Slashdot Mirror


Russia Seeking To Ban Tor, VPNs and Other Anonymizing Tools

An anonymous reader writes Three separate Russian authorities have spoken out in favor of banning online anonymizing tools since February 5th, with particular emphasis on Tor, which — despite its popularity with whistle-blowers such as Edward Snowden and with online activists — Russia's Safe Internet League describes as an 'Anonymous network used primarily to commit crimes'. The three authorities involved are the Committee on Information Policy, Information Technologies and Communications, powerful Russian media watchdog Roskomnadzor and the Safe Internet League, comprising the country's top three network providers, including state telecoms provider Rostelecom. Roskomnadzor's press secretary Vadim Roskomnadzora Ampelonsky describes the obstacles to identifying and blocking Tor and VPN traffic as "difficult, but solvable."

215 comments

  1. This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anything the evil former Commies do now is held up as a destroyer of freedom. If someone here proposes a similar law, half of Congress will (hopefully) stand up and say "That's something the Russians would do to suppress Freedom(TM)."

    1. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Can't tell if Putin is an asshole or if Obama is wagging the dog...

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by I'm+just+joshin · · Score: 2

      Both?

    3. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      the greeks can start using rubles for all I care. saves them the trouble of printing the money themselves.

      oh and if you don't think that he's an asshole... how is he not? his policies are just asshole policies through and through. he's not cleaning up street level corruption in russia and only taking things into his own fold, pisses on the elections, parliament and freedom of expression and rights of the people, annexed a part of another state after his puppet got overthrown and is supplying weapons and troops.

      and not least assholistic is running the russian media as he is.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch Putins way PBS, scapegoated I don't think so. Your really wrong about Putin.

    5. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by ihtoit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      oh, so Putin invaded three countries immediately following the world trade centre incident on the pretext of finding the one man they held responsible? No wait, that was the United States.
      Putin bombed Serbia? No, wait, that was the United States.
      Putin aided in bloody coups against legitimately elected Governments in Liberia, Haiti, Somalia, Syria, Libya, Egypt? No, all the United States.

      Who's the asshole?

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    6. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who has works with people from Russia, the best description of how the country is run would be similar to Chicago with the Mafia in charge. There is just enough order so that things can function, and not much else past that.

      One example are Russian cars. By law, they have to have sets of cameras on them... because there will be no other way to find who is at fault if a wreck happens. The police don't have enough resources to find who is at fault, so one has to "pack their own parachute" in order to get insurance money if there is a wreck.

      Is Putin another Stalin? No. Russia has its issues, mainly underpopulation, and thousands of miles of borders with countries that would love to nick off some Russian territory. Plus, here in the US, Islamic extremist aggression makes the news often. There, border skirmishes by combatants is common, and there is a sizable death toll.

      Another part of it is that Putin has to be an asshole. He has to run the country with an iron grip or else separatists will fracture the country... and if this happens, it would have far reaching and severe consequences.

      The real truth is that Putin is an ass... but there is a lot worse that could be running the country. However, Russia has only to gain in future years. Oil prices are going back up, and will be at three digits a barrel by Memorial Day due to OPEC production cuts. While fracking has depleted US reserves, Russia still sits on incredible deposits, which are only going to be worth more as everyone else runs dry.

    7. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      oh, so Putin invaded three countries

      You mean, Georgia, Ukraine and (brewing) Moldova? With functional takeover of a number of ex-USSR countries as well (Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova differ only by daring to stand up to Russia)? And aiding bloody coups elsewhere?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    8. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by ihtoit · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'll see your former Soviet states and raise you a Columbia, Panama and Zaire.

      I could do this all fuckin' day,

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    9. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll see your former Soviet states and raise you a Columbia, Panama and Zaire.

      I could do this all fuckin' day,

      The number of assholes isn't limited to one. In addition: You aren't automatically the good guy if there are worse people.

    10. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that Russia plans to annex its neighbors.

      If you can't see the difference in that, you are the asshole.

    11. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll see your former Soviet states and raise you a Columbia, Panama and Zaire.

      I could do this all fuckin' day,

      Gentlemen, gentlemen,

      Both countries have small penises. Can we please move on.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    12. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      By law, they have to have sets of cameras on them... because there will be no other way to find who is at fault if a wreck happens.

      Dashcams are a good idea. I live in America, and I have one. I bought it for $39 from Amazon. It hasn't recorded an accident yet, but I did record a robbery that occurred in front of my car in a parking lot. I emailed the video to the cops, and they said it helped them nail the guy. The victim was an Indian woman. They are often targeted by muggers because they wear a lot of solid gold jewelry.

    13. Re: This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snitches get stitches. Just sayin'. You should get rid of that dashcam before some... "Accident" happens.

    14. Re: This is (sort of) good news for Americans by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      that is probably true, but even so it is a very sad indictment on American society.

    15. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin is not another Stalin. Putin is another Hitler.

    16. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, so Putin invaded three countries immediately following the world trade centre incident....blah,blah
      So just a few differences here. The US invades, fixes, leaves. Oh, and Serbia was bombing and killing long before the US got to them. Serbia has nothing to crow about, their shameful acts of genocide are second only to Hitlers'. The US hasn't been grabbing land and calling it 'the 51'st state', 'the 52'nd state', etc. He didn't grab 20% of Georgia (the country) and claim it and keep it since 2004, just invaded and (stole) Crimea, and called it "ours", and isn't calling Eastern Ukraine "Russia West". Oh, and lets go with one more: The US does not supply arms to militias that then shoot civilian jetliners out of the sky. That one we can pin on Putin and Russia. Oh, and lets just keep going with this: When the Americans take power its through and election. Its not through blowing up a theater, blaming people in another country (Crimea) then invading that country .... and its all a staged lie. And that's what Putin did. Oh, and Putin is running a Kleptocracy. All the money is stolen. The Ukrainians threw out Moscow's guy because he was a thief just like Putin (remember the fancy Mansion with the private zoo?). Putin keeps yelping about the west staying out of Ukraine, but why should they be the only ones? 9000 Russian tanks are in Ukraine right now. Russian soldiers are in Ukraine right now. The only thing Putin has to fear is getting his ass kicked up past his eyeballs. One thing though: a few more loose words about "Nuclear war" and he will see his own sorry ass glowing like a neon sign, the dirty filthy rat bastard.

    17. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by blind+biker · · Score: 2

      oh, so Putin invaded three countries

      You mean, Georgia, Ukraine and (brewing) Moldova? With functional takeover of a number of ex-USSR countries as well (Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova differ only by daring to stand up to Russia)? And aiding bloody coups elsewhere?

      Moldova got already invaded - Putin took Transnistria already. In fact, that was his first invasion.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    18. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I could do this all fuckin' day,

      Yep. Of course you can do it all day. Because you can live in a country where you can do that without fear of retribution.

      But. Y'know. Keep fighting the good fight, comrade.

    19. Re: This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thugs gets slugs... and it aint' no accident!

    20. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Putin is a poison murderer and responsible for the death of many women and children. So yes, that qualifies him as an asshole.

