Slashdot Mirror


Blogger Who Revealed GOP Leader's KKK Ties Had Home Internet Lines Cut

blottsie writes Last month, Lamar White, Jr. set off a firestorm in Washington when a post on his personal blog revealed that House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, the third most powerful Republican in the House of Representatives, was a featured speaker at a white nationalist conference put on by former Klu Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke. Then someone climbed in his back yard and severed his Internet cables.

26 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. Censorship? by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee, they fight for their second amendment rights but stop someone else from using their rights under the first.

    "My rights are for me and me alone."

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Censorship? by B1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think this is more about intimidation than censorship.

      By cutting his cable, they may be silencing him temporarily, but more importantly they are sending him a message. "We know where you live."

    2. Re:Censorship? by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Indeed. Even the blogger who had his lines cut is (surprisingly) calm about it. He says:

      "It might not be the Klan or the white nationalists, it could just be a random person who found my address and didn't like what I was posting," he said. "I understand my address is public record. If someone wants to find where you live, they can find where you live, no matter who you are. I'm really not intimidated by that."

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Censorship? by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Back when my email address was listed with my /. name I posted an anti-Bush comment, got sent a creepy picture of an old tombstone. Intimidation has always been a favorite tactic of bullying types.

    4. Re:Censorship? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have found progressives more inclined to ask questions of their critics than conservatives

      It has to do with mental makeup, that is to say progressives are a great deal more curious about the world around them, while conservatives already know how everything is and just want to shut up those who disagree with them

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    5. Re:Censorship? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      progressives are also much better at the avoidance of buying into stereotypes as well.

    6. Re:Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Every time you trot out this known falsehood you sound like an idiot. They were political organizations that were required to do more work to prove that they were following the law and not taking advantage of hype in one area or another. The groups targeted were both left and right leaning groups and the leftists groups were the only ones denied anything. Stop lying or being misinformed. I'm so sick of people who can't see that they are being manipulated by political entities against their own self interest acting as the mouthpiece for their overlords. I'm not saying it's an issue that affects one political party more than another, but currently conservatives seem to be the ones more full of stupid. No one should be proud to be ignorant. We have enough real issues to deal with that this kind of childish distraction just gets in the way of getting things most Americans already agree on done.

    7. Re:Censorship? by usuallylost · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am not sure this is a sign of an attempt to silence this guy. A few years ago I had something very similar happen to me, and I am not a blogger with enemies. This was before we got cable Internet in my area. My employer had put a fractional T1 line in so that I could work from home when I was on call. Somebody came along cut the cable off the back of my house pulled the whole thing up all the way back to the box behind the row of houses and took it. They guy who came from the phone company was of the opinion they wanted the copper. From the way the guy talked it sounded like it was a fairly common occurrence. Copper prices are much higher now than they were back then. So it is entirely possible that somebody wanted the cable but it was just too hard for them to pull up. That fits the description of the damage in the article.

    8. Re:Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> progressives are a great deal more curious about the world around them, while conservatives already know how everything
      >
      > I'm sure you'd like to believe this, but it isn't true. There are introspective people from all walks and everywhere on the spectrum,

      What you wrote is true in the binary sense, but it does not address the numbers of such people. It is part of the definition of conservatism to be satisified with the status quo and conversely, progressivism has a central tenant that change is necessary. And while there are certainly conservatives who believe change is necessary, that very fact makes them less conservative than those who think progress is unnecessary.

    9. Re:Censorship? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you of course assume that if I suggest that the *minimum* intelligence of a right winger is low, it must mean I am a left winger and therefore think left wingers are smarter.

      FYI I'm neither a left nor right winger. I am a free thinker and an independent voter. I have actually voted for twice as many republicans as democrats (2 republicans vs 1 democrat).

      I'm not sure why the idea that the dumbest right winger would in fact be dumb is even controversial. The dumbest left winger is no doubt dumb as well, but I don't see why this even needs to be explicitly stated. It should be obvious.

  2. Re:Telecom sabotage - what's the penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given the state of net neutrality today, it seems to be a Senate seat.

  3. Re:Telecom sabotage - what's the penalty? by Fx.Dr · · Score: 5, Funny

    $200 Billion in tax breaks.

  4. Re:Internet cables? by Russ1642 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're actually tubes, not cables.

  5. Police State! by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly, this was done by the thugs at the NASA at the behest of the United State Government, in the person of House Majority Whip Steve Scalise - a Republican, of course. This just goes to show how evil and corrupt our government has become - after all, even the leadership in China would never do anything like this. Government sponsored censorship is on the rise in this country!

    Wait, why is this even a story? Someone vandalized someone else's house because they didn't like something they wrote and published on the Internet?

  6. Re:Internet cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, and now the guy's back yard is full of cats.

  7. His ties to the KKK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's stretching it a bit. While touring New Orleans to speak about his opposition the Stelly tax plan, he spoke once to a small EURO contingent, hours before the actual convention, not at the actual convention, one stop among many. Guilty by brief association?

    http://www.snopes.com/politics...

