Slashdot Mirror


Will Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis Support Cryptocurrency In Greece?

giulioprisco writes New Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis, former Economist-in-Residence at game developer Valve Corporation, sees something like Bitcoin — or, more likely, a state-controlled "Fedcoin" — possibly playing a role in the (necessarily creative) rescue of the Greek economy. "The technology of Bitcoin, if suitably adapted, can be employed profitably in the Eurozone," he said.

160 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Betteridge's law of headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis Support Cryptocurrency In Greece?

    No

    As obvious as the question is stupid.....

  2. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most of Europe does, actually, seeing as he is negotiating with the rest of the Eurozone to make a deal that will save Greece's car crash of an economy. If Greece implodes, it could take the entire Eurozone with it by causing domino defaults, because Greece owes a lot of money to other nations that are already in dire fiscal straights

    an ignorant American might not care, but President Obama has already weighed in to support Varoufakis in seeking debt relief, as he does not want a major trading partner to collapse

  3. Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, they will. Good for them. I'd rather see a nation state profit from financial fraud than the usual consortium of bankers.

    Iceland seems to be doing just fine, despite not honoring their debts.

    1. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Iceland was not in debt. It was defrauded. The money was stolen and they took it back. We all need to do the same thing.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by cheesybagel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Iceland did the right thinag. The Government shouldn't be forced to pay the debts of failed private companies. Even if they are banks. The PIIGS are all suffering because they followed the EU command to assume private banking debts. Notice how even in Greece, which had the most government debt, supposedly they had to cave in early because other 'the ATMs wouldn't have money to dispense next week' because of a banking run. Bah.

    3. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Greece did not profit from financial fraud so much, but some of her politicians and Goldman (who arranged the schemes to borrow far and above what Greece could afford) profited. The brouhaha is happening because now the regular Greeks have to foot the bill.

    4. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Also, the issue in Greece is that if they do something the banks don't like, there will be another coup. It's 1967 all over again.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      If only the PIIGS had done that too.

    6. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Nah. All they had to do was let the Greek banks fail and handle it as any other business bankruptcy. The bank assets would be resold on the market and used to repay the creditors who would then have to write down the debt on their books. Instead they're just kicking the can down the road and letting the debt snowball.

    7. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Iceland did the right thinag.

      This.

      When the whole crisis thing happened, we should have jailed the bankers, and the politicians that let them do it (by repealing regulation laws, removing funding from compliance offices, etc.)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  4. Why? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Informative

    Greece doesn't need a currency, it needs liquidity - a crypto currency won't bring that. The entire current issue is not about which currency to go for, its how Greece keeps paying its creditors - if they can't service their current debts, their ability to borrow goes through the floor, and a crypto currency isn't going to reverse that. Greece can't back its own crypto currency with anything it has a monopoly on either because it doesn't have anything that valuable.

    1. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      That's why it's time to purge the books. The banks can easily afford it. The most they might lose is a fleet of new jets and yachts, and they might have to buy cheaper hookers and drugs. The 'debts' are predatory and fraudulent.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Why? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      If you have your own currency you can print money. That gives you liquidity, at the cost of massive currency devaluation. Currency devaluation will make Greek exports cheaper and imports more expensive- and both will greatly benefit local industry and services, creating local jobs and economic growth. Switching to their own currency will fix all their problems, unless you are rich.

    3. Re:Why? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      What they want is a cryptocurrency whole Europe / world use and one which is "printed" / made in Greece so they can let inflation for everyone else cover their never ending spending beyond their means =P

    4. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      They can do what Iceland did. The loan sharks that run the system need to be 'pushed into the sea'.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Why? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Greece doesn't need a currency, it needs liquidity - a crypto currency won't bring that.

      Actually, what is needs is a lack of liquidity. It needs to live within it's means. If it's overextended then
      maybe bankrupcy is the right thing to do. A crytpcurrency might help if it can't be manipulated and used
      to print new money. I wouldn't say bitcoin is super stable at the moment but a stable currency backed by
      something that can't be faked would go a long ways to fixing greece and the other economies that like
      to print their own money instead of balancing their budgets.

    6. Re:Why? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      That worked well for Zimbabwe, hasn't it?

    7. Re:Why? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I guess you didn't hear that even Greece is now running a primary surplus. You know what that means? The Goverment spends less than it collects in taxes.

      Spain had been running a primary surplus for a long time and the banking sector fail still brought them down.

    8. Re:Why? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Hmm, sounds like a variation of Smoot-Hawley in that it makes imports more expensive to the benefit of local companies.

      And we all know how well Smoot-Hawley worked, right?

      It should also be pointed out that Weimar Germany went that route once too. And that worked almost as well as Smoot-Hawley....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    9. Re:Why? by gclef · · Score: 2

      There's one problem it won't fix: the Greek debts to EU are not going to shift to the a currency just because Greece does. The debts to the rest of the EU will remain in Euros, and if the Greek "new Drachma" devalues massively compared to the Euro, the relative loan repayments in new Drachma will go up correspondingly.

      Greece can't print their way out of the loans. They can print their way to cheaper exports, yes....but the can't print their way out of the loans.

    10. Re:Why? by itzly · · Score: 1

      What about the stuff they don't produce locally and have to import, like such vital things as oil and gas ?

    11. Re:Why? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      This.

      Monopoly money by another name would stink as bad.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    12. Re:Why? by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      No, they cannot. They are in pretty much the opposite position. It is not the banks not having money (as in Iceland), it is the government not having money.

    13. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      That is the lie they want you to believe, besides not making sense. All these countries, Iceland, Greece, Spain, etc. were robbed. Iceland so far is the only one to fight back, they told the creditors to fuck off. And now they are better off for it. We all need to do that and put up public banks.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    14. Re:Why? by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      Electing a populist government over and over does not qualify for being robbed.

    15. Re:Why? by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

      A surplus built on the back of borrowed money is not a surplus if you decide not to pay that money back. There's a reason accountants use amortization schedules and depreciate long-term assets. If you want to artificially restrict your analysis to just what the government spends (minus debt repayments) and collects, then you also need to subtract any economic activity generated by purchases made with that money which led to the debt.

      In other words, you cannot buy a car with a car loan, get a job which requires the use of the car, then claim you shouldn't have to pay back the loan because you'd be making money if it weren't for those pesky car loan payments. Eliminating the car loan from your calculation also necessitates eliminating the car.

    16. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You nuts? The seas are already polluted enough. Find a different way to get rid of your trash!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If part of the "deal" was that I have to starve my population but I have to buy German submarines for the money instead, I guess I'd be a tad bid pissed as well.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Russia might just be interested enough in having an ally inside the EU to consider striking a deal. I could well see Greece dropping any kind of embargo on the grounds that if the EU shits on me, I'm under no obligation to play along with their embargo anymore.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:Why? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      If you have your own currency you can print money. That gives you liquidity, at the cost of massive currency devaluation.

      Oh dear. First, Greece is on the Euro - they can't print more money.

      Second, money is just a representation of value/wealth. It is not value/wealth in and of itself. The true value is productivity. Anything you do to alter the money supply changes nothing if productivity is not altered. All that happens is you just add or subtract a zero to every number used in the accounting books. If your paycheck increases by 10x, but prices also increase by 10x, then nothing has changed. The economy gains no liquidity from printing money.

      The one thing printing more currency does is shift wealth away from people who have been saving up (i.e. your savings account at the bank) to the entity printing the money. This is why investors flee to gold in bad economic times - the government cannot print more gold, so its value cannot decline due to this type of wrong-headed fiscal policy. (Note: It could actually be the proper course of action if huge amounts of the country's wealth is being held by a small group of extremely wealthy individuals. But I don't believe that's the case in Greece.)

      Same thing happens with debts (which are just a form of deferred savings). Debt repayments don't scale with currency fluctuations, so if you print enough money that your need 10x as much currency to do the same thing as before, then suddenly your debt is 1/10th what it was before in terms of real productivity.

      But that's exactly the same thing as defaulting on your debt. Except instead of defaulting on 100% of it, you've defaulted on 90% of it. And that loss of economic credibility (i.e. credit) will make it that much harder for you to convince someone to lend you money in the future, worsening your liquidity crisis.

    20. Re:Why? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      There's one problem it won't fix: the Greek debts to EU are not going to shift to the a currency just because Greece does. The debts to the rest of the EU will remain in Euros, and if the Greek "new Drachma" devalues massively compared to the Euro, the relative loan repayments in new Drachma will go up correspondingly.