    21. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      One example are Russian cars. By law, they have to have sets of cameras on them

      I don't know who told you that, but there's no law in Russia that requires having dashcams. Nor is it a prerequisite for getting insurance - having a car insurance is obligatory, and the companies are required to provide it with certain minimum conditions satisfied.

      What it does is make it easier to prove your insurance claim should you have to make one. And also, in some cases, keep you out of jail, by proving your innocence (e.g. in a faked pedestrian hit).

      He has to run the country with an iron grip or else separatists will fracture the country

      Oh? And who are those separatists exactly, and which parts of the country are threatening to separate?

    22. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by ladoga · · Score: 1, Troll

      You mean, Georgia, Ukraine and (brewing) Moldova? With functional takeover of a number of ex-USSR countries as well (Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova differ only by daring to stand up to Russia)? And aiding bloody coups elsewhere?

      Don't forget Chechenya. That war basically brought Putin into power.

      Moscow apartment bombings were executed to get a pretext for invading Chechenya (2nd war). FSB even got caught planting one of the bombs. Guess who was leading the FSB back then? Guess who blamed it all to Chechens?

      For Putin, killing thousands of people is nothing. He will do just about anything to stay in power. I don't really think he needs to be paranoid even. With all the crimes he has done, whoever follows might not be easy on him

    23. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by dunkelfalke · · Score: 3, Informative

      The civil war in Transnistria happened when Putin was just a suitcase carrier for the then-mayor of St. Petersburg.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    24. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. This only gives the likes of Obama and whoever replaces him an erection, because they know they could get away with it here if they push it.

    25. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's the asshole?

      Since Putin wasn't involved in any of those I don't see how that would be an argument against Putin being an asshole.
      Unless you claim that there can only be one asshole in the world, but that would be an utterly retarded claim.

    26. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Another part of it is that Putin has to be an asshole. He has to run the country with an iron grip or else separatists will fracture the country...

      You mean like Ukraine would like to fracture Russia by not being a part of it?
      A lot of the separatisms comes from not being a "natural" part of the country.

    27. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by the_xaqster · · Score: 1, Funny

      Godwin'd!

      --
      I'm just here to regulate Funkyness
    28. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really putin should just abandon Ukraine altogether, yes it will probably result in ukraine doing some ethnic cleansing and a lot of unpleasantness but he has done worse. Once abandoned then Europe can concern themselves with the Nazi's. will be interesting to watch the US and EU backpedal as they fight to find reasons to keep Ukraine at arms length.

    29. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by ihtoit · · Score: 0

      citations required.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    30. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by r.freeman · · Score: 1

      The best democracy in the world, the land of the free and child murderers is also waging similar shitty laws, with better effects and for decade.

    31. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh? And who are those separatists exactly, and which parts of the country are threatening to separate?

      The Ukrainians

    32. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    33. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      One example are Russian cars. By law, they have to have sets of cameras on them... because there will be no other way to find who is at fault if a wreck happens.

      That actually sounds better than what the UK has. Here we have a vast network of CCTV cameras with automatic number plate recognition, feeding into Big Brother's giant database of car journeys. If there is an accident and you don't have your own camera, you had better hope there was some CCTV to prove your side of the story. Unless something serious happened the police won't turn up. The Highways Agency might try to bill you for the cost of any road repairs and clean-up. Many insurance companies will try to settle 50-50 if there are no witnesses.

      At least with the Russian system there isn't the Big Brother database component.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Obama are YOU looking at?

      The Republican tail is wagging the Democratic dog of "who won the election" and has been ever since Obama won. Hell, it's likely it's the Tea Party flea on the Republican tail that's doing all the demanding screaming to get their own way, without whom the US government may have been able to actually run because the welfare and even lives of both Democrats and Republicans willing to work with them for the sake of the USA would no longer be at risk to the fundamentalist christian terrorists of the teabaggers.

    35. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      that's a damn impressive effort for an intelligence officer stationed in Dresden. Would love to know how he managed that one.

    36. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by hackertourist · · Score: 2

      That didn't work the last time. Remember the '80s? Oh, how we laughed at the KGB, Stasi et al. and their invasive ways. Listening to everybody, having half the population on the payroll and informing on the other half, reading all mail etc.
      How superior we felt, with our freedoms.

      Now look where we are.

    37. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by rockout · · Score: 2

      Oil prices are going back up, and will be at three digits a barrel by Memorial Day due to OPEC production cuts.

      I'd just like to point out that if this Anonymous Coward knew this as fact, he could be a multi-millionaire by Memorial Day with ease.

      If you agree with him, then so could you.

      Good luck with that.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    38. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One example are Russian cars. By law, they have to have sets of cameras on them... because there will be no other way to find who is at fault if a wreck happens. The police don't have enough resources to find who is at fault, so one has to "pack their own parachute" in order to get insurance money if there is a wreck.

      someone is telling you bullshit. there is no such law in Russia. people drive there with camera on there dash as it makes insurance claims easier as insurance companies require proof as Russia has a high accident count and quite a bit of fraud, first hand accounts without such proof can be rejected by some insurance companies.

    39. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? How aboit some ginko for those memory problems?

    40. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      solid gold jewelry.

      14 karat gold is a popular ingredient in that jewelry. The thieves must be desperate to take even moderate risks for such a low return. I guess the methamphetamine usage is to blame.

    41. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Prince Alwaleed agrees with you.

      https://secure.marketwatch.com...

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    42. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Maritz · · Score: 1

      This isn't Highlander. You realise there can be more than one asshole right? Putin is a fucking de-facto dictator at this point. The Russians, by and large, are pathetic for not opposing his power grabs.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    43. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is that Russia seems to think it's the 19th century all over again and expands its territories at every change it gets. That alone should drive its border neighbors to "nuke-up" at the earliest possibility.

    44. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Drethon · · Score: 1

      The things I read when I have no mod points.

    45. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by chenjeru · · Score: 1

      Oil prices are going back up, and will be at three digits a barrel by Memorial Day due to OPEC production cuts.

      There is absolutely no indication that this is happening or will happen. OPEC is not cutting production at all, and Saudi Arabia is happy to keep pumping which keeps the US shale and Iranian markets suppressed. There is no way that the price per barrel will hit 3 digits in the first half of this year, because even if production gets reduced, everyone's reserves are completely topped up now.

      --
      Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
    46. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Like in little-league sports these days, that contest can have many "winners."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    47. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      I don't think Putin's an asshole

      I think thousands of wounded/displaced Ukrainians would disagree, and the dead ones if they could talk. Plus the families of the people on the downed airliner.

    48. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      oh, so Putin invaded three countries immediately following the world trade centre incident on the pretext of finding the one man they held responsible? No wait, that was the United States. Putin bombed Serbia? No, wait, that was the United States. Putin aided in bloody coups against legitimately elected Governments in Liberia, Haiti, Somalia, Syria, Libya, Egypt? No, all the United States.

      Who's the asshole?

      Putin invaded the following after 9-11-2001, although his reasons had nothing to do with those events.
      Georgia, Moldova (arguable whether Russian troops were involved at first, but they're in Transnistria now), Ukraine
      Those invaded areas are for all practical purposes under the control of Russia. In Georgia and Ukraine, you might as well redraw the map and give them to Russia.
      How many counties the "evil" US invaded does it control? Yeah, that's what I thought.