    1. Re:His ties to the KKK? by andydread · · Score: 5, Interesting

      this is the same guy that said he's David Duke without the baggage were talking about here.

    2. Re:His ties to the KKK? by orgelspieler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's David fucking Duke. You can't be a politician from Louisiana and NOT know who he is. How do you go speak at a group and not do even a little bit of research on what they stand for? He may not be a neo-Nazi, but he's completely ignorant when it comes to political appearances. How does a guy like that make it to a leadership position in the Republican party?

  8. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by Doitroygsbre · · Score: 5, Informative

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), the House majority whip, acknowledged Monday that he spoke at a gathering hosted by white-supremacist leaders while serving as a state representative in 2002

    So he confirmed he spoke to a group, but didn't know they were founded by Duke and didn't know they were racist. Where is the lie?

    --
    There in no religion higher than truth.
  9. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nonsense.. Even Scalise doesn't believe that.

  10. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by andydread · · Score: 4, Informative

    actually that has been debunked. He did speak to them and he's gone so far as admitted it. He also told a reporter that he's "David Duke without all the baggage"

  11. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by dywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The hypocrisy is thick alright.
    About as thick as that pile of BS you just spouted.

    The dude admitted he spoke to them.
    That's your narrative.
    Case closed.

    As for Robert Byrd, he repeatedly said he quit and left, and repeatedly apologized for the year he was a member, and repeatedly spoke against discrimination and in favor or tolerance. Yes, you got him: he started a local chapter and though it was a good thing, for about a year. And then spent the rest of his life apologizing for and denouncing it.

    But as you said, the narrative has been set, and the facts don't matter.
    The only think you left out is that you were speaking about yourself.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  12. Standard cop tactic in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this is more about intimidation than censorship. [...] they are sending him a message. "We know where you live."

    I am a witness in a court case against a local city cop who has been running an illegal dumping ring with the assistance of corrupt members of the state environmental protection agency and the county cops.

    I got a 2am visit from the state cops and a county cop. They said that a neighbor had his car broken into and some of my mail (stolen from my mailbox) was found in the car. They accused me of getting drunk, breaking into the neighbor's car, and accidentally leaving my mail there. After harassing me and my neighbor (also a witness) for a couple of hours they left. At no point did my neighbor accuse me of breaking into his car and everybody present knew exactly what was going on - the cops were saying "all cops are brothers, and we will break the law to protect our brothers, and we know who you two guys are".

    They were really hoping one of us would get noisy or do something aggressive so they could just shoot us, of course. Because every cop knows now that they can shoot an unarmed man on camera and get away with it. Cops are above the law, just like the ultra-rich are.

    Pissed me right off, I can tell you. But I stayed calm and addressed them as "Sir" so I'm still alive to testify....

    1. Re:Standard cop tactic in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, did you tell the prosecutor (or plaintiff)? Even in Philadelphia, witness intimidation can get you in trouble.

    2. Re:Standard cop tactic in the USA by jklovanc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you report it to any of the following; local police board, state police board, prosecutor in the case? The prosecutor would be your best bet as they usually get pissed off when their witnesses are messed with. The prosecutor could charge the officers with witness tampering. Did you politely ask for the case number so you could refer to the incident later?

  13. Re:Internet cables? by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what do you prefer to call the coax cable that carries the internet connection? "The network frobnication string"?

    The "coaxial cable", or the "cable television connection".

    What's particularly stupid is the claim that it took a "power tool" to cut this line. Cutting standard 75 ohm cable TV cables takes all the power of ... a knife. At worst, a pair of dikes. Now, maybe this guy was special and the cable company used hardline into his house, but even then a simple bolt cutter would make quick work of it.

    Let's see if we can summarize this tempest over this awful event. A politician organized and led a chapter of the KKK. He sent a letter to senator saying:

    I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.

    He was interviewed in 2001 and said:

    There are white niggers. I've seen a lot of white niggers in my time, if you want to use that word.

    His bigotry extended to gay rights, where he:

    ... strongly opposed Clinton's 1993 efforts to allow gays to serve in the military and supported efforts to limit gay marriage. In 1996, before the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act, he said, "The drive for same-sex marriage is, in effect, an effort to make a sneak attack on society by encoding this aberrant behavior in legal form before society itself has decided it should be legal. [...] Let us defend the oldest institution, the institution of marriage between male and female as set forth in the Holy Bible."

    This Scalise guy is clearly ... oh, wait. He didn't do any of that. That's all stuff that the highly respected Senator Robert Byrd did.

    So what did Scalise do that shows he has "KKK ties"? He was invited to and spoke at a conference that he didn't know was organized by someone involved with the KKK. He talked about economics. Afterwards, the KKK organizers blogged about all the useful information about slush funds he gave them, as if his intent was to teach the KKK about how to use slush funds for evil things.

    Scalise no more has KKK ties than Barack Obama has KKK ties because Obama spoke at Byrd's funeral and said good things about him.