Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Closing Two Phone Factories In China

randomErr writes: Microsoft is closing two factories in China by the end of March. About 9,000 people worked in these factories, and those jobs were cut a while back as part of the company's major restructuring after its Nokia purchase. Much of the equipment located in these factories from Beijing and the southeastern city of Dongguan is being shipped to Vietnam.

85 comments

  1. ANTITRUST BURGER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hold the competition!

  2. Well, Dice finally did it by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Informative

    They finally got rid of the ability to follow comment histories on the nobeta. Now it's impossible to see if a comment has been replied to and following any comment thread has to be done manually, one post at a time.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by NotDrWho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a fucking shame This site used to be so great back in the day. I remember when it was routine to see postings with over 1,000 comments (don't be fooled by my UID, I've been here a LONG time). And I'm still not sure why Dice seems so absolutely determined to kill it off. But man, have they done a great job of it! Even after the outcry against the Beta, they are just DETERMINED to FORCE it on us. They're like a drunk friend who wants to fight you tooth-and-nail to get into that car and drive off that cliff. He is just GOING TO DRIVE OFF THAT CLIFF, no matter how many times you plead with him and warn him.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really shouldn't post AC, Timothy.

    3. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Soulskill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just a bug. Will be back.

    4. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Soylent site has more usability issues than /. Beta ever did. Just because you want a site to look like it was designed in 1999, doesn't mean it has to function like one.

    5. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The bug will be back? Well of course it will, you guys can't program worth shit.

    6. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by blind+biker · · Score: 2

      Genuine question (no flamebait): what procedures does does Dice follow to do software testing before release? There has been an interesting amount of bugs introduced lately, in the Slashdot interface, like the huge gray strip on the right appearing on Chrome. This bug has been now fixed, so props for that, but it took weeks. Shouldn't it have been caught during the testing phase, before releasing the changes into the live system?

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    7. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Soulskill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not on the Engineering team, and I don't make the Product decisions, so I'm not going to be of much help with your question. Yeah, the bugs probably should have been squashed before releasing -- but the Slashdot codebase is a monster, and there are a lot of edges cases among users, so I think the release is done under the "perfect is the enemy of good" philosophy. Hopefully we can get the big ones taken care of in short order.

    8. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. In fact, I don't know how people are even posting top level comments. I cannot for the life of me find a button to do that on this new jacked up layout. It doesn't help that it renders wrong - text on top of text in a few places, a "Post" checkbox for "Post Anonymously" that is a line above the actual text, etc. All jacked up. I guess I can only reply now. Why wouldn't they test this crap in Chrome?

    9. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      You can get there by adding /comments to the URL. Ex:
      http://slashdot.org/~NotDrWho/...

      Also -- is the "Post" button nearly invisible for everyone else? On my browser, it is teal on teal. I only found it by searching the page.

      Also - when posting, the "buttons" for preview, quote parent, options, and cancel are just regular link text so they kinda vanish too. They need to be buttons.

    10. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the answer, and I agree with the "perfect is the enemy of the good"-philosophy, but the grey right-hand strip bug seemed to affect basically every Chrome user (I wasn't even one to complain, just reading the comments from fellow Chrome users).

      For what it's worth, I wasn't affected by the bug the OP was mentioning.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    11. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Also, the button colors are wrong. I think you meant for them to have a bubble around them. But right now "Post" and "Load All Comments" are showing as teal text on a teal background. Same with "post" "moderate" "moderator help" etc. I only found the post button by searching the page. Similarly, when posting, the buttons for "Preview" "Quote Parent" "Options" and "Cancel" look like regular links. There's no background color or button outline on them.

    12. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Testing phase? That's a clever idea...

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    13. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's in the same spot it's always been, it's just not easily visible because the 'button' effect is missing unless you hover on top of the links.

    14. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There appear to be a lot of Chrome issues, and enough really basic ones to assume that whoever is in charge of testing is either unable or unwilling to include Chrome in testing. If it's the latter, that seems petty.

    15. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it have more than 3 users?

    16. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too. It looks a bit wonky.

    17. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck QAs this? This is literally the second most important function on the site, after being able to comment. How the fuck did this make it into production?

