Slashdot Mirror


The "Cool Brick" Can Cool Off an Entire Room Using Nothing But Water

ErnieKey writes Emerging Objects, a company which experiments with 3D printing technology, has created what they call the "Cool Brick." Using basic concepts of evaporation, it holds water like a sponge, takes in hot dry air and converts it into cool moist air. 3D-printed with a specially engineered lattice using ceramics, it can be formed into entire walls which could be placed in different rooms of a house or building, thus replacing the need for air conditioning in hot, dry climates such as deserts.

183 comments

  1. *cough* bullshit *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    *cough* bullshit *cough* 3d printed *cough* magic *cough cough*

    1. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      You seem to have a sore throat. You should consider buying a 'health brick'. 3d printed with a specially engineered ceramic lattice, 'health brick' uses basic concepts of medicine, it holds water like a sponge, takes in contaminated air and converts it into healthy air.

    2. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure you meant concepts of holistic medicine.

      But this brick is little more than a high tech swap cooler already used in homes in dry climates for years and years before AC was even invented. It would seem that the only magicsl thing about this is it would be vertical instead of horizontal. It still needs water and it still works off the evaporative cooling effect.

    3. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Rei · · Score: 1

      No, the point of the 3d printing is to give it a lattice of small channels, increasing its porosity and surface area.

      --
      I would have you sign my banana, but it's on the roof.
    4. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by tmosley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Almost like the fabric medium in current swamp coolers, except they can't be replaced because they are mortared in there, so everyone gets Legionnaire's Disease!

    5. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straw bales with a fan blowing over them do the trick too.
      However mold is unhealthy as is Legionella supported by a wall of damp slimy germ laden bricks pretending to be straw bales.

    6. Re: *cough* bullshit *cough* by rkcth · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not bullshit. Many commercial buildings in hot dry climate use evaporative chilers. You can also get devices that do it indoors. The issue with doing it indoors, is that once the air becomes saturated with moisture it stops working. Plus the room gets wet and cold, which is not a good environment, it leads to mold and mildew. Indoor evaporative coolers are best used in places that you only want to cook on rare occasions, that are very dry, and are located far from a window.

    7. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      But this brick is little more than a high tech swap cooler already used in homes in dry climates for years and years before AC was even invented. It would seem that the only magicsl thing about this is it would be vertical instead of horizontal. It still needs water and it still works off the evaporative cooling effect.

      Yeah, but this one is *3D PRINTED*! That makes this version much cooler.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    8. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Really it's just swamp cooler media. The only thing that makes swamp cooling viable is high CFM airflow. I lived with evaporative cooling only (no refrigerated a/c) for 25 years and a small house needs at least a 3000 CFM squirrel cage fan encased in a frame of three or four water soaked paper lattice or Excelsior wood fiber pads providing the moisture. The biggest problem is cooling media degradation due to calcification from hard water. As the water evaporates it leaves minerals behind. Some minerals do get suspended in the air, making a fine white dust, but most of the "lime" rinses through the media and is collected by a pump that runs it through the media again. The water becomes supersaturated in a day and dumps the precipitate on the media as the water evaporates and the temperature of the pad drops. Pumps with a "purge cycle" mitigate the issue somewhat but the media (and pump, and tubing) still becomes plugged and brittle in at most two seasons. Do you print a new wall at that point, or use purified water from the start? A new wood fiber pad is under four bucks (google "swamp cooler pads"), so I don't see how printing media is going to be useful. Passive cooling with wind power is right out, if the air is not moving fast enough it just warms up and then you have heat and humidity.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    9. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure you meant concepts of holistic medicine.

      But this brick is little more than a high tech swap cooler already used in homes in dry climates for years and years before AC was even invented. It would seem that the only magicsl thing about this is it would be vertical instead of horizontal. It still needs water and it still works off the evaporative cooling effect.

      And outside of the desert, isn't worth crap. Here in the Northeast, all this brick swamp cooler would do is add more water in the air.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      *cough* bullshit *cough* 3d printed *cough* magic *cough cough*

      Actually, it is a 3d printed evaporation cooler (swamp cooler). The "technology" has been around since ancient times. In hot, dry climates, soaking a porous object in water and letting it evaporate cools the air around it. The larger the object, the greater the effect. What's new here is using a 3d printer to create the substrate. Whether that substrate is more efficient than clay or cloth (the two most common substrates), is yet to be seen. In the US, there is limited locales that this could be used, such as the southwest. However, in many parts of the world, this could work wonders. Would it cool as much as modern air conditioner? No, but it would still cool.

    11. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clarifying what GP meant when it said "dry climates".

    12. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by fbumg · · Score: 2

      he, he, you said "cooler". I see what you did there!

      --
      I know I don't know what I don't know.
    13. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      Possibilities I see are:
      1) The media itself is able to withstand many "purge cycles" using acid to dissolve the calcification. I've had good results with citric acid to remove humidifier scale - the problem is that at least with my humidifier, the acid also attacks the wick so eventually the wick falls apart. A plastic mesh wick might be able to withstand this abuse.
      2) The vastly increased surface area of this approach might significantly reduce the airflow needed, and especially reduce the backpressure encountered by any air circulation mechanism.

      That said, it's still just a glorified swamp cooler so it won't work in many areas. In most of the areas it WOULD work, water is a precious resource.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    14. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      You forgot the "Doctors hate it!" part.

    15. Re: *cough* bullshit *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This technology is usable, but it has three caveats:

      1: It should be done with air going outside via a heat exchanger, so inside air isn't too wet.

      2: As stated previously, it requires a dry climate.

      3: There is the mold issue since there is a surface constantly wet. This can be addressed by a number of ways. The heat exchanger does help, but it might not hurt to have a UV light system as both part of the system to kill mold entering or exiting.

      In more humid areas like Texas or Florida, there is no getting around use of a compressor. Evaporative cooling will just not work most of the year, and the wind isn't steady enough to have a house cooled reliably cooled by breezes.

    16. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And outside of the desert, isn't worth crap. Here in the Northeast, all this brick swamp cooler would do is add more water in the air.

      And it can become useless in dry climates, too, when there's a monsoon season that cranks the humidity to 90+% while leaving the temperature elevated.

    17. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by skids · · Score: 1

      Nah he's just allergic to all the mold growing on his cool-bricks. He should have thrown them out when they stopped working due to the lattice getting clogged with calcium.