      And the reason a financially independent Greece would keep paying Euro loans is...?

      Frankly, Euro was doomed from the beginning. As long as national currencies could float relative to each other deficits and surpluses balanced automatically through such adjustment. Euro scrapped this mechanism with replacing it with another, so now weakest EU nation goes bankrupt, then the next weakest, then the next, etc. Ultimately, they all serve as permanently indentured servants to the final victor (almost certainly Germany). Except of course they'll simply break away, returning their national currencies and declaring their Euro debt null and void.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    21. Re:Why? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      No they can't.

      It will cause a great depression not seen since WWII. Reason being is the way the books are counted at the banks. Imagine the game of hot potato in kindergarten? Now imagine each time you caught it counted as an asset. When you throw it it counted as another asset.

      Debt = assets. Not liabilities today??

      See the problem? So since everyone is in a web of IOUs you close one down and it impacts the others and the house of cards collapss in a domino effect hence 2008 financial crises. Difference is we got bailed out back then. Today ... there is no more cash to do so.

    22. Re:Why? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Also the same with business reliance on lines of credit to pay employees and suppliers.

      No one pays in cash and that is a common misconception today. Wall Street likes smooth lines and no bumps which lines of credit pay for daily operations. No lines of credit POOF out of business even if you have money it means suppkiers who put in 90 days pay as they too used a line of credit can't pay your employer. So the cash reserves will go with them as well.

      Lovely. In 1929 only the few big titans of industry was so dependent on lines of credit. Not true in 2015

    23. Re:Why? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      I want to see how a "financially independent" Greece does, really, except it won't be pretty. If the historical record is any indication, they'll be the third-poorest Balkan nation, ahead of maybe Macedonia and Albania but behind everybody else, with a GDP per capita at a healthy 15-20% of the EU-12 average and an economic growth in the low 50 points of one percent when times are exceptionally good.

      Unless they have another coup d'etat or, maybe, get bought wholesale by Istanbul or Moscow with all the expectations of good government that such a deal implies.

    24. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      That's right. Allowing your bank to remove your deposits and devalue your currency is.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    25. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Greeks are too stubborn and UNWILLING to work with creditors.

      Good for Greece! The 'creditors' are fraudsters. Screw them.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    26. Re:Why? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Greece needs to grow up and stop the tax holiday for the rich rort. They simply need to balance out the revenue side of the taxation so they cay pay for social services. So lock down the wealth of the rich and the tax the hell out of it, basically something like 20 odd years worth.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    27. Re:Why? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >That worked well for Zimbabwe, hasn't it?

      Zimbabwe was a completely different scenario. More-over there is zero reason to suspect a similar outcome.
      The idea that government spending in a recession causes hyperinflation is bullshit, it comes from Austrian economics - the only school of economics that ignores empirical data (on purpose!) and there is literally not a single example anywhere in history of that *ever* happening.

      I know you're about to say "Zimbabwe", "Rome under Nero" or any of the other examples of hyperinflation - which all did big money printing, but they really aren't valid. All of them had other factors too. Rome under Nero had just gone through a massive drought that destroyed their farming crops, and two civil wars. Zimbabwe had a major near-revolution first.
      In fact the ONLY example of hyperinflation in all of history that was NOT preceded by a massive social upheaval of NON-economic nature is Spain in the 15th century - and that was with gold-standard money (it turns out -the gold standard gets fucked if a few citizens discover a whole lot of gold on another continent and just keep bringing more).

      A recession, by definition, is a liquidity trap. In a liquidity trap inflation is very difficult to achieve at all - in fact you're at constant risk of DEFLATION - you WANT to cause inflation to counter that effect. The whole point of a recession is that nobody is spending (or able to spend) - so nobody is making money either. If SOMEBODY doesn't start spending, you stay in a recession for ever. Usually the only possible OPTION to BE that somebody is the government.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    28. Re:Why? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >Note: It could actually be the proper course of action if huge amounts of the country's wealth is being held by a small group of extremely wealthy individuals. But I don't believe that's the case in Greece

      Actually - it kind of is the case in Greece.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    29. Re:Why? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Greece can't back its own crypto currency with anything it has a monopoly on either because it doesn't have anything that valuable.

      Really? And other currencies are backed by what, exactly? Promises of the government, that's what. It's been a long time a major currency was actually backed by anything valuable.

      Greece doesn't need a currency, it needs liquidity - a crypto currency won't bring that.

      A currency under the control of the government will bring that. One price that countries paid for joining the Euro zone was that they lost fiscal control. Your own currency - doesn't matter if it's called Drachme or Bitme - gives that control.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    30. Re:Why? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Currencies aren't backed by government promises, although government promises of stability do help stabilize them. They aren't backed by anything. The dollar is worth what a dollar will buy, nothing more.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. Taxation by Teun · · Score: 1
    The lax tax moral of the Greek was together with the huge number of public servants an important reason their economy faltered.

    The government of this game developer wants to re-employ many of the laid off people so fixing the tax system is probably the only option they have left to keep the country from again falling over.

    And such a currency can include many safeguards to ensure taxes are going to be paid.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re: Taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Varoufakis wasn't a game developer. He was Valve's economist; now he's in effect an economist for the Greek government.

    2. Re:Taxation by JBMcB · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My favorite story about Greece's problems:

      In the 90's a governmental committee was formed for the sole purpose to close a particular dam. After a decade, the dam was closed and demolished. That committee still exists. They don't go around closing other dams, they, I assume, just make sure the dam is still closed.

      Source: Planet Money

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    3. Re:Taxation by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Fact: Greece has less government employees per capita than Germany.

    4. Re:Taxation by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      If you think this kind of thing doesn't happen everywhere you are deluding yourself. How many Yucca Mountain studies have been done by now?

    5. Re:Taxation by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      That was because the house majority leader at the time was from Las Vegas.

      Needless to say the locals heavily oppose it in their backyard.

    6. Re:Taxation by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Germany also has one of the worlds highest per capita of government, but they collect taxes. Interestingly Greece actually spend significantly more on military than Germany per capita, that is the sort of shit that gets them in this mess. When you have such insanely high levels of government you have to be incredibly careful on how you run your economy and ensure you have a healthy tax base that actually pays tax.

    7. Re:Taxation by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Why did you think Merkel was kowtowing to Putin regarding Ukraine? Germany has cut their armed forces substantially since the fall of the Soviet Union. Just look at the amount of Leopard 2 tanks they sold to other countries including Greece. The Germans today have less Leopard 2 tanks in their army than the Greeks!

      That's why Putin can do whatever he damned pleases.

      That's one of the reasons the Greeks are miffed at Germany. A large fraction of the Greek government expenses were spent in German military hardware. German military companies actively corrupted Greek government officials to get those contracts. This is documented.

  6. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Teun · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yes and no.

    The European economy is contrary to 5 or 6 years ago presently plenty strong enough to absorb the exit of Greece from the Euro.

    But for the EU it is a matter practicality and also of honour to keep the lot together, it is the difference between a continuing struggle and complete failure for the Greek economy and people.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  7. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure you understand the matter.

    If Greek economy implodes, it does not invalidate debts (there are no default system in loans between nations). It is possible, that other nations who borrowed the money come across, understand that interests have made situation for them unbearable, thus gives up parts of the loan (not the capital that was loaned, but showing understanding and giving up most of the accumulated interest), that would be very understandable act. I'm all for that. I wish Greeks to stay within EU. The problems there are not (mostly) do with ordinary people, it's just darn reckless management of state business what happened there. (Falsifying statistics and covering up real numbers, to keep nose above surface.) Nobody in their senses would have loaned money there if they had known how bad situation was.

    I'm from a country that has loaned them money, billions of euros, and if you think we will just let them say "sorry, we don't have money, we're not going to have money for some time and we're never going to pay anything ..." is just bullshit. They will not be able to escape the loans, no matter if they detach from euro zone and have drakmas again. It will only make their situation worse. They need to start working with the plan that was made for them to clear up the mess and other nations will help them. It's their country and nation it's their job to get it done, we can't and won't even be able to do it if they don't cope with the facts.

  8. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... continuing a bit.

    The reason the can't escape completely the loans is simply, if they dare to say that they don't pay, then who's going to loan them money after that? Right, nobody.

    How they would be able to do trade with other nations after that? Right, paying everything in front in euros or dollars, nobody else would trust them otherwise.

