Slashdot Mirror


Linux Kernel Switching To Linux v4.0, Coming With Many New Addons

An anonymous reader writes Following polling on Linus Torvald's Google+ page, he's decided to make the next kernel version Linux 4.0 rather than Linux 3.20. Linux 4.0 is going to bring many big improvements besides the version bump with there being live kernel patching, pNFS block server support, VirtIO 1.0, IBM z13 mainframe support, new ARM SoC support, and many new hardware drivers and general improvements. Linux 4.0 is codenamed "Hurr durr I'ma sheep."

14 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. Re:New version! by invictusvoyd · · Score: 5, Funny

    No . Systemd now includes a new daemon called kerneld 4.0 .. and all these afre included in .... .... .... EMACS mwhahahahaha

  2. Linus Git message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    .. after extensive statistical analysis of my G+ polling, I've come to
    the inescapable conclusion that internet polls are bad.

    Big surprise.

    But "Hurr durr I'ma sheep" trounced "I like online polls" by a 62-to-38%
    margin, in a poll that people weren't even supposed to participate in.
    Who can argue with solid numbers like that? 5,796 votes from people who
    can't even follow the most basic directions?

    In contrast, "v4.0" beat out "v3.20" by a slimmer margin of 56-to-44%,
    but with a total of 29,110 votes right now.

    Now, arguably, that vote spread is only about 3,200 votes, which is less
    than the almost six thousand votes that the "please ignore" poll got, so
    it could be considered noise.

    But hey, I asked, so I'll honor the votes.

    Source

  3. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it's the kernel. systemd is a crap load of applications. Applications that ignore stderr, drop higher priority syslog messages, and ignores nonzero exit statuses.

    What the fuck is up with you trolls repeating these stupid lies?

    systemd may or may not have problems, but it demonstrably does not "ignore stderr, drop higher priority syslog messages, [or] ignore nonzero exit statuses".

    If it does, or ever has done, any of these things where is the fucking bug report.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  4. Re:New version! by Ash-Fox · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it does, or ever has done, any of these things where is the fucking bug report.

    The server running the bug reporting solution dropped the bug report.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  5. Re:Unprofessional by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well Toyota did release the MR2 in France....

  6. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by stjobe · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Hurr durr I'ma sheep" won over the alternative "I like online polls" which got 38% of the votes. ...in a vote Torvalds asked people not to vote in, and yet 5,796 people did.

    In the real poll, "v4.0" beat out "v3.20" by 56% to 44% out of 29,110 votes.

    Since nobody ever use the kernel code name, it doesn't matter in the slightest what it's called. Everyone will refer to the kernel as "4.0".

    --
    "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  7. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if those "technical arguments" are lies?

    Seriously -- there are no reliable reports of systemd doing what these anonymous trolls report it as doing.

    One of the advances of systemd is that it does log stderr from processes it starts, so some clown has decided to complain that it doesn't.

    There are no reliable reports of this behaviour -- it's all a bunch of AC posts on Slashdot plus one on Reddit (which was immediatley refuted), plus a few paranoid claims about bug reports being "deleted". How do you delete a bug report from bugzilla? You can't.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  8. Re:New version! by awing0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, exactly. I'm running Debian Jessie and I'm not really comfortable with binary logs. It takes decades of log practice and throws it away. For what? Search capability? Maybe there's some security benefit, honestly I don't know enough about it to comment. I'll be forwarding my logs to nice text files for the foreseeable future though, until I for one welcome my new systemd overlord.

    --
    Cthulhu Saves.
  9. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    when you say 'the UNIX way of things', you mean like AIX does, like Solaris does or like HPUX does? because those UNIX stopped using custom scripts years ago

  10. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, exactly. I'm running Debian Jessie and I'm not really comfortable with binary logs.

    The default configuration on Debian Jessie is to log everything to syslogd as before.

    What difference did you notice in the logging?

    I'll be forwarding my logs to nice text files for the foreseeable future though

    Why are you doing that? The system already does it for you.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  11. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's a bold statement.

  12. Re:New version! by Megol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most Unix stuff doesn't follow the Unix "way of doing things"...
    Wake up, this is the real world...

  13. Single Quote? by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All I'm wondering is whether there has ever been a single quote in the codename before? Virtually guaranteed to break someone's build system...

  14. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, Linux is only on embedded devices. It's not running on my phone, laptop, desktop, and server at all.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.