      Are you a Russian apologist? You should know why NATO, not the US only, bombed Serbia. It was over genocide. But if you wish to play the Russian propaganda card here, the Serbs were all helpless victims and did nothing wrong. Right.

      Actually US participation in the Egyptian coup was negligible or non-existent because most of the Obama administration believed that the Muslim Brotherhood was doing a great job and the US officially opposed the coup. Not sure what exactly you are referring to via the Somalia and Haiti comments. It's arguable that Libya's elections at the time were not free given that it was a one party state. Liberia? I haven't heard about the US doing anything there other than trying to help with Ebola, which is something good ol' Russia could never be bothered to do. Syria is another one party state so you can call it "legitimately elected" if you have a really loose definition of what a "legitimate election" means.

    49. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by kbahey · · Score: 1

      Legitimately elected Governments in ..., Syria, Libya, Egypt?

      What? Legitimately elected? Syria, Egypt, Libya? Really?

      Is this Vodka or pot overdose?

    50. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      No one, not one single person or entity is predicting 100+ for oil "by memorial day". The highest predictions from anyone, anywhere, is that it is back up to mid 60s.

    51. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes legitimately elected.

      Just like Iran.

      The USA when it doesn't get a regime that likes them will INSIST that it's not a legitimate result, because corruption. Of course, Shrub's "winning" isn't brought up nor the Diebold frauds. That moves things "off message" which is basically "America! FUCK YEAH!".

      PS why is favouring the USA a good thing but favouring Russia wrong? Because?

    52. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by kbahey · · Score: 0

      Mubarak was legitimately elected?
      Gaddafi was legitimately elected?
      Assad was legitimately elected?

      If you are not joking, you have to be in an alternate universe, or out of your mind.

      [I am Egyptian by the way, and know what I am talking about]

    53. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      For now, Transnistria is only occupied, what's brewing is full annexation.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    54. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      How come, in Litvinyenko's name, ladoga's post got moderated "troll"? Comrades, didn't you get the memo? The First Secretary is ok with people knowing that. He would use a speeding car or a dose of that invisible "100% natural cardiac event" poison, rather than polonium you can't get without being a state actor. Instead, the message sent means "yes, we did it, and if you fuck with us the same can happen to you".

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    55. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by simonreid · · Score: 1

      Ha, dream on. Now that they are trying to pass 'Net Neutrality' by pushing Title 2 on all all broadband providers just wait and see how long it takes before they deem the 'dark web', aka TOR and any VPN traffic the NSA can't see, as 'unlawful content'. Your netflix might not be buffering, but you better not try doing anything anonymously on the internet - I mean, if it was lawful, why would you hide it?

    56. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      You mean the way they've been attacking said dictators?

      Oh wait.

      http://thedailyshow.cc.com/vid...

    57. Re: This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd get one, but honestly I'm not looking for that kind of trouble with the police.

    58. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by ultranova · · Score: 1

      How superior we felt, with our freedoms.

      Now look where we are.

      That is the irony of Capitalism: it can only work as long as it has another system to compete against. As soon as Communism fell, Capitalism became a monopoly in the marketplace of political options, and like all monopolies, it became bloated and lazy. And now it's falling due to resulting internal problems. It'll be intersting to see what system will replace it.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    59. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Transnistria declared independence at the time of the Soviet breakup. Russian troops have helped preserve that independence since about 1995, long before Putin came to power.
      Abkhazia and South Ossetia (both formerly parts of Georgia) declared independence at the time of the Soviet breakup. Russian troops have helped preserve that independence since about 1995, long before Putin came to power.

    60. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop making shit up. The US all on it's own bombed Serbia? There wasn't, oh I don't know, a dozen other countries involved in the process of trying to stop more ethnic cleansing? There were legitimately elected governments in Haiti, Somalia, Syria, Libya, and Egypt? Only in a Russian propaganda fever dream were dictators like Gaddafi, Taylor, Baby Doc, Mubarak, and Assad legitimately "elected"? But since Dear Leader Putin (glory be his name) governs in a similar fashion to those murderers it makes sense that his defenders like you would identify with them and call them "legitimately elected". Why don't you ask the people of countries like Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Finland, Afghanistan, Georgia, Ukraine, Poland how they feel about their peaceful Russian neighbors?

    61. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      What? British Columbia? I don't remember that.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    62. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legitimately elected Governments in ..., Syria, Libya, Egypt?

      What? Legitimately elected? Syria, Egypt, Libya? Really?

      Is this Vodka or pot overdose?

      Don't forget to add Ukraine to the "Legitimately" elected governments. The current government is nothing less then a coup!

    63. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Enfixed · · Score: 1

      Right?! That was about the most fun to read line of comments I've seen on here in ages. Looks like nothing was happening on reddit today and a few of the funny people swung by slashdot.

      --
      Sigs are bad for you...
    64. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are paying Obama back for the solid we did to cripple Iran's nuke program with Stuxnet

    65. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, what?

      Russia is losing bits of territory to neighbors? Fracking has depleted US reserves? 3 digit oil price by May? Opec cutting production?

      I'm not sure you and I live in the same universe.

    66. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin is a cock sucking faggot. Also he has no chin.

      Obama is spineless, welshing sycophant. Also he is half white.

    67. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by kbahey · · Score: 1

      I can't talk about Ukraine because I am not fully informed about it as I am about the other countries I listed. But from a cursory look, Russia accepted an independent vote from the Crimean penninsula, and annexed it based on that. If it is good for Crimea, then it is good for the rest of Ukraine.

      But as I said, Ukraine is not what I can/want to discuss. I am specifically astonished to you characterizing these three Arab countries as having 'legitimately elected government" while the facts completely contradict this. These are dictatorships, and not legitimate at all. They were a brutal police states.

      Moreover, the role of the USA in removing or trying to remove the dictators was minimal to non-existent.

    68. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by strikethree · · Score: 1

      So, um, not to detract from your rant or anything...
      Putin invaded several countries, just to refresh your memory I will specifically name Georgia and Ukraine. Putin aided numerous bloody coups, you just do not hear about them because everyone, yourself included, is so focused on what America is doing.

      Or should we move on to China and some of their imperialistic maneuvers too?

      You speak like if we could just destroy America, everything would go back to being peaches and cream. Definitely a naive viewpoint.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    69. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      you're repeating. I'll give you three more, DIFFERENT ones:

      Columbia
      Cuba
      Argentina.

      Not enough? Here's THREE MORE:

      South Korea
      Vietnam
      Panama.

      Well, shit. This'll keep you occupied in typing out those same three former Soviet states over the weekend: Three more:

      Grenada
      Lebanon
      Dominican Republic.

      You are beginning to look fucking stupid now.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    70. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of those were during Putin's time? Hmm, I think it's rather few. You can't compare the US's Cold War actions with the actions of Russia since Putin took over. That's just intellectually dishonest. You'll also notice that the United States hasn't annexed any of the countries it invaded, and while you could argue "puppet government" I'm not sure that's always the case. Besides, South Korea is doing pretty well. Vietnam isn't, but that's mostly because of the Chinese involvement in the Vietnam conflict (not technically a war). You can blame Cuba's state of affairs on both the USSR and the US. The others, I'm not as well-versed on, but your argument is beginning to look fucking stupid now, especially since both countries can be assholes. It's not an either-or situation.