    So, where would they get those euros / dolallars? Now, that's the real tough guestion, and I don't have an answer for that. Nor I think has Mr. Varoufakis either, and that's the reason even as he trying to play tough guy will have to thing seriously before spewing "We don't pay our loans" or anything that could even remotely be understood like that.

  9. Whatever they do by fustakrakich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just hope they hold up and tell the banks and Germany to go to hell. That is what they were elected for. Now, if they do, there could very easily be another military coup ordered by those banks. Unfortunately, it looks like compromise for the benefit of financial institutions is still the only thing on the menu. This 'crypto-currency' thing looks like a diversion.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Whatever they do by Teun · · Score: 1
      The Greek economy is still extremely weak and needs support to grow, going it alone is not realistic.

      Greece gets that support from the EU, their only alternative is this guy Putin and he has already been seen in Athens.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    2. Re:Whatever they do by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Did you read that notice about the formation of the BRICS bank? It is supposed to start operating in the middle of next year. Basically the BRICS are creating the XXIst century equivalent of COMECON as a counter to the G7 nations.

    3. Re:Whatever they do by Teun · · Score: 1
      So?

      I don't believe they'd burn their fingers on a Greece without EU support.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:Whatever they do by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

      I wonder, under what terms will BRICS bank lend Greece anything.

    5. Re:Whatever they do by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Greece has untapped oil reserves.

    6. Re:Whatever they do by Teun · · Score: 1
      (Oilfield laugh)Hahaha(/Oilfield laugh)

      An independent that buys it's own rig is a recipe for failure, besides 100 million Bbls is peanuts and Greek oil is notoriously difficult to get up.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    7. Re:Whatever they do by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      And the US Geological Society estimates there are around 22 billion barrels of oil in the Ionian Sea, off western Greece, and another 4 billion barrels in the northern Aegean Sea.

      http://www.aljazeera.com/progr...

  10. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    They will not be able to escape the loans...

    So what are your plans? Call in the generals and take over? Wouldn't be the first time...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  11. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Greece implodes, it could take the entire Eurozone with it by causing domino defaults, because Greece owes a lot of money to other nations that are already in dire fiscal straights

    Two years ago maybe, when the whole euro-zone was in a depression and there weren't plans in place but now they've prepared and the Greek economy is only about 2% of the total. Germany has been very ready to play hardball and let Greece fall on their sword if they don't stick to the rescue plan. You have to remember that once you've made sure the other dominos won't fall many want to make Greece an example of what happens when you spend irresponsibly. So does their new PM really want to go "all in" and find out if they'll really get kicked out of the-euro zone? That's some real high stakes poker there if he gets called they tell him to get out.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  12. Greek Myths by Guy+From+V · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure the River Styx freezing with Aphrodite and Helen of Troy ice skating naked while Dionysus hands out brews and bags of trainwreck is less mythological than the possibility that Greece's economy will start looking up with the current megasocialist nanny state political mindset going on over there. "Crypto" currency is right, like...literally.

    1. Re:Greek Myths by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      "Crypto" is also a terrible misnomer for cryptographically secured currencies :-)

      They aren't hidden. They are public. BitCoin only works when the entire transaction ledger is available to all it's users.

      In contrast, banks keep their ledger as private as possible. Historically this stems from the fact that you had to keep it secure - or people would just alter it. Then the secrecy became something that people relied on and almost more important than the security.

    2. Re:Greek Myths by Guy+From+V · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there aren't any truly capitalist states, nor has one ever existed. The capitalists you think are persecuting these ochlocratic countries are just a just a bit more capitalist than they are. A truly capitalist state would be vastly more harmonious and progressive than most any other kind of state, the misery and repression begin when capitalism begins to slip into fascist corporatism. At least IMHO.

    3. Re:Greek Myths by MeNeXT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More like the capitalists don't dare let them succeed. It would show the world that there was another way, and demands to go that way would escalate in other states.

      I will assume that you are not a troll. The fault lies within the Greeks themselves. You cannot forever consume more than you produce. No matter who you are. Capitalist or socialist. Greece has borrowed to support their lifestyle since WWII, if not before. They are constantly running an operating deficit. Nobody wants to lend Greece money because Greece does not want to change their ways. They want to consume more than they produce. The Greeks would't lend themselves the money!

      Austerity is not the problem, it's a solution. Did you Notice that Greece has not proposed one solution in which they pay back the debt? They only demand they are bringing to the table is that they can't be asked to reduce their spending. It's humiliating.

      Now some will come forward and say that a recession is not the time to reduce spending. This is right when you are not always running a deficit and when the burden of your debt is manageable. Greece was forgiven 100 billion euros already. If the Greeks don't want the austerity measures let them propose a solution to the repayment of all the loans including the 100 billion which was forgiven on the condition of austerity.

      I am more of a socialist than a capitalist. I honestly believe that the state needs to help even the field in order to produce more than is consumed which translates to building wealth. Yeah I agree with you the boogieman did it. It's just that the boogieman in this case it's the Greeks who think that they are entitled to live beyond their means.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    4. Re:Greek Myths by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      "They want to consume more than they produce"

      if you were familiar with what the EU *forced* us to do when we entered the euro, you wouldn't say this.

      they basically paid us to stop exporting.

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    5. Re:Greek Myths by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      Fascism is the natural end state of capitalism; the concentration of power eventually means that the state and the corporation merge and things are done for the benefit of the corporation.

      You can't have unregulated capitalism without it devolving into fascism. I think the UK and the US are already there - the essential dishonesty of our leaders, who publicly claim to want to do the best for us, then turn around and do the best for their corporate masters. The careful creation of a rhetoric of "them and us" to justify military action which just takes what they have and has us foot the bill (and much of it goes to private contractors). The brutal destruction of our public welfare systems to clear the way for much more profitable and expensive corporate systems.

      Without regulation, how does this go down? Really, the only difference would be that you'd be cowed by the private armies of the corporations, rather than the force deployed by government on their behalf. Rich men act to protect what is theirs. They fear being bereft of it. The only way people lack fear is if they feel in control, and when your interests are so large, that needs a lot of control.

    6. Re:Greek Myths by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Harsh, but cryptic.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    7. Re:Greek Myths by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      People got fed up paying for the mistakes of bankers and politicians. They decided to put an end to it, and look out for themselves. The government is supposed to be the will of the people, and work for their benefit. Now it is, now it does.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Greek Myths by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there aren't any truly capitalist states, nor has one ever existed.

      Then how do you know that

      A truly capitalist state would be vastly more harmonious and progressive than most any other kind of state, the misery and repression begin when capitalism begins to slip into fascist corporatism.

      ?

      If 20th century taught us anything, it's that ideologies that promise Earthly paradise in return for absolute obedience are extremely suspect.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:Greek Myths by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Austerity is not the problem, it's a solution. Did you Notice that Greece has not proposed one solution in which they pay back the debt?

      Actually Greece is proposing to pay back all of their debt. What they are saying is that instead of crippling austerity that is ruining Greek people's lives they want to first fix their economy, recover and when times are good pay off the debt. It worked well in other countries, such as Britain after WW2. Rather than paying off debts to the US and banks the government rebuilt the country. Lots of jobs, lots of investment and stimulus. Then when things were booming again debt was paid off.

      Austerity has already failed in Greece. Eventually it might pay off the debt but people still need to live in the mean time. Massive unemployment and people not being able to afford basics like food and electricity are not a solution.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Greek Myths by Tom · · Score: 1

      They are constantly running an operating deficit.

      Ironically, Greece had a balanced budget in 2014. Germany did not. Yes, this is true.

      Austerity is not the problem, it's a solution.

      Austerity has resulted in the Greece GDP imploding. The amount of debt a country is allowed under EU rules is based on the GDP. Thanks to austerity, even with a balanced budget the debt ratio of Greece became worse, even as the actual debt itself was being paid back.

      Did you Notice that Greece has not proposed one solution in which they pay back the debt?

      Did you notice that the vast majority of the "debt relief" money that was given to Greece never actually arrived there? The whole thing has been another scam to bail out banks, and they took almost all the money that was allegedly "given" to Greece.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    11. Re:Greek Myths by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Ironically, Greece had a balanced budget in 2014. Germany did not. Yes, this is true if you compare apples to oranges.

      Greece had a small budget surplus if you exclude debt repayments and one off payments such as bank bailouts. Overall it's budget deficit was around 13% (which meant that Greece was no longer in last place with Slovenia something around 15%)

      18 European countries kept their deficit within the 3% threshold. Luxembourg posted a small surplus while Germany[1] was balanced.

      https://euobserver.com/news/12...

