Slashdot Mirror


Blogger Who Revealed GOP Leader's KKK Ties Had Home Internet Lines Cut

blottsie writes Last month, Lamar White, Jr. set off a firestorm in Washington when a post on his personal blog revealed that House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, the third most powerful Republican in the House of Representatives, was a featured speaker at a white nationalist conference put on by former Klu Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke. Then someone climbed in his back yard and severed his Internet cables.

67 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. Censorship? by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee, they fight for their second amendment rights but stop someone else from using their rights under the first.

    "My rights are for me and me alone."

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Censorship? by B1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think this is more about intimidation than censorship.

      By cutting his cable, they may be silencing him temporarily, but more importantly they are sending him a message. "We know where you live."

    2. Re:Censorship? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well the person who you think is using "Right to Free Speech" to Vandalize someone's infrastructure that they too use to deploy free speech. So who is censoring who?

      Free Speech doesn't mean every freaking action you do, because you want to send a message falls under free speech.

      In that case those gangsters who shoot down those other gangsters to explain that this is their territory are in the right as well.
       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Censorship? by operagost · · Score: 2

      Who is "they"? Do you have evidence you'd like to share?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Censorship? by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Indeed. Even the blogger who had his lines cut is (surprisingly) calm about it. He says:

      "It might not be the Klan or the white nationalists, it could just be a random person who found my address and didn't like what I was posting," he said. "I understand my address is public record. If someone wants to find where you live, they can find where you live, no matter who you are. I'm really not intimidated by that."

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Censorship? by Serenissima · · Score: 2

      Then he grabbed his mobile device and started blogging again. :)

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    6. Re:Censorship? by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Back when my email address was listed with my /. name I posted an anti-Bush comment, got sent a creepy picture of an old tombstone. Intimidation has always been a favorite tactic of bullying types.

    7. Re:Censorship? by sycodon · · Score: 3, Informative

      The same people who claim to have nooses put on their door knobs, or had the N word written on their check, or etc. etc. only to find they did it themselves, "to make a statement"

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    8. Re:Censorship? by poetmatt · · Score: 2

      It's also hilariously ineffective in this day and age where wireless access does tend to exist.

      If someone cuts the internet connection to my house I can just tether my phone to my router and continue uninterrupted. So as long as I have power, this doesn't mean shit. What's sad is that the moron trying to intimidate via cutting internet cables didn't get electrocuted in the process.

    9. Re:Censorship? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have found progressives more inclined to ask questions of their critics than conservatives

      It has to do with mental makeup, that is to say progressives are a great deal more curious about the world around them, while conservatives already know how everything is and just want to shut up those who disagree with them

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    10. Re:Censorship? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...it could even have been the blogger, in a stunt to garner even more attention.

    11. Re:Censorship? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      progressives are also much better at the avoidance of buying into stereotypes as well.

    12. Re:Censorship? by HBI · · Score: 2
      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    13. Re:Censorship? by HBI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure you'd like to believe this, but it isn't true. There are introspective people from all walks and everywhere on the spectrum, but most people are captives of their own echo chamber and don't want to hear a word otherwise. Leftists do not have any special properties in this regard. They are just as eager to squelch speech as any other government, when in power.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    14. Re:Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Every time you trot out this known falsehood you sound like an idiot. They were political organizations that were required to do more work to prove that they were following the law and not taking advantage of hype in one area or another. The groups targeted were both left and right leaning groups and the leftists groups were the only ones denied anything. Stop lying or being misinformed. I'm so sick of people who can't see that they are being manipulated by political entities against their own self interest acting as the mouthpiece for their overlords. I'm not saying it's an issue that affects one political party more than another, but currently conservatives seem to be the ones more full of stupid. No one should be proud to be ignorant. We have enough real issues to deal with that this kind of childish distraction just gets in the way of getting things most Americans already agree on done.

    15. Re:Censorship? by plopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would call it terrorism.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    16. Re:Censorship? by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every time you trot out this known falsehood you sound like an idiot. They were political organizations that were required to do more work to prove that they were following the law and not taking advantage of hype in one area or another. The groups targeted were both left and right leaning groups and the leftists groups were the only ones denied anything. Stop lying or being misinformed. I'm so sick of people who can't see that they are being manipulated by political entities against their own self interest acting as the mouthpiece for their overlords. I'm not saying it's an issue that affects one political party more than another, but currently conservatives seem to be the ones more full of stupid. No one should be proud to be ignorant. We have enough real issues to deal with that this kind of childish distraction just gets in the way of getting things most Americans already agree on done.