    71. Re:This is (sort of) good news for Americans by burbilog · · Score: 1
      Really putin should just abandon Ukraine altogether, yes it will probably result in ukraine doing some ethnic cleansing and a lot of unpleasantness but he has done worse.

      He can't. Revolution in Ukraine happened on anti-corruption ground and put his rule to serious danger. So everything was done to destabilize Ukraine, to show failure of anti-corruption revolution to Russian people. Ukrainian success will destroy current ruling party and opposition will win in Russia. And he can't afford that, that means death or Haague for him and loss of freedom and money for all his high-ranked friends.

  2. Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will all of the VPN traffic that originates from Russia to steal data out of US homes and companies finally end?
    Awesome!

    1. Re:Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unlikely, the US government will simply find another country to tunnel the traffic through.

    2. Re:Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! How will I keep my business open! :]

  3. Putin Has Aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was reported this week. I wonder if his condition is repsonsible in some way for his thoughts and actions.

    1. Re:Putin Has Aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't so much as fart without explicit permission from his ogliarch backers. His autism or lack thereof is irrelevant to anything.

    2. Re:Putin Has Aspergers by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Actually, I like Asperger with hollandaise sauce and stuff.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Putin Has Aspergers by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

      Your pee smells funny

    4. Re:Putin Has Aspergers by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      No, he doesn't. That was just some bogus analysis by people who have never directly observed him to reach a diagnosis: http://www.forbes.com/sites/fayeflam/2015/02/09/stories-claiming-putin-has-aspergers-reveal-more-about-pathology-in-media-than-in-russian-leader/

      My son has Asperger's Syndrome (actually diagnosed by a medical professional who spent 6 hours directly observing my son). I deal with actual-Asperger's every day. You don't get a diagnosis from someone watching some news clips. If Putin sees a medical professional and actually obtains a diagnosis, I'll change my mind, but you can't declare he has Asperger's based on a couple of people who watched a clip or two of him and decided "that's kinda Aspy."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    5. Re:Putin Has Aspergers by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      lol. True.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    6. Re: Putin Has Aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's kinda aspy" new sitcom?

  4. We need a distributed Tor immedietly by buddha379 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Tor and other centralized VPN proxies are coming under attack from authoritarian/totalitarian governments all over the world. China started assaulting VPNs recently as well. The Arab dictatorships won't be far behind. As long as there are central servers to ban/block/attack then there is no way to stop them. Eventually they will seize control of their local internet and cut themselves off from the world. There is only one answer.

    We need a distributed VPN/Proxy.

    We need a ubiquitous p2p proxy that is both a client and server. It needs to be ridiculously easy to set up, as in download it, click a few buttons and you are browsing the web through random onion routing and allowing others to do the same. 100s of millions of server/clients cannot be shut down if they run over https.

    Lantern may fit the bill. https://www.getlantern.org/ If there are others they need to get funding and widespread publicity as quickly as possible.

    1. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, most of the Tor nodes are probably owned by Government agencies looking to farm sensitive data.

    2. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      why are you only talking about authoritarian/totalitarian governments. VPN, Tor and anonymous proxies have been under government attack from the UK, USA, Australia as well. this isn't just coming from the "so called" bad governments.

    3. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right.
      Good luck with that, yanky

    4. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those three governments qualify.

    5. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tor *is* a distributed, anonymysing proxy.

    6. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by dugancent · · Score: 1

      The U.S. government invented tor.

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    7. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't we live in an authoritarian(ish) government already? (talking US here, I don't live in the UK or Australia, so I can't speak for them). How much control do any of us have as to who's in office? Even if we assume that none of the voting is rigged (ha!), we still have to deal with the "ooh I recognize that name - let's vote for that guy". Or the stupid Electoral College. My vote only counts if the majority of people in my state agree with me? Nice. People are talking about 'electing' King Bush III, for crying out loud. The same families (Bush, Clinton, etc.) have been in political control for a long time. They get an advantage by default - name brand recognition, wealth, connections.

      We live in an oligarchy or aristocracy (or something along those lines, anyway) at best. The power is kept within a small group of people. I don't know if that's the textbook definition of totalitarianism, but it certainly captures the spirit of the word in my opinion.

    8. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This project is suspect. They aren't doing the same things as Tor and potentially putting users at risk. The first thing that screamed danger when I visited was the connection to facebook. Are you seriously telling facebook that I accessed your site? I mean, this is 101 stuff people on what not to do if your claiming to be an anonymity privacy censorship resistant network. Simply being "open source" isn't enough. You have to be conscious of what free software is and the various privacy threats. While Tor isn't the perfect solution we want it to be the reality is its as good as it gets right now. The idiot proof simplicity is pretty close- but it isn't idiot-proof solution in that it can't stop you for doing stupid stuff like posting your address on an illegal forum. It also can't protect you if you do something with it incorrectly. Tails might solve that, but its not idiot-proof simple.

    9. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by sk999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "China started assaulting VPNs recently as well."

      China has been blocking VPNs since 2011. It seems like an annual ritual. Here is a typical article from back then:
      http://www.theguardian.com/tec...

      Eventually the blocking eases, or people figure out another way around. It becomes a game of "whack-a-mole".

    10. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe we just need to replace IP.

    11. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lantern is not an anonymity tool. If you require that the sites you visit do not learn your IP address or physical location (they normally can, which may come as a surprise), or you cannot risk network monitors being able to determine what sites you visit, we recommend you use Tor. Tor is great software, and we communicate with the Tor team frequently. Again, Lantern’s purpose is access. Tor’s purpose is anonymity.

    12. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree with your statement of the problem, but I'm not sold on any kind of easy fix you can download and install. Lantern depends pretty heavily on Google servers, which are not safe from US government snooping. It also breaks down completely if you aren't careful about who you (or your friend's friend's friend) connect to. Https isn't really safe either, even if you are selective about your certificates. Besides this, any government that can block tor can learn to block any new protocol as it gets popular, ruining the ubiquitousness of the system.

      These are all temporary bandaids on a symptom of a larger problem. The problem is the nature internet architecture itself. It was not designed for malicious actors nor establishing trust. If there's any solution at all, it would need to be an overhaul of the traditional network stack that treats security as a first-class citizen.

    13. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This misses the point. The crackdown on VPNs has been getting tougher. (I live in China.) Yes, there are ways around it, but the bottleneck is that most people use a VPN provider, and the VPN providers have a limited number of IP addresses. If the government blocks the IP addresses of known VPN providers, it prevents most VPN access while not blocking terribly much of the traffic it considers acceptable. Allowing VPN traffic to flow through a significant fraction of the net's IP addresses requires a large organizational push from.... well, whatever organizations would not like to see VPNs blocked, but I think the international tech industry might be on our side in this one. There are certainly other things that can be done to disguise VPN traffic, but that's an easier game with more limited results.

    14. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia? The answer is absolutely none.

      It's been proven time and time again that whomever we elect can just be voted out by their own party and a new figurehead/cabinet installed without public intervention.

      Just this week, one particular 'spill' vote was shot down, with Tony Abbot's government keeping power (for now), their reputation bruised from the scuffle as it is.