    18. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by killkillkill · · Score: 1
      The problem is it wouldn't add water to the air-- at least enough to use enough of the thermal energy in the room.

      It is perfect for the desert were there is low enough humidity and a never-ending supply of water to evaporate... oh, wait.

    19. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by MakersDirector · · Score: 0

      LOL!

      My thoughts, EXACTLY!

      Clearly nothing more than a 'respin' of old - and highly obsolete - technology known as "Evaporative Cooling", I wonder if these brain dead 'inventors' actually consider we have access to our past memories and the same databases they do ..

      Secondly, it's kind of funny. Whether it's manufactured by hand or through a 3d printing apparatus, it's still (as you said) *cough* bullshit *cough*.

      I'm giving you a BIG HUGE thumbs up for being the first to call it like it is, and I do hope you get scored higher because of it!

    20. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by MakersDirector · · Score: 0

      Good thing ya aint a marketing person for this company. You'd have made absolutely no sales with this *cough* bullshit *cough*!

    21. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by nobuddy · · Score: 2

      I am unaware of any dry climates that have a monsoon season.

    22. Re: *cough* bullshit *cough* by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      you can use the water heat exchanger to improve the operation of refrigeration cooling in humid areas. This is quite common,maybe universal, in large building cooling systems.

    23. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      I am interested because current technology requires the replacement of the substrate due to calcium buildup and infection by contaminants. A ceramic substrate would allow sterilization as well as lime removal processes making them permanent or at very least long lasting.

    24. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      Not at all obsolete. Evaporative cooling is pretty universal in large building cooling systems. On the small scale it is limited by area to dry climates, but is still very common in those areas. Go to the Great Plains and deserts and count how many swamp coolers are in use. You are likely to be very surprised.

    25. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      Arizona. WX folks talk about the monsoon season, when a pacific tropical system manages to go up the Colorado river.

    26. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by MakersDirector · · Score: 0

      I lived for 30 years in Phoenix, just moved away 2 years ago. Evap coolers are nonexistent. Makes the air too humid for most computing equipment, and doesn't lower the temperature sufficiently enough to maintain coolness when the doors are opened.

      Nice try though, but you selling this as 'new technology' is like trying to sell cow dung to a dairy farmer.

  2. I would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The last thing you want to have done in a desert is have water evaporate away.

    1. Re:I would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, indoor evaporative cooling has been used for ages in deserts. It helps keep the interior atmo healthy and more humid than outside. Of course, since it has been used for ages, this thing is like saying "look, we 3d printed a short cylinder and placed a bar through it allowing the cylinder to spin around the bar while the bar remains stationary. We feel this invention might revolutionize the automobile industry!"

    2. Re:I would think by Slugster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is really the problem with evaporative coolers: they work best in desert/arid environments, where water is (usually) already in (relatively) short supply.

      In humid climates water is plentiful--but they barely work at all in humid environments, where they mainly cause mildew growth (inside the home).

    3. Re:I would think by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      If you have dry summers and wet winters, reservoirs supply enough water for the summer.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:I would think by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article has no comparison of overall efficiency as compared to evaporative coolers. It looks like a very costly construction technique even if it were refined significantly.

    5. Re:I would think by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Trouble with that is across most of the western US the aquifer keeps going down and down. We are depleting it by pumping it dry.

        If you build reservoirs, that means damning rivers which has consequences for ecosystem for thousands of miles up and down the river, to say nothing of the nearby effect of flooding in many cases several thousand sq miles, and the effects on the surrounding vegetation that had been living in a fully arid climate and now finds itself next to a large pool of evaporating and seeping surface water. Finally its been shown for the first decade at least while all the vegetation under the reservoir decomposes there are massive releases of greenhouse gases both carbon dioxide and methane.

      Short answer there is no free lunch! We are still probably better off with a closed circuit refrigeration cycle powered with that cheap abundant nuclear energy they have been promising for 60 years.
         

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    6. Re:I would think by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Depends on the kind of desert and how much money you have, Australia is largely desert, much of it less than 500 meters above sea level, which is why you can drill a hole almost anywhere and find water in abundance (although it said the pressure has been dropping over the last century). That's how these giant cattle stations survive, the land is arid scrub and acacia trees, they drill a bunch of bore holes for watering stations and just turn the cattle loose. A year later they round up as many as they can find on the property, brand the calfs, harvest some yearlings, vet and release the rest for next year's harvest.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    7. Re:I would think by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      Because then I could print a car at home cheaper than paying a dealership? Would we even need an "industry" anymore?

    8. Re:I would think by Adambomb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From my days working in the dry portions of Colorado in the summers, exactly this.Swamp Coolers have been used forever and are a godsend in the 100+ parts of summer.

      It's a dry heat sure, but thats why swamp coolers work there.

      All this seems to be doing is optimizing the concept instead of just having giant slats paddlewheeling in a tank.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    9. Re:I would think by blue+trane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Short answer there is no free lunch!"

      http://subbot.org/coursera/big...

      Do they really need so much water for golf courses in the desert? Yet they exist in Yuma. The problem is the very rich using any amount of water for whatever they want. Also lack of business investment in more basic research in solar desalination, for example. The market wants to eliminate free lunches because they're bad for business.

    10. Re:I would think by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You forgot: Pretend their stringy 'grass fed' cattle tastes good'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re:I would think by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      I live in Salt Lake City. My house has a heat pump, but my shop is cooled by a swamp cooler. It is effective and much cheaper to run. The constant refresh of the air in the shop is just a bonus.

    12. Re:I would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that much water. I grew up in AZ and pre-1980's, few people had AC's, it was all evap cooling. Mold is not a problem. The real problem is that the really miserable hot months (July, August, September) are also very humid and the cooler stops working. I spent my childhood summer nights sleeping on the cool ground in front of a box fan.

    13. Re:I would think by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1
      Waiiiiit a minute comrade.

      How on earth do you blame free markets when the price of water is controlled by the government?

      --

      Liberty.

    14. Re: I would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did GP say free?

      And Lobbyism is a market too.

    15. Re: I would think by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      And Lobbyism is a market too.

      This makes no sense at all. Free markets are based on individuals making voluntary decisions. Bribing politicians to gain access to the power of the gun and theft is not in any way related.

      --

      Liberty.

  3. Hot, dry climates such as deserts, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    where water tends to be in short supply than energy, e.g., sunlight.

