YouTube Launches Multi-Angle Video Experiment
jones_supa writes YouTube is experimenting with a fun feature already known from DVDs: videos that let you switch between different camera angles while the video is playing. These multi-angle videos are only an experiment right now and there's only one demo video that actually showcases this feature so far. Provided that the user can supply multiple camera streams, YouTube tells that the multiplexing will be automatic, but that the technology is not ready to scale to everyone yet. If you want to give this a try, head over to Madilyn Bailey's channel. The YouTube team took her performance at the most recent YouTube Music Night and set it up as a multi-angle video.
Wasn't this one of the hyped features of DVDs back in the day? Didn't make a splash then...
"Look, our toddler's in The Matrix!" [swish swish swish]
Table-ized A.I.
Just after she's introduced to sing I hit left twice just to test it out, and it was of her rear which works up to her head. I LOL'd
Yep, it's not really ready for primetime. I'm surprised they released it like this!
In a couple moments, I quickly spotted two issues:
1) The majority of the time that I switch camera angles, I get a little repeat/skip backwards in the audio.
2) When changing between cameras, it seems you get a real quick shot of the last frame you were on with that camera. So as the scene progresses and you change cameras, this causes some subliminal-style image flashes.
Now we can change angles just like a DVD!
"Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
Watch the game from a bunch of different angles. Put several different TVs in a sports bar with all the different angles, get way more customers. Then mic up all the players and choose the channel you want to listen to. It'd lead to famous trash talk segments when video with sound are linked on forums.
God spoke to me
I tried to watch the sample video thing. Terrible issues with audio-continuity between the views. Seeing that dude's fanny pack was a great example of why nobody needs \ wants this. I might have had some degree of respect for the guy despite his annoying voice if I hadn't switched to the view that showed the bejeweled fanny-pack. Editing exists for a reason, just like elected political representatives. This is like those people that show you their completely unedited vacation photos- all 568 of them. It kills the magic. If done very very well, I could imagine this maybe being useful for porn (but only until good holograms become available).
ôó
The U2 Elevation DVD used multi-angle really well - you could switch between different views of the concert, from the control room to BonoCam (yes really, even before Google Glass there were cameras in glasses) and general wide angle views. The control room view was especially fun.
I have to admit it never caught on generally but there are some select subjects where it can be really great - personally I think it could really flourish on a place like YouTube with and endless array of specialized subjects and millions of people to think up some creative use. I'm interested to see what comes of it.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Why can't the morons who upload videos to youtube use multiple angles in a single video stream so we don't have to switch? It's simply annoying and unpleasant to watch the same angle for even 5 minutes (eg: see professional music videos, TV shows, movies etc.), let alone the whole video length of 10-50 minutes. How come people are allowed to upload without learning this basic skill of filming?
http://www.nba.com/tntovertime... started this years ago. Very fun.
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
Meh
How come people are allowed to upload without learning this basic skill of filming?
A lot of these people don't have someone else to handle the camera. Yeah, it's sad, but it's true. I don't have anyone who wants to operate a camera while I pontificate about something that might be interesting to a handful of people. If I make a video like that, you can be sure that it will have a static camera.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Not only that, many don't have the equipment to run a multicam setup. Cameras and a time code generator cost money.
One of my favorite DVDs, not movies, has got to be Beastie Boys Video Anthology. It's one of the most feature rich DVDs that I own and if a group were to release a collection of videos this is how it should be done. Some of the video not only include multiple angles, but multiple remixes on the language tracks.
Not only that, many don't have the equipment to run a multicam setup. Cameras and a time code generator cost money.
I've done multicam with 2 smartphones. You don't need a time code generator. Start the recording on both cameras at approximately the same time, and make a loud, sharp, noise (like a single hand clap or banging a table) to emulate the clapperboard that you are too poor to buy. Don't stop the recording until the scene is done. Use the loud sharp noise at the beginning of the clips to sync up the videos. Make your video PIP and throw away one of the audio tracks, or do proper cuts if you want to be fancy. Done.
Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
Nicki Minaj from an angle other than the one with the camera pointing at her butt?