Slashdot Mirror


Texas Boy Suspended For "Threatening" Classmate With the One Ring

An anonymous reader writes Nine-year-old Aiden Steward has been suspended by officials at a Texas school after he allegedly threatened to use his magic ring to make another boy disappear. His father says the family had watched The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies last weekend. His son brought a ring to class and told another boy his magic ring could make the boy disappear. "I assure you my son lacks the magical powers necessary to threaten his friend's existence," Aiden's father wrote in an email. "If he did, I'm sure he'd bring him right back." Principal Roxanne Greer declined to comment on the school's zero tolerance policy on magic rings. It may seem easy to make fun of Principal Greer in this case, but it does make one wonder how many elves could have been saved if someone took a hard line with a young Sauron.

92 of 591 comments (clear)

  1. Yay for "zero tolerance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    and, is this policy thing working out for you?

    1. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More like "zero intelligence" policy.

    2. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, this is common all over the country now. Today's school system is way too much like washington dc, they don't want to be held accountable for anything, so they silence everything. They're also way too interested in pushing certain political viewpoints on the kids.

    3. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no excuse for this kind of idiocy. When something is obviously not a threat to then treat it like one shows that the principal is an idiot. She should have confiscated the ring and told the kid to go back to class and behave. Actually a teacher should have handled it. How it ever got to the level it did is mind boggling. I know this kind of behavior goes on all the time because kids are kids. Most teachers and principals would have handled this without all the fuss, this time it was an idiot. Unfortunately you can't filter them all out, sometimes a few get through. They should fire her immediately and replace her with someone with some sense.

    4. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by jd2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually they should expell the kid. In fact expulsion for every minor offence. On the other hand not getting vaccinated is no reason to take kids out of school. It is after all the parents right even if it puts others at risk for actual harm. But threatening with a 'magic ring' or making a gun gesture with your hands, expell the brat.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    5. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would take a certain pleasure in seeing a massive doxxing campaign against principals and other officials on state payrolls who make such stupid decisions and hide behind bad policy.

      Agree the story sounds bizzare, but if an angry mob of mouth breathers is your idea of natural justice then I for one am glad you are not a public servant or an educator.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I love people who take pot shots and don't know what the fuck they're talking about. All school districts are taking tougher stances on punishment and more and more districts across the country are adopting zero tolerance policies. Is it draconian? yes, but when you have inattentive parents who don't take the time to explain right from wrong or turn a blind eye to the kids' activities this is what you get. This is clearly one that the schools administration could deal with but their hands are probably tied by district policy. Schools need to get back to the job of teaching and inspiring our youth, not being extensions of a detention system. That means that parents, you know the ones that actually bring these kids into the world, need to get involved with their kids and start by doing some teaching at home.

      While I agree wholeheartedly with what you say there is another reason for such policies:

      By mandating certain actions the school's administration is not required to make judgement calls that could be second guessed by the district or the courts. This way, they can fall back on the "district policy" argument to protect themselves. Before someone Goodwin's this thread with the "I was just following orders" argument with the current willingness of many parents to sue at the drop of a hat zero tolerance is a better defense than judgement call.

      Yes, it leads to stupid results and is really a bad idea but until parents step up we'll see more and more of this.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    7. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no excuse for this kind of idiocy. When something is obviously not a threat to then treat it like one shows that the principal is an idiot. She should have confiscated the ring and told the kid to go back to class and behave. Actually a teacher should have handled it. How it ever got to the level it did is mind boggling. I know this kind of behavior goes on all the time because kids are kids. Most teachers and principals would have handled this without all the fuss, this time it was an idiot. Unfortunately you can't filter them all out, sometimes a few get through. They should fire her immediately and replace her with someone with some sense.