      I may disagree with Abbot and most of his policies, but the one point we agree on is that it should be the people that vote him out, not political dissidence and in-party power plays.

    15. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You need to address the agents that provide your internet service. As long as you have to go through them, there is going to be trouble. Anybody can be shutdown. Even Slashdot, by a *faulty disk*

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    16. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha

      great tool for the govt to pinpoint dissenters. look at their privacy policy.

    17. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by sk999 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the feedback. I've been to China once (several years ago) and back then, while the "Great Wall" was evident, it was not omnipresent. Since then I have been blocked by "Great Walls" imposed by hotels and conference sites (all in the US) that were far more oppressive, and which got me into looking at VPNs. I now have 5 VPNs to choose from (none of them from a commercial provider) but I understand what you are saying - given enough time, the mole-holes will get filled in.

    18. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Totalitarians aren't perfect.

    19. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by mlts · · Score: 2

      I have not dealt with the Great Firewall, but I've seen some quite restrictive stuff here at home. One coffee shop near me actually tries to MITM traffic to my E-mail provider with a bogus SSL key coming from 192.168.168.168, and the people there have zero clue on it, and say it is corporate's decision.

      I've seen other crap as well on store Wi-Fi networks, be it ads inserted in-flight (www.google.com doesn't have Flash ads, nor does it try to install "securityupdate.apk" files if on Android), as well as executables that were downloaded and demanded to be run/installed in order to use the Wi-Fi connection. Websites were blocked or redirected willy-nilly (Google would be redirected to another search engine or some no-name site.)

      Because of that, I always use a VPN on Wi-Fi networks. Either the Wi-Fi network allows the traffic (and it will be obvious if they attempt to spoof the VPN keys), it will throttle the traffic, or it will disallow it. In this case, the real network traffic is allowed and protected, or it is blocked. The dodgy Wi-Fi AP can't tamper with it.

    20. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gnu net (besides the clicky clicky bit), but on real computers it is just an apt-get install away).

      If you are using Windows (or any closed proprietary black box, although the "NSA key" back door in Windows makes it pretty plain), and care about your privacy, you have already lost-- really.

    21. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by MichaelMacDonald · · Score: 1

      I think the bigger problem will be dpi. In the end, that's what Russia will use. They will identify the traffic at the source, and stop it at the ISP. Even if we manage to decentralize everything, we will have to learn to disguise packets as SSL HTTP or something like this, something that will get it past the DPI filters. I mean, right now, tor could set up (If it hasn't already) a namecoin dns. This would stop them from being able to block the DNS and download the client. From there TOR should be able to function. It's hard to say. I'm not sure about getlantern, though, they don't seem to be able to build a web page, let alone solidly code something decent :/.

    22. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by MichaelMacDonald · · Score: 1

      'ish'??? Not so ish.. The US has that largest incarceration rate in the world. By far. You guys get 2 choices of who will rule you, and they work as a tag team purposefully switching back and forth, keeping you guys fighting each other as if you had a choice and that choice somehow made a difference. No, the USA is the most authoritarian government in the world right now.

    23. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by MichaelMacDonald · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, it's a matter of hours or at most a day before the VPN companies adjust to whatever new methods are being used.

    24. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by MichaelMacDonald · · Score: 1

      Well, routable protocols need to have addresses. Addresses can be tied to individuals. It's difficult to get around no matter what you do. Everything about anonymity involves hiding anything that links your activity to your identity from the rest of the world. No routable protocol can do that, and no non-routable protocol can be the internet. And so you get what we had here today. Which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it... I don't like it any more than you do.

    25. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by MichaelMacDonald · · Score: 1

      There is no possible way to keep the government out of that. Or business that both answers to the government and it's own internal regulations. Copper and fiber are expensive, they are also physically owned objects. Unless you come up with another way to run high speed network signals, there is nothing that can be done about this. Our data is made up of electronic signals travelling down *their* wire. It's not some abstract idea, it is all real physical stuff.

    26. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Global mesh networks are almost logistically impossible. They are also the only conceivable solution, long term. Time to get busy?

    27. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we need is a snail mail proxy.
      Send email or other stuff to a in-country server.
      That information gets cut up into three or more pieces; optionally re-encrypted

      You then rely on the mail service and the disks surface in a third country to be reassembles with some security checks, then transmitted. Like TOR, but this time intercepts on/over the trunking wont work.

      Then a timing transmission with no payload , say just pinging a few random ip addresses at the right times sends the content to the next hop. (Just like flushing the toilet at 10pm means something)

      This is a variation of asking a traveler to post a letter when he arrives at his destination.
      While secure, reading a one week newspaper, or taking a few days for a negative tweet or blog post to surface may not suit everyone, the ability of one LTO tape to physically resurface anywhere - will occur if they dare threaten VPN's.

    28. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lantern may fit the bill. https://www.getlantern.org/

      No. Lantern does not provide anonymity. So even as an censorship unblocker it is vulnerable and it is useless for dissent or anything vaguely unpopular.

    29. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If ISP's stopped providing broadband with ridiculously low upstream bandwidth allot of people would be running their own servers for all kinds of purposes, business, entertainment, VPN's/proxies but unfortunately we'r stuck with 3Mbit upstreams while having 100Mb downstream.

    30. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Systemd on linux.
      Also Intel AMT/vpro/vt.
      AMD has something similar, as does ARM

    31. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ignorant buffoon. You don't even understand what the word "authoritarian" means if you try to claim that the US government is the most authoritarian in the world.

    32. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by itsthebin · · Score: 1

      5$ USD a month for VPS and run your own OpenVPN server

      I chose a bulgarian provider for its semi european presence

      a distro is needed that that sets up VPN server , encrypted cloud sync/storage , email server . TOR relay etc that is auto updated and can be set up via an easy GUI

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
    33. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Not just the usual suspects - the UK and Australia are putting together restrictions on VPNs and various people in power in both places don't give a shit how much collatoral damage they do in the process. Murdoch is behind some of it for cable tv vs file sharing reasons but is only one of many pushing for it - making VPNs illegal is a wet dream for various security agencies. They've been like that ever since SSL was invented but now they have people in politics taking them seriously.

    34. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      We're supposed to live in a free country, with a government with greatly restricted powers. Then, surveillance, crony capitalism, kickbacks to regulate your competition out of business, all that can't happen, and then who wins isn't some plum of godhood of control. That you panic over the possibility of "King Bush III" shows just how far down that unintended shithole of governance, away from freedom we have slid over the decades.

      You are right, regardless of political side, to be terrified of who may win. This is the shitty country with unrestricted government you, and your past few generation of ancestors, have built.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    35. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop insulting people that leave under a real dictatorship, moron.
      Go live in North Korea, they love idiots like you.

    36. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Classic case of arming foreign rebels to undermine your enemy, and then being dismayed when the weapons make their way into the hands of people you'd like to suppress yourself.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    37. Re:We need a distributed Tor immedietly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the USA is the most authoritarian government in the world right now.

      That is pure bullshit. The US has a lot of problems, some of which you named, but to say that it's more authoritarian than NK or Russia is stupid.

  5. yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should make the Internet safer for everyone else.

