Slashdot Mirror
MPAA Considers Major Changes After Sony Hack
Earthquake Retrofit shares this story about changes that may be coming to the MPAA prompted by the Sony hack. "Fissures revealed by the hacking at Sony Pictures Entertainment have raised the prospect of profound change at one of Hollywood's oldest institutions: the Motion Picture Association of America. In a behind-the-scenes drama, the Sony Pictures chairman, Michael Lynton, last month told industry colleagues of a plan to withdraw from the movie trade organization, according to people who have been briefed on the discussions. He cited the organization’s slow response and lack of public support in the aftermath of the attack on Sony and its film The Interview, as well as longstanding concerns about the cost and efficacy of the group. Reversing course in mid-January, as the Oscar nominations were being announced, Mr. Lynton stayed in. But he and other studio executives are now discussing proposals that could alter the structure, mandate and governance of a 93-year-old organization that has been the policy front for Hollywood’s major film studios."
Disbanding is the only postive change the MPAA could make, IMHO.
Anybody taking bets if this will be good or bad for the customers and what are the odds? I am going for 1000:1.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
Selling off their divisions, and now breaking ties with their industry allies.
Hopefully, they'll take the RIAA down with them. They could end up getting bailed out by the Japanese Government.
Have you folks read TFA and seen the annuals fees due the MPAA by it's members? I am stunned. What value does the MPAA possibly offer that could come anywhere close to commanding such regal sums annually?
From the sound of it Sony wants a Meaner and leaner attack dog that does more damage and costs less.
They fought tooth and nail against digital distribution to keep the Movie Theatre business model, and by the time Netflix and the like had come out, online piracy model for movies was already well established. So now they have the US as a decent digital market, and some developed countries, but a large part of the world is not covered properly.
So much time spent on DRM and DVDs that self destruct, what a waste.
You want to make a small fortune in Hollywood start with a large one.
I was, of course, talking from my own point of view. I am not talking better DRM, I am talking about getting rid of some corporate idiocy. We are all drowning in it.
Insiders are reporting a shift in the hierarchy are being proposed such as allowing Satan to step down as CEO and having a board of directors take his place with possible suggested applicants being Lucifer, called the Lord of Light by some for his personality and ability mediate conflicts effectively, Babylon The Great Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth...a possibly good PR move to appeal to women in the field and a relative newcomer named Nyarlathotep who is unknown in many circles and seen as charismatic Middle-Eastern troubleshooter that "gets things done with everybody happy".
Well I agree about too much corporate and idiocy in general. I just wouldn't hold my breath on this guy. Just how did he expect the MPAA to come to his aid when his company was too stupid to properly secure it's network ? Strikes me as someone who is adept at blaming others for their mistakes.
We already have enough DRM, region coding, forced commercials on our blu-rays and DVD's, etc. to annoy our OWN customers. Why do we need the MPAA harassing them too, when we do it so well already?
SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
From the sound of it Sony wants a Meaner and leaner attack dog that does more damage and costs less.
Yeah, so they can ensure they stop all those evil pirates from streaming The Interview at home before it hits theatre...oh, Sony did what?!?
(Yeah, kind of a bitch to take that hypocritical stance now that Sony themselves have set precedent with first-run screenings, regardless of the reason.)
From the sound of it Sony wants a Meaner and leaner attack dog that does more damage and costs less.
I fear that you are correct. The only possible bright spot would be if Sony realized (bear with me here, this is purely hypothetical, not a prediction) that an attack dog that spends all its time throwing lawyers at the next advance in content distribution(in the fine Valenti tradition of accusing the VCR of being the Boston Strangler of the film industry) is actually not as useful as an attack dog that doesn't roll over and wag its tail the moment some rag-tag band of competent but not extraordinary hackers make one of the world's larger movie publishers cry, in public, for weeks on end, with effectively no response from anyone else in the industry.
I doubt that they'll actually do this; but if they decide that the MPAA is better used to protect them from real threats, then even a toothier version of it might actually be good, or at least indifferent. I'm not holding my breath, though.
They're not saying this in terms of wide-open streaming of back catalogs and less obsession with DRM.
When they give back what was stolen from me.
Yea - Sony wants a pickachu, not a damn snorlac
this comes as a surprise to them?!? are they fucking serious?!? I felt bad for the worker bees who had their pii plastered out to the world (& whose jobs will be cut to make up the cost cause it obviously ain't coming out of the bonuses of those who didn't fund security) but sony as a company? those inglorious bastards should count their lucky stars they didn't dd /dev/random their entire enterprise!
From the rootkit company? Nothing good.
Right, and I want a Unicorn, but thankfully we can't have all the things we want.
Heaven forbid a company want to protect their rights.
Except they don't want to "protect their rights". They want to steal ours.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
I wonder how many young starlets were convinced they would be up-and-coming if they would get with a senator and be up-and-cumming?
Why settle for the lesser evil?
From the sound of it Sony wants a Meaner and leaner attack dog that does more damage and costs less.
Yeah, so they can ensure they stop all those evil pirates from streaming The Interview at home before it hits theatre...oh, Sony did what?!?
(Yeah, kind of a bitch to take that hypocritical stance now that Sony themselves have set precedent with first-run screenings, regardless of the reason.)
That's not a hypocritical stance. Their stance has always been that the movie owners dictate when and how movies are distributed. If they want to put it up on streaming before or during a theatrical release, it's entirely their choice and doesn't smack of hypocrisy.
Can we get some new ones where violence is bad and love is good?