Slashdot Mirror


How Walking With Smartphones May Have Changed Pedestrian Etiquette

An anonymous reader writes The phenomenon of 'distracted walking' — pedestrians who walk while using smartphones — has raised civic attention in the last few years, with Utah issuing fines and cities in China creating dedicated 'smartphone lanes' for walkers who need to keep up with Whatsapp on the move. This article argues that smartphone users have become so accustomed to other people getting out of their way that they will no longer negotiate for sidewalk space even when not using their phones.

47 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. Take your space by ADRA · · Score: 4, Informative

    Too many people period are idiots about not negotiating equitable space that I just bowl them down. I'm taller and large bigger than most, so if I think they're being oblivious or careless, down they go! Being a dick about sharing a laneway is a dick move and the only ONLY way to punish it is to not yield.

    If you wanted to be an uber dick, you'd pick up their phone and throw it away, but that's too much for me =) Oh, that goes double for movie theatre texters! Die in a pit of hell assholes!

    --
    Bye!
    1. Re:Take your space by TWX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When my wife and I were fairly new as a couple she would get annoyed when I would precede her through crowds. What she came to realize though, was that since my work takes me into secondary schools and I have to navigate halls between periods, I've had to become a master of the Morpheus Walk, referring to the scene in The Matrix where Fishburne's character is teaching Neo of the risks of agents in the Matrix, and the crowd parts for him while Reeves' character is colliding with all of the simulated people. I'm also fairly tall, and I'm able to put on a demeanor that usually gets people to move out of my way.

      Once she saw how much easier it is to navigate a crowd that way she has been a lot happier in crowded situations to let me go first. If she sticks close behind then she can follow easily and we end up where we want to faster.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Take your space by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am with you on this. If you have a place to go, walk with determination. Don't look like you are in a hurry, just go. If you are just aimlessly wandering around, pretend you are trying to get somewhere. Obviously I am not being a dick and running people over.

      Being over six feet tall does help, but anyone of any size or gender can do it. Works great at concerts too.

      Though sometimes the lady in red grabs my attention and I walk face first into an agent... doh!

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Take your space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But the female place is behind the male (except for the minefields etc) - everybody knows that, so why was she upset?

    4. Re:Take your space by retech · · Score: 3, Funny

      Amen! I do the same thing. At nearly 6' 6" I just act like a wall and let them hit me. Then enjoy the squirming as they look up and try to apologize out of it. It's a good moment to let them know what rude asshats they are for not paying attention.

    5. Re:Take your space by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      quarter of a second

      Say no more, say no more....

      You should have a passenger verify the time you take looking at the phone, because personally, I don't believe it.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re: Take your space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a special snowflake just like you. It's okay for us to use cellphones when driving but not anyone else. We are special and know how to do it safely. Rules are for other people.

    7. Re:Take your space by stevedog · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that probably was pretty funny. Except that, when accounting for the retail cost of the phone, you almost certainly caused over $500 of damage. Then, when you charged him with assault (which would be dismissed), he would have your name and would then charge you with felony vandalism, for which you would be convicted, probably summarily. Now you can't vote in most states, carry a firearm, or get a decent job. Oopsies!

    8. Re:Take your space by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If they maintain their lane, and just follow the traffic rules robotically then there is no problem. When I was a kid I'd walk and read a book at the same time, no problem. The problem is that people aren't following the traffic rules when they are paying attention, so when they're not paying attention they're just sortof stumbling into the street without knowing what the state is. If they're practiced in following the rules, they can do that on autopilot and they'll wait for the light to change before crossing without consciously even realizing they had stopped for it. And they'll maintain their lane, too.

    9. Re: Take your space by Aighearach · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, it is the best way to get through a rough neighborhood. If you can walk tall, confident, but not swaggering or strutting, you can pass right through almost anything. You do have to weave around gang-bangers, you can't crash into them, but if you maintain the right walk they usually won't even see you, you're just background. If they're also walking, they always make room for me, I only have to weave around them when they're loitering. I've done that in most major American cities, and I've never had a problem.

      In fact, the places I have had problems have been small towns, usually without sidewalks. Places where it doesn't matter how you walk, because there isn't enough traffic for it to matter.

