Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Government Moves To Crack Down On Puns

FreedomFirstThenPeac (1235064) writes "A story in The Guardian tells us that in an Orwellian move to legislate language, the Chinese government is attempting to stop the use of puns because they are disruptive and may lead to chaos (not the mathematical kind) and as such are unsuitable for use. However, Chinese is rife with puns, with this example quoted in the story: "When couples marry, people will give them dates and peanuts – a reference to the wish Zaosheng guizi or 'May you soon give birth to a son.' The word for dates is also zao and peanuts are huasheng." The powerful date and peanut lobbies are up in arms, claiming that such a ban will cost them more than peanuts. Their claim? "If you outlaw puns. Only criminals will have puns."

95 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Confucius say... by mendax · · Score: 1, Funny

    Woman who fly upside down have hairy crack up.

    The Chinese government can bite me now.

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    1. Re:Confucius say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      learn to masturbate, come in handy

    2. Re:Confucius say... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I felt a great disturbance in the force... as if millions of old men suddenly cried out in terror, and then were suddenly banned from making bad puns...

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re:Confucius say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Man who walk through airport turnstile sideways going to Bangkok

    4. Re:Confucius say... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Dawn, nows there's coffee all over keyboard! Got...to...clean...this...up...before...anyone...sees...it...

  2. Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by billstewart · · Score: 2

    We'll see how that works out for them.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      We'll see how that works out for them.

      One of the worst things a Government can do is make people laugh at it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Because most people's roommates don't speak mandarin,
       
      link to explanation

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Ok I am bad at html apparently, good luck - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
       
        link attempt #2

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      One of the worst things a Government can do is make people laugh at it.

      A tyrant fears the laugh more than the assassin's bullet. -Robert Heinlein
       

    5. Re:Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      Could be that's why they're doing this, so that the next time someone starts talking about River Crabs they can more easily do something about it, though if so I'm not sure what's stopping them already.

    6. Re: Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by Livius · · Score: 1

      They care if everyone laughs at them, because it means no-one fears them. Individuals laughing can be dealt with, um, individually.

    7. Re:Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, one of the worst things you could do TO a totalitarian government is to laugh about them.

      Totalitarian regimes rely on fear and intimidation. Both go out the window once you see that the emperor has no clothes.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re: Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Laughter is more communicable than any tyrant can be comfortable about.

    9. Re:Well, Grass Mud Horse to them! by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      China is more authoritarian than totalitarian. N. Korea would be an example of a totalitarian regime.

  3. I call hoax! by toygeek · · Score: 2

    I saw this article recently on ThePunion.com, I'm sure of it.

    1. Re:I call hoax! by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I saw this article recently on ThePunion.com, I'm sure of it.

      Agreed, this reminds of one of those times when a paper in China or Russia rips a story from the Onion.

      It still might be legit, according to the article:

      But the order from the State Administration for Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television says: “Radio and television authorities at all levels must tighten up their regulations and crack down on the irregular and inaccurate use of the Chinese language, especially the misuse of idioms.”

      Which is plausible as random bureaucrats sometimes issue brain dead rules which are quickly forgotten once the laughter dies down.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:I call hoax! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Next up....

      Strict prohibition against with life jail term or execution for: calling out hoaxes, creating hoaxes, pointing out lies by government or powerful companies, Hyperbole, Toilet humor, and Sarcasm.

  4. I laughed by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If you outlaw puns. Only criminals will have puns."

    I'll admit, as a 2nd amendment proponent I laughed out loud at this one.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:I laughed by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thoes who pun will be PUNished.
      That right I will be here all night. (Away from human contact like I should)

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:I laughed by Barny · · Score: 1

      I solve practical problems. Like how do I stop some mean-ol' mother-hubbard from [figuratively] tearing me a structurally superfluous behind?

      The answer, is a pun.

      And if that don't work... use more pun!

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    3. Re:I laughed by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2

      Use a pun, go to prison.

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    4. Re:I laughed by eric31415927 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Puns don't kill people, comedians with puns kill people.

    5. Re:I laughed by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Informative

      How did that military service as the price for military issue gun ownership go?

      1. That's your requirement, not mine.
      2. Besides, 'everyone' is part of the militia(pretty much).
      3. Finally, the amendment specifies the people's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The militia clause more means that if the government felt the need it could call the appropriate people up(fit, not to old, etc...) for mandatory militia training, whether they owned a firearm or not. Matter of fact, in the early militia acts they could force you to purchase a suitable weapon once notified of your obligation in the militia.

      You didn't do it?

      Are you speaking in general or specifically to me? Didn't your parents ever teach you about making assumptions?

      Oh so you've twisted that amendment so that it's a right without responsibility - what a clever little coward you are.

      Have you attended your mandatory internet speech training citizen? No? You're not allowed to post to the internet until you've completed it. It involves working at the post office for 4 years.

      It's pathetic that a sporting club full of cowards who cannot properly manage their sport have bought so much influence in Washington.

      Meh. You're jealous that all your side has is a few rich donors like Bloomberg and can't muster proper grass-roots support like the NRA* and other organizations can.

      *You think the NRA is biased? I'm a member of the Gun Owners of America (GOA), the gun rights organization that thinks that the NRA is too compromising.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    6. Re:I laughed by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      Use a pun, go to prison.

      *Snerk*

      Thank's everyone. I had work to do so I couldn't go on a gun = pun sloganfest, thanks for taking up the slack!

      "This is my rifle and this is my pun; this is for fighting and this is for fun!"

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    7. Re:I laughed by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Upon review, I'm going to conclude that you're just hurt that I have a sense of humor and you don't.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    8. Re:I laughed by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      The AC got it right. I've never worn a police uniform in my life.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    9. Re:I laughed by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      2A supporter like George Zimmerman and Michael Dunn?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:I laughed by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Besides, 'everyone' is part of the militia(pretty much)

      How convenient. No responsibility required. Carry on then, maybe cut that flag into strips to clean your guns since it's not doing anything useful.

    11. Re:I laughed by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      How convenient. No responsibility required.

      Ah, I suggest you have a talk with somebody if you think that responsibility only grows out of participation in the military, and or at the direction of the government.

      It's probably shocking to you, but I think you should have demonstrated enough responsibility for a firearm by the time you're graduating high school, instilled by your parents, the schools, community, and life in general.

      The military can only do so much, and has gotten out of most of the 'teaching responsibility' game. It's no longer big enough or funded enough to serve that purpose.

      Carry on then, maybe cut that flag into strips to clean your guns since it's not doing anything useful.

      Man, you're just full of non-sequiturs, aren't you?

      I think you passed 'strawman' several miles ago have have progressed to attacking a wicker-man.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  5. Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From all over the internet, punsters will hear the call of this thread, and they will come. They will post. Puns.

    It is the End Times, I'm afraid.

  6. Definitely a new meaning for "Punishment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    -30-

  7. This so funny ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I don't know whether to slap my chin or knees.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:This so funny ... by fiveblinks · · Score: 1

      I'd punch myself on the nose

  8. hey by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many man smoke, but Fu Man Chu.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  9. Hey 2 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Then there was the Chinese Stud - One Hung Lo.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Hey 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, american-ised puns like that while mildly humorous, are shallow at best - generally focusing just on mild word play.

    2. Re:Hey 2 by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      It was actually a legendary family. There was Dong Hung Lo who had two sons. One son was named Wang Hung Lo. The other, first one born in America, was named Richard.

  10. That ministry is only a joke. by nemoshipmaster · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that, and they will not succeed, as always.

  11. puns bypass censorship by Iamthecheese · · Score: 5, Funny

    Chinese pundits frequently opine upun political matters with clever word play. It's much more difficult to use automated search for all the combinations of characters that can phunetically mean something political. Those seeking a "harmonious society" therefore hate the practice.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:puns bypass censorship by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Without a pun, pundits would just be dits.

      The way I see it, China's just banned a whole class of lame jokes, presumably for mental health reasons. Maybe this'll force people to start using proper double entendres instead. I for one am looking forward to a whole new generation of insults.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  12. This is too meta. by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I can't tell if this is some kind of Kafka joke. Or if the level of cognitive dissonance their leaders has achieved is some new type of weapon. Either way, it's giving me a headache. o.o;;

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:This is too meta. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Authoritarian politics tends to reduce itself to Kafka jokes after a while. Arbitrary madness is easier than proper governance.

  13. Whereupun by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    we must punish the puny pundits with punty of punalties

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  14. A question mark alone, isn't a subject I'm told by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Guizi (Chinese: ; pinyin: guzi) is a Chinese slang term for foreigners, and has a long history of being used as a racially depreciating insult. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

    (Also posted below before it hit the front page)

    1. Re:A question mark alone, isn't a subject I'm told by The+Cornishman · · Score: 1

      And then there's the whole class of ideographic allusions, somewhat like puns but with no analogue in an alphabetic written language. The character chosen to match to a particular word can carry hidden meaning within it. See for instance Graphic pejoratives in written Chinese. Although many of those racial and ethnic slurs have been eliminated, it would be really hard (and counter-productive, and wrong) to try to remove that aspect of the written language.

  15. Don Quixote, anyone ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    That "State Administration for Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television" is nothing but a bunch of imbecile pencil pushers

    If they think that they can change a culture which has 7,000 years of history behind it, with an "official edict" they better stand in front of a big mirror

    Chinese history is filled with many attempt of cultural engineering - and in the 7,000 years of history, only two succeeded

    Confucianism and chop-sticks

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Don Quixote, anyone ? by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on, the Qin emperor, bless his tiny meglomaniacal heart managed at least two successful ones. His standardization of the written system and massive book burning were both hugely effective and influential to this day. (One could probably make some kind of argument around the great wall for a third, though casting something which was a massive defense project AND a means of disposing of malcontents as cultural engineering would at least take effort.)

      The recent standardization of the spoken language is young enough that the jury is still out, but it switch to mandarin has been pretty startlingly large even just in my lifetime, and it's huge even in the overseas communities. I've watched Seattle's Chinatown go from being primarily Taihanese and Cantonese to mandarin overwhelmingly dominating. Which is handy for me - I speak mandarin - but... weird.* Especially with the influx of new people and new money. And a lot of the families that have been in the area for generations and speak Cantonese at home are choosing to send their kids to school to learn Mandarin because they see it as advantageous for business. And, of course, you have the recent reworking of the written system, which is also huge, and incredible influential. (And a pain in the ass when you essentially have to learn them both, but I digress.)

      Or... what about the end of foot binding? Because, seriously, it's gone.

      Puns, though... yeah, I just can't see that happening. Far too much a part of the languaguage and culture. Far too commonly used in protest - and frequently anonymous protest. I'm remembering the little bottles in '78, when people were calling for Deng XiaoPing to return... (XiaoPing is a homophone for "little bottle.")

      * Much of this is me being grumpy. There are places I've been going since I was five that aren't there any more. And the new places don't make pineapple custard buns as well. I have a pretty long list of new places I'm entirely in favor of.

  16. Need a new language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If they want to get out of puns they need to get a new language. My wife is Chinese and explains to me all the time about all the puns.

  17. It's a reference to an obscenity by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    Hadlock has the correct link to that 2009 meme, but that meme had existed way before the advent of the Net

    The word "Grass", or in Chinese "Cao", sounds like another word, to put it in "family term", sexual intercourse

    The word "Mud", or in Chinese "Ni", sounds a lot like the word that carries the meaning of "You"

    The word "Horse", in Chinese "Ma", is a root-character in Chinese, for many Chinese characters has "Ma" (or Horse) embedded, including the character that represents "Mother" (also pronounce as "Ma" in Mandarin)

    Bonus tip for those who do not know the Mandarin Language: The "Ma" character that represents "Mother", has "female" on the left hand side and "horse" on the right hand side

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:It's a reference to an obscenity by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Another fun pun, is that the word for "grandmother" is the same as the word for "boobs".
      So, you can ask a girl "Can I see your grandmother?"
      If she says yes, great.
      If she gets upset, you can backtrack, and say that you just wanted to meet her family.

    2. Re:It's a reference to an obscenity by narcc · · Score: 1

      Another fun pun, is that the word for "grandmother" is the same as the word for "boobs".

      ... I'd love to know how that happened ...

    3. Re:It's a reference to an obscenity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It could be worse, in Japanese "daddy" is a homonym for "tits."

    4. Re:It's a reference to an obscenity by cciRRus · · Score: 1

      You gave a detailed explanation of "ni" and "ma" but the most important word "cao" was briefly explained. Whoever's interested, check out the etymology of "cao". :)

      --
      w00t
  18. No, bite the wax tadpole by istartedi · · Score: 1

    No, no, bite the wax tadpole. Don't cook it with baking soda and smoke it.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  19. Re:Good by elgol · · Score: 1

    You are wrong, in my opunion.

  20. Mao said it best by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Political power grows out of the barrel of a pun.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Mao said it best by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that one was from Mao? - wasn't Hitler the one who was always shooting his mouth off?

  21. Next week, on Cracked... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    I have the feeling this is going to be one of those "Top 10 viral stories that where complete BS" on cracked.com in about a week.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    1. Re:Next week, on Cracked... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      well slashdot.jp is only 2 days behind slashdot.org for news articles so when this story hits there in 2 days there will probably be another day for the asians to figure it out then another two days for them to translate back to english for cracked....

  22. For China by mod+prime · · Score: 1

    stinks - you can tell if she hang high: a veritable fragrant harbour. I'd put money on it if, if I were to bet, but I have no mao money so I'll have to gweilo for a while.

  23. Double Translation by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Just so /. stays readable in China, can we have a list of phrases in English that translate into Chinese puns?

  24. Umm... laughee or laughor? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

    Mahatma Gandhi

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Umm... laughee or laughor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First they march you through hundreds of miles of jungle without food or water, then they shoot you, then they disembowel you, then you lose.

      Mahatma Gandhi, had Japan won WW2

  25. and of course... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    offenders are sent to the punitentiary

    1. Re:and of course... by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      They're enacting punitive measures.

  26. Re:Surely, that's no pun by lgw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What, did the Chinese government finally cotton onto the fact that the Lion-Easting Poet in the Stone Den was mocking them? Not sure it's strictly speaking a lengthy pun, but it's at least a related wordplay, and was a protest against the choice of Pinyin vs other choices that would have presented more distinction when writing a tonal language.

    IIRC, Wikipedia used to lead with the explanation that the poem was really an exercise in slipping one past the censors to protest the choice, disguised as an "exercise in constrained writing". Now the text doesn't seem to discuss the mockery at all, unless I'm missing it, making the joke image of "an uneaten stone lion" seem strangely out-of-place.

    While The Hunting of the Snark remains the greatest-ever exercise in slipping one past the censors (so much so that a non-dirty meaning of "snark" has become common!), Lion-Eating Poet was always a close second IMO. I notice Wikipedia doesn't give the obvious explanation of the Carroll poem either, but maybe that's just an elaborate exercise in avoiding spoilers, so I'll do the same here!

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  27. Wrong by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    China isn't banning puns. They're disallowing news anchors from using them during broadcasts, specifically public media. But that's not fear mongering enough, so of course that's not how it got picked up.

    1. Re:Wrong by KramberryKoncerto · · Score: 1

      It applies to anything televised, not just news anchors.

    2. Re:Wrong by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

      The news I got was from Taiwan, so we might not have the same sources. However, all the English articles I've seen either imply or directly state that it's a full on crackdown on everyone - no puns for any reason.

    3. Re:Wrong by Livius · · Score: 1

      If news anchors run out of everything else they're allowed to say, they're liable to resort to actual journalism.

      Hmmm.... Maybe the West should try that...

  28. I'm Qing of the thread! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    but not first post.

    Hurts me tsu much.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  29. bioue by airdf · · Score: 1

    before the advent of the Net

  30. Disambiguation by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Mandarin works with one syllabus per character. There are 5000 characters (well, 2000 to read the newpaper), but 300 different syllabus. The language is extraordinary ambiguous.

    Disambiguation often works by sticking synonyms characters together to form a word. I can understand puns are a threat to the language interoperability. It must be a serious threat for China to use law against it.

  31. From the Tao Te Ching by ikhider · · Score: 1

    "In the land of many laws, many laws are broken."

    --
    "SO we bide our time, waiting for a purer kick to bloom and the future is still bleak, uncertain and beautiful" -GSYBE
  32. Tones? Good luck with that! by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1

    I don't speak Mandarin, but a language where a variation in tones can generate a different meaning must be ripe for puns. Given such a puntastic environment, I don't the government stands a chance.

  33. Re:Surely, that's no pun by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

    Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den is from the early 1910s, meaning it pre-dates pinyin by 50 years. It does look especially stupid in pinyin, but the joke works just as well for theoretical Chinese people who aren't aware of roman characters at all - making puns of words with different tones is very, very common.

    I'd need to see a little more background than this article gives, because (as the article does state), puns are just a basic part of Chinese culture. This is probably just an over-interpretation of some vague proclamation given by some no-name politician, aimed at stopping Internet users from posting pictures of crabs wearing wristwatches.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  34. I don't know........ by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    I think there's a chink in their argument.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  35. Pretty sure that's not true... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    One of the worst things a Government can do is make people laugh at it.

    In no particular order... war, recession, genocide, ecological disaster, government prescribed religion, concentration camps, fascism, disbanding of social services, police state...

    All far worse and clearly in a different category from "make people laugh at it".

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  36. Nope. by denzacar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, one of the worst things you could do TO a totalitarian government is to laugh about them.

    Nope.

    Totalitarian regimes rely on fear and intimidation. Both go out the window once you see that the emperor has no clothes.

    Also nope.

    The actual quote mentions a TYRANT. A singular ruler whose power relies heavily on personal reputation.
    Misapplying that to a regime at best makes you misinformed. At worst disappeared.

    A totalitarian government is NOT one that NEEDS fear and intimidation to rule. It's a government that already HAS you by the balls.
    It does not need fear or intimidation. That's for petty dictatorships. A totalitarian government has CONTROL over rules and laws.
    I.e. It does not need to intimidate you into not drinking alcoholic beverages. It just makes it illegal.

    So, because it is aware of its own power, it is perfectly fine with letting you get your rocks off at its expense - as it knows that all it has to do is squeeze for your laughter to become a squeal.
    And it also knows that if it lets you bark at it you will never get frustrated enough to bite, while it can dismiss you with a wave of a hand "proving its openness to criticism".
    If you do eventually bite... well, you're clearly a mad dog. Just look at all your history of constant barking.

    It's totalitarian cause it already has all the power and control. It doesn't need fear nor does it fear ridicule.
    Only those who DO NOT have absolute power, but pretend that they do, fear laughter.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Nope. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      psst.... We're having fun here. Isn't there a "Women in STEM careers" thread you can spread your sunshine around in somewhere? Otherwise, have some Pun! You know a good pun is it's own re-word.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Nope. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Actually, the parent is afraid of totalitarian governments. And that is a very real fear. But anyone that has measured the size of Rome, and the Forbidden Palace knows that they are not a big as they use to be; why? We will see how well the new super power has learned from not reading histories.

    3. Re:Nope. by hvidstue · · Score: 1

      Interesting, how this applies just well to all western governments also ;)

  37. Re:Surely, that's no pun by lgw · · Score: 1

    Ah, thanks for the background! I hadn't heard of the 10 mythical species, but it's good to know creativity is alive and well.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  38. Re:Surely, that's no pun by daremonai · · Score: 2
    Yuen-Ren Chao was not protesting against pinyin (which didn't yet exist) or any other romanization scheme when he wrote the Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den. In fact, he was a key proponent of "National Romanization" (Guoyu Luomazi), one of pinyin's precurors.

    He mostly intended it as a linguistic joke - if you've ever read any of his works, he can be quite amusing - and as a demonstration of how Chinese has changed over the millenia. In ancient Chinese, the poem would be more or less comprehensible (although still a little odd here and there), but in modern Mandarin, so many sounds have converged together, that it just sounds like gibberish.

  39. Next on the list is to outlaw inlaws. by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    When inlaws are outlawed only outlaws will have inlaws.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  40. Re:Good by Smallpond · · Score: 1

    We should outlaw puns. If you want to tell a pun to Princess Leia, you should have a Permit to Carrie.

  41. There once was a girl from Nantucket.. by helsinki92 · · Score: 1

    Oh wait. That's a limmerick. Those are probably next.

  42. Re:Surely, that's no pun by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I couldn't help but wonder about the new world order, but my reply is, "huasheng."

    Boys and Girls, Google your Grand Parents about the use, and historical applications. Only say, "Nuts," to them and see their faces when you do. XD

  43. I sometimes think... by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    ...that these moves are feints, made to be fighted against and to distract from the more serious oppressions. No other "sensical" explanation comes to mind.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  44. The best ever ... by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

    ... is when KTVU News in San Francisco got praked into reporting fake Chinese names on live TV as part of the story of the Asiana Flight 214 crash. As tragic as the crash was, it's one of the best pranks ever.

    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  45. Re:ConfucI see it nowius say... by marcello_dl · · Score: 2

    This is the new word order :(

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  46. i for one say HARRO! to our PRC overlords by retchdog · · Score: 1

    ah, the inevitable poorly-worded statement of false equivalence.

    are definite articles really so fucking difficult to learn?

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  47. Also by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    They're not punny. Outlaw them!

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.
  48. Outlawning puns? by jbee02 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, i thik the chinnese government has to much free time if they are passing laws against puns