      Most teacher I know often handle this in class but once it gets noticed outside of class there is no longer a option of using common sense. If one kid gets a hand slap and another a more serious punishment then the school is open to a lawsuit; and if the kid escalates into more serious actions then the school and teacher are in trouble as well. Yes, this is a stupid case and I wish we didn't have these dumb zero tolerance positions but we do. It's easier on the administration of a school and politicians get to say they are taking a tough stance on XYZ and as a result stupid outcomes happen. Welcome to the new reality where judgement is bad and having punishments fit the circumstances is a distant memory.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    8. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no excuse for this kind of idiocy. When something is obviously not a threat to then treat it like one shows that the principal is an idiot. She should have confiscated the ring and told the kid to go back to class and behave. Actually a teacher should have handled it. How it ever got to the level it did is mind boggling. I know this kind of behavior goes on all the time because kids are kids. Most teachers and principals would have handled this without all the fuss, this time it was an idiot. Unfortunately you can't filter them all out, sometimes a few get through. They should fire her immediately and replace her with someone with some sense.

      Should you fire the person that is likely legally bound to make a very nonsensical call?

      Or should you perhaps do the right thing instead, and call into question why yet again the threat of legal liability is turning humans into robots.

      Tell me, at what point will the middle finger be considered not just grounds for expulsion, but an Act of Terrorism?

      Don't laugh, we're well on our way, thanks to the wrong kind of thinking.

    9. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Virtucon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let me give you a real world example to clarify the problems school administrators face. About 3 years ago a teenager girl going to the same high school as my kids was killed by someone she had accused of sexual assault. He was out on bail with a trial pending and she just started attending the high school the same week. The administrators didn't know the situation at all, nor did the local police dept. as all of this happened in another city. She was abducted on school grounds just after school had let out and he lured her by befriending her on social media. He shot her and she wound up in the river. Here's the whole story. http://www.dallasnews.com/news...

      It's these kinds of incidents and the obvious outcry that creates zero tolerance policies. I agree that the administrator and teacher should have been given the alacrity to determine some other kind of punishment but I'll bet both would have been subject to disciplinary action had then not taken the action they did. It's stupid, it's dumb. Hell, have the shit I did when I was in school would have wound me up in jail by all this zero tolerance shit. My original point was that it's not just in Texas, this is all over the nation and it's getting worse. Schools now aren't places of learning, they're more akin to detention centers with lock down policies. Hell when I'd go to a school conference I'd have to give them my driver's license and they'd do a warrant check before I'd be allowed entry. I'd have to tell them "hey, you invited me here remember?"

      Schools are a reflection of the communities they serve and until we start addressing the violence and problems outside the schools, they'll continue to have things like zero tolerance and lock down environments where a kid, fantasizing about sorcery gets suspended. It's stupid, dumb and disgusting but we've allowed this to happen. It's well that it happened in the US because in Saudi Arabia he'd have been beheaded for sorcery.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    10. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by gtall · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think we must consider the possibility that the teacher actually believed the kid could make people disappear with his ring. This is Texas after all. Devil-Worship is breaking out and this principal decided to put a stop to it. Good for her, now if she could only use her talents on a state-wide level. Come to think of it, maybe she could politely ask to use the little boy's ring.

    11. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      'violence problems' are a red herring.

      all indications are that crime has GONE DOWN over the decades, not up!

      and if you're worried about your little snowflake, chances are that its someone you know that may abduct him or her, not some 'stranger danger' guy.

      stop being afraid of goddamned shadows. living in fear is no way to live. man up, dammit.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    12. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by itzly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come to think of it, maybe she could politely ask to use the little boy's ring.

      Bad idea. She would use this ring from a desire to do good... But through her, it would wield a power too great and terrible to imagine.

    13. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by gtall · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since you bring race into it, there is a journalist I heard on NPR who studied black crime and police. The problem has little to do with white folks in the communities she worked with. Most black crime is black on black. The families living in these areas would much prefer more police protection. However, the police don't have the street level view of the crimes that are being committed. Nor can they protect witnesses very well when the witnesses live with the perps. The witnesses are intimidated into shutting up. The police, not being able to get inside information, wind up cracking down on the crimes they can see in the hopes of putting at least some of the perps behind bars. That leaves the black community feeling the police are only arbitrarily enforcing petty crimes and some how don't want to arrest the real perps.

      That said, the police depts have their own internal problems. At least in parts of L.A., there are different units assigned to murders than to gang activity and the two do not communicate very well. Police depts. need to be reorganized to streamline communication, but communities must also rat out the perps in their midst. As long as the communities do not feel like police can protect them against retribution, that won't happen.