      Small issue with your "known falsehood"... The IRS Inspector General reported that in fact, the IRS DID target conservative groups to a greater extent than non-conservative. This report is what started the whole noise machine in the first place.

      --
      Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
    17. Re:Censorship? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you might be overestimating the minimum intelligence of right wingers.

      3. A right wing supporter of Scalise, who should (but still doesn't) know the result will be #1.

      I think #1 and #3 are both pretty likely.

    18. Re:Censorship? by JackieBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you might be overestimating the minimum intelligence of right wingers.

      3. A right wing supporter of Scalise, who should (but still doesn't) know the result will be #1.

      I think #1 and #3 are both pretty likely.

      You would. A lot of closed minded people view people with opposite viewpoints as less intelligent.

    19. Re:Censorship? by usuallylost · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am not sure this is a sign of an attempt to silence this guy. A few years ago I had something very similar happen to me, and I am not a blogger with enemies. This was before we got cable Internet in my area. My employer had put a fractional T1 line in so that I could work from home when I was on call. Somebody came along cut the cable off the back of my house pulled the whole thing up all the way back to the box behind the row of houses and took it. They guy who came from the phone company was of the opinion they wanted the copper. From the way the guy talked it sounded like it was a fairly common occurrence. Copper prices are much higher now than they were back then. So it is entirely possible that somebody wanted the cable but it was just too hard for them to pull up. That fits the description of the damage in the article.

    20. Re:Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> progressives are a great deal more curious about the world around them, while conservatives already know how everything
      >
      > I'm sure you'd like to believe this, but it isn't true. There are introspective people from all walks and everywhere on the spectrum,

      What you wrote is true in the binary sense, but it does not address the numbers of such people. It is part of the definition of conservatism to be satisified with the status quo and conversely, progressivism has a central tenant that change is necessary. And while there are certainly conservatives who believe change is necessary, that very fact makes them less conservative than those who think progress is unnecessary.

    21. Re:Censorship? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you of course assume that if I suggest that the *minimum* intelligence of a right winger is low, it must mean I am a left winger and therefore think left wingers are smarter.

      FYI I'm neither a left nor right winger. I am a free thinker and an independent voter. I have actually voted for twice as many republicans as democrats (2 republicans vs 1 democrat).

      I'm not sure why the idea that the dumbest right winger would in fact be dumb is even controversial. The dumbest left winger is no doubt dumb as well, but I don't see why this even needs to be explicitly stated. It should be obvious.

    22. Re:Censorship? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, if you go back to the 40s and 50s, you will find that most of the south was Dems and there were even Dem Senators who had been Klan members

      Then this little thing call the Civil Rights Movement came along. Some of the former Klansmen (Sen Byrd is a good example) turned their backs on their past and worked to convince people to no longer be associated with that group

      By the 70s many people in the South were disillusioned with the Dem party because of the support of civil rights and they were attracted to the Republican party due to the Southern Strategy that was promoted by Nixon and Reagan

      Since that time 'States Rights' was the dog whistle to call the racists and klansmen to the GOP and they have gone over in droves, there is no surprise to find that the ranks of the gop are littered with people of that mindset

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    23. Re:Censorship? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...it could even have been the blogger, in a stunt to garner even more attention

      It could have even been... (*messes up hair so it stands straight up*) ... ALIENS.

      It could also have been your mom.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Censorship? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Actions sometimes send messages, but they are not speech.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    25. Re:Censorship? by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not about making a statement, it's really about ethics in games journalism.

    26. Re:Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perpetually arguing about left-wing and right-wing is one of the major reasons for the US political system being as fucked up as it is.

      I wish public opinion would finally, any day now, force the political discourse to sway away from the partisan bickering and towards actual issues.

      Of course, that won't happen. Because reasons.

    27. Re:Censorship? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      I think you might be overestimating the minimum intelligence of right wingers.

      Or the education of Left-wingers who don't know that the KKK has historically been closely tied to the Democrat party?

      (Even just Wikipedia will tell you that much.)

    28. Re:Censorship? by CronoCloud · · Score: 2, Informative

      the KKK has historically been closely tied to the Democrat party?

      It WAS tied to the Democrats. Even as early as 1948, the segregationists knew their welcome in the Democratic party was coming to an endl. the 1964 civil rights act and Nixon's Southern Strategy pretty much finished the job.

      The KKK's been Republican aligned for years.

    29. Re:Censorship? by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      Yes yes yes but PARTY POLITICS! SOLIDARITY!