    1. Re:Hot, dry climates such as deserts, by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      Obviously the solution is to cover the house with a large cupola, with solar powered freezing, that would condensate the evaporated water and recover it in a container so it can be reused by the 3d printed walls.

    2. Re:Hot, dry climates such as deserts, by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually, ordinary swamp cooler design doesn't use a huge amount of water, since it recycles whatever flows through the pads without evaporating. Probably maxes around 10 gallons evaporated per day in extremely hot dry weather, but that's enough to cool a medium-sized house by a good 40 degrees (and keep your eyeballs from turning to raisins).

      The fact that the little pump can move up to 20 gallons an hour doesn't mean that water just gets flushed out and lost -- rather, it dribbles down the pads to the base of the unit and is pumped back up. With a heat exchanger, the water system could be closed and could have little or no loss.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Hot, dry climates such as deserts, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use the combination of solar cells and air conditioning. ...oh wait, you are joking. hahaha

  4. Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatures by ZombieEngineer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a chart which shows the optimal temperature for an office is around 23'C (Google "HVAC comfort chart"), this is the temperature which has the widest acceptable range for humidity that people find comfortable.

    Evaporative cooling brings the air temperature down by increasing the humidity of the air. The issue is that to achieve sufficient cooling the humidity increases beyond the comfort zone without bringing the temperature down sufficiently.

    What would be interesting is a two stage evaporative cooling that does not require mechanical assistance. In a two stage system the first stage provides net cooling without humidifying the air used by the second stage. It results in cooler air with less humidity.

    ZombieEngineer

  5. Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for your walls to start leaking and your electronics to start rusting. That and a large water bill for your bone-dry desert residence.

  6. mold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    evaporative humidifiers work great until they start breeding molds and algae. The water channels need to be cleaned and the screens replaced. The screen in this case being a wall in the house.

    1. Re:mold? by tshawkins · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here in the philippines, water is often kept cool by storing it in porus pots, the water slowly seeps through the walls of the clay pot, and evaporates from the outside, there are no channels as its using the micro pore structure of the earthen ceramic pot. The evaporation lowers the temperature of the whole pot.

    2. Re:mold? by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the minerals that will be left behind to clog the wall along with the mold. Locations that are dry enough for evaporative cooling to work are usually short of water, too, so this would be like a faucet continually running.

      --
      Nate
    3. Re:mold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An evaporative cooler in a 3000 square foot house uses 2 - 3 gallons of water per day.

      Just don't flush once or twice and you're golden.

    4. Re:mold? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      Here in the philippines, water is often kept cool by storing it in porus pots, the water slowly seeps through the walls of the clay pot, and evaporates from the outside, there are no channels as its using the micro pore structure of the earthen ceramic pot. The evaporation lowers the temperature of the whole pot.

      Yes, but I'd bet good money your granny taught you to let the pot dry before refilling, or at least every two or three refills, because if it stays damp all the time, things will grow in it. Clay pots also have a tendency to get broken and replaced every now and then.

      To do the same with this "cool brick" (dry your walls out completely), you're going to need to go without cooling for an extended period at the hottest time of the day, which is the time you most want cooling. Something of an intractable dilemma.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    5. Re:mold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the philippines, water is often kept cool by storing it in porus pots, the water slowly seeps through the walls of the clay pot, and evaporates from the outside, there are no channels as its using the micro pore structure of the earthen ceramic pot. The evaporation lowers the temperature of the whole pot.

      I saw the same thing in Brazil. In Brazil, it's generally a two chamber clay pot. Water that was boiled (and cooled to room temperature) is put in the top chamber. That water makes its way through the clay to the bottom chamber which has a spigot. Water is kept cool through evaporation as mentioned by tshawkins, but it also picks up minerals (and favor). Boiled water tastes flat.

    6. Re:mold? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      More like 3 or 4 gallons per hour assuming a load of 3 Tons.

    7. Re:mold? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There are materials that discourage bacterial and fungal growth. But seems to me an occasional spritz of bleach would do for most of it, and otherwise, let it dry out at night (daytime temps are not going to sterilize it anyway).

      And without light, very little will grow in a clay pot.

      I have a 5 gallon plastic jug that I filled from a friend's well (from an outdoor faucet so hardly sterile) back in 1984, and kept for an emergency water supply. As of a couple years ago I'd used about half of it and both water and jug were still pristine.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  7. mold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this system would be susceptible to mold growth...

  8. Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I lived in an apartment which had a swamp cooler and no air conditioning. Even in the dry air of suburban Los Angeles, it sucked. It required moving massive amounts of air, which meant constant noise. It meant interior doors – and exterior windows – had to be left open.

    I suppose it's better than nothing, but so is a fan and a wet towel.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by pitchpipe · · Score: 4, Funny

      But you just don't understand. This thing was fucking 3D PRINTED. Everything that is 3D printed is so cool it is downright cold. It'll just cool the room by sitting there not doing anything at all!

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    2. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by paiute · · Score: 2

      You can say the same for a traditional air conditioner. Up in the high desert of the Great Basin, you build a swamp cooler into the ducted HVAC and cool your whole house with a tiny squirrel cage fan. The sound not right in your face.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    3. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's great, now you can have mold growing in your house in the desert too.

    4. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With my traditional air conditioner, only one window is left open, and it ha the air conditioner plugging it.

    5. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by tshawkins · · Score: 1

      The 3d printing part of it allows the creation of meta materials that cannot be created by any other means, with a fine enough printing system you can control the internal geometric structure of the material. All sorts of weird properties can created. The "cool" is not in the 3d printing, that is just a tool to create the meta material. The "cool" is in the structure of the material Itself.

      Short of a working nano assembler tech, 3d printing is about as close as you can get to creating virtual alloys of materials with complex internal geometric structures.

    6. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, so you're in the desert, right?
      And you're hot, right? And you don't wanna be hot.
      Man I've got the device for you! It's a brick that sits in your structure. Cools it right off! No electricity required.
      That's great you say? How does it work you say? Well it takes your widely and regularly available water.
      Wait, no, you have water right?
      Just let me show you the thing in operation!
      *slam*

    7. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LA hasn't been dry enough for swamp coolers to work well since the early '70s. Irrigation (and swamp coolers) have raised the humidity.

    8. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by kuhnto · · Score: 1

      Can I WOOSH this guy?