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    18. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by snookiex · · Score: 1

      Just a bug. Will be back.

      The bug or the feature?

      --
      Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
    19. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      The bug will be fixed, and the feature will be back.

    20. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is amusing. Slashdot invented social networks. The world never really noticed. Changes like this remind me why.

    21. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chrome's not even in the repos; you have to use a PPA!

    22. Re:Well, Dice finally did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As one of the big contributors to the nobeta protest last year, one would think that I would protest any change. But this is great. Modern, fast, semantic, works OK on my phone... you're just a few iterations away from a really nice, responsive design.

      Bravo!

  3. Cheaper in Vietnam by monkeyxpress · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Make sense. Chinese wages and standards of living have been increasing rapidly over the last few years, while the political systems/economies in parts of South East Asia are becoming developed enough to provide confidence to foreign investment. Will be interesting to see how China deals with this shift. Hopefully not in the western way, with all the bosses patting themselves on the back for lowering costs while the consumer economy falls apart around them.

    1. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Now I understand Amazon's idea of putting 3d printers on trucks. The factory of the future will be ship or container based, so it can be moved to whichever country provides the cheapest labour at any one time.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Limekiller42 · · Score: 1

      I hadn't heard they were interested in that, but it makes very good sense. One of the big trends in supply chain management is the "push-pull" strategy. Push strategy is when you are forecasting customer demand and trying to get your supply chain optimized to meet it. If you don't get it just right, can end up with shortages (angry customers) or overages (increased holding and order costs). Pull supply chains provide the product as the customer demands it. Sometimes that can work well (Amazon Kindle, since we're talking about Amazon) and sometimes it just doesn't work. Slapping 3rd printers on trucks would be "push-pull" you do some advanced forecasting (how much raw materials to put on that Amazon truck, how many trucks are you going to need), but the pull would not be assembling the product (or printing it....) until you get that customer order.

    3. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Limekiller42 · · Score: 0

      Low cost is the overall Chinese strategy at this point whether it's commoditized cheap labor or keeping their currency as low as possible (which gets them accused of currency manipulation...which is a weird accusation since it's reasonable for nation-states to adopt monetary policies that are in their best interest) so that their goods are very attractive on the world market. If they start losing this cheap labor/currency advantage before they are ready to move their economy into more of a value-add direction, we could see some very bad things happen in the Chinese and global economies.

    4. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it's hilarious to see China losing jobs to a low-cost foreign competitor. How does it feel, bitch?! Not only that but it's a country they used to support militarily. The suck it double bonus.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    5. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      The fact that China is increasingly hostile to the internal use of Western tech (promoting their own OS, banning Apple products, etc) could also be a factor, not to mention things like their anti-monopoly lawsuit against MS. And let's face it, it's not like anyone in China really *paid* for their copy of Windows anyhow.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This shows the danger of the Race To the Bottom concept.

      US/European Manufacturing cannot have dirt cheap labor, but it still isn't dead. Western Manufacturing is value add manufacturing. While you may pay more per device, your device will have a lower refund rate, or more automation on the line, where product are more constantly completed.

      However for the countries who are getting business from just being the cheapest, means once someone can be cheaper than you, then you are out of business, with a population of unskilled -semi-skilled workers out of work, and probably desperate (and that makes them dangerous) and a debt of an expensive infrastructure that hasn't been paid off yet.

      Living in upstate NY, I have seen the effect of a manufacturing losses. Where in the 1970-1980's most jobs started to get shipped overseas, because they were cheaper, and the Pre-WWII buildings and infrastructure wasn't adequate. (We can discuss politics too... However that is still open to a lot of debate). Most towns economy was dependent on one large company once that company leaves the town dies. Because the old manufacturing was only about units out. That can be pushed anywhere. Now that US Manufacturing is slowly coming back, it is about more than cost per unit, but other factors as well... And these new manufacturing are no longer so vital to the economy, that the area can survive after it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it shows the benefits of the wealth transfer system. As the country at the bottom (China) gets an influx of wealth, they are able to rebuild their economy and the employees that save have the opportunity to re-invest in the local economy and flourish. The country has a small bust and then a boom. The small bust is happening now. In 10 years, China will be the USA in 1990. It's just a matter of time now.