      To Greece's credit, balancing the budget excluding debt repayments and one off items was achieved around a year ahead of the agreed austerity plan.

      [1] To reconcile this with your claim I can only assume that Germany was very slightly negative. Small enough that most people call it balanced.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    12. Re:Greek Myths by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      Actually Greece is proposing to pay back all of their debt. What they are saying is that instead of crippling austerity that is ruining Greek people's lives they want to first fix their economy, recover and when times are good pay off the debt. It worked well in other countries, such as Britain after WW2. Rather than paying off debts to the US and banks the government rebuilt the country. Lots of jobs, lots of investment and stimulus. Then when things were booming again debt was paid off.

      Austerity has already failed in Greece. Eventually it might pay off the debt but people still need to live in the mean time. Massive unemployment and people not being able to afford basics like food and electricity are not a solution.

      It is very easy to talk but what is needed is action. The only plan of action that I heard which is to reign in Greece's spending in order for it to be able to come out of this is the European austerity package. The problem with the Greek economy is that the spending is beyond the income that Greece is capable of earning and most Greeks do not wish to contribute. I know first hand. Greece had since WWII to build wealth like Britain but in Greece it was not about building wealth but about greed. Many Greeks were forced out of Greece because of this greed and now are watching from the outside and can't believe the gaul that the Greeks in Greece have. Fix the greed. Fix the corruption. Roll up your sleeves and start working as a country and not as a few privileged individuals who are raping the rewards from the rest of the population.

      Austerity hasn't failed it has awoken the Greeks to hopefully understand that an exit from Eurozone will result in a more drastic reduction in their earnings than the austerity measures currently imposed. The Greek problem is the Greeks themselves. Stop blaming others for your failings. Nobody has forced this path on you. This path was created by your actions and you should be thanking Europe that they are there to continue lending Greece money. If you can't see that, then you will never get out of this problem .

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    13. Re:Greek Myths by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      If I get behind property taxes I have more to worry than about electricity. Not only will I loose my electricity but I will also loose my home. I will loose any other asset if my home does not have enough equity to cover the taxes and the loan and I will be forced into bankruptcy. I will be out on the street.

      For 60 or more years Greeks have borrowed (plundered) Greece and now Greeks expect someone to come and give them more so they can continue. Stop looking at the last 4 years and look at the last 60. How many surpluses have have you had in the last 60? How many of the deficits exceeded the cost of living? Greeks have borrowed from their children and now the children are forced to pay. You can't fix 60 years of indulgence in 4 years it's going to take a generation before things start improving to the point where you can start building wealth. If it were not for austerity people would be starving to death and Greece would probably need the Red Cross and charity.

      Wake up! Nobody can fix this problem but the Greeks. Stop blaming others. Last I heard Greece was a democracy. The Greeks need to start getting involved. Start fixing the corruption. Start paying taxes. Nobody needs to lend Greece money and the Greeks should be grateful that someone has enough to help them. The Greeks haven't yet realized what would happen if nobody lent them any more money. They still believe that they are entitled.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    14. Re:Greek Myths by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      They are constantly running an operating deficit.

      Ironically, Greece had a balanced budget in 2014. Germany did not. Yes, this is true.

      One year in over 60?

      Austerity is not the problem, it's a solution.

      Austerity has resulted in the Greece GDP imploding. The amount of debt a country is allowed under EU rules is based on the GDP. Thanks to austerity, even with a balanced budget the debt ratio of Greece became worse, even as the actual debt itself was being paid back.

      Austerity was caused by 60 years of borrowing money that was never ever intended of being repaid. The cause of the implosion to the GDP is the 60 years of borrowing. There would be no need for austerity if there was not prior, out of control, borrowing.

      Did you Notice that Greece has not proposed one solution in which they pay back the debt?

      Did you notice that the vast majority of the "debt relief" money that was given to Greece never actually arrived there? The whole thing has been another scam to bail out banks, and they took almost all the money that was allegedly "given" to Greece.

      Everyone needs to pay their debt no matter who they are unless the debtor forgives. I don't know what your point to this last statement is. Why would the money go to Greece when it already went to Greece over the last 60 years. You want to eat your cake and have it too. Greece was forgiven 100 Billion. This money went to Greece. The rest went to pay the creditors. When I sell my house, the money that will be mine is what will be left after I pay off the bank. The bank didn't steal my money. I used theirs to purchase the house.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    15. Re:Greek Myths by Tom · · Score: 1

      One year in over 60?

      The last time Germany had a balanced budget was 1969.

      Austerity was caused by 60 years of borrowing money that was never ever intended of being repaid. The cause of the implosion to the GDP is the 60 years of borrowing. There would be no need for austerity if there was not prior, out of control, borrowing.

      So who are the idiots who gave money to someone who so obviously not only couldn't, but never intended to actually pay it back? And why are we bailing them out with taxpayer money?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    16. Re:Greek Myths by Tom · · Score: 1

      Overall it's budget deficit was around 13%

      That is the point. 13% of WHAT - of the GDP. Which had just imploded, thanks to austerity measures.

      I posted elsewhere a car analogy. This is like me borrowing you money, then when you get into trouble forcing you to sell your car to pay your debt. Ok, so far it's more or less fine (though stupid of me if you need your car to earn money to pay me back). But here's the trick: After you sold your car, I tell you that since your net worth has dropped (you no longer own a car), you now have a different credit rating, and because of that, you owe me more money, higher interest, whatever. Please sell your bike, too. Yes, that will reduce your net worth further.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  13. Cryptocurrency won't work in Greece by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    For the same reason that it wouldn't work in Argentina. Any successful cryptocurrency gets its tradable value from the perception that the money supply is strictly limited, as in the days when currencies were based on the issuing country's gold reserve. For a cryptocurrencies,money supply is limited by some publicly available and testable mathematical formula.

    For any government whose dreams exceed its revenue, this means instant and long-lasting austerity. It would be like the Euro, but even stricter.

    1. Re:Cryptocurrency won't work in Greece by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Gold was ancestrally popular because each country could print no money exceeding its share of the world's gold (and in early times had to actually circulate bullion coins as money), and the supply of gold increased at a modest amount each year that roughly matched the total value of fungible goods and services in each country. This meant that an ounce of gold traded for about the same quantity of goods century in and century out, with no inflation or deflation.

      Then the industrial revolution dramatically increased the rate at which a country's fungible goods and services grew each year. Gold production increased slightly too with better mining methods, but not by enough to allow money to increase at a fast enough rate to remain a neutral medium of exchange. That meant that in technology-driven societies gold keeps increasing in "value" every year compared to goods and services, causing people to hoard it out of circulation compared to any money whose supply is less limited. So central banks developed, which attempt to maintain neutral currencies by continually checking to see how goods and services are changing each year, and adjusting the money supply to match.

      Central banks vary a lot in how well they do at keeping the money supply trimmed to match its country's goods and services. Some ratings are: excellent - Switzerland; fairly good - US, poor - Greece and Argentina.

    2. Re:Cryptocurrency won't work in Greece by packrat0x · · Score: 1

      The *real* problem with gold backed currency is that a foreign country (not on a gold standard) can hoard and dump gold, and thus cause economic pain. Yes it would be expensive to do so, but then again, war is expensive too.

      --
      227-3517
  14. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Grow up? Do you have any idea why military coups happen? Apparently not! You appear to be some kind of idealist.

    And learn about the editorial 'you'. It might come in handy in the future.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  15. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Once the possibility of someone exiting the Euro becomes real other countries will be tempted or pushed out basically making it pointless.

    It was an economic marriage. And like in any marriage there are good times and bad times. Unfortunately some in Europe don't think of it this way.

  16. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    The Eurozone is still in a depression. Even Germany is in a situation of under-employment as a large fraction of the people they count as employed only have part-time low paying jobs.

  17. Re:Not gonna fly by cheesybagel · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In other words cryptocurrencies are a Ponzi scheme. Plus Bitcoin is deflactionary like the man himself said.

  18. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tempted? Are you an ill-informed euro sceptic? If it weren't for the need to bail out Greece, the euro would've been a tremendous boost for the economies of all countries that have adopted it. The absence of currency fluctuation has increased B2C trade between eurozone countries with at least an order of magnitude compared with trade prior to the adoption of it. Now the benefits only slightly outweigh the problem with Greece. Greece was admitted into the euro with a last minute lowering of the bar and despite that Greece had to cook the books. Besides, as an entry condition all new EU member states have committed themselves to adopting it once their economies fulfill the criteria.

