the country the items are going to? I'd have thought the US Federal Trade Commission would be scrutinizing these practices.

    1. Re:I'm not clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have thought the US Federal Trade Commission would be scrutinizing these practices.

      But the people getting screwed here aren't US citizens. The FTC has no charter to keep corporations from screwing over Australians.

      Where is the Australian equivalent of the FTC? Probably enjoying the coke and hookers donated by American corporations. I'm not saying that the Aus regulators are somehow more corrupt than American ones. There just isn't enough blow available to meet the FTC's price for screwing their own constituency over.

    2. Re:I'm not clear by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Lots of places won't ship to non-US* addresses. Whether they just can't be bothered with the extra hassle, or have agreements with their suppliers not to (for example: http://www.coolstuffinc.com/p/...), or just don't like foreigners is really none of the customers concern - the business is allowed to choose what sort of shipping it will offer.

      * Often with Canada as an exception.

    3. Re:I'm not clear by jules_d'entremont · · Score: 2

      Do even huge online retailers like Amazon charge different prices depending on the country the items are going to?

      Of course they do, and we've known about it for years. The Canadian government started an investigation into the issue last year. Even cars manufactured in Canada are cheaper to buy in the U.S. than in Canada.

    4. Re:I'm not clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Australian sellers charge Australians more. For low volume/non commodity items, insane amounts more. I'll pick two items:
      Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5: US pricing $2300USD MSRP, Aus pricing: $2600 USD RRP
      Baby Jogger City Select double stroller (pram): US pricing ~$500USD (Amazon), Aus pricing: $900USD

      For fun:
      6 pack PBR: $6 USD vs $20USD

    5. Re:I'm not clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Photoshop, MS Office etc., are 40% more expensive in Australasia. It comes from historical justifications because they needed to put products on board to get them there, not as many customers as the US, etc, and they're trying to maintain the markup premiums despite digital delivery. If you come from an Australasian IP then you'll pay a premium

    6. Re:I'm not clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like how prescription pharmaceuticals manufactured in the US are cheaper by an order of magnitude pretty much anyplace else in the world.

    7. Re:I'm not clear by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      After reading the links it's still not clear to me why this is occurring. Is it that sellers charge Australians more just because they can, and if so, are they not able to get away with it elsewhere? Do even huge online retailers like Amazon charge different prices depending on the country the items are going to? I'd have thought the US Federal Trade Commission would be scrutinizing these practices.

      For a variety of reasons.

      The most obvious ones are Australian distributors with exclusivity deals - for some products like Adobe and Microsoft software, this is the primary reason why it costs more.

      Others include legal requirements - taxes, duties, support, warranties and other things, some of which only apply in Australia. So an Australian using this service might lose out on that or may find they need to ship the product back to the US because the Australian depot refuses to service it for not being purchased in Australia. Or maybe Australia forces a product to be warrantied for 2 years or more, while the US version is 90 days to a year, and stuff like that usually gets factored into the price. So some Australians might get confused when the product they buy only has a 1 year warranty because it was purchased through this service rather than through the Australian distributor (where it has 2 years). Apple products come to mind for this - if you buy it in Europe, you get the 2-3 years EU law provides (and pay for it), whereas if you bought it in the US, you get standard 1 year.

    8. Re:I'm not clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're paying $6 USD anywhere for a 6-pack of PBR then you're a fool.

    9. Re:I'm not clear by redback · · Score: 1

      a lot of things wont ship to australia at all.

    10. Re:I'm not clear by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Pricing across continents always gets tricky. The basic problem is that it's really far from where you built all your distribution centers, because it's an island in the middle of the fucking ocean, so shipping is hell. Hawaii is one of the most expensive states to live in mostly because of shipping, and it's closer to a Cali-based warehouse then Adelaide is.

      Foreign currency fluctuations are also a huge pain in the ass. In my lifetime, for example, a Canadian dollar has bought between $0.65US and $1.05US. This year the difference between peak and trough is about 5 cents. And it's going down. Which means if you didn't charge Canadians 105% of a reasonable price back at peak (in June, IIRC), then you're gonna have to jack up prices today because you're losing money.