      --
      "A 'person' is smart. 'People' are dumb, panicky animals and you know that."
    9. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by paiute · · Score: 1

      Same with a swamp cooler. You can hang it out of one window and leave other windows in the house closed. Provide a vent on the far end of the air flow path by cracking a door or window. A unit not much larger than a dorm fridge will keep 2000 sq ft or so cool.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    10. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      Add Phoenix metro to this. Yeah, the evap cooler tech works somewhat in the spring and early summer. When the multi-month monsoon season hits, however, evap coolers are pretty much worthless.

      I'm also pretty sure that hard water deposits in these "bricks" would render them useless pretty quickly.

    11. Re:Wow. Maybe they should call it a swamp cooler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here to say this, leaving satisfied.

  9. awesome update for old technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had these during the Vietnam war...called "chill boxes." All you had to do was add water to it and it would start to pump out cool air.

    1. Re:awesome update for old technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, the ones I saw you pumped in vaporized opium and marijuana.

  10. Wrong way around by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    I want a wall that removes cool, wet air from the room and replaces it with dry, warm air so that I can dry laundry indoors in winter without covering my house in condensation and mold.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    1. Re:Wrong way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in England, don't you?

    2. Re:Wrong way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you need an amazing new invention, the "tumble drier".

    3. Re:Wrong way around by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I want a wall that removes cool, wet air from the room and replaces it with dry, warm air so that I can dry laundry indoors in winter without covering my house in condensation and mold.

      Wait, what? Are you sure the ventilation is sufficient? Drying laundry indoors will increase the humidity, but if you actually get condensation and mold on surfaces, that's very bad for you and the building! If possible, at least limit the drying to bathroom or get a dedicated drier.

    4. Re:Wrong way around by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Maybe the miracle "Cool Brick" can also perform "Cold Fusion" . . . then you'd have your heat.

      Also, maybe we should try to 3D print a cure for Ebola? Anything 3D printed seems to have magical properties.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Wrong way around by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I want a wall that removes cool, wet air from the room and replaces it with dry, warm air so that I can dry laundry indoors in winter without covering my house in condensation and mold.

      That's called a dehumifier and there are many people that sell them at a reasonable price. I bought an "ebac" brand one since it's the brand favoured by tradespeople for things like drying out water damage and drying plaster more quicky. It works great.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Wrong way around by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Easy. Just install something like this and something like this and you're set.

    7. Re:Wrong way around by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      If your cloth is to wet to be dried indoors, then there is either something wrong with your washing machine or you wash an immense amount of cloth.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re: Wrong way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you 3d print a girlfriend with one?

    9. Re:Wrong way around by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Well, as soon as we get some decent results on the World Community Grid (http://worldcommunitygrid.org) we can have something to print...

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    10. Re:Wrong way around by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      I want a wall that removes cool, wet air from the room and replaces it with dry, warm air so that I can dry laundry indoors in winter without covering my house in condensation and mold.

      That's called a dehumifier and there are many people that sell them at a reasonable price. I bought an "ebac" brand one since it's the brand favoured by tradespeople for things like drying out water damage and drying plaster more quicky. It works great.

      They are cheap to buy, but, as I discovered when I had my house, expensive as hell to run.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  11. Water by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't water kinda expensive in deserts?

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    1. Re:Water by Rodot · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, water is abundant in deserts.

    2. Re:Water by itzly · · Score: 4, Funny

      For sufficiently small values of abundant.

    3. Re:Water by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that most people live in more humid areas. That and the timing of the article makes it seem very unappealing as it is currently snowing and 12âï

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why deserts have so many lush green pastures and rainforests. Because there is so much water in a desert. Yessir, it's wetter than the sea - abundant.

    5. Re:Water by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

      Where is the problem ? Just use this.

    6. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a matter of fact, water is abundant in deserts.

      As is sugar. We should be 3D printing these bricks from sugar. I'm off to register the Hansel and Gretel construction company, which will be building desert houses out of sugar printed bricks.

    7. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      desert2
      dezrt/
      noun
      noun: desert; plural noun: deserts

      1. a dry, barren area of land, especially one covered with sand, that is characteristically desolate, waterless, and without vegetation.

      I'm curious. The dictionary seems to think that a desert is "characteristically waterless". But according to you, one of a desert's defining features is that "water is abundant". Who is correct? Is it you?

    8. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why you have moisture farmers, d'uh.

    9. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dictionary is wrong.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert

      Cold deserts, such as the arctic and antarctic, typically have the kind of water one would experience in the ocean. Unfortunately, cooling isn't what one needs there.

      If you take a look at the largest deserts in the world, the top two are cold deserts. In fact, if you add up all the rest of the top ten list, you'll find that there's an abundance of cold deserts and few hot deserts.

    10. Re:Water by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Logically, water can be considered abundant wherever rain is imminent, and under new US definitions of imminent, water is abundant everywhere.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    11. Re:Water by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Understanding sarcasm is clearly your strong point.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  12. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by rioki · · Score: 2

    Add that to areas that already have a high humidity and this thing is useless. Then you don't need a 3d printed brick, you can soak a towel let it dry for the same effect.

  13. where does one put the brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My apartment doesnt have air conditioning. So all I need to do is buy some of these cool bricks and put one in each room of my home? By how many degrees will that lower the temp? If I buy more will it make my place freezing cold? Can you disable the cooling function in the winter?

  14. It's a swamp cooler. Big deal. by jcr · · Score: 1

    So it's 3D printed. I'm not seeing how it's superior to any previous evaporative cooling approach.

    There is an outfit I've read about that uses evaporation in adjacent tubes to produce a stream of cool, DRY air that you can send into a building. You can find them on YouTube if you search for "Coolerado".

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  15. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What would be interesting is a two stage evaporative cooling"

    In datacenters this is called "water side economization". An evaporation plate like the one suggested is coupled to a water loop. No good unless you have a lot of water and no humidity, so basically just in the Northwest.

  16. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

    I am not an engineer (nor a zombie for that matter) so excuse me if I am wrong, but aren't you essentially describing how an AC unit works?

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

  17. I tried to print one with my 3D printer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but there must be a problem with the design, since when I sent it to the 3D printer, it stopped working and it is now bricked showing no signs of life. That's not cool...

  18. Legionnaires' disease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legionnaires'_disease

  19. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Add that to areas that already have a high humidity and this thing is useless.