  19. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by TyFoN · · Score: 1

    The Greeks have done nothing but cook the books and lie to get into EU, get loans to spend on handouts and now they blame everyone but themselves.
    The public in Greece voted for every single one of these crooks and are to blame.
    I think the best course of action is to toss them out, they were never fit to be in. They even hid public debt in their train company to pass EU requirements all to be able to borrow cheap with no intention of paying back.

    Sorry, I don't want to pay for the Greeks early retirements.

  20. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cryptolemur · · Score: 1

    There are two problems with making Greece and example: they did not spend irresponsibly, they became insolvent only after Germany forced them to shrink their economy, and secondly, because once out of Euro Greece can pay back their loans with newly printed bitdrakhmas, and Germany will take the biggest hit of that being the biggest creditor.
    Ok, three problems, since even the term "punishment" makes it also obvious that EU is not a cooperative looking for the common good of it's citizens, but tool for the German financial elite to have their way regardless of things like democracy.

  21. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

    The Euro had all sorts of problems. That spurious inflation on the beginning was one. As for the increase in trade it went mainly in one direction and actually exacerbated the current problem.

    Do you know what caused the inflation? Germany printed a bunch of DMs before the Euro came into the market. In order to keep their inflation low, and fullfill the ERM convergence criteria, they kept the DMs stashed in the banks and kept them out of the market. Once the Euro came online they converted all these bogus DMs into Euros and flooded the market with them causing the inflation, and loaned them to countries like Greece. So effectively the Germans loaned bad money to countries like Greece and are asking for good money in goods and services as return now.

    Also whoever had the idea of making a monetary union with free bank transfers with a eurozone wide deposit insurance scheme was bonkers.

  22. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

    What do you mean? If I knew my bitcoin wallet doubled its value every year, I would spend/invest NONE of it. And since everyone else would do the same, the value would grow even further and further, until it wouldn't. Then there is incentive to spend, thus flooding the market with bitcoins, which results in inflation, which forces to spend even more, before value is lost even further. Sounds like solid economical base to me.

  23. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by ecotax · · Score: 1

    I'm not in favour of making Greece an example; most Greece people didn't ask for the mess they are in and are hardly to blame for being ruled incompetently in the past. That said, it's complete nonsense to blame the unfortunate financial situation the country is in on Germany or the remainder of the EU. Greece has been completely incompetent in raising taxes and clientelism and corruption are widespread. I can imagine the austerity measures to be impopular, but let's not forget that the EU has been dumping hundreds of billions of euro's in the EU, in an attempt to help Greece.

    --
    "Money is a sign of poverty." - Iain Banks
  24. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

    A rose by any other name...

  25. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by gTsiros · · Score: 2

    ... do you have a source?

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
  26. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    None of that explains why military coups happen, nor why it could easily happen again in Greece. In fact you're not addressing anything I posted. The bankers will get their piece of flesh, through blood sacrifice if needed. And it does no good to bring up the US/UK imperial war in the Middle East. It does not relate to this here discussion, aside from the financial sources.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  27. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by CaptainDork · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, just like we wiped out North Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and just how we've just about wiped out ISIS and stuff.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  28. Re:Not gonna fly by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    This, and it's kinda obvious:

    When in danger
    When in doubt
    Run in circles
    Scream and shout

    Even if it's a useless fucking idea, it's an idea.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  29. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    Absolutely, it's all Germany's fault.

    Your problem is that you don't have to convince yourself of that, but since you want Germans to pay for the mess the Greece are in, you have to convince the Germans. And knowing how they are pissed off with the Greek and have had just about enough of it, you'll have a hard time doing that.

  30. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once the possibility of someone exiting the Euro becomes real other countries will be tempted or pushed out basically making it pointless.

    It was an economic marriage. And like in any marriage there are good times and bad times. Unfortunately some in Europe don't think of it this way.

    Not pointless - there's real economic benefit to a single currency for Europe.

    If it's a marriage, then Greece is the abusive, cheating spouse. They've gone from irresponsibly spending more than they could ever repay (since they can't inflate their way out of debt), through a brief attempt at surviving austerity (terms of the debt relief they got - everyone knew it would suck), to saying "screw you, we're too big to fail, we're gonna spend spend spend, what are you gonna do about it?"

    Greece was in a better economic position than most of Eastern Europe at the start of all this, with a better standard of living (even had they chosen to live within their means) than many later entrants in to Euro. But they chose to spend vastly more than they were making, running up the highest debt-to-GDP ratio in Europe, inflating that standard of living artificially until they could borrow no more.

    What the US thinks of that isn't very relevant, but those Easter European countries that made real sacrifice to join the Euro, and who have been keeping their debt down and surviving with a much lower standard of living than Greece and directly paying for Greece's first bailout in some cases aren't impressed with Greece's excuses. At this point, a "Grexit" will be less disruptive than continued bailouts.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  31. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Like I said before, They need to do like Iceland. The 'debt' is a result of bankers fraud and is not legitimate. And yes, a lot more nations should do the same. It's time to put things in the proper order and make the banks serve and not rule. That would mean instituting a public bank, through their post office or whatever.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  32. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    There is little chance of Greece leaving the Euro. For a start it would take at least a year to set up a new currency to use. A year of limbo with Greece still using the Euro but having no interest in its future.

    Of course, setting up a new currency wouldn't even begin before months of negotiations to agree a procedure for an exit. There is currently no mechanism for a country to leave the Euro. Then there needs to be a new treaty to set it up.

    Neither side will wait that long, there will be an agreement in the ~18 months it will take to happen.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  33. Re: Umm... Lulz.Markets will Rule by BoRegardless · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Prediction is Greece will exit the EU because of inefficient use of all forms of resources. They have been pseudo-socialist giveaway state for so long w/1 in 3 workers working for the state's institutions, they've collectively forgotten market economics is what runs countries effectively.

    Venezuela is the prime example of wasteful redistribution policies by a government which collapse a society (military takeover is next.)

    Greece will change fairly soon and it will be somewhat painful or they will deteriorate toward Venezuela's position, in which case it will impoverish Greece's working class.

  34. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Greece and the EU are currently like two poker players going all-in with their mortgage money, knowing that if the other one doesn't fold they can't pay and lose their house.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  35. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Eurozone might be able to absorb a Greek exit in purely financial terms, but in psychological terms it would be a disaster. If Greece leaves, then that provides a precedent for countries leaving. Investments in Euros are based on the premise that the Euro is backed by a large economic base and if countries can leave that base then there's a lot less of an incentive to use the Euro. That's likely to lead to a drop in liquidity in the rest of the Eurozone, which would make leaving an even more attractive bet for some of the weaker economies.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  36. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    secondly, because once out of Euro Greece can pay back their loans with newly printed bitdrakhmas, and Germany will take the biggest hit of that being the biggest creditor

    Normally you have to pay back loans in the currency that they were given. If you only have another currency, then you have to find someone willing to exchange them. The exchange rate isn't likely to be very good for a little while. That said, it would probably be great for the Greek economy, as a very weak currency will make exports very easy for them.

    The other problem that you're not mentioning is that, if Greece leaves the Euro then Putin will be very happy to extend trade deals to them to get around sanctions and to piss off Germany and no one wants Greece to become a satellite state of the new USSR.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  37. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Teun · · Score: 3, Informative
    Maybe you should take your temperature?

    Nearly every EU country has a couple of conspiracy nuts claiming *.* screwed them during or before unification.

    The problem is not someone loaned bad or good money to Greece, the problem is Greece wasn't and isn't able to hold up it's own pants, all due to their own lack of courage to fix their tax and economic imbalances.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  38. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    Easter European countries that made real sacrifice to join the Euro, and who have been keeping their debt down and surviving with a much lower standard of living than Greece

    Sounds great, we should join - UK, I look forwards to a much lower standard of living.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  39. Too bad their currency can't buy them by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    As it will be worth less than the paper it is printed on if they default on their debt which they plan on doing.

  40. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact that the Troika hasn't been willing to give one iota on the Greece issue should be enough of a reflection on how little consequence they think an exit of Greece from the eurozone would be. Germany in particular doesn't want to give any ground (I imagine all of the nazi-name calling has played no small part), but they're hardly alone, many countries are taking a very hardline stance on Greece. Most parties feel that the consequence of giving way to Greece could be significant, but the consequences of their exit - while not completely painless - would not be that dramatic.