      You can see a microcosm of this playing out in the prisons. These are captive populations with plenty of cops, yet inside the inmates run their own justice system and the cops cannot protect inmates from retribution. When the society gets that evil, it is very difficult to fix.

    14. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by sribe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Should you fire the person that is likely legally bound to make a very nonsensical call?

      No. You should fire the person who is legally bound to respond to credible threats, but who doesn't have any fucking sense about what is obviously a completely non-credible threat.

      Similar thing in CO a few years back, where administrators are required to deal with students who bring weapons onto campus, and/or students who use even fake weapons to threaten other students. But somehow an administrator thought that a marching band member's wooden rifle sitting in an unoccupied locked car qualified...

    15. Re:Yay for "zero tolerance" by Stargoat · · Score: 4, Funny

      When Rings of Power are outlawed, only outlaws will have Rings of Power.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    16. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by ZeroWaiteState · · Score: 2

      If you read the original story, he has already been suspended three times prior to this incident. You'll get a laugh out of the reasons for the other suspensions as well.

    17. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by tylersoze · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually as a parent of two children in the Texas school system I know exactly what I'm talking about. This is a school system that criminalizes truancy for instance. You and your child can literally be sent to jail for your child being *tardy* too many times. 3 tardies is the equivalent of absence, so basically being 30 seconds late to class too many times can get you put in jail. Honor role students are facing jail time for truancy for god sakes. It's utterly ridiculous, we're having to stress over making sure to get the kids on time every morning. There is literally "no intelligence" involved.

    18. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      What if the policy actually requires them to treat all threats as credible, no matter how ridiculous?

      And if they don't follow the policy to the letter, they get fired?

      I don't know if this is the case, but it is possible that the stupidity is coming from a higher level.

    19. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Our ability to learn of crime has vastly outgrown the actual crime rate. Crimes are going down, but reporting/knowledge of the events is growing exponentially.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    20. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Young man, give me that ring."
      "Ooooh... its so pretty. I could do great things with this ring. No... no... it's better if we just destroy it."
      "I have passed the test. I shall diminish and gain tenure."

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    21. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by thegameiam · · Score: 2

      and me without my mod points...

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    22. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Expelliarmus!

    23. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by lgw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Take a stand, have a moral compass, do the right thing, not the easy thing. "Just following orders" when herding the children into camps is not behavior anyone would consider laudable.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    24. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by MobSwatter · · Score: 2

      Credibility of the threat has zero possibility here. Suspension was most definitely the "Christian" thing to do.

    25. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Should you fire the person that is likely legally bound to make a very nonsensical call?

      No. You should fire the person who is legally bound to respond to credible threats, but who doesn't have any fucking sense about what is obviously a completely non-credible threat.

      Similar thing in CO a few years back, where administrators are required to deal with students who bring weapons onto campus, and/or students who use even fake weapons to threaten other students. But somehow an administrator thought that a marching band member's wooden rifle sitting in an unoccupied locked car qualified...

      I'm glad you used the word "qualified" here, because I have a far easier time that these scenarios qualified for the idiocy around zero tolerance policies than I do believing we actually have trained monkeys running schools.

      Yes, there are some obvious cases of bad interpretation here, but that is EXACTLY what a ZERO tolerance policy is designed to eliminate, so we probably shouldn't act so surprised when the foolproof trap designed to be foolproof did its job with even a fool in charge.

    26. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Minwee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you read the article, the kid already has a suspension on file for daring to bring [The Big Book of Knowledge] to school.

      Elementary school is no place for Knowledge, young man.

    27. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Minwee · · Score: 2

      Schools need to get back to the job of teaching and inspiring our youth...

      LOL! Can you imagine such a thing?

      They already are. Just today I was inspired to place my hand on my forehead and sigh.

      Reading the full article inspired me to try something I had never done before and now, thanks to the brave folks at Kermit Elementary School, I know that I can do an Olympic Double Face Palm.

    28. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems like now that actual violent crime is dropping we have to invent new problems. It's like a solution in search of a problem.

    29. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Again, you're applying common sense to the situation. You can't do that. This is a governmental agency with written policies, which must be adhered to. If the policies are stupidly written, and enforced at the highest levels, this is what we'll get.