    Many things are useless in different areas.
    I live in Sweden, ask me how useful I find the AC that everyone living in southern California thinks of as a necessity.

  20. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am not an engineer (nor a zombie for that matter) so excuse me if I am wrong, but aren't you essentially describing how an AC unit works?

    No. An AC unit takes advantage of gas pressure laws. It compresses a gas, then allows it to expand. As the gas expands, its temperature drops. By wrapping all this up with a set of radiator coils and fan(s), you can pump heat from inside to outside. Along the way, the cooled air will drop any water vapor that exceeds the carrying capacity for that temperature.

    So an AC requires a pump (which can be mechanical or a heat source) and air recirculators, and the net result is air that is both cooler and drier.

    A swamp cooler is almost completely passive. It needs a mechanism to inject the water, and (preferably) something to help the water-laden air move, but instead of lowering room humidity, it raises it.

  21. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by number6x · · Score: 2

    No, they are describing a good old-fashioned evaporative cooler. We used to call then swamp coolers. They are effective in arrid climates. They can cool the air a few degrees. They also add a little humidity to the air, which is nice in the desert. It would not work in a humid climate.

  22. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

    There is a chart which shows the optimal temperature for an office is around 23'C (Google "HVAC comfort chart"), this is the temperature which has the widest acceptable range for humidity that people find comfortable.

    Now I'm curious. For the math/HVAC nerds among us, how much of a humidity increase are you looking at from evaporative cooling? Say 33C with 20% humidity to 23C as the OP lays out, what would the resulting humidity be?

  23. Not just deserts by anchovy_chekov · · Score: 1

    Well.. maybe not useful in deserts, but in South Australia evaporative cooling is both popular and useful. Low average humidity in Summer, ready access to water - at least in the cities. So a system like this would work in South Australia - it'd probably be completely useless in other Australian States where the humidity in Summer is high. I'm guessing there are similar places to South Australia around the world though, so maybe there's also a market.

    But evaporative cooling systems are so cheap to build and run, and easy to maintain, I wonder if a brick wall you can't control (other than the flow of water) makes sense. Perhaps using the material to replace the battens in evaporative systems makes sense - as these are the main parts that wear out over time.

  24. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the AC that everyone living in southern California thinks of as a necessity.

    Interesting fact about Southern California is that the ocean currents come down from Alaska. So the water is cold. But if you live within a few miles of the coast then you don't need AC. And, in fact, most apartments near the coast don't have AC. They do often have little heaters for when it gets chilly in the winter.

  25. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    No, they are describing a good old-fashioned evaporative cooler. We used to call then swamp coolers.

    Also no. The GP is describing a good old-fashioned evaporative cooler coupled to an air to air heat exchanger. The reason we don't do what they suggest is that it takes up a lot of space.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Now I'm curious. For the math/HVAC nerds among us, how much of a humidity increase are you looking at from evaporative cooling?

    I'm not a Math/HVAC nerd, despite getting an ASE certification in automotive HVAC, you don't actually need to know much of anything to get one, keep that in mind next time you go to get your car serviced by an ASE-certified repairman, all their certs are shit like that and their "master" certs just prove that you have a bunch of their worthless lower certs. But anyway, I've lived with a swamp cooler, and I'll never understand how all those people can swaddle themselves in cloth in the desert because on hot days I had to be naked (or nearly so) and literally in the path of airflow from the cooler to be even vaguely comfortable. They also don't work worth a crap if the humidity is over 25%, so they really only work properly in deserts or places working hard on becoming deserts.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Re:It's a swamp cooler. Big deal. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    There is an outfit I've read about that uses evaporation in adjacent tubes to produce a stream of cool, DRY air that you can send into a building. You can find them on YouTube if you search for "Coolerado".

    An evaporative cooler followed by an air to air heat exchanger is not a revolutionary idea. It's not even a bad idea, except that it only works on dry days and it takes up an awful lot of space.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  28. Two problems by goodmanj · · Score: 3, Informative

    Two problems.

    First, the problem that every evaporative cooler has: water is scarce in the hot dry places where evaporative cooling works well.

    Second, water always has some minerals dissolved in it that crystallize out when you remove the water. A traditional swamp cooler has an active flow and a reservoir that you have to empty to keep these from building up, but with these "smart bricks", the pores in the bricks are going to fill up with lime and gypsum, and pretty soon they'll be "dumb bricks".

    1. Re:Two problems by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      That is why you include our (recurring revenue generating) 3d printed Smart Filter with Nano Surface Texture (tm). The Smart Filter (tm) filters the mineral content out of the water far better than reverse osmosis or activated charcoal and keeps your environmentally irresponsible smart Brick functioning like new!

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:Two problems by itzly · · Score: 1

      water is scarce in the hot dry places where evaporative cooling works well.

      That's okay. Just 3D print some new water, as required.

  29. With swamp coolers by no-body · · Score: 1

    you can replace the wood wool easily when it gets yucky. You may have an expensive problem with this "cool brick".
    Algae, fungie and who knows what else can grow when germs/spores in air get blown into moist and porous material and start growing there creating a stink.

    Unless this "cool brick" has some antibacterial properties, stuff will grow. And if one wants constantly present antibiotics around in a living environment is questionable.

    I wonder how this should work. Has this been tested for a longer period?

    1. Re:With swamp coolers by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

      In Arizona, we have a type of swamp cooler called a MasterCool which uses a single, big paper cooling pad instead of the shredded wood thing. Ours lasts for several years before needing replacement, and we have plenty of dissolved calcium in our water.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    2. Re:With swamp coolers by no-body · · Score: 1

      Seems like another show stopper - minerals in water - how to get those out or prevent from getting into this âcool brick" structure inside. Seems premature to get useability information. Possilbly hype....

  30. Not good, short term gain long term pain by RichMan · · Score: 1

    Converts nice dry, but hot air into moist but cool air. Then that moist cool air circulates and gets warm then you get a room full of hot moist air and the evaporator cooler stops working because the air is saturated. So over time it converts a livable room in which you can sweat and cool yourself into a hot moist room where sweating is impossible.

    Short term gain, long term pain.