  6. It's only a matter of time by ddtmm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I can see annoying tools being banned in North America at some point. Maybe not personal and business VPNs, but anonymizing services in general. I don't agree with it but we see our online rights being chipped aways slowly but surely, especially in Canada.

    1. Re:It's only a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see annoying tools being banned in North America at some point. I.. don't agree with it but we see our online rights being chipped aways slowly but surely, especially in Canada.

      I hope those annoying tools will be banned too. I propose we start with the laawmower

    2. Re:It's only a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about we start with leafblowers instead. Anyone too lazy to use a broom should be shot.

  7. No surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the communist country are doing just that.

  8. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is one of the more meta troll-posts I've seen on /. If you had only posted it anonymously it would have been perfect.

  9. Re:Good by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    There you go Braveheart... troll-spotting from the grassy knoll.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  10. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, government bans you!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by qpqp · · Score: 1

      In soviet Russia, you watch TOR!
      err... Wait a minute..
      In soviet Russia, government watches you using TOR!
      Wait. That isn't news... For Russia maybe... hmm...
      In Soviet Russia, you watch the government!
      That about right...? I'm confused.

  11. Re:Good by Kjella · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure I'm being trolled here... and he used a nick instead of his real name, foiled again. Now that you do mention it, it would be useful... what's your name and address again?

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  12. Incorrect text in the summary by yurik · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Vadim Roskomnadzora Ampelonsky" -- the second word is not part of the name, that's the organization name he is working for. It should be "Vadim Ampelonsky".

    1. Re:Incorrect text in the summary by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 1

      I am not even a Russian speaker, and that one jumped off the page at me. Unless the Organization Man begins to use an organizational patronymic.

  13. Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Waiting for a barrage of "but Tor isn't primarily used for crime" - style posts. Get real. Just as with Bit Torrent, the criminals vastly outnumber the legitimate users.

    1. Re: Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you define "crime" properly, pretty much _everything_ anybody does on the Internet is criminal.

    2. Re: Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If you define "crime" properly, pretty much _everything_ anybody does on the Internet is criminal."

      Well said, and correct, Anonymous poster. "Criminal" has no meaning, or any meaning they wish.

      In Russia, criticizing the Orthodox Church will see them slam you in prison, and calling out Putin as a pedo will get you and half a restaurant radioactively poisoned with polonium, which only comes from government nuclear reactors.

      In Israel, trying to leave your ghetto may get you killed, tortured, or dumped in prison, or all three.

      In Saudi Arabia, pretty much anything is "criminal" (except, of course, anything royals choose to do, including creating and running Al Qaida).

      Everything and nothing is a crime. Bedspreads are golden sprinkler cookie clowns. See? So much fun when words mean nothing at all.

    3. Re:Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true, but the same kind of argument could be made for a lot of things that are good in a just society. The vast, vast majority of criminal cases in the court system end in "guilty." Why spend that much money protecting a criminal who's probably guilty anyway? Why force police to get a warrant to search your car or your house--do you have something to hide? Tor is just a tool, and the drawbacks of its use simply reflect the drawbacks of humanity in general.

    4. Re: Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bible allows pedo with young girls:

      Deuteronomy 22 28-29
      read in Hebrew.

      Why doesn't russia if it's going religious?

    5. Re: Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by MichaelMacDonald · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In the USA you can be picked up by the police for a traffic violation, put in jail with a murderer and then allowed to bleed out on the jailroom floor after having your head knocked on. Or shot while running unarmed from a police officer, or if you're a teenage kid shot in front of your parents for carrying a screw driver because the police didn't want to waste their time teaching you the lesson your parents intended. I'm not sure. There's so much more. In any event, you're more likely to be killed in the USA than just about anywhere else in the world. The poorer you are, the better your chances of being killed at any given moment.

    6. Re: Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guns are tools too, and the overwhelming majority of civilized countries ban them because they were mostly used for illegal acts. You as an ordinary citizen do not need a gun. And you do not need anonymizing tools as well. Ban TOR. Ban online anonymity. In case you have not noticed, banking secrecy is also a thing of the past. Why should the internet be an exception? You say "chilling effect", I say "behave and nothing will happen". It's called being a part of a community. Grow up. Embrace it.

    7. Re: Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, what a good little Soviet Propagandist you are!
      “Yes, but you lynch blacks.”

      It was a joke 50 years ago, and it hasn't improved with age.

    8. Re: Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, you were a joke 50 years ago, but 50 years of saying "we don't do that no more" but shooting blacks instead doesn't make it any less true that you're a bunch of paranoid racist thugs no better AT ALL than Putin's Russia.

      But you're a good little USian propogandist. Keep spreading the GoodFact!

    9. Re: Cue the delusional "legitimate use" posts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is far from perfect, but you are not helping by saying such bullshit, you have no idea what the rest of the world is like, do you ?

  14. SSH under threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm.. one can access a server via SSH then net or VPN from there... Will SSH be banned too, will Russian telecommuters be forced to use telnet?

    1. Re:SSH under threat? by blang · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, all traffic that is not clear text in a language understood by the sensors will have to be banned.
      Because blocking port 21 or 22 would not stop ssh, you can agree with the server to user any port for that protocol..
      That means, no more movies, pictures, or any digital content that is not written in cyrillic and approved by tsar putin.
      Welcome to the 1880's internet.

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  15. The real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TOR is owned and funded by the CIA

  16. not all nets are inter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're gonna stop people from freely communicating, why have internet connections at all? Why not simply ban sales of all cables and telecom equipment?

    1. Re:not all nets are inter by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If you're gonna stop people from freely communicating, why have internet connections at all? Why not simply ban sales of all cables and telecom equipment?

      Because the object is to keep tabs on what's going on, not push it underground.

      In $INSERT_COUNTRY Tor watches YOU!

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  17. This sounds vaguely familiar ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... oh, here it is.

    “If we find evidence of a terrorist plot and despite having a phone number, despite having a social media address or email address, we can’t penetrate that [encryption], that’s a problem,” Obama said. He said he believes Silicon Valley companies also want to solve the problem. “They’re patriots.” ...

    Emphasis mine.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:This sounds vaguely familiar ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... oh, here it is.

      “If we find evidence of a terrorist plot and despite having a phone number, despite having a social media address or email address, we can’t penetrate that [encryption], that’s a problem,” Obama said. He said he believes Silicon Valley companies also want to solve the problem. “They’re patriots.” ...

      Emphasis mine.

      If you can find evidence of a terrorist plot, already have phone numbers and social media accounts, and an email address, and still have issues getting a conviction, you do have a problem. Incompetent Law Enforcement and DA's. Phone number gives you everything now a days, right down to real time location data.

      If you know exactly who somebody is, exactly where the are, and have access to some of their online accounts already, you already have everything you need.

    2. Re:This sounds vaguely familiar ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they are worried about not having enough for conviction but rather they would like to find out his acquaintances on the current and possibly also other plans.

      Not that I agree with it since it can be used for tons of other things as well where it shouldn't be.

    3. Re:This sounds vaguely familiar ... by MichaelMacDonald · · Score: 2

      Just don't make out like this is partisan. The Patriot act was the Republicans. Too many people quote that crap with the intention to imply that the Right wing is better. It's, actually, worse. This is an overall problem in the USA, and it doesn't matter who you vote for.