      As somebody who lived in rough neighborhoods as a teen, one thing I picked up on: You're actually less likely to get shot/stabbed or randomly assaulted there. A lot of people have some means of self defense. Picking a fight could get you shot, so people don't pick fights unless you're obviously walking scared. You're unlikely to get robbed in a drug neighborhood, for example, because most people either don't have anything to steal, or have a weapon, or will fight to the death over their last $2. There are people getting robbed, but the perp knows the victim, and knows they have drugs, or knows they have money that they're trying to buy drugs with.

      The neighborhood where you might get stabbed over stupid shit is usually a University Neighborhood, the same place where you're likely to be assaulted by strangers. Those high crime neighborhoods, they're stabbing/shooting people that they know, and have a real dispute with. Don't borrow/loan money, don't borrow/loan drugs, don't arrange drug deals that might go bad, etc., and they probably won't involve you.

    10. Re:Take your space by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Good luck with that when you have a policeman as a witness about who walked into whom.

      You'd have as much chance of getting a refund from DeVry on their JD program. Which you should try.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Take your space by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      I do that already, and they really do move after you stop. They'll only crash into you when you're both in motion and it is no-fault.

    12. Re:Take your space by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Except that in cities we have this concept of "keep right* except when passing." There is room for travel in both directions. If there isn't room, the obstruction is on one person's side, or the other person's side. The person on the side of the obstruction is expected to wait. Some people, mostly youngsters, haven't figured this out. But it is actually somewhat rare. Most of the people will sort themselves to the correct lane if you force them to. You're not in "their" way if you're on the right side of the sidewalk.

      * Some locations use a different side than this.

    13. Re: Take your space by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Humans are animals. All animals have instincts. I've walked through some rougher neighborhoods than most people will ever encounter in their lives.

      You know what startled people? I said "hi". A white guy walking through the bad part of the projects, most adults went inside and locked the doors. No good in their lives has ever come from a white person. But they kept an eye out as I passed, making sure that I passed. The neighborhood kids ran up and made all sorts of odd and racist comments. I just said "hi" with a smile and kept walking. A number of them followed me to my friend's house. The crime is high because "everyone" knows that the police doesn't go there. The people were nice, but the predators, none out at the time, know that they have no accountability in such neighborhoods.

    14. Re:Take your space by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Nothing pisses off a 3-wide group of assholes more than walking towards them, not dashing to the side, then stopping as you get close, so that they have to consciously split to get past. If you keep walking into them, they think you are the asshole. If you stop and make them think about themselves, then they get it.

    15. Re: Take your space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Take it easy there little fella. Boasting about your gun isn't gonna make your dick stop being small.

    16. Re:Take your space by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am with you on this. If you have a place to go, walk with determination. Don't look like you are in a hurry, just go.

      You left out the most important part: Don't look at anyone. You must look through them, as if they were below your notice entirely. Once you appear not just to have someplace to go but also to be completely oblivious of anyone in your path, that is when they tend to move out of your way of their own accord.

      It doesn't hurt that I'm over two meters and twenty stone, of course. If you're small, prepare to be ignored even harder.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Take your space by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except that in cities we have this concept of "keep right* except when passing." There is room for travel in both directions. If there isn't room, the obstruction is on one person's side, or the other person's side. The person on the side of the obstruction is expected to wait. Some people, mostly youngsters, haven't figured this out. But it is actually somewhat rare. Most of the people will sort themselves to the correct lane if you force them to. You're not in "their" way if you're on the right side of the sidewalk.

      * Some locations use a different side than this.

      Some people find this keep right except to pass on a sidewalk a strange concept... I think it's even in our motor vehicle act. Even on a sparsely populated suburban sidewalk I keep to the right edge so if a runner or a faster walker comes up behind me, I'm predictable and they can pass with ease. It irritates me to see slow walkers erratically walking all over the sidewalk making it difficult to pass.

      Sometimes people will walk two abreast, which is fine, but if you saw an oncoming walker you think you'd go single file. A surprising number of people (not just youngsters) fail to do this. I don't bowl them down, but I just keep walking till I'm a step from them, stop, then let them negotiate the fact that they can't just walk straight.

    18. Re:Take your space by aXis100 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's plenty of time when "lanes" on a footpath dissapear and you have to be more dynamic in your pathfinding. People looking at their smarphone arent doing this to the point that it's rude.