    1. Re:Not good, short term gain long term pain by tibit · · Score: 1

      Of course you can then run a dehumidifier in the same room - because having one noisy machine in your room isn't enough. Of course, it's best to have two sets of circulating fans and a compressor. /s

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  31. Re:Evaporative cooling in nothing new... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh, and by the way - do you know what the gas is that is responsible for 95% of Global Warming? No, not CO2. Water Vapour. I wonder why no one has called for this invention to be banned out of hand...?

    First, most water vapor in the atmosphere comes from natural sources. Unless you're planning on eliminating oceans, lakes, rivers, swamps, wetlands and rain (and thus killing all life on earth), the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere isn't going to change.

    Second, Water vapor condenses and precipitates out of the atmosphere naturally, so it doesn't build up beyond the levels that are already there It's not a problem. CO2, on the other hand, does not condense and precipitate out of the atmosphere naturally (unless you drop the earth's temperature to -147ÂC, that is, which would kill almost all life on earth and leaving it for the tardigrades to inherit). It does build up and it is a problem.

  32. Quite the opposite by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it holds water like a sponge, takes in contaminated air and converts it into healthy air.

    My concern would be the exact opposite happening: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legionnaires'_disease

  33. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because some americans use the perjorative term of swamp cooler doesnt mean these things arent effective in the right climate. Where i live it gets to 40c and the delta T (theoretical maximum temp drop from a so called swamp cooler) is usually around 15 degrees which means with the correctly sized unit for my house it drops the temp inside down to 25c or so which is just perfect. It also costs cents per day to run vs the much larger cost of running my regfrigerative unit. Which in my climate is only required maybe 4 or 5 days of the year.

  34. We can make it better, not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In most areas the water contains dissolved minerals. These like to deposit themselves where the water evaporates, just check your nearest filter-based humidifier, it's all crunchy. So unless you can run distilled water through your wall eventually your wall will be plugged. Then you'll have to soak it with lime-away.

    With the 3,300 year old system you could just replace the jar when it got crusty.

  35. All you need is WATER in hot dry desert ?! by fygment · · Score: 1

    In the hot dry climate, esp. a desert, you might not want to piss away your water cooling the (uninsulated) tent.
    You might be able to find a better use for the rare and life-supporting resource.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  36. "Feels like a sauna in here!" by MTEK · · Score: 1

    One step closer to an uncomfortable truth.

  37. Right by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Because water is what you have a lot of in a "hot dry desert". Though I guess once people start dropping from Legionnaire's there'll be more water to go around those that are left.

  38. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Just because some americans use the perjorative term of swamp cooler doesnt mean these things arent effective in the right climate.

    It's not that they don't work, it's that the resulting air is humid as hell. If you live someplace where the house cooks all year then good on you, but if you live someplace with a wet winter then a swamp cooler is a miserable thing because it will drive moisture into everything which will then rot and/or mold.

    It also costs cents per day to run vs the much larger cost of running my regfrigerative unit.

    This is certainly the reason why we still use them.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  39. AKA a swamp cooler by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Which works fine, but use water which is a problem in the desert.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  40. Smells like swamp gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Legionnaires disease waiting to happen.

  41. Stanley "Cool Brick" by dkman · · Score: 1

    If the Stanley tool people marketed it would it be Stanley Cool Brick?

    Get it? Ahh screw it. Get off my lawn!

    --
    I refuse to sign
    1. Re:Stanley "Cool Brick" by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Get it?

      I don't have space in my apartment for a large black obelisk just sitting around being cool. Can I lay it on its side and use it as a table?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  42. Termites invented this tech by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Termites have been successfully farming arid land using this technology for longer than humans have been on this planet. The high humidity climate is a benefit to the termites since termite farms grow a specific species of mold for food. The mold apparently evolved from a tropical species but is now totally dependent on termite climate control technology. The mounds themselves are built using technology similar to a 3D printer with 20 million print heads. They use spit and mud rather than hot plastic but the basic idea is the same.

    I have termites on the brain since I recently visited the Kimberley in NW Australia, to say this termite technology has been successful is an understatement. The mounds are more closely packed than the apartments in the inner suburbs of Sydney, I'm not sure how far they stretch but I drove from Broome to Fitzroy crossing and they didn't thin out. Also note that the entire Kimberley region is under 2 meters of water in the wet season, the few people that live there survive the wet with tin boats to get between buildings on stilts or one of the few islands of high ground, not sure how termites survive the annual flood?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  43. Seems potentially unsanitary by usuallylost · · Score: 1

    The article says that the creators of this envision it as a structural element of buildings. Where you would have an entire wall made of this material that gets soaked with water to cool the space when it gets hot. I have not dealt with a swamp coolers but I have dealt with humidifiers quite a lot. The one thing that I have observed is that every part that gets wet grows a colony of who knows what pretty fast if it isn’t regularly cleaned. In a lot of systems you have a pad, which is frequently structured very similarly to this material, which has to be replaced because there is no real way to clean the interior surfaces. Well with this stuff they are talking about taking that pad and making a permanent wall out of it. My prediction is that anybody who used this would end up with a huge mold filled science experiment in a fairly short time. The closest thing I can see to being able to really clean that would be to periodically saturate the wall with some sort of chemical cleaner. I could see these printed ceramic structures being used to make swamp coolers, and humidifiers, more efficient but use outlined in the article just seems like a bad idea.

    1. Re:Seems potentially unsanitary by ledow · · Score: 3, Informative

      British houses have a double-brick-wall construction, mostly.

      The idea is that the outside wall can get as wet as it likes (and it's Britain, so it gets wet!) but the internal wall is separated by an air gap. Whenever you join the outside wall to the inside (e.g. cables, etc.) you have to be careful how you do so so that water can't transfer between the two.

      You still put in vents, etc. to get some kind of airflow from outside to in, however, because without vents (and with modern double-glazing especially) you just end up with condensation everywhere inside and mould in your internal plaster.

      And one of the biggest problems with old houses built like this is still damp (there's no such thing as "rising damp" by the way, but that's another matter) and mould.

      Having a wall with water in it is not a good idea, certainly not inside a building. We specifically build our houses to account for this and it's still possible to get mould inside if the water breaks through or settles inside.

      The only thing that could combat it is a very good airflow so that water can't settle which, shockingly, will cool those kinds of places anyway.

  44. Doh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously in hot dry desert like climates water is at a premium so this is great how?