    30. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      No, a threat is a threat. If I threaten to make you disappear, and you don't feel that I'm joking, you won't care whether I added "by using magic" as how I would do it.

      This. If I put my hand in my pocket, point my finger, and tell you I have got a gun, it's still a crime. The fact that this is a child only points out that we have billion dollar industries designed to create belief in the metaphysical in children. Harry Potter, Tolkein, Twilight, etc. And billion dollar industries taking fiction and turning it into reality. (I have a watch that has a more powerful computer in it than were imagined when I was born. RPi 2 is a quad-core A7 with 1 Gig RAM for $35! I can get a gun that I can use to rob you that has little chance of killing you but will completely disable you while I take your wallet.)

      Not that I'm necessarily disagreeing with you as to their having a "zero intelligence" policy.

      This, too.

    31. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It has ever been thus. US History goes real light on certain topics, like French involvement in the Revolutionary War (the Continental Army was almost a sideshow) and the use of the Army against striking workers. Things like the Maine, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, and Perry's trip to Japan tend to be reported uncritically. Similarly with the phrase "manifest destiny". Every country's history is whitewashed, but the US is particularly good at it.

    32. Re: Yay for "zero tolerance" by omfgnosis · · Score: 2

      No, a threat is a threat. If I threaten to make you disappear, and you don't feel that I'm joking, you won't care whether I added "by using magic" as how I would do it.

      I'm gonna make you think really hard about how stupid that sounds... by using magic.

  2. This is Texas! by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The reason why he got expelled was because he didn't bring a gun to class. And in turn he started spouting some non-christian magic mumbo jumbo.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re: This is Texas! by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 5, Funny

      Um, this is a serious offense. There is no telling how many invisible people there might be all around us. Getting trapped in invisibility could ruin a kid's prospects for getting a job, getting married, or otherwise fulfilling their dreams.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    2. Re:This is Texas! by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

      "And he caused his children to pass through the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom: also he observed times, and used enchantments, and used witchcraft, and dealt with a familiar spirit, and with wizards: he wrought much evil in the sight of the LORD, to provoke him to anger." - Chronicles 33:6

      I don't understand why they let the boy go. He should have been executed for wizardry.

      Or whatever means of punishment they use in Texas.

      Oh, wait. It IS execution. Now it makes even less sense.

    3. Re:This is Texas! by quenda · · Score: 5, Informative

      The kid is a serial offender. Previously disciplined for referring to another kid as "black", and for bringing a book to school depicting pregnancy.
      If they don't do something, what next? He might bring in a book on evolution.

    4. Re:This is Texas! by mysidia · · Score: 2

      He might bring in a book on evolution.

      He might give a lecture... or even worse...... participate in a debate in which he disagrees with a prominent elected government official.

    5. Re:This is Texas! by Pulzar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The kid is a serial offender. Previously disciplined for referring to another kid as "black", and for bringing a book to school depicting pregnancy.

      I thought you were joking. But that's really what he's been suspend for the previous two times.

      That's insanity...

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    6. Re:This is Texas! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's kind of mind-boggling, isn't it?

      This tells me the principal at this school is quite possibly a complete fucking moron who is too stupid to hold this job.

      For pretending he'd use his magic powers he gets suspended? Amazing.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:This is Texas! by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      what next? He might bring in a book on evolution.

      Don't be silly. This is Texas; simple behaviour cannot turn into more complex behaviour without divine intervention.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:This is Texas! by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Suspending a kid because he has a book that talks about pregnancy isn't much above the "unga bunga" stage when it comes to education.

      There is no way I'd have a child in that school after THAT incident. None at all.

    9. Re: This is Texas! by NotFamous · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've personally do not know of ANY unemployed invisible people. Now that's math!

      --
      Some settling may occur during posting.
    10. Re:This is Texas! by fremsley471 · · Score: 2

      Hang on, did I miss a memo? What's wrong with using the term black? What's the acceptable epithet? (oh, and just an advanced "Fuck off" to any racists with 'hilarious' replies).