    19. Re: Take your space by glitch23 · · Score: 2

      Humans are not animals, unless you have chosen to fall for the lie of evolution. If you have fallen for that then by extension you believe that we have no morals to abide by (animals kill out of instinct so that means we can too). But humans know right from wrong and can choose to act accordingly. Animals, not so much. If you still disagree then you shouldn't mind people killing each other out of instinct. So the question is, would you mind that? Being mere animals also means we are no longer responsible for our actions because everything is an instinct rather than being based on a moral code of conduct. I advise you to rethink your statement. It has far reaching consequences.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    20. Re:Take your space by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      They usually figure out to get on their side of the walk by the time we meet.

      I like the look on their face when I stop, and they walk into shadow and then stop, and then look up... my nose.

      However the city I live in is laid out rather dumbly with every store putting tones of shit all over the too-narrow sidewalk,

      Futbol!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re: Take your space by RuffMasterD · · Score: 2

      Dang, you must think humans are special or something. I can't think of a single period in history when people weren't mindlessly killing each other, let alone other animals.

      Right now we have Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, Central African Republic, and Israel vs Palestine. Mexico just killed 43 students, plus countless other drug cartel related deaths we never hear about. A few years ago it was Libya, Egypt, and Mali. Since the end of the second world war... Pol Pot comes to mind, for killing 25% of the people of Cambodia in the 1970s. Rwanda genocide wiped out between 500,000 and 1,000,000 Rwandans during a 100 day period in 1994. Vietnam War, nuff said. The first and second world wars were simply meat grinders. The Nazis hardly even bothered to disguise the herding and butchering like animals of thousands of civilians per day.

      Humans are animals. We strut around in our fancy clothes, scratching ourselves, picking our noses, and pointing bang sticks at the other tribe.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    22. Re:Take your space by rioki · · Score: 2

      Funny you say that. i have noticed that this depends on the size of the city. For example, I currently live in a medium sized European city (Karlsruhe, Garmany). This is the largest city in the area and as a result many people "go to town"; which results in quite a chaos in down town on a Saturday. The average person is incapable of negotiating a crowded area. In contrast, cities like Paris, Berlin or Munich this was never an issue. The flow of people is almost always running quite smoothly... until a Tourist stumbles on the scene. You also don't see many people using their smartphone while walking; because you can't. If you use your smart phone you either get bumped into or run in front of a tram or bus.

    23. Re:Take your space by mlts · · Score: 2

      I have given up on theaters except for the Alamo Drafthouse here in Austin. Where other theaters have the constant people prattling and tapping on their devices, I have seen the ADH ushers be pretty proactive at tossing the texters and the yakkers out.

      Long term, with people's tempers already raw, I wonder how long it will take until brawls start happening because people end up just sick and tired of the phone zombies, be it the cretin with one finger in his ear, screaming into his phone, or the people expecting others to clear a trail for them on the road. It only is a matter of time before this starts rubbing people past their breaking point.

      As for lanes... good luck with that as pedestrians, that is great in theory, but once you get the people walking 3-5 abreast, that idea is going to go out the window unless there is a physical barrier preventing people from doing that.

    24. Re:Take your space by dave-man · · Score: 2

      I don't think this is a smartphone problem. I think it is an attention and etiquette problem. Children in particular are not educated by the parents to have good manners. Keeps me out of malls and on Amazon.

      --
      Bill Gates is a communist -- he's just more equal than the rest of us.
    25. Re:Take your space by MarbleMunkey · · Score: 2

      They usually figure out to get on their side of the walk by the time we meet.

      I like the look on their face when I stop, and they walk into shadow and then stop, and then look up... my nose.

      This! So much this!
      I've had people (usually college age girls) walk right into me; No clue that I was even there. The reactions are priceless.

    26. Re:Take your space by nightsky30 · · Score: 2

      Can the beeper sound like, "DERP, DERP"?

  2. Cellphone morons by technical_maven · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love walking in to people like that on purpose and then saying, "Oh... Sorry..." I secretly hope they drop their damn phone!

