Slashdot Mirror


Philae's Batteries Have Drained; Comet Lander Sleeps

astroengine (1577233) writes "In the final hours, Philae's science team hurried to squeeze as much science out of the small lander as possible. But the deep sleep was inevitable, Rosetta's lander has slipped into hibernation after running its batteries dry. This may be the end of Philae's short and trailblazing mission on the surface of Comet 67P, but a huge amount of data — including data from a drilling operation that, apparently, was carried out despite concerns that Philae wasn't positioned correctly — was streamed to Rosetta mission control. "Prior to falling silent, the lander was able to transmit all science data gathered during the First Science Sequence," said Stephan Ulamec, Philae Lander Manager. "This machine performed magnificently under tough conditions, and we can be fully proud of the incredible scientific success Philae has delivered.""

183 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Hey don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    3D printing and private space means that we'll soon have dozens, no, hundreds of private space probes out there searching for mineable asteroids and comets because there's just so much money to be made out there!

    1. Re:Hey don't worry by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      We will need the cheap Delta-V first.

      Just print it! Geez guy, haven't you been keeping up?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Hey don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Easier solution: just print the asteroids here and mine them without even leaving the planet.

    3. Re:Hey don't worry by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      I think in the future Gerald Bull will be proven right and for non human payloads a supergun will be the way to go. Sadly he was hampered by the tech of his time but I could see something like a coilgun up the side of mountain on the equator being doable, hell you could probably harness both the wind on the mountainside and geothermal if you picked the right mountain and drive costs way down.

      You might even be able to one day use it for human launches by firing it in stages, similar to the V3 of WWII

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Hey don't worry by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      None of what you say contradicts my point. Even had he whipped up a Perl script, doing so just to post Space Nutter first posts is itself a sign of obsession, and it would also imply that he were always around the computer. Whether he is doing things in a clumsy manual fashion or using some scripting solution, it's not healthy either way.

    5. Re:Hey don't worry by gargleblast · · Score: 1

      Bro I feel your pain. But we were discussing injected-Bitcoin-guy one para up on the main page.

    6. Re:Hey don't worry by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1, Funny

      He almost had one, guess he shouldn't have picked Saddam Hussein as his financial backer LOL His mega-gun was one of the top targets in Desert Storm.

    7. Re:Hey don't worry by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      a sign of obsession, or maybe he just likes to piss people off. Still not a "good thing", but being a troll is a bit better than being so OCD you write a script to get FP on / lol

    8. Re:Hey don't worry by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      he's a STRAWTROLL.

    9. Re:Hey don't worry by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Humanity will die out on one planet or many. You can't win against entropy and thermodynamics. See you in the black hole!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:Hey don't worry by camperdave · · Score: 1

      What do you think we're searching the asteroids for? The only thing of value in space: water. Water outside of a gravity well is propellant. Just run it past a hot nuclear pile, and it turns to steam. Voila... cheap delta-V

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:Hey don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If only there were no pesky atmosphere. You know, the stuff which is such a drag when returning from orbit.

    12. Re:Hey don't worry by itzly · · Score: 1

      Water outside of a gravity well is propellant. Just run it past a hot nuclear pile, and it turns to steam. Voila... cheap delta-V

      You have a curious notion of "cheap". How much does it cost to get your hot nuclear pile near the water supply and to operate it ?

    13. Re:Hey don't worry by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      a supergun will be the way to go

      I'm sure the idea will be popular in the US. You could fund it with NRA sponsorship.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    14. Re:Hey don't worry by resfilter · · Score: 1

      well,

      although a near impossibility, i like to have faith that on some level everything will work out for us, and that a future incarnation of what we've grown into will witness the final years of the universe, rather than just being a bunch of coincidental meat sacks that will instantly die out when something random smacks into our planet, or a bunch of space fleas that jump around to various planets in our solar system to survive until we witness the death of our sun, and that's the end.

      that stupid impossible thought, that what we're doing here today could have some eventual influence on how eternity on the scale of the universe plays out, drives me to learn and understand as much as i can in my life.

      i hope that's a driving force for some of the people that design these space probes and experiments too

      or it's possible i've just read too much asimov, whichever

    15. Re:Hey don't worry by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Don't know why this has been modded funny, it just depends on the interpretation of "soon." Give it another hundred years and the solar system will indeed be crawling with private robots, unless we somehow manage to seriously fuck up our civilization until then. On a cosmic time scale another hundred or two hundred years is nothing.

      What annoys me a bit, though, is that I'm probably born too early to be able to download my consciousness into a machine during my lifetime, so I won't see what the future brings. :(

    16. Re:Hey don't worry by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      This was thought up LONG ago. Except the idea was to propel hydrogen plasma, not water.

      There was too much backlash against the idea of nuclear rockets, due to the possibility of launch failure (turning the launch zone into a radioactive nuclear wasteland)

    17. Re:Hey don't worry by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Bull was probably pretty pissed when the US military killed his project.

      I wonder how he felt when Mossad killed him!

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    18. Re:Hey don't worry by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Give him a break, at least he reads good SF.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    19. Re:Hey don't worry by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Nobody's accusing you of being wrong (except the space nutters).

      You're just accused of being obsessive.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    20. Re:Hey don't worry by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I've heard of moving the goalposts, but in your case the goalposts have gone relativistic.

    21. Re:Hey don't worry by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Nerd challenge: Design an experiment that will determine whether Space Nutter Troll is a bot or a person.

    22. Re:Hey don't worry by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. It's reading stories about a non-existent man in the sky in languages nobody speaks, versus a bit of coding practice.

      Think I'd be reaching for the Camel book.

      You're not in a position to criticise anybody for how he uses his time.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:Hey don't worry by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The crucial question is, won't using Bennett Haselton as the nozzle material clog the printer?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    24. Re:Hey don't worry by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You only need a very small stage if you leave the barrel at a few km/s. In fact, you would still need a stage to achieve orbit even without the atmosphere because it's a two-impulse maneuver, so you just need some extra fuel to compensate for the atmospheric drag you experience within the first two or three seconds (and an ablative shield to survive it), but overall, the idea isn't all that bad.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    25. Re:Hey don't worry by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1
      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    26. Re:Hey don't worry by itzly · · Score: 1

      Give it another hundred years and the solar system will indeed be crawling with private robots

      Private robots suggest there's profit to be made, which is rather far fetched.

    27. Re:Hey don't worry by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Depends on the amounts of Delta-V you need. That's a bulk solution - high fixed cost, but can scale up almost indefinitely on the cheap. Not really what we're working with currently - lots of gravity assists, decades-long missions, budget cropped to the minimum. If you need a ton of stuff transported to the Moon, that's a very bad solution - plain chemical rocket will be better. If you want a regular route between the Asteroid Belt and Earth, transferring 500 tons in either direction, chemical, ion etc don't nearly scale up this nicely. Bringing the reactor to the orbit would be very costly, but once there it could operate at marginal cost for a long time producing a lot of delta-V on the cheap as long as you can just supply water.

      Think of it as a truck engine. If you're going to a grocery store at the corner (orbit), you walk there, or take a bicycle, because using a truck would be ridiculously expensive. Now if you need to move a truckload of raw materials 100 miles (outer planets), walking or bicycle will be a poorer choice than renting a truck - and cost more summarily, in food and accomodations along the way. Currently if we want to travel that 100 miles, what we do is walking + hitchiking (gravity assists) which is cheap, takes time, doesn't let you to take a lot of cargo and gets you weathered from all the time you spent traveling (old equipment fails).

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    28. Re:Hey don't worry by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      You're giving too little credit to human curiosity.