    11. Re:This is Texas! by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would not be surprised if he made the mistake of questioning someone's ancestory with the suggestion they were not racially pure and it happened to be the kid of someone who already did not like his parents.

      Well, do you have anything to back that up, or is it just the wild-ass speculation it sounds like?

      I would not be surprised if you were talking completely out of your ass with neither facts nor evidence to back it up. I might not even be surprised if you beat your wife and children. I might not be surprised if you killed and tortured animals.

      In this case, "I would not be surprised" is code for "I''m going to make unfounded bullshit speculation and insinuate there is a basis for it other than I felt like making shit up".

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:This is Texas! by Holi · · Score: 3

      Not sure where "left-wing" comes into this at all.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    13. Re:This is Texas! by Holi · · Score: 2

      I believe you meant porch monkey.

      "Randal Graves: Well, I still don't think that porch monkey should be considered a racial term. I've always used it to describe lazy people, not lazy black people. I think if we really tried, we could take back porch monkey and save it."

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    14. Re:This is Texas! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Funny

      This has been going on for some time now:

      "In the first place God made idiots. This was for practice. Then He made School Boards." -- Mark Twain in 1897

    15. Re:This is Texas! by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First, I'd like to point out we're hearing a third-hand rendition of what happened in each case. The kid told his parents told the media why he got suspended.

      Black isn't a racial slur. The name of the race on the US Census is "Black or African American". The only way it could possibly be okay to suspend him is if he repeatedly and with intent to harass called someone who didn't like being called black, black. Did this happen, or is some teacher using her power to engage in a personal vendetta against a word she doesn't like but is generally considered acceptable? I don't know. Like I said, we know one side of the story.

      Maybe, in this most recent case, the kid actually, for fun, tormented a superstitious classmate into thinking he was really in danger of being exiled from existence due to black magic.

      TLDR: Many kids are assholes. Many teachers are assholes. Parents will never admit, due to myopia, that their kids are assholes. Schools will never admit, for legal and union reasons, that their teachers are assholes. Who was an asshole here? We'll never know. But I do assure, someone was.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    16. Re: This is Texas! by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Blindness by invisibility is only a problem when using SCIENCE.

      Magical invisibility causes no such issues.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    17. Re:This is Texas! by denzacar · · Score: 2

      This is why my partner and I make sacrifices in order to send our child to a private school.

      To which deity and/or demon? And does he/she/it demand living things or only objects or food?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    18. Re:This is Texas! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Left wing comes in whenever race is involved. Calling someone "Black" is a racial slur in some places, right up with the N word. Funniest thing I ever saw was someone calling a black guy from Britain who had never been to America (or Africa) an "African American". The liberal outrage when I pointed it out to them was almost as funny.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  3. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

    the school is teaching the kid that threats have consequences.

    What's the consequence of threatening boys with suspension for imaginary witchcraft?

  4. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    school is for learning and teaching.

    Not this school

    Two of the disciplinary actions this year were in-school suspensions for referring to a classmate as black and bringing his favorite book to school: "The Big Book of Knowledge."

    “He loves that book. They were studying the solar system and he took it to school. He thought his teacher would be impressed,” Steward said.

    But the teacher learned the popular children’s encyclopedia had a section on pregnancy, depicting a pregnant woman in an illustration, he explained.

    Most kids who have younger siblings or friends who have younger siblings have seen a pregnant woman, so what is the big deal? Idiots teaching others how to be idiots by example.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  5. Where he went wrong by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seeing that this is Texas he should have just said that "God will strike down the unbeliever" and left it at that.

    I'd love to see this zero tolerance policy come up against religious freedom.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  6. Zero Tolerance Vs. Common Sense. The Showdown by geekmux · · Score: 2

    "It may seem easy to make fun of Principal Greer in this case, but it does make one wonder how many elves could have been saved if someone took a hard line with a young Sauron."

    Ironically, his level of ignorance has triggered my zero tolerance for morons in powerful positions. Particularly those responsible for education.

    Just once, just one damn time I'd like to see Common F. Sense kick the living shit out of Zero Tolerance.

    Once again, we watch the fear of litigation create handcuffs and cause cranial-rectal inversion. Damn that shit gets old.

