Slashdot Mirror


An Automated Cat Litter Box With DRM

HughPickens.com writes: Jorge Lopez had always wanted an automatic cat litter box, and finally found one called the CatGenie, a fully automated self-washing litter box connected to water, electricity and the sewer that cleans itself with water and soap. "It's the Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes, a hefty device that scoops, cleans, and disposes of the waste all on it's own. It's completely automated, even senses when a cat poops and cleans up afterwards." But there's trouble in paradise. "Life with the CatGenie was great, but not quite perfect," writes Lopez, after discovering that CatGenie uses a smart cartridge that is only available from the manufacturer. "I found that the "Smart" in SmartCartridge is that it has an RFID chip inside of it to keep track of how much solution it has, and once it runs out, well, you can't refill. I honestly did not believe this and tore one of the cartridges apart, and there it was, looking back at me, a tiny chip holding up it's little metal finger." Fortunately there are some amazing people helping the CatGenie community who have released products like the custom firmware CatGenious and CartridgeGenius, which allows you to use whatever solution you want. "The cost savings is great, but isn't the biggest driver for me, it's mainly the principle that I don't own the device I paid for, and I'm really tired of having cat litter everything in my home."

190 comments

  1. Im Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    is this hackaday? I swore i typed in slashdot...

  2. What's next? by kheldan · · Score: 5, Funny

    DRM-laden toilets?
    v1.0: Uses proprietary toilet paper and won't allow you to flush any TP that doesn't have the manufacturer-specific RFID tag in it.
    v2.0: You may only eat and drink foods specified by the manufacturer, which also contain microscopid RFID tags, which are biologically inert and pass harmlessly through your digestive tract and into your feces and urine. Detection of any other waste substances will result in Failure to Flush.
    v3.0: All RoboToiliet users must have an RFID tag implanted in their ass; others may not use the toilet. RoboToilet must be connected to AC mains power and a broadband internet connection 24/7/365, or Failure to Flush will not occur because end-user authentication will not be possible. Naturally there is an annual subscription fee, with complimentary membership in the RoboToilet Owners Club.

    I'll leave it up to you to decide what the 'owners club' is all about.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:What's next? by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

      DRM-laden toilets?

      The purpose of toilets is to receive DRM. Not sure what TFS is complaining about: your cat comes along and deposits DRM in the litter-box; job well done!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:What's next? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 0

      So... you're saying the DRM is shit? :)

    3. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are sharp.

    4. Re:What's next? by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, now we know what Soylent Brown is

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:What's next? by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Doubtful, since Canada is one of the largest TP makers in the world there's no benefit in it for us. We have an entire industry built around cutting down trees, planting new trees, and making TP from it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:What's next? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      I believe you meant:

      Failure to Flush will not occur because user-end authentication will not be possible.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:What's next? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      And it flushes itself! Awesome, where can I get one.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    8. Re:What's next? by Aereus · · Score: 1

      The Keurig 2.0 has the "only drink liquids specified by the manufacturer" part down already.

    9. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By using our toilet you agree to let us sample and test your waste. This way we can sell the information to advertisers, who can target you with health and food products.
       

    10. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far be it from me to argue with the country with the economic acumen to bring freemium games to the world, but wouldn't it be better to make TP from the trees you cut down, rather than the new ones you've just planted?

    11. Re:What's next? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      The Keurig 2.0 has the "only drink liquids specified by the manufacturer" part down already.

      Well, technically they only control the container which creates a solution from whatever liquid you put into the coffee maker.

      You would, for example, be perfectly free to put beer in your Keurig to brew coffee with.

      Or pee in someone else's.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:What's next? by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      And god help you if you buy the robotoliet model ED-209.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    13. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm now curious. Is there an actual way of referring to feces that (b)acronyms to DRM, or are you simply comparing DRM to feces?

    14. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, which is not to be confused with saying DRM is the shit. ;)

    15. Re:What's next? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the next evolution of the Internet, the Internet in Things, namely, large corporations shafting your ass with their DRM.

      And yes, that's going to be the future where the toilet won't flush if you're not using the correct brand of toilet paper. Or your toaster won't work because the brand of bread is wrong.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    16. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah whatever. Until Jorge Lopez can figure out how to display text without the use of JavaScript, I don't give a shit about anything he has to say.

    17. Re:What's next? by hawk · · Score: 1

      One of my partners bought one of these for the office.

      Then we found reusable filter canisters that we could load with better coffee.

      Then it broke.

      Our staff makes better coffee without having to clean several of those a day.

      hawk

    18. Re:What's next? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Late-comer thanks to Christmas, but can you tell me whether RoboToilet comes with twitter integration and other social networking services?

  3. Stuff that Matters? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 0, Troll

    Lazy cat owners bitching about DRM in their robotic kitty box? This is a 1st world problem if there ever was one.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Stuff that Matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet was created to give the first worlders a voice. Finally their concerns will be heard and the world will know how they suffer so!

  4. Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you take a real Rolls Royce to an unauthorized dealer for repairs?

    Seems a bit silly to me to go this expense and suddenly get stingy on the cartridges.

    1. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Would you take a real Rolls Royce to an unauthorized dealer for repairs?

      Seems a bit silly to me to go this expense and suddenly get stingy on the cartridges.

      The thing only costs $200, Their cartridges cost $25 for a 120 use cartridge. At 2 uses/day that's 6 cartridges/year -- so you're paying 75% of the cost of the unit in a year just for the cartridges.

      I think if Rolls Royce dealers charged $150K each year for required maintenance on a $200K Rolls Royce, there'd be few people getting service at the dealer.

    2. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      The thing only costs $200, Their cartridges cost $25 for a 120 use cartridge. At 2 uses/day that's 6 cartridges/year -- so you're paying 75% of the cost of the unit in a year just for the cartridges.

      I think if Rolls Royce dealers charged $150K each year for required maintenance on a $200K Rolls Royce, there'd be few people getting service at the dealer.

      I assume you gave up your ink-jet printer for a color lasar?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by hawguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The thing only costs $200, Their cartridges cost $25 for a 120 use cartridge. At 2 uses/day that's 6 cartridges/year -- so you're paying 75% of the cost of the unit in a year just for the cartridges.