      There's also the issue of who actually operates in Australia. If you use your own subsidiary, then your Aussie customers are paying for two CEOs: one down under and the other up-top. If you use a local distributor, then those guys will a) have their own CEO to pay, b) shipping/exchanging currency/etc. also applies to them, and c) know exactly the amount the can force their countrymen to pay.

    11. Re:I'm not clear by marka63 · · Score: 1

      The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).

    12. Re:I'm not clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon charges me the same whether they ship to my address in the USA or to my address in China. Not all items are available for export to China, though. Amazon even handles the import and brokerage paperwork that is otherwise a PITA in China. Clearly the taxes aren't free and I have to pay for them, but if that Bluetooth mouse costs $8.99, it's the same price regardless of my shipping address.

      I happen to work for an American company that builds cars in Canada. I lived in the GTA for more than a year as a result. You guys make a helluvalot of money compared to the Americans. At one time when the discount was 20% to 30% the buying power was par, but now that the currency is par your buying power is a lot higher ('cos, you know, no one's salaries were cut). The same goes for our Australians. People three grades below me make more than I do when taking exchange rate into account. That makes them seem overpaid in China (or the USA), but when I go to Australia and pay $10 AUS for a pint or see what they're paying for property, I'm certainly not envious of the pay discrepancy. Same for the prices of stuff in Ontario and especially the GTA.

      Most of Apple's products are built in China. The retina iMac I spec'd out costs about $2900 in the USA, and $3800 if I buy it in China. (In the end I decided my 2011 iMac is still perfectly good.)

      Damn. I'm not signed in.

    13. Re:I'm not clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam also charges regional premiums based on location.

    14. Re:I'm not clear by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Yep the 2 biggest groups, by sales, here are

      (1) US ebay sellers.
      (2) Amazon, who ship books but not their complete inventory OS.

      Now they can just deliver to a regular US address.

      Personally I'd look forward to all those special offers, e.g. when HTC were recently having a one-day US-only sale on their new Android tablets.

    15. Re:I'm not clear by mjwx · · Score: 1

      After reading the links it's still not clear to me why this is occurring. Is it that sellers charge Australians more just because they can, and if so, are they not able to get away with it elsewhere? Do even huge online retailers like Amazon charge different prices depending on the country the items are going to? I'd have thought the US Federal Trade Commission would be scrutinizing these practices.

      For a variety of reasons.

      The most obvious ones are Australian distributors with exclusivity deals - for some products like Adobe and Microsoft software, this is the primary reason why it costs more.

      Others include legal requirements - taxes, duties, support, warranties and other things, some of which only apply in Australia. So an Australian using this service might lose out on that or may find they need to ship the product back to the US because the Australian depot refuses to service it for not being purchased in Australia. Or maybe Australia forces a product to be warrantied for 2 years or more, while the US version is 90 days to a year, and stuff like that usually gets factored into the price. So some Australians might get confused when the product they buy only has a 1 year warranty because it was purchased through this service rather than through the Australian distributor (where it has 2 years). Apple products come to mind for this - if you buy it in Europe, you get the 2-3 years EU law provides (and pay for it), whereas if you bought it in the US, you get standard 1 year.

      Taxes are low in Australia, so you automatically lose that argument.

      But the same products are cheaper in the UK and EU that have more strenuous requirements for warranties and support, so you lose that argument too.

      You need to admit that things cost more because someone is profiteering. It literally costs less to fly to the US, buy an adobe product and fly back to Australia than to buy it here and there is not additional warranty provided on software. Software is pretty much sold "as is" in Australia.

      The answer to this profiteering is to allow grey imports. This has worked wonders for the price of cameras.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:I'm not clear by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      Yep, sellers charge Australians more literally "just because they can". They sometimes make up excuses like shipping or localization, and sometimes buyers even believe them! But the reality is that Australians are willing to pay more than Americans for the same thing, so sellers take advantage of this.