    1. Re:Cellphone morons by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

      Use more force to ensure success.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Cellphone morons by nitehawk214 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Learn from hockey. Lead with the shoulder, if you are a bit taller crouch down a bit to catch them in the chest. If you are short, jump a bit right at the moment of contact, the refs will never call charging on the short guys.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  3. Re:List of folks with permanent rights of way by pspahn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    3. Bicyclists

    You haven't ridden a bike since you were 16, have you?

    Do you think cyclists feel entitled to their right of way to the point where they are oblivious to oncoming collisions? If that were true, don't you think after, say, six months, there wouldn't be any cyclists left because they had all been run over?

    Walking down the street with a screen attached to your face and being oblivious to the world around you is a lot different than riding a bike through a busy intersection and dodging every third car driven by someone with a screen attached to their face.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  4. Re:List of folks with permanent rights of way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you think cyclists feel entitled to their right of way to the point where they are oblivious to oncoming collisions?

    Yes.

  5. Re:List of folks with permanent rights of way by ATMAvatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    3. Bicyclists

    That one goes both ways. I see plenty of entitled cyclists asserting right of way when they don't have it, but I have also seen a number of times where drivers are either oblivious or malicious to bicyclists, nearly running them down. This includes cases where there are bike lanes and the cars feel the need to cross into said lanes for nothing more than getting around another car or running through crosswalks despite the signal and despite having a red.

    tl:dr: people are dicks, especially on the road

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  6. Re:List of folks with permanent rights of way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You haven't ridden a bike since you were 16, have you?

    Do you think cyclists feel entitled to their right of way to the point where they are oblivious to oncoming collisions? If that were true, don't you think after, say, six months, there wouldn't be any cyclists left because they had all been run over?

    You haven't driven a car through a city since you were 16, right?

  7. Learned to drive where... by niftymitch · · Score: 2

    One very real issue is where someone grew up
    and learned the rules of the road. Phones and distracted
    walking make it all worse.

    There are nations with left hand and right hand auto driving.
    Pedestrian bias is shaped by these early days and parents.

    Many communities now have a large enough community of newcomers
    that these habits collide on the sidewalk. Mericans in Stralia, Brits
    in France, .... India, Japan, Indonesia,,.... all nations now have a large enough
    influx of newcomers that this is important.

    I first encountered this at airports. Then the powered walkways seemed
    to make it go away but.. no it is still there....

    Worse or perhaps more importantly Mericans have highly controlled cross walks
    for K-12 students. Students do not learn to look all ways for traffic. They simply
    step out -- many will wait for a light but many not. No officer blows a whistle and
    hollers get yer butt off the road. No one hollers get a move on you are blocking
    traffic. Entitlement like turtles goes all the way down...

    Universities have always had pedestrian accidents as egg heads oblivious to the world forget that
    they have left the safe roads of the school and stepped into townie roads. This and the
    localized communities of H1B visa holder make this obvious in some parts of the US.
    Other nations have the same problems with clusters of expats.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  8. New App! by retech · · Score: 3, Funny

    Time to make an app that warns people when they're about to collide.

  9. Re:Maybe Not by JustNiz · · Score: 3

    seriously if you're trying to get someone arrested/fined/sent to court just because they accidentally bumped into you on the sidewalk, then you have a much bigger issue than they do.

  10. Last week ... by Martin+S. · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last week when I was driving to work as was approaching a traffic light that turned from red to green as I approached. I noticed a youth crossing the other side, head phones in and face down in his phone, slowed down in anticipation of him walking out in front of me. He did, I braked and blew my horn in warning and stopped and stepped backwards onto the central refuge and launched into a tirade of abuse and offensive gestures. Despite the fact I'd just saved him from serious injury at minimum as a result of his own stupidity.

    You just cannot help some people.

    1. Re:Last week ... by redelm · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might be right or you might be wrong: Most places, traffic entering an intersection on the green must yield to traffic already in the intersection. That would include yielding to a pedestrian who got half-way across unless the crosswalk was clearly two-phases (London), usually with railings.

      Of course smart pedestrians expect aggressive drivers. And smart drivers know better than to blow through fresh greens.

    2. Re:Last week ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am not the gpp you responded to...

      I am a native Californian who was taught both that pedestrians have the right of way in crosswalks and that it would be shameful to walk out into one against the lights, including entering with the flashing don't walk sign that is equivalent to a yellow light for drivers. People who crossed randomly in mid-block would be ticketed for jay-walking if observed by a cop, and found at fault if they were run down by a car. As a bicyclist I was taught that I should ride in the roadway and follow vehicle rules including direction of travel, signaling turns, and observing traffic control signals and right-of-way rules.