      I think if Rolls Royce dealers charged $150K each year for required maintenance on a $200K Rolls Royce, there'd be few people getting service at the dealer.

      I assume you gave up your ink-jet printer for a color lasar?

      I gave up the inkjet printer years ago - I used to use an inkjet printer for photo prints until I realized that Walgreens makes better prints than my inkjet printer can at less cost. So for at least the last 5 years, I've had a black and white laser printer. I have no real need for a color printer at home, though if I did, I'd get a color laser.

    4. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Layzej · · Score: 3, Funny

      We used to have an automated litter box. We called it "The Scatapult". Every so often it would launch the shit into the air rather than into the bag. Not recommended,

    5. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      The thing only costs $200, Their cartridges cost $25 for a 120 use cartridge. At 2 uses/day that's 6 cartridges/year -- so you're paying 75% of the cost of the unit in a year just for the cartridges.

      I think if Rolls Royce dealers charged $150K each year for required maintenance on a $200K Rolls Royce, there'd be few people getting service at the dealer.

      I assume you gave up your ink-jet printer for a color lasar?

      I can't speak for him, but *I* did. And when I need prints on real photo paper, I take it to one 'a' them there Kodak kiosks. Dye based printers are scams, pure and simple.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I assume you gave up your ink-jet printer for a color lasar?

      Damn fucking right! Several years ago, and I have only replaced toner once. There is a limit to what I will spend on "rented" product...

    7. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      We used to have an automated litter box. We called it "The Scatapult". Every so often it would launch the shit into the air rather than into the bag. Not recommended,

      If Douglas Adams were alive, he'd put that in a book. That is so Sirius Cybernetics Corporation.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    8. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "Would you take a real Rolls Royce to an unauthorized dealer for repairs?"

      you bet your ass I would. I take my BMW to a non BMW mechanic. in fact I refuse to let the thieves at the BMW dealership TOUCH my BMW as they are no talent hacks.

      Only a complete and utter fool believes that authorized means anything other than scam.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      If Douglas Adams were alive, he'd put that in a book. That is so Sirius Cybernetics Corporation.

      Great, you just made the automated cat litter box sad.

    10. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      ...I realized that Walgreens makes better prints than my inkjet printer can at less cost.

      Yeah, just be careful with the baby pics

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I assume you gave up your ink-jet printer for a color lasar?

      No I drilled a hole in the top of the cartridges and refill them with after market bulk purchased ink. Once I had to replace a print head due to it getting clogged, but otherwise I have used the original cartridge with its 800% markup for most of its printing life.

    12. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you not? I'm 30 and I've never owned a printer in my life. I just printed everything at school, work, bummed from a friend, or a parent, or just bought prints at a Staples or something. You hardly need to print anything these days. What did we used to print? Maps, boarding passes, tickets, coupons, forms, resumes, etc. it's all electronic now. If I decide that I need to own a personal printer, I will get a color laser printer.

    13. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It depends on who's paying.

      BMWs come with one hell of a service plan. If it's under warranty, then it goes to the stealership where BMW USA can pay for whatever, and you get a nice loaner to drive around until they're done. If it's off warranty, yeah - take it to someone who charges reasonably, does quality work, and does it quickly.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    14. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by davester666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Man, what a ripoff. There were ZERO baby pics at the link.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    15. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They kinda deserved it for supporting walmart. Karma is a bitch.

    16. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by infolation · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well the article includes a car analogy...

      "CatGenie can't run without SaniSolution, like a car can't run without petrol." is often heard. But that's a flawed analogy and an insult to most people's intellect because it's the laws of physics that prevent a car from running without petrol, but it's a flaky business model that prevents CatGenie from running without SaniSolution.

      But a better car analogy would be: "CatGenie can't run without SaniSolution, like a car can't run without Esso."

      So if you want to use BP, Shell, or Total in your car - no can do.

    17. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Kergan · · Score: 1

      ...I realized that Walgreens makes better prints than my inkjet printer can at less cost.

      Yeah, just be careful with the baby pics

      Sheesh... The US gets crazier by the year...

    18. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      dye sublimation printers make beautiful prints.
      You mean ink based printers.

    19. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think if Rolls Royce dealers charged $150K each year for required maintenance on a $200K Rolls Royce, there'd be few people getting service at the dealer.

      There are few people owning a Rolls Royce to begin with, and if you count in the salary you pay to your chauffeur, then I guess, it does cost that much. :-)

    20. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can FTP your picture files to AdoramaPix and they'll send you the prints via mail (the whole cycle takes couple days). You can choose from several paper types, upload your own color profiles (if you don't want their technicians, who are excellent, to correct color balance), etc. Excellent quality, and no, I have no affiliation with them whatsoever.

    21. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by TrentTheThief · · Score: 1

      Spoken by someone who has never experienced driven one. Having a driver is very last century.

    22. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by disposable60 · · Score: 1

      There are few people driving Rollers to begin with, and any horrific expense in their upkeep only adds to the allure of exclusivity. In other words, don't give them any ideas - RR owners are already sufficiently clubby.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    23. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparing an RR to a BMW is like comparing a cat to cat shit.

    24. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take my BMW to a non BMW mechanic.

      BMW != Rolls You're not even close to comparison.

    25. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      "Share and enjoy!" *sproing*

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    26. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Dude, its a car, not a magical carriage. Any qualified and competent mechanic could fix one. Also, BY LAW, there is no such thing as an 'unauthorized dealer' for repairs. All certified mechanics are 'authorized' to repair any car without affecting the warranty of the car.

      --
      Good-bye
    27. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The thing is, not everyone wants to keep all that information on their pocket computer that gets rifled through by every app you put on it. I'll keep printing out my boarding passes and using cash, thank you very much.

      --
      Good-bye
    28. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I meant what I said, although I understand it can easily be misunderstood. Inkjet printers generally use dye based inks. There are a few consumer models that use pigment based inks. The pigment based inks tend to have a longer life both as a photo and in the cartridge. But that runs contrary to most manufacturer's business model, where a "head cleaning" is required often which uses up to 25% of the cartridge, and the most expensive per-page use case is casual use, which is the category most consumers fall under.

      Epson used to make printers that used pigment based inks, but I think they're all dye based now. It's possible the only manufacturer left that uses pigment inks is Kodak.