      A similar situation of price discrimination exists for university textbooks. US edition textbooks can cost about double the price of the "international edition" of the exact same book. This is because Americans are willng to pay more than the rest of the world for the same book.

    17. Re:I'm not clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how established retailers dislike grey market imports! Officeworks has a price match policy, but try and price match something from MSY, and then they start making excuses that MSY sells grey market imports, so, for instance, Canon Australia will not warrant a MSY product, so, sorry, we can't price match MSY products.

  8. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by nedlohs · · Score: 2

    Sure Australia Post, a government owned entity, gets money from it when people pay them for the service.

    From a snooping perspective it makes no difference. The government can search any package it wants that is being imported into the country.

  9. NZ Post has had this service for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based in Portland.

    I wonder what is special about Oregon.

    1. Re:NZ Post has had this service for a long time by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      I'd guess because it's the only US state on the pacific coast with no sales tax.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:NZ Post has had this service for a long time by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      I wonder what is special about Oregon.

      No sales tax.

  10. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that will work until those businesses selling said items catch on and start charging a different price when the shipping address is chosen as this location in Oregon.

  11. Shopmate Green by Hardness · · Score: 1

    //However, this service, called "Shopmate", comes at a cost.//

    It's made from Australian-Americans.

  12. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    It would allow the Australian NSA access without violating those pesky laws they're supposed to follow...

    What pesky laws are those? I'm pretty certain that governments already have the rights to inspect any goods that pass over their borders and to know the details of who is transporting them, where they came from and to whom they are going.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  13. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by slazzy · · Score: 1

    No need, retailers will simply learn the addresses and apply the "Australia Tax" to those shipping addresses so they can keep profiting from it.

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
  14. Listen all y'all, it's an Arbitrage!! by trout007 · · Score: 1
    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  15. Perhaps someone can explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can I order a flashlight from China for a dollar including packaging and postage, but it costs more to send a postcard from Hamburg to Berlin? What trickery is going on there?

    1. Re:Perhaps someone can explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because most likely someone is subsidizing the cost to corner the market. in this case the chinese government by manipulating its currency to keep exports flowing.

      you really think it should cost you a dollar to mail ANYTHING across the globe?

    2. Re:Perhaps someone can explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currency manipulation only explains how the goods are so cheap and how they get from China to the border for next to nothing. However, the rest of the way, the same postal service which refuses to carry a postcard from Hamburg to Berlin for so little money, brings the package with the Chinese flashlight to me.

    3. Re: Perhaps someone can explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because it wasn't one flashlight sent across?

    4. Re:Perhaps someone can explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's where the subsidized comes in.

      someone is paying for it. it's just the why and how much that we don't know.

      also, companies can get bulk discounts you can't... it costs me a dollar and 15 cents to get a postcard from texas to germany. bulk rates ftw.

    5. Re: Perhaps someone can explain this by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      Nope, I actually was surprised about this a couple times, too. For example, on the German amazon website, there are quite a few sellers which offer cheap 1-2 euro stuff (like e.g. USB adapters, ink cartridges for pens, ...) with free shipping, from china or japan. I needed a USB OTG cable for my android tablet, so I bought one from such a seller. And indeed, one week later, I had a padded envelope with that cable, from china, in my hands. 2 euro item with free shipping from china, the profit on that sale cannot be very high, even if the cable itself cost only a couple cents for the seller.

    6. Re:Perhaps someone can explain this by guruevi · · Score: 1

      A box or container of postcards would cost you less (per postcard) than a single postcard. It also costs you the same amount of money to send 1 postcard or 5 within an envelope.

      The UPU says that each country retains all money collected for international postage so it doesn't cost the Chinese anything to send stuff from China to anywhere in the world once it is beyond their borders.

      The postal system in the US and most European countries is funded by the market instead of by the government. When I grew up in Europe, before the postal system became privatized in 2000, you could send a 50kg package across the world for the (inflation adjusted) equivalent of ~USD 15 (and we thought that was barely affordable). Today, sending the same package costs USD 325. There is very few stuff I receive directly from China and if I do, it's usually less than 2 kg in an envelope, they seem to have paid CNY 3.10 for my last package (USD 0.51).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    7. Re:Perhaps someone can explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. "UPU" was the key to finding the explanation: An article about the "trickery" that is going on.