      And the best part is we get to improve the standard of living in Vietnam the same way. It's an excellent system.

      And if you ever worked in any of those factory labour jobs from the 1970s, trust me, you'd be happy they don't exist now. My father would come home covered with steam burns because they're dangerous, shitty jobs that people did because they REALLY needed the money. NY is not known for its dangerous employment standards anymore. The triangle shirtwaists have left, and all is for the better.

    8. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The fact that China is increasingly hostile to the internal use of Western tech (promoting their own OS, banning Apple products, etc) could also be a factor

      Um, what?

    9. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not be surprised if the real reason is the Chinese Government's hacking US companies off their "approved purchase" list. I think MS saw the handwriting on the wall.

    10. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Limekiller42 · · Score: 1

      And it shows the benefits of the wealth transfer system. As the country at the bottom (China) gets an influx of wealth, they are able to rebuild their economy and the employees that save have the opportunity to re-invest in the local economy and flourish. The country has a small bust and then a boom. The small bust is happening now. In 10 years, China will be the USA in 1990. It's just a matter of time now..

      Ten years from now China's economy could very well be a smoking ruin because of their command economic policies. Their stock market has very little transparency and investment options for the emerging middle class in China are limited. This case caused the creation of a massive real estate bubble that will burst if it can't be deflated by the Chinese government. The current economic system that China is using is a dangerous blend of crony capitalism and command economics. Don't make the mistake of thinking that China has adopted a free market system similar to what exists in the United States and Europe. China has some very serious systems flaws that will prevent it becoming like the US economy such as lack of transparency and the lack of a independent civil justice system to do things like protect property rights, enforce contracts, and the like.

    11. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      China is in a bind. If they let their currency get stronger, it becomes less of an economic advantage for businesses to make stuff there. If they get oil traded from a currency other than the US dollar, the US economy tanks, and thus, they start incurring losses.

      As someone who shopped around to have something made for a business, if you want something made -well-, you can go to a lot of countries, be it the US, China, Japan, Switzerland, Germany, Canada, Australia, the UK, Israel, France, Russia, Sweden [1], and many others.

      If one wants something made -cheap-, then China are the go-to people. They give "discounts" on rare earths if you have stuff made there.

      Because of this, China can make stuff as good as anyone else, but they can also do it cheap. In fact, I've encountered products that were unusable, not because they came from China... but because the specs given to the Chinese factory made the items that way. Spec pot metal, get pot metal.

      As for shopping around, because the company wanted the product made well, since almost everyone was at the same price point and quality, I ended up just going with a factory that was about 20 miles away and located on a major interstate.

      [1]: Oddly enough, I found that if I did want to offshore, the best bang for buck for what I was looking to build was Sweden.

    12. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      China might have supported Vietnam during the US war but Vietnam and China have gone to war and not just once and if you go far enough back in history you will find China and Vietnam have been enemies far longer than they've been friends. IIRC China has actually invaded and occupied vietnam several times.

    13. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      I believe he referred to banning for use by the Chinese government not by the Chinese people.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    14. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can drop the libertarian buzz words. Issues of property rights, contracts, and command economics are effectively noise.

      Its all just plain old, vanilla corruption. Simple conflict of interest. A concept as old as humanity itself.

      You're in power. You wield that power to benefit yourself and your friends. That is what is happening in China, full stop. The PRC is an elite social class that controls business and government. The rulers are the owners.

      This causes the lack of an independent civil justice system - The elite are immune to prosecution for bad actions, and wield the power to create unjust prosecution on opponents.
      This causes the lack of protection of property rights - The elite take what they want.
      This causes lack of enforcement of contracts - (You should get the idea of what's going on by now)

      The problems you state are artifacts of corruption, not the other way around.

    15. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, I've encountered products that were unusable, not because they came from China... but because the specs given to the Chinese factory made the items that way. Spec pot metal, get pot metal.

      Anything you don't specify precisely gets done the cheapest possible way, sometimes with amazing ingenuity. Parts omitted, sloppy tolerances, surfaces left unfinished, cheaper materials--just good enough so that most of the widgets will work out-of-the-box.