      I sidestep the issue by not printing my photos at home.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    29. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1
      "Epson used to make printers that used pigment based inks....."

      Used to?

      http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/S...

      For the home market, they might not use their new UltraChrome HDR inks, but for the semi-pro and pro markets, they do. We have a 4900 here in the lab; amazing is a fair word to describe the output.

      --

      Chris Knight is my hero.

    30. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      You are right, A rolls Royce is complete Cat Shit. They are rolling turds with leather.

      Anyone with any IQ on cars knows that RR = complete and utter shit. They are built like shit, made from shit, and are not designed for anything but to sit in a service department getting fixed.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    31. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I bought a good inkjet printer years ago that wasn't cheap, but had cheap ink. I bought it at the height of Hewlett-Packard's "liquid gold ink - cheap printer" strategy.

      I still use it frequently. Individual cartridges are â3.50, a full set of four CMYB is â11.00.

      It's the Canon Pixma IP3000. It prints at 4800 x 1200 dpi. It prints double sided from its 150 page paper tray. It does photo prints well when using the correct paper. It can handle envelopes, cardboard, CDs and other materials that can't be bent or folded from it's manual feed. I think it's from 2003 and I still find it a great printer.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    32. Re:Rolls Royce of cat litter boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the CatGenie 120 only uses the cartridge solution every other time when in automated mode. That means $60-$75/yr. Cat litter isn't much below this to keep the same level of cleanness.

  5. Barely scratches the surface by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2

    And to think week ago I thought that both Keurig DRM defenders vs hackers were making petty efforts over petty territories.

    1. Re:Barely scratches the surface by OhPlz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may seem petty now, but if every device we use in our daily lives started doing this, it wouldn't so good. Keurig is a good example. You can still make coffee with a simple french press. Trouble is, the k-cups have taken over the coffee selection in a lot of groceries. Expand that into devices of all types and shopping for consumables becomes a total PITA.

    2. Re:Barely scratches the surface by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It may seem petty now, but if every device we use in our daily lives started doing this, it wouldn't so good. Keurig is a good example. You can still make coffee with a simple french press. Trouble is, the k-cups have taken over the coffee selection in a lot of groceries. Expand that into devices of all types and shopping for consumables becomes a total PITA.

      That's ok, the grocery store is the worst place to buy coffee anyway, buy it at a local coffee shop that roasts their own so you know it hasn't been sitting on a shelf (or worse, non air climate controlled warehouse) for weeks or months before you buy it.

    3. Re:Barely scratches the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I like my coffee like I like my women.... ground up and in the freezer.

      Just kidding, that's a horrible way to keep coffee.

    4. Re:Barely scratches the surface by hawguy · · Score: 2

      I like my coffee like I like my women.... ground up and in the freezer.

      Just kidding, that's a horrible way to keep coffee.

      And women.

    5. Re:Barely scratches the surface by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point.

    6. Re:Barely scratches the surface by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless these schemes are proven to fail again and again, there will only be more of them. If you don't want every trivial device in your life to refuse to use anything but it's own overpriced brand of expendables, one would think you would at least encourage if not otherwise support efforts like these.

    7. Re:Barely scratches the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but not men. they're scum.

    8. Re:Barely scratches the surface by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Keurigs are for people who fail at math. They cost roughly 75 cents a cup. It would be way cheaper to buy a good old reliable $30 Mr. Coffee, drink one cup from the pot, and throw the rest away.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    9. Re:Barely scratches the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you know, just buy a thermos. Pour one cup and put the rest in the thermos and leave it by the coffee pot. Avoids having to keep the heat on (which tends to burn the bottom bit of the pot), lessons vaporatization into the air, and actually stays pretty hot for a day.

    10. Re:Barely scratches the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mileage may vary. :-)

    11. Re:Barely scratches the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Leave it by the coffee pot" implies that you are too stupid to just pour heated water into the filter on top of the thermos. Why bother with the coffee pot at all?

      Now hand-grinding your roasted beans right before cooking coffee: that's actual effort. It's also worth the trouble since ground coffee loses aroma rather quickly.

      I'm not actually a coffee drinker, but when I actually was for a while, it turned out that all of this effort was needed in order to get something that was sort of tolerable, being more akin to food than medication.

      What companies have sitting in their coffee pots for consumption by workers... I don't understand how anyone can drink this stuff. Similar to pretty much anything that gets served as coffee. For me it takes a whole lot of effort to get even to the "tolerable" level. And at some point of time, it just was no longer worth the effort to me.

    12. Re:Barely scratches the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keurigs are for people who fail at math. They cost roughly 75 cents a cup. It would be way cheaper to buy a good old reliable $30 Mr. Coffee, drink one cup from the pot, and throw the rest away.

      Or you could buy a pack of the re-usable k-cups and put your own coffee in it and have no waste at all. I guess you just like throwing money down the drain.

    13. Re:Barely scratches the surface by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, as the discussion started here; the reusable cups don't work with the Keurig 2.0 coffee makers.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    14. Re:Barely scratches the surface by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      This is only the beginning.

      --
      Good-bye
    15. Re:Barely scratches the surface by surd1618 · · Score: 1

      It would be cheaper to buy coffee machines at the thrift store and toss the entire machine out once a week. Not that that makes any sense.

    16. Re:Barely scratches the surface by hawk · · Score: 1

      Buy your coffee already roasted???

      *yech*

      hawk

    17. Re:Barely scratches the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my local Walmart (I'm sorry. I only went there because this is a small town and its the only store that has coffee makers without me having to drive 30 minutes and waste a bunch of gas. Please don't kill me for shopping there once or twice.) the Mr. Coffee was only $19.97. Somebody is ripping you off if yours was $30.

    18. Re:Barely scratches the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but taken to it's logical conclusion we're back to total PITA since we now have to go find the local specialist in every damn consumable we use.

  6. Obvious solution... by slew · · Score: 1

    I'm really tired of having cat litter everything in my home.

    There's an obvious solution this... Assuming you don't want a cat or a home...

    No? Can we assume this is the only product on the market (and before it was invented, cats littered homes with reckless abandon)...
    If in the end, this is your only solution, then make your piece with the DRM, or with bypassing it. Don't forget, you always have a choice..