    4. Re:This sounds vaguely familiar ... by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

      Remember the clipper chip?

      Democrats are no more friends of privacy than right wingers are.

    5. Re:This sounds vaguely familiar ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... evidence of a terrorist plot ...

      Evidence isn't good enough because what? Obama isn't demanding that everyone prove their innocence. He wants more power over people so he has power over the criminals. Like all those laws and police against criminals don't matter, police must perv on the actual plaintext. This is the same argument as 'Think of the children'.

      ... can’t penetrate that [encryption] ...

      Well if they're sending encrypted files, that definitely a hindrance to surveillance. Although a minor one with the government conducting financial data surveillance and total meta-data surveillance including real-time positioning data. I'm not sure how one sends encrypted files on twitter or Facebook. If criminals have encrypted their public communications (eg. codewords), then banning encryption software, VPNs, or even TOR will not reveal the codewords to police.

    6. Re:This sounds vaguely familiar ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is an overall problem in the USA, and it doesn't matter who you vote for.

      Of course it does. If you limit yourself to the Republicans or the Democrats it doesn't matter which one you vote for, but any vote for a third party makes a difference.
      You don't need a majority of the votes make your voice heard, not when the major parties only cares about power. If a third party get the number of votes that makes the difference between them then they represent a large enough group of voters to remove the power from one party and give it to the other. That is sufficient to make them both listen very closely to what you have to say.

      Now, if one of the major parties actually had an ideology that is opposed to yours that would be another thing, but they only care about power.

    7. Re:This sounds vaguely familiar ... by alphatel · · Score: 1

      Obama believes Silicon Valley companies also want to solve the problem. “They’re patriots.” ...

      A patriot is "a person who vigorously supports their country and is prepared to defend it against enemies or detractors." Corporations run to whatever country will shelter them. They have no allegiance unless it empowers them financially or otherwise.

      Snowden would qualify as a better patriot than any corporation since he is 1) a person (and not in the deluded SCOTUS sense either), and 2) he is prepared to defend it against ITSELF. The setback for him is his country will not let him back without sitting in a jail cell for the remainder of his life.

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    8. Re:This sounds vaguely familiar ... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      End to end encrypted communications are definitely troubling to purveyors of mass surveillance, but Tor is not that. We don't care (that much) about Tor, because we have the resources to compromise it, so this really says more about the limits of Russian electronic surveillance than anything else.

    9. Re:This sounds vaguely familiar ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Except encryption.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  18. Cliche time! by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    When encryption is outlawed, only outlaws will have encryption!

    When privacy is outlawed, only oligarchs will have privacy!

    When free speech is outlawed, Tor is "an anonymous network to commit crimes"!

    And last but not least...

    In Soviet Russia, VPN watches you!

    1. Re:Cliche time! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, VPN watches you!

      I would have gone with:
      In Soviet Russia, VPN connect to you.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Cliche time! by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      I would have gone with:
      In Soviet Russia, VPN connect to you.

      It was a little weak, I admit. My muse failed me, what can I say.

    3. Re:Cliche time! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it was decided that some terrorists might have muses so all muses have been blocked.

      Back in line, Citizen Unit #3858375.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  19. strange that the only source for this by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    is a technology magazine based in an urban industrial sublet in Kensington.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  20. Swell by blang · · Score: 2

    The same wonderful country that have brought us Russian Mafia Cyber Criminals is now going to break the net wide open for government criminals.
    I expect the Russian Mafia will continue to have the benefit of government protection and enjoy Tor and VPN while Russian opposition is going to get assfisted. Hail Putin.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  21. Dictator's Internet Guide to Power Retention by dwheeler · · Score: 2

    This is straight from The Dictator's Practical Internet Guide to Power Retention (recommended).

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  22. Stegonography is the future for freedom fighters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can embed a lot of "what's on the other side of the Great Firewall"- and "let's plan the revolution"-type text in an innocent-looking image.

    Those looking to use it to hide their warez- and pr0n-trading are probably out of luck though, the overhead is just too much.

    Did I say future? For all I know, it may be the present. Oh wait, I think I've said too much.

  23. the irony... by Maimun · · Score: 0, Troll

    Snowden, the great whistleblower, the great freedom fighter, ended up in *Russia* - a fascist country that suppresses individual liberties, deprives its citizens of privacy and inculcates patriotic insanity. Right now Russia is in war with one of its neighbours (Ukraine) and has recently stolen parts of two other neighbours by force (Georgia and Moldova) and the official TV threatens with war Poland, Litva, Latvia and Estonia, and even Finland. I wonder how does Snowden reconcile his free spirit with the fascist regime of the country he chose to live in?

    1. Re:the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how does Snowden reconcile his free spirit with the fascist regime of the country he chose to live in?

      Yes, he chose to live in the USA. He was forced to live in Russia.

    2. Re:the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a better suggestion for where Snowden would be able to live unmolested?

    3. Re:the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets face it most people support the country they live it. Just look at the USA, despite being one of the most violent western countries (you are more likely to be killed on the street in the US than in Ukraine even with the current conflict there) with the least freedoms you still have an abundance of patriots screaming they live in the land of the free.

    4. Re:the irony... by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      Let alone how does Russia reconcile giving asylum to Snowden with banning all the freedom rights he represents.

    5. Re:the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was either the US or Russia, I guess he just picked the lesser of two evils.

    6. Re:the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fascist regime is Ukraine not Russia. Despite that yes Russia are pretty nasty too. But when your choice is a be assassinated by US or live somewhere that isn't exactly ideal but at least safe I know which I would pick too. The US don't respect international borders or human life, Russia is one of a very few places capable of protecting him.

    7. Re:the irony... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In USA, he can live the rest of his life in a prison cell that's 6' by 8'.

      In Russia, he can live the rest of his life in a prison cell that's 6,600,000 square miles wide.

      Which one would you choose?

    8. Re:the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russian women are hot. Well, it might be a factor ;)

    9. Re:the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When life gives you lemons...

      Vast pine forests in russia
      That's the "bad" "crappy" part of russia.
      We wish we had that kind of wilderness.

      If they go totally pro-bible then there could be marrying cute young girls too (Deuteronomy 22 28-29 allows it). Russians are white and pretty.

  24. Anonymous network used primarily to commit crimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the internet. Be it piracy, spam, cyber bullying, or malware distribution... Oh and porn, which adding to Russia's list would be gay porn as a crime. Honestly, it's always great when an authoritarian regime on a subject is so shitty at it and keeps grabbing for more as if that's any sort of solution. In the US, it's the war on drugs. In Russia, it's basically anything so long as it's not actually mob related.

  25. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ONLY thing anonymity has ever done for me is prevent me from identifying trolls.

    Like you could even do anything with that information if you had it. Candyass.

  26. OTOH, they'll give Snowden a pass by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The Russians won't block it if you've paid them the right amount.

    Given that Snowden traded US intelligence information for his life, he will only be subject to the law when he can no longer pay off the Russians.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:OTOH, they'll give Snowden a pass by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The New York Times is run by Russians?