    16. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by johanw · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an adequate descriptionof the USA.

    17. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China's free market is indeed freer than the US market, despite whatever someone might have taught you. That being said, it isn't a free market. Neither is the US. Don't believe me?

      Open a lemonade stand on your front lawn (Preferably somewhere public enough you'll be noticed and make a good amount of cash). No, none of the paperwork bullshit. Just take a hammer, saw, nails and paint and put the stand together. Sell lemonade. I'll be nice and even say collect the taxes.

      See how long you stay in business (and avoid jail!) and get back to me with "free market".

      Now, do the same thing in China. I bet if you "forget" to collect taxes, you only have to pay a bribe and you're back in business.

    18. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open a lemonade stand on your front lawn (Preferably somewhere public enough you'll be noticed and make a good amount of cash). No, none of the paperwork bullshit....See how long you stay in business (and avoid jail!) and get back to me with "free market".

      Kids still do that around here without any problems other than attracting summer flies and the occasional yellow jacket. Certainly there are some jurisdictions (maybe even entire states) where the kids would get a lesson in government run amok, but in most places, they'll be fine. If you can really generalize so zealously from a handful of news stories, you must think the entire country is currently overrun with escaped llamas. There are no absolutely free markets, but to judge two nations' economic freedoms based on a comparison of curb-side lemonade stand feasibility is simply moronic.

      - T

    19. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Yeah, exactly. I didn't phrase that very clearly.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    20. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by unixisc · · Score: 1

      And after the Sino-Soviet split, Vietnam was more an ally of the Soviets against China, and topped the China backed Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia. They are 2 of the 4 parties in territorial disputes over islands in the South China Sea

    21. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so hilarious if you happen to be one of the people who lost their job, I bet.

    22. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so hilarious if you happen to be one of the people who lost their job, I bet..

    23. Re:Cheaper in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I posted to the wrong comment.

  4. It's a start... by MagickalMyst · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if they would only close the shop in Redmond.

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
  5. Move from Dongguan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Just a year or so after the new Chinese president shuts down the rampant prostitution in the area, a move which made an estimated 100.000 girls unemployed.

    I see what you are really after Microsoft production managers.

  6. Market Labor Forces by Limekiller42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This shouldn't surprise anyone. If you commoditize your labor market (which means you are competing on price) you run the risk that someone else will offer a cheaper alternative. If you can't defend your position on price, you have to compete with some sort of other value add like offering skilled labor. If you can't do that, you've got a real problem.

  7. Always a cheaper fish... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    Given that China has historically been the nominally-communist-but-attractively-cheap-and-open-for-business destination, they can't be entirely surprised that Vietnam is now cutting into their action.

    That aside, though, I wonder if this is more or less purely cost focused, or whether the quasi-mercantalist Chinese government policies aimed at aiding domestic firms and speeding up acquisition of foreign firms' tech has a bigger role? They aren't necessarily irrational, given that competing on price and low environmental standards isn't exactly a fun game, even when you are winning it; but such policies presumably do encourage foreign firms to head for the exit more quickly at the same time as they reduce the impact of their doing so.

    1. Re:Always a cheaper fish... by Limekiller42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's likely a cost-play. If you build your economy on the concept of commoditized labor (where you are just competing with others on price rather than other value adds), you run this risk which is that others will offer that commodity cheaper. As China's living standards move up, the wages are moving with it and that is causing a problem for the Chinese leadership. They also have a massive real estate bubble that could wreck their own economy pretty badly and also have a pretty painful global impact.

    2. Re:Always a cheaper fish... by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 1

      Well, it's kind of too late for Microsoft. The locals has already learned and adapted. Cost will be lower in Vietnam but will cost for Microsoft in Vietnam be lower than the cost for Xiaomi in China? China is Xiaomi's domestic market and unlike our government, the Chinese government actual cares about keeping its citizens employed and earning a living. Sure, it's not a great living for most, but it is improving.

      It's sad to see communist authoritarians beating the capitalist democrats in the world economy.

