Slashdot Mirror
CIA on UFO Sightings: 'It Was Us'
mrflash818 sends word that the CIA has taken the blame for a majority of early UFO sightings. In a tweet, the agency said, "It was us," and linked to a document summarizing their use of U-2 spy planes from 1954-1974 (PDF).
"High-altitude testing of the U-2led to an unexpected side effect — a tremendous increase in reports of unidentified flying objects," the CIA wrote in the document, which it wrote in 1998. "In the mid-1950s, most commercial airliners flew at altitudes between 10,000 and 20,000 feet and [many] military aircraftoperated at altitudes below 40,000 feet. Consequently, once U-2s started flying at altitudes above 60,000 feet, air-traffic controllers began receiving increasing numbers of UFO reports." [T]he CIA cross-referenced UFO sightings to U-2 flight logs. "This enabled the investigators to eliminate the majority of the UFO reports," the CIA wrote, "although they could not reveal to the letter writers the true cause of the UFO sightings."
If I was a Sleestak alien overlord, that's exactly what I would say.
But it was aliens.
(BTW, what happened to the other half?
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
That makes sense. Doesn't explain the Men in Black.
It's best to get in front of these PR issues...
I'm skeptical about aliens in UFOs, but I'm also skeptical that U2 aircraft were responsible.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Yes military aircraft probably accounts for the majority of sightings, but not the ones that zip around faster than anything we have even today, stop on a dime and go another direction just as fast. Plus there's the book "The Day After Roswell" written by Colonel Philip J. Corso. That book convinced Canada's former Minister of National Defense (Paul Hellyer) to go public about American involvement with alien technology and beings. And there is also all of the people involved in "The Disclosure Project": government employees from around the world getting together to blow the whistle in a press conference. They assembled their evidence in a book that you can still buy today.
Our very existence prooves that intelligent life happens and we can't be the only star with life of billions in our galaxy, which is just one of billions of galaxies in the universe. An alien civilization that is thousands or millions of years more technologically advanced and evolved has probably found a way to get here. Our physics today doesn't have an answer. Go back 200 years ago and tell people that we'd be driving horseless carriages, flying above the clouds anywhere in the world within a day, landing on the moon and returning, or communicating with people around the world instantaneously. They would have burned you at the stake like mainstream science does today (ending your career) when you talk about aliens.
Whenever the CIA admits to something, I wonder, what's the bigger lie they're trying to cover up? Or, am I just being paranoid? Could somebody please send water to 37.2350 N, 115.8111 W, I'm really thirsty, thanks!
Look it, they want us to believe it was them. But the truth is aliens did come.
BUT the CIA was behind the Kennedy assassination with Marilyn Monroe's help.
Also, Marilyn was also the architect behind the fake Moon landing.
You all should know too, that Eric Snowden is actually working for the CIA - well, a splinter group. See, the NSA pissed off some bigshot at the CIA so the CIA had Snowden take them out - although the FBI is behind the CIA splinter group due to Obama being the anti-Christ.
It all makes perfect sense.
Now, with the U2 siightings. See, Bono caused it. I mean really, he is obviously an Alien. And what better cover than an obnoxious Irishmen - let alone a rock star.
Gotta get to Costco and get my aluminum foil to make new hats because Bono has been stealing all of my songs and passing them off as his - with some changes of course. "Pride, in the name of love" was originally, "Fuck, I stubbed my toe." -
I have always thought it was bunk until now.
This right here though is kind of hard to ignore, since we know the CIA has never told the truth to the American people about anything unless congress speciifcally drags it out of them or there is a leak....so....I think its safe to assume that none of these incidents were them, and in fact, they can't rule any out....and even the fact that they are commenting on this strongly implies a coverup.
"I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
Wait till they declassify the Elvis sighting reports... It was really President JFK, disguised by plastic surgery after he secretly resigned !
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
What about the other 49%? Are they real aliens? Or just NSA? Or some other TLA?
If so, it's pretty funny that the UFOs actually were based at Area 51 :)
I thought that the CIA didn't have authority to spy in the US (at least in the 70s, 80s and 90s). So does that mean they confessed to spying on US Citizens before they were legally permitted?
What I'm not getting: OK, so there's a new kind of plane up there, flying especially high. Does it look that much more like a UFO than other planes? Up that high, isn't it just a speck? People are calling in to report, "Look, I saw a speck in the sky, it must be aliens"?
I am submitting a FOIA request to get that anal probe data.
Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
If I was a Sleestak alien overlord, that's exactly what I would say.
I know what CIA are trying to do ... they are trying very hard to discredit ALL the UFO sighting reports
Even if most of the UFO sightings are bonkers, some of the sightings just can't be explained away with whatever CIA did, nor the U-2 spy planes
I guess this identification chart is now obsolete:
http://xmb.stuffucanuse.com/xm...
When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
That's not fair, ok? Taking away our toy after we spent so many years explaining how THEY keep us in the dark and how THEY cover up everything, then come out with a perfectly reasonable explanation. But it's all just a plot! Plans within plans within plans. They just SAY that it was their now-no-longer-secret planes to make us think that they did hide something, that they had some good reason for it and now we're supposed to believe them telling us the truth just because it is rationally sane and makes perfect sense? PAH! Since when did this have any room in conspiracy!
The truth is out there. Far, far out there. And I'm NOT paranoid! Because if you are, THEY will notice it!
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
This is such horseshit. Regardless of what you think of UFOs, of the hundreds of thousands of UFO sightings, many reported by military people, law enforcement and people trained to observe aircraft, hardly any of them resembled anything like a U2 spyplane.
Last time I checked, a U2 spyplane was not really capable of hovering motionless and then accelerating to the horizon in a moment. Nor were they gigantic triangular craft.
I don't think for a second that there are aliens from Ork involved with the UFO sightings that have been common for the last five millennia, but I doubt more than a handful were people who were seeing U2 spyplanes. Who knows fuck-all about what those UFOs really were or whether they were inside or outside the observers heads? But at the moment, I'm not prepared to believe a goddamn thing the CIA says about anything. In my opinion, they're a bigger threat to people's safety and sanity than practically any outside threat, including North Korea, Iran, Russia or Israel (who are all plenty bad),
Now, if you want to tell me that the abductions people have been reporting for the past 40 years are the CIA, I may buy that, because they are some sadistic motherfuckers who love putting things up peoples' asses, as we have learned from recent government leaks. Yeah, anal probes, mutilations, etc, that sounds just like the CIA's speed.
You are welcome on my lawn.
Pay no attention to the torture, er I mean Enhance Interrogation Technique, er I mean EITs, yeah EIT's sounds better. Look UFO's!
Never mind that we cruelly froze an innocent guy to death, UFO's!!!
Once the CIA has everyone believing the UFO sightings were actually spy planes, they'll be ready to blame all the upcoming CIA drone sightings on extra-terrestrial vehicles.
Oh yeah, I believe everything the government says, especially the CIA.
Well.. Ummm... So the CIA is taking credit for a flying device which moves at MACH speeds and changes directions on a dime? Seriously?
Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
My kind of UFO
Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
I think this is actually evidence for the existence of aliens. Given how they can't stop lying.
The USA ran a disinformation campaign around area 51 so as to obscure testing at area 51.
MUFON, who handled a lot of UFO reporting, was often running local chapters using retired military officers or retired spooks or intelligence folks and a condition of the reporting was signing away your disclosure rights. So much for the conspiracy stuff.
No real evidence of aliens but I personaly have seen a lot of strange stuff out there. Most likely plasmoids generated by ionized gas within geomagnetic fields and lit up by exited electrons. However some of these seem to exhibit a principle of awareness or response to mental phenomenon, at those megahertz can also provoke mental phenomenon. Perhaps a state between cosmic awareness and the physicla world that will never be fully explained but I think Russelian Physics comes the closest.
Have gnu, will travel.
Sure, it flies high, but according to Wikipedia top speed is about 500 mph, and it's very unstable, it would definitely not be doing any fancy twists and turns. So you're talking about a tiny object flying fairly slow and straight at 70,000 feet. I don't see it attracting a lot of attention. The whole point of the plane was that the Soviets couldn't detect it(didn't work out so well, but most civilians aren't walking around with high-powered radar arrays)
Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
Almost every single person now has a still+video camera on their person at all times.
And yet, globally, there has been nothing really new, let alone groundbreaking, as far as...
UFOs / aliens
Bigfoot / Yeti / Abominable Snowmen
the Lock Ness monster / other sea monsters
ghosts
etc
There hasn't even been a spike in "disappearances" of people or content online.
If you look at one of those Internet compilations of Photos you really need to look at to understand, it is very impressive just how confused you can be by chance juxtapositions of visual elements.
#18 is particularly interesting. It's not a precise juxtaposition. The shadow looks like the shadow of a flag; it's not shaped like the rug. You can understand intellectually what's happening in about five seconds. And yet it takes a real effort of will to perceive the rug is lying on the sand. Relax for an instant and it once again looks as if it is levitating.
"How to Do Nothing," kids activities, back in print!
convinced Canada's former Minister of National Defense (Paul Hellyer) to go public about American involvement with alien technology and beings.
Paul Hellyer also believes that we could end our reliance on fossil fuels by harnessing the power cosmic, if only it weren't for those pesky bankers!
The world could end its dependence on fossil fuels by harnessing "the energy that exists in everything within the cosmos."
People could replace their car engines and furnaces with a little box that harnesses the "exotic energy" of the universe except the world's banking "cabal" prevents people from accessing the technology, Hellyer says. - http://www.ottawasun.com/2014/...
This was made public a number of years ago.
A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
Yes, I respect Paul Hellyer and think the Americans are withholding alien technology from the world. Why would they share it? It doesn't make sense from a military perspective, and it would destroy the petrodollar.
People who don't want to look, won't see.
There are dozens of arguments which detail how people are poor observers, easily tricked, etc. -And this is true. But like neurons firing, when you get enough activity, a signal emerges and things tip.
I can be fooled dozens of ways into thinking that there are dogs in the park. I can be accused of all sorts of bias problems, etc. But the frailty of human perceptive abilities doesn't mean that there are actually no dogs in the park.
"Yes, but there is not enough evidence for the Spooky Shit."
Except there is.
Those who argue against the Spooky Shit out there existing have simply not bothered to read the reports or the history. There's more than enough signal to at least give pause to the truly open-minded skeptic.
Read Richard Dolan's first book, "UFOs and the National Security State" -He sifted through thousands of incidents from the 1940's to the 1970's, selecting only those which involved multiple witnesses who were also aviation, military or police professionals required to document things in the course of their jobs. Even with those filters in place, he offers a couple hundred astonishing reports. -Along with admissions from senior Air Force staffers who tell us point blank that they were charged with lying to the public in order to quell concerns.
The argument about cell phone camera proliferation proving a negative is lazy and ill-informed because, A) There are in fact hundreds of captures available for your viewing pleasure on YouTube, and B) most of those suck because photographing dots in the sky is hard and not worth much, and C) the really close encounters tend to mess with electronics, perceptions and time. If you can't keep your brain's bio-electrics running correctly, what chance does your smart phone have? -Let alone your car engine.
Also worth reading is pretty much anything by John Keel. -Old school journalism at its finest. I especially found his collection of newspaper clippings from the 1800's fascinating. This shit has been going on forever. (And for the record, he doesn't think it's about space aliens. He thinks it's something which is native to Earth, and which has the characteristics of a malevolent trickster of sorts.)
Crop circles, (though the genuine ones appear to have stopped now for a number of reasons), are also quite revealing. Check out the film, "Crop Circles; Quest for Truth" -It addresses all the usual skeptical brush-offs without particularly intending to. Magnetic seeds? Shit, dude! There are a variety of details which simply don't hold with assholes with ropes and planks. Not to mention the black helicopters and military clamp downs reported by witnesses.
Cattle Mutilation is another fascinating subject which has only been 'debunked' in the most wishful sense. The arguments against it, even from the premier skeptical websites, are astonishingly infantile and easily disproved with the most cursory research and basic logic.
So this is not a case of there not being ample proof; those who argue against are simply very ignorant or very willful in their denial. -And please note that when I say "Ignorant" I do not mean it as an insult. Ignorance is just a state of mind where the information has not yet been accessed. It's the *reason* for the ignorance which can sometimes be damning.
Personally, I don't understand why people wouldn't explore this material thoroughly. I mean, we're talking about the possibility of some truly amazing shit happening on our planet, right here and now. -It's safe to say that everybody on Slashdot is a sci-fi fan, so why wouldn't the possibility of the real thing be considered at least somewhat interesting and worthy of more attention than a half-baked brush-off?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Pretty much sums up all the bullshit you hear about aliens in UFOs
you little mind controlled slave
Comment removed based on user account deletion
WTF does the aircraft flight ceiling have to do with anything? 20,000, 40,000, or 60,0000... The article seems to indicate that the rise in UFO's was due to spyplanes that flew at 60,000 feet. Sorry, if a spy plane is flying at 60,000 feet you won't even see it, that is kind of the point (and the fact that they are harder to detect and intercept). The only time UFO sightings would even be possible, would be when they come in to land or take off. Which would make sense if the sighting were situated around a military base with an airfield.
Besides if Aliens can figure out how to magically travel between the stars, I am pretty sure they can figure out a way not to be seen if they do not want to be.
Mirage Men (miragemen.com) a doco released last year has interviews with ex-NSA and AFOSI agents who were doing this sort of thing in the 80's. NOt your average UFO doc, but then I am one of the people who made it so am biased.
That's believable
They're covering for something here. What I saw wasn't remotely like anything I've ever seen conventionally.
A bright yellow orb with a propulsion that sounded like tyres going through wet road and seemed to lift gracefully as if unaffected by gravity
The irony in the CIA's admission is that on 16 December 1953 Kelly Johnson -- the lead designer of the CIA's U2 spy plane -- his wife, and one of Johnson's test crews, who were flying a Lockhead WV2 aircraft in the same vicinity, spotted a UFO that hovered over the Santa Barbara Channel for 6 to 7 minutes.
Johnson's conclusion after his sighting: "I am now more convinced than ever, that such devices exist, and I have some highly technical converts in this belief."
The Air Force's conclusion? "Johnson, his wife, and the airplane crew had seen a lenticular cloud."
"It's a question of who you going to believe: your lying eyes or the government?" -- John Callahan, former FAA investigator who briefed several CIA officials (among others) on the JAL 1628 incident over Anchorage Alaska in 1987.
The CIA is lying, that is their job. 8-)