      Seriously, people are *IDIOTS* when politics come out. One of the forums I hang out in refers to the phenomenon as "politics is the mind-killer". It turns normally rational people into raving lunatics at a sport competition, except with less cheering and (somehow) even more bullshit.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    30. Re: Censorship? by cduffy · · Score: 2

      Christianity = everyone encouraged to help the less fortunate and free to decide who is less fortunate

      Care to cite where the Bible tells people to only help the deserving poor?

  2. Re:Telecom sabotage - what's the penalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given the state of net neutrality today, it seems to be a Senate seat.

  3. Re:Telecom sabotage - what's the penalty? by Fx.Dr · · Score: 5, Funny

    $200 Billion in tax breaks.

  4. Re:Internet cables? by Russ1642 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're actually tubes, not cables.

  5. Re:This is Slashdot, not Politico by Dimwit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blogs are on the internet.

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
  6. Police State! by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly, this was done by the thugs at the NASA at the behest of the United State Government, in the person of House Majority Whip Steve Scalise - a Republican, of course. This just goes to show how evil and corrupt our government has become - after all, even the leadership in China would never do anything like this. Government sponsored censorship is on the rise in this country!

    Wait, why is this even a story? Someone vandalized someone else's house because they didn't like something they wrote and published on the Internet?

    1. Re:Police State! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Clearly, this was done by the thugs at the NASA at the behest of the United State Government

      Hey, at least the NASA thugs are intercepting ISIS's communications. Although I've never understood why they keep sending them supplies...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  7. Re:Internet cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, and now the guy's back yard is full of cats.

  8. His ties to the KKK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's stretching it a bit. While touring New Orleans to speak about his opposition the Stelly tax plan, he spoke once to a small EURO contingent, hours before the actual convention, not at the actual convention, one stop among many. Guilty by brief association?

    http://www.snopes.com/politics...

    1. Re:His ties to the KKK? by andydread · · Score: 5, Interesting

      this is the same guy that said he's David Duke without the baggage were talking about here.

    2. Re:His ties to the KKK? by orgelspieler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's David fucking Duke. You can't be a politician from Louisiana and NOT know who he is. How do you go speak at a group and not do even a little bit of research on what they stand for? He may not be a neo-Nazi, but he's completely ignorant when it comes to political appearances. How does a guy like that make it to a leadership position in the Republican party?

    3. Re:His ties to the KKK? by quantaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's stretching it a bit. While touring New Orleans to speak about his opposition the Stelly tax plan, he spoke once to a small EURO contingent, hours before the actual convention, not at the actual convention, one stop among many. Guilty by brief association?

      http://www.snopes.com/politics...

      The snopes article doesn't quite back you up. It's possible that he spoke to a related gathering a few hours before the convention, not knowing it was EURO related nor that there were a few white supremacists in attendance. But it's also possible that he did address the EURO convention with full knowledge of who they were, either because he wanted their support (or non-opposition) and/or he was sympathetic to their beliefs.

      The truth is there's insufficient information to know what really happened.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  9. Re:Internet cables? by Carewolf · · Score: 2

    Who the hell writes this crap? Internet cables?

    I assume this is in the US. Where the cables are in the air going from the house to the utility pole, just like in 3rd world countries. They probably cut the telephone cable as well if there was one, but who would notice that?

  10. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by Doitroygsbre · · Score: 5, Informative

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), the House majority whip, acknowledged Monday that he spoke at a gathering hosted by white-supremacist leaders while serving as a state representative in 2002

    So he confirmed he spoke to a group, but didn't know they were founded by Duke and didn't know they were racist. Where is the lie?

    --
    There in no religion higher than truth.
  11. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nonsense.. Even Scalise doesn't believe that.

  12. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by andydread · · Score: 4, Informative

    actually that has been debunked. He did speak to them and he's gone so far as admitted it. He also told a reporter that he's "David Duke without all the baggage"

  13. Re:nc by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    No need to kill, you just have to put on your robe and wizard hat.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  14. Re:This is Slashdot, not Politico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Republicans do terrible things every single day. it's not hard to find an instance of wrongdoing from a party that offers nothing but theocracy and right-wing authoritarianism, so don't act like these toxic, regressive assholes are somehow being picked on. It's certainly not just a matter of "basement dwellers" "disagreeing" with evil. Why do the Republicans always claim that their evil is something to be agreed or disagreed with?

    Face it, the losers who still haven't abandoned this insane, racist, far-right, deeply superstitious, reality-denying Republican party are terrible people. All the smart, well-meaning people bailed years ago when the wingnuts took over. Nixon and Reagan made huge mistakes in pandering to racists, homophobes, and superstitious people.