  45. Re:It's a swamp cooler. Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is (or was) quite a common form of small building air conditioning plant not too long ago. I have come across a number of buildings in universities that uses such air conditioning plants. It is a cost effective (cheap energy wise) means of air-conditioning. The only downsides are:

    1. Large and limited cooling capacity. One of the buildings I worked in had its evaporative air conditional converted to refrigerant type to increase capacity.
    2. Possibility of Legionaires disease if the water is not kept clean.

    If you want to find one, just listen for the sounds of water continually splashing near the plant room.

  46. What could possibly go wrong by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    This would be great for deserts, because everyone knows that water is in abundant supply in desert environments.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  47. Like a sponge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Using basic concepts of evaporation, it holds water like a sponge, takes in hot dry air and converts it into cool moist air.

    If only there was something already in existence that could do this. Like, say, a *sponge*.

  48. This is nothing more than a swamp cooler by kallen3 · · Score: 1

    which really will not work in areas that experience a monsoon season during the summer seasons. For example in Arizona the monsoon season starts beginning of July and last through September. The monsoon (not a weather service term for you purists) is typically when the dew point is at 55 degrees for 3 days. Guess when a swamp cooler looses effectiveness? When the wet bulb is at 55 degrees. So it is only useful during 2 months of the year in the U.S. desert souhwest.

  49. swamp cooler cools, 3D printing cooler cooler by raymorris · · Score: 3, Funny

    A swamp cooler is cool because it cools the air, making it cooler. 3D printed stuff is cool, so a cool 3D printed cooler is a cooler cooler, making the room cooler.

    1. Re:swamp cooler cools, 3D printing cooler cooler by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      Yo dawg, I put something cool in your cooler, so you can be cool while you cool.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
  50. Alabaster by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

    Someone told me they did this in places with alabaster containers. The alabaster is porous enough to let the water evaporate through it. I have a better idea, stop living in the desert.

  51. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    You might want to google "adaptive comfort."

    Comfort is a function of temperature, humidity, air movement, radiant temperatures, clothing, and metabolism. There are a fair number of variables to play with, enthalpy is just the easiest to look at.

    The other interesting thing about deserts is monsoons. Swamp coolers don't do much good then.

  52. See also New York bison (Buffalo buffalo) by raymorris · · Score: 1, Funny

    Which reminds me of an odd thing about bison in Buffalo, New York. Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo. That is to say, New York bison whom New York bison bully themselves bully New York bison.

    1. Re:See also New York bison (Buffalo buffalo) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious! More info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

    2. Re:See also New York bison (Buffalo buffalo) by tepples · · Score: 0

      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

      Mushroom mushroom!

      (Or was that Badgers?)

  53. Of course there's a little gotcha... by tibit · · Score: 1

    Of course this needs to run on deionized water, and I certainly do hope that they have a robust, validated mold and fungus control solution for this thing.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  54. greeaaat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "thus replacing the need for air conditioning in hot, dry climates such as deserts"
    so instead of aircon from cheap electricity from an oil rich nation, instead water from A FUCKING DESERT!
    much better use of resources there

  55. Re:It's a swamp cooler. Big deal. by jcr · · Score: 1

    An evaporative cooler followed by an air to air heat exchanger is not a revolutionary idea.

    There's a bit more to it than that. It's worth looking them up.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  56. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Used to help out at an old church in San Antonio. Basement was cooled by an AC unit or two, but mostly by being below-ground, but the sanctuary with it's 30 foot ceilings was cooled by a swamp cooler. Worked quite well since the whole place would dry out during the week by virtue of it being San Antonio, and you could cool it off in short order for cheap for those few hours when you had people in the sanctuary. I shudder to think what the AC bills would have been had we used regular AC for the whole place.

  57. This is what we call a "Swamp cooler" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here in sunny Texas, people have been using evaporative coolers for a very long time before modern A/C's came along. 100 years ago and more, people would put a bale of wet straw in front of a window and force air through it with a fan. We call them "Swamp Coolers" - not because they cool swamps - but because your home feels like a swamp when they are running.

    That said, they do work fairly well in very low humidity places. Their big problems are:

    1) They don't work worth a damn as the ambient humidity increases.

    2) They humidify the air to the max - and people tend to get condensation and mold problems in their homes because of them.

    3) When the temperatures go up, you feel more comfortable in low humidity than in high...so while they are generally able to reduce the temperature, you may not feel any more comfortable.

    4) Sweating doesn't work as well in humid air - so these things really do have to get the temperature down well below where you'd need to sweat - and they aren't always that good.

    There is a reason that freon-based air-conditioning was so revolutionary to people in the southern USA...it enabled people to live here more comfortably - despite the fact that evaporative coolers were cheaper and easily available.

        -- Steve

  58. Ok.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, cool your home in the desert with water. Even if it somehow works, water... In the desert... I would think that would be a bit more expensive than throwing in a solar panel and an air conditioner over time..

  59. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    There are two main types of air-conditioner, the most common type of ac unit works like your fridge, it has a compressor, the gas is compressed outside the fridge, compression heats it up and it is cooled back down to room temperature by the radiator at the back, the gas is then allowed to expand again inside the fridge, the drop in pressure causes the gas to re-absorb the heat lost in the external radiator. Metaphorically the heat is "pumped out" of the fridge.

    OTOH an evaporative cooler works because the water changes state from a liquid to a gas, the state change itself absorbs energy from the surrounding environment resulting in a temperature drop. The problem with EC is that the air quickly becomes supersaturated with water vapour and both the EC and your sweat will stop cooling you, at this point you need to empty the humid air from the room and replace it with hot dry air from outside. or alternatively, die from heat exhaustion.

    As the GP indicated, a large damp towel will do the same thing as a high tech, overpriced, 3D printed nano-scale heat sponge. As an old fart Aussie who's seen more than 50 summers I can tell you from experience that the damp towel is very effective if you hang it over a $20 room fan and put it near a shaded window opened just enough to keep the room ventilated. Tall sliding windows are the best since the fan pulls in hot dry air at the bottom and cools it down on the way in. Hot air that tends to accumulate near the ceiling is pushed out at the top of the window

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  60. 3000 year old tech, abandoned... by steak · · Score: 1

    there's a reason this 3000 year old technology was abandoned when a/c became cheap enough.

  61. Congragualations! You invented nothing new... by bobbied · · Score: 1

    It's called a swamp cooler and apart from being printed in a 3D printer there is NOTHING new to see here.

    What's next? You going to 3D print a gun? Oh wait... Already done..