  7. Should be obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... Another case that proves the old saying - "Zero Tolerance Policy" means "Zero Intelligence Policy"

  8. OMFG .. I just read TFA by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Informative

    yeah I know that reading the TFA helps. But this little gem says it all - this kid is a huge trouble maker and has been suspended before. Look at the crap he has pulled:

    Two of the disciplinary actions this year were in-school suspensions for referring to a classmate as black and bringing his favorite book to school: "The Big Book of Knowledge."

    “He loves that book. They were studying the solar system and he took it to school. He thought his teacher would be impressed,” Steward said.

    But the teacher learned the popular children’s encyclopedia had a section on pregnancy, depicting a pregnant woman in an illustration, he explained.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:OMFG .. I just read TFA by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here in Europe everybody would have laughed their pants off.

      Assuming their pants were on in the first place.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  9. Hard line with young Sauron. by Chas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since Sauron is a Maia, he predates what we know as "creation".

    So the answer to this is probably "no".

    As always, Eru Illuvatar did not make himself available for comment.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  10. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the school is teaching the kid that threats have consequences.

    Credible threats have consequences. Threatening to magically make someone magically vanish lacks credibility.


    and a pretty good lesson

    "Good" lessons have a point to them. Teaching kids to fear imaginary threats does not.

  11. Re:what's the big deal? by Chas · · Score: 2

    I remember getting in trouble in grade school for calling someone a homo sapiens (yes I knew I wasn't REALLY insulting the idiot kid, but HE didn't know that, but I got in trouble because he "felt" insulted.

    Then again, most of my teachers in grade school were fucking assholes.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  12. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm all for teaching kids that threats (and other mean things said) have consequences. As a father, I have to do this more often than I'd like. (Mostly from my boys getting on each others' nerves.) However, your response needs to be proportionate to the actual threat. If a child brings a gun to school and threatens another child with it - even if the gun was unloaded - suspension could definitely be considered. If a child is threatening another child with a "magic ring", though, perhaps you should just talk with the child about how it's not nice to threaten people even with imaginary objects. At most, have the child write an essay or something to drive the point home. However, a suspension over "my magic ring will make you invisible" is really going over the line.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  13. Not the school name that I expected ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2

    TFA says that the school is called ''Kermit Elementary School'', I was expecting the name ''Hogwarts'' - silly me!

    1. Re:Not the school name that I expected ... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Interesting

      TFA says that the school is called ''Kermit Elementary School''

      So I guess it's appropriate that the principal is a muppet.

  14. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2

    And despite the bozos that constantly talk about kids not being "fully formed persons," nine-year-old kids know the difference between stories and reality. If they don't then it is a mental health issue, not a displinary one. Children are PERSONS at another stage of development, not un-persons with brains that don't work.

    This is silly. If I go to my office mate and joke that I am going to hit him with a Super Mario Bros. fireball, should I be fired? If a really believe it maybe I should be sent to the farm...

  15. it should be outlawed. by nimbius · · Score: 2

    The one ring is no joke. Theres an entire multipart documentary on how its a bane on society and threatening to use it against another classmate is atrocious. Parents should talk to their kids about Sauron and how to properly dispose of the ring. Clearly had this kid been mentored by wizards he would have known the appropriate quest to take to rid the land of the scourge.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  16. Here we go again by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As a victim of the totalitarian school system, my disdain for school administrators is proven justifiable again and again.

    There is something seriously wrong with this principle. I do not know if is something that needs counseling, or psych-drugs, or whether she is mentally challenged, or merely power mad, and enjoys exerting it over little children, but no, childplay should never be punished like that. I don't think she should be allowed to be around children.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  17. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the school is teaching the kid that threats have consequences.

    Credible threats have consequences. Threatening to magically make someone magically vanish lacks credibility.

    and a pretty good lesson

    "Good" lessons have a point to them. Teaching kids to fear imaginary threats does not.

    There is one good lesson they're teaching this boy: those with authority are not to be trusted.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  18. lessons in incompetence by schlachter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's part of the "teaching incompetence and government absurdity" in the classroom program. Best the kids learn early that rational thought and reason does not exist if the words threat, school, sex, gay, religion, race, and more are used in a sentence.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    1. Re:lessons in incompetence by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Funny

      Best the kids learn early that rational thought and reason does not exist ...