  15. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by dywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The hypocrisy is thick alright.
    About as thick as that pile of BS you just spouted.

    The dude admitted he spoke to them.
    That's your narrative.
    Case closed.

    As for Robert Byrd, he repeatedly said he quit and left, and repeatedly apologized for the year he was a member, and repeatedly spoke against discrimination and in favor or tolerance. Yes, you got him: he started a local chapter and though it was a good thing, for about a year. And then spent the rest of his life apologizing for and denouncing it.

    But as you said, the narrative has been set, and the facts don't matter.
    The only think you left out is that you were speaking about yourself.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  16. Standard cop tactic in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this is more about intimidation than censorship. [...] they are sending him a message. "We know where you live."

    I am a witness in a court case against a local city cop who has been running an illegal dumping ring with the assistance of corrupt members of the state environmental protection agency and the county cops.

    I got a 2am visit from the state cops and a county cop. They said that a neighbor had his car broken into and some of my mail (stolen from my mailbox) was found in the car. They accused me of getting drunk, breaking into the neighbor's car, and accidentally leaving my mail there. After harassing me and my neighbor (also a witness) for a couple of hours they left. At no point did my neighbor accuse me of breaking into his car and everybody present knew exactly what was going on - the cops were saying "all cops are brothers, and we will break the law to protect our brothers, and we know who you two guys are".

    They were really hoping one of us would get noisy or do something aggressive so they could just shoot us, of course. Because every cop knows now that they can shoot an unarmed man on camera and get away with it. Cops are above the law, just like the ultra-rich are.

    Pissed me right off, I can tell you. But I stayed calm and addressed them as "Sir" so I'm still alive to testify....

    1. Re:Standard cop tactic in the USA by OldSport · · Score: 2

      Man, I wish you had filmed it. Right onto Youtube and viral on the Internet. That's the only thing that kind of cop is afraid of.

    2. Re:Standard cop tactic in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, did you tell the prosecutor (or plaintiff)? Even in Philadelphia, witness intimidation can get you in trouble.

    3. Re:Standard cop tactic in the USA by jklovanc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you report it to any of the following; local police board, state police board, prosecutor in the case? The prosecutor would be your best bet as they usually get pissed off when their witnesses are messed with. The prosecutor could charge the officers with witness tampering. Did you politely ask for the case number so you could refer to the incident later?

    4. Re:Standard cop tactic in the USA by bigtrike · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Chicago, the internal affairs division of the police is staffed mostly by ex-cops. The prosecutor may be a better bet if they're not obviously trying to do a bad job to protect their brothers.

  17. Is anyone surprised? by TrentTheThief · · Score: 2

    KKK, ISIS, AL QUEDA, LOL.... Different idiots with the same outlook on disagreement.

  18. Why isn't the KKK a terrorist organization? by plopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They have lynched, raped, blown up churches, intimidated etc. Why are they not considered a terrorist organization?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Why isn't the KKK a terrorist organization? by plopez · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would say Dixiecrats, who have long since fled to the Republican Party. The TEA party are their intellectual heirs, IMO.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Why isn't the KKK a terrorist organization? by blueshift_1 · · Score: 2

      Because they're OUR terrorists. Which are natrually not nearly as bad as THEIR terrorists.

  19. Re:Except of course the story was FALSE by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    Except that he did not SPEAK to the racist group. He spoke to a neighborhood civic association...you know the types of groups which campaigning politicians speak at 5 or 6 a day? The fact that the chairman of that group was a friend of David Duke and had scheduled the David Duke group to meet at the same hotel later that day is not something you can reasonably expect either the Congressman (state legislator at the time) or his aids to know. If they had looked into the background of the civic association at whose meeting he was asked to meet, they would have discovered nothing except a normal neighborhood association. Why would they have looked into who else was meeting in that hotel later that day? My source by the way is the Times-Picayune and I gave the link further up the thread. Furthermore, I do not see any of these people fussing about President Obama associating with Al Sharpton, a much more virulent racist than David Duke (after all, I have never seen any allegations that David Duke stirred up violent protests which led to someone being killed , whereas Al Sharpton has no done it at least twice).

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  20. it's Jack Daniels, he did it by swschrad · · Score: 2

    or Old Overshoe or homebrew or whatever... there is always a fringe group of wackos that self-appoint themselves as avengers, just as soon as they get a little numb and it's dark enough...

    those guys will eventually spill the beans to a buddy over a cold one. cops might solve a quarter of their cases that way, working their way in to being that buddy.

    dating back to the original assassins, who had to get hopped up on a little hash before doing their tasks.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  21. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

    As for Robert Byrd, he repeatedly said he quit and left, and repeatedly apologized for the year he was a member, and repeatedly spoke against discrimination and in favor or tolerance.