    8. Re:Perhaps someone can explain this by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, Chinese businesses don't pay a cent for international postage - yay, communism!

      Under international treaty, the receiving country delivers said small packages for free to the consumer.

      Hamburg to Berlin, well it's sender-pays.

  16. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not US retailers, generally, who are overcharging Australians. If the retailers also do business in Australia, they might care. But if you buy something from a company with no presence in Australia who previously wouldn't ship there themselves, then it'll be fine.

  17. Not very new or novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many "package forwarding" services like this for individuals outside of the USA, especially in SE Asian countries. Shipping goods over the pacific ocean is expensive! But this works both ways. If you've ever tried to import anything from Japan you can end up paying more for shipping than for the item, especially if the item is inexpensive (say, one volume of manga).
     
    I've worked for a small company that sold products over the Internet and shipped mostly worldwide with USPS, and I can tell you from experience that I would rather ship to a US package forwarding service than to another country. Carriers fail to use tracking numbers, there's a much higher incidence of lost packages, and it takes weeks for the product to arrive because it needs to clear customs both upon leaving the US and upon entering the other country. Australia and Canada tend to track USPS packages via their respective domestic services, so it's not so bad, but shipping is still expensive and still takes long. If you want to ship with a carrier besides USPS, it's even more expensive.

  18. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does ANYONE think that this would be happening if the gov agencies didn't think they could get something from it ?

    You mean like make money (it will be profitable) and aiding their citizens (cheaper goods) and keep money in Australia (better Australian economy) and lowering the cost of trade with Australia (general trade = good arguments here)? Because, yeah, I mean, I do think the government does things for any one of those purposes.

    Or do you mean nutter "if it weren't for this, how would customs officials have the right to open packages coming into the country on clearly marked USPS/UPS/FedEx shipments?"

    On a personal note, this is great. Overseas shipping is such a complex beast my company was not planning on shipping to Australia (at least until we grew larger). Saying to Australians, "you can purchase our product through a ShipMate account" will help my company with more sales, and Australians who want to buy our product.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  19. This isn't new by dmbrun · · Score: 3, Informative

    New Zealand has a similar service. It's been running for a couple of years or so.

    It is called Youshop https://www.nzpost.co.nz/tools...

    The USA warehouse opens the parcel and repackages it if they can. This saves volume and for Amazon packages this might be a 50% volume saving. All of the packages are then bundled together and shipped to New Zealand for final distribution.

    For the user there may or not be a mail cost saving. You pay for shipping to a US address and then for shipping from there to Australia. The service is extremely useful where the seller won't ship to a foreign address but will ship to a US one.

  20. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by Etherwalk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not US retailers, generally, who are overcharging Australians. If the retailers also do business in Australia, they might care. But if you buy something from a company with no presence in Australia who previously wouldn't ship there themselves, then it'll be fine.

    This. It's like Canada--the middle-man makes a ridiculous amount of money because there's less competition in middle-men, so products often cost more than in the states. It's not as bad as it was pre-NAFTA, but it's not great either. The cost of a tire was at least 30% higher the last time I checked, although YMMV.

  21. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just who do you think is controlling the price of products shipped to Australian addresses? Remember that the "Australia Tax" is AFTER government taxes are removed from the equation.

  22. Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA! We're right next door to the USA and we routinely get reamed on shipping costs and even more so when the post offices aren't used.

  23. Canadians are used to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many US retailers won't ship outside the US, or when they do, they have hamstrung themselves with shitty agreements that limit them anyways due to cost (see point). For example, for the longest time most US companies would only ship via UPS. By the time the Canadian receives a $70 package, they can expect shipping fees + customs + bullshit brokerage to double the price of said package.