    1. Re:Obvious solution... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Please understand that the portion of the post you responded to was in fact quoted verbatim from TFS which you evidently did not bother to read.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:Obvious solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? I read it just fine. It doesn't parse regardless of the source. Did you think I was blaming /. or the submitter?

    3. Re:Obvious solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm really tired of having cat litter everything in my home.

      Does not parse.

      I'm really tired of having [the] cat litter everything in my home. I'm really tired of having cat litter [on] everything in my home. I'm really tired of having cat litter [take precedence over] everything in my home.

      Please use English, much easier for reader.

      I parsed it just fine. The OP is really tired of having a whole bunch of different kitty litter products in their home. It goes back to DRM forcing you to use the same company for the entire vertical.

    4. Re:Obvious solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM is not forcing the guy to be too fucking lazy to buy a normal cat box with a normal cat litter bag and fill it with normal cat litter and empty it like a normal cat owner.

      I wonder, if he has kids, is he looking for an automatic diaper changer too, so he doesnt have to dirty his precious fingers with baby shit?

    5. Re:Obvious solution... by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Wow, I remember back when I was young and naive and hadn't been taught the rule of thumb that if it came out of a body and didn't come out of yours, it's a hazardous material. Wait, no, I was taught about toxoplasmosis as a small child, so I was never innocent about cat feces.

      As a well-educated cat owner, I will spend money on something if it means I never have to come into direct contact with cat feces. At least with a baby, the odds are pretty good that the bacterial burden will be rather close to mine. That said, I'd still suggest washing hands before and after & using gloves if the kid or you are unlucky enough to be sick, and point out that probably the safest choice for dealing with diapers are disposable diapers that can be incinerated and the ashes used to enrich the soil. (And, really, I'd want a baby bidet: just wash the poor baby's ass clean.)

  7. sigh by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The cost savings is great, but isn't the biggest driver for me, it's mainly the principle that I don't own the device I paid for, and I'm really tired of having cat litter everything in my home."

    So exercise your rights as a consumer to research beforehand and not buy it. Or return it. Or modify it, as you have. Or, for god sakes, ask your vet or friends with cats or reddit for advice on having cat litter everywhere (I believe the most common solution is a covered box with fairly high side.) You can also teach your cat to pee/crap in the toilet, believe it or not. There are little "litter box" inserts that reportedly make it pretty easy; the cat goes "oh, another litter box" and uses it for a week or two, and then you remove the insert, and if the cat notices, they go *shrug* and still use it. No more litter, no more stink.

    But for god sakes....I was around on Slashdot when the fist inkjet printer companies started chipping their cartridges. I also learned about Gillette in...either middle school or high school. That was a century ago, if not more. The "handle is free, the blades are disposable and we have a very healthy profit margin on them" model is quite, quite old. Why are people surprised? Especially if you read Slashdot, why didn't you do research on it?

    Your robotic, do-everything catbox would've cost substantially more if the company were not figuring on a continuing revenue stream. In fact, it might have cost so much that nobody would've bought it.

    1. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't companies just price shit appropriately instead of trying to TRICK customers to gain an upper hand?

      It disgusts me to no end and I refuse to buy anything that has digital restrictions in it. I'll BREAK you f'ing crap and THEN return it. It's not like the people at the store know any better and can refuse the damm return.

    2. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy to say, 100% completely impossible to fully do in practice even if you spent every waking hour to do it with every single purchase.

      Unless of course you never bought anything or next to anything and made/grew it all yourself.

    3. Re:sigh by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      So exercise your rights as a consumer to research beforehand and not buy it. Or return it. Or modify it, as you have.

      He DID modify it, as you noted. What's the problem?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:sigh by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why can't companies just price shit appropriately

      In this case the shit is free, and its the disposal that costs money.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He does not see DRM software and kitty litter as being different and is angry that other people disagree.

      He spends too much time looking at code and not enough at the real world. We know thing A is running a proprietary expendables scam. Thing B is found to be running the same thing, therefore Thing B is not surprising.

    6. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can also teach your cat to pee/crap in the toilet, believe it or not.

      Yes, you can. I've done it and it's amazing. However, not all cats can learn. For one thing, it requires a certain amount of coordination. Still, one month of painful training for a lifetime of just flushing the toilet instead of dealing with a litter box was amazing. I miss Pixel. She wasn't the most affectionate cat, but using the toilet made up for lots of things, including all the mouse and keyboard cords she chewed up.

    7. Re:sigh by RyoShin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I believe the most common solution is a covered box with fairly high side.

      I volunteer at a cat rescue and sanctuary where the cats roam freely, and we use giant totes (>25 gal) in our main area filled about 1/4-1/3 of the way up. We still have some spill over because there are so many cats (mainly when they jump out, not from digging), but it's a sprinkling instead of a beach. High sides are a good way to go.

      Our smaller rooms use normal litter boxes, but again only filled about 1/3 of the way. Still not much spill over, but that could be because they're mostly kittens and don't have as much digging power. Most people that suffer from litter going all over are filling it too high, so it may be as simple as just putting less litter in the box at a time.

      The cover, however, might not help. The adoption counselors recommend against covered boxes: while it might seem useful to humans (between extra protection against spilling and odor filters that can be put in the top) it isn't that enticing to cats (I can't remember exactly why.)

    8. Re:sigh by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You need to know before hand what the hidden features are though. Trouble is that you can't easily find it out. If you check customer reviews you will almost always find glowing positive reviews for things just dripping with DRM. Though to be fair, when I see a glowing review I almost always think that there must be something suspicious, because no one can get that excited about a mere consumer product. Plus these reviews usually get written long before the problems are discovered, which means you have to wait a year maybe before some more honest and objective reviews show up.

      People LOVE the Blu-Ray despite the horrendous DRM it has. People still buy Origin games. People somehow are quivering with delight at Keurig despite the alternatives that don't have DRM.

      The problem here is not the high margin on replacement parts, but on the DRM itself. I can make an adapter for a Gillette razor if I wanted to without breaking any DMCA laws. Inkjet cartridges did not originally have DRM but instead just some ominous "for best results please only official parts" warnings. And of course people figure out the do-it-yourself solutions pretty quickly, until the manufacturers figure out how to change software to prevent the DIY.