      Indeed. How does it make any sense to punish misbehavior with a three day vacation spent watching TV while falling further behind academically? At my kids' school, they punish misbehavior with detention and extra work, which seems to be effective since they have had NO students disappear due to magic spells.

    2. Re:lessons in incompetence by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Right, it's not just one random dickhead or a press beat up, it's a vast conspiracy to hasten the onset of the idiocracy! - Although I must admit your post could be taken as evidence the conspiracy is working.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:lessons in incompetence by lgw · · Score: 2

      The current school system is, in fact, a massive, well-documented, openly discussed at the time "conspiracy" to train kids to be good little manufacturing workers, with learning as a secondary goal. This wasn't evil at the time: manufacturing jobs were great jobs, once, long ago. But we need engineers now, and those are the great jobs, and the whole system actively discourages the curiosity and exploration and skepticism of authority needed to develop the engineering mindset.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  19. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by mysidia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Credible threats have consequences. Threatening to magically make someone magically vanish lacks credibility.

    How can the rules distinguish between Humor/Fake/Play threats, and real Bullying?

    I think any reasonable person would believe the threat to magically disappear someone would be imaginary and non-credible.

    Just like you would probably laugh if your next door neighbor tried to threaten you with Thermonuclear destruction.

    But what if the victim was gullible, and the kid kept coming up with new imaginary threats to intimidate him?

    Such cases can't entirely be dismissed, if there is a legitimate pattern of bullying or intentional intimidation.

  20. Texans can't separate fantasy and reality by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

    Look at how popular extremist Christianity is down there. No one told Texas that the supernatural is imaginary.

  21. Re:Zero Tolerance Vs. Common Sense. The Showdown by Immerman · · Score: 2

    Oh, it's probably happened, the news industry is just to embarrassed to admit that "administrator not a complete idiot" actually qualifies as news. They have to make their audience feel good about themselves after all.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  22. Re:Wow. Principal Greer: Go back to Cali with that by jcr · · Score: 2

    Jesus, how awful is it for a black kid to be told that "black" is a bad word?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  23. Re:They've also outlawed freeze tag by epyT-R · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, they really have outlawed and/or regulated it in several states, because it encourages "anti social" behavior.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
    http://www.nydailynews.com/new...

    Why are we letting the government regulate stupid shit like this? So are the kids supposed to stay inside and play video games instead? Bumps, bruises, getting teased, and learning to deal with losing/competition are life lessons.

  24. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by Holi · · Score: 2

    "Just like you would probably laugh if your next door neighbor tried to threaten you with Thermonuclear destruction."

    I don't know, my neighbor has been buying A LOT of smoke detectors lately.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  25. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by bledri · · Score: 2

    Mod this parent up, please. I can't understand why schools have gotten so trigger-happy nowadays. ...

    Most likely because parents are sue happy when their little angel is "traumatized."

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  26. Extraordinary Claims by Akratist · · Score: 2

    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Zero-tolerance policies, in turn, require extraordinary stupidity.

  27. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by DarkOx · · Score: 2

    I think its the other child that needs a talking to.

    Its not clear from the article that Aiden had any intent in the way of assault, "the putting in of fear". As far as I can tell he was playing make believe after seeing a movie.

    The fact that another 9 year old feels 'threatened' by any action which might be taken using the "magic" ring other than perhaps it being thrown at him should be of greater concern.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  28. Re:Further down in the article... by pr0fessor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of my sons was expelled from the highschool the day after the Columbine shootings because had previously owned a trench coat that he had out grown and hadn't owned for nearly a year. The expulsion only lasted half a day before someone came to our house and apologized as the principal had over stepped his authority when he expelled every student that had ever worn a trench coat to school. That was also his last year as principal.

    He was also suspended for wearing a pentacle by a vice principal wearing great big honking cross. After a lengthy explanation about religious symbols used as gang signs from her I simply told her she's not suspending him and will never mention it again unless she intends to suspends every person wearing a cross. She started to try and convince me that was different and I cut her off and cautioned her that there wasn't any argument she could give that wouldn't make me want to see her fired.