    3. Re:Always a cheaper fish... by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

      Well, China has been playing games with taxes and regulation a bit lately and a properly outfitted labor camp anywhere convenient in China has become exorbitantly costly. I think Made in Vietnam is just a stopgap. Myanmar next? The day when major corporations own and operate their own countries is not too far off. Pesky governments always wanting their cut and all....

  8. Why don't they just give up? by AqD · · Score: 0

    They already lost. Their market share is so tiny to the point that continuing existence would make no difference to their overall image.

    The best thing they can do now is to make their own version of Android on Nokia and push the market bit by bit by superior quality / lower cost which means huge amounts of $$$, until all other brands are finished and then they could dump it.

    It's not gonna happen though.

    1. Re:Why don't they just give up? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't understand how business works.

      Also, Windows Phone is already better quality than Android, by a mile, and they're significantly cheaper.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Why don't they just give up? by AqD · · Score: 1

      By quality I mean the hardware specs, not how the phone actually performs, because given 4 cores and 2+GB RAM most people cannot feel the sluggishness of Android anyway. By hardware they're not cheaper than Indian or Chinese phones such as OnePlus, and they still block vendors from crippling the UI or adding garbage so it's unlikely these vendors will shift their focus from Android to WP in foreseeable future.

      Either way it's not helping their market. They're actually trying to make great products and that's why they gonna fail this time.

    3. Re:Why don't they just give up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Windows Phone ... and they're significantly cheaper.

      The reason that Windows Phones are 'cheaper' is that they are being sold heavily discounted to try to gain market share. When Nokia had the phone division is never made a profit in any quarter (though Nokia as a whole did) in spite of being subsidised $1 billion per year. Now we don't know how much Microsoft is losing. They are being bought because they are cheap, not because they are Windows.

    4. Re:Why don't they just give up? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      They already lost. Their market share is so tiny to the point that continuing existence would make no difference to their overall image.

      The best thing they can do now is to make their own version of Android on Nokia and push the market bit by bit by superior quality / lower cost which means huge amounts of $$$, until all other brands are finished and then they could dump it.

      It's not gonna happen though.

      I somehow get the sense that they're headed that way! Like OneNote for Android, which one has to separately get from the Play store, allows you to draw, whereas the one that comes w/ Windows Phone doesn't! Go figure!

      The OS and the UI themselves were fantastic, and unlike Windows 8.x for PCs, Windows Phone 8.x is great! Problem is that most great apps are either iOS only or iOS and Android, but most of them have punted on Windows Phone. My Lumia recently malfunctioned - the battery stopped charging. I had the opportunity to simply get it exchanged for another, but I grabbed the opportunity to replace it w/ a Moto-X, and I couldn't be happier.

      Also, Verizon, while it still offers Windows Phones from HTC, seems to have stopped offering the Lumia Icons. The Windows Phones are probably now the smartphones for the Third World, where people don't use apps beyond Whatsapp, Camera, FaceBook, Twitter and Skype

    5. Re:Why don't they just give up? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I have seen a lot of garbage apps on Windows Phone, a lot of them being web wrappers. The hardware - the 510 is as cheap as anything else in the market, and in markets where people don't use phones to scan Q-readers, or read a credit card, or connect through an internet phone, or work for Uber, a Windows phone is just fine.

    6. Re:Why don't they just give up? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I think their only cheap phones are their bottom of the line phones, like 510s. Above that, they are at par pricewise w/ iPhones and Galaxies. Problem is that they lack a lot of the apps that would make one want to prefer a smartphone to one of the older Symbian based phones. Hence they hardly move. In the Microsoft store in the city where I live, I've seen employees carry iPhones IN ADDITION to their Lumias.

  9. outsourcers have been outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Underpaid labor is cheaper in Vietnam.

  10. Re:leave this mess. by Soulskill · · Score: 1

    Actually, we scrubbed the beta. Announcement here. The only thing we've rolled out today was a new header and removing the left-hand nav links, which hardly anybody used.

  11. "global economy" by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At first I thought this was a story of Microsoft heralding a broadsword by bringing their interests home.

    As it tuns out, even the repressed have it bad in the 'global economy'.