    On the other hand, in Greece, there's only one route for exit, and that's capital controls (or a rapid conversion over the weekend) where everyone's assets are converted to some kind of new-drachma, which instantly devalues to half its value or less. Which is why everyone is taking their euros out of the banks, they're not stupid (unfortunately, thieves aren't stupid either, breakins have become an epidemic as they look for people hoarding money at home).

    I can't see a cryptocurrency helping in any way... if anything I'd guess it'd only serve to unnerve markets even more and lose even more value as a consequence. I could picture it maybe as a simultaneous and rate-locked currency to a physical New Drachma, maybe. But it sounds IMHO like an incredibly risky move even then. I mean, one presumes for example that there's a government-controlled master key to "print" more cryptocoins? Then that means that your entire economy can be crushed overnight by someone hacking, physically stealing, misusing, cracking, or whatnot your master key. Isn't that an unnecessarily big risk to take? And on an individual level it seems full of problems as well...

    Don't get me wrong, I don't think cryptocurrencies are inherently an evil or shouldn't exist. But I would have serious second thoughts about such a massive nationwide rollout on a country that's already in chaos.

    --
    We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
  41. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Success? Please!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  42. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Teun · · Score: 1
    You've clearly not been living in the EU.

    Or you've for the past ~15-50 years been living under a rock.

    Had you not been living under said rock and like me been travelling the world and the EU you would have had first hand experience of the vast steps forward we've made.

    Oh yes, because you live under a rock you've likely not heard the populists in France and Denmark are after the recent attacks by domestically bred terrorists keeping VERY quiet with their stale demands to close the borders to keep out trouble.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  43. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 2

    It's easy for Americans who've never had to live with a weak, low circulation currency to say "EURO BAD!". But they've never seen the consequences. How even in a good economy your money steadily becomes more and more worthless because inflation of such currencies is almost always worse than that of stronger currencies. How you pay out the nose for loans because of the higher risk of inflation or currency swings. How many companies won't even work with transfers to / from your currency.

    Big, strong currencies offer serious benefits. America has been given a *massive* economic boost due to the widespread usage of the Greenback. Their economy would be nowhere near what it is today if each state had its own currency.

    --
    We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
  44. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    No, we must take back the money they stole and close their accounts. It can all be done with the push of a button. You do remember when the banks directly robbed account holders to pay off the Russian Mob accounts, right? Let's reverse that.

    Now, here's the thing, if the Greeks and others actually resist, there will be war. That is a guarantee. If Russia attacks first, it will be a big war.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  45. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's also this big lie that "Greece has been saddled with debts that they could never pay". Greece's state assets are worth an order of magnitude more than their debts. They could sell off a tenth of them and have all of their debts in the clear right away.

    Obviously, they don't want to privatize everything, and I don't blame them. But the concept that this debt is impossible to service is simply a lie. They just don't want to. Heck, they could do it without excessive pain to the middle class or extensive privatization if only they'd go after their wealthy - there's a couple dozen Greek billionaires and countless more in the next eschelons. And these are the biggest tax dodgers who don't pay anywhere close to their fair share. But Greece is apparently either unable or unwilling to go after them.

    --
    We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
  46. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 1

    If I were an investor, I'd be glad to see the Euro kick out any countries that undermine the currency.

    --
    We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
  47. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 1

    You do realize that to import goods, you have to pay for them, right?
    You do realize that without international trade Greece would resemble Somalia, right?

    Yes, Greece can declare itself another North Korea and cut itself off from the world if it wants to give the global financial system the middle finger. But hey, good luck with that...

    --
    We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
  48. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by ewibble · · Score: 2

    I don't think anything that bad will happen Greece defaults, sure the government may not loans, for a while, that will just force them live within there means, while removing any interest burden. Who in their right mind lending more money to Greece anyway, and simply not trying to recover as much money back as they can. Private companies will still get loans, the wouldn't have defaulted.

    If you lend people money to take on a risk (Isn't that the justification for charging interest), and if you lend too much money to people and they can't pay, well like any investment you can loose, and I don't feel sorry for the lenders. These are large banks and countries that have lent to Greece and as such should have done due diligence.

    Maybe if Greece defaults, It will teach these people, don't lend to people who can't afford to pay (even countries), and it will not allow countries like Greece to get into these situations, in the first place.

    At some point going bankrupt, is the only sane choice, probably better than having your entire economy crippled by interest repayments for the foreseeable future.
     

  49. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Kjella · · Score: 2

    There are two problems with making Greece and example: they did not spend irresponsibly, they became insolvent only after Germany forced them to shrink their economy

    LOL you must be from Greece, their debt-to-GDP ratio was poor to begin with increasing every year through budget deficits. They went insolvent because the market understood they had no chance of paying their debts and interest rates skyrocketed. It's rather hilarous to blame Germany and the EU for the terms of the loans when the market would sooner lend money to a drunken hobo than to Greece, it was either that or bankruptcy.

    You can of course argue that they're now trapped in an evil circle where the austerity measures are killing the economy and they should default sooner rather than later, but they're just where everyone deep in credit card debt are - they spend what little income they have paying interest and don't have any surplus to improve their situation. What you're blaming Germany for is doing just enough to keep the Greek economy from dying, but not enough to cure it. That's right, you rich uncle isn't going to come in and solve all your problems. From all the gratitude they're getting I'm guessing that the next time they'd rather not bail anybody out at all.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  50. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Secrets lead to excessive speculation. If there is something to hide, then something is wrong with the project, especially if it involves public funding. And besides, how does it match up with infrastructure that was destroyed by the war? Sorry, sounds like shtick to me. Even vampires don't enter a house uninvited.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  51. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Greece, as my high school history teacher would put it, is a basket case. It survives only on the handouts from the EU.

    I worked on an EU funded research project, where Greeks were involved, the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) and the Athens Technology Center (ATC). Although some of those folks had PhDs, none of them were even close to being productive as a US high school student.

    Whine, moan, bitch and complain, someone else was responsible for their failure. I couldn't even hear it any more.

    Yeah, great, a funky new currency . . . but Greece needs some more radical reform . . . and not some leftist bullshit.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  52. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    For what? The money printing?
    https://www.richmondfed.org/pu...

    Figure 6 pg 41. Also that chart conveniently does not show the amount of DMs they printed when they absorbed Eastern Germany. They converted Eastern German currency to DMs on a 1:1 basis when black market value was 10:1!

  53. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Greece has problems. But the talk they were the only ones that cheated their way into the Euro is just plain bunk. Basically everyone cheated their way into it. Germany set the rules and they were the first to break them when they started running up a deficit followed by France. Just because currently they are running up less of a deficit doesn't mean they won't the future. Do the German government think China is going to buy their stuff forever? Good luck.

    The Chinese high-speed rail buildup is a good example why the Germans won't get what they want. They are always running to try to find new markets in Africa and Latin America but they will bump into already installed Chinese interests when they try to get there.

  54. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Ask the Czechs and Poles why they're dragging their feet so they don't get in the Eurozone.

    Fact is anyone with an economy that matters has tried to steer well clear of the Euro for quite some time now ever since the troubles started. And if countries start being ejected it will only precipitate the destruction of the Eurozone.

  55. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by lgw · · Score: 1

    Perhaps. I'm of the opposite opinion - that if countries start being ejected for financial mismanagement, the skeptical might be encouraged that the Euro is a currency run by grown-ups. But we have no actual data either way - perhaps we'll see the experiment performed, and then we'll know.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  56. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by gTsiros · · Score: 1

    If you have the patience, can you please give me a short explanation how to read the chart? Thank you in advance.

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
  57. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    Don't forget your incredible victory against drugs!

  58. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by cynicist · · Score: 1

    More people would be using Bitcoin?

  59. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    A crypto currency would be like buying gold to hedge against the inevitable inflation or devaluation of the currency. It wouldn't be a matter of printing more, it would be a matter of will this dollar still buy a dollars worth of something if the value is cut in half. But with a crypto currency, the initial scarcity could be negated if there was a one time creation of enough currency to cover the expected load and the key would be destroyed (or useless) and unlike investing in gold to hedge the value, it wouldn't temporarily increase demand and costs initially. I'm guessing that instead of creating a new currency, they would just create an exchange with the help of other exchanges.