      Continuing to live in California now in my forties, I observe so much behavior that is counter to what I was taught and obeyed. I don't know if it is all immigration with newcomers having learned different rules. Or, it might just be a general erosion of a sense of civic responsibility. Or I might just be turning into a cranky old man who complains about kids these days.

      I frequently bicycle to work using a circuitous route that links scenic paths and bike lanes to minimize my time sharing lanes with cars. I have seen more close calls in the past few years than I saw in my entire life before, with cars clearly running red lights, overtaking and swerving across bike lanes with no concern for cyclists occupying the lane, etc. I have also seen so many cyclists and pedestrians doing equivalently careless things like crossing against lights, ignoring direction of travel rules, and mindlessly entering and leaving the roadway without looking.

    3. Re:Last week ... by dj245 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am not the gpp you responded to...

      I am a native Californian who was taught both that pedestrians have the right of way in crosswalks and that it would be shameful to walk out into one against the lights, including entering with the flashing don't walk sign that is equivalent to a yellow light for drivers. People who crossed randomly in mid-block would be ticketed for jay-walking if observed by a cop, and found at fault if they were run down by a car. As a bicyclist I was taught that I should ride in the roadway and follow vehicle rules including direction of travel, signaling turns, and observing traffic control signals and right-of-way rules.

      Continuing to live in California now in my forties, I observe so much behavior that is counter to what I was taught and obeyed. I don't know if it is all immigration with newcomers having learned different rules. Or, it might just be a general erosion of a sense of civic responsibility. Or I might just be turning into a cranky old man who complains about kids these days.

      I frequently bicycle to work using a circuitous route that links scenic paths and bike lanes to minimize my time sharing lanes with cars. I have seen more close calls in the past few years than I saw in my entire life before, with cars clearly running red lights, overtaking and swerving across bike lanes with no concern for cyclists occupying the lane, etc. I have also seen so many cyclists and pedestrians doing equivalently careless things like crossing against lights, ignoring direction of travel rules, and mindlessly entering and leaving the roadway without looking.

      Police used to issue tickets for these things. But sitting in a speed trap maximizes more revenue. I have never heard of anyone in my lifetime (30 years) getting a ticket for actual unsafe driving, despite seeing it every day. Everyone I know has gotten a speeding ticket however.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  11. Re:List of folks with permanent rights of way by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He's saying the truth. 8-9 / 10 asshats on bikes don't follow the rules of the road that they are legally required to. Just a few things:

    1: don't stop for stop signs... many times not even slowing down, then expecting traffic to magically not hit them. I have personally witnessed several tickets being handed out to them since my city is FINALLY starting to crack down on them, they will even do it right in front of a cop....
    2: riding on sidewalks instead of using the apparently wasted bike lanes, and hitting people walking ( you know the ones that belong on the sidewalks ). Happens with different asshats several times a month in my city alone, and I doubt it is a fluke since you see all the other asshattery anywhere you go. Hell because of #1 I have been hit by a stupid ass biker in a fucking crosswalk with the light in MY favor.
    3: they observe speed limits worse than 4-wheel car drivers. School zone? Still going as fast as possible, on the sidewalk where they don't belong. They should be ticketed just as if a car was speeding ( this does occasionally happen, just needs to more often).

    There you go, took mere minutes to come up with just a few things that 80% of the observed bike riders do to make everyone look down on bike riders. Sucks for the last 10-20% that actually are courteous, but then maybe THEY should start bashing heads of the rest if they want their image to look better.

    --
    To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  12. Re:List of folks with permanent rights of way by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Idaho bicycles can treat stop signs as yield signs. When a bike does a "rolling-stop" through a stop-sign, it is called an "Idaho stop." Many states are legalizing it. It passes most places it is considered. Expect it to be the norm in 20 years. Just like, there was a time where only a few states allowed a right turn at a red light; now it is nearly universal. Because it works. My dad told me a story about driving in the midwest when he was a kid, and they didn't have that rule yet. He made a right turn on red, and had people shouting at him for just brazenly running a light! lol "it just seemed so natural"

    In my State bicycles are allowed to use the sidewalks. Also, vechicles with 3-or-less wheels that are hardware limited to 15mph or less are considered bicycles, and can also use the sidewalk. (this was to allow Segways without going into the weeds and endorsing specific wheel configurations) Luckily, pedestrians have the right-of-way and the bicycles are required to always yield.