  29. Then this kid is way ahead already... by denzacar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Best the kids learn early that rational thought and reason does not exist if the words threat, school, sex, gay, religion, race, and more are used in a sentence.

    From TFA:

    He's already been suspended three times this school year.
    Two of the disciplinary actions this year were in-school suspensions for referring to a classmate as black and bringing his favorite book to school: "The Big Book of Knowledge."

    "He loves that book. They were studying the solar system and he took it to school. He thought his teacher would be impressed," Steward said.

    But the teacher learned the popular children's encyclopedia had a section on pregnancy, depicting a pregnant woman in an illustration, he explained.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Then this kid is way ahead already... by David_W · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, I wondered if there could be more to this story, like the concern was not the actual threat so much at the intent behind it. (Like, it wasn't any concerns over the "magic" angle, but that the threat was rooted in an actual desire to cause harm. Then I read this in your comment:

      ...the disciplinary actions this year were in-school suspensions for... bringing his favorite book to school... depicting a pregnant woman in an illustration...

      Yup, that tells me everything right there. They are nuts. Remind me never to go anywhere near this school system, ever.

    2. Re:Then this kid is way ahead already... by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Best the kids learn early that rational thought and reason does not exist if the words threat, school, sex, gay, religion, race, and more are used in a sentence.

      From TFA:

      He's already been suspended three times this school year. Two of the disciplinary actions this year were in-school suspensions for referring to a classmate as black and bringing his favorite book to school: "The Big Book of Knowledge."

      "He loves that book. They were studying the solar system and he took it to school. He thought his teacher would be impressed," Steward said.

      But the teacher learned the popular children's encyclopedia had a section on pregnancy, depicting a pregnant woman in an illustration, he explained.

      Knowledge. You know that shit can be dangerous in a classroom. We should probably suspend anyone who brings such educational porn in from the local bookstore...

    3. Re:Then this kid is way ahead already... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      But the teacher learned the popular children's encyclopedia had a section on pregnancy, depicting a pregnant woman in an illustration, he explained.

      hang on, don't teachers usually already know about pregnancy and all that adult type stuff? this teacher just learned about it NOW?

      maybe the kids should be teaching class...

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  30. It is NOT draconian. by denzacar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it draconian?

    That's a common misconception.

    Bilbo only uses the ring to fool the dragon, the ring was not made or previously owned by said dragon.
    It was actually Sauron who forged the ring, as it was explained already in Lord of the Rings.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  31. Re:its not about the ring, its just a lesson. by KingMotley · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all fun and games until it's your child that gets turned invisible.

  32. Re:They've also outlawed freeze tag by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    When I was a kid in the ealry 1970's, we couldn't flap our jackets and screamed "BATMAN!" while running on the playground. Our parents were told not to let us watch "violent" TV shows like Batman and The Three Stooges at home.

  33. Re: Yay for by Minwee · · Score: 2

    Take away the ring, and what dose "I'm going to make you disappear" mean? It could mean he was threatening to kill him.

    Did he mean it that way? Not likely, but a school can't take that chance.

    It gets even scarier. Another kid said "Excuse me, may I go to the washroom please?" to his teacher.

    He may have really wanted to go into the hallway to set off an atomic bomb he had stashed in his backpack, destroying the entire city. If only this bill had been passed the brave teacher would have been allowed to use deadly force to protect global freedom. Instead, all they could do was expel the terrorist in training.

    You just can't take any chances at all.

  34. Re:Tell her what you think of her decision. by Phil+Urich · · Score: 2

    While I won't disagree that personal attacks cause issues and are ethically questionable, the counterargument (and the framework under which the anonymous doxxer is likely working under) is that awareness that the wider world might come crashing down on you will affect others' actions. So even if this isn't their district, it might well affect the actions of principals and other administrators in local districts, and in general humanity would be better off if there was a counterweight to the zero-tolerance bullshit, which was that admins would fear the general public's zero tolerance for the bullshit of zero-tolerance.

    Now, to be clear, I don't actually think doxxing this principal will affect the actions of any other principals, since this kind of idiocy is already showing itself to be impervious to foresight, awareness, and sensibility.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!