      As well, with the razors, the blade is the real product and the handle is merely a free accessory. The ink cartridges require a really specialized formula (easy to replicate from a third party of course). But for a cat box cartridge it's just a plastic container full of soap and water, there's nothing special going on there except the dimensions and interfaces of the container.

      For the profits, this may work out well at first. But after awhile people will stop buying them. Negative word of mouth gets around. Maybe they make less money overall than if they just raised the base price at the start. After all, there are a lot of people out there who are perfectly willing to buy the "official" replacement cartridges.

    9. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      you had me at kitten digging power

    10. Re:sigh by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      In this case the shit is free...

      What, your cat hunts for its own food?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re:sigh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So exercise your rights as a consumer to research beforehand and not buy it.

      Easier said than done. Did you google every CD you ever were thinking of buying to check if it contained a rootkit? Did you check with every printer if you were able to add after market ink?

      The problem with these DRM schemes is that someone has to fall victim to them at least once before that information becomes public because in very few cases are they required to explicitly state the use of DRM up front.

    12. Re:sigh by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      No but I also don't use my printer so much that paying the OEM price will break me. If you are printing that kind of volume, you probably should be researching better options than ink-jet.

    13. Re:sigh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I did. Aftermarket ink and an inkjet were the best price / quality point. Laser has quality problems, and opto/chemical processes are bankrupting for personal use.

    14. Re:sigh by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Cats tend to do that even when they're getting food from humans.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    15. Re:sigh by hymie! · · Score: 1

      Your robotic, do-everything catbox would've cost substantially more if the company were not figuring on a continuing revenue stream. In fact, it might have cost so much that nobody would've bought it.

      It is not my job to provide you with a "continuing revenue stream". It is your job to convince me that your product is worthy of receiving my money.

    16. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the problem?

      It's illegal under the DMCA.

    17. Re:sigh by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I know. They often leave me some of theirs in return.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    18. Re:sigh by JRV31 · · Score: 1

      So what?

    19. Re:sigh by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      So exercise your rights as a consumer to research beforehand and not buy it. Or return it. Or modify it, as you have

      That's what he did. He exercised his right to modify it, and he exercised his right to tell people what he did.

    20. Re:sigh by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Before I had to put my best bud to sleep, I had bought a small piece of carpeting (2' x 1'?) with a moderate pile and put it in front of the litter box. When he walked over it after taking care of business the litter would fall on to this and every so often I would take this carpet outside and give it a good shake and a few smacks.

      Took care of 95% of litter trackage.

      As to covered litter boxes, I have never had an issue with any cat using a covered box. I just made sure there was plenty of light shining into the front.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    21. Re:sigh by jfengel · · Score: 1

      You can also teach your cat to pee/crap in the toilet, believe it or not.

      Yeah, you can try. Of my two cats, one would have nothing whatsoever to do with it, and the other one made it about a week before freaking out and peeing on the floor instead.

      Not everybody's cats are as dumb as mine (these are among the dumbest cats I've ever met), but at least anecdotally the whole cat-toilet idea isn't as easy as it sounds.

    22. Re:sigh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I like hacking stuff like this, because it simultaneously benefits me but punishes the company trying to ram DRM up my arse. They usually go for the razor blade model, where the handle is cheap and the blades are where they make their profit. By not buying blades they at best break even, or maybe even lose money.

      Now I know these things can be hacked I'm thinking of getting one. Generally I don't buy stuff unless I know I can support it myself, because the chance of the manufacturer losing interest after a year or two, or of charging silly money for parts is too great.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem here is not the high margin on replacement parts, but on the DRM itself. I can make an adapter for a Gillette razor if I wanted to without breaking any DMCA laws.

      DMCA doesn't apply to k-cups/inkjets/etc. There is no work of authorship being protected. The DMCA anti-circumvention provision doesn't cover other types of IP (trademarks/patents/etc)

    24. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't companies just price shit appropriately instead of trying to TRICK customers to gain an upper hand?

      Because in the past forty years, the median US personal savings/income rate has dropped from ~11% to ~3% and the savings/debt ratio has gone from ~2:1 to ~1:7.

      Companies have to acknowledge that reality if they want to make sales.

    25. Re:sigh by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Did you google every CD you ever were thinking of buying to check if it contained a rootkit?

      No, but 1) I do not buy a lot of CDs, mainly records and 2) I disable Autoplay/Autorun as part of installing Windows.

      Did you check with every printer if you were able to add after market ink?

      That's pretty much my main criterion for choosing a printer. That and how reliable it is. This is the reason why I use a 13 (probably) year old HP PSC 2500CM (that I got broken for almost free and repaired it myself) - the DRM does not work (as long as I do not download drivers from HP and instead use the ones that are part of Windows) and the cartridges are very easy to refill. After modifying the cartridge I only need a syringe to fill it and ink in bottles is quite cheap. I can keep filling the cartridges until the pump wears out or the cartridge starts leaking. Even original cartridges (HP No. 10) are not that expensive and are large - 69ml for black, 28ml for the others.

      And if someone asks me for advice on a new printer, I first find a few candidates depending on what the printer will be used for, then check the website of an printer cartridge store to see whether third part cartridges are available and how expensive are they.

    26. Re:sigh by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      My family had a cat that was...well... As far as anybody could tell, he actively tried to track out litter, having tried all of the tricks mentioned. He's been dead several years, and we've still not cleaned it all up. High sides and a covered box were both no-goes: He took both as personal affronts and objected the way he objected to everything--by refusing to use it. He even contrived to spray urine against the wall, which we dealt with by taping up plastic tarps. He actually let us know he was ready to be put to sleep via cat exhaust everywhere.

    27. Re:sigh by hawk · · Score: 1

      > I can make an adapter for a Gillette razor if I
      > wanted to without breaking any DMCA laws.

      When I was in college, Safeway's generic/house brand used the same head.

      I bought those, and pulled off the heads to snap on to the better handle . . .

      (these were made with nice hard metal, unlike the bic disposables which would cut my face the first time I used them)

      hawk

    28. Re:sigh by hawk · · Score: 1

      >Not everybody's cats are as dumb as mine

      Yes they are.

      It is a Statistical Mystery as to how 99% of cats are it the bottom quartile of intelligence.

      It may have to do with having a brain the size of a walnut . . .

      hawk

    29. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never used Gilette. I can get Schick blades for less than $1 each when I buy 20 at a time. Seems like a perfectly decent price for a piece of metal and plastic that I trust not to slice up my face. Manufacturing costs money, people. You cheapskate asshats who want everything for free are why we have practically no domestic manufacturing now and an economy beholden to the whim of Asia.

  8. Typo in summary: CatGenious - CatGenius by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    yeah, the summary has the typo, not the project.

  9. Your cat thinks you're a moron by PvtVoid · · Score: 0

    Your cat thinks your a moron, and is going to poop in your headphones.

    1. Re:Your cat thinks you're a moron by vm146j2 · · Score: 1
      --
      "Lost time is not found again."
    2. Re:Your cat thinks you're a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My a moron?

    3. Re:Your cat thinks you're a moron by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Yes, your.

  10. I don't know about you... by vettemph · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...But I am tired of this shit!

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  11. Catgenie is usually brokengenie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had 2 and they were always breaking. They warranted them for 2 years but they were always being sent back for repair. After the warranty was up I chucked them and went back to cat litter. I think they are a great idea poorly executed. I would rather scoop cat litter instead of cleaning up the mess those things leave behind when the fail.

    1. Re:Catgenie is usually brokengenie by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      I've had a different brand, less fancy, but whenever the automation kicked in it terrified the cats. Which of course means that they went anywhere BUT the litter box.

  12. LitterRobot FTW! by Octorian · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are other options in this market, not all of which require proprietary consumables. We've been using the LitterRobot which, while more expensive (~$300), requires no further financial commitment to the manufacturer. You just need to buy normal cat litter and periodically replace a normal garbage bag in the base.

    1. Re:LitterRobot FTW! by cmh31909 · · Score: 1

      The LitterRobot is great. Dump that other piece of DRM'd crap and get yourself a LR, you will not regret it!

  13. I briefly considered CatGenie... by dfenstrate · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...But turned away because not only was the machine expensive, but the hack was another $100. I highly recommend the Litter Robot (~$370). I've had one for a few years, and it works off of standard kitchen trash bags. I have two cats and I tend to it once every 7-10 days- I refill the litter and swap out the bags, and maybe do a thorough cleaning twice a year. No BS consumables.
    Another model, Litter Maid (~$120), uses custom plastic trays. It's cheaper, but it doesn't work as well as the Litter Robot. After a few months you'll find yourself tending to it every other day. The cost of the plastic trays added up over the course of a year, but it's a non-DRM receptacle, so you can hack a cheaper 'solution' at home with a small amount of craftiness. If you do go with Litter Maid, go for the cheaper one- it actually works better than the 'Elite' model.
    But really, go for the Litter Robot. I've had mine for two or three years and I love it.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re: I briefly considered CatGenie... by tuxidriver · · Score: 1

      I would also highly recommend the litter robot. I've had one in my house for several years now and it's been fantastic.

    2. Re: I briefly considered CatGenie... by kwbauer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I highly recommend not having cats. Doing that has reduced the time I've never spent cleaning up after them to zero.

    3. Re: I briefly considered CatGenie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You completely horked that one dude.

      Double negative'd it.

    4. Re:I briefly considered CatGenie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...But turned away because not only was the machine expensive, but the hack was another $100.

      A quick google search found me some Arduino-based solutions that would be much cheaper. They reset the counter in the cartridge rather than trying to fool the main machine. $25 if you don't plan to use the Arduino for anything else...

    5. Re: I briefly considered CatGenie... by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is a totally screwed up sentence but you got the point. I figure pointless and whimsical comments are about the only way to gently nudge cat owners into seeing the error of their ways.

    6. Re: I briefly considered CatGenie... by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

      Well, sometimes your aunt offers you a free cat, and you're like, hey, why not, it's free! and it's still a kitten and it's cute and your girlfriend/later wife loves it. Then the cat runs around maniacally and you're like hey, that cat needs a friend. So you get another cat! It's a feral little barn kitten that came with fleas and ear mites, but it was 'free' too, and it does it's job of making the first cat behave better. So you keep feeding it.
      Then your sister in law says, hey, I've got this stray dog I can't keep because of my MS. But I love it and I want her to go to a good home. So then you get a dog, too, because you like your sister in law and don't mind dogs.
      So, there you are, two cats and a dog later. And they're good friends and good pets, and no internet crank is going to make you see the error of your ways, because the pets are furry and happy to see you.
      What was I saying? Oh, yeah, Merry Christmas!

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    7. Re: I briefly considered CatGenie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sending Freddy and Malcolm to kill you now. They'll leave a dead bird at your door so you know when to expect them.

  14. How hard is it...? by GrahamCox · · Score: 3, Informative

    How hard is it for people to learn this ultra-simple rule. Sorry to be the grammar nazi, but every time I see this it drives my parser up the wall.

    all on it's own.

    Aaarrggh!!!!

    It's completely automated

    Correct. "it's" is a contraction of "it is".

    a tiny chip holding up it's little metal finger

    Aaaarrrgghh!!!! Doesn't make sense: "...holding up it is little metal finger".

    And to address the article itself, who even needs cat litter and all that nastiness in a house? Just let your damn cat out! They will never, ever soil in the house given a choice.

    1. Re:How hard is it...? by ledow · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the rules of English are backwards here.

      John's = it belongs to John.
      it's != it belongs to "it".

      Why that is, I don't know, but it's true. I assume it's to distinguish from "it is" and "belongs to it" because you don't have the same problem with "John is" being "John's".

      However you look at it, it's a simple error, yes. But if the person isn't a native English speaker, it's yet-another "You just have to do this backwards, for no particular reason" rule.

      Give it fifty years, and it'll all merge into the same pidgin-English and nobody will notice or care.

      Though I am a bit of a grammar Nazi (waits for people to hunt mistakes in this post...), I only really care about it from others in informal posts on the Internet when it affects communication. Here, we both know what was intended by the sentence, so understanding isn't impaired. Live with it.

    2. Re:How hard is it...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on where you live, "John's going to the store" was perfectly valid in my mid-Atlantic upbringing. Doesn't make the it's vs. its any less of an exception, of course.

      I always thought the "i before e except after c" rule was a little weird as well...

    3. Re:How hard is it...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you write "hi's" and "her's?"

    4. Re:How hard is it...? by crabbz · · Score: 2

      The problem is that the rules of English are backwards here.

      John's = it belongs to John. it's != it belongs to "it".

      Why that is, I don't know, but it's true. I assume it's to distinguish from "it is" and "belongs to it" because you don't have the same problem with "John is" being "John's".

      An easy way to remember is that "his" and "her" don't have apostrophes either, just like "its".

    5. Re:How hard is it...? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nouns take apostrophes for the possessive. Pronouns do not.

      Now that we've completed our third-grade review lesson, can we perhaps get back to discussing DRM, or cats, or something remotely on-topic?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:How hard is it...? by gsslay · · Score: 1

      my mid-Atlantic upbringing

      Ascension Island?

    7. Re:How hard is it...? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      In an Information Age, like the one we are currently in, casual typed conversation DOES NOT have to adhere to strict grammar. Those rules were made for when comms were hard and expensive and the effects long lasting.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:How hard is it...? by Flymo2 · · Score: 1
      You missed

      The cost savings is great

    9. Re:How hard is it...? by ledow · · Score: 1

      "I always thought the "i before e except after c" rule was a little weird as well..."

      An English "rule" which - even in the full form which you've not stated - actually has more exceptions than followers in the English dictionary.

    10. Re:How hard is it...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > An easy way to remember is that "his" and "her" don't have apostrophes either, just like "its".

      It is always been that way.

  15. Big LR fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been happy with the Litter Robot (for 3 years). The first unit I got was totally fried and non-functional. They sent a replacement base through overnight deliver. Once it was confirmed the replacement worked, I dropped the original in the box, slapped the included return sticker on the box and they had UPS stop by and pick up the package. I can't imagine they made any money on me, but they really are rock stars with customer service in my book.

    And yea, the consumables are just ordinary materials. The machine works, it keeps itself clean. I do a little extra cleaning twice a year on the ball portion of the unit, 10 minutes of my time. It will jam if you don't empty it out at a reasonable frequency, but once you wipe off the mess it works fine. It holds quite a large amount of waste. Emptying it out once a week is sufficient for my medium sized cat, taking a quick look at it once a day to throw a little more fresh litter in when it seemed low was the 30 seconds.

    The main thing to replace is the carbon filter, which the litter robot company will sell you for a reasonable price. But I already have a roll of the stuff for AC units and cut a square to size.

    The standard size litter robot isn't usable by my largest cat. There is a bigger model that has a "bubble", but I'm not confident that 3" would make much difference to him.

  16. Re:Wait a second by aXis100 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comprehension fail. The machine washes the granules itself, and in the process consumes sanitiser in the DRM laden cartridge.

  17. much like printer cartridges by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Give it a couple of years and if the market is big enough somebody will come up with a refill method, just like printer cartridges. I just hope they don't confuse ink with sanitizer though.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:much like printer cartridges by torkus · · Score: 1

      Already done. In fact someone made a $100 module that basically lets you override the controls. Reports have it that it works better without the soap anyhow.

      Basically they wanted to make a consumable so they could generate a perpetual revenue stream. It worked. For every person hacking this and that there's many, many more who just but what they need. Look at Keurig 2.0. Despite all the bad press they're sure selling plenty of 'legit' k-cups.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  18. Assumptions are expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're doing it the hard way: Toilet train your cat. Google for "toilet training cats" and you'll soon see that assuming a tech solution is not only not the only path, it's probably the wrong one entirely.

  19. its by paiute · · Score: 1

    damn it

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  20. natural solutions by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    "completely automated, even senses when a cat poops and cleans up afterwards."

    My 10 month old Irish setter does the same exact thing. The only downside is that her breath is not really kissably-sweet afterwards.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:natural solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Dogs are truly disgusting animals.

  21. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He bought it, he has an expectation that it won't come loaded with traps and catches. He's warning consumers that this product comes with traps and catches. Your teacher warned you that gillette blades come with traps and catches. So how is he any different than your teacher?

    Why do you think he should be complaining about it on Slashdot?

    It's a technical lock in on a new product and so this is Slashdot stuff. We want to know to avoid this crappy product,unless we're prepared to flash it.

    "Your robotic, do-everything catbox would've cost substantially more if the company were not figuring on a continuing revenue stream."

    Model A: He pays a price up front and is aware of the full price
    Model B: He pays a lower price up front, and SURPRISE we're gonna sting you for the rest later

    So don't try to tell me this is somehow in his interests! Either way he's paying.

  22. Re:Principles? by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing you're reading slashdot and not dotslash then.

  23. You own nothing! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Not even your body... Just try to take your amputated leg home and mount it on the wall.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  24. DMCA has got to go by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is all courtesy of US' DMCA law.

    DRM Ink and toner cartridges
    DRM Keurig 2.0 coffee makers

    It's only going to get worse without push back.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    1. Re:DMCA has got to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy it, use it for as long as the "free returns" period will allow and then return it. Enough 'second hand' product coming back to the manufacturer will make them think twice about it next time.

    2. Re:DMCA has got to go by rhazz · · Score: 1

      This is all courtesy of US' DMCA law. DRM Ink and toner cartridges DRM Keurig 2.0 coffee makers

      So if someone uploads The Hurt Locker to your Keurig, Hollywood can file a DMCA take-down request with the manufacturer?

    3. Re:DMCA has got to go by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know you are being facetious here.

      Abuse of DMCA started with 3rd party garage door openers:
      https://www.google.com/search?...

      Then with inkjet and toner refills:
      https://www.google.com/search?...
      https://www.google.com/search?...

      Keurig is next:
      https://www.google.com/search?...

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  25. Yeah, but... by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 1

    ...what kind of coffee does it make?

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
  26. Remember Dongles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About a decade ago, I purchased a software product, and nowhere in the literature was it mentioned that it came with a parallel port dongle. I sent it right back.

    1. Re:Remember Dongles? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      wow.. you didn't just say that word.. I think it's time we had a conversation.

  27. Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could just get a dog. Our's cleans a regular, 5$ litter box regularly. Admittedly I'm not sure it's great for her digestion, but...

    1. Re:Dog by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Dogs come with all kinds of other issues though. That cat turd will just end up back out on your rug, or stuck between the treads of your lawn mower..

  28. Learn to spell "its." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Spelling matters.

    1. Re:Learn to spell "its." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's" was used properly in the sentence. It's every other word that was wrong.

  29. Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unreadable websites AND failure to edit the summary.

  30. Re:Wait a second by putaro · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell the "washing" of the granules is part of the automatic cycle.

  31. I've seen similar. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I own a product called a Flash Powermop. Here in the UK, Flash is a manufacturer of cleaning products. It's just a mop with replacable heads and a squirter in the handle that can deposit cleaning fluid when a button is pressed.

    It doesn't have DRM - it has old-fashioned mechanical limitations. The cleaning fluid comes in an official Flash powermop cartridge. Much old an ancient inkjet printer, the cartridge has only one port, and it's mechanically designed to only dock with the corresponding port on the mop. They really made it solid too, so you can't force it open to refill an empty cartridge. It's basically a rubbery window - the mop has two hollow needles that pierce it. One to let air in, one to get fluid out.

    So I cut a hole in the top of the bottle and silicone-sealed the screwtop from a soft drink bottle over it. Now I have a refill board, and an everlasting cartridge. I enough people do this, I'll expect the Powermop 2 to come with a chip in the bottle that records how much has been dispensed.

    1. Re:I've seen similar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In North America, the identical product is called a Swiffer Wetjet.

    2. Re:I've seen similar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't have DRM - it has old-fashioned mechanical limitations. The cleaning fluid comes in an official Flash powermop cartridge. Much old an ancient inkjet printer, the cartridge has only one port, and it's mechanically designed to only dock with the corresponding port on the mop. They really made it solid too, so you can't force it open to refill an empty cartridge. It's basically a rubbery window - the mop has two hollow needles that pierce it. One to let air in, one to get fluid out.

      If that is anything like the Swiffer Wetjet, there is a solution. The cartridge top is screw-on, but has tabs to prevent it from being unscrewed. The "fix" is to take hot water, soak the top in the water for a few seconds up to half a minute or so, then unscrew it while the tabs are still soft from the heat. After the top is removed, a sharp box cutter blade will make quick work of removing the tabs.

      After the tabs are removed, the top screws and unscrews normally.

  32. Don't look down by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    And the Schrodinger's version?

  33. Re:Principles? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Hi, I'm a moron who not only enjoys bumping into trees because I don't want to know that I'm in a forest, I like to brag about it on Slashdot, too.

    TFTFY.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  34. Invest 3 weeks to train your cat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It took our cat 3 weeks to learn to use the normal toilet. Do a search for "toilet training cat" and you come up with training instructions. If you want to spend money you can buy some training kit.

  35. The correct word is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Naturally there is an annual subscription fee ...

    If you take away one "n" and one "u" from that bolded word, what would you get ?

  36. News for Geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you, people, geeks or what? With all that Arduino and robotics stuff available on the market, and you are whining about a cat litter box having been DRM-ed!

  37. Ewww...train your cats... by bradley13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On a related note, he notes that the cat litter sticks to his cats paws, and he really dislikes finding cat litter particles on his kitchen counters, tables, chopping boards, etc.

    Ewww... Why don't people train their cats properly. It's not hard. My cats do not enter the kitchen, and all tables are also off limits. Teach them the rules when they are kittens. Afterwards, maybe once every year or two, you'll need to remind them that the rules haven't changed.

    How to train? You just let them understand that there is a really odd law of nature: going in the kitchen or hopping on a table causes them to get wet. Squirt gun, pans of water set back from the table edge, whatever. Don't yell or anything - you don't want them to associate the water with you, but with the location they tried to go. Easy, and well worth it...

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Ewww...train your cats... by eam · · Score: 2

      Heck, training is even easier than that. Just install this in the kitchen:

      http://www.amazon.com/Scarecro...

    2. Re:Ewww...train your cats... by danomac · · Score: 1

      Sure they'll follow your "rules" when you are around.

      If you put a camera up when you are not around, your cats will be going to places where you don't want them to. They're funny that way.

    3. Re:Ewww...train your cats... by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Some cats are more trainable than others. My family's last cat was not trainable for anything but when food was about to be given him, but thankfully also not able to get on counters or tables what with having acrophobia. Clicker training is the only kind that might have worked, but that's not particularly useful when you want to train an animal to not do things.

  38. I read Jeniffer Lopez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it.

  39. All on "it's" own? by azav · · Score: 1

    All on it is own?

    I really wish that posts get automatically grammar checked. People who communicate with adults need to learn third grade English.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  40. DCMA shutdown in 3...2......... by TrentTheThief · · Score: 1

    It's coming. The company would crash, obviously, if you could let your cat shit in just any old brand of litter. They have to protect their market share against interlopers!

  41. Why is this news? by Jimbo+God+of+Unix · · Score: 1

    It's been out for a few years already. This is old dusty, crufty news.

    It was news 2 or 3 years ago.

  42. Stupid consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop buying DRM enabled devices, morons.

  43. Sounds like it could be time ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... to crowd source an alternative.

  44. People still buy Origin games by phorm · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I don't play a lot of Origin games (mostly steam, though they're similar in concept), but it's still a vast improvement over what I had previously in many cases. Multiple discs, serial keys, etc. My biggest complaint is the lack of multiplayer servers. At least with previous games of Battlefield etc you could host your own - on a Linux server even - but now you pretty much have to buy hosting and older games pretty much die out. That's more designed obsolescence than DRM though.

  45. Remember who done it to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > This is all courtesy of US' DMCA law.

    Remember it was the Clintons that signed it into the law when you vote in the next presidential election.

    1. Re:Remember who done it to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Remember it was the Clintons that signed it into the law when you vote in the next presidential election.

      "The Clintons" were in office, LOL. I'm sure Bill said to Hillary, "honey is it okay if I sign this legislation?"

  46. Everything old is new.... by gtworld2001 · · Score: 1

    There used to be a similar product in Canada. At that time they named it 'Catch-It'. (Worth saying out loud...) As Jack Paar used to say, "I kid you not".