    So during and after the fallout, some currency could be exchanged back into whatever dollar system is in place as needed and it would be at the exchange rate in comparison to a more stable dollar (like the euro or USD) instead of holding a dollar that is worth only 25 percent of it's value 10 or even 2 years ago. OF course this will make purchasing more crypto currency units more expensive as you would need to spend 4 times as much but it would lessen the shock of whatever is to come. And on another note, if the finance minister adopted and used a specific crypto currency through their exchange, they would also have records of who can be taxed and perhaps those records would be more complete than what they have now (I hear tax avoidance in Greece is rampant).

  60. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    " it's about how much the ordinary people of Greece should suffer for borrowing excesses of it's previous government in the past."

    It's about how much the ordinary people of Greece should suffer for the lending excesses of German banks.

  61. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    I don't hate Germany. I hate near sighted politicians. And I don't know why you think I'm Greek.

  62. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    And if they did leave the Euro, wouldn't the new currency be weak and make it practically impossible to pay off a debt that is Euro based. I don't think people who want Greece to leave have considered the consequences. / I could be wrong, I'm no currency expert.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  63. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 2

    Whatever they convert it into, New Drachmas or Cryptodrachmas, it's still going to devalue like crazy. Both, being backed by the same entity (the state) will have the same credibility problem. Except even moreso for the cryptocurrency because of all of the concerns that carries with for many investors.

    --
    We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
  64. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    I don't think you understand the concept.

    If they create an exchange with a current crypto currency and conver all their money to it except what is needed from day to day, then drop out of the Eurozone and create their own dollar, each crypto dollar will be the value of the crypto currency used. If their created dollar is worth 1/10 of a Euro and each crypto dollar or coin is worth 2 Euros, it will bring in 20 Drachmars when cashed out.

    The key is a current crypto currency. It will be backed by something other than the state. the other option which is virtually identical is to convert it to a foreign currency then convert it back. Except the later is subject to manipulation and fees imposed by the banks- some of which will be butt hurt over the defaults when they leave the Eurozone.

  65. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by qpqp · · Score: 1

    They need to start working with the plan that was made for them to clear up the mess and other nations will help them.

    Wrong. I wouldn't work with a plan that forces me to cut my own legs (sell state-owned, important infrastructure to the likes of Telekom, Vattenfall, etc.) either, instead I'd look for a proper way out (grow - not shrink).

  66. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by qpqp · · Score: 1

    The oil markets will not accept local currencies; it has to be dollars or in some cases, euros.

    You're forgetting Rubles, which is a serious oversight currently.
    Also, Greeks do have their own oil, if they start drilling. They have their own electricity too. It'd be difficult, but possible.

  67. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by qpqp · · Score: 1

    They could also pivot towards the EEU and/or SCO, who'd both probably be welcoming Greece with open arms.

  68. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by qpqp · · Score: 1

    have had just about enough of it

    Who cares?
    Fortunately, these days Germans don't have an army capable of attacking anyone, unless it's with broomsticks. So they'd have to live with it.

  69. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Znarl · · Score: 1

    Germany is an export economy and so does very well out of a weak Euro. It is in Germany's best interest for countries who drag down the value of the Euro to not get kicked out as it lowers the cost of Germany's exports for the rest of the world. If only strong export based countries used the Euro then it would increase the price of those countries exports for the rest of the world.

  70. Can any Greek speakers help translate GPL software by HongPong · · Score: 1

    I helped cleanup & docs on a GPL project called Integral Community Exchange System (ICES) just approved as full drupal.org project module suite https://www.drupal.org/project... . It is already used by Ecoxarxes (econetworks) around Spain specifically Catalonia to provide timebanking/time credit and needs/offers listings. It feature-replaces closed source CES software used in places like South Africa and Australia.

    I think that getting basic needs connected and covered for people and enhancing trust among a web of people, without need for deflated (or low velocity /liquidity fiat currencies like Euro in depressed Spain or Greece), with either timebanking or basic services listed, already helping a lot of people. Exchanges: https://www.integralces.net/ce... developer docs https://docs.integralces.net/ Thanks for considering something practical. No fancy blockchains, but an OAuth / OpenTransaction implementation to exchange crossovers is working in dev. If anyone would like to plugin or translate please check it out...

  71. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by siddesu · · Score: 1

    Call me EU-biased, populist, fourth Reich apologist or whatever, but I don't see how the Euro has been bad for Belgium by looking at its GDP growth. It isn't spectacularly different before/after the Euro, but it seems there is a lot more economic stability after than before.

    Belgium:

    Before Euro: http://www.tradingeconomics.co...

    After Euro: http://www.tradingeconomics.co...

    As for France, the tendency of diminishing growth has been there since at least the oil shocks, nothing in the chart I see that would point to the introduction of the Euro as the culprit.

    http://www.tradingeconomics.com/charts/france-gdp-growth-annual.png?s=frgegdpy&d1=19500101&d2=20151231

  72. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

    Actually I think more the opposite, Greece being pushed out would show the healthy countries that the EU is not just wealth fare system for countries that mismanage their economies while at the same time scaring some of the more troubled countries into doing something to rectify their own issues. Greece staying in the Euro and NOT fixing their economy I think is far more likely to shatter the EU than them being ejected.

  73. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    If they leave the Euro they will most likely default on their Euro debts anyway. The only point of leaving is to abandon those debts.

    Actually defaulting might be a good option for them. It worked out okay for Argentina. Not brilliant but better than what they have now. The other Euro countries would obviously prefer that that didn't happen though, so I think in the long run will accommodate them.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  74. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 1

    If they create an exchange with a current crypto currency and conver all their money to it except what is needed from day to day, then drop out of the Eurozone and create their own dollar, each crypto dollar will be the value of the crypto currency used.

    Sorry, but unless there's hard assets behind it, it's going to float. And the float will be way down, just the same as any other Greek currency. Greece's creditors and exporters don't want New Drachmas, CryptoDrachmas, or anything of the sort: they want dollars and euros. To get dollars and euros, Greece has to make and export goods and services at a rate competitive with their rate of imports. For their government to get dollars and euros, they actually have to stamp out corruption, tax evasion, and so forth. Greece's inability to do these things is the reason they're in the bind they are today.

    --
    We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
  75. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by siddesu · · Score: 1

    If you can read the opposite of what the charts actually say, it is pointless to talk to you. Go feel sorry about yourself somewhere else.

  76. Re: Umm... Lulz.Markets will Rule by Tom · · Score: 3, Informative

    You've read too much propaganda.

    The crisis in Greece has many reasons. Inefficiency is a problem, but not a crisis cause. The fact that the country had a strongly interconnected (not to say, inbred) web of corruption between politics, administration and business is much more likely to have been a leading cause.

    The greek "giveaway state" is such a cheap myth. They don't even have social welfare the way that those who cry loudest (e.g. Germany) have.

    The real problem is that Greece was heavily in debt to foreign banks. Instead of giving them a way out, the governments of the countries of those banks pressured them into paying their debts and interests, and cutting spending. When your economy is in a crisis, every economist who's not a total idiot knows that cutting government spending will deepen the crisis. What a surprise, that's exactly what happened.
    And now comes the magic trick: The amount of debt that the EU, European Central Bank and IWF consider "acceptable" is calculated based on a countries GDP. Greece actually cut spending a lot and last year ran on a balanced budget, something that our own Mrs. Merkel didn't manage to do with our country. Greece debt has actually decreased. However, due to the magic trick, Greece debt ratio has become worse, not because of more debt, but because of less GDP.

    It's like telling you that because you're in debt, you need to sell your car to pay me. And after you've done so, telling you that because your net worth has now declined, you've now got a different credit rating and owe me more money for the higher risk.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  77. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But Greece is apparently either unable or unwilling to go after them.

    The old government was, because of the strong ties between the old parties and the business moguls. The new government has no such ties, and has, in fact, announced steps to do exactly what you say they should do.

    But, of course, since they're evil communistsocialistliberalevilcommitraitors, it doesn't matter what they actually do, does it?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  78. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

    Germany in particular doesn't want to give any ground

    Because it's been running an internal class warfare for the past 20 years. Germany is strong right now because all of the burden has been shifted to the low and middle classes, with real wages being stagnant for over 10 years, more unemployment than at any time since the war, and massive amounts of the workforce employed in temporary or part-time jobs.

    In other words: The cost of labour has been systematically driven down. The problem for Germany is that this system is unsustainable, unless you can always shift off the cost to someone else. The austerity is not new, it's the same recipe that Merkel and her predecessor cooked Germany with. They cannot allow another country to shake off this yoke without their home country asking why the fuck they need to justify spending 12 Euros instead of 10 Euros on a sports club for the kids when the rich have doubled their income in the same time everyone else has only lost.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  79. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 2

    Germany is playing hardball exactly because it can not afford Greece to step out of the austerity program.

    If Greece does it, and survives - even if badly, it just needs to survive - then Spain, Portugal and Italy will certainly follow, with Cyprus, Ireland and others close behind.

    Merkel has presented austerity as "without alternative" in the same way she has run her own country (disclaimer: I am german). Every major decision in her entire reign was never justified by being the best option or shown to be productive, the primary argument has always been that there are no other alternatives and that's it.

    If the new Greece government can demonstrate that there is an alternative, the whole house of cards will come crashing down. Merkel will fall, because her entire political system (she's even made sure that there is no alternative to her within her own party, guaranteeing that they will not win the next election after she steps down) is based on this "without alternative" premises.

    And if you don't think that politicians are willing and able to ruin whole countries or continents over their personal ambitions and powerplays, you've slept through all of history class.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  80. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

    While based on some extremely limited understanding of the world this is technically true, you do understand that a) you'd all die in nuclear hellfire as Russia and China retaliate (because if you start a nuclear war for no reason, you can't be trusted not to do it on a whim to them) and b) "you americans" can do squiddly doo. 0.0001% of you can do. I think on a metaphor your small brain will understand, compared to your body that is about the equivalent of those three hairs on your balls you don't like.

    Also, "those greasers" had democracy when America was ruled by buffaloes. They already were over with a full civilization, artists, philosophers and scientists included, when "USA" became spellable because latin letters had just been invented. They laugh on your history of 300 years, because they can add an entire order of magnitude to that. Those "greasers" invented the logic that is the foundation of the math that is the foundation of the computer science that is the foundation of the hardware and software you unwashed redneck use to spit out your mental sperm into the world.

    In many respects, Greece is the seed and core of everything that you admire in your world, but it would be stupid to ask you for some respect, because people like you don't know what that is.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  81. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can't sell the stuff because no one knows who actually owns it. What chance do they have without even a proper land registry? I heard about this in a comment on The Economist, and couldn't believe it, but then found more details here: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05...

  82. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Bonzoli · · Score: 1

    Nobody is going after those who took all this money? Its not magic, it went somewhere.
    The new government officials are cozying up with the kremlin which is a kleptocracy. In may western nations puts them on par with communists. You know the ones currently driving tanks west across the Ukraine.

    Clearly stepping on the economy while hoping it will improve to pay back the loans is a bad idea. But are the people mad enough now, to go get the stolen money back? This will require a lot of people going to jail or giving it back. If they aren't then its not going to get better.

  83. Re: Umm... Lulz.Markets will Rule by Tom · · Score: 1

    Like that happened by itself, or like the fact that banks had bought the government bonds somehow makes the situation more troublesome than if individuals had bought the bonds.

    It does, because banks are big players and can trick or coerce governments into deals that are bad for them. There's a reason many governments are buying back properties they privatized in the 80s and 90s when corrupt consultants convinced them that selling state property was a cute idea.

    There are long articles by actual economists on this topic, but the basic idea is that for any debt crisis, you need not only an irresponsible borrower, but also an irresponsible lender.

    Oh, now it's Greece's achievement that the reforms which were demanded of them actually worked?

    Are you fucking kidding me? They balanced their budget, by crashing their economy. Your definition of "worked" is far out there.

    For the getting-the-money-back part, the balanced budget is happening soon.

    One way for us to balance our budget could be to sell all those people who are so willing to give away our money to prop up other nations who hate us for it.

    You mean our banks? I'm against selling them into slavery, they belong into jails.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  84. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

    Nobody is going after those who took all this money? Its not magic, it went somewhere.

    To foreign banks, mostly. And if we've learnt anything at all during the past seven years, it is that Iceland is the only european country with enough balls and not enough corruption to actually go after those responsible for the whole clusterfuck.

    The new government officials are cozying up with the kremlin which is a kleptocracy.

    True, but since the US basically doesn't give a fuck about your country if you don't have oil, and europe is in the firm grasp of a woman who gets pleasure from re-introducing levels of poverty we've not seen since the world wars, there really aren't many places to go to for support.

    You know the ones currently driving tanks west across the Ukraine.

    That's a completely different topic, so I'll only say that the europeans actions in Ukraine will probably be in the history books of the 22nd century as examples of unbelievable stupidity and ignorance.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  85. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

    The battle cry of socialists and communists world-wide: We'll do it and the world will follow. Never seems to work, does it?

    Step out of the binary world for a second. There is communist dicatorship soviet style, and oppressive hypercapitalism USA style, but there are also worlds inbetween. For 50 years, Europe had a successful social-economical system called social market economy. It worked really great, and gave us the prosperity of (almost) the USA with the social security systems of (almost) socialism. The gap between rich and poor was much lower than across the atlantic, while productivity and freedom were much higher than in the east.

    The new greece government makes demands that 30 years ago wouldn't have raised an eyebrow in Europe. You want people to be able to actually survive on the wages of a full-time job? Yeah, so what? Everyone wants that. You want to spend money to help the unemployed and create jobs? Why are you even saying that, this is what we all expect from a government.

    Also, how many times do you have to watch handout economies fall back versus competitive economies to LEARN THE FUCKING LESSON!

    "fall back" in what metric? The USA looks great on paper, but your richest 0.1% are taking in 50% or 90% or whatever incredible share of all the wealth and profits.

    Do you want to live in a country with an average wage of 5000 or 10000? Sounds like a simple question. But if the average is just statistics, and most people actually collect 10% of it in the "richer" country, living in the poorer one is the better choice for most people.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  86. How Hitler Defied The Bankers? by NewYork · · Score: 1

    How Hitler Defied The Bankers?
    http://open.salon.com/blog/gor...

  87. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

    The Greeks can build their socialist utopia if they like

    Are you retarded or what? The plans of the new greece government are as far away from "socialist utopia" as a Ford Model T from a flying car.

    All sustainable advancements towards more participation and social insurance in Europe have been made from a position of economic strength

    Not really, no. But don't let facts spoil your ranting. Especially social changes often came about in times of crisis, because it is then that the ugly truth of the current system shows itself in full splendor.

    If you can't even see how competitive economies are far preferable to economies which create all the "right" disincentives,

    If you don't understand that all extremist positions are evil, you've not paid attention in history class. Competition is good, but hypercompetitive environments are disasters to physical and mental health, society, culture and every aspect of humanity other than profit, profit, profit. On the opposite end, social security is good, but nanny-states (the real ones, not the "omg, the government actually moved a finger" hyperbole of american right-wingers) cut into innovation, progress and motivation to do anything at all.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  88. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    lol.. Not really. It would be no different then them buying US dollars, exiting the Eurozone, creating a crap currency, then converting back into their crap currency. It needs nothing hard at all. Any paper or fiat currency will work.

    Greece will not have to export anything, all they will have to do is find someone willing to sell. That's where a bit coin operation would work. They purchase bitcoins from whoever sells, when they exchange them back out, it's the current exchange rates. Whoever sells them can purchase hard assets or take the loss or do whatever their scheme allows.

    Greece could purchase gold and do the same. Using a crypto currency only allows that to happen without having to purchase the asset themselves.

  89. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by Meski · · Score: 1

    All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health, what have the Greeks ever done for us?

  90. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

    discussions with communists

    Americans. Everyone who disagrees with them or who thinks that letting people starve on the streets might be unbecoming of a civilized nation must be a communist.

    You're not very different from ISIS. For them everyone who disagrees with them is a to-be-slaughtered satan worshipper. Different words and details, same approach. Bush Jr. summed the american mindset up very good: If you're not with us, you are against us. In the small box that is your world, there is only space for two opinions, and nothing inbetween or to the sides.

    I would pity you, but ignorance is a choice and not an accident, and I never pity people for self-inflicted misery.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  91. Cryptography by DrYak · · Score: 1

    For the record, a Cryptocurrency isn't called so because it's hidden (indeed it's not).

    It's called so because is relies a lot on *Cryptography*: digital signature, public keys, message authentication, etc. All these are necessary for the distributed nature of cryptocurrencies to work reliably.

    As for "state controler Fedcoin": Sorry, no. It doesn't work that way. The whole point of cryptocoins is to be distributed accross the network, so that there isn't a signle entity that has single hand control over everything else. That's *why* they rely on a transaction ledger (Blockchain) distributed accross the whole network. State control is impossible this way.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]