    Uh, yeah. If he had been a Republican I would still see some a picture of him with some awful sneer or whatever (captured from a video) along with a hateful caption every single day on my facebook wall. But he was a Democrat so it's all good.

  22. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by NoDough · · Score: 2, Informative

    The dude admitted he spoke to them.
    That's your narrative.
    Case closed.

    No, he didn't. The "dude" said he didn't know the group he spoke to was a supremacist group and apologized IF they were.

    The reason he didn't know is because he didn't speak to the supremacist group. He spoke to a civics group. The only connection between the two groups was that the same man rented the same room for both groups. But the meetings were 2 1/2 hours apart.

    I have no idea whether the man is a white supremacist or not. But I hope I'm not gullible enough to label him as such just because a bunch of lemmings are taking it an running toward the cliff with it.

  23. Re:Internet cables? by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what do you prefer to call the coax cable that carries the internet connection? "The network frobnication string"?

    The "coaxial cable", or the "cable television connection".

    What's particularly stupid is the claim that it took a "power tool" to cut this line. Cutting standard 75 ohm cable TV cables takes all the power of ... a knife. At worst, a pair of dikes. Now, maybe this guy was special and the cable company used hardline into his house, but even then a simple bolt cutter would make quick work of it.

    Let's see if we can summarize this tempest over this awful event. A politician organized and led a chapter of the KKK. He sent a letter to senator saying:

    I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.

    He was interviewed in 2001 and said:

    There are white niggers. I've seen a lot of white niggers in my time, if you want to use that word.

    His bigotry extended to gay rights, where he:

    ... strongly opposed Clinton's 1993 efforts to allow gays to serve in the military and supported efforts to limit gay marriage. In 1996, before the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act, he said, "The drive for same-sex marriage is, in effect, an effort to make a sneak attack on society by encoding this aberrant behavior in legal form before society itself has decided it should be legal. [...] Let us defend the oldest institution, the institution of marriage between male and female as set forth in the Holy Bible."

    This Scalise guy is clearly ... oh, wait. He didn't do any of that. That's all stuff that the highly respected Senator Robert Byrd did.

    So what did Scalise do that shows he has "KKK ties"? He was invited to and spoke at a conference that he didn't know was organized by someone involved with the KKK. He talked about economics. Afterwards, the KKK organizers blogged about all the useful information about slush funds he gave them, as if his intent was to teach the KKK about how to use slush funds for evil things.

    Scalise no more has KKK ties than Barack Obama has KKK ties because Obama spoke at Byrd's funeral and said good things about him.

  24. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    He didn't remember the exact group he spoke to, so he said he was sorry if it was affiliated with the KKK... but it turned out it was not the same group at all.

    If you'd only read the original link you responded to, you would know that also.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by Orgasmatron · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those with weak reading comprehension:

    1. EURO organizes a conference.
    2. Knight, acting for EURO, books a hotel's conference facilities.
    3. The facilities include a hospitality room, generally like a lounge.
    4. Knight uses the hospitality room for other purposes, before the EURO conference starts.
    5. One of those other things is a meeting for a neighborhood association.
    6. Scalise spoke at that meeting, in the hospitality room.

    Now make sure your tinfoil hat is on good and tight because the next step is a doozy:

    7. Lamar White, Jr. asks three or four people if they've ever heard of the association in question, and they haven't.
    8. Lamar White, Jr. assumes that any time a group of 3 or more people gather they must obtain government permission and get recorded on the state registry of corporations and DBAs, so he queries that database and finds nothing.
    9. Lamar White, Jr. thus concludes that the whole thing was made up to hide Scalise's involvement.

    Note also that step 6 involves "speaking at an event HOSTED by", but not "speaking TO a conference of".

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
  26. When your hash table only has two buckets... by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do you equate gun-rights advocates with KKK members?

    When your hash table only has two buckets, you either hash into bucket 'A' or you hash into bucket 'B'.

  27. Funniness by Slim_Jack · · Score: 2

    The funny thing here is how David Duke seems to be a poster child (strawman) for anyone wanting to smear the Republican Party. Back in 1994 I volunteered for the Louisiana Republican Party's nomination convention, and Lindsey Graham and a few other national Republicans showed up; CNN sent a crew to record it and they never interviewed Graham or the other legit contenders, they kept trying to interview David Duke who was an unregistered attendee and kept getting thrown out of the hall -- he was a better story for them than any of the actual Republicans. Same story, different time.