    Here it is folks, the wealthy rule the earth.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:"global economy" by Limekiller42 · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that you are wrong, but that's the way repression works. It's a bad thing no matter what economic model you are being repressed in, but it can be...and has been...a whole lost worse for Chinese laborer. China is still much better off in the global economy than what they had before they entered as a player in the global market. Remember it was't all that long ago when Chinese were starving to death by the millions.

  12. Re:leave this mess. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Informative

    It looks like some of the other bugs have been fixed as well - comments were not always full-width, which made it a PITA on large screens. Much appreciated. The message links still work for me (they were an off-and-on thing for quite a while) so it's not harder to follow a discussion or replies to posts ... (shrug).

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  13. Re:H1-b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always imagined a room full of chimpanzees banging away at keyboards.

  14. Re:leave this mess. by chihowa · · Score: 1

    I really appreciate the removal of the left sidebar, actually. This new layout, as totally fucked and buggy as it is in so many ways, at least gives ample room to the comments. Deep comments are still not handled well, where after ten comments deep the nesting gets screwed up.

    Bugs aside, this is a huge improvement over Beta, which basically ignored the fact that the comments are the only thing that make this site worth visiting. A little testing would help, though. This layout is broken on every browser I try. What browser are the devs testing it on?

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  15. Even American Idols have become commodities by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    Everything becomes a commodity when too much of it is produced. This goes for gadgets, fastfood, pulp fiction, and yes even American Idols and pornography.

    1. Re:Even American Idols have become commodities by Limekiller42 · · Score: 1

      It's not quantity that makes a product a commodity. Commoditization appears when the market gets to the point where there no or little differentiation in the market so competition becomes one of price. Mobile phones are created in very large quantities (Samsung, Apple, etc), but still command high prices (so high that the cost is hidden inside of subsidized mobile phone plans. We pay a lot of money for these devices). PC computers, on the other hand, are also created in large quantities and have become a commodity market because competitors haven't figured out a good way to differentiate other than on price. Air travel is working the same way. High quantity and low price. Airlines are trying to do some differentiation (SouthWest's boarding policies, selling more leg room, etc) but the market really doesn't seem to be responding and it's still largely a price game. Producing more product that demand does impact price, but it's not because it's a commodity. It's because you screwed up your forecasting and now you have to wait for the market to go back to equilibrium.

  16. Probably the beginning of the end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS has been stuck at 3% or less of market penetration for years. Its mobile division is losing tens of millions of dollars per quarter. At some point, MS will have to pull the plug. Sure, they can carry on like this for years but, at some point, they will look stupid and ridiculous. MS can't afford that.

    1. Re:Probably the beginning of the end by frog_strat · · Score: 1

      Sure, they can carry on like this for years but, at some point, they will look stupid and ridiculous. MS can't afford that.

      Thanks, I just snorted my coffee.

  17. World REJOICE! by Skiron · · Score: 1

    Umm. I read it wrong: "Microsoft Closing: Two Phone Factories In China" I thought it was two stories.

  18. beta crap back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh again we are back at this? whats wrong with the old site?

  19. Re:leave this mess. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Probably not the right thread for it, but you're answering questions, so what the hell!

    Will the non-javascript classic (the REAL classic version) be staying? I prefer that version, but I sometimes have to browse with scripts disabled in order to get it to work (actually, I usually read from Dillo or Links2 neither of which do JS, because I like the responsiveness). Unfortunately, though this means that I can't metamoderate any more since that requires JavaScript.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  20. Personally, I expected an India closure. by tlambert · · Score: 2

    Personally, I expected an India closure.

    Especially after India "discovered" Nokia "owed" $3.4B in "taxes", as soon as they heard Nokia was being sold to Microsoft.

  21. Re: H1-b by Threni · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sniffing and snorting like animals. Seriously what's that about?

  22. Re:leave this mess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lynx, obviously. Anyone who's using a graphical browser that supports CSS is not hardcore enough and therefore not /.'s target audience.

  23. Re:leave this mess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the 21st fucking century. If you want advanced features, use an advanced browser.

    Javascript is not evil, and in many advanced browsers, it's security issues have been largely contained.

  24. Re:leave this mess. by Soulskill · · Score: 1

    Most testing is done in the four major desktop browsers. We support those going back three versions.