    Or, option 2: Have it shipped to a nearby US address (often for free). Pick it up, pay $5 for the privilege of them receiving it, drive over the border and gamble on whether the officer cares to charge you GST/HST or not (if you have family in the car, typically the answer is no) and you're done. For me, the gas to drive there and back is about $30 and rather than waiting 6 to 12 weeks to get my package, I'll have it in 2 days. Hell yeah I'll take a "free" shopping trip in the US (might as well pick up some of those half-price groceries while I'm at it).

  24. This is All Wrong! by sexconker · · Score: 2

    document.getElementsByTagName("body")[0].style.transform = "rotate(180deg)";

    There, that's better.

  25. You should not be so pissed about history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the terms "settlers" or "deported convicts" should be relabeled "genocidal squatters" and "brutalized slaves".

    The history of the "settling" is horrifying. It was rumored and now proposed the uninvited "settlers" deliberately spread small pox...
    http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/ockhamsrazor/was-sydneys-smallpox-outbreak-an-act-of-biological-warfare/5395050
    The genocide in Tasmania, forced slavery of Pacific Islanders, massacres and mass graves have been recorded.
    The laws passed to ensure that only a desirable gene pool of the Caucasian race could settle... yep, some caucasians were more pure white than other caucasian.
    And for the other cultures and peoples... yep, the South African Apartheid was closely modeled on Queensland's Aboriginal Protection Act (1897).

    It's only in the recent decades that true progress has been achieved in Australia and it may not be over yet...
    Every now and then you hear reports of pubs targeting the aboriginal communities with alcohol and even shipping it by plane to remote communities.
    Now that these poor sods cannot be hunted down, lets make money by keeping them drunk, the stupider they become...the better for the squatters who can grab their land that is mineral reach for a pittance.
    As I said in the title you should not be so pissed...

    But sometimes someone truely amazing comes along that makes Australians proud, check out this eulogy of a past Prime Minister, truely awesome:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsXmYHiuJ8s

    Perhaps there is a glimmer of hope for the Australian squatters after all.

    1. Re:You should not be so pissed about history by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Perhaps there is a glimmer of hope for the Australian squatters after all.

      Hey I am not going to deny any of the past genocide or current treatment now and I am ashamed of that aspect of Oz. On the other hand I still feel pride in where I was borne.

      The sad thing is that even given such eulogies we still have people like Andrew Bolt.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  26. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are right, but there are many services that do this by now. New ones are being added to the list every day.

  27. uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it - it's just as expensive as Fedex.
    Why would I buy from the US when China is more than willing to sell me stuff ?
    Oh thats right....sad lonely people who must have the new iphone before anyone else on their street......

  28. Too late by trawg · · Score: 1

    With the Republicans scoring big in the election, the US dollar hit a high (apparently because they're pro business) against the Aussie dollar, which is now the lowest it's been for 4 years after a gradual slide over the last few months.

    This would have been fantastic 2 years ago but now we're just facing the original Australia tax - a poor exchange rate. Might still be a few things that you can get a good deal on though.

    1. Re:Too late by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Does Tony Abbott have anything to do with that?

  29. 2 problems with this by jonwil · · Score: 2

    1.Its expensive (more expensive than existing mail forwarding services)
    and 2.If people actually start using it, online retailers will refuse to ship to it (just like many online retailers will refuse to ship to existing mail forwarding services, citing fraud, dodgy credit cards and drop-ship scams)

    1. Re:2 problems with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.Its expensive (more expensive than existing mail forwarding services)
      and 2.If people actually start using it, online retailers will refuse to ship to it (just like many online retailers will refuse to ship to existing mail forwarding services, citing fraud, dodgy credit cards and drop-ship scams)

      1 is irrelevant as Australians would be choosing to use the service at their own cost
      2 *should* be irrelevant as the service is the Australian national mailing service - much lower risk of these scams.

    2. Re:2 problems with this by dmbrun · · Score: 1

      1. It can be more expensive. You have to do the sums and work out which is cheaper.

      2. New Zealand's Post Office has been doing it for a couple of years with no problems.

    3. Re:2 problems with this by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Bet you cant use the NZ Post drop-ship option to get US pricing at the online LEGO store (to name one example of a business who is going all out in blocking drop-shipping)

  30. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Right, but one that has a local branch (the local post office) near to you and is unlikely to vanish with overnight (it is the national postal service after all) and isn't based in Russia with a Russian language web site is likely to have a competitive advantage in Australia.

  31. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by omnichad · · Score: 2

    The cost of a tire was at least 30% higher the last time I checked, although YMMV.

    Is there really a correlation between the varying retail price of a tire and its mileage?

  32. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... aiding their citizens (cheaper goods) ...

    There are three causes of higher buying costs: Importer's fees, differential pricing (because they can), exorbitant postal charges. Buying from inside the USA eliminates the first and second problems. With ShopMate starting at AU$31 for international post (eg. a HDD or novel), plus re-packaging (for large goods) and storage (for valuable goods) fees, buying from inside the USA won't eliminate the third problem.

  33. Who the hell do you people think Australians are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1. The extra taxes associated are because we have a mandatory 3 year warranty on any electronic goods, and 1 to 2 year mandatory warranty on any other goods and because Any good an Australian buys they have the right to return for a full refund within 60 days at the place of purchases expense

    3. If any US business charges Australian tax on us goods they have a legal obligation to give it to the Australian Tax Office or they face tax fraud

    4. The goods if over priced are due to the U.S. supplier mainly, import tax is only 10% of item cost...

    5. Australians are no more convicts or genosidists then Americans. We may have killed what is expected to be a few million Aboriginals intentionally or not but you enslaved an entire population of African Americans (we never did this) and you crushed a Native American population of nearly 50-100 million! And you still glorify the people who did it, Custer, George Wasington.. And as for convicts, the majority came for petty crime such as stealing food so they could feed there families. So if you proclaim that as convicts we are denigrated by this status you are a sociopath. Who in the right mind wouldn't risk stealing if your entire family was starving.

    6. Australians really don't need ecomnomic advice from America. We have a higher GDP, we have basically no dept per capita compared to you and we are ranked second in the world for our economy. We may pay a bit more but we do it for the good of our economy.

    7. Australia is ranked by the consensus of studies the most liveable country in the world, with all of its major cities listed in the top 10. We do not have gun massacres on a weekly basis in our schools, in fact the last gun massacre in Australian was more than 20 years ago. We do not have a criminal epidemic, Australia is ranked one of the lowest counties in the world for crime and corruption. But most of all at least we don't parade our self as the global sovereign for peace and justice and then declare 'wars on false pretences'.

  34. It's Not Always About Tax by enter+to+exit · · Score: 1

    The US market is big enough that a lot of US businesses simply don't bother offering to ship anywhere else. The potential of having to deal with foreign customers/regulations is often not worth it, regardless of how simple the procedures are.

  35. It's called "Country Pricing" by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    In Australia, however, "Country Pricing" has gone "full retard"
    https://www.google.com/search?...

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  36. Taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would assume this is just being done by the government as a way to make sure they can collect taxes on the sales that the individual would have otherwise had shipped to them as a "gift" to avoid import duties. I don't see any reason this would get shut down by the Australian government since it benefits them (more tax revenue, yay), but I could see groups like MPAA, ESA, RIAA, and so on trying to get it shut down so their members that run businesses in Australia can continue to overcharge for cheaply made products.

  37. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by redback · · Score: 1

    if you dont mind at least $30 being added to the cost, which is the minimum shipping fee from shipmate

  38. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by master5o1 · · Score: 1

    It would allow the Australian NSA access without violating those pesky laws they're supposed to follow...

    Australian Security Intelligence Organisation or ASIO.

    --
    signature is pants
  39. Re: One has to expect this will be caught up with. by jd2112 · · Score: 1

    Yes. I bought a set of Michellins and they were good for about 60,000 miles but the cheaper brand only lasted for 40,000.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  40. Far from the beach by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

    Woomera wasn't too bad and though we had sand we were a ways from the beach ;-).

  41. Re: Who the hell do you people think Australians a by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

    mandatory 3 year warranty on any electronic goods

    Citation needed. None of the electronics that have failed on me were covered by a mandatory 3 year warranty.

  42. Re: One has to expect this will be caught up with. by omnichad · · Score: 1

    But that's not the same tire, but bought through a middle-man.

  43. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Which at least a known cost.

    Yeah it's a lot, almost doubling the unit cost. But, if we ship a dozen together...

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  44. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can choose the tires retailers put on your car, you can ensure you are buying an "American made" tire from an American manufacture instead of a Chinese one.

  45. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by mjwx · · Score: 1

    It's not US retailers, generally, who are overcharging Australians. If the retailers also do business in Australia, they might care. But if you buy something from a company with no presence in Australia who previously wouldn't ship there themselves, then it'll be fine.

    This. It's like Canada--the middle-man makes a ridiculous amount of money because there's less competition in middle-men, so products often cost more than in the states. It's not as bad as it was pre-NAFTA, but it's not great either. The cost of a tire was at least 30% higher the last time I checked, although YMMV.

    This. Distributors take the absolute piss with pricing. A CD that costs $10-15 in the US costs $25-30 in Australia however to ship the same media from the US to Australia it costs less than $5 to do it on an indivdual basis (I order all of my games from the UK or Hong Kong). Tyres are another one, good Continental tyres (225/45/17) cost $150 a corner from tirerack.com, but if I ordered them in Australia from an Australian distributor it would be over $200 a corner.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  46. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Usually it's distributors and major brands colluding to not lower prices to Australian retailers, and to not supply bulk quantity to distributors that are exporting to Australia. Technically it's unlawful, and small amounts of goods slip through the cracks.

  47. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Sure Australia Post, a government owned entity, gets money from it when people pay them for the service.

    From a snooping perspective it makes no difference. The government can search any package it wants that is being imported into the country.

    This.

    If I get a packaged Fed Ex'd from the US to Australia (which is something I do on a semi regular basis) it still has to pass customs and quarantine. For some things I have to do a customs declaration as I did for some knives and a bottle of spirits that you cant get in Oz (yep you can import liquor, but you still have to pay tax on it).

    So it's not a snooping issue. It's Australia post trying to make more money and stay relevant in the market in an age where traditional post is almost dead. Personally I think it's a good thing that Oz post is doing this, more competition and all that.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  48. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

    To some degree, however not really.

    Tire life depends on tread wear.

    The higher the tread wear, the less sticky the tire.

    So tire life (mileage) also depends on tire performance.

    High performance tires, or stickier tires, don't last long. If you get a very long lasting tire, it'll be a great highway tire, but not as good at handling and breaking distance.

  49. Re:Who the hell do you people think Australians ar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's why Adobe software is double the price, incase it breaks in two years!

  50. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by bane2571 · · Score: 1

    As an example: Magic the gathering cards. US site: http://sales.starcitygames.com... AU site:http://shop.goodgames.com.au/trading-card-games/magic-the-gathering/boosters-and-boxes/magic-2014-core-set-booster-box.html So with a $65 difference I'll happily take that $30 shipping hit. Note: Good games is one of the biggest games store franchise in the country and their prices are about the lowest you'll get.

  51. I'm a bit pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be American.

    In Australia, "I'm a bit pissed" has an entirely different meaning.

    As does "I've rooted my phone"

  52. Maybe it's a regional thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's an American cultural import.

    Being "Pissed" as in tipsy, dates back to WW1.

    The American version of "being pissed" is a recent import. It really grates with dinky die aussies.

  53. Re:One has to expect this will be caught up with.. by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Completely missed my point. GP post was talking about the cost of a specific tire changing based on there being a middle man. I'm not talking about different brands/models.

  54. Re:And to allow the NSA/Austrailian gov access to by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    The government can search any package it wants that is being imported into the country.

    Which is pretty much true for any government in any part of the world. There are certain mutually-agreed exceptions, such as countries within the Schengen region not searching packages from other Schengen countries without prior evidence of a crime (e.g., sniffer bees drawing attention to the package), but generally it's the case that all mail into or out of a country is subject to search for contraband. Which includes paper money.

    There's this thing called tax ...

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  55. Re: Who the hell do you people think Australians a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only 10% is tax the rest is private sector markups

  56. Re: Who the hell do you people think Australians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If is a 'reasonable' fault in the good or it does not full fill its intended purpose it is. Of course it's not covered if you damage it or excessively wear it. That's only in all fairness.

  57. Not good for general purchases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is bloody awesome for purchases which are labeled US Delivery Only . Oh man there are sooooo many amazing little shops I've wanted to buy stuff from and get it shipped to Melbourne, but every time I get to the shipping and handling "US & Canada Only".

    Jump for joy!

  58. Re:Who the hell do you people think Australians ar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We may have killed what is expected to be a few million Aboriginals intentionally or not but you enslaved an entire population of African Americans (we never did this) and you crushed a Native American population of nearly 50-100 million!

    Who is "You"? Many people who immigrated to Australia come from the same ethnic and cultural background as the people who engaged in the slave trade in the USA and other places.

    Over 90% of the slaves shipped from Africa across the Atlantic were NOT shipped to North America, the Caribbean sugar plantations killed people in huge numbers and needed "replacements". Many of the sugar plantations were owned by the British for much of the relevant historical period, and these produced huge profits for Britain which funded all kinds of stuff, including things of benefit to Australia! Study the history of Britain and you'll really learn to appreciate how significant a role that sugar trade played!

    Do you consider every citizen of the USA today an accomplice to slavery? If so, you need to consider pretty much every citizen of every country in the world such, because slavery in one form or another has existed around the world across most cultures at some point in history. For example, millions of Europeans ended up as slaves in Northern Africa and the Middle East as a result of the "Arabic Slave Trade" (which also heavily involved the Italian City States, the Vikings, the Byzantines (Greeks), and many others, not just Arabs). Most human beings probably have descendants that were slaves, and descendants that were slavers.

    Then there's the issue of the "Indentured Labour" system used throughout much of the British Empire -- a system which lasted until the second decade of the 20th century (long after the US Civil War), which Australia definitely participated in, which affected millions of people, and which wasn't all that different from slavery (involving mass kidnapping, whips, chains, and lots of deaths).

    The British and those in many former British colonies like to cite the British anti-slavery record, but always forget to include this minor detail!

    Admittedly the Royal Navy did quite a lot to stop the African slave trade (after having insured British control of most of the Caribbean, this placing the British in control of those previously mentioned sugar plantations!), but they somehow missed the boat when it came to the indentured "servant" trade.

    Then there's the Native American issue, which conveniently sidesteps the fact that 1) Europeans have been participants in many wars on conquest around the world, and 2) the diseases that did most of the killing came from Europe! Since the descendents of many Australians came from Europe, if we consider citizens of the USA responsible for this because some fraction of the population has European descent, we must also consider citizens of Australia responsible (except for the natives and the immigrants from elsewhere, who probably have their own issues in their family histories!).

    Should we force the Turks to give Turkey back to the Greeks and Persians? Do we force the Japanese to give Japan back to the Ainu? Do we take Egypt away from the Islamic world and give it to the few remaining descendants of ancient Egypt? How long are we going to hold present populations hostage for the actions of the past?

    A classic example of trying to claim the moral high ground without actually having it!

  59. It will be interesting by melting_clock · · Score: 1

    I've made a lot of international purchases from Australia without ever using using a forwarding service to hide my location. There are a lot of retailers in the US that are happy to ship to Australia and that can mean it arrives here 3-4 days after the order is placed. Ordering from retailers in Europe and throughout Asia is often possible. US retailers have a right to set their policies and very little of what I buy is actually made in the US anyway so there are generally other options when US retailers will not ship here.

    In the past, I have had the help of friends in the US to deal with a few retailers that wouldn't accept by Australian credit card for online purchases, while I was actually in the US...