    3D print joint replacements? That doo.

    3D print...

    What's next, make it available for people who want to pay in BitCoin?

    What passes as advanced technology sometimes amazes me...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  62. Vaporware by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Agreed; this is definitely vaporware.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  63. I stopped at... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because the air in dessert environments is so hot and dry..."

  64. lmgtfy.com/?q=swamp+cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slow news day, huh?

  65. Re:Evaporative cooling in nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3D-printed tardigrades: http://www.shapeways.com/product/SLS5DK33Z/tardigrade-water-bear

  66. google "swamp cooler" by whitroth · · Score: 1

    And you'll find exactly this thing, purchasable off-the-shelf, no 3-D printing needed....

                    mark

  67. It's just a fanless swamp cooler. by Ziggitz · · Score: 1

    This is really nothing new, we have tons of swamp coolers that work on this principle in Colorado. The thing is you need a low humidity atmosphere for it to work to prevent humidity getting uncomfortably high and you need a plentiful water source because you're going to increase usage by several gallons per day per household in a zero percent humidity environment.

    --
    There is no memory shortage. yes I have heard of XFCE. Go away.
  68. Genius invention by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    This "cool brick" looks like a $5 humidifier pad with funky abstract patterns etched on the sides.

  69. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by jbengt · · Score: 1

    60% +/- assuming an adiabatic process at near 100% efficiency, and no heat gain in the space to conteract the sensible cooling.

  70. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Solandri · · Score: 1

    I believe GP is proposing that you use a swamp cooler to chill one channel of outside air. Then run it past another channel of outside air via a heat exchanger. The net result would be outside air chilled by the same amount as the swamp cooler, but without the added humidity. In fact you could do this multiple times for extremely hot air (a swamp cooler will only lower the air temp by about 15-20 F, which if the outside temperature is 100+ F leaves the air at a still-uncomfortable 80+ F).

  71. Re:Evaporative cooling in nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think that CO2, the biggest (only) building block for all living things, doesn't come out of the atmosphere naturally, then I have a bridge to sell you, you moron...

  72. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by nobuddy · · Score: 1

    >Evaporative cooling brings the air temperature down by increasing the humidity of the air.

    This statement is false. The air is cooled by the endothermic nature of evaporating of water. The humidity is a side effect.

  73. Laundry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like somebody visited their mother to wash up their weekly laundry and watched it dry in a room.

  74. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But this is how commercial units work (and have for he last 50 years), so what is the new proposal?

  75. Ernie Key by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    must work for 3dprint.com as he only submits stories from them.. that or they are a DICE co.

  76. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

    What's pejorative about "swamp cooler"? It's just a heck of a lot easier to say in casual conversation then "evaporative cooler". Is calling that 4-wheel thing out in a parking spot a "car" worse than calling it an "automobile"?

  77. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    The problem with a two-stage system is the dew point and the distinction between absolute and relative humidity. There are nice cool springs in northern Florida that pump out water at a brisk 72 degrees F. Jump in them and you will cool off rapidly. But they cannot cool anything below 72 F, and at 100% relative humidity that isn't pleasant. In a dry climate, you can use two-stage coolers to do all the work. In a wetter climate, you can use them to reduce the energy demand of regular air conditioners, but you still can't use them to do all the work of making pleasant indoor air. You have to cut the relative humidity somehow, and that requires lower temperatures.

  78. Bad for electronics? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Water is bad for electronics though. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  79. It looks fragile by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    ...for a building block.

  80. "the most abundant compound found on Earth: water" by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

    There is where the article lost me.

    --
    So say we all
  81. Re:It's a swamp cooler. Big deal. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I sure hope so, because what you said is "There is an outfit I've read about that uses evaporation in adjacent tubes to produce a stream of cool, DRY air that you can send into a building" and this is how air conditioning works, HTH. That's why the thing what cools the air is called the evaporator.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  82. Ummmm. by azav · · Score: 1

    I spent one summer working in a factory in the Fresno desert. It used evaporative cooling to cool the plant.

    I can tell you that there is a point where evaporative cooling fails and then the air just becomes hot and sticky.

    You'd have to couple something like this with a dehumidifier.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  83. It can only work to a point by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

    As a person who lives in one of these dry areas (Utah) I have an evaporative cooler along side my AC unit. Mold is not a big issue here but can be a problem. The bigger problem is that there are limits to what a cooler can do. If it's 120 degrees outside you won't be able to get it to feel like it's 70 inside. It can definitely make it comfortable but only to a point.

    The other issue is that as your house becomes more humid it becomes less effective. You can't leave them running all the time or else you get a hot humid muggy house that feels like your walking through a swamp. That's why I use both a AC unit and the cooler. When it starts to get too hot or humid I kick on the AC. I save on power usage and get the best of both worlds.

    All this being said, the idea of building a wall out of these with water running through it does not seem like a good idea. I hope they can make it work, but even if it does it won't be able to replace an air conditioner.

  84. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Reziac · · Score: 1

    I was gonna say, looks like they basically reinvented the swamp cooler, tho this version is more versatile in terms of where you can locate it, and being amenable to more-portable units.

    But as to monsoons, those don't affect all (or even most) deserts.

    Having lived in the SoCal desert for 28 years, I can attest that monsoons there are a non-issue... we might get a little rain 10-15 days a year (some years we didn't hit 1 inch =total= precip), and our idea of 'humid' was 10%.

    Tucson is another matter, they get the late-summer monsoons with full humidity.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  85. Re:Nice in principle but fails at higher temperatu by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Actually, a good swamp cooler will lower air temps by as much as 40 degrees, as I can attest from long experience in the desert (where our peak temp was +122F, but my house would stay under 80F despite a lack of insulation). The big tricks are to not move the air too fast -- you want to give it time to cool down before sending it to the target room -- and to keep the amount of water held in the pads fairly high (pads too clean or too dirty will both impair that).

    And our natural humidity was so low that the air desperately needed all it could get.

    But the concept of a heat exchanger sounds good to me, as swamp coolers are very inexpensive to run (the powered parts being just a tiny pump and a squirrel-cage fan). Whether a swamp cooler with heat exchanger would be more economical than a heat pump?

    Dunno, swamp coolers are very low tech -- anyone can construct a passive swamp cooler using dripping water, moving air, and some burlap or other absorbant-but-porous material. (In fact I've done so as a temporary measure.)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?