    The speed limit applies to the street, not the sidewalk. They'll beat that ticket. However, many places have a rule that bicycles on the sidewalk have to go walking speed, so there might be a different non-speeding ticket they can get. Most cyclists don't actually go over the 20MPH of a school zone, certainly not over 25 which is the normal real speed. (limit+5 is standard for cars, except in places where it is limit+8)

    There are real problems with cyclists that ride poorly and don't follow the rules, but I'm not convinced you know the rules well enough that you're driving according to them. ;)

  13. The obvious solution: STOP by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 2

    All these replies, and not one person has said that they would stop.

    I always stop if someones coming at me with a phone. 9 times out of 10, for whatever reason, they process a static object in-front of them differently and look up before collision. Most likely also apologizing to me at the same time.

    If 2 walkers collide, it could be said that they were both negligent. If someone walks into you though, they look like a complete dumbass and cannot possibly blame you (after all you are simply standing there, already staring at them angrily)

    --
    -
  14. Re:List of folks with permanent rights of way by mjwx · · Score: 2

    3. Bicyclists

    You haven't ridden a bike since you were 16, have you?

    Do you think cyclists feel entitled to their right of way to the point where they are oblivious to oncoming collisions?

    You haven't ridden a bike since you were 16 have you.

    Cyclists will happily turn into traffic without as second thought and expect everyone else to get out their way. I've got a nice highlight reel from my dashcam of cyclists behaving badly. Some of my favourites are people riding right at me the wrong way down the road... and they're all on the road because they hate slower pedestrians getting in their way the same way cyclists get in the way of motorists (oh the irony).

    People walking with their heads buried in their phones are extremely rude, but the Lycra warriors on their bikes are the gods that the rude and inconsiderate pray to. They have no consideration for other road users and are so arrogant that they never believe anything they do can be wrong.

    If that were true, don't you think after, say, six months, there wouldn't be any cyclists left because they had all been run over?

    No, the cyclists are trying to get laws changed in every western country to make the driver automatically responsible for any accident with a cyclist regardless of what actually happened. One of the big reasons I have a dash cam is because cyclists are so reckless. This has only been reinforced by new research in my city (Perth, Western Australia) that cyclists are at fault the majority of the time (along the lines of 60% of collisions).

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  15. Anecdotes from Germany ... by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    Germans are sort of polite, but they have some anoyingly stupid habits that I've only seen here:

    1.) When a train stops, those wanting to get on will group around the doors and give those wanting to get of a hard time in doing so. It's a site like from a Monty Python sketch. Like sheep you often have to shove them aside. I've resolved to boldly stepping straight out and onto the feet of anybody standing smack in the middle of the way and making loud suggestions on how to organise things so the people getting off can do so quickly for the benefit of all.

    2.) Blocking the left side of escalators. Really annoying! I recently was to belgium and was astonished how orderly people standing on an escalator would move to the right side, so that people could walk on the left side. I was so astonished I pulled out my camera and took a series of pictures of this "phenomenon". ... Not so in Germany. Regularly people will stop and stand wherever they like to, no matter if they're blocking the way or not. I've resolved to the habit of just about stepping on peoples heels and breathing into their ear if they're unneccessarily blocking the way. Stupid remarks are riposted with witty "... or you could just stand on the right side just like everybody else in every other country on the planet." ... Usually shuts them up. I've actually seen people embarassed because of this. Good.

    3.) As for people mindlessly tumbling about with their smartphones and earplugs: That annoys me greatly, especially in public spaces that are crowded and where you have to expect frequent social interaction, like on a crowded trainstation during rush-hour. ... Take out your f*cking earplugs and put them in when you've found your place on the train, for goodness sake! Nowadays, whenever I try to address someone and he doesn't listen because of earplugs and/or audio cranked up to max, I usually just push or pull them aside gently. Some are so zoned out they're actually OK with that. ... Guess electronic escapisim is shaping our social interaction in that way too.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca