Slashdot Mirror


Energy Company Trials Computer Servers To Heat Homes

New submitter MarcAuslander sends this Associated Press report: Eneco, a Dutch-based energy company with more than 2 million customers, said Tuesday it is installing 'e-Radiators' — computer servers that generate heat while crunching numbers — in five homes across the Netherlands in a trial to see if their warmth could be a commercially viable alternative for traditional radiators. The technology is the brainchild of the Dutch startup company Nerdalize, whose founders claim to have developed the idea after huddling near a laptop to keep warm after their home's thermostat broke and jokingly suggesting buying 100 laptops. Nerdalize says its e-Radiators offer companies or research institutes a cheaper alternative to housing servers in data centers. And because Nerdalize foots the power bill for the radiators, Eneco customers get the warmth they generate for free. The companies said the environment wins, too, because energy is effectively used twice in the new system - to power the servers and to heat rooms.

160 comments

  1. Great idea... by JMJimmy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...except during summer when it'll be churning out heat and you want it cool.

    1. Re:Great idea... by DogDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It could be used to generate hot water, too.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Great idea... by jep77 · · Score: 1

      ...except the average daytime temps in the Netherlands in Summer often could still use some warming.

    3. Re:Great idea... by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      So don't run it in the summer. I'm guessing you pay for the original hardware, and they pay for the energy bill to run it--so it's a decent upfront cost, but great savings for you long-term. If they don't heavily subsidize the original purchase, you don't get any benefit or harm from owning it without using it, and they don't get any benefit or harm from you having it in your house but turned off. It doesn't need to be user serviceable so they can really go all out in trying to spillproof it. In the end, the actual hardware is still user owned though.

    4. Re:Great idea... by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Average summer daytime temps are 17-20C which is about what we heat to in the winter in Canada. (regulations vary from 18-21C as a minimum)

    5. Re:Great idea... by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      The computing power will be needed all year round but the heat won't be - that was my point.

    6. Re:Great idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In summer, you only crunch negative numbers, obviously...

    7. Re:Great idea... by jep77 · · Score: 1

      Wait a second. The Canadian government regulates how warm you heat your home?

    8. Re:Great idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last summer it was 38 degrees is my house. I even have a 70% light reflection coating on my windows.

    9. Re:Great idea... by itzly · · Score: 1

      In the summer, you dump the heat in a river or in the air.

    10. Re:Great idea... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      But it gets to run full blast 24/7 for the other half of the year.

    11. Re:Great idea... by Primate+Pete · · Score: 1

      Depending on whether that's 38 in Fahrenheit or Celsius, you were either very warm or committing an ecological crime with your A/C.

    12. Re:Great idea... by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      I think they regulate the appropriate temp in rentals, where often units don't pay or have individual control.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    13. Re:Great idea... by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      Probably standards on what minimum temp they heat offices/workshops to.

    14. Re:Great idea... by aevan · · Score: 1

      We tried to ban being cold, but when that failed, we regulated it instead.

    15. Re:Great idea... by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      I don't see how it's _needed_. Depends on the tasks. I guess I kinda see it as rooftop solar...if it's bright and everyone has extra, cool, they can sell it back to the grid and (in a perfect world) electricity is cheaper overall. If it's cloudy, you still need the electricity, so you get it from somewhere else.

      Alternately maybe they're just mining bitcoins, so crunching numbers means extra cash but it's not mission critical to everyone.

    16. Re:Great idea... by mitzampt · · Score: 1

      .... so everything between 0 and 1 would be met with lukewarm success? That's a great way of ruining both Christmas and 8th of August ;).

      --
      uhm...
    17. Re:Great idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or into a dessicant-bed dehumidifier, which runs on heat. There are various other ways to use heat in air conditioning.

    18. Re: Great idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fucked up!

    19. Re: Great idea... by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      That's fucked up!

      Trust me, it's not. It was regulated because people were freezing to death due to lack of heat in their apartments. While it was a long time ago, most companies will set the temperature to the exact minimum they can get away with - if the regulations go down, so does the temperature.

      Now they're considering regulating how hot it can get, especially in nursing homes, as the elderly are dying in poorly run facilities due to heat exhaustion.

    20. Re:Great idea... by slazzy · · Score: 1

      I think there are some suggested standard temps to help protect against condensation and mold (which is a serious problem here).

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    21. Re:Great idea... by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Wait a second. The Canadian government regulates how warm you heat your home?

      Not exactly. They regulate the *minimum* the temperature an be during the winter months for rental units. Federally, it's 18C but then individual provinces/municipalities have different temperatures. Ontario is 20C I believe and Toronto is 21C.

    22. Re:Great idea... by danomac · · Score: 3

      Correction: They regulate the minimum temperature for rentals. The landlord has to provide a heating system that can heat to a minimum temperature for the winter, typically 20-21 C.

      I have rented several units, I've never seen a unit where there was no temperature control. One of my friends, however, liked to rent basement suites, and they often had no separate heat controls. The thermostat would be in the upstairs part of the house.

    23. Re:Great idea... by Random+Nobody · · Score: 2

      Wait a second. The Canadian government regulates how warm you heat your home?

      This is for landlords who have control over central HVAC systems. This is also not a federal regulation but province-level. No such regulation exists in British Columbia which sucks because I've lived in places where the landlord would regularly have the place at 8c during the winter.

    24. Re: Great idea... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps he means that not having individual temperature control is fucked up?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    25. Re:Great idea... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      OK, a lot of the converted houses here (Wilmington, DE, USA) have a single central heating system from before the splitting of the units.

      There is a "livable" range they have to keep it to I believe. I assumed urban rentals were frequently like that (lacking individual thermostats).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    26. Re:Great idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been taking advantage of server heat here in Canada since early days. Good for all year 'round.

    27. Re: Great idea... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Usually they keep it to a cool but livable temperature for free, and you can spot heat with electric heaters as needed.

      It's a deal I'd happily take.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    28. Re:Great idea... by pellik · · Score: 1

      Or you could expand positive ones!

    29. Re:Great idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you blow numbers up instead of violently crunching them. .

    30. Re: Great idea... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You do realize that by "for free" you really mean "included in your rent, which you still pay for," right?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    31. Re:Great idea... by Theovon · · Score: 1

      Crap, what happens if we crunch imaginary numbers instead?

    32. Re:Great idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how they say that if you're cold, visualize something hot, and it will make you feel warmer?

      Well, that's how you achieve climate control if you're normally reliant on computational waste heat for warmth, and they're using complex numbers with nonzero coefficients in their calculations.

      Or... you multiply the temperature indoors by the opposite of any even root of a negative number, it cancels out the ones in the computer, and makes the temperature positive, and of course, REAL. Then Bob, as the English say for some reason I'll never fully understand, is your uncle.

    33. Re: Great idea... by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that by "for free" you really mean "included in your rent, which you still pay for," right?

      It depends. If you could find a rental which is cheaper but you have to pay your own electric/gas for the heater, the cost could end up more expensive than the one with "for free." The landlord just help controling your spending. =))

    34. Re:Great idea... by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      Farther up the east coast, a lot of older rentals have radiators with a single boiler for multiple units. The landlord is required to heat for a certain part of the year (15 October to 15 April is fairly common). There may be rules for a minimum livable temperature, and at least in NYC there are plenty of examples of "slum lords" who don't maintain that.

      But to support the parent post, few if any of these units have a thermostat in them. But I suppose you do have some control. You can always open/close the valve to a given radiator (and many really do effectively have those two settings with little in between) or open a window if it gets too hot.

    35. Re:Great idea... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's usually in places that still have the single boiler system here too.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  2. Just imagine the tech support calls by Shoten · · Score: 3, Funny

    "What do you mean, you can't come out to fix my hard drive until next week? Don't you know how cold it is outside?!?!?"

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  3. PS3 as prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fired it up first thing in the morning to take the chill out of the room.

    1. Re:PS3 as prior art by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      We always knew the PS3 wasn't cool.

      Signed, Nintendo and/or Microsoft fanboys.

  4. Summer? by saccade.com · · Score: 1

    The article says nothing about what happens during the summer months. You just shut down the servers then? (HTTP 707 Error: Server on summer break).

    1. Re:Summer? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      The article says nothing about what happens during the summer months. You just shut down the servers then? (HTTP 707 Error: Server on summer break).

      They probably install a duct to just circulate outdoor air through the unit. In The Netherlands the average high temp doesn't get past 70F/21C so there are few times when you would have waste heat that you couldn't use.

      Plus, these are no doubt highly distributed redundant systems (cloud, as it were) so turning them off and relying on servers elsewhere is a viable option.

    2. Re:Summer? by Alomex · · Score: 2

      This is Europe. No one here works in the Summer.

    3. Re:Summer? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      And, as a bonus, you can always heat water - showers are (hopefully) always in style.

      Even preheating water can save a significant fraction of your power bill.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. Hand in your nerd card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Nerdalize, whose founders claim to have developed the idea after huddling near a laptop to keep warm after their home's thermostat broke"

    If they didn't know to just short the Heat/Fan wires to kick the furnace on when the thermostat is broken, then they don't have my support. Nerds? Wtf?

    1. Re:Hand in your nerd card by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

      Modern nerds they need a arduino and a wiki page.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    2. Re:Hand in your nerd card by masterofthumbs · · Score: 1

      They are computer programmers, not computer engineers.

    3. Re:Hand in your nerd card by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Odd; I thought they were humans with the ability to think rationally and critically.

    4. Re: Hand in your nerd card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you really fucked up. That's a point against your nerd card.

    5. Re:Hand in your nerd card by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      OMG. A wire! Run Away! Run Away!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Hand in your nerd card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      critical and rational thinking are just as rare as common sense.

  6. Worrying by MightyDrunken · · Score: 1

    I have had the fancy that in the future the computers with the most processing power in your home would be the devices we currently use to just generate heat. Things like hairdryers and electric ovens would be massively powerful computers full of graphical processing unit like chips. Crunching fiendishly difficult computation while performing their normal function, just generating heat is waseful.

    Now it seems this random idea is coming true, I hope many of my other random ideas don't come true for the safety of humanity!

    1. Re:Worrying by eyenot · · Score: 1

      "What are you trying to do, destroy us all?!"
        -- Zac Hobbes, The Quiet Earth

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    2. Re:Worrying by Holi · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it would be extremely expensive an inefficient to get my computer up to the same temp as my furnace, not to mention horrible on the computer parts.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:Worrying by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      having an Itanium2 server with exposed heat sink, you won't need a stove any more

    4. Re:Worrying by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      But why use a furnace at all? Just stick a computer everywhere you've currently got a forced air vent. Bring them on-line as needed. You could even do this by setting top levels in each CPU that are linked to heat generation levels. But to really work well, you'd want the system to be able to request more computation (bitcoin mining?) when you really want to heat things up.

      I can just imagine what would happen here during a cold snap... there would be more requests for computation than problems to throw at the machines... fall back to generating money!

    5. Re:Worrying by itzly · · Score: 1

      You could run an additional heat pump with the cool side attached to the computer.

    6. Re:Worrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that because your company went out of business for investing in Itanium, so you lost your house? Or did you mean that if you were dumb enough to buy an Itanium processor, you're too dumb to be trusted with stove?

  7. Risk by Uruk · · Score: 1

    Who bears the risk of junior spilling a juice cup all over the expensive servers?

    --
    -- Truth goes out the door when rumor comes innuendo. -- Groucho Marx
    1. Re:Risk by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Who bears the risk of junior spilling a juice cup all over the current heating furnace?

      Obviously the server should be kept in the utility room (or basement) where junior doesn't usually play, and protected within some housing that doubles as a means of keeping the hot air collected so it can be ventilated at specific places throughout the home.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    2. Re:Risk by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Then it will make a pretty useless damned radiator, won't it?

      If you are trying to use this thing as central heating, then I'm betting all of the possible benefits pretty much go away.

      If you want central heating, use central heating. If you want a radiator in a room to give spot heating, do that.

      But putting a giant toaster in your basement to then circulate the heat around? I'm pretty much certain the laws of thermodynamics would say that's a terrible way of doing it.

      For central heating, the existing solutions would work far better than inefficient electrical appliances generating hear.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Risk by myrdos2 · · Score: 2

      But putting a giant toaster in your basement to then circulate the heat around? I'm pretty much certain the laws of thermodynamics would say that's a terrible way of doing it.

      No less efficient than any other central heating system.

      For central heating, the existing solutions would work far better than inefficient electrical appliances generating hear.

      There is no such thing as an inefficient electrical heater, unless you're venting the heat outside or something. Because all the waste energy is given off as.. more heat. Plus the heat given off by these appliances is free, since the server company is paying for it.

      Free heat
      It's hard to beat
      Even with forced air
      It works a treat

    4. Re: Risk by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      I wonder how they will circulate the heat as well. I have a wood stove on the lower level, with a door open and a fan, the upstairs still ends up being 20 degrees cooler.

    5. Re:Risk by swb · · Score: 2

      Heat is heat, it's maybe less efficient to redistribute it throughout a house than in a single room, but a rack of servers puts out a lot of heat.

      You would want a thermostat that controls an input damper and an output damper, so that when it called for heat the servers recirculated the indoor air and when it didn't, the severs drew air from outside and output it outside. An existing furnace could provide supplementary heat if the rack's heat output wasn't sufficient.

      I think the bigger idea has a lot of drawbacks.

      Data connectivity? Maybe in the Netherlands everyone has access to gig fiber at residential addresses, but that wouldn't work in the US.

      Regular server maintenance? Parts like disk drives break often enough that I wouldn't want to have to deal with the technician all the time, especially not off hours.

      Power? At a residential address you would need some significant wiring done and a separate meter for the server rack. What about power outages?

      But it does provide an esoteric data center model. With the right site selection, you could have a very distributed compute facility that would be insulated from single-site failures. But it would only work for the kinds of distributed workloads that don't care about a bunch of nodes dropping off.

    6. Re:Risk by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Well, you could also say:
      "Who bears the risk of junior spilling a juice cup all over the baseboard electric heaters / oven / refrigerator / toaster / etc?"

      The answer is: YOU :)

      My idea is to replace not the furnace, but the individual heat points, assuming a forced air model. But their model does indeed appear to be to replace the furnace.

    7. Re: Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how running one CPU will provide enough heat compared to a cheap electric radiator. So let's see expensive, uses more power and provides less heat. Yeah it pretty much fails any way you look at it.

    8. Re: Risk by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      I sure would like to know the specifies. I would hope they thought out the details. Seems like more possible problems than it is worth.

    9. Re:Risk by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Maybe a little rewiring and you now have that render farm you've always wanted.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Risk by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Free heat

      It's hard to beat

      Even with forced air

      It works a treat

      Burma Shave!

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  8. Re:End the Fed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet look how strong the dollar is! Odd, that...

  9. Want to know what I think? by eyenot · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think this idea sounds like a bunch of ...
    *takes of glasses* ... hot air.
    * YAAAAGGGGHHHHHHHH *

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  10. 4 words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin Mining for heat

    1. Re:4 words... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Oh crap, the value of Bitcoin is below the cost of the electricity required to mine it - we're going to freeze to death!

    2. Re:4 words... by toejam13 · · Score: 1

      As somebody who mined Alt-coins during the winter months, I'm getting a kick out of this response.

    3. Re:4 words... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Is it still worth it to mine any coins at all with a GPU?

    4. Re:4 words... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Oh crap, the value of Bitcoin is below the cost of the electricity required to mine it - we're going to freeze to death!

      That's only if you're comparing the cost of the electricity to the value of the Bitcoins. When you add in the value of the heat you're generating for practical use it's different.

    5. Re:4 words... by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Mining cryptcoins is deplorable. It is an activity of the selfish and greedy.

  11. Data centres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Data centres are data centres for a reason... redundant high speed backbone connections, and redundant power supplies (with generator capacity). As well as physical security, non-destructive fire suppression, and trained on-site technicians. Heat dissipation is just the current focus because all of the other (real) problems have been addressed so well.

    1. Re:Data centres by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Data centres are data centres for a reason... redundant high speed backbone connections, and redundant power supplies (with generator capacity). As well as physical security, non-destructive fire suppression, and trained on-site technicians.

      Sounds like a lovely place to live. I'd move right in. Are there any view apartments?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  12. NSA called by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    They'd like a few thousand installed in all their employees' homes. Fon't worry about after install support we'll take care of that.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  13. Re:End the Fed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the dollar is doing really well right now and will probably go up in value further once The Fed increases interest rates.

  14. Mine coins! by dirtaddshp · · Score: 1

    Thats what ive been doing in the winter months, only used the heater a handful of times.. usually when its under 0F. But yeah usually keeps the home above 70F inside.

    1. Re:Mine coins! by davek · · Score: 1

      In the long run, I think this will be the only way digital currency becomes profitable.

      I imagine giant server farms in Alaska, Canada, and Russia, all with liquid-cooled ASIC processors, keeping both the bitcoin network alive AND providing heat to their local communities. Win win.

      --
      6th Street Radio @ddombrowsky
  15. This could work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who manages a data center, and is constantly dealing with heat issues.. this could work! I'm amused by the comments so far, as I sit behind my 18RU Cisco router for heat. :)

  16. I smell Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The companies said the environment wins, too, because energy is effectively used twice in the new system - to power the servers and to heat rooms."

    Ermm... no the system isn't "effectively" used twice. I'm not a scientist nor ever took a physics class beyond high school but I can see past this statement. If the servers were 100% efficient at using power to perform calculations, there would be no heat left to provide to the homeowner. However, because the servers aren't 100% efficient, heat is one of the byproducts of performing work. Redirecting this heat into someone's home may be great in December-February but I wonder how they will feel when these servers continue to contribute the same heat load in the middle of summer. (Unless the company somehow has completely seasonal workloads but that seems like a horrible waste of hardware to sit idle/off for 6-9 months of the year.)

    Furthermore, if AC is now required in the summer, commercial systems will have much higher efficiencies in managing the heat load of centralized server farms than distributed individual residential systems removing their part of the overall heat load. Are we sure this is a net win for and not just a marketing strategy such as re-branding the incandescent light bulb as heating device that happened to produce light???

  17. Re:End the Fed! by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    You know ... we have these neat research servers to help you with that.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  18. Re:End the Fed! by dirtaddshp · · Score: 1

    strong vs when? 5 minutes ago? Look at the value of a dollar from the early 1900s... or shoot even 10 years ago and you will see massive inflation.

  19. Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about having access to loaned servers in your home?

    1. Re:Security? by timelorde · · Score: 1

      There's no access like physical access

  20. Bad Idea by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Sure using the heat is great, but then use it to heat the corporate building it is housed in. A server needs a regulated environment not 110 degrees in the summer and -10 in the winter. It needs humility and dust control. And most of all it needs a room not filled with 5 yos and hot choco, and a teenager bouncing a ball off the outside of it. No competent insurer would even give insurance for commercial server in a residential house. There is no economical way to distribute servers into residential houses. If you want to distribute your servers and cut down on restate than find a why to house them in the back of Starbucks or some other business.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely needs humility.

    2. Re:Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It needs humility

      But I thought Apple didn't make Xserve anymore...

    3. Re:Bad Idea by vux984 · · Score: 1

      A server needs a regulated environment not 110 degrees in the summer and -10 in the winter

      I keep my furnace and hot water tank in a dedicated room like most people. There aren't ever 5 year olds and hot chocolate in it.

      It also tends to be pretty constant temperature; not ranging wildly from 110 to -10 on any scale.

      It needs humility and dust control.

      Honestly even average smb server rooms/closets lack anything beyond rudimentary ventilation.

      No competent insurer would even give insurance for commercial server in a residential house.

      Yet they'll insure a $10- $20,000 worth of home theatre gear in the living room without batting an eyebrow. I'm pretty sure they won't blink at a couple feet worth of cheap dell blades in a dedicated ventilated room.

      There is no economical way to distribute servers into residential houses

      Maybe. Maybe not.

      I'm a bit confused as to who owns the servers and processes on them here; and who would be willing to have a server in such an environment. (I mean... if I fire up an amazon cloud server I don't really care where it is... but that's still under the assumption that its in a proper secured data center somewhere and not in joe the hackers basement...

      But for big data / open computing clusters working on weather simulation for public universities etc... then yeah, there probably is a market for cheap computing server power or perhaps a virtual host for your cat's blog ... where you don't care in the least even if it might be in joe-the-hackers basement.

    4. Re:Bad Idea by itzly · · Score: 1

      There are already places in the Netherlands where they have combined electricity/heat plants. The waste heat from the electricity generator is pumped around underground conduits for heating houses.

      You could combine these plants with extra computer server rooms. Start with cold water, run it through the servers, send the warm water into the steam generator where it will take less energy to turn into steam. Send the hot water to the houses.

    5. Re:Bad Idea by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Which is a commercial enterprise. You are talking about dedicated government of business run installations, not installing them in residential homes.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    6. Re:Bad Idea by itzly · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Putting individual servers in residential homes is a stupid plan.

  21. Pardon me while I span the switch port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and watch all of your traffic for passwords.

  22. What could possibly go wrong? by nukenerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know where to begin with what's wrong with this idea.

    What is it they say about computer security? I remember - no system can be defended if the hacker has physical access. Real data centres have high security : guards, locked doors, and even inside the building the servers are within their own locked cages. Let me know me what hosting companies are proposing to house their servers in Joe Sixpack's basement, and I'll avoid.

    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck identifying which hosting companies are doing it.

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by adolf · · Score: 2

      And despite this commonly-held belief, it took *years* for the PS3 to be cracked open, with millions of units in the field, without guards or locked doors.

      Physical security is a hell of a good start toward stemming the tide, but it doesn't hold a candle to systems that are actually secure.

      I used to heat a large 2-bedroom ground-floor corner apartment with waste heat from computers and audio gear. It did have baseboard heaters, which did get used once or twice on the coldest nights, but often there was a window or outside door cracked open to let the heat out (in Ohio, in January) instead..

    3. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is it they say about computer security? I remember - no system can be defended if the hacker has physical access.

      Only matters if the data is private or the hardware is expensive. You are not going to host a e-commerce web server on these, I doubt the bandwidth is reasonably available anyway. You'll use this for compute: mine bitcoins or do protein folding.

      "That couldn't possibly work!!!111one" SETI, Folding@Home and various other projects have done compute by getting random people from the internet to run untrusted compute clients on untrusted 3rd party hardware that participate in a cloud. It's worked fine for about 2 decades at this point.

    4. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...it wasn't cracked till they blocked the user from installing a 3rd party OS, then it was what? a few months

    5. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And despite this commonly-held belief, it took *years* for the PS3 to be cracked open"

      Ummm well, that kinda depends on what you consider "cracked open". It took years to get it to boot and run something not designed to run on it. If you talk about, say, reading data on the system, that would not have taken years. Also, I have no idea how many people were working to crack PS3, I guess not that many, and the one who succeeded was some kid(no offence to smart kids, they are the ones who have time to work on things like cracking PS3 for fun) ? Just saying if the crackers had been people who had worked on such systems before the time might have been way shorter.

    6. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Ummm well, that kinda depends on what you consider "cracked open". It took years to get it to boot and run something not designed to run on it. If you talk about, say, reading data on the system, that would not have taken years. Also, I have no idea how many people were working to crack PS3, I guess not that many, and the one who succeeded was some kid(no offence to smart kids, they are the ones who have time to work on things like cracking PS3 for fun) ? Just saying if the crackers had been people who had worked on such systems before the time might have been way shorter.

      You know, I normally don't reply to ACs for a variety of reasons. I even have AC reply notification emails directed to /dev/null. I only see AC replies if I go looking for them, and I seldom do that. If you (or anyone else) wants to actually conduct discourse with me, please log in first.

      It took years for the PS3 to be a general-purpose computer, outside of the (revoked, crippled) Linux environment.

      Of course, a real impetus on a game console is piracy / copyright-infringment / making trial-ware out of pay-ware / running backups instead of originals. My own PS1 has a hardware mod chip that I installed myself, not to run Linux on the thing, but to make it run whatever the fuck I feel like -- even if it is a CD-R backup of a game that I've bought.

      My original Xbox had a similar mod, though it was entirely done in software/firmware.

      I have a hacked PS3. It required no soldering.

      And it took *years* for this to happen. By then, the space-heater/radiator systems in TFS will have been supplanted with better ones. And with the current ease with which whole-disk and end-to-end network encryption is performed, I really don't see a clear-and-present security issue for companies using such machines as back-end database servers (indeed, perhaps the most available backup DB servers they have, on average -- with abilities to go live).

      The PS1 hack happened without armed guards. It simply emulated a plain-to-the-eye barcode on the disc, and since the system itself had no on-board storage that was perfectly adequate to enable it to do whatever.

      The Xbox hack was a buffer overflow using a saved game (I used 007), which allowed the Pentium-based machine to do the user's bidding: It booted a custom OS upon loading of a magical save-game. (wherein save-game itself was just a thing downloaded from the internet, stubbed onto an Xbox memory card using a special windows driver and a magic USB driver, and loaded into a memory card plugged into an official Xbox controller plugged into any run-of-the-mill PC, using a cheap big-box-store Mad Catz extension cable as a USB adapter and a soldering iron and/or a crimping tool to make the mismatched connectors mate.)

      Those were all quick hacks, on the order of short weeks or months, with clear and present outcomes in terms of piracy.

      The PS3 hack took *years* of fuckery to establish itself, and took such tomfoolery and even decapping chips (which was as-yet largely unheard of in such circles...) to make happen. And PS3 piracy still doesn't seem to be rampant, and backups are still hard to do.

      But anyway, AC, my point stands: The PS3 took years to crack, and it was a much bigger crack than just reading a MySQL DB off of an unencrypted HD, or taking control of the system that provides heat for your house (==you're getting paid for). The former is simple with physical access (and most certainly isn't something that someone would install on a server intended for in a common abode these days), the latter is readily identifiable and actionable with failure and latency heuristics.

      Truecrypt, OpenVPN == win.

      Good bye again, AC. And good luck for getting "free" heat from the third-party servers installed in your house if you get them to do your bidding instead of their proprietors', or of 0wning them and taking the data for yourself. The very best you'll by fucking with them will be to break them so that they generate negative revenue for yourself, as they draw power and don't generate expected results.

      You're better off plugging a big resistor into the wall: I think we call these "space heaters," and there is no contract required.

  23. Are you going to trust by Chas · · Score: 1

    A company who hosts its servers in random people's houses?

    While an interesting social experiment, this looks like a very self-limiting market.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Are you going to trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the Uber/Lyft/AirBnB of data centers! Regular people like you in a regular house like yours. Instead of specialized data center environments and cab medallions. Look at Uber's valuation of $40 billion for just a weakly executed concept thus far. It doesn't need to actually work in real life to get some investor's money. They are smarter than you because they spend other people's money.

    2. Re:Are you going to trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the torrent system was such a failure.. oh wait....

  24. Make a nice ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... home computer, too.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  25. look up summertime temperatures in netherlands n/t by Ionized · · Score: 1

    look up summertime temperatures in netherlands.

  26. Stealing clock cycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they'd let me host a Civ V game on their servers :3

  27. yes obviously you are right by Ionized · · Score: 5, Informative

    clearly you are an expert in this field and have done all the necessary research to determine whether this could be pursued in a trial rollout.

    unfortunately, the project is not being run by experts such as yourself, it is being run by random dudes that just troll the internet posting drivel in comment threads. they are doomed!

    1. Re:yes obviously you are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is being run by random dudes

      No no no, not "random dudes", these are people with a masters in "Entrepreneurship", a "logistics manager" (in charge of the 2012 Olympics!) and a guy who programmed for 14 WHOLE years! (Googlecache, their own website 404's) Wow, how DARE anyone even suggest that they don't know thermodynamics or how to operate servers.

    2. Re:yes obviously you are right by Ionized · · Score: 1

      so here's the cool thing about heat. creating heat is one of the few things that we can actually do with amazing efficiency, nearly 100% in fact.

      so i'm not sure what you think thermodynamics has to do with this, but even a 7th grader could tell you that running a computer is actually a very effective and efficient way to generate heat from electricity.

      now, when sending servers out to a bunch of different locations and keeping track of them, i would say that a logistics manager is pretty darn useful. here's the definition, in case you aren't clear: http://www.merriam-webster.com...

      when it comes to creating a distributed system of servers that handle programming tasks and then report their findings back to a central source, i'd probably want a hot-dog vendor to plan that out for me. wait, no, i'd want a programmer, that's right.

      what are your qualifications, oh anonymous coward?

  28. other more practical sources of heat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about developing practical easy to implement solutions that focus on capturing the heat from laundry driers, waste/bathroom water first either for home heating (cold periods) or hot water heating (warm periods)?

    Those off the grid hippies have some interesting ideas. Just need to change the basic way we do things.

  29. nice by memph · · Score: 1

    will they use them to heat water in the summer?

  30. Flashback to 2011 by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

    http://tech.slashdot.org/story...

    Seriously guys, when Microsoft 1.) had the idea years ago, 2.) has the investment capital to give this a viable shot, and 3.) with Azure, has an immediately viable and marketable need for a set of servers that can be dynamically powered up and down...and THEY haven't gotten it to be a viable idea...I sincerely doubt that a startup in the Netherlands will have greater success.

    To be fair though, one would imagine that the Netherlands is colder, for more of the year, than the majority of the continental US. Still, servers coming up and down with the thermostat does not seem to be a good enough idea to be of real assistance.

    1. Re:Flashback to 2011 by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      http://tech.slashdot.org/story...

      Seriously guys, when Microsoft 1.) had the idea years ago, 2.) has the investment capital to give this a viable shot, and 3.) with Azure, has an immediately viable and marketable need for a set of servers that can be dynamically powered up and down...and THEY haven't gotten it to be a viable idea...I sincerely doubt that a startup in the Netherlands will have greater success.

      It's worth noting the Netherlands is going to have better broadband service to network those far-flung servers with.

  31. The new thermostat settings by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    A dial on the side of the server ranging from:

    1) Allow Single thread only
    2) Allow Multiple Threads
    3) Allow Multiple Cores
    4) Enable GPU Access
    5) Start Java processes
    6) Disable port blocking
    7) Run NortonAV
    8) Run Chrome
    9) Compile complex C++ Template-base Project
    10) Enable Adobe Updater

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The new thermostat settings by RandomAdam · · Score: 1

      11) run flash game

      --
      @Random_Adam

      Sometimes a sig doesn't have to be funny!!
    2. Re:The new thermostat settings by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      (12) mine coins

      (Seriously, what kind of a /.er uses unbalanced parentheses for lists? Please hand in your geek card at once.)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:The new thermostat settings by rizole · · Score: 1

      Missing option: Turn it up to 11

  32. Finally, a good use for AMD hardware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or old Pentium 4s, but I don't think we'd want the e-radiators to catch fire.

  33. Three major problems with this idea by Kardos · · Score: 0

    1) Security. You're going to have to come up with something really fancy (read expensive) so keep the homeowners and any of their guests/kids from tampering with it. Also keep it a secret, $Xk of gear would be a good target for thieves.
    2) Reliability. Even a halfway competent datacentre will have very high reliable power and networking. Some guy's house? I'd wager less so.
    3) Like everyone else said, warm seasons.

    So, if you need to host something that doesn't require any security and you're happy with poor uptime, it's could be an option...

    1. Re:Three major problems with this idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Distributed bittorrent-like file hosting for software updates, steam-like video game or media download services.

    2. Re:Three major problems with this idea by Yomers · · Score: 1

      I guess more CPU intensive, less bandwidth hungry - you gonna freeze on media download and a like, very little CPU power needed to saturate fat pipe - those belongs to data-centers.

  34. Last mile bandwidth is still the limitation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that kills this. If you can't get data to/from the system, then you simply can't do this. I know here in Seattle, which is considered by many to be the tech capital of the world, that for much of the city 1.5 Mbps DSL is the fastest connection available. I live on the edge of downtown, and I'm on ISDN since Comcast doesn't serve my block and I'm too far from the CO for DSL. If we still suffer with 64 kbps here, then the rest of the world is even worse off.

    1. Re:Last mile bandwidth is still the limitation... by Yomers · · Score: 1

      I'm writing this from a wooden hut in rural Thailand. Place between 2 small towns, river view, 20 km to nearest 7-11, local children still amazed when they see foreigner - it's as far from civilization as it gets in Thailand. ADSL, Bandwidth Down/Up(kbps) 7168 / 506 - could be better, it's cheapest tariff, something less than $15/mo. My point is - there is no excuses for 64kbps torture anywhere in a country that invented the thing!

    2. Re:Last mile bandwidth is still the limitation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you have good working ISDN then you should try DSL again. That's an old trick my friends and I have used for years with CenturyLink. By law, CenturyLink has to make ISDN work well no matter what the cost. After they replacing wiring and interconnects to get ISDN solid, then DSL will probably work. That's how I got my 576 kbps DSL working where I live near Pioneer Square at the edge of downtown. I love it. I no longer have to pay per minute Internet connection fees like most of my friends.

    3. Re:Last mile bandwidth is still the limitation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 576 kbps DSL

      Oh man I wish I had a connection that fast. Not many people here in Seattle have a connection faster than that. Here's the speedtest.net results for my 0.16 Mbps DSL connection to CenturyLink:

      http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3840461248

      At least the latency is nice. It's only 50 ms. And as far as I know, I have the fastest connection in my apartment building. Most of my neighbors can't even get DSL to work since the wiring in the building is so bad. I got lucky that the demarc point is just on the other side of my bedroom wall so I could run a very short piece of cat 5 to the 66 block and put the DSL modem only a couple of feet from the demarc.

    4. Re:Last mile bandwidth is still the limitation... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      If your apartment building is big enough, club together to get a leased line which you can all share... They will install dedicated lines anywhere if your willing to pay the installation costs.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  35. I already did that back in the 90s by Black+Art · · Score: 1

    It is called a Seagate 10000rpm SCSI drive.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
  36. Re:End the Fed! by blue+trane · · Score: 2

    Purchasing power has advanced much faster than inflation. A common meme is "A suit cost $20 in 1913." But the GDP per capita in 1913 was much less. You can look it up (as I have) and you will find that as a percentage of GDP per capita, a suit today is something close to 5 times less than it was in 1913.

    The money supply has increased significantly faster than inflation. The quantity theory of money is deeply flawed.

  37. May not completely on topic. by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    I have an old Optiplex 280 and 270 running FreeBSD and Debian servers respectively. They are also stacked. When I turn them on, they quickly outpace any space heater. A couple of unusually cold winters ago, I used them just for that.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  38. Compared to my electric radiator? by Holi · · Score: 1

    This sounds beyond useless. Going by my Mac Pro tower, and my $30 electric radiator: Mac Pro, expensive, never really gets all that warm, did almost nothing to warm up my room, draws more power. Electric Oil Filled Radiator, Wicked cheap, warms my room nicely enough, draws less power them my Mac Pro.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    1. Re:Compared to my electric radiator? by sribe · · Score: 1

      This sounds beyond useless. Going by my Mac Pro tower, and my $30 electric radiator: Mac Pro, expensive, never really gets all that warm, did almost nothing to warm up my room, draws more power. Electric Oil Filled Radiator, Wicked cheap, warms my room nicely enough, draws less power them my Mac Pro.

      So, care to guess where the power drawn by the Mac Pro goes to?

      A tiny, really tiny, amount to a power LED and a little to a fan. The rest winds up as heat. You know, that pesky conservation of energy thingie. If the Mac Pro actually drew more power (which it certainly does not), then it would also put out more heat.

  39. Re:End the Fed! by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Except a $20 suit in 1913 was probably tailor made for you out of very good fabric. The suit you are trying to compare it to nowadays is a cookie cutter piece of trash made with the cheapest fabrics somewhere in Bangladesh sold in some big box store. You are certainly not comparing it to a tailor made suit nowadays that would cost you easily in the thousand(s) of dollars range.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  40. Re:End the Fed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dollar is doing just fine. This Asian Development bank is likely to also be a big flop. China is one protest away from a grand disaster. So many Chinese are taking their money out of that country and moving to freer locations such as the US.

  41. How much will this save really? by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

    What is the average heating bill? 1000 a year? If it is usually cool... wouldn't you just need to vent in air to cool a server farm? They are going to save more than a 1000 a year in cooling by doing this... ?

  42. A few fairly obvious things by stevelinton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Thermodynamics: if you need to convert electricity to heat for any purpose you can get computation out for free. Electricity is very low entropy, low-grade heat over a large area very high, you can have the difference as useful computation

    2. The article makes clear these are compute servers, not data servers or web servers. They may well be bitcoin mining, or running large-scale compute jobs for universities or the local met office or rendering a movie or ... In any event you expect a proportion of the servers in any job to fail. When you think they may have failed you restart the tasks they were doing somewhere else. Most of these tasks do not need much security either. There is little to gain by stealing or changing the predicted air pressure in a 100x100x10km block of air over Belgium next Thursday.

    3. They are surely custom servers, not standard racks -- no moving parts. SSD for boot, application data over the net and a fanless design. They can be totlally sealed units entirely immune to junior's orange juice. Use mainly nonstandard form factors and they become basically unsellable reducing the theft problem and getting round some more security issues.

    3. The article says that the supplier supplies power. Whatever cable they use for that can easily have a fibre built in for data.

    4. Since this is cloud compute, it doesn't matter much if it gets turned off on rare hot days in the Netherlands, but if you care, pay the owner to open a window instead.

    1. Re:A few fairly obvious things by fgouget · · Score: 1

      3. [...]no moving parts. SSD for boot,

      As far as I can tell this is speculation on your part. Past a certain weight people are not going to throw the box around. As a heater it's also quite possible that it will be fastened to a wall or something too. Not that it matters anyway.

      3. The article says that the supplier supplies power. Whatever cable they use for that can easily have a fibre built in for data.

      That however is totally unrealistic. First they say they'll pay for power, not that they will lay their own electric cable all the way to the customer to bring power. That would be incredibly stupid, wasteful and so expensive they would never get a positive return on investment. So they will at most install a separate electric meter at the customer's premises, and then hook up their machine to a regular power outlet. So then this fiber you want to put in the power cable will have nowhere to plug into. And again, given that most houses/apartments don't have fiber yet it, requiring a fiber connection would limit them to just a fraction of the potential market, or would force them to lay their own fiber which again is incredibly expensive (but at least it would not be redundant if they manage to resell it to regular ISPs). But it's more likely they will simply reuse their customer's Internet connection (remember data caps are mostly a US thing). So really what this tells us is that they will limit themselves to workloads which don't require too much communication. The ideal case would be CPU/GPU intensive computations like Folding@Home, SETI, GIMPS, etc.

    2. Re:A few fairly obvious things by stevelinton · · Score: 1

      You are right that the no moving parts thing is speculation, but it's what I'd do. Several people have worried about disk failures and such like as a concern with the idea, and noise would also be a concern.

      Regarding cabling, yes, you are right. In densely populated areas of the Netherlands there is probably fibre to the apartment building already, but they might have a low-networking workload in mind.

  43. I think this is BS by mseeger · · Score: 1

    At least commercially it is BS. In a modern DC, climate control takes up less than 9% of all electricity. Those meager savings can't make up for all the problems involved here (service and installation processes, safety issues, etc).

    1. Re:I think this is BS by Yomers · · Score: 1

      Quick googling on a topic shows different numbers , like "most of the world’s data centers, 63 percent of the power is associated with cooling the IT equipment" , new DC designs lowers ratio of power used for cooling to about 30%, etc. Less than 9% for cooling is in Iceland DCs, right?

    2. Re:I think this is BS by mseeger · · Score: 2

      Nope, Central Europe.

      State of the art for a DC is a PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness) value of 1,1 or lower. This means: for getting 1kwh used for a computer, you have to put 1,1kwh (or less) into the datacenter.

      This uses the adiabatic cooling, which is some kind of cheating (you are evaporating water). But water is in ample supply here (not being California).

      We are currently in the process of designing a new DC and getting the PUE value as low as possible is major design goal.

      See: http://www.modbs.co.uk/news/ar...

    3. Re:I think this is BS by Yomers · · Score: 1

      Informative, thanks for clarifying.

      From TFA - it's an energy company with existing customers, they are planning to use those for distributed computing projects - security uptime and connection bandwidth is not an issues. Servicing clogged fans might be a hassle. Obviously they are going to charge customers for those "e-Radiators" - so basically energy company pays for hardware in electricity.

  44. P'shaw I've been doing this for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    P'shaw I've been doing this for years! Duluth doesn't have summers so NBD there.

  45. Atonement by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seriously, what kind of a /.er uses unbalanced parentheses for lists?

    Atonement for years of unfinished LISP programs.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  46. Re:End the Fed! by blue+trane · · Score: 2

    Even so.

    $20 in 1913 was worth almost $500 today. But the nominal gdp per capita in 1913 was about $400, while in 2013 it was over $50000. So: $20 / $400 gdp per capita in 1913 = 0.05 or 5% of yearly income. $400 / $50000 = 0.008, or 0.8% of yearly income. Thus, purchasing power has increased since 1913. The equivalent of $20 today will buy you much more than you could get in 1913. That includes electronics that didn't exist in 1913: radios, wind-up LED lights, cell phones, etc.

    Regarding your example of a good suit costing "in the thousands": 5% of $50000 is $2500. So your purchasing power has not decreased: you can spend the same percentage of yearly income on a suit, and get a very high quality one today, as you did in 1913. Also, there are so many electronic products that cost $infinity in 1913, such as computers, cellphones, TVs, and many other things we take for granted today.

    The myth of inflation being such a destructive force is thus revealed to be hyperbole.

  47. Re:End the Fed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except a $20 suit in 1913 was probably tailor made for you out of very good fabric. The suit you are trying to compare it to nowadays is a cookie cutter piece of trash made with the cheapest fabrics somewhere in Bangladesh sold in some big box store. You are certainly not comparing it to a tailor made suit nowadays that would cost you easily in the thousand(s) of dollars range.

    To seriously address your point, how much could you buy for an ounce of gold back then? A night at a nice hotel? How about a nice custom tailored suit? Both viable choices and seems pretty much the same.

    Now to seriously mock your one dimensional thought:

    Let's see, today I can get a windbreaker for $10 in a variety of eye catching colors. How about back then?
    How much for a lightweight water proof packable blanket? What about a sport jacket, flawlessly and uniformly woven?
    How much for a Gortex jacket in 1908? How much to travel to the polling place and vote, if I'm black and a resident of Charlotte?

    How much does a picture of Earth from the moon cost, with accurate topography?

    Let's do one more, how much for a a high definition video recording of a Presidential debate?
    Infinitely dollars you say? That they can't be bought at all, at any price?

    Let's add that up and average over the number of compared items..... Looks like the old way is infinitely more expensive for the same quality. And that the old quality can be bought for pretty much comparable exchange in terms of goods and services from non-slave wages.

  48. Prior art from Qarnot Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some prior art already exists in France. Qarnot Computing provides cloud computing services with computer hosted in homes.
    http://www.qarnot-computing.com/technology
    https://vimeo.com/38095665

  49. Re:End the Fed! by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that many diseases were a death sentence in 1913. Sure, health care was cheap. The doctor would take a chicken in trade; but all he had was a black bag. Appendicitis? surgical mortality was much higher. Polio? No vaccine. That's why FDR was in a wheel chair. Today? We can even cure some cancers if we catch them in time. Yeah, paying premiums sucks. I just paid mine today. Hate it; but I have no desire to go back to 1913.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  50. Re:End the Fed! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

    It's not a linear conversion. Even a $5 suit in 1913 was likely to be hand-tailored simply because mass-production wasn't as far advanced back then. Electronics were esoteric high-tech devices, not something run off en-masse by extremely specialized automated machinery. Food, on the other hand, was quite labor-intensive and made up a big chunk of where most people's paychecks went. It still has a lot of labor in it (hence the exemption from minimum-wage laws for farm workers), but we've managed to come up with a lot more farm automa since then, and no few items that use those much cheaper, more compact, and more reliable electronics that people so love to use as a false measuring stick of time-relative purchasing power.

    Inflation is destructive when the relative values of income versus expenses rises rapidly or disproportionately. An extreme example was given me by an old German teacher who said that her grandfather sold a solid wood wardrobe in the morning pre-WWII and in the evening was barely able to buy a pound of bacon with the proceeds. In our day, inflation in absolute terms is mostly low and thus it would take longer to make such a radical difference - you'd have had to stash the money in some non-appreciating place for a relatively long period of time to get that kind of hurt. Instead what hurts us is the downsizing of positions such that so many people have to take lower-paying jobs even while the absolute salaries are more or less tracking inflation. Meaning that there's effective high inflation despite little absolute high inflation.

    The absolute number written on a dollar bill is almost meaningless. What matters is whether or not buyers and sellers are both receiving enough of them to be satisfied. That's equally true for shiny yellow rocks, but some people can't seem to understand that. They think the rocks have some sort of absolute value.

  51. My art is prior. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My first unix box was an Altos. Don't recall exactly when I got it but it finally died in the late '80s.

    The thing burned something like a kilowatt. It also had a four-inch muffin fan - blowing outward. While this sucked dust in all the openings, it was convenient for heat scavenging, AND exhaust. The latter was important in my non-air-conditioned college-town house.

    I got a couple 4" drier vents, some drier vent hose, and a heat-scavenging diverter valve (which were big that year - for electric driers only!). Took the flapper valve and rain shield off one of the drier vents, yeilding a fitting that I mounted on the pancae fan's four mounting screws. It coupled the airflow nicely into the drier vent hose, which was essentially exactly the diameter of the fan blade shroud. A few 2x4s mad a wooden insert that went into the window in place of the screen unit, with the other vent in the middle of it. Hooked the two together with the hose, with the diverter in the middle of it, and the third hose segment feeding the hot air register.

    In the summer the space-heater's-worth of hot air went out the window instead of into the house. In the winter the hot air fed the furnace distributon, providing a base heat supply to the house with the furnace coming on to "top it off" to the desired temperature.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  52. Saw it done using mainframes... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the early 1990's I saw something VERY like it when I did a 1.5 yr. 3 time renewed contract w/ a then Fortune 500 called Goulds Pumps in Seneca Falls N.Y..

    They USED to use an IBM mainframe - can't recall WHICH model but that's not really that important - they did the SAME basic thing then it ran so HOT!

    (It turned out that it had TOO much processing power, @ least for their needs even in heavy engineering work, & so much so, they used to lease time to surrounding companies & iirc, even academic institutions on timeshares etc.)

    Yes - they even used to HEAT THEIR BUILDINGS using it via, iirc, a radiated heat type system pushing water thru radiator arrangements campus-wide to all buildings!

    (Which was smart & practical bigtime, & it's what you get, efficient usage "making the most" of what you have, when engineers rule the roost in a company - wish our country was run that way, you know?).

    APK

    P.S.=> Great place to work by the way - place made TONS of money (lots of TESLA tech too, in bladeless turbine pumps that fascinated me - they got MORE EFFICIENT the heavier the material pushed thru them), everyone was HAPPY there, great mgt. (who really helped me along when I was just fresh outta academia), & just in general FUN to work for...

    Man!

    Wish I never left there in fact, since it was the nicest environment I ever worked in & in my 1st job outta academia too... but after I was done doing cross-platform talk to their THEN main computer (AS/400) transitioning them over to a 'client-server model' using IBM DLLs + their SDK to get their NEWEST addition of PC's talking to that IBM midrange (mostly mgt. information systems work really in reporting)? I was done after 3 contract renewals & it was off to Atlanta Ga. to learn more (was new then in this field) - never worked the like since (while I worked for others in the art & science of computing circa 1994-2008 that is - now I run my own business, it's better by far still)... apk

  53. Something is not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why heat the homes exclusively with a server farm, when there is the district heating system? Just like the power generation stations pump their heat into the system, any data center with the proper connections, systems and permits could do it.

  54. fah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been doing this for years-- partially winter heating my all-electric home with servers. The only difference is that I pay for the electricity. And now that the temperature inside is up to 30C, it is time to move them to the garage. It is called Folding At Home, a Stanford University project led by Vijay Pande. In the winter I have to pay for electricity to heat the house any way. Might as well have fah get something out of it, at least in the winter time.

    My least powerful unit is a lot like a radiator. It has no cpu fan, just a big passive heatsink.

  55. Good idea! by Askmum · · Score: 1

    And when are they going to start? Next Wednesday?

  56. The service already exists elsewhere by judgecorp · · Score: 2

    Whatever the drawbacks, it's worth pointing out that there are at least three other companies in this field, two of them are already offering service.

    Qarnot Computing of France has around 300 Q-Rad servers installed in homes, offices and schools, carrying out specialised work, including risk calculations for a French bank
    http://www.datacenterdynamics....

    In Germany Cloud&Heat offers a generic OpenStack service to "cloud customers", and free heat to "heat customers" who have its cabinets installed in their buildings.
    http://www.datacenterdynamics....

    And in New York, Exergy is still at the Kickstarter phase, but has some interesting ideas
    http://www.datacenterdynamics.... Peter Judge

  57. What a great idea! by ericpf · · Score: 1

    And actually we have a website, too! Check out nerdalize.com .

    There's a heat expel mechanism that allows us to remain operational in the summer, too (see the video on the site). We aim to run big CPU bound jobs now, e.g. we are doing massive protein folding. Such tasks are expensive in current cloud offerings, and there's a lot of innovations (e.g. Docker) commoditizing the cloud now. We can cut back on costs because traditional data centers have a lot of overhead in building, redundancy and infrastructure cost that we radically eliminate.

    Having said that, we are also contacted regularly by data center builders and operators. They are interested in our innovation in cooling technology. We can't disclose much about that at this point, though.

    Reaching Slashdot was on our bucket list, thanks for catching this! Good summary BTW.