  27. Offtopic: Typo in fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal." - Zaphod Beeblebrox in "Hithiker's Guide to the Galaxy"

    Just sayin'.

  28. whoosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there goes all my favorite exit nodes!

  29. Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vadim Roskomnadzora Ampelonsky describes the obstacles to identifying and blocking Tor and VPN traffic as "difficult, but solvable."

    Yeah, good luck with that. All you will achieve is a new arms race for the ultimate distributed encryped anonymised stealth network. And you are always going to be one step behind. Doing this will ultimately only benefit the criminals by giving them better tools while causing nothing more than an occasional, slight inconvenience for everybody else. And it's going to cost you millions. In the first year.

  30. Re:Good by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    Poe's law.

    The sad thing is that I've seen articles from people who really believe this. Long rants...

  31. ^H^H^H^H^H^H by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The World

    FTFY!

  32. Re:Stegonography is the future for freedom fighter by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    Wrong in both cases - it's already the past.
    Decades ago I noticed a lot of large jpgs that have the visual quality of tiny jpgs... That implies that all of the low bits aren't correlated with the visual data.

  33. They should talk to David Cameron & co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they find some allies there?

    Those ***ocrats are becoming more and more alike each other.

    1. Re:They should talk to David Cameron & co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [They should talk to David Cameron & co]...

      Perhaps they find some allies there?

      Those *****RATS are becoming more and more alike each other.

      FTFY

  34. (bdum tish) by jhantin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Both countries have small penises. Can we please move on.

    I dunno, Alaska and Kamchatka are both sizable peninsulas.

    --
    ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
    1. Re:(bdum tish) by Duckman5 · · Score: 1

      While it's true that Alaska is sizeable, it's not very sporting to use a country's former peninsula against it. Perhaps we could offer up Florida as the US example instead? That one used to be Spanish. Plus, it's got a more appropriate shape.
      You know...now that I'm thinking about it. The US must have some serious peninsula envy if it keeps taking them from other countries...

    2. Re:(bdum tish) by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Florida. We're double hung from both sides!

    3. Re:(bdum tish) by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Sweden would like to remind you that the entire country is a wang.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  35. Time to leave, while you still can. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That country has very little going for it these days and I can't see it staying open if it continues in the direction it is.

  36. Edichka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what is the Fridom Fighter Edichka Snodenov feels now.

  37. Re:Good by ZeRu · · Score: 1

    Yet there's plenty of non-anonymous trolls on Facebook. Did Facebook made the world a better place? I don't think so. Trolls will be trolls, even if you strip them off their anonymity.

    --
    If you post as an AC, don't expect me to spend a mod point on you.
  38. Urm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't they just steal this idea off the British?

  39. Roffles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking China can't block Tor. Why could Russia?

  40. So tell us what the difference is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When russia annexes the country still retains their government but have left veto to the russian government.
    When the USA "brings democracy" to a country, it still retains their government but if they don't play ball with the USA, they'll shock and awe them into the stone age and complicance.

    So tell us what the difference is.

  41. What's the value of laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...without the freedom to commit crimes?

    Take away all the ways to break the laws, and what do you get?

    Certainly not a free society.

    1. Re: What's the value of laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a safe one, which is rationally the better outcome. "Freedom" is a nice concept but for it to work you need everybody to be an intelligent and responsible individual. Of course, this is not the case and it can never be: no amount of education can instill intelligence into those who are bereft of it, and responsibility is a word shunned by the vast majority. The only rational solution is to take away the means by which crimes are committed, or at least make them so difficult to obtain than only very resourceful and determinate individuals will still try, and this is where total surveillance comes in. And before you children cry "panopticon!" ask yourselves: if we can save lives thanks to the panopticon, isn't it worth it? If you answer "no" you either haven't thought enough, you're not smart enough or you have a vested interest in allowing crime to endure.

    2. Re: What's the value of laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I break laws, or would break laws that I deem unjust.

      I break laws against drawn pornography because there isn't a victim, thus I deem it unjust.
      I'd buy LSD from Tor if I had Bitcoins.
      I think laws against incest are antiquated and arbitrary.

      Etc, etc.

    3. Re: What's the value of laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of society doesn't think that way, therefore what you think is wrong. Only mentally impaired people or small children believe the world revolves around them. You break laws, society breaks you. It's that simple. There are more of us than there are of you, we the majority call the shots. But I don't believe for a moment you will have the guts to actually go through with your empty bolsterous claims. You will conform.

  42. "committing crimres" = "exposing the government" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The denial of free speech is the first act of tyranny."

  43. We're not going to make it by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    As a species, we've reached our peak. But it's all down hill from here, dragged back down into the Darwinian muck by greed, ignorance, the lust for power regardless of consequence, racist nationalism, misogyny, religious-driven intolerance and murder...

    It was a nice try. Perhaps the cockroaches or yeast will succeed where we failed.

    1. Re:We're not going to make it by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the cockroaches or yeast will succeed where we failed.

      My money is on the raccoons. They already have the opposable thumbs.

  44. Canada is moving that way as well.. as is the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're ALL being sold that anonymity online is a BAD thing and ONLY criminals use it.

    Lets be real about this - the fact is that anonymizing is not used just by normal people who expect the right to privacy our various founding documents, but by whistleblowers trying to contact journalists, and other 'subversives' who look to expose the corruption and crimes of the power elite, whether it be government or corporation.

    The power elite, and it doesn't matter which power elite you're talking about, they all want to eliminate the threat of exposure in their respective spheres of influence, using criminal activity or terrorism or child pornography or whatever justification to protect their own interests.

  45. Go ahead and ban Tor, it's outdated anyway by Floyd-ATC · · Score: 1

    When will oppressive authorities understand that as long as it's mathematically possible to hide information from them, people will do whatever it takes to do so? There are no technical limitations to how well a piece of information can be hidden away and piggy-backed onto seemingly uninteresting or useless data; the only way to shut down unwanted communication is to prevent ANY AND ALL communication.

    --
    Time flies when you don't know what you're doing
  46. Nope. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The New York Times is run by Russians?

    While the New York Times has gone on leftward slants, it's not run by Russians.

    On the other hand, the Russian government (which has received such information from Snowden) is run by Russians.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Nope. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      More than the New York times got?
      Where is your source for all this - either you are leaking top secret information yourself or are making up shit.

    2. Re:Nope. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Do you sincerely think that the Russians would house Snowden if he had no intelligence to hand over to them? Housing such an individual has substantial costs, especially with the gated communities they have to use and the people that have to be paid.

      Until every "journalist" and source that had any connection to Snowden is unmasked, the answer to your question is indeterminate. It is a non-zero number sufficient enough for the Russian government to house him, but not precise enough to say whether the New York Times received more or less.

      It would be amusing to see the Russians in such a dire economic state that they either hand Snowden to the US (in exchange for aid) or that the US makes short work of the Russians left to mind him.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  47. Backdoor by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Are they seeking the ban due to backdoor in Tor?

  48. Occum's razor by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Do you sincerely think that the Russians would house Snowden if he had no intelligence to hand over to them?

    Since it embarrasses the USA for nearly no effort on Putins part, what do you think?

    It may be boring and not Biggles meets Bond, but sometimes life's not like the movies.