      Our skies are nearly crawling with privately-owned drones and very few of them are flown for profit.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    29. Re:Hey don't worry by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Evolution is still happening. There was no humanity a million years ago, and there won't be one in another million.

      We have dogs, but wolves still exist. We have "homo sapiens", but neanderthals still exist (just watch Jerry Springer for proof). Coelacanths are still swimming around, when they were believed to have gone extinct 66 million years ago.

      Who's to say that whatever is next along the evolutionary line might not want to keep us around, both as a genetic reservoir, and because we're interesting?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    30. Re:Hey don't worry by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      What annoys me a bit, though, is that I'm probably born too early to be able to download my consciousness into a machine during my lifetime, so I won't see what the future brings. :(

      Don't worry, once your brain dies, so does your consciousness. Even if you could "copy" your consciousness into a machine just before your physical body died, you would still cease to exist upon death. All that would be left is an echo, a simulacrum of what you used to be, not a continuation of your self.

      I think a lot of people would be willing to settle for that, when compared to the alternative. Besides, your "self-aware persona" isn't in continuous existence from the day you were born until the day you die. People fall asleep all the time. We just take these interruptions in our existence as normal.

      Who you are is in constant flux - you're not exactly the same person you were yeterday, never mind 10 years ago, or when you were a kid. The alternative would be a "50 First Dates" existence.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    31. Re:Hey don't worry by itzly · · Score: 1

      Sounds great, except for the fact that we don't have any need for transferring 500 tons to and from the asteroid belt.

    32. Re:Hey don't worry by itzly · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that in the next century, people have enough disposable income that they'll fly interplanetary probes for a hobby ?

    33. Re:Hey don't worry by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      You actually want to put it on the highest mountain you can find, since that gives you less air to fly through, and therefore less drag loss.

    34. Re:Hey don't worry by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      With the gun club and United States references, surely he was referring to well-known Bad SF.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    35. Re:Hey don't worry by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      Space is already a $300 billion/year industry. Just servicing and fueling GEO commsats would be worth billions a year. That's enough to finance mining and repair stations in orbit.

    36. Re:Hey don't worry by Askmum · · Score: 1

      The Rosetta mission cost 1.8 billion US$. So you only need to find 66 grams of Californium 252 to get your money's worth. But that element has a relatively short half life time, so I doubt you'll find that much in a comet.
      I wouldn't get my hopes up.

    37. Re:Hey don't worry by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      There's benefits and costs to that idea. Yes, you get up to about a second less of high-drag regime, but you're paying for it with inability to control azimuth, elevation, and launch site. The people who did the numbers probably concluded that sea would be better for a number of reasons, including sonic conditions around the site. (Firing heavy hypersonic projectiles out of a barrel can't possible make your neighbors happy.)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    38. Re:Hey don't worry by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      ...yet.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    39. Re:Hey don't worry by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Yes. Cubesats are currently within most university space enthusiasts clubs budget now, and launched in such number thae ISS got a launcher/gun for them installed to streamline the process. I can easily see small probes going that way once cost per kg out of Earth gravity well gets on par with current cost per kg to LEO.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  2. ShirtStorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think we're all more interested in the shirt drama than any of this science stuff!

    1. Re:ShirtStorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=shirtstorm

    2. Re:ShirtStorm by weilawei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holy shiitake. How could anyone possibly imagine that might be okay in a professional context? Wear it at home or to the beach... but that ain't a work shirt.

    3. Re:ShirtStorm by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      wow, and the flute...that makes it even worse. Quite phallic! Only way for that to be worse is if the title of the statue was "The Skin Flute" or something

    4. Re:ShirtStorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's a scientist who can land a robot on a comet 10 years and 500 million kilometers away (well, it's a team effort, but anyway.) His girlfriend made him this shirt for his birthday. He gets to wear his lucky shirt on the day of the landing, capiche? There are still places where doing a good job is more important than looking the part, whatever that means. Need I remind you that the "computer people" didn't/don't look very reputable to business folk either?

    5. Re:ShirtStorm by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Nakedness is an artistic symbol for innocence, and the BBC doesn't protect anyone from anything. It is a broadcasting company, nothing more.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:ShirtStorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not that I agree with wearing a shirt like that to work, but it appears a woman tattoo artist made it for him.
      https://twitter.com/ellypriZeMaN

      The tattoo shop has a picture of him in it.
      https://twitter.com/eternalartessex

    7. Re:ShirtStorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's a scientist with a doctorate in physics. How shallow do you have to be to make a grown man cry and apologize for wearing a shirt that his girlfriend made for him? You fucking bastards! If you could do half as much science in your politically correct, dress-code compliant uniform as that man, you'd realize how destructive your comments about his appearance are. But you wouldn't spend years of your life working to design science experiments in obscurity. Otherwise you wouldn't put someone down on the day all that work comes to fruition. The people who take offense at that shirt are a disgrace to humanity. Get your priorities in order, embrace diversity and have some decency, for heaven's sake. Don't shit on a someone's work because of the way they dress! You'd think of all people geeks would understand the concept.

    8. Re:ShirtStorm by real_b0fh · · Score: 1

      amen to that.

      this world as it is today is a complete disgrace. idiocracy at its finest.

      --
      "Contrary to popular belief, UNIX is user friendly. It just happens to be selective on who it makes friendship with"
    9. Re:ShirtStorm by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3

      Worse: the guy is probably going to face some flak from his superiors over this. His bosses and coworkers probably didn't think much about his shirt, if they even noticed it: it looks more like tattoo art than "pin up girls" and calling it "mysogenic" as one newspaper did is a bit silly. But now that the press is all over it, they can't let it slide. I don't know what is worse: people looking at everything with a magnifying glass so they can find something to feel offended by, or the people who take the "perennially offended" seriously.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    10. Re:ShirtStorm by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      This illustrates why real space programs, especially those which involve serious risk to human life, are going to have to go private. Any governmental program is bound to get pecked to death by Luddites on one side and agenda-driven single issue warriors like the Shirtstorm crowd. The more global elite billionaires responsible to nothing and no one who get involved in space, the better off we will be.

      And how will we measure success? As soon as we start to hear yammering along the lines of "Musk is strip-mining the Moon!" That's when.

    11. Re:ShirtStorm by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      mysogenic

      What have mushrooms got to do with it?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:ShirtStorm by jcr · · Score: 1

      I heartily invite you to go fuck yourself. Your approval of his attire is neither sought nor required.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    13. Re:ShirtStorm by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Those who think that images of women in lingerie are degrading need to visit a therapist. Female sexuality is not degrading.

      The shirt is unprofessional. Sexuality is an awkward subject, and bringing it up in the workplace is delicate. Not a subject for t-shirts.

      But holy crap I love the response shirt: https://twitter.com/SMLXist/status/532928903778934784/photo/1

    14. Re:ShirtStorm by weilawei · · Score: 1

      I think I probably should've chosen different words to state that. I'm not against how a person represents themselves--but when you act as part of a team, you represent the team. Does an athlete show up in attire of their own choosing, or that which their sponsors/team settles on collectively?

      You're free to express yourself however you like. I'm not going to stop you. And you're free to tell me to fuck off. I just think that it's in poor taste to advertise the team that way, because it isn't representative of the team (only one person). What you do on your own time, as a representative of your own views, is your problem. Do whatever you like. Go naked. I don't care. I'm not a prude. But if someone pays me money to represent their interests, it typically comes with the expectation that I won't be promoting my own agenda in a way that overshadows theirs.

      Alright, go ahead. Keep modding everything I say as Troll. (The redefinition of that is obnoxious too, but c'est la vie.)

    15. Re:ShirtStorm by tloh · · Score: 1

      You're not wrong. But Please! Get over it people! Your teachers lied. Santa Claus isn't real. Your parents had sex. Your children will have sex. Let's just get our heads out of our asses and be grown ups about this. Space exploration and science literacy has nothing to do with dubious fashion sense. Why don't I see outrage over the fact that Kim Kardashian doesn't know her amino acids from her Armani hand bags or whatever.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    16. Re:ShirtStorm by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      > Santa Claus isn't real.

      Saint Nicholas of Myra is quite real. His bones are buried in two places in Italy (long story). He's the original whose story and image have been mutated over the centuries. The modern mall Santa image comes from Clement Clark Moore's poem, the Saturday Evening Post, and Coca Cola (http://www.arts-stew.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/1936-Vintage-Coca-Cola-Christmas-Ad.jpg). The modern version incorporates no small amount of pagan imagery.

    17. Re:ShirtStorm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      And if a woman scientist on this project had worn a revealing shirt with a picture of a guy with a big boner on it, all you 8chan betas would be howling about how she was an attention whore trying to grab 15 minutes of fame.

      Sure, the guy wore his shirt because that's his privilege. His male privilege. His WHITE male privilege.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:ShirtStorm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Because stuff in your pants or under your sleeves is about breaking rules at work so people will notice you?

      It wasn't "under his sleeves". He wore clothes to make sure it was visible.

      And I don't know where you work, but there is no workplace anywhere that doesn't serve alcohol that would allow a shirt like that. Because it's creepy.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:ShirtStorm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      They know what to say to be accepted on the team. Of course women are going to say that. Because if they didn't, they'd end up getting harassed out of their profession.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:ShirtStorm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I don't think guys tend to react in fury when objectified or sexualized.

      You must not be following the gamergate kerfuffle.

      Men are from Mars, women are from Venus.

      Actually, since neither of those planets is habitable by humans, no, they are not.

      They're both from right here on Earth, and one of those groups has been standing on the necks of the other for a long long time.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:ShirtStorm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I've worked in multiple research labs and consulted at several companies that would be just fine with clothing like that, and have seen worse on jobs. Sometimes it is just in blue-collar areas of the business, sometimes it is the whole business, sometimes everyone is wearing a tie. Some places thinks clothes affect your performance heavily, others don't care as long as you perform your job and coworkers' concerns are respected. The latter results in even places nudists can find work, although they will put on clothes when customers (or consultants) come by.

      How about on the one day in the person's career when he is absolutely certain to be all over the media? You think it would be acceptable then?

      In the "multiple research labs" where you worked, if you were to be presenting your findings to the worldwide media, do you think it would acceptable to management for you to wear those clothes on that day? Is that how much respect you have for the places that have employed you?

      Ah, the bro in full....mansplaining how it's no problem for you to wear offensive clothing because shut up you feminists. I've got a goddamn PhD and I'll wear what I please.

      And then people wonder why there are so few women in STEM. It couldn't possibly be because of the preponderance of total a-holes in those fields, now could it? A woman going into any of those areas has to either get on board and learn to be OK with a locker-room mentality or GTFO. Right?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  3. We may hear from Philae later by AbrasiveCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While the main battery is nearly depleted and at this point there is not enough solar power striking the solar panels to boot it back up, as the comet approaches the sun the light intensity should go up. We can hope that the existing conditions provide enough power to prevent damage to the landers electronics. Then as the comet approaches the sun and the comet either changes origination to provide more light or just Philae get more intense light it may rise again. That would be grand!

    1. Re:We may hear from Philae later by Zordak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course, the comet will also start shooting off monster steam blasts, which could easily blast Philae off at escape velocity. The next Twitter update from Philae could be "I'm Lost in Space!"

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    2. Re:We may hear from Philae later by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Is it really "monster steam blasts"?

      At what point from the sun do we normally see them?

      What I mean is that melting ice on the earth isn't really a "monster steam blast", but sure it generate steam ..

      Then again I guess it can lose grip if enough is melted away too.

    3. Re:We may hear from Philae later by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      heck, just the comet shaking BEFORE it starts out-gassing might send Philae off. A human there could easily punt Philae off the surface way over escape velocity. Luckily Rosetta will see that happening pretty quickly; but your probably right it will get shaken off before it can recharge much. Maybe if it can recharge a bit first they can actually fire the harpoons. ARG, A HUMP LIKE A SNOWHILL! IT'S COMET 67P!

    4. Re:We may hear from Philae later by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The density of particles around the comet should go up too. You don't get much sunlight in a dust-storm. Not to mention it's not very good for the solar panels. While it's good to be hopeful I personally believe that Philae's mission is over.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:We may hear from Philae later by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you could kick it back into Earth orbit. That would be cool.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:We may hear from Philae later by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Philae has the same orbital parameters as the comet. it would take quite a lot of delta-v to convert that orbit to orbitting the Earth. After all, it took ten years and four planetary slingshots in order to get it there in the first place.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:We may hear from Philae later by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Especially when escape velocity on a comet is a white guy's jump.

    8. Re:We may hear from Philae later by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      Of course, the comet will also start shooting off monster steam blasts, which could easily blast Philae off at escape velocity.

      Only in Hollywood movies.

      Meanwhile they asked this question to the ESA people (watch the press conference), and it turns out that (1) the expected mass emissions of the comet are not that large, so no monster blasts, and (2) the lander is still pretty massive (about a metric tonne) so it has a large inertia, and will be hard to move by the escaping gas. In summary, they didn't expect it to go anywhere soon (unless it got hit by a meteoroid).

    9. Re:We may hear from Philae later by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Considering Philae weights almost 100kg (which is not its gravity mass but its inert mass) the blasts may actually push it out of the hole it fell into, and then it may land back, at a better spot. It's not like they happen all over the comet - they are quite localized.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    10. Re:We may hear from Philae later by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Generally we see them whenever the comet is near the sun - as the "comet tail" - you know, the distinguishing feature of comets that sets them apart from asteroids?

      And melting ice on Earth happens in ~1bar atmospheric pressure. Meaning water is liquified instead of vaporized, and presence of air limits the range of any steam blast to several meters at most, while in vacuum a "steam tail" may run for many kilometers with no atmosphere to disrupt it.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    11. Re:We may hear from Philae later by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Nope.
      A human could -push- it over escape velocity. With a good shove.
      Philae is still 100kg of inert mass so kicking it will either injure your foot or break the panels. OTOH its weight is around 10g, and the escape speed is some 0.8m/s, so propelling it to escape speed really doesn't require much work.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    12. Re:We may hear from Philae later by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Since the comet crosses Earth orbit, yes, with enough luck you could *crash* Philae into Earth without all that much delta-V. Now to *land* it...

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    13. Re:We may hear from Philae later by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      You got the mass an order of magnitude too big. It's a little under 100kg. And while a *blast* is unlikely to do anything, a continuous push, even very weak, can move it. You need only around 1N of force to get Philae to move up against the gravity; even less in horizontal direction.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    14. Re:We may hear from Philae later by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      he lander is still pretty massive (about a metric tonne)

      You're off by an order of magnitude. The lander is still pretty massive (about a metric tonne)

      The lander has a mass of 97.9 kg. That's 215.8 pounds.

      Escape velocity is about 3 feet a second, or 2.2 mph. That's not even a brisk walk, so if there were a human in a spacesuit hanging around, they could get it (and themselves) up to escape velocity if they could avoid first sending themselves (and the probe) into orbit instead.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    15. Re:We may hear from Philae later by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      It's a lot easier to get back from the comet than to get to it. The escape velocity of the comet is not exactly that great. The rest would be simply a matter of timing. A stable orbit would be impossible, but given the right time and angle I'm pretty sure you could at least loop it around the Earth, cause it to re-enter the atmosphere or if you're really good get it into an unstable highly elliptical orbit that would rapidly decay. And it would be cool! GO KERBALS!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    16. Re:We may hear from Philae later by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking too, until I realized someone would have to go up there and hit the power button to bring it out of hibernate. Dammit.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    17. Re:We may hear from Philae later by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It's not escaping from the comet that's the difficult part. It's the slowing down enough to enter Earth's orbit. First, Philae is already travelling well beyond Earth's escape velocity, so you've got to slow down a lot before you get anywhere near to an orbit; and Philae and the comet are only going to get faster as the days and weeks to perihelion tick by. Even at Aphelion the comet is travelling at half of Earth's escape velocity. Second, Philae has no heat shield, so you're not going to be able to knock off any serious amount of speed through aerobraking. Third, Philae has only one thruster, which can be fired once only and only at full strength (and that thruster has already failed). Fourth, even if you could somehow remotely fix the thruster, Philae can only orient itself in one plane. So, you only have one chance at a course correction. Fifth, 67P (and Philae with it) doesn't get close enough to the Earth to do any appreciable gravity assist manoevres (the closest it gets is halfway between Mars and Earth). Finally, and most importantly, Philae has no way of launching itself, so its going to have to rely on a violent outgassing, which only happens near perihelion.

      So, Philae would have to be blasted off of 67P by a random yet serendipitous outgassing that throws it clear of the comet, without destroying it, at an attitude that the single reaction wheel can compensate for, on the off chance that the previously malfunctioning thruster can somehow push it on a perfect course of multiple Jupiter/Mars flybys that would cut the lander's speed in half, allowing it to settle into an orbit around Earth. The odds against it are, if you'll pardon the pun, astronomical.

      The only way Philae will see Earth again, barring some future trophy hunting space jockey, is as a harbinger of 67P's crash into the planet.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    18. Re:We may hear from Philae later by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Or a very lucky/well timed aerobraking maneuver...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    19. Re:We may hear from Philae later by camperdave · · Score: 1

      You have a far better chance of winning the top prize in every major state lottery for the next ten years.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    20. Re:We may hear from Philae later by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah s*.

      But the point was how near to the sun do they have to be? And are they really having "monster steam blasts" - whatever that is, explosions? - or is it just melting away on the surface?

      Thank you for the pressure part though. So it's vaporized at a lower temperature too (?)
      Guess that explain why one see the trails at what I thought might had been a pretty far distance from the sun.

      That make it harder for me to have any idea for how violently it may "boil off" relative a surface temperature too.

      I have no idea how the surface will be behaving at different times really =P

    21. Re:We may hear from Philae later by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Yes, the comet's perihelion is about 1.3AU so not much farther than Earth's orbit (and so Earth surface heat input), and yes, ice melting temperature drops significantly with pressure. As for what forms the emission takes, this is one of the huge questions Rosetta is suppoed to answer - we've never observed a comet from near enough to see how exactly the melting process works. In one hand, the chance that they will be explosive is quite low (though non-zero, under-rock ice pockets heating up and accumulated steam blasting its way out), on the other hand Philae weighs about 1 gram while on Chury, and its size is around 1 cubic meter. That's about the parameters of 1m^3 sized soap bubble when it comes to reacting to "wind". So the emission doesn't have to be anywhere near to explosive; even mild zephyr from under the surface can move the lander.

      Since we still don't know about the character of the emissions from the comet, we can only guess whether the point when Philae heats up enough to starts charging its batteries happens before or after the comet produces enough steam to blow it away.

      Of course, had the harpoons deployed, that would be moot. Currently the outlook isn't too good. Philae is in a hole, which can channel the steam into a stream. Plus its systems could have been damaged by extreme cold, plus even the intensified sun input may be insufficient, plus the 'seasonal shift' of shadows can (though is unlikely) to worsen the shadow conditions... Still - until the comet actually begins emitting steam and we see how it does it, we have really no clue what's going to happen.

      Check this nice graph for water behavior in different pressures.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  4. Amino acid data? by rfengr · · Score: 1

    So did they collect the data that tests for chiral amino acids? I assume that would be the mass spec?

    1. Re:Amino acid data? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I think it's the gas chromatograph rather than the mass spectrometer (surely chirality doesn't measurably affect the mass of a molecule?), but they're built in to the same instrument, COSAC. This abstract sounds like a chromatograph to me.

  5. Re:Who cares about the lander? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had to google "shirtstorm" to see what you're talking about... holy shit there is no hope left for society

    --
    A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
  6. "Yeah, but fuck science... by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because the scientists wear shirts featuring pin-up girls!"

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:"Yeah, but fuck science... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...designed by women!

    2. Re:"Yeah, but fuck science... by itzly · · Score: 1

      Who cares what the rest of the demographic likes ?

    3. Re:"Yeah, but fuck science... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Neither does it mean that the "rest of the demographic" is seriously offended by that shirt and is agreeing with those feminists. Most sane people, with actual feminists among them, probably couldn't care less about such an insignificance.

      But yeah, science is dead! We need science+.

  7. On the comet by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    The dark gray comet
    The Philae sleeps tonight
    woo-oo-OO-oo..

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:On the comet by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      Wimoweh, wimoweh, wimoweh, wimoweh

      On the comet, the mighty comet,
      the lander sleeps tonight.
      On the comet, the quiet comet,
      the lander sleeps tonight.

      woo-oo-OO-oo..

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  8. Re:Sleep well, sweet dreams by DrJimbo · · Score: 2

    Electric Sleep?

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
  9. Re:Who cares about the lander? by dbIII · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Google suggests SJW is "social justice warrior" which is apparently used as an insult.
    Why do I have to learn this shit to follow things on a technical site instead of some far side of crazy teabagger site shoving politics in our faces?

  10. Everything we knew about comets is wrong by dbIII · · Score: 2

    Of course, the comet will also start shooting off monster steam blasts

    Only if comets are balls of ice, like we used to think. Shooting off monster blasts of vaporized rock needs a lot more heat, so there's probably a chance to charge up the batteries before then :)

  11. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by NoKaOi · · Score: 2

    This may be the end of Philae’s short and trailblazing mission on the surface of Comet 67P, but a huge amount of data — including data from a drilling operation that, apparently, was carried out despite concerns that Philae wasn’t positioned correctly — was streamed to Rosetta mission control, potentially revolutionizing our understanding about the nature of comets.

    And Rosetta will continue orbiting its comet as 67P drops closer to the sun, providing us with a unique and historic perspective on an icy body that could hold the secrets to the formation of our solar system.

    I'm sorry, where does it say that the mission was a failure?

  12. Re:Who cares about the lander? by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 3, Funny

    "No country for young men"

    How much ado about nothing. This ladies will go insane at the hentai floors of the bookstores at Akihabara, and then buy a truckload of boylove manga.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  13. LA Time article by SternisheFan · · Score: 4, Informative
    From http://www.latimes.com/science...

    Fifty-six hours after landing on the surface of a comet, Philae sent one more round of data about its new home across 310 million miles of space. Then, its power went out.

    "@Rosetta, I'm feeling a bit tired, did you get all my data? I might take a nap..." read a message on the @philae2014 Twitter feed.

    The Rosetta mission's twitter response: "You've done a great job Philae, something no spacecraft has ever done before."

    All the experiments on board the lander had a chance to run and return information back to Earth. Philae's instruments scooped up material from the comet's surface, took its temperature, sent radio waves through its nucleus, and went hunting for hints of organic material. Cameras took the first panoramic images from the surface of a comet.

    It has been a whirlwind ride for the lander, which was dropped onto the surface of the mountain-sized comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on Wednesday morning. Two harpoons that were designed to tether it to the surface failed to fire, and scientists say the lander made two bounces before becoming stable. The first bounce caused the lander to go one-third of a mile into the air.

    Friday morning, ESA officials expressed concern that the lander would not have enough battery power left to send back any more data from experiments it was conducting on its new, icy home.

    When Philae landed on the comet on Wednesday, it had enough battery power for about 60 hours of work. Scientists initially hoped that it would continue to operate on solar power, but the lander seemed to have settled in a hole on the comet, where it was surrounded by rock-like structures that block the sun.

    Stefan Ulamec, the lander manager from DLR, said the that one of the solar panels on the lander was getting about an hour and 20 minutes of sunlight a day. Two other panels got just 20 to 30 minutes a day, he said.

    At a news conference Friday morning before the last signal was received, Ulamec said it was possible that scientists would not hear from the lander again.

    "We are hoping to get contact again this evening, but it is not secured," he said. "Maybe the battery will be empty before it talks to us."

    Happily, that turned out not to be the case. On Friday evening, ESA reported that all the science experiments had been deployed, and that the lander had been rotated 35 degrees in an attempt to get more sun on one of its larger solar panels.

    There is a chance that as the comet flies closer to the sun, the increase in solar energy will allow ESA to communicate with Philae once again.

    ESA officials say the odds of that happening are small, but with Philae, the little lander that could, anything is possible.

  14. Sad by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you stop and think about the fact that the Rosetta project was launched over ten years ago (something I didn't realize until recently), it's hard not to feel sorry for the scientists and others on the project.

    The statements the ESA is putting out have a positive spin on them (for multiple reasons, I'm sure), but at the end of the day this has got to be a pretty hard blow to the people personally invested in the project. After the effort required just to get it launched and a decade of waiting, it must be hard on them. Wish them the best of luck for a second chance when the comet nears the Sun.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
    1. Re:Sad by steelfood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes and no. On one hand, it wasn't the perfect landing. On the other hand, they waited 10 years for a successful landing. And it happened. That's gotta count for something.

      Remember that ESA probe to Mars that died when it got there? These guys could've waited 10 years to find out that their probe crashed into the comet, or overshot it, or some other calamity befell the lander rendering it inoperative.

      Instead, they did their science, got their data, and have a chance at doing a bit more in the future. That they couldn't do more is unfortunate, but there's a reason they demarcated certain tasks as primary and put enough juice into the thing to complete all of them.

      The probability of abject failure was much higher than the probability of any success, even if imperfect. The fact that this was a partial success, and I would argue it's mostly a success, is worth something.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re: Sad by troon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey, it landed, did its science and lasted longer than the Soviet Venera landers on Venus, which were a resounding success â" lens caps asideâ¦

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    3. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Imagine the scenario of a small chunk of metal landing on a spinning mass of rock, it's fascinating that it even managed to land in one piece. Sure, the timeframe was a little short but it has supplied photos and other information back. I find the fact it was even able to get close to the comet pretty satisfying.

  15. Re:Who cares about the lander? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Of course.. Something new to maintain that all important perpetual offense..

  16. Fair-weather power sources are lame... by KonoWatakushi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After all the trouble and expense of sending a probe or lander out into the unknown, it seems a waste not to provide them with an RTG for reliable power. Solar panels have hobbled Mars rovers as well as other spacecraft.

    1. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by itzly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given a fixed budget, what part of the mission would you have taken out to replace with an RTG ?

    2. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by Yoda222 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You cannot really blame ESA to not take into account Mars rovers solar panel problems. I think it's very difficult to take problems which happens after the launch of a spaceprobe during the design of this probe. Maybe ESA should hire some fortune teller?

    3. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately we're pretty much out of Pu238. The US just started in 2013 to make it again, but only at 1.5Kg a year. Curiosity used around 4kg of it, so it would take at least 2-4 years to make enough for a single probe. We used to buy decommissioned nukes from Russia and reprocess it, but now a) Putin hates us and b) they too are pretty much out of decommissioned nuclear material to even sell. Maybe by 2017 the USA might have enough to make a single RTG for a deep space mission.

    4. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Um, probably would have left off the solar panels and all that charging equipment. Pioneer 10 ran for 30 years off a single kilo. A few grams would have kept this lander probe going for quite some time.

    5. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by itzly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pioneer 10 used four SNAP-19 radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs). They were positioned on two three-rod trusses, each 3 meters (9.8 ft) in length and 120 degrees apart. This was expected to be a safe distance from the sensitive scientific experiments carried on board. Each of the SNAP-19 generators was 35 pounds, not including the supporting trusses.

      So, it seems you're overlooking some aspects of this issue. Namely the weight of the total generator, not just the plutonium. Also, there may be a requirement to mount the RTGs on a truss to keep them away, which would greatly complicate the design of the lander. And of course, apart from the design, mass there's also the simple cost issue. Solar panels are probably cheaper to obtain and install than plutonium based RTGs

    6. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by itzly · · Score: 1

      And what else ... ?

    7. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by tomhath · · Score: 2

      For the weight of an RTG they could have dropped several different probes onto the comet, all of which could have very large solar panels. The lander they have was as much weight as they could deliver; the only thing that failed was the mechanism to attach it.

    8. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by rasmusbr · · Score: 2

      I don't think ESA would ever be cleared to handle plutonium, let alone launch it into space. For starters, I don't know who would have the authority to clear ESA to use plutonium.

    9. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately we're pretty much out of Pu238

      [FIXED LINK]
      Which is one reason we need LFTR to produce Pu238, among countless other reasons.

      --
      <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    10. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      As has been pointed out earlier, RTGs are bigger than you think. The real moral of the Philae story is that robots, especially those operating outside the latency boundary of teleoperator technology, are pathetically unable to adapt to local surprises. It would have been trivially easy for a human traveling with Rosetta to go EVA and position Philae in a sunnier place, or to right it if it had landed upside down or fallen into a gully. Building in the life supports to get a human that far from Earth is a Hard Problem, but stories like this are the reason that one day it will have to be solved.

    11. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by Okneff · · Score: 1

      Radioisotope thermoelectric generator requires plutonium and they weren't able to use it mainly for political reasons.

    12. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by joshuao3 · · Score: 1

      A bit more detail: nuclear batteries used to power probes like Voyager used plutonium-238, which is available via the US and Russia. Bottom line, the ESA would need to rely on it's supply of americium-241 to create the next generation of batteries. The conversation about using the stockpiles of americium-241 to create batteries really started in earnest (media coverage-wise, at least) in 2012, which was after this probe was deployed.

      --
      Monitor bandwidth usage on IIS6 in real-time: http://www.waetech.com/services/iisbm/
    13. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by itzly · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You must be joking. For the price of a manned mission, we could send 100 robotic probes. Surely, one of those will land correctly. For added science benefit, we could send those probes to 10 different comets.

    14. Re: Fair-weather power sources are lame... by JoeRobe · · Score: 1

      Something I'm wondering about is why the batteries that the panels are recharging can't be intermittently charged for 1.5 hours every 12 hours until they're full again. At that point could they just fire Philae back up and run it until it's out of juice again? Solar chargers on earth are capable of this as long as there's not an external drain on the batteries.

      So basically why can't Philae run with a X% duty cycle, where X is some number less than the 100 they were hoping for?

      I'm sure there's a good reason why that won't work (is there an external drain?) but does anyone here know why?

      --
      The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
    15. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      For the weight of an RTG they could have dropped several different probes onto the comet, all of which could have very large solar panels.

      Why do people think RTGs are the huge things the Soviets used to power their remote lighthouses? The RTGs used for space missions with the same power requirements as Philae have been about 12-15 kg. About the same as the solar panels, regulation electronics, and batteries aboard Philae.

    16. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      There was one more significant concern: the thermoelectric generators have actually pretty low efficiency, something of order of 10%. Lots of heat generated by the generator would affect the ground around, risking melting the ice and causing exactly the problems with "steam blast" mentioned a little above.

      OTOH, Philae could definitely use a couple more thrusters, to be able to control its descent and move around.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    17. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by Cthulhu's+Physicist · · Score: 1

      " Solar panels have hobbled Mars rovers as well as other spacecraft."
      The solar powered rover, Opportunity is still rolling and sending back data 10 years after it landed, not too shabby!

    18. Re:Fair-weather power sources are lame... by samwichse · · Score: 1

      The payload mass of Philae was only 21kg. So we've just kicked half the science off the lander for an RTG (assuming at least 3kg for the solar panels).

  17. For he's a jolly good fellow, by weilawei · · Score: 1

    For he's a jolly good fellow,
    For he's a jolly good fellow, and so say all of us
    And so say all of us, and so say all of us
    For he's a jolly good fellow, for he's a jolly good
    For he's a jolly good fellow, and so say all of us!

  18. Re:Who cares about the lander? by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Since when is it bigoted for a guy to announce that he likes attractive women? Gay pride activists have whole fucking parades devoted to their preferences, and are always announcing it to the world.

  19. Re:Matt Taylor's Wardrobe Malfunction. by itzly · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, in India you get raped on a bus ride.

  20. Not the last contact. by Snufu · · Score: 1

    Earth will get a ticket for dumping.

  21. Re:Who cares about the lander? by Yoda222 · · Score: 2

    I have both sciences, feminist and general news sources in my regular news feed. I've seen much more stuff about sciences than about shirt. Maybe you should reconsider your sources of information and remove some of the "feminist are devil" sources from them.

  22. SONG TIME by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    Deep in space, in quiet space...the lander sleeps tonight...

    Still hugely impressive, and it might still wake up eventually.

  23. Re:Who cares about the lander? by Yoda222 · · Score: 1

    "social justice warrior" is only an insult when it comes from someone who think that the opposite, "asocial injustice coward" is a compliment.

  24. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by Yoda222 · · Score: 1

    What a spectacular list of two items!

  25. Re:Who cares about the lander? by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 1

    Twitter #Gamergate

    --
    Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question
  26. SONG TIME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No tears it's with Spirit and the Vikings now.

  27. Re:Who cares about the lander? by ctid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people can think about more than one thing at a time. So in my head at the moment we have: It's an amazing achievement for the ESA and the team and for humanity at large. AND putting on that shirt was a bit thoughtless if he knew he was going to be on TV. AND if he didn't know he'd be asked to talk on TV and his bosses made him do it, that was a bit stupid on their part. AND if the TV people picked him to be on TV because of his shirt, that was pretty dickish of them.

    See? You can think of more than one thing at a time and none of the other thing detract from the defining achievement of the mission. Unless you're a piss-baby who thinks your world is being ruined by SJWs. Then you can only keep one thing in your head at a time I guess.

    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  28. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Informative

    Mission was projected to remain active until Dec 2015. Lander is dead on 2nd mission day. Yeah, huge success there. Come on leave PC out of it and call a spade a spade. OK some science was done but a roaring success it is not.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  29. Re:true by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    "how many ESA astronauts have been killed on the launch pad?"

    "how many ESA shuttles have be lost?" Silly questions considering there have been zero ESA manned missions and zero ESA shuttles. Kind of like calling a plumber a successful neurosurgeon because he hasn't killed anyone on the operating table yet...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  30. Re:Who cares about the lander? by Daetrin · · Score: 2

    So sarcasm aside, it sounds like you're annoyed that people got diverted from talking about the science to discuss the politics of a shirt? In fact you were so concerned about the issue you decided to write a post diverting us from talking about the science to discuss the politics of discussing the politics of a shirt. After all, it's of dire importance we raise awareness about people trying to raise awareness about the shirt since none of the people complaining about it were kind enough to complain about it here first where we would be aware of it.

    Well speech is free, and it's not like we can't discuss both issues (or all three issues?) And I am glad you care enough about justice in these kinds of social issues to fight for your beliefs!

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  31. Gerald Bull was an amateur. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

    What you really want is a Nuclear Verne Gun.

    Launch 3500 tonnes at escape velocity in a single shot. Enough to kickstart a lunar colony. All for roughly the same cost as a single 20 tonne-to-LEO conventional rocket launch.

    Drill a 2-3km shaft into a salt dome, excavate a cavity at the bottom, suspend a 150kT nuclear warhead at the centre surrounded by a reaction mass, such as water laced with a neutron absorber. Above the cavity, at the bottom of the shaft, put a large shock absorber (such as a few hundred metres of oil backed by an ablative-coated pusher plate), with your 3500 tonnes of payload on top.

    Most of the radiation would be contained underground, and a dome over the launch site would capture most of the rest.

    If you want to launch into LEO, you can have a much larger payload, over 10,000 tonnes, but you'll need a conventionally rocket as a "chase ship" to grab it and circularise the orbit. Likewise you'll need an insertion and landing burns for a lunar payload, however you can use Orion-type nuclear propulsion once you're past the Van Allen belts. Launch your delicate payloads (like people) via more conventional means.

    This would be an ideal way for China to leap decades ahead of every other space power in just one or two (somewhat controversial) Verne launches. 3500 tonnes would be enough payload for not only a lunar base, but enough fuel stockpiled in lunar orbit to power a LEO-LLO ferry for the conventionally launched humans (and delicate payloads.) Pretty much as soon as they have their proposed space station built, they have enough technology and capacity to take advantage of the Verne payload.

    Note: 150kT keeps you under the cut-off for the nuclear test ban treaty. However, in an emergency (say, asteroid threat) a 20MT warhead would be able to launch over 200,000 tonnes (almost two Nimitz-class aircraft carriers.)

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:Gerald Bull was an amateur. by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      What a nitpicker. A shock absorber was specified. Just add a 100m layer of marshmallow peeps and it should be fine.

    2. Re:Gerald Bull was an amateur. by operator_error · · Score: 1

      If I'm reading and understanding you correctly, you're suggesting that 150kT should be enough for anybody, right? (Although wouldn't 20Mt would be oh so grand.)

      Huh, amateurs. Who'da thought otherwise?

    3. Re:Gerald Bull was an amateur. by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      Drill a 2-3km shaft into a salt dome, excavate a cavity at the bottom, suspend a 150kT nuclear warhead at the centre surrounded by a reaction mass, such as water laced with a neutron absorber. Above the cavity, at the bottom of the shaft, put a large shock absorber (such as a few hundred metres of oil backed by an ablative-coated pusher plate), with your 3500 tonnes of payload on top.

      Most of the radiation would be contained underground, and a dome over the launch site would capture most of the rest.

      Is that like the geek's version of "hold my beer"? Holy shit.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
  32. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Remember the Mar's Beagle?? The probe made it to Mar's

    Maybe they should have taken it one Mar at a time?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  33. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    That's a possessive, not a plural. "Made it to Mar's" means "Made it to the place owned by Mar."

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  34. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    Remember the Mar's Beagle?? The probe made it to Mar's, just to have a spectacular crash.

    Beagle 2 was a lander, not a probe. The ESA's Mars probe it was carried on was Mars Express, which is still operating successfully after ten years orbiting Mars.

    Remember the Cassini–Huygens mission??

    The flaw was on Cassini (run by NASA), not Huygens (run by ESA) which performed perfectly even though it was landing on a completely unmapped world with an unknown surface. (Could be rock-hard ice, could be liquid ethane, could be some kind of organic sludge. Turned out to be sludgy liquid with a thin hard crust.)

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  35. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by itzly · · Score: 1

    The lander is dead, but the orbiter is still alive.

  36. I read this in the voice of Scott Manley by CptJeanLuc · · Score: 1

    Sounds better/funnier if you imagine it read to you by Scott Manley. Too bad batteries are not recharging, but I bet ESA still managed to unlock som new goodies in their tech tree with all the science they got.

  37. Re:Renewable energy doomed the mission by AC-x · · Score: 1

    Too heavy though, the weight budgets for space are brutal.

  38. why no rtg by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Reading the pre mission discussions, they already knew that the geography of their target was going to be challenging, so I'm curious why they went with solar power (that requires some pretty consistent orientation data) instead of rtg's for Philae? It was further clear that once the comet started outgassing nobody has any clue how that thing is going is going to spin our tumble, an even better reason for rtgs.

    Anyone know?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:why no rtg by itzly · · Score: 1

      Mass, availability of Pu-238, price, complexity of the design, interference from the radiation on the instruments, just to name a few things. Also, given the unknown geography, and the challenges of landing, there was a big risk anyway that it would end up with the drill sticking in empty space, and the camera facing a rock. In that case, an RTG would be a waste of resources.

    2. Re:why no rtg by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Money and fear. Pu-238 is in pretty short supply and (afaik) is not being "made" because the toxicity and complications of manufacture can't justify the price. It was, iirc, a byproduct of nuclear warhead production and now that we're not actively building up an arsenal to turn the planet into radioactive glass there's none to be had.

      The fear part is, of course, the danger that a fairly hot (if small) sample would be a hazard in the event of a launch failure. Now, in reality I think RTG hot products are packaged in MP35N, a high-nickel stainless which, as it was explained to me by a NASA engineer, "in 10,000 years when all traces of the human race are at the bottom of the ocean, the parts that are still shiny will be the ones that were made of MP35N." Still, OMG R4di04CtiV3!11!1!

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:why no rtg by stooo · · Score: 1

      >>in 10,000 years ... the parts that are still shiny
      yeah, except when irradiated. Then they deform. crack, leak, and just turn to (very toxic) dust.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    4. Re:why no rtg by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> I'm curious why they went with solar power

      they went with battery power, solar was a bonus.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  39. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The lander is not dead, just batteries are empty. As the comet turns and tumbles Philae might see a sunrise and wake up. Just because you have never seen a sunrise on a comet doesn't mean there isn't one. Question is when.

  40. Re:HUGE Fiasco sold as a triumph by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Second out of how many? There are thousands of successful space projects that use solar.

  41. "Science data" by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Why does NASA's use of the term "science data" sound so weird to me? I mean, sure, it's data collected for scientific purposes, but the turn of phrase just rubs me the wrong way. Maybe it sounds pretentious.

    1. Re:"Science data" by gclef · · Score: 2

      "Science data" as opposed to "telemetry data". It's a bit of a jargon term, but makes sense to me.

    2. Re:"Science data" by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

      ESA (who launched this probe) and NASA (who once had an interplanetary space program) probably use the same terminology. Suppose you have a probe to earth bandwidth of between 7 bits per second and 28 kbps. How do you use this bandwidth?

      • Telemetry indicating health of space probe (e.g. whether or not the harpoons fired?)
      • Navigational telemetry (including position of various movable parts)
      • Scientific data collected from planned experiments (e.g. photograph, spectrographs, audio...
      • Non-scientific data to help inspire humans (Vger's pale blue dot photo fits into this category)
  42. RTG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If people were not so afraid of radionuclides Philae would be awake.... for years.

  43. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

    It is amazing how ESA continues to have spectacular failures project after project. They manage to reach the target just to fail miserably due to lack of testing or by ignoring basic configurations.

    I fail to see how "all the experiments on board the lander had a chance to run and return information back to Earth" (from LA times article) makes this mission a failure. Philae did everything they wanted it to do, the "charge battery and stay in contact" was just an optional extra.

    Considering the official statement was that just LANDING there had only a 50:50 chance of succeeding, this whole thing was an incredible success.

  44. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Shhh! Do you think *he* knows that?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  45. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mission was projected to remain active until Dec 2015

    This is the expected end of mission for the orbiter. The instruments on the orbiter are considered far more critical to the goals of the mission and were expected to last much longer. "Very optimistic" expectations for the lander were a couple months at most. Just look at the instruments on the lander, and the vast majority of them were limited use, and would not be able to do anything beyond several days. And 2 of the three that could be used beyond that quickly get diminishing returns in the longer run.

  46. Re:Who cares about the lander? by lolocaust · · Score: 2

    This ain't even a joke. My "Boy Love" fanatic ex also thought it was okay to have videos of 12 year old boys showering and hugging inappropriately, all the while blaming anyone unfortunate enough to be male for starting at her nearly exposed breasts, and calling every regretful sexual encounter "rape". The feminist double standards have really gone too far, affected the minds of girls who are now young adults, and have begun to remove all safe spaces for men to be themselves. Speaking out against this gets you labelled as a misogynist without further discussion leaving many men without a voice, which is the actual definition of oppression.

    --
    Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
  47. Re:Who cares about the lander? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I see you've ended your Intel boycott and can finally read things on the Internet again. Welcome back!

    AND putting on that shirt was a bit thoughtless if he knew he was going to be on TV. AND if he didn't know he'd be asked to talk on TV and his bosses made him do it, that was a bit stupid on their part. AND if the TV people picked him to be on TV because of his shirt, that was pretty dickish of them.

    Uh, wrong. It's a neat shirt that was a gift from his girlfriend. Why shouldn't he be allowed to wear things that his girlfriend picked out for him?

    Unless you're a piss-baby who thinks your world is being ruined by SJWs.

    Crap like this demonstrates exactly how the world is being destroyed by SJWs. Their whining is potentially going to be career ruining to a guy who's only crime is wearing a shirt that was given to him as a gift. A shirt. All because it hurt some SJW's feelings, because they can't stand the thought of people looking at pretty women.

  48. Re:Renewable energy doomed the mission by RussR42 · · Score: 1

    Looks like a SNAP-19 RTG would have provided plenty of power and added 1.4 kg to the mass (when swapped for the existing power system).

  49. This is why we still need humans in space by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    Neil Armstrong flying over a boulder strewn crater and finding a suitable landing site on the fly vs. Philae happily flying into a hole.

  50. Re:Who cares about the lander? by umghhh · · Score: 1

    I suppose the poor guy may have made a mistake but the nazimfems and their serfs that go after him and his shirt should be sent to uranium mine for their stupidity and lack of spirit and understanding for other humans, especially if those are equipped with rape toolkit formerly known as penis.

  51. Re:ESA's spectacular rash of achieving failures by umghhh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the statements about dead of the lander are slightly exaggerated. It may still wake up. What was the last time when your project delivered all you started it for, did it on time and possibly (as we do not know it yet) did not reach goals on ambition level? I would like project that I work on be as good as this one. But than I have the biggest evil in the whole universe to fight against: bean counters.

  52. Re:Who cares about the lander? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's insult when used by people described as "cishet scum" by the SJW. "Cishet scum" means non-transgender heterosexuals. Anyone who isn't currently described as "discriminated" is scum. According to SJW if you're white male, with male identity and not homosexual, you are pretty much the worst blight of this earth.

    The core of the SJW legion is female supremacists - the kind of extremist feminists who are absolutely not satisfied by the idea of equality of genders, claiming e.g. that all men are supporters of the rape culture (and about 10%-20%, (varies with different groups), are actual rapists.)

    They also take a great offense in assuming one's gender basing on physical characteristics, and using plain pronouns like 'he, she' when referring to people, without first asking them which gender pronoun they want used (xe, shi etc...?). It's the kind of people who will protest when presented with a form that requires you to enter your gender and provides two checkboxes - [ ] male [ ] female - ability to check either, both or none is insufficient to describe their genders...

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  53. Re:HUGE Fiasco sold as a triumph by stooo · · Score: 1

    it didn't fail. it ended it's mission sucessfully.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  54. Re:Space Guns by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 2

    I was manager at Boeing on a Gun-Launch propellant delivery system study, and using them for space launch is quite feasible. They have been used in hypersonic research for decades, like this one at Arnold Engineering Development Center: https://upload.wikimedia.org/w... You just need to make one somewhat larger, and install it on a mountain with the right slope.

    Gas guns are preferred over electromagnetic ones for low launch rates. The power supply for a space launch gun would be immense, because the power draw is very high for a short time. High pressure gas can be stored in a tank, and released all at once. Electromagnetic would be more efficient in the long run, but you need to overcome the high initial cost.

    For humans and spacecraft equipment (as opposed to bulk items like fuel and structural parts), you are limited to about 6 g's (60 m/s^2). There are a few locations on Earth where you can install a 20 km pipe, which lets you reach about Mach 5. The gas pressure for that level of acceleration is surprisingly low, about what is put in vehicle tires.

  55. Re:Value in Space by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

    > The only thing of value in space: water.

    You have a very limited view of what is valuable. The amount of solar energy passing the Earth, closer than the Moon's orbit, is equal to the whole world's known fossil fuel reserves every minute. Tapping even a tiny fraction of that could power our entire civilization. What's that worth?

  56. Re:Who cares about the lander? by ctid · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you understand that I am not wrong. I have an opinion. So do you. My opinion is different from yours. Neither of us is "wrong" or "right". We might gauge whether one of us is more in line with social mores at a particular point in time. At the moment, my observations are correct. That is why he came under so much pressure. You never know; people like you might be able to convert sufficient other people so that your view becomes the majority. We will still neither of us be "right" or "wrong". We'll just be more or less in line with social mores at a particular point in time.

    Crap like this demonstrates exactly how the world is being destroyed by SJWs. Their whining is potentially going to be career ruining to a guy who's only crime is wearing a shirt that was given to him as a gift. A shirt. All because it hurt some SJW's feelings, because they can't stand the thought of people looking at pretty women.

    You can be a child if you want to, but society has a view of itself, just as it always has. At the moment, one of the big issues for society is the imbalance in career choices between girls and boys. Remember, there's no "right" or "wrong" about this; it's just one of the many issues that (our Western) society is debating at the moment. That is why this guy is taking heat for his shirt. This is grown-up stuff, and it takes thinking about. You and the other piss-baby can join the debate like a grown up and take your chance at convincing society that your POV is correct. Saying that "the world is being destroyed by SJWs" can be your opening argument in this debate, if you like, but I don't think it is going to convince anyone. There's no organisation called "SJWs". There's people like you and then there's lots of grown-ups in our societies who are trying to think hard about this stuff. These issues are important. Either think about them and join the debate like an adult, or fuck off.

    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  57. Re:Who cares about the lander? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Thanks. You've very narrowly defined that group in such detail that it appeared no-one has to worry about the three of them - then I remembered this is a vast internet and there will be a lot of bunches of three.
    All those dogs that have been kicked and turned mean (obviously an analogy) can now visibly snap out at anyone that comes nearby, so we get to be aware of some people we just did not notice before.

  58. Re:Value in Space by camperdave · · Score: 1

    The amount of solar energy passing the Earth, closer than the Moon's orbit...

    I'm not sure what you mean by that. Are you talking about a disk sized collector the size of the Moon's orbit?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  59. Re:Pfft by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

    Actually NASA budget is around 17 billion and ESA budged is $5 billion. In fact, NASA budget is greater than the budgets of European, Russian, Chinese, Japanese and Indian space agencies put together.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  60. Re:Who cares about the lander? by ctid · · Score: 1

    And you're going to solve this by destroying a man's career over his SHIRT?!! And I'm the childish one?!!!

    Nice strawman. You can read my views on the shirt. No offence but trying to argue like this makes you look like an imbecile.

    Freedom of expression is objectively right

    And yet you argue by pretending that one person's expression of their ideas does not exist and attempting impose something else so that you can attack it.

    But the SJW mindset IS damaging. It IS destroying things. It's dangerous and it needs to be stopped.

    This is just hyperbole. Grow up.

    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  61. Re:Space Guns by aurizon · · Score: 1

    In fact, it is the AC who is in denial and delusional in his belief that this is a doomed area.
    The limiting factor is the fact that the projectile is discharged into air, with huge drag.
    If you look at the rail guns made by the US military, you can see the plasma created by travel through the air after it exits the vacuum seal = huge drag. Even a 20 KM vacuum tunnel at a 45 degree angle that discharged at 14 Km above ground would still have a lot of drag to battle, however, we must also realize that every rocket launched must pass through that same regime..

    Thus, you might be able to launch a multi stage rocket from an equatorial mountain at 45 degrees to reach a fairly high velocity at about 4 miles up, fulfilling the role of the first stage and the second subsequent stages ignite in the atmosphere after exiting the launch tube.

    Would there be a net saving that offsets the cost of the tube? With no need to limit the acceleration to human limits, it might be well suited to supply missions.

  62. Re:Renewable energy doomed the mission by AC-x · · Score: 1

    What about shielding? The missions that used SNAP-19 power sources kept them on 3m booms to prevent their radiation from interfering with the scientific equipment.

  63. Re:Who cares about the lander? by ctid · · Score: 1

    If your view is anything other than "it's a shirt" then you're the one with the problem, not me.

    This is grown-up stuff. The thoughts you had as a fifteen year-old don't cut it when you're discussing with grown ups.

    If SJWs were only expressing their ideas, that would be one thing. They're actively harassing the scientist to the point where he had to issue a public apology to try and get them to back off.

    You can read my views on the shirt. Just don't misrepresent them, child.

    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  64. Re:Who cares about the lander? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Spend some time on Tumblr, see some blogs of these. They are very much the same, echo chambers / mutual admiration societies, the word 'misandry' uttered with pride. Or look into how some men's rights organizations were snubbed.

    Here, have a link to get you primed on a sample of what you're facing.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  65. Re:Who cares about the lander? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Rather not. Hearing about it from posts like yours is enough for me to get a bit of an idea and remind me of people I've met best described as kicked dogs snapping out at outsiders. Such stuff I think covers the entire political spectrum (and it IS politics here despite there being gender issues involved), but we notice it more in "unusual" cases, and it figuratively sells more papers.

  66. Re:Who cares about the lander? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    See no evil, hear no evil, say no evil...

    The linked post is exactly about turning the argument of "margin cases" on its head.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  67. Re:Who cares about the lander? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'll take a look when I'm out of the workplace (middle of week long shitstorm due to the wrong person clicking on the wrong link and getting malware resulting in a lot of pissed